Fluoride: The Ultimate Cluster Flux Folder 2A

Fluoride: The Ultimate Cluster-Flux
And the Players Involved
A Compilation of Documents and Articles

Relating to Fluoride
This collection is dedicated to those who wrote the original works and
made them available on the internet. I have spent countless hours
searching for information on fluoride and it is my wish, by assembling
these works, to enable others to save time looking and make available
more time for them to ‘do’.
If you are sickened and appalled by the approved use of fluoride in

food, beverage and other consumer products then I ask that you spread
this knowledge on to others and contact your local representatives in the
hopes that one day fluoride will be more strictly regulated or, banned
altogether.
These documents are listed in roughly the order I found them. It would
be nearly impossible to group them in some kind of order since they are
all linked together – a cluster-flux of monumental proportions.
I would like to thank (or curse) Christopher Bryson whose excellent

book, The Fluoride Deception, opened my eyes to fluoride and started
me on this journey of uncovering the truth.
For more information on fluoride, I would recommend the Fluoride Action

Network (FAN) http://www.fluoridealert.org/ as a good place to start.
NOTICE
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without
permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These
materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use" non-profit educational purposes,
without permission of the copyright owner.
About Heinz College
http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/about-heinz/index.aspx
The Heinz College was founded as the School of Urban and Public Affairs in 1968. The
animating vision that lead to the founding of the school was to bring a systems analytic
approach (inspired by engineering and the mathematical social sciences) to the study of
important questions of public interest – at that time particularly questions related to U.S.
urban environments. At the time, no similar academic institution even contemplated the
possibility that engineering, operations research, or computing systems had even the
remotest relation to the conduct of policy and public management. Indeed, even more
traditional mathematically-based social science disciplines brought into the School at that
time - economics and statistics, in particular – were quite unusual in the environment of
schools of “public affairs”.
Despite the significant changes in the world since 1968, our basic approach to solving
real problems has remained incredibly durable and is the soul of who we are today. But
the contexts in which we have chosen to apply that approach have expanded remarkably.
They include the expansion of public interest domains beyond urban development and
poverty to areas like health, globalization and social innovation. We have also gone
beyond the traditional boundaries of the domain of the public interest to explore deeply
the impact of information technology on organizations, markets and societies. Finally, we
have persistently explored the ways in which we could make our educational programs
more relevant and effective in their curriculum, in their delivery models, and in their
degree of connection to external partners.
Unlike many graduate schools, we are not organized along academic departments.
Faculty collaborate in instruction and research, an operating model we believe leads to
innovation in research and a superior educational experience. Our strengths span the
applied disciplines of empirical methods and statistics, economics, information systems
and technology, operations research and organizational behavior.
Our faculty focus their research efforts on a vast array of issues. They have established
worldwide reputations for excellence in areas such as the study of crime and criminal
justice, urban policy, health care policy and management, arts management, information
security policy, and information systems management.
In addition to full-time, on-campus programs in Pittsburgh and Adelaide, Heinz College

offers graduate-level programs to nontraditional students through part-time on-campus
and distance programs, customized programs delivered virtually anywhere in the world,
and executive education programs for senior managers.
Heinz College exists to improve the ability of public, not-for-profit and private
organizations to address the most difficult challenges facing society, as well as to
strengthen and exploit our cultural resources through skilled leadership and management.
Our success is reflected in the contributions our more than 5,000 graduates have made to
society, through their work in international, national, state and local public agencies, not-
for-profit organizations, and private corporations.
Oct., 1952
American Journal of Public Health

and THE NATION'S HEALTH
Official Monthly Publication of the American Public Health Association, Inc.
Volume 42 October, 1952 Number 10
C.-E. A. WINSLOW, DR.P.H., Editor

REGINALD M. ATWATER, M.D., Managing Editor
Editorial Board
MARK D. HOLLIS, C.E. JOHN D. PORTERFIELD, M.D.
RUTH W. HUBBARD, R.N. GEORGE ROSEN, M.D.
RAYMOND S. PATTERSON, PH.D. HOWARD J. SHAUGHNESSY, PH.D.
C.-E. A. WINSLOW, DR.P.H.
REGINALD M. ATWATER, M.D.. Ckairman
Staff
WrLLIMINA RAYNE WALSH FRANCES TOOROCK LYDIA GARi
THE BATTLE FOR SOUND TEETH

THE effects of adding fluorine to community water supplies-on the dental status
of. the population have been the subject of study for some time. It has been
determined that too high a concentration of fluorine produces mottling of the
enamel; and that a complete lack is conducive to excessive caries formation. It
has been conclusively demonstrated that an optimum fluoride content, of the order
of one part per million, will reduce caries in children to about one-half its normal
incidence, while failing to produce mottling. The optimum amount is as effective
whether water supplies have been blended to reduce the natural fluoride content to
the desired level or fluorides have been artificially added to bring the content up
to the established concentration. No harmful effects whatever have been observed
from drinking waters containing the recommended amount of fluoride, either in
those who have been exposed to it naturally for as long as 80 years, or in those who
have received it on a planned basis for over 5 years.
An impressive number of professional health organizations have reviewed the
literature-independently, it must be added-and have concluded that artificial
fluoridation of public water supplies in controlled amounts is desirable as one
effective means for the partial control of dental caries in the young. In view of
its far-reaching effect on a staggeringly massive problem, and in the absence of
demonstrable ill-effects, fluoridation of water supplies must be reckoned with as
one of the most significant tools of preventive medicine which has been devised in
recent years.
Debate between the conservative and the progressive elements is traditional in
our society and is desirable to maintain good balance; but the instinctive tendency
of certain minds to fear any departure from the supposedly beneficent processes
[13041
Vol. 42 EDITORIALS 1305
of nature cannot be indefinitely condoned, in the face of accumulating mountains

of evidence. Furthermore, it is uinfortunate that the case of the conservative should
be intensified-as in this instance-by the support of vested interests and of fanatics
and members of the lunatic fringe who appear to consider dental caries as an essen-
tial part of the "American Way of Life" and any attempt to alter its incidence as
Communist-inspired mass-poisoning.
A particularly striking example of the unfortunate effects of such opposition was
described at the Denver meeting of the Western Branch of the APHA last June.'
The movement for fluoridation in Seattle, Wash., began with a revealing study
by the PTA in 1950 which disclosed that the average child in the eleventh and
twelfth grades had nearly 15 decayed, missing, or filled teeth. The director of the
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, after thorough consideration of
the evidence, and with the approval of the local medical and dental societies,
recommended to the City Council in February, 1951, the introduction of fluorida-
tion. At first there was no opposition except from some representatives of the Water
Department. The Water Department produced a fantastically high estimate of
cost ($1.20 per year for each of the premises served); and, a local election being in
sight, the City Council dodged its responsibilities by submitting the desirability
of fluoridation (at this assumed cost) to the people in a referendum in March.
The Department of Public Health, with the approval of the medical and dental
societies, secured the appointment of a highly representative Committee for
Fluoridation with a Speaker's Bureau (on which 37 dentists served). At the
beginning of the campaign, however, persons vocal in opposing fluoridation formed
the Washington State Council Against Fluoridation which was backed by the
National Nutrition League, Inc. Most of these were owners, operators, and
patrons of so-called "health food" stores. Later, about the first of Februarv,
Christian Scientists, deploring "'compulsory medication," took the lead in forming
the Anti-Fluoridation Committee. An attorney served as chairman, a trained
publicity man worked with him, and a Speaker's Bureau was formed. Billboards
opposing fluoridation appeared during the last week or so of the campaign.
Following the formation of the Anti-Fluoridation Committee in February,
opposition speakers appeared on a wide variety of programs. Added to the ranks
of the opposition were three physicians from the Medical Society, and several
well known attorneys who appeared at meetings, on the radio, and on television
to debate the issue on the basis of invasion of individual rights, and alleged pressure
for the program from Oscar Ewing and the U. S. Public Health Service. Their
suggested alternative was to add fluorides to salt.
Although a great deal of nonsense has been talked about the subject, perhaps
the climax of absurdity was reached in this debate by the claim that the addition of
fluoride was "Socialized Medicine."
Radio and television stations became active instruments for local propaganda.
The Committee for Fluoridation issued 10,000 copies of a pamphlet and the
opposition distributed great quantities of literature. The first of these pamphlets
carried a skull and crossbones on the front. Reprints were distributed including
accusations of "Socialized Medicine" and recommendations for a "campaign for
better systemic health through natural nutritious foods." Fluorine was described
as 'rat poison" which would cause hardening of the arteries, would interfere with
kidney excretion, cause bones to become brittle, and might cause cancer. It was
alleged that fluorine was used in Germany after World War I to "weaken the wills
of the people."
1306 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH Oct., 1952
The battle continued for nine weeks; and on March 11 the fluoridation proposal
was defeated by a vote of two to one.
The reader will be inclined to say that such a campaign could not take place-
and certainly could not succeed-in an educated American community. But it did
and the teeth of Seattle children must continue to ache.
In reading about this case, one is forcibly reminded of the outcry which
occurred in Boston in 1721 against smallpox inoculation. Cotton Mather, the
learned divine who played a courageous part in defending the practice, says he
"never saw the Devil so let loose.... A lying spirit was gone forth at such a rate
that there was no believing anything one heard. . . . The people who made the
loudest cry . . . had a very Satanic Fury activating them. They were, like the
possessed people in the Gospel, exceeding fierce."
Perhaps even more menacing, in view of its national import, is the recent display
of the same prejudiced thinking in the setting of that recurrent phenomenon, a
Congressional investigating committee. The House Select Committee To Investi-
gate the Use of Chemicals in Foods and Cosmetics, more easily known as the
Delaney Committee, has just published over 600 pages of its hearings on fluorida-
tion of water supplies. The saddest part of the hearings reports the mental
gymnastics of a physician member of the Committee, formerly a public health
official, who proclaimed for the record that public health officials force state health
officials to carry out programs presumably against their will by means of bribery;
and, finally, that "you can prove most anything you want to by the statistical
figures on morbidity and mortality." This gentleman may-or may not-have
revealed his own personal motivations in these statements. He certainly did not
represent the public health profession, with which he was for a short time allied.
The opposition to fluoridation is not easy to understand. Perhaps only the
psychiatrist can find an adequate explanation for the phenomenon, since an exag-
gerated fear of change is a common symptom of insecurity. The primary interests
involved are those of the dentist; and with a vision and a public spirit worthy of
the highest praise, they are precisely the people who have led in this campaign. All
honor to them!
The Friends of Dental Caries won in Seattle and showed strength in the House
Committee to which we have referred. They won the battle of Seattle; but they
cannot win the war. "Truth is Mighty" and, in the long run, it will prevail.
1. Lehman, S. P., and Kahn, B. L. Seattle Votes on Fluoridation. Seattle, Wash.: Seattle-King County Depart-
ment of Public Health, 1500 Public Safety Building.
OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH

THE problem of translating theory into practice is usually beset with difficulty,
even in the more exact natural sciences. In the past, this problem has suffered
from neglect, perhaps because it was assumed that practical men could apply in
practice any clearly stated theory, and needed no special agency to facilitate and
accelerate this process. During World War II, however, a rapid reciprocal adjust-
ment between theory and practice became necessary in the conduct of certain
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE,
AND FLUORINE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
September 2003
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE ii
DISCLAIMER
The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE iii
UPDATE STATEMENT
A Toxicological Profile for Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine, Draft for Public Comment was released in
September 2001. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile.
Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary. For information regarding the update
status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at:

Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch
1600 Clifton Road NE,
Mailstop E-29
Atlanta, Georgia 30333
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE vii
QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
Toxicological Profiles are a unique compilation of toxicological information on a given hazardous

substance. Each profile reflects a comprehensive and extensive evaluation, summary, and interpretation
of available toxicologic and epidemiologic information on a substance. Health care providers treating
patients potentially exposed to hazardous substances will find the following information helpful for fast
answers to often-asked questions.
Primary Chapters/Sections of Interest
Chapter 1: Public Health Statement: The Public Health Statement can be a useful tool for educating
patients about possible exposure to a hazardous substance. It explains a substance’s relevant
toxicologic properties in a nontechnical, question-and-answer format, and it includes a review of
the general health effects observed following exposure.
Chapter 2: Relevance to Public Health: The Relevance to Public Health Section evaluates, interprets,
and assesses the significance of toxicity data to human health.
Chapter 3: Health Effects: Specific health effects of a given hazardous compound are reported by type
of health effect (death, systemic, immunologic, reproductive), by route of exposure, and by length
of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic). In addition, both human and animal studies are
reported in this section.
NOTE: Not all health effects reported in this section are necessarily observed in the clinical
setting. Please refer to the Public Health Statement to identify general health effects
observed following exposure.
Pediatrics: Four new sections have been added to each Toxicological Profile to address child health
issues:
Section 1.6 How Can (Chemical X) Affect Children?
Section 1.7 How Can Families Reduce the Risk of Exposure to (Chemical X)?
Section 3.7 Children’s Susceptibility
Section 6.6 Exposures of Children
Other Sections of Interest:

Section 3.8 Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect
Section 3.11 Methods for Reducing Toxic Effects
ATSDR Information Center

Phone: 1-888-42-ATSDR or (404) 498-0110 Fax: (404) 498-0093
E-mail: atsdric@cdc.gov Internet: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov
The following additional material can be ordered through the ATSDR Information Center:
Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Taking an Exposure History—The importance of taking an

exposure history and how to conduct one are described, and an example of a thorough exposure
history is provided. Other case studies of interest include Reproductive and Developmental
Hazards; Skin Lesions and Environmental Exposures; Cholinesterase-Inhibiting Pesticide
Toxicity; and numerous chemical-specific case studies.
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE viii
Managing Hazardous Materials Incidents is a three-volume set of recommendations for on-scene

(prehospital) and hospital medical management of patients exposed during a hazardous materials
incident. Volumes I and II are planning guides to assist first responders and hospital emergency
department personnel in planning for incidents that involve hazardous materials. Volume III—
Medical Management Guidelines for Acute Chemical Exposures—is a guide for health care
professionals treating patients exposed to hazardous materials.
Fact Sheets (ToxFAQs) provide answers to frequently asked questions about toxic substances.
Other Agencies and Organizations
The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) focuses on preventing or controlling disease,
injury, and disability related to the interactions between people and their environment outside the
workplace. Contact: NCEH, Mailstop F-29, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-
3724 • Phone: 770-488-7000 • FAX: 770-488-7015.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducts research on occupational
diseases and injuries, responds to requests for assistance by investigating problems of health and
safety in the workplace, recommends standards to the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), and trains
professionals in occupational safety and health. Contact: NIOSH, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW, Washington, DC 20201 • Phone: 800-356-4674 or NIOSH Technical Information Branch,
Robert A. Taft Laboratory, Mailstop C-19, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998
• Phone: 800-35-NIOSH.
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the principal federal agency for
biomedical research on the effects of chemical, physical, and biologic environmental agents on
human health and well-being. Contact: NIEHS, PO Box 12233, 104 T.W. Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • Phone: 919-541-3212.
Referrals
The Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) has developed a network of clinics
in the United States to provide expertise in occupational and environmental issues. Contact:
AOEC, 1010 Vermont Avenue, NW, #513, Washington, DC 20005 • Phone: 202-347-4976 •
FAX: 202-347-4950 • e-mail: AOEC@AOEC.ORG • Web Page: http://www.aoec.org/.
The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) is an association of

physicians and other health care providers specializing in the field of occupational and
environmental medicine. Contact: ACOEM, 55 West Seegers Road, Arlington Heights, IL
60005 • Phone: 847-818-1800 • FAX: 847-818-9266.
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE ix
CONTRIBUTORS
CHEMICAL MANAGER(S)/AUTHOR(S):
Carolyn A. Tylenda, D.M.D., Ph.D.

ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA
Dennis Jones, D.V.M.

ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA
Lisa Ingerman, Ph.D.

Gloria Sage, Ph.D.
Lara Chappell, Ph.D.
Syracuse Research Corporation, North Syracuse, NY
THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS:
1. Health Effects Review. The Health Effects Review Committee examines the health effects
chapter of each profile for consistency and accuracy in interpreting health effects and classifying
end points.
2. Minimal Risk Level Review. The Minimal Risk Level Workgroup considers issues relevant to
substance-specific Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs), reviews the health effects database of each
profile, and makes recommendations for derivation of MRLs.
3. Data Needs Review. The Research Implementation Branch reviews data needs sections to assure
consistency across profiles and adherence to instructions in the Guidance.
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xi
PEER REVIEW
A peer review panel was assembled for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. The panel consisted of
the following members:
1. Jan Ekstrand, Professor & Vice Dean, Board of Research and Postgraduate Education, Nobels
väg 5, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
2. Julie Glowacki, Ph.D., Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;
3. Michael Kleerekoper, M.B., B.S., F.A.C.P., F.A.C.E., Departments of Internal Medicine,

Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Pathology Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit,
MI;
4. Gary Whitford, Ph.D., D.M.D., School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA.
These experts collectively have knowledge of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine's physical and
chemical properties, toxicokinetics, key health end points, mechanisms of action, human and animal
exposure, and quantification of risk to humans. All reviewers were selected in conformity with the
conditions for peer review specified in Section 104(I)(13) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended.
Scientists from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) have reviewed the peer
reviewers' comments and determined which comments will be included in the profile. A listing of the
peer reviewers' comments not incorporated in the profile, with a brief explanation of the rationale for their
exclusion, exists as part of the administrative record for this compound. A list of databases reviewed and
a list of unpublished documents cited are also included in the administrative record.
The citation of the peer review panel should not be understood to imply its approval of the profile's final
content. The responsibility for the content of this profile lies with the ATSDR.
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xiii
CONTENTS
DISCLAIMER ..............................................................................................................................................ii
UPDATE STATEMENT .............................................................................................................................iii
FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................ v
QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS....................................................................vii
CONTRIBUTORS.......................................................................................................................................ix
PEER REVIEW ...........................................................................................................................................xi
CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................xiii
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................xvii
LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................xix
1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT.......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 WHAT ARE FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE? ........................... 1
1.2 WHAT HAPPENS TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE
WHEN THEY ENTER THE ENVIRONMENT?....................................................................... 3
1.3 HOW MIGHT I BE EXPOSED TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND
FLUORINE?................................................................................................................................ 4
1.4 HOW CAN FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE ENTER AND
LEAVE MY BODY? .................................................................................................................. 6
1.5 HOW CAN FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE AFFECT MY
HEALTH? ................................................................................................................................... 7
1.6 HOW CAN FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE AFFECT
CHILDREN? ............................................................................................................................... 9
1.7 HOW CAN FAMILIES REDUCE THE RISK OF EXPOSURE TO FLUORIDES,
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?....................................................................... 10
1.8 IS THERE A MEDICAL TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER I HAVE BEEN
EXPOSED TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?...................... 11
1.9 WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS HAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MADE TO
PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH?............................................................................................... 12
1.10 WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION? ..................................................................... 13
2. RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH ................................................................................................. 15

2.1 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES TO FLUORIDES,
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE IN THE UNITED STATES ........................... 15
2.2 SUMMARY OF HEALTH EFFECTS...................................................................................... 17
2.3 MINIMAL RISK LEVELS ....................................................................................................... 22
3. HEALTH EFFECTS.............................................................................................................................. 29
3.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 29
3.2 DISCUSSION OF HEALTH EFFECTS BY ROUTE OF EXPOSURE .................................. 31
3.2.1 Inhalation Exposure .............................................................................................................. 32
3.2.1.1 Death................................................................................................................................. 33
3.2.1.2 Systemic Effects ............................................................................................................... 36
3.2.1.3 Immunological and Lymphoreticular Effects ................................................................... 69
3.2.1.4 Neurological Effects ......................................................................................................... 70
3.2.1.5 Reproductive Effects......................................................................................................... 70
3.2.1.6 Developmental Effects...................................................................................................... 71
3.2.1.7 Cancer ............................................................................................................................... 71
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xiv
3.2.2 Oral Exposure........................................................................................................................ 72

3.2.2.1 Death................................................................................................................................. 74
3.2.2.2 Systemic Effects ............................................................................................................... 75
3.2.2.3 Immunological and Lymphoreticular Effects ................................................................. 110
3.2.2.4 Neurological Effects ....................................................................................................... 110
3.2.2.5 Reproductive Effects....................................................................................................... 111
3.2.2.6 Developmental Effects.................................................................................................... 114
3.2.2.7 Cancer ............................................................................................................................. 117
3.2.3 Dermal Exposure................................................................................................................. 125
3.2.3.1 Death............................................................................................................................... 126
3.2.3.2 Systemic Effects ............................................................................................................. 127
3.2.3.3 Immunological and Lymphoreticular Effects ................................................................. 132
3.2.3.4 Neurological Effects ....................................................................................................... 132
3.2.3.5 Reproductive Effects....................................................................................................... 132
3.2.3.6 Developmental Effects.................................................................................................... 132
3.2.3.7 Cancer ............................................................................................................................. 132
3.3 GENOTOXICITY ................................................................................................................... 132
3.4 TOXICOKINETICS................................................................................................................ 136
3.4.1 Absorption........................................................................................................................... 136
3.4.1.1 Inhalation Exposure ........................................................................................................ 136
3.4.1.2 Oral Exposure ................................................................................................................. 138
3.4.1.3 Dermal Exposure ............................................................................................................ 139
3.4.2 Distribution ......................................................................................................................... 140
3.4.2.2 Oral Exposure ................................................................................................................. 141
3.4.2.3 Dermal Exposure ............................................................................................................ 144
3.4.2.4 Other Routes of Exposure............................................................................................... 144
3.4.3 Metabolism.......................................................................................................................... 145
3.4.4 Elimination and Excretion................................................................................................... 145
3.4.4.2 Oral Exposure ................................................................................................................. 146
3.4.4.3 Dermal Exposure ............................................................................................................ 147
3.4.5 Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Models ........... 147
3.5 MECHANISMS OF ACTION ................................................................................................ 151
3.6 TOXICITIES MEDIATED THROUGH THE NEUROENDOCRINE AXIS ........................ 153
3.7 CHILDREN’S SUSCEPTIBILITY ......................................................................................... 154
3.8 BIOMARKERS OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECT .................................................................. 157
3.8.1 Biomarkers Used to Identify or Quantify Exposure to Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride,
and Fluorine ........................................................................................................................ 158
3.8.2 Biomarkers Used to Characterize Effects Caused by Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride,
and Fluorine ........................................................................................................................ 160
3.9 INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER CHEMICALS .................................................................. 162
3.10 POPULATIONS THAT ARE UNUSUALLY SUSCEPTIBLE ............................................ 162
3.11 METHODS FOR REDUCING TOXIC EFFECTS................................................................ 164
3.11.1 Reducing Peak Absorption Following Exposure ................................................................ 165
3.11.2 Reducing Body Burden ....................................................................................................... 166
3.11.3 Interfering with the Mechanism of Action for Toxic Effects.............................................. 167
3.12 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE..................................................................................... 168
3.12.1 Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and
Fluorine ............................................................................................................................... 169
3.12.2 Identification of Data Needs ............................................................................................... 173
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xv
3.12.3 Ongoing Studies .................................................................................................................. 185
4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION.............................................................................. 187

4.1 CHEMICAL IDENTITY......................................................................................................... 187
4.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES...................................................................... 187
5. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL .......................................................... 193

5.1 PRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 193
5.2 IMPORT/EXPORT ................................................................................................................. 194
5.3 USE.......................................................................................................................................... 199
5.4 DISPOSAL .............................................................................................................................. 200
6. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE ......................................................................................... 203

6.1 OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................ 203
6.2 RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 206
6.2.1 Air ....................................................................................................................................... 209
6.2.2 Water ................................................................................................................................... 213
6.2.3 Soil ...................................................................................................................................... 214
6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE.................................................................................................... 215
6.3.1 Transport and Partitioning................................................................................................... 215
6.3.2 Transformation and Degradation ........................................................................................ 216
6.3.2.1 Air ................................................................................................................................... 216
6.3.2.2 Water............................................................................................................................... 217
6.3.2.3 Sediment and Soil ........................................................................................................... 218
6.3.2.4 Other Media .................................................................................................................... 218
6.4 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT ............................... 218
6.4.1 Air ....................................................................................................................................... 218
6.4.2 Water ................................................................................................................................... 219
6.4.3 Sediment and Soil ............................................................................................................... 222
6.4.4 Other Environmental Media................................................................................................ 223
6.5 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE ..................................... 225
6.6 EXPOSURES OF CHILDREN ............................................................................................... 230
6.7 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES ........................................... 234
6.8 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE...................................................................................... 237
6.8.2 Ongoing Studies .................................................................................................................. 241
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS ............................................................................................................... 243

7.1 BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS................................................................................................. 243
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES............................................................................................ 246
7.3 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE...................................................................................... 251
7.3.2 Ongoing Studies .................................................................................................................. 253
8. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIES ............................................................................................... 255
9. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 265
10. GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................... 351

FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xvi
APPENDICES
A. ATSDR MINIMAL RISK LEVEL AND WORKSHEETS ...............................................................A-1
B. USER'S GUIDE .................................................................................................................................. B-1
C. ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS...................................................................... C-1
D. FLUORIDE AND DENTAL CARIES ...............................................................................................D-1

FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xvii
LIST OF FIGURES
3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Inhalation ................................................... 41
3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine – Inhalation .................................................................... 50
3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Inhalation .................................................................... 54
3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Oral ............................................................................. 87
3-5. Conceptual Representation of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model for a

Hypothetical Chemical Substance .................................................................................................... 150
3-6. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluoride ......................................................................... 170
3-7. Existing Information on Health Effects of Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid.......................... 171
3-8. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluorine ......................................................................... 172
6-1. Frequency of NPL Sites with Fluoride, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine Contamination.............. 204
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xix
LIST OF TABLES
2-1. Adequate Intake Levels for Fluoride .................................................................................................. 16
3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Inhalation ................................................... 37
3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine – Inhalation .................................................................... 43
3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Inhalation .................................................................... 53
3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Oral ............................................................................. 76
3-5. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Dermal ..................................................... 128
3-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Dermal ...................................................................... 129
3-7. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vitro ..................................................................................................... 133
3-8. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vivo...................................................................................................... 135
3-9. Ongoing Studies on the Health Effects of Fluoride, Hydrogen Fluoride, or Fluorine...................... 186
4-1. Chemical Identity of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride, Fluosilicic Acid,
and Sodium Silicofluoride ................................................................................................................ 188
4-2. Physical and Chemical Properties of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride,
Fluosilicic Acid, and Sodium Silicofluoride..................................................................................... 190
5-1. U.S. Manufacturers of Hydrogen Fluoride, Fluorine, Sodium Fluoride, Fluosilicic Acid,
and Sodium Silicofluoride ................................................................................................................ 195
5-2. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Hydrogen Fluoride ............................................................ 196
5-3. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Fluorine ............................................................................. 198
6-1. Releases to the Environment from Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Hydrogen
Fluoride............................................................................................................................................. 207
6-2. Releases to the Environment from Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Fluorine...................... 210
6-3. Mean Daily Dietary Intake of Fluoride for Selected Canadian Population Groups ......................... 227
6-4. Comparison of Fluoride Levels (µg/g) in Cow Milk and Infant Formulas....................................... 232
6-5. Levels of Fluoride in Human Tissue and Urine—Selected Studies ................................................. 235
7-1. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Biological Materials............................................ 245
7-2. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Environmental Samples ...................................... 247
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE xx
7-3. Analytical Methods for Determining Hydrogen Fluoride in Environmental Samples ..................... 249
8-1. Regulations and Guidelines Applicable to Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride, Hydrogen Fluoride,
and Fluorine ...................................................................................................................................... 256
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE 1
1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT
This public health statement tells you about fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine and the
effects of exposure presented in the toxicological profile. These profiles were specifically
prepared by ATSDR for hazardous substances which are most commonly found at facilities on
the CERCLA National Priorities List (Superfund sites) and are intended to describe the effects of
exposure from chemicals at these sites.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies the most serious hazardous waste sites in
the nation. These sites make up the National Priorities List (NPL) and are the sites targeted for
long-term federal cleanup activities. Fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine have been found
in at least 188 of the 1,636 current or former NPL sites. However, the total number of NPL sites
evaluated for these substances is not known. As more sites are evaluated, the sites at which
fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine is found may increase. This information is important
because exposure to these substances may harm you and because these sites may be sources of
exposure.
When a substance is released from a large area, such as an industrial plant, or from a container,
such as a drum or bottle, it enters the environment. This release does not always lead to
exposure. You are exposed to a substance only when you come in contact with it. You may be
exposed by breathing, eating, or drinking the substance, or by skin contact.
If you are exposed to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine, many factors determine whether
you'll be harmed. These factors include the dose (how much), the duration (how long), and how
you come in contact with it/them. You must also consider the other chemicals you're exposed to
and your age, sex, diet, family traits, lifestyle, and state of health.
1.1 WHAT ARE FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?
Fluorides are properly defined as binary compounds or salts of fluorine and another element.
Examples of fluorides include sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride. Both are white solids.
Sodium fluoride readily dissolves in water, but calcium fluoride does not. Sodium fluoride is
often added to drinking water supplies and to a variety of dental products, including toothpastes
and mouth rinses to prevent dental cavities. Other fluoride compounds that are commonly used
for water fluoridation are fluorosilicic acid and sodium fluorosilicate. Calcium fluoride is the
compound in the common minerals fluorite and fluorspar. Fluorspar is the mineral from which
hydrogen fluoride is produced. It is also used in the production of glass and enamel and in the
steel industry. In this profile, we will often use the term “fluoride” to include substances that
contain the element fluorine. The reason for this is that we generally measure the amount of
fluorine in a substance rather than the amount of a particular fluorine compound.
Fluorine is a naturally occurring, widely distributed element and a member of the halogen
family, which includes chlorine, bromine, and iodine. However, the elemental form of fluorine,
a pale yellow-green, irritating gas with a sharp odor, is so chemically reactive that it rarely
occurs naturally in the elemental state. Fluorine occurs in ionic forms, or combined with other
chemicals in minerals like fluorspar, fluorapatite, and cryolite, and other compounds. (Ions are
atoms, collections of atoms, or molecules containing a positive or negative electric charge.)
Fluorine gas reacts with most organic and inorganic substances; with metals, it forms fluorides
and with water, it forms hydrofluoric acid. Fluorine gas is primarily used to make certain
chemical compounds, the most important of which is uranium hexafluoride, used in separating
isotopes of uranium for use in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons.
Hydrogen fluoride is a colorless, corrosive gas or liquid (it boils at 19.5 °C) that is made up of a
hydrogen atom and a fluorine atom. It fumes strongly, readily dissolves in water, and both the
liquid and vapor will cause severe burns upon contact. The dissolved form is called hydrofluoric
acid. It is known for its ability to etch glass. Commercially, hydrogen fluoride is the most
important fluorine compound. Its largest use is in the manufacture of fluorocarbons, which are
used as refrigerants, solvents, and aerosols.
For more information on the chemical properties of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine,
and their production and use, see Chapters 4 and 5.
1.2 WHAT HAPPENS TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE

WHEN THEY ENTER THE ENVIRONMENT?
Fluorides occur naturally in the earth’s crust where they are found in rocks, coal, clay, and soil.
They are released into the air in wind-blown soil. Hydrogen fluoride is released to the air from
fluoride-containing substances, including coal, minerals, and clays, when they are heated to high
temperatures. This may occur in coal-fired power plants; aluminum smelters; phosphate
fertilizer plants; glass, brick, and tile works; and plastics factories. These facilities may also
release fluorides attached to particles. The biggest natural source of hydrogen fluoride and other
fluorides released to the air is volcanic eruptions.
Fluorine cannot be destroyed in the environment; it can only change its form. Fluorides released
into the atmosphere from volcanoes, power plants, and other high temperature processes are
usually hydrogen fluoride gas or attached to very small particles. Fluorides contained in wind-
blown soil are generally found in larger particles. These particles settle to the ground or are
washed out of the air by rain. Fluorides that are attached to very small particles may stay in the
air for many days. Hydrogen fluoride gas will be absorbed by rain and into clouds and fog to
form aqueous hydrofluoric acid, which will fall to the ground mainly in precipitation. The
fluorides released into air will eventually fall on land or water.
In water, fluorides associate with various elements present in the water, mainly with aluminum in
freshwater and calcium and magnesium in seawater, and settle into the sediment where they are
strongly attached to sediment particles. When deposited on land, fluorides are strongly retained
by soil, forming strong associations with soil components. Leaching removes only a small
amount of fluorides from soils. Fluorides may be taken up from soil and accumulate in plants, or
they may be deposited on the upper parts of the plants in dust. The amount of fluoride taken up
by plants depends on the type of plant, the nature of the soil, and the amount and form of fluoride
in the soil. Tea plants are known to accumulate fluoride in their leaves. Animals that eat
fluoride-containing plants may accumulate fluoride. However, the fluoride accumulates
primarily in the bones or shell rather than in edible meat.
For more information about what happens to fluorides in the environment, see Chapter 6.
1.3 HOW MIGHT I BE EXPOSED TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND

FLUORINE?
Fluoride is a natural component of the earth’s crust and soil. Small amounts of fluorides are
present in water, air, plants, and animals. You may be exposed to small amounts of fluoride by
breathing air, drinking water, and eating food. In particular, fluorides are frequently added to
drinking water supplies at approximately 1 part of fluoride per million parts of water (ppm) and
to toothpaste and mouth rinses to prevent dental decay. Analytical methods used by scientists to
determine the levels of fluoride in the environment generally do not determine the specific form
of fluoride present. Therefore, we do not always know the form of fluoride that a person may be
exposed to. Similarly, we do not know what forms of fluoride are present at hazardous waste
sites. Some forms of fluoride may be insoluble or so tightly attached to particles or embedded in
minerals that they are not taken up by plants or animals.
Fluorides are normally found in very small amounts in the air. Levels measured in areas around
cities are usually less than 1 microgram (one millionth of a gram) of fluoride per cubic meter
(µg/m3) of air. Rural areas have even lower levels. The amount of fluoride that you breathe in a
day is much less than what you consume in food and water. You may breathe in higher levels of
fluoride in areas near coal-fired power plants or fluoride-related industries (e.g., aluminum
smelters, phosphorus fertilizer plants) or near hazardous waste sites.
Levels of fluorides in surface water average about 0.2 parts of fluoride per million parts of water
(ppm). Levels of fluorides in well water generally range from 0.02 to 1.5 ppm, but often exceed
1.5 ppm in parts of the southwest United States. Many communities fluoridate their water
supplies; the recommended level of fluoride is around 1 ppm. In the United States,
approximately 15,000 water systems serving about 162 million people are fluoridated in the
optimal range of 0.7–1.2 ppm, either occurring naturally or through adjustment. Persons living
in non-fluoridated areas may receive water exposure through beverages and foods processed in
fluoridated areas. You will be exposed to fluorides in the water that you drink or in beverages
prepared with fluoridated water.
The concentration of fluorides in soils is usually between 200 and 300 ppm. However, levels
may be higher in areas containing fluoride-containing mineral deposits. Higher levels may also
occur where phosphate fertilizers are used, where coal-fired power plants or fluoride-releasing
industries are located, or in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites. You may be exposed to
fluorides through dermal contact with these soils.
You may also be exposed to fluorides in your diet. While food generally contains low levels of
fluoride, food grown in areas where soils have high amounts of fluorides or where phosphate
fertilizers are used may have higher levels of fluorides. Tea and some seafoods have been found
to have high levels of fluorides. The average daily fluoride intake by adults from food and water
is estimated to be 1 milligram (mg) if you live in a community with <0.7 ppm in your water, and
about 2.7 mg if you have fluoridated water. You can contact your local water system to
determine the level of fluoride in your drinking water or refer to the annual Consumer
Confidence Report furnished by your water system operators. You may also be exposed to
fluoride in dental products, such as toothpastes, fluoride gels, and fluoride rinses. Dental
products used in the home such as toothpastes, rinses, and topically applied gels contain high
concentrations of fluoride (range 230–12,300 ppm) and are not intended to be ingested. The
most commonly used dental products, toothpastes, contain 900–1,100 ppm fluoride (ca. 0.10%),
most often as sodium fluoride. If you swallow these products, you will be exposed to higher
levels of fluoride. Swallowing toothpaste can account for a large percentage of the fluoride to
which a child <8 years of age might be exposed The Food and Drug Administration requires that
toothpaste tubes be labeled with instructions to minimize ingestion of fluoride by children
including the use of a “pea-sized” amount of paste and parental supervision of brushing.
You may also be exposed to higher levels of fluoride if you work in industries where fluoride-
containing substances are used, most notably in the electronics industry where hydrogen fluoride
may be used to etch glass in TV picture tubes or to clean silicon chips and in aluminum and
phosphate fertilizer plants. Exposure will primarily result from breathing in hydrogen fluoride or
fluoride-containing dust. Exposure will be reduced if exhaust systems or protective masks are
used in the workplace.
For more information on how you can be exposed to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine,
see Chapter 6.
1.4 HOW CAN FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE ENTER

AND LEAVE MY BODY?
Generally, most of the fluoride in food or water that you swallow enters your bloodstream
quickly through the digestive tract. However, the amount that enters your bloodstream also
depends on factors such as how much of the fluoride you swallowed, how well the fluoride
dissolves in water, whether you ate or drank recently, and what you ate or drank. Factors such as
age and health status affect what happens to the fluoride ion once it is in your body. After
entering your body, about half of the fluoride leaves the body quickly in urine, usually within
24 hours unless large amounts (20 mg or more, which is the amount in 20 or more liters of
optimally fluoridated water) are ingested. Most of the fluoride ion that stays in your body is
stored in your bones and teeth.
When you breathe in air containing hydrogen fluoride or fluoride dusts, it enters your
bloodstream quickly through your lungs. When hydrofluoric acid touches skin, most of it can
quickly pass through the skin into the blood. How much of it enters your bloodstream depends
on how concentrated the hydrofluoric acid is and how long it stays on your skin. Almost all of
the fluoride that enters the body in these ways is quickly removed from the body in the urine, but
some is stored in your bones and teeth.
When you breathe in air containing fluorine, fluoride can enter your bloodstream through your
lungs, but it is not known how quickly this happens. Much of the fluoride leaves your body in
urine, but some is stored in your bones and teeth. Exposure to fluorine gas is uncommon, except
in industrial settings.
For more information on how fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine enter and leave your
body, see Chapter 3.

MY HEALTH?
To protect the public from the harmful effects of toxic chemicals and to find ways to treat people
who have been harmed, scientists use many tests.
One way to see if a chemical will hurt people is to learn how the chemical is absorbed, used, and
released by the body; for some chemicals, animal testing may be necessary. Animal testing may
also be used to identify health effects such as cancer or birth defects. Without laboratory
animals, scientists would lose a basic method to get information needed to make wise decisions
to protect public health. Scientists have the responsibility to treat research animals with care and
compassion. Laws today protect the welfare of research animals, and scientists must comply
with strict animal care guidelines and must be recertified regularly with training in updated and
new guidelines.
Fluorides. Several medicines that contain fluoride are used for treating skin diseases (e.g.,
flucytosine, an antifungal) and some cancers (e.g., fluorouracil, an antimetabolite).
Small amounts of fluoride are added to toothpaste or drinking water to help prevent dental decay.
However, exposure to higher levels of fluoride may harm your health. Skeletal fluorosis can be
caused by eating, drinking, or breathing very large amounts of fluorides. This disease only
occurs after long-term exposures and can cause denser bones, joint pain, and a limited range of
joint movement. In the most severe cases, the spine is completely rigid. Skeletal fluorosis is
extremely rare in the United States; it has occurred in some people consuming greater than
30 times the amount of fluoride typically found in fluoridated water. It is more common in
places where people do not get proper nutrition. At fluoride levels 5 times greater than levels
typically found in fluoridated water, fluoride can result in denser bones. However, these bones
are often more brittle or fragile than normal bone and there is an increased risk of older men and
women breaking a bone. Some studies have also found a higher risk of bone fractures in older
men and women at fluoride levels typically found in fluoridated water. However, other studies
have not found an effect at this fluoride dose. If you eat large amounts of sodium fluoride at one
time, it can cause stomachaches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Extremely large amounts can cause
death by affecting your heart.
We do not know if eating, drinking, or breathing fluoride can cause reproductive effects in
humans. Reproductive effects, such as decreased fertility and sperm and testes damage, have
been seen in laboratory animals at extremely high doses (more than 100 times higher than levels
found in fluoridated water). However, other studies have not found any reproductive effects in
laboratory animals.
A number of studies have been done to assess whether there is an association between fluoride
and cancer in people who live in areas with fluoridated water or naturally high levels of fluoride
in drinking water, or people who work in jobs where they may be exposed to fluorides. Most
studies have not found any association between fluoride and cancer in people. A study in rats
and mice found that a small number of male rats developed bone cancer after drinking water with
high levels of fluoride in it throughout their lives. This was considered equivocal evidence that
fluoride causes cancer in male rats. Fluoride did not cause cancer in mice or female rats.
Another study found no evidence that even higher doses of fluoride caused cancer in rats. Both
animal studies had problems that limited their usefulness in showing whether fluoride can cause
cancer in humans. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined
that the carcinogenicity of fluoride to humans is not classifiable.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Hydrogen fluoride is also a very irritating gas. Hydrogen fluoride is not as
dangerous as fluorine, but large amounts of it can also cause death. People breathing hydrogen
fluoride have complained of eye, nose, and skin irritation. Breathing in a large amount of
hydrogen fluoride with air can also harm the lungs and heart. Kidney and testes damage have
been observed in animals breathing hydrogen fluoride.
Hydrofluoric acid is dangerous to humans because it can burn the eyes and skin. The initial
exposure to hydrofluoric acid may not look like a typical acid burn. Skin may only appear red
and may not be painful at first. Damage to skin may happen over several hours or days, and
deep, painful wounds may develop. When not treated properly, serious skin damage and tissue
loss can occur. In the worst cases, getting a large amount of hydrofluoric acid on your skin can
lead to death caused by the fluoride affecting your lungs or heart.
Fluorine. Fluorine gas is very irritating and very dangerous to the eyes, skin, and lungs. Fluorine
gas at low concentrations makes your eyes and nose hurt. At higher concentrations, it becomes
hard to breathe. Exposure to high concentrations of fluorine can cause death due to lung
damage.
For more information on the health effects of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine, see
Chapter 3. For more information on fluoride and dental caries, see Appendix D.

CHILDREN?
This section discusses potential health effects from exposures during the period from conception
to maturity at 18 years of age in humans.
When used appropriately, fluoride is effective in preventing and controlling dental caries.
Drinking or eating excessive fluoride during the time teeth are being formed can cause visible
changes in teeth. The condition is called dental fluorosis. The changes increase in severity with
increasing levels of fluoride. Dental fluorosis develops only while the teeth are forming in the
jaw and before they erupt into the mouth (age <8 years). After the teeth have developed and
erupted, they cannot become fluorosed. Most enamel fluorosis seen today is of the mildest form,
in which there are a few almost invisible white spots on the teeth. In moderate cases, there are
large white spots on the teeth (mottled teeth), and some brown spots. In severe cases, the teeth
are pitted and are fragile, and sometimes the teeth can break. The appearance of affected teeth is
not identical for all children exposed to the same level of fluoride in the drinking water.
Exposure to fluoride from other sources, such as fluoride tablets or rinses, may account for these
differences. In general, some children who drink water with 1 ppm fluoride may get a few small
spots or slight discolorations on their teeth. Some children who drink water with 4 ppm fluoride
in it for long periods before their permanent teeth are in place may develop a more severe form
of dental fluorosis.
Fluoride can cross the placenta from the mother’s blood to the developing fetus. Only a very
small portion of fluoride ingested by women is transferred to a child through breast milk.
Several human studies found an increase in birth defects or lower IQ scores in children living in
areas with very high levels of fluoride in the drinking water. Those studies did not adequately
access other factors that could have contributed to the effects. Another study did not find birth
defects in children living in areas with low levels of fluoride. Birth defects have not been found
in most studies of laboratory animals.
1.7 HOW CAN FAMILIES REDUCE THE RISK OF EXPOSURE TO FLUORIDES,

HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?
If your doctor finds that you have been exposed to significant amounts of fluorides, hydrogen
fluoride, and fluorine, ask whether your children might also be exposed. Your doctor might need
to ask your state health department to investigate.
It is unlikely that the general population would be exposed to fluorine gas or hydrogen fluoride.
Because fluorides are found naturally in the environment, we cannot avoid being exposed to
them. Some areas of the United States, such as the Southwest, naturally have high levels of
fluorides in well water. There has been an increase in the cosmetic condition of tooth enamel
fluorosis in children in both fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. Ask your health
department whether your area has naturally high levels of fluorides in the drinking water. If you
live in such an area, you should use bottled drinking water and consult your dentist for guidance
on the need for appropriate alternative fluoride supplements.
These areas may also contain high levels of fluorides in soil. A few hazardous waste sites may
contain high levels of fluorides in soil. By limiting your contact with such soil (for example,
reducing recreational activities that raise dust), you would reduce your family’s exposure to
fluoride. Some children eat a lot of dirt. You should prevent your children from eating dirt.
You should discourage your children from putting their hands or objects in their mouths or
engaging in other hand-to-mouth activity. Make sure they wash their hands frequently and
always before eating.
If you work in a phosphate fertilizer plant or other industry that uses minerals high in fluorides, it
is sometimes possible to carry fluorides home from work on your clothing, skin, hair, tools, or
other objects removed from the workplace. You may contaminate your car, home, or other
locations outside work where children might be exposed to fluoride-containing dust. Your
occupational health and safety officer at work can and should tell you whether the chemicals that
you work with are likely to be carried home on your clothes, body, or tools as well as whether
you should be showering and changing clothes before you leave work, storing your street clothes
in a separate area of the workplace, or laundering your work clothes at home separately from
other clothes.
Children may be exposed to high levels of fluorides if they swallow dental products containing
fluoridated toothpaste, gels, or rinses. Swallowing toothpaste can account for a large percentage
of the fluoride to which a small child might be exposed. You should teach your children not to
swallow these products. For children under age 8, parents should supervise brushing and place,
at most, a small pea size dab of toothpaste on the brush.
1.8 IS THERE A MEDICAL TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER I HAVE BEEN

EXPOSED TO FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?
Urine and blood samples can be analyzed to find out if you have been exposed to fluorides. The
fluoride level in the sample is compared with the level of fluoride usually found in urine or
blood. This will show if a person has been exposed recently to higher-than-normal levels of
fluorides. However, this test cannot be used to predict any specific health effects that may occur
after fluoride exposure. The test must be performed soon after exposure because fluoride that is
not stored in the bones leaves the body within a few days. This test can be done at most
laboratories that test for chemical exposure. Bone sampling can be done in special cases to
measure long-term exposure to fluorides. Because fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine all
enter the body as fluoride, these tests cannot distinguish among exposure to these different
chemicals.
For more information on medical tests to determine exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and
fluorine, see Chapters 3 and 6.
1.9 WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS HAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MADE TO

PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH?
The federal government develops regulations and recommendations to protect public health.
Regulations can be enforced by law. Federal agencies that develop regulations for toxic
substances include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Recommendations provide valuable guidelines to protect public health but cannot be enforced by
law. Federal organizations that develop recommendations for toxic substances include the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
Regulations and recommendations can be expressed in not-to-exceed levels in air, water, soil, or
food that are usually based on levels that affect animals; then they are adjusted to help protect
people. Sometimes these not-to-exceed levels differ among federal organizations because of
different exposure times (an 8-hour workday or a 24-hour day), the use of different animal
studies, or other factors.
Recommendations and regulations are also periodically updated as more information becomes
available. For the most current information, check with the federal agency or organization that
provides it. Some regulations and recommendations for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and
fluorine include the following:
Sodium fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine have been named hazardous substances by the
EPA. The federal government has set regulatory standards and guidelines to protect workers
from the possible health effects of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine in air. OSHA has
set a legally enforceable limit of 0.2 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) for fluorine, 2.0 mg/m3
for hydrogen fluoride, and 2.5 mg/m3 for fluoride in workroom air to protect workers during an
8-hour shift over a 40-hour work week. NIOSH recommends air levels of 0.2 mg/m3 for
fluorine, 2.5 mg/m3 for hydrogen fluoride, and 2.5 mg/m3 for sodium fluoride in workroom air to
protect workers during an 8-hour shift over a 40-hour work week.
The federal government has also set regulatory standards and guidelines to protect the public
from the possible health effects of fluoride in drinking water. EPA determined that the
maximum amount of fluoride allowed in drinking water is 4.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L).
For the prevention of dental decay, the Public Health Service (PHS) has, since 1962,
recommended that public water supplies contain fluoride at concentrations between 0.7 and
1.2 mg/L. PHS scientists representing the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the FDA, ATSDR, and other government agencies conducted an
extensive examination of the worldwide biomedical literature on the public health risks and
benefits of fluoride in 1991. The PHS report stated that fluoride in the drinking water
substantially reduces tooth decay.
For more information on recommendations regarding exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride,

and fluorine, see Chapter 8.
1.10 WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION?
If you have any more questions or concerns, please contact your community or state health or
environmental quality department or

Division of Toxicology
1600 Clifton Road NE
Mailstop E-29
Atlanta, GA 30333
* Information line and technical assistance
Phone: 1-888-42-ATSDR (1-888-422-8737)

Fax: 1-404-498-0057
ATSDR can also tell you the location of occupational and environmental health clinics. These
clinics specialize in recognizing, evaluating, and treating illnesses resulting from exposure to
hazardous substances.
* To order toxicological profiles, contact
National Technical Information Service

5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
Phone: (800) 553-6847 or (703) 605-6000
Web site: http://www.ntis.gov/
2. RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH
2.1 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES TO FLUORIDES,

HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE IN THE UNITED STATES
Fluorine is the most electronegative and reactive of all elements; fluoride is the ionic form of fluorine.
Fluorine and anhydrous hydrogen fluoride are naturally occurring gases that have a variety of industrial
uses including the production of fluorine-containing chemicals, pharmaceuticals, high octane gasoline,
and fluorescent light bulbs; aqueous hydrofluoric acid is a liquid used for stainless steel pickling, glass
etching, and metal coatings. The general population is typically exposed to very low levels of gaseous
fluoride (primarily as hydrogen fluoride); in the United States and Canada, the levels ranged from 0.01 to
1.65 µg/m3. Populations living near industrial sources of hydrogen fluoride, including coal burning
facilities, may be exposed to higher levels of hydrogen fluoride in the air. Additionally, vegetables and
fruits grown near these sources may contain higher levels of fluoride, particularly from fluoride-
containing dust settling on the plants.
Fluoride salts, generically referred to as fluorides, are naturally occurring components of rocks and soil.
One of the more commonly used fluoride salt is sodium fluoride; its principal use is for the prevention of
dental caries. Sodium fluoride and other fluoride compounds, such as fluorosilicic acid and sodium
hexafluorisilicate, are used in the fluoridation of public water. Sodium monofluorophosphate and
stanneous fluoride are commonly used in dentifrices such as toothpaste. The general population can be
exposed to fluoride through the consumption of fluoridated drinking water, food, and dentifrices. The
average dietary intake (including water) of fluoride ranges between 1.4 and 3.4 mg/day (0.02–
0.048 mg/kg/day) for adults living in areas with 1.0 mg/L fluoride in the water. In areas with <0.3 mg/L
fluoride in water, the adult dietary intakes ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 mg/day (0.004–0.014 mg/kg/day). In
children, the dietary intakes ranged from 0.03 to 0.06 mg/kg/day in areas with fluoridated water and from
0.01 to 0.04 mg/kg/day in areas without fluoridated water. The Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute
of Medicine has developed adequate intakes (AIs) for fluoride. The AI is the “estimated fluoride intake
that has been shown to reduce the occurrence of dental caries maximally in a population without causing
unwanted side effects including moderate dental fluorosis.” The AIs for each age group are presented in
Table 2-1.
Table 2-1. Adequate Intake Levels for Fluoridea
Age range Adequate intake level (mg/day) Adequate intake level (mg/kg/day)b
0–6 months 0.01 0.0014
6–12 months 0.5 0.056
1–3 years 0.7 0.054
4–8 years 1 0.045
9–13 years (males and females) 2 0.05
14–18 years (males) 3 0.046
14–18 years (females) 3 0.053
>18 years (males) 4 0.052
>18 years (females) 3 0.049
a
Source: IOM 1997
b
mg/kg/day doses were calculated by using reference body weights reported by IOM (1997)
2.2 SUMMARY OF HEALTH EFFECTS
Fluoride. The main health concern regarding fluoride is likely to be from excessive chronic oral
exposure in drinking water. Due to the deposition of significant amounts of fluoride in bone, the primary
target system for intermediate and chronic exposures of both humans and several laboratory animal
species is the skeletal system (including teeth). Both beneficial and detrimental dental and skeletal effects
have been observed in humans. Fluoride has been shown to decrease the prevalence of dental caries and,
under certain conditions, has been used for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, excess fluoride can
also result in dental fluorosis and can result in an increased prevalence of bone fractures in the elderly or
skeletal fluorosis. Both the beneficial and detrimental effects of fluoride appear to be related to fluoride-
induced alterations in tooth and bone mineralization.
Direct contact with fluoride can result in tissue damage. At high concentrations, fluoride can cause
irritation and damage to the respiratory tract, stomach, and skin following inhalation, oral, and dermal
exposure, respectively. At very high fluoride doses, fluoride can bind with serum calcium resulting in
hypocalcemia and possibly hyperkalcemia; the severe cardiac effects (e.g., tetany, decreased myocardial
contractility, cardiovascular collapse, ventricular fibrillation) observed at or near lethal doses are probably
due to this electrolyte imbalance.
The available data on the potential of fluoride to induce reproductive and/or developmental effects is
inconclusive. A study of birth records found a significant association between high levels of fluoride in
municipal drinking water (3 ppm and greater) and decreases in fertility rates; another study found
decreases in serum testosterone levels in men with skeletal fluorosis (fluoride concentration in water was
3.9 ppm). However, design limitations of these studies, particularly the use of poorly matched controls,
limits the usefulness of these studies. Some animal studies have found alterations in reproductive
hormone levels, histology of the testes, spermatogenesis, and fertility following exposure to relatively
high oral doses of sodium fluoride, roughly equivalent to a human exposure level of >150 ppm in
drinking water. However, other animal studies, including two-generation studies, have not found
alterations in serum hormone levels in male rats, testicular histopathology, sperm morphology, or fertility.
None of the available laboratory animal studies examined reproductive toxicity at low fluoride doses.
The inadequate human studies and conflicting animal studies do not allow for an assessment of the
potential of fluoride to induce reproductive effects in humans. Available human studies provide
suggestive evidence that exposure to elevated levels of fluoride in drinking water may decrease IQ in
children; however, neither study controlled for other confounding variables. Animal studies have not
found increases in the incidences of birth defects in the absence of maternal toxicity; at doses that caused
maternal toxicity (decreases in body weight gain and food consumption), increases in abnormalities were
found.
Numerous community-based studies have examined the possible association between fluoridated water
and cancer. Most of these studies did not find significant associations between water fluoridation and
cancer mortality or site-specific cancer incidence. Some studies have found associations between water
fluoridation and cancer mortality/incidence or site-specific cancer incidence (osteosarcoma or bone
cancer). The lack of control for potential confounding variables (i.e., age, race) limits the interpretation
of the total cancer study results. The weight of the evidence indicates that fluoridation of water does not
increase the risk of developing cancer. A 2-year study in rats found a weak, equivocal fluoride-related
increase in the occurrence of osteosarcomas in male rats, and no evidence of carcinogenicity in female
rats or male or female mice. IARC has determined that the carcinogenicity of fluoride to humans is not
classifiable.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Hydrogen fluoride is highly corrosive, the primary effects are tissue damage
resulting from direct contact. Acute inhalation exposure can result in irritation, inflammation, bronchiolar
ulceration, pulmonary hemorrhage and edema, and death. Gastrointestinal irritation has also been
observed in humans exposed to low levels of hydrogen fluoride. Direct contact of hydrogen
fluoride/hydrofluoric acid with the eyes or skin can produce skin burns, “burning sensation”, and
lacrimation. In addition to these direct contact effects, exposure to hydrogen fluoride can result in
skeletal and cardiac effects. Some evidence of early skeletal fluorosis has been observed in workers
exposed to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts. These studies did not adequately characterize fluoride
exposure levels and, in most of the studies, there is some uncertainty regarding the diagnosis of skeletal
fibrosis. Exposure to very high levels of hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid can result in severe
cardiovascular effects, which are attributed to a combination of hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia; cardiac
arrhythmias have been seen in humans following hydrofluoric acid splashes in the face region, and
myocardial necrosis and congestion were observed in rabbits. Hepatic (fatty degeneration and necrosis)
and renal effects (tubular degeneration and necrosis) have also been observed in animal studies.
Although elevated cancer rates have been reported in some occupational groups exposed to hydrogen
fluoride and fluoride dusts, these studies were not controlled for the multiple substance exposures to
which industrial workers are generally exposed. Because of these multiple exposures and the problems
inherent in all occupational studies in identifying appropriate reference populations, only limited evidence
from such studies is specifically relevant to the investigation of possible carcinogenic effects of long-term
dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid and inhalation exposure to hydrogen fluoride and/or fluoride dusts
in human beings. As noted previously, IARC has determined that the carcinogenicity of fluoride to
humans is not classifiable.
Fluorine. Limited data exist on the toxicity of fluorine; the two possible routes of exposure to fluorine
are inhalation or dermal contact with the gas. Fluorine gas is extremely irritating; human and animal data
suggest that the primary health effects of acute fluorine inhalation are nasal and eye irritation (at low
levels), and death due to pulmonary edema (at high levels). In animals, renal and hepatic damage have
also been observed.
A greater detailed discussion of fluoride-induced skeletal effects and portal of entry effects following
exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine follows. The reader is referred to
Section 3.2, Discussion of Health Effects by Route of Exposure, for additional information on other
health effects.
Dental and Skeletal Effects. Human and animal data clearly indicate that fluoride accumulates in
the teeth and bone resulting in beneficial and detrimental alterations in the structure. There is strong
evidence that oral exposure to fluoride can reduce the risk of dental caries. However, elevated fluoride
levels during enamel maturation can also result in dental fluorosis, which is characterized by hypo-
mineralization of subsurface layers of enamel. In the mildest forms of dental fluorosis, the tooth is fully
functional but has cosmetic alterations, almost invisible opaque white spots. In more severely fluorosed
teeth, the enamel is pitted and discolored and is prone to fracture and wear. Several studies have found
significant increases in the number of decayed, missing, or filled tooth surfaces in children with severe
dental fluorosis. The prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis is strongly associated with fluoride
exposure levels. Dose-response relationships cannot be established from most of these studies because all
sources of fluoride were not considered and most studies used fluoride levels in drinking water as the
dosimetric. A recent meta-analysis estimated that 48% of children living in communities with 1 ppm
fluoride in the water would have evidence of dental fluorosis, most of it considered very mild. The
predicted incidence of dental fluorosis of aesthetic concern was 12.5%. Although the exact mechanism of
dental fluorosis is not known, it is generally believed to result in a fluoride-induced delay in the
hydrolysis of the enamel matrix protein amelogenin during the early enamel maturation phase of tooth
development.
In bone, fluoride replaces the hydroxyl ion in hydroxyapatite to form fluorapatite, thus changing the
physicochemical properties of the bone. Ingestion (and inhalation) of large doses of fluoride for an
extended period of time can result in thickened bones and exostoses (skeletal fluorosis). Signs of skeletal
fluorosis range from increased bone density to severe deformity, known as crippling skeletal fluorosis. In
the more severe cases of crippling fluorosis, complete rigidity of the spine can occur. Reported cases are
found almost exclusively in developing countries, particularly India and China, and are often associated
with malnutrition. It is generally stated that a dose of 10–20 mg/day (equivalent to 5–10 ppm in the
water, for a person who ingests 2 L/day) for at least 10 years is necessary for the development of crippling
skeletal fluorosis, but individual variation, variation in nutritional status, and the difficulty of determining
water fluoride levels in such situations make it difficult to determine the critical dose.
At lower doses, fluoride can cause an increase in bone density and fragility. A large number of
epidemiology studies have attempted to examine the relationship between fluoride in drinking water and
the risk of bone fracture. The results of these predominantly ecological studies are inconsistent. Studies
have found increases and decreases in hip fracture rates among older women living in areas with fluoride
in the drinking water (typically about 1 ppm), as compared to women living in areas with very low levels
of fluoride in the drinking water (<0.3 ppm). Other studies have not found an effect of fluoride on
fracture risk. A relationship between exposure to 1 ppm fluoride in drinking water and the risk of bone
fractures cannot be established from these studies. Studies involving exposure to higher doses of fluoride
have consistently found significant increases in the risk of nonvertebral fractures, particularly hip
fractures. A study involving lifetime exposure to 4.3–8 ppm fluoride in drinking water found an elevated
risk of hip fractures among elderly men and women; this elevated risk of hip fracture was also observed in
a community with very low fluoride (0.25–0.34 ppm) in the water. Studies of individuals using sodium
fluoride for the treatment of osteoporosis also found significant increases in bone mineral density.
Studies in laboratory animals have found defects in bone growth, fracture healing, and bone strength.
Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, Dermal, and Ocular Effects. Fluoride, hydrogen fluoride,

hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine are extremely irritating chemicals and can cause tissue damage after direct
contact. The respiratory tract is the primary target of toxicity following inhalation exposure to hydrogen
fluoride or fluorine. Single exposures to relatively low concentrations of hydrogen fluoride (≥0.5 ppm) or
fluorine (≥10 ppm) can result in upper respiratory tract irritation in humans. At higher concentrations
pulmonary congestion, necrosis and/or edema have been observed in laboratory animals; pulmonary
edema has also been observed in humans exposed to lethal concentrations of hydrogen fluoride.
Pulmonary and nasal irritations have also been reported following repeated exposures for about 30 days.
Chronic exposure to hydrogen fluoride and cryolite dust has resulted in impaired lung function in
workers. The observed respiratory effects are attributed to its highly corrosive properties. Human and
animal data suggest that preexposure to lower levels can reduce the respiratory effects.
Acute and chronic oral exposure to high doses of sodium fluoride, typically >1 mg fluoride/kg, can result
in nausea, vomiting, and gastric pain. Nausea, loss of appetite, and vomiting has also been reported by
workers exposed to cryolite dust for >2 years. The effects occur shortly after ingestion and are likely due
to the formation of hydrofluoric acid in the stomach. There is some evidence to suggest that these overt
signs of gastric irritation may not be sensitive indicators of gastric mucosa damage. Petechiae and/or
erosions were observed in most subjects exposed to sodium fluoride or a dental gel; however, nausea was
only reported by 33% of the subjects. Similar findings were reported in animal studies; thickening of the
glandular stomach mucosa and punctate hemorrhages were observed in rats ingesting high doses of
sodium fluoride in drinking water for an intermediate duration. Gastrointestinal effects have been
observed following inhalation and oral exposure to hydrogen fluoride. Populations living near a smelter
emitting hydrogen fluoride or exposed during an accidental release of hydrogen fluoride have reported
gastrointestinal effects, including nausea, gastrointestinal distress, and vomiting.
Fluorine and hydrogen fluoride are highly reactive chemicals; direct contact can result in severe damage
to the skin or eyes. The severity of the damage is directly related to the concentration and duration of
exposure. Humans exposed to hydrogen fluoride gas for an acute duration have reported symptoms of
skin irritation (itching and burning sensation) and eye irritation. Most of these human data are inadequate
for establishing concentration-response relationships; the data on ocular irritation do provide some
information of the threshold of toxicity. Very mild eye irritation was observed in subjects exposed to
0.5–4.5 ppm hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour, mild eye irritation was reported during a 15–50-day,
6-hour/day exposure to 3 ppm. Aqueous hydrofluoric acid applied directly to the skin can cause
extensive damage; it is quickly absorbed through the epidermis causing necrosis in underlying tissues
(Chela et al. 1989). In rabbits, a 1-minute exposure to 2% hydrofluoric acid did not produce skin lesions;
however, necrotic lesions were observed after a 1–4-hour exposure to this concentration.
There are limited data on the dermal and ocular toxicity of fluorine. A human study reported slight eye
irritation following a repeated exposure to 10 ppm fluorine (no irritation was reported a during 15-minute
exposure to this concentration), mild eye irritation during a 3-minute exposure to 30–50 ppm, and marked
irritation during a <1-minute exposure to 100 ppm.
2.3 MINIMAL RISK LEVELS
Fluorides
Inhalation MRLs
No inhalation MRLs were derived for fluoride. Several occupational exposure studies examined fluoride
toxicity in aluminum potroom workers (Carnow and Conibear 1981; Chan-Yeung et al. 1983b;
Czerwinski et al. 1988; Dinman et al. 1976c; Kaltreider et al. 1972). Interpretation of these studies is
limited by co-exposure to hydrogen fluoride and other chemicals including aluminum. There are limited
data on the inhaled toxicity of fluoride. Significant increases in lung weight and pulmonary edema have
been observed in mice exposed to 10 mg fluoride/m3 as sodium fluoride 4 hours/day, for 10–14 days
(Chen et al. 1999; Yamamoto et al. 2001). Impaired pulmonary bactericidal activity has also been
observed in mice exposed to 5 mg fluoride/m3 as sodium fluoride (Yamamoto et al. 2001). These studies
cannot be used for MRL derivation because none of the studies examined the skeletal system, which has
been shown to be a sensitive target following oral exposure.
Oral MRLs
A limited number of end points have been examined in humans and animals following acute oral
exposure to fluorides. Most of the available data involved exposure to lethal doses of fluoride; other
examined potential targets of toxicity include the gastrointestinal tract, bone, sperm morphology, and the
developing organism. Symptoms of gastric irritation, such as nausea, vomiting, and gastric pain, have
been observed shortly after exposure to fluoride in drinking water (Hoffman et al. 1980; Spak et al. 1989,
1990; Spoerke et al. 1980). Spak et al. (1989) reported macroscopic and microscopic signs of gastric
irritation in subjects ingesting 20 mg fluoride (1,000 ppm) as sodium fluoride; other studies have not
reliably identified exposure concentrations. A decrease in modulus of elasticity was observed in the
bones of weanling rats exposed to 9.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for
2 weeks (Guggenheim et al. 1976). No alterations in sperm morphology were observed in mice exposed
to 32 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride (Li et al. 1987a). In the absence of maternal toxicity, no
adverse effects in rat or rabbit offsprings were observed (Heindel et al. 1996); skeletal and visceral
alterations were observed in the offspring of rat dams with decreases in body weight and feed
consumption (Guna Sherlin and Verma 2001). From the available data, it appears that the stomach is a
sensitive target of fluoride toxicity following consumption of a bolus dose of fluoride. However, the
observed effect (gastric irritation) is likely due to the fluoride concentration rather than a daily dose
(expressed as mg/kg/day). It is not known whether the gastric mucosa would adapt to repeated exposure
to this concentration of fluoride. An acute-duration oral MRL for fluorides was not derived due to the
previously mentioned uncertainties in basing the MRL on a study that administered a single bolus dose of
sodium fluoride and because the resultant MRL would be lower than the chronic-duration oral MRL.
Several studies have examined the toxicity of sodium fluoride following intermediate-duration exposure
in laboratory animals. These studies have identified a number of potentially sensitive targets of fluoride
toxicity. The lowest identified lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs) are 0.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day for thyroid effects in rats exposed to sodium fluoride in drinking water for 2 months
(Bobek et al. 1976) and 0.80 mg fluoride/kg/day for increased bone formation in mice exposed to sodium
fluoride in drinking water for 4 weeks (Marie and Hott 1986). Neither study identified a no-observed-
adverse-effect level (NOAEL). Derivation of an intermediate-duration MRL from either study would
result in an MRL that is lower than the chronic-duration oral MRL.
• A chronic-duration oral MRL of 0.05 mg fluoride/kg/day was derived for fluoride.
A number of studies have examined the possible association between exposure to fluoridated water and
the risk of increased bone fractures, particularly hip fractures. In general, the studies involved comparing
the incidence of hip fractures among residents aged 55 years and older living in a community with
fluoridated water (around 1 ppm) with the incidence in a comparable community with lower levels of
fluoride in the water. Inconsistent results have been found, with studies finding decreases (Lehmann et al.
1998; Phipps et al. 2000; Simonen and Laittinen 1985), increases (Cooper et al. 1990, 1991; Danielson et
al. 1992; Jacobsen et al. 1990, 1992; Kurttio et al. 1999), or no effect (Arnala et al. 1986; Cauley et al.
1995; Goggin et al. 1965; Jacobsen et al. 1993; Karagas et al. 1996; Kröger et al 1994; Suarez-Almazor et
al. 1993) on hip fracture risk. Studies by Li et al. (2001) and Sowers et al. (1986) have examined
communities with higher levels of naturally occurring fluoride in the water. Both studies found increases
in the incidence of hip fractures in residents exposed to 4 ppm fluoride and higher (Li et al. 2001; Sowers
et al. 1986, 1991); the hip fracture incidence in the highly exposed community was compared to the rates
in communities with approximately 1 ppm fluoride in the water. Significant increases in the occurrence
of nonvertebral fractures were also observed in postmenopausal women ingesting sodium fluoride (34 mg
fluoride/day; 0.56 mg fluoride/kg/day) for the treatment of osteoporosis (Riggs et al. 1990, 1994). This
result was not found in another study of postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis treated with
34 mg fluoride/day as sodium fluoride (Kleerekoper et al. 1991). A meta-analysis of these data, as well
as other clinical studies, found a significant correlation between exposure to high levels of fluoride and an
increased relative risk of nonvertebral fractures (Haguenauer et al. 2000). The Li et al. (2001) study was
selected as the basis for the chronic-duration oral MRL. This study was selected because other potential
sources of fluoride were considered (the Riggs et al. [1990] study did not provide information on the level
of fluoride in the drinking water or other sources of fluoride) and calcium levels were similar among the
different communities (the Sowers et al. [1986] study did not control for calcium intake). The Li et al.
(2001) study identified a NOAEL of 2.62–3.56 ppm (0.15 mg fluoride/kg/day) and LOAEL of 4.32–
7.97 ppm (0.25 mg fluoride/kg/day). An MRL of 0.05 mg fluoride/kg/day is calculated by dividing the
NOAEL of 0.15 mg/kg/day by an uncertainty factor of 3 to account for human variability; a partial
uncertainty factor was used because the most sensitive subpopulation, elderly men and women, was
examined.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid
Inhalation MRLs
• An acute-duration inhalation MRL of 0.02 ppm fluoride was derived for hydrogen fluoride.
The respiratory tract appears to be the primary target of hydrogen fluoride toxicity. Upper respiratory
tract irritation and inflammation and lower respiratory tract inflammation have been observed in several
human studies. Nasal irritation was reported by one subject exposed to 3.22 ppm fluoride as hydrogen
fluoride 6 hours/day for 10 days (Largent 1960). Very mild to moderate upper respiratory symptoms
were reported by healthy men exposed to 0.5 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al.
1997). At higher concentrations, 4.2–4.5 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour, more severe
symptoms of upper respiratory irritation were noted (Lund et al. 1997, 2002). In subjects exposed to
4.2 ppm for 1 hour, analysis of nasal lavage fluid provided suggestive evidence that hydrogen fluoride
induces an inflammatory response in the nasal cavity (Lund et al. 2002). Similarly, bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid analysis revealed suggestive evidence of bronchial inflammation in another study of subjects
exposed to 1.9 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al. 1999); no alterations were
observed at 0.5 ppm. Respiratory effects have also been reported in rats acutely exposed to hydrogen
fluoride. Mild nasal irritation was observed during a 60-minute exposure to 120 ppm fluoride
(Rosenholtz et al. 1963), and respiratory distress was observed at 2,310, 1,339, 1,308, and 465 ppm
fluoride for 5, 15, 30, or 60 minutes, respectively (Rosenholtz et al. 1963). Midtracheal necrosis was
reported in rats exposed to 902 or 1,509 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 2 or 10 minutes using a
mouth breathing model with a tracheal cannula (Dalbey et al. 1998a, 1998b). These effects were not
observed when the tracheal cannula was not used.
The Lund et al. (1997, 1999) study was selected as the basis of the acute-duration inhalation MRL for
hydrogen fluoride. As reported in the 1997 publication, a trend (p=0.06) toward increased upper
respiratory tract symptom score, as compared to pre-exposure symptom scores, was observed at the
lowest concentration tested (0.5 ppm). A significant increase in the total symptom score was also
observed at this concentration. No significant alterations in symptom scores were observed at the mid
concentration (1.9 ppm), and increases in upper respiratory and total symptom scores were observed at
the high concentration (4.5 ppm). Suggestive evidence of bronchial inflammation was also observed at
≥1.9 ppm fluoride (Lund et al. 1999), although no alterations in lower respiratory tract symptoms (Lund
et al. 1997) or lung function (Lund et al. 1997) were observed at any of the tested concentrations. The
MRL is based on the minimal LOAEL of 0.5 ppm fluoride for upper respiratory tract irritation. Data on
nasal irritation from the Largent (1960) report, the Lund et al. (2002) study, and the intermediate-duration
study by Largent (1960) provide suggestive evidence that the severity of nasal irritation does not increase
with increasing exposure duration. These three studies identified similar LOAEL values for different
exposure durations: 3.22 ppm 6 hours/day for 10 days (Largent 1960), 3.8 ppm 1 hour/day for 1 day
(Lund et al. 2002), and 2.98 ppm 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 15–50 days (Largent 1960). Thus, time
scaling was not used to derive the acute MRL. The MRL of 0.02 ppm was calculated by dividing the
minimal LOAEL of 0.5 ppm by an uncertainty factor of 30 (3 for the use of a minimal LOAEL and 10 to
account for human variability).
There are limited data on the long-term toxicity of hydrogen fluoride. Slight nasal irritation was reported
by volunteers exposed to an average concentration of 2.98 ppm fluoride, 6 hours/day for 15–50 days
(Largent 1960). In rats, rabbits, and dogs, pulmonary hemorrhages were observed after exposure to
31 ppm fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). An intermediate-duration
inhalation MRL was not derived for hydrogen fluoride because an MRL based on the Largent (1960)
study is higher than the acute-duration inhalation MRL derived from the Lund et al. (1997, 1999) study.
No chronic-duration studies were located for hydrogen fluoride; thus, a chronic-duration inhalation MRL
was not derived.
Oral MRLs
No oral MRLs were derived for hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid. Only lethality studies were
identified for hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid, precluding derivation of oral MRLs for this chemical.
Fluorine
Inhalation MRLs
• An acute-duration inhalation MRL of 0.01 ppm fluorine was derived for fluorine.
Irritation appears to be the primary effect following acute inhalation exposure to fluorine. The observed
effects include eye, skin, and nasal irritation in humans intermittently exposed to ≥10 ppm for 0.5–
15 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa 1968) and dyspnea and lung congestion in rats and mice exposed to 47–
175 ppm fluorine for 5–60 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). The threshold for the respiratory effects
appears to be duration-related. Necrosis was also observed in the liver parenchymal tissue and in the
renal tubules of rodents acutely exposed to fluorine. In general, the liver and kidney effects occurred at
higher concentrations than the respiratory effects.
The NOAEL and LOAEL values for nasal irritation identified in the human study by Keplinger and
Suissa (1968) were selected as the basis of an acute-duration inhalation MRL for fluorine. Subjects did
not report nasal or eye irritation following a 3-, 5-, or 15-minute exposure to 10 ppm. Eye irritation was
observed at ≥23 ppm; nose irritation at ≥50 ppm, and skin irritation at ≥78 ppm. The severity of the
irritation was concentration related. Exposure to 100 ppm was considered very irritating and the subjects
did not inhale during the exposure period. The NOAEL of 10 ppm was adjusted for intermittent exposure
(0.25 hour/24 hours) and divided by an uncertainty factor of 10 to account for human variability to derive
an acute-duration inhalation MRL of 0.01 ppm fluorine.
Longer-duration exposure studies are limited to a multi-species intermediate-duration study (Stokinger

