Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Calculation Draft
Design Calculation Draft
Design Calculation
Jetty Structure
of
Terminal C
05.06.2012
REV.
DATE
Storm
DESCRIPTION
PREPD
CHKD
Client:
YOLAS CONSULTANTS
Contractor:
JULIUS BERGER
Project:
APPD
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Revision Log
Revision
Description
Pages revised
Page 2 of 50
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Section No.
Rev: 0
Description
Page
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Facility ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Material ................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1
Concrete .................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
Reinforcement ......................................................................................................................... 8
5.2
Software ................................................................................................................................................ 10
Loading ................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.1
Quayside.................................................................................................................................. 10
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
7.1.4
Preface .................................................................................................................................... 14
8.2
Design Section......................................................................................................................... 14
8.3
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.4
Calculation ............................................................................................................................... 17
8.4.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................. 17
8.4.2
Wall calculation...................................................................................................................... 17
8.4.3
8.4.4
8.4.5
8.4.6
8.4.7
8.5
9
Load combinations................................................................................................................... 13
Section 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 24
9.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................... 24
Page 3 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.2
Design Section......................................................................................................................... 24
9.3
9.4
Calculation ............................................................................................................................... 26
9.4.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................. 26
9.4.2
Wall calculation...................................................................................................................... 26
9.4.3
9.4.4
9.4.5
9.4.6
9.4.7
9.4.8
9.5
9.5.1
9.6
Results................................................................................................................................... 32
9.6.1
9.6.2
9.6.3
9.6.4
9.6.5
9.6.6
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 35
Preface ................................................................................................................................. 38
11.2
Elevation .............................................................................................................................. 38
11.3
11.4
Preface ................................................................................................................................. 44
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
PC-U-Beam .......................................................................................................................... 49
12.6
13 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 50
Page 4 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
1 Introduction
The following calculation proofs the waterfront structures which are proposed to use for
the reconstruction of the Terminal C. Changes due to additional requirements or
agreements with the client in respect to the minimising of the quantities are considered
in this calculation.
Further detailed design issues for connections and reinforcement are investigated in the
following.
Instead of use the tendered Peine Piling system it is foreseen to install the Arcelor
Piling system and to consider a higher steel quality (S430 instead of S355).
The following items of the Arcelor system are foreseen:
king piles: HZM1080A (S430) and HZM 880A (S430)
Intermediate piles: AZ 14/770 (SW355)
Anchor wall AU 25 (S355)
Following additional changes are required in the design:
Bollard load of 800 kN instead of 600 kN
No additional anchor at bollards
2 Facility
The present berth structure Terminal C was constructed in the late 1970s. Due to the
serve damages at the sheet piles and at the capping beam and heavy settlements at the
Land side the stability of the structure could not be verified. Further the berth should be
upgraded for a water depth of 10m below CD.
Therefore the whole berth with a length of about 500 m will be equipped with a new
sheet piling system. The system contains a main king pile wall anchored by lightly
inclined tie rods and a continuous anchor wall. The king pile wall is equipped by a
concrete capping beam which bears the fender and mooring equipment.
The system of the berth consists of two different Sections depending on the
encountered subsoil condition. The Section 1 covers a length of 300 m, the Section 2 a
length of 180m.
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx
GmbH
Page 5 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
LAYOUT:
Section 1
Section 2
TYPICAL SECTION:
Acc, to Tender
Page 6 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
DIN 1045-1
4 Subsoil conditions
Subsoil strategraphy and soil conditions according to Geotechnical Interpretative
Report (TB-GEO/April 10,2012)
Page 7 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
5 Material
5.1 Concrete
The design of the concrete structures is executed according to the requirements of BS
6349 which refers to BS 5400.
5.1.1 Strength Grade
The following concrete strengths as specified in BS EN 206 will be used for the
construction:
Concrete Grade C32/40 with a characteristic compressive strength at 28 days 40.0
N/mm for reinforced concrete.
