1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES,

:
:
Government, :
:
v.
:
:
DANIEL CHOI,
:
:
Defendant.
:
:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

MJ 10-739

Washington, D.C.
Friday, October 7, 2011
10:11 a.m.

9
10

TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL ARGUMENT

BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROYCE C. LAMBERTH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE

11
12

APPEARANCES:

13

For the Government:

ANGELA GEORGE, ESQUIRE

STRANTON STRAND, ESQUIARE
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Room 4444
555 4th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 252-7943
(202) 514-6010 (fax)
angela.george@usdoj.gov
(202) 252-6754
(202) 252-6720 (fax)
stratton.strand@usdoj.gov

For The Defendant:

ROBERT J. FELDMAN, ESQUIRE

ROBERT FELDMAN
14 Wall Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
(212) 657-5177
robertjfeldman@aol.com

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Pages 1 through 20

2
1
APPEARANCES (Continued):
2
For the Defendant:

NORMAN ELLIOTT KENT, ESQUIRE

KENT & CORMICAN, PA
110 SE 6th Street
Suite 1970
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 763-1900
norm@normkent.com

Court Reporter:

THERESA M. SORENSEN, CVR-CM

Official Court Reporter
333 Constitutional Avenue, N.W.
Room 4808-B
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 273-0745

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

3
P R O C E E D I N G S

1
2

THE DEPUTY CLERK:

Magistrate Case 10-739, the

United States of America versus Daniel Choi.

Mr. Strand for the government, Mr. Feldman and Mr. Kent for

the defense.

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

With the Court's permission, may I

have my paralegal sit at the table, Judge?

THE COURT:

11

MR. FELDMAN:

12

THE COURT:

13

MR. STRAND:

15

Good morning, Your Honor.

Good morning.

10

14

Ms. George and

Yes.
Thank you very much, Your Honor.

All right.
May it please the Court, Stratton

Strand on behalf of the government.

Your Honor, the Magistrate Judge committed clear

16

and indisputable error by treating the selective prosecution

17

claim as a defense on the merits rather than as grounds for

18

dismissal, and refusing to rule on the government's motion

19

in limine to deem it waived.

20

corrected, the government will be forced to devote

21

significant resources to defending against a baseless,

22

procedurally barred claim, and the government's right to

23

appeal any adverse ruling on that claim will be jeopardized.

24
25

If this error is not

The defendant has acknowledged in his pleadings

that the Judge erred by treating this motion -- by treating

4
1

this defense as a defense on the merits.

acknowledged that this is in fact an attack on the

institution of the indictment, the institution of the

prosecution.

The defendant has

Despite that fact, it is also clear that the

Magistrate Judge here consistently has treated this

selective prosecution claim as a defense on the merits that

can be raised and considered at trial.

status call, where the trial court said that, "The objection

From the August 25th

10

will be reserved.

11

the government counsel when she objected under Rule

12

12(B)3(a).

13

I will hear it when I try the case" to

To the start of the trial on August 29th, when the

14

government asked the Court to rule on the motion in limine,

15

and the Court said it didn't need to because the defendant's

16

"defenses," were not relevant "until you prove him guilty."

17

To the October 31st session, when the government

18

specifically asked for a clarification, "Are you, Your

19

Honor, going to allow the defendant to pursue the selection

20

prosecution claim as a theory of the defense?" and the

21

Magistrate Judge specifically said, "Yes.

22

The defendant has so testified."

23

It already has.

It's apparent that the Magistrate Judge was

24

treating this as a defense on the merits, and that was

25

clearly erroneous.

5
1

The reason that we need mandamus to correct this

error, the reason there's no other adequate remedy, is that

if the Magistrate Judge were to go ahead and terminate the

proceedings on the basis of a selective prosecution claim

before a verdict, without Mr. Choi's consent, either through

a judgment of acquittal or as a dismissal, the due

process -- the double jeopardy clause would bar any appeal

by the government, as Scott itself held, "Whether the judge,

acting without the defendant's consent, aborts the

10

proceeding, the defendant has been deprived of his valued

11

right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal."

12

We believe all indications are here that Mr. Choi

13

would not consent to a determination of the proceeding

14

pre-verdict.

15

motion and not have this ruled on as a dismissal.

16

Court were to do that, it would do it over objection, and we

17

would, in fact, lose our right to appeal.

18

need mandamus, Your Honor.

19

His intention all along has been to not file a

THE COURT:

Okay.

So if the

That's why we

Do you want to address first

20

the question the respondent raises then, of whether I have

21

jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus?

22

MR. STRAND:

23

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

Have you got any reported case where

24

is District Court Judge has issued a writ of mandamus

25

against a Magistrate Judge?

6
1
2

MR. STRAND:

I don't believe we've cited one, Your

Honor, but we believe that it's --

THE COURT:

Why would that be?

That would not

seem to be this unusual in the course of events, so why do

you think that would be?

other side either that you've found or you would have

disclosed it?

I take it there's no case on the

MR. STRAND:

THE COURT:

10

MR. STRAND:

11

THE COURT:

12

MR. STRAND:

Exactly.

13

THE COURT:

All right.

14

MR. STRAND:

15

Circuit called In re:

16

within the appellate jurisdiction of the higher court, which

17

is Your Honor, a writ of mandamus --

18
19

THE COURT:

No, no.

Correct, Your Honor.

So there's no case either way -No, exactly.

-- directly on point?

But there is a case from the D.C.

Tenant, which says, "Where a case is

That's assuming then that a magistrate

is a lower court.

20

MR. STRAND:

And the statute supports that, Your

21

Honor.

We cited at great length in our reply brief, the

22

appellate jurisdiction under the local -- under Federal

23

Criminal Rule Procedure 58(G)2(b), appeals from a magistrate

24

order are to the District Judge.

25

lower -- the Magistrate Judge is necessarily a lower court

So is necessarily the

7
1

if the appeal is the District Court, and there are a number

of other reasons, statutory, but I think it's pretty clear

that Your Honor is a superior court, and in aid of your

jurisdiction, the All Writs Act makes it clear that you can

issue mandamus in aid of your appellate jurisdiction.

THE COURT:

Well, I don't think it makes it clear

because if there's no reported case ever that anybody has

cited, I wouldn't say it's crystal clear to me.

MR. STRAND:

Okay.

Let me -- I didn't say

10

"crystal clear," but I take Your Honor's point.

11

that it is implicit from the plain language of the statute,

12

Your Honor, and from the structure of the District Court and

13

the Magistrate Judge court.

14

THE COURT:

We believe

Now, let me ask you if you would

15

address, and I don't -- I think this was cited for something

16

else in one of the briefs, but if you look at In re:

17

Cheney, the en banc opinion, which is at 406 F3. 723, at

18

page 729, this is the language the en banc Court of Appeals

19

says in our circuit.