1949) and an occupational exposure study (Lyon 1962). As with acute-duration exposure, the primary
effect of intermediate-duration exposure to fluorine was eye, nose, and mouth irritation, which was
observed in rats and dogs (Stokinger 1949). Evidence of pulmonary damage (bronchitis, hemorrhage, and
edema) was also observed in rats, rabbits, and dogs. The study author noted that there was some
difficulty in measuring the exposure concentrations and considered the measurements of exposure
concentrations to be questionable. The chronic-duration study of workers exposed to fluorine (Lyon
1962) was not considered for MRL derivation because it used a relatively insensitive measure of
respiratory effects (absences from work and visits to the medical department with respiratory complaints)
and the workers and the controls were exposed to uranium hexafluoride and hydrogen fluoride.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of this chapter is to provide public health officials, physicians, toxicologists, and
other interested individuals and groups with an overall perspective on the toxicology of fluorides,
hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. It contains descriptions and evaluations of toxicological studies and
epidemiological investigations and provides conclusions, where possible, on the relevance of toxicity and
toxicokinetic data to public health.
A glossary and list of acronyms, abbreviations, and symbols can be found at the end of this profile.
The term fluoride properly refers to numerous natural and synthesized compounds that are derived from
hydrofluoric acid. This class of chemicals is commonly referred to as fluorides. Some of these
compounds, such as oxygen difluoride, are very reactive and highly toxic. Because of their reactivity,
these compounds would not migrate unchanged from a hazardous waste site. Fluoride salts, such as
sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride, are much less reactive and much less toxic. Since the fluoride ion
is the toxicologically active agent, and discussion of water fluoridation uses the term fluoride, the term
fluoride is used generically in this profile to refer to toxicology of fluoride salts. Because numerous
different fluoride compounds exist naturally in the environment and have varying chemical properties, the
term fluorides is used in the discussion of environmental media. Most of the available literature on
fluoride toxicity concerns sodium fluoride. Additional toxicity literature is available on some other forms
of fluoride, such as stannous fluoride. Other forms of fluoride are discussed only if exposure is likely to
occur at a hazardous waste site. (Such exposure to stannous fluoride is not likely.) Wherever the form of
fluoride exposure is known, that salt is identified in the profile.
Hydrogen fluoride is also a gas and is very water soluble. It dissolves readily in any water present in the
air or other media. When hydrogen fluoride is dissolved in water, it is called hydrofluoric acid. Although
hydrofluoric acid is very corrosive and can etch glass, it is a weak acid, meaning that it can be present in
water as an undissociated molecule. However, in dilute solutions, it is almost completely ionized; salts
are formed if cations are available. Due to formation of complexes, very concentrated solutions of
hydrofluoric acid are also largely ionic in nature. Therefore, a hydrogen fluoride or hydrofluoric acid
spill would result in contamination with fluoride ion, but hydrogen fluoride or hydrofluoric acid would
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
not be of concern outside the immediate vicinity of the spill. However, while members of the public are
only likely to come into contact with fluoride contamination, clean-up workers could be exposed to
hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid. In this profile, hydrogen fluoride is used to refer to the gas, while
hydrofluoric acid is used to refer to the liquid form. When both forms are included, the term hydrogen
fluoride is used.
Fluorine is a gaseous element that occurs only in very low concentrations in the environment in the
absence of anthropogenic sources (see Chapter 6 for further discussion). Because it is strongly
electronegative, it is rarely found in the environment in the elemental state, nor is it likely to be found in
the environment near toxic waste sites as molecular fluorine.
Limited information also exists concerning occupational exposure to the mineral cryolite (Na3AlF6),
sometimes with concomitant exposure to hydrogen fluoride. Because these exposures usually involve
exposure to both hydrogen fluoride and cryolite, sometimes along with exposure to other fluoride dusts,
they are discussed separately in the profile.
This profile will discuss data, or the absence of data, concerning the toxicity of inorganic compounds of
fluorine that people could be exposed to at a hazardous waste site. Exposure and toxicity are discussed
separately for fluoride, hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine. Toxic effects of occupational
exposure in aluminum reduction plants, where exposures to hydrogen fluoride, fluoride dusts, and cryolite
all occur, are also discussed separately. Because the toxic effects of fluorine are largely due to the action
of the fluorine molecule on the respiratory tract or other exposed surfaces, fluorine exposure is reported as
exposure to a level of diatomic fluorine. By contrast, systemic effects of hydrogen fluoride are due to the
fluoride ion, so concentrations of hydrogen fluoride are converted to fluoride equivalents. All doses of
fluoride are reported as the amount of fluoride ion.
The primary routes and durations of concern vary with the different fluorine compounds. In general, the
more soluble the fluoride, the more that can be absorbed by oral ingestion, and the more toxic it is. The
primary exposure routes and duration for hydrofluoric acid are the inhalation or dermal routes, related to
acute occupational exposure, while the primary exposure route and duration for fluoride is chronic oral
exposure to fluoride in the drinking water, food, and fluoride-containing dental products. Therefore, most
of the information for the inhalation and dermal routes comes from studies of acute exposure to fluorine
or hydrofluoric acid, while most of the information regarding the oral route is based on sodium fluoride.
The toxicity following inhalation or dermal exposure to other inorganic fluorine compounds differs from
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
that of hydrofluoric acid. Similarly, oral exposure to various fluorides other than sodium fluoride may
result in different toxic effects.
3.2 DISCUSSION OF HEALTH EFFECTS BY ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
To help public health professionals and others address the needs of persons living or working near
hazardous waste sites, the information in this section is organized first by route of exposure (inhalation,
oral, and dermal) and then by health effect (death, systemic, immunological, neurological, reproductive,
developmental, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects). These data are discussed in terms of three exposure
periods: acute (14 days or less), intermediate (15–364 days), and chronic (365 days or more).
Levels of significant exposure for each route and duration are presented in tables and illustrated in
figures. The points in the figures showing no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) or lowest-
observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs) reflect the actual doses (levels of exposure) used in the studies.
LOAELs have been classified into "less serious" or "serious" effects. "Serious" effects are those that
evoke failure in a biological system and can lead to morbidity or mortality (e.g., acute respiratory distress
or death). "Less serious" effects are those that are not expected to cause significant dysfunction or death,
or those whose significance to the organism is not entirely clear. ATSDR acknowledges that a
considerable amount of judgment may be required in establishing whether an end point should be
classified as a NOAEL, "less serious" LOAEL, or "serious" LOAEL, and that in some cases, there will be
insufficient data to decide whether the effect is indicative of significant dysfunction. However, the
Agency has established guidelines and policies that are used to classify these end points. ATSDR
believes that there is sufficient merit in this approach to warrant an attempt at distinguishing between
"less serious" and "serious" effects. The distinction between "less serious" effects and "serious" effects is
considered to be important because it helps the users of the profiles to identify levels of exposure at which
major health effects start to appear. LOAELs or NOAELs should also help in determining whether or not
the effects vary with dose and/or duration, and place into perspective the possible significance of these
effects to human health.
The significance of the exposure levels shown in the Levels of Significant Exposure (LSE) tables and
figures may differ depending on the user's perspective. Public health officials and others concerned with
appropriate actions to take at hazardous waste sites may want information on levels of exposure
associated with more subtle effects in humans or animals (LOAELs) or exposure levels below which no
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
adverse effects (NOAELs) have been observed. Estimates of levels posing minimal risk to humans
(Minimal Risk Levels or MRLs) may be of interest to health professionals and citizens alike.
Estimates of exposure levels posing minimal risk to humans (Minimal Risk Levels or MRLs) have been
made for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. An MRL is defined as an estimate of daily human
exposure to a substance that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse effects (noncarcino-
genic) over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are derived when reliable and sufficient data exist to
identify the target organ(s) of effect or the most sensitive health effect(s) for a specific duration within a
given route of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancerous health effects only and do not consider
carcinogenic effects. MRLs can be derived for acute, intermediate, and chronic duration exposures for
inhalation and oral routes. Appropriate methodology does not exist to develop MRLs for dermal
exposure.
Although methods have been established to derive these levels (Barnes and Dourson 1988; EPA 1990),
uncertainties are associated with these techniques. Furthermore, ATSDR acknowledges additional
uncertainties inherent in the application of the procedures to derive less than lifetime MRLs. As an
example, acute inhalation MRLs may not be protective for health effects that are delayed in development
or are acquired following repeated acute insults, such as hypersensitivity reactions, asthma, or chronic
bronchitis. As these kinds of health effects data become available and methods to assess levels of
significant human exposure improve, these MRLs will be revised.
A User's Guide has been provided at the end of this profile (see Appendix B). This guide should aid in
the interpretation of the tables and figures for Levels of Significant Exposure and the MRLs.
3.2.1 Inhalation Exposure
Inhalation exposure most commonly occurs in an occupational setting. As discussed above, most of the
available information concerning toxic effects of fluorine and its compounds following inhalation
exposure comes from studies of exposure to hydrogen fluoride or hydrofluoric acid. There are also a
limited number of useful studies concerning inhalation exposure to fluorine or particulates of inorganic
fluoride compounds. However, no animal studies were located regarding toxic effects of exposure to the
particulate fluoride compounds. Toxic effects of hydrogen fluoride are discussed in all of the following
sections. Where toxicity data exist for fluoride or fluorine, these substances are also discussed.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Acute inhalation of hydrogen fluoride following facial splashes with hydrofluoric acid can cause
bronchiolar ulceration, pulmonary hemorrhage and edema, and death. In addition, renal and hepatic
damage have been observed in animal studies. Many of the human studies regarding inhalation of
hydrogen fluoride fumes also involved dermal exposure; in such cases, it is difficult to determine which
effects are specific to the inhalation route. However, the respiratory effects of hydrogen fluoride appear
to be inhalation-specific, because they have not been reported in cases where there was clearly no
inhalation exposure. The effects of combined inhalation and dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid are
also discussed in Section 3.2.3.
Fluorine gas is extremely irritating. The primary health effects of acute fluorine inhalation are nasal and
eye irritation (at low levels), and death due to pulmonary edema (at high levels). In animals, renal and
hepatic damage have also been observed.
The major health effect of chronic inhalation exposure to fluoride is skeletal fluorosis, which has been
reported in cases of exposure to fluoride dusts and hydrogen fluoride, either individually or in
combination.
3.2.1.1 Death
Both hydrogen fluoride and fluorine can cause lethal pulmonary edema, although cardiac effects also
contribute to the toxicity of hydrogen fluoride. The reported LC50 values for hydrogen fluoride in rats for
a given duration are generally at least 3.5 times higher than the value for fluorine (as diatomic fluorine) in
rats for the same duration. Although strain differences could account for some of this difference, the
LC50 values of hydrogen fluoride in Crl:CD®BR and Wistar-derived rats were very similar.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Acute inhalation of hydrogen fluoride fumes in combination with dermal exposure
to hydrofluoric acid has been reported to cause death in humans. Actual exposure concentrations are not
known in any of these cases. Death was generally due to pulmonary edema (resulting from irritation and
constriction of the airways) or to cardiac arrhythmias with pronounced hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, and
hypomagnesemia.
The death of a chemist who sustained first- and second-degree burns of the face, hands, and arms when a
vat containing hydrofluoric acid accidentally ruptured has been described (Kleinfeld 1965). This 29-year-
old male died 10 hours after admission to the hospital. Postmortem examination revealed severe
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
tracheobronchitis and hemorrhagic pulmonary edema. A petroleum refinery worker was splashed in the
face with 100% anhydrous hydrofluoric acid (Tepperman 1980). The absorption of fluoride produced
acute systemic fluoride poisoning with profound hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia and cardiac
arrhythmias. The patient died <24 hours after exposure; autopsy revealed pulmonary edema. A young
woman splashed in the face with hydrofluoric acid died of respiratory insufficiency a few hours after
exposure (Chela et al. 1989). The autopsy revealed severe burns of the skin and lungs, with hemorrhagic
pulmonary edema produced by hydrofluoric acid and its vapor.
The lethal concentration of hydrogen fluoride has been investigated in rats, mice, and guinea pigs. It
appears that mice are more sensitive to the acute effects of hydrogen fluoride than rats, and rats are more
sensitive than guinea pigs. The 15-minute LC50 values for hydrogen fluoride were 4,327 ppm fluoride for
guinea pigs and 2,555 ppm fluoride for Wistar-derived rats (Rosenholtz et al. 1963). The 60-minute
LC50 values for hydrogen fluoride were 325 ppm fluoride in ICR-derived mice (Wohlslagel et al. 1976),
1,325 ppm fluoride in Sprague-Dawley-derived rats (Wohlslagel et al. 1976), and 1,242 ppm fluoride in
Wistar-derived rats (Rosenholtz et al. 1963). In a study (Dalbey et al. 1998a) comparing the toxicity of
hydrogen fluoride in rats using mouth-breathing (rats fitted with a tracheal cannula) and nose-breathing
models, dramatic differences in lethality were observed. In the mouth-breathing rats, 50 and 80% of the
animals died within 2 weeks of a 10-minute mouth breathing exposure to 3,655 or 6,663 ppm fluoride,
respectively. In contrast, no deaths were noted following exposure to these concentrations using the nose-
breathing model. The difference in lethality between the two models is probably due to the higher dose of
hydrogen fluoride reaching the lower airways in the mouth-breathing model.
The LC50 values reported by Haskell Laboratory (1988) for Crl:CD®BR rats were much higher than the
values reported by the above investigators, although the size of the discrepancy decreased with longer
exposure durations. For example, the 15-minute LC50 was reported as 6,620 ppm, while the 60-minute
LC50 was 1,610 ppm. Although the concentration of hydrogen fluoride that produced death was reported
to be lower when it was administered to rats in humid air (Haskell Laboratory 1988), the method for
measuring fluoride in humid air may not have given accurate results. This limitation was recognized by
the authors, who stated that the collection efficiency of the sampling train for aerosols was not evaluated.
Longer-term effects of hydrogen fluoride were investigated by exposing various species to 8.2 or 31 ppm
fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). Humidity was
47–97% at the lower concentration and 48–66% at the higher concentration. Marked species differences
were observed. All rats and mice exposed to 31 ppm died, but no guinea pigs, rabbits, or dogs exposed at
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
this level died. No animal of any species died following exposure to 8.2 ppm. In an experiment where
five rabbits, three guinea pigs, and two Rhesus monkeys were exposed to 18 ppm for 6–7 hours/day,
5 days/week for 50 days (309 hours total), the only deaths observed were two guinea pigs (Machle and
Kitzmiller 1935). Exposure of one of these animals stopped after 134 hours of exposure, and exposure of
the other one stopped after 160 hours, when marked weight loss was observed. Nevertheless, the animals
died about 2 weeks later.
Fluorine. No information was located on death in humans caused by fluorine. Fluorine toxicity has been
investigated in Osborne-Mendel rats, Swiss-Webster mice, New England guinea pigs, and New Zealand
rabbits (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). Similar values for the LC50 were calculated for the different species.
In the rats, the LC50 values for exposures of 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes were 700, 390, 270, and 185 ppm,
respectively. At concentrations near the LC50, few signs of intoxication were observed immediately after
exposure, except for irritation of the eyes and nose. Several hours after exposure, the animals exhibited
lethargy, dyspnea, and general weakness. Except at concentrations above the LC90, death generally
occurred 12–18 hours after exposure. Animals that survived for 48 hours generally survived for the
duration of the observation period. Loss of body weight was also observed, but was considered
nonspecific and was attributed to anorexia.
Toxic effects of inhalation exposure to fluorine and hydrogen fluoride were compared in rats, mice,
rabbits, and guinea pigs (Stokinger 1949). Lethal doses from fluorine exposure determined by this group
are about 3–4 times those determined by Keplinger and Suissa (1968), but quantitative exposure level
data from these experiments are not reliable due to technical problems in monitoring fluorine gas levels.
However, qualitative results from these experiments are useful. These experiments also found that
fluorine was more toxic than hydrogen fluoride.
There are some indications that preexposure to low levels of fluorine may provide resistance to lethal
effects of fluorine. Increases in survival time were observed in rabbits exposed to 50 ppm fluorine for
30 minutes, 1 day/week for 4 weeks prior to exposure to a lethal concentration of fluorine (400 ppm for
30 minutes) (Keplinger 1969). Survival time in the rabbits was 48 hours, as compared to 18 hours or less
in similarly exposed rabbits not preexposed to fluorine. In mice, slight increases in LC50 values were
found in animals receiving a single exposure to 30–45 ppm fluorine prior to exposure to lethal
concentrations. However, slight decreases in LC50 values were seen in mice preexposed to 25 ppm
fluorine (Keplinger 1969). No mechanism for the possible tolerance was suggested.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Repeated exposures of rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits to 0.5, 2, 5, or 18 ppm fluorine were conducted
for up to 178 hours over 35 days (Stokinger 1949). The exposure regimen was not stated, but appears to
be 6 hours/day, 6 days/week. The exposure levels at these lower concentrations were considered fairly
reliable. Guinea pigs and rats were less sensitive to lethal effects than were rabbits or dogs. All of the
rabbits and dogs exposed to 5 ppm and mice exposed to 18 ppm died, while only half of the rats and
guinea pigs exposed to 18 ppm died. Most animals exposed to 2 ppm survived.
The LC50 values for each species and duration category of exposure to hydrogen fluoride are recorded in
Table 3-1 and plotted in Figure 3-1. The LC50 values for each species and duration category of exposure
to fluorine are recorded in Table 3-2 and plotted in Figure 3-2.
3.2.1.2 Systemic Effects
The highest NOAEL values and all reliable LOAEL values for systemic effects in each species and
duration category of exposure to hydrogen fluoride are recorded in Table 3-1 and plotted in Figure 3-1.
duration category of exposure to fluorine are recorded in Table 3-2 and plotted in Figure 3-2. The highest
NOAEL values and all reliable LOAEL values for systemic effects in each species and duration category
of exposure to fluoride are recorded in Table 3-3 and plotted in Figure 3-3.
Respiratory Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Acute inhalation of 122 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride by two male volunteers
produced marked respiratory irritation within 1 minute (Machle et al. 1934). Pulmonary edema,
pulmonary hemorrhagic edema, and tracheobronchitis have been reported in cases of people being
splashed in the face with hydrofluoric acid, where concurrent inhalation and dermal exposures are likely
(Chan et al. 1987; Chela et al. 1989; Dieffenbacher and Thompson 1962; Kleinfeld 1965; Tepperman
1980). Exposure concentrations were not known in these cases. In another case, a women developed
herrhagic alveolitis and adult respiratory disease syndrome following exposure to a presumably high
concentration of hydrogen fluoride from a cleaning product (Bennion and Franzblau 1997).
Two human experimental studies have been conducted to assess the ability of hydrogen fluoride to induce
respiratory tract inflammation. In the first study, increases in upper airway symptoms were observed in
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE
Table 3-1 Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride - Inhalation
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
a Frequency Reference
Key to Species NOAEL Less Serious Serious
figure (Strain) (Specific Route) Chemical Form
System (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Death
1 Rat 1d Haskell Laboratory 1988
5-60 2890 (30-minute LC50)
min/d hydrogen fluoride
6620 (15-minute LC50)
14600 (5-minute LC50)
1610 (60-minute LC50)
2 Rat 1d Rosenholtz et al. 1963

5-60 1940 (30-minute LC50)
(Wistar) hydrogen fluoride
min/day
2555 (15-minute LC50)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
4722 (5-minute LC50)
1242 (60-minute LC50)
3 Rat 1d Wohlslagel et al. 1976

60 min/d 1325 (60-minuteLC50)
hydrogen fluoride
4 Mouse 1d Wohlslagel et al. 1976

60min/d 325 (60-minute LC50)
hydrogen fluoride
5 Gn Pig 1d Rosenholtz et al. 1963

5-60 4327 (15-minute LC50)
(Hartley) hydrogen fluoride
min/d
Systemic
6 Human 1 hour Lund et al. 1999; Lund et al. 1997
Resp 1.9 M (lower respiratory inflammation)
b hydrogen fluoride
0.5 M (upper respiratory irritation)
37
Table 3-1 Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride - Inhalation (continued)
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
7 Human 1 hour Lund et al. 2002

Resp 4.2 M (upper airway irritation and
inflammation) hydrogen fluoride
8 Human 1 to sev Machle et al. 1934

minutes Dermal 122 (smarting of the skin)
see hydrogen fluoride
comments
Ocular 122 (conjunctival irritation)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
9 Rat 2 min Dalbey et al. 1998a, b
Resp 563 1509 (mucosal necrosis in mid
(Sprague- trachea) hydrogen fluoride
Dawley)
Hemato 4643 8190 (incr RBC, hemoglobin, and

hematocrit levels)
Hepatic 563 1509 (incr asparate aminotransferase

activity)
10 Rat 10 min Dalbey et al. 1998a, b

Resp 257 902 (minimal midtracheal necrosis)
(Sprague- hydrogen fluoride
Dawley)
Hemato 1676 (incr hemoglobin and hematocrit

levels)
Hepatic 1676

5 min/d Resp 712 (mild nasal irritation) 2310 (temporary respiratory distress
and nasal discharge) hydrogen fluoride
Ocular 712 (moderate lacrimation)
38
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

15min/d Resp 292 357 (nasal irritation) 1339 (temporary respiratory distress
Ocular 292 357 (lacrimation)

60min/d Resp 98 120 (nasal irritation) 465 (temporary respiratory distress
Ocular 98 120 (lacrimation)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
14 Rat 30 min Stavert et al. 1991
Resp 1235 (fibrinonecrotic rhinitis in nose
(Fischer- 344) breathing rats; tracheal and hydrogen fluoride
bronchial necrosis in mouth
breathing rats)
Bd Wt 1235 (10% body weight reduction)

INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE
Death
15 Rat 5 wks Stokinger 1949
6d/wk 31 (100% mortality)
(NS) hydrogen fluoride
6hr/d
16 Mouse 5 wks Stokinger 1949

6hr/d
Systemic
17 Human 15-50 d Largent 1960
6 hr/d Resp 2.98 (slight nasal irritation)
hydrogen fluoride
Dermal 2.98 (stinging sensation on skin)
Ocular 2.98 (stinging sensation in eyes)
39
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

6hr/d Resp 8.2 31 (pulmonary hemorrhage)
Hemato 31
Renal 8.2 31 (cortical necrosis)
Ocular 8.2 (subcutaneous hemorrhage

around the eyes and on the
feet)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
19 Mouse 5 wks Stokinger 1949
6d/wk Dermal 8.2 (subcutaneous hemorrhage
(NS) around the eyes and on the hydrogen fluoride
6hr/d
feet)
20 Dog 5 wks Stokinger 1949

6d/wk Resp 31 (pulmonary hemorrhage)
6hr/d
Hemato 31
21 Rabbit 5 wks Stokinger 1949

6d/wk Resp 8.2 31 (pulmonary hemorrhage)
6hr/d
Hemato 31
Neurological
22 Rat 5mo Sadilova et al. 1965
24hr/d 0.01 0.03 (disturbances in conditioned
(albino) reflexes; lengthened latent hydrogen fluoride
periods)
a The number corresponds to entries in Figure 3-1.
b Used to derive an acute-duration inhalation minimal risk level (MRL) of 0.02 ppm; the concentration was divided by an uncertainty factor of 30 (3 for use of a minimal LOAEL and 10
to account for human variability).
40
Bd = body weight; d = day(s); Hemato = hematological; hr = hour(s); incr = increase; LC50 = lethal concentration, 50% kill; LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; min =
minute(s); mo = month(s); NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect level; ppm = parts per million; RBC = red blood cell; Resp = respiratory; wk = week(s)
Figure 3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride - Inhalation
Acute (≤14 days)

Systemic
al ht
tory logic eig
ppm ira ato tic al r yW
ath sp m pa rm ula d
De Re He He De Oc Bo
100000
1r
10000
9r
1r
5g 2r 9r
1r 2r
2r 11r
1r 9r 10r 9r 10r
2r 3r 12r 14r 14r
1000 10r
11r 11r
9r 9r
13r
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
4m 12r 12r
10r 12r 12r
13r 8 8 13r
100 13r 13r
10
6
1
6
0.1
0.01
c-Cat k-Monkey f-Ferret n-Mink Cancer Effect Level-Animals Cancer Effect Level-Humans LD50/LC50
d-Dog m-Mouse j-Pigeon o-Other LOAEL, More Serious-Animals LOAEL, More Serious-Humans Minimal Risk Level
r-Rat h-Rabbit e-Gerbil LOAEL, Less Serious-Animals LOAEL, Less Serious-Humans for effects
p-Pig a-Sheep s-Hamster NOAEL - Animals NOAEL - Humans other than
41
q-Cow g-Guinea Pig Cancer
Figure 3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride - Inhalation (Continued)
Intermediate (15-364 days)

Systemic
al al
ry gic gic
ato ato
lo l r lo
ppm
ath spir m n al r ma ula u ro
De Re He Re De Oc Ne
100
16m 15r 20d 18r 21h 20d 18r 21h 18r
10
18r 21h 18r 19m 18r
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
17 17 17
0.1
22r
0.01 22r
42
Table 3-2 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine - Inhalation
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Death
1 Rat 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968
5-60min/d 270 (30-minute LC50)
(Osborne- fluorine
Mendel) 390 (15-minute LC50)
700 (5-minute LC50)
2 Mouse 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

15-60min/d 225 (30-minute LC50)
(Swiss- fluorine
Webster) 375 (15-minute LC50)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
600 (5-minute LC50)
3 Gn Pig 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

15-60min/d 395 (15-minute LC50)
(New fluorine
England) 170 (60-minute LC50)
4 Rabbit 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

5-30min/d 820 (5-minute LC50)
(New fluorine
Zealand) 270 (30-minute LC50)
Systemic
5 Human 2-3 days Keplinger and Suissa 1968
3-5 minutes every 15 Dermal 10 (slight skin irritation)
minutes fluorine
Ocular 10 (slight eye irritation)
43
Table 3-2 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine - Inhalation (continued)
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
6 Human 15 minutes b Keplinger and Suissa 1968

Resp 10
fluorine
Dermal 10
Ocular 10
7 Human 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

0.5min/d Resp 100 (nasal irritation)
fluorine
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Ocular 100 (eye irritation)

1min/d Resp 67 (nasal irritation)
fluorine
Dermal 67 67 (skin irritation)
Ocular 67 (eye irritation)

3min/d Resp 10 50 (slight nasal irritation)
fluorine
Ocular 10 50 (eye irritation)

5min/d Resp 23
fluorine
Dermal 23
Ocular 10 23 (slight eye irritation)
44
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

5min/d Resp 88 350 (irritation)
(Osborne- fluorine
Mendel) 175 (dyspnea; mild lung congestion)

(Osborne- fluorine
Mendel) 98 (very mild lung congestion)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Ocular 195

30min/d Resp 35 140 (nasal irritation)
(Osborne- fluorine

(Osborne- fluorine
Ocular 93

5min/d Resp 79 174 (dyspnea; nasal irritation;
(Swiss- diffuse lung congestion; alveolarfluorine
Webster) necrosis)
Hepatic 174 195 (necrosis and cloudy swelling)
Renal 79 114 (necrosis)
45
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

(Swiss- fluorine
Webster) 87 (very mild lung congestion)
Ocular 188

15min/d Resp 65 82 (alveolar necrosis and
(Swiss- hemorrhage) fluorine
Webster)
Hepatic 128 144 (coagulation, necrosis, and
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
cloudy swelling)
Renal 65 82 (coagulation, necrosis)

Webster)
Hepatic 82 116 (coagulation, necrosis, and

cloudy swelling)
Renal 51 82 (coagulation, necrosis)

(Swiss- fluorine
Webster) 32 67 (very mild lung congestion)
Ocular 113

(Swiss- fluorine
Webster) 50 (very mild lung congestion)
46
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

Webster)
Hepatic 55 80 (necrosis and cloudy swelling)
Renal 50 55 (necrosis)

(New fluorine
England) 100 (very mild lung congestion)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
60min/d Resp 73 135 (mild lung congestion, irritation,
(New dyspnea) fluorine
England)
24 Dog 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

15min/d Resp 39 93 (slight lung congestion)
(NS) fluorine
25 Dog 1d Keplinger and Suissa 1968

60min/d Resp 68 93 (irritation, cough, and slight
(NS) dyspnea) fluorine

(New fluorine
Zealand) 134 (slight dyspnea)
47
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/

(New fluorine
Zealand) 71 (very mild lung congestion)
Death
(NS) fluorine
6hr/d
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(NS) fluorine
6hr/d

(NS) fluorine
6hr/d
Systemic
6d/wk Resp 5 18 (severe pulmonary irritation)
(NS) fluorine
6hr/d
Bd Wt 18 (weight loss)

6d/wk Resp 0.5 2 (pulmonary hemorrhage and
(NS) edema) fluorine
6hr/d
Hepatic 5 18 (liver congestion)

6d/wk Resp 0.5 2 (mild bronchial inflammation) 18 (hemorrhage in the lungs)
(NS) fluorine
6hr/d
Hepatic 2 5 (hyperemia of the liver)
48
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
Reproductive
6d/wk 5 18 (testicular degeneration)
(NS) fluorine
6hr/d
b Used to derive an acute inhalation minimal risk level of 0.01 ppm; the concentration was adjusted for intermittent exposure (0.25 hours/24 hours) and divided by an uncertainty
factor of 10 to account for human variability.
d = day(s); Gn Pig = Guinea pig; LC50 = lethal concentration, 50% kill; LOAEL; lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level; min = minute(s); NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect level;
ppm = parts per million; Resp = respiratory
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
49
Figure 3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine - Inhalation
Acute (≤14 days)

Systemic
ry
irato
ppm ath sp
De Re
1000
4h
1r
2m
3g 2m 1r 26h
11r
1r 4h
2m 22g
1r 15m 16m 11r 12r
3g 2m 20m
23g 13r 26h 27h
100 22g 7 19m
24d 25d 16m 11r 12r 14r
23g 15m 17m 18m 26h
25d 22g 8 16m 17m 19m 19m 13r 27h
9 18m 20m 21m 12r 14r
24d 13r
19m 20m 21m 27h
14r
10
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
10 6 9
0.1
0.01
50
Figure 3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine - Inhalation (Continued)
Acute (≤14 days)

Systemic
tic l al r
pa na rm ula
ppm He Re De Oc
1000
15m
15m
15m 15m 16m 11r 12r
17m 17m 13r
18m 15m 19m
100 24d 7 11r 14r
18m 21m 15m 17m 18m
17m 8 8 25d 8 13r
21m 18m 21m 21m 9
24d 25d
10 10
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
10 5 6 5 6 9 10
0.1
0.01
51
Figure 3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine - Inhalation (Continued)

Systemic
y ht tiv
e
ator c eig duc
ath s pir pati d yW p ro
ppm
De Re He Bo Re
100
28r 31r 33h 32d 31r 34r
10
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
29d 30h 31r 32d 33h 34r
32d 33h 33h
32d 33h
0.1
52
Table 3-3 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Inhalation
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
System (mg/m³) (mg/m³) (mg/m³)
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Systemic
1 Mouse 4 hours/day Chen et al. 1999
10 days Resp 13.3 M (increased relative lung weight)
(ICR) sodium fluoride
2 Mouse 4 hour/day Yamamoto et al. 2001

14 days Resp 2M 10 M (pulmonary edema)
(BALB/c) sodium fluoride
Immuno/ Lymphoret
3 Mouse 4 hour/day Yamamoto et al. 2001
14 days 2M 5 M (decreased pulmonary
(BALB/c) bactericidal activity) sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Systemic
4 Mouse 4 hours/day Chen et al. 1999
20-30 days Resp 13.3 M (increased relative lung weight)
(ICR) sodium fluoride
LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; M = male; NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect level; Resp = respiratory
53
Figure 3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Inhalation
Acute (≤14 days)

Systemic
r
pho
y ym
tor o/L
ira n
mg/m3 es
p mu
R Im
100
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
1m
10 2m
3m
2m 3m
54
Figure 3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Inhalation (Continued)

Systemic
y
tor
mg/m3 pira
Res
100
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
4m
10
p-Pig s-Hamster NOAEL - Animals NOAEL - Humans other than
55
q-Cow a-Sheep g-Guinea Pig Cancer
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
individuals exposed to 0.5 or 4.5 ppm hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al. 1997). Significant
increases in the percentage of CD3-positive cells and lymphocytes in the bronchial portion of the lower
respiratory tract, as assessed via bronchoalveolar lavage performed 3 weeks prior to exposure and
24 hours after exposure, was also observed at 4.5 ppm, but not at 0.5 ppm (Lund et al. 1999). However,
no significant alterations in lung function or lower airway symptoms were observed (Lund et al. 1997).
The second study with a similar study design assessed upper airway inflammation via nasal lavage (Lund
et al. 2002). An inflammatory response in the nasal mucosa was observed following a 1-hour exposure to
3.8–4.5 ppm hydrogen fluoride. Seven of the 10 tested subjects also reported upper airway symptoms
(specific symptoms were not presented); most of the subjects scored the severity of the symptoms as very
mild to mild.
A number of residents of Texas City, Texas, reported respiratory symptoms following the accidental
release of hydrogen fluoride. It was estimated that most of the hydrogen fluoride was released in the first
2 hours after the accident, and evacuation of residents within 0.5 miles of the facility began within
20 minutes of the accident. Many of the 939 people who went to the emergency room within 24 hours of
the accident reported signs of respiratory irritation: throat burning (21.0%), shortness of breath (19.4%),
sore throat (17.5%), and cough (16.4%) (Wing et al. 1991). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second
(FEV1) was <80% of predicted values in 42.3% of the 130 individuals who underwent pulmonary
function testing. In another study of the Texas City residents, health effects within 1 month of the
accident and 2 years after the accident were assessed in 1,994 residents who were asked to complete
health questionnaires 2 years after the accident (Dayal et al. 1992). A large number of highly exposed
residents reported severe symptoms of breathing problems (e.g., coughing, difficulty breathing, shortness
of breath), throat problems (e.g., difficulty swallowing, burning irritation, phlegm, voice changes), and
nose problems (e.g., sneezing, runny nose, problems smelling food); the prevalence of severe symptoms
were 60.2, 51.9, and 40.7% for breathing, throat, and nose problems, respectively, within the first month
of the accident. High prevalence of these effects was still reported 2 years after the accident; 38.5, 22.1,
and 26.5% for severe breathing, throat, and nose problems, respectively. The prevalence of severe
breathing, throat, and nose problems in the nonexposed population were 11.3, 6.2, and 6.4%, respectively,
within 1 month of the accident and 8.2, 3.3, and 4.1%, respectively, 2 years after the accident. The
prevalence of the breathing problems were higher in a subgroup of the high exposure group that had pre-
existing respiratory problems or smoked more than two packs of cigarettes per day. Although this study
(Dayal et al. 1992) provides suggestive evidence that acute exposure to hydrogen fluoride can result in
long-term damage to the respiratory tract, the study results should be interpreted with caution. The
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
symptom survey was administered 2 years after the accident, there was no medical confirmation of the
effects, and the study authors did not provide a definition for severe symptoms.
Lethality studies in animals have also reported respiratory effects in rats, mice, and guinea pigs from
acute inhalation exposure to hydrogen fluoride. True respiratory effects, such as respiratory distress,
pulmonary congestion, and intra-alveolar edema were generally observed at levels of at least ~50% of the
LC50 (Haskell Laboratory 1988; Rosenholtz et al. 1963; Wohlslagel et al. 1976). These effects appear to
be reversible within a week upon cessation of exposure.
A series of experiments by Dalbey et al. (1998a, 1998b) examined the acute toxicity of nonlethal
concentrations of hydrogen fluoride in rats following a 2- or 10-minute exposure. In most of the
experiments, a mouth-breathing model with a tracheal cannula was used to maximize delivery of
hydrogen fluoride to the lower respiratory tract. A number of respiratory tract effects were found in the
mouth-breathing rats, including alterations in bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) parameters (increased total
protein, myeloperoxidase, lactate dehydrogenase, β-glucuronidase, and glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase), impaired lung function (decreased total lung capacity, vital capacity, peak expiratory
flow, forced expiratory flow at 50 and 25% of the forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at
0.1 second, forced vital capacity, and diffusing capacity and increased pulmonary resistance), and
histological damage (necrosis and acute inflammation in trachea and acute alveolitis and perivascular/
peribronchial edema and inflammation in the lung). Rats exposed for 2 minutes manifested histological
damage and BAL parameter alterations at 1,509 ppm fluoride and impaired lung function at 4,643 ppm.
No adverse respiratory effects were observed at 563 ppm fluoride. In the rats exposed for 10 minutes,
histopathological alterations (necrosis of the trachea only) and BAL parameters (polymorphonuclear
leukocytes and myeloperoxidase levels only) were observed at 903 ppm fluoride; impaired respiratory
function was observed at 1,676 ppm fluoride. No adverse effects were observed at 257 ppm fluoride.
The respiratory effects were consistently more severe in the rats exposed for 2 minutes as compared to
10 minutes, when exposure was expressed as the product of concentration x time. In other experiments,
rats were exposed for 60 minutes to hydrogen fluoride. No adverse respiratory effects were observed at
19 or 46 ppm. Respiratory effects observed in nose-breathing rats were limited to the nose. Necrosis and
acute inflammation of the ventral meatus, nasal septum, and nasoturbinates were observed in rats exposed
to 6,072 ppm for 2 minutes and 1,586 ppm for 10 minutes. A dramatic decrease in breathing frequency
was also observed in the nose-breathing rats; within the first minute of exposure, breathing frequency was
32–35% of the preexposure levels. The decrease in breathing frequency, which is a component of reflex
apnea, is a response to sensory irritation.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Similar results were observed in rats exposed to 1,235 ppm fluoride for 30 minutes. Moderate to severe
fibronecrotic rhinitis and large fibrin thrombi in the submucosa and hemorrhage were observed in the
nasal cavity of nose-breathing rats; no nasal lesions were observed in similarly exposed rats fitted with a
tracheal cannula to simulate mouth-breathing. Epithelial, submucusal, and cartilage necrosis in the
trachea, trace levels of neutrophils in the alveoli, and necrosis of the bronchi were observed in the mouth-
breathing rats, but not in the nose-breathing rats, suggesting that the toxicity of hydrogen fluoride occurs
at the point of entry. Reflex apnea, as evidenced by a marked decrease in breathing frequency, was
observed in the nose-breathing rats. Based on differences in minute ventilation rates, the study authors
estimated that the mouth-breathing rats inhaled 27% more hydrogen fluoride than the nose-breathing rats.
Pulmonary hemorrhage was noted in dogs, rabbits, and rats exposed to 31 ppm fluoride as hydrogen
fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). At 8.2 ppm fluoride, no effect was
seen in rats or rabbits, and localized hemorrhages were seen in only 1/5 dogs.
Pulmonary hemorrhage, alveolar inflammation, and hyperplasia of the bronchial epithelium were
observed in guinea pigs that died due to exposure to 18 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 6–
7 hours/day, 5 days/week for about 35 days (Machle and Kitzmiller 1935). This effect was not readily
reversible. The one surviving guinea pig had alveolar exudates, thickening of the alveolar walls, and
hemorrhages of the lungs when necropsied 9 months after the conclusion of the full 50-day exposure
period. Similarly, all four rabbits exposed under the same conditions had lobular pneumonia and
leucocytic infiltration of the alveolar walls, sometimes with edema and thickening of the walls, when
necropsied 7–8 months after the last exposure. No clinical signs of toxicity were reported in rabbits and
weight gain was generally similar to the controls. This study is limited by the small number of animals
used and the incomplete reporting of the data.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. A study of an occupational cohort exposed to hydrogen
fluoride and fluoride dusts in the pot rooms of an aluminum smelter reported a significantly lower forced
expiratory volume and increased cough and sputum production in the highest exposure group, compared
with controls who worked in the office or casting department and were reported to have no significant
occupational exposure to air contaminants. Corrections were made for age, height, and smoking habits.
The ambient air fluoride concentration in the high-exposure area was 0.2 mg fluoride/m3 as vapor
(presumably hydrogen fluoride) and 0.28 mg/m3 "particulate fluoride." It is not clear whether the latter
value represented the air concentration of fluoride in particulates or the concentration of the particulates
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
that contain fluoride. Actual exposure was unknown because the workers wore respirators. Although
urinary fluoride levels increased over the course of one work shift in the high-exposure group and not in
the control group, the decrease in respiratory volume in the same time period was about the same in both
groups (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a). This effect was attributed to the fact that the exposed workers wore
respirators; historical use of respirators was not reported. Because actual exposure was not known, no
quantitative relationship between clinical symptoms and environmental or urinary fluoride levels could be
established. There also may have been concomitant exposure to other respiratory irritants.
Fluoride Particulates. There is limited information on the respiratory toxicity of fluorides. Significant
increases in relative lung weight were observed in mice exposed to 13.3 mg F/m3 as sodium fluoride
4 hours/day for 10, 20, or 30 days (Chen et al. 1999). The toxicological significance of this effect is not
known because histopathology was not conducted. In another study of mice (Yamamoto et al. 2001),
lung damage, as evidenced by significant decreases in total cells and alveolar macrophages and increases
in polymorphocytic neutrophils and lymphocytes in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, was found in mice
exposed to 10 mg F/m3 as sodium fluoride 4 hours/day for 14 days. An increase in polymorphocytic
neutrophils was also observed at 5 mg/m3.
Fluorine. Limited data are available regarding respiratory effects of fluorine on humans. Five volunteers
(19–50 years of age; gender not specified) were exposed to fluorine through a face mask that covered the
eyes and nose but not the mouth (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). A concentration of 10 ppm was not
irritating to the respiratory tract for at least 15 minutes. Slight nasal irritation was reported following a
3-minute exposure to 50 ppm, and exposure to 100 ppm for 0.5 or 1 minute was very irritating to the
nose. Intermittent inhalation (3–5-minute exposure every 15 minutes for 2–3 hours) of 23 ppm did not
cause respiratory difficulty.
An occupational cohort study comparing the incidence of respiratory complaints by 61 exposed workers
with over 2,000 "unexposed" workers found no increase in the exposed group (Lyon 1962). The average
fluorine level was 0.9 ppm, and the maximum measured value was 24 ppm. The study author concluded
that the workers became "hardened" to the irritating effects of fluorine. The study is limited in that both
groups were also exposed to uranium hexafluoride and hydrogen fluoride. The method of measuring
respiratory complaints (visits to the plant medical department) was also not very sensitive. However, the
observation of tolerance caused by repeated low level exposures is supported by the results from animal
studies discussed in Section 3.2.1.1 and later in this section (Keplinger 1969).
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Diffuse lung congestion has been reported in rats, mice, guinea pigs, dogs, and rabbits exposed to fluorine
for 5–60 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). The severity was concentrated-related. The adverse
effect levels for each exposure duration did not appear to vary across species. The ranges of adverse
effect levels for each exposure duration were 174–175 ppm for 5 minutes, 87–100 ppm for 15 minutes,
67–71 ppm for 30 minutes, and 47–135 ppm for 60 minutes. Other respiratory effects that were observed
in these animals included dyspnea, irritation, and alveolar necrosis.
In 5-week exposure studies conducted by Stokinger (1949), pulmonary hemorrhage, edema, and bronchial
inflammation were reported. These studies found species differences in sensitivity to fluorine-induced
respiratory effects. Exposure to 2 ppm, 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks resulted in no effects in
rats, pulmonary hemorrhage and edema in dogs, and mild bronchial inflammation in rabbits; respiratory
effects (severe pulmonary irritation) were observed in rats exposed to 18 ppm.
Swiss-Webster mice that were preexposed once to 30 ppm fluorine for 60 minutes and then exposed to
118–410 ppm fluorine for 15 minutes after an interval of 4–96 hours showed markedly less lung
pathology than animals that were not pretreated (Keplinger 1969). At the highest level (410 ppm),
exposure 4 hours prior to the challenge reduced the lung pathology from the most severe rating to a rating
of normal–mild. Preexposure also reduced the increased lung weight otherwise seen following fluorine
exposure. However, a similar preexposure regimen only resulted in slight increases in the LC50, as
discussed in Section 3.2.1.1.
Cardiovascular Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Cardiac arrhythmias have been seen in humans following hydrofluoric acid splashes
in the face region, where both dermal and inhalation exposures were involved (Chan et al. 1987;
Tepperman 1980). It is not known whether inhalation exposure alone would cause these effects.
However, myocardial necrosis and congestion were observed in three rabbits following inhalation
exposure of 26 ppm fluoride as anhydrous hydrogen fluoride for an unspecified period (Machle et al.
1934). The study was limited by the small sample size and undetermined exposure period.
Gastrointestinal Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. A population exposed to airborne hydrogen fluoride near a smelter reported nausea
(22.6%) and diarrhea (21.7%). The corresponding levels reported by a control population were 6.9 and
12.1%, respectively. The total levels of gastrointestinal complaints were 70.5 and 36.2% in the subject
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
and control populations, respectively. The subject population appears to have been derived by self-
selection and random house-to-house sampling, while the control population lived in a nonindustrial area.
Although atmospheric concentrations were not presented, concentrations of fluoride in animals and plants
in the area surrounding the smelter were substantially above normal. The smelter was also reported to
emit metallic oxide fumes (Waldbott 1979).
Similar gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) were reported by Texas residents exposed
to an accidental 2-hour release of hydrogen fluoride (Dayal et al. 1992). During the first month after the
accident, 38.5% of the highly exposed residents reported severe gastrointestinal effects; 15.5% of the
residents still reported severe gastrointestinal effects 2 years after the accident. The occurrence of severe
gastrointestinal effects among nonexposed residents was 4.5 and 2.7%, respectively, for these time
periods.
Hematological Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Hemograms of 20 variables (not specified) determined in the rat (30/group), rabbit
(10/group), and dog (4/group) following exposure to 18 ppm fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week, for
5 weeks showed no clear changes (Stokinger 1949).
Five rabbits and two Rhesus monkeys were exposed to 18 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride via
inhalation 6–7 hours/day, for 50 days (Machle and Kitzmiller 1935). Blood counts were done beginning
1 week prior to exposure and ending 3 months after the final exposure. There was a small but significant
decrease in erythrocyte levels in both species, but the study authors considered that the result may have
been due to biological variation. Significant increases in hemoglobin levels were seen in monkeys. There
was no effect on hemoglobin levels in rabbits or on leukocyte levels in either species. These experiments
used only a few animals from each species, and the exposure measurement technology was not very
precise.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. No signs of hematological effects, as measured by routine
blood counts, were seen in a large cohort of aluminum workers exposed to total fluoride levels below
2.5 mg/m3 for durations of at least 10 years (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983b). Similarly, no increase in
abnormal findings was seen in 74 workers exposed at a phosphate fertilizer plant (Derryberry et al. 1963).
The average urinary fluoride level in the exposed group was 4.6 mg/L. Significantly reduced levels of
hemoglobin were reported in Slovak children aged 6–14 years living near an aluminum smelter (Macuch
et al. 1963), but no information was provided on any statistical tests used. No information was provided
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
on air fluoride concentrations, but urinary fluoride levels were about 0.8 mg/L for 6–11-year-old children
and about 0.4 mg/L for 12–14-year-old children. In an outdated study of 78 workers exposed to cryolite,
anemia was present in 11/30 subjects with pathological bone changes (Moller and Gudjonsson 1932).
Blood parameters were not analyzed for the workers without bone changes.
Fluorine. No studies were located on hematological effects of inhalation exposure of humans to fluorine.
No effect on complete blood count parameters was observed in Osborne-Mendel rats exposed to 142 ppm
for 60 minutes or 329 ppm for 15 minutes or in dogs exposed to 109 ppm for 60 minutes or 93 ppm for
15 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). These concentrations were higher than the corresponding
LC50 values. Blood counts were monitored for 21 days postexposure. Similarly, Stokinger (1949) saw no
effect on hematological parameters in dogs, rabbits, or rats following repeated exposures at
concentrations up to lethal levels (31 ppm). This study did not specify which parameters were measured.
Musculoskeletal Effects.
Fluoride. There are several case reports of radiological alterations (primarily thickening of the bone) in
workers exposed to sodium fluoride (McGarvey and Ernstene 1947), rock phosphate dust containing
3.88% fluoride (Wolff and Kerr 1938), or cryolite (Roholm 1937). In the two cryolite workers, the
fluorine content of the costa bone was 10-fold higher than in non-exposed individuals. Roholm (1937)
also examined 68 cryolite workers exposed to high levels (35 mg/m3) of cryolite dust. Approximately
35% of the workers complained of “rheumatic attacks, pains, or feeling of stiffness” and reduced mobility
was found in approximately 21% of the workers. Radiological examinations revealed diffuse
osteosclerosis in approximately 84% of the workers.
No studies were located regarding musculoskeletal effects in animals after inhalation exposure to fluoride.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Human data on the musculoskeletal effects of hydrogen fluoride (in the absence of
concomitant exposure to fluoride dusts) are limited to a case report of a worker employed at an alkylation
unit of an oil company (Waldbott and Lee 1978). The worker complained of back pains, leg pains, and
loss of memory and was diagnosed with advanced osteoarthritis of the spine. The data presented in this
report are inadequate to assess whether the back and leg pains were related to hydrogen fluoride exposure,
the osteoarthritis, or a petroleum product.
Duration- and concentration-related increases in tooth and bone fluoride levels were reported in the rat
following exposure to 8.2 or 31 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). The study author did not report whether there were any visible or radiological
signs of dental or skeletal fluorosis.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. Marked evidence of skeletal fluorosis was reported in workers
exposed to gaseous fluoride (largely hydrogen fluoride) and fluoride dust in the pot rooms of the
aluminum industry (Kaltreider et al. 1972). Individual exposure concentrations and durations were not
presented. However, the estimated time-weighted average (TWA) 8-hour exposure to total fluorides for
one plant ranged from 2.4 to 6.0 mg/m3. Average post-shift urinary fluoride levels were about 9 mg/L.
Exposure at a second plant was lower as a result of industrial hygiene measures; no TWA was available,
but post-shift urinary fluoride levels ranged from 1.4 to 4.6 mg/L. No skeletal changes were observed at
the second plant, and detailed physical examinations of the workers at both plants revealed no general
health impairment. No data were presented that correlated urinary fluoride levels to the presence or
absence of fluorosis.
In a follow-up study of 59 of the potroom workers at the second plant, the average preshift (after 48 hours
away from work) urinary fluoride level was 2.24 mg/L (range, 1.4–3.1). The average level after 3–
5 working days (postshift) was 5.68 mg/L (range, 2.7–10.4). In spite of this evidence of fluoride
exposure, there was no radiological evidence of any fluoride-related bone abnormalities (Dinman et al.
1976c). Total occupational exposure ranged from 10 to 43 years. This study may provide urinary
fluoride levels that are not associated with any bone effects in healthy adults. However, because only
workers who remained at the high-exposure tasks for the duration of the study were examined, any
sensitive population that may have found work elsewhere because of adverse health effects might have
been missed.
Clinical and radiological investigations were performed for 2,258 aluminum workers exposed to fluoride
for an average of 17.6 years (Czerwinski et al. 1988). The form of fluoride was not reported, but it was
probably hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dust. Possible fluorosis (multiple joint pains, limited motion in
at least two joints or in the spine, and initial ossifications visible on x-ray films) was found in 14% of the
workers. Indications of early skeletal fluorosis (advanced painful symptoms, advanced limitation of
motion in at least two joints or spine, marked ossifications on two or more x-rays, initial osteosclerosis,
slight periosteal reaction, and thickening of long bone cortices ) were found in 5.12% of the workers and
definite fluorosis (stage I) was found in 1.0% of the workers. The study authors reported finding a close
positive correlation between the occurrence of fluorosis and the time and level of fluoride exposure.
Another health study of 2,066 workers in an aluminum smelter reported early signs of skeletal fluorosis
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(mild increase in bone density, periosteal changes, calcifications of ligaments) in a few pot room workers
employed for >10 years. The study authors noted that there was poor agreement on early signs of
fluorosis among the two radiologists reading the x-ray films. No effects were seen in workers exposed for
<10 years. Actual airborne fluoride levels measured at the time of the health assessment were 0.2 mg/m3
hydrogen fluoride and 0.28 mg/m3 fluoride dusts. Historical fluoride levels were not reported; although
the study authors implied that exposure levels had been below 2.5 mg/m3 for some period (Chan-Yeung et
al. 1983b).
Skeletal fluorosis was also observed in workers involved in study the crushing and refining of cryolite
(Moller and Gudjonsson 1932). Thirty-nine of the 78 examined workers showed evidence of skeletal
fluorosis in the form of dense calcification in the long bones, cartilage, and in extreme cases, of the skull
as well. Although an average exposure period was not presented, no workers with <2 years of exposure
were included; some workers had been exposed for as long as 40 years.
While the above studies generally found radiologically-apparent skeletal fluorosis appearing prior to or
concurrent with musculoskeletal symptoms, Carnow and Conibear (1981) found musculoskeletal
symptoms in aluminum workers in the absence of radiological findings. Questionnaire answers suggested
a significant increase in incidence and severity of musculoskeletal disease and fracture frequency with
fluoride exposure. By contrast, there was no exposure-related increase in evidence of skeletal fluorosis
on chest and spinal x-ray films. Neither radiologic data nor actual exposure levels or durations were
reported. As the authors recognized, the exposure group was heterogeneous and was exposed to other
chemicals, and some of the musculoskeletal symptoms may have actually been due to heavy physical
labor.
Fluorine. No data were located regarding musculoskeletal effects of fluorine inhalation on humans.
Fluoride levels in the teeth of rats exposed to 18 ppm fluorine for approximately 6 hours/day, 6 days/week
for 5 weeks were about 14 times the levels in controls; fluoride levels in the femur were about 6 times that
of the controls (Stokinger 1949). The appearance of the teeth was characterized as corresponding to that
of very mild to mild dental fluorosis. The fluoride levels in the teeth and bone at lower concentrations
decreased in a concentration-related manner. Pigment changes were reported as just perceptible in
animals exposed to 2 ppm fluorine.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Hepatic Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Ten animals (five rabbits, three guinea pigs, and two Rhesus monkeys) were
exposed via inhalation to 18 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride 6–7 hours/day for 50 days (Machle and
Kitzmiller 1935). Fatty degeneration of the liver parenchyma, scattered focal necroses, and fibroblastic
encroachment of periportal spaces were observed in the guinea pigs. Two of the three guinea pigs began
losing weight after about 145 hours of exposure, were withdrawn from the exposure regimen, and died
about 2 weeks later. Generalized fatty changes were also seen in two of four rabbits sacrificed 7 months
after exposure termination. These experiments used only a few animals from each species, and the
exposure measurement technology was not very precise.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. The occupational health study by Chan-Yeung et al. (1983b)
discussed above revealed no adverse effects on liver function, as measured by levels of total bilirubin,
serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), and alkaline phosphatase.
Fluorine. No studies were located regarding hepatic effects of fluorine inhalation in humans. Mice
exposed to fluorine exhibited coagulation necrosis of the liver, periportal hemorrhages, and diffuse cloudy
swelling (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). These effects were generally observed after exposure to
concentrations of 195, 144, 116, or 80 ppm fluoride for 5, 15, 30, or 60 minutes, respectively. Damage
became apparent 7–14 days after exposure. Liver congestion was reported in dogs, but not in other
species subjected to repeated exposures to a lethal concentration of fluorine (18 ppm 6 hours/day,
6 days/week for 5 weeks) (Stokinger 1949).
Renal Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Pathologically elevated serum creatinine and urea levels were seen 24 hours after
accidental dermal and inhalation exposure to a mixture of 70–80% sulfuric acid and 10% hydrofluoric
acid at 150 °C (Braun et al. 1984). Neither the effect of the sulfuric acid nor the exposure levels were
known.
Degeneration and necrosis of the renal cortex was reported in 27/30 rats exposed to 31 ppm fluoride as
hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks, but not in rats exposed to 8.2 ppm fluoride
(Stokinger 1949). Pathological examination of rabbits and guinea pigs (n=3/species/exposure level)
exposed to hydrogen fluoride revealed tubular necrosis, congestion, and edema (Machle et al. 1934). A
variety of different exposure levels and durations were tested, but the levels at which exposure-related
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
effects were seen were not reported. Rabbits (n=4) exposed via inhalation to 18 ppm fluoride as
hydrogen fluoride 6–7 hours/day for 50 days developed degeneration and necrosis of convoluted tubules,
accompanied by fibrous tissue replacement of cortical tissues (Machle and Kitzmiller 1935).
Degenerative and inflammatory changes were also seen in the single exposed monkey at necropsy. The
experiments described in both of these papers used a small number of animals and no control data were
presented.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. Increased incidence of albuminuria (p<0.1) was observed in
phosphate fertilizer plant workers with an average urinary fluoride level of 4.6 mg/L (Derryberry et al.
1963). However, the testing method used in this study is considered to be hypersensitive (Dinman et al.
1976a), and several other studies have found no effects. No signs of renal effects, as measured by
standard renal function tests, were seen in a large cohort of aluminum workers exposed to total fluoride
levels estimated to be below 2.5 mg/m3 (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983b). Two other studies of aluminum
workers failed to find an increase in the incidence of albuminuria (Dinman et al. 1976c; Kaltreider et al.
1972). Average postshift urinary fluoride levels were ≤5.68 mg/L (Dinman et al. 1976c) and ≤9.6 mg/L
(Kaltreider et al. 1972). The exposed population included workers exposed to estimated air fluoride
levels of 4–6 mg/m3 (time-weighted average), of which 50% was gaseous fluoride (presumably hydrogen
fluoride) (Kaltreider et al. 1972).
The weight-of-evidence indicates that typical inhalation occupational exposure to hydrogen fluoride and
fluoride dust is not nephrotoxic. The overall animal data indicate that inhalation exposure to sufficiently
high levels of hydrogen fluoride or fluorine can cause kidney damage, but the relevance to human health
and the potential nephrotoxic level cannot be determined because of generally incomplete human and
animal data. In addition, only one animal experiment was located that conducted a histopathic exam
following fluorine exposure.
Fluorine. No studies were located regarding renal effects of fluorine inhalation in humans. Mice
exposed to fluorine exhibited focal areas of coagulation necrosis in the renal cortex and focal areas of
lymphocyte infiltration in the cortex and medulla following exposure to 114 ppm for 5 minutes, 82 ppm
for 15 or 30 minutes, or 55 ppm for 60 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). Damage became apparent
7–14 days postexposure.
Endocrine Effects. No studies were located regarding endocrine effects in humans or animals after
inhalation exposure to fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Dermal Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. Dermal exposure to hydrogen fluoride can cause irritation of the
skin and mucous membranes. Residents exposed to hydrogen fluoride following an accidental release
reported a number of skin effects including itching, burning, and rash; 43.8% of the highly exposed
residents reported severe skin problems, as compared to 5.3% of nonexposed residents (Dayal et al.
1992). Two years after the accident, severe skin problems were reported by 21.9% of the high-exposure
group compared to 2.7% of the control group. “Smarting" of exposed skin occurred in humans within
1 minute of exposure to hydrogen fluoride at about 122 ppm fluoride (Machle et al. 1934). This was the
highest concentration that two male volunteers could tolerate for >1 minute. Repeated exposures did not
reveal any habituation.
Exposure to hydrogen fluoride levels approaching the LC50 can cause lesions of the face in rats (Haskell
Laboratory 1988). Rats exposed to hydrogen fluoride (whole body) at a concentration of approximately
1,395 ppm fluoride for 60 minutes were observed to have erythema of an unspecified severity of the
exposed skin (Wohlslagel et al. 1976). Subcutaneous hemorrhages around the eyes and on the feet
developed in rats exposed to 8.2 or 31 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for
5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). The effect was more severe at the higher exposure level. Dogs exposed to
31 ppm fluoride for the same time periods developed inflammation of the scrotal epithelium.
Fluorine. When the shaved backs of New Zealand rabbits were exposed to fluorine gas under 40 pounds
of pressure for 0.2–0.6 seconds at distances of 0.5–1.5 inches, the resulting burn appeared to be thermal,
rather than chemical in nature (Stokinger 1949). Exposure for 0.2 seconds produced an ischemic area
about ¼ inch in diameter, surrounded by an erythematous area. This became a superficial eschar that
sloughed off within 4 days, revealing normal epidermis. The longer exposures produced a flash of flame
that resulted in combustion of hair, singeing, and erythema over an area several times the area of the
primary burn. Coagulation necrosis and charring of the epidermis was also reported. The wound healed
within 13 days. The burns resembled those produced by an oxyacetylene flame, rather than those made
by hydrofluoric acid, and so were characterized as thermal, rather than chemical. However, it is not clear
if the difference from the hydrofluoric acid burn is due to the shorter exposure to fluorine.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Ocular Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Marked conjunctival irritation was noted in humans within 1 minute of exposure to
hydrogen fluoride at about 122 ppm fluoride (Machle et al. 1934). This was the highest concentration
that two male volunteers could tolerate for >1 minute. At 61 ppm fluoride, conjunctival and nasal
irritations were still marked, and tickling and discomfort of the nasal passages were reported. A
concentration of 32 ppm fluoride produced mild irritation of the nose and eyes and irritation of the larger
air passages. This concentration could be tolerated for "several" minutes (at least 3 minutes). The
authors of this study reported some difficulties with their measurements of exposure. Repeated exposures
did not reveal any habituation.
Severe symptoms of eye problems were reported by 63.2% of Texas residents exposed to high levels of
hydrogen fluoride following an accidental release (Dayal et al. 1992). The most commonly reported eye
effects were redness, itching, and burning or irritation. Two years after the accident, 11.5% of the
population still reported severe eye problems. In nonexposed residents, the prevalence of severe
symptoms within the first month of the accident was 7.4; 2 years later, the prevalence was 4.9.
Mild eye irritation was observed in five volunteers exposed 6 hours/day for 15–50 days, to hydrogen
fluoride at concentrations averaging from approximately 0.85 to 7.7 ppm fluoride; the mean of the
average concentrations was 2.98 ppm (Largent 1960). This study is limited by the inadequacy of both the
experimental details and the description of effects observed.
Hydrogen fluoride levels approaching the LC50 can cause corneal opacity in rats (Haskell Laboratory
1988), while slight ocular irritation was observed in rats exposed to levels as low as 6% of the LC50
(Rosenholtz et al. 1963). Eye irritation, evidenced by pawing of eyes, was observed in rats exposed to
140 or 175 ppm fluorine for 30 or 5 minutes, respectively, and in dogs exposed to 68 or 93 ppm fluorine
for 60 or 15 minutes, respectively. In experiments with exposure for durations of 15–60 minutes, eye and
nose irritation was reported only at ~50% of the LC50. Similar results were obtained with Swiss-Webster
mice, New England guinea pigs, and New Zealand rabbits (Keplinger and Suissa 1968).
Fluorine. Volunteers (19–50 years of age) were exposed to 10 ppm fluorine for 15 minutes without
discomfort or irritation of the eyes or nose (Keplinger and Suissa 1968). However, repeated exposures to
10 or 23 ppm fluorine for 3–5 minutes every 15 minutes over a 2–3-hour period caused slight eye
irritation. Exposure was through a face mask that covered the eyes and nose but not the mouth. Eye
irritation was also reported following exposure to 50 ppm for 3 minutes and 67 and 78 ppm for 1 minute.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Exposure to 100 ppm was very irritating and became uncomfortable after a few seconds. At this
concentration, the subjects reported that the eyes burned and felt as though they were covered by a film.
Body Weight Effects.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Pronounced weight loss shortly before death was observed in rats exposed to a
lethal level of hydrogen fluoride (31 ppm fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks). Guinea
pigs exposed under the same conditions lost weight following the third exposure week, even though there
were no deaths (Stokinger 1949). While a decrease compared to the low-exposure level group is clear, no
control animals were used and the lowest exposure level that would result in a significant change was not
established. Animals surviving a lethal exposure exhibited a body weight loss of 10–15% for up to a
week after exposure (Rosenholtz et al. 1963; Stavert et al. 1991).
Fluorine. Decreased weight gain was observed in rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits exposed to 18 ppm
fluorine for about 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks (Stokinger 1949). While a decreased weight gain
in the high-exposure group compared to the low-exposure groups is clear, no control animals were used
and the lowest exposure level that would result in a significant change was not established.
3.2.1.3 Immunological and Lymphoreticular Effects
No studies were located regarding immunological effects in humans or animals after inhalation exposure
to hydrogen fluoride or fluorine.
Fluoride Particulates. A significant decrease in pulmonary bactericidal activity was observed in mice
challenged for 30 minutes with aerosol inhalation of Staphylococcus aureus following a 14-day exposure
(4 hours/day) to 5 or 10 mg F/m3 as sodium fluoride (Yamamoto et al. 2001). Bactericidal activity was
not significantly altered in mice exposed to 2 mg/m3. The highest NOAEL values and all reliable LOAEL
values for immunologic effects in each species and duration category of inhalation exposure to fluoride
are recorded in Table 3-3 and plotted in Figure 3-3.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.2.1.4 Neurological Effects
Hydrogen Fluoride. The threshold of the light adaptive reflex was measured as a marker for neurological
effects in three subjects following exposure to hydrogen fluoride at concentrations of 0.02, 0.03, or
0.06 ppm fluoride (Sadilova et al. 1965). While the threshold level was determined to be 0.03 ppm, it is
not clear whether this response is due to irritation of mucous membranes or is the result of an effect on
cerebral cortical function. The toxicological significance of a change in light adaptive reflex is not
known.
Exposure to concentrations at about 50% of the LC50 values was reported to cause general weakness and
decreased activity in Wistar rats (Rosenholtz et al. 1963). Albino rats given 24-hour exposures to either
0.03 or 0.1 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 5 months developed central nervous system
dysfunctions, as evidenced by diminished conditioned responses and increased time before motor nerve
response. Histological studies showed changes in the nerve cell synapses of only those animals exposed
to 0.1 ppm. A concentration of 0.01 ppm was found to be without effect on conditioned responses,
latency in motor nerve response, or neurohistological parameters. When additional stresses were added
(alcohol, 24-hour starvation), the conditioned responses were extinguished more frequently (Sadilova et
al. 1965). Some recovery in conditioned responses was seen following a 1-month recovery period in the
animals exposed to 0.1 ppm. Animals exposed to 0.03 ppm recovered completely.
All reliable LOAEL values for neurological effects of exposure to hydrogen fluoride in each species and
duration category are recorded in Table 3-1 and plotted in Figure 3-1.
Fluorine. No studies were located regarding neurological effects in humans of fluorine following
inhalation exposure. Dogs exposed to 5 or 18 ppm for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for up to 35 days had
seizures prior to death (Stokinger 1949). Because no further details were available, the neurotoxic
potential of fluorine cannot be evaluated.
3.2.1.5 Reproductive Effects
No studies were located regarding reproductive effects in humans after inhalation exposure to fluoride,
hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine, and no studies were located regarding reproductive effects in animals after
inhalation exposure to fluoride.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Hydrogen Fluoride. All four dogs exposed to 18 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day,
6 days/week for 5 weeks developed degenerative testicular changes and ulceration of the scrotum
(Stokinger 1949). This effect was not seen at 8.2 ppm, or in rabbits or rats at either exposure level. No
further details were available. Furthermore, it is not clear whether this is a systemic effect or a result of
irritation from dermal contact with the gas.
Fluorine. Rats exposed to 18 ppm fluorine, 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 5 weeks showed testicular
degeneration (Stokinger 1949). No further details were available. It is not clear whether this effect was
seen both in animals that died and in those that survived.
3.2.1.6 Developmental Effects
No studies were located regarding developmental effects in humans or animals after inhalation exposure
to fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine.
3.2.1.7 Cancer
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. Most occupational exposure to fluoride occurs as a result of
inhalation of hydrofluoric acid fumes or dust from cryolite or fluorspar. A cohort of cryolite workers in
Denmark was reported to have an increase in mortality and morbidity from respiratory cancer compared
with the national average (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] of 2.52, 95% confidence interval of 1.40–
4.12, Standardized Incidence Ratio of 2.5 , 95% confidence interval of 1.6–3.5) (Grandjean et al. 1985).
The study authors stated that the increase can be explained by the fact that the respiratory cancer death
rate for the Copenhagen area is about twice the national average for the birth cohorts from 1890 to 1929,
so that comparison with national rates may not be appropriate. Respiratory cancer rates for the workers
were slightly higher than those of the general population of Copenhagen (standardized incidence ratio of
1.5, 95% confidence interval of 1.0–2.1). No apparent relationship between incidence of all cancers and
the length of employment or latency period was found. Significant increases in cancer mortality,
particularly respiratory cancer, were also found in a follow-up study of this cohort (Grandjean et al.
1992). The SMR for all cancer was 1.34 (95% confidence interval of 1.2–1.50) compared to Danish
national rates and the standardized incidence ratio for lung cancer was 1.40 (95% confidence interval
of 1.01–1.90) compared with rates for Copenhagen. Additionally, a significant increase in bladder cancer
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
incidence was seen (standardized incidence ratio of 1.84, 95% confidence interval of 1.08–2.96). The
investigators noted that smoking habits may have accounted for some of the lung cancer risk.
Increased lung cancer rates have been reported in several studies of aluminum industry workers
(Andersen et al. 1982; Gibbs and Horowitz 1979; Milham 1979), but no correction was made for smoking
or concurrent exposure to tars and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Similarly, fluorspar miners had
increased lung cancer rates, but they were also exposed to elevated radon levels (deVilliers and Windish
1964). A cohort study of 21,829 workers in aluminum reduction plants for ≥5 years did not find an
increase in lung cancer, but did report an increase in mortality due to pancreatic cancer, lymphohemato-
poietic cancers, genitourinary cancer, and nonmalignant respiratory disease (Rockette and Arena 1983).
Only the effect on pancreatic cancer rates was statistically significant. Increases in incidence of
hematopoietic cancers and respiratory disease were also reported by Milham (1979). Because of the
confounding factors mentioned above, and because no breakdown was done by fluoride exposure, these
studies are of questionable relevance to the issue of possible carcinogenicity of inhalation exposure to
hydrogen fluoride and/or fluorides.
A study was published describing a positive relationship between increased lung cancer occurrence and
exposure to fluoride among individuals residing near, or working in, the steel industry (Cecilioni 1972).
Possible occupational exposures to other carcinogenic substances from steel and other industries were not
considered. Carcinogenicity via inhalation of fluoride is not considered to be likely by most investigators
reporting in the existing literature.
No studies were located regarding cancer in animals after inhalation exposure to fluoride, hydrogen
fluoride, or fluorine.
3.2.2 Oral Exposure
Because hydrogen fluoride and fluorine are gases, oral exposure to these substances occurs only
concomitant with inhalation exposure. Oral exposure to hydrofluoric acid has been reported very rarely.
Except where otherwise indicated, the following sections on oral exposure refer to oral exposure to
fluoride.
The oral toxicity of fluoride has been investigated in humans and animals. The human database mostly
consists of epidemiology studies designed to assess whether consumption of fluoridated water is
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
associated with adverse health effects, particularly skeletal effects and cancer. Most of these studies are
community-based and do not provide data on individual exposure levels or the particular fluoride
compound. Fluorosilicic acid and sodium hexafluorosilicate are the primary fluoride compounds used in
water fluoridation programs, although exposure to other fluoride compounds, such as
monofluorophosphate, used in dental products also contribute to total fluoride exposure. Additional
information on the toxicity of fluoride in humans comes from studies of communities with naturally high
levels of fluoride in the drinking water and experimental studies typically involving exposure to sodium
fluoride. Animal studies have primarily involved exposure to sodium fluoride in drinking water or the
diet. A few animal studies also examined the toxicity of fluoride following exposure to calcium fluoride,
cryolite, and fluoride from rock phosphate. For all forms of fluoride discussed, doses are reported as
amount of the fluoride ion.
Conflicting results have been obtained from animal experiments addressing whether fluorine is an
essential element. Much of this conflict appears to result from the great difficulty in preparing an animal
diet that has negligible amounts of fluoride, but otherwise allows normal animal growth and development.
As discussed in Section 3.2.2.6, there have been suggestions that fluoride can aid fertility by improving
intestinal absorption of iron and other trace elements (Messer et al. 1973; Tao and Suttie 1976). In a
study where fluoride was rigorously removed from dietary components, a total of 110 Wistar rats were
observed over the course of four generations (Maurer and Day 1957). There were no adverse effects
compared to controls that received the same diet and 0.28 mg fluoride/kg/day in drinking water. Animals
fed the low-fluoride diet were healthy, had sleek coats and healthy teeth, and had similar weight gains to
those of the controls. Low success in bringing pups to weaning (50%) was reported for both the low-
fluoride and control groups. No fluoride was detectable in the diet (detection limit not reported), and
fluoride levels in femurs were ≤8.8 ppm fluoride in bone ash. In a more recent study, dose-dependent
increases in daily weight gain of F344 rats were observed when a low-fluoride diet was supplemented
with fluoride (Schwarz and Milne 1972). The fluoride provided by the basal diet varied, but was
sometimes 0.023 mg/kg/day and occasionally dropped below 0.002 mg/kg/day. However, the results are
likely to be due to other nutritional deficiencies that were partially compensated by fluoride. Rats in both
the control and low-fluoride groups had shaggy fur, loss of hair, and seborrhea. Fluoride was only
partially effective in correcting the bleached incisors found in the low-fluoride group. Bleached incisors
have been related to deficiencies of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, and vitamins E, D, and A.
None of these studies provide strong evidence that fluoride is an essential element.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Several organizations consider fluoride to be an important dietary element for humans. The Institute of
Medicine (IOM 1997) has derived adequate intake values ranging from 0.01 to 4 mg/day to reduce the
occurrence of dental caries. Adequate intake values broken down by age group are 0–6 months,
0.01 mg/day; 7–12 months, 0.5 mg/day; 1–3 years, 0.7 mg/day; 4–8 years, 1 mg/day; 9–13, 2 mg/day;
14–18 years, 3 mg/day; 19 years and older, 4 mg/day (males) and 3 mg/day (females); pregnancy,
3 mg/day; and lactation, 3 mg/day. Using body weight data reported by IOM (2000), these dietary intakes
are equivalent to doses of approximately 0.05 mg/kg/day for ages 6 months to >18 years; the dose in
infants 0–6 months is 0.0014 mg/kg/day. The World Health Organization (WHO) considers fluoride to
be “essential” because it considered “resistance to dental caries to be a physiologically important
function” (WHO 2002).
3.2.2.1 Death
Fluoride. Fatal ingestion of sodium fluoride has been reported as early as 1899 (Sharkey and Simpson
1933). A summary of early fatalities indicates that the primary symptoms were the sudden onset of
nausea and vomiting, accompanied by burning, cramp-like abdominal pains and diarrhea. Clonic
convulsions and pulmonary edema were reported in some cases; the pulmonary edema may have been
due to aspiration of vomitus. While a few of these deaths were suicides, most of them resulted from
accidental exposure to sodium fluoride when containers of insecticide were mistaken for baking powder
or epsom salts. Based on numerous incidents of fatal fluoride poisoning, Hodge and Smith (1965)
estimated the certainly lethal dose to be 5–10 g sodium fluoride (32–64 mg fluoride/kg) in adults.
More recent information includes the case report of a 3-year-old boy who swallowed 200 sodium fluoride
tablets (1 mg fluoride each) for a dose of 16 mg fluoride/kg body weight (Eichler et al. 1982).
Immediately after ingestion, he vomited and appeared to recover, but he collapsed 4 hours later. The boy
died 7 hours after fluoride ingestion. Upon autopsy, hemorrhagic edema of the lungs, hemorrhagic
gastritis, and massive cerebral edema were observed. The hemorrhagic edema observed in the lungs was
probably due to aspiration of the gastric contents. Cloudy swelling was observed in the cells of the liver,
heart, and kidney. In another case, a 27-month-old child died 5 days after ingesting about 100 fluoride
tablets, for a dose of about 8 mg fluoride/kg body weight (Whitford 1990). Based on this case and weight
tables for 3-year-old boys, Whitford (1990) calculated a probable toxic dose of about 5 mg fluoride/kg
body weight.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Erickson (1978) examined the possible relationship between water fluoridation and increased death rate
among residents of 24 cities with fluoridation and 22 cities without water fluoridation. Although there
was a difference in crude death rates for all causes between the two study populations (1,109.9 and
1,053.6/100,000 person-years for the fluoridation and non-fluoridation populations, respectively), similar
death rates (1,123.9 and 1,137.1/100,000 person-years, respectively) were found after adjustment for
differences in age, sex, race, and analysis of covariance (median education and city population density
In rats, LD50 values for sodium fluoride administered by oral gavage range from 31 to 126.3 mg
fluoride/kg (DeLopez et al. 1976; Lim et al. 1978; Skare et al. 1986; Whitford et al. 1990). Differences in
rat strains, variations in weight (and presumably differences in ages), and gender differences may account
for the reported differences in LD50 values. LD50 values were higher in younger female rats (52–
54 mg/kg) than in older female rats (31 mg/kg) (DeLopez et al. 1976). LD50 values (84.3–146.3 mg
fluoride/kg) were also estimated in rats administered monofluorophosphate (Whitford et al. 1990). These
LD50 values were similar to the LD50 values for sodium fluoride (85.5-126.3 mg fluoride/kg) measured in
the same study. An LD50 of 44.3 mg fluoride/kg was reported for mice (Lim et al. 1978).
All reliable LD50 and LOAEL values for death in each species and duration category are recorded in
Table 3-4 and plotted in Figure 3-4.
Hydrofluoric Acid. Six deaths were reported to have occurred between 1 and 6 hours following
accidental or intentional ingestion of a rust remover containing hydrofluoric acid (Menchel and Dunn
1984). No dose levels of fluoride were reported. At autopsy, severe hemorrhagic gastritis was noted in
all cases. In one case, hemorrhage and necrosis of the pancreas were also noted. A fatal case of
hydrofluoric acid ingestion occurred when a 29-year-old man drank a mouthful, thinking it was water
(Manoguerra and Neuman 1986). In spite of immediate vomiting, respirations were shallow within an
hour, and the patient died within 2 hours of exposure. Serum calcium and SGOT levels were markedly
depressed. Serum fluoride level was 35 ppm. Another study reported six deaths due to hydrofluoric acid
ingestion (Menchel and Dunn 1984). The major symptoms reported were nausea, thirst, and ulcerations
of the buccal mucosa, followed by the rapid onset of tetany and coma.
No studies were located regarding dermal or ocular effects in humans or animals after oral exposure to
fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine.
Table 3-4 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
System (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day)
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Death
1 Human 1d Eichler et al. 1982
1x/d 16 (1 child)
sodium fluoride
(C)
2 Rat 1d DeLopez et al. 1976

