U.S.

Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board of Immigration Appeals Office ofthe Clerk

5107 Leesburg Pike, SMile 2000 Falls Church. V1rgl.nia 22041

Snyder, Leslie I. Esq. Leslie I Snyder, P.A. 4000 Ponce De Leon Blvd. Ste. 470 Coral Gables, FL 33146-0000

OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - MIA 333 South Miami Ave., Suite 200 Miami, FL 33130

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: SABAN, ZIYAAD

A 070-623-999

Date of this notice: 2/8/2013

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

D&nJ'tL t!t1./lA)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure
Panel Members: Miller, Neil P.

L ulseges Userteam:

Docket

Cite as: Ziyaad Saban, A070 623 999 (BIA Feb. 8, 2013)

U.S.

Department of Justice

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Executive Office for Immigration Review Falls Church, Virginia 22041

File:

A070 623 999 - Miami, FL

Date:

FEB -8 2013

In re: ZIYAAD SABAN a.k.a. Saban Ziyaad a.k.a Saban Zeyaad

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS MOTION ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: APPLICATION: Reconsideration Leslie Snyder, Esquire

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

ORDER: This case was last before the Board on October 9, 2012, when the Board dismissed the respondent's appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision denying the respondent's motion to reopen and rescind the in absentia order of removal entered against him on February 11, 2005. The respondent has now filed a timely motion to reconsider. However, the pending motion sets forth no adequate basis for reconsideration of that Board decision.

also Matter of 0-S-G-,

See 8 C.F.R.

1003.2(b);

see

24 l&N Dec. 56 (BIA 2006) (discussing the requirements for motions to

reconsider). The respondent's motion does not identify any prior argument presented on appeal that was overlooked by the Board nor does it identify any error of law or fact in the Board's October 9, 2012, decision. We only separately note that the respondent's conviction for the offense of burglary of an occupied building in violation of section 810.02(3)(a) of the Florida assertion, renders him removable as charged. See Matter of 754 (BIA 2009). Accordingly, the respondent's motion is denied. Statutes is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude, which contrary to the respondent's

Louissaint,

24 l&N Dec.

FOR THE BOARD

Cite as: Ziyaad Saban, A070 623 999 (BIA Feb. 8, 2013)