Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual Section Reports Fall 2000 Fall 2010
Individual Section Reports Fall 2000 Fall 2010
E
ci
D
c>
V
0)
V (1
ci)
t3 ci) ci) (0 0c
(I)
Ci3
()E
D 0
-ci) pci.
cut
E)
,
cci)
HLw3
1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 4 2 0 0 0 29 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 10 7 2 2 0 0 38 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 11 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 14 4 2 1 0 0 32 21 1.52 15 6 0 0 0 0 27 21 1.29 4 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 10 8 2 1 0 0 36 21 1.71 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 12 7 1 1 0 0 33 21 1.57
4
E_ cu
oc
tt5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Concepts iStronglyAgree 2Agree 3Neutral 4Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total Total replies Mean No Answer
1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 1 0 0 0 0 22
1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 18 3 0 0 0 0 24
1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 17 3 1 0 0 0 26
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 14 4 3 0 0 0 31 21
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 12 7 1 1 0 0 33 21 1.57
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 17 3 0 0 0 0 23 20 1.15
is
21 21 21 21 21 1.05 1.38 1.14 1.24 1.81 not counted in points or in number of participants.
1.481
101.xls 12/6/00
itI
U)
Spring 2001
2
.!
U)
1-
>
L-
U) C))
-
> C) 00 0
-o
2
-
(1) U) (1) s 00 V U)
(1)
(1)0 U)
U)
CD
U)
CZ)
ct
U)
C))
c:
-
CC)) 0c
E 0 E
U) U)
F-
I-
E 4 5 1 3 2 4 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 5
1 12 3 4 2 0 60
E 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 5
8 8 4 0 2 0 46
5 5 5 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 5
7 9 3 0 3 0 49
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 2Agree 3Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1
1 2 2 1 2 1 14 8 0 0 0 0 30
6 6 6 4 1 2 2 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 5
6 9 1 1 1 4 36
4 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 5
4 7 9 1 1 0 54
2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 1 2 5 9 12 0 0 1 0 38
2 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 5
8 12 0 1 1 0 41
4 5 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 4 5 0 10 6 4 2 0 64
4 4 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 5
1 12 6 2 1 0 56
4 5 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 2 3 5
3 7 9 1 2 0 58
3 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 5
8 11 2 0 1 0 41
Total replies 22 22 22 22 22 Mean 1.36 t64 2.45 1.73 2.73 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
22 2.09
22 2.23
22 1.86
22 291
22 2.55
22 2.64
22 1.86
201-202x1s 4/27/01
PARISHUESCA, Eva
Spring 2001
E
D
.-
-o a
-
a,> > E
0 Ct3
c,
0 C
a, 0 c C W
G) , a,
, a,
a, 0)
a, a,
ciE a,
.f-
0c Ho
HE
2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 1 3
4*
o-
a,D)
00-) Q
Ca,
a,
aa,
Ea,
2 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 3
%-
a,a,
a,a,
j
0 =
a,
cfE
Ca,
Ez C) Ea,
OW
O
a,
cia,
C)
IW
a, ox
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
3 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 111 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2
2 1 3 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 3
1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 3 111 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 3
2 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 3
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-
2 2 1 3 9 6 3 1 0 0 34 15 2 3 0 0 0 28 20 1.40
Concepts I Strongly Agree 2Agree 3Neutral 4Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total
Total replies Mean No Answer
*
16 3 1 0 0 0 25 20 t25
9 4 6 0 0 1 35 20 175
14 5 0 0 0 0 24 19 t26
14 6 0 0 0 0 26 20 1.30
7 8 5 0 0 0 38 20 1.90
9 8 2 1 0 0 35 20 1.75
9 7 4 0 0 0 35 20 1.75
16 4 0 0 0 0 24 20 1.20
13 5 1 1 0 0 30 20 1.50
14 3 2 1 0 0 30 20 1.50
19 1.79
PARISHUESCA, Eva
20 Students Enrolled
FaIl 2001
>
-
D 0 0
-
V
CU
L
o>
0
U,
CU
,,
-g
0
-
CU
CU
D
C W
+-
0
-
OCU
CU. _
c)
CU
oE
10
CU CD
C C)
C
U)
0 C
CU
u)-CU 0
HE
)!E
JV
LiJJ
0 0 O OW
U)
C)
fW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Concepts
3 4 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 6 1 1 11 11
2 2 1
E1
1 9 4 1 0 0 0 20
3 2 1 1 1 8 2 2 1 0 1 22
3 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 2
3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
2 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 3
4 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 2
4 2 3 1 2 2 2 4 3 2 1 3 5 5 2 2 0 0 29 2 5 4 2 0 0 32 13 2.46
2 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
4 2 3 4 2 1 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 2
3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2
4 1 5 3 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 2
4 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2
5 5 4 0 0 0 27
7 6 1 0 0 0 22
4 6 4 0 0 0 28
6 6 2 0 0 0 24 14 1.71
3 6 3 2 0 0 32 14 2.29
6 4 4 0 0 0 26 14 1.86
3 4 5 1 1 0 35 14 2.50
6 3 4 1 0 0 28 14 2.00
Total replies 14 14 14 14 14 Mean 1.43 1.57 1.93 1.57 2.00 No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
*
14 2.07
201.XLS 12/6/2001
PARlSHUESCA, Eva
20 Students Enrolled S
CD
i!
._
3 CD 3 Cl)
Fall 2001
>E
o (U t
-
CU U) CU
Cl)
t) Cl) CU
TJ
= (1)
(j)
j3
C LU
) 3
j3
..c 0 (U (I)
E
LU
0 0 C
oE (U
Ho
(l)c
HE
2 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2
a)
z(l) CI).
CD
WJ
Oc C(U
E 0
E
U) O
OW
()
HW
CDX
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
2 1 2 6 6 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 I 3 7 4 1 0 0 2 18
1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 20
2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 3 0 0 0 0 17
3 4 1 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 11 11 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 8 4 2 0 0 0 22
14 1.57
2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
oncepts Strongly Agree 2 Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6 No Answer Total
1 3 1 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 1 2 11 3 0 0 0 0 17 8 2 2 2 0 0 26
14 1.86
2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 19
14 1.36
3 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 3 5 5 4 0 0 0 27
14 1.93
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 14
14 1.00
13 1 0 0 0 0 15
6 6 2 0 0 0 24
7 4 2 1 0 0 25
14 1.79
Total replies 14 14 14 14 14 Mean 1.07 1.29 1.43 1.21 1.71 No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
14 1.21
201.XLS 12/6/2001
21 students enrofled
4-
a)
,
Spring 2002
;5
D
a) a)
.-
0 C a) a) (1) ..C
-
,,
.UQ)
>.,
a) 0) a) t)
C) (I) C!)
a)
.2
) a) a) 0)
0o Oc C w J
a) C)
X > Cl) C!) C!) a) C WQ)
a) C
a)a) a) H 0
C Lii
a) (1)
oE a).
c w
U) 0) a) ID C)
D C) C) (ja)
a)
E
C)
uj
i
-_
Cl)
a)a) a)a) J -o
a)cj
uJ
C)
H W
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 2Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 12
2 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 16
1 1 1 1 11 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 2 6 4 0 1 0 0 18 7 4 0 0 0 0 15
3 2 4 1 4 2 1 4 1 1 5 2 1 3 0 0 24
2 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 5 5 1 0 0 0 18
1 2 2 2 1 5 2 1 2 1 2 4 6 0 0 1 0 21
1 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 1
2 2 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 8 0 1 0 0 22
2 2 2 1 4 2 1 2 1 1
5 5 0 1 0 0 19
2 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 1 2
3 5 3 0 0 0 22
1 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 6 4 1 0 0 0 17
6 4 1 0 0 0 17
Totalreplies 11 11 11 11 11 Mean 1.09 1.45 1.64 1.36 2.18 No Answer is not courned in points or in number of participants.