20

Civil Procedure long ago abolished the writ of mandamus in

21

the District Courts, although not in the Appellate Courts.

22

But the rule permitted relief heretofore available by

23

mandamus to be obtained by actions brought in compliance

24

with the rules."

25

"Rule 81(B) of the Federal Rules of

How does that -- I mean, that quote is troubling

8
1

to me about what that actually means, as to whether it was

"heretofore available," which is what I would have to do to

meet that test.

MR. STRAND:

We don't believe that the civil rule,

Rule 81 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, applies to

the criminal context, Your Honor.

7
8

THE COURT:

a writ for a mandamus in a criminal case, you would say?

MR. STRAND:

10

THE COURT:

11
12

So that doesn't apply to a criminal --

Yes.

Correct, Your Honor.

And there is no analogue in the

criminal rules to 81(B)?

MR. STRAND:

13

alternate procedure.

14

THE COURT:

Correct.

All right.

Correct.

There is no

Now, I understand the

15

argument about if he were to -- if the Magistrate Judge were

16

to decide this is a defense, then the government is

17

precluded the opportunity to seek appellate review --

18

MR. STRAND:

19

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

-- because double jeopardy would

20

prevent it.

21

appeal of right.

22

raise double jeopardy if I reversed him on that, and then

23

you sought to complete the trial or retry him?

24
25

If he were to simply dismiss, you would have an

Your concern is that the defendant might

MR. STRAND:

If the dismissal were without the

defendant's consent, and if it were pre-verdict -- if the

9
1

dismissal were post verdict, we don't have a problem because

then there would have been a finding of guilt, and an

acquittal by the Judge could be reviewed and dismissed and

dispensed with, and the judgment of guilt simply instated.

But if it's a -- if it's a dismissal or an acquittal, a

judgment of acquittal pre-verdict, and it's done over the

defendant's objection, then whether it's an acquittal or

dismissal, we've lost our right of appeal under the Scott

case.

10

THE COURT:

Now, when the Magistrate Judge --

11

well, your argument of why -- I'll let you make it first

12

then.

13

Magistrate Judge was persisting in going forward with this?

14
15
16
17
18

Why didn't you simply take an appeal when the

MR. STRAND:

There is no interlocutory appeal that

we could have taken at this time.

THE COURT:

Because he didn't exclude evidence or

suppress evidence?
MR. STRAND:

He didn't dismiss the indictment, he

19

didn't suppress evidence, he didn't grant a new trial.

20

There are three ways under the --

21

THE COURT:

22

MR. STRAND:

23

THE COURT:

24
25

So there was no appellate possibility?

Exactly, Your Honor.
Mandamus was the only option, you

would say, would be your argument?

MR. STRAND:

Exactly.

10
1

THE COURT:

And once he ordered that discovery, or

whatever it was, there is no -- well, that would fall in the

same category.

appealable at that point?

He hadn't ordered anything that was

MR. STRAND:

THE COURT:

Exactly.

Do you agree that the circuit Court of

Appeals would have jurisdiction over this mandamus petition?

8
9

Exactly, Your Honor.

MR. STRAND:

No, Your Honor.

That's why we filed

it here.

10

THE COURT:

11

MR. STRAND:

Okay, why?
Because the circuit is not the

12

appellate body having supervisory authority over the

13

Magistrate.

14

cited a case in our reply brief that specifically refused to

15

issue a mandamus to a Magistrate Judge on --

16
17

Your Honor is the -- the District Court is.

THE COURT:

We

Because there hadn't been an appeal to

the District Judge?

18

MR. STRAND:

Exactly, Your Honor.

19

THE COURT:

In that circumstance.

Here, where

20

there could be no appeal to the District Judge, though, why

21

would not mandamus lie in this circuit rather than in the

22

District Court?

23

MR. STRAND:

I'm not sure, Your Honor.

24

thought that part through.

25

up again later.

I haven't

Maybe I will by the time I stand

11
1

THE COURT:

Okay.

In terms of filing the

petition, and I take it since your name is not on it you

didn't do it, but --

MR. STRAND:

THE COURT:

Correct, Your Honor.

-- if you know, why is the petition

filed in the magistrate number, and why is it "U.S. v. Choi"

instead of "U.S. v. Facciola"?

I'm not sure I understand

the actual way this got here.

Wouldn't it have been a -- a

mandamus petition would ordinarily have a separate docket

10

number and have been filed naming the person to whom the

11

writ is going to issue, wouldn't it?

12

MR. STRAND:

I wasn't involved in that decision,

13

Your Honor, so I don't -- I don't know the reasoning that

14

went into that decision, but I can find out and respond.

15

THE COURT:

All right.

I guess there's -- well, I

16

guess that's all I have to ask right now.

17

other merits question I want to ask you, but I'll hear from

18

the respondent first.

19

MR. STRAND:

20

THE COURT:

21

MR. STRAND:

22

THE COURT:

23

Mr. Feldman.

24

MR. FELDMAN:

25

There may be one

Thank you, Your Honor.

Anything else you want to add?
No, Your Honor.
All right.

Good morning, Your Honor.

May it

please the Court, may it please Ms. George, the government,

12
1

Your Honor.

The bigger picture of this case is there were

three civil disobedience protests.

One was in March, one

was in April, one was in November.

In March it was

successful.

were only two people involved, Captain James, Peter Angelo,

and Lieutenant Dan Choi.

Everybody got their post and forfeit.

May I refer to them in their ranks?

THE COURT:

Sure.

10

MR. FELDMAN:

11

THE COURT:

12

service?

13
14

16

The second one was --

Are they out now?

I mean, out of the

That was not intended as a pun.

MR. FELDMAN:

Let's say that.

15

There

Sort of.

That's dictum, Judge.

Thank you, Judge.

The second one was a little bit bigger, and it was

also successful.

17

There was post and forfeit.

The third one was really big, and what happened --

18

and it's all on the record -- on November 12th some fairly

19

high level, senior, White House officials got good word that

20

"get equal" was going to protest the imminent or not repeal

21

of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" statute.

22

a lame duck session, and they refer to -- their e-mails

23

referred to that, Judge.

24

record.

25

Remember, there was

I don't need to clutter the

So the big news is out.

This was November 12th.

13
1

So they were watching my client and his friends three days

before.

that they were.

legal or not, but I certainly call it dirty hands.

hands, Judge.

I don't know how.

I can't prove it.

That's documented.

All I know is

I don't know if that's

Filthy

The Obama -- President Obama's White House then

decided on November 15th, at approximately three hours

before the unsuccessful -- and I call it unsuccessful

because we're ending up in a Federal Court on a parking

10

ticket, Judge.

11

they arrested them, and Solicitor Assistant General Randy

12

Meyers wrote a very good legal opinion on how to twist the

13

law to make 28 C.F.R., you know, applicable rather than a

14

much more petty offense in local Superior Court on the other

15

side of the park, Judge.

