No Sanctuary in the Ivory Tower - In These Times

http://inthesetimes.com/article/14604/no_sanctuary...

SUBSCRIBE GIVE A GIFT GET FREE NEWSLETTERS DONATE CURRENT ISSUE

HOME

POLITICS

THE MOVEMENT

LABOR

CULTURE

COLUMNISTS

BLOGS

DONATE

SEARCH

ALSO BY CHRIS LEHMANN

Year of the White-Guy Meltdown Boehner's f-bomb, LaPierres rant ... have the white men in power simply lost it? MORE Blinded by Thrift Store Irony It makes very little sense to characterize irony, strictly speaking, as a matter of self-presentation.
MORE

Weak Teavangelicals
Aaron Swartz attends a Boston Wiki Meetup on Aug. 18, 2009. (Ragesoss / Flickr)
VIEWS FEBRUARY 26, 2013

Despite great efforts, Billy Graham and his flock failed to pull out a Romney win. Is the 'values voter' era over? MORE

No Sanctuary in the Ivory Tower

Why didnt MIT defend Aaron Swartz?
BY CHRIS LEHMANN

In These Times
Like 10,712 people like In These Times.

When Aaron Swartz took his own life with the approach of trumped up legal proceedings of evidence poised to threaten his freedom, he became a national symbol of two notorious failings of our legal system: federal prosecutors who, with an eye on their conviction scorecard, overcharge cases and bully defendants into submission; and the enforcement of proprietary computer terms-of-service agreements as if they were the republics first line of defense against mass sedition.

University administrators, eager to kowtow to their federal paymasters, become surrogate enforcers rather than principled defenders of academic freedom.

Facebook social plugin

But the Swartz case brought home a third failing: the abject capitulation of MIT to the dictates of the U.S. attorneys office. In 2011, Swartz used MITs computer system to access the proprietary academic-research site JSTOR, and thereby briefly liberated more than 4 million journal articles from behind the sites paywall. MIT administrators meekly permitted federal prosecutors access to Swartz and his computer, without benefit of a search warrant. And after JSTOR declined to press charges in Swartzs low-stakes hacking case, MIT chose to remain a complainant in the take-no-prisoners prosecution mounted by U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, who multiplied the counts against Swartz until he was looking at as many as 50 years in federal prison. MITs role is puzzling given its long history as one of the nations chief progenitors of hacker culture. It allowed Richard Stallman, the programmer who essentially founded the free software movement, to use an office on campus as his operating base (and at times, reportedly, as his home). As the Swartz case demonstrates, universities that were once deemed preserves of cultural dissent and nonconformity, these days reflexively knuckle under to the powerful enforcingand funding arms of the federal government. This seems to be another piece of evidence that we in major universities look toward Washington before we make a decision about, say, some young oddball whos hooked his

MOST READ

1 of 3

26/02/2013 09:08

No Sanctuary in the Ivory Tower - In These Times

http://inthesetimes.com/article/14604/no_sanctuary...

computer to our wiring, says Harry Lewis, a Harvard computer science professor who was also Harvards undergraduate dean from 1995 to 2003. We have so many entanglements: Pell grants, research funding, undocumented students we have on our campuses, says Lewis. So were always looking over our shoulder. To see how deep-seated this trend is, one need only look across town, to Boston College, where from 2001 to 2006 Irish historian Ed Moloney directed an oral history project, collecting interviews with former members of the Irish Republican Army about the groups past terrorism campaigns. Guarantees of confidentiality were central to the project, for obvious reasons. But in 2011, Northern Ireland prosecutors issued subpoenas for Moloneys interviewssubpoenas that the Department of Justice summarily dropped on BC. BC did hire lawyers to fight the subpoenas (after Moloney leaked the story to the New York Times), but rather than defend academic freedom, the college pursued a narrower stay on the release of some of the interviews. This left Moloney and his collaborators to file their own broader appeal to the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments later this year. Says Moloney: When we sought amici briefs for our SCOTUS case we had no difficulties attracting journalistic and media organizations but U.S. academe ran screaming for the shadows. And in late January, the BC case took its own eerie Swartz-like turn: Dolours Price, the former IRA member in Moloneys project whose participation originally roused the interest of Irish authorities, had died of an apparent drug overdose. Laid side by side, these two Boston-area cases point to eerily similar trends: Inquisitorial federal prosecutors, operating under loose interpretations of the mandate to combat terrorism, are prepared to run roughshod over protocols that protect the traditions of academic autonomy and free inquirywhile university administrators, eager to kowtow to their federal paymasters, become surrogate enforcers rather than principled defenders of academic freedom. Aaron Swartzs legacy might well produce important gains in the struggle to expand the free play of information into a significantly enlarged public sphere. But in institutional terms, the cases of MIT and Boston College suggest the struggle has already been foughtand lost.

Debtors Prisons Make a Comeback Yes, He Did: Obama Plugged TransPacific Partnership While Touting Middle Class Growth Two 2016 Prospects Reveal Democrats Identity Crisis Immigration Reform Prevents Employer Abuse Ignore the Conservative Sideshow Testless in Seattle The Revolution Will Be Capitalized Who Owns The World? Israel and Palestine: One State or Two? Didnt Watch the Super Bowl? You Still Got Charged

Tell Congress: End the Bush Tax Cuts for the Top 2%
author: Workers' Voice signatures: 31,576

sign petition

start a petition | grab this widget

ABOUT THIS AUTHOR Chris Lehmann, a contributing editor of In These Times, is an editor of Book Forum and the Baffler and the author of Rich People Things (Haymarket, 2011). He is now working on a book about American religion and the money culture. More information about Chris Lehmann SHARE THIS ARTICLE | PRINT

2 of 3

26/02/2013 09:08

No Sanctuary in the Ivory Tower - In These Times

http://inthesetimes.com/article/14604/no_sanctuary...

ALSO ON IN THESE TIMES

AROUND THE WEB

What's this?

Testless in Seattle

1 comment

Imagining a 'Just Recovery' from Superstorm Sandy 1 comment Whale Wars 7: The Sea Shepherd Strikes Back 159 comments Firedoglake Obtains FBI's File On Aaron Swartz 1 comment

21 Images You Won't Believe Aren't Photoshopped , Part 8 Cracked.com Camille Grammer's Cut-Out Bikini Leaves Little to the Imagination CafeMom 5 Jobs You Can Get Arrested for Doing
Investopedia

The Stages of Depression

Lifescript

0 comments
Leave a message...

Discussion

Community

Share

r Comment feed

Subscribe via email

ABOUT US NEWSLETTERS CONTACT US LOG IN

REPRINTS ARCHIVES SUBMISSIONS

DONATE LEAVE A LEGACY SPONSORSHIPS

ADVERTISE PRESS PRIVACY POLICY

SUBSCRIBE GIVE A GIFT INTERNSHIPS/JOBS

COPYRIGHT 2012 IN THESE TIMES AND THE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Sites of Interest: Online Casino Roulette Download Youtube Convert Youtube Mp3 Casinos online roulette

3 of 3

26/02/2013 09:08