Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Class of Functional Equation and Fractal
A Class of Functional Equation and Fractal
-JCU
14B(1999) ,90-98
w1
Introduction
~xN=l be a partition of the
interval I = [ 0 , 1 ] , I j = [-x~-i , x j ] , ) = 1,2 . . . . . N , and K = I X [a , b ] , where - - o o < a < b < -.~-c<~. Let Lj'I--,-Ij be contractive homeomorphisms satisfying :
1,0~p~
1.
(1.1)
1,2 . . . . . N ,
V y',y"E [-a,b],O~q~l.
j= 1,2 . . . . . N ,
(1.2)
Wj(x,y) = (Li(x),Fj(x,y)),
( I F S ) corresponding with the set { (x~,yj) }~.
(1.3)
Barnsley tll proved that such IFS has a unique attractor G, which is the graph of some continuous function f ( x ) . I - - ~ [ a , b ] , with f ( x j ) : - y ~ , j = O , 1 . . . . . N. T h a t is G = { ( x , a fractal interpolation func-
f(x) IxEI}.
tion (abbreviated F I F ) associated with Received : 1997-09-15. 1991 MR Subject Classification..28A80,41A05. Keywords :Functional equation, fractal interpolation, approximation. The project supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China.
No. 1
Sha Zhen
FRACTAL INTERPOLATION
FUNCTION
91
!
tional equation : L(r
Wj(x,y),j
= 1,2 . . . . . N , 0,1 . . . . . N. }.
{ ( x , , y j ) IJ
Here is the outline of this paper. In w 2 and w 3, we introduce and s t u d y a new func-
~-]~aj(o~)L(r
i=1
-4- f ( r
( i . 4)
In w 4, we will note that a kind of F I F satisfy the functional equation (~. 4 ) , and f r o m (1. 4) we construct a n o t h e r functional equations called truncated equations. mate between F I F and interpolated function. T h e i r solutions are also to a p p r o x i m a t e F I F arbitrarily. In Section 5, we will give a new a p p r o x i m a t e esti-
w2
1)}.
for o~= (il ,iz . . . . ) and ~o----(;~,~2 . . . . ) E g2, we introduce the distance function
I
Io, -
?ol =
~,,
h=l
N*
ik . . . .
we Let
will denote it by (i~ . . . . i . , 0 ) , similarly for i ~ = N - - l , k ~ n + l , a'2" denote the subset of I"2: O" = {(it . . . . . i . , 0 ) or (i~ . . . . .
i.,N--
1)ln~
1,i, E ( 0 , 1 . . . . . N - -
1)}.
r
n--1
h=l
~. N
By the ergodic t h e o r y , for almost every point x E [-0,1) (corresponding to oJ) we have
i=0
where X~ denotes the characteristic function of E and r e ( E ) denotes the Lebesgue m e a s u r e of E. T h u s a l m o s t all set {tb.,~}7~ is dense e v e r y w h e r e in l-0,1]. Let C 0 [ - 0 , 1 ] = { f E C [ - 0 , 1 ] I f ( 0 ) = f ( 1 ) = 0 } ,
It is not difficult to
-4- f(tb~.),
where L , f E C o ~ O , 1 ]
lail<oo,
92
Appl. Math. - J C U
Vol. 14,Set. B
function on [0,1-], and VECo[-O,1-]. Now we consider the following functional equations in C0[0,1-]: L(ib~) = ~-]ajL(r
i=1
+ fQb.),
f E Col0,1-].
(2.1)
(2. 2)
If
j=l
~ lajl<ooand ~ IAil<oo,then
j~l
+ ~-]Akf(~b2,~).
h~l
(2. 3)
and f ( r
For simplicity, when ~o= (i~ . . . . . i~,()) El'/" , we will denote ~,. by [i~ . . . . . i , ] , by f [ i l . . . . . i~].
1--1
Using induction, if L is a solution of equation ( 2 . 1 ) , then we will have: L[i~ . . . . . i~-] = f [ i l . . . . . ik] + Z A j f [ i i + ,
2/=1
. . . . . ik-].
(2.4)
In fact, obviously we have L [ i l ] = f[il-], L[il,iz-] = fT_il ,i2] + a~f[i2]. then Now suppose that the formula ( 2 . 4 ) is true for k ~ m , L[i~ . . . . . i . ,i=+1] =
ra
m--j
f[ia . . . . . i=+x-] + ~ a i { f [ i j + l
J =1
j* =1
j=l
f [ i l . . . . . i.+~] :?
1=1
A j f [ i ,+ ~. . . . . i=+1-].