16

They knew it, and they spied on them, and

One of the great officers in this case, the unsung

17

hero in this case is -- and I don't remember his rank.

18

apologize -- is Stoutameyer (ph. sp.) who has been on the

19

force for 22 years.

20

He said he never saw this.

Another great unsung hero is Lechants (ph. sp.).

21

He admitted that, when I was wrestling with him about the

22

vagueness of the sidewalk versus the masonry of the White

23

House, that I had a good point, and I stopped my

24

questioning.

25

Facciola acknowledge that I was right.

He acknowledge that I was right, and Judge

14
1

And then the key point, the pentacle of this

three-day trial, which is still going on, God willing, was

when Lieutenant Choi testified, and Captain Peter Angelo

testified, and it convinced Judge Facciola, I submit, not

only -- I'm editorializing here -- not only prima facie, but

beyond any doubt that the government had filthy hands, and

that he, in the interest of justice, in the interesting of

preserving the checks and balances, in the interest of

having the judicial department, the Judicial Branch check

10

out what the Executive Branch is doing, he wanted to

11

continue the trial because he's a good judge.

12

Therefore, we move that the government's mandamus

13

be denied in all respect, and the trial continue at the

14

Court's pleasure.

15
16
17

THE COURT:

Why didn't you file that motion before

the trial began?

MR. FELDMAN:

I came on the case on August 25th,

18

2011, Judge.

That was my first appearance.

It was on the

19

phone, and I was with Ms. George on the phone.

20

Fire island, and I suppose Ms. George was in Judge

21

Facciola's chambers -- courtroom in this building, and it's

22

very clear that I indicated that it was my belief that the

23

government was selectively or vindictively, or Bermuda

24

onions, whatever, to my client.

25

would allow us to pursue that during the trial, and since he

I was in

The Judge ruled that he

15
1

wears two hats --

THE COURT:

All right, let's stop right there.

that point, why was that not error?

Rule 12 that says you have to file that motion before the

trial begins and before jeopardy attaches?

have to do that?

MR. FELDMAN:

At

Why did he not enforce

Why didn't he

Because prior counsel, Judge, did,

in fact, I believe, waive discovery, I believe, sometime in

May.

10
11
12

I don't even know, Judge.

THE COURT:

Okay.

Then that's a problem for you

as to whether what he did is clearly erroneous, isn't it?

MR. FELDMAN:

No, I don't think so because there's

13

no jury here, Judge.

There was no jury there, okay?

14

his job to not only try the facts, try the law, judge the

15

credibility.

16

different than a jury trial, and I believe -- and I cannot

17

cite you a statute and I cannot cite you a case.

18

commonsense.

19

extend the case for a year if he wants, and that's what --

20

I'm not asking for a year in this case.

21

two or three days.

22

get to the heart of the matter as to the filthy hands of the

23

government to show why my client should get an apology and a

24

dismissal from the government.

25

THE COURT:

We're not wasting a jury's time, Judge.

It's

It's

I cite you

When you have a Judge sitting there, he can

It can be over in

I just want to continue the trial and

Is it your position that he -- do you

16
1

agree he cannot acquit on the basis of selective or

vindictive prosecution?

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

I agree with that.

You agree that would be legal error?

Yes.

Now, if he dismisses, what's your

position about their argument that jeopard is attached and

your client would have to consent --

MR. FELDMAN:

10

THE COURT:

Who's liable?

If he were to dismiss -- the

11

government just argued that unless your client consents,

12

jeopardy is attached and that would operate as an acquittal.

13

Would that be --

14

MR. FELDMAN:

483(B) refers there, Judge, and for

15

the record my client does not consent to anything other than

16

a full trial or a dismissal by the United States Attorney's

17

Office with an apology in open court on the record.

18
19
20

THE COURT:
sure.

Hold your breath for an apology, I'm

I've never seen that in a case yet.

Let me ask you if you're familiar with a case that

21

I found in my research, and that is by a very respected

22

Judge in Massachusetts.

23

Express Company, Incorporated.

24

U.S. District Lexis 2927, and so you can look it up and

25

decide if you want to file something supplemental.

The caption is In re: Calore

The citation I have is 1998

17
1

presume you don't know about it.

side here, but Judge Sterns finds that a Bankruptcy Judge is

an Article I Judge, very similar in kind to a Magistrate

Judge, and Judge Sterns finds that there is authority to

issue a writ of mandamus against a Bankruptcy Judge because

the Bankruptcy Judge is acting as an inferior court because

appeals are taken to the District Judge.

remarkably similar to this.

9
10

MR. FELDMAN:
THE COURT:

It was not cited by either

It sounds

It sure does.

So unless his opinion is wrong, it

11

sounds to me like it's a pretty good precedent since neither

12

side has found the case, I take it.

13
14
15

MR. FELDMAN:
analogous.

Thank you, Judge.

It's very

It's your discretion.

THE COURT:

I don't really -- I am a little

16

surprised at this stage of our history that there is not

17

clear cut law on the question of whether I can mandamus a

18

Magistrate Judge, but --

19

MR. FELDMAN:

20

THE COURT:

Hard cases make good law, Judge.

Okay.

What is your response to his

21

argument that Rule 81(B) is a civil rule and it doesn't

22

apply at all to this criminal case?

23

MR. FELDMAN:

24

THE COURT:

25

I agree.

You agree, okay.

And your position is

it's the government has the petitioner's burden to establish

18
1

that I have jurisdiction?

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

9
10
11
12
13
14

but I'm here, Judge.

I consent to your jurisdiction.

Okay.
My client consents to your --

By a mandamus?
No.

You didn't do that in your papers.

No.

I don't consent by mandamus,

I'm not going to be rude and say you

don't have jurisdiction.

THE COURT:

Well, I don't consider that rude, it's

a legal argument.
MR. FELDMAN:

I know, sir.

Please rely on my

brief for that.

15

THE COURT:

Okay.

16

MR. FELDMAN:

17

THE COURT:

18

talk to your client.

All right.

Thank you, Judge.

I'll give you a minute if you want to

19

MR. FELDMAN:

20

THE COURT:

21

Would the D.C. Circuit have jurisdiction over this

22

Thank you, Judge.

Sure.

Sure.

mandamus petition?

23

MR. FELDMAN:

24

THE COURT:

25

MR. FELDMAN:

Sure.

You agree?
Sure.

19
1

THE COURT:

Okay.

MR. FELDMAN:

Judge, we would consent to

jurisdiction to Your Honor, to Judge Facciola, and goodness

forbid -- I won't -- I won't complete the sentence.

trust the Judges in this building.

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

THE COURT:

MR. FELDMAN:

10

THE COURT:

11

MR. STRAND:

We

Okay.
For the most part.

Okay.