5.1.2 Concrete Cover
structural
element
Insituconcrete
Precastelements
Exposure
class
XS3
XS3
XS3
XS3
requiredcover[mm]
60(exposedtoair)
30(exp.toconcrete)
60(exposedtoair)
30(exp.toconcrete)
Min.concrete
grade
C32/40
C32/40
C32/40
C32/40
5.1.3 Reinforcement
The design is based on hot rolled high yield deformed reinforcement bars grade 500 in
accordance with BS 4449.
strength grade 500: yield strength 500 N/mm2
Page 8 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
m = 1.5
Reinforcement m = 1.15
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx
GmbH
Page 9 of 50
Design Calculation
Software
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Various software will be used for the structural analysis depending on the investigated
structural problem. The sheet pile wall structure will be analyzed by means of the
software developed by DC-Software, Munich, Germany.
Generally MICROSOFT Excel sheets will be used to facilitate calculations of repetitive
nature.
7 Loading
7.1 Quayside
7.1.1 Dead Load
For reinforced concrete a dead load of 25 kN/m shall be used.
7.1.2 Life Load
On the quayside a general live load of 50 kN/m is specified.
7.1.3 Mooring Loads
For the berth 800 kN bollards are required.
7.1.4 Berthing load
The following vessel are specified
Page 10 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 11 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 12 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 13 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
8 Design Section 1
8.1 Preface
The Section 1 is valid for the South area of the berth for a length of about 300 m. The
length is specified in the Tender drawings and the corresponding soil profile is evaluated
in the GIR. The Soil profile in Section 1 is more favourable for the Sheet piling System
as the Soil profile in Section 2.
Page 14 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 15 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The Anchor load is distributed due to the head beam to about 10 anchors with a
maximum load of 130 kN per anchor.
Page 16 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
For the Check of the sheet piles the normalforce due to dead load is considered
Normal force in sheet pile at max M
Due to earth pressure and deadweight of wall automatic considered by PC software
Due to capping beam
1,8*1,6*25 = 72 kN/m
Due to anchor
8.4 Calculation
8.4.1 Preface
The Sheet piling is calculated by means of the Software DC-PIT. The relevant data of
the calculation are printed below the whole calculation is tabled in the attachment.
The wall itself is considered as full restrained in the soil.
For the sheet piling Structure the ARCELOR Profile HZ 880M A-12/AZ 14-770 are
foreseen.
For the Design two loadcombinations are investigated:
LC1 (max Live load, max water pressure, max water depth)- decisive for wall length
LC 2 ( as LC1 + hawser pull) decisive for anchor force
I
8.4.2 Wall calculation
Loadcomb 1
Page 17 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load comb 2
Page 18 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 19 of 50
Load
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load case
Md
Nd
wall
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
wall
(kN/m)
(kN)
(m)
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
1630
-430
23,8
450
622
26,3
1290
1534
-440
23,7
522
722
27,9
1500
Page 20 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Designacc.toEAU20068.4.9.7SafetyagainstFailureofAnchoringSoil
Conditions:
OnesoillayerwithGroundwater
LimitStateCase1BFailureofstructure
INPUTCELLS
RESUTCELLS
Symbol
description
Soilparameters
friction
'
weight
weight
'
Geometryparameters
h
walltoebelowGS
h'
GWbelowGS
P
uniformliveload
Loadcase
forselctionofsafetyparameters
LC
Loadcase
Anchorforce
Ad
Designanchorforce
DesignVaues
earthresistance
EP
Permanentactions
G
variableactions
Q
kah(=2/3phi)
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx
GmbH
Page 21 of 50
unit
value
()
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(m)
(m)
(kN/m)
(1/2/3)
(kN/m)
()
()
()
()
35
20
11
7,3
2
20
722
1,3
1,2
1,3
0,22
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Eah,k(G)
Eah,k(P)
Eph,k
kph(=0)
activeearthpressure(soil)
activeearthpressure(LiveLoad)
passiveearthpressure
check
Rd/Ed
()
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
3,69
67
33
1109
()
1,01
OK
h
h
GW
Ad
p(=0)
a(=2/3)
Eph
Eah
The required toe of the wall is 7,2 m below surface. By consideration of a 5m long wall
the top of wall is CD+1,3m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,2 m.