~,Ajf[ii_,
j=l
. . . . . i . ] -j--1
A j f (~bd~) =
r,,,/z]
~ ] A, {f[ij+~ . . . . . i . ] -- f Q b d . ) } +
j--1
A J Q b d . ) ~ I~ + I , -
13.
F R A C T A L INTERPOLATION FUNCTION
93
On the other hand, it is easy to verify that the function L, defined by ( 2 . 3 ) , is really a solution of equation (2. 1). The theorem has been completely shown. Remark. Note that, in the Theorem 2. 1, two conditions ~
j=l
IAj [ < o o
are independent with respect to each other in general. Corollary 1. Corollary 2. Let a j = ( - - 1 ) J - ~ d ~, I d l < l , Let a i = - - d j, I d l < l , then equation (2. 1) has a unique solution: (2.5) (2.6) L(~b.) = f(~b.) + df(~b,.). then equation (2.1) has a unique solution: L(~b,) = f(~b,) -- df(~b,.). Given {d,}o u-a,
Now we discuss the other case in which the coefficients {a~} in (2. 1) are relative to co.
(2.7)
If d =
O~i~N--
max
Theorem 2 . 3 .
(2. 9)
d.,~f(~b,.) + f(~b.).
(2. 10)
then we have
,/o
i
(2. 11)
[ 0 ( ~ ) , i f a ~ fl, 7 = min(a,/~ , where o~(L;~) denotes the modulus of continuity of L, and f l = l o g 2 d / l o g ( 1 / N ) . Proof. Given 0 % 8 % 1 , then there is a nonnegative interger m, such that 1 / N "+1 ~ ~ ~ 1 / N ' . Setting oJ= ( i l , i 2 , . . . ) , w r= (i'm,irz . . . . ) E ~ , and i ~ = i ' , , l ~ k ~ m ,
m
form ( 2 . 8 ) , we have
L(~b,.)
l~m+l
k~m-t- 1
Appl. Math.-JCU
Vol. 14,Ser. B
2k-'d k.
Notice that 2 d = N -~ and using the similar method as showed in[-2] we can complete the proof of the theorem. Next we consider more general functional equation as follows
L(r
= ~aj(oa)f(r
j=l
+ f(r
(2.12)
Suppose that for any j , the aj(oa) is a single valued function on ~ , and aj(co)=a1(~o) for any oa=(ij . . . . . i . , D ) , ~ o = ( i 1. . . . . i . - - 1 , N - - 1 ) E ~ ' . "A1 (oJ) = al (oD, Setting (2.13)
m > 1,
We have the following theorem. Theorem 2.5. Let a i ( w ) E C ( ~ ) , V j and f 0 f f C 0 [ - 0 , 1 ] . Both series ~
/=1
la~(o~)l and
~2] ]Aj(w) [ are uniformly convergent on J~, then the equation (2. 12) has the following
)--1
(2.14)
w3
Example
~ f(r
f E C0[O,
l],d ~ O,
(3.1)
"r
'
if
a = fl
(3.3)
1 -+- 4 ~ - ] ' / / l o g ( 1 / N ) . 2
(3.4)
No. 1
Sha Zhen
95
f(x)
Simultaneously, set N = 2 and
(3. 5)
,/-g- - !
4
<d<
J-g-2
then the Box-dimension of graph of L . dimn g r a p h L = 2 - - f l ~ l , 4). In fact, for equation ( 3 . 1 ) we have A a = d , A z = 2 d
_ ,/-5~" 2 ,/-g-
3(1
z )
"' 32
+ 2
,/-r)" 1
By T h e o r e m 2 . 1 , then (1) is proved. The proof of (2) is similar to that of T h e o r e m 2 . 4 , so we omit the details. N o w we prove (3). By assumption and ( 2 ) , we have 0 < f l < l dimBgraph Note L -~ 2 -- ft. and L E L i p / 3 . Thus (3.7)
f[-i.,.
and
,i,.,13 -- f~i~.
"
"
,i,.,O~
- -
(~
- h + Z
'
L[-i,
'''" '
i=,l~ -- L~i~
'''"
--
1)q
m--I
(--
~--7~
1 ) i~+1
For a fixed v and m > v , set L,-~=i,~-,+I = . 9 9 = i , , ~=L,. By calculation, we can find a constant K , such that
IL[-i,, .
. , i ,., 1 ~ . -. L[-ii . .