11 1.64
11 1.91
11 1.55
11 2.00
11 1.731
11 2.001
11 1.55
102.XLS 5/3/2002
U! JO
suiod
U!
09191L3 0 0 0 L 9 9
1L9i91-
POTUflO3 10U S!
UJGMSUV
N.
L9117!-
L619163 0 11. 3 9
L6114 L3 0 0 0 L 17
09 91317 0 I17 9 3
LL19!03 0 0 0 0 9 01-
LVI91LI0 0 0 0 3 LI-
L91-
03I-
ueej
so!deijjoj
93 0 0 0 3 9 L
93 0 0 1L 17 L
33 0 0 0 0 9 9
93 0 0 0 19 9
91Q 0 0 0 31-
JOJ
j73
C
17
C 3 3 3 3 3 1-
3 3 C 3 C
17 13 1. 3 3
3 3 1I3 13 1.1111I-
9 3 3 3 3 III1-_ 9 C
C)
Di
I-_ II3
17
II3 C C rn
(D
3 3 3 3 1II3 III3 3 3
o
I1. 1C 9
CDCD D
C 3 3 13 3 3 3 II13 C
3 13 3 3 1I3 3
3 111I113 I-
3 17 3 3 17 3 I 13 17 9
si CD
CD E.u)
I-_II[1-
I. C 3 3
H CD
Di
13
0ra.
(0
CD
-,
ni
:j
cn !g3
(DC
-Di
D(D
Q
CD
CC (D (0 CD C
C, 0 C (0
(DY
-
3o
CD
( Di
C)
Di
-,
CD
X C,
C-) Di
a-
a3
0
-
C)
CD
a-
<
3003 IId
a-
a-
o
A3
a-
I
VDS3flH SIdVd
POI!OJUO S}UOpftJS 03
1700
DS
1-03
L4S!UedS
20 students enrolled
(1)
(13
:_
PARIS-HUESCA, Eva
,+#
P C
Cl)
0)
Fall 2002
(1)
o
L-
05
co
0
-
=
t3 0 0 C
L
(13
<
0)
8
()Ct3
CD
C3
Cl)
c
(Dq
=
Lii
(U 0)
Ho
cv uE (U..::; cv
Cl)
D
0
-=
3.(I)
0
-
,i
D
L___.
()
LU
Co
w
CD.E
rL_
(3ci
0)0)
HC
00) OC 0 C
CL)
LQ)
00)
(UQ
,.
UJJ
>
Ow 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1
HW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 2Agree 3Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
11 1 1 2 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1
3 1 1 2 1 2 4 3 2 1 3 2 3 3 4 1
3 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 3 3 2 1
2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2
5 2 2 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1
3 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 1
3 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 1
15 1 0 0 0 0 17
4 8 1 0 0 0 23
12 3 0 1 0 0 22
13 3 0 0 0 0 19
8 6 2 0 0 0 26
5 4 5 2 0 0 36
7 5 4 0 0 0 29
7 9 0 0 0 0 25
7 5 2 1 1 0 32
7 6 3 0 0 0 28
4 7 5 0 0 0 33
9 4 3 0 0 0 26
Total replies 16 13 16 16 16 Mean 1.06 1.77 1.38 1.191 1.63 No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
16 2.25
16 1.81
16 1.56
16 2.00
16 1.75
16 2.06
16 1.63
su!od
U!
pounoo
OU S BJOMSUV ON,
99191.
69191.
9E1. 91.
99191.
99191.
9191.
09191.
61.191.
176191.
9191. 93 0 0 116
1-191.
ueej
sO!ldeJIeoJ
93 0 0 0
17
173 0 0 0 3 17 01-
OE 0 0 117 9
L3 0 0 10 9 L
83 0 10 3 17 6
93 0 0 13 3 1-1.
93 0 0 0 01.
173 0 0 0 3 17 01-
61. 0 0 0 0 1-
1-C 0 0 13 9 9
910 0 0 0 3 14
s4daouo3
I3 11 3 13
1111 11117
13 113
I 3
13 3 I 111 3 1 3
3 13 1-
1 3 I3 3 13 3 3 3
13 1111111113
13 113 3 13 17 113 3 3 13
1-_ 17 Z5
CD
.
13 13 13 1 17 3 13 1111-
1-_
D
Th
m o
zcj
ow
CD(D
-,
D D
CD cn
cc
IC )
Cl)
$j
--
o H DCD D) CD
-
-H CD D)
-
!P Q cr
0
C)
-
> 0
D) ci CD
C)
Cl CD Cl
Cl) Ct) 0
CD Cl
D) CO CD Cl
> <
D
003 6u!JdS
Cl
CO - CD 0
?W
D
< CD CD Cl
D CD CD 0 D Cl
0A3
VDS3flH SlelVd
19 students enrolled
a) t3
-a
a
U)
it5
a)
L
Spring 2003
E
a)
D C
a) >
a)
-
a) o a) a)
a)
-
t3 a) ) a) a)
,
a)a) > 0
E -o
Z
>.,
a) C)
t3
T3
-a
-
a) = a) C) a)
U)
-
t3
a) a) a)
__
E
L
a)
Qa)
oE
F-
a)4.a U)
a)
a)c
0 C) C W
U) j)
ci .E 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 5 1 1 1 3 1
Q)a)
-o
LJJ
a) D:3 ) Ca)
>C :3>
a)
C) W
C)
F- W
(DX
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
2 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 1 2 1 2 1
1 1 1 2 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1
1 3 1 5 3 3 1 5 1 1 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 53 2 1 3 2 1 1 5 5 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1
1 2 1 3 1 2 1 5 2 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 2 1
1 1 1 2 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1
Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 2Agree 3Neutral 4Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 6NoAnswer Total
10 2 0 0 1 0 19
9 2 1 0 1 0 21
5 7 0 0 1 0 24
10 2 0 0 1 0 19
5 3 3 0 2 0 30
8 2 2 0 1 0 23 13 1.77
7 2 2 0 2 0 27 13 2.08
9 2 1 0 1 0 21 13 1.62
8 3 1 0 1 0 22 13 1.69
11 1 0 0 1 0 18 13 1.38
8 3 0 0 2 0 24 13 1.85
10 2 0 0
0 19
Total replies 13 13 13 13 13 Mean 1.46 1.62 1.85 1.46 2.31 No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
13 1.46
201 4/29/2003
PARISHUE5CA Eva
26 students enrolled
9)
Fa112003
,
.-z
-:
:_
2_H-
F-
I 2 -I
5
6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
I I 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1
2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 2
1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1
I I 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1
I 1
2 I
2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1
1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 15 14 5 15 9 2Agree 2 3 10 2 7 3Neutral 0 0 1 0 1 4Disagree 0 0 1 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 0 0 0 0 Total 19 20 32 19 26 Total replies 17 17 17 17 17 Mean 1.12 1.18 1.88 1.12 1.53 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
11 4 2 0 0 0 25 17 1.47
9 7 1 0 0 0 26 17 1.53
11 6 0 0 0 0 23 17 1.35
10 7 0 0 0 0 24 17 1.41
13 4 0 0 0 0 21 17 1.24
8 9 0 0 0 0 26 17 1.53
13 4 0 0 0 0 21 17 1.24
101.XLS 12/11/2003
PARIS4IUESCA, Eva
--
19 students enrolled -u U z
u
-
Fall 2003
.
c, n n
C
$
vo. u c.