Thank you, Mr. Feldman.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Anything else, Mr. Strand?

Unless Your Honor has specific

12

questions for me, I don't plan to respond to some of the

13

spurious comments.

14
15

THE COURT:

All right.

submitted, and I will rule as promptly as I can.

16

MR. FELDMAN:

17

MR. STRAND:

18

THE COURT:

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

I'll consider the appeal

Thank you very much, Your Honor.

Thank you, Your Honor.

Thank you, counsel.

(Whereupon, the proceedings in the above-entitled

matter were adjourned at 10:36 a.m.)

20
1
2

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
I certify that the foregoing is a

correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the

above-entitled matter.

5
6

___________________________________

Theresa M. Sorensen, CVR-CM

Official Court Reporter

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

21

763-1900 [1] 2/5

7943 [1] 1/16

-x [1] 1/8

0
0745 [1] 2/9

1
10-739 [2] 1/3 3/2
10005 [1] 1/22
10:11 [1] 1/6
10:36 [1] 19/20
110 [1] 2/3
12 [2] 4/12 15/4
12th [2] 12/18 12/25
14 [1] 1/21
15th [1] 13/7
1900 [1] 2/5
1970 [1] 2/4
1998 [1] 16/23

2
20 [1] 1/25
20001 [1] 2/9
2011 [2] 1/5 14/18
202 [5] 1/16 1/17 1/18 1/18 2/9
20530 [1] 1/16
20th [1] 1/22
212 [1] 1/23
22 [1] 13/19
252-6720 [1] 1/18
252-6754 [1] 1/18
252-7943 [1] 1/16
25th [2] 4/8 14/17
273-0745 [1] 2/9
28 [1] 13/13
2927 [1] 16/24
29th [1] 4/13

3
31st [1] 4/17
333 [1] 2/8
33301 [1] 2/4

4
406 [1] 7/17
4444 [1] 1/15
4808-B [1] 2/8
483 [1] 16/14
4th [1] 1/15

5
514-6010 [1] 1/17
5177 [1] 1/23
555 [1] 1/15
58 [1] 6/23

6
6010 [1] 1/17
657-5177 [1] 1/23
6720 [1] 1/18
6754 [1] 1/18
6th [1] 2/3

7
723 [1] 7/17
729 [1] 7/18
739 [2] 1/3 3/2

81 [4] 7/19 8/5 8/11 17/21

9
954 [1] 2/5

A
a.m [2] 1/6 19/20
abolished [1] 7/20
aborts [1] 5/9
about [5] 8/1 8/15 13/21 16/7 17/1
above [2] 19/19 20/4
above-entitled [2] 19/19 20/4
acknowledge [2] 13/24 13/25
acknowledged [2] 3/24 4/2
acquit [1] 16/1
acquittal [6] 5/6 9/3 9/5 9/6 9/7 16/12
Act [1] 7/4
acting [2] 5/9 17/6
actions [1] 7/23
actual [1] 11/8
actually [1] 8/1
add [1] 11/20
address [2] 5/19 7/15
adequate [1] 5/2
adjourned [1] 19/20
admitted [1] 13/21
adverse [1] 3/23
again [1] 10/25
against [3] 3/21 5/25 17/5
ago [1] 7/20
agree [7] 10/6 16/1 16/3 16/4 17/23 17/24
18/24
ahead [1] 5/3
aid [2] 7/3 7/5
all [16] 3/12 5/12 5/14 6/13 7/4 8/14 11/15
11/16 11/22 12/18 13/2 14/13 15/2 17/22
18/15 19/14
allow [2] 4/19 14/25
along [1] 5/14
already [1] 4/21
also [2] 4/5 12/16
alternate [1] 8/13
although [1] 7/21
am [1] 17/15
America [1] 3/3
analogous [1] 17/14
analogue [1] 8/10
ANGELA [1] 1/13
angela.george [1] 1/17
Angelo [2] 12/6 14/3
Another [1] 13/20
any [4] 3/23 5/7 5/23 14/6
anybody [1] 7/7
anything [4] 10/3 11/20 16/15 19/10
aol.com [1] 1/23
apologize [1] 13/18
apology [3] 15/23 16/17 16/18
apparent [1] 4/23
appeal [11] 3/23 5/7 5/17 7/1 8/21 9/8 9/12
9/14 10/16 10/20 19/14
appealable [1] 10/4
appeals [4] 6/23 7/18 10/7 17/7
appearance [1] 14/18
APPEARANCES [2] 1/12 2/1

appellate [7] 6/16 6/22 7/5 7/21 8/17 9/21

10/12
applicable [1] 13/13
applies [1] 8/5
apply [2] 8/7 17/22
approximately [1] 13/7
April [1] 12/4
are [7] 4/18 5/12 6/24 7/1 9/20 12/11 17/7
argued [1] 16/11
argument [7] 1/9 8/15 9/11 9/24 16/7 17/21
18/12
arrested [1] 13/11
Article [1] 17/3
as [17] 3/17 3/17 4/1 4/7 4/20 4/24 5/6 5/8
5/15 8/1 12/12 15/11 15/22 16/12 17/6 19/15
19/15
ask [5] 7/14 11/16 11/17 12/21 16/20
asked [2] 4/14 4/18
asking [1] 15/20
ASSISTANT [2] 1/14 13/11
assuming [1] 6/18
attached [2] 16/7 16/12
attaches [1] 15/5
attack [1] 4/2
ATTORNEY'S [2] 1/14 16/16
ATTORNEYS [1] 1/14
August [3] 4/8 4/13 14/17
August 25th [1] 4/8
August 29th [1] 4/13
authority [2] 10/12 17/4
available [2] 7/22 8/2
Avenue [1] 2/8

B
balances [1] 14/8
banc [2] 7/17 7/18
Bankruptcy [3] 17/2 17/5 17/6
bar [1] 5/7
barred [1] 3/22
baseless [1] 3/21
basis [2] 5/4 16/1
be [17] 3/20 3/23 4/8 4/10 6/3 6/4 6/5 7/23
9/3 9/24 10/20 11/16 14/13 15/20 16/4 16/13
18/9
because [13] 4/15 7/7 8/19 9/1 9/16 10/11
10/16 13/9 14/11 15/7 15/12 17/5 17/6
been [7] 5/10 5/14 9/2 10/16 11/8 11/10
13/18
before [7] 1/10 5/5 13/2 13/8 14/15 15/4 15/5
began [1] 14/16
begins [1] 15/5
behalf [1] 3/14
belief [1] 14/22
believe [8] 5/12 6/1 6/2 7/10 8/4 15/8 15/8
15/16
Bermuda [1] 14/23
beyond [1] 14/6
big [2] 12/17 12/25
bigger [2] 12/2 12/15
bit [1] 12/15
body [1] 10/12
Branch [2] 14/9 14/10
breath [1] 16/18
brief [3] 6/21 10/14 18/14
briefs [1] 7/16
brought [1] 7/23
building [2] 14/21 19/5
burden [1] 17/25