1x/d 52 (LD50 for 150g rats)
(Sprague- sodium fluoride
Dawley) (GW) 54 (LD50 for 80g rats)
b
31 (LD50 for 250g rats)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3 Rat 1d Lim et al. 1978
1x/d 51.6 (LD50)
(Rochester) sodium fluoride
(GW)
4 Rat 1d Skare et al. 1986

1x/d 101.3 (LD50)
Dawley) (GW)
5 Rat once Whitford et al. 1990

126.3 M (LD50)
(Sprague- (GW) sodium fluoride
Dawley)

85.5 M (LD50)
(Sprague- (GW) sodium fluoride
Dawley)

146.3 M (LD50)
(Sprague- (GW) Monofluorophosphate
Dawley)

84.3 M (LD50)
(Sprague- (GW) Monofluorophosphate
Dawley)
76
Table 3-4 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral (continued)
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
9 Mouse 1d Lim et al. 1978

1x/d 44.3 (LD50)
(Swiss) sodium fluoride
Systemic
10 Rat 2wk Guggenheim et al. 1976
Musc/skel 9.5 (decreased modulus of
(W) elasticity) sodium fluoride
Reproductive
11 Mouse 5d Li et al. 1987a
1x/d 32
sodium fluoride
(G)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Developmental
12 Rat GD 6-19 Guna Sherlin and Verma 2001
18 F (increased percentage of
(Wistar) (GW) skeletal and visceral sodium fluoride
abnormalities)
13 Rat Gd 6-15 Heindel et al. 1996

daily 13.21
Dawley) (W)
14 Rabbit Gd 6-19 Heindel et al. 1996

daily 13.72
(New sodium fluoride
Zealand) (W)
Death
15 Mouse 6 mo NTP 1990
daily 67 (increased mortality)
(B6C3F1) sodium fluoride
(W)
16 Mouse 6mo c NTP 1990

ad lib 300 M (increased mortality)
sodium fluoride
(W) 600 F (increased mortality)
77
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
Systemic
17 Rat 2 mo Bobek et al. 1976
7d/wk Endocr 0.5 (decreased thyroxine levels;
24hr/d increased T3- resin uptake sodium fluoride
ratio)
(W)
18 Rat daily Collins et al. 2001a

16-19 weeks Musc/skel 8.25 F 10.7 F (prominent growth lines on
(CD) upper incisors) sodium fluoride
(W)
19 Rat 7d/wk DenBesten and Crenshaw 1984

24hr/d Musc/skel 10.5 (decr mineral content and incr
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(Sprague- proline in tooth enamel matrix) sodium fluoride
Dawley) (W)
20 Rat 5 wk Harrison et al. 1984

Musc/skel 13 19 (histological fluorosis; decr
(Wistar) (W) bone growth) sodium fluoride
21 Rat 6 mo NTP 1990

Gastro 7 (hyperplasia of glandular
(Fischer- 344) daily stomach) sodium fluoride
(W)
Hepatic 20
Renal 20
22 Rat daily Turner et al. 2001

16 or 48 weeks Musc/skel 0.15 M 0.5 M (decreased vertebral strength
(Sprague- and bone mineralization) sodium fluoride
Dawley) (W)
23 Rat 30d Uslu 1983

Musc/skel 14 (delayed healing of broken
(W) bones) sodium fluoride
78
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
24 Mouse 280 d Greenberg 1982a

daily Hepatic 0.95 (pale, granular hepatocytes
with fatty vacuoles) sodium fluoride
(W)
25 Mouse 280d Greenberg 1986

Renal 1.9 (nephron degeneration)
(W) sodium fluoride
26 Mouse 4 wk Marie and Hott 1986

7d/wk Musc/skel 0.8 (incr bone formation rate; slight
daily decr bone calcium) sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(W)
27 Mouse 6 mo NTP 1990

daily Cardio 67 (multifocal mineralization and
(B6C3F1) degeneration of the sodium fluoride
(W) myocardium)
Musc/skel 5.6 M (increased osteoid in femur and

tibia)
Hepatic 67 (megaolocytosis and syncytial

alteration)
Renal 67 (multifocal nephrosis)
Bd Wt 67 (20% decr bw gain)
28 Mouse 35 d Pillai et al. 1988

1x/d Hemato 5.2 (decr RBC and hemoglobin, incr
WBC) sodium fluoride
(GW)
Bd Wt 5.2 (decr body weight)
79
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
29 Mouse daily Zhao et al. 1998

100-150 days Musc/skel 0.06 M 3.2 M (incisor fluorosis)
(Kunmin) sodium fluoride
(W)
Endocr 0.06 M 3.2 M (decreased radiolabelled iodine

uptake)
Bd Wt 3.2 M
30 Rabbit 6 mo Purohit et al. 1999

daily Resp 4.5 (congestion, edema fluid,
(NS) desquamation of respiratory sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(F) epithelium in lungs)
Neurological
31 Rat 6 wk Mullenix et al. 1995
daily 6 F (altered spontaneous behavior)
Dawley) (W)
32 Rat 6 wk Mullenix et al. 1995

daily 5.5 F 7.5 F (altered spontaneous behavior)
Dawley) (W)
33 Rat 60 d Paul et al. 1998

daily 9 (decr spontaneous activity)
(Wistar) sodium fluoride
(GW)
Reproductive
34 Rat daily Al-Hiyasat et al. 2000
30 days 10.21 F (decreased number of viable
(Sprague- fetuses, increased resorptions) sodium fluoride
Dawley) (W)
35 Rat 60 d Araibi et al. 1989

7d/wk 2.3 (decr seminiferous tubule 4.5 (50% reduction in fertility, decr
(CD) diameter) in percentage of seminiferous sodium fluoride
(F) tubules containing spermatozoa
and decr testosterone levels)
80
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
36 Rat daily Chinoy et al. 1992

30 d 2.3 (decreased fertility and sperm
(NS) counts) sodium fluoride
(GW)
37 Rat 30 or 50 days Chinoy et al. 1995

d 4.5 (decreased sperm motility and
(Charles count) sodium fluoride
Foster) (F)
38 Rat daily Collins et al. 2001a

16-19 weeks 10.7 F
(CD) sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(W)
39 Rat daily Krasowska and Wlostowski 1992

6 wk 21
(W)
40 Rat daily Krasowska and Wlostowski 1992

16 wk 7.5 (seminiferous tubule atrophy)
(W)
41 Rat 3 mo Marks et al. 1984

7d/wk 23
sodium fluoride
(F)
42 Rat daily Narayana and Chinoy 1994

50 d 4.5 (decr testosterone levels and
Charles Leydig cell diameter) sodium fluoride
Foster (GW)
43 Rat daily Sprando et al. 1997

16
(Sprague- (W) sodium fluoride
Dawley)
81
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
44 Rat daily Sprando et al. 1998

16
(Sprague- (W) sodium fluoride
Dawley)
45 Mouse 30 d Chinoy and Sequeira 1992

daily 4.5 (decr sperm motility and count
(Swiss) and infertility) sodium fluoride
(F)
46 Mouse 25 wks Messer et al. 1973

9.5 19 (nearly complete infertility)
(Swiss- (W) sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Webster)
47 Mouse 35 d Pillai et al. 1988

1x/d 5.2
sodium fluoride
(GW)
48 Gn Pig 30 d Chinoy et al. 1997

daily 4.5 (decr sperm motility and
(NS) viability) sodium fluoride
(GW)
Developmental
49 Rat Gd 1-20 Collins et al. 1995
daily 11.2 11.4 (incr in average number of
(CD) fetuses per litter with 3+ skeletal sodium fluoride
(W) variations)
50 Rat daily Collins et al. 2001b

16-19 weeks 12.2 F
(CD) sodium fluoride
(W)
51 Rat 28 wk Ream et al. 1983

7d/wk 21
Dawley) 24hr/d
(W)
82
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
CHRONIC EXPOSURE
Systemic
52 Human daily Hillier et al. 2000
Musc/skel 0.04
(W) sodium fluoride
53 Human Daily d Li et al. 2001

Musc/skel 0.15 0.25 (Increased prevalence of bone
(W) fractures) sodium fluoride
54 Human 4 yr Riggs et al. 1990

Musc/skel 0.56 (increased fracture rate)
(C) sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
55 Rat 103 wk NTP 1990
Resp 3.9
(Fischer- 344) (W) sodium fluoride
Cardio 3.9
Gastro 3.9
Hemato 3.9
Musc/skel 2.5 4.3 (osteoscleosis)
Hepatic 3.9
Renal 3.9
Bd Wt 3.9
83
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
56 Mouse 103 wk NTP 1990

Resp 7.6
(B6C3F1) (W) sodium fluoride
Cardio 7.6
Gastro 7.6
Hemato 7.6
Musc/skel 4.3 M 7.6 M (dentine dysplasia)
Hepatic 7.6
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Renal 7.6
Bd Wt 7.6
57 Rabbit 24 mo Susheela and Das 1988

1x/d Gastro 5 (roughened duodena mucosa)
sodium fluoride
(GW)
58 Rabbit 7-12 mo Susheela and Jain 1983

1x/d Hemato 4.52 (decr leukocyte and hemoglobin
levels) sodium fluoride
(G)
59 Mink 382 d Aulerich et al. 1987

24hr/d Musc/skel 5 (mottled and brittle kit teeth) 9.1 (sagittal crests deformed, 3/6
adults) sodium fluoride
(F)
Immuno/ Lymphoret
60 Rabbit 18 mo Jain and Susheela 1987
1x/d 4.5 (decr primary and secondary
(albino) antibody titers) sodium fluoride
(G)
84
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
Reproductive
61 Mouse 3 gen Tao and Suttle 1976
13
(F) sodium fluoride
62 Rabbit daily Kumar and Susheela 1994

18 mo 4.5 M (structural damage of the
(NS) spermatid and epididymal sodium fluoride
(GW) spermatozoa)
63 Rabbit daily Kumar and Susheela 1995

20 or 23 mo 4.5 M (structural damage of the
(NS) spermatid and epididymal sodium fluoride
(GW)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
spermatozoa)
64 Rabbit daily Susheela and Kumar 1991

18 or 29 mo 4.5 (complete cessation of
(NS) spermatogenesis) sodium fluoride
(GW)
65 Rabbit daily Susheela and Kumar 1997

18 or 23 mo 4.5 (Leydig cell damage)
(New sodium fluoride
Zealand) (GW)
66 Mink 382 d Aulerich et al. 1987

daily 9.1
sodium fluoride
(F)
85
Exposure/ LOAEL
Duration/
Cancer
67 Rat 103 wk NTP 1990
2.4 M (osteosarcoma of bone)
(Fischer- 344) (W) sodium fluoride
b Only this dose level, for the most sensitive group, is plotted in Figure 3-4.
c Differences in levels of health effects and cancer effects between males and females are not indicated in Figure 3-4. Where such differences exist, only the levels of effect for the
most sensitive gender are presented.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
d Used to derive a chronic-duration oral minimal risk level (MRL) of 0.05 mg fluoride/kg/day; the dose was divided by an uncertainty factor of 3 to account for human variability.
ad lib = ad libitum; Bd Wt = body weight; (C) = capsule); d = day(s); decr = decrease; Endocr = endocrine; (F) = feed; F = female(s); (G) = gavage; Gastro = gastrointestinal; Gd =
gestational day; gen = generation(s); (GW) = gavage in water; Hemato = hematological; hr = hour(s); incr = increase; LD50 = lethal dose, 50% kill; LOAEL =
lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; M = males; mg/kg/day = milligram per kilogram per day; mo = month(s); Musc/skel = muscular/skeletal; NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect
level; RBC = red blood cell(s); Resp = respiratory; T3 = triiodothyronine; (W) = water; WBC = white blood cell(s); wk = week(s); x = time
86
Figure 3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral
Acute (≤14 days)

Systemic
tal l
kele tive enta
los d uc pm
th cu ro lo
mg/kg/day a s p ve
De Mu Re De
1000
7r
5r
100 4r
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
6r 8r
2r 2r 3r
9m
2r 11m
12r
1
13r 14h
10 10r
p-Pig s-Hamster NOAEL - Animals NOAEL - Humans other than
87
a-Sheep
Figure 3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral (Continued)

Systemic
lar al al al
y cu stin ic e let
tor as nte log sk ne
mg/kg/day th pira d iov troi a to culo a tic al o cri
ea es Car as em us ep en nd
D R G H M H R E
1000
16m
16m
100
15m 27m 27m 27m
20r 21r 21r
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
20r 23r
10 18r 19r
18r
21r
28m 27m
30h
29m 29m
25m
1 24m
26m
22r 17r
22r
0.1
29m 29m
0.01
88
Figure 3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral (Continued)

Systemic
l
ht al tive enta
eig ic uc
log pm
yW o od lo
d ur pr ve
mg/kg/day Bo Ne Re De
1000
100
27m
39r 41r 51r

46m
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
43r 44r
38r 49r 49r 50r
10 33r 46m 34r
32r 40r
31r 32r
28m 47m
48g 45m 35r 37r 42r
29m
35r 36r
0.1
0.01
89
Figure 3-4 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Oral (Continued)
Chronic (≥365 days)

Systemic
r al al or
ula tin al let t ph
y s ic e h ym ve
tor sc nte log sk eig o/L cti
a va i
ato lo c od
u r*
spir rdio s tro m s cu pati nal dyW un p r nce
mg/kg/day Re Ca Ga He Mu He Re Bo Imm Re Ca
100
61m
10 59n 66n
56m 56m 56m 56m 56m 56m 56m 56m
57h 58h 59n
56m 55r 60h 62h 63h 64h 65h
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
55r 55r 55r 55r 55r 55r 55r
55r 67r
54
53
53
0.1
52
*Doses represent the lowest dose tested per study that produced a tumorigenic
0.01 response and do not imply the existence of a threshold for the cancer endpoint.
90
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Respiratory Effects. No studies were located regarding respiratory effects in humans after oral
exposure to fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine.
Congestion, the presence of edema fluid, and desquamation of respiratory epithelium were observed in
the lungs of rabbits exposed to 4.5 or 9 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in the diet for 6 months
(Purohit et al. 1999). Inflammatory cell infiltrates, congestion, and desquamated epithelium were also
observed in the large bronchi and trachea of rabbits fed 9 mg fluoride/kg/day. Necrosis of the lung
parenchyma was also observed in two high-dose rabbits that died before the end of the study.
Cardiovascular Effects. The cardiovascular effects of fluoride have been attributed to hypocalcemia
and hyperkalemia caused by high fluoride levels. Fluoride can bind with serum calcium if the dose is
sufficient and cause hypocalcemia. Calcium is necessary for the functional integrity of the voluntary and
autonomic nervous systems. Hypocalcemia can cause tetany, decreased myocardial contractility, and
possibly cardiovascular collapse (Bayless and Tinanoff 1985). Hyperkalemia has been suggested as the
cause of the repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and eventual death that are often encountered in
cases of fluoride poisoning (Baltazar et al. 1980).
Approximately 2 hours after ingestion of 120 g of roach powder (97% sodium fluoride) in an
unsuccessful suicide attempt, a 25-year-old male had severe toxic reactions that included tetany, multiple
episodes of ventricular fibrillation, and esophageal stricture (Abukurah et al. 1972). Within 14 hours
following exposure, the patient experienced 63 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. In a study of adults
with skeletal fluorosis living in an area of China with high levels of fluoride in the drinking water (4.1–
8.6 ppm) (Xu and Xu 1997), a higher percentage of electrocardiogram abnormalities was observed in
individuals with skeletal fluorosis (50.73%), as compared to a control group (0.1–0.6 ppm fluoride in
water) (20.0%).
In two epidemiological studies, fluoride in the drinking water did not increase the mortality rates from
cardiovascular effects. One of these studies was a report of 428,960 people in 18 areas of "high" natural
fluoride (0.4–>3.5 ppm) in England and Wales and 368,580 people in control areas (<0.2 ppm fluoride).
The water supply for 52% of the "high" fluoride population had average fluoride levels of ≥1 ppm
(Heasman and Martin 1962). Results indicated that there were no significant differences between areas
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
with different fluoride levels in mortality due to coronary disease, angina, and other heart disease, as
evidenced by standard mortality ratios (SMRs). The second study (Hagan et al. 1954) examined 32 pairs
of cities in the United States that contained 892,625 people in the high fluoride areas and
1,297,500 people in the control cities. A positive relationship between heart disease and water
fluoridation was reported, but these authors did not adjust for a doubling of the members of this
population over 75 years old during the period of fluoridation under study (Jansen and Thomson 1974).
In addition, this study lacked statistical analysis and drew conclusions regarding trends that were not
obvious from the data presented. The large variation in the presented data was not discussed. Doses of
fluoride are difficult to estimate for large populations, however, because most people are potentially
exposed to fluoride through a variety of sources, such as food, beverages, medicine, and dental products.
Similarly, no significant alterations in the rate of cardiovascular system abnormalities were observed in a
community with 8 ppm fluoride in the water supply, as compared to a community with 0.4 ppm (Leone et
al. 1954).
The results of other studies have suggested a role for fluoride in reducing cardiovascular disease. A study
of 300 North Dakota residents who drank water containing 4–5.8 ppm and 715 people who drank water
containing 0.15–0.3 ppm found a lower incidence of calcification of the aorta in the high-fluoride group
(Bernstein et al. 1966). Significant differences were found in 45–54-year-old males (p<0.05), as well as
in males aged 55–64 and 65+ years (p<0.01). This effect was not due solely to differences in age
distribution, because the incidence in the 55–64-year-old, high-fluoride group was lower than the
incidence in the 45–54-year-old, low-fluoride group. A crude analysis also found no association with
milk and cheese consumption. In a study of four towns in Finland, Luoma (1980) found that incidence of
cardiovascular disease correlated negatively with water fluoride concentration. Taves (1978) likewise
found that standard mortality ratios decreased to a greater extent in fluoridated cities from 1950 to
1970 as compared to non-fluoridated control cities. Both studies, however, relied on population-summary
information for disease rates. A mechanism for this potential reduction in cardiovascular disease could be
the ability of fluoride to inhibit the calcification of soft tissue such as the aorta, as demonstrated in in vitro
studies (Taves and Neuman 1964; Zipkin et al. 1970).
About half of the male and female B6C3F1 mice that died as a result of exposure to 67–71 mg
fluoride/kg/day for 6 months as sodium fluoride in drinking water had mineralization of the myocardium
(NTP 1990); some female mice also had myocardial degeneration. Electrocardiogram alterations and
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
histological alterations in the myocardium were observed in rabbits exposed to sodium fluoride (Okushi
1971).
Gastrointestinal Effects. The primary gastrointestinal effects following both acute and chronic oral
exposure to fluoride consist of nausea, vomiting, and gastric pain. The irritation of the gastric mucosa is
attributed to fluoride (as sodium fluoride) forming hydrofluoric acid in the acidic environment of the
stomach (Hoffman et al. 1980; Waldbott 1981). The uncharged hydrogen fluoride molecule can then
penetrate cell membranes and enter the neutral environment of the cytoplasm where it dissociates to
release both fluoride and hydrogen ions.
Thirty-four students (kindergarten through third grade) exhibited acute gastrointestinal effects after
drinking water from school water fountains that provided a fluoride supplement designed to raise the
water level to a range of 1–5 ppm (Hoffman et al. 1980). An accident with the delivery system resulted in
the water levels reaching 375 ppm; specific doses could not be calculated, but were estimated to range
from 1.4 to 90 mg per child. In two other cases, individuals vomited and had abdominal pain
immediately after accidentally consuming 1 tablespoon of sodium fluoride (used as a dusting powder for
poultry) (Rao et al. 1969) or sodium fluorosilicate (Dadej et al. 1987).
Of the 150 cases involving fluoride intake reported to a poison control center from 1978 to 1979, most of
the cases involved ingestion of <1 mg/kg fluoride, although exact doses could not be determined (Spoerke
et al. 1980). Effects included nausea (13.9%), vomiting (77.8%), and diarrhea (8.3%). These effects
usually subsided within 24 hours. Symptoms of a more serious nature were not reported.
Endoscopies were performed and biopsy samples were taken from healthy volunteers either after no
treatment (control), or 2 hours after drinking 20 mL of a solution containing 20 mg fluoride (1,000 ppm)
as sodium fluoride (Spak et al. 1989), or application of 0.42% fluoride dental gel (5.1 mg fluoride
ingested) (Spak et al. 1990). Fluoride treatment resulted in petechiae (minute hemorrhages) or erosions in
most of the subjects. Histological examination of biopsied stomach tissue revealed signs of irritation.
Nausea was present in one-third of the subjects drinking the sodium fluoride solution, suggesting that
nausea may not be the first sign of fluoride irritation of the gastric mucosa.
While high levels of fluoride clearly can cause gastrointestinal irritation, it is unclear whether there are
any gastrointestinal effects of chronic exposure to fluoride in drinking water. Gastrointestinal tract
disorders were not evaluated in the Bartlett-Cameron study of the effect of water containing 8 ppm
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
fluoride (Leone et al. 1954). The sole evidence of an effect comes from a study of 20 non-ulcer dyspepsia
patients at an outpatient clinic in India and 10 volunteers without gastrointestinal problems from the
surgical clinic (Susheela et al. 1992). While none of the drinking water supplies of the controls had
fluoride levels >1 ppm, the water supplies of 55% of the dyspepsia patients were at this level. In addition,
all of the dyspepsia patients and 30% of the controls had serum fluoride levels >0.02 ppm (mean of the
dyspepsia group, 0.1 ppm); all of the dyspepsia patients and none of the controls had urine fluoride levels
>0.1 ppm (mean, 1.34 ppm). The study was compromised by small treatment size, undetermined total
fluoride doses, undetermined nutritional status of the subjects, and lack of statistical comparisons. In
addition, the appropriateness of the control population was not clear.
Seventy-eight workers engaged in the crushing and refining of cryolite, a mineral compound composed of
sodium, aluminum, and fluoride, were examined (Moller and Gudjonsson 1932). Although an average
exposure period was not presented, no workers with <2 years of exposure were included; 18 workers had
been exposed for >10 years. Forty-two workers reported evidence of gastrointestinal effects. The
primary effect was nausea, followed by loss of appetite and vomiting. Chronic indigestion was also
reported in these workers. The study authors stated that the effects were due only to cryolite dust being
swallowed (either due to dust being deposited in the mouth during mouth-breathing, or due to deposition
on the bronchial tree followed by mucociliary action bringing the material to the epiglottis) and absorbed
through the gastrointestinal tract. They based this conclusion on the fact that 21 enamel-, glass-, and
sulphuric acid-industry workers exposed by inhalation to fluorine gas (some for up to 40 years) revealed
no evidence of any effect on the stomach. In light of what is now known about the absorption of fluorides
through the lung, the cryolite workers probably were exposed by both the oral and inhalation routes.
Decreased appetite, congestion of the duodenum, and mild diarrhea were reported in sheep given a single
intragastric dose of 28.5 mg fluoride/kg in the form of sodium fluoride via nasoesophageal catheter
(Kessabi et al. 1985). It is difficult to extrapolate possible human effects from this study because the
gastrointestinal system of ruminants (sheep, cows, goats) is quite different from that of humans.
Thickening of the mucosa of the glandular stomach and punctate hemorrhages were seen in F344/N rats
given 20 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 26 weeks (NTP 1990). Similar, but
less severe, alterations were seen in some rats that received 7 mg fluoride/kg/day. Stomach ulcers were
also seen in some high-dose males and females. Histologically identified stomach lesions included
necrosis and hyperplasia. No gastrointestinal effects were reported in B6C3F1 mice in this study at doses
up to 67–71 mg fluoride/kg/day. No gastrointestinal effects were reported in the chronic portion of this
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
study at doses up to 9.1 mg/kg/day (mice) or 4.5 mg/kg/day (rats). Roughened duodenal mucosa and a
"cracked-clay" appearance of the absorptive cells were observed following daily dosage of nine rabbits
with 5 mg/kg fluoride via oral gavage for 24 months (Susheela and Das 1988). The rabbit gastrointestinal
system also differs from that of humans, and the study is limited by the small number of rabbits per group
and the use of only one dose.
Hematological Effects. The incidence of abnormal white blood cell counts was significantly higher
in a community with high levels of naturally occurring fluoride (8 ppm) as compared to a community
with low levels of fluoride (0.4 ppm fluoride). However, the study authors did not consider this finding
as necessarily an effect of fluoride (Leone et al. 1954). No other significant hematological effects were
observed. No significant alterations in hemoglobin, erythrocyte, and total leukocyte levels were found in
children living in a community with fluoridated water (1.2 ppm), as compared to children living in a
community with nonfluoridated water (Schlesinger et al. 1956).
As part of the 2-year National Toxicology Program (NTP) study of fluoride (NTP 1990), hematological
analyses were conducted at 27 and 66 weeks. No treatment-related effects were observed at doses up to
4.5 and 9.1 mg/kg/day in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, respectively.
Lactating Holstein cows were fed a mineral supplement containing soft rock phosphate (6,000 ppm
fluoride) and a protein supplement containing 1,088 ppm fluoride (Hillman et al. 1979). Because
consumption of minerals fed ad libitum could not be determined accurately under farm conditions, no
dose estimates could be made. After 9 months, red blood cells per unit volume, blood hemoglobin,
hematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume were significantly lower (p<0.05) in herds exhibiting evidence
of high fluoride exposure. The number of eosinophils increased with increasing urinary fluoride. Rabbits
administered 4.52 mg fluoride/kg/day by gavage for 6–12 months had significantly decreased numbers of
blood cells (e.g., erythrocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytes, monocytes, neutrophils) and hemoglobin
(Susheela and Jain 1983). Similar, although not identical, results were seen in mice fed 5.2 mg
fluoride/kg body weight (Pillai et al. 1988). These animals showed a significant decrease in red blood
cell count, but a significant increase in white cells. Although a dose-effect relationship cannot be
determined from single-dose studies, these studies suggest that the hematopoietic system may be affected
by oral exposure to high levels of fluoride.
Musculoskeletal Effects. The skeletal system is the primary site of fluoride deposition in the body
resulting in both beneficial and adverse effects. Oral exposure to fluoride has been shown to decrease the
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
prevalence of dental caries in children (the relationship between fluoride and dental caries is discussed in
greater detail in Appendix D); however, at higher doses, fluoride can also result in non-beneficial effects
on the teeth, dental fluorosis. Dental or enamel fluorosis occurs when excess amounts of fluoride are
ingested during tooth development (1–8 years of age). It is characterized by increased porosity (or
hypomineralization) of the subsurface enamel and well mineralized surface layer of enamel. Mildly
fluorosed enamel is full functional (denBesten and Thariani 1992), but may be cosmetically
objectionable. As the severity of dental fluorosis increases, the depth of the enamel involvement and the
degree of porosity increases (Fejerskov et al. 1990). More severely fluorosed enamel is more porous,
pitted, and discolored and is prone to fracture and wear because the well mineralized zone is very fragile
to mechanical stress (denBesten and Thariani 1992; Fejerskov et al. 1990). Not all teeth are similarly
affected by elevated fluoride levels. Teeth that develop earlier in life appear to be less affected than those
that develop later (Fejerskov et al. 1990). Several methods have been developed for quantifying dental
fluorosis. The most commonly used method is Dean's index (Dean 1934), which classifies fluorosis as a
scale of from 0 to 4 as follows: class 0, no fluorosis; class 1, very mild fluorosis (opaque white areas
irregularly covering ≤25% of the tooth surface); class 2, mild fluorosis (white areas covering 25–50% of
the tooth surface); class 3, moderate fluorosis (all surfaces affected, with some brown spots and marked
wear on surfaces subject to attrition); and class 4, severe fluorosis (widespread brown stains and pitting).
The average score of the two most severely affected teeth is used to derive the classification. Other
commonly used methods to rate dental fluorosis include the Thylstrup-Fejerskov (TF) index (Thylstrup
and Fejerskov 1978) and the tooth surface index of fluorosis (TSIF) (Horowitz et al. 1984). Unlike the
Dean’s index, the TF and TSIF indexes use all tooth surfaces to develop the final index score.
The development and severity of dental fluorosis is dependent on the amount of fluoride ingested, the
duration of exposure, and the stage of amelogenesis at the time of exposure. The relationship between
fluoride exposure levels and the prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis was first established in the
1930s and 1940s. There is an extensive amount of literature on the relationship between the prevalence of
dental fluorosis and the concentration of fluoride in municipal water (e.g., Alarcón-Herrera et al. 2001;
DHHS 1991; Eklund et al. 1987; Heifetz et al. 1988; Jackson et al. 1995; Selwitz et al. 1995; Teotia and
Teotia 1994) and the use of fluoridated dentifrices (as reviewed by Warren and Levy 1999). Studies
examining children living in communities with different fluoride levels found that the severity of dental
fluorosis is directly related to fluoride exposure levels. Higher fluorosis severity scores were found in
children living in communities with 4 ppm fluoride in drinking water compared to children living in
communities with 1 ppm fluoride in drinking water (Heifetz et al. 1988; Jackson et al. 1995; Selwitz et al.
1995). No signs of dental fluorosis (using the TSIF scoring method) were found in 81.8, 54.7, and 7.9%
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
of the children aged 7–14 years living in communities with 0.2, 1, or 4 ppm, fluoride in drinking water,
respectively (Jackson et al. 1995). Moderate dental fluorosis (TSIF score of 3) was observed in 0, 0.9,
and 25.7%, respectively, of the children. The maximum TSIF score was 2 (3.2% of the children received
this score) in the 0.2 ppm community, 4 (0.9% of children) in the 1 ppm community, and 7 (6.9% of
children) in the 4 ppm community. Studies in adults have not always found a direct relationship between
severity of dental fluorosis and prevalence of dental caries (Eklund et al. 1987). A recent meta-analysis
of 88 studies on dental fluorosis (McDonagh et al. 2000) found a dose-related response relationship
between the levels of fluoride in drinking water and the prevalence of dental fluorosis. At a water
fluoride concentration of 1 ppm, the estimated prevalence of dental fluorosis is 48% (95% confidence
interval of 40–57%) and the prevalence of fluorosis of aesthetic concern would be 12.5% (95%
confidence interval of 7.0–21.5%). Another meta-analysis found a significant association between dental
fluorosis and use of fluoride supplements (Ismail and Bandekar 1999).
There is also evidence that the prevalence of dental fluorosis has increased over time due to the multiple,
widespread sources of fluoride in food processed with fluoridated water and dentifrices containing
fluoride, which has resulted in higher fluoride exposure levels. The DHHS (1991) compared the
prevalence of dental fluorosis in three cities (Kingston, New York, Kewanee, Illinois, and Newburgh,
New York) measured in 1939 or 1955 with prevalence in those cities in 1980 or 1985. In Kingston,
which had a municipal fluoride level of 0 ppm, the prevalence of dental fluorosis (using the Dean’s index)
increased from 0.0 to 7.3%, primarily in the very mild (4.4% received this score) category. In the other
two cities (0.9 or 1.0 ppm fluoride in water), there was only a slight change in the overall prevalence
(12.2 versus 14.6% for Kewanee and 7.3 versus 7.7% in Newburgh) of dental fluorosis. However, there
was a shift toward higher severity scores. For example in Kewanee, the prevalence in the very mild, mild,
moderate, and severe categories was 10.6, 1.6, 0.0, and 0.0%, respectively, in 1939 and 7.4, 4.8, 1.8, and
0.6%, respectively, in 1980. In another comparison conducted by DHHS (1991), the prevalence and
severity of dental fluorosis measured in children living in 21 cities in the 1940s were compared with the
prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis measured in 28 cities in the 1980s. During the 40-year period,
the prevalence of fluorosis in areas with <0.4 ppm fluoride increased from <1% to about 6%; nearly all of
the increase was in the very mild and mild categories. Both the prevalence and severity of fluorosis
increased in communities with 0.7–1.2 ppm fluoride, with prevalence increasing from about 13% to about
22%. Most of the increase was in the very mild and mild categories, which increased from 12.3% to
17.7% and from 1.4% to 4.4% of the population, respectively. The combined prevalence of the severe
and moderate categories increased from 0.0% to 0.9%. While there were some differences between the
studies in the 1940s and those in the 1980s, such as the subject population and examination conditions,
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
they do not affect the overall trends. Although total fluoride intake was not measured, these studies
indicate that intake by children at risk has increased since the 1940s, because fluorosis levels increased
for all water fluoride levels. Another series of studies compared the prevalence and severity of dental
fluorosis in 8–10 and 13–15-year-old children living in communities with 1, 2, 3, or 4 ppm fluoride in
drinking water in 1980 to the prevalence in 1985 (Heifetz et al. 1988) and 1990 (Selwitz et al. 1995).
While there were no marked changes in fluorosis levels in 8–10-year-old children, both the prevalence
and severity increased in the 13–15-year-old children (this group of children also participated in the 1980
study). Increases in the 1-ppm communities were mostly in the category of barely visible white spots.
However, the percentage of labial surfaces of incisors and canines from children in the 2-ppm group that
had brown mottling increased from 0 to 7.6%. Less marked increases in mottled and pitted teeth were
seen in the higher exposure groups. The increased levels of fluorosis were attributed to increased fluoride
exposure from multiple sources. However, the apparent increase in fluorosis did not continue from 1985
to 1990 (Selwitz et al. 1995); in many cases, the severity of the fluorosis declined in the period of 1985–
1990 compared to the 1985 levels.
There is some evidence to suggest that exposure to very high levels of fluoride can increase the
susceptibility to dental caries. Studies in children and adolescents aged 8–16 years (Driscoll et al. 1986;
Mann et al. 1987) found higher incidences of dental caries in individuals with severe dental fluorosis than
in individuals with less severe dental fluorosis. However, for children with very mild, mild, or moderate
fluorosis, no significant associations were found. Driscoll et al. (1986) reported a mean decayed, missing,
and filled surface (DMFS) score of 2.96 for children with severe fluorosis (TSIF score of 4) compared to
1.40 for children with very mild dental fluorosis (TSIF score of 0.5) or 1.58 for children with mild to
moderate fluorosis (TSIF score of 1–3). It is possible that the higher prevalence of filled teeth was due to
the increased rate of fracture and wear in severely fluorosed teeth rather than a higher risk of tooth decay.
As with the dental effects, fluoride has both beneficial and adverse effects on bone. Because fluoride
stimulates bone formation, and increases bone mass, especially in cancellous bone, and inhibit bone
resorption, fluoride has been used as a treatment for osteoporosis. However, the effect of fluoride on the
bone varies in different parts of the body. It increases bone formation earlier and to a larger extent in
trabecular bone than in cortical bone (Gruber and Baylink 1991). There is an excellent response in the
spine, slight response in the hip, and poor response in the wrist as a result of fluoride treatment. Studies
examining the efficiency of fluoride treatment for osteoporosis have found an increased risk of hip
fractures; the prevailing view is that the beneficial increase in spinal bone mass is at the expense of an
increasing risk of hip fractures. There is some evidence that exposure to low doses of slow released
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
sodium fluoride can significantly reduce the occurrence of spinal fractures in individuals with
osteoporosis (Pak et al. 1995). A large number of studies have examined the adverse skeletal effects of
fluoride; the human studies primarily consist of clinical trials of elderly subjects administered fluoride for
the treatment of osteoporosis and community-based studies of populations exposed to fluoride in drinking
water. The observed effects include increases in bone density, increased risk of bone non-vertebral
fractures, and skeletal fluorosis.
Skeletal fluorosis is a condition associated with an accumulation of fluoride in the bone resulting in brittle
bones and decreased tensile strength. In severe cases (crippling skeletal fluorosis), complete rigidity of
the spine, often accompanied by kyphosis (humpbacked) or lordosis (arched back), is observed. Skeletal
fluorosis is associated with long-term exposure to very high oral doses of fluoride or occupational
exposure to cryolite (AlF6Na2) dust (which would involve inhalation and oral exposure to fluoride).
Cases of skeletal fluorosis are predominantly found in developing countries, particularly India and China,
and are associated with high fluoride intakes coupled with malnutrition (WHO 2002). High tea
consumption and increased consumption of water with high levels of naturally occurring fluoride are the
primary contributors to the elevated fluoride intake; in China, the indoor burning of fluoride-rich coal also
contributes to the overall fluoride intake. Most reports of skeletal fluorosis are inadequate for establishing
dose-response relationships. Choubisa et al. (1997) examined the prevalence of skeletal fluorosis in
residents of 15 villages in India. At 1.4 ppm fluoride in drinking water, the prevalence of skeletal
fluorosis was 4.4%; at 6.0 ppm fluoride, the prevalence was 63.0%. Another investigator found that
skeletal fluorosis occurred 10 years after the initiation of increased fluoride consumption; the average
water concentration was 9.2 ppm fluoride and daily water consumption was 4.6 L/day (42 mg
fluoride/day) (Saralakumari and Ramakrishna Rao 1993); after 20 years of exposure, the prevalence of
skeletal fluorosis was 100%. A limited number of cases of skeletal fluorosis have been reported in the
United States (Bruns and Tytle 1988; Fisher et al. 1981; Goldman et al. 1971; Sauerbrunn et al. 1965);
where doses are known, they are generally 15–20 mg fluoride/day for over 20 years. In a study of
116 people who had lived in an area with an average of 8 ppm fluoride in the drinking water for at least
15 years, a 10–15% incidence of fluoride-related bone changes was observed (Leone et al. 1955).
Coarsened trabeculation and thickened bone were observed, but no exostoses were evident, and the
subjects were asymptomatic. The severity of the skeletal fluorosis appears to be related to bone fluoride
levels. Among persons whose drinking water contains about 1 ppm fluoride, bone ash fluoride
concentrations trypically range from 500 to 1,500 ppm. The higher values are generally found among
older persons since the concentrations tend to increase gradually throughout life. Bone from people with
preclinical skeletal fluorosis, which is generally asymptomatic and characterized by slight radiologically
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
detectable increases in bone mass, contains 3,500–5,500 ppm fluoride. Sporadic pain, joint stiffness, and
osteosclerosis of the pelvis are observed at 6,000–7,000 ppm, while chronic joint pain, increased
osteosclerosis, and slight calcification of ligaments occur at 7,500–9,000 ppm. Crippling fluorosis is
observed at fluoride bone concentrations >10,000 ppm (Franke et al. 1975).
Studies of individuals undergoing fluoride treatment for osteoporosis, epidemiology studies of

communities with high levels of fluoride in drinking water, and community-based studies of populations
with different fluoride levels in the water have examined the possible relationship between exposure to
fluoride and alterations in bone mineral density and/or the risk of bone fractures. The effect of fluoride
on bone fracture rate and mineralization has alos been investigated in children.
A prospective, randomized of 135 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis ascertained the effect of
administering 34 mg fluoride/day as sodium fluoride (0.56 mg fluoride/kg/day) for 4 years (Riggs et al.
1990). The fluoride treated and the placebo control groups received 1,500 mg calcium/day. Although
bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter increased markedly in the
treatment group, bone mineral density in the shaft of the radius decreased 4%. There was no significant
difference in the number of new vertebral fractures between the treatment and control groups, although
the number of vertebral fractures in the fluoride group was slightly elevated in the first year. In contrast,
the level of nonvertebral fractures in the fluoride group was 3.2 times that of the control group, with
significant increases in both the frequency and rate of fractures. Most of the increase was due to
increased incidences of incomplete ("stress") fractures, which occurred 16.8 times more often in the
treatment group. In a follow-up to this study, Riggs et al. (1994) examined 50 of the women in the
fluoride treatment group after an additional 2 years of treatment with 34 mg fluoride/day as sodium
fluoride. The lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter bone mineral density continued to
increase and the bone mineral density of the radius continued to decrease during years 4–6 of treatment.
The vertebral fracture rate decreased during years 4–6 as compared to years 0–4. The nonvertebral
fracture rate also decreased during the last 2 years, but the rate for the full 6-year period was still 3 times
higher than the rate in the placebo control group. In addition to extending the study for an additional
2 years, Riggs et al. (1994) also re-examined the data from the previous study. Vertebral fracture rate was
influenced by several factors. Vertebral fracture rate decreased with increasing lumbar spine bone
mineral density except in the cases where the higher bone mineral density was associated with a rapid rate
of increase in the lumbar spine bone mineral density or a large increase from baseline serum fluoride
level.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
In a similar study by Kleerekoper et al. (1991), the anti-fracture efficacy of 34 mg fluoride/day as sodium
fluoride was examined in 46 postmenopausal women (mean age of 66.2 years) with spinal osteoporosis.
A daily dose of 1,500 mg calcium was also administered to this group as well as a placebo control group
of 38 postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis (mean age of 67.9 years). No significant
differences in bone mineral density of the forearm, vertebral fractures, or peripheral fractures were found.
A significant increase in painful lower extremity syndrome was observed in the fluoride group. It should
be noted that Riggs et al. (1990, 1994) considered the lower extremity syndrome to be incomplete
fractures and the incidence of incomplete fractures was added to the complete fracture incidence to
calculate nonvertebral fracture incidence.
Haguenauer et al. (2000) performed a meta-analysis to examine the effects of fluoride on the treatment
and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis using the data from the Riggs et al. (1990, 1994),
Kleerekoper et al. (1991), and 10 other studies. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in bone
mineral density in the lumbar spine and hip and a decrease in bone mineral density in the forearm after
2 or 4 years of fluoride treatment. When the data from all studies were used, fluoride treatment for 2–
4 years did not affect the relative risk of vertebral fractures. However, in studies in which the subjects
were exposed to low levels of fluoride or a slow-release formulation for 4 years, a significant decrease in
vertebral fracture relative risk was seen. An increase in the relative risk of nonvertebral fracture was
observed when data from all studies were used; no effect was seen in studies using low levels of fluoride
(<30 mg/day) or slow-release fluoride.
Conflicting findings on whether fluoride exposure in drinking water results in increased bone mineral
density have been reported, with studies finding increases in spine and femur bone mineral density
(Kröger et al. 1994; Phipps et al. 1998, 2000), decreases in radius mineral density (Phipps et al. 1998), or
no effect on bone mineral density (Cauley et al. 1995; Lehmann et al. 1998; Sowers et al. 1991). Lumbar
spine, proximal femur, and forearm bone mineral densities were measured in men and women 60 years
and older living in one of three cities with different levels of naturally occurring fluoride in drinking
water (Phipps et al. 1998). After adjusting for a number of non-fluoride related risk factors, significant
elevations in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (men and women) and proximal femur (women
only) were observed in residents with the highest levels of fluoride (2.5 mg/L), as compared to densities
in residents with the lowest fluoride concentration (0.03 mg/L); no significant differences in bone mineral
density were found between residents with the mid-level fluoride concentration (0.7 mg/L) and the lowest
concentration. In contrast to this finding, a negative correlation between bone mineral density of the
forearm and an individual’s fluoride intake from drinking water and toothpaste was found. Significant
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
increases in bone mineral density were also reported in another study by this group (Phipps et al. 2000).
Adjusted (age, weight, education, knee/grip strength, surgical menopause, calcium intake, alcohol
consumption, estrogen use, thiazide use, diabetes, thyroid hormone levels, exercise, and smoking) mineral
densities were higher in the lumbar spine and femur and lower in the radius in women aged 65 years and
older exposed to fluoridated drinking water, as compared to women with no reported exposure to
fluoridated water. Kröger et al. (1994) also found significant increases in bone mineral density (adjusted
for confounding factors such as age, weight, menopausal status, calcium intake, physical activity) of the
femoral neck and lumbar spine among women aged 47–56 years exposed to fluoridated drinking water
(1.2 mg/L) for >10 years (mean exposure duration was 25.9 years), as compared to women exposed to
fluoridated drinking water for <10 years.
In a study of women aged 65 years and older, no significant alterations in bone mineral density of the
radius, calcaneus, hip, or lumbar spine were found between women with no exposure to fluoridated water
(n=1,248), 1–10 years of exposure (n=438), 11–20 years of exposure (n=198), or greater than 20 years of
exposure (n=192) (Cauley et al. 1995). Total calcium intake was significantly higher in the >20-year
group and lower in the 11–20-year group. Lehmann et al. (1998) also found no difference in age- and
weight-adjusted bone mineral density of the spine and femur of women aged 20–69 years living in an area
with fluoridated water (1 mg/L). In the men living in the fluoridated water a community, there was a
significant increase in age- and weight-adjusted bone mineral density of the Ward’s triangle portion of the
femur, but no effect on neck or trochanter portions of the femur or the spine. The lack of adjustment for
other risk factors limits the interpretation of this study; significantly higher alcohol consumption and
lower calcium intakes were found in the fluoride-exposed group. Sowers et al. (1991) also found no
significant alterations in bone mass in women aged 20–80 years living in a community with naturally
high fluoride levels (4 mg/L) as compared to women living in a community with fluoridated water
(1 mg/L). However, radius bone mass was significantly lower in the high fluoride group.
As with bone mineral density, conflicting results have been found on the effect of low levels of fluoride
on the risk of fractures, particularly hip fractures. These studies have found conflicting results, with
studies finding a lower or higher incidence of hip fractures or no differences in hip fracture between
humans exposed to fluoride in drinking water.
Several studies have found decreases in hip fracture incidences in communities with fluoride in the
drinking water, suggesting that there may be a beneficial effect. Simonen and Laittinen (1985) examined
male and female residents older than 50 years living in two cities in Finland with either trace amounts of
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
fluoride in the water or with 1 ppm fluoride in the water. The occurrence of femoral neck fractures was
lower in the men 50–80 years old and women >70 years old living in the area with fluoridated water, as
compared to the low fluoride community. No difference in femoral neck fracture was observed in women
50–69 years of age. In a prospective study of older women, Phipps et al. (2000) examined the possible
relationship between living in an area with fluoridated water and the risk of fractures among women
≥65 years old. Fewer spine, hip, and humerus fractures were observed in this group. However, a
nonsignificant trend toward higher incidences of wrist fractures was observed in the continuous exposure
group. Lehmann et al. (1998) also found a significant decrease in the occurrence of hip fractures
(adjusted for age) in men and women living in an area with fluoridated water (approximately 1 ppm), as
compared to residents living in a city with low levels of fluoride in the water.
In contrast to the results of these studies, other studies have found an increase in the incidence of hip
fractures in communities with fluoride in the drinking water. Sowers et al. (1986) found a higher
incidence of hip fractures among women aged 55–80 years living in a community with high levels of
naturally occurring fluoride (4 ppm) in the water, as compared to women living in an area with
fluoridated water (1 ppm). The lower calcium intake in the high fluoride group may have influenced
these results. A geographical correlational study of 541,985 white women hospitalized for hip fractures
found a weak association (regression coefficient=0.001, p=0.1) between hip fracture incidence and
fluoridation of water (Jacobsen et al. 1990). The association was strengthened (regression
coefficient=0.003, p=0.0009) after correcting by county for other factors found to correlate with hip
fracture incidence (latitude, hours of sunlight, water hardness, income level, and percentage of land in
farms). Another study by this group (Jacobsen et al. 1992) also found a significantly elevated risk of hip
fractures in residents living in counties with fluoridated water. The relative risks were
1.17 (95% CI=1.13–1.22) and 1.08 (95% CI=1.06–1.10) for men and women aged 65 years and older.
The highest prevalence of hip fractures was found in counties that began a fluoridation program within
the last 5 years. Madans et al. (1983) examined the association between fluoride in drinking water and
risk of hip fractures using hip fracture data from the National Health Interview Surveys of 1973–1977 and
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on the percent of a population in each U.S.
county served with water having a natural or adjusted fluoride content of at least 0.7 ppm in 1973.
Female residents over 45 years of age living in areas with lower fluoride levels in the drinking water had
9% more hip fractures than women living in high fluoride areas; however, the difference was not
statistically significant. An increase in the risk of hip fractures (age, sex, and quatelet index-adjusted
odds ratio of 1.86, 95% CI=1.02–3.36) was also observed in adults aged 65 years and older living in areas
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
with drinking water fluoride levels ranging from 0.11 to 1.83 ppm (Jacqmin-Gadda et al. 1995); these
data were reported as a letter to the editor and limited study details were provided.
A study in England and Wales also found increased rates of hip fractures in men and women over
age 45 as water fluoride levels increased up to 0.93 ppm (Cooper et al. 1991). Hip fracture rates in
39 counties (standardized by age and sex) were compared with water fluoride levels in those counties. In
the original analysis (Cooper et al. 1990), no significant correlation was found. However, when the
authors reanalyzed the data using a weighted least-squares technique (weighting by the size of the
population aged ≥45 years) to account for differences in the precision of the county-specific rates, a
significant positive correlation between water fluoride levels and hip fracture rates was found (r=0.41,
p=0.009). The correlation existed for both women (r=0.39, p=0.014) and men (r=0.42, p=0.007) (Cooper
et al. 1991). Kurttio et al. (1999) studied over 144,000 residents living in rural areas of Finland from
1967 to –1980. When all age groups were considered together, no relationship between fluoride levels in
drinking water and the risk of hip fractures was found. However, among women aged 50–64 years with
higher fluoride levels, an increase in the risk of hip fractures was found. No consistent relationships were
found in men or in older women. The study authors suggested that other risk factors for hip fracture may
be more important than fluoride exposure in determining risk of hip fractures in older women. An
ecologic cohort study compared the hip fracture rate for men and women in a Utah community that had
water fluoridated to 1 ppm with the rate in two communities with water containing <0.3 ppm fluoride
(Danielson et al. 1992). The age-adjusted rate was significantly elevated in both women (relative risk
1.27, 95% CI=1.08–1.46) and men (relative risk 1.41, 95% CI=1.00–1.81). In men, the rates in the
fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities were similar until age 70. After age 75, the difference
between the rates in the fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas increased with age. The difference between
the hip fracture rates in the fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas increased for women in the 70- and
75-year age groups. However, the fracture rates in women at ages ≥80 years old were similar in the
fluoridated and nonfluoridated towns. The study authors attributed this to the fact that women older than
80 years would have already gone through menopause by the beginning of fluoridation, and so would
have had less bone remodeling and less incorporation of fluoride into the bone. The study authors also
suggested that the reason that they found an effect when other investigators have not was the low levels of
exposure to risk factors for osteoporosis (smoking and alcohol) in the Utah populations. This was a well-
conducted study that suggests that communities with fluoridated water have an elevated risk of hip
fracture. However, several possible confounding factors were not examined. Calcium levels in the water,
total calcium and vitamin D intake, and individual fluoride intake were not determined. Estrogen use was
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
not evaluated, but was assumed to be similar since the communities were similar distances from larger
medical centers. In addition, estrogen levels would not cause the effect in men.
A study by Li et al. (2001) found a U-shaped pattern for the prevalence of overall bone fractures and the
level of fluoride in the drinking water of six communities in rural China. The prevalence of bone
fractures (adjusted for age and gender) was significantly elevated in the communities with 0.25–0.34 ppm
fluoride (7.41%) or 4.32–7.97 ppm fluoride (7.40%), as compared to the prevalence (5.11%) in the
community with 1.00–1.06 ppm fluoride in the water. When only hip fractures since age 20 years were
examined, the age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted prevalence was only significantly higher in the
4.32–7.97 ppm group; prevalence of 1.20% compared to 0.37% in the 1.00–1.06 ppm group. A similar
pattern was found for overall fractures since age of 50 years; the age-adjusted prevalences were 4.80 and
3.28% in the 4.32–7.97 and 1.00–1.06 ppm groups, respectively.
Other studies have not found a relationship between fluoride in drinking water and hip fracture
prevalence. No significant differences in the incidence or type of upper femoral fracture were observed
when groups of subjects living in communities with low fluoride (<0.3 ppm), fluoridated (1.0–1.2 ppm),
or high fluoride (>1.5 ppm) drinking water (Arnala et al. 1986). Kröger et al. (1994) found no effect on
self-reported fractures among a group of older Finnish residents (mean age of approximately 53 years)
living in an area with fluoridated water (1.0–1.2 mg/L), as compared to residents living in an area with
low fluoride levels in the drinking water (<0.3 ppm). Similarly, Avorn and Niessen (1986) found no
statistically significant alteration in the occurrence of long bone fractures among women aged 65 years
and older living in counties with fluoridated water (fluoride concentrations were not reported) as
compared to residents living in counties without fluoridated water. No alteration in the occurrence of hip
or ankle fractures were observed in men and women aged 65 years or older residents living in
communities with fluoridated water, as compared to residents living in communities without a water
fluoridation program (Karagas et al. 1996). In men, the risk of proximal humerus fracture (relative risk
1.23, 95% CI=1.06–1.43) and distal forearm fractures (relative risk of 1.16, 95% CI=1.02–1.33) were
higher in the fluoridated water areas; the relative risks of these fractures in women living in fluoridated
areas were not significantly altered. Cauley et al. (1995) found no effect on the risk of vertebral or
nonvertebral fractures among women aged 65 years and older exposed to fluoridated water for 13 years
(mean exposure duration).
Jacobsen et al. (1993) compared hip fractures rates in the 10-year period prior to fluoridation to the rates
in the 10-year period after fluoridation of a city’s water source (fluoride concentration of 1.1 ppm). No
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
significant differences in the risk of hip fractures were found in men or women aged 50 years and older;
the relative risks, after adjusting for other risk factors, were 0.78 (95% CI=0.37–1.66) and 0.60 (95%
CI=0.42–0.85) for men and women, respectively. No significant alterations in the risk of hip fracture
were found among male and female residents aged 45 and older living in a city with fluoridated water
(Suarez-Almazor et al. 1993). However, when male residents were considered separately, the relative risk
of hip fracture was statistically significant in the 65 years and older age bracket (risk ratio of 1.13, 95%
CI=1.00–1.24) and all men combined (risk ratio of 1.12, 95% CI=1.01–1.24).
With the exception of studies examining skeletal fluorosis, most of the studies on the skeletal effects of
fluoride involved older adult populations. There is also some limited evidence that fluoride may affect
bone mineralization in children. Increased trabecular height and area were observed in the distal radial
metaphysis of boys (11–12 years of age) with dental fluorosis living in an area with 2.7 ppm fluoride in
water (Chlebna-Sokol and Czerwinski 1993). No alterations were observed in similarly aged girls or
older (13.5–15 years) boys and girls. The trabecular changes were correlated with lower serum calcium
levels and higher alkaline phosphatase activity levels. Alarcón-Herrera et al. (2001) found a significant
correlation between bone fracture incidence and Dean’s index of dental fluorosis among children aged 6–
12 years and adults aged 13–60 years.
Evidence from animal experiments supports the association of high levels of fluoride and adverse effects
on bone. The femurs of weanling male rats of a Wistar-derived strain that were given ≥9.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride for 2 weeks exhibited a marked decrease in the modulus of elasticity.
It is not clear if the change was analyzed statistically. No lower doses were tested (Guggenheim et al.
1976). Musculoskeletal effects in albino rats (strain not identified) following oral exposure of
intermediate duration have been investigated. After 30 days of exposure to 100 ppm of fluoride in water
(14 mg fluoride/kg/day), tibia bones were broken and allowed to heal (Uslu 1983). Collagen synthesis
was determined to be defective, and fracture healing was delayed, when compared to the controls.
Decreased bone growth and signs of fluorosis were observed in rats given 19 mg fluoride/kg/day as
sodium fluoride in their drinking water and adequate calcium for 5 weeks; with elevated calcium levels,
fluorosis was not observed until the fluoride level reached 35 mg fluoride/kg/day (Harrison et al. 1984).
Male mice administered 0.80 mg fluoride/kg/day for 4 weeks exhibited a statistically significant increase
in the bone formation rate and a slight but statistically significant decrease in bone calcium levels (Marie
and Hott 1986). The authors concluded that 0.80 mg fluoride/kg increased the population of osteoblasts
under the conditions of this experiment. Turner et al. (1992) found a biphasic relationship between bone
strength and bone fluoride content in rats. At lower fluoride intakes, increased bone strength was
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
observed; the maximum bone strength was achieved at 1,000–1,500 ppm fluoride in the bone. At fluoride
concentrations >1,000 ppm bone strength started to decrease. The sagittal crests were enlarged and/or
deformed in three of six adult female mink fed 9.1 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride for 382 days
(Aulerich et al. 1987). The authors attributed the abnormalities of the sagittal crests to increased
osteoblastic activity. An increase in the diameter of the femur bone and decreased breaking strength was
observed in pigs administered sodium fluoride or rock phosphate in the diet (Kick et al. 1933).
Hepatic Effects. No studies were located regarding hepatic effects in humans after oral exposure to
fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine.
Pale, granular hepatocytes, compatible with parenchymal degeneration, were observed in mice
administered 0.95 mg fluoride/kg/day in drinking water for 7–280 days (Greenberg 1982a). Fatty
granules were observed after 3 weeks. Liver congestion was observed in sheep given a single intragastric
dose of fluoride as low as 9.5 mg fluoride/kg. Mild serum increases of liver enzymes (glutamate
dehydrogenase [GDH] and gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT]) also occurred in sheep administered
38 mg fluoride/kg (Kessabi et al. 1985). It is difficult to use this result to predict to possible human
effects because ruminants (sheep, cows, goats) have gastrointestinal systems quite different from that of
humans.
Enlarged liver cells with multiple foci were seen in about half of the male B6C3F1 mice that died after
receiving 33–36 or 67–71 mg fluoride/kg/day for up to 6 months as sodium fluoride in drinking water
(NTP 1990). This change was seen in all of the female mice that died at the 71 mg/kg/day dose level. No
liver effects were seen in a parallel experiment with F344/N rats at doses up to 20 mg/kg/day. Similarly,
no liver histopathology was seen in the chronic portion of this study (NTP 1990), in which rats received
total fluoride doses (amount added to water plus endogenous fluoride in food) of about 4.5 mg/kg/day
(rats) or up to 9.1 mg/kg/day (mice). Alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly increased in male
and female mice at the 66-week interim sacrifice of the chronic study.
Renal Effects. One study was located in which ingestion of fluoride appeared to be linked with renal
insufficiency (Lantz et al. 1987). A 32-year-old man ingested 2–4 L of Vichy water (a highly gaseous
mineral water containing sodium bicarbonate and approximately 8.5 mg/L of fluoride) every day for
about 21 years. This exposure ended 4 years before his hospital admission. The patient also had
osteosclerosis and a moderate increase in blood and urinary levels of fluoride. No teeth mottling was
observed. The authors could not find factors, other than fluoride, related to his interstitial nephritis. No
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
effect on the incidence of urinary tract calculi or the incidence of albuminuria was found in the Bartlett-
Cameron study of people drinking water containing 8 ppm fluoride (Leone et al. 1954).
Congestion of the kidney was observed in sheep given a single intragastric dose of fluoride as low as
9.5 mg fluoride/kg (Kessabi et al. 1985). An intermediate exposure study tested the effect of
administering up to 67–71 mg fluoride/kg/day to B6C3F1 mice (8–9/group) as sodium fluoride in drinking
water for 26 weeks (NTP 1990). Acute nephrosis characterized by extensive multifocal degeneration and
necrosis of the tubular epithelium was believed to be the main cause of death in two of the four males
exposed to 67 mg/kg/day that died, the single male that died after exposure to 33 mg/kg/day, and two of
the four females in the high dose group that died. No kidney histopathology was observed in surviving
mice or in rats exposed to 20 mg fluoride/kg/day and higher (NTP 1990). Significant increases in water
consumption and apparent (based on qualitative descriptions) increases in acid phosphatase activity in the
glomeruli were observed in monkeys exposed to 0.46 mg fluoride/kg/day as hydrofluosilicic acid for
180 days (Manocha et al. 1975). The toxicological significance of these changes is not known.
Changes in kidney histology were seen in mature Swiss mice given a dose of sodium fluoride in drinking
water for up to 280 days that was described as the maximum dose that could be chronically tolerated, i.e.,
1.9 mg/kg/day (Greenberg 1986). Using a sensitive staining technique, increased collagen levels were
seen after about 45 days. Thickening of the Bowman's capsule, edematous swelling of the tubules, and
infiltrations of mononuclear cells were also noticed. No kidney pathology was seen in a 2-year study in
B6C3F1 mice at doses up to 8.1 mg/kg/day (males) or 9.1 mg/kg/day (females), or in F344/N rats at doses
up to 4.1 mg/kg/day (males) or 4.5 mg/kg/day (females) (NTP 1990).
Endocrine Effects. Significant increases in serum thyroxine levels were observed in residents of
North Gujarat, India with high levels of fluoride in the drinking water (range of 1.0–6.53 mg/L; mean of
2.70 mg/L) (Michael et al. 1996). No significant changes in serum triiodothyronine or thyroid stimulating
hormone levels were found. Increases in serum epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were also
observed. In another study conducted in India, a positive dose-response relationship between parathyroid
hormone and fluoride intake from drinking water was observed in children aged 6–12 years (Gupta et al.
2001). It is unclear if nutritional deficiencies played a contributing role to the observed endocrine effects.
Jooste et al. (1999) found a higher goiter prevalence among children (6–15 years of age) living in two
towns in South Africa with high levels of fluoride in the water (1.7 or 2.6 ppm), as compared to children
living in towns with low (0.3 or 0.5 ppm) or optimal (0.9 or 1.1 ppm) fluoride levels in the water. The
prevalence of goiter was also elevated in three of the other four towns, although the prevalence was lower
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
than in the high fluoride towns; suggesting that the children were exposed to other goitrogens. Iodine
deficiency was not the likely etiological agent because the median urinary iodine levels were higher than
iodine sufficiency standards. These data are inadequate to assess the relationship between elevated
fluoride intake and goiter formation.
Fluoride has been shown to affect the endocrine system in rats given 0.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium
fluoride in drinking water every day for 2 months (Bobek et al. 1976). These animals showed decreased
thyroxine levels and an increased T3-resin uptake ratio. In contrast, Zhao et al. (1998) did not find any
alterations in serum T3 or T4 levels in mice exposed to 3.2 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in
drinking water for 100 or 150 days. However, a decrease in thyroid radiolabelled iodine uptake was
observed at 3.2 mg fluoride/kg/day, but not at 0.06 mg fluoride/kg/day.
No significant alterations in parathyroid hormone levels or morphological alterations in the parathyroid