Check of the passive friction angle by the verification of the equilibrium of the vertical
forces (Characteristic).
V anchor = 522* tan 5,5 = 50 kN/m
V active earth pressure = (67+33)*tan 23.3 = 43 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 5* 1,5 = 7,5 kN
43+7,5 = 50,5 > 50 OK
Page 22 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 23 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9 Section 2
9.1 Preface
The Section 2 is valid for the North area of the berth for a length of about 180 m. The
length is specified in the Tender drawings and the corresponding soil profile is evaluated
in the GIR. The Soil profile in Section 2 is more unfavourable for the Sheet piling
System as the Soil profile in Section 1. Therefore heavier profiles will be necessary.
Page 24 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Part:
Design Calculation
9.3
Predesign evaluations
For the Section 2 the same pre-design evaluations and loadings are valid as for
Section1.
Horizontal force for sheetpile design 130/2,07 = 63 kN/m
Moment 64*0,5 = 32 kNm/m
Due to earth pressure and deadweight of wall automatic considered by PC software
Due to capping beam
1,8*1,6*25 = 72 kN/m
Due to anchor
Page 25 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.4 Calculation
9.4.1 Preface
The Sheet piling is calculated by means of the Software DC-PIT. The relevant data of
the calculation are printed below the whole calculation is tabled in the attachment.
For the sheet piling Structure the ARCELOR Profile HZ 1080M A-12/AZ 14-770 are
foreseen.
The pile toe shall be at elevation -24m (pile 100% restrained)
For the Design two loadcombinations are investigated:
LC1 (max Live load, max water pressure, max water depth)- decisive for wall length
LC 2 (as LC1 + hawser pull) decisive for anchor force
Page 26 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load comb 2
Page 27 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load case
Md
Nd
Lw
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
Page 28 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
(kN/m) (kN)
(m)
(kN)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
1983
- 406
27,2
505
703
30,2
1457
1876
-408
27
578
813
31,9
1682
Page 29 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The required toe of the wall is 8 m below surface. By consideration of a 6m long wall the
top of wall is CD+1,5m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,5 m.
Page 30 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Check of the passive friction angle by the verification of the equilibrium of the vertical
forces (Characteristic).
V anchor = 578* tan 5,4 = 55 kN/m
V active earth pressure = (80+36)*tan 23.3 = 50 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 6* 1,5 = 9 kN/m
50+9 = 5) > 50 OK
Walling
Walling force Wd = 813 kN/m
Md = 813*2,07/10 = 348 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 348/0,355*1,1 = 1078 cm
Proposed 2* U 300 (S355) (W = 1070cm)
Selected Profile 2U 320 (Arcelor proposal)
Page 31 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.5.1 Results
As proofed the utilisation of the main wall is not very high for the optimisation
of the wall the wall length could be reduced (restrain grade reduced) in respect to
the increasing anchor forces.
Page 32 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load case
Md
Nd
Lw
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
(kN/m) (kN)
(m)
(kN)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
2173
-412
26
527
703
30,2
1578
2060
-415
25,8
599
813
32
1798
Page 33 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 34 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The required toe of the wall is 8 m below surface. By consideration of a 6m long wall the
top of wall is CD+1,5m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,5 m.
Check of the passive friction angle by the verification of the equilibrium of the vertical
forces (Characteristic).
V anchor = 599* tan 5,4 = 57 kN/m
V active earth pressure = (80+36)*tan 23.3 = 50 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 6* 1,5 = 9 kN/m
50+9 = 59 > 57 OK
9.6.6 Conclusion
With the selected Sheet piling profile the piling length could be reduced by 1 m without
changing the anchorage system.