22

C
C.F.R [1] 13/13
call [3] 4/9 13/4 13/8
called [1] 6/15
Calore [1] 16/22
came [1] 14/17
can [8] 4/8 7/4 11/14 15/18 15/20 16/24
17/17 19/15
can't [1] 13/2
cannot [3] 15/16 15/17 16/1
Captain [2] 12/6 14/3
caption [1] 16/22
case [22]
cases [1] 17/19
category [1] 10/3
certainly [1] 13/4
CERTIFICATE [1] 20/1
certify [1] 20/2
chambers [1] 14/21
check [1] 14/9
checks [1] 14/8
Cheney [1] 7/17
CHIEF [1] 1/10
CHOI [6] 1/6 3/3 5/12 11/6 12/7 14/3
Choi's [1] 5/5
circuit [6] 6/15 7/19 10/6 10/11 10/21 18/21
circumstance [1] 10/19
citation [1] 16/23
cite [3] 15/17 15/17 15/17
cited [6] 6/1 6/21 7/8 7/15 10/14 17/1
civil [5] 7/20 8/4 8/5 12/3 17/21
claim [6] 3/17 3/22 3/23 4/7 4/20 5/4
clarification [1] 4/18
clause [1] 5/7
clear [9] 3/15 4/5 7/2 7/4 7/6 7/8 7/10 14/22
17/17
clearly [2] 4/25 15/11
client [8] 13/1 14/24 15/23 16/8 16/11 16/15
18/4 18/18
clutter [1] 12/23
CM [2] 2/7 20/7
COLUMBIA [1] 1/1
comments [1] 19/13
committed [1] 3/15
commonsense [1] 15/18
Company [1] 16/23
complete [2] 8/23 19/4
completed [1] 5/11
compliance [1] 7/23
concern [1] 8/21
consent [9] 5/5 5/9 5/13 8/25 16/8 16/15 18/2
18/8 19/2
consents [2] 16/11 18/4
consider [2] 18/11 19/14
considered [1] 4/8
consistently [1] 4/6
Constitutional [1] 2/8
context [1] 8/6
continue [3] 14/11 14/13 15/21
Continued [1] 2/1
convinced [1] 14/4
CORMICAN [1] 2/3
correct [7] 5/1 6/8 8/9 8/12 8/12 11/4 20/3
corrected [1] 3/20
could [3] 9/3 9/15 10/20
counsel [3] 4/11 15/7 19/18
course [1] 6/4

court [26]
Court's [2] 3/8 14/14
courtroom [1] 14/21
Courts [2] 7/21 7/21
credibility [1] 15/15
criminal [6] 6/23 8/6 8/7 8/8 8/11 17/22
crystal [2] 7/8 7/10
cut [1] 17/17
CVR [2] 2/7 20/7
CVR-CM [2] 2/7 20/7

e-mails [1] 12/22

editorializing [1] 14/5
either [4] 5/5 6/6 6/9 17/1
ELLIOTT [1] 2/2
else [3] 7/16 11/20 19/10
en [2] 7/17 7/18
ending [1] 13/9
enforce [1] 15/3
entitled [2] 19/19 20/4
D
equal [1] 12/20
D.C [5] 1/5 1/16 2/9 6/14 18/21
erred [1] 3/25
Dan [1] 12/7
erroneous [2] 4/25 15/11
DANIEL [2] 1/6 3/3
error [5] 3/16 3/19 5/2 15/3 16/4
day [1] 14/2
ESQUIARE [1] 1/13
days [2] 13/1 15/21
ESQUIRE [3] 1/13 1/20 2/2
decide [2] 8/16 16/25
establish [1] 17/25
decided [1] 13/7
even [1] 15/9
decision [2] 11/12 11/14
events [1] 6/4
deem [1] 3/19
ever [1] 7/7
defendant [9] 1/7 1/20 2/2 3/24 4/1 4/19 4/22 Everybody [1] 12/5
5/10 8/21
evidence [3] 9/16 9/17 9/19
defendant's [4] 4/15 5/9 8/25 9/7
exactly [7] 6/10 6/12 9/22 9/25 10/5 10/5
defending [1] 3/21
10/18
defense [8] 3/5 3/17 4/1 4/1 4/7 4/20 4/24
exclude [1] 9/16
8/16
Executive [1] 14/10
defenses [1] 4/16
Express [1] 16/23
denied [1] 14/13
extend [1] 15/19
department [1] 14/9
F
deprived [1] 5/10
F3 [1] 7/17
Despite [1] 4/5
Facciola [4] 11/7 13/25 14/4 19/3
determination [1] 5/13
Facciola's [1] 14/21
devote [1] 3/20
facie [1] 14/5
dictum [1] 12/13
fact [4] 4/2 4/5 5/17 15/8
did [3] 15/3 15/7 15/11
didn't [11] 4/15 7/9 9/12 9/16 9/18 9/19 9/19 facts [1] 15/14
fairly [1] 12/18
11/3 14/15 15/5 18/7
fall [1] 10/2
different [1] 15/16
familiar [1] 16/20
directly [1] 6/11
fax [2] 1/17 1/18
dirty [1] 13/4
Federal [4] 6/22 7/19 8/5 13/9
disclosed [1] 6/7
FELDMAN [5] 1/20 1/21 3/4 11/23 19/8
discovery [2] 10/1 15/8
file [4] 5/14 14/15 15/4 16/25
discretion [1] 17/14
filed [3] 10/8 11/6 11/10
dismiss [3] 8/20 9/18 16/10
filing [1] 11/1
dismissal [9] 3/18 5/6 5/15 8/24 9/1 9/5 9/8
filthy [3] 13/4 14/6 15/22
15/24 16/16
find [1] 11/14
dismissed [1] 9/3
finding [1] 9/2
dismisses [1] 16/6
finds [2] 17/2 17/4
disobedience [1] 12/3
Fire [1] 14/20
dispensed [1] 9/4
first [4] 5/19 9/11 11/18 14/18
DISTRICT [14] 1/1 1/1 1/10 5/24 6/24 7/1
FL [1] 2/4
7/12 7/21 10/13 10/17 10/20 10/22 16/24
Floor [1] 1/22
17/7
do [10] 5/16 5/16 5/19 6/4 8/2 10/6 11/3 15/6 forbid [1] 19/4
force [1] 13/19
15/25 18/7
forced [1] 3/20
docket [1] 11/9
foregoing [1] 20/2
documented [1] 13/3
forfeit [2] 12/5 12/16
does [3] 7/25 16/15 17/9
Fort [1] 2/4
doesn't [2] 8/7 17/21
forward [1] 9/13
doing [1] 14/10
found [3] 6/6 16/21 17/12
don't [21]
Friday [1] 1/5
done [1] 9/6
friends [1] 13/1
double [3] 5/7 8/19 8/22
full [1] 16/16
doubt [1] 14/6
duck [1] 12/22
G
due [1] 5/6
General [1] 13/11
during [1] 14/25