gland were observed in rats exposed to 3.3 mg fluoride/kg in drinking water for 46 weeks (Rosenquist et
al. 1983).
Body Weight Effects. Final body weight was reduced by >40% relative to the controls in female
F344/N rats administered 25 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 14 days; body
weight in males was reduced by >10% at doses ≥6.3 mg/kg/day (NTP 1990). A clear and consistent
effect on body weight of B6C3F1 mice was seen only at the high dose (69 mg/kg/day), which was lethal
to males (3/5), but not to females. In the intermediate-duration (6 months) phase of the study, the body
weight of mice administered 17 mg fluoride/kg/day was reduced by 20%; it was reduced by 10% at
19 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice given large doses of sodium fluoride in drinking water for 14 days had
reduced water intake (NTP 1990). Male and female rats given 25 mg fluoride/kg/day drank about 30%
less water than the controls. Water consumption by male rats given 51 mg fluoride/kg/day was 50% of
controls, while it was 25% of controls for females. Similarly, mice given 69 mg fluoride/kg/day drank
≤60% the volume of water consumed by the controls. This means that actual fluoride doses are lower
than the estimates given here, since these values were calculated assuming normal water intake.
However, the reduced water intake may have been due to the disagreeable taste of fluoride at high
concentrations in the water.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
A request to the American Academy of Allergy was made by the U.S. Public Health Service for an
evaluation of suspected allergic reactions to fluoride as used in the fluoridation of community water
supplies (Austen et al. 1971). The response to this request included a review of clinical reports and an
opinion as to whether these reports constituted valid evidence of a hypersensitivity reaction to fluoride
exposure of types I, II, III, or IV (Austen et al. 1971), which are, respectively, anaphylactic or reaginic,
cytotoxic, toxic complex, and delayed-type reactivity. The Academy reviewed the wide variety of
symptoms presented (vomiting, abdominal pain, headaches, scotomata [blind, or partially blind areas in
the visual field], personality change, muscular weakness, painful numbness in extremities, joint pain,
migraine headaches, dryness in the mouth, oral ulcers, convulsions, mental deterioration, colitis, pelvic
hemorrhages, urticaria, nasal congestion, skin rashes, epigastric distress, and hematemesis) and concluded
that none of these symptoms were likely to be immunologically mediated reactions of types I–IV. No
studies were located that investigated alterations in immune response following fluoride exposure in
humans.
In a study with rabbits administered 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride for 18 months, decreased
antibody titers were observed (Jain and Susheela 1987). These results were observed after 6 months of
treatment; the authors hypothesized that a threshold level is reached at which time the immune system is
impaired. However, as only one dose level (4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day) was tested, no dose-effect
relationships can be established. An increase in the cellularity of Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph
nodes was observed in rats administered sodium fluoride (Butler et al. 1990).
There are limited data on the neurological toxicity of fluoride in humans. Exposure to very high doses of
fluoride can result in neuromuscular symptoms (e.g., tetany, paresthesia, paresis, convulsions). These
effects are probably due to hypocalcemia caused by fluoride binding of calcium causes these symptoms
(Eichler et al. 1982). As discussed in the Developmental Effects section, decreases in intelligence were
reported in children living in areas of China with high levels of fluoride in the drinking water, as
compared to matched groups of children living in areas with low levels of fluoride in the drinking water
(Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000), but these studies are weak inasmuch as they do not address important
confounding factors. Using dental fluorosis as a surrogate for high fluoride intake, Morgan et al. (1998)
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
examined the possible correlation between dental fluorosis and behavioral problems in children aged 7–
11 years. No significant correlations were found.
There are limited animal data on the neurotoxicity of fluoride. Significant decreases in spontaneous
motor activity were observed in rats exposed via gavage to 9 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in
saline for 60 days (Paul et al. 1998). No alterations in motor coordination, as assessed with the rotarod
test, were found. A decrease in blood cholinesterase activity was also observed in these rats. Another
study (Mullenix et al. 1995a) found alterations in spontaneous behavior in female rats exposed to 7.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 6 weeks beginning at 3 weeks of age and in
female rats exposed to 6.0 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 6 weeks beginning
at 13 weeks of age. The study authors noted that the observed effects were consistent with hyperactivity
and cognitive deficits. In a recent study only available as an abstract (Whitford et al. 2003), no significant
alterations in performance on operant behavior tests were observed in female rats exposed to 2.9–11.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day in drinking water for 7 months. Varner et al. (1998) found increases in the frequency of
neuronal abnormalities in the neocortex and a bilateral accumulation of β-amyloid in the thalamus of rats
exposed to 0.11 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water. This study did not assess
neurofunction; thus, it is difficult to assess the toxicological significance of these effects.
There are limited data on the potential of fluoride to induce reproductive effects in humans following oral
exposure. A meta-analysis found a statistically significant association between decreasing total fertility
rate and increasing fluoride levels in municipal drinking water (Freni 1994). Annual county birth data
(obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics) for over 525,000 women aged 10–49 years living
in areas with high fluoride levels in community drinking water were compared to a control population
approximately 985,000 women) living in adjacent counties with low fluoride drinking water levels. The
fluoride-exposed population lived in counties reporting a fluoride level of 3 ppm or higher in at least one
system. The weighted mean fluoride concentration (county mean fluoride level weighted by the 1980 size
of the population served by the water system) was 1.51 ppm (approximately 0.04 mg fluoride/kg/day
calculated using a reference water intake of 2 L/day and body weight of 70 kg), and 10.40% of the
population was served by water systems with at least 3 ppm fluoride. The mean weighted mean fluoride
concentration in the control population was 1.08 ppm (approximately 0.03 mg fluoride/kg/day).
However, this meta-analysis relied on a comparison of two quite disparate data sets, inasmuch as the
fluoridation population often did not correlate well with the population for whom health statistics was
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
available. The ecologic nature of this study design does not allow an evaluation of the nature of the total
fertility rate and fluoride association. Another study found significantly decreased serum testosterone
levels in 30 men diagnosed with skeletal fluorosis and in 16 men related to men with fluorosis and living
in the same house as the patient (Susheela and Jethanandani 1996). The mean drinking water fluoride
levels were 3.9 ppm (approximately 0.11 mg fluoride/kg/day), 4.5 ppm (0.13 mg fluoride/kg/day), and
0.5 ppm (0.014 mg fluoride/kg/day) in the patients with skeletal fluorosis, related men, and a control
group of 26 men living in areas with low endemic fluoride levels. No correlations between serum
testosterone and urinary fluoride levels or serum testosterone and serum fluoride levels were found. One
limitation of this study is that the control men were younger (28.7 years) than the men with skeletal
fluorosis (39.6 years) and the related men (38.7 years). In addition, the groups are small and potentially
confounding factors are not well addressed.
Animal studies have examined the effect of fluoride on reproductive hormone levels, histology of the
testes, spermatogenesis, and fertility. No alterations in mean serum levels of testosterone, luteinizing
hormone, or follicle stimulating hormone were found in male rats exposed to 16 mg fluoride/kg/day as
sodium fluoride in drinking water for 14 weeks or in their male offspring exposed during gestation,
lactation, and for 14 weeks after weaning (Sprando et al. 1997). In contrast, significant decreases in
serum testosterone levels were observed in rats receiving daily gavage doses of 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as
sodium fluoride for 50 days (Narayana and Chinoy 1994) and in rats exposed for 60 days to 4.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in the diet (Araibi et al. 1989).
No alterations in Sertoli cells or in the seminiferous tubules were observed in the male offspring of rats
exposed during gestation, lactation, and for 14 weeks post weaning to 16 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium
fluoride in drinking water (Sprando et al. 1998). However, other studies have reported testicular damage,
which appears to be directly related to the length of exposure. No histological alterations were observed
in the testes of rats exposed to 21 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride for 6 weeks (Krasowska and
Wlostowski 1992). However, after 16 weeks of exposure, seminiferous tubule atrophy was observed at
7.5 mg fluoride/kg/day and higher (Krasowska and Wlostowski 1992). A decrease in the mean diameter
of the seminiferous tubules was observed in rats exposed to 2.3 or 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium
fluoride in the diet for 60 days (Araibi et al. 1989); thickening of the peritubular membrane of the
seminiferous tubules was also observed at 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day. Consistent with the decreases in serum
testosterone levels, significant decreases in Leydig cell diameter were observed in rats (Narayana and
Chinoy 1994) and rabbits (Susheela and Kumar 1991) receiving 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day via gavage as
sodium fluoride in water for 50 days or 18–23 months, respectively.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Although some studies have not found significant alterations in spermatogenesis or sperm morphology, a
number of studies have reported adverse effects. No alterations in sperm head abnormalities (Li et al.
1987a) or sperm morphology (Dunipace et al. 1989) were observed in B6C3F1 mice administered sodium
fluoride by gavage at doses up to 32 mg fluoride/kg/day for 5 days and killed 30 days later or in
B6C3F1 mice administered 23 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in water. In CD rats administered
4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in the diet for 60 days, a significant decrease in the percentage
of seminiferous tubules containing spermatozoa was observed (Araibi et al. 1989). Damage to the
spermatid and epididymal spermatozoa were observed in rabbits administered by gavage 4.5 mg
fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in water for at least 18 months (Kumar and Susheela 1994, 1995), and
complete cessation of spermatogenesis was observed after 29 months of exposure (Susheela and Kumar
1991). A number of studies have found significant alterations in cauda epididymal and vas deferens
sperm. Decreased sperm counts, sperm motility, and sperm viability (the ratio of live to dead sperm) have
been observed in rats exposed to 2.3 mg fluoride/kg/day and higher (Chinoy et al. 1992, 1995) and mice
(Chinoy and Sequeira 1992) and guinea pigs (Chinoy et al. 1997) exposed to 4.5 mg fluoride/kg/day and
higher. When exposed male rats were mated with unexposed females, decreased fertility was observed at
2.3 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride and higher (Chinoy and Sequeira 1992; Chinoy et al. 1992).
The alterations in sperm and the infertility were reversible 30–60 days after termination of a 30-day
exposure period (Chinoy and Sequeira 1992).
Adverse reproductive effects have also been observed in females. Nearly complete infertility was
observed in female Swiss-Webster mice exposed to 19 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in the
drinking water for 25 weeks (Messer et al. 1973). However, this effect was not repeated in another study
of Webster mice exposed to 13 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in the diet for three generations
(Tao and Suttie 1976). The study authors attributed the difference between this study and the Messer et
al. (1973) study to the higher iron levels in the Tao and Suttie (1976) study, as anemia was reported by
Messer et al. (1973), but not by Tao and Suttie (1976). Significant decreases in the number of viable
fetuses and increases in the resorption rate were observed in female Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to
10.21 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 30 days prior to mating with
unexposed males (Al-Hiyasat et al. 2000); it is not known if these effects were directly related to fluoride
exposure or were secondary to the severe decreases in body weight (31% lower than controls) and water
consumption. In contrast, a two-generation study by Collins et al. (2001a) did not find any significant
alterations in reproductive performance in CD rats exposed to 10.7 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride
in drinking water for 10 weeks prior to mating with similarly exposed males. This study only found a
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
small decrease in body weight gain (approximately 6%) in the rats exposed to a similar sodium fluoride
concentration as used by Al-Hiyasat et al. (2000). Decreased estrus rate and increased incidence of
missed pregnancies was observed in Sheltie dogs fed dog food supplemented with rock phosphate at a
level of 11.5 mg fluoride/kg/day (Shellenberg et al. 1990). However, these changes were also observed in
groups provided with distilled water rather than well water. No adverse effects on reproduction were
observed in a two-generation rat study in which male and female rats were fed diets containing 23 mg
fluoride/kg/day (Marks et al. 1984). Additional evidence that fluoride adversely affects female
reproduction includes decreased lactation in rats exposed to 21 mg fluoride/kg/day in drinking water for
88 days (Yuan et al. 1994) and decreased calving rate (Van Rensburg and de Vos 1966) and decreased
milk production (Maylin and Krook 1982) in cows ingesting large amounts of fluoride.
The highest NOAEL values and all reliable LOAEL values for reproductive effects for each species and
Fluoride readily crosses the placenta and is found in fetal and placental tissue (Armstrong et al. 1970;
Gupta et al. 1993; Malhotra et al. 1993; Shen and Taves 1974). A number of human and animal studies
have examined the potential of fluoride to induce developmental effects.
Analysis of birth certificates and hospital records for over 200,000 babies born in an area with fluoridated
water and over 1,000,000 babies born in a low fluoride area found no difference in the incidence of birth
defects attributable to fluoride (Erickson et al. 1976). Exposure to high levels of fluoride has been
described together with an increased incidence of spina bifida (Gupta et al. 1995). The occurrence of
spina bifida was examined in a group of 50 children aged 5–12 years living in an area of India with high
levels of fluoride in the drinking water (4.5–8.5 ppm) and manifesting either clinical (bone and joint pain,
stiffness, and rigidity), dental, or skeletal fluorosis. An age- and weight-matched group of children living
in areas with lower fluoride levels (≤1.5 ppm) served as a control group. Spina bifida was found in
22 (44%) of the children in the high fluoride area and in 6 (12%) of the children in the control group.
This study did not examine the possible role of potentially important nutrients such as folic acid,
however, and had other study design flaws.
Three studies (Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000; Zhao et al. 1996) conducted in China have found significant
decreases in intelligence score in children living in areas with high endemic levels of fluoride in the
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
water. As noted below, these studies have a number of design limitations, which restrict the interpretation
of the results. A fourth study did not find significant alterations in IQ scores in Mexican children
(Calderon et al. 2000). The study by Li et al. (1995a) examined intelligence in children living in areas
with high fluoride levels due to soot from coal burning. A group of 907 children aged 8–13 years were
divided into four groups depending on the existence and severity of dental fluorosis; 20–24 children in
each age group for each area were examined for intelligence. A significant decrease in IQ was measured
in children living in the medium- (mean IQ of 79.7) and severe- (mean of 80.3) fluorosis areas, as
compared to the children living in the non- (mean of 89.9) or slight- (mean of 89.7) fluorosis areas. More
children with IQs of <70 and 70–79 and fewer children with IQs of 90–109 and 110–119 were found in
the medium- and severe-fluorosis areas than in the non- or slight-fluorosis areas. No information on
exposure levels were provided; the mean urinary fluoride levels were 1.02, 1.81, 2.01, and 2.69 mg/L in
the non-, slight-, medium-, and severe-fluorosis areas, respectively. Numerous potentially confounding
variables were not mentioned in this study, however, which raises questions regarding the validity of the
study’s findings. A study by Lu et al. (2000) also examined exposure to high fluoride levels and
decreased intelligence. Sixty children aged 10–12 years living in an area with high fluoride levels in the
drinking water (3.15 mg/L) were examined for intelligence. The test results were compared to a group of
58 children with similar social, education, and economic backgrounds who lived in an area with low
fluoride levels in water (0.37 mg/L). A significant decrease in IQ was observed in the high fluoride area
(mean IQ of 92.27) as compared to the control group (103.05). Additionally, there was a significantly
higher number of children from the high exposure area with IQ scores of <70 (retarded) and 70–
79 (borderline retarded) than in the control group. A significant inverse relationship between urinary
fluoride levels and IQ was also found. Nevertheless, because this study relied on small groups and
presented scant discussion of numerous potential confounders, the strength of its conclusions are
questionable. Zhao et al. (1996) found significantly lower IQ scores in children living in a village with
high levels of fluoride in drinking water (4.12 ppm) as compared to children living in a village with
0.91 ppm fluoride in water. The study authors noted that IQ levels in children were correlated with the
educational levels of the parents; however, the educational level of parents in the village with low fluoride
levels was higher than those in the high fluoride village.
No significant alterations in IQ scores were found in Mexican children (6–8 years of age) exposed to 1.2–
3 ppm fluoride in drinking water (Calderon et al. 2000; only available as an abstract). However, increases
in reaction time and decreases in visuospatial organization were found; the scores on these tests were
correlated with urinary fluoride levels.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Rapaport (1956) reported an increased prevalence of Down’s syndrome in areas with fluoridated water.
However, this finding has not been replicated by several other investigations (Berry 1958; Erickson et al.
1976; Needleman et al. 1974). No correlation was found between fluoridation and Down's syndrome
incidence (corrected for maternal age) in a study of over 234,000 children in fluoridated areas and over
1,000,000 children in low-fluoride areas (Erickson et al. 1976). Ascertainment was based on birth
certificates and hospital records, but was probably incomplete. Takahashi (1998) criticized the methods
used by Erickson et al. (1976) to analyze the data. Using the same dataset and combining Down’s
syndrome prevalence for the three youngest maternal ages, Takahashi (1998) found a significant
association between water fluoridation and Down’s syndrome. Similar to Erickson et al. (1976),
Needleman et al. (1974) found no maternal age-specific increases in Down’s syndrome; ascertainment
was nearly complete in this study of over 80,000 children in fluoride areas and over 1,700,000 children in
low-fluoride areas. Similarly, a study of the incidence of Down's syndrome in England did not find an
association with the level of fluoride in water, but age-specific rates were not determined and tea was not
taken into account as a source of fluoride (Berry 1958).
No alterations in the number of live births, sex ratio, fetal body weights, or the occurrence of external,
visceral, or skeletal malformations were observed in the offspring of rats and rabbits exposed to doses as
high as 13.21 or 13.72 mg fluoride/kg/day, respectively, as sodium fluoride in drinking water consumed
on gestational days 6–15 or 6–19, respectively (Heindel et al. 1996) or in the offspring of F0 or F1 rats
exposed to 12.2 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 10 weeks prior to mating and
during gestation (Collins et al. 2001b). Similarly, no developmental effects were observed in offspring of
rats drinking water containing at least 11.2 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride on gestational days 1–
20 (Collins et al. 1995). An increase in the average number of fetuses per litter with at least three skeletal
variations was seen at the highest dose tested (11.4 mg fluoride/kg/day); however, this was associated
with decreased maternal water and food consumption and decreased body weight gain. Significant
increases in the percentage of fetuses with skeletal or visceral abnormalities were also observed in the
fetuses of rats receiving gavage doses of 18 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride on gestational days 6–
19 (Guna Sherlin and Verma 2001). As with the Collins et al. (1995) study, significant decreases in
maternal body weight and food consumption were also observed in the dams.
Bone morphology of weanling Sprague-Dawley rats from dams that received 21 mg fluoride/kg day for
10 weeks prior to breeding and during gestation was examined with both light and electron microscopy.
No pathological changes were seen, suggesting that although fluoride is transported across the placenta,
the amount transported was not sufficient to affect fetal bone development (Ream et al. 1983). There
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
were no developmental effects of fluoride in the first litter of an extended two-litter reproduction study in
rats that were fed diets containing 23 or 2.8 mg fluoride/kg/day (two litters from each dam) (Marks et al.
1984). However, the second litters born to mothers in the high-fluoride group had a higher number of
abnormal newborns and affected litters than were found in the low-fluoride group. The significance of
this finding is unclear because the effect was not analyzed statistically.
Wild and domestic animals may be more sensitive than laboratory animals to developmental effects of
fluoride. Stunted growth (Krook and Maylin 1979) and lameness (Maylin and Krook 1982) have been
reported in calves that foraged on land downwind of an aluminum plant. Severe dental fluorosis
confirmed high levels of fluoride ingestion. Mink kits that were born to mothers fed 9.1 mg
fluoride/kg/day and fed the same feed after weaning exhibited a marked decrease in survivability (14% at
3 weeks, compared with 86% for the control) (Aulerich et al. 1987). There was no effect at the next
lower dose. No further clinical details were provided for these pups. However, survival of the females
exposed to that level was also decreased (17% at the end of the trial [382 days], compared with 100% for
the control), so it is not clear if the kit effects were secondary to maternal toxicity. The only clinical signs
in the adult mink were general unhealthiness, hyperexcitability, and lethargy a few days before they died.
No lameness was observed.
3.2.2.7 Cancer
Numerous epidemiological studies have examined the issue of a connection between fluoridated water
and cancer. Most studies have not found significant increases in cancer mortality (Erickson 1978; Hoover
et al. 1976; Rogot et al. 1978; Taves 1977) or site-specific cancer incidence (Freni and Gaylor 1992;
Gelberg et al. 1995; Hoover et al. 1976; Mahoney et al. 1991; McGuire et al. 1991). However, a couple
of studies have reported significant fluoridation-related increases in cancer mortality (Yiamouyiannis and
Burk 1977) or incidence (Takahashi et al. 2001). The lack of control for potential confounding variables
(i.e., age, race) limits the interpretation of these study results. Most of the investigations were
community-based studies, and the sensitivity limit of even the most sensitive analysis in these studies
appears to be a 10–20% increase.
Yiamouyiannis and Burk (1977) were the first investigators to suggest a relationship between water
fluoridation and increased cancer risk. In their study, cancer death rates for 1940–1950 were compared to
rates for 1953–1969 for residents of the 10 largest cities in the United States with fluoridated water.
Similar comparisons were made in 10 cities without fluoridated water. The investigators noted that prior
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
to fluoridation (1940–1950) the crude cancer deaths were similar in the two groups of cities. After
fluoridation (1953–1969), a sharp increase in cancer deaths was observed in the cities with fluoridated
water. The increases in cancer deaths among residents aged 45–64 years and ≥65 years living in cities
with fluoridated water were significantly higher than in residents of cities with nonfluoridated water.
Yiamouyiannis and Burk (1977) noted that there was a greater increase in nonwhites in the fluoridated
cities than in the nonfluoridated cities. Because they found no correlation between the increase in age-
adjusted cancer death rate and the increase in the number of nonwhites living in each city, they concluded
that the change in racial composition did not contribute to the fluoridation-related increase in cancer death
rates.
A number of investigators have criticized the methods used by Yiamouyiannis and Burk and have re-
analyzed the data (Chilvers 1982, 1983; Doll and Kinlen 1977; Hoover et al. 1976; Kinlen and Doll 1981;
Oldham and Newell 1977; Smith 1980; Taves 1977). The study was primarily criticized for the
dissimilarity of the age, sex, and race distribution between the fluoridated and nonfluoridated cities and
the rather short cancer latency period. Chilvers (1983) and Smith (1980) noted that the divergence in
crude cancer deaths began almost immediately after fluoridation was initiated. The latency period (the
period of time between first exposure and the discovery of cancer) is usually >5 years and the period
between first exposure and death from cancer is typically >15 years. Thus, Chilvers (1983) and Smith
(1980) suggested that exposure to fluoridated water was not the likely cause of the divergence in cancer
mortality between the two groups of cities that began shortly after initiation of a water fluoridation
program. Smith (1980) noted that using age bands of 20 years is problematic for cancer studies because
cancer mortality dramatically increases with age so that small differences in the age distribution between
two populations can result in apparently significant differences in cancer mortality.
Smith (1980) also criticized Yiamouyiannis and Burk’s dismissal of the potential confounding variable of
race based on the lack of significant correlation relationships. Additionally, he noted that the appropriate
analytical method should account for race, age, and sex differences at the same time. Between 1950 and
1970, the proportion of nonwhites and individuals over the age of 65 years increased more rapidly in the
fluoridated cities than in the nonfluoridated cities (Doll and Kinlen 1977). This change in demographics
would have likely resulted in increased cancer deaths independent of fluoridation. Oldham and Newell
(1977) noted that although the crude cancer rates in the two groups of cities were similar, the 1950 excess
cancer rate (which accounts for race, sex, and age differences) in the fluoridated cities was 10.3 per
100,000 higher than in the nonfluoridated cities. The higher excess cancer rate in the fluoridated cities
was attributed to the smaller number of white elderly women and greater number of elderly white males.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Oldham and Newell (1977) estimated that in 1970, the excess cancer rate increased by 1% in the
fluoridated cities and 4% in the nonfluoridated cities; the increases in absolute deaths were 8.8 per
100,000 and 7.7 per 100,000 in the fluoridated and nonfluoridated cities, respectively. In re-examining
the data used by Yiamouyiannis and Burk (1977), Hoover et al. (1976) noted that when fluoride was the
only variable used in the regression analysis, it was a significant predictor of cancer mortality rate.
However, when other demographic variables (population density, education level, race, employment in
manufacturing, and geographic section of the country) were also entered into the equation, fluoride only
statistically predicted stomach cancer mortality rate. Re-analysis of stomach cancer data with adjustment
for high-risk ethnic groups resulted in a nonsignificant association for females and a significant
association for males.
Yiamouyiannis and Burk’s selection of nonfluoridated cities has also been criticized because they did not
select the 10 largest cities (the criteria used for selecting fluoridated cities), rather they selected the
10 largest cities with a crude cancer death rate exceeding 155 per 100,000 (the average in fluoridated
cities). Comparison of the SMRs for 1950, 1960, and 1970 and the change from 1950 to 1970 using
cancer mortality analysis of data from the original 10 largest fluoridated cities and the 10 largest
nonfluoridated cities did not result in any relevant changes in cancer mortality (Kinlen and Doll 1981).
Similarly, Taves (1977) calculated SMRs for three 2-year periods (1949–1951, 1959–1961, and 1969–
1971) for all cancers in the fluoridated and nonfluoridated cities examined by Yiamouyiannis and Burk
and for the next 10 largest fluoridated cities and 5 nonfluoridated cities. The SMRs for the 20 fluoridated
cities, as well as the SMRs for the 15 nonfluoridated cities, were relatively constant for the three time
periods, suggesting that water fluoridation did not increase the cancer risk.
A number of other population studies have examined the possible association between water fluoridation
and increased risk of all cancers or site-specific cancers. Hoover et al. (1976) examined cancer mortality
data for counties in Texas with varying levels of naturally occurring fluoride. For white males and
females, no significant increases in SMRs for all cancers combined or site-specific cancers were found in
the three groups of counties with high levels of fluoride (0.7–1.2 ppm, 1.3–1.9 ppm, and ≥2.0 ppm) as
compared to counties with very low fluoride levels in the drinking water. Hoover et al. (1976) also
examined the effect of artificial fluoridation on cancer mortality. SMRs were calculated for residents of
counties in the United States that were 67% urban. No significant differences in the SMRs for all cancer
combined between the fluoridated and nonfluoridated counties were seen prior to fluoridation or 5, 10, or
15 years after fluoridation. Similarly, no significant differences in SMRs were seen for individual cancer
sites. A third study conducted by Hoover et al. (1976) examined cancer incidence data from Birmingham,
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Alabama (nonfluoridated) and Denver, Colorado (fluoridated after 1947–1948). No fluoridation-related

increases in age-adjusted, site-specific cancer incidence rates were found prior to fluoridation (1947–
1948) or after fluoridation (1969–1971).
Using mortality data from 22 nonfluoridated and 24 fluoridated cities with populations greater than
250,000, Erickson (1978) calculated crude and adjusted death rates for all malignant neoplasms and
several site-specific cancers (digestive, respiratory, breast, genital, urinary, leukemia). Slightly higher
crude mortality rates were seen in the fluoridated cities (206.6 versus 183.0); however, when the mortality
rates were adjusted for age, sex, and race, and demographic, social, and economic variables, no
significant differences were found. Rogot et al. (1978) also found no association between fluoridation
and cancer mortality among cities with populations of 25,000 or more in 1950. Mortality rates for 1950,
1960, and 1970 and the change from 1950 to 1970 were compared for fluoridated and nonfluoridated
cities. In a study of cancer mortality rates in three counties in Kansas with fluoridated water, and one
county with nonfluoridated water, no consistent fluoridation-related increases in age-adjusted mortality
from all cancers were found (Neuberger 1982). In one fluoridated county, there was a significant increase
in mortality; however, in another county, cancer mortality was significantly lower than in the
nonfluoridated county and in the third county, there were no significant differences. Examination of
cancer mortality data for individual tumor sites revealed slightly higher rates of rectum cancer in females,
higher rates of pancreatic cancer in females living in the county with the longest history of fluoridation,
and bone cancer in males with the longest history of fluoridation exposure; the statistical significance of
these findings was not reported. Using data from the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result
(SEER) program, Hoover et al. (1991a) evaluated cancer mortality data for 36 years and incidence data
for 15 years. No consistent evidence of a relationship between site-specific cancer mortality or incidence
and the pattern of fluoridation was found. A suggestive relationship between renal cancer incidence and
duration of fluoridation was found. However, when the incidence data were divided into two time periods
(1973–1980, 1981–1987), no relationship between renal cancer incidence and duration of fluoridation was
found.
A more recent study has also examined cancer incidence in populations with fluoridated water. Using
data from three states (Connecticut, Iowa, and Utah) and six cities (Atlanta, Detroit, New Orleans, Seattle,
San Francisco, and Los Angeles), Takahashi et al. (2001) conducted regression analysis of site-specific
cancers. Statistically significant positive associations between fluoridation index (percentage of
population with naturally or artificially fluoridated water) and cancer at a number of sites including the
oral cavity, esophagus, colon, liver, pancreas, bronchus, lungs, kidney, urinary bladder, and bone were
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
found. However, interpretation of these data is limited by the lack of control for potential confounding
variables (particularly age and race) between the fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities.
In the early 1990s, two population-based studies found increases in the incidence of bone and joint cancer
or osteosarcoma among males under the age of 20 living in areas with fluoridated water (Cohn 1992;
Hoover et al. 1991b). Based on the NCI SEER program data, Hoover et al. (1991b) found 47 and 79%
increases in the incidences of bone and joint cancer and osteosarcoma, respectively, among males and
females living in areas with fluoridated water. In contrast, 34 and 4% declines in bone and joint cancer
and osteosarcoma, respectively, were found in the nonfluoridated areas. The investigators questioned the
biological significance of this finding because no relationship between the increased incidence and the
initiation of fluoridation was found (Hoover et al. 1991b). In the Cohn (1992) study of the New Jersey
cancer registry data, significant increases in the osteosarcoma incidence risk ratios were found among
males under the age of 20 years living in areas with fluoridated water. The investigator cautioned that
these results were based on a small number of cases. Other population-based studies (Freni and Gaylor
1992; Mahoney et al. 1991) did not find significant associations between fluoridation and bone cancer.
Freni and Gaylor (1992) reported significant increases in the cumulative risk of bone cancer among young
men aged 10–29 years in 40 cancer registry areas in the United States, Canada, and Europe for the period
of 1958–1987. However, when registry data for areas with known fluoridation status were examined, no
consistent pattern was observed; both increases and decreases in cumulative risk were found in areas with
fluoridated water. Similarly, Mahoney et al. (1991) reported a significant trend for increasing incidence
of bone cancer among young men (<30 years of age) living in New York State, exclusive of New York
City. A significant trend was not observed in young females or for osteosarcomas. Comparisons between
bone cancer and osteosarcoma incidence rates among residents of counties with fluoridated water and
residents of counties with nonfluoridated water did not reveal any statistically significant associations. A
case-control study of New York residents, excluding New York City, also failed to show an association
between fluoridated water and increased risk of osteosarcoma (Gelberg et al. 1995). A significant
protective trend (odds ratio decreased with increased fluoride intake) was observed for males, although
the authors noted that this may be due to good health practices rather than fluoride because a significant
trend was not observed when only fluoridated water was considered. A small-scale case-control study
(22 cases examined) also failed to find a significant association between fluoridated water and
osteosarcoma occurrence (McGuire et al. 1991).
The NTP conducted two chronic oral bioassays of fluoride administered as sodium fluoride (0, 25, 100, or
175 ppm) in drinking water for 103 weeks, using F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (Bucher et al. 1991; NTP
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
1990). The first study was considered compromised for reasons that will be discussed below. However,
pathology data from the first study were used in determining the doses for the second study. The
specially formulated diet used in the second study contained 8.6 ppm fluoride; daily fluoride amounts
administered in the food for control and experimental groups were 0.43 mg/kg/day in rats and
1.1 mg/kg/day in mice. Based on the total amount of fluoride ingested and the amount in the feces, and
apparently assuming that none of the fluoride found in the feces was absorbed, Bucher et al. (1991)
calculated that the average bioavailability of fluoride in the food over the course of the experiment was
60%. Assuming complete absorption of fluoride in the water, they estimated total fluoride intake
(including fluoride in both water and diet) of control, low-, medium-, and high-dose male rats as 0.2, 0.8,
2.5, and 4.1 mg/kg/day, respectively. Similarly, the high doses for female rats, male mice, and female
mice were 4.5, 8.1, and 9.1 mg/kg/day, respectively.
The study found osteosarcomas in the bone of 1/50 male rats in the mid-dose group and 3/80 of the high-
dose male rats. An additional high-dose male had an extraskeletal osteosarcoma in subcutaneous tissue.
Examination of radiographs did not reveal a primary site in bone for the extraskeletal tumor, suggesting
that it was a soft-tissue tumor that later ossified. No osteosarcomas were found in the low-dose or control
rats. One of the osteosarcomas in the high-dose group was missed on radiographic examination and in the
necropsy, and found only on microscopic examination. Three of the tumors were in the vertebra and only
one was in a long bone. This is unusual, as Bucher et al. (1991) stated that chemically-induced
osteosarcomas usually appear in the long bones, rather than in the vertebrae. Statistical analysis found a
significant dose-response trend in the four osteosarcomas of the bone (p=0.027), but no significant
difference (p=0.099) in a pairwise comparison of the controls with the high-dose group. The probability
value for the trend test was decreased (p=0.010) when the extraskeletal osteosarcoma was included, but
the pairwise test was still not significant (p=0.057). Osteosarcomas are rarely observed in control male
rats in NTP studies; the historical incidence is 0.6% (range 0–6%). The rate in the high-dose group in this
study was 3.75 or 5%, depending on whether or not the extraskeletal tumor is included. Tumor rates
could not be compared with the historical controls because the diet generally used for NTP studies
contains >20 ppm fluoride. Assuming the same bioavailability of 60%, the study report states that this
would place the historical controls between the low- and mid-dose groups in the fluoride study.
Conversely, the more extensive bone examinations used in the fluoride study, both at the macroscopic
level and histologically, could have led to higher bone tumor levels being observed than in historical
controls.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
The average fluoride level in the bones of male rats in the high-dose group was 5,260 ppm. While similar
bone fluoride levels were found in the bones of female rats and male and female mice, there was no
evidence of treatment-related osteosarcomas in these groups. Osteosclerosis was observed in high-dose
female rats, suggesting a stimulatory or mitogenic effect on osteoblasts (Marie and Hott 1986).
Osteosclerosis was not observed in mice, despite the higher dose. Osteosarcomas were observed in one
low-dose male mouse, one low-dose female mouse, and one control female mouse. There was also one
osteoma in a control female mouse. No osteosarcomas were observed at mid- or high-dose levels in
female rats or male or female mice. The study authors stated that the absence of treatment-related
osteosarcomas in female rats and male and female mice may have limited relevance to the findings in
male rats. Results in the literature are mixed as to whether there is a sex-linked response in bone tumor
formation (Litvinov and Sikivuev 1973; NCI 1978).
Increased tumor incidence in rats or mice was noted in a few other tissues, but was not considered
biologically significant. For example, the combined incidence of squamous cell papillomas and
carcinomas in the oral mucosa was marginally increased in the high-dose male and female rats and
thyroid follicular cell neoplasms were marginally increased in the high-dose male rats. Neither increase
was statistically significant, and both types of neoplasms lacked a supporting pattern of increased
preneoplastic lesions. Similarly, increased levels of keratoacanthomas were observed in high-dose female
rats, but were not considered biologically significant because other benign neoplasms arising from
stratified squamous epithelium was found in the controls. Malignant lymphoma and histiocytic sarcoma
incidence in female high-dose mice was marginally increased (combined rate 30%), but the increase was
not considered biologically significant. The incidence was well within the range of historical controls at
the study laboratory (18–48%) and at all NTP laboratories (10–74%). The incidence of hepatocellular
neoplasms in male and female mice of the treatment and control groups was higher than in historical
controls. The study authors noted similar increases in other NTP studies that were conducted
contemporaneously, and suggested that they may be associated with increased animal weight. Hepato-
cholangiocarcinomas, which are rare liver neoplasms, were identified in the original pathology
examination in five treated male mice, four treated female mice, and one control female mouse. The
Pathology Working Group reclassified all of the neoplasms (except one in a high-dose female mouse and
one in a control female mouse) as hepatoblastomas, because they contained well-defined populations of
cells that resembled embryonal liver cells more closely than they did biliary cells. The dose levels at
which the reclassified hepatocholangiocarcinomas were found were not reported.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Interpretation of this study is further complicated because higher doses might have been tolerated in both
the rat and the mouse studies (NTP 1990). Fluoride-related tooth abnormalities found in the study
included dental attrition in males of both species that was dose-related in rats but not in mice, dentine
dysplasia in both genders of both species, and tooth deformities in male rats. No other treatment-related
toxic effects were found in any group, and there was no evidence of decreased body weight gain in any
group. Higher fluoride levels may have affected the teeth of the male rats so severely as to interfere with
the animals' ability to eat. However, it appears that the mice and possibly the female rats could have
tolerated a higher dose.
Based on the finding of a rare tumor in a tissue known to accumulate fluoride, but not at the usual site for
chemically-associated osteosarcomas, a weakly significant dose-related trend, and the lack of supporting
data in female rats and mice of either gender, the NTP concluded that there was "equivocal evidence of
carcinogenic activity of sodium fluoride in male F344/N rats." NTP defined equivocal evidence of
carcinogenic activity to be a situation where the results show "a marginal increase in neoplasms that may
be chemically related." NTP further concluded that there was no evidence that fluoride was carcinogenic
at doses up to 4.73 mg/kg/day in female F344/N rats, or at doses up to 17.8 and 19.9 mg/kg/day in male
and female B6C3F1 mice, respectively.
The first chronic study in this series conducted by NTP was a 2-year cancer study in B6C3F1 mice and
F344/N rats using a semisynthetic diet containing 2.1 ppm fluoride and fluoride provided in drinking
water as sodium fluoride at 0, 10, 30, or 100 ppm. Several nontreatment-related clinical signs developed
in rats, including corneal lesions and head tilt. Analysis of the diet revealed marginal to marked
deficiencies in manganese, chromium, choline, and vitamins B12 and D. Based on these findings, the
study was considered compromised, but the results were used to aid in dose selection for the second
study. Only the following unverified pathology findings were reported: (1) one osteosarcoma in the
occipital bone of one low-dose male rat; (2) one osteoma in the vertebra of a male control mouse; (3) one
subcutaneous osteosarcoma in one female high-dose mouse; and (4) no osteosarcomas in female rats
(male mice were not mentioned).
A study sponsored by Procter and Gamble examined the carcinogenic potential of sodium fluoride
administered in feed to Sprague-Dawley rats (Maurer et al. 1990). One group of controls was fed
laboratory chow, and another control group was fed a semisynthetic low-fluoride diet. The control group
fed the low-fluoride diet received 0.14 (males) or 0.18 (females) mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride.
The fluoride level in the laboratory chow was not determined. Treatment groups ingested 1.8, 4.5, or
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
11.3 mg fluoride/kg/day in the diet as sodium fluoride. Fluoride bioavailability was not determined and
water fluoride levels were not reported. Fluoride-related toxicity included dose-related hyperostoses in
males and females, tooth abnormalities, and stomach inflammation. Fluoride levels in the bone ash of the
high-dose males and females were 16,761 and 14,438 ppm, respectively. Primary tumors in target tissues
as reported by the study authors were one fibroblastic sarcoma with areas of osteoid formation in a high-
dose male, one osteosarcoma in a low-dose female, one chordoma in a mid-dose male, one chondroma
each in a mid-dose male and a low-dose female, one odontoma in a laboratory-chow control, and one
stomach papilloma in a low-fluoride control. Re-examination of tissue slides as part of a review of the
study by the Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration (CAC/CDER/FDA) revealed an additional osteosarcoma in a low-dose female and
one osteosarcoma in a high-dose male. Statistical analysis of the incidence of bone tumors found no
dose-response relationship (CDER 1991).
Several limitations of the study were not apparent in the study report, but were noted in the CAC review
(CDER 1991). The low-fluoride diet may not have allowed normal growth and development, since pale
livers and gastric hairballs were observed in all study animals except those fed laboratory chow. The diet
and water were often above specifications for minerals, ions, and vitamins. A virus was found during the
pretest period and its continued presence during the study was suspected; this may have compromised the
health of the animals. The finding of bone tumors missed by the contract laboratory raised questions
about the adequacy of the examination at gross necropsy. Finally, bone sections from only 50–80% of the
mid- and low-dose animals were analyzed microscopically. The CAC review concluded that there are
"flaws and uncertainties in the studies that keep them from providing strongly reassuring data." However,
the committee concluded that the study results reaffirm the negative finding of the NTP study in female
rats, and do not reinforce the equivocal finding in male rats.
3.2.3 Dermal Exposure
Several human and animal studies investigating the health effects following accidental dermal exposure to
hydrofluoric acid were located. In addition, many of the human and animal studies investigating the
health effects of inhalation exposure to hydrogen fluoride or fluorine found dermal/ocular effects due to
the irritating effects of these chemicals. (In this section, hydrogen fluoride refers to the gas while
hydrofluoric acid refers to the liquid.) One study regarding dermal exposure to sodium fluoride was
located. Fluorine causes severe irritation of the eyes and skin and can severely burn the skin at high
concentrations. Hydrofluoric acid is a caustic acid and can produce severe tissue damage either as the
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
water solution, or in the anhydrous form (hydrogen fluoride). Hydrofluoric acid can also rapidly
penetrate the skin and cause systemic effects, especially cardiac arrhythmias. If left untreated, death can
result.
3.2.3.1 Death
Hydrofluoric Acid. Fatalities from dermal fluoride exposure occur most frequently from accidental
exposure to hydrofluoric acid in an occupational setting. The actual systemic doses are seldom known.
However, the extent and severity of the burns, and occasionally, clinical chemistry values are reported.
Death following hydrofluoric acid burns to the extremities, in the absence of inhalation exposure, is due
to cardiac arrhythmias, with pronounced hypocalcemia, hyperkalemia, and hypomagnesemia. Ion pump
disruption is thought to be the mechanism of systemic toxicity. Hydrofluoric acid exposure of the face
has also resulted in death due to respiratory insufficiency, but the respiratory effects are likely to be due to
concurrent inhalation exposure. Depending on the extent of the body surface exposed and the
effectiveness of medical treatment, death usually occurs within a few hours (Chan et al. 1987; Chela et al.
1989; Kleinfeld 1965).
A patient with hydrofluoric acid burns on his leg involving 8% of his body surface area died from
intractable cardiac arrhythmia, presumably secondary to the depletion of ionized calcium by the fluoride
ion (Mullett et al. 1987). Serum fluoride level 4 hours after the burn injury was reported to be
9.42 µg/mL, about 400 times the value reported as normal for that age and sex. A 23-year-old man who
sustained second and third degree burns of his thighs, covering 9–10% of his body surface area died of
cardiac arrhythmia 17 hours after exposure (Mayer and Gross 1985); serum fluoride was 4.17 µg/mL.
The death of a chemist who sustained first- and second-degree burns of the face, hands, and arms when a
vat containing hydrofluoric acid accidentally broke has been reported (Kleinfeld 1965). This 29-year-old
male died 10 hours after admission to the hospital. Postmortem examination showed severe
tracheobronchitis and hemorrhagic pulmonary edema. A petroleum refinery worker was splashed in the
face with 100% anhydrous hydrofluoric acid (Tepperman 1980). The burn produced acute systemic
fluoride poisoning with profound hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia. The patient died <24 hours after
exposure. A young woman splashed in the face with hydrofluoric acid died a few hours after exposure
occurred (Chela et al. 1989). The autopsy revealed severe burns of the skin and lungs, with pulmonary
hemorrhagic edema produced by hydrofluoric acid and its vapor.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
No studies were located regarding lethality in humans after dermal exposure to fluorine or fluoride, and
no studies were located regarding lethality in animals after dermal exposure to fluoride, hydrofluoric acid,
or fluorine.
No studies were located regarding gastrointestinal, hematological, musculoskeletal, endocrine, or body

weight effects in humans or animals after dermal exposure to fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine.
duration category of exposure to hydrofluoric acid are recorded in Table 3-5. All reliable LOAEL values
for systemic effects in each species and duration category for fluoride are recorded in Table 3-6.
Respiratory Effects.
Hydrofluoric Acid. Respiratory effects including pulmonary edema, tracheobronchitis, and pulmonary
hemorrhagic edema have been reported in humans following acute dermal exposure of the face to
hydrofluoric acid (Chela et al. 1989; Kleinfeld 1965). However, the pulmonary effects are likely to be
due to concomitant inhalation of the acid vapor. As two of these cases were occupational accidents and
the third was a homicide, no doses could be estimated from the information provided.
No studies were located regarding respiratory effects in humans after dermal exposure to fluoride or
fluorine, and no studies were located regarding respiratory effects in animals after dermal exposure to
fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine.
Cardiovascular Effects. Cardiac arrhythmias are found following acute dermal exposure to
hydrofluoric acid in humans (Mayer and Gross 1985; Mullett et al. 1987). A man who received a
hydrofluoric acid burn on the arm covering 5% of the body experienced repeated ventricular fibrillation
episodes, but survived following administration of intravenous calcium chloride, subcutaneous calcium
gluconate, and excision of the burn area (Buckingham 1988). These cardiovascular effects are believed to
result from the strong binding of fluoride to calcium, which produces hypocalcemia. Serum calcium is
critical for proper ion transport in neuromuscular synapses; hypocalcemia can cause the ventricles not to
contract properly.
Table 3-5 Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride - Dermal
Exposure/
Duration/ LOAEL
Species Frequency Reference
(Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious Serious Chemical Form
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Systemic
Rabbit 1d Dermal 2 2 Derelanko et al. 1985
1-4hr/d (necrotic lesions)
Percent (%) Percent (%)
hydrogen fluoride
Systemic
Rat 5 wks Dermal 8.2 Stokinger 1949
6d/wk (subcutaneous
(NS) ppm hemorrhage around the
6hr/d hydrogen fluoride
eyes and on the feet)
Reproductive
Dog 5 wks 8.2 31 Stokinger 1949
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
6d/wk (ulceration of the
(NS) ppm ppm
6hr/d scrotum) hydrogen fluoride
d = day(s); hr = hour(s); LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; min = minute(s); NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect level; wk = week(s); ppm = parts per million
128
Table 3-6 Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride - Dermal
Exposure/
Duration/ LOAEL
Species Frequency Reference
(Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious Serious Chemical Form
ACUTE EXPOSURE
Systemic
Rat 1d Dermal 0.5 1 Essman et al. 1981
24hr/d (superficial necrosis, (extensive necrosis,
(Sprague- Dawley) Percent (%) moderate edema, PMN Percent (%) marked edema, sodium fluoride
infiltration) degenerating mast cells)
d = day(s); hr = hour(s); LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect level; PMN = polymorphnuclear leukocyte
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
129
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
No studies were located regarding cardiovascular effects in humans after dermal exposure to fluoride or
fluorine, and no studies were located regarding cardiovascular effects in animals after dermal exposure to
fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine.
Hepatic Effects.
Hydrofluoric Acid. Elevated SGOT, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), and lactate dehydro-
genase levels were found in a man who was splashed in the face and on the neck with a mixture of 10%
hydrofluoric acid and sulfuric acid (Braun et al. 1984). The elevated SGOT and SGPT levels were
attributed to either muscle necrosis or temporary liver damage caused by toxic metabolic products from
necrotic tissue.
Renal Effects.
Hydrofluoric Acid. A 49-year-old man who was splashed in the face and on the neck with a mixture of
hydrofluoric acid and sulfuric acid became oliguric for a brief period on the day after the accident, and
then became anuric (Braun et al. 1984). Concomitant inhalation exposure is likely, and the effect of the
sulfuric acid is unknown.
Dermal Effects. Skin irritation and damage has been observed in humans and/or animals exposed to
fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine. Dermal effects related to exposure to
hydrogen fluoride or fluorine are discussed under Inhalation Exposure (Section 3.2.1.2).
Fluoride. Sodium fluoride applied topically to the abraded skin of Sprague-Dawley rats (0.5 or 1.0%) for
24 hours produced both morphological and biochemical changes (Essman et al. 1981). At 0.5%, the
abraded surface showed focal superficial necrosis of the epidermis. At 1.0%, the abraded surface showed
edema and vacuolization. There was marked edema of the dermis with inflammation. Skin histamine
concentrations were also increased following application of 0.5 or 1% sodium fluoride to shaved-only or
epidermally abraded skin, although the variance of these measurements was quite high.
Hydrofluoric Acid. Dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid results in extensive skin burns (Chela et al.
1989). Hydrofluoric acid quickly penetrates into soft tissues and causes necrosis. As a result of cell
membrane destruction, the fluoride ion has easy access to lymph and the venules, can be distributed
rapidly, and can cause significant adverse effects such as inhibition of glycolytic enzymes, hypocalcemia,
and hypomagnesia. Untreated burns of the fingers can result in loss of fingers. There are many reports of
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
hydrofluoric acid skin burns in humans. In one case, a 23-year-old man received fatal second- and third-
degree burns over 9–10% of his body from a 70% hydrofluoric acid spill (Mayer and Gross 1985). The
patient died 17 hours after exposure due to cardiac arrhythmias. Two case studies of accidental dermal
exposure of the hands to hydrofluoric acid (5–7%) reported serious dermal injury following exposures
from 45 minutes to 6 hours (Roberts and Merigian 1989). Topical treatment with calcium gluconate
prevented loss of nails. Other case reports are discussed in Section 3.2.3.1.
The concentration of hydrofluoric acid and the length of exposure affect the severity of dermal lesions
(Derelanko et al. 1985). Rabbits exposed to a hydrofluoric acid solution of 0.01% for 5 minutes had
visible skin lesions, whereas exposure to 2% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute did not produce lesions. A
longer exposure of 1–4 hours to 2% hydrofluoric acid solution produced necrotic lesions on the backs of
rabbits (Derelanko et al. 1985). The application of 0.2 mL of a 47% hydrofluoric acid solution to the
shaved backs of New Zealand rabbits over a surface of 1¼ inches produced no immediate reaction
(Stokinger 1949). The material was held in place by lanolin and allowed to dry for 24 hours. Within a
few days of exposure, erythema and dark spots of liquefaction necrosis appeared. Multiple eschars were
formed in the necrotic areas. These wounds healed more slowly than those produced by fluorine gas.
Healing did not near completion until 27 days after exposure.
Ocular Effects. Ocular irritation and damage has been observed in humans and animals exposed to
hydrogen fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine. The ocular effects resulting from exposure to
hydrogen fluoride or fluorine are discussed under inhalation exposure (Section 3.2.1.2).
Some evidence of delayed ocular damage due to persistence of the fluoride ion was observed 4 days after
a 3-year-old girl accidentally sprayed a hydrofluoric-acid-containing product in her eyes (Hatai et al.
1986). Opacification of the corneal epithelium and thrombosis of the conjunctival vessels were seen.
These changes were not permanent; after 30 days, the eyes returned to normal, and vision was 20/20.
However, it is difficult to generalize from this report as the product contained both hydrofluoric acid and
phosphoric acid at unspecified concentrations.
McCulley et al. (1983) concluded that the greater severity of hydrofluoric acid eye injuries compared to
injuries from other inorganic acids at comparable strengths probably results from the destruction of the
corneal epithelium allowing substantial penetration of the fluoride ion into the corneal stroma and
underlying structures.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
No studies were located regarding the following effects in humans and animals after dermal exposure to
fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine:
3.2.3.7 Cancer
3.3 GENOTOXICITY
In general, positive genotoxicity findings occurred at doses that are highly toxic to cells and whole
animals. Lower doses were generally negative for genotoxicity. Tables 3-7 and 3-8 present the results of
more recent assays.
The in vivo genotoxicity of fluoride has been tested in humans and animals following inhalation, oral, or
parenteral exposure. No alterations in the occurrence of sister chromatid exchange were observed in a
population living in areas with high levels of fluoride (4.8 ppm) in the drinking water (Li et al. 1995b).
Mixed results have been reported in animal studies examining the clastogenic potential of hydrogen
fluoride and sodium fluoride. Increases in the occurrence of chromosome aberrations were found in the
bone marrow cells of rats exposed by inhalation to 1.0 mg/m3 hydrogen fluoride 6 hours/day, 6 days/week
for 1 month (Voroshilin et al. 1975) and in mouse bone marrow cells following oral, intraperitoneal, or
subcutaneous exposure to sodium fluoride (Pati and Bunya 1987). However, other studies did not find
significant alterations in the occurrence of chromosome aberrations in mouse bone marrow cells
following oral exposure (Kram et al. 1978; Martin et al. 1979). Additionally, no alterations in sister
chromatid exchange occurrence were observed in mouse or Chinese hamster bone marrow cells following
oral exposure (Kram et al. 1978; Li et al. 1987b). Intraperitoneal injection of sodium fluoride resulted in
an increase in micronuclei in mouse bone marrow cells (Pati and Bhunya 1987); no alterations were
observed in rat bone marrow cells following oral exposure (Albanese 1987). Hydrogen fluoride was
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Table 3-7. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vitro
Results
With Without
Species (test system) End point activation activation Reference Form
Prokaryotic organisms:
Salmonella typhimurium Gene mutation – – Martin et al. 1979; NTP NaF
1990; Tong et al. 1988
Eukaryotic organisms:
Human lymphocytes Chromosomal No data + Albanese 1987 NaF
aberrations
Human lymphocytes Chromosomal No data – Thomson et al. 1985 NaF, KF
aberrations
Human fibroblasts Chromosome No data + Tsutsui et al. 1984c NaF
aberrations
Human fibroblasts Chromosomal No data – Tsutsui et al. 1995 NaF
aberrations
Human diploid IMR-90 Chromosomal No data + Oguro et al. 1995 NaF
cells aberrations
Human lymphocytes Sister chromatid No data – Thomson et al. 1985; NaF
exchange Tong et al. 1988
Human lymphocytes Sister chromatid No data – Thomson et al. 1985 KF
exchange
Human lymphoblasts Gene mutation + + Caspary et al. 1988 NaF
Human fibroblasts Unscheduled No data + Tsutsui et al. 1984c NaF
DNA synthesis
Syrian hamster embryo Chromosomal No data + Tsutsui et al. 1984b NaF
cell aberrations
Syrian hamster embryo Sister chromatid No data + Tsutsui et al. 1984b NaF
cell exchange
Syrian hamster embryo Unscheduled No data + Tsutsui et al. 1984b NaF
cell DNA synthesis
Chinese hamster ovary Sister chromatid No data – Li et al. 1987b NaF
cells exchange
Chinese hamster ovary Sister chromatid No data – Tong et al. 1988 NaF
cells exchange
Chinese hamster ovary Sister chromatid + + NTP 1990 NaF
cells exchange
Chinese hamster ovary Chromosomal + + Aardema et al. 1989 NaF
cells aberrations
Chinese hamster ovary Chromosomal – + NTP 1990 NaF
cells aberrations
Chinese hamster Gene mutation No data – Slameńová et al. 1992 NaF
V79 cells
Mouse lymphoma cells Gene mutation No data (+) Cole et al. 1986 NaF
Mouse lymphoma cells Gene mutation + + Caspary et al. 1987, NaF
1988; NTP 1990
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Table 3-7. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vitro
Results
With Without
Species (test system) End point activation activation Reference Form
Mouse lymphoma cells Gene mutation + + Caspary et al. 1987 KF
Rat hepatocytes DNA repair No data – Tong et al. 1988 NaF
Rat liver epithelium cells Gene mutation No data – Tong et al. 1988 NaF
Rat vertebral body Chromosome No data + Mihashi and Tsutsui NaF
derived cells aberrations 1996
Rat bone marrow cells Chromosome No data (+) Khalil 1995 NaF, KF
aberrations
Rat bone marrow cells Sister chromatid No data – Khalil and Da’dara 1994 NaF, KF
exchange
– = negative result; + = positive result; (+) = weakly positive result; DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; KF = potassium
fluoride; NaF = sodium fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Table 3-8. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vivo
Species (test system) End point Results Reference Form

Human lymphocytes (oral exposure) Sister chromatid exchange – Li et al. 1995b NR
Rat bone marrow cells (oral Micronuclei – Albanese 1987 NaF
exposure)
Rat bone marrow Chromosome aberrations + Voroshilin et al. 1975 HF
Rat testis cells (oral exposure) DNA strand breaks – Skare et al. 1986 NaF
Mouse (C57B1) Dominant lethal – Voroshilin et al. 1975 HF
Mouse (Harlan Sprague-Dawley) Sperm head abnormality – Li et al. 1987a NaF
Mouse bone marrow and testis cells Chromosome aberrations – Martin et al. 1979 NaF
(oral exposure)
Mouse bone marrow cells (oral, Chromosome aberrations + Pati and Bhunya 1987 NaF
intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous
exposure)
Mouse bone marrow cells Micronuclei + Pati and Bhunya 1987 NaF
(intraperitoneal exposure)
Mouse bone marrow cells (oral Chromosome aberrations – Kram et al. 1978 NaF
exposure)
Mouse bone marrow cells (oral Sister chromatid exchange – Kram et al. 1978 NaF
exposure)
Chinese hamster bone marrow cells Sister chromatid exchange – Li et al. 1987b NaF
(oral exposure)
– = negative result; + = positive result; DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; HF = hydrogen fluoride; NaF = sodium fluoride;
NR = not reported
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
negative for dominant lethal mutations following inhalation exposure to hydrogen fluoride in C57B1 mice
(Voroshilin et al. 1975). In a study in Drosophila melanogaster in which reproductive parameters were
measured as an indicator of genotoxicity, significant reductions in the number of eggs per female and
male fertility were observed following inhalation exposure to hydrogen fluoride (Gerdes et al. 1971b).
The maximum lethality to adults of one of the two tested strains was 60%; under most of the test
conditions, the lethality was ≤40%.
3.4 TOXICOKINETICS
The majority of data on the toxicokinetics of fluoride focus on sodium fluoride and hydrofluoric acid.
Data regarding the toxicokinetics of calcium fluoride and other fluorides in human or animals are limited.
While radioactive isotopes are useful in toxicokinetic studies, this use is limited in studies of fluoride
because the fluorine isotope 18F has a short half-life (Wallace-Durbin 1954).
3.4.1 Absorption
3.4.1.1 Inhalation Exposure
Data providing information on absorption exist on the inhalation exposure of humans to hydrogen
fluoride or mixtures of hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts, and inhalation exposure of animals to
hydrogen fluoride. Animal data also exist showing that fluorine is absorbed.
Hydrogen Fluoride. Increases in plasma fluoride levels were observed in humans inhaling 0.8–2.8 or
2.9–6.0 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride of 60 minutes (Lund et al. 1997); maximum plasma
concentrations were observed 60–90 minutes after exposure initiation. A study in rats suggests that
hydrogen fluoride is absorbed primarily by the upper respiratory tract, and that removal of hydrogen
fluoride from inhaled air by the upper respiratory tract approaches 100% for exposures that range from
30 to 176 mg fluoride/m3 (Morris and Smith 1982). Furthermore, it is apparent that distribution to the
blood is rapid. Immediately following 40 minutes of intermittent exposure, plasma fluoride
concentrations correlated closely (correlation coefficient=0.98; p<0.01) with the concentration of
hydrogen fluoride in the air passed through the surgically isolated upper respiratory tract. Plasma levels
were not measured at time points <40 minutes.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. The absorption in humans of inhaled hydrogen fluoride and
fluoride dusts has been demonstrated in several studies. In a study by Collings et al. (1952), two workers
were exposed to approximately 5 mg fluoride/m3 for 6 hours with 15-minute breaks every 2 hours.
Absorption of fluoride was evaluated by monitoring urinary excretion of fluoride during and after
exposure. Analysis of 2-hour serial urine samples showed a peak fluoride level 2–4 hours after cessation
of exposure, which decreased to base levels within 12–16 hours after exposure. Similar results were
obtained using the same protocol to measure urinary fluoride following exposure to air containing 5.0 mg
fluoride/m3 as rock phosphate dust (Collings et al. 1951). Another study reported clinical observations of
employees in the production of phosphate rock and triple superphosphate (Rye 1961). Three employees
were exposed to airborne fluoride (2–4 ppm) composed of approximately 60% dust and 40% hydrogen
fluoride gas. Within 2–3 hours after exposure began, urinary fluoride levels increased from 0.5 to
4.0 mg/L and peaked 10 hours (7–8 mg/L) following cessation of exposure. None of the subjects had
prior occupational exposure to fluoride. Two studies of aluminum potroom workers found elevated
plasma fluoride levels (Ehrnebo and Ekstrand 1986; Søyseth et al. 1994). In workers exposed to
0.910 mg fluoride/m3 total fluoride (34% of which was gasous fluoride) during an 8-hour workshift,
elevated plasma fluoride concentrations and urinary fluoride levels were observed (Ehrnebo and Ekstrand
1986). Although these studies demonstrate absorption of fluoride, none measure the extent of fluoride
absorption.
Fluorine. No data were located regarding the absorption of fluorine in humans. Hepatic and renal effects
were observed in mice following exposure to fluorine for periods up to 60 minutes (Keplinger and Suissa
1968). This indicates that the fluoride ion was systemically available following the exposure. Fluoride,
rather than fluorine, is the agent that is toxicologically active systemically, since fluorine is too reactive to
be absorbed unchanged. Similarly, the finding of elevated fluoride levels in bones, teeth, and urine during
intermediate-duration exposure to fluorine indicates that fluoride is absorbed under these conditions
(Stokinger 1949). No information on absorption rate or extent is available.
Furthermore, although the data presented concern only acute exposures, it is expected that virtually
complete absorption would also be observed during long-term exposure to low levels of fluoride in the
air.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.4.1.2 Oral Exposure
Fluoride. In humans and animals, fluoride is rapidly and efficiently absorbed from the gastrointestinal
tract. Elevated plasma fluoride levels are seen shortly after exposure to sodium fluoride; peak plasma
levels are typically seen within 30–60 minutes of ingestion (Carlson et al. 1960a; Ekstrand et al. 1977,
1978). Fluoride is absorbed from both the stomach and small intestine via passive diffusion. Nopakun et
al. (1989) estimated that in rats, approximately 20% of total absorbed fluoride was absorbed from the
stomach. Absorption of fluoride from the stomach is inversely proportional to pH (Messer and Ophaug
1993; Whitford and Pashley 1984), suggesting that fluoride is absorbed from the stomach as the
undissociated hydrogen fluoride rather than the fluoride ion (Whitford and Pashley 1984). After gastric
emptying, fluoride was rapidly absorbed from the small intestine (Messer and Ophaug 1993). An in vitro
study suggests that in the small intestine, fluoride is primarily absorbed as the fluoride ion (Nopakun and
Messer 1990). The absorption of fluoride does not appear to be homeostatically regulated. A linear
correlation between fluoride (as sodium fluoride) intake and the area under the plasma fluoride
concentration curve was found in humans ingesting 2–10 mg doses of sodium fluoride (Trautner and
Seibert 1986).
A number of dietary factors can influence the absorption of fluoride. Delayed gastric emptying slows the
rate of fluoride absorption, but does not appear to affect the total amount of fluoride absorbed (Messer
and Ophaug 1993). Ingestion of sodium fluoride with food delayed the peak plasma level but did not
significantly alter the total amount of fluoride absorbed, as compared to values when the subjects ingested
sodium fluoride after an 8-hour fast (Shulman and Vallejo 1990; Trautner and Einwag 1987). In contrast,
ingestion of calcium fluoride with a meal dramatically increased (33.5 versus 2.8%) the absorption of
fluoride, as compared to absorption after an 8-hour fast; similar results were found for the fluoride in bone
meal tablets (Trautner and Einwag 1987). It is likely that the increased residence time in the upper
gastrointestinal tract increased absorption. Ingestion of sodium fluoride with milk decreased fluoride
absorption by 13–50% (Ekstrand and Ehrnebo 1979; Shulman and Vallejo 1990; Trautner and Seibert
1986). Other studies have also shown that co-exposure to calcium carbonate or a diet high in calcium
decreases fluoride absorption (Jowsey and Riggs 1978; Whitford 1994). Increased exposure to
magnesium (Stookey et al. 1964; Weddle and Muhler 1954) or aluminum (Stookey et al. 1964; Weddle
and Muhler 1954) also resulted in decreases in fluoride absorption.
Soluble fluoride compounds, such as sodium fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorosilic acid, are readily
absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Studies in humans and animals have found that >80% of an oral
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
dose of soluble fluoride compound is absorbed (Ericsson 1958; McClure et al. 1950, 1945; Zipkin and
Likins 1957); several studies have reported 99–100% absorption efficiencies (Ekstrand et al. 1978;
Trautner and Einwag 1987). Poorly soluble fluoride compounds, such as calcium fluoride, magnesium
fluoride, and aluminum fluoride, do not appear to be well absorbed. Very little (<10%) fluoride was
absorbed in fasting subjects ingesting calcium fluoride (Afseth et al. 1987; Trautner and Einwag 1987).
Compared to sodium fluoride, the fluoride from bone meal (McClure et al. 1945; Trautner and Einwag
1987) and cryolite (McClure et al. 1945) was poorly absorbed.
The absorption of fluoride in infants, children, and adults appears to be similar. A study of four infants
(mean age 8 months) reported mean absorption rates of 88.9–96.0% when a sodium fluoride solution was
administered along with infant formula (Ekstrand et al. 1994b). As discussed previously, the absorption
efficiency in adults usually exceeds 90% (Ekstrand et al. 1978; Trautner and Einwag 1987). As with
adults, peak plasma levels usually occurred in 30–60 minutes (mean of 39 minutes) in infants (Ekstrand et
al. 1994a) and young children aged 3–4 years (Ekstrand et al. 1983). One observed difference between
fluoride absorption in infants and adults is that administration of fluoride with a high calcium diet did not
result in a significant decrease in fluoride absorption (88.9 versus 96.0%) in infants (Ekstrand et al.
1994b); a decrease in absorption has been reported in adults (Ekstrand and Ehrnebo 1979; Shulman and
Vallejo 1990; Trautner and Einwag 1987).
3.4.1.3 Dermal Exposure
Data exist on dermal absorption of hydrofluoric acid in humans and animals, and limited quantitative rate
data are available in animals.
Hydrofluoric Acid. Dermal application of hydrofluoric acid results in rapid penetration of the fluoride
ion into the skin. Sufficiently large amounts cause necrosis of the soft tissue and decalcification and
corrosion of bone in humans (Browne 1974; Dale 1951; Dibbell et al. 1970; Jones 1939; Klauder et al.
1955). Systemic fluoride poisoning has been reported following accidental dermal exposure to anhydrous
hydrogen fluoride (Buckingham 1988; Burke et al. 1973). Although the extent of the contribution of
inhalation exposure in these cases is not known, the reports suggest that hydrogen fluoride is quickly
absorbed into the body following dermal exposure. However, these studies did not provide useful
information concerning the extent of fluoride absorption, or information on absorption of smaller doses.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Dermal absorption of hydrofluoric acid in albino mice of the d.d. strain was inferred in a study by
Watanabe et al. (1975). Mice were painted with 0.02 mL of 50% hydrofluoric acid, and the residual acid
was wiped off after 5 minutes. The mice were then injected intraperitoneally with [14C]glucose and
analyzed by whole body radiography. Radioactivity levels in the liver, renal cortex, lungs, and blood
were elevated 30 minutes after injection. This suggests that fluoride was absorbed through the skin and
interfered with the tissue distribution of glucose. No data were located on the extent of absorption of
fluoride in animals exposed dermally to hydrofluoric acid.
These studies indicate that fluoride as hydrofluoric acid is absorbed through the skin in humans and
animals. However, the degree of absorption is not known, nor is it known whether other forms of fluoride
would be absorbed, and to what extent. Furthermore, it is expected that the relationship between duration
or concentration and degree of absorption would be affected by the corrosive action of hydrofluoric acid.
Therefore, prediction of the extent of absorption following exposure to a low concentration of
hydrofluoric acid cannot be made based on the existing data.
Fluorine. Systemic effects have been observed following whole-body exposure to fluorine (Keplinger
and Suissa 1968; Stokinger 1949). However, these effects are likely to be due to inhalation exposure,
rather than dermal exposure.
3.4.2 Distribution
Hydrogen Fluoride. No data were located regarding the distribution of fluoride in humans following
exposure to only hydrogen fluoride. Evidence from studies in animals supports the inference from
occupational studies of exposure to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dust that fluoride is distributed to the
rest of the body when inhaled. Duration- and concentration-related increases in tooth and bone fluoride
levels were reported in the rat following exposure to 7 or 24 mg/m3 for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for up to
30 days (Stokinger 1949). Fluoride levels in new bone were up to twice the levels in old bone. The
distribution of the fluoride ion was studied in the tissues of rabbits, a guinea pig, and a monkey exposed
to hydrogen fluoride at various concentrations (1.5–1,050 mg/m3) and exposure times (Machle and Scott
1935). The observation period ranged from 9 to 14 months. As might be expected, based on the
following discussion of human occupational exposure to fluoride compounds, the fluoride ion
accumulated chiefly in the skeleton of all three species.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Several studies in animals have demonstrated that fluoride is widely available through the blood, although
actual concentrations in tissues other than blood have, for the most part, not been reported. For example,
whole body exposure of male rats to levels ranging from 11 to 116 mg fluoride/m3 as hydrogen fluoride
for 6 hours resulted in a dose-dependent increase in lung and plasma fluoride concentrations (Morris and
Smith 1983). In another study, rats exposed to 84 mg fluoride/m3 as hydrogen fluoride by whole body
exposure had significantly elevated levels of fluoride in plasma and lungs 6 hours postexposure (Morris
and Smith 1983).
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. Limited information was located on the distribution of inhaled
fluoride in humans. However, reports of skeletal fluorosis (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983b; Czerwinski et al.
1988; Kaltreider et al. 1972) and elevated bone fluoride levels (Baud et al. 1978; Boivin et al. 1988) after
occupational exposure to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts indicate that fluoride is distributed to bone
and accumulates there.
Fluoride deposition in bone occurs mainly in regions undergoing active ossification or calcification. If
the source of fluoride exposure has been removed, fluoride levels in bone decrease as the bone undergoes
remodeling. Areas of fluoride deposition during high-level exposure are distinguished by highly elevated
fluoride levels even after the average fluoride level of the bone has returned to normal (Baud et al. 1978).
Fluorine. No data were located regarding the distribution of fluoride following the inhalation exposure
of humans to fluorine. In rats exposed to 25 mg/m3 fluorine for about 5 hours/day, 6 days/week for
21 days, markedly elevated fluoride levels were observed in teeth and bone, the only tissues that were
analyzed (Stokinger 1949). Tooth fluoride levels were about 14 times the levels in controls, and fluoride
levels in the femur were about 6 times those in the controls. Similar concentration-related increases in
bone and tooth fluoride levels were observed at the lower concentrations (3 and 0.8 mg/m3).
Fluoride. Once absorbed, fluoride is rapidly distributed throughout the body via the blood. Fluoride is
distributed between the plasma and blood cells, with plasma levels being twice as high as blood cell levels
(Whitford 1990). After ingestion of sodium fluoride, the plasma fluoride does not appear to be bound to
proteins (Ekstrand et al. 1977a; Rigalli et al. 1996). However, there is evidence that following ingestion
of sodium monofluorophosphate, the plasma contains diffusible fluoride and protein-bound fluoride
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
(Rigalli et al. 1996). The elimination of fluoride from plasma following short-term exposure to sodium
fluoride has been fit to a two-compartment model (Ekstrand et al. 1977a). The half-life of the terminal
phase ranged from 2 to 9 hours. The rapid phase of fluoride distribution represents distribution in soft
tissues, with fluoride being more rapidly distributed to well-perfused tissues. In pigs, the plasma
clearance half-time of fluoride was 0.88 hours (Richards et al. 1982). Fluoride does not accumulate in
most soft tissue; the ratio between tissue fluoride levels and plasma fluoride levels is typically between
0.4 and 0.9 (Whitford et al. 1979a). It is likely that fluoride enters the intracellular fluid of soft tissues as
hydrogen fluoride (Whitford et al. 1979a). Studies in rats and ewes suggest that the blood brain barrier is
effective in preventing fluoride migration into the central nervous system (Spak et al. 1986; Whitford et
al. 1979a); brain fluoride concentrations typically do not exceed 10% of plasma concentrations (Whitford
et al. 1979a). Higher fluoride concentrations are found in the renal tubules, the concentration often
exceeding plasma concentrations.
The largest concentration of fluoride in the body is found in calcified tissues. Approximately 99% of the
fluoride in the body is found in bones and teeth (Hamilton 1990; Kaminsky et al. 1990). The pineal gland
which contains hydroxyapatite also accumulates fluoride (Luke 2001). Fluoride is incorporated into bone
by replacing the hydroxyl ion in hydroxyapatite to form hydroxyfluroapatite (McCann and Bullock 1957;
Neuman et al. 1950). Fluoride is not irreversibly bound to bone and is mobilized from bone through the
continuous process of bone remodeling and to a lesser extent from ionic flux between interstitial fluoride
and the crystalline bone surface (Turner et al. 1993; Whitford 1990). The biological half-life of fluoride
was estimated to be 58.5 days in pigs orally exposed 2 mg fluoride/kg/day as sodium fluoride for
6 months (Richards et al. 1985). A comparison between the retention of sodium fluoride, fluorosilicic
acid, and sodium fluorosilicate did not find significant differences in the percentage of intake retained in
the body of female rats exposed to 24 ppm fluoride in the diet for 5 months; fluoride retentions were 66.2,
68.1, and 64.8, respectively (Whitford and Johnson 2003; only available as an abstract).
Tissue fluoride levels are not homeostatically regulated. In adults, plasma fluoride levels appear to be
directly related to fluoride intake. At higher fluoride intakes, a wide fluctuation of plasma fluoride levels
were found in two adults and three children consuming 9.6 ppm fluoride in water (Ekstrand 1978); the
fluctuation in plasma fluoride levels was smaller in the children, as compared to the adults. Mean plasma
levels in individuals living in areas with a water fluoride concentration of <0.1 ppm was 0.4 µmol/L,
compared to a mean plasma fluoride level of 1 µmol/L in individuals with a water fluoride content of 0.9–
1.0 ppm (Guy et al. 1976). The level of fluoride in bone is influenced by several factors including age,
past and present fluoride intake, and the rate of bone turnover. In adults (mean age, 47–60 years),
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
fluoride levels in the iliac crest ranged from 0.06 to 0.10% of bone ash (Boivin et al. 1988). In contrast,
in subjects undergoing sodium fluoride treatment for osteoporosis for 5–6 years, the fluoride content of
the iliac crest was 0.67% bone ash. Termination of high fluoride exposure can result in a decrease in
bone fluoride levels. In aluminum workers diagnosed with skeletal fluorosis, there was a significant and
progressive decrease in bone fluoride levels (Boivin et al. 1988).
Age strongly influences the distribution of fluoride. The amount of fluoride taken up by bone is inversely
related to age (Lawrenz et al. 1940; Miller and Phillips 1956; Suttie and Phillips 1959; Zipkin and
McClure 1952; Zipkin et al. 1956). In a study of dogs (Ekstrand and Whitford 1984; Whitford 1990), the
fractional uptake of fluoride by bone steadily declined during the first year of life. At weaning, 90% of an
administered dose was taken up by bone compared to 50% at 1 year of age. Similar findings have been
reported in human studies. In infants aged 37–410 days exposed to 0.25 mg fluoride supplement, the
mean retention (bone uptake) of fluoride ranged from 68.1 to 83.4% (Ekstrand et al. 1994a, 1994b). In
contrast, retention in adults receiving a fluoride supplement was 55.3% (Ekstrand et al. 1979).
Human and animal studies have shown that fluoride is readily transferred across the placenta. There
appears to be a direct relationship between maternal blood fluoride levels and cord blood fluoride levels
(Armstrong et al. 1970; Gupta et al. 1993; Malhotra et al. 1993; Shen and Taves 1974). At relatively low
maternal blood levels, the cord blood levels were at least 60% of that of maternal blood (Brambilla et al.
1994; Gupta et al. 1993). Although cord fluoride levels were typically lower than maternal levels, one
study found no statistical difference between maternal and newborn (1 day old) serum fluoride levels
(Shimonovitz et al. 1995). However, a partial placental barrier may exist at high maternal fluoride levels.
At higher maternal blood levels, the cord to maternal fluoride ratio is lower than at lower maternal
fluoride levels (Gupta et al. 1993). Another study found that the use of fluoride supplements markedly
increased placental fluoride levels, while fluoride levels in fetal blood remained relatively constant,
suggesting that the placenta can regulate the transfer of fluoride from maternal blood to fetal blood
(Gedalia 1970). Animal studies also demonstrate that maternal fluoride exposure also results in increased
levels of fluoride in fetal teeth and bones (Bawden et al. 1992b; Nedeljković and Matović 1991; Theuer et
al. 1971).
In humans, fluoride is poorly transferred from plasma to milk (Ekstrand et al. 1981c, 1984b; Esala et al.
1982; Spak et al. 1983). A single dose of 1.5 mg sodium fluoride did not result in a significant rise in
fluoride breast milk concentrations within 3 hours of the exposure (Ekstrand et al. 1981c). Although no
linear correlation between fluoride levels in tap water and fluoride levels in breast milk has been found,
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
significantly higher breast milk fluoride concentrations were found in women living in an area with high
levels of naturally occurring fluoride (1–7 ppm) as compared to women in areas with low fluoride levels
in tap water (0.2 ppm) (Esala et al. 1982). Fluoride levels in human milk of 5–10 µg/L have been
measured (Fomon and Ekstrand 1999).
No information was located in humans or animals regarding the distribution of fluoride, hydrogen
fluoride, or fluorine following dermal absorption.
3.4.2.4 Other Routes of Exposure
Based on the results of a five-compartment computer model, Charkes et al. (1978) calculated that about
60% of intravenously administered radiolabelled fluoride (18F) is taken up by bone; the half-time for this
uptake is about 13 minutes.
Perkinson et al. (1955) found initial rates of removal of fluoride from sheep and cow blood to be 41 and
32%/minute of the intravenously administered dose, respectively. These data suggest a rapid distribution
of fluoride and corroborate findings reported by other routes of administration.
Fluoride distribution in rats was examined during and after continuous intravenous infusion of
radiolabeled sodium fluoride at varying chemical dose rates for 3 hours (Knaus et al. 1976). Blood,
kidneys, and lungs contained the highest fluoride concentrations at doses up to 3.6 mg fluoride/kg/hour,
but at 6 mg/kg/hour, the fluoride content of the liver, spleen, and hollow organs increased sharply,
indicating that the dose exceeded the amount readily processed by the excretory mechanisms of the body.
In rat pups injected intraperitoneally with 0.1 µg fluoride/g body weight as sodium fluoride solution,
significant increases in the fluoride content occurred in the developing enamel and bone (Bawden et
al. 1987). Thus, regardless of the route of administration, some fluoride is deposited in teeth, bone, and
soft tissues of animals, and some is excreted in the urine, sweat, and saliva.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.4.3 Metabolism
Fluoride is believed to replace the hydroxyl ion (OH-) and possibly the bicarbonate ion (HCO3-)
associated with hydroxyapatite—a mineral phase during formation of bone (McCann and Bullock 1957;
Neuman et al. 1950). The resultant material is hydroxyfluorapatite. Once absorbed, a portion of the
fluoride is deposited in the skeleton, and most of the remainder is excreted in the urine, with smaller
amounts in feces, and sweat, and saliva within 24 hours (Dinman et al. 1976a, 1976b; McClure et al.
1945). Urinary excretion is markedly decreased in the presence of decreased renal function (Kono et al.
1984; Spak et al. 1985).
A portion of the circulating inorganic fluoride acts as an enzyme inhibitor because it forms metal-
fluoride-phosphate complexes that interfere with the activity of those enzymes requiring a metal ion
cofactor. In addition, fluoride may interact directly with the enzyme or the substrate. It is a general
inhibitor of the energy production system of the cell (i.e., glycolytic processes and oxidative
phosphorylation enzymes responsible for forming ATP) (Guminska and Sterkowicz 1975; Najjar 1948;
Peters et al. 1964; Slater and Bonner 1952). Although much is known about enzyme inhibition by
fluoride, the human health significance remains to be determined. The studies on enzymatic inhibition by
fluoride were in vitro studies and used fluoride concentrations that were significantly (100–1,000 times)
higher than concentrations that would be normally found in human tissues.
3.4.4 Elimination and Excretion
Hydrogen Fluoride. Overnight urinary fluoride excretion in dogs and rabbits exposed to 7 mg/m3
hydrogen fluoride for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 30 days was about 1.5 times that of controls
(Stokinger 1949). No further details were reported.
Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoride Dusts. Studies in humans indicate that fluoride absorbed from inhaled
hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts over an 8-hour work shift is excreted even during exposure, with
urinary excretion peaking approximately 2–4 hours after cessation of exposure (about 10 hours following
beginning of exposure) (Collings et al. 1951; Rye 1961). A significant correlation between urinary
fluoride excretion and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was found in aluminum
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
workers (Ehrnebo and Ekstrand 1986). A significant correlation between urinary fluoride excretion and
exposure levels of gaseous fluoride, but not particulate fluoride, was also found.
Fluorine. No data were located regarding excretion of fluoride following human inhalation exposure to
fluorine. Urinary fluoride levels were increased in dogs and rabbits exposed to levels as low as 0.8 mg/m3
for 5–6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 35 days (Stokinger 1949). No quantitative data were reported at this
level, but urinary fluoride levels in rabbits exposed to 3 mg/m3 were 1.5 times normal. No further details
were reported.
Fluoride. The primary pathway for fluoride excretion is via the kidneys and urine; to a lesser extent,
fluoride is also excreted in the feces, sweat, and saliva. A study in rats suggests that the source of the
small amount fecal fluoride may be fluoride that has re-entered the more distal portion of the intestine and
became associated with unabsorbed cations (Whitford 1994). It has been estimated that approximately
1% or less of an ingested dose is excreted in saliva (Carlson et al. 1960a; Oliveby et al. 1989), because
saliva is swallowed, this amount does not enter mass balance calculations. The concentration of fluoride
in the saliva appears to mirror plasma fluoride levels (Ekstrand 1977; Oliveby et al. 1989, 1990) and the
ratio of saliva fluoride to plasma fluoride is about 0.5–0.64 (Ekstrand 1977; Oliveby et al. 1989). There
are limited data on fluoride excretion via sweat. An older study (McClure et al. 1945) estimated that 19%
of an ingested fluoride dose (3.7 mg) was excreted in sweat under comfortable conditions. Excretion of
fluoride increased to 42% under hot-moist conditions. However, this study appears to have grossly
overestimated fluoride excretion in sweat. A more recent study (Henschler et al. 1975), reported low
levels of fluoride in sweat, approximately 20% of plasma levels, 2 hours after administration of sodium
fluoride.
Renal excretion is the major route of fluoride removal from the body; it typically equals 35–70% of intake
in adults (Ekstrand et al. 1978; Machle and Largent 1943;). The fluoride ion is filtered from the plasma
as it passes through the glomerular capillaries followed by a varying degree (10–70%) of tubular
reabsorption; there is no evidence of tubular secretion of fluoride (Schiffl and Binswanger 1982; Whitford
1990). Renal clearance rates in humans can range from 12.4 to 71.4 mL/minute with average values of
36.4–41.8 mL/minute (Schiffl and Binswanger 1982; Waterhouse et al. 1980). A number of factors,
including urinary pH, urinary flow, and glomerular filtration rate, can influence urinary fluoride
excretion. Urinary pH appears to be the major determining factor for fluoride reabsorption from the renal
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
tubules (Ekstrand et al. 1980a, 1982; Järnberg et al. 1980, 1981, 1983; Whitford et al. 1976). At lower
pH levels, more fluoride exists in the undissociated form (hydrogen fluoride) than in the ion form; the
uncharged hydrogen fluoride more readily diffuses through the tubular epithelium to the interstitial fluid
than the free charged fluoride ion. In the neutral interstitial fluid, the hydrogen fluoride would rapidly
dissociate and the fluoride ions would be returned to the systemic circulation (Whitford et al. 1976).
Thus, renal clearance of fluoride is directly related to urinary pH. A significant correlation between
urinary flow and urinary fluoride excretion has been reported in humans (Ekstrand et al. 1978, 1982).
Ekstrand et al. (1982) noted that a high flow rate in the renal tubules would likely increase the renal
clearance of a substance that is reabsorbed at a slow rate. Similarly, a decrease in glomerular filtration
rate would result in a decrease in urinary fluoride excretion (Jeandel et al. 1992).
Most of the data on renal clearance of fluoride in humans come from studies of health adults; however,
several studies have examined renal clearance of fluoride at different age levels (Ekstrand et al. 1994a;
Jeandel et al. 1992; Spak et al. 1985; Villa et al. 2000). Whitford (1999) compared the results of many of
these studies in infants and children with those in adults and concluded that there are no apparent age-
related differences in renal clearance rates (adjusted for body weight or surface area) between children
and adults. However, in older adults (>65 years), a significant decline in renal clearance of fluoride has
been reported (Jeandel et al. 1992). This is consistent with the decline in glomerular filtration rate and
renal clearance of many substances that are also observed in the elderly (Whitford 1999).
No studies were located regarding excretion of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine in humans or
animals following dermal exposure. However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is expected
that dermally absorbed fluoride would be sequestered in bone and excreted in urine in a manner similar to
that observed following oral or inhalation exposure.
3.4.5 Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Models
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models use mathematical descriptions of the uptake and
disposition of chemical substances to quantitatively describe the relationships among critical biological
processes (Krishnan et al. 1994). PBPK models are also called biologically based tissue dosimetry
models. PBPK models are increasingly used in risk assessments, primarily to predict the concentration of
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
potentially toxic moieties of a chemical that will be delivered to any given target tissue following various
combinations of route, dose level, and test species (Clewell and Andersen 1985). Physiologically based
pharmacodynamic (PBPD) models use mathematical descriptions of the dose-response function to
quantitatively describe the relationship between target tissue dose and toxic end points.
PBPK/PD models refine our understanding of complex quantitative dose behaviors by helping to
delineate and characterize the relationships between: (1) the external/exposure concentration and target
tissue dose of the toxic moiety, and (2) the target tissue dose and observed responses (Andersen et al.
1987; Andersen and Krishnan 1994). These models are biologically and mechanistically based and can
be used to extrapolate the pharmacokinetic behavior of chemical substances from high to low dose, from
route to route, between species, and between subpopulations within a species. The biological basis of
PBPK models results in more meaningful extrapolations than those generated with the more conventional
use of uncertainty factors.
The PBPK model for a chemical substance is developed in four interconnected steps: (1) model
representation, (2) model parametrization, (3) model simulation, and (4) model validation (Krishnan and
Andersen 1994). In the early 1990s, validated PBPK models were developed for a number of
toxicologically important chemical substances, both volatile and nonvolatile (Krishnan and Andersen
1994; Leung 1993). PBPK models for a particular substance require estimates of the chemical substance-
specific physicochemical parameters, and species-specific physiological and biological parameters. The
numerical estimates of these model parameters are incorporated within a set of differential and algebraic
equations that describe the pharmacokinetic processes. Solving these differential and algebraic equations
provides the predictions of tissue dose. Computers then provide process simulations based on these
solutions.
The structure and mathematical expressions used in PBPK models significantly simplify the true
complexities of biological systems. If the uptake and disposition of the chemical substance(s) is
adequately described, however, this simplification is desirable because data are often unavailable for
many biological processes. A simplified scheme reduces the magnitude of cumulative uncertainty. The
adequacy of the model is, therefore, of great importance, and model validation is essential to the use of
PBPK models in risk assessment.
PBPK models improve the pharmacokinetic extrapolations used in risk assessments that identify the
maximal (i.e., the safe) levels for human exposure to chemical substances (Andersen and Krishnan 1994).
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
PBPK models provide a scientifically sound means to predict the target tissue dose of chemicals in
humans who are exposed to environmental levels (for example, levels that might occur at hazardous waste
sites) based on the results of studies where doses were higher or were administered in different species.
Figure 3-5 shows a conceptualized representation of a PBPK model.
Only one published PBPK model has been identified (Rao et al. 1995); it differs from published
compartmental models for fluoride kinetics (Charkes et al. 1978, 1979; Ekstrand et al. 1977a; Hall et al.
1977; Richards et al. 1982, 1985) in that the earlier models were data-based and useful only to simulate
short-term fluoride kinetics. Because the fluoride ion is characterized by its long residence time in the
body, health effects based on long-term fluoride exposure are of concern. In contrast to the earlier
models, the Rao et al. (1995) PBPK model is amenable to extrapolation across species, routes, and doses,
thereby offering an advantage in quantitative risk assessment for fluoride exposure.
In order to assess the complex relationship between extended fluoride exposure, target tissue (bone) dose,
and tissue response, a sex-specific PBPK model has been developed to describe the absorption,
distribution, and elimination of fluorides in rats and humans (Rao et al. 1995). The PBPK model
incorporates age and body weight dependence of the physiological processes that control the uptake of
fluoride by bone and the elimination of fluoride by the kidneys. Six compartments (lung, liver, kidney,
bone, and slowly- and rapidly-perfused compartments) make up the model. The bone compartment
includes two subcompartments: a small, flow-limited, rapidly exchangeable surface bone compartment,
and a bulk, virtually nonexchangeable inner bone compartment. The inner bone compartment contains
nearly all of the whole body content of fluoride, which, in the longer time frame, may be mobilized
through the process of bone modeling and remodeling. This model has been validated by comparing
predictions with experimental data gathered in rats and humans after drinking water and dietary ingestion
of fluoride.
The PBPK model permits the analysis of the combined effect of ingesting and inhaling fluorides on the
target organ, bone. It takes into account the effects of age and growth; in the human model, for instance,
the bone and renal clearance rates accounted for 90 and 10%, respectively, during the growth period,
compared to about 50% each in adulthood. Estimates of fluoride concentrations in bone are calculated
and related to chronic fluoride toxicity. The model incorporates nonlinear binding rates of fluoride to
bone, which has been described at high plasma concentrations. The model is thus useful for predicting
some of the long-term metabolic features and tissue concentrations of fluoride that may be of value in
understanding positive or negative effects of fluoride on human health. In addition, the PBPK model
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Figure 3-5. Conceptual Representation of a Physiologically Based

Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model for a
Hypothetical Chemical Substance
Source: adapted from Krishnan et al. 1994
Note: This is a conceptual representation of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for a hypothetical
chemical substance. The chemical substance is shown to be absorbed via the skin, by inhalation, or by ingestion,
metabolized in the liver, and excreted in the urine or by exhalation.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
provides a basis for cross-species extrapolation of the effective fluoride dose at the target tissue (bone) in
the assessment of risk from different exposure conditions.
3.5 MECHANISMS OF ACTION
Skeletal Effects. A number of mechanisms are involved in the toxicity of fluoride to bone. Fluoride ions
are incorporated into bone by substituting for hydroxyl groups in the carbonate-apatite structure to
produce hydroxyfluorapatite, thus altering the mineral structure of the bone (Chachra et al. 1999). Unlike
hydroxyl ions, fluoride ions reside in the plane of the calcium ions, resulting in a structure that is
electrostatically more stable and structurally more compact (Grynpas 1990). Following administration of
fluoride, there is a shift in the mineralization profile towards higher densities and increased hardness
(Chachra et al. 1999). However, the structure of the bone (cortical thickness and the trabecular
architecture of the femoral head) was largely unchanged in rabbits by fluoride administration. Chachra et
al. (1999) suggest that the shift in mineralization could be due to either hypermineralization of older
(denser) fractions or to a greater packing density of the hydroxyapatite crystals. Although high-dose
fluoride administration is associated with an increase in bone mass, in vivo and in vitro animal studies
have found a negative association between fluoride-induced new bone mass and bone strength, suggesting
that the quality of the new bone was impaired by the fluoride (Silva and Ulrich 2000; Turner et al. 1997).
Because bone strength is thought to derive mainly from the interface between the collagen and the
mineral (Catanese and Keavney 1996), alteration in mineralization probably affects strength. The wider
crystals, which are formed after fluoride exposure, are presumably not as well associated with collagen
fibrils and thus, do not contribute to mechanical strength. Turner et al. (1997) found that the crystal width
was inversely correlated with bending strength of the femur. Thus, although there is an increase in
hardness and bone mass and unaltered structure, the mechanical strength of bone is decreased with long-
term, high-dose administration of fluoride (Chachra et al. 1999).
In addition to the physicochemical effect of fluoride on the bone, at high doses, fluoride can be mitogenic
to osteoblasts (Farley et al. 1990; Gruber and Baylink 1991) and inhibitory to osteoclasts. The osteoblasts
are still active, although there are fewer plump, cuboidal, highly secretory osteoblasts; whereas fluoride is
mitogenic to osteoblastic precursors (Bonjour et al. 1993), it is toxic to individual osteoblasts at the same
concentration (Chachra et al. 1999). The effect of fluoride on osteoclasts is not well understood; it
appears that fluoride decreases the amount of bone resorbed by osteoclasts (Chachra et al. 1999).
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Studies in humans and animals suggest that the effect of fluoride on bone strength is biphasic. In rats
administered 1–128 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride in drinking water for 16 weeks, both increases and
decreases in bone strength were found; the maximum femoral bone strength occurred at 16 ppm (Turner
et al. 1992). A biphasic relationship between femoral bone strength and bone fluoride content was found.
Bone strength increased 18% as the bone fluoride content increased from 100 to 1,216 ppm, and
decreased by 31% as the bone fluoride levels increased from 1,216 to 10,000 ppm. It should be noted that
the bone fluoride levels in this study, as well as other studies discussed in this section, resulted from high
doses of fluoride. Arnala et al. (1986) measured fluoride levels in iliac crest biopsies taken from 18–
25 subjects with hip fractures living in areas with low fluoride (<0.3 ppm), high fluoride (>1.5 ppm), or
with fluoridated (1.0–1.2 ppm) water. The average fluoride levels in the bone were 450, 3,720, and
1,590 ppm, respectively.
The biphasic nature of bone effects is supported by data from clinical trials in women with
postmenopausal osteoporosis (Haguenauer et al. 2000). The meta-analyses of 12 studies found a
significant increase in the relative risk of nonvertebral fractures in subjects ingesting high doses of
fluoride (>30 mg/day); in subjects administered low fluoride doses or slow-release formulations, there
was no effect on nonvertebral fractures. Further,, there was no effect on vertebral fracture risk in high
fluoride dose subjects, but a decrease in this risk in subjects administered low fluoride doses or slow-
release formulations was found.
Dental Fluorosis. Numerous human and animal studies have demonstrated that exposure to elevated
fluoride levels during tooth development can result in dental fluorosis. As described previously,
fluorosed enamel is composed of hypomineralized subsurface enamel covered by well-mineralized
enamel. The exact mechanisms of dental fluorosis development have not been fully elucidated. Although
there are a number of proposed mechanisms, most of the recent research has focused on the theory that
dental fluorosis results from a fluoride-induced delay in the hydrolysis and removal of amelogenin matrix
proteins during enamel maturation and subsequent effects on crystal growth (as reviewed by Aoba 1997;
Bawden et al. 1995; DenBesten and Thariani 1992; Whitford 1997). Amelogenins, proteins secreted by
ameloblasts, comprise >90% of the enamel matrix proteins and are involved in the regulation of the form
and size of hydroxapatite crystallites; large molecular weight amelogenins inhibit the growth of enamel
crystallites. In the early maturation phase of tooth development, the amelogenins are removed from the
enamel matrix by amelogeninases, and crystallite growth dramatically increases. This phase of enamel
maturation appears to be the most sensitive to elevated fluoride levels. The current evidence strongly
suggests that fluoride inhibits amelogeninase activity. In one proposed mechanism, fluoride indirectly
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
inhibits amelogeninase, a calcium-dependent metalloenzyme, by binding to calcium in the mineralizing

milieu and thereby decreasing the calcium concentration (or its activities) and the activation of
amelogeninases (Aoba 1997; DenBesten and Thariani 1992; Whitford 1997). Another proposed
mechanism is that amelogeninases are activated by a metalloproteinase and that calcium is required for
this activation (Bawden et al. 1995; DenBesten and Thariani 1992); fluoride thus interferes with the
proteolytic cascade necessary for hydrolysis of amelogenins. The fluoride-calcium interaction is
supported by the findings that the enzymatic cleavage of amelogenins occurs at a slow rate during the
secretory phase when calcium transport is low and dramatically increase during the early maturation
phase (in the absence of excess fluoride) when calcium transport is high (Aoba 1997).
An alternative theory on the mechanism of dental fluorosis is related to the effects of fluoride on
maturation-stage ameloblasts (Bawden et al. 1995; DenBesten and Thariani 1992). Elevated fluoride
exposure results in a decrease in the number of ameloblast modulations, which in turn could reduce the
number of zone refinement cycles. As defined by Bawden et al. (1995), zone refinement is the process by
which impurities (such as magnesium) that have been incorporated into forming crystals are reduced,
resulting in an improvement of the structural characteristics of the crystal. Thus, a reduction in zone
refinement cycles could result in inferior apatite crystalline structure. This theory is not incompatible
with the theory that fluoride interferes with the hydrolysis of amelogenins. The fluoride-induced
inhibition of amelogeninases results in an enamel matrix with a higher organic content, which could
influence ameloblast modulation rate.
3.6 TOXICITIES MEDIATED THROUGH THE NEUROENDOCRINE AXIS
Recently, attention has focused on the potential hazardous effects of certain chemicals on the endocrine
system because of the ability of these chemicals to mimic or block endogenous hormones. Chemicals
with this type of activity are most commonly referred to as endocrine disruptors. However, appropriate
terminology to describe such effects remains controversial. The terminology endocrine disruptors,
initially used by Colborn and Clement (1992), was also used in 1996 when Congress mandated the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a screening program for “...certain substances
[which] may have an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen, or other such endocrine
effect[s]...”. To meet this mandate, EPA convened a panel called the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and
Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC), which in 1998 completed its deliberations and made
recommendations to EPA concerning endocrine disruptors. In 1999, the National Academy of Sciences
released a report that referred to these same types of chemicals as hormonally active agents. The
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
terminology endocrine modulators has also been used to convey the fact that effects caused by such
chemicals may not necessarily be adverse. Many scientists agree that chemicals with the ability to disrupt
or modulate the endocrine system are a potential threat to the health of humans, aquatic animals, and
wildlife. However, others think that endocrine-active chemicals do not pose a significant health risk,
particularly in view of the fact that hormone mimics exist in the natural environment. Examples of
natural hormone mimics are the isoflavinoid phytoestrogens (Adlercreutz 1995; Livingston 1978; Mayr et
al. 1992). These chemicals are derived from plants and are similar in structure and action to endogenous
estrogen. Although the public health significance and descriptive terminology of substances capable of
affecting the endocrine system remains controversial, scientists agree that these chemicals may affect the
synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, action, or elimination of natural hormones in the body responsible
for maintaining homeostasis, reproduction, development, and/or behavior (EPA 1998c). Stated
differently, such compounds may cause toxicities that are mediated through the neuroendocrine axis. As
a result, these chemicals may play a role in altering, for example, metabolic, sexual, immune, and
neurobehavioral function. Such chemicals are also thought to be involved in inducing breast, testicular,
and prostate cancers, as well as endometriosis (Berger 1994; Giwercman et al. 1993; Hoel et al. 1992).
Although there is no evidence that fluoride is an endocrine disruptor, there are some data to suggest that
fluoride does adversely affect some endocrine glands. An increase in serum thyronine levels, in the
absence of changes in triiodothyronine and thyroid stimulating hormone levels, was observed in
individuals living in areas of India with high fluoride levels in the drinking water (Michael et al. 1996).
In contrast, a decrease in thyroxine levels was observed in rats exposed to fluoride in drinking water for
2 months (Bobek et al. 1976). Significant decreases in serum testosterone have been observed in rats
exposed to sodium fluoride for 50–60 days (Araibi et al. 1989; Narayana and Chinoy 1994).
3.7 CHILDREN’S SUSCEPTIBILITY
This section discusses potential health effects from exposures during the period from conception to
maturity at 18 years of age in humans, when all biological systems will have fully developed. Potential
effects on offspring resulting from exposures of parental germ cells are considered, as well as any indirect
effects on the fetus and neonate resulting from maternal exposure during gestation and lactation.
Relevant animal and in vitro models are also discussed.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Children are not small adults. They differ from adults in their exposures and may differ in their
susceptibility to hazardous chemicals. Children’s unique physiology and behavior can influence the
extent of their exposure. Exposures of children are discussed in Section 6.6 Exposures of Children.
Children sometimes differ from adults in their susceptibility to hazardous chemicals, but whether there is
a difference depends on the chemical (Guzelian et al. 1992; NRC 1993). Children may be more or less
susceptible than adults to health effects, and the relationship may change with developmental age
(Guzelian et al. 1992; NRC 1993). Vulnerability often depends on developmental stage. There are
critical periods of structural and functional development during both prenatal and postnatal life and a
particular structure or function will be most sensitive to disruption during its critical period(s). Damage
may not be evident until a later stage of development. There are often differences in pharmacokinetics
and metabolism between children and adults. For example, absorption may be different in neonates
because of the immaturity of their gastrointestinal tract and their larger skin surface area in proportion to
body weight (Morselli et al. 1980; NRC 1993); the gastrointestinal absorption of lead is greatest in infants
and young children (Ziegler et al. 1978). Distribution of xenobiotics may be different; for example,
infants have a larger proportion of their bodies as extracellular water and their brains and livers are
proportionately larger (Altman and Dittmer 1974; Fomon 1966; Fomon et al. 1982; Owen and Brozek
1966; Widdowson and Dickerson 1964). The infant also has an immature blood-brain barrier (Adinolfi
1985; Johanson 1980) and probably an immature blood-testis barrier (Setchell and Waites 1975). Many
xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes have distinctive developmental patterns. At various stages of growth
and development, levels of particular enzymes may be higher or lower than those of adults, and
sometimes unique enzymes may exist at particular developmental stages (Komori et al. 1990; Leeder and
Kearns 1997; NRC 1993; Vieira et al. 1996). Whether differences in xenobiotic metabolism make the
child more or less susceptible also depends on whether the relevant enzymes are involved in activation of
the parent compound to its toxic form or in detoxification. There may also be differences in excretion,
particularly in newborns who all have a low glomerular filtration rate and have not developed efficient
tubular secretion and resorption capacities (Altman and Dittmer 1974; NRC 1993; West et al. 1948).
Children and adults may differ in their capacity to repair damage from chemical insults. Children also
have a longer remaining lifetime in which to express damage from chemicals; this potential is particularly
relevant to cancer.
Certain characteristics of the developing human may increase exposure or susceptibility, whereas others
may decrease susceptibility to the same chemical. For example, although infants breathe more air per
kilogram of body weight than adults breathe, this difference might be somewhat counterbalanced by their
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
alveoli being less developed, which results in a disproportionately smaller surface area for alveolar
absorption (NRC 1993).
A number of studies have examined the effects of fluoride in children. Due to its cariostatic properties,
several agencies (for example, IOM 1997; WHO 1973) advocate the use of fluoride supplementation in
children. However, there is a delicate balance between prevention of dental caries and the occurrence of
dental fluorosis. Dental fluorosis, which is an increased porosity or hypomineralization of the tooth
enamel, results from excess exposure to fluoride during tooth development (ages 1–8 years). The
development and severity of dental fluorosis are dependent on the amount of fluoride ingested, the
duration of exposure, and the stage of enamel development at the time of exposure. In the more severe
cases, the tooth enamel is discolored, pitted, and prone to fracture and wear. Severe dental fluorosis is not
commonly found in the United States; one study found prevalences of 0.9 and 6.9% in children living in
communities with 1 or 4 ppm fluoride in drinking water, respectively (Jackson et al. 1995). In milder
forms of dental fluorosis, opaque striations can run horizontally across the surface of the teeth, sometimes
becoming confluent giving rise to white opaque patches. In mild dental fluorosis, the tooth enamel is
fully functional; the opaque spots are considered a cosmetic effect. A recent meta-analysis (McDonagh et
al. 2000) estimated the prevalence of dental fluorosis in children consuming 1 ppm fluoride in water to be
48%; in 12.5% of the children, the fluorosis would be of aesthetic concern. Most of the community-based
studies used for the meta-analysis did not consider other sources of fluoride, such as dental products,
manufactured beverages, or food.
Approximately 99% of the body’s fluoride is found in calcified tissues. Chronic exposure to high levels
of fluoride results in bone thickening and exostoses (skeletal fluorosis). Because of the dynamic nature of
growing bone, it is likely that children will deposit more fluoride in bone than adults consuming an equal
amount of fluoride. However, it is not known if children would be more susceptible to skeletal fluorosis
than adults.
Developmental effects have been observed in humans and animals exposed to fluoride. In humans, an
increased occurrence of spina bifida was found in children living in areas of India with high levels of
fluoride in the drinking water (Gupta et al. 1995). However, this study had several deficiencies. For
example, it did not address the nutritional status of the mothers. This is important because folic acid
deficiency has been implicated in the etiology of spina bifida (Hernandez-Diaz et al. 2001; Honein et al.
2000). In addition, the paper did not provide the fluoride levels in the blood of the mothers, nor
radiographic evidence of spina bifida. Studies by Li et al. (1995a) and Lu et al. (2000) concluded that
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
there were decreases in IQ scores in children living in areas of China with high fluoride levels due to soot
from coal burning, but it is not known if other contaminants in the soot also contributed to this effect, and
the adequacy of the design of these studies is highly questionable. In the Gupta et al. (1995) and Li et al.
(1995a) studies, the observed effects occurred in children with dental and/or skeletal fluorosis. In general,
developmental effects have not been observed in rat or rabbit oral exposure studies (Collins et al. 1995;
Heindel et al. 1996). However, the animal studies did not assess potential neurodevelopmental effects.
The available human and animal data suggest that the developing fetus is not a sensitive target of fluoride
toxicity.
Fluoride retention appears to be higher in children than adults; although on a body weight basis, clearance
is about the same in children and adults. Approximately 80% of an absorbed dose of fluoride is retained
in young children compared to 50% in adults (Ekstrand et al. 1994a, 1994b). This is supported by the
finding that renal fluoride excretion rate is lower in children than adults (Gdalia 1958; Spak et al. 1985).
This difference in fluoride retention is due to high fluoride uptake in developing bones. Data on other
potential age-related differences in the toxicokinetic properties of fluoride were not located. Fluoride is
poorly transferred from maternal blood to breast milk (Ekstrand et al. 1981c; 1984b; Escala et al. 1982;
Spak et al. 1983).
Most of the available information on biomarkers, interactions, and methods for reducing toxic effects is
from adults and mature animals; no child-specific information was identified, with the exception of
biomarker data. It is likely that the available information in adults will also be applicable to children.
3.8 BIOMARKERS OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECT
Biomarkers are broadly defined as indicators signaling events in biologic systems or samples. They have
been classified as markers of exposure, markers of effect, and markers of susceptibility (NAS/NRC
1989).
Due to a nascent understanding of the use and interpretation of biomarkers, implementation of biomarkers
as tools of exposure in the general population is very limited. A biomarker of exposure is a xenobiotic
substance or its metabolite(s) or the product of an interaction between a xenobiotic agent and some target
molecule(s) or cell(s) that is measured within a compartment of an organism (NAS/NRC 1989). The
preferred biomarkers of exposure are generally the substance itself or substance-specific metabolites in
readily obtainable body fluid(s), or excreta. However, several factors can confound the use and
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
interpretation of biomarkers of exposure. The body burden of a substance may be the result of exposures
from more than one source. The substance being measured may be a metabolite of another xenobiotic
substance (e.g., high urinary levels of phenol can result from exposure to several different aromatic
compounds). Depending on the properties of the substance (e.g., biologic half-life) and environmental
conditions (e.g., duration and route of exposure), the substance and all of its metabolites may have left the
body by the time samples can be taken. It may be difficult to identify individuals exposed to hazardous
substances that are commonly found in body tissues and fluids (e.g., essential mineral nutrients such as
copper, zinc, and selenium). Biomarkers of exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine are
discussed in Section 3.8.1.
Biomarkers of effect are defined as any measurable biochemical, physiologic, or other alteration within an
organism that, depending on magnitude, can be recognized as an established or potential health
impairment or disease (NAS/NRC 1989). This definition encompasses biochemical or cellular signals of
tissue dysfunction (e.g., increased liver enzyme activity or pathologic changes in female genital epithelial
cells), as well as physiologic signs of dysfunction such as increased blood pressure or decreased lung
capacity. Note that these markers are not often substance specific. They also may not be directly
adverse, but can indicate potential health impairment (e.g., DNA adducts). Biomarkers of effects caused
by fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine are discussed in Section 3.8.2.
A biomarker of susceptibility is an indicator of an inherent or acquired limitation of an organism's ability

to respond to the challenge of exposure to a specific xenobiotic substance. It can be an intrinsic genetic or
other characteristic or a preexisting disease that results in an increase in absorbed dose, a decrease in the
biologically effective dose, or a target tissue response. If biomarkers of susceptibility exist, they are
discussed in Section 3.10 “Populations That Are Unusually Susceptible”.
3.8.1 Biomarkers Used to Identify or Quantify Exposure to Fluorides, Hydrogen

Fluoride, and Fluorine
There is extensive literature regarding fluoride levels in biological tissues such as urine, teeth, bone, and
fingernails as indices of exposure. Since it does not produce any metabolites, the fluoride ion itself is the
measured indicator. The most commonly used medium for identifying fluoride exposure is urinary levels
(Ekstrand and Ehrnebo 1983). Several investigators have used this parameter to detect exposure to
sodium fluoride through drinking water (Zipkin et al. 1956) or by ingestion (i.e., toothpaste or diet)
(Ekstrand et al. 1983). Villa et al. (2000) found that measurement of fractional urinary fluoride excretion
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
in children is a good predictor of total daily fluoride intake. Occupational exposure to hydrogen fluoride
is also evaluated from urine fluoride levels (Yoshida et al. 1978).
Urinary fluoride levels are generally ≤1 mg/L when the water supply contains ≤1 ppm fluoride
(Schamschula et al. 1985; Venkateswarlu et al. 1971; Zipkin et al. 1956). Only one report was located of
urinary fluoride levels following acute poisoning. Following dermal exposure to about 5 g hydrofluoric
acid over 2.5% of the body surface (along with concomitant inhalation exposure), the urinary fluoride
level in the first sample obtained 3.5 hours after the accident was 87.0 mg/L (Burke et al. 1973). It is
difficult to determine urine levels that are associated with chronic effects such as skeletal fluorosis,
because no studies that report urinary fluoride levels, accurate exposure levels, duration of exposure, and
health effects were located. Probably the most complete study reports average urinary fluoride levels of
9 mg/L following inhalation exposure to 2.4–6.0 mg/m3 for an unspecified period of time (Kaltreider et
al. 1972). Marked evidence of fluorosis was seen in these workers. In another study (Dinman et al.
1976c), the average postshift urinary fluoride level after 3–5 working days was 5.7 mg/L (range, 2.7–
10.4). No exposure levels were available, but they were reported to be lower than in the plant where
urinary fluoride levels were 9 mg/L. In spite of 10–43 years of occupational exposure, no signs of
skeletal fluorosis were seen. This study may provide urinary fluoride levels that are not associated with
skeletal fluorosis, but any sensitive workers may have left such work and not been included in the study.
These studies are described in more detail in Section 3.2.1.2.
Urinary fluoride levels up to 13.5 mg/L have been reported in areas of India where skeletal fluorosis due
to high water fluoride levels (up to 16.2 ppm) is prevalent (Singh et al. 1963).
Other media that have been used to measure fluoride exposure include plasma (Ekstrand et al. 1983),
ductal saliva (Oliveby et al. 1990; Whitford et al. 1999b), nails (Whitford et al. 1999a), and tooth enamel
(McClure and Likins 1951). When using plasma or saliva as a biomarker, the samples should be obtained
under fasting conditions when measuring body burden (long-term intake) of fluoride (Whitford et al.
1999b). Care must be taken when using plasma fluoride as an indicator of exposure; dosage, time, and
duration must be taken into account (Whitford and Williams 1986). A wide range of plasma fluoride
levels have been reported for the general population; the daily intake of fluoride appears to be one of the
major contributors to plasma fluoride levels (Ikenishi et al. 1988; NAS 1971a). One study (Guy et al.
1976) found a mean plasma fluoride concentration of 0.4 µmol/L (7.5 µg/L) in individuals consuming
drinking water containing <0.1 ppm fluoride and an average plasma fluoride level of 1 µmol/L (19 µg/L)
in individuals consuming 0.9–1.0 ppm fluoride in drinking water. Much higher plasma fluoride levels
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
have been reported in poisoning cases. For example, a plasma fluoride level of 2,000 µg/L was reported
in a case of severe oral poisoning with 53 g fluoride as sodium fluoride (Abukurah et al. 1972). Chronic
exposure to high levels of fluoride can result in wide fluctuations in plasma fluoride levels during the day
(Ekstrand 1978).
Urine, plasma, or saliva can be used as biomarkers of acute exposure to fluoride. Concentrations can
peak within 1 hour after exposure since fluoride is rapidly absorbed from all routes of exposure. Fluoride
salts possess a peculiar "soapy-salty" taste that enables some individuals to recognize that they are
consuming large quantities of fluoride. With chronic exposures, such as from drinking water containing
fluoride, urinary fluoride levels initially increase, and then reach a constant level. In workers, postshift
urinary levels differ from preshift levels since fluoride exposure during the work day is absorbed rapidly
into the body. However, these measurements may not always be useful for quantifying chronic exposure
because fluoride can accumulate in bones. It may be retained in the skeletal tissues for a long period after
the end of exposure, and later re-enter circulating blood to be taken up by bone again or excreted in urine.
Furthermore, background tissue/fluid levels may affect these measurements since fluoride is prevalent in
the environment from dietary sources. An important factor in biological fluid fluoride concentration is
urinary pH (Whitford 1990). When urine is alkaline, fluoride urine excretion increases and is followed by
a decline in plasma fluoride.
Bone fluoride levels can be used to quantitate long-term fluoride exposure (Baud et al. 1978; Boivin et al.
1988). However, this requires a bone biopsy, so bone fluoride levels are most frequently measured after
clinical signs appear. As described in Section 3.2.2.2, the fluoride level found in bone varies between
bones and increases with age. That section also describes fluoride levels in normal bone and levels
associated with various effects.
Studies of Hungarian (Schamschula et al. 1985) or Brazilian (Whitford et al. 1999a) children have
demonstrated a direct relationship between fluoride concentrations in drinking water and fluoride levels in
fingernail clippings, suggesting that fluoride in fingernails may be a reliable biomarker of exposure.
3.8.2 Biomarkers Used to Characterize Effects Caused by Fluorides, Hydrogen

Fluoride, and Fluorine
Because soft tissues do not accumulate significant levels of fluoride over long periods of time, effects of
chronic exposure to fluoride first appear in the teeth or skeletal system. Chronic oral fluoride exposure
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
can produce dental fluorosis (denBesten and Thariani 1992; DHHS 1991; Eklund et al. 1987; Fejerskov et
al. 1990; Heifetz et al. 1988; Ismail and Bandekar 1999; Jackson et al. 1995; McDonagh et al. 2000;
Selwitz et al. 1995; Teotia and Teotia 1994; Warren and Levy 1999), and higher levels of oral or
inhalation exposure can lead to skeletal effects (Kaltreider et al. 1972; Leone et al. 1955). Evidence of
moderate or severe dental fluorosis (pitting, staining, and/or excessive wear) are possible markers of
effect for fluoride exposure (Walton 1988). However, dental fluorosis is reflective of fluoride exposure
during tooth development (typically during ages 1–8 years), rather than current fluoride exposure.
Alteration in bone density or derangement of trabecular structure can be detected by radiographs, and can
indicate fluoride-induced changes. However, these are nonspecific changes and can be associated with
other exposures. Other elements can sequester in the skeleton and produce similar changes observed in
radiographs. Exostoses, apposition of new bone, ossification of ligaments and tendon insertions, and
metastatic aberrant growth of new bone appear to be much more specific and constant findings in severe
cases of skeletal fluorosis (Vischer et al. 1970). Skeletal fluorosis has been reported following inhalation
exposure to 2.4–6.0 mg/m3 for an unspecified duration (Kaltreider et al. 1972). As discussed in
Section 3.2.2.2, nutritional status plays a large role in determining the oral fluoride exposure levels that
lead to this effect. In the few cases of skeletal fluorosis in the United States for which doses are known,
they are generally 15–20 mg/day for over 20 years (Bruns and Tytle 1988; Sauerbrunn et al. 1965).
No well-documented information was located regarding biomarkers of effect for fluoride, although there
are studies in which cellular changes occurred after fluoride exposure. Increases in glucose or lipid
metabolism have been reported in tissues after exposure to fluorides (Dousset et al. 1984; Shearer 1974;
Watanabe et al. 1975). Changes in erythrocyte enzyme activities including enolase, pyruvate kinase, and
ATPase were found in chronically exposed workers in conjunction with slightly increased fluoride levels
in the body (Guminska and Sterkowicz 1975). These alterations may explain the decreased red blood cell
counts observed in other studies (Hillman et al. 1979; Susheela and Jain 1983). However, none of these
enzyme alterations are specific to fluoride exposure. No information is available regarding how long
these effects last after the last exposure. The enzymatic effects were measured within a few hours of a
single fluoride treatment, while the red blood cell effects were seen as a result of chronic exposure.
There is evidence that in patients with skeletal diseases, the proportion of dialyzable and nondialyzable
hydroxyproline peptides serves as an index of bone collagen turnover. A decreased proportion of
nondialyzable hydroxyproline peptides in the urine of fluorosis patients indicates either a decreased rate
of synthesis of new collagen or an increased utilization of newly formed collagen for matrix formation.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
This marker offers potential for an early, although nonspecific, indication of altered bone metabolism
after long-term fluoride exposure (Anasuya and Narasinga Rao 1974). No information is available
regarding how long this lasts after chronic exposure. Sudden hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia are effects
seen with fluoride intoxication due to the marked potassium efflux from intact cells caused by fluoride
(McIvor et al. 1985). These ionic shifts are the only serologic markers of effect that have been identified,
and these changes are not unique to fluoride. They last for a few hours after exposure. Polydypsia and
polyuria are also nonspecific markers of effect.
3.9 INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER CHEMICALS
The absorption of fluoride from the gastrointestinal tract of humans and/or animals is affected by the
presence of several minerals including calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and aluminum (Rao 1984).
These effects are discussed in Section 3.11. No reliable data on interactions that exacerbate negative
effects of fluoride were located.
Teotia and Teotia (1994) found that deficient calcium intake and elevated fluoride intake (1.1–4.0 ppm)
resulted in a significant increase in the occurrence of dental fluorosis (100%) and dental caries (74%), as
compared to children with normal calcium intakes and excess fluoride intakes (prevalences of dental
fluorosis and caries were 14.2 and 31.4%, respectively).
3.10 POPULATIONS THAT ARE UNUSUALLY SUSCEPTIBLE
A susceptible population will exhibit a different or enhanced response to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and
fluorine than will most persons exposed to the same level of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine in
the environment. Reasons may include genetic makeup, age, health and nutritional status, and exposure
to other toxic substances (e.g., cigarette smoke). These parameters result in reduced detoxification or
excretion of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine, or compromised function of organs affected by
fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. Populations who are at greater risk due to their unusually high
exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine are discussed in Section 6.7, Populations With
Potentially High Exposures.
Some existing data indicate that subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible to the toxic
effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include the elderly, people with osteoporosis,
people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, vitamin C, and/or protein (Murray and Wilson 1948;
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Pandit et al. 1940; Parker et al. 1979), and people with kidney problems (Kono et al. 1984, 1985; Schiffl
and Binswanger 1980; Spak et al. 1985). For most of these populations, there are very limited data to
support or refute increased susceptibility to fluoride. Additionally, there are no data to suggest that
exposure to typical fluoride drinking water levels would result in adverse effects in these potentially
susceptible populations.
The major route of fluoride excretion is via the kidney and the urine; fluoride excretion is influenced by a
number of factors, including glomerular filtration rate, urinary flow, and urinary pH (Ekstrand et al. 1978,
1980a, 1982; Järnberg et al. 1980, 1981, 1983; Whitford et al. 1976). In chronic renal failure, there is a
decrease in glomerular filtration rate, which would result in a decrease in urinary fluoride excretion
(Jeandel et al. 1992; Schiffl and Binswanger 1980). Decreases in fluoride excretion have been seen in
adults (Kono et al. 1984; Schiffl and Binswanger 1980) and children (Spak et al. 1985) with impaired
renal function. In children with low glomerular filtration rates (<92 mL/minute), renal fluoride clearance
was 31.4 mL/minute compared to 45.0 mL/minute in children with normal glomerular filtration rates
(Spak et al. 1985). In older adults (>65 years of age), there is a decline in renal function, which results in
a decrease in renal clearance of fluoride (Jeandel et al. 1992; Kono et al. 1985).
Poor nutrition increases the incidence and severity of dental fluorosis (Murray and Wilson 1948; Pandit et
al. 1940) and skeletal fluorosis (Pandit et al. 1940). Comparison of dietary adequacy, water fluoride
levels, and the incidence of skeletal fluorosis in several villages in India suggested that vitamin C
deficiency played a major role in the disease (Pandit et al. 1940). Calcium intake met minimum
standards, although the source was grains and vegetables, rather than milk, and bioavailability was not
determined. Because of the role of calcium in bone formation, calcium deficiency would be expected to
increase susceptibility to effects of fluoride. Calcium deficiency was found to increase bone fluoride
levels in a 2-week study in rats (Guggenheim et al. 1976), but not in a 10-day study in monkeys (Reddy
and Srikantia 1971). Guinea pigs administered fluoride and a low-protein diet had larger increases in
bone fluoride than those given fluoride and a control diet (Parker et al. 1979). Bone changes in monkeys
following fluoride treatment appear to be more marked if the diet is deficient in protein or vitamin C, but
the conclusions are not definitive because of incomplete controls and small sample size (Reddy and
Srikantia 1971). Inadequate dietary levels of magnesium may affect the toxic effects of fluoride.
Fluoride administered to magnesium-deficient dogs prevented soft-tissue calcification, but not muscle
weakness and convulsions (Chiemchaisri and Philips 1963). In rats, fluoride aggravated the
hypomagnesemia condition, which produced convulsive seizures. The symptoms of magnesium
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
deficiency are similar to those produced by fluoride toxicity. This may be because of a fluoride-induced
increase in the uptake of magnesium from plasma into bone.
Although the possible relationship between fluoride in drinking water and the risk of fractures has been
extensively investigated, the data are inconclusive with studies finding beneficial (Madans et al. 1983;
Phipps et al. 2000; Simonen and Laittenen 1985) and deleterious (Cooper et al. 1990, 1991; Danielson et
al. 1992; Jacobsen et al. 1990; Kurttio et al. 1999; Sowers et al. 1986) effects or no effects (Arnala et al.
1984; Cauley et al. 1995; Kröger et al. 1994). Clinical trials of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
have found an increased risk of nonvertebral fractures following exposure to high doses of fluoride
(34 mg/day) (Haguenauer et al. 2000; Riggs et al. 1990, 1994); no effect on vertebral fracture risk was
found. However, administration of low doses of slow release sodium fluoride medications has been
effective in treating spinal osteoporosis (Pak et al. 1995).
3.11 METHODS FOR REDUCING TOXIC EFFECTS
This section will describe clinical practice and research concerning methods for reducing toxic effects of
exposure to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. However, because some of the treatments
discussed may be experimental and unproven, this section should not be used as a guide for treatment of
exposures to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. When specific exposures have occurred, poison
control centers and medical toxicologists should be consulted for medical advice. The following texts
provide specific information about treatment following exposures to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and
fluorine:
Bronstein AC, Currance PL. 1988. Emergency care for hazardous materials exposure. St. Louis, MO:
The C.V. Mosby Company, 113-114, 165-166.
Ellenhorn MJ, Barceloux DG. 1988. Medical toxicology: Diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning.
New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. 76, 83, 531-536, 873-874, 924-929.
Goldfrank LR, Flomenvaum NE, Lewin NA, et al., eds. 1990. Goldfrank’s toxicologic emergencies.
Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 220-221, 745, 769-779.
In all cases of acute high-level exposure to fluoride, hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid, or fluorine, the
focus of mitigation is to limit further absorption and to complex or remove the free fluoride ions from the
blood while maintaining the proper electrolyte balances. The majority of relevant acute high-level
exposure situations for which mitigation information is available involve dermal and/or inhalation
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
exposure to hydrofluoric acid or gaseous hydrogen fluoride. Some information is also available regarding
mitigation of chronic oral exposure to fluoride.
3.11.1 Reducing Peak Absorption Following Exposure
Fluoride. Ingested fluoride is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. However, fluoride
absorption is affected by the presence of several minerals including calcium, magnesium, and aluminum
which bind to the fluoride to form less soluble complexes (Ekstrand and Ehrnebo 1979; Kuhr et al. 1987;
Machle and Largent 1943; McClure et al. 1945; Spencer and Lender 1979; Spencer et al. 1980a, 1981;
Whitford 1994). Gastric lavage with solutions of calcium gluconate, calcium carbonate, calcium lactate,
calcium chloride, calcium hydroxide, calcium- or magnesium-based antacid, or aluminum hydroxide gel
have been used in the treatment of fluoride poisoning (Ellenhorn and Barceloux 1988; Goldfrank et al.
1990; Haddad and Winchester 1990; Morgan 1989). Two treatments that are not recommended are
attempting to neutralize the acid with orally administered sodium bicarbonate due to the resulting
exothermic reaction (Bronstein and Currance 1988) and emesis due to the formation of hydrofluoric acid
in the stomach (Bronstein and Currance 1988; Haddad and Winchester 1990).
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. In cases of dermal and inhalation exposure, the exposed persons
are first removed from the source of exposure, and any particles or excess liquids are removed by
brushing or blotting (Bronstein and Currance 1988). Thorough irrigation with cold water or saline is then
done to further limit absorption through exposed skin and eyes. Irrigation is followed by washing the
affected skin with an alkaline soap and water (Bronstein and Currance 1988; Dibbell et al. 1970).
Persistent pain is an indication that large amounts of free fluoride ions remain. In such cases, magnesium
oxide paste is applied or the exposed skin is soaked in cold solutions of magnesium sulfate, calcium salts,
or quaternary ammonium compounds (benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium) (Browne 1974; Goldfrank
et al. 1990; Haddad and Winchester 1990). However, the evolving standard of treatment for mild to
moderate burns involves massaging the affected area with a penetrating calcium gluconate gel, to avoid
problems with magnesium oxide precipitation (Borak et al. 1991; Browne 1974; Goldfrank et al. 1990).
Fluorine. Inhalation exposure to fluorine is treated very similarly to inhalation exposure to hydrogen
fluoride. The source of exposure is removed and water used to decontaminate the patient. The eyes are
washed with saline if necessary, and magnesium oxide paste can be applied (Bronstein and Currance
1988; Stutz and Janusz 1988).
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.11.2 Reducing Body Burden
Fluoride. There is limited information on reducing the body burden of fluoride. Whitford (1994)
demonstrated that a diet high in calcium resulted in a negative fluoride balance in rats due to a significant
increase in fecal excretion of fluoride. Although no significant alterations in plasma fluoride levels were
found, the high calcium diet did result in a significant decrease in fluoride levels in the femur epiphysis.
In a study of 10 individuals with clinical manifestations of fluorosis (Susheela and Bhatnagar 2002), a
diet with adequate levels of calcium, vitamins C and E, and other antioxidants and access to drinking
water with low levels of fluoride (1 ppm or lower) resulted in a decrease in urinary and blood fluoride
levels and a decrease in clinical signs were observed. One year after intervention, there was complete
recovery of gastrointestinal complaints, muscular weakness, polyuria, polydypsea, and pain and rigidity in
the joints. A study by Khandare et al. (2000) provides suggestive evidence that co-administration of
fluoride and tamarind results in increased urinary excretion of fluoride and decreased bone fluoride levels
in dogs.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. Hydrogen fluoride burns are characterized by intense pain and
progressive tissue destruction. The damage associated with this burn occurs in two stages. The first stage
is immediate tissue damage caused by a high concentration of hydrogen ions and the second is
liquefaction necrosis that is caused by free fluoride ions (Seyb et al. 1995). There are a number of
recommended forms of therapy; these therapies have the common goal of binding the fluoride ion and/or
altering its reactivity with tissues (Dunn et al. 1992). Recommended forms of therapy include topical
treatments with calcium gluconate paste, magnesium oxide paste, and iced solutions of quaternary
ammonium compounds, alcohol, or magnesium sulfate and intradermal injections of either magnesium
sulfate or calcium gluconate, or intraarterial injection of calcium gluconate (Dunn et al. 1992; Seyb et al.
1995). Intra-arterial infusions of calcium gluconate are often preferred to intradermal injections due to
the ability of the infusions to deliver more calcium to the burn site, better distribution of calcium in the
tissues, and the need for only a single injection, as opposed to an injection for every square centimeter of
affected dermal tissue (Haddad and Winchester 1990). Additionally, in burns involving the hands,
multiple intradermal injections pose the risk of elevating tissue pressures and forcing the removal of the
nails (Ellenhorn and Barceloux 1988; Goldfrank et al. 1990). One source reports that calcium gluconate
injection was successfully used in at least 96 cases without causing damage (Browne 1974).
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Several studies have compared different therapies in an attempt to identify the most effective treatment.
The therapeutic effects of calcium gluconate, magnesium acetate, and magnesium sulfate on hydrofluoric
acid burns of shaved Sprague-Dawley rats were compared using intradermal and subcutaneous injection
(Harris et al. 1981). Although this study found that injection of calcium gluconate, but not the
magnesium compounds, was irritating in the absence of a burn, and the duration, depth, and area of
lesions were reduced with the magnesium compounds compared with calcium gluconate, no reports were
located of using intradermal injection of magnesium compounds in humans. Seyb et al. (1995) found that
subcutaneous injections of 10% calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate solution and topically applied
calcium gluconate mixed with dimethyl sulfoxide significantly reduced the damage caused by hydrogen
fluoride exposure in rats exposed to 70% hydrogen fluoride for 60 seconds followed by continuously
rinsing with tap water for 5 minutes. Treatment with topically applied dimethyl sulfoxide only or calcium
gluconate only did not affect the degree of tissue damage. In contrast, Dunn et al. (1992) found that
injection of 10% calcium gluconate was the least effective therapy in pigs following topical application of
38% hydrogen fluoride. The most effective treatments were soaking in calcium acetate or iced Zephiran
(benzalkonium chloride), or injection of 5% calcium gluconate.
3.11.3 Interfering with the Mechanism of Action for Toxic Effects
Fluoride. The major treatment strategies for long-term, low-level exposure to fluorides are removal of
the source of exposure and administration of compounds that reduce intestinal absorption. Skeletal
fluorosis has been reported to be partially reversed 8–15 years after the elevated exposure ended
(Grandjean and Thomsen 1983). Sclerosis of the trabecular bone in ribs, vertebral bodies, and pelvis
faded, but calcification of muscle insertions and ligaments was not altered. Techniques that increase bone
turnover or bone resorption might be effective in reversing skeletal fluorosis. However, no information
on such techniques was located.
Chinoy and associates have examined the effectiveness of calcium, ascorbic acid, vitamin E, and
vitamin D in reversing the reproductive effects associated with oral exposure to sodium fluoride.
Administration of ascorbic acid and/or calcium and cessation of sodium fluoride exposure enhanced the
recovery of sperm function and morphology and testicular damage, as compared to no treatment, in rats
(Chinoy et al. 1993), mice (Chinoy and Sharma 2000), and rabbits (Chinoy et al. 1991). The combined
administration of ascorbic acid and calcium was the most effective treatment. Postexposure
administration of vitamins E and/or D was also effective in the recovery of sodium-fluoride induced
testicular effects in mice (Chinoy and Sharma 1998). Likewise, posttreatment administration of ascorbic
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
acid and/or calcium and vitamins E and/or D also aided in the recovery of ovarian effects in mice (Chinoy
and Patel 1998; Chinoy et al. 1994). It is believed that the antioxidant properties of ascorbic acid and
vitamin E aid in the recovery of fluoride damage. Vitamin D promotes the intestinal absorption of
calcium and phosphorus, thus maintaining the optimal blood concentration of these elements (Chinoy and
Patel 1998). The calcium may act by forming insoluble complexes with fluoride (Chinoy and Patel 1998;
Chinoy et al. 1994). Similarly, Guna Sherlin and Verma (2001) found that co-administration of
vitamin D reduced the maternal toxicity (decreased body weight gain and feed intake) and fetal toxicity
(increased percentage of fetuses with skeletal or visceral abnormalities) as compared to rats only
receiving sodium fluoride.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. The primary focus of research on reducing the toxic effects
following dermal exposure to hydrogen fluoride or hydrofluoric acid is on methods for reducing
absorption and decreasing the amount of fluoride ions. The tissue damage associated with hydrogen
fluoride exposure is believed to be caused by the binding of fluoride ions with tissue calcium and
magnesium cations to form insoluble salts, which are believed to interfere with cellular metabolism,
inducing cellular death and necrosis. Thus, the most effective method for interfering with the mechanism
of action is removal of the fluoride ions; these methods are discussed in Section 3.11.2.
3.12 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA, as amended, directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with the
Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine is available.
Where adequate information is not available, ATSDR, in conjunction with the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), is required to assure the initiation of a program of research designed to determine the
health effects (and techniques for developing methods to determine such health effects) of fluorides,
hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine.
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR, NTP, and EPA. They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment. This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled. In the future, the identified data needs will be
evaluated and prioritized, and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.12.1 Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and

Fluorine
The existing data on health effects of inhalation, oral, and dermal exposure of humans and animals to
fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine are summarized in Figures 3-6, 3-7, and 3-8. The purpose of
these figures is to illustrate the existing information concerning the health effects of fluorides, hydrogen
fluoride, and fluorine. Each dot in the figure indicates that one or more studies provide information
associated with that particular effect. The dot does not necessarily imply anything about the quality of the
study or studies, nor should missing information in this figure be interpreted as a “data need”. A data
need, as defined in ATSDR’s Decision Guide for Identifying Substance-Specific Data Needs Related to
Toxicological Profiles (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1989), is substance-specific
information necessary to conduct comprehensive public health assessments. Generally, ATSDR defines a
data gap more broadly as any substance-specific information missing from the scientific literature.
There are many case reports and epidemiological studies investigating the health effects of hydrogen
fluoride in humans by the inhalation and dermal routes, and the health effects of fluoride compounds by
the inhalation and oral routes. There are also limited data from experimental human exposure to fluorine.
Most human studies of the health effects of oral exposure to fluoride are community-based studies of
populations ingesting drinking water with various levels of fluoride and case reports of acute and chronic
oral exposure to sodium fluoride. There are also some case reports of acute dermal exposure to
hydrofluoric acid.
Human fatalities have resulted from both oral exposure to sodium fluoride and dermal exposure to
hydrofluoric acid. Dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid is often accompanied by inhalation of
hydrofluoric acid fumes. Human studies and case reports have investigated the effects of nonlethal oral
doses of sodium fluoride, although only after acute exposure. These exposures have resulted in mostly
gastrointestinal effects and consequences of hypocalcemia (e.g., nervous system and cardiovascular
effects). Exposure to fluorine gas causes respiratory, ocular, and dermal irritation in humans after acute
exposure. One study on chronic exposure to fluorine was located. Chronic human studies have generally
examined health effects in workers exposed to hydrogen fluoride or fluoride-containing dusts by
inhalation, and populations exposed to ionic fluoride through drinking water. These studies have
investigated the relationship between fluoride and neurological and reproductive effects and cancer.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Figure 3-6. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluoride

3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Figure 3-7. Existing Information on Health Effects of

Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Figure 3-8. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluorine

3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Studies conducted on animals have been fairly extensive, and have focused on the health effects following
inhalation of hydrogen fluoride and oral exposure to fluoride. A few studies on inhalation exposure to
fluorine also exist. Dermal studies in animals are limited to those investigating dermal and ocular effects
from exposure to fluorine, hydrofluoric acid, and sodium fluoride. A number of studies on the
genotoxicity of fluoride were located.
3.12.2 Identification of Data Needs
Acute-Duration Exposure.
Fluoride. Information on the acute toxicity of inhaled fluoride dust is limited to two animal studies that
found respiratory tract damage and impaired immune response in mice exposed to sodium fluoride for
4 hours/day for 10–14 days (Chen et al. 1999; Yamamoto et al. 2001). These data were not considered
adequate for derivation of an acute-duration inhalation MRL because the upper respiratory tract, a
potentially sensitive target of toxicity, was not examined in either study. Studies examining a wide range
of end points, including the upper respiratory tract, and using a number of exposure concentrations would
be useful for establishing concentration-response relationships and deriving an acute-duration inhalation
MRL for fluorides. The acute toxicity of ingested fluorides has been investigated in human and animal
studies. Most of the available human (Eichler et al. 1982; Hodge and Smith 1965; Sharkey and Simpson
1933) and animal (DeLopez et al. 1976; Lim et al. 1978; Skare et al. 1986; Whitford et al. 1990) acute
studies reported lethal doses and effects resulting from exposure to a lethal dose of sodium fluoride. The
gastrointestinal tract (Hoffman et al. 1980; Kessabi et al. 1985; Spak et al. 1989, 1990; Spoerke et al.
1980) and bone (Guggenheim et al. 1976) have been identified as targets of toxicity following a nonlethal
exposure to fluorides in human and rat studies, respectively. The potential of sodium fluoride to induce
reproductive (Li et al. 1987a) and developmental (Guna Sherlin and Verma 2001; Heindel et al. 1996)
effects has also been investigated in laboratory animals. An acute-duration oral MRL was not derived for
fluoride; the available data suggest that gastric irritation is the most sensitive end point of acute fluoride
toxicity; however, additional studies are needed to establish a concentration-response curve and to assess
whether the gastric mucosa would adapt to repeated exposure to fluoride. These studies should also
examine other potentially sensitive targets. Data on the dermal toxicity of fluoride is limited to a study
that found epidermal necrosis and marked edema of the dermis following application of sodium fluoride
to the abraded skin of rats (Essman et al. 1981). Additional dermal exposure studies would be useful for
establishing concentration-response relationships for fluoride.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. A number of studies have examined the acute toxicity of
hydrogen fluoride in humans under accidental exposure conditions (Dayal et al. 1992; Wing et al. 1991)
or experimental conditions (Lund et al. 1997, 1999, 2002; Machle et al. 1934) and in laboratory animals
(Dalbey et al. 1998a, 1998b; Rosenholtz et al. 1963; Stavert et al. 1991). These studies demonstrate that
the respiratory tract is the most sensitive target of toxicity; at slightly higher concentrations, skin and eye
irritation are also observed. Hematological (increased red blood cell and hemoglobin levels) and liver
(increased aspartate aminotransferase activity) alterations have also been observed in laboratory animals
exposed to much higher concentrations (Dalbey et al. 1998a, 1998b). An acute duration inhalation MRL
based on lower respiratory tract irritation in humans (Lund et al. 1997) was derived for hydrogen fluoride.
Data on the oral toxicity of hydrofluoric acid are limited to a report of six deaths following accidental
consumption of a rust remover containing hydrofluoric acid (Menchel and Dunn 1986). These data were
not considered adequate for derivation of an acute-duration oral MRL for hydrofluoric acid. It is likely
that the most sensitive target following acute oral exposure to hydrofluoric acid would be the
gastrointestinal tract; studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis and establish a concentration-response
curve. Dermal exposure studies demonstrate that hydrofluoric acid is very caustic, and severe tissue
damage can result from direct contact (Chela et al. 1989; Derelanko et al. 1985; Mayer and Gross 1985;
Roberts and Merigan 1989). Exposure to a high concentration or prolonged exposure can result in
systemic effects that are similar to fluoride (Braun et al. 1984; Mayer and Gross 1985; Mullett et al.
1987). There are limited concentration-response data and additional dermal exposure studies would be
useful.
Fluorine. A series of studies conducted by Keplinger and Suissa (1968) have investigated the acute
toxicity of fluorine in humans, rats, mice, rabbits, guinea pigs, and dogs. In all species tested, fluorine
was irritating to the respiratory tract, skin, and eyes. In addition to these direct contact effects, exposure
to fluorine also resulted in liver (necrosis and cloudy swelling) and kidney (necrosis) effects in the
laboratory animal species. An acute-duration MRL for fluorine was derived from the Keplinger and
Suissa (1968) human study, which identified a NOAEL and LOAEL for nasal irritation. Additional
studies are needed to evaluate the concentration-response relationship for skin effects as well as other end
points following dermal-only exposure.
Intermediate-Duration Exposure.
Fluoride. The toxicity of inhaled fluoride is limited to an animal study that found lung effects in mice
exposed to sodium fluoride for 4 hours/day for 20–30 days (Chen et al. 1999). With the exception of
direct contact effects, it is likely that the toxicity of inhaled fluoride would be similar to ingested fluoride.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Additional inhalation studies would be useful for establishing a concentration-response relationship and
deriving an intermediate-duration inhalation MRL for fluorides. A number of animal studies have
investigated the toxicity of fluoride following intermediate oral exposure; no intermediate-duration
human studies were located. These animal studies have reported a number of systemic effects, including
alterations in bone and tooth mineralization (Collins et al. 2001a; DenBesten and Crenshaw 1984;
Harrison et al. 1984; Marie and Hott 1986; Turner et al. 2001; Uslu 1983; Zhao et al. 1998), hyperplasia
of the glandular stomach (NTP 1990), alterations in thyroid function (Bobek et al. 1976; Zhao et al.
1998), and kidney damage (Greenberg 1986; NTP 1990). Additionally, neurological (Mullenix et al.
1995; Paul et al. 1998; Purohit et al. 1999), reproductive (Al-Hiyasat et al. 2000; Araibi et al. 1989;
Chinoy and Sequeira 1992; Chinoy et al. 1992, 1997; Krasowska and Wlostowski 1992; Messer et al.
1973; Narayana and Chinoy 1994), and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity
(Collins et al. 1995) have been observed. The available studies identify the bones and possibly the
thyroid as the most sensitive targets of fluoride toxicity in rodents following intermediate-duration
exposure to fluoride. Chronic-duration studies in humans strongly support the identification of bone as a
sensitive target of fluoride toxicity. However, bone growth in rats differs from humans, and it is not
known whether it is appropriate to extrapolate an adverse effect level from rats to humans. The potential
of fluoride to induce thyroid effects in humans has not been adequately assessed; additional studies are
needed to determine whether this end point is relevant for humans. The intermediate-duration database
was considered inadequate for derivation of an MRL due to the uncertainties associated with the use of
rodent data, and derivation of an MRL using the Bobek et al. (1976) or Turner et al. (2001) animal studies
that identified the lowest LOAEL values would result in an MRL that is lower than the human-based
chronic-duration MRL. No intermediate-duration dermal toxicity studies were identified for fluorides;
based on the results of an acute-duration rat study (Essman et al. 1981), it is likely that fluoride exposure
would result in damage to the skin. Studies are needed to confirm that this would also be the most
sensitive target of toxicity following longer-duration exposure and to assess whether there are other
sensitive targets.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. Nasal irritation was reported in the only human intermediate-
duration study identified for hydrogen fluoride (Largent 1960). A small number of animal studies are
available. These inhalation studies found respiratory tract irritation (Machle and Kitzmiller 1935;
Stokinger 1949), skin and eye irritation (Stokinger 1949), kidney damage (Machle and Kitzmiller 1935),
and neurobehavioral alterations (Sadilova et al. 1965) in laboratory animals. An intermediate-duration
inhalation MRL was not derived for hydrogen fluoride because an MRL based on the Largent (1960)
study is higher than the acute-duration inhalation MRL derived from the Lund et al. (1997, 1999) study.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Additional studies are needed to identify a NOAEL for respiratory tract effects. No intermediate-duration
oral or dermal exposure studies were identified; the gastrointestinal tract and skin, respectively, are the
likely targets of toxicity. Studies are needed for establishing concentration-response curves for these
exposure routes and identifying other possible targets of toxicity.
Fluorine. The database on the intermediate-duration toxicity of fluorine is limited to a multispecies study
that found eye, nose, and mouth irritation in rats and dogs and lung damage in rats, rabbits, and dogs
(Stokinger 1949). Because the measurements of exposure concentrations were questionable, this study
was not selected as the basis of an intermediate-duration inhalation MRL for fluorine. Additional studies
using multiple exposure concentrations are needed to establish the concentration-response relationship for
fluorine and derive an MRL. Studies involving dermal-only exposure to fluorine gas would be useful for
assessing the dermal toxicity of this element in humans wearing respirators without adequate protective
clothing.
Chronic-Duration Exposure and Cancer.
Fluoride. No studies have examined the chronic toxicity of inhaled fluorides; however, several
occupational exposure studies have examined workers exposed to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts,
and these are discussed under hydrogen fluoride. Thus, a chronic-duration inhalation MRL was not
derived for fluorides. Shorter-term inhalation studies and chronic-duration oral studies suggest that the
respiratory tract, teeth, and bones are likely to be the principal targets of fluoride. Studies are needed to
confirm this hypothesis and to establish concentration-response data. A large number of human and
animal studies have investigated the chronic toxicity of ingested fluoride. Most of the human studies are
ecological studies examining communities with fluoridated water or naturally high levels of fluoride in
water. For the most part, these studies have focused on the occurrence of dental fluorosis (DHHS 1991;
Eklund et al. 1987; Heifetz et al. 1988; Ismail and Bandekar 1999; Jackson et al. 1995; McDonagh et al.
2000; Selwitz et al. 1995; Teotia and Teotia 1994; Warren and Levy 1999) and alterations in bone density
or increased bone fracture rates (Arnala et al. 1986; Cauley et al. 1995; Cooper et al. 1990, 1991;
Danielson et al. 1992; Goggin et al. 1965; Jacobsen et al. 1990, 1992, 1993; Haguenauer et al. 2000;
Hillier et al. 2000; Karagas et al. 1996; Kleerekoper et al. 1991; Kröger et al 1994; Kurttio et al. 1999;
Lehmann et al. 1998; Li et al. 2001; Phipps et al. 2000; Riggs et al. 1990, 1994; Simonen and Laittinen
1985; Suarez-Almazor et al. 1993). At typical fluoridation levels (0.9–1.0 ppm), increases, decreases, or
no effect on bone fracture rates have been found. At higher doses, fluoride has consistently increased
bone fracture rates. Other potential targets of toxicity that have been examined in humans include the
cardiovascular system (Hagan et al. 1954; Heasman and Martin 1962), gastrointestinal tract (Susheela et
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
al. 1992), kidneys (Lantz et al. 1987), intelligence and behavior (Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000; Morgan et
al. 1998), reproductive system (Freni 1994; Susheela and Jethanandani 1996), and developing organism
(Berry 1958; Erickson et al. 1976; Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000; Needleman et al. 1974; Rapaport 1956;
Takahashi 1998). These studies did not find positive and/or consistent results. Several animal studies
have examined the chronic toxicity; the observed effects included bone alterations in rats (NTP 1990),
mice (NTP 1990), and mink (Aulerich et al. 1987), intestinal damage in rabbits (Susheela and Das 1988),
hematological effects in rabbits (Susheela and Jain 1983), immunological effects in rabbits (Jain and
Susheela 1987), and male reproductive effects in rabbits (Kumar and Susheela 1994, 1995; Susheela and
Kumar 1991, 1997). One limitation of the animal studies is that the doses used were much higher
(>10 times higher) than doses that result in increased fracture rates in humans. Additional animal studies
that used lower doses would be useful in determining if there are additional sensitive targets of toxicity
following chronic-duration oral exposure to fluoride. A large community-based study by Li et al. (2001)
was used to derive a chronic-duration oral MRL for fluoride. No chronic-duration dermal studies were
identified. The toxicity of fluoride is not likely to be route-specific, with the exception of direct contact
effects. An acute toxicity study (Essman et al. 1981) found skin damage in animals exposed to sodium
fluoride; studies are needed to identify the threshold of toxicity of dermal irritation and other potentially
sensitive targets such as teeth and bone.
The carcinogenicity of fluoride has been assessed in a number of human studies of communities with
fluoridated water or naturally high levels of fluoride in the drinking water (Cohn 1992; Erickson 1978;
Freni and Gaylor 1992; Gelberg et al. 1995; Hoover et al. 1976, 1991a, 1991b; Kinlen and Doll 1981;
Mahoney et al. 1991; McGuire et al. 1991; Neuberger 1982; Oldham and Newell 1977; Rogot et al. 1978;
Takahashi et al. 2001; Taves 1977; Yiamouyiannis and Burk 1977) and chronic-duration oral exposure
studies of rats (Maurer et al. 1990; NTP 1990) and mice (NTP 1990). Although some human studies have
found positive results, particularly for bone cancer (Cohn 1992; Hoover et al. 1991b; Takahashi et al.
2001; Yiamouyiannis and Burk 1977), the majority of the studies have not found significant increases in
cancer risk. The NTP (1990) bioassay found a weak, equivocal fluoride-related increase in the
occurrence of osteosarcomas in male rats, and no evidence of carcinogenicity in female rats or male or
female mice. Significant increases in cancer risk were found in the Maurer et al. (1990) study.
Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the potential of fluoride to induce bone cancers
following chronic oral exposure.
Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid. The available data on the chronic toxicity are limited to several
occupational exposure studies of workers (Carnow and Conibear 1981; Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a, 1983b;
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Czerwinski et al. 1988; Derryberry et al. 1963; Dinman et al. 1967c; Kaltreider et al. 1972; Macuch et al.
1963; Moller and Gudjonsson 1932) exposed to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts and an inhalation
study in guinea pigs (Rioufol et al. 1982). The occupational exposure studies primarily focused on
respiratory tract and skeletal effects and the guinea pig study examined the kidneys. Although the
occupational exposure studies examined the primary targets of hydrogen fluoride and fluoride toxicity,
they are limited by co-exposure to a number of other chemicals and limited, if any, exposure data.
Additional chronic-duration studies are needed to derive a chronic-duration inhalation MRL for hydrogen
fluoride. No chronic-duration dermal exposure studies were located for hydrogen fluoride. At high
concentrations, the skin is the most sensitive target of toxicity; however, long-term exposure to lower
concentrations is likely to result in different targets of toxicity, possibly the same as chronic fluoride
toxicity. Additional chronic-duration studies are needed to establish the concentration-response
relationships for direct contact effects and other possible targets of toxicity.
Several studies have examined the carcinogenicity of hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dust exposures in
cryolite workers (Grandjean et al. 1985, 1992), aluminum industry workers (Andersen et al. 1982; Gibbs
and Horowitz 1979; Milham 1979; Rockette and Arena 1983), fluorspar miners (deVilliers and Windish
1964), and individuals residing near or working in the steel industry (Cecilioni 1972). Several studies
reported increases in respiratory tract cancer rates (Andersen et al. 1982; deVilliers and Windish 1964;
Gibbs and Horowitz 1979; Grandjean et al. 1985, 1992; Milham 1979); however, no adjustments for
occupational exposure to other carcinogenic compounds and smoking were made in most of these studies.
Well-controlled studies are needed to assess the carcinogenic potential of hydrogen fluoride and fluoride
dust exposure.
Fluorine. Data on the chronic toxicity of fluorine is limited to an occupational exposure study in which a
relatively insensitive measure of respiratory tract effects (visits to the medical department with respiratory
complaints and absences from work) was used and in which the controls and exposed workers were
exposed to uranium hexafluoride and hydrogen fluoride (Lyon 1962). This study was considered
inadequate for derivation of a chronic-duration inhalation MRL. Additional studies are needed to define
the concentration-response relationships following exposure to inhaled fluorine gas and following dermal-
only exposure to fluorine. There are no data on the carcinogenicity of fluorine; the carcinogenicity of
absorbed fluorine is expected to be similar to fluoride. However, additional studies are needed to assess
whether long-term exposure to fluorine would result in portal-of-entry cancers.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Genotoxicity. There is a significant database on the genotoxicity of fluoride compounds in several

species and several cell types. However, the results from well-characterized systems are much more
limited, and additional well-designed experiments would be useful in resolving contradictory data. The
results have been inconsistent in many instances, but a consensus is developing that at toxic levels
(>10 µg/mL, and usually seen at >40 µg/mL), there may be a general inhibition of enzymes, including the
DNA polymerases (Caspary et al. 1987, 1988).
Reproductive Toxicity. Hydrogen fluoride and fluorine animal inhalation exposure studies and
human and animal fluoride oral exposure studies have assessed reproductive toxicity. No data are
available on the reproductive toxicity following dermal exposure in humans or animals. Degenerative
testicular changes were observed in rats exposed to high concentrations of hydrogen fluoride (Stokinger
1949) or fluorine (Stokinger 1949); it is possible that these effects were due to direct contact with the gas
rather than a systemic effect. Several studies have investigated the reproductive toxicity of fluoride in
humans. One study found a significant association between decreasing total fertility rates and increasing
fluoride levels in drinking water (Freni 1994) and another study found decreases in serum testosterone
levels in men with skeletal fluorosis (Susheela and Jethanandani 1996). Both studies have several
limitations that preclude drawing firm conclusions from them about the potential of fluoride to induce
reproductive toxicity. Alterations in the male reproductive system have also been observed in rats and
rabbits orally exposed to sodium fluoride. The observed effects included alterations in serum testosterone
levels (Araibi et al. 1989; Narayana and Chinoy 1994), histological alterations in the testes (Krasowska
and Wlostowski 1992; Narayana and Chinoy 1994; Susheela and Kumar 1991), alterations in sperm
morphology or spermatogenesis (Chinoy et al. 1992, 1995, 1997; Kumar and Susheela 1994, 1995;
Susheela and Kumar 1991), and impaired fertility (Chinoy and Sequeira 1992; Chinoy et al. 1992).
However, other studies have not found any effects on male reproduction (Dunipace et al. 1989; Li et al.
1987a; Sprando et al. 1997, 1998). Additional studies are needed to address the conflicting results. As
with the male reproductive effects, conflicting results have been found for fluoride-induced female
reproductive effects. Infertility was observed in one study (Messer et al. 1973), but not in three others
(Collins et al. 2001a; Marks et al. 1984; Tao and Suttie 1973). A decrease in fetus viability and an
increase in resorption rate have also been reported at maternally toxic doses (Al-Hiyasat et al. 2000).
Developmental Toxicity. The potential of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine to induce

developmental effects following inhalation or dermal exposure has not been investigated in humans or
animals. Several community-based studies have examined the possible association between fluoridated
water consumption and developmental effects (Berry 1958; Erickson et al. 1976; Needleman et al. 1974;
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Rapaport 1956; Takahashi 1998); the overall weight of evidence suggests that low levels of fluoride are
not associated with developmental effects. However, higher exposure levels (levels associated with
dental or skeletal fluorosis) have been associated with developmental effects in humans (Gupta et al.
1995; Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000); additional studies are needed to confirm the results of these studies,
which do not appear to adjust for potential confounders such as poor nutrition and exposure to other
chemicals. Studies in laboratory animals have not found adverse developmental effects in the offspring of
rats or rabbits exposed to sodium fluoride in drinking water (Collins et al. 1995, 2001b; Heindel et al.
1996); however, fetal mortality and abnormalities were observed at maternally toxic doses (Collins et al.
1995; Guna Sherlin and Verma 2001). Studies in wild or domestic animals (cattle and mink) (Aulerich et
al. 1987; Krook and Maylin 1979; Maylin and Krook 1982) have reported developmental effects; the
relevance to humans is not known.
Immunotoxicity. Information of the potential of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine to induce

