Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beyond The Chaoulli Ruling: Debates On Our Health System Need To Be Based in Evidence
Beyond The Chaoulli Ruling: Debates On Our Health System Need To Be Based in Evidence
ca
So who is winning the debate? On that one, the jury is still out. One thing is certain: the political f uror in Canada over healthcare f inancing is unlikely to vanish any time soon. One need only look at the Chaoullistyle case currently f acing the BC court, and, possibly, the Supreme Court of Canada again, to see the debate is f ar f rom over. Our examination of the politics of health care f inancing makes clear that too f ew commentators and politicos on both sides employ evidence to buttress their positions. Precious little hard f acts, numerous statements of dubious validity and, overall, policy pref erences mostly explained by the group to which the speaker belong characterize public dialogue on the health system in this country. We deserve better. We deserve evidence. Healthcare f inancing is everyones business and it is def initely something that ought to be widely debated in the public sphere. But at the same time, it is too big an issue to be decided on weak and partisan rhetoric put f orward by groups def ending their own interest. T his is a topic where strong evidence built f rom the analysis of decades of international experience is readily available. Now its time to make that evidence part of the national dialogue. Damien Contandriopolous is an expert advisor with EvidenceNetwork.ca and a professor in the Faculty of Nursing at the University of Montral.