Page 35 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
10 Construction stage
Due to the installation of the new sheet piling structure in front of the existing and the
partial dismantling of the existing the new structure has to secure the stability meantime
without anchor.
In the following it is proofed the loading conditions for these construction stage in order
not minimise the deflection of the cantilever system to 10 cm at the top of wall. The
purpose is to guaranty the use of the PC elements of the headbeam.
The investigation is executed for the condition of Section 1 with the small wall profile.
The following Construction sequence are foreseen:
Installation of King piles
Installation of intermediated sheet piling
Check of sea bed ensure sea bed elevation of -5,0m (possible fill)
Fill of gab between new and old wall up to Elevation 0,0 m
Partial excavation at anchor wall
Installation of anchor wall
Remove of subsoil up to 0,0 m over 10 m length
Dismantling of existing capping beam and removal of existing anchors if necessary
Installation of new Anchor
Refill to final elevation
Installation of capping beam
Page 36 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Result: Due to the above described construction sequence the deformation of the
wall is in the specified limit.
Page 37 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
11 Wingwall
11.1 Preface
The wing wall secures the sheet piling structure to the South. For the neighbouring
embankment a design is not yet existing for the wing wall design it is assumed that the
embankment is sloped 1:2 and protected by an adequate system.
11.2 Elevation
Page 38 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 39 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
(HZ 880N A-12/AZ14-770) S430
= 1534/4830*10= 317 N/mm < 430/1,1 = 390 N/mm
Wall length 17 m
Page 40 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
(HZ 880N A-12/AZ14-770) S430
=837/4830*10= 173 N/mm < 430/1,1 = 390 N/mm
Wall length 20 m (1 m more than calculated because of scour)
Anchor
Ak = 317 kN/m
Ad = 443 kN/m
Ad = 917 kN/anchor
Nec. Upset anchor M72 , grade 500 (Frd = 1005 kN), = 22,5 m
Anchor wall
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx
GmbH
Page 41 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Due to the anchor layers of the main wall the anchors have to be positioned horizontal.
Therefore for the anchor wall a restrained wall is required.
Page 42 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
Nec W ((AU 25) S355
=706/2500*10= 282 N/mm < 355/1,1 = 322 N/mm
Wall length 8,5 m (top 1m below Ground surface)
Waling
Ad = 443 kN
Md = 443 *2,07/10 = 199 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 199/355*1,1*10. = 616 cm
2 U 260 (Wy = 742 cm)
Page 43 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Fender load
HVk = 1100 kN
Mxk = 1100*0,2 = 220 kNm
Mzk = 1100*0,15*1,5 = 250 kNm
Page 44 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 45 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Page 46 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
h = 140 cm
d = 132 cm
Max Md = 1810 kNm
Kd = 132/1810/1,4 =3,67 Ks = 2,36
Nec As = 2,36*1810/132 = 32, 4 cm
Max Vd = 547 kN
Page 47 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Vessel impact
Max Qd = 825 kN
Page 48 of 50
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Required
Rev: 0
Chosen reinforcement
Bothe sides 9 25 (44,2 cm)
Top and bottom 8 20 ( 25,1 cm)
Stirrups generell 14/15 ( 20,5 cm), at bolloard and fenders 14/12,5 (24,7 cm) for
3m.
12.5 PC-U-Beam
The PC u-beam is reinforced in respect to structural reasons by an crosswise uniform
reinforcement 10/15 inside and outside
Check of Wall reinforcement(due to insitu fill)
Considered safety factor for casting 1.5 dyn effects
Md = 1.5*1.4*25*1.4/6*1,5 = 25,7 kNm
Nec as = 2,6 *25,7/15 = 4.5 cm/m
Chosen reinforcement 10/15 crosswise inside and out side at the edges bars 12
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx
GmbH
Page 49 of 50
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
13 Conclusion
The above executed calculation verifies that the structures are able to bear the loadings
in respect to the specified safety factors.
Page 50 of 50