U
b1 U U
C C c C Cc+. LHL
*
C
C
u.
F< 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 6 1 1 2 1 1
Hc
c u UC
3 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
HE
C
UU
U)
C C IC
ct.E
-C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1
3 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 1
2 3 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 1 2 3
2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 3 2 2 3
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1
2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 1
3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1
3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 1
2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 1 1
26 27 28
Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 2Agree 14 1 8 5 6 7 8 6
5
8
3Neutral 0 1 2 1 2 4Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 1 0 0 0 Total 16 21 26 23 27 Total replies 15 14 15 15 15 Mean 1.07 1.50 1.73 1.53 1.80 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
4 6 4
1 0 0 32 15 2.13
4 8 2 1 0 0 30 15 2.00
11 4 0
5 6 4
7 6 2
2 8 5
5
2
0 0 0 19 15 1.27
0 0 0 29 15 1.93
0 0 0 25 15 1.67
0 0 0 33 15 2.20
0 0 0 24 15 1.60
PARIS, Eva
-*
20 students enrolled
-
J)
Spring2006
-.
_)
ir
ij
,. -
-)
0
U
..-.
2
,_
-L.
Li
) -.,
c
U
Li
I 2
I I
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 2 1 1
1 I 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 12 11 1 3 11 11 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1
1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 1 2 1 1
1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1
1 1 I 2 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1
I 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 4 1 2 2 3 1
1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1
2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1
2 1 I 2 2 I 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1
/ Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 14 13 13 12 10 2Agree 1 1 2 2 5 3Neutral 0 0 0 1 0 4 Disagree 0 0 0 0 1 5 Strongly Disagree 1 1 1 1 0 6NoAnswer 0 1 0 0 0 Total 21 20 22 24 24 Total replies 16 15 16 16 16 Mean 1.31 1.33 1.38 1.50 1.50 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
6 9 0 1 0 0 28 16 1.75
6 9 0 1 0 0 28 16 1.75
11 4 0 1 0 0 23 16 1.44
5 9 1 1 0 0 30 16 1.88
11 4 0 1 0 0 23 16 1.44
8 7 1 0 0 0 25 16 1.56
10 5 0 0 0 24 16 1.50
300.XLS 5/1/2006
PARIS, Eva
--
--
22 students enrolled
,-
c
c
c,
)
_
)
.-
N
.
Spring 2006
2
.
C..)
CC
Z
i.L
) -= C)
)
-
)
...
z
C)
C)
C.
z =
5
rM
>
V
-
c
0
LL
E 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1
rM C)
j
C. C)
C)
0 C)
Z V)
=
..
C)
C)
C.I)
W...
L)
C.)
(..)v
EU
i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
1 1 1 2 5 1 1 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3
1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
2 1 1 2_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2
2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
2 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3
2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
E2
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 2
1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 I 2 1 1 1 1 2 2
2 3 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Concepts / I Strongly Agree 15 12 13 12 10 2Agree 3 2 5 6 8 3Neutral 0 2 0 0 0 4Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 2 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 0 0 0 0 Total 21 32 23 24 26 Total replies 18 18 18 18 18 Mean 1.17 1.44 1.78 1.28 1.33 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
/
12 5 1 0 0 0 25 18 1.39
11 5 1 1 0 0 28 18 1.56
13 4 1 0 0 0 24 18 1.33
12 5 0 1 0 0 26 18 1.44
15 3 0 0 0 0 21 18 1.17
11 6 1 0 0 0 26 18 1.44
15 2 0 0 0 22 18 1.22
1 02.XLS 5/3/2006
PARIS. Eva
--
16 students enrolled
.2
,
-:i
Spriig 2006
E!
Concepts / 1 StronglyAgree 16 13 15 12 9 2Agree 1 3 2 5 6 3Neutral 0 1 0 0 1 4Disagree 0 0 0 0 1 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 0 0 0 0 Total 18 22 19 22 28 Totalreplies 17 17 17 17 17 Mean 1.06 1.29 1.12 1.29 1.65 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
13 3 1 0 0 0 22 17 1.29
10 3 4 0 0 0 28 17 1.65
13 3 1 0 0 0 22 17 1.29
7 3 5 0 2 0 38 17 2.24
12 2 3 0 0 0 25 17 1.47
15 0 2 0 0 0 21 17 1.24
15 1 1 0 0 0 20 17 1.18
--
.-
--
15 students enrolled
0
1.-u
c C
>.
a) a)
.
a)a)
a)
Fall 2006
.
be
-
.-r:
-.
u n
a) C)
a)
C)
a) 0
n 1..
n
C
a)n
a)
bO
e 1
=
nu
Ho
n u
C)
HE 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1
, a)
C
C) n
be
= a)
a)
C)
a)
Cb
a)
a)
C)
.E 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 2
Ca)
u-1 I 1 2 1 I 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 I 1 1 1 3 1 4 3 1
c
1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 1
Ua)
a)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 1 1
1 1 1 3 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 6 1
2 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 1
1 2 1 I 1 1 3 1 I 2 1
I I 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 4 1
1 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1
1 1 3 1 2 3
Concepts I Strongly Agree 10 8 7 9 2Agree 2 4 1 2 3 Neutral 1 1 1 1 4 Disagree 0 0 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 1 0 0 0 Total 15 15 18 16 Totalreplies 12 11 12 12 Mean 1.25 1.36 1.50 1.33 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
7 4 1 0 0 0 18 12 1.50
5 5 2 0 0 0 21 12 1.75
5 4 2 1 0 0 23 12 1.92
9 2 1 0 0 0 16 12 1.33
8 1 2 1 0 0 20 12 1.67
7 3 2 0 0 0 19 12 1.58
6 3 3 0 0 0 21 12 1.75
9 2 0 0 0 17 12 1.42
--
15 students enrolled
=
F
U
U
Spring 2007
U C)
C)
C3 U
C)
C C)
tSJ
1
)
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
1 2 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
1 6 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 3
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3
1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 2
Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 11 10 8 10 2Agree 0 1 3 1 3Neutral 0 0 0 0 4Disagree 0 0 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 0 0 0 Total 11 12 14 12 Totalreplies 11 11 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.27 1.09 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
5 4 2 0 0 0 19 11 1.73
8 2 1 0 0 0 15 11 1.36
7 3 1 0 0 0 16 11 1.45
9 2 0 0 0 0 13 11 1.18
5 3 2 0 0 1 17 10 1.70
7 3 1 0 0 0 16 11 1.45
7 2 2 0 0 0 17 Il 1.55
10 0 0 0 0 12 11 1.09
203-204-210 5/2/2007
15 students enrolled
Spring 2007
,
J) 0
-) 0
Z u
-n 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 I 1 1 3 3 1 1 2 1
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 3 1_ 1 1 I 1 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 2 2 1 1 1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1
1 1 2 1 1 4 4 1 4 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1
28 Concepts 1 Strongly Agree 12 10 9 10 2Agree 1 0 4 3 3 Neutral 0 1 0 0 4Disagree 0 0 0 0 5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 6NoAnswer 0 2 0 0 Total 14 13 17 16 Totalreplies 13 11 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.18 1.31 1.23 * No Answer is not counted in points or in number of participants.