immune effects is limited to an inhalation study in mice that found a decrease in bactericidal activity
following exposure to sodium fluoride (Yamamoto et al. 2001) and an oral exposure study in rabbits that
found a decrease in antibody titers following an 18-month exposure via gavage to sodium fluoride and
immunization with transferrin (Jain and Susheela 1987). These studies provide some suggestive evidence
that the immune system is a target of fluoride toxicity. A study utilizing an immune battery of tests
would be useful in assessing the immunotoxic potential of fluoride.
Neurotoxicity. Alterations in the light adaptive reflex were found in humans exposed to very low
concentrations of hydrogen fluoride (Sadilova et al. 1965). The investigators of this study also found
alterations in conditioned responses in rats exposed to relatively low concentrations. This finding has not
been supported by other human or animal studies. A decrease in IQ scores has also been observed in
children living in areas with high fluoride levels in the water (Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000; Zhao et al.
1996); however, the lack of control of potential confounding variables limits the interpretation of these
studies. Epidemiology studies examining this end point and controlling for potentially confounding
variables, such as poor nutrition and exposure to other chemicals, would provide confirming or refuting
data. Alterations in spontaneous behavior were found in rats orally exposed to sodium fluoride (Mullenix
et al. 1995a; Paul et al. 1998); however, another study did not find this effect (Whitford et al. 2003).
Studies utilizing a neurobehavioral test battery would provide valuable information on the neurotoxic
potential of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Epidemiological and Human Dosimetry Studies. Available data on the toxicity of inhaled
hydrogen fluoride and fluorine come from case reports involving exposure to hydrogen fluoride (Bennion
and Franzblau 1997; Braun et al. 1984; Chan et al. 1987; Chela et al. 1989; Dieffenbacher and Thompson
1962; Kleinfeld 1965; Machle et al. 1934; Tepperman 1980; Waldbott and Lee 1978), accidental exposure
of a community to hydrogen fluoride (Dayal et al. 1992; Wing et al. 1991), experimental studies of
exposure to hydrogen fluoride (Largent 1960; Lund et al. 1997, 1999, 2002; Machle et al. 1934) and
fluorine (Keplinger and Suissa 1968), and occupational exposure to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts
(Carnow and Conibear 1981; Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a; Czerwinski et al. 1988; Derryberry et al. 1963;
Dinman et al. 1976c; Kaltreider et al. 1972; Moller and Gudjonsson 1932), fluorides (McGarvey and
Ernstene 1947; Roholm 1937; Wolff and Kerr 1938), or fluorine (Lyon 1962). These studies identify the
respiratory tract as the most sensitive target of toxicity, and data are sufficient to derive acute-duration
inhalation MRLs for hydrogen fluoride and fluorine using these human data. However, the long-term
toxicity of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine has not been adequately investigated. The only
consistently reported effect is skeletal fluorosis (Czerwinski et al. 1988; Dinman et al. 1976c; Kaltreider
et al. 1972; Moller and Gudjonsson 1932); poor exposure characterization and difficulty assessing the
skeletal fluorosis limit these studies.
Many studies have examined the possible association between the long-term exposure to fluoridated
water and adverse health effects, particularly effects on bone and teeth. Most of the studies are
community-based studies examining the prevalence of dental fluorosis (DHHS 1991; Eklund et al. 1987;
Heifetz et al. 1988; Jackson et al. 1995; McDonagh et al. 2000; Selwitz et al. 1995; Teotia and Teotia
1994; Warren and Levy 1999) and bone fracture rates (Arnala et al. 1986; Cauley et al. 1995; Cooper et
al. 1990, 1991; Danielson et al. 1992; Goggin et al. 1965; Jacobsen et al. 1990, 1992, 1993; Karagas et al.
1996; Kröger et al 1994; Kurttio et al. 1999; Lehmann et al. 1998; Phipps et al. 2000; Simonen and
Laittinen 1985; Suarez-Almazor et al. 1993) in residents living in communities with fluoridated water or
water with naturally high levels of fluoride. Overall, the data on dental fluorosis provide strong evidence
of increased prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis with increasing fluoride exposure levels.
However, a dose-response relationship is difficult to establish because other sources of fluoride (e.g.,
dentrifices, bottled water) were typically not taken into consideration. The findings on the possible
association between exposure to approximately 1 ppm fluoride in water (typical level of fluoride in
communities with fluoridated water) and increases in hip fracture rates in the elderly are inconsistent,
with studies finding increases, decreases, or no effect. A common limitation of these community-based
studies is the lack of individual exposure data; fluoride levels in drinking water were used to estimate
intake and other sources of fluoride or water consumption levels were not taken into consideration.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Experimental studies (Haguenauer et al. 2000; Riggs et al. 1990, 1994) and a community study (Li et al.
2001) involving exposure to higher levels of fluoride have consistently found increases in bone fracture
rates. Human case reports (Hoffman et al. 1980; Rao et al. 1969; Spoerke et al. 1980) and experimental
studies (Spak et al. 1989, 1990) have also identified the gastrointestinal tract as a sensitive target
following bolus administration of fluoride; additional studies are needed to establish the dose-response
relationship for this end point.
In addition to these effects, human studies have examined reproductive (Freni et al. 1994), neurodevelop-
mental (Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000 Zhao et al. 1996), and developmental (Erickson et al. 1976; Gupta
et al. 1995) end points; inadequate exposure characterization and adjustments for potentially confounding
variables limit the interpretation of these studies. A number of studies have examined the carcinogenicity
of fluoride in communities with fluoridated water (or high levels of naturally occurring fluoride) (Cohn
1992; Erickson 1978; Freni and Gaylor 1992; Gelberg et al. 1995; Hoover et al. 1976, 1991a, 1991b;
Kinlen and Doll 1981; Mahoney et al. 1991; McGuire et al. 1991; Neuberger 1982; Oldham and Newell
1977; Rogot et al. 1978; Takahashi et al. 2001; Taves 1977; Yiamouyiannis and Burk 1977). Most of
these studies have not found a significant association, although some studies have found increased risks
(Takahashi et al. 2001; Yiamouyiannis and Burk 1977), particularly for bone cancer in young men (Cohn
1992; Hoover et al. 1991b). Additional studies that control for potentially confounding variables are
needed to adequately assess whether there is an increased risk of bone cancer in young males living in
communities with fluoridated water.
Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect.
Exposure. Fluoride can be readily detected in biological tissues such as urine (Ekstrand and Ehrnebo
1983; Ekstrand et al. 1983; Zipkin et al. 1956), plasma (Ekstrand et al. 1983), nails (Whitford et al.
1999a), saliva (Oliveby et al. 1990; Whitford et al. 1999b), and tooth enamel (McClure and Likins 1951).
Urinary fluoride is most commonly used to assess fluoride exposure and has been shown to be a good
predictor of total daily fluoride intake (Villa et al. 2000). Urine, plasma, and saliva can be used as
biomarkers for acute exposures; however, measurements should be taken shortly after exposure due to the
rapid elimination of fluoride. Bone (Baud et al. 1978; Boivin et al. 1988) and nail (Schamschula et al.
1985; Whitford et al. 1999a) fluoride levels can be used to quantitate long-term fluoride exposure.
Additional studies are needed to relate levels of fluoride in these biological tissues to exposure dose.
Effect. Fluoride accumulates in bone, with levels increasing with age. This accumulation of fluoride in
bone can lead to adverse effects such as alterations in bone density, which can be detected by radiographs.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
However, these are nonspecific changes and other elements can sequester in the skeleton and produce
similar changes observed in radiographs. Exposure to elevated levels of fluoride can also result in dental
fluorosis in children (Den Besten and Thariani 1992; DHHS 1991; Eklund et al. 1987; Fejerskov et al.
1990; Heifetz et al. 1988; Ismail and Bandekar 1999; Jackson et al. 1995; McDonagh et al. 2000; Selwitz
et al. 1995; Teotia and Teotia 1994; Warren and Levy 1999). There is some evidence that dental fluorosis
can be used as a reliable biomarker in children younger than 7 years of age (Den Besten 1994). However,
additional studies are needed to quantify the effect of several variables including dose, duration of
exposure, and timing of exposure.
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion. The absorption, distribution,

metabolism, and excretion of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine have been investigated in humans
and animals. Evidence for absorption of fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, and fluoride after exposure via the
inhalation and dermal routes is provided by the observation of elevated urine and plasma levels in
workers exposed to hydrogen fluoride and fluoride dusts (Collings et al. 1951; Ehrnebo and Ekstrand
1986; Rye 1961; Søyseth et al. 1994), in people accidentally exposured to hydrofluoric acid (Buckingham
1988; Burke et al. 1973), and in subjects experimental exposed to hydrogen fluoride (Lund et al. 1997).
A number of human experimental studies provide strong evidence that fluoride is rapidly and completely
absorbed following oral exposure to soluble fluoride compounds (Carlson et al. 1960a; Ekstrand et al.
1977, 1978; Shulman and Vallejo 1990; Trautner and Einwag 1987) and insoluble fluoride compounds
are poorly absorbed (Afseth et al. 1987; Trautner and Einwag 1987). The results of animal inhalation
(Keplinger and Suissa 1968; Morris and Smith 1982; Stokinger 1949), oral (McClure et al. 1945, 1950;
Zipkin and Likins 1957), and dermal (Keplinger and Suissa 1968; Watanabe et al. 1975) exposure studies
confirm the results of the human studies. Additional studies would be useful in characterizing the
absorption of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine following inhalation and dermal exposure.
The distribution of fluoride following oral exposure has been characterized in human (Ekstrand et al.
1977a, 1978, 1979, 1994a, 1994b; Guy et al. 1976; Rigalli et al. 1996) and animal (Ekstrand and Whitford
1984; Richards et al. 1982; Spak et al. 1986; Whitford and Johnson 2003; Whitford et al. 1979a, 1990)
studies. The limited available information on the distribution of inhaled fluoride (Baud et al. 1978;
Boivin et al. 1988; Chan-Yeung et al. 1983b; Czerwinski et al. 1988; Kaltreider et al. 1972), hydrogen
fluoride (Machle and Scott 1935; Morris and Smith 1983; Stokinger 1949), and fluorine (Stokinger 1949)
suggested that the long-term distribution is similar to fluoride following oral exposure. No information is
available on the distribution of fluoride following dermal exposure; it is likely that the distribution would
be similar to the oral route.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Occupational exposure studies provide some information on the excretion of hydrogen fluoride and
fluoride dusts (Collings et al. 1951; Ehrnebo and Ekstrand 1986; Rye 1961) and animal inhalation studies
provide excretion data for hydrogen fluoride (Stokinger 1949) and fluorine (Stokinger 1949). The
excretion of fluoride following ingestion has been extensively investigated in humans (Carlson et al.
1960a; Ekstrand 1977; Ekstrand et al. 1978, 1980a, 1982; Järnberg et al. 1980, 1981, 1983; Jeandel et al.
1992; Oliveby et al. 1989, 1990; Machle and Largent 1943; Schiffl and Binswanger 1982; Spak et al.
1985; Villa et al. 2000; Waterhouse et al. 1980; Whitford et al. 1976). No excretion data are available for
the dermal route of exposure. Because the excretion of fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine
following inhalation or dermal exposure would be similar to that following ingestion of fluoride, no
additional excretion studies are needed at this time.
Comparative Toxicokinetics. A study by Whitford et al. (1991) provides evidence for differences
in the toxicokinetic properties of fluoride in dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, and hamsters. Plasma, renal, and
extrarenal clearance in the dog was most similar to humans. Although there are adequate data to assess
the toxicokinetics of fluoride in humans and the current MRLs are based on human data, additional
studies are needed to evaluate the relevance of other animal species to humans to allow for the assessment
of other potentially relevant end points of toxicity, such as reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity.
Methods for Reducing Toxic Effects. Fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine are rapidly
absorbed following inhalation, oral, or dermal exposure. For fluoride, gastric lavage administration of
calcium, magnesium, or aluminum compounds can decrease absorption by forming less soluble
complexes with the fluoride (Ellenhorn and Barceloux 1988; Goldfrank et al. 1990; Haddad and
Winchester 1990; Morgan 1989). For hydrogen fluoride and fluorine, the recommended methods for
decreasing absorption involve removal from the area, irrigation of skin and eyes (Bronstein and Curranc
1988; Dibbell et al. 1970), and application of magnesium, calcium, or quaternary ammonium compounds
to limit further dermal absorption (Browne 1974; Goldfrank et al. 1990; Haddad and Winchester 1990;
Stutz and Janusz 1988). There is some evidence that a diet high in calcium will reduce the fluoride body
burden (Susheela and Bhatnagar 2002; Whitford 1994); additional studies are needed to determine if this
is an effective method for reducing bone fluoride levels.
Children’s Susceptibility. The available human studies that examined the toxicity of fluoride in
children primarily focused on effects on teeth, particularly dental fluorosis. It should be noted that there
is also an extensive database on the beneficial effects of fluoride in preventing dental caries, which will
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
not be discussed in this section dealing with fluoride toxicity. Excess fluoride exposure has been shown
to cause dental fluorosis in young children; the severity is dependent on the amount of fluoride ingested,
the duration of exposure, and the stage of enamel development at the time of exposure (DHHS 1991;
Eklund et al. 1987; Heifetz et al. 1988; Jackson et al. 1995; Selwitz et al. 1995; Teotia and Teotia 1994;
Warren and Levy 1999). Although the severity of fluorosis is known to increase with dose, the exact
dose-response relationship is not known because very few studies measured individual fluoride intake;
additional studies are needed to better assess this relationship. Because more fluoride is deposited in
children’s bones than adults, there is a need for additional studies to assess whether children are more
susceptible to skeletal effects. Human studies have suggested that high doses of fluoride may result in
spina bifida (Gupta et al. 1995) or decreased intelligence (Li et al. 1995a; Lu et al. 2000; Zhao et al. 1996)
but, as noted previously, the Gupta et al. (1995), Li et al. (1995a), Lu et al. (2000), and Zhao et al. (1996)
studies appear to have major study design deficiencies. In general, animal studies have not found
developmental effects following oral exposure; however, these studies did not examine neurodevelop-
mental end points. Additional animal studies are needed to assess neurodevelopmental potential of
fluoride.
A number of studies have examined potential differences in the toxicokinetic properties of fluoride
between adults and children. These studies suggest that absorption (Ekstrand et al. 1978, 1983, 1994a,
1994b) and excretion (Whitford 1999) of ingested fluoride do not appear to be strongly influenced by age.
However, the uptake of fluoride into bone is strongly influenced by age; with a higher percentage of
ingested fluoride being sequestered in bone in very young children compared to adults (Ekstrand and
Whitford 1984; Ekstrand et al. 1979, 1994a, 1994b; Lawrenz et al. 1940; Miller and Phillips 1956; Suttie
and Phillips 1959; Whitford 1990; Zipkin and McClure 1952; Zipkin et al. 1956).
Child health data needs relating to exposure are discussed in Section 6.8.1 Identification of Data Needs:
Exposures of Children.
3.12.3 Ongoing Studies
Ongoing studies pertaining to fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorine have been identified and are shown
in Table 3-9.
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Table 3-9. Ongoing Studies on the Health Effects of Fluoride,

Hydrogen Fluoride, or Fluorine
Investigator Affiliation Research description

Ziegler, EE University of Iowa Toxicokinetic properties in infants
Levy, SM University of Iowa Bone development in children
Boskey, AL Hospital for Special Therapies Osteoporosis therapy
Source: FEDRIP 2002

4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION
4.1 CHEMICAL IDENTITY
The common synonyms and other information for fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, sodium fluoride,
fluorosilicic acid, and sodium fluorosilicate are listed in Table 4-1. The terms “fluorine” and “fluoride”
are often used interchangeably in the literature as generic terms. In this document, we will use “fluoride”
as a general term to refer to all combined forms of fluorine unless the particular compound or form is
known and there is a reason for referring to it. The term “fluorine gas” will sometimes be used to
emphasize the fact that we are referring to the elemental form of fluorine rather than a combined form. In
general, the differentiation between different ionic and molecular or gaseous and particulate forms of
fluorine-containing substances is uncertain and may also be unnecessary.
4.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Fluorine is the lightest member of Group 17 (VIIA) of the periodic table. This group, the halogens, also
includes chloride, bromine, and iodine. As with the other halogens, fluorine occurs as a diatomic
molecule, F2, in its elemental form. It has only one stable isotope and its valence in all compounds is -1.
Fluorine is the most reactive of all the elements, which may be attributed to its large electronegativity
(estimated standard potential +2.85 V). It reacts at room temperature or elevated temperatures with all
elements other than nitrogen, oxygen, and the lighter noble gases. Fluorine is also notable for its small
size; large numbers of fluorine atoms fit around atoms of another element. This, along with its
electronegativity, allows the formation of many simple and complex fluorides in which the other element
is in its highest oxidation date. Important physical and chemical properties of fluorine, hydrogen fluoride,
sodium fluoride, fluorosilicic acid, and sodium fluorosilicate are presented in Table 4-2. It should be
noted that fluorosilicic acid only exists in aqueous solution, and not in the anhydrous state. Its properties
will depend on its concentration and temperature (Aigueperse et al. 1988).
Table 4-1. Chemical Identity of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride,

Fluosilicic Acid, and Sodium Silicofluoridea
Characteristic Fluorine Hydrogen fluoride Sodium fluoride

Synonym(s) Fluorine-19 Hydrofluoric acid; hydrofluoride Monosodium
flurorideb
Registered trade name(s) No data No data Alcoa sodium
fluorideb
Chemical formula F2 FH FNa
Chemical structure F-F H-F Na-F
Identification numbers:
CAS registry 7782-41-4 7664-39-3 7681-49-4
NIOSH RTECS NIOSH/LM64750000 NIOSH/MW7890000 NIOSH/WB0350000
EPA hazardous waste P056 U134 No data
OHM/TADS No data 7216750 7216897
DOT/UN/NA/IMO UN1045; fluorine UN1790; hydrofluoric acid UN1690; sodium
shipping solution fluoride
UN1052; anhydrous hydrogen
fluoride
HSDB 541 546 1766
EINECS 231-954-8 231-634-8 231-667-8
NCI No data No data C55221
Table 4-1. Chemical Identity of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride,

Characteristic Fluorosilicic acid Sodium fluorosilicate

c
Synonym(s) Dihydrogen hexafluorosilicate; Disodium hexafluorosilicate; disodium
hexafluorosilicic acid; fluosilicic silicofluoride; silicon sodium fluoride;
acid; hexafluosilicic acid; hydro- sodium silicofluoride; sodium fluosilicate;
fluorosilicic acid; hydrogen hexa- sodium hexafluorosilicate; sodium
fluorosilicate; hydrosilicofluoric hexafluosilicate; sodium silicon fluoride
acid; silicofluoric acid; silicon hexa-
fluoride dihydride
c
Registered trade name(s) FKS Prodan; Salufer
Chemical formula H2SiF6 Na2SiF6
Chemical structure 2-
F F F
Si 2HF F F
F F
F Si F 2 Na
+
Identification numbers:
CAS registry 16961-83-4 16893-85-9
NIOSH RTECS NIOSH/VV8410000 NIOSH/VV8225000
EPA hazardous waste No data No data
OHM/TADS No data No data
DOT/UN/NA/IMO UN 2674; sodium silicofluoride UN 1778; fluosilicic acid
shipping
HSDB 770 2018
EINECS 241-034-8 240-934-8
NCI No data No data
a
All information obtained from HSDB 2003 and ChemID 2001 except where noted.
b
Sodium fluoride is an ingredient in many dental care products and rodenticides. Since it is not the only component
in these products, they cannot properly be considered trade names or synonyms. Some of these products are:
Floridine, Antibulit, Cavi-trol, Chemifluor, Credo, Duraphat, F1-tabs, Florocid, Flozenges, Fluoral, Fluorident,
Fluorigard, Fluorineed, Fluorinse, Fluoritab, Fluorocid, Fluor-o-kote, Fluorol, Fluoros, Flura, Flura drops, Flura-gel,
Flura-Loz, Flurcare, Flursol, Fungol B, Gel II, Gelution, Gleem, Iradicav, Karidium, Karigel, Kari-rinse, Lea-Cov,
Lemoflur, Luride, Luride Lozi-tabs, Luride-SF, Nafeen, Nafpak, Na Frinse, Nufluor, Ossalin, Ossin, Osteofluor,
Pediaflor, Pedident, Pennwhite, Pergantene, Phos-flur, Point Two, Predent, Rafluor, Rescue Squad, Roach salt,
So-flo, Stay-flo, Studafluor, Super-dent, T-fluoride, Thera-flur, Thera-Flur-N, Villiaumite, and Zymafluor. Another
compound of sodium and fluorine is sodium bifluoride (also called sodium hydrofluoride and sodium hydrofluoride),
NaF-HF or NaHF2, which is not discussed here.
c
IARC 1982
CAS = Chemical Abstracts Services; DOT/UN/NA/IMCO = Department of Transportation/United Nations/North

America/International Maritime Organization Code; EINECS = European INventory of Existing Chemical Substances;
EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; HSDB = Hazardous Substances Data Bank; NCI = National Cancer
Institute; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OHM/TADS = Oil and Hazardous
Materials/Technical Assistance Data System; RTECS = Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
Table 4-2. Physical and Chemical Properties of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride,

Sodium Fluoride, Fluosilicic Acid, and Sodium Silicofluoridea
Property Fluorine Hydrogen fluoride Sodium fluoride

Molecular weight 37.997 20.006 42.00
Color Pale yellow Colorless Colorless
Physical state Gas Gas Cubic or tetragonal
crystals
Molecular formula F2 FH FNa
Melting point, °C -219.61 -83.36 993
Boiling point, °C -188.13 19.51b 1,704
Density, g/cm3 1.5127 at -188.13 °C 0.991 at 19.54 °C 2.78
Odor Pungent, irritating odor Strong, irritating odor Odorless
Odor threshold:
Water Not relevant No data No data
Air 0.035 ppm 0.5–3 ppm No data
Solubility:
Water 1.69 mg/L Miscible 43 g/L at 25 °C
Organic solvents No data Benzene (2.54); toluene (1.80); Very slightly soluble
ethanol (very soluble); m-xylene in ethanol
(1.28); tetraline (0.27)b
Partition coefficients:
Log Kow Not relevant No data No data
Log Koc Not relevant Not relevant No data
Vapor pressure 0.4 kPa (3 mmHg) at 400 mmHg at 2.5 °C 1 mmHg at 1,077 °C
55 °Kc; 12.3 kPa (92.3
mmHg) at 70 °K
Henry’s Law constant at No data 0.104 at m-L/molee No data
20 °C
Autoignition temperature No data No data No data
Flashpoint Not flammable Not flammable Not flammable
Flammability limits No data No data No data
Conversion factors 1 mg/m3 = 1.554 ppmd 1 mg/m3 = 1.223 ppmd Not applicable
1 ppm = 0.64 mg/m3 1 ppm = 0.82 mg/m3
Explosive limits No data No data No data
Table 4-2. Physical and Chemical Properties of Fluorine, Hydrogen Fluoride,

Sodium Fluoride, Fluosilicic Acid, and Sodium Silicofluoridea
Property Fluorosilicic Acid Sodium Fluorosilicate

Molecular weight 144.1 188.1
Color Colorless, fuming liquid white
Physical state liquid granular powder
Molecular formula H2SiF6 Na2SiF6
Melting point, °C 60-70% solution solidifies at about decomposes at red heatb
19 °C, forming a crystalline dihydrate
Boiling point, °C decomposes decomposes at red heatb
Density, g/cm3 1.4634 (60.97% solution) at 25 °C: 2.679f
17.5/17.5 1.2742 (30% solution)f
Odor Sour, pungent odorb No data
Odor threshold:
Water No data No data
Air No data No data
Solubility:
Water No data 0.76 g/100 g water at 25 °Cg
Organic solvents No data No data
Partition coefficients:
Log Kow No data No data
Log Koc No data No data
Vapor pressure No data No data
Henry’s Law constant at No data No data
20 °C
Autoignition temperature No data No data
Flashpoint No data No data
Flammability limits No data No data
Conversion factors Not applicable Not applicable
Explosive limits No data No data
a
All information obtained from HSDB 2003 except where noted
b
Budavari 2001
c
Lide 1992
d
NAS 1971a
e
Betterton 1992; apparent Henry’s law constant (ratio of the gas phase concentration to that of the total dissolved
solute)
f
IARC 1982
g
Aigueperse et al. 1988
5. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL
5.1 PRODUCTION
The most important natural starting material for the production of fluorine chemicals, including fluorine,
hydrogen fluoride, and sodium fluoride, is the mineral fluorite (calcium fluoride [CaF2]), commonly
called fluorspar. Other important fluorine minerals are fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F) and cryolite (Na3AlF6).
There has been no fluorspar mine production in the United States since 1996; supplies were imported or
purchased from the National Defense Stockpile. In addition, some byproduct calcium fluoride was
recovered from industrial waste streams. An estimated 8,000–10,000 metric tons of fluorspar are
recovered each year from uranium enrichment, stainless steel pickling, and petroleum alkylation. To
supplement fluorspar supplies, fluorosilicic acid is recovered from phosphoric acid plants processing
phosphate rock. In 2001, the main fluorspar-producing countries, in order of importance, were China,
Mexico, South Africa, Russia, Spain, and France (USGS 2002b). The apparent consumption of fluorspar
(excluding fluorspar equivalents of fluorosilicic acid, hydrofluoric acid, and cryolite) in the United States
was 601,000 metric tons in 2000 and was estimated to be 636,000 metric tons in 2001 (USGS 2002a).
Approximately 60–65% of the fluorspar consumed goes into the production of hydrogen fluoride. Large
amounts are also used as a flux in steel production.
In 2001, 65,200 tons of byproduct fluorosilicic acid (equivalent to 104,000 tons of fluorspar) were
produced by 10 plants owned by 6 companies. Fluorosilicic acid was used primarily in water
fluoridation, either directly or after processing into sodium silicofluoride. Fluorosilicic acid is also used
to make aluminum fluoride for the aluminum industry. About 41,200, 4,700, and 13,200 tons of
byproduct fluorosilicic acid were sold for water fluoridation, AlF3 production for the aluminum industry,
and for other uses, such as sodium silicofluoride production, respectively. Domestic production data for
fluorosilicic acid for 2001 were developed by the U.S. Geological Survey from voluntary surveys of U.S.
operations. Of the 11 fluorosilicic acid operations surveyed, 10 respondents reported production and
1 respondent reported zero production (USGS 2002b).
Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is manufactured by the action of sulfuric on calcium fluoride. Powdered
acid-grade fluorspar (≥97% CaF2) is distilled with concentrated sulfuric acid; the gaseous hydrogen
fluoride that leaves the reactor is condensed and purified by distillation (Smith 1994). The U.S. capacity
for hydrogen fluoride production was 208,000 metric tons in 2001 (SRI 2002). The demand for
hydrofluoric acid, which was 350,000 metric tons in 2001, is expected to increase to 364,000 metric tons
in 2005 (CMR 2002).
Sodium fluoride is manufactured by the reaction of hydrofluoric acid with sodium carbonate or sodium
hydroxide. The salt is centrifuged and dried (Mueller 1994). Information concerning the amount of
sodium fluoride produced is not available. Fluorosilicic acid is a byproduct of the action of sulfuric acid
on phosphate rock containing fluorides and silica or silicates. Hydrogen fluoride acts on silica to produce
silicon tetrafluoride, which reacts with water to form fluorosilicic acid (Lewis 1997).
Fluorine is produced commercially by electrolyzing anhydrous hydrogen fluoride containing dissolved

potassium fluoride to achieve adequate conductivity (Jaccaud and Faron 1988; Shia 1994). Potassium
fluoride and hydrogen fluoride form potassium bifluoride (KHF2 or KF·HF). Fluoride is oxidized at the
anode, producing fluorine, and the hydrogen ion is reduced at the cathode, producing hydrogen gas.
Information concerning the amount of fluorine produced is not available. The commercial fluorine
production capacity of the United States and Canada is over 5,000 tons/year (Shia 1994).
Current U.S. manufacturers of fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, sodium fluoride, fluorosilicic acid, and sodium
silicofluoride are given in Table 5-1. Tables 5-2 and 5-3 list the number of facilities in each state that
manufacture, process, or use hydrogen fluoride and fluorine, respectively, their intended uses, and the
range of maximum amounts of these substances that are stored on-site. In 2000, there were, respectively,
1,031 and 15 reporting facilities that produced, processed, or used hydrogen fluoride or fluorine in the
United States. The data listed in Tables 5-2 and 5-3 are derived from the Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI01 2003). Only certain types of facilities were required to report. Therefore, this is not an
exhaustive list. Sodium fluoride or other fluoride salts are not listed on TRI.
5.2 IMPORT/EXPORT
In 2000, the United States imported 484,000 metric tons of acid grade (>97%) fluorspar and
39,000 metric tons of metallurgical-grade (<97%) fluorspar (USGS 2002a). This importation was
supplemented by the fluorspar equivalent of 208,000 metric tons from hydrofluoric acid plus cryolite.
The estimated imports of fluorspar for 2001 were 530,000 metric tons of acid-grade, 33,000 of
metallurgical-grade, and 181,000 tons from hydrofluoric acid plus cryolite. Between 1997 and 2000, 63%
of fluorspar imports came from China, 26% from South Africa, and 11% from Mexico. Exports of
Table 5-1. U.S. Manufacturers of Hydrogen Fluoride, Fluorine, Sodium Fluoride,

Company Location
b,c
Hydrogen Fluoride
Dupont La Porte, Texas
Honeywelld Geismar, Louisiana
Fluorine
Honeywelld Metropolis, Illinois
Sodium fluoride
Mallinckrodt Baker, Inc. Phillipsburg, New Jersey
Ozark Fluorine Specialties, Inc. Tulsa, Oklahoma
Solvay Fluorides, Inc. Alorton, Illinois
Sodium silicofluoride
IMC Phosphates Company, IMC-Agrico Phosphates Faustina, Louisiana
Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation Mulberry, Florida
Fluosilicic acid
Cargill Fertilizer, Inc. Riverview, Florida
Farmland Hydro, L.P. Bartow, Florida
IMC Phosphates Company, IMC-Agrico Phosphates Faustina, Louisiana; Nichols, Florida; South
Pierce, Florida; Uncle Sam, Louisiana
PCS Phosphate Co. Inc. Aurora, North Carolina
Royster-Clark Inc. Americus, Georgia; Chesapeake, Virginia;
Florence, Alabama; Hartsville, South Carolina
U.S. Agri-Chemicals Corporation Fort Meade, Florida
a
Derived from SRI 2002
b
Plant capacity was available only for hydrogen fluoride, and was reported as 80,000 and 120,000 metric tons for
DuPont and Honeywell, respectively.
c
Merchant producers. Alcoa produces hydrogen fluoride as a nonisolatable product.
d
Formally General Electric
Table 5-2. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Hydrogen Fluoride
Number of Minimum amount on Maximum amount on

Statea facilities site in poundsb site in poundsb Activities and usesc
AK 2 0 99,999 1, 5, 13
AL 28 0 9,999,999 1, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13
AR 13 0 9,999,999 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13
AZ 23 0 999,999 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
CA 34 0 49,999,999 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14
CO 16 0 999,999 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12
CT 5 100 99,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12
DE 3 0 999,999 1, 5, 6
FL 24 0 999,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
GA 26 0 999,999 1, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13
IA 15 0 99,999 1, 5, 7, 12
ID 5 100 99,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
IL 41 0 9,999,999 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
IN 36 0 999,999 1, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
KS 14 0 9,999,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13
KY 29 0 9,999,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12
LA 19 0 9,999,999 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12
MA 11 0 99,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12
MD 12 0 9,999 1, 5, 11, 13
ME 3 0 9,999 1, 11, 13
MI 25 0 99,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13
MN 14 0 99,999 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13
MO 27 0 99,999 1, 5, 7, 11, 12
MS 9 0 999,999 1, 5, 8, 11, 13
MT 6 0 999,999 1, 5, 10
NC 37 0 999,999 1, 5, 11, 12, 13
ND 8 0 999,999 1, 5, 10, 12, 13
NE 8 0 999,999 1, 3, 5, 9, 13
NH 4 0 99,999 1, 5, 12
NJ 15 0 9,999,999 1, 5, 6, 10, 12
NM 7 0 999,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 13
NV 2 0 999,999 1, 5
NY 29 0 99,999 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12
OH 62 0 999,999 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
OK 17 0 999,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
OR 20 0 999,999 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
PA 67 0 9,999,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
PR 1 100,000 999,999 6
RI 3 100 99,999 6, 10, 11
SC 30 0 999,999 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 14
Table 5-2. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Hydrogen Fluoride
Number of Minimum amount on Maximum amount on

Statea facilities site in poundsb site in poundsb Activities and usesc
SD 1 0 99 1, 13
TN 19 0 999,999 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13
TX 82 0 49,999,999 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
UT 14 0 999,999 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13
VA 23 0 99,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12
VT 2 1,000 99,999 11
WA 18 0 999,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12
WI 24 0 99,999 1, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13
WV 20 0 999,999 1, 5, 10, 11, 12
WY 9 0 99,999 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 13
Source: TRI01 2003

a
Post office state abbreviations used
b
Amounts on site reported by facilities in each state
c
Activities/Uses:
1. Produce 6. Impurity 11. Chemical Processing Aid
2. Import 7. Reactant 12. Manufacturing Aid
3. Onsite use/processing 8. Formulation Component 13. Ancillary/Other Uses
4. Sale/Distribution 9. Article Component 14. Process Impurity
5. Byproduct 10. Repackaging
Table 5-3. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Fluorine
Number of Minimum amount Maximum amount on

Statea facilities on site in poundsb site in poundsb Activities and usesc
AL 1 0 99 1, 13
IL 1 10,000 99,999 1, 3, 6, 7
KS 1 0 99 1, 5, 12
LA 1 1,000 9,999 1, 3, 6, 12
OK 1 1,000 9,999 8
PA 2 1,000 999,999 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10
PR 1 1,000 9,999 10
TX 1 1,000 9,999 12
Source: TRI01 2003

a
Post office state abbreviations used
b
Amounts on site reported by facilities in each state
c
Activities/Uses:
1. Produce 6. Impurity 11. Chemical Processing Aid
2. Import 7. Reactant 12. Manufacturing Aid
3. Onsite use/processing 8. Formulation Component 13. Ancillary/Other Uses
4. Sale/Distribution 9. Article Component 14. Process Impurity
5. Byproduct 10. Repackaging
fluorspar for 2000 were 40,000 metric tons and are estimated to be 21,000 in 2001 (USGS 2002a).
Exports consist of imported material that was reexported or material obtained from the National Defense
Stockpile. In 2001, no disposal of metalurgical-grade fluorspar from the stockpile was reported. In 2001,
most of the exports were to Canada and Taiwan (USGS 2002a, 2002b).
U.S. imports for consumption are available for three other fluorides: hydrofluoric acid, cryolite, and
aluminum fluoride. For 2001, these were 112,000, 6,750, and 17,400 metric tons, respectively. For
hydrofluoric acid, 74% of imports came from Mexico and 23% from Canada (USGS 2002b).
5.3 USE
Hydrogen fluoride is the most important compound of fluorine. Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is used in
the production of most fluorine-containing chemicals. It is used in the production of refrigerants,
herbicides, pharmaceuticals, high-octane gasoline, aluminum, plastics, electrical components, and
fluorescent light bulbs. Aqueous hydrofluoric acid is used in stainless steel pickling, glass etching, metal
coatings, exotic metal extraction, and quartz purification (Hance et al. 1997). The most important use of
hydrogen fluoride is in the production of fluorocarbon chemicals, including hydrofluorocarbons, hydro-
fluorochlorocarbons, and fluoropolymers; 60% of production is used for this purpose. Demand for
hydrogen fluoride for fluorocarbons, broadly used as refrigerants, is increasing as a nonchlorinated
alternative to ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons. (Production of fluorocarbons uses more hydrogen
fluoride than production of chlorofluorocarbons.) The next most important uses of hydrogen fluoride are:
chemical derivatives, 18%; aluminum manufacturing, 6%; stainless steel pickling, 5%; petroleum
alkylation catalysts, 4%; and uranium chemicals production, 3%. Miscellaneous other uses include glass
etching, herbicides, and rare metals (CMR 2002). Generally, the aluminum industry consumes 10–40 kg
of fluoride per metric ton of aluminum produced. The AlF3 used in aluminum reduction cells may be
produced directly from acid-grade fluorspar or byproduct fluorosilicic acid, rather than from hydrogen
fluoride. Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is used as a catalyst in the petroleum alkylation, a process that
increases the octane rating of petroleum. In uranium chemicals production, hydrogen fluoride is used to
convert uranium oxide (yellow cake, U3O8) to UF4 before further fluorination to UF6.
Fluorine gas is used captively for the production of various inorganic fluorides. The preparation of
fluorides of an element in its highest oxidation state makes use of fluorine’s oxidizing and fluorinating
ability. The most important product is uranium hexafluoride (UF6), which is used in the gaseous diffusion
process for producing enriched uranium-235 for the nuclear industry. This use consumes 70–80% of
fluorine production. The second most important product is sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), which is used as a
gaseous dielectric for electrical and electronic equipment and a tracer gas for determining ventilation rates
and air movements in buildings. Other uses of fluorine include: the treatment of polyolefin containers to
reduce their permeability to organic liquids; the treatment of a polymer surface for the application of an
adhesive or coating; and the production of some fluorinated organic compounds (Guo et al. 2001; Shia
1994).
The chemicals most commonly used by American waterworks for water fluoridation are fluorosilicic acid,
sodium silicofluoride, and sodium fluoride (Urbansky 2002). Generally, 1.5–2.2 mg of sodium fluoride is
added per liter of water (0.7–1.0 mg/L as fluoride) (Mueller 1994). Data from the Centers for Disease
Control’s (CDC) 1992 Fluoridation Census indicate that 25% of utilities reported using sodium fluoride;
however, this corresponds to 9.2% of the U.S. population drinking fluoride-supplemented tap water
(Urbansky 2002). Sodium fluoride may also be applied topically to teeth as a 2% solution to prevent
tooth decay. It is also used as a flux for deoxidizing rimmed steel, as a component of laundry sours
(removal of iron stains), and in the re-smelting of aluminum, manufacture of vitreous enamels, pickling of
stainless steel, wood preservative compounds, casein glues, manufacture of coated papers, and heat-
treating salts (Mueller 1994). Fluorosilicic acid, as a 1–2% solution, is used widely for sterilizing
equipment in brewing and bottling. Other concentrations of fluorosilicic acid solutions are used in
electrolytic refining of lead, in electroplating, for hardening cement, for crumbling lime or brick work, for
removal of lime from hides during the tanning process, for removals of molds, and as a preservative for
timber. Sodium fluorosilicate is also used in enamels for china and porcelain, in the manufacturing of
opal glass, as an insecticide, as a rodentcide, and for mothproofing of wool. It is also an intermediate in
the production of synthetic cryolite (Budavari 2001).
5.4 DISPOSAL
According to the TRI, in 2001, an estimated 2.5 million pounds of hydrogen fluoride were transferred off-
site, including to publicly owned-treatment works (POTWs), by 991 reporting facilities presumably for
disposal (TRI01 2003). In 2001, 240,196 pounds of fluorine were transferred off-site by 9 reporting
facilities. According to the TRI, in 2001, 77% of hydrogen fluoride that was recycled or treated was
performed on-site (TRI01 2003). Of the hydrogen fluoride recycled in 2001, 23.8 million pounds were
recycled on-site and 251,203 pounds were recycled off-site. Of the hydrogen fluoride that was treated,
234 million pounds were treated on-site and 2 million pounds were treated off-site (TRI01 2003). No
information was found concerning how hydrogen fluoride is generally treated for disposal.
Fluorine gas can be disposed of by conversion to perfluorocarbons or fluoride salts. Because of the long
atmospheric lifetimes of perfluorocarbons, conversion to fluoride salts is preferable. Industrially, the
waste stream is scrubbed with a caustic solution, KOH or NaOH, and for dilute streams, allowed to react
with limestone (Shia 1994). Adequate contact and residence time is essential in the scrubber to ensure
complete neutralization of the intermediate oxygen difluoride to prevent it from leaving the scrub tower.
According to the TRI, in 2001, 18,973 pounds of fluorine were treated on-site and 240,196 pounds were
treated off-site (TRI01 2003).
No information was found regarding the disposal of sodium fluoride. It would appear from its use that
most of it is disposed of in municipal landfills or POTWs.
6. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
6.1 OVERVIEW
Fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine have been identified in at least 188 of the 1,636 hazardous
waste sites that have been proposed for inclusion on the EPA National Priorities List (NPL) (HazDat
2003). However, the number of sites evaluated for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine is not
known. The frequency of these sites can be seen in Figure 6-1. Of these sites, all are located within the
United States.
Fluorides are naturally-occurring components of rocks and soil and are also found in air, water, plants,
and animals. They enter the atmosphere through volcanic emissions and the resuspension of soil by wind.
Volcanoes also emit hydrogen fluoride and some fluorine gas. Fluorine is a highly reactive element and
readily hydrolyzes to form hydrogen fluoride and oxygen. Hydrogen fluoride reacts with many materials
both in the vapor phase and in aerosols. The resultant fluorides are typically nonvolatile, stable
compounds. Marine aerosols also release small amounts of gaseous hydrogen fluoride and fluoride salts
into the air (Friend 1989). Anthropogenic fluoride emissions include the combustion of fluorine-
containing materials, which releases hydrogen fluoride, as well as particulate fluorides, into the air. Coal
contains small amounts of fluorine, and coal-fired power plants constitute the largest source of
anthropogenic hydrogen fluoride emissions. According to the Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI),
in 2001, the largest contributing industrial sectors were electrical utilities (TRI01 2003). Total air
emissions of hydrogen fluoride by electrical utilities in 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 were reported as 64.1,
58.3, 58.3, and 55.8 million tons, respectively. Major sources of industrial fluoride emissions are
aluminum production plants and phosphate fertilizer plants; both emit hydrogen fluoride and particulate
fluorides (EPA 1998b). Other industries releasing hydrogen fluoride are: chemical production; steel;
magnesium; and brick and structural clay products. Hydrogen fluoride would also be released by
municipal incinerators as a consequence of the presence of fluoride-containing material in the waste
stream. Hydrogen fluoride is one of the 189 chemicals listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) in
Title III, Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) emission standards are being developed by the EPA for each HAP. The goal of
Figure 6-1. Frequency of NPL Sites with Fluoride, Hydrogen Fluoride, and
Fluorine Contamination
Frequ en cy o f
NPL S i tes
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
9-11
14-19
D erived from HazDat 2003
HAP emissions control is to reduce human health risks (Kelly et al. 1994). In addition to industrial
effluent and natural releases (e.g., weathering of rocks and runoff from soil), fluorides are released into
surface water in municipal waste water as a result of water fluoridation.
In the atmosphere, gaseous hydrogen fluoride will be absorbed by atmospheric water (rain, clouds, fog,
snow) forming an aerosol or fog of aqueous hydrofluoric acid. It will be removed from the atmosphere
primarily by wet deposition. Particulate fluorides are similarly removed from the atmosphere and
deposited on land or surface water by wet and dry deposition. Atmospheric precipitation weathers crustal
rocks and soil, but dissolves out very little fluoride; most of the fluoride mobilized during weathering is
bound to solids such as clays. Upon reaching bodies of water, fluorides gravitate to the sediment
(Carpenter 1969). Fluorides have been shown to accumulate in some marine aquatic organisms (Hemens
and Warwick 1972). When deposited on land, fluoride is strongly retained by soil, forming complexes
with soil components. Fluorides in soils are transported to surface waters through leaching or runoff of
particulate-bound fluorides. Leaching removes only a small amount of fluorides from soils. Fluorides
may be taken up from soil and accumulate in plants. The amount of fluorides accumulated depends on
the type of plant and soil and the concentration and form of fluoride in the soil. Fluorides may also be
deposited on above-ground surfaces of the plant. Tea plants are particularly known to accumulate
fluoride, 97% of which is accumulated in the leaves (Fung et al. 1999). Fluoride accumulates primarily in
the skeletal tissues of terrestrial animals that consume fluoride-containing foliage. However, milk and
edible tissue from animals fed high levels of fluorides do not appear to contain elevated fluoride
concentrations (NAS 1971a).
In natural water, fluoride forms strong complexes with aluminum in water, and fluorine chemistry in
water is largely regulated by aluminum concentration and pH (Skjelkvale 1994). Below pH 5, fluoride is
almost entirely complexed with aluminum and consequently, the concentration of free F- is low. As the
pH increases, Al-OH complexes dominate over Al-F complexes and the free F- levels increase. Fluoride
forms stable complexes with calcium and magnesium, which are present in sea water. Calcium carbonate
precipitation dominates the removal of dissolved fluoride from sea water (Carpenter 1969). Fluorine is
incorporated into the calcium salt structure and removed from solution when the latter precipitates.
Fluoride occurs in soil in a variety of minerals and complexes with aluminum, iron, and calcium.
Fluorides occur predominantly as aluminum fluorosilicate complexes in acidic soils and calcium fluoride
in alkaline soils. The availability of these soluble complexes increases with decreasing pH (Fung et al.
1999; Shacklette et al. 1974). This explains why acidic soils have both higher water-soluble fluoride and
higher extractable aluminum levels. The retention of fluoride in alkaline soils depends largely upon the
aluminum content of the soil.
The general population is exposed to fluoride through consumption of drinking water, foods, and
dentifrices. Fluorides used in dentifrices are sodium fluoride, sodium monofluorophosphate, and
stannous fluoride (Pader 1993). Populations living in areas with naturally high fluoride levels in water
and soil may be exposed to high levels of fluoride in water. This is especially true if drinking water is
derived from wells.
Fluoride intake in infants depends on whether or not the child is nursed. Fluoride intake by an infant who
is exclusively breast fed is generally <2 µg/kg-day(Fomon and Ekstrand 1999). Levy et al. (2001) found
that for most children, water fluoride intake was the predominant source of fluoride, especially through
age 12 months. This was due in large part to children receiving fluoridated water mixed with infant
formula concentrate (Levy et al. 1995b, 2001). Fluoride exposure was calculated to be 102, 105, and
167 µg/kg-day for infants consuming concentrated liquid milk-based formula, concentrated liquid isolated
soy protein-based formula, and powdered milk-based formula, respectively, which were diluted with
water that is 1 ppm in fluoride. Infants may be exposed to higher fluoride concentrations now than in the
past. In the 1960s, nearly 80% of infants were fed cow's milk by 6 months of age. In 1991, 80% of
6-month-old infants were fed formula (Fomon and Ekstrand 1999).
Some plants, most notably tea, accumulate fluorides, and people who drink large quantities of tea may be
exposed to high levels of fluoride in their diets. Populations living near industrial sources of fluoride may
be exposed to higher levels of fluorides in the air they breathe. Vegetables and fruits grown near such
sources may contain higher levels of fluorides particularly from fluoride-containing dust settling on the
plant. Populations exposed to relatively high concentrations of fluoride include workers in fluoride-
processing industries and individuals residing near such industries. Similarly, populations living near
hazardous waste sites may also be exposed to high levels of fluoride by analogous routes.
6.2 RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT
According to the TRI, in 2001, total releases of hydrogen fluoride to the environment (including air,
water, soil, and underground injection) from 991 reporting facilities that produced, processed, or used
hydrogen fluoride were 72.1 million pounds (TRI01 2003). Table 6-1 lists amounts released from these
Table 6-1. Releases to the Environment from Facilities that Produce, Process, or
Use Hydrogen Fluoride
Reported amounts released in pounds per yeara

Under- Total off- Total on and
Number of ground Total on-site site off-site
Stateb facilities Airc Water injection Land released releasee release
AK 2 73,027 No data 0 0 73,027 0 73,027
AL 28 3,304,387 0 0 12,000 3,316,387 18,596 3,334,983
AR 13 942,385 0 0 0 942,385 8 942,393
AZ 23 694,190 No data 0 3,405 697,595 1,062 698,657
CA 35 9,211 5 0 0 9,216 2,886 12,102
CO 17 795,831 No data 0 0 795,831 0 795,831
CT 5 107,388 0 0 0 107,388 10,732 118,120
DE 3 201,815 No data 0 0 201,815 0 201,815
FL 24 2,358,937 5 0 7,965 2,366,907 0 2,366,907
GA 28 3,286,300 0 0 0 3,286,300 2,944 3,289,244
IA 16 1,300,253 No data 0 0 1,300,253 0 1,300,253
ID 5 208,065 0 0 0 208,065 255 208,320
IL 41 2,255,380 1 0 5 2,255,386 1,510 2,256,896
IN 36 3,888,416 250 0 0 3,888,666 0 3,888,666
KS 16 775,771 0 0 0 775,771 930 776,701
KY 29 2,090,877 0 0 0 2,090,877 1,301 2,092,178
LA 19 613,860 250 0 11 614,121 0 614,121
MA 11 197,829 No data 0 0 197,829 237 198,066
MD 14 1,376,506 No data 0 0 1,376,506 15 1,376,521
ME 3 1,286 0 0 0 1,286 0 1,286
MI 27 2,139,731 0 0 0 2,139,731 39,376 2,179,107
MN 15 217,532 0 0 0 217,532 0 217,532
MO 29 2,464,416 0 0 158,300 2,622,716 0 2,622,716
MS 9 461,108 197 0 2,287 463,592 0 463,592
MT 7 167,298 0 0 0 167,298 0 167,298
NC 38 5,160,908 5 0 0 5,160,913 0 5,160,913
ND 8 490,133 0 0 0 490,133 260 490,393
NE 8 1,279,219 No data 0 0 1,279,219 0 1,279,219
NH 4 208,550 No data 0 0 208,550 391 208,941
NJ 15 249,406 0 0 0 249,406 2 249,408
NM 7 209,568 No data 0 0 209,568 420 209,988
NV 2 439,874 No data 0 0 439,874 0 439,874
NY 31 1,137,383 0 0 0 1,137,383 750 1,138,133
OH 64 6,147,565 1,601 4,400,000 0 10,549,166 34,884 10,584,050
OK 18 892,504 100 0 0 892,604 250 892,854
OR 21 67,943 0 0 18,398 86,341 0 86,341
PA 70 5,056,848 35 0 5 5,056,888 17,156 5,074,044
Use Hydrogen Fluoride

Under- Total off- Total on and
Number of ground Total on-site site off-site
PR 1 500 No data 0 0 500 0 500
RI 3 3,683 No data 0 0 3,683 0 3,683
SC 30 2,153,397 0 0 0 2,153,397 0 2,153,397
SD 2 89,000 No data 0 0 89,000 0 89,000
TN 19 2,069,004 0 0 0 2,069,004 0 2,069,004
TX 83 3,828,730 10 0 21 3,828,761 1,100 3,829,861
UT 14 467,778 0 0 24,930 492,708 0 492,708
VA 23 1,745,413 0 0 0 1,745,413 0 1,745,413
VT 2 4,141 0 0 0 4,141 0 4,141
WA 19 323,942 0 0 0 323,942 1,405 325,347
WI 24 1,231,556 0 0 0 1,231,556 0 1,231,556
WV 21 3,722,619 19,090 0 0 3,741,709 0 3,741,709
WY 9 337,011 No data 0 52,248 389,259 0 389,259
Total 991 67,248,474 21,549 4,400,000 279,575 71,949,598 136,470 72,086,068
Source: TRI01 2003

a
Data in TRI are maximum amounts released by each facility.
b
Post office state abbreviations are used.
c
The sum of fugitive and stack releases are included in releases to air by a given facility.
d
The sum of all releases of the chemical to air, land, water, and underground injection wells.
e
Total amount of chemical transferred off-site, including to publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
facilities grouped by state. In addition, 136,470 pounds of hydrogen fluoride were transferred off-site by
these facilities (TRI01 2003). Starting in 1998, metal mining, coal mining, electric utilities and Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)/solvent recovery industries were required to report to the TRI,
industries with potentially large releases of hydrogen fluoride. The industrial sector producing,
processing, or using hydrogen fluoride that contributed the greatest environmental releases was electrical
utilities, which contributed 78% of the total environmental releases.
According to the TRI, in 2001, total releases of fluorine to the environment (including air, water, soil, and
underground injection) from 9 reporting facilities that produced, processed, or used fluorine were
165,938 pounds (TRI01 2003). Table 6-2 lists amounts of fluorine released from these facilities grouped
by state. The two largest contributing industrial sectors were electrical utilities and primary metals, which
respectively contributed 65 and 19% of the total environmental releases. Neither sodium fluoride nor any
other fluorides are listed on TRI. The TRI data should be used with caution because only certain types of
facilities are required to report. This is not an exhaustive list.
Hydrogen fluoride is one of the 189 chemicals listed as a HAP in Title III, Section 112 of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990. MACT emission standards are being developed by the EPA for each HAP.
The goal of HAP emissions control is to reduce human health risks (Kelly et al. 1994). The Final Air
Toxic MACT Rule for fluoride emissions from primary aluminum reduction plants, published in 1997,
was projected to reduce fluoride emissions by 3,700 tons per year. The Final Air Toxic MACT Rule for
fluoride emissions from phosphoric acid manufacturing and phosphate fertilizer production, published in
1999, was projected to reduce fluoride emissions by 260 tons per year (EPA 2000).
Fluorides have been identified in a variety of environmental media (air, surface water, leachate,
groundwater, soil, and sediment) collected at 188 of 1,636 current or former NPL hazardous waste sites
(HazDat 2003).
6.2.1 Air
The major natural source of hydrogen fluoride emissions to the atmosphere is volcanoes. These
emissions are estimated to range from 0.6 to 6 million metric tons per year. On average, <10% of these
emissions are a result of large eruptions that are efficiently injected into the stratosphere (Symonds et al.
1988). Passive degassing of volcanoes is a major source of tropospheric hydrogen fluoride. In addition
Use Fluorine

Under- Total on and
Number of ground Total on-site Total off-site off-site
AL 1 0 31,328 0 0 31,328 0 31,328
IL 1 4,979 No data 0 0 4,979 0 4,979
KS 1 429 No data 0 107,282 107,711 0 107,711
LA 1 2,280 No data 0 0 2,280 0 2,280
OK 1 263 No data 0 0 263 0 263
PA 2 1,001 No data 0 0 1,001 0 1,001
PR 1 0 18,376 0 0 18,376 0 18,376
TX 1 0 No data 0 0 0 0 0
Total 9 8,952 49,704 0 107,282 165,938 0 165,938
Source: TRI01 2003

a
Data in TRI are maximum amounts released by each facility.
b
Post office state abbreviations are used.
c
The sum of fugitive and stack releases are included in releases to air by a given facility.
d
The sum of all releases of the chemical to air, land, water, and underground injection wells.
e
Total amount of chemical transferred off-site, including to publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
to hydrogen fluoride, volcanic gases also contain other fluorine compounds, namely SiF4, H2SiF6, and F2.
Soil naturally contains fluoride, and resuspension of soil by wind also contributes to the atmospheric
burden of fluorides in the form of soil minerals (NAS 1971a). Another source is sea salt aerosol, which
releases small amounts of gaseous hydrogen fluoride and fluoride salts into the air. The marine aerosol is
potentially a major source of tropospheric hydrogen fluoride (Friend 1989). However, these releases
would be confined to the air over the oceans.
The largest anthropogenic source of hydrogen fluoride emissions to air in the United States is electrical
utilities. Coal naturally contains fluorides as impurities and this will be released primarily in the form of
hydrogen fluoride during combustion. Some of the fluoride in the coal may be absorbed onto fly ash or
bottom ash. A typical 650 megawatt coal-burning power plant running at 67% capacity (the average for
U.S. coal plants) would release 180,000 pounds of hydrogen fluoride per year (Rubin 1999). EPA
(1998a) reports an emission factor of 0.15 pounds/ton (0.075 kg/Mg) for coal combustion under a variety
of firing conditions. The Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) (1996) reports hydrogen
fluoride emission factors for bituminous and lignite coals of 0.12 and 0.01 kg/Mg coal, respectively.
Hydrogen fluoride is water soluble and emissions are readily controlled by acid gas scrubbers. Other
gaseous fluorides that may occur in the flue gas are SiF4 and H2SiF6. Emissions of fluorides from
aluminum reduction processes are primarily gaseous hydrogen fluoride and particulate fluorides,
principally aluminum fluoride and calcium fluoride. Emission factors for aluminum production are
0.03 pounds of total fluorides and 0.02 pounds of hydrogen fluoride per ton of aluminum produced (EPA
1998b). Fluorine-containing compounds are contained in the raw materials used to produce brick and
structural clay products and, therefore, hydrogen fluoride and other fluoride compounds are emitted from
kilns used to manufacture these products. In addition, coal may be used to fire the kilns and contribute to
the fluoride emissions. In the production of phosphate fertilizers, gaseous fluorides (hydrogen fluoride
and silicon tetrafluoride), as well as particulate fluorides, may be released. EPA’s Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards has developed emission factors for hydrogen fluoride for these and other
hydrogen fluoride emitting industries. Hydrogen fluoride would be released by municipal incinerators as
a consequence of the presence of fluoride-containing material in the waste stream. The amount of
hydrogen fluoride released in flue gas would depend on the fluorine content of the waste stream and the
efficiency of pollution control devises used in the stack.
Anthropogenic hydrogen fluoride emissions to the atmosphere in Canada were estimated to be

5,400 metric tons per year, of which 75% was contributed by primary aluminum producers. Other
industries releasing hydrogen fluoride in Canada and their relative contributions were: coal-burning
utilities, 10%; chemical production, 6%; steel production, 4%; phosphate fertilizer production, 2%; and
magnesium production, 1% (CEPA 1996).
On a global scale, emissions of fluorides from coal combustion and other anthropogenic sources are
minor and of local concern compared with natural emissions, estimated as 2.5x1010 kg/year (Carpenter
1969). Anthropogenic releases of total fluorides into the atmosphere were 155,300 tons/year from the
major fluoride-processing industries measured between 1964 and 1970 (EPA 1980a). The major
contributors were steel, brick, tile, and aluminum manufacturing, combustion of coal, and production of
phosphorus and phosphate fertilizer (EPA 1980a; NAS 1971a). In 1977 and 1978, monthly atmospheric
emission factors for fluorides from the Kitimat aluminum plant in British Columbia, Canada ranged from
4.0 to 6.8 kg fluoride per ton of aluminum produced; production capacity was 300,000 tons of aluminum
per year (Sauriol and Gauthier 1984). Subsequently, regulations were established that set emissions
standards for aluminum manufacturing (EPA 1980b) and phosphate fertilizer plants (EPA 1975).
Fluorides can also enter the atmosphere in dusts and aerosols from the manufacture and use of pesticides
such as sodium fluoride, sodium fluorosilicate, barium fluorosilicate, and cryolite (NAS 1971a). In the
United States, fluoride emissions from coal-burning electric utilities are estimated to be around
37x106 kg/year (Bauer and Andren 1985).
There is evidence that emissions of fluorides have been declining. Fluoride in precipitation has declined
since 1967 (Ares 1990). A recent study from a forested area near Cologne, Germany registered a sharp
decline in the fluoride content of Roe deer antlers from peak levels in the 1950s and 1960s (Kierdorf and
Kierdorf 2000). In the 1990s, levels were almost an order of magnitude lower than the peak levels, which
are attributed to reduced emissions from stationary sources. Fluoride is a skeletally-deposited
contaminant, and it can be assumed that fluoride is mobilized during the annual antler growth period and
transported to the mineralizing antlers. Therefore, the fluorine content of antlers is a good indicator of
fluoride release.
According to the TRI, in 2001, releases of 67.2 million pounds of hydrogen fluoride to air from
991 reporting facilities accounted for 93% of the total environmental releases of hydrogen fluoride
(TRI01 2003). Table 6-1 lists amounts of hydrogen fluoride released to air from these facilities grouped
by state. The industrial sector contributing the largest release of hydrogen fluoride to air was electrical
utilities, which contributed 83% of releases to air.
According to the TRI, in 2001, releases of 8,952 pounds of fluorine to air from 9 reporting facilities
accounted for 5% of the total environmental releases of fluorine (TRI01 2003). Table 6-2 lists amounts of
fluorine released to air from these facilities grouped by state. The TRI data should be used with caution,
however, since only certain types of facilities are required to report. This is not an exhaustive list.
According to the TRI, total air emissions for hydrogen fluoride ranged from 15.9 million pounds in 1998
to 8.9 million pounds in 1994, during the period from 1988 to 2001. Total air emissions of fluorine have
decreased from 18,319 pounds in 1995 to 8,523 pounds in 2001 (TRI01 2003). This trend information
only includes emission data from the original industry subtotal, those industries with Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) Codes 20–39. Starting in 1998, metal mining, coal mining, electric utilities,
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)/solvent recovery industries, and chemical wholesalers
were also required to report. Of these industries, electrical utilities contribute significantly to emissions
of hydrogen fluoride to air. Total air emissions of hydrogen fluoride by electrical utilities in 1998, 1999,
2000, and 2001 were reported as 64.1, 58.3, 58.3, and 55.8 million tons, respectively.
Fluorides were detected in the air at 8 of the 188 current or former NPL hazardous waste sites, where they
were detected in some environmental media (HazDat 2003).
6.2.2 Water
Natural sources of fluoride released to waters are primarily a result of runoff from the weathering of
fluoride-containing rocks and soils and the leaching of fluorides from the soil into groundwater. In the
western regions of the United States, rocks and soils have greater than average concentrations of fluoride;
as a result, greater amounts of fluorides leach into the groundwater. Leaching from alkaline igneous
rocks, dolomite, phosphorite, and volcanic glasses may result in water with high-fluoride levels (EPA
1980a; NAS 1971a).
Anthropogenic sources contributing to fluoride levels in water include atmospheric deposition of