23
indictment [2] 4/3 9/18
G
indisputable [1] 3/16
GEORGE [5] 1/13 3/3 11/25 14/19 14/20
inferior [1] 17/6
get [3] 12/20 15/22 15/23
instated [1] 9/4
give [1] 18/17
instead [1] 11/7
go [1] 5/3
institution [2] 4/3 4/3
God [1] 14/2
intended [1] 12/12
going [6] 4/19 9/13 11/11 12/20 14/2 18/9
intention [1] 5/14
good [9] 3/6 3/7 11/24 12/19 13/12 13/23
interest [2] 14/7 14/8
14/11 17/11 17/19
interesting [1] 14/7
goodness [1] 19/3
interlocutory [1] 9/14
got [4] 5/23 11/8 12/5 12/19
involved [2] 11/12 12/6
government [17] 1/4 1/13 3/4 3/14 3/20 4/11 is [56]
4/14 4/17 5/8 8/16 11/25 14/6 14/23 15/23
island [1] 14/20
15/24 16/11 17/25
isn't [1] 15/11
government's [3] 3/18 3/22 14/12
issue [5] 5/21 7/5 10/15 11/11 17/5
grant [1] 9/19
issued [1] 5/24
great [3] 6/21 13/16 13/20
it [48]
grounds [1] 3/17
it's [17] 4/23 6/2 7/2 7/8 9/5 9/5 9/6 9/7 12/18
guess [2] 11/15 11/16
14/21 15/13 15/15 17/11 17/13 17/14 17/25
guilt [2] 9/2 9/4
18/11
guilty [1] 4/16
itself [1] 5/8

had [2] 13/23 14/6

hadn't [2] 10/3 10/16
hands [4] 13/4 13/5 14/6 15/22
happened [1] 12/17
Hard [1] 17/19
has [13] 3/24 4/1 4/6 4/21 4/22 5/10 5/14
5/24 7/7 13/18 17/12 17/25 19/11
hats [1] 15/1
have [24]
haven't [1] 10/23
having [2] 10/12 14/9
he [25]
he's [1] 14/11
hear [2] 4/10 11/17
heart [1] 15/22
held [1] 5/8
here [9] 4/6 5/12 10/9 10/19 11/8 14/5 15/13
17/2 18/9
heretofore [2] 7/22 8/2
hero [2] 13/17 13/20
high [1] 12/19
higher [1] 6/16
him [4] 4/16 8/22 8/23 13/21
his [9] 3/24 5/10 5/11 5/14 13/1 13/17 15/14
17/10 17/20
history [1] 17/16
Hold [1] 16/18
Honor [32]
Honor's [1] 7/10
HONORABLE [1] 1/10
hours [1] 13/7
House [3] 12/19 13/6 13/23
how [3] 7/25 13/2 13/12

James [1] 12/6

jeopard [1] 16/7
jeopardized [1] 3/23
jeopardy [5] 5/7 8/19 8/22 15/5 16/12
job [1] 15/14
judge [57]
Judges [1] 19/5
judgment [3] 5/6 9/4 9/6
judicial [2] 14/9 14/9
jurisdiction [11] 5/21 6/16 6/22 7/4 7/5 10/7
18/1 18/2 18/10 18/21 19/3
jury [3] 15/13 15/13 15/16
jury's [1] 15/15
just [2] 15/21 16/11
justice [1] 14/7

I
I'll [4] 9/11 11/17 18/17 19/14
I'm [7] 10/23 11/7 14/5 15/20 16/18 18/9
18/9
I've [1] 16/19
imminent [1] 12/20
implicit [1] 7/11
Incorporated [1] 16/23
indicated [1] 14/22
indications [1] 5/12

K
KENT [3] 2/2 2/3 3/4
key [1] 14/1
kind [1] 17/3
knew [1] 13/10
know [9] 11/5 11/13 13/2 13/2 13/3 13/13
15/9 17/1 18/13

L
LAMBERTH [1] 1/10
lame [1] 12/22
language [2] 7/11 7/18
later [1] 10/25
Lauderdale [1] 2/4
law [4] 13/13 15/14 17/17 17/19
Lechants [1] 13/20
legal [4] 13/4 13/12 16/4 18/12
length [1] 6/21
let [4] 7/9 7/14 9/11 16/20
let's [2] 12/14 15/2
level [1] 12/19
Lexis [1] 16/24
liable [1] 16/9
lie [1] 10/21
Lieutenant [2] 12/7 14/3
like [1] 17/11
limine [2] 3/19 4/14
little [2] 12/15 17/15

local [2] 6/22 13/14

long [1] 7/20
look [2] 7/16 16/24
lose [1] 5/17
lost [1] 9/8
lower [3] 6/19 6/25 6/25

M
magistrate [19] 3/2 3/15 4/6 4/21 4/23 5/3
5/25 6/18 6/23 6/25 7/13 8/15 9/10 9/13
10/13 10/15 11/6 17/3 17/18
mails [1] 12/22
make [3] 9/11 13/13 17/19
makes [2] 7/4 7/6
mandamus [20] 5/1 5/18 5/21 5/24 6/17 7/5
7/20 7/23 8/8 9/23 10/7 10/15 10/21 11/9
14/12 17/5 17/17 18/5 18/8 18/22
March [2] 12/3 12/4
masonry [1] 13/22
Massachusetts [1] 16/22
matter [3] 15/22 19/20 20/4
may [7] 3/8 3/13 11/16 11/24 11/25 12/8 15/9
Maybe [1] 10/24
me [7] 7/8 7/9 7/14 8/1 16/20 17/11 19/12
mean [2] 7/25 12/11
means [1] 8/1
meet [1] 8/3
merits [5] 3/17 4/1 4/7 4/24 11/17
Meyers [1] 13/12
might [1] 8/21
minute [1] 18/17
MJ [1] 1/3
more [1] 13/14
morning [3] 3/6 3/7 11/24
most [1] 19/7
motion [6] 3/18 3/25 4/14 5/15 14/15 15/4
move [1] 14/12
Mr [6] 3/4 3/4 3/4 11/23 19/8 19/10
Mr. [2] 5/5 5/12
Mr. Choi [1] 5/12
Mr. Choi's [1] 5/5
Ms [4] 3/3 11/25 14/19 14/20
much [3] 3/11 13/14 19/16
my [11] 3/9 13/1 13/23 14/18 14/22 14/24
15/23 16/15 16/21 18/4 18/13