5 3 2 3 0 0 29 13 2.23
8 4 1 0 0 0 19 13 1.46
8 2 1 2 0 0 23 13 1.77
10 3 0 0 0 0 16 13 1.23
9 2 0 2 0 0 21 13 1.62
9 4 0 0 0 0 17 13 1.31
6 4 3 0 0 0 23 13 1.77
10 2 0 0 0 18 13 1.38
203-204-210 5/2/2007
14
Student Response to Instructor: PARIS HUESCA EVA Department: SPANISH Course/Sect: 110 12 Schedule Number: 42794 Semester: Fall 07 Forms returned: 25 Total Enrollment: 31 Response Rate: 80.65 4 3 1 OMIT N SD
******** ***** ***
About the 5
****************************************
****************************************
MEAN
* *
1. 0 .52 .65 0 25 25 20 80% 14 56% 4 16% 9 36% 1 4% 2 8% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 25 0 0% 0 25 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 25 .77 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 4% 2 8% 5 20% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 8 32% 6 24% 8 32% 1 4% 6 24% 2 8% 2 8% 15 60% 17 68% subject matter 12 48% 24 96% 18 72% 23 92% 23 92%
4.76 4.48
2.
The instructor was well prepared for class. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never) The instructor explained course material clearly. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
3.
4.48 .65
4.
The instructor used class time well. (5=Almost Always, l=Almost never)
4.60 .79
5.
4.28 25 .20
6.
The instructor showed a personal interest in helping. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
7.
8.
The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
4.92 .28
9.
4.92
Overall, how much do you feel you (5=Much more, l=Much less)
1 4% 0 0% 1 4%
0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
0 0
25 25 0
.81 .76 25
11.
Overall rating of instructors teaching. (5=Almost Always Effective, l=Almost Never Effective)
12.
Overall rating of this course. (5One of the best,l=One of the worst) Expected Grade:
3.92
****************************************
course is:
Student class
level:
0% 44% 52% 4% 0% 0% 0%
Student Response to Instructor: PARIS HUESCA EVA Department: SPANISH Course/Sect: 110 1 Schedule Number: 42772 Semester: Fall 07 Forms returned: 21 Total Enrollment: 30 Response Rate: 70.00 5 3 1 OMIT N SD 2 4 MEAN
About the
************************
1. 15 75% 5 25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 .44 20 0 0% 1 20 0 0% 0 21 0 0% 0 21 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 21 .60 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 1 5% 2 10% 1 5% 3 14% 0 0% 4 19% 0 0% 2 10% 7 35% 2 10% 5 24% 6 29% 4 19% 3 14% 1 5% 3 15%
*******
The instructor was well prepared for class. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never) 12 60% 16 76% 15 71%
4.75
2.
The instructor explained course material clearly. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
4.55
3.
.87
4.57
4.
The instructor used class time well. (5=Almost Always, l=Almost never)
.58
4.67
5.
The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter 11 (5A1most Always, 1=Almost never) 52% 17 81% 14 67% 19 90% 15 75%
.90 21
4.29
6.
The instructor showed a personal interest in helping. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
.40 0
4.81 21
7.
.81 0 21
4.48
8.
The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5=Almost Always, l=Almost never)
.68 1
4.81 20
9.
.67
4.65
**************************************** ********** *****
Overall, how much do you feel you (5=Much more, l=Much less)
5 24% 0 0% 4 19%
0 0% 1 5% 0 0%
1 5% 0 0% 1 5%
21
1.00 0 21
3.90 .75 0 21
11.
Overall rating of instructors teaching. (5=Almost Always Effective, 1=Almost Never Effective)
4.48
12.
1 .02
4 .05
**********fl***
****************************************
is:
***
Student class
level:
Student Response to Instruction Report Instructor: PARIS HUESCA EVA Department: SPANISH Course/Sect: 120 07 Schedule Number: 61852 Semester: Spring 08 Forms returned: 24 Total Enrollment: 30 Response Rate: 80.00 ***** ********* * ********** ************************* ***************** ***************** ***** ********* About the Instructor and the course: 5 4 3 ************.************* 2 1 OMIT N *******w************
************************* ************
SD MEAN
*****************
1. 14 58% 9 38% 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 .59 .83 0 24 24 0 0% 0 0% 0 24 0 0% 0 24 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 24 .82 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 9 38% 3 13% 7 29% 6 25% 2 8% 5 21% 5 21% 2 8% 8 33% 11 46% 7 29% 7 29% 9 38% 7 29% 8 33% 8 33% 7 29% 9 38% 10 42% subject matter 8 33% 12 50% 12 50% 10 42% 14 58%
The instructor was well prepared for class. (5=Almost Always, lAlmost never)
4.54 3.92
2.
The instructor explained course material clearly . (5Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
3.
The instructor cleared up points of confus ion. (5Almost Always, l=Almost never)
4.17
4.
The instructor used class time well. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
.85
4.13 1.05
5.
The instructor inspired interest in the (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never) in helping.
3.83 24 .82
6.
4.33 24 .81 0 24 0
7.
4.29
8.
The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5Almost Always, lAlmost never)
.90 24
4.13 .66
9.
4.50
10. 8 33%
Overall, how much do you feel you learned? (5Much more, 1=Much less)
9 38%
2 8% 5 21% 13 54% 1 4% 1 4%
0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
24
.92 0 24
3.67 .86 0 24
11.
4.04 .83
12.
3.54
course is:
Student class
level:
14:26:27
UNIVERSITY
OF
MASSACUUSETTS
Student Response to Instructor: PARIS HUESCA EVA Department: SPANISH Course/Sect: 120 16 Schedule Number: 6L978 Semester; Spring 08 Forms returned: 20 Total Enrollment: 25 Response Rate: * * * * * * ** *** ** * ** 80.00 5 4 3 2 1 OMIT N SD MEAN
About the
* ********* *** * *** **** *** ************* *** ********** **** *** ***** **** * *** **** ***** ** ************************* **,,**
1. 19 95% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 20 .22 0 0% 0 20 .41 0 0% 0 20 0 0% 0 20 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 20 20 .37 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 1 5% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 1 5% 4 20% 3 15% 3 15% 5 25% 1 5% 4 20% 1 5% 2 10% 16 80% 17 85% 16 80% 14 70% 19 95% 15 75% fair. 19 95% 17 85%
The instructor was well prepared for cass. (5=AlmoSt Always, 1=Almost never)
4.95
2.