emissions from coal-fired power plants and other industrial sources that are deposited directly into water
or that are first deposited on land and enter waterways in runoff. Most of this deposition is in the form of
precipitation. Waste water may enter surface water directly or as effluent of water treatment plants.
Since much of the nation’s water supplies are fluoridated to a level of 0.7–1.2 ppm to decrease the
incidence of tooth decay (DHHS 1991), this will contribute to fluoride in effluents from treatment plants.
According to the TRI, in 2001, releases of 21,549 pounds of hydrogen fluoride to water from
991 reporting facilities accounted for 0.030% of the total environmental releases of these substances
(TRI01 2003). Table 6-1 lists amounts of hydrogen fluoride released to water from these facilities
grouped by state. According to the TRI, in 2001, releases of 49,704 pounds of fluorine to water from
9 reporting facilities accounted for 30% of the total environmental releases of this substance (TRI01
2003). Table 6-2 lists amounts of fluorine released to water from these facilities grouped by state. As of
1998, TRI no longer separately collects data on substances released indirectly to POTWs, part of which
may ultimately be released to surface waters. The TRI data should be used with caution, however, since
only certain types of facilities are required to report. This is not an exhaustive list.
Fluorides were detected in groundwater and surface water at 135 and 53 sites, respectively, of the
188 NPL hazardous waste sites where they were detected in some environmental media (HazDat 2003).
6.2.3 Soil
Fluoride comprises about 0.09% of the earth’s crust, ranking 13th in order of abundance (Lindahl and
Mahmood 1994). Fluoride-containing minerals include biotite, muscovite, hornblende, apatite, and
fluorspar (NAS 1971a). Fluorides are released to soils from the weathering of crustal rock and minerals,
deposition of fluorides released to air from natural and anthropogenic sources, and plant and animal
residues. Man-made sources applied directly to soil include phosphate fertilizers, mine tailings, and
landfilled industrial and municipal waste (EPA 1980a; NAS 1971a). In a study by Oelschläger (1971),
fertilization with superphosphates added 8–20 kg fluoride/hectare to the soil. Soil contamination by
atmospheric fluorides near an industrial source reflected the gradient of fluoride deposition. In one study,
the total fluoride concentration was found to decrease over a distance of 8.8 km from 2,700 to 616 µg/g
fluoride and the water extractable fraction decreased from 292 to 10 µg fluoride/g (Polomski et al. 1982).
According to the TRI, in 2001, releases of 279,575 pounds and 4.4 million pounds of hydrogen fluoride
respectively to land and underground injection from 991 reporting facilities accounted for respectively
0.38 and 6.1% of total environmental releases of these substances (TRI01 2003). Table 6-1 lists amounts
of hydrogen fluoride released to land and underground injection from these facilities grouped by state.
According to the TRI, in 2001, 107,282 pounds of fluorine were released to land from 9 reporting
facilities accounted for 65% of the total environmental releases of this substance (TRI01 2003).
However, it is not clear how a gaseous substance can be released to land, and this figure is likely an error.
Table 6-2 lists amounts of fluorine released to air from these facilities grouped by state. The TRI data
should be used with caution, however, since only certain types of facilities are required to report. This is
not an exhaustive list.
Fluorides were detected in soil and sediment collected at 32 and 22 sites, respectively, of the 178 NPL
hazardous waste sites, where they were detected in some environmental media (HazDat 2003).
6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
6.3.1 Transport and Partitioning
In the atmosphere, gaseous hydrogen fluoride will be absorbed by atmospheric water (rain, clouds, fog,
snow) forming an aerosol or fog of aqueous hydrofluoric acid. It will be removed from the atmosphere
primarily by wet deposition (including rainout or in-cloud scavenging and washout or below-cloud
scavenging). Particulate fluorides are similarly removed from the atmosphere and deposited on land or
surface water by wet and dry deposition. Atmospheric precipitation weathers crustal rocks and soil, but
dissolves out very little fluoride; most of the fluoride mobilized during weathering is bound to solids such
as clays. Upon reaching bodies of water, fluorides gravitate to the sediment (Carpenter 1969).
Most of the fluorides in the oceans are received from rivers; a lesser amount comes from atmospheric
deposition. Losses occur in aerosols to the atmosphere and incorporation into the tissue of aquatic
organisms. Fluorides have been shown to accumulate in some marine aquatic organisms. In a study by
Hemens and Warwick (1972), toxic effects due to fluorosis were observed in species of mussel, mullet,
crab, and shrimp in an estuary where waste from an aluminum plant was released.
Fluoride is strongly retained by soil, forming complexes with soil components. Fluorides in soils are
transported to surface waters through leaching or runoff of particulate-bound fluorides. Leaching
removes only a small amount of fluorides from soils. Oelschläger (1971) reported that about 0.5–6.0% of
the yearly increment of fluoride added to forest and agricultural areas through the application of
phosphate fertilizer was lost in the leaching process. In this study, superphosphates added 8–20 kg
fluoride/hectare to the soil, while seepage water contained between 52 and 208 µg fluoride/L, depending
upon soil levels of clay, lime, and fluoride.
Fluorides may be taken up from soil and accumulate in plants. They may also be deposited on above-
ground surfaces of the plant. Tea plants are known to accumulate fluoride, 97% of which is accumulated
in the leaves and 3% in the other parts of the plant. Fung et al. (1999) observed that the fluoride contents
of tea leaves were 1,000 times the soluble fluoride content of the soil and 2–7 times the total fluoride
content. The amount of fluoride taken up by plants is more a function of the soil type, its pH, and calcium
and phosphorous content than of the total fluoride content of the soil (Brewer 1966). The addition of
soluble fluoride to unlimed soil will result in increased fluoride uptake. In studies of plants grown on
heavily polluted soil near aluminum smelters, uptake was via the roots and the stomata. Fluoride
concentrations were much lower in the leaves than in the roots of plants, and most of the fluoride
adsorbed by the roots was desorbed in water. Others have found that fluoride uptake is increased by the
presence of aluminum, probably due to the uptake of aluminum–fluoride complexes. The fluoride uptake
in ryegrass and clover from contaminated soil was strongly correlated with water and calcium chloride-
extractable fluoride in the soil (Arnesen 1997). In this study, the fluoride content of pasture ryegrass
exceeded the recommended fluoride limit only in grass grown in the most polluted soil, while that in
clover exceeded this limit even in moderately polluted soil.
Fluoride accumulates primarily in the skeletal tissues of terrestrial animals that consume fluoride-
containing foliage. However, milk and edible tissue from animals fed high levels of fluorides do not
appear to contain elevated fluoride concentrations (NAS 1971a). Fluoride is taken up by hens and
concentrated in the shell of their eggs. Hens living in the vicinity of two major coal-fired power plants
had fluoride levels in egg shells of 1.75 mg/kg compared with reference means of 0.07 mg/kg, indicating
significant uptake of anthropogenic fluoride (de Moraes Flores and Martins 1997).
6.3.2 Transformation and Degradation
6.3.2.1 Air
Hydrogen fluoride is the most abundant gaseous fluoride released into the atmosphere. It reacts with
many materials both in vapor and in aerosols. For example, hydrogen fluoride reacts with silica, forming
silicon tetrafluoride. However, no information was found on the reactions of hydrogen fluoride with
common atmospheric species or estimates of its overall atmospheric half-life. The predominant mode of
degradation of inorganic fluorides in the air is hydrolysis. Silicon tetrafluoride, a major industrial
pollutant, reacts with water vapor in air to form hydrated silica and fluorosilicic acid. Sulfur
hexafluoride, a gaseous dielectric for electrical and electronic equipment, reacts with water at elevated
temperatures (>850 °C) to form sulfuric acid and hydrogen fluoride (Guo et al. 2001). Molecular fluorine
hydrolyzes to form hydrogen fluoride and oxygen. Hydrolysis of uranium hexafluoride, which is used in
nuclear power applications, also produces hydrogen fluoride as well as nonvolatile uranyl fluoride. These
compounds are then removed from the atmosphere by condensation or nucleation processes (NAS 1971a).
Fluorides emitted by industries in particulate matter are stable compounds that do not readily hydrolyze.
6.3.2.2 Water
Contrary to traditional thought, hydrogen fluoride, a very weak acid in dilute solution, is dissociated in
solution, but forms tight ion pairs F-...H+–OH2, unique to F-, which reduce the thermodynamic activity
coefficient of H3O+ (Cotton et al. 1999). In natural water, fluoride ions form strong complexes with
aluminum, and fluorine chemistry in water is largely regulated by aluminum concentration and pH.
Below pH 5, fluorine is almost entirely complexed with aluminum and consequently, the concentration of
free F- is low. As the pH increases, Al-OH complexes dominate over Al-F complexes and the free F-
level increases. The dominant Al-F complex at pH <5 is AlF2+ (Skjelkvale 1994). In the absence of
aluminum, dissolved fluorides are usually present as free F- at neutral pH (Bell et al. 1970). As the pH
decreases, the proportion of F- decreases, while HF2- and undissociated hydrogen fluoride increase.
Levels of undissociated hydrogen fluoride also increase in concentrated solutions. Fluorine can form
stable complexes with calcium and magnesium, which are present in sea water. Using the stability
constants valid for sea water, 51.0% of fluorine will be present as free F-, 47.0% as MgF+, and 2.0% as
CaF+ (Stumm and Morgan 1981). Calcium carbonate precipitation dominates the removal of dissolved
fluoride from sea water. Fluoride is incorporated into the calcium salt structure and is removed from
solution when the latter precipitates. The next most important removal mechanism is incorporation into
calcium phosphates (Carpenter 1969). The residence time of dissolved fluoride in the oceans, as
calculated from its sedimentation rate, is 2–3 million years (Carpenter 1969).
In a recent review article, different models of the equilibria of the hexafluorosilicate anion in water
solution were compared. It was concluded that concentrations of any fluorosilicate species are extremely
small at drinking water pH (Urbansky 2002). The analysis presented reaffirms the conclusions made
earlier by Feldman et al. (1957), that in drinking water with a pH of ≥5, fluoridated with sodium
silicofluoride to a concentration of ≤16 ppm of fluoride ion or less, silicofluoride is completely
hydrolyzed to silicic acid, fluoride ion, and hydrogen fluoride. While the kinetics of dissociation and
hydrolysis of the hexafluorosilicate anion are not well understood from a mechanistic or fundamental
perspective, the rate data suggest that equilibrium should be achieved by the time drinking water reaches
the consumer (Urbansky 2002).
6.3.2.3 Sediment and Soil
Fluoride occurs in soil as a variety of minerals and complexes with aluminum, iron, and calcium. At low
pH, aluminum complexes, AlF3, AlF2+, and AlF2+, are the dominant dissolved species, and the availability
of these soluble complexes increases with decreasing pH (Fung et al. 1999; Shacklette et al. 1974). This
explains why more acidic soils have both higher water-soluble fluoride and higher extractable aluminum
levels. While aluminum may complex with organic ligands, this does not appear to alter aluminum-
fluoride complexation significantly (Ares 1990). In certain soils in which calcium is present mostly as
calcium fluoride and in which there is sufficient alumina, fluoride is fixed by the formation of relatively
insoluble aluminum fluorosilicate, Al2(SiF6)3 (Brewer 1966).
6.3.2.4 Other Media
Several species of plants have the capacity to convert fluoride obtained from soil or water into carbon-
fluorine compounds such as monofluoroacetic acid, ω-fluoro-oleic acid, ω-fluoropalmitic acid, and
ω-fluoromyristic acid (Marais 1944; NRC Canada 1971; Ward et al. 1964). These compounds have a
higher mammalian toxicity than inorganic fluoride salts.
6.4 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT
6.4.1 Air
The concentration of fluoride in ambient air depends on the presence of industrial sources of fluoride in
the area, the distance from the sources, meteorological conditions, and topography (Davis 1972).
Ambient concentrations of hydrogen fluoride measured in the United States (ca. 1985) ranged from 1.0 to
7.5 µg/m3 (Kelly et al. 1993). In a study by Thompson et al. (1971) of 9,175 urban air samples in the
United States in 1966, 1967, and 1968, 87% of all measurements at urban stations and 97% of all
measurements at non-urban stations showed fluoride concentrations below 0.05 µg/m3, the threshold of
detectability. Only 18 measurements (0.2%) exceeded 1.00 µg/m3; the maximum concentration was
1.89 µg/m3 at urban locations and 0.16 µg/m3 at non-urban locations (Yunghans and McMullen 1970).
The ambient air concentration of gaseous fluoride varies from 0.01 to 1.65 µg/m3 in Canada and the
United States, approximately 75% of which exists as hydrogen fluoride (CEPA 1996).
Atmospheric hydrogen fluoride concentrations were measured at nine sites in Southern California during
the last 8 months of 1986. Samples were collected every 6th day for a 24-hour sampling period. Average
hydrogen fluoride concentrations ranged between 0.13 µg/m3 (0.15 ppb) and 0.22 µg/m3 (0.25 ppb)
(Hance et al. 1997). The lowest concentration was at a remote off-shore location (San Nicolas Island).
The maximum hydrogen fluoride levels at the eight on-shore sites varied from 0.34 µg/m3 (0.38 ppb) to
1.91 µg/m3 (2.14 ppb). Ambient hydrogen fluoride levels were fairly constant throughout the year.
However, there were occasional isolated peaks in the hydrogen fluoride levels. These are thought to be
the result of accidental releases. Although there are major refineries and chemical plants in the area that
use hydrogen fluoride, it was not possible to correlate the spike in hydrogen fluoride levels with any
reported accidental releases.
Atmospheric fluoride levels are often elevated near fluorine-related industrial operations. A 1976 study
reported fluoride levels 1.5 km from an aluminum plant that emitted 34 kg fluoride/hour (Krook and
Maylin 1979). The average particulate fluoride level was 0.31 µg/m3 (5.53 µg/m3, 12-hour maximum),
and the average gaseous fluoride level was 0.36 µg/m3 (6.41 µg/m3, 12-hour maximum). An indicator of
atmospheric fluoride levels is the amount of fluoride dust deposited on foliage. After an aluminum plant
began operating in 1958 in Oregon, the average fluoride content of foliage in cherry and peach trees
jumped from 13 to 65 and 76 ppm, respectively. The highest average values occurred 2 years later,
measuring 196 and 186 ppm, respectively (NAS 1971a). Since then, the fluoride levels in foliage
dropped appreciably.
6.4.2 Water
Surface Water. Fluoride levels in water vary according to local geology and proximity to emission
sources. In rivers, fluoride concentrations range from <1 to 6,500 µg/L; the average fluoride
concentration is around 200 µg/L (Fleischer et al. 1974). Fluoride levels may be higher in lakes,
especially in saline lakes and lakes in closed basins in areas of high evaporation. The Great Salt Lake in
Utah has a fluoride content of 14,000 µg/L (Fleischer et al. 1974). Lakes in East Africa where fluoride
leaches from the alkalic rocks in the region contain 1,000–1,600 mg/L of fluoride. Fluoride levels in the
Norwegian ‘1,000 lake survey’ ranged from <5 to 560 µg/L with one outlier at 4,120 µg/L and a median
of 37 µg/L (Skjelkvale 1994). The highest levels were found in lakes in Southern Norway that receive the
greatest amounts of acid rain. Fluoride concentrations at these lakes are correlated with sulfate
concentrations, an indicator of acid rain. In studies of natural water in the Rift Valley of Kenya and
Tanzania, high fluoride levels in water and a high incidence of fluorosis were correlated with low levels
of calcium and magnesium in the water (Gaciri and Davies 1993). Calcium carbonate entraps fluorides
and removes it from solution. These results are consistent with researchers who maintain that waters low
in hardness and high in alkalinity present the highest risk of fluorosis. Other reasons for high fluoride
levels in some Kenyan waters are evaporative concentration resulting in much higher fluoride levels in
surface water than groundwater, fluoride-rich volcanic rocks in the region, and contamination by waste
water from fluorspar mining. Seawater contains more fluoride than fresh water, approximately 1,200–
1,500 µg/L (Bowen 1966; Carpenter 1969; Fleischer et al. 1974; Goldschmidt 1954).
Fluoride content of waters for Yellowstone National Park ranged from 0.5 mg/L in Yellowstone River to
24.0 mg/L in the Midway Geyser Basin. Fluoride concentrations in some selected thermal waters in
Idaho ranged from 9 to 30 mg/L. Data from more than 300 geothermal waters in the Western United
States indicate that at least 68% of these waters contain fluoride, with concentrations ranging from 2.1 to
30 mg/L. Fluoride concentrations from a regular well and a geothermal well from a ranch in Idaho were
0.8 and 14.2 mg/L, respectively. Use of geothermal well water for irrigation induces high fluoride levels
in alfalfa and pasture grasses consumed by cattle (Miller et al. 1999).
Groundwater. The fluoride content of groundwater generally ranges from 20 to 1,500 µg/L (EPA 1980a;
Fleischer 1962). Fleischer et al. (1974) contains a map of the fluoride content in groundwater in the
conterminous United States by county. Highest fluoride levels in groundwater are generally found in the
southwest, and maximum groundwater levels in Nevada, southern California, Utah, New Mexico, and
western Texas exceed 1,500 µg/L. In a survey of fluoride levels in Texas groundwater in which water
from nearly 7,000 wells in 237 counties were analyzed, Hudak (1999) identified four regions with high
fluoride levels. In one region in northwest Texas, at least 50% of the wells sampled in each of five
counties had fluoride levels exceeding the primary drinking water standard of 4,000 µg/L. County-
median fluoride concentrations ranged from 90 to 5,110 µg/L. Twenty-five counties had median fluoride
levels above the secondary standard of 2,000 µg/L and 84 counties had median concentrations higher than
1,000 µg/L, the target fluoride concentration for many water fluoridation programs. Factors responsible
for the elevated fluoride levels were the mineral constitution of the aquifers, seepage from nearby saline
formations, and low recharge and dilution rates in the aquifers. The results of this study suggest that
geology has an important influence on the distribution of fluoride in Texas groundwater. Groundwater
constitutes approximately 60% of the water consumed in Texas.
Fluoride levels in groundwater are higher than in surface water because they are more influenced by the
rocks in which they occur (EPA 1980a; Fleischer et al. 1974; NAS 1971a; WHO 1984). Groundwater
from granitic rock, basaltic rock, limestones and dolomites, and shales and clays average 1,200, 100, 300,
and 400 µg fluoride/L, respectively, while groundwater from alkalic rocks average 8,700 µg fluoride/L
(Fleischer et al. 1974). An example of the influence of geology on the concentration of fluorides in
groundwater is illustrated by a region in the Pampa in Argentina where groundwater is alkaline and
moderately saline (Nicolli et al. 1989). Forty-two percent of groundwater samples from this area had
fluoride levels exceeding 1,400 µg/L and the maximum level was 6,300 µg/L. The highest levels of
fluoride were found in waters with the highest sodium and potassium contents.
Drinking Water. The concentration of fluoride in 384 Norwegian waterworks sampled during the winter
of 1983 ranged from 13 to 1,210 µg/L with a mean and median of 87 and 58 µg/L, respectively (Flaten
1991). Fluoride is a naturally-occurring constituent of groundwater and the fluoride in the water was
mostly a consequence of local soil or rock formations. In addition, there was evidence that the fluoride
levels were influenced by local sources and long-range transport. In a random survey of farmstead wells
by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2 of the 103 wells sampled contained fluoride
levels above EPA’s maximum contaminant level (MCL) that was reported at the time as 1,800 µg/L for
public water supplies (Steichen et al. 1988). The highest fluoride level found in this study was
2,300 µg/L.
Rain Water. Rain water sampling was conducted in eight arctic catchments in Northern Europe from
May to September in 1994 (Reimann et al. 1997). Some of the world’s largest industrial sources are in
this region. The median concentrations of fluoride in all of the 30-day composite rain water samples from
the eight catchments were <0.05 mg/L. In five of the catchments, all samples contained <0.05 mg/L of
fluoride. The maximum concentration of fluoride was 1.53 mg/L. Concentrations of fluoride in
precipitation in Norway ranged from 0 to 253 µg/L with volume-weighted averages from 13 to 25 µg/L
(Skjelkvale 1994). Correlations of fluoride content with other ions indicated that the fluoride is not of
marine origin and is mostly correlated with industrial sources of sulfur oxides. Higher fluoride levels in
some rain samples were due to nearby aluminum smelters.
6.4.3 Sediment and Soil
Fluorides are widely distributed in the earth's crust. The concentration of fluoride in soils and other
surficial materials in the conterminous United States ranges from <10 to 3,700 ppm with a mean of
430 ppm (Shacklette and Boerngen 1984). Other values for the mean fluoride content of mineral soils
ranges from 200 to 300 ppm (Bowen 1966; NAS 1971a; Worl et al. 1973). The fluoride content of
organic soils is usually lower. The chief fluorine-containing minerals are fluorspar, cryolite, and
fluorapatite. In soils with high concentrations of these minerals, the soil fluoride content is much higher
and may range from 7 to 38 g/kg (Smith and Hodge 1979). In most soils, fluorine is associated with
micas and other clay minerals. Robinson and Edgington (1946) reported the fluorine content of 137 soil
samples in 30 soil profiles as ranging from trace to 7.07% fluorine, with an average of 0.029%. While the
highest fluoride concentration was found in a Tennessee soil high in rock phosphate (apatite), the main
source of fluoride in the soil were micaceous clays. In general, silt and clay loam soils had higher
fluoride content than sandy soils. Average fluoride soil concentrations differ between the eastern and
western United States. The average concentrations are 340 ppm in the east and 410 ppm in the west
(EPA 1980a). Fluoride concentrations also tend to increase with soil depth. Of 30 domestic soil samples,
the mean fluoride concentration at a depth of 0–3 inches was 190 ppm, whereas the mean concentration at
a depth of 3–12 inches averaged 292 ppm (NAS 1971a).
The fluoride content of soil may be increased by the addition of fluoride-containing phosphate fertilizers
(WHO 1984). Soils near industrialized sources show elevated concentrations that decrease with distance
from the source and depth below the surface. Concentrations of fluoride in the top 0.5 inches of soil
located near a phosphorus extraction facility near Silver Bow, Montana, were reported to range from
265 to 1,840 ppm (Van Hook 1974). Humus near an elementary phosphorus plant in Newfoundland,
Canada, where 80–95% of balsam fir trees were dead because of the pollution, contained average fluoride
levels of 58 ppm dry weight in 1973 and 24.2 ppm in 1974 (Sauriol and Gautier 1984). In 1975, when the
plant was not in operation during the growing season, the humus fluoride content was 8.1 ppm. Humus
fluoride levels in an uncontaminated zone were 2.0 ppm.
The fluoride concentrations in recent oceanic sediments appear to vary between 450 and 1,100 ppm
(Carpenter 1969). Similar levels have been reported for fresh water lakes.
6.4.4 Other Environmental Media
Several factors influence the level of fluorides in food. These include the locality in which the food is
grown and whether there were sources of fluoride emissions in the area, the amount of fertilizer and
pesticides applied, the type of processing the food receives, and whether fluoridated water is used in food
preparation (McClure 1949; Myers 1978; Waldbott 1963b). Foods characteristically high in fluoride
content are certain types of fish and seafood (1.9–28.5 mg/kg), especially those types in which the bones
are consumed, bone products such as bone meal and gelatin, and tea, which contains approximately
0.52 mg fluoride/cup (Cook 1969; Kumpulainen and Koivistoinen 1977).
During a comprehensive total diet study, foods were collected in Winnipeg, Canada in 1987 and were
processed into 148 composite food samples (Dabeka and McKenzie 1995). The mean, median, and range
of fluoride in all samples were 325, 99, and <11–4,970 ng/g, respectively. Food categories with the
highest mean fluoride levels were fish (2,118 ng/g), beverages (1,148 ng/g), and soups (606 ng/g).
Individual samples with the highest fluoride levels were tea (4,970 ng/g), canned fish (4,570 ng/g),
shellfish (3,360 ng/g), cooked veal (1,230 ng/g), and cooked wheat cereal (1,020 ng/g). The drinking
water used to prepare the food came from a single source containing the optimal fluoride concentration of
1 mg/L. This fluoride would contribute substantially to the fluoride levels in the food. The fluoride level
in 68 samples of cows’ milk purchased in retail stores throughout Canada ranged from 7 to 86 ng/g, with
a mean and median concentration of 41 and 40 ng/g, respectively (Dabeka and McKenzie 1987).
Provincial mean levels varied from 25 to 74 ng/g. Other studies of fluoride levels in cows from
uncontaminated areas reported similar fluoride levels in milk (Dabeka and McKenzie 1987). A study
compared fluoride content in foods and beverages from a negligibly fluoridated community
(Connersville, Indiana) and an optimally fluoridated community (Richmond, Indiana). The fluoride
concentrations in Connersville and Richmond are 0.16±0.01 and 0.90±0.05 µg F/g. It was found that
fluoride content in non-cooked and non-reconstituted foods and beverages ranged from 0.12 to
0.55 µg F/g and that there was no significant difference between the two communities. The difference in
fluoride content of foods prepared and/or cooked with water from the two study sites were statistically
different, except in the case of cooked vegetables (Jackson et al. 2002).
Beverages may contain fluoride from the fluoride content of the water used in their production, as well as
the base ingredients (e.g., fruit, flavoring) in the product. In a North Carolina study, beverages purchased
from six regions of the state showed considerable differences in the fluoride content of the product. This
was especially true for carbonated beverages. The ranges (means) of fluoride concentrations in various
beverage types were: sodas, 0.07–1.37 ppm (0.28 ppm); juices, 0.01–1.70 ppm (0.36 ppm); punches,
0.00–1.44 ppm (0.33 ppm); tea, 0.61–6.68 ppm (2.56 ppm); and Gatorade, 0.02–1.04 ppm (0.85 ppm)
(Pang et al. 1992). Fluoride concentrations were measured in 332 carbonated soft drinks, manufactured
by 10 companies, which are available in Iowa grocery stores. Fluoride concentrations were found to
range from 0.02 to 1.28 ppm, with a mean of 0.72 ppm. For 71% of the drinks analyzed, fluoride
concentrations exceeded 0.60 ppm. Concentrations were found to vary substantially by production site,
even within the same company and for the same product (Heilman et al. 1999).
The fluoride content of most plant foliage growing in areas removed from sources of fluoride pollution
ranges from 2 to 20 ppm dry weight (Brewer 1966). A notable exception is tea plants. The highest
fluoride concentration reported in vegetation was over 8,000 ppm in tea leaves. Tea plants take up
fluoride from soil and accumulate it in the leaves. A large percentage of the total fluoride, 25–84%, is
released during infusion, and tea is considered to be a major source of fluoride. The older tea leaves
contain more fluoride and brick tea, which is prepared from older leaves, may be very high in fluoride
content, 4.73–7.34 mg/L, compared with quality green and black tea, which is prepared from younger
leaves and may contain 1.2–1.7 and 0.9–1.9 mg/L, respectively (Fung et al. 1999).
Fruits and vegetables grown in industrial areas where fluoride emissions are high contain elevated
fluoride levels compared with those grown in control areas. The highest levels are found in the leafy
parts of the plants rather than the roots. In a Polish study, vegetables grown 1.5 and 5 km from a steel
plant contained average fluoride levels of 0.54–8.82 and 0.39–4.95 mg/kg, respectively, compared with
0.02–0.41 mg/kg for controls (Krelowska-Kulas 1994). Fruits grown 1.5 and 5 km from the steel plant
contained average fluoride levels of 1.42–5.44 and 1.24–2.75 mg/kg, respectively, compared with 0.40–
1.05 mg/kg for controls. Vegetables from the Saint-Régis Mohawk Indian reservation contained an
average of 1.54–45.17 ppm fluoride dry weight compared with 0.63–11.3 ppm fluoride for vegetables
from an uncontaminated site (Sauriol and Gauthier 1984). The reservation is located along the
St. Lawrence River, straddling territory in New York State, Québec, and Ontario, where there are three
potential sources of industrial fluoride emissions, namely two aluminum plants and a phosphate fertilizer
plant.
Fluoride concentrations in vegetation form Yellowstone National Park varies over a wide range from 3 to
430 ppm. Studies where plants were watered by spray treatments containing 4 ppm fluoride showed that
plants accumulated up to 36 ppm fluoride (dry weight), but a significant amount of this could be removed
by washing the leaves in distilled water. In another experiment using 6 ppm fluoride solution, leaf
analysis contained up to 55 ppm fluoride in the unwashed leaves and 35 ppm in washed leaves. Fluoride
content in vegetation around a phosphate plant was found to range from 4 to 718 ppm. Fluoride was
present in the air in the form of particulate fluorides and hydrogen fluoride gas (Miller et al. 1999).
Fluoride levels in various marine crustaceans were found to range from not detected to 2,500 (whole-
body), not detected to 5,977 (exoskeleton), and not detected to 257 (muscle) µg/g, dry weight. Fluoride
levels in saltwater fish were found to range from 45 to 1,207 (skeletal bone) and from 1.3 to 26 (muscle)
mg/kg, wet weight (Camargo 2003).
The fluoride concentration in most dental products available in the United States ranges from 230 ppm
(0.05% NaF mouth rinse) to 12,300 ppm (1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel) (NRC 1993). The
most commonly used dental products, toothpastes, contain 900–1,100 ppm fluoride (ca. 0.10%), most
often as sodium fluoride, but also as disodium monofluorophosphate.
The fluoride concentration of a bituminous coal used in power generation is around 65.0 ppm dry weight
and may contain up to 200 mg fluoride/kg (Rubin 1999; Skjelkvale 1994). The fluoride in the coal occurs
predominantly as fluorapatite and fluorspar. Hydrogen fluoride and other fluorides are released from the
coal during combustion. Bauer and Andren (1985) studied fluoride emissions from an electricity-
generating plant in Portage, Wisconsin that consisted of two nearly-identical 527-MW pulverized-coal
units, differing only in the type of coal burned and the operating conditions. In one unit, emissions
contained a median of 1.9 mg fluoride/scm (86% of available fluoride in coal) and the other contained a
median of 0.22 mg fluoride/scm (4.2% of available fluoride in coal). The first unit burned a bituminous
coal from Colstrip, Montana containing 9% ash and 46 ppm fluoride and the second unit burned a
bituminous coal from Gillette, Wyoming containing 5% ash and 45 ppm fluoride. It was thought that the
greater mineral matter in the coal feeding the first unit may have played a role in the greater release of
fluoride in the vapor phase from this unit. The concentration of hydrogen fluoride reported in emissions
from a modern municipal waste incinerator in Germany was 0.2–0.3 mg/m3 (Greim 1990). Fluoride
concentrations in waste water from a coal-fired power plant in Utah ranged from 2.4 to 3.8 ppm (Miller et
al. 1999).
6.5 GENERAL POPULATION AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
The major sources of fluoride intake by the general population are water, beverages, food, and fluoride-
containing dental products. Since levels in ambient air are, in most cases, below detectable limits, the
levels inhaled are generally very low except for in areas immediately surrounding industries that emit
fluorides into the air. Hodge and Smith (1977) estimated air intake of fluoride of about 0.01 mg/day. In
occupational settings where airborne concentrations are frequently at the exposure limit of 2.5 mg/m3
(OSHA 1985), fluoride intake via inhalation can be 16.8 mg/day, assuming an 8-hour shift and that a
person inhales 20 m3 air/day. The daily intake of fluoride from drinking water fluoridated at the optimal
levels (0.7–1.2 mg/L) would be 1.4–2.4 mg.
The chemicals most commonly used by American waterworks are fluorosilicic acid, sodium
silicofluoride, and sodium fluoride. Data from the CDC's 1992 Fluoridation Census indicate that 25% of
utilities reported using sodium fluoride; however, this corresponds to 9.2% of the U.S. population
drinking fluoride-supplemented tap water (Urbansky 2002). Concerns over the purity of water
fluoridation agents have been raised as well as possible links between fluoridation agents and lead levels
in the bloodstream (Masters et al. 2000). Analyses of available grades of fluorosilicic acid, sodium
fluoride, and sodium fluorosilicate show the presence of arsenic and lead, but at levels far below that
which would necessitate recommended maximum impurity content (RMIC) values based on the
maximum dosage of 1.2 mg of fluoride ion per liter (NRC 1982).
Based on a comprehensive total diet study conducted in Winnipeg, Canada in 1987, the estimated daily
dietary intake of fluoride by the average Canadian was 1,763 µg and varied from 353 µg for the 1–4-year-
old-age group to 3,032 µg for 40–64-year-old males (Dabeka and McKenzie 1995). The results for all
age groups are shown in Table 6-3. The drinking water used to prepare the food came from a single
source containing the optimal fluoride concentration of 1 µg/mL (1 mg/L). This fluoride would
contribute substantially to the fluoride intake in the food. In an earlier study in which the dietary intake of
24 adult Canadians was assessed, Dabeka et al. (1987) compared the intake of half of the participants who
lived in communities with 1 µg/g (1 mg/L) fluoride in their drinking water with those who lived in
communities with <0.2 µg/g (<0.2 mg/L) of fluoride in water. The respective median intakes of fluoride
were 2,090 or 30.3 µg/kg/day and 414 or 7.0 µg/kg/day. For the cities with fluoridated water, the
majority of fluoride was contributed by beverages (68%) and water (13%); for the nonfluoridated cites,
beverages contributed 58% of the fluoride intake. These results can be compared with earlier estimates of
fluoride intake by U.S. adults. San Filippo and Battistone (1971) estimated the average daily adult
fluoride intake from food ranged from 0.8 to 0.9 mg, while the daily intake from food and water was 2.1–
2.4 mg. Spencer et al. (1970) estimated the fluoride intakes as 1.2–2.7 mg/day from food and 2.82–
5.9 mg/day from food and water. Kumpulainen and Koivistoinen (1977) reported the average total
dietary intake in 12 fluoridated U.S. cities as 2.7 mg/day. In areas where fluoride is not added to water,
Table 6-3. Mean Daily Dietary Intake of Fluoride for Selected Canadian
Population Groupsa
Population Mean daily intake (µg/day)

1–4 years, males and females 353
5–11 years, males and females 530
12–19 years, males and females 1,025
12–19 years, females 905
20–39 years, males 2,544
20–39 years, females 2,172
40–65 years, males 3,032
40–65 years, females 2,615
65+ years, males 2,588
65+ years, females 2,405
All ages male and female 1,763
a
Dabeka and McKenzie 1995
the total intake from food and water does not usually exceed 1.0 mg/day (WHO 1984). However, there
are exceptions, such as an area in China where the fluoride content of the water is low, but the intake from
food and tea is high enough that the rate of dental fluorosis exceeds 80% (Han et al. 1995). In England,
where much more tea is consumed, a study found daily average intakes of fluoride from tea to be
1.26 mg/day in children and 2.55 mg/day in adults (Cook 1969). In areas near sources of fluoride
emissions, oral intake may also be increased from dust contamination of food (WHO 1984). Fluoridated
dentifrices and mouth rinses are additional sources of fluoride (Barnhart et al. 1974; Ericsson and
Forsman 1969). Fluorides approved by the FDA for use in dentifrices are sodium fluoride (0.22%),
sodium monofluorophosphate (0.76%), and stannous fluoride (0.41%) (Pader 1993). The concentration
of fluoride in each of these formulations is 0.1% (equivalent to 1,000 mg/kg or 1,000 ppm). Fluoride
tablets or drops are ingested in some areas where water fluoride levels are low, providing 0.25, 0.50, or
1.00 mg/day depending on the age of the child and the drinking water fluoride concentration. In his
analysis of systemic fluoride intake, Burt (1992) found that there is no evidence from dietary surveys to
show that fluoride intake in adults has increased since the 1970s.
In considering dietary intake, it is important to take bioavailability into account, and not simply the
fluoride content of the consumed substance. As discussed in Sections 2.3.1.2 and 2.8, absorption is
affected by factors such as whether the material was eaten with a meal, the chemical and physical form of
the fluoride, and the current health status of the individual (Rao 1984). The bioavailability of fluoride as
sodium fluoride is high. In contrast, absorption of calcium fluoride is rather inefficient, but is enhanced
when administered with food. Thus, the actual absorbed dose could be smaller than the intake levels
reported above. NRC (1993) reports that approximately 75–90% of ingested fluoride is absorbed from
the alimentary tract.
The fluoride content of urine and plasma are useful as short-term indicators of fluoride exposure; hair,
fingernails, and tooth enamel are indicators of longer-term response. The mean and median serum
fluoride levels of 168 representative Danish adults were 470±270 and 400 nmol/L (0.00893±0.00513 and
0.00760 mg/L), respectively (Poulsen et al. 1994). Levels were significantly higher in urban inhabitants
than rural inhabitants and increased significantly with age. Shida et al. (1986) measured fluoride
concentrations in five different layers of enamel of incisors that had been extracted due to periodontal
disease. Half of the teeth were treated with 0.9% acidified fluorophosphate for 4 minutes. In the
fluoride-treated group, the outer layer of enamel contained 1,660–5,910 ppm fluoride compared with
147–698 ppm in the untreated group. A similar method was employed by Schamschula et al. (1982) on
enamel of children. They found that the fluoride content of enamel did reflect environmental fluoride
exposure of the group, but variations occurred among individuals.
The NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) conducted in 1981–1983 estimated that
about 182,589 workers were potentially exposed to hydrogen fluoride (NIOSH 1989). The NOES was
based on field surveys of 4,490 facilities that included virtually all workplace environments, except
mining and agriculture, where eight or more persons are employed. The principal exposure pathway
would be inhalation.
Workers in the electronics industry in Japan who used hydrogen fluoride for glass etching (e.g., TV
picture tubes) and as a silicon cleaner (e.g., semiconductors) are exposed daily to mean air hydrogen
fluoride concentrations of up to 5 ppm (Kono et al. 1987). The mean urinary fluoride levels were linearly
related to the hydrogen fluoride concentration in the air and there were also significant differences in pre-
and postshift urinary fluoride level of the workers. The workers in this study were only exposed to
gaseous hydrogen fluoride. The wide variation of fluoride levels in serum and urine in the workers and
controls has been ascribed to dietary differences, particularly the consumption of tea and seafood (water
fluoridation is not practiced in Japan). In a follow-up study Kono et al. (1993) found a linear correlation
between urine fluoride levels and hair fluoride levels.
A study evaluated the use of urinary fluoride as an exposure index for a prospective study of asthma in an
aluminum smelter. In the first part of the study, 32 subjects wore personal air sampling pumps. The
12-hour time weighted average results show that overall mean levels were 15.7, 4.07, and 0.74 mg/m3 for
particulate mass, total fluoride, and hydrogen fluoride, respectively. Urinary fluoride concentrations were
considered reasonably low, 1.3 and 3.0 mg/g creatinine in pre- and post-shift collections. Carbon
smelters had the highest exposure levels as compared to workers working as potmen and trappers (Seixas
et al. 2000). An average total fluoride exposure of 0.91 mg/m3, of which 34% was gaseous fluoride, was
measured for 41 workers in an aluminum plant in Sweden. Mean fluoride plasma concentrations were
determined to be 23 and 48 ng/mL pre- and post-shift, respectively. Use of a safety mask during the shift
led to a reduction in exposure of inhaled fluoride. Workers wearing a safety-mask throughout the whole
shift reduced inhalation of fluoride to 30–40% of those workers not wearing masks (Ehrnebo and
Ekstrand 1986).
Certain populations, such as patients with kidney disease, may be especially sensitive to fluoride
exposure. In 1993, 20 patients became ill due to acute fluoride intoxication after receiving hemodialysis
treatment for end-stage renal failure. This outbreak was found to be caused by errors in the maintenance
of the deionization system used to treat the water used for dialysis. In this case, the deionization units
continued to be used after the ion exchange resins were exhausted, resulting in the release of the resin-
bound fluoride into the treated water (Arnow et al. 1994).
6.6 EXPOSURES OF CHILDREN
This section focuses on exposures from conception to maturity at 18 years in humans. Differences from
adults in susceptibility to hazardous substances are discussed in Section 3.7 Children’s Susceptibility.
Children are not small adults. A child’s exposure may differ from an adult’s exposure in many ways.
Children drink more fluids, eat more food, breathe more air per kilogram of body weight, and have a
larger skin surface in proportion to their body volume. A child’s diet often differs from that of adults.
The developing human’s source of nutrition changes with age: from placental nourishment to breast milk
or formula to the diet of older children who eat more of certain types of foods than adults. A child’s
behavior and lifestyle also influence exposure. Children crawl on the floor, put things in their mouths,
sometimes eat inappropriate things (such as dirt or paint chips), and spend more time outdoors. Children
also are closer to the ground, and they do not use the judgment of adults to avoid hazards (NRC 1993).
Children are exposed to fluorides primarily through their diets and dental products. Normal dietary
sources of fluorides are augmented by fluoridation of water supplies. Based on data obtained from a 1987
total diet study in Winnipeg, Canada, the average 1–4 and 5–11 year olds consume 353 and 530 µg
fluoride/day, respectively, compared with 1,763 µg/day for all age groups combined (Dabeka and
McKenzie 1995). The mean daily dietary intakes of fluoride by 6-month-old infants and 2-year-old
children in four regions of the United States were 0.21–0.54 and 0.32–0.61 mg/day, respectively (NRC
1993; Ophaug et al. 1985). The mean intake of 2-year-old children, but not 6-month-old infants, was
directly related to the fluoride concentration in the drinking water. Dietary intake may increase in areas
where there are industrial emissions containing fluorides. Increased incidences of mottled teeth were
observed in children living within 3 km of a superphosphate fertilizer plant in Port Maitland, Ontario
(Sauriol and Gauthier 1984). The most plausible reason for the increased fluoride intake is higher
fluoride levels in vegetables and fruits from dust deposited on the plants.
It has been assumed that children in communities without fluoridated water consume a negligible amount
of fluoride other than from food. Because of the marked increase in dental fluorosis in nonfluoridated
populations and the increased consumption of beverages that may have been prepared with fluoridated
water, a study was conducted to estimate the average daily amount of fluoride ingested by a sample of
North Carolinian children aged 2–10 from these beverages (Pang et al. 1992). The study found that
children of ages 2–3, 4–6, and 7–10 consumed daily means of 0.36, 0.54, and 0.6 mg fluoride,
respectively, from beverages. This is a significant source of fluoride intake. Beverages contributed about
60% of the children’s total liquid consumption. While fluoride consumption increased with age, little
difference was found between males and females. Children in a high fluoride area of Kenya consume
high levels of fluoride from the water (9 ppm) and from the practice of giving tea to young children. In
this area, children aged 0–1 and 1–4 years old had mean daily fluoride intakes of 0.62 and 1.23 mg/kg
body weight, respectively. Tea accounted for nearly half of the fluoride intake of 1–2-year-old children.
The daily fluoride consumption from breast milk supplements and substitutes averaged 7.6 mg,
>250 times the amount of fluoride provided by 800 mL of breast milk (Opinya et al. 1991a).
Fluoride intake in infants depends on whether the child is nursed or not. Human breast milk contains very
little fluoride (about 0.5 µmol/L or 0.01 mg/L) and provides <0.01 mg fluoride/day (NRC 1993).
Fluoride intake by an infant who is exclusively breast fed and consuming 170 mL/kg-day is generally
<2 µg/kg-day (Fomon and Ekstrand 1999). Levy et al. (2001) found that for most children, water fluoride
intake was the predominant source of fluoride, especially through age 12 months. This was due in large
part to children receiving fluoridated water mixed with infant formula concentrate (Levy et al. 1995b,
2001).
The results of a survey of fluoride levels in 68 samples of cows’ milk and 115 samples of infant formulas
and oral electrolytes are shown in Table 6-4. Mean fluoride levels in cows’ milk, evaporated milk, and
ready-to-use formula were 0.041, 0.23, and 0.79 µg/g, respectively. Mean levels in concentrated liquid
and powder formula were 0.60 and 1.13 µg/g, respectively (Dabeka and McKenzie 1987). A major
source of fluoride in the infant formulas appears to be the processing water used in its manufacture. In
the United States where manufacturers remove fluoride from the processing water, mean levels of
fluoride were much lower than in the Canadian products. All U.S. products were well within the upper
guideline of 0.40 µg/g for ready-to-use formula proposed by the Committee on Nutrition of the American
Academy of Pediatrics. Fluoride exposure was calculated to be 102, 105, and 167 µg/kg-day for infants
consuming 170 mL/kg-day of concentrated liquid milk-based formula, concentrated liquid isolated soy
protein-based formula, and powdered milk-based formula, respectively, which were diluted with water
that is 1 ppm in fluoride. Infants may be exposed to higher fluoride concentrations now than in the past.
Table 6-4. Comparison of Fluoride Levels (µg/g) in Cow Milk and Infant
Formulasa
Number Mean Median Rangea

Cow milk 64 0.041 0.040 0.007–0.086
Evaporated milk 9 0.23 0.12 0.06–0.55
Ready-to-use formula, all
Canadian 34 0.90 0.86 0.35–2.31
U.S. 7 0.23 0.26 0.15–0.28
Ready-to-use formula, glassb
Canadian 20 0.82 0.83 0.46–1.13
U.S. 3 0.28 0.28 0.28–0.28
Ready-to-use formula, canned
Canadian 14 1.02 0.95 0.35–2.31
U.S. 4 0.19 0.17 0.15–0.26
Concentrated liquid formula, canned 33 0.60 0.60 0.15–1.47
Formula, powdered concentrate 18 1.13 0.80 0.14–5.53
Electrolytes (water), glassb 12 0.066 0.04 0.01–0.15
a
Dabeka and McKenzie 1995
b
Product not available on retail market, obtained from hospitals.
In the 1960s, nearly 80% of infants were fed cow's milk by 6 months of age. In 1991, 80% of 6-month-
old infants were fed formula (Fomon and Ekstrand 1999). Fluorinated organic chemicals are widely used
and may accumulate in breast milk due to their high fat solubility and slow rate of metabolism and
excretion. The breast milk fluoride concentration from a German study was 25 ppb (Broomhall and
Kovar 1986). Fluoride may be an important mineral for babies born prematurely, since prematurity is
associated with an increased incidence of dental caries; however, recommendations for fluoride intake are
only available for full-term infants (Zlotkin et al. 1995).
Fluoridated dentifrices and mouth rinses are additional sources of fluoride, particularly in small children
who do not have complete control of the swallowing reflex. Dentifrice ingestion was inversely correlated
with age; average ingested levels per brushing for children aged 2–4, 5–7, and 11–13 were 0.30, 0.13, and
0.07 g (Barnhart et al. 1974). Average fluoride intake from these sources in children younger than 7 years
old ranged from 0.3 to 0.4 mg/use for mouth rinses, depending on the child's age, and was about
0.1 mg/brushing for fluoridated toothpaste use (Ericsson and Forsman 1969). Other studies indicated that
an average of 25% (range, 10–100%) of the toothpaste introduced into the mouth was swallowed. The
average amount of fluoride in toothpaste used in one brushing is about 1.0 mg. From these studies, it has
been estimated that the amount of fluoride ingested in toothpaste by children who live in communities
with fluoridated water, who have good control of swallowing, and brush their teeth twice a day is
approximately equal to dietary fluoride intakes. For younger children who have poor control of
swallowing, intakes from dental products could exceed dietary intakes.
Although Burt (1992) concludes that data on fluoride intake by children from food and beverages, infant
foods included, are not strong enough to conclude that an increase in fluoride ingestion has occurred since
the 1970s, he warns that the suggested upper limit of fluoride intake is substantially being reached by
many children by ingestion of fluoride from food and drink (0.2–0.3 mg/day) and from fluoride
toothpaste (0.2–0.3 mg/day). Levy (1994) also found substantial variation in ingestion among
individuals; 10–20% of individuals received up to several times as much exposure as the mean. Some
children appeared to ingest enough fluoride from one source to exceed the total recommended fluoride
intake, and are therefore at increased risk of dental fluorosis. Levy et al. (1995a) made the following
recommendations concerning use of fluoride by children:
“(1) the fluoride content of foods and beverages, particularly infant formulas and water used in their
reconstitution, should continue to be monitored closely in an effort to limit excessive fluoride intake;
(2) ingestion of fluoride from dentifrice by young children should be controlled, and the use of only small
quantities of dentifrice by young children should be emphasized; and (3) dietary fluoride supplements
should be considered a targeted preventive regimen only for those children at higher risk for dental caries
and with low levels of ingested fluoride from other sources (Levy et al. 1995a).”
Schamschula et al. (1985) analyzed various body fluids and tissue from a group of Hungarian children
exposed to low, intermediate, and high levels of fluoride in their drinking water. These tissue levels,
included in Table 6-5, are indicators of exposure over the short and long term. Fluoride dentifrices were
not in general use in the villages from which the sample populations were drawn. Mean fluoride
concentrations of 1.85, 5.28, and 7.52 mg/kg were found in fingernails of Brazilian children, 6–7 years
old, living in communities where fluoride concentrations were 0.1, 1.6, and 2.3 ppm, respectively.
Analysis of these data indicated a direct relationship between fluoride concentrations in drinking water
and fingernails. The 95% confidence intervals for the 0.1 and 1.6–2.3 ppm areas showed no overlap; a
small overlap was noted for the 1.6 and 2.3 ppm areas (Whitford et al. 1999a).
6.7 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES
Populations living in areas with high fluoride levels in groundwater may be exposed to higher levels of
fluorides in their drinking water or in beverages prepared with the water. Among these populations,
outdoor laborers, people living in hot climates, and people with polydipsia will generally have the greatest
daily intake of fluorides because they consume greater amounts of water. Groundwater fluoride levels are
especially high in the southwest; maximum groundwater levels in Nevada, southern California, Utah,
New Mexico, and western Texas exceed 1,500 µg/L. In one region of northwest Texas, the median level
in well water exceeded 4,000 µg/L. People who drink large amounts of tea or consume large quantities of
seafood may also have high intakes of fluoride.
Populations living downwind of facilities emitting high levels of fluorides (e.g., phosphate fertilizer
plants, aluminum plants, or coal-fired power plants) may be exposed to higher fluoride levels in the air
(Ernst et al. 1986). Emissions from these plants may contaminate vegetables and fruit with fluorides from
industrial emissions, exposing people eating local produce to potentially high levels of fluorides in their
diets. Workers in industries where fluoride-containing substances are used, most notably the aluminum
and phosphate fertilizer plants, may be occupationally exposed to high levels of both gaseous and
particulate fluorides. Workers using sulfur hexafluoride as a tracer gas for determining ventilation rates
Table 6-5. Levels of Fluoride in Human Tissue and Urine—Selected Studies
Site Population Sample Concentration Type Units Reference

Human plasma from blood banks in five U.S. cites with different fluoride levels in Guy et al. 1976
drinking water
Albany, NY (n=30) Blood plasma 0.38 (0.14-1.1) Mean µmol/L
<0.1 ppm fluoride (Range)
Rochester, NY (n=30) 0.89 (0.35-4.2)
1 ppm fluoride
Corpus Christi, TX (n=12) 1.0 (0.60-1.7)
0.9 ppm fluoride
Hillsboro, TX (n=4) 2.1 ppm 1.9 (0.60-2.6)
fluoride
Andrews, TX (n=30) 4.3 (1.4-8.7)
5.6 ppm fluoride
Poland (1980) Miszke et al. 1984
Employee of electrolysis Urine, random 1.87 mg/dm3
shop of aluminum plant
HF workers in the electronics industry, Japan Kono et al. 1987
Unexposed controls (n=82) Urine, random 0.58 (0.23) Geometric ppm
mean
(GSD)
All workers (n=142) 2.34 (1.40)
Hydrogen fluoride exposure
level
0.3 ppm (n=16) 0.91 (0.26)
0.5 ppm (n=20) 1.04 (0.34)
0.6 ppm (n=12) 1.07 (0.41)
1.2 ppm (n=14) 2.02 (0.57)
1.6 ppm (n=17) 2.40 (0.68)
2.8 ppm (n=21) 3.94 (1.07)
4.2 ppm (n=32) 5.05 (1.30)
5.0 ppm (n=10) 6.50 (1.98)
HF workers in the electronics industry, Japan Kono et al. 1993
All hydrogen fluoride Hair 61.1 (101.6) Geometric µg/g
workers (n=142) mean
(GSD)
Controls (n=237) 13.4 (6.4)
HF workers, Japan Kono et al. 1984
Hydrogen fluoride workers Serum 40.10 (23.72) Mean (SD) µg/L
(n=120)
Controls (n=320) 24.50 (12.10)
Hydrogen fluoride workers Urine, 24 hour 0.98 (0.75) Mean (SD) mg/L
(n=120)
Controls (n=320) 0.54 (0.30)
Table 6-5. Levels of Fluoride in Human Tissue and Urine—Selected Studies
Site Population Sample Concentration Type Units Reference

Danish adults Poulsen et al. 1994
Representative population Serum 470 (270) Mean (SD) nmol/L
(n=168)
Brazilian children (6-7 years old) exposed to different water fluoride concentrations Whitford et al. 1999a
Fluoride concentration in
drinking water:
0.1 ppm (n=19) fingernail 1.85 (0.75-3.53) Mean mg/kg
(range)
1.6 ppm (n=12) 5.28 (2.28-7.53)
2.3 ppm (n=15) 7.52 (4.00-13.18)
Hungarian children exposed to three levels of fluoride in drinking water Schamschula et al.
1985
Low exposurea (n=45) Urine 0.15 (0.07) Mean (SD) ppm
Medium exposureb (n=53) 0.62 (0.26)
High exposurec (n=41) 1.24 (0.52)
Low exposurea (n=45) Nails 0.79 (0.26) Mean (SD) ppm
Low exposurea (n=45) Hair 0.18 (0.07) Mean (SD) ppm
Low exposurea (n=45) Saliva 6.25 (2.44) Mean (SD) ppb
Low exposurea (n=45) Enamel (0.44– 1,549 (728) Mean (SD) ppm
0.48 µm
depth)
Medium exposureb (n=53) 2,511 (1,044)
High exposurec (n=41) 3,792 (1,362)
Low exposurea (n=45) Enamel (2.44– 641 (336) Mean (SD) ppm
2.55 µm
depth)
Medium exposureb (n=53) 1,435 (502)
High exposurec (n=41) 2,107 (741)
a
Low exposure: concentration of fluoride in water 0.06–0.11 ppm, 0.09 ppm, mean.
b
Medium exposure: concentration of fluoride in water 0.5–1.1 ppm, 0.82 ppm, mean.
c
High exposure: concentration of fluoride in water 1.6–3.1 ppm, 1.91 ppm, mean.
GSD = geometric standard deviation; SD = standard deviation

and air flow in buildings may be exposed to hydrogen fluoride when unvented combustion sources are
present in the building because SF6 reacts with water vapor at high temperatures, forming hydrogen
fluoride (Guo et al. 2001).
Populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites may be exposed to fluorides through contact
with contaminated air, water, and soil. Food grown near the source may also be contaminated. Data on
the concentrations of fluorides in waste site media are quite limited, and no information was located
regarding daily intake of fluorides from these sources.
adequate information on the health effects of fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorides is available.
health effects (and techniques for developing methods to determine such health effects) of fluorine,
hydrogen fluoride, and fluorides.
Physical and Chemical Properties. The physical/chemical properties of fluorine, hydrogen

fluoride, and sodium fluoride are sufficiently well characterized to enable assessment of the
environmental fate of these compounds.
Production, Import/Export, Use, Release, and Disposal. Information on the production and
importation of fluorspar and hydrogen fluoride are available (CMR 2002; USGS 2001). Information on
exports is only available for fluorspar. No data are available on the production, import, or export of
fluorine, sodium fluoride, and other fluorides. Information is readily available on the uses of fluorine,
hydrogen fluoride, and other fluorides (Mueller 1994). Because of its high reactivity, fluorine is disposed
of by conversion to fluoride salts in a scrubber (Shia 1994). The TRI contains information on the
amounts of hydrogen fluoride transferred off-site, presumably for disposal, and the amount recycled. No
information was found regarding the disposal of sodium fluoride. Additional quantitative information on
production, import, and export of fluorides, as well as common disposal practices, would be useful in
assessing the release of, and potential exposure to, these compounds.
According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C.
Section 11023, industries are required to submit chemical release and off-site transfer information to
EPA. The TRI, which contains this information for 2001, is currently available. This database will be
updated yearly and should provide a list of industrial production facilities and emissions.
Environmental Fate. Upon release to the atmosphere, fluorine gas will readily react to form
hydrogen fluoride. Both hydrogen fluoride and particulate fluorides will be transported in the atmosphere
and deposited on land or water by wet and dry deposition. Fluorides undergo transformations in soil and
water, forming complexes and binding strongly to soil and sediment (NAS 1971a; WHO 1984).
Information on the environmental fate of fluorides is sufficient to permit a general understanding of the
widespread transport and transformation of fluorides in the environment.
A recent review (Urbansky 2002) looked at the fate of fluorosilicate drinking water additives. Various
fluorosilicates and aquo/hydroxo/oxo/fluorosilicates may exist in fluoridated water systems and these
species may occur, regardless of the fluoridating agent used, since water may contain natural silica. The
author states that it would be desirable to be able to identify and measure or calculate concentrations of
those species that do exist and rule out those that do not exist (Urbansky 2002).
Bioavailability from Environmental Media. Fluorides are absorbed by humans following

inhalation of workplace and ambient air that has been contaminated (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a; Waldbott
1979), ingestion of drinking water and foods (Carlson et al. 1960a; Spencer et al. 1970), and dermal
contact (Browne 1974; Buckingham 1988). Information is available on factors that influence
bioavailability of ingested fluoride (Rao 1984). However, this information is rarely coupled with the
available information on total ingested fluoride to determine actual bioavailable dose. Additional
information on absorption following ingestion of contaminated soils (i.e., by children) would be useful in
determining the bioavailability of fluorides from these routes of exposure, which may be of particular
importance for populations living in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites.
Food Chain Bioaccumulation. Fluorides have been shown to accumulate in animals that consume
fluoride-containing foliage (Hemens and Warwick 1972). However, accumulation is primarily in skeletal
tissue and therefore, it is unlikely that fluoride will biomagnify up the food chain.
Exposure Levels in Environmental Media. Fluorides have been detected in ambient air, surface
water, groundwater, drinking water, and foods (Barnhart et al. 1974; Davis 1972; EPA 1980a; Hudak
1999; Waldbott 1963b). However, the existing monitoring data are not current. Air concentrations are
expected to be different today in view of changes in industries and the wider use of pollution control
devises. Recent serial measurements of fluorides in air are needed. Groundwater contains higher fluoride
levels than surface water. Although Fleischer (1962) mapped the levels of fluoride in groundwater in the
United States and these levels would not be expected to change, it would be useful to survey the
concentration of fluoride in groundwater used for drinking. This is particularly important in areas where
groundwater has high fluoride content, as in northwest Texas where 50% of the well water in some
counties exceed 4 µg/L (Hudak 1999). The fluoride level in food depends on the locality in which the
food is grown, including the geology, potential sources of fluorine emissions in the area, the amount of
fertilizer and pesticides applied, the type of processing the food receives, and whether fluoridated water is
used in food preparation (McClure 1949; Myers 1978; Waldbott 1963b). Foods characteristically high in
fluoride content include tea, seafood, and bone products such as bone meal and gelatin (Cook 1969;
Kumpulainen and Koivistoinen 1977). Old estimates of intake via ingestion have been made for members
of the general population (Kumpulainen and Koivistoinen 1977; NAS 1971a; Spencer et al. 1970; WHO
1984). Recent data are available on the concentration of fluoride in different foods in Canada and the
daily dietary intakes for different Canadian age groups (Dabeka and McKenzie 1995). However, recent
analogous information is not available for the United States. Up-to-date data on concentrations of
fluoride in food items and the dietary intake of fluorides in the United States is important in view of the
changes in fluoride emissions and the effect that the use of fluoridated water or water with a high natural
fluoride content may have on the fluoride levels in processed food and beverages (Pang et al. 1992).
Fluorides have also been detected in a limited number of surface water, groundwater, and soil samples
taken at hazardous waste sites (HazDat 2003; Van Hook 1974). Additional information is needed on
concentrations in ambient air, surface water, groundwater, and soils at these waste sites. This information
will be helpful in estimating exposures of populations living near these sites through contact with
contaminated media.
Exposure Levels in Humans. Fluorides can be measured in urine, plasma, saliva, tooth enamel,
nails, bone, and other tissues. Detection of fluoride in biological tissues, particularly urine, has been used
as an indicator of human exposure to fluorides in the workplace and through consumption of fluoridated
drinking water (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a; Kaltreider et al. 1972; Spencer et al. 1970). Additional data on
fluoride levels in urine and other fluids and tissues are needed for populations living near hazardous waste
sites. This information will be helpful in establishing exposure profiles for waste site populations that
may be exposed to higher than background levels of fluorides through contact with contaminated media.
The total human intake is of interest, since multiple sources, all of which are generally considered safe by
themselves, could, under some circumstances, provide total intake that is considered to be above the
"safe" level.
Exposures of Children. Children are exposed to fluorides primarily through their diets and the use
of dental products, particularly toothpaste. Normal dietary sources of fluorides are augmented by
fluoridation of water supplies. Human breast milk contains very little fluoride (NRC 1993). Information
is available on the levels of fluoride in infant formula in Canada and results show that major source of
fluoride appears to be the processing water used in its manufacture (Dabeka and McKenzie 1987). In the
United States, manufacturers remove fluoride from the processing water and thus, fluoride levels in infant
formulas are much lower. The mean dietary intake of fluoride by infants and children is available for
Winnipeg, Canada and four regions of the United States (Dabeka and McKenzie 1995; Fomon and
Ekstrand 1999; NRC 1993). The mean daily dietary intakes of fluoride by 6-month-old infants and
2-year-old children in four regions of the United States were 0.21–0.54 and 0.32–0.61 mg/day,
respectively. The mean intakes of 2 year olds, but not 6 month olds, were directly related to the fluoride
concentration in the drinking water. Pang et al. (1992) noted that children obtain a sizeable amount of
fluoride from beverages. Infants may be exposed to higher fluoride concentrations now than in the past.
While nearly 80% of infants were fed cow's milk by 6 months of age in the 1960s, in 1991, 80% of
6-month-old infants were fed formula, which contains higher fluoride concentrations than either human or
cow's milk (Fomon and Ekstrand 1999). Since beverages may not be prepared with water from the local
community and beverages constitute 60% of children’s total liquid consumption, more information on the
fluoride content of beverages would be useful in estimating children’s dietary intake of fluoride. Intake
of fluoride by children from fluoridated dentifrices and mouth rinses have been estimated (Barnhart et al.
1974; Ericsson and Forsman 1969). For younger children who have poor control of swallowing, intakes
from dental products could exceed dietary intakes. Fluoride may be an important mineral for babies born
prematurely, since prematurity is associated with an increased incidence of dental caries; however,
recommendations for fluoride intake are only available for full-term infants (Zlotkin et al 1995).
Fluoride exposure in communities near mining and other industrial facilities where fluoride-containing
rock or minerals are processed are a public health concern, especially for infants and children. The same
is true for hazardous waste sites containing fluoride waste. Since fluoride remains in the surface soil
indefinitely and long past land uses may be forgotten, people may not realize that they are living in areas
where high levels of fluoride may occur in soil. Contaminated soils pose a particular hazard to children
because of both hand-to-mouth behavior and intentional ingestion of soil (pica) that contains fluorides and
other contaminants. In these communities, fluorides may have been tracked in from outdoors and
contaminate carpeting. Fluoride-containing dust may be brought home in the clothing of parents working
in industries where they are exposed to fluoride. Children may be exposed to this fluoride while crawling
around or playing on contaminated carpeting. Exposure may also result from dermal contact with soil, or
by inhaling dust and then swallowing it after mucociliary transport up out of the lungs. Because much of
the fluoride in soil is embedded in or strongly adsorbed to soil particles or insoluble, it may not be in a
form accessible for uptake by the body.
Child health data needs relating to susceptibility are discussed in Section 3.12.2 Identification of Data
Needs: Children’s Susceptibility.
Exposure Registries. No exposure registries for fluorides were located. This compound is not
currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National Exposure
Registry. The compound will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made for
subregistries to be established. The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related to
the exposure to this compound.
The Federal Research in Progress (FEDRIP 2002) database provides additional information obtainable
from a few ongoing studies that may fill in some of the data needs identified in Section 6.8.1.
Remedial investigations and feasibility studies conducted at the 188 NPL sites known to be contaminated
with fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorides may add to the existing database on exposure levels in
environmental media at hazardous waste sites, exposure levels in humans, and exposure registries.
J.G. Schumacher of USGS, Water Resources Division, Weldon Spring, Missouri, is doing research
sponsored by USGS to determine the geochemical controls on contaminant migration from the raffinate
pits, Weldon Spring chemical plant, St. Charles County, Missouri. The former U.S. army facility
processed uranium ore-concentrates and scrap into uranium trioxide, uranium tetrafluoride, and uranium
metal. Waste from these operations (referred to as raffinate) was pumped into four large pits that contain
various quantities of uranium, thorium, nitrate, sulfate, fluoride, magnesium, and other elements. The
raffinate pits have been determined to be leaking and Li, U, NO3, and SO4, and various trace elements
have been found in groundwater and surface water both on and off site.
No other ongoing studies pertaining to the environmental fate of fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, or fluorides
were identified.
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the analytical methods that are available for detecting,
measuring, and/or monitoring fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine, its metabolites, and other
biomarkers of exposure and effect to fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine. The intent is not to
provide an exhaustive list of analytical methods. Rather, the intention is to identify well-established
methods that are used as the standard methods of analysis. Many of the analytical methods used for
environmental samples are the methods approved by federal agencies and organizations such as EPA and
the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Other methods presented in this
chapter are those that are approved by groups such as the Association of Official Analytical Chemists
(AOAC) and the American Public Health Association (APHA). Additionally, analytical methods are
included that modify previously used methods to obtain lower detection limits and/or to improve accuracy
and precision.
Fluorine gas is too reactive to exist in biological or environmental samples. Indeed, fluorine is too
reactive to be analyzed directly by conventional methods, but rather is quantitatively converted to
chlorine gas and the latter is analyzed (Shia 1994). The methods discussed below are for the analysis of
the fluoride ion, or in the case of gaseous acid fluorides, hydrogen fluoride. The particular fluorine
molecule is rarely identified.
7.1 BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS
Trace levels of fluoride in biological media are determined primarily by potentiometric (ion selective
electrode [ISE]) and gas chromatographic (GC) methods. Colorimetric methods are available, but are
more time consuming and lack the sensitivity of the other methods (Kakabadse et al. 1971;
Venkateswarlu et al. 1971). Other methods that have been used include fluorometric, enzymatic, and
proton activation analysis (Rudolph et al. 1973). The latter technique is sensitive to trace amounts of
sample and requires minimal sample preparation. Urine and blood and other bodily fluids can be
analyzed with a minimum of sample preparation. Tissue will require ashing, digestion with acid, or even
fusion with alkali to free the fluoride from its matrix. The most accurate method of sample preparation is
microdiffusion techniques, such as the acid-hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS) diffusion method by Taves
(1968). These methods allows for the liberation of fluoride from organic or inorganic matrices (WHO
2002). During sample preparation, the analyst must be careful to avoid sample contamination, incomplete
release from matrices, and losses due to volatilization (NRC Canada 1971). Vogel et al. (1990) reported
methodologies for sample manipulation and fluoride analysis on very small sample volumes. Techniques
included micropipette procedures for transferring samples, preparation of micro fluoride-selective
electrodes, and methods for adapting standard electrodes for micro- and semi-micro volumes (0.005–
5 µL). These techniques have been used for fluoride analysis of various biological samples, such as
salvia, plaque, and tooth enamel (Vogel et al. 1990, 1992a, 1992b). Table 7-1 describes some analytical
methods for determining fluorides in biological materials.
There is extensive literature on the ISE methodology because it is the most frequently used method for
fluoride measurement in biological media. The fluoride ion selective membrane utilizes a membrane
consisting of a slice of a single crystal of lanthanum fluoride that has been doped with europium (II)
fluoride to improve its conductivity (Skoog et al. 1990). It has a theoretical response to changes in
fluoride ion activity in the range of 100–10-6 M. It is selective to fluoride over other common anions by
several orders of magnitude; only hydroxide ion causes serious interference. The pH of the solution
analyzed is adjusted to approximately 5 to eliminate interference. ISE is the methodology recommended
by NIOSH in Method 8308 for the determination of fluoride in urine (NIOSH 1994). Fluoride analyses
using the ion selective electrode are simple, sensitive, and rapid. Recoveries are usually >90%, but this is
dependent on the type of sample and the sample preparation required. Sample for ISE analysis must be
prepared to solubilize the fluoride in the sample. For some samples, ashing or NaOH fusion is required.
A total-ionic strength adjustment buffer (TISAB) is used to adjust samples and standards to the same
ionic strength and pH; this allows the concentration, rather than the activity, to be measured directly and
often read directly off a meter. The pH of the buffer is about 5, a level at which F- is the predominant
fluorine-containing species. The buffer contains cyclo-hexylene-dinitrilotetraacetic acid, which forms
stable complexes with Fe(III) and Al(III), thus removing interferences by freeing fluoride ions from
complexes with these ions (NIOSH 1994; Schamschula et al. 1985; Tusl 1970). Bone fluoride levels can
be measured using the ISE technique after ashing of the sample (Boivin et al. 1988). Fingernail fluoride
levels can be measured using the ISE technique after nail clippings were prepared by HMDS-facilitated
diffusion overnight. This sample preparation was found to quantitatively remove fluoride from the nail
material (Whitford et al. 1999a). Whitford et al. (1999a) also reported that soaking the fingernail samples
in deionized water for 6 hours or in a solution of 1.0 ppm fluoride for 2 hours did not change the
concentration of fluoride found in the nail.
Recent studies have employed GC to measure fluoride concentrations in human urine and plasma (Chiba
et al. 1982; Ikenishi and Kitagawa 1988; Ikenishi et al. 1988). In this method, derivatization and
Table 7-1. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Biological Materials
Sample
Analytical detection Percent
Sample matrix Preparation method method limit recovery Reference
Urine Extract with TMCS; inject organic GC 4 µg/L 935 Chiba et al. 1982
phase (microwave induced plasma
emission detector)
Add equal volume TISAB solution ISE, 0.1 mg/L 95% NIOSH 1994
NIOSH
8308
Add TMCS toluene solution; GC >5 ng/mL No data Ikenishi et al. 1988
centrifuge; inject toluene layer
Biological fluids Absorb with calcium phosphate; ISE 10 µg/L 92–102% Venkateswarlu et
and tissue ex- centrifuge; analyze al. 1971
tracts (ionic and
ionizable
fluoride)
Saliva Resuspend in TISAB buffer; analyze ISE No data 99.8% Petersson et al.
1987; Schamschula
et al. 1985
Biological fluids Add TMCS toluene solution; centri- GC 5 ng/L 88.1– Ikenishi et al. 1988
fuge; inject toluene layer and 97.2%
analyze by measuring TMFS peak
height
Biological Extraction from acidified sample as ISE with >0.04 ng/ No data Venkateswarlu
tissues and fluorosilane; reverse extraction as hanging sample 1974
fluids fluoride ion into alkaline solution drop
assembly
Biological Sample pulverized to fine powder; PAA <10 ng/ No data Rudolph et al. 1973
tissues irradiate with energetic beam of sample
protons; detect gamma rays emitted
Decomposition of sample at 700– Colori- 1 µg/sam No data Kakabadse et al.
1,000 °C (pyrohydrolytic technique) metry ple 1971
Tooth enamel Soak teeth; decalcify in HClO4; add ISE No data No data Schamschula et al.
TISAB; analyze 1982; Shida et al.
1986
Plaque Dried; microdiffusion; analyze ISE No data 97% Schamschula et al.
1985
Bone Ash sample; dissolve in perchloric ISE No data No data Boivin et al. 1988
acid; add 1,2-cyclohexylenedinitro-
tetraacetic acid
Hair/fingernail Wash in diethylether; dry; de- ISE No data 94–96% Schamschula et al.
compose in NaOH 1985
Fingernail HMDS-facilitated diffusion overnight ISE No data No data Whitford et al.
1999a
GC = gas chromatography; HClO4 = perchloric acid; HMDS = hexamethyldisiloxane; ISE = ion selective electrode;
NaOH = sodium hydroxide; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; PAA = proton activation
analysis; TISAB = total ionic strength activity buffer; TMCS = trimethylchlorosilane; TMFS = trimethylfluorosilane
extraction is achieved using trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) in toluene to produce trimethylfluorosilane

(TMFS). The organic layer is injected into the GC system and the TMFS peak height is compared with
those of standard solutions. The GC method has the advantage of high sensitivity—nanogram quantities
of fluoride are detectable in a milliliter of urine or plasma. This method is also useful for assessing the
fluoride released from fluorine-containing drugs in biological fluids. The detection of bound fluorine
provides an advantage over the ISE technique, which is not suitable for bound or organic fluoride
measurements. It should also be noted that the aluminum ion may cause interference under the operating
conditions of the GC, as it does with the ISE method.
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
The ISE method is the most widely used method for determining fluoride levels in the environmental
media. Table 7-2 describes this and other methods for determining fluoride in environmental samples.
Table 7-3 describes methods for determining hydrogen fluoride in air. ISE methods are simple to perform
and have good precision and sensitivity. Fluoride-specific electrodes are commercially available. The
method detects only free fluoride ions in solution. Because of the inherent restriction of this technique,
several approaches have been recommended to prepare the sample for analysis. Lopez and Navia (1988)
assayed total fluoride (bound and free) in food and beverages by initially acid hydrolyzing samples at
100 °C in borosilicate vials. This closed-system approach decreases contamination, eliminates dry
ashing, and yields high recoveries. Dabeka and McKenzie (1981) employed microdiffusion with 40%
perchloric acid to food samples in Petri dishes at 60 °C for 24–48 hours. Difficulties arose in controlling
contamination and fluoride loss in the Petri dishes, and low recoveries were reported. Preparation of total
fluoride in dry plant material (i.e., hay, barley, straw, corn, grass) was described by Eyde (1982); samples
were fused in nickel crucibles with sodium hydroxide at 350–475 °C. The ash was diluted and filtered for
analysis. This method is more tedious than the others, and fluoride loss is expected from the high fusion
temperatures. All of these preparatory techniques can liberate bound fluoride from the sample matrices.
It is important to prevent interference of other ions and to avoid fluoride loss at high decomposition
temperatures before potentiometric analyses. Kakabadse et al. (1971) described a pyrohydrolytic
technique for tea, coca, or tobacco samples that could be employed prior to colorimetric or ISE analysis.
Decomposition of the sample at 700–1,000 °C is mediated by a current of air or pure oxygen to evolve
hydrogen fluoride. An advantage of this approach is that fluoride is collected from inorganic and organic
fluorides in one operation. Ashing, which may produce loss of organic fluorine, is eliminated.
Table 7-2. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Environmental

Samples
Sample Analytical Sample Percent

matrix Preparation method method detection limit recovery Reference
Air Ambient air collected using teflon ISE 0.1 µg/L No data Danchik et
tubing; detect with continuous al. 1980
flow analyzer
Sample at 1–2 L/minute using IC/conductivity 3 µg/sample No data NIOSH 1994
cellulose ester membrane filter detector; (gas);
and alkaline-impregnated backup NIOSH 7906 120 µg/sample
pad to collect particulate and (particulate)
gaseous fluorides. Extract
hydrogen fluoride and soluble
fluorides with water; insoluble
fluorides require NaOH fusion
Sample at 1–2 L/minute using ISE, 3 µg/sample No data NIOSH 1994
cellulose ester membrane filter NIOSH 7902
and alkaline-impregnated backup
pad to collect particulate and
gaseous fluorides; extract
hydrogen fluoride and soluble
fluorides with 50 mL 1:1 TISAB:
water; insoluble fluorides require
NaOH fusion
Syringe-sampling; dilute with 50% Colorimetry 0.3 ppm No data Bethea 1974
(v/v) 1,2-dioxane containing
Amadec-F
Water Dilute sample; add barium Colorimetry 2,000 µg/L No data Macejunas
chloride; complex with zirconium- 1969
xylenol orange for color
development
Sample added to sulfuric acid Colorimetry; 0.10 mg/L No data EPA 1998c
and distilled to remove inter- EMSLC
ferences; distilled sample treated Method 340.1
with SPADNS reagent; color loss
resulting from reaction of reagent
with fluoride is determined at
570 nm and concentration read
off standard curve
Mix sample and standard 1:1 with ISE, OSW 0.500 mg/L No data EPA 1996
TISAB (for soluble fluorides) Method 9214
No sample treatment required ISE, EMSLC 0.100 mg/L No data EPA 1998c
Method 340.2
Bellack distillationa, after which Colorimetry, 0.050 mg/L No data EPA 1998c
fluoride ion reacts with the red EMSLC
cerous chelate of alizarin Method 340.3
complexone in an autoanalyzer
Table 7-2. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Environmental

Samples
Sample Analytical Sample Percent

matrix Preparation method method detection limit recovery Reference
Extract with TMCS; analyze GC 4 µg/L 93–100% Chiba et al.
organic phase (microwave 1982
induced plasma emission
detector)
Waste Centrifuge sample to settle solids; Anion exclusion 200 µg/L No data Hannah 1986
water filter and dilute chromatography
Water, rain Dilute sample with TISAB buffer; ISE 2 µg/L No data Fucsko et al.
analyze in flow injection system 1987
Food, Homogenize sample; acid ISE 0.1 µg/g 97% Lopez and
beverage hydrolysis in a closed system Navia 1988
Sample pulverized to powder PAA 1 µg/g dry No data Shroy et al.
weight 1982
Tea, Decomposition at 700–1,000 °C Colorimetry >1 µg No data Kakabadse
cocoa, in moist current of oxygen or air; et al. 1971
tobacco collect hydrogen fluoride; react to
form Ce(III)alizarin-complexan
Milk, peas, Sample is dried and ground to ISE 0.2–5 µg/g 54–109% Dabeka and
pears powder; microdiffusion in Petri McKenzie
dish; analyze 1981
Vegetation Fluorine-19 sample activation INAA 14 µg/sample No data Knight et al.
1988
Extraction of sample ISE >0.05 µg/g >95% Jacobson
and Heller
1971
Fusion with NaOH; dissolve in ISE 10 µg/g No data Sager 1987
tiron buffer
Feed Sample is dried and acidified ISE 15 µg/g 90–108% Melton et al.
1974
Household Dilute sample, add buffer; ISE No data 98–104% Schick 1973
products addition procedure
Plants Sample dried and fused in nickel ISE >0.3 µg/g 87–102% Eyde 1982
crucibles; filter
a
Bellack distillation uses HClO4/AgClO4 to remove chloride.
Ce III = cesium ion (+3 oxidation state); EMSLC = EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Cincinnati;
GC = gas chromatography; HPLC = high pressure liquid chromatography; IC = ion chromatography;
INAA = instrumental neutron activation analysis; ISE = ion selective electrode; NaOH = sodium hydroxide;
NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSW = Office of Soild Waste; PAA = proton
activation analysis; SPADNS = sodium 2-(parasulfophenylazo)-1,8-dihydroxy-3,6-naphthalene disulfonate;
TISAB = total ionic strength activity buffer; TMCS = trimethylchlorosilane; (v/v) = volume/volume
Table 7-3. Analytical Methods for Determining Hydrogen Fluoride in

Environmental Samplesa
Sample
Sample Analytical detection Percent
matrix Preparation method method limit recovery Reference
Air Personal air sampled at 1– ISE, 0.7 µg fluoride/ No data NIOSH 1994
2 L/minute for total sample of 12– NIOSH 7902 sample
800 L onto treated pad; soak pad
in 25 mL water and 25 mL TISAB;
collect using teflon tubing and
analyze with continuous flow
analyzer.
Personal air sampled at 0.2– IC/conductivity 0.7 µg/sample No data NIOSH 1994
0.3 L/min for total sample size of detector,
3–100 L using silica gel sample NIOSH 7903
tube; boil sorbent from sample tube
in bicarbonate/carbonate buffer for
10 minutes.
Personal air sampled at 1– IC/conductivity 3 µg/sample No data NIOSH 1994
2 L/minute using cellulose ester detector, (gas); 120 µg/
membrane filter and alkaline- NIOSH 7906 sample
impregnated backup pad to collect (particulate)
particulate and gaseous fluorides;
extract hydrogen fluoride and
soluble fluorides with water;
insoluble fluorides requires NaOH
fusion.
Hydrogen fluoride vapor collected ISE 100 µg/L No data Young and
with dosimeter containing poly- Monat 1982
propylene element.
Dual cellulose filter to separate ISE 1.2 µg/filter No data Einfeld and
particulate and gaseous fluoride; Horstman
heat filters at 75 °C; extract; dilute 1979
with TISAB buffer.
a
Some methods measure both gaseous (HF) and particulate fluorides.
IC = ion chromatography; ISE = ion selective electrode; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health; TISAB = total ionic strength activity buffer, v/v = volume/volume
Fluoride ions form stable, colorless complexes with certain multivalent ions, such as (AlF6)3-, (FeF6)3-,
and (ZrF6)3-. Most colorimetric methods for the determination of fluoride are based on the bleaching of
colored complexes of these metals with organic dyes when fluoride is added (WHO 1984). The degree of
bleaching is determined with a spectrophotometer, and the concentration of fluoride ions is assessed by
comparison with standard solutions. In EPA Method 340.1, the sodium 2-(parasulfophenylazo)-1,8-di-
hydroxy-3,6-naphthalenedisulfonate (SPADNS) reagent is used, and the color loss is measured at 570 nm
(EPA 1998c). In EPA Method 340.3, the red cerium complex with alizarin complex one turns blue on the
addition of fluoride (EPA 1998c).
Ion chromatography (IC) utilizes anion exchange resins as a stationary phase to separate fluoride ions
from other species. In most cases, conductivity detectors are used to detect the ions in the eluent. Both
the stationary phase and the eluent must be chosen to separate fluoride from overlapping ions. Hannah
(1986) used a variant of ion exchange chromatography, namely anion exclusion chromatography, to
analyze fluoride in waste water. This method is generally applied to the separation of weak organic acids
and its use for fluoride determinations is based on the fact that fluoride is an anion of a weak acid,
hydrogen fluoride, with a pKa of 3.19, similar to that of weak organic acids. The acids elute in order of
increasing pKa. At low pH, anions of strong acids remain disassociated and are excluded from the resin
and are rapidly eluted. Hydrogen fluoride exists primarily in the molecular form, and interacts with the
resin, delaying its elution. In this way, fluoride is sufficiently separated from ionic interferences to be
reliably quantified. Interfering anions, such as chloride, emerge as one peak before the fluoride elutes.
Resolution can be controlled by adjusting the pH.
Fluorides in air may be present in the gas phase (generally hydrogen fluoride) or in the particulate phase.
Sampling may involve trapping the particulate phase on a membrane filter and the hydrogen fluoride on
an alkaline impregnated backup pad as in NIOSH Method 7906 (NIOSH 1994). Several modifications
have been suggested for the air sample collection. Einfeld and Horstman (1979) found that gaseous
fluoride, to some extent, may get trapped in the filter for particulate fluoride. They suggest that
postsampling heat treatment promotes desorption of the gaseous fluoride from the particulate phase. The
use of Teflon® tubing and materials in the analyzer is indicated for controlling loss of sample ions
(Candreva and Dams 1981; Danchik et al. 1980).
For the analysis of pollutants in the environment, EPA has approved the ISE (Method 340.2) and
colorimetric methods (Methods 340.1 and 340.3) for determining inorganic fluoride in water (EPA 1998).
NIOSH recommends the use of ISE (Method 7902) and IC methods (Methods 7903 and 7906) for the
determination of fluoride and hydrogen fluoride in air (NIOSH 1994).
Fluoride gas or vapors in ambient air are measured primarily with the ISE method. NIOSH Method 7902
uses this technique for the determination of hydrogen fluoride and particulate fluorides in air (NIOSH
1994). The hydrogen fluoride gas and particulate fluorides are collected on separate filters before
determination. Several modifications have been suggested for the air sample collection. Einfeld and
Horstman (1979) found that gaseous fluoride may get trapped in the filter for particulate fluoride to some
extent. They utilized postsampling heat treatment to desorb hydrogen fluoride from particulates. The use
of Teflon® tubing and materials in the analyzer is indicated for controlling fluoride loss (Candreva and
Dams 1981; Danchik et al. 1980).
Young and Monat (1982) developed a dosimeter to be worn on the lapel in the workplace for monitoring
airborne fluoride vapor. A replaceable collection element adsorbs the fluoride vapors. Samples are
desorbed with TISAB solution and analyzed on the ISE. The study authors noted its convenience,
stability, retentivity, and insensitivity to moisture at 5–88% humidity and competing sulfur dioxide
vapors. Interference may occur from reactive volatile fluorine compounds. Wind, temperature, and
atmospheric pressure can affect results. The dosimeter yields a sample detection range of 0.1–387 ppm
fluoride in air.
Two analytical methods for fluorine determination have been developed based on neutron or proton
activation of fluorine-9 (Knight et al. 1988; Shroy et al. 1982). Instruments measure the emitted gamma
rays or x-rays using lithium-drifted germanium detectors. This approach has wide application, since it
does not depend on a specific sample matrix or chemical form. However, the need for a special facility
with a source of neutrons or protons limits its use.
adequate information on the health effects of fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine is available.
health effects (and techniques for developing methods to determine such health effects) of fluorides,
hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine.
Methods for Determining Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect.
Exposure. Sensitive, reproducible analytical methods are available for detecting fluorides in biological
materials following short-term exposure (such as plasma and urine) and long-term exposure (i.e., bone).
The most common technique is the ISE method because it is reliable, simple, and sensitive, and has good
recoveries (NIOSH 1994; Venkateswarlu et al. 1971). GC is also useful for detection of trace levels of
fluoride in plasma and urine (Chiba et al. 1982; Ikenishi and Kitagawa 1988; Ikenishi et al. 1988). Both
methods can measure samples at concentrations at which health effects may occur.
Urinary fluoride is a widely accepted biomarker of recent fluoride exposure and has frequently been used
as an indicator of fluoride exposure in occupational studies (Chan-Yeung et al. 1983a; Kaltreider et al.
1972) and to determine exposure from drinking water (Spak et al. 1985). A minimum fluoride level of
4 mg/L in the urine using the ISE technique has been recommended as an indicator of recent fluoride
exposure in workers (Derryberry et al. 1963). Other possible biomarkers of fluoride exposure include
fluoride concentrations in tooth enamel (Shida et al. 1986), hair (Schamschula et al. 1982), nails
(Schamschula et al. 1982; Whitford et al. 1999a), saliva (Petersson et al. 1987), blood (Jackson and
Hammersley 1981), and bone (Baud et al. 1978; Bruns and Tytle 1988; Fisher 1981; Sauerbrunn et al.
1965) for which analytical methods are available.
Effect. For biomarkers of effect following chronic exposure, investigators have looked for skeletal
fluorosis using radiographs. Bone density is a common index used for evaluation (Kaltreider et al. 1972).
Guminska and Sterkowicz (1975) found an increase in erythrocyte enzyme activity (i.e., enolase, pyruvate
kinase, ATPase) that may reflect altered glucose metabolism during prolonged fluoride exposure. These
biochemical alterations are suggested for possible diagnostic purposes, but they represent a response that
may be induced in the body by a physiological change or other chemical agents. Therefore, more specific
analytical methods are needed for measuring biomarkers of effect.
Methods for Determining Parent Compounds and Degradation Products in Environmental