N
N.W [2] 1/15 2/8
name [1] 11/2
naming [1] 11/10
necessarily [2] 6/24 6/25
need [4] 4/15 5/1 5/18 12/23
neither [1] 17/11
never [2] 13/19 16/19
new [2] 1/22 9/19
news [1] 12/25
no [20] 5/2 6/5 6/8 6/8 6/9 6/10 7/7 8/10 8/12
9/14 9/21 10/2 10/8 10/20 11/21 15/12 15/13
15/13 18/6 18/8
norm [1] 2/5
NORMAN [1] 2/2
normkent.com [1] 2/5
not [26]
November [4] 12/4 12/18 12/25 13/7
now [6] 7/14 8/14 9/10 11/16 12/11 16/6
number [3] 7/1 11/6 11/10
NY [1] 1/22

24
precedent [1] 17/11
O
precluded [1] 8/17
Obama's [1] 13/6
preserving [1] 14/8
objected [1] 4/11
President [1] 13/6
objection [3] 4/9 5/16 9/7
presume [1] 17/1
obtained [1] 7/23
pretty [2] 7/2 17/11
October [2] 1/5 4/17
prevent [1] 8/20
October 31st [1] 4/17
prima [1] 14/5
offense [1] 13/14
prior [1] 15/7
OFFICE [2] 1/14 16/17
problem [2] 9/1 15/10
officers [1] 13/16
procedurally [1] 3/22
Official [2] 2/7 20/8
procedure [4] 6/23 7/20 8/5 8/13
officials [1] 12/19
proceeding [2] 5/10 5/13
okay [13] 5/19 7/9 10/10 11/1 15/10 15/13
proceedings [3] 5/4 19/19 20/3
17/20 17/24 18/3 18/15 19/1 19/6 19/8
process [1] 5/7
once [1] 10/1
promptly [1] 19/15
one [10] 6/1 7/16 11/16 12/3 12/3 12/4 12/10 prosecution [6] 3/16 4/4 4/7 4/20 5/4 16/2
12/15 12/17 13/16
protest [1] 12/20
onions [1] 14/24
protests [1] 12/3
only [5] 9/23 12/6 14/5 14/5 15/14
prove [2] 4/16 13/2
open [1] 16/17
pun [1] 12/12
operate [1] 16/12
pursue [2] 4/19 14/25
opinion [3] 7/17 13/12 17/10
Q
opportunity [1] 8/17
question [3] 5/20 11/17 17/17
option [1] 9/23
questioning [1] 13/24
ORAL [1] 1/9
questions [1] 19/12
order [1] 6/24
quote [1] 7/25
ordered [2] 10/1 10/3
ordinarily [1] 11/9
R
other [6] 5/2 6/6 7/2 11/17 13/14 16/15
raise [1] 8/22
our [6] 5/17 6/21 7/19 9/8 10/14 17/16
raised [1] 4/8
out [5] 11/14 12/11 12/11 12/25 14/10
raises [1] 5/20
over [6] 5/16 9/6 10/7 10/12 15/20 18/21
Randy [1] 13/11
P
rank [1] 13/17
PA [1] 2/3
ranks [1] 12/8
page [1] 7/18
rather [3] 3/17 10/21 13/13
Pages [1] 1/25
re [3] 6/15 7/16 16/22
papers [1] 18/7
really [2] 12/17 17/15
paralegal [1] 3/9
reason [2] 5/1 5/2
park [1] 13/15
reasoning [1] 11/13
parking [1] 13/9
reasons [1] 7/2
part [2] 10/24 19/7
record [5] 12/18 12/24 16/15 16/17 20/3
particular [1] 5/11
refer [2] 12/8 12/22
pentacle [1] 14/1
referred [1] 12/23
people [1] 12/6
refers [1] 16/14
permission [1] 3/8
refused [1] 10/14
permitted [1] 7/22
refusing [1] 3/18
persisting [1] 9/13
relevant [1] 4/16
person [1] 11/10
relief [1] 7/22
Peter [2] 12/6 14/3
rely [1] 18/13
petition [5] 10/7 11/2 11/5 11/9 18/22
remarkably [1] 17/8
petitioner's [1] 17/25
remedy [1] 5/2
petty [1] 13/14
remember [2] 12/21 13/17
ph [2] 13/18 13/20
repeal [1] 12/20
phone [2] 14/19 14/19
reply [2] 6/21 10/14
picture [1] 12/2
reported [2] 5/23 7/7
Reporter [4] 2/7 2/7 20/1 20/8
plain [1] 7/11
research [1] 16/21
plan [1] 19/12
reserved [1] 4/10
pleadings [1] 3/24
resources [1] 3/21
please [4] 3/13 11/25 11/25 18/13
respect [1] 14/13
pleasure [1] 14/14
respected [1] 16/21
point [6] 6/11 7/10 10/4 13/23 14/1 15/3
respond [2] 11/14 19/12
position [3] 15/25 16/7 17/24
respondent [2] 5/20 11/18
possibility [1] 9/21
response [1] 17/20
post [3] 9/1 12/5 12/16
retry [1] 8/23
pre [3] 5/14 8/25 9/6
reversed [1] 8/22
pre-verdict [3] 5/14 8/25 9/6

review [1] 8/17

reviewed [1] 9/3
right [17] 3/12 3/22 5/11 5/17 6/13 8/14 8/21
9/8 11/15 11/16 11/22 13/24 13/25 15/2 15/2
18/15 19/14
ROBERT [2] 1/20 1/21
robertjfeldman [1] 1/23
Room [2] 1/15 2/8
ROYCE [1] 1/10
rude [2] 18/9 18/11
rule [12] 3/18 4/11 4/14 6/23 7/19 7/22 8/4
8/5 15/4 17/21 17/21 19/15
ruled [2] 5/15 14/24
rules [4] 7/19 7/24 8/5 8/11
ruling [1] 3/23

S
said [4] 4/9 4/15 4/21 13/19
same [1] 10/3
saw [1] 13/19
say [6] 7/8 7/9 8/8 9/24 12/14 18/9
says [3] 6/15 7/19 15/4
Scott [2] 5/8 9/8
SE [1] 2/3
second [2] 12/10 12/15
seek [1] 8/17
seem [1] 6/4
seen [1] 16/19
selection [1] 4/19
selective [4] 3/16 4/7 5/4 16/1
selectively [1] 14/23
senior [1] 12/19
sentence [1] 19/4
separate [1] 11/9
service [1] 12/12
session [2] 4/17 12/22
she [1] 4/11
should [1] 15/23
show [1] 15/23
side [4] 6/6 13/15 17/2 17/12
sidewalk [1] 13/22
significant [1] 3/21
similar [2] 17/3 17/8
simply [3] 8/20 9/4 9/12
since [3] 11/2 14/25 17/11
sir [1] 18/13
sit [1] 3/9
sitting [1] 15/18
so [13] 4/22 5/15 6/4 6/9 6/24 8/7 9/21 11/13
12/25 13/1 15/12 16/24 17/10
Solicitor [1] 13/11
some [2] 12/18 19/12
something [2] 7/15 16/25
sometime [1] 15/8
SORENSEN [2] 2/7 20/7
Sort [1] 12/13
sought [1] 8/23
sounds [2] 17/7 17/11
sp [2] 13/18 13/20
specific [1] 19/11
specifically [3] 4/18 4/21 10/14
spied [1] 13/10
spurious [1] 19/13
stage [1] 17/16
stand [1] 10/24
start [1] 4/13
STATES [7] 1/1 1/3 1/10 1/14 1/14 3/3 16/16
status [1] 4/9