The instructor explained course material clear ly. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
4.80
3.
The instructor cleared up points of confus ion. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
4.85 .55
4.
The instructor used class time well. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
5.
The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never>
4.65 4.95
6.
The instructor showed a personal inter est in helping. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never) 0
7.
20
.57 0 20 0 20
4.70 .22
8.
4.95 .52
9.
The instructor stimulated student parti cipation. (5=Almost Always, 1=Almost never)
4.80
************************
******
Overall, how much do you feel you (5=Much more, 1=Much less)
7 35% 0 0% 5 25%
0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
20
.83 0 20
3.95
11.
Overall rating of instructors teachin g. (5=Almost Always Effective, 1=Almost Never Effective>
.44 0 20
4.75 .81
12.
4.15
course is:
Student class
level:
85% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 5%
Instructor Item # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor explained course material clearly. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor cleared up points of confusion. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor used class lime well. (5=Almost always. lAlmost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) I received useful feedback on my performance. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor stimulated student participation. (5Almost always. 1 =Almost never) Overall, flow much do you feel you learned in this course? (5Much more than most, lMuch less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5=Almost always effective, 1=Almost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (5=One of the best, 1=One of the worst) Mean 4.7 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.5 4.3 3.9 St. 0ev. 0.46 0.94 0.86 0.80 0.83 0.46 0.63 0.64 0.62 0.92 0.62 0.64
tzzzzi
.
Item mean
10
11
12
Item Means **Repot.ted only if data were available for 10 or more sections. Means were calculated using combined data for academic years 2005-07. all courses from the same department; College = courses from all other departments in the school/college; Campus = All UMass courses. For more information on comparison groups visit www.umass.edu/oapaIsrti . Office of Academic Planning and Assessment. 02/13/2009
**Dept
Semester. FALL 2008 Instructor: PARIS HUESCA, EVA Course: SPANISH 120 Section #:01 Class #: 75967 Forms returned: 15 Total enrollment: 31 Response rate: 48% WARNING: SAMPLE MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE DUE TO LOW RESPONSE.
Item # 1 SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor explained course material clearly. (5Almost always, 1oAlmost never) The instructor cleared up points of confusion. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor used class time well, (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5Almost always. 1 Almost never) I received useful feedback on my performance. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5oAlmost always, lAlmost never) The instructor stimulated student participation, (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5=Much more than most, I =Much less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5=Almost always effective, 1=Almost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (50One of the best, 1 =One of the worst) 5 11 73% 2 7 47% 3 6 40% 4 7 47% 5 6 40% 6 11 73% 7 10 67% S 9 60% 9 11 73% 10 1 7% 11 6 40% 12 2 13% Student Expected 4 4 27% 5 33% 7 47% 5 33% 5 33% 4 27% 4 27% 5 33% 3 20% 8 53% 8 53% 9 60% 3 0 0% 2 13% 1 7% 3 20% 4 27% 0 0% 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% 3 20% 1 7% 4 27% 2 0 0% 1 7% 1 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 20% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 OMIT 0 N 15
This course is a
Major requirement Gen. Ed. requirement Other requirement Elective Missing 27% 27% 27% 7% 13%
class level
Freshmen Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate Other Missing 0% 13% 40% 47% 0% 0% 0%
grade
A A8+ B BC+ C C0+ D F Other Missing 27% 20% 13% 7% 13% 7% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
For more information or help interpreting your results visit www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/13/2009
Instructor Item # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SRTI Item The instructor was wet prepared for class. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor explained course matenal clearly. (5Alrnost always, lAlmost never> The instructor cleared up points of confusion. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor used class time well. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5=Aimost always, lAlmost never) I received useful feedback on my performance. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5=Almost always, 1 =Almost never) The instructor stimulated student participation. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5Much more than most, lMuch less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5Almost always effective, 1 =Atmost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (5One of the best, lOne of the worst) Mean 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 5.0 3.9 4.8 4.4 St. Dev. 000 0,34 0.25 0.34 0.40 0.34 0.40 0.54 0.00 0.57 0.40 0.63
EEEZI
[EEzEl
Ls:
Campus
Item mean 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Item Means **Repo,.ted only if data were available for 10 or more sections. Means were calculated using combined data for academic years 2005-07. all courses from the same department; College = courses from all other departments in the school/college; Campus All UMass courses. For more information on comparison groups visit www.umass.edu/oapa./srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/13/2009
**Dept
2
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
1
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
00/
OMIT
0
N
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
16
16
16
This course Is a
Major requirement Gen. Ed. requirement Other requirement Elective Missing 63% 6% 19% 13% 0%
Expected grade
A AB B BC+ C CD+ D F Other Missing 25% 44% 19% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
For more information or help interpreting your results vtsit wvw. umass.edu/oapa/srtj, Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/13/2009
Semester: SPA 2009 Instructor: PARIS HUESCA, EVA Course: SPANISH 230 Section #:03 Class #: 16452 Forms returned: 20 Total enrollment: 28 Response rate: 71%
Item # 1 SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, loAlmost never) The instructor explained course material clearly, (5=Almost always, 1=Alrnost never) The instructor cleared up points of confus ion, (5=Almost always, lAln,ost never) The instructor used class time well, (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Alrnost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor showed an interest in helpin g students learn. (5=Atmost always, lAlmost never) I received useful feedback on my perform ance. (5oAlmost always, 1 =Almost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5Almost always, loAlmost never> The instructor stimulated student partici pation. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned In this course? (SMuch more than most, lMuch less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teachin g. (5Almost always effective, 1=Alm ost never Overall rating of this course. (5=One of the best, 1 =One of the 5 18 90% 15 75% 16 80% 16 80% 16 80% 18 90% 17 85% 16
80%
4 2 10% 5 25% 4 20% 3 15% 4 20% 2 10% 2 10% 4 20% 3 15% 5 25% 5 25% 6 30%
3 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 3 15% 0 0% 2 10%
2 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
1 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
OMIT 0
N 20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
17 85% 12 60%
20
10
20
11
effective>
15 75%
20
12
worst)
12 60%
20
This course Is a Major requirement Gen. Ed, requirement Other requirement Elective Missing 55% 5% 20% 15% 5%
Student class level Freshmen Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate Other Missing 15% 35% 25% 20% 0% 0% 5%
D
F Other Missing
0% 0% 0% 5%
For more information or help inter preting your results visit www.uma ss.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 06/23/20 09
Item # I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, lAlmost never> The instructor explained course materi al clearly. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor cleared up points of confus ion. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor used class time well. (SAlmostalways, l=Almost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (SAlmost always, lAlmost never) I received useful feedback on my perform ance. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor stimulated student partici pation. (5Almost always, 1 =Almost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5Much more than most, 1=Much less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teachin g. (5Almost always effective, 1 Almost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (5=Orie of the best, 1One of the worst)
