1. Loukis, E., Georgiou, S. and Pazalos, K. (2007).

A value flow model for

the evaluation of an e-Learning service. In: Proceedings of the European
Conference on Information Systems, June, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
-->Summary:
− Literature review
− Concludes with a model proposition based on TAM
− Suggests future use of PLS

2. Chang, S-C and Tung, F-C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’

behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British
Journal of Educational Technology 39(1), 71-83
-->Summary:
− Empirical study
− based on combination of TAM, IDT and other constructs
− LISREL, SPSS

3. de Carvalho, R.B., Araújo, M., Ferreira, T. and Wei, C. (2005). Towards a

Portal Maturity Model (PMM): Investigating Social and Technological
Effects of Portals on Knowledge Management Initiatives. In: Proceedings
of the 34th Canadian Academy of Information Sciences Annual Conference
-->Summary:
- Theoretical proposition of the Portal Maturity model
− Encapsulates concepts from TAM

4. Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L. and Chan, Y.H.C. (2007). Empirical examination
of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education 48, pp.
250–267.
-->Summary:
- Extended TAM
- Empirical study
-Uses SEM (does not clarify—possibly PLS since there is no goodness of fit etc )

5. Ong, C-S, Lai, J-Y. and Wang, Y-S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’
acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies.
Information & Management 41, pp. 795–804.
-->Summary:
- Extended TAM
- Empirical study amongst engineers from international companies
- SAS CALIS ( Similar to LISREL SEM)

6. Ong, C-S, Lai, J-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and

relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in
Human Behavior 22 (2006), pp. 816–829.
-->Summary:
-TAM
- SAS CALIS similar to LISREL
-empirical study in companies

7. Behrens, S., Jamieson, K., Jones, D. and Cranston, M. (2005).Predicting

System Success using the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study.
16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. 9 Nov – 2 Dec
2005, Sydney.
-->Summary:
- empirical investigation based on an Online Assignment Submission,
Infocom System (OASIS)
- TAM
- Does not describe the data analysis method

8. Roca, J.C. and Gagne΄, M.(2008). Understanding e-learning continuance

intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory
perspective.Computers in Human Behavior 24, pp.1585–1604.
-->Summary:
- Uses the SDT (self-determination theory) and extends TAM
- continuance intention concepts
- Data analysis with LISREL

9. Saadé, R.G., Nebebe, F. and Tan,W.(2007).Viability of the “Technology

Acceptance Model”in Multimedia Learning Environments: A Comparative
Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3,
-->Summary:
- Uses TAM
- Data analysis PLS

10.Liaw, S-S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived

satisfaction,behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case
study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, pp.864–873
-->Summary:
- Uses TAM; 3-TUM
- Data analysis with multiple regression

11. Sun, P-C., Tsai, R.J., Finger,G., Chen, Y-Y. and Yeh, D. (2008). What
drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation
of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers &
Education 50, pp. 1183–1202
-->Summary:
- Uses custom model based on TAM
- Data analysis with SPSS
12.Zhang, N., Guo, X-H. and Chen, G-Q. (2007). Extended Information
Technology Initial Acceptance Model and Its Empirical Test. SETP, 27(9):
123–130
-->Summary:
- Uses TAM in a generic IT acceptance setting
- Data analysis with PLS

THEORETICAL PAPERS

13.King, R.W. And He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology

acceptance model. Information & Management.

14.Whitworth, B., Bañuls, V., Sylla, V. and Mahinda, E. (2008).Expanding the

Criteria for Evaluating Socio-Technical Software. IEEE Transactions on
Systems, man and Cybernetics 38(4)