25

S
statute [4] 6/20 7/11 12/21 15/17
statutory [1] 7/2
Sterns [2] 17/2 17/4
still [1] 14/2
stop [1] 15/2
stopped [1] 13/23
Stoutameyer [1] 13/18
STRAND [4] 1/13 3/4 3/14 19/10
STRANTON [1] 1/13
Stratton [1] 3/13
stratton.strand [1] 1/19
Street [3] 1/15 1/21 2/3
structure [1] 7/12
submit [1] 14/4
submitted [1] 19/15
successful [2] 12/5 12/16
Suite [1] 2/4
superior [2] 7/3 13/14
supervisory [1] 10/12
supplemental [1] 16/25
supports [1] 6/20
suppose [1] 14/20
suppress [2] 9/17 9/19
sure [9] 10/23 11/7 12/9 16/19 17/9 18/20
18/20 18/23 18/25
surprised [1] 17/16

T
table [1] 3/9
take [5] 6/5 7/10 9/12 11/2 17/12
taken [2] 9/15 17/7
talk [1] 18/18
Tell [1] 12/21
Tenant [1] 6/15
terminate [1] 5/3
terms [1] 11/1
test [1] 8/3
testified [3] 4/22 14/3 14/4
than [5] 3/17 10/21 13/13 15/16 16/15
Thank [11] 3/11 11/19 12/14 17/13 18/16
18/19 19/8 19/9 19/16 19/17 19/18
that [87]
that's [9] 5/17 6/18 10/8 11/16 12/13 13/3
13/3 15/10 15/19
their [4] 12/5 12/8 12/22 16/7
them [3] 12/8 13/10 13/11
then [10] 5/20 6/18 8/16 8/22 9/2 9/7 9/12
13/6 14/1 15/10
theory [1] 4/20
there [23]
there's [6] 5/2 6/5 6/9 7/7 11/15 15/12
Therefore [1] 14/12
THERESA [2] 2/7 20/7
they [7] 12/11 12/22 13/1 13/3 13/10 13/10
13/11
think [5] 6/5 7/2 7/6 7/15 15/12
third [1] 12/17
this [30]
though [1] 10/20
thought [1] 10/24
three [6] 9/20 12/3 13/1 13/7 14/2 15/21
three-day [1] 14/2
through [3] 1/25 5/5 10/24
ticket [1] 13/10
time [3] 9/15 10/24 15/15
transcript [2] 1/9 20/3

treated [1] 4/6

treating [4] 3/16 3/25 3/25 4/24
trial [15] 4/8 4/9 4/13 5/11 8/23 9/19 14/2
14/11 14/13 14/16 14/25 15/5 15/16 15/21
16/16
tribunal [1] 5/11
troubling [1] 7/25
trust [1] 19/5
try [3] 4/10 15/14 15/14
twist [1] 13/12
two [3] 12/6 15/1 15/21

which [5] 6/15 6/16 7/17 8/2 14/2

White [3] 12/19 13/6 13/22
who [1] 13/18
Who's [1] 16/9
whom [1] 11/10
why [15] 5/17 6/3 6/4 9/11 9/12 10/8 10/10
10/20 11/5 11/6 14/15 15/3 15/3 15/5 15/23
will [6] 3/20 3/23 4/10 4/10 10/24 19/15
willing [1] 14/2
within [1] 6/16
without [3] 5/5 5/9 8/24
won't [2] 19/4 19/4
U
word [1] 12/19
U.S [3] 11/6 11/7 16/24
would [27]
under [5] 4/11 6/22 6/22 9/8 9/20
wouldn't [3] 7/8 11/8 11/11
understand [2] 8/14 11/7
wrestling [1] 13/21
UNITED [7] 1/1 1/3 1/10 1/14 1/14 3/3 16/16 writ [7] 5/21 5/24 6/17 7/20 8/8 11/11 17/5
unless [3] 16/11 17/10 19/11
Writs [1] 7/4
unsuccessful [2] 13/8 13/8
wrong [1] 17/10
unsung [2] 13/16 13/20
wrote [1] 13/12
until [1] 4/16
Y
unusual [1] 6/4
up [3] 10/25 13/9 16/24
year [2] 15/19 15/20
us [1] 14/25
years [1] 13/19
usdoj.gov [2] 1/17 1/19
Yes [6] 3/10 4/21 5/22 8/9 8/18 16/5
yet [1] 16/19
V
York [1] 1/22
vagueness [1] 13/22
you [52]
valued [1] 5/10
you're [1] 16/20
verdict [5] 5/5 5/14 8/25 9/1 9/6
you've [1] 6/6
versus [2] 3/3 13/22
your [51]
very [7] 3/11 13/12 14/22 16/21 17/3 17/13
19/16
vindictive [1] 16/2
vindictively [1] 14/23

W
waive [1] 15/8
waived [1] 3/19
Wall [1] 1/21
want [6] 5/19 11/17 11/20 15/21 16/25 18/17
wanted [1] 14/10
wants [1] 15/19
was [36]
Washington [3] 1/5 1/16 2/9
wasn't [1] 11/12
wasting [1] 15/15
watching [1] 13/1
way [2] 6/9 11/8
ways [1] 9/20
we [15] 5/1 5/12 5/16 5/17 6/2 6/21 7/10 8/4
9/1 9/15 10/8 10/13 14/12 19/2 19/4
we're [2] 13/9 15/15
we've [2] 6/1 9/8
wears [1] 15/1
well [5] 7/6 9/11 10/2 11/15 18/11
went [1] 11/14
were [15] 4/16 5/3 5/16 8/15 8/15 8/20 8/24
8/25 9/1 12/2 12/6 13/1 13/3 16/10 19/20
what [7] 8/1 8/2 12/17 14/10 15/11 15/19
17/20
what's [1] 16/6
whatever [2] 10/2 14/24
when [9] 4/10 4/11 4/13 4/17 9/10 9/12 13/21
14/3 15/18
where [4] 4/9 5/23 6/15 10/19
Whereupon [1] 19/19
whether [6] 5/8 5/20 8/1 9/7 15/11 17/17