Instructor Mean 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.5 4.8 4.5 St. 0ev. 0.31 0.44 0.41 0.55 0.41 0.31 0.52 0.41 0.37 0.76 0.44 0.69
COMPARISON GROUP: Undergraduate sections with 25 to 59 enrolled Dept: SPANISH College: HFA Campus # Sections: 30 # Sections: 438 # Sections: 2535 Reap. rate: 77% Resp. rate: 74% Resp. rate: 74% Mean St. 0ev. Mean St. 0ev. Mean St. 0ev. 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.4 3.9 4.4 4.0 0.20 0.33 0.34 0.22 0.39 0.31 0,24 0.23 0.34 0.30 0.30 0.37 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.3 3.9 4.3 4.0 0.30 0.41 0.42 0.41 0.48 0.40 0.51 0.40 0.56 0.49 0.48 0.53 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.2 3.9 4.2 3.9 033 0.51 0.50 0.42 0.54 0.46 0.55 0.43 0.59 0.52 0.54 0,58
I_______
Instructor
Department
School/College Campus
csz
Item mean 5.0 1
3.0
1234
56
1112
**Re ported only if data were available for 10 or more sections. Means were calculated usin all courses from the same depa g combined data for academic year rtment; College = courses from all s 2005-07. other departments in the school/co For more information on com llege; Campus = All UMass cour parison groups visit www.uma ses. ss.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 06/2 3/2009
SRTI Item
The instructor was well prepared for class. (5=Almost always, 1 Almost never>
5
13 87%
4
1 7% 4 27% 4 27% 4 27% 4 27% 2 13% 3 20% 5 33% 2 13% 6 43% 4 29% 3 21%
3
1 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 13% 0 0% 0 0% 3 21% 1 7% 3 21%
2
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 14%
1
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 7% 0 0% 1 7%
OMIT
0
N
15
The instructor explained course material clearly. (5Almost always, I =Almost never>
11 73%
15
11 73%
15
The instructor used class time well. (SAlrnost always, lAlmost never)
11 73%
15
The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5Almoxt always, I Almoxt never>
Ii 73%
15
The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5Almoxt always, I=Almost never>
13 87%
15
10 67%
15
The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5Almost always, lAlmost never>
10 67%
15
13 87%
15
10
Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5=Much more than most, 1=Much less than most)
4 29%
14
11
Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5=Almost always effective, I =Almost never effective)
9 64%
14
12
Overall rating of this course. (5=One of the best, 1 =One of the worst)
5 36%
14
Student
Thts course Is a Major requirement Gee. Ed. requirement
Other requirement Elective
Expected
grade 13% 53% 13% 7% 0% 0% 13% A A8. 8 5C* C CD+ O F Other
Missing
class level 87% 0% 0% 7% 7% Freshmen Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate Other Missing
Missing
For more information or help interpreting your results visit www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/22/2010 Page 1
Instructor Item # I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor explained course material clearly. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor cleared up points of confusion. (5Almost always. lAlmost never) The instructor used class time well. (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (SAlmost always, lAlmost never) I received useful feedback on my performance. (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor stimulated student participation. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5=Much more than most, 1=Much less than most) Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5Almost always effective, 1Almost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (5=One of the best, 1=One of the worst) Mean 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4,9 4.5 4.7 4.9 3.9 4.6 3.6 St. Dev. 0.56 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.35 0.74 0.49 0.35 1.10 0.65 1.34
L: EEl
Item mean
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00
Item Number
**Repo!.ted only for 10 or more sections. Comparison group means are calculated using combined data for academic years 2006-08. Undergraduate sections are used as the comparison group for 500-level courses. Dept all courses from the same department; College = courses from all other departments in the school/college; Campus = All UMass courses. For more information on comparison groups visit www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/22/2010 Page 2
SRTI Item
The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, 1 =Almosf never)
5
10 91%
4
I 9% 0 0% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% I 9% 6 55% 2 18% 5 45%
3
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 9% 1 9% 0 0% 1 9%
2
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
1
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
OMIT
0
N
11
The instructor explained course material clearly. (5Almost always, 1 =Almost never)
II 100%
11
11 100%
11
The instructor used class time well. (5Almost always, lAlmost never)
10 91%
Ii
The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5Almost always. 1 Almost never)
11 100%
11
The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5Almost always, 1 =Almost never)
ii 100%
11
11 100%
1I
The methods of evaluating roy work were fair. )5Almost always. 1 Almost never)
11 100%
I1
9 82%
II
10
Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5Much more than most, 1 =Muh less than most)
4 36%
11
11
Overall rating of this instructors teaching. (5Almost always effective, IAlmost never effective)
9 82%
11
12
Overall rating of this course. (5=One of the best, 1 One of the worst)
5 45%
11
Expected grade
A A8+ B BC+ C CD D F Other Missing 91% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
For more information or help interpreting your results visit www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, 02/22/2010 Page 1
Individual Section Report: Mean Student Response to Instruction (SRTI) Comparisons (Within Class Size
Semester: FALL 2009 Instructor: PARIS HUESCA, EVA Course: SPANISH 301 Section #: 01 Class #: 36006 Forms returned: 11 Total enrollment: 18 Response rate: 61%
Item # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SRTI Item The instructor was well prepared for class. (5Almost always, 1Almost never) The instructor explained course materi al clearly. (5=Almost always, lAimost never) The instructor cleared up points of confus ion. (5Almost always, 1 Almost never) The instructor used class time well. (5Almost always, 1=Almost never> The instructor inspired interest in the subject matter. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor showed an interest in helping students learn. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) I received useful feedback on my perform ance. (5Almost always, lAlmost never) The methods of evaluating my work were fair. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) The instructor stimulated student partici pation. (5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) Overall, how much do you feel you learned in this course? (5Much more than most, 1=Much less than most> Overall rating of this instructors teachin g. (5=Almost always effective, 1=Almost never effective) Overall rating of this course. (50ne of the best, 1 =One of the worst)
Instructor Mean 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.3 4.8 4,4 St. 0ev. 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.40 0.67
*COMPARISON GROU P: Undergraduate sections with fewer than 25 enrolled Oept: SPANISH College: HFA Campus # Sections: 57 # Sections: 1,176 # Sections: 3,254 Resp. rate: 84% Resp. rate: 82% Resp. rate: 83% Mean St. 0ev. Mean St. 0ev. Mean St. Dcv, 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.1 4.5 4.2 0.17 0.30 0.32 0.29 0.41 0.25 0.31 0.27 0.32 0.44 0.37 0.47 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.4 4.6 4,5 4.1 4,4 4.2 0.33 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.49 0.37 0.50 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.50 0,57 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.6 4,4 4.6 4,5 4,1 4.4 4,1 0.32 0,45 0.45 0.43 0.47 0.38 0.51 0.39 0.48 0.53 0,49 0.56
EE
Item mean
5.00
10
11
Item Number
12
**Reported only for 10 or more sections. Comparison grou p means are calculated using combine sections are used as the comparis d data for academic years 2006-08. Und on group for 500-level courses. Dept = all ergraduate courses from the same department: departments in the school/college Cam College courses from all other : pus = All UMass courses. For more information on comparison groups visit www.umass.edu/oapa/sr ti. Office of Academic Planning and Asse ssment, 02/22/2010 Page 2
Intnjctnr PARIS HUI7SCA, EVA .nw7ter SPR 2010 COos V 57633 Crytjie SPANISH 311 Section 001 20 rot nrncd
lott enrolinrer 4: 24
83%, 5 4
1
2
1
OMIT
13
SRTI Item
-ri.