Media. Methods are available for determining fluoride levels in environmental samples. Methods
determine the fluoride concentration and not the particular fluorine-containing compound. Therefore,
analytical methods do not distinguish between parent compound and degradation product. The ISE
method is the most common method for measuring fluoride in environmental samples. It is a convenient,
sensitive, and reliable method, but fluoride ions must first be released from any matrix and rendered free
in solution. Methods are available for preparing various types of environmental samples for analysis
(Dabeka and McKenzie 1981; EPA 1998c; Eyde 1982; Kakabadse et al. 1971; Lopez and Navia 1988;
NIOSH 1994; NRC Canada 1971; WHO 1984).
One ongoing study regarding techniques for measuring and determining fluoride in biological and
environmental samples was located. Noah Seixas of the University of Washington proposes to adapt real-
time instruments for monitoring HF and SO2 and a nonspecific particulate, integrating currently available,
electrochemical sensor, and light scattering technology and, using these instruments, to monitor exposure
in four aluminum smelting operations (FEDRIP 2002).
8. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIES
No international regulations pertaining to fluorides were found. The national and state regulations and
guidelines regarding fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine in air, water, and other media are
summarized in Table 8-1.
A chronic-duration oral MRL of 0.05 mg fluoride/kg/day has been derived for fluoride. This MRL is
based on a NOAEL of 0.15 mg fluoride/kg/day and a LOAEL of 0.25 mg fluoride/kg/day for skeletal
effects (increased fracture rate) (Li et al. 2001). The MRL was derived by dividing the NOAEL by an
uncertainty factor of 3 to account for human variability.
An acute-duration inhalation MRL of 0.02 ppm fluoride has been derived for hydrogen fluoride. This
MRL is based on a minimal LOAEL of 0.5 ppm for upper respiratory tract inflammation in humans
exposed to hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al. 1997, 1999). The MRL was derived by dividing the
unadjusted LOAEL by an uncertainty factor of 30 (3 for a use of a minimal LOAEL and 10 to account for
human variability).
An acute-duration inhalation MRL of 0.01 ppm has been derived for fluorine. This MRL is based on a
NOAEL of 10 ppm for respiratory irritation in humans exposed to fluorine for 15 minutes (Keplinger and
Suissa 1968). The MRL was derived by dividing the 24-hour adjusted NOAEL of 0.1 ppm by an
uncertainty factor of 10 to account for human variability.
EPA (IRIS 2003) derived an oral reference dose (RfD) of 0.06 mg/kg/day for fluorine (soluble fluoride).
The RfD was based on a NOAEL of 0.06 mg/kg/day and a LOAEL of 0.12 mg/kg/day for the cosmetic
effect of dental fluorosis in children (Hodge 1950). The NOAEL was divided by an uncertainty factor
of 1 to derive the RfD.
Table 8-1. Regulations and Guidelines Applicable to Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride,

Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine
Agency Description Information Reference

INTERNATIONAL
Guidelines:
IARC Carcinogenicity classification IARC 1987
Fluoride and sodium fluoride Group 3a
WHO Drinking water guideline WHO 2001
Fluoride 1.5 mg/L
NATIONAL
Regulations and
Guidelines:
a. Air
ACGIH TLV-TWA ACGIH 2000
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
Fluorine 1.0 ppm
STEL (ceiling)
Fluorine 2.0 ppm
Hydrogen fluoride 3.0 ppm
EPA Accidental release prevention EPA 2001b
Threshold quantity 40CFR68.130
Fluorine 1,000 pounds Table 1
Hydrogen fluoride 1,000 pounds
Accidental release prevention EPA 2001a
Toxic end point 40CFR68
Fluorine 0.0039 mg/L Appendix A
Hydrogen fluoride 0.0160 mg/L
OSHA PEL (8-hour TWA) OSHA 2001c
General industry 29CFR1910.1000
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3 Table Z-1
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
Hydrogen fluoride 2.0 mg/m3
PEL (8-hour TWA) OSHA 2001f
Construction industry 29CFR1926.55
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3 Appendix A
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
PEL (8-hour TWA) OSHA 2001a
Shipyards 29CFR1915.1000
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3 Table Z
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
Highly hazardous chemicals OSHA 2001d
Fluorine 1,000 pounds Appendix A
Highly hazardous chemicals OSHA 2001e
Hydrogen fluoride 1,000 pounds Appendix A


NATIONAL (cont.)
OSHA Brazing and gas welding fluxes OSHA 2001b
shall have a cautionary wording 29CFR1910.252(c)(1)
to indicate that they contain
fluorine compounds
NIOSH REL (TWA) NIOSH 2001a
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3 NIOSH 2001b
Hydrogen fluoride 2.5 mg/m3 NIOSH 2001c
Sodium fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
IDLH NIOSH 2001a
Fluorine 25 ppm NIOSH 2001b
Hydrogen fluoride 30 ppm NIOSH 2001c
Sodium fluoride 250 ppm
USC HAP USC 2001
42USC7412
b. Water
EPA BPT effluent limitationCfluoride EPA 2001c
Maximum for 1 day 6.1 kg/kkg 40CFR415.82
Average of daily values for 2.9 kg/kkg
30 consecutive days
Effluent limitationCfluoride EPA 2001e
Maximum for 1 day 75 mg/L 40CFR422.42
Average of daily values for 25 mg/L
30 consecutive days
Groundwater protection EPA 2001f
standards at inactive uranium 40CFR192
processing sitesClisted Appendix I
constituents include fluorine and
hydrogen fluoride
MCLGCfluoride 4.0 mg/L EPA 2001j
40CFR141.51(b)
MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L EPA 2001k
40CFR141.62(b)
Secondary MCLCfluoride 2.0 mg/L EPA 2001l
40CFR143.3
Water pollutionChazardous Hydrogen fluoride EPA 2001r
substance designation Sodium fluoride 40CFR116.4
c. Food
EPA PesticidesCfluorine compounds; EPA 2001n
residue tolerances 40CFR180.145
Apricots, beets, blackberries, 7 ppm
blueberries, boysenberries,
broccoli, brussels sprouts,
cabbage, cauliflower, citrus
fruits, collards, cranberries


NATIONAL (cont.)
EPA PesticidesCfluorine compounds; EPA 2001n
residue tolerances 40CFR180.145
Cucumbers, dewberries, 7 ppm
eggplant, grapes, kale,
kohlrabi, lettuce, loganberries,
melons, nectarines, peaches,
peppers, plums, pumpkins,
radish, raspberries, rutabaga,
squash, strawberries,
tomatoes, turnip,
youngberries
Potatoes 2 ppm
Potatoes, processing waste 22 ppm
Kiwifruit 15 ppm
FDA Adhesive component, indirect Total fluoride from all FDA 2000e
food additiveCfor use only as sources not to exceed 21CFR175.105(c)(5)
bonding agent for aluminum foil, 1% by weight of the
stabilizer, or preservative finished adhesive
Hydrogen fluoride
Sodium fluoride
Bottled waterCno fluoride added Temperatureb mg/L FDA 2000g
53.7Bbelow 2.4 21CFR165.110
53.8B58.3 2.2
58.4B63.8 2.0
63.9B70.6 1.8
70.7B79.2 1.6
79.3B90.5 1.4
Bottled waterCfluoride added Temperatureb mg/L
53.7Bbelow 1.7
53.8B58.3 1.5
58.4B63.8 1.3
63.9B70.6 1.2
70.7B79.2 1.0
79.3B90.5 0.8
Over-the-counter drug products FDA 2000b
LabelingCfluoride, fluorine, 21CFR355.50
and sodium fluoride
FDA 2000c
21CFR355.60
Over-the-counter drug products FDA 2000d
TestingCfluoride 21CFR355.70
Over-the-counter drug products FDA 2000a
Active ingredientCfluorine, 21CFR355.10
hydrogen fluoride, and sodium
fluoride FDA 2000f
21CFR310.545(a)(2)


NATIONAL (cont.)
FDA Surface component, food FDA 2000h
contactCsodium fluoride for use 21CFR177.2800
as preservative only (d)(5)
d. Other
ACGIH Carcinogenicity classification ACGIH 2000
Fluoride A4c
BEI
Fluorides in urine
Prior to shift 3 mg/g creatinine
End of shift 10 mg/g creatinine
CPSC Requirements for child-resistant More than 50 mg and CPSC 2001
packaging for household more than 0.5% 16CFR1700
products containing elemental
fluoride
DOT Hazardous materials DOT 2001
Reportable quantity 40CFR172.101
Fluorine 10 pounds Appendix A
Hydrogen fluoride 100 pounds
Sodium fluoride 1,000 pounds
EPA RfDCfluorine 6x10-2 mg/kg/day IRIS 2003
Toxic chemical release reporting; EPA 2001q
Community Right-to- 40CFR372.65
KnowCeffective date
Fluorine 01/01/95
Hydrogen fluoride 01/01/87
Contaminated soilCfluoride Concentrations greater EPA 2001d
than 10 times UTS 40CFR268.49(f)
Hazardous wasteChealth based EPA 2001g
limits for exclusion of waste- 40CFR266
derived-residue Appendix VII
Fluorine residue concentration 4.0 mg/kg
limit
Hazardous wasteCidentification EPA 2001h
and listing 40CFR261.33(e)
Fluorine P056 EPA 2001i
Hydrogen fluoride U134 40CFR261.33(f)
PesticidesCresidue tolerances Not more than 25% of EPA 2001m
Sodium fluoride pesticide formulation 40CFR180.1001(d)
SuperfundCreportable quantity EPA 2001o
Fluorine 1 pound 40CFR302.4
Hydrogen fluoride 5,000 pounds Appendix A
Sodium fluoride 5,000 pounds


NATIONAL (cont.)
EPA SuperfundCextremely hazardous EPA 2001p
Reportable quantity 40CFR355
Fluorine 10 pounds Appendix A
Threshold planning quantity
Fluorine 500 pounds
STATE
a. Air
Connecticut HAPCfluoride, fluorine, and BNA 2001
hydrogen fluoride
Hawaii Air contaminantChydrogen BNA 2001
fluoride
Idaho Toxic air pollutants BNA 2001
Fluoride
OEL 2.5 mg/m3
EL 0.167 pounds/hour
AAC 0.125 mg/m3
Fluorine
OEL 2.0 mg/m3
EL 0.133 pounds/hour
AAC 0.1 mg/m3
Michigan PEL (TWA) BNA 2001
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
Hydrogen fluoride 3.0 ppm
Montana Air contaminant (TWA) BNA 2001
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
New Mexico Toxic air pollutant BNA 2001
Fluorides
OEL 2.5 mg/m3
Emissions 0.167 pounds/hour
Fluorine
OEL 2.0 mg/m3
Emissions 0.133 pounds/hour
New York Air contaminant (TLV) BNA 2001
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3


STATE (cont.)
Washington Toxic air pollutantCASIL BNA 2001
Fluoride 8.3 µg/m3
Fluorine 5.3 µg/m3
Hydrogen fluoride 8.7 µg/m3
PEL BNA 2001
Fluoride 2.5 mg/m3
Fluorine 0.2 mg/m3
Hydrogen fluoride (STEL) 3.0 ppm
Wisconsin Emission rate (pounds/hour) <25 feet >25 feet BNA 2001
Fluoride 0.2088 0.8640
Fluorine 0.1656 0.6720
Hydrogen fluoride 0.1272 0.4800
b. Water
Alaska MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Secondary MCLCfluoride 2.0 mg/L
Arizona Drinking water guidelineCfluoride 4.0 mg/L HSDB 2003
Reporting limitCfluoride 2.0 mg/L BNA 2001
California Drinking water standardsC 2.0 mg/L HSDB 2003
fluoride
Connecticut MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Delaware Drinking water standardsC 1.8 mg/L HSDB 2003
fluoride
Georgia MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Hawaii Drinking water standardsC 1.4B2.4 mg/L HSDB 2003
fluoride
Idaho Groundwater quality standardsC 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
fluoride
Kansas AgricultureCfluoride BNA 2001
Livestock 2.0 mg/L
Irrigation 1.0 mg/L
Public health foodCfluoride
Domestic water supply 2.0 mg/L
Maine Drinking water guidelineCfluoride 2.4 mg/L HSDB 2003
Maximum exposure guideline 2.4 mg/L BNA 2001
Action level 1.2 mg/L
Mississippi Groundwater standardsCfluoride 4.0 ppm BNA 2001
Nebraska MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001


STATE (cont.)
New Jersey Groundwater quality criteriaC 2.0 mg/L BNA 2001
fluoride
PQLCfluoride 0.5 mg/L
New York Groundwater effluent limitationsC 3.0 mg/L BNA 2001
fluoride
MCLCfluoride 2.2 mg/L BNA 2001
North Carolina Drinking water standardsC 4.0 mg/L HSDB 2003
fluoride
North Dakota MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Oklahoma MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Pennsylvania Drinking water standardsC 2.0 mg/L HSDB 2003
fluoride
Rhode Island MCLGCfluoride 4.0 ppm BNA 2001
MCLCfluoride 4.0 ppm
South Dakota Groundwater quality standardsC 2.4 mg/L BNA 2001
fluoride
Tennessee MCLCfluoride 4.0 ppm BNA 2001
Texas MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Utah Groundwater standards 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Vermont Groundwater quality standardsC BNA 2001
fluoride
Enforcement standard 4.0 mg/L
Preventive action level 2.0 mg/L
Washington MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
West Virginia Groundwater standards Not to exceed 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
Wisconsin MCLGCfluoride 4.0 mg/L BNA 2001
MCLCfluoride 4.0 mg/L
Groundwater standardsCfluoride BNA 2001
Enforcement standard 4.0 mg/L
Preventive action limit 0.8 mg/L
c. Food No data
d. Other
Connecticut Use of pesticides; control of For use as a wood BNA 2001
registrations and usesCsodium preservative
fluoride


STATE (cont.)
Minnesota Hazardous substanceCfluoride BNA 2001
(as F, as dust), fluorides
(inorganic), fluorine, and
hydrogen fluorine
New Jersey Hazardous substanceCfluorine BNA 2001
and hydrogen fluoride
a
Group 3: not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans
b
Temperature: annual average of maximum daily air temperatures (EF)
c
A4: not classifiable as a human carcinogen
AAC = acceptable ambient concentrations; ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists;
ASIL = acceptable source impact levels; BEI = biological exposure indices; BNA = Bureau of National Affairs;
BPT = best practicable control technology; CFR = Code of Federal Regulations; CPSC = Consumer Product Safety
Commission; DOT = Department of Transportation; EL = emissions levels; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency;
FDA = Food and Drug Administration; HAP = hazardous air pollutant; HSDB = Hazardous Substances Data Bank;
IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer; IDLH = immediately dangerous to life and health;
IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System; MCL = maximum contaminant level; MCLG = maximum contaminant
level goal; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OEL = occupational exposure limit;
OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PEL = permissible exposure limit; PQL = practical
quantitation level; REL = recommended exposure limit; RfD = reference dose; STEL = short term exposure limit;
TLV = threshold limit values; TWA = time-weighted average; USC = United States Code; UTS = universal treatment
standards; WHO = World Health Organization
9. REFERENCES
Aardema MJ, Tsutsui T. 1995. Series: Current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, No. 59:
Sodium fluoride-induced chromosome aberrations in different cell cycle stages. Mutat Res 331:171-172.
*Aardema MJ, Gibson DP, LeBoeuf RA. 1989. Sodium fluoride-induced chromosome aberrations in
different stages of the cell cycle: A proposed mechanism. Mutat Res 223:191-203.
Aasenden R, Peebles TC. 1978. Effects of fluoride supplementation from birth on dental caries and
fluorosis in teenaged children. Arch Oral Biol 23:111-115.
Aasenden R, Moreno EC, Brudevold R. 1973. Fluoride levels in the surface enamel of different types of
human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 18:1403-1410.
Abou-Elela SI, Abdelmonem. 1994. Utilization of wastewater from fertilizer industry- A case study.
Wat Sci Tech 29(9):169-173.
*Abukurah AR, Moser AM Jr, Baird CL, et al. 1972. Acute sodium fluoride poisoning. JAMA 222:816-
817.
ACGIH. 1971. Documentation of the threshold limit values for substances in the workroom air.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 116-117.
ACGIH. 1983-1984. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents in the work
environment. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
ACGIH. 1986. Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. 5th ed.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
ACGIH. 1992. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and biological agents and biological
exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 22-23,
64-65.
*ACGIH. 2000. Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological indices. Cincinnati, OH:
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
Adams DF. 1960. An automatic hydrogen fluoride recorder proposed for industrial hygiene and stack
monitoring. Anal Chem 32:1312-1316.
Addy M, Dowell P. 1986. Dentine hypersensitivity: Effect of interactions between metal salts, fluoride,
and chlorhexidine on the uptake by dentine. J Oral Rehabil 13:599-605.
Addy M, Mostafa P. 1988. Dentine hypersensitivity: I. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of metal
ions, fluoride and formaldehyde onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil 15:575-585.
Addy M, Mostafa P. 1989. Dentine hypersensitivity: II. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of
toothpaste onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil 16:35-48.
_______________________
* Cited in text
9. REFERENCES
*Adinolfi M. 1985. The development of the human blood-CSF-brain barrier. Dev Med Child Neurol
27:532-537.
*Adlercreutz H. 1995. Phytoestrogens: Epidemiology and a possible role in cancer protection.

Environ Health Perspect Suppl 103(7):103-112.
*Afseth J, Ekstrand J, Hagelid P. 1987. Dissolution of calcium fluoride tablets in vitro and
bioavailability in man. Scand J Dent Res 95:191-192.
*Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1989. Decision guide for identifying substance-
specific data needs related to toxicological profiles; Notice. Federal Register 54(174):37618-37634.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1990. Biomarkers of organ damage or dysfunction
for the renal, hepatobiliary, and immune systems. Subcommittee on Biomarkers of Organ Damage and
Dysfunction. Atlanta, GA.
*Aigueperse J, Mollard P, Devilliers D, et al. 1988. Fluorine compounds, Inorganic. In: Gerhartz W,
ed. Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. 5th ed., Vol A11. Weinheim, Germany: VCH
Publishers, 308-348.
Akesson B, Hogstedt B, Skerfving S. 1980. Fever induced by fluorine-containing lubricant on stainless

steel tubes. Br J Ind Med 37:307-309.
Akpata ES, Fakiha Z, Khan N. 1997. Dental fluorosis in 12-15-year-old rural children exposed to
fluorides from well drinking water in the hail region of Saudi Arabia. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol
25:324-327.
*Alarcón-Herrera MT, Martin-Dominguez IR, Trejo-Vázquez R, et al. 2001. Well water fluoride, dental
fluorosis, and bone fractures in the Guandiana Valley of Mexico. Fluoride 34(2):139-149.
Alary J, Bourbon P, Balsa C, et al. 1981. A field study of the validity of static paper sampling in fluoride
pollution surveys. Sci Total Environ 22:11-18.
*Albanese R. 1987. Sodium fluoride and chromosome damage (in vitro human lymphocyte and in vivo
micronucleus assays). Mutagenesis 2:497-499.
Alhava EM, Olkkonen H, Kauranen P, et al. 1980. The effect of drinking water fluoridation on the
fluoride content, strength and mineral density of human bone. Acta Orthop Scand 51:413-420.
*Al-Hiyassat AS, Elbetieha AM, Darmani H, et al. 2000. Reproductive toxic effects of ingestion of
sodium fluoride in female rats. Fluoride 33(2):79-84.
Alshuller AP. 1969. Air pollution. Anal Chem 41:IR-13R.
*Altman PL, Dittmer DS. 1974. In: Biological handbooks: Biology data book. Vol. III. 2nd ed.
Bethesda, MD: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1987-2008, 2041.
*Anasuya A, Narasinga Rao BS. 1974. Hydroxyproline peptides of urine in fluorosis. Clin Chim Acta
56:121-123.
9. REFERENCES
*Andersen A, Dahlberg BE, Magnus K, et al. 1982. Risk of cancer in the Norwegian aluminum industry.
Int J Cancer 29:295-298.
*Andersen ME, Krishnan K. 1994. Relating in vitro to in vivo exposures with physiologically based
tissue dosimetry and tissue response models. In: Salem H, ed. Animal test alternatives: Refinement,
reduction, replacement. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 9-25.
*Andersen ME, Clewell HJ III, Gargas ML, et al. 1987. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the
risk assessment process for methylene chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 87:185-205.
Anderson R, Beard JH, Sorley D. 1980. Fluoride intoxication in a dialysis unit. Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Reports 29:134-136.
Anderson WJ, Anderson JR. 1988. Hydrofluoric acid burns of the hand: Mechanisms of injury and
treatment. J Hand Surg 12A:52-57.
Ando M, Tadano M, Yamamoto S, et al. 2001. Health effects of fluoride pollution caused by coal
burning. Sci Total Environ 27:107-116.
Angmar-Mansson B, Whitford GM. 1982. Plasma fluoride levels and enamel fluorosis in the rat. Caries
Res 16:334-339.
Anonymous. 1963. Sodium fluoride in bone disease. N Eng J Med 269:216-217.
Anonymous. 1969. Inorganic fluorides. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 30:98-101.
Anonymous. 1970. Hydrogen fluoride and other inorganic fluorides: Methods for the detection of toxic
substances in air booklet. London, England: Her Majesty's Office Stationery Office, 19:1-15.
Anonymous. 1972. Can fluoride cause lung cancer? Fluoride 5:169-171.
Anonymous. 1979. Environmental fluoride. Fluoride 12:1-4.
*Aoba T. 1997. The effect of fluoride on apatite structure and growth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
8(2):136-153.
Appleton J. 1994. Formation and structure of dentine in the rat incisor after chronic exposure to sodium
fluoride. Scanning Microsc 8(3):711-719.
Appleton J. 1995. Changes in the plasma electrolytes and metabolites of the rat following acute exposure
to sodium fluoride and strontium chloride. Arch Oral Biol 40(4):265-268.
*Araibi AA, Yousif WH, Al-Dewachi OS. 1989. Effect of high fluoride on the reproductive
performance of the male rat. J Biol Sci Res 20:19-30.
Arends J, Christoffersen J. 1990. Nature and role of loosely bound fluoride in dental caries. J Dent Res
69(special issue):601-5.
*Ares J. 1990. Fluoride-aluminum water chemistry in forest ecosystems of central Europe.

Chemosphere 21(4-5):597-612.
9. REFERENCES
Ares JO, Villa A, Mondadori G. 1980. Air pollutant uptake by xerophytic vegetation: Fluoride. Environ
Exp Bot 20:259-269.
Armstrong WD, Singer L. 1980. Fluoride tissue distribution: Intracellular fluoride concentrations. Proc
Soc Exp Biol Med 164:500-506.
*Armstrong WD, Gedalia I, Singer L, et al. 1970. Distribution of fluoride. In: Fluoride and human
health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Monograph Series 59:93-139.
Arnala I, Alhava EM, Kauranen P. 1985. Effects of fluoride on bone in Finland: Histomorphometry of
cadaver bone for low and high fluoride areas. Acta Orthop Scand 56:161-166.
*Arnala I, Alhava EM, Kivivuori R, et al. 1986. Hip fracture incidence not affected by fluoridation.
Acta Orthop Scand 57:344-348.
*Arnesen AKM. 1997. Availability of fluoride to plants grown in contaminated soils. Plant Soil 191:13-
25.
*Arnow PM, Bland LA, Garcia-Houchins S, et al. 1994. An outbreak of fatal fluoride intoxication in a
long-term hemodialysis unit. Ann Intern Med 121:339-344.
Aschengrau A, Zierler S, Cohen A. 1993. Quality of community drinking water and the occurrence of
late adverse pregnancy outcomes. Arch Environ Health 48(2):105-113.
*Ast BH, Finn SB, Chase HC. 1951. Newburgh-Kingston caries fluorine study. II. Further analysis of
dental findings including the permanent and deciduous dentitions after 4 years of fluoridation. J Am Dent
Assoc 42:188-195.
Ast DB, Smith DJ, Wachs B, et al. 1956. Newburgh-Kingston caries-fluorine study: XIV. Combined
clinical and roentgenographic dental findings after ten years of fluoride experience. J Am Dent Assoc
52:314-325.
*Attwood D, Blinkhorn AS. 1991. Dental caries in schoolchildren 5 years after fluoridation ceased in
South-west Scotland. Int Dent J 41:43-48.
*Aulerich RJ, Napolitano AC, Bursian SJ, et al. 1987. Chronic toxicity of dietary fluorine to mink. J
Anim Sci 65:1759-1767.
*Austen KF, Dworetzky M, Farr RS, et al. 1971. A statement on the question of allergy to fluoride as
used in the fluoridation of community water supplies. J Allergy 47:347-348.
Avioli LV. 1987. Adjunctive modes of therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Pros and cons.
Postgrad Med 14(9):21-27.
*Avorn J, Niessen LC. 1986. Relationship between long bone fractures and water fluoridation.
Gerodontics 2:175-179.
Awadia AK, Birkeland JM, Haugejorden O, et al. 2000. An attempt to explain why Tanzanian children
drinking water containing 0.2 or 3.6 mg fluoride per liter exhibit a similar level of dental fluorosis. Clin
Oral Invest 4:238-244.
9. REFERENCES
Baars AJ, Van Beek, Spierenburg TJ, et al. 1987. Fluoride pollution in a salt marsh: Movement between
soil, vegetation, and sheep. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 39:945-952.
Baars AJ, Van Beek, Spierenburg TJ, et al. 1988. Environmental contamination by heavy metals and
fluoride in the Saeftinge salt marsh (the Netherlands) and its effect on sheep. Vet Q 10:90-98.
Baker BB, Morrison JD. 1955. Determination of microgram quantities of fluoride and cyanide by
measurement of current from spontaneous electrolysis. Anal Chem 27:1306-1307.
Balazova G. 1971. Effects of long-term fluorine emissions on children's organs. Med Lav 62:202-207.
*Baltazar RF, Mower MM, Funk M. 1980. Acute fluoride poisoning leading to fatal hyperkalemia.
Chest 78(4):660-663.33.
Bang S, Voivin G, Gerster JC, et al. 1985. Distribution of fluoride in calcified cartilage of a fluoride-
treated osteoporotic patient. Bone 6:207-210.
Barbakow F. 1983. Intake, absorption, and excretion of dietary fluoride. Int J Vitam Nutr Res [Suppl]
25:83-94.
Barber JC, Farr TD. 1970. Fluoride recovery from phosphorous production. Chem Eng Prog 66:56-62.
*Barnes DG, Dourson M. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 8:471-486.
Barnes D, Bellin J, De Rosa C, et al. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk
assessments. Vol. 1, appendix A: Integrated risk information system supportive documentation.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment. EPA600/8-86-032a.
*Barnhart WE, Hiller LK, Leonard GL, et al. 1974. Dentifrice usage and ingestion among four age
groups. J Dent Res 53(6):1317-1322.
Baud CA, Bang S, Demeurisse C, et al. 1986. Long-term retention of fluoride in the bones of former
aluminum workers. Fluoride Res 27:187-191.
Baud CA, Boivin G, Demeurisse C. 1982. Drug-induced skeletal fluorosis. Fluoride 15(2):54-56.
*Baud CA, Lagier R, Boivin G, et al. 1978. Value of the bone biopsy in the diagnosis of industrial
fluorosis. Virchows Arch [Pathol Anat] 380(4):283-297.
*Bauer CF, Andren AW. 1985. Emissions of vapor-phase fluorine and ammonia from the Columbia
coal-fired power plant. Environ Sci Technol 19:1099-1103.
*Bawden JW, Crenshaw MA, Wright JT, et al. 1995. Consideration of possible biologic mechanisms of
fluorosis. J Dent Res 74(7):1349-1352.
Bawden JW, Deaton TG, Crawford BP. 1992a. Fluoride and calcium content of enamel organ, muscle,
liver and plasma in rats. Caries Res 26:263-267.
9. REFERENCES
*Bawden JC, Deaton TG, Crenshaw MA. 1987. The short-term uptake and retention of fluoride in
developing enamel and bone. J Dent Res 66:1587-1590.
Bawden JW, Deaton TG, Koch GG, et al. 1992b. Fluoride uptake in hard tissues of fetal guinea pigs in
response to various dose regimens. Arch Oral Biol 37(11):929-933.
Bawden JW, McLean P, Deaton TG. 1986. Fluoride uptake and retention at various stages of rat molar
enamel development. J Dent Res 65:34-38.
*Bayless JM, Tinanoff N. 1985. Diagnosis and treatment of acute fluoride toxicity. J Am Dent Assoc
110:209-211.
Baylink DJ, Bernstein DS. 1967. The effects of fluoride therapy on metabolic bone disease: A
histologic study. Clin Orthop 55:51-85.
Beal JF, Rock WP. 1976. Fluoride gels: A laboratory and clinical investigation. Br Dent J 140:307-310.
Bednar CM, Kies C. 1991. Inorganic contaminants in drinking water correlated with disease occurrence
in Nebraska. Water Resour Bull 27(4):631-635.
*Bell ME, Largent EJ, Ludwig TG, et al. 1970. The supply of fluorine to man. World Health
Organization Monograph Series 59:17-74.
Bell RD. 1936. Poisoning by sodium fluoride. Br Med J 1936:886.
Bellack E. 1972. Methods and materials for fluoride analysis. J AWWA 64:62-66.
Bellack E, Schouboe PJ. 1958. Rapid photometric determination of fluoride in water: Use of sodium 2-
(p-sulfophenylazo)-1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene-3,6-disulfonate-zirconium lake. Anal Chem 30:2032-
2034.
Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Griffin SO, Lockwood SA. 2002. Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the
United States from the 1930’s to the 1980’s. JADA 133:157-165.
*Bennion JR, Franzblau A. 1997. Chemical pneumonitis following household exposure to hydrofluoric
acid. Am J Ind Med 31:474-478.
*Berger GS. 1994. Epidemiology of endometriosis. In: Berger GS, ed. Endometriosis: Advanced
management and surgical techniques. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Bernstein DS, Cohen P. 1967. Use of sodium fluoride in the treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 27:197-210.
*Bernstein DS, Sadowsky N, Hegsted DM, et al. 1966. Prevalence of osteoporosis in high- and low-
fluoride areas in North Dakota. JAMA 198(5):85-90.
*Berry WTC. 1958. A study of the incidence of mongolism in relation to the fluoride content of water.
Am J Ment Defic 62:634.
*Bethea RM. 1974. Improvements in colormetric analysis of chlorine and hydrogen fluoride by syringe-
sampling technique. Environ Sci Technol 8:587-588.
9. REFERENCES
*Betterton EA. 1992. Henry's law constants of soluble and moderately soluble organic gases: Effects on
aqueous phase chemistry. In: Nriagu JO, ed. Gaseous pollutants: Characterization and cycling. New
York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1-50.
Beulke SH. 1998. First-aid treatment of dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid. Aust J Hosp Pharm
28(6):445.
Bezuglaya EY, Shchutskaya AB, Smirnova IV. 1993. Air pollution index and interpretation of
measurements of toxic pollutant concentrations. Atmos Environ 27A(5):773-779.
Bhatt A, Gupta VK. 1985. Pollutants: A new reagent for the detection of fluoride. Microchem J
31:322-325.
Bierman HR. 1972. Fluorides in neoplastic disease. Postgrad Med 51:166-173.
Biersteker K, Zielhuis RL, Dirks O, et al. 1977. Fluoride excretion in urine of school children living
close to an aluminum refinery in the Netherlands. Environ Res 13:129-134.
Biochemical Assay Committee. 1971. Biological monitoring studies: Fluorides. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J
32:274-279.
Birdsong-Whitford NL, Whitford GM, Lecompte EJ. 1987. Acute fluoride toxicity associated with
plasma calcium and fluoride levels. Caries Res 21:165-166.
Bishop PA. 1936. Bone changes in chronic fluorine intoxication. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther 35:577-
585.
Bjarnason S, Noren JG, Koch G. 1989. Enamel fluoride and caries in Icelandic children and a
comparison of enamel fluoride in Swedish and Icelandic children. Caries Res 23:87-91.
Blodgett DW, Suruda AJ, Crouch BI. 2001. Fatal unintentional occupational poisonings by hydrofluoric
acid in the U.S. Am J Ind Med 40:215-220.
*BNA. 2001. Environmental and Safety Library on the Web States and Territories. Bureau of National
Affairs, Inc., Washington, D.C. http://www.esweb.bna.com/. May 25, 2001.
*Bobek S, Kahl S, Ewy Z. 1976. Effect of long-term fluoride administration on thyroid hormones level
in blood in rats. Endocrinol Exp 10:289-295.
Boeckh-Haebisch EM, Oliveira-Filho M. 1997. Systemic effects of fluoridated water on rats. Arq Biol
Technol 40(1):57-68.
Boeuf B. 1977. Automatic analyzer of fluorine in air. Fluoride 10:12-14.
Bohatyrewicz A. 1999. Effects of fluoride on mechanical properties of femoral bone in growing rats.
Fluoride 32(2):47-54.
Boink A, Meulenbelt J, Wemer J, et al. 1995. Systemic fluoride poisoning following dermal
hydrofluoric acid exposure: Development of an intravenous sodium fluoride infusion model in rats. J
Toxicol Cutaneous Ocul Toxicol 14(2):75-87.
9. REFERENCES
Boivin G, Meunier PJ. 1990. Fluoride and bone: Toxicological and therapeutic aspects. In: Cohen RD,
Lewis B, Alberti KGMM, et al., eds. The metabolic and molecular basis of acquired disease.
Philadelphia, PA: Balliere Tindall, 2:34-52.
*Boivin G, Chapuy MC, Baud CA, et al. 1988. Fluoride content in human iliac bone: Results in
controls, patients with fluorosis, and osteoporotic patients treated with fluoride. J Bone Miner Res
3(5):497-502.
Boivin G, Chavassieux P, Chapuy MC, et al. 1989. Skeletal fluorosis: Histomorphometric analysis of
bone changes and bone fluoride content in 29 patients. Bone 10:89-99.
Bompart G, Do phuoc H, Ourbon P. 1983. Action of hydrogen fluoride on dimethylnitrosamine liver

metabolism in rats. Toxicol Eur Res 5:273-276.
*Bonjour JP, Caverzasio J, Rizzoli R. 1993. Effect of fluoride on bone cells. Res Clin Forums 15:9-12.
*Borak J, Callan M, Abbott W. 1991. Hazardous materials exposure: Emergency response and patient
care. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Brady Press, 115, 165-166, 228-229, 239.
Bordelon BM, Saffle JR, Morris SE. 1993. Systemic fluoride toxicity in a child with hydrofluoric acid
burns. J Trauma 34(3):437-439.
Borke JL, Whitford GM. 1999. Chronic fluoride ingestion decreases 45Ca uptake by rat kidney
membranes. J Nutr 129:1209-1213.
Boros I, Vegh A, Schaper R, et al. 1984. Fluoride levels in sera and hard tissues of rats consuming
fluoride via drinking water. Fluoride 17:183-192.
Borysewicz-Lewicka M, Kobylanska M. 1983. Periodontal disease, oral hygiene and fluoride content of
dental deposits in aluminum workers. Fluoride 16:5-10.
Bourbon P, Rioufol C, Levy P. 1984. Relationships between blood urine and bone fluoride levels in
guinea-pig after short exposures to hydrogen fluoride. Fluoride 17:124-131.
*Bowden GHW. 1990. Effects of fluoride on the microbial ecology of dental plaque. J Dent Res
*Bowden GHW, Odlum O, Nolette N, et al. 1982. Microbial populations growing in the presence of
fluoride at low pH isolated from dental plaque of children living in an area with fluoridated water. Infect
Immun 36:247-254.
*Bowen HJM. 1966. Trace elements in biochemistry. 1st ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 18-184.
*Brambilla E, Belluomo G, Malerba A, et al. 1994. Oral administration of fluoride in pregnant women,
and the relation between concentration in maternal plasma and in amniotic fluid. Arch Oral Biol
39(11):991-994.
*Braun J, Stob H, Zober A. 1984. Intoxication following the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride. Arch
Toxicol 56:50-54.
9. REFERENCES
*Brewer RF. 1966. Fluorine. In: Chapman HD, ed. Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils. Riverside,
CA: Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, 180-195.
Brimblecombe P, Clegg SL. 1989. Erratum. J Atmos Chem 8:95.
*Bronstein AC, Currance PL. 1988. Emergency care for hazardous materials exposure. St. Louis, MO:
The C.V. Mosby Company, 113-114, 165-166.
*Broomhall J, Kovar IZ. 1986. Environmental pollutants in breast milk. Rev Environ Health 6(1-
4):311-337.
Brown MG. 1985. Fluoride exposure from hydrofluoric acid in a motor gasoline alkylation unit. Am
Ind Hyg Assoc J 46:662-669.
*Browne TD. 1974. The treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. J Soc Occup Med 24:80-89.
*Bruns BR, Tytle T. 1988. Skeletal fluorosis: A report of two cases. Orthopedics 11(7):1083-1087.
Bruun C, Thylstrup A. 1984. Fluoride in whole saliva and dental caries experience in areas with high or
low concentrations of fluoride in the drinking water. Caries Res 18:450-456.
*Bucher JR, Hejtmancik MR, Toft JD II, et al. 1991. Results and conclusions of the national toxicology
program's rodent carcinogenicity studies with sodium fluoride. Int J Cancer 48:733-737.
*Buckingham FM. 1988. Surgery: A radical approach to severe hydrofluoric acid burns: A case report.
J Occup Med 30:873-874.
*Budavari S, ed. 2001. The Merck index- An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals. 13th ed.
Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 4206, 8699.
Buettner W, Karle E. 1974. Chronic toxicity and retention of fluoride in the unilaterally nephrectomized
rat. Caries Res 8:359-367.
Bunce HW. 1985. Fluoride in air, grass, and cattle. J Dairy Sci 68:1706-1711.
*Burke WJ, Hoegg UR, Phillips RE. 1973. Systematic fluoride poisoning resulting from a fluoride skin
burn. J Occup Med 15:39-41.
*Burnelle JA, Carlos JP. 1990. Recent trends in dental caries in U.S. children and the effect of water
fluoridation. J Dent Res 69 (Spec Iss):723-727.
*Burt BA. 1992. The changing patterns of systemic fluoride intake. J Dent Res 71:1228-1237.
*Burt BA, Keels MA, Heller KE. 2000. The effects of a break in water fluoridation on the development
of dental caries and fluorosis. J Dent Res 79:761-769.
*Butler JE, Satam M, Ekstrand J. 1990. Fluoride: an adjuvant for mucosal and systemic immunity.
Immunol Lett 26:217-220.
Cabello-Tomas ML, West TS. 1969. Kinetochromic spectrophotometry. Talanta 16:781-788.

9. REFERENCES
*Calderon J, Machado B, Navarro M-E, et al. 2000. Influence of fluoride exposure on reaction time and
visuospatial organization in children. Epidemiology 11:S153.
Camarasa JG, Serra-Baldrich E, Lluch M, et al. 1993. Contact urticaria from sodium fluoride. Contact
Dermatitis 28(5):294.
Camargo JA. 1996. Comparing levels of pollutants in regulated rivers with safe concentrations
of pollutants for fishes: A case study. Chemosphere 33(1):81-90.
*Camargo JA. 2003. Fluoride toxicity to aquatic organisms: A review. Chemosphere 50:251-264.
Cameron AC, Widmer RP, eds. 2003. Handbook of pediatric dentistry. Mosby, Elsevier Science, 390-
391.
*Candreva F, Dams R. 1981. Determination of gaseous fluoride and chloride emissions in a municipal
incinerator. Sci Total Environ 17:155-163.
Capozzi L, Brunetti P, Negri PL, et al. 1967. Enzymatic mechanism of some fluorine compounds.
Caries Research 1:69-77.
Cappell MS, Simon T. 1993. Fulminant acute colitis following a self-administered hydrofluoric acid
enema. Am J Gastroenterol 88(1):122-126.
Caravati EM. 1988. Acute hydrofluoric acid exposure. Am J Emerg Med 6:143-150.
Carbone PP, Zipkin I, Sokoloff L, et al. 1968. Fluoride effect on bone in plasma cell myeloma. Arch
Intern Med 121:120-140.
Carlson CE, Dewey JE. 1971. Environmental pollution by fluorides in Flathead National Forest and
Glacier National Park. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
*Carlson CH, Armstrong WD, Singer L. 1960a. Distribution and excretion of radiofluoride in the
human. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 104:235-239.
Carlson CH, Singer L, Armstrong WD. 1960b. Radiofluoride distribution in tissues of normal and
nephrectomized rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 103:418-420.
*Carnow BW, Conibear SA. 1981. Industrial fluorosis. Fluoride 14(4):172-181.
Carotti AA, Kaiser ER. 1972. Concentrations of twenty gaseous chemical species in the flue gas of a
municipal incinerator. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 22(4):248-253.
*Carpenter R. 1969. Factors controlling the marine geochemistry of fluorine. Geochim Cosmochim
Acta 33:1153-1167.
Carriere D, Bird DM, Stamm JW. 1987. Influence of a diet of fluoride-fed cockerels on reproductive
performance of captive American kestrels. Environmental Pollution 46:151-159.
*Caspary WJ, Langenbach R, Penman BW, et al. 1988. The mutagenicity activity of selected
compounds at the TK locus: Rodent vs. human cell. Mutat Res 196:61.
9. REFERENCES
*Caspary WJ, Myhr B, Bowers L, et al. 1987. Mutagenic activity of fluorides in mouse lymphoma cells.
Mutat Res 187:165-180.
Cassinelli ME. 1986. Laboratory evaluation of silica gel sorbent tubes for sampling hydrogen fluoride.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47:219-224.
*Catanese J, Keaveny TM. 1996. Role of collagen and hydroxyapatite in the mechanical behavior of
bone tissue. J Bone Miner Res 11:S295.
*Cauley JA, Murphy PA, Riley TJ, et al. 1995. Effects of fluoridated drinking water on bone mass and
fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Min Res 10:1076-1086.
Cavagna G, Locati G, Ambrosi L. 1969. Experimental studies in newborn rats and mice on the supposed
capillary-damaging effects of fluorine and fluorine-containing industrial pollutants. Fluoride Quart Rep
2:214-221.
CDC. 1991. Public health service report on fluorine benefits and risks. Centers for Disease Control.
JAMA 262:1061-1067.
*CDER. 1991. Dose determination and carcinogenicity studies of sodium fluoride in Crl:CD-1 mice and
Crl:CD (Sprague Dawley) BR rats. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Carcinogenicity
Assessment Committee. In: Review of fluoride: Benefits and risks: Report of the ad hoc subcommittee
on fluoride of the committee to coordinate environmental health and related programs. Washington, DC:
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
*Cecilioni VA. 1972. Lung cancer in a steel city: Its possible relation to fluoride emissions. Fluoride
5:172-181.
CELDS. 1989. Computer-Aided Environmental Legislative Data Systems. University of Illinois,

Urbana, IL.
*CEPA. 1996. National ambient air quality objectives for hydrogen fluoride (HF): Science assessment
document. Ontario: CEPA/FPAC Working Group on Air Quality Objectives and Guidelines, Canadian
Environmental Protection Act.
Cerklewski FL. 1987. Influence of dietary magnesium on fluoride bioavailability in the rat. J Nutr
117:496-500.
Cerklewski FL, Ridlington JW. 1985. Influence of zinc and iron on dietary fluoride utilization in the rat.
J Nutr 115:1162-1167.
Cerklewski FL, Ridlington JW, Bills ND. 1986. Influence of dietary chloride on fluoride bioavailability
in the rat. J Nutr 116:618-624.
*Chachra D, Turner CH, Dunipace AJ, et al. 1999. The effect of fluoride treatment on bone mineral in
rabbits. Calcif Tissue Int 64:345-351.
*Chan K-M, Svancarek WP, Creer M. 1987. Fatality due to acute hydrofluoric acid exposure. J Toxicol
Clin Toxicol 25:333-340.
9. REFERENCES
Chan JT, Stark CM, Wild TW, et al. 1992. Influence of vitamins and iron on plasma fluoride levels in
rats. Pediatr Dent 14(1):37-40.
Chang CW, Thompson CR. 1964. An improved diffusion method for determining submicrogram
amounts of fluoride in biological samples. Microchem J 8:407-414.
*Chan-Yeung M, Wong R, MacLean L, et al. 1983a. Epidemiologic health study of workers in an

aluminum smelter in British Columbia, Canada: Effects on the respiratory system. Am Rev Respir Dis
127:465-469.
*Chan-Yeung M, Wong R, Tan F, et al. 1983b. Epidemiologic health study of workers in an aluminum
smelter in Kitimat, British Columbia: II. Effects on musculoskeletal and other systems. Arch Environ
Health 38:34-40.
Charkes ND, Brookes M, Makler TP, Jr. 1979. Studies of skeletal tracer kinetics. II. Evaluation of five-
compartment model of [18F] fluoride kinetics in humans. J Nucl Med 20:1150-1157.
Charkes ND, Makler PR, Phillips C. 1978. Studies of skeletal tracer kinetics: I. Digital-computer
solution of a five-compartment model of [18F] fluoride kinetics in humans. J Nucl Med 19:1301-1309.
*Chela A, Reig R, Sanz P, et al. 1989. Death due to hydrofluoric acid. Am J Forensic Med Pathol
10:47-48.
Chen PS, Smith FA, Gardner DE, et al. 1956. Renal clearance of fluoride. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
92:879-883.
*Chen XQ, Machida K, Ando M. 1999. Effects of fluoride aerosol inhalation on mice. Fluoride
332(3):153-161.
Chiazze L Jr, Wolf P, Ference LD. 1986. An historical cohort study of mortality among salaried research
and development workers of the Allied Corporation. J Occup Med 28:1185-1188.
*Chiba K, Yoshida K, Tanabe K, et al. 1982. Determination of ultratrace levels of fluorine in water in
urine samples by a gas chromatographic/atmospheric pressure helium microwave induced plasma
emission spectrometric system. Anal Chem 54:761-764.
*Chiemchaisri Y, Phillips PH. 1963. Effect of dietary fluoride upon magnesium calcinosis syndrome. J
Nutr 81:307-311.
*Chilvers C. 1982. Cancer mortality by site and fluoridation of water supplies. J Epidemiol Community
Health 36:237-242.
*Chilvers C. 1983. Cancer mortality and fluoridation of water supplies in 35 U.S. cities. Int J Epidemiol
12:397-404.
Chilvers C, Conway D. 1985. Cancer mortality in England (UK) in relation to levels of naturally
occurring fluoride in water supplies. J Epidemiol Community Health 39:44-47.
*Chinoy NJ, Patel D. 1998. Influences of fluoride on biological free radicals in ovary of mice and its
reversal. Environ Sci 6(3):171-184.
9. REFERENCES
*Chinoy NJ, Sequeira E. 1992. Reversible fluoride induced fertility impairment in male mice. Fluoride
25(2):71-76.
*Chinoy NJ, Sharma A. 1998. Amelioration of fluoride toxicity by vitamins E and D in reproductive
functions of male mice. Fluoride 31(4):203-216.
*Chinoy NJ, Sharma A. 2000. Reversal of fluoride-induced alteration in cauda epididymal spermatozoa
and fertility impairment in male mice. Environmental Sciences 7(1):29-38.
*Chinoy NJ, Narayana MV, Dalal V, et al. 1995. Amelioration of fluoride toxicity in some accessory
reproductive glands and spermatozoa of rat. Fluoride 28(2):75-86.
*Chinoy NJ, Patel BC, Patel DK, et al. 1997. Fluoride toxicity in the testis and cauda epididymis of
guinea pig and reversal by ascorbate. Med Sci Res 25(2):97-100.
*Chinoy NJ, Pradeep PK, Sequeira E. 1992. Effect of fluoride ingestion on the physiology of
reproductive organs of male rat. J Environ Biol 13(1):55-61.
*Chinoy NJ, Sequeira E, Narayana MV. 1991. Effects of vitamin C and calcium on the reversibility of
fluoride-induced alterations in spermatozoa of rabbits. Fluoride 24(1):29-40.
*Chinoy NJ, Sharma M, Michael M. 1993. Beneficial effects of ascorbic acid and calcium on reversal of
fluoride toxicity in male rats. Fluoride 26(1):45-56.
*Chinoy NJ, Walimbe AS, Vyas HA, et al. 1994. Transient and reversible fluoride toxicity in some soft
tissues of female mice. Fluoride 27(4):205-214.
*Chlebna-Sokol D, Czerwinski E. 1993. Bone structure assessment on radiographs of distal radial

metaphysic in children with dental fluorosis. Fluoride 26(1):37-44.
Cholak J, Schafer LJ, Hoffer F. 1952. Results of a five-year investigation of air pollution in Cincinnati.
Ind Hyg Occup Med 6:314-325.
*Choubisa SK, Choubisa DK, Joshi SC, et al. 1997. Fluorosis in some tribal villages of Dungarpur
District of Rajasthan, India. Fluoride 30(4):223-228.
*Chow LC. 1990. Tooth-bound fluoride and dental caries. J Dent Res 69(special issue):595-600.
Christie DP. 1980. The spectrum of radiographic bone changes in children with fluorosis. Radiology
136:85-90.
Chubb C. 1985. Reproductive toxicity of fluoride. 3rd International Congress of Andrology, Boston,
Massachusetts. J Androl 6:59.
Cimasoni G. 1966. Inhibition of cholinesterase by fluoride in vitro. Biochem J 99:133-137.
Cittanova L, Lelongt B, Verpont C, et al. 1996. Fluoride ion toxicity in human kidney collecting duct
cells. Anesthesiology 84:428-435.
Clark R. 1981. Neutrophil iodination reaction induced by fluoride: Implications for degranulation and
metabolic activation. Blood 57:913-921.
9. REFERENCES
*Clarkson BH, Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, et al. 1996. Rational use of fluorides in caries control. In:
Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt BA, eds. Fluorides in dentistry. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 347-
357.
Clement JG, Filbert M. 1983. Antidote effect of sodium fluoride against organophosphate poisoning in
mice. Life Sci 32:1803-1810.
Clements RL, Sergeant GA, Webb P. 1971. Determination of fluorine in rocks and minerals by a
pyrohydrolytic method. Analyst 96:51-54.
Clemmesen J. 1983. The alleged association between artificial fluoridation of water supplies and cancer:
A review. Bull WHO 61:871-833.
*Clewell HJ III, Andersen ME. 1985. Risk assessment extrapolations and physiological modeling.
Toxicol Ind Health 1(4):111-131.
CLPSD. 1988. Contract Laboratories Program Statistical Database. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
*CMR. 2002. Chemical profile. Hydrofluoric acid. Chemical Market Reporter. October 7, 2002.
Cohen-Solal ME, Augry F, Mauras Y. 2002. Fluoride and strontium accumulation in bone does not
correlate with osteoid tissue in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:449-454.
*Cohn PD. 1992. An epidemiologic report on drinking water and fluoridation. Environmental Health
Service. New Jersey Department of Health.
*Colborn T, Clement C. 1992. Chemically induced alterations in sexual and functional development.
The Wildlife/Human Connection. In: Advances in modern environmental toxicology. Volume XXI.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishing Co.
*Cole J, Muriel WJ, Bridges BA. 1986. The mutagenicity of sodium fluoride to L5178Y (wild-type and
TK- positive/negative (3.7.2c) mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 1:157-168.
*Collings GH, Fleming RBL, May R. 1951. Absorption and excretion of inhaled fluorides. AMA Arch
Ind Hyg Occup Med 4:585-590.
*Collings GH, Fleming RBL, May R, et al. 1952. Absorption and excretion of inhaled fluorides: Further
observations. Ind Hyg Occup Med 6:368-373.
*Collins TFX, Sprando RL, Black TN, et al. 2001a. Developmental toxicity of sodium fluoride
measured during multiple generations. Food Chem Toxicol 39:867-876.
*Collins TFX, Sprando RL, Black TN, et al. 2001b. Multigenerational evaluation of sodium fluoride in
rats. Food Chem Toxicol 39:601-613.
*Collins TFX, Sprando RL, Shackelford ME, et al. 1995. Developmental toxicity of sodium fluoride in
rats. Food Chem Toxicol 33(11):951-960.
Colquhoun J. 1984. Disfiguring dental fluorosis in Aukland, New Zealand. Fluoride 17(4):234-242.
9. REFERENCES
*Colquhoun J. 1992. Fluoridation and fractures. N Z Med J 105(944):436.
*Cook HA. 1969. Fluoride in tea. Lancet 2:329.
Cooke JA, Johnson MS, Davison AW. 1976. Determination of fluoride in vegetation: A review of
modern techniques. Environmental Pollution 11:257-268.
*Cooper C, Wickham C, Lacey RF, et al. 1990. Water fluoride concentration and fracture of the
proximal femur. J Epidemiol Community Health 44:17-19.
*Cooper C, Wickham CAC, Barker DJR, et al. 1991. Water fluoridation and hip fracture. JAMA
266:513-514.
Costa JL, Joy DC, Maher DM, et al. 1978. Fluorinated molecule as a trace: Difluoroserotonin in human
platelets mapped by electron energy-loss spectroscopy. Science 200:537-539.
*Cotton FA, Wilkinson G, Murillo CA, et al. 1999. Advanced inorganic chemistry, 6th ed. New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 62-64.
*CPSC. 2001. Final rule. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Code of Federal Regulations.
16 CFR 1700. http://cpsc.gov/businfo/frnotices/fr-98/fluoride.html. March 27, 2001.
Craggs C, Davison AW. 1985. The effect of simulated rainfall on grass fluoride concentrations.
Environmental Pollution (Series B) 9:309-318.
Craggs C, Blakemore J, Davison AW. 1985. Seasonality in the fluoride concentrations of pasture grass
subject to ambient airborne fluorides. Environmental Pollution (Series B) 9:163-178.
Crissman JW, Maylin GA, Krook L. 1980. New York state and U.S. federal fluoride pollution standards
do not protect cattle health. Cornell Vet 70:183-192.
Crosby ND, Shepherd PA. 1957. Studies on patterns of fluid intake: Water balance and fluoride
retention. Med J Aust 10:341-346.
Cumpston AG, Dinman BD. 1965. A modified diffusion method for the determination of urinary
fluoride. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 26:461-464.
Curry AS. 1962. Twenty-one uncommon cases of poisoning. Br Med J 5279:687-689.
Czerwinski E, Lankosz W. 1977a. Fluoride-induced changes in 60 retired aluminum workers. Fluoride

10:125-136.
Czerwinski E, Lankosz W. 1977b. Gastric ulcer and fluoride. Fluoride 10:149-151.
*Czerwinski E, Nowak J, Dabrowksa D, et al. 1988. Bone and joint pathology in fluoride-exposed
workers. Arch Environ Health 43:340-343.
Czerwinski E, Pospulka W, Nowacki G, et al. 1981. Effect of fluoride after discontinuation of

occupational exposure. Fluoride 14:61-68.
9. REFERENCES
*Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD. 1981. Microdiffusion and fluoride-specific electrode determination of
fluoride in infant foods: Collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 64:1021-1026.
*Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD. 1987. Lead, cadmium, and fluoride levels in market milk and infant
formulas in Canada. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 70:754-757.
*Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD. 1995. Survey of lead, cadmium, fluoride, nickel, and cobalt in food
composites and estimation of dietary intakes of these elements by Canadians in 1986-1988. J AOAC Int
78(4):897-909.
Dabeka RW, Karpinski KF, McKenzie AD, et al. 1986. Survey of lead, cadmium, and fluoride in human
milk and correlation of levels with environmental and food factors. Food Chem Toxicol 24:913-921.
*Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD, Lacroix GMA. 1987. Dietary intakes of lead, cadmium, arsenic and
fluoride by Canadian adults: A 24-hour duplicate diet study. Food Addit Contam 4(1):89-102.
*Dadej N, Kosiminder K, Machoy Z, et al. 1987. Case history of acute poisoning by sodium
fluorosilicate. Fluoride 20(1):11-13.
Daessler HG. 1971. The effect of hydrogen fluoride and cryolite dust upon plants and animals near a
hydrogen fluoride factory. Fluoride Quarterly Report 4:21-24.
Dahlgren BE. 1979. Fluoride concentrations in urine of delivery ward personnel following exposure to
low concentrations of methoxyflurane. J Occup Med 21:624-626.
Daijei H, Chongwan Z. 1988. Radiological and histological studies on bones of experimental rabbits in
skeletal fluorosis. Fluoride 21:76-81.
*Dalbey W, Dunn B, Bannister R, et al. 1998a. Acute effects of 10-minute exposure to hydrogen
fluoride in rats and derivation of a short-term exposure limit for humans. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
27:207-216.
*Dalbey W, Dunn B, Bannister R, et al. 1998b. Short-term exposures of rats to airborne hydrogen
fluoride. J Toxicol Environ Health 55(4):241-275.
*Dale RH. 1951. Treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Br Med J 1:728-732.
*Danchik RS, Millegass HF, Tarcy GP. 1980. The continuous measurement of gaseous fluoride in
ambient air. Light Metals 783-799.
*Danielson C, Lyon JL, Egger M, et al. 1992. Hip fractures and fluoridation in Utah's elderly
population. JAMA 268:746-748.
Darmer KI Jr., Haun CC, MacEwen JD. 1972. The acute inhalation toxicology of chlorine pentafluorine.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 33:661.
Das TK, Susheela AK. 1991a. Chronic fluoride toxicity and pituitary-adrenal function. Environ Sci
1(2):57-62.
Das TK, Susheela AK. 1991b. Effect of chronic fluoride toxicity on glucocorticoid level in plasma and
urine. Fluoride 24(1):23-28.
9. REFERENCES
Das TK, Susheela AK. 1993. Effect of long-term administration of sodium fluoride on plasma calcium
level in relation to intestinal absorption and urinary excretion in rabbits. Environ Res 62:14-18.
Das TK, Susheela AK, Gupta IP, et al. 1994. Toxic effects of chronic fluoride ingestion on the upper
gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Gastroenterol 18(3):194-199.
Dasarathy S, Das TK, Gupta IP, et al. 1996. Gastroduodenal manifestations in patients with skeletal
fluorosis. Gastroenterology 31(3):333-337.
Daston GP, Rehnberg BF, Carver B, et al. 1985. Toxicity of sodium fluoride to the postnatally
developing rat kidney. Environ Res 37:461-474.
*Davis WL. 1972. Ambient air fluorides in Salt Lake County. Rocky Mountain Med J 69:53-56.
Davydova VI, Pochashev EN. 1974. The combined effect of manganese and fluorine compounds on the
body. Gig Sanit 7:21-25.
*Dayal HH, Brokwick M, Morris R, et al. 1992. A community-based epidemiologic study of health
sequelae of exposure to hydrofluoric acid. Ann Epidemiol 2(3):213-230.
*Dean HT. 1934. Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 21:1421-1426.
*Dean HT. 1938. Endemic fluorosis and its relation to dental caries. Public Health Reports 53:1443-
1452.
*Dean HT, Arnold FA Jr, Jay P, et al. 1950. Studies on mass control of dental caries through fluoridation
of the public water supply. Public Health Rep 65:1403-1408.
*Dean HT, Dixon RM, Cohen C. 1935. Mottled enamel in Texas. Public Health Rep 50:424-42.
*Dean HT, Jay P, Arnold FA Jr, et al. 1939. Domestic water and dental caries, including certain
epidemiological aspects of L. acidophilus. Public Health Rep 54:862-868.
*Dean HT, Jay P, Arnold FA Jr, et al. 1941. Domestic water and dental caries. II. A study of 2,832
white children aged 12-14 years of age with suburban Chicago communities, including L. acidophilus
studies of 1,761 children. Public Health Rep 56:761-792.
*Dean HT, Jay P, Arnold FA Jr, et al. 1942. Domestic water and dental caries. V. Additional studies of
the relation of fluoride domestic waters to dental caries experience in 4,425 white children, aged 2 to 14
years of 13 cities in four states. Public Health Rep 57:1155-1179.
DeChatelet LR, Campbell TL, Westrick MA, et al. 1981. Effects of fluoride on the oxidative metabolism
of human neutrophils. Biochem Med 25:106-113.
Deka RC, Kacker SK, Shambaugh GE Jr. 1978. Intestinal absorption of fluoride preparations.
Laryngoscope 88:1918-1921.
*DeLiefde B. 1998. The decline of caries in New Zealand over the past 40 years. NJ Dent J 94:109-113.
9. REFERENCES
*DeLopez OH, Smith FA, Hodge HC. 1976. Plasma fluoride concentrations in rats acutely poisoned
with sodium fluoride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 37:75-83.
*de Moraes Flores EM, Martins AF. 1997. Distribution of trace elements in egg samples collected near
coal power plants. J Environ Qual 26:744-748.
*DenBesten PK. 1994. Dental fluorosis: Its use as a biomarker. Adv Dent Res 8:105-110.
DenBesten PK, Crenshaw MA. 1984. The effects of chronic high fluoride levels on forming enamel in
the rat. Arch Oral Biol 29:675-679.
*DenBesten PK, Thariani H. 1992. Biological mechanisms of fluorosis and level and timing of systemic
exposure to fluoride with respect to fluorosis. J Dent Res 71(5):1238-1243.
*Derelanko MJ, Gad SC, Gavigan F, et al. 1985. Acute dermal toxicity of dilute hydrofluoric acid.
Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 4:73-85.
Derner HA. 1967. Semi-automated determination of fluoride in urine. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 28:357-362.
*Derryberry OM, Bartholomew MD, Fleming RBL. 1963. Fluoride exposure and worker health. Arch
Environ Health 6:503-514.
Desai VK, Bhavsar BS, Mehta NR, et al. 1983. Clinical radiological observations among workers of
fluoride processing industry. Fluoride 16:90-100.
DeTroiani RM, Sanchez TM, Lavado RS. 1987. Soil response and alfalfa fluoride content as affected by
irrigation water. Fluoride 20:14-17.
Deutsch D, Gedalia I. 1982. Fluoride concentration in human fetal enamel. Caries Res 16:428-432.
*deVilliers AJ, Windish JP. 1964. Lung cancer in a fluorspar mining community: I. Radiation, dust and
mortality experience. Br J Ind Med 21:94-109.
Dewey JE. 1973. Accumulation of fluorides by insects near an emission source in western Montana.
Environ Entomol 2:179-182.
*DHHS. 1991. Review of fluoride: Benefits and risks: Report of the ad hoc subcommittee on fluoride
of the committee to coordinate environmental health and related programs. Washington, DC:
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
*DHHS. 2000. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research,
National Institutes of Health.
DHHS. 2001a. Oral health. Healthy people 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
*DHHS. 2001b. Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United
States. MMWR 50(RR-14):1-42. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5014al.htm.
9. REFERENCES
Dhuna AK, Gu XF, Pascual-Leone A, et al. 1992. Skeletal fluorosis: An unusual cause of progressive
radiculomyelopathy. Spine 17(7):842-844.
*Dibbell DG, Iverson RE, Jones W, et al. 1970. Hydrofluoric acid burns of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg
52:931-936.
*Dieffenbacher PF, Thompson JH. 1962. Burns from exposure to anhydrous hydrofluoric acid. J Occup
Med 4:325-326.
*Dinman BD, Backenstos DL, Carter RP, et al. 1976a. A five year study of fluoride absorption and
excretion. J Occup Med 18:17-20.
*Dinman BD, Bovard WJ, Bonney TB, et al. 1976b. Excretion of fluoride during a seven-day
workweek. J Occup Med 18:14-16.
*Dinman BD, Elder MJ, Bonney TB, et al. 1976c. A 15-year retrospective study of fluoride excretion
and bony radiopacity among aluminum smelter workers - part 4. J Occup Med 18:21-23.
Di Stefano CM, Ruggien M. 1969. Interaction of fluorine with serum albumin. Fluoride Quarterly
Report 2:91-96.
DOE. 1992. Chemical contaminants on DOE lands and selection of contaminant mixtures for subsurface
science research. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Energy.
NTIS DE92-014826.
*Doll R, Kinlen L. 1977. Fluoridation of water and cancer mortality in the U.S.A. Lancet 1:1300-1302.
Dost FN. 1970. Fluorine distribution in rats following acute intoxication with nitrogen and halogen
fluorides and with sodium fluoride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 17:573-584.
*DOT. 2001. List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Department of
Transportation. Code of Federal Regulations. 49 CFR 172.101, Appendix A.
http://www.dot.gov/safety.html. March 26, 2001.
*Dousset JC, Rioufol C, Feliste R, et al. 1984. Effects of inhaled HF on lipid metabolism in guinea pigs.
Fundam Appl Toxicol 4:618-623.
Dousset JC, Rioufol C, Philibert C, et al. 1987. Effects of inhaled HF on cholesterol carbohydrate and
tricarboxylic acid metabolism in guinea-pigs. Fluoride 20:137-141.
Dowbak G, Rose K, Rohrich RJ. 1994. A biochemical and histologic rationale for the treatment of
hydrofluoric acid burns with calcium gluconate. J Burn Care Rehab 15:323-327.
Doyle JJ. 1979. Toxic and essential elements in bone: A review. J Anim Sci 49:482-497.
Drinkard CR, Deaton TG, Bawden JW. 1985. Enamel fluoride in nursing rats with mothers drinking
water with high fluoride concentrations. J Dent Res 64:877-880.
Driscoll WS. 1981. A review of clinical research on the use of prenatal fluoride administration for
prevention of dental caries. ASDC J Dent Child 48:109-117.
9. REFERENCES
*Driscoll WS, Horowitz HS, Meyers RJ, et al. 1986. Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis in
areas with negligible, optimal, and above-optimal fluoride concentrations in drinking water. Corrections.
J Am Dent Assoc 113:370.
Dubois L, Monkman JL, Teichman T. 1962. The determination of urinary fluorides. Am Ind Hyg Assoc
J 23:157-163.
Duffey PH, Tretbar HC, Jarkowski TL. 1971. Giant cells in bone marrow of patients on high-dose
fluoride treatment. Ann Intern Med 75:745-757.
Dunipace AJ, Brizendine EJ, Wilson ME, et al. 1998. Chronic fluoride exposure does not cause
detrimental, extraskeletal effects in nutritionally deficient rats. J Nutr 128:1392-1400.
Dunipace AJ, Brizendine EJ, Zhang W, et al. 1995. Effect of aging on animal response to chronic
fluoride exposure. J Dent Res 74(1):358-368.
*Dunipace AJ, Zhang W, Noblitt TW, et al. 1989. Genotoxic evaluation of chronic fluoride exposure:
Micronucleus and sperm morphology studies. J Dent Res 68:1525-1528.
*Dunn BJ, Mackinnon MA, Knowlden NF, et al. 1992. Hydrofluoric acid dermal burns. J Occup Med
34(9):902-909.
Duxbury AJ, Leach FN, Duxbury JT, et al. 1982. Acute fluoride toxicity. Br Dent J 153:64-66.
Eanes ED, Reddi AH. 1979. The effect of fluoride on bone mineral apatite. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res
2:3-10.
Ebeling W, Reierson DA, Wagner RE. 1968. The influence of repellency on the efficacy of blatticides:
III. Field experiments with German cockroaches with notes on three other species. J Econ Entomol
61:751.
Eckerlin RG, Maylin GA, Krook L. 1986. Milk production of cows fed fluoride contaminated
commercial feed. Cornell Vet 76:403-414.
Edelman P. 1986. Hydrofluoric acid burns. State of the Art Reviews: Occupational Medicine 1:89-103.
Edgar WM. 1981. Fluoride metabolism in dental plaque, bacteria and man. Front Oral Physiol 3:19-37.
*Ehrnebo M, Ekstrand J. 1986. Occupational fluoride exposure and plasma fluoride levels in man. Int
Arch Occup Environ Health 58:179-190.
*Eichler HG, Lenz K, Fuhrmann M, et al. 1982. Accidental ingestion of NaF tablets by children. Int J
Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 20:334-338.
*Einfeld W, Horstman SW. 1979. Investigation of a dual filter sampling method for gaseous and
particulate fluoride. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 40:626-632.
*Eklund SA, Burt BA, Ismail AI, et al. 1987. High-fluoride drinking water, fluorosis, and dental caries
in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 114(3):324-328.
9. REFERENCES
*Ekstrand J. 1977. Fluoride concentrations in saliva after single oral doses and their relation to plasma
fluoride. Scand J Dent Res 85:16-17.
*Ekstrand J. 1978. Relationship between fluoride in the drinking water and the plasma fluoride
concentration in man. Caries Res 12:123-127.
Ekstrand J. 1989. Fluoride intake in early infancy. J Nutr 119:1856-1860.
*Ekstrand J, Ehrnebo M. 1979. Influence of milk products on fluoride bioavailability in man. Eur J Clin
Pharmacol 16:211-215.
*Ekstrand J, Ehrnebo M. 1983. The relationship between plasma fluoride, urinary excretion rate, and
urine fluoride concentrations in man. J Occup Med 25:745-748.
Ekstrand J, Koch G. 1980. Systemic fluoride absorption following fluoride gel application. J Dent Res
59:1067.
*Ekstrand J, Whitford GM. 1984. Fluoride in body fluids-cariostatic and toxicologic aspects. In:
Guggenheim B, ed. Cariology today. International Congress, Zürich 1983. 269-278.
Ekstrand J, Alván G, Boréus LO, et al. 1977a. Pharmacokinetics of fluoride in man after single and
multiple oral doses. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 12:311-317.
*Ekstrand J, Boreus LO, de Chateau P. 1981c. No evidence of transfer of fluoride from plasma to breast
milk. Br J Med 283:761-762.
*Ekstrand J, Ehrnebo M, Boréus LO. 1978. Fluoride bioavailability after intravenous and oral
administration: Importance of renal clearance and urine flow. Clin Pharm Ther 23:329-337.
Ekstrand J, Ehrnebo M, Whitford GM, et al. 1980b. Fluoride pharmacokinetics during acid-base balance
changes in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 18:189-194.
*Ekstrand J, Ericsson Y, Rossell S. 1977b. Absence of protein-bound fluoride from human blood
plasma. Arch Oral Biol 22:229-232.
*Ekstrand J, Fomon SJ, Ziegler EE, et al. 1994a. Fluoride pharmacokinetics in infancy. Pediatr Res
35(2):157-163.
*Ekstrand J, Hardell LI, Spak CJ. 1984a. Fluoride balance studies on infants in a 1 ppm water fluoride
area. Caries Res 18:87-92.
Ekstrand J, Koch G, Lindgren LE, et al. 1981a. Pharmacokinetics of fluoride gels in children and adults.
Caries Res 15:213-220.
*Ekstrand J, Koch G, Petersson LG. 1980a. Plasma fluoride concentration and urinary fluoride excretion
in children following application of the fluoride-containing varnish Duraphat. Caries Res 14:185-189.
*Ekstrand J, Koch G, Petersson LG. 1983. Plasma fluoride concentrations in pre-school children after
ingestion of fluoride tablets and toothpaste. Caries Res 17:379-384.
9. REFERENCES
Ekstrand J, Lange A, Ekberg O, et al. 1981b. Relationship between plasma, dentin, and bone fluoride
concentrations in rats following long-term fluoride administration. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 48:433-437.
*Ekstrand J, Spak CJ, Ehrnebo M. 1982. Renal clearance of fluoride in a steady state condition in man:
Influence of urinary flow and pH changes by diet. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 50:321-325.
*Ekstrand J, Spak C-J, Flach J, et al. 1984b. Distribution of fluoride to human breast milk following
intake of high doses of fluoride. Caries Res 18:93-95.
*Ekstrand J, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE, et al. 1994b. Absorption and retention of dietary and supplemental
fluoride by infants. Adv Dent Res 8(2):175-180.
Elfers LA, Decker CE. 1968. Determination of fluoride in air and stack gas samples by use of an ion
specific electrode. Anal Chem 40:1658-1661.
*Ellenhorn MJ, Barceloux DG. 1988. Medical toxicology: Diagnosis and treatment of human
poisoning. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 76, 83, 531-536, 873-874, 924-
929.
Elrashidi MA, Lindsay WL. 1987. Effect of fluoride on pH, organic matter and solubility of elements in
soils. Environ Pollut 47:123-134.
Elsaadi MS, Hall AH, Hall PK, et al. 1989. Hydrofluoric-acid dermal exposure. Vet Hum Toxicol
31:243-247.
Elsair RMJ, Denine R, Reggabi M, et al. 1980. Boron as a preventive antidote in acute and subacute
fluoride intoxication in rabbits: Its action on fluoride and calcium-phosphorus metabolism. Fluoride
13:129-138.
EPA. 1971. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 180.142.
*EPA. 1975. Standards of performance for the phosphate fertilizer industry. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60.1200-60.243.
*EPA. 1980a. Reviews of the environmental effects of pollutants: IX. Fluoride. Cincinnati, OH:
Health Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. EPA-600/1-78-050.
*EPA. 1980b. Standards of performance for primary aluminum reduction plants. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60.190-60.194.
EPA. 1985a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 141.51.
EPA. 1985b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 141.62.
EPA. 1985c. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 50(220):47142-47155.

9. REFERENCES
EPA. 1987. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 52:21152-21208.
EPA. 1988. Test results of acute inhalation studies with anhydrous hydrogen fluoride with cover letter
dated 03/16/88. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. FYI-OTS-0388-0607.
EPA. 1990. Interim methods for development of inhalation reference doses. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. EPA 600/8-
88/066F.
EPA. 1994. Method 9056. Determination of inorganic anions by ion chromatography. Environmental
Protection Agency. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/9056.pdf. September 16, 1995.
*EPA. 1996. Method 9214. Potentiometric determination of fluoride in aqueous samples with ion-
selective electrode. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/9214.pdf. November 6, 1996.
*EPA. 1997. EPA Environmental monitoring methods index. McLean, VA: Enviro Dynamics.
*EPA. 1998a. AP-42 Section 1.1. Bituminous and subbituminous coal combustion.
http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch01/final/c01s01.pdf. September 1998