"MERS's intentional misrepresentation of itself as both a mortgagee and a nominee for the mortgagee creates an intentional fog that permeates a wide-spread misunderstanding about the the fundamental roles parties play in the contemporary, hyper-complex financial system and secondary market. To wit, the Superior Court decision in the present case suggests that MERS can call itself both a mortgagee and a nominee of the mortgagee because the current mortgage market, created in large part by MERS, leaves us no alternative but to embrace this legal fiction"
"MERS's intentional misrepresentation of itself as both a mortgagee and a nominee for the mortgagee creates an intentional fog that permeates a wide-spread misunderstanding about the the fundamental roles parties play in the contemporary, hyper-complex financial system and secondary market. To wit, the Superior Court decision in the present case suggests that MERS can call itself both a mortgagee and a nominee of the mortgagee because the current mortgage market, created in large part by MERS, leaves us no alternative but to embrace this legal fiction"
"MERS's intentional misrepresentation of itself as both a mortgagee and a nominee for the mortgagee creates an intentional fog that permeates a wide-spread misunderstanding about the the fundamental roles parties play in the contemporary, hyper-complex financial system and secondary market. To wit, the Superior Court decision in the present case suggests that MERS can call itself both a mortgagee and a nominee of the mortgagee because the current mortgage market, created in large part by MERS, leaves us no alternative but to embrace this legal fiction"