131313:1
lIsle ptrine13t ceurse rriulrcrt Ovilrt Tisi (((Almost ulways, 1 vAlmest lever)
5131 7
0%
13%
0% Ii
13
(1 0%
I 13%
0 (3%
20
6.S4,
rf r,rfl),vrv,l TIre irhrilr,r sPeared rip po clv 13s--t,rs., I :lsia,v lA)nr,,vt ne-en
3%-I(1
(3
(3
13
2(3
.,
The inslrricter river) class lime wOk tAInvrst seven r(%Ahr,rrvl ,rl,sa
-
l3
13
(I
(3
t maIler The revtwclivr rvprred ulerest n tie vulgec (5,Atmovt always tAtmosl sever)
10 50%
13 35%
13
0%
0 0%
(3
20
(5%
student,. learn The invteiclor showed an interest in helprn )hAtmost always, I Atmost never)
16
4 20%
ii 0%
(3 0%
20
3%
0 0% 0
213
)%AlmovItwaos O-Alrnrvtrreverr
(5
20
7(3:7we.rc lair The methods of evatunhng my work )%Alrnost always (3Atnrosl severs 17 65% pal,oe Tie mvii outer vrurruioled strident panircr (SeAlmost always. I eAlmost never)
15-I 2
10%
5-s
I 5%. (1 7%,
0 0%
15 75%
5 25%
(1 0% 00
0
0%
0-
20
131
10
7 In this course Overall, how nonch do you feel yon learned moO; (bvMuch more than rrost, 1Much less than
5 25%
8 40%
4
20%
1 1513-13
0 0%
20
11
g Overall rating of this instructionS teachin st effective) )5Almosl always efteclise. 1 eAlmo never
11
6 30%
(1
013..
0
113.
20
55% Overall rating of this course (5Orie of the hest, 7%One of the worst)
9 45(3 .35
13
0 0%.
20
12
20%
Student
This course is a
Mator requirement Gee Ed. requirement Other requirement Elective MIssing 80% 0% 5% 5% 10%
Expected
grade
40% 20% 20% 10% 0% 0% A ABrB B0+ 15/I 15%, 20% 15% 10% 0%
class level
Freshrrrerr Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate Other Missing
10%
C
C D+ D F Other Missirrg
5%
0% 0% 0% 20%
2010 of Academic Planning and Assessment, 06/02/ results vistt www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office Page 1 For more information or help interpreting your
to Instruction (SRTI) Amherst Student Response University of Massachusetts s (Within Class Size) parison
St. 0ev.
0.22 (3l
COMPARISON GROUP: fewer than 25 enrolled Undergraduate sections with Campus College: HFA Dept: SPANISH # Sections: 3.254 8 Sections: 1,176 57 Sections: 8 Resp. rate: 83% Resp. rate: 82% Resp. rate: 84% St. Dcv Mean St. 0ev. Mean St. Dcv, Mean
4.
Il
SRTI lien,
prevareif for ease I re oslO/ti: was wok ver) (Sm8rnost alwsye, I Almost,e course safenal ( leailV fhe lnstru/tcir exolained Inst i ir I
ts of i onfus.orr. fire iOstiuvtr clamS en povi ri movt 1 (SvAlmovt aOieyv i05 nem
5.0
0.17
1(1
4 7
0.31 04:
4.7
1) 32
45
4 5
.1 5
060 0.09
46
4.6
0 32
4 5
6
net. The instwctor used c.iSss tIme (5r05f :iwaCw 17\[r.ro4 never)
:;f In the subject matter. Tne Inst norton in psed )nrters never) (5Atrnost away: I A)rnosf st In lrenrr-iq students earn The instructor showed an vfere o;t never, ksvAlrnosf aisvys. iA)m est uncurl )50mosI sways iA)m my pertormenro. received useful feedback on
4.0 4 .1
48
4 5 4 5 4.7
$4
043
1 47
0 75 0,41 0.82
4 5
4.8
46
48
4.6
7 8 4
10
ny work were feir 1 he met rinds of evatuatinry ,osf neven (S05lmost eways i.Aln
052
0.44
1.02 0.75 0.75
$ 7
4,6
$ 1 4,5 4.2
0.27
032
0 44
4.6 4.5
4.1
ent part.cneten. 1 be rnst rector stvruiated stud never) (5Ai,rost always 1A)most earned in this course how much do you feel you
QueuE IMuch lees than must) )5Much more than most,
48
0 55
0 53
0.49 0 56
3.8
4.4 3 9
0,37
0.47
4.4 4.2
0.50
r
12
1A!mosf never effective, )5Atrnost always etfectrve. se. DversllraLg Ui tile cour e of mowers!) )5One of the best, 1Ori
0.57
LJ
J 0 L..
Item mean
5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00
1.50 1.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
Item Number
s 2006-08. Undergraduate combined data for academic year p means are calculated using = courses from all other more sections. Comparison grou the same department: College **Repoded Only for 10 or ses. Dept = all courses from parison group for 500-level cour 06/02/2010 sections are used as the com emic Planning and Assessment. . Campus = all UMass courses. Page 2 ss.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Acad departments in the school/college comparison groups visit www.uma For more information on
to Instruction (SRTI) Amherst Student Response University of Massachusetts isons (Within Class Size>
Instructor Mean Item 4 I 2 3 4 5 (1 7 if 9 10 11 12 SRTI Item class. The instructor was well prepared for )SAlmost always, lAlmost never) material clearly. The instructor explained course (5=Almost always, 1Almost never) of confusion. The instructor cleared up points (54Almost always, lAlmost never) The instructor used class time well, never) l5=Almost always, lAlmost t matter. nstructor inspired interest in the subjec The (5Almost always, lAlrnost never) in helping students learn. The instructor showed an interest (54Almost always, 1Almost never) ance. I recemed useful feedback on my perform )5=Almost always, 1=Almost never) were fair. The methods of evaluating my work (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) participation. The instructor stimulated student (54Almost always, 1=Almost never) learned ri this course? Overall, how much do you feel you than most, lMuch less than most) (5Much more g. Overall rating of this Instructors teachin ost never effective) (54Almost always effective, 1 Alm Overall rating of this course, (54One of the best, lOne of the worst) 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.7 4.9 4.5 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.49 0,34 0.73 St. 0ev,
.*COMPARISON GROUP: r than 25 enrolled Undergraduate sections with fewe Campus College: HFA Oept: SPANISH 4 Sections: 3414 # Sections: 1245 72 # Sections: Rasp. rate: 84% Resp. rate: 83% Resp. rate: 85% St. 0ev. Mean St. Dcv. Mean St. 0ev. Mean 4.8 4.6 4,6 4.7 4.5 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.1 4.6 4.2 0.18 0.30 0,31 0.31 0.41 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.43 0.36 0.44 4,7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.7 4,5 4.6 4.5 4.1 4,4 4,2 0.34 0.47 0.46 0,45 0.48 0.37 0.51 0.40 0.45 0.54 0.51 0.57 4.7 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.6 4,5 4.1 4,4 4.2 0.32 0,45 (1.45 0.43 0,46 0,37 0.51 0.40 0,47 0.53 0.49 0.55
Item mean
years 200 7-09. Undergraduate g combined data for academic ses from all other group means are calculated usin epoded only for 10 or more sections. Comparison same department; College cour **R ses. Dept = all courses from the comparison group for 500-level cour sections are used as the 02/14/2011 emic Planning and Assessment, ; Campus = all UMass courses. Page 2 departments in the school/college .umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Acad on on comparison groups visit www For more informati
iiiiiu
Item Number
n (SRTI) erst Student Response to Instructio University of Massachusetts Amh isons (Within Class Size)
Instructor Mean Item 4 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 51411 item class. The instructor was well prepared for (5=Atrnosf always, IAlmost never) al clearly. The instructor explained course materi (5Almost always, FAlmost never) confusion. I he instwctor cleared up points of (54Almost always, ThAlmost never) The instructor used class time well. (5=Almoxt always, 1=Almost never) t matter. The instructor inspired interest in the subjec (5=Almost always, tAlmost never) helping students learn. Ihe instructor showed an interest in (5Almost always, 1Almost never) ance. I received useful feedback on my perform (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) were fair. The methods of evaluating my work (54Almost always, 1Almost never) participation. The ii strucfor stimulated student (5=Almost always, lAlmost never) learned in this course? Overall, how much do you feel you than most) ch more than most, lMuch less (5Mu g. Overall rating of this instructors teachin never effective) (5=Almost always effective, 1 Almost Overall rating of this course, (5=One of the best, IOne of the worst) 4.6 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.6 4,6 4.4 4.6 4.9 3.6 3.9 3.6
053
St. 0ev.