, i , , 0 ~ l >~ K 9 [(1 + T' ~/-g-)d~ m, if m is large enough 9 which can cover L is larger than
K 9 2--~ 9 [-(1 3. 4'-5-)d~ m. Thus dimagraph L ~ lim l o g K 9 2~-~ 9 [-(1 3" 4 ' - 5 - ) d ] " log(1 3" ~ - 5 - ) d .... log2,~+1 ----- 1 3" log2 = 2 -- ft. Combining it with ( 3 . 7 ) , (3) is proved.
96
Appl. M a t h . - J C U
Vol. 14,Ser. B
w4 Lemma 4. 1.
If two f j ( x ) ( j = l , 2 )
Approximation of FIF
are the F I F associated with (x)), n = 1,2 . . . . . N ; j = 1,2,
(x,y) = (L.(x),d.y+q.
( { ( x , , y ~ j))li = 0,1 . . . . . N ; j =
respectively, then f l
1,2}, n = 1,2 . . . . . N ,
.~W . ( x , y )
[ { ( x , , y ( 1 ) y~Z))li = 0,1 . . . . . N } ,
respectively.
Lemma 4. 2.
Let l ( x )
t
Corollary.
I~.(x,y)
= (L.(x),d.y+a.x+b.),
,N},
n = 1,2 . . . . . N ,
{ ( x , , l ( x , ) ) [i = 0 , 1 , . . .
where a.,/~, are some suitable constants being dependent on {d.}. If f ( x ) is the F I F associated with
= (L.(x),d.y-~-q.(x)),
0,1, .... N
n---- 1,2 . . . . . N ,
},
l ( x ) and B~. are showed in Lemma 4.2. T h e n ( f - - l ) E C o [ - 0 , 1 - ] is the F I F associated with =- ( L ~ ( x ) , d . y + q . ( x ) -- a . x -- b . ) , n = 1,2 . . . . . N.
T h u s in the following we can suppose that Y o = y N = O (without loss of generality). N o w we consider the following I F S .
W.(x,y)
where
= (L.(x),F.(x,y)),n
= 1,2 . . . . , N ,
(4.1)
I
and 0 ~ , d . _ , [ < l , Assume f(x) ~,y~
l
L.(x)=
. n--1
LF.(x,y)
= d._~y -k- h ( L . ( x ) ),
~d,~<k)h(~b2,~).
Theorem 4. 1.
Let f ( x )
be 9
F I F associated with ( 4 . 1 ) .
LQb,~) ~- = ~dwu>L(r
where t$(~b~)=h(~b~) +
j=l
+ ~(r
(4.3)
1 ~d,,,(j)h ( r
No. 1
Sha Zhen
97
From equation ( 4 . 3 ) , we consider the following functional equation, called truncated equation : L~(r
T h e o r e m 4. 2.
j=l ~d.~j)L~(~b~) +
h(r
+ ~
i=1 ~1 --d~i~h(r
(4. 4)
Let f(2) be the F I F associated with (4. 1), L= be the solution of equation
i
2--d g~,[[ ~ (1 - - d ) 2
d~
" " 2+ - - - ~ "
Ilhll.
(4. 5)
The proofs of Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 are not difficult, so we omit the details.
w5 L e m m a 5. 1. [z]
A N e w A p p r o x i m a t e Estimate o f FIF
Let
f(x)
lo (1)
f(x)
be the FIF associated with ( 4 . 1 ) , where h E ~-~ti~ E (0,1 . . . . . N - 1) . (5.2)
Theorem 5.1.
Given r
Let
C0[-0,1],hELipl,
Suppose that L" is a solution of the following equation: L(r Setting = 2h(r + ~Td.(j~ LQb./.). (5.3)
e(N;n) =
then we have [r
(5.4)
-- f ( x ) [ <~ e(N;n)
w(#,
ifm~n, Ix--x"
(5.5)
where the eonstant K is independent of n. Proof. Let x E [ 0 , 1 J , then there is a x" E K ( N ; n ) I~... And let ~"
~d~j)L(r ~-]d~)h(~.).
j=l
Vol. 14,Ser. B
--f(x) r
(r
= -- r
-- r
) A- ( r
) ) A- ( r
----
I~(x)T h e T h e o r e m is p r o v e d .
f(x),
~to(~;~,)+e(N;n)
d- NK----~.
References
1 2 3 Barnsley, M.F. , Fractal functions and interpolation, Constructive Approximation, 1986,2:303~329. Sha Zhen, Holder property of fractal interpolation function, Approx. Theory Appl. , 1992,4:45~57. Sha Zhen ~. Chen Gang. , Haar expansions of a class of fractal interpolation function and their logical derivatives, Approx. Theory Appl. , 1993,4:73~88.