than 25 enrolled Undergraduate sections with fewer Campus College: HFA Dept SPANISH 4 Sections: 3414 4 Sections: 1245 72 ions: 4 Sect Reap. rate: 84% Resp. rate: 83% Resp. rate: 85% St. Dcv. Mean Dcv. St. Mean St. Dcv, Mean 4 8 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.8 4.6 4,7 4.6 4.1 4.6 4.2 018 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.41 0.24 0.30 0,30 0.32 0.43 0.36 0.44 4.7 4.5 4.5 0.34 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.48 0.37 0.51 0.40 0.45 0.54 0.51 0.57 4 7 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 4,6 4.4 4,6 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.2 0.32 0,45 0.45 0.43 0.46 0.37 0.51 0,40 0.47 0.53 0.49 0.55
COMPARISON GROUP:
0.93 0.83 0.93 0.53 0.73 1.01 0.73 0.33 1.01 0.93 1.01
4,5
4.5 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.2
Item mean
5.00
Item Number
years 2007-09. Undergraduate using combined data for academic courses from all other parison group means are calculated **Reported only for 10 or more sections, Com the same department; College courses. Dept = a/I courses from the comparison group for 500-level sections are used as nt, 02/14/2011 ; Campus all UMass courses. Academic Planning and Assessme departments in the school/college Page 2 www.umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of mation on comparison groups visit For more infor
uction (SRTI) erst Student Response to (nstr Universfty of Massachusetts Amh Frequencies
Instructor: PARIS HUESCA, EVA Semester FALL 2010 Class #: 75016 Course SPANISH 197A Section #:01 9 Forms returned: ii Totol enrollment 62% Response rate:
Item #
I
5
5 56%
4
4 44% 2
3
0 0%
2
0 0% 0 0% 0
1
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
OMIT
0
N
9
SRI! Item
class, The Instructor was well prepared br (5Almosl always. lAlmosl never)
al clearly. The nslnrcbor explained course malert 2 )5Almosl always. I Almost never)
4 44%
4
3
33% 2
22% 3
33% 2 22%
44%
4 44%
22%
3 33%
0%
0 0%
The instructor used class time well. l5eAlmosl always, lAlmost never)
(1
t matter. The instruclor inspired interest in the sublec )5Atmost always, lAlmost never)
in helping students learn. The instructor showed an interest (5=Alniosl always, 1=Almovt never)
5 56%
6
4 44%
2
0 0%
1 11% 0
0 0% 0
0% 1
0 0%
0 0% 0
67%
6
22%
2
0% 1 11% 0 0% 4
0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9
were fair. The methods of evaluating my work never) )5=Almost always, lAlmost pation. The instructor stimulated student partici )5Almost always, 1Almosl never) learned in this course? Overall, how much do you feet you less than most) )5Much more than most, 1=Much
10
44%
1 11% 4 44%
II
teaching. Overall rating of this instructors st never effective) (5=Almosl always effective, 1 =Almo
12
Overall rating of this course. worst) )5=Onu of the best, 1=One of the
This course Is a
Major requirement Gen. Ed requirement Other requirement Elective Missing 56% 0% 33% 11% 0%
Expected grade
A A8 8 8C+ C C22% 0% 11% 22% 33% 0% 0% 11% 0%
o
F
0%
0% 0%
Other Missing
0%
02/14/2011 emic Planning and Assessment, Page 1 .umass.edu/oapa/srti. Office of Acad interpreting your results visit www For more in formation or help
uction (SRTI) erst Student Response to Instr University of Massachusetts Amh Frequencies
230 23 24 96%
5
23 100% 20 87% 20
4
0 0% 3 13% 3 13% 1 4% 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 2 9% 0 0% 6 33% 3 13% 6 26%
3
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
2
0 0% 0 (1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
1
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
OMIT
0
N
23
SRTI Item
for class The nstructor was well prepared (hAIn o I always 1 Almost neve )
material clearly. The instructor captained course (5Alniosl always, lAlmosl never)
23
23
87%
22 96% 22 96% 23 100% 21 91% 21 91% 23 100% 12 67% 20 87% 14 61%
The instructor used class lime welL (5Atmost always, 1=Almost never) subject mailer. The nslructor inspired interest in the (5=Alrnost always, 1=Atmost never) in helping students learn. The inStructor showed an interest (5=Almost always, I =Almost never)
23
23
23
23
were fair. The methods of evaluating my work )5Alnrost always, 1Atmosl never)
23
participation. The instructor stimulated student (5Almovl always, lAtmosl never) learned in this course? Overall, how much do you feel you ch less than most) (5Much more than most, lMu
23
18
10
11
g. Overall rating of this instructors teachin ooAtmost never effective) (5Atrnost always effective, 1
23
12
Overall rating of this course. worst) (5One of the best, lOne of the
3
13%
23
Student
This course is a
Major requirement Gen Ed. requirement Other requirement Elective Missing
Expected
grade
43% 9% 26% 17% 0% 0% 4% A A 8+ 8 8C+ C 9% 30% 13% 22% 13% 4%
90/
Freshmen
Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate Other Missing
C0+
0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0%
0 F
Other Missing
nt, 02/14/2011 emic Planning and Assessme Page 1 mass.edu/oapa/sdi. Office of Acad interpreting your results visit wv.u For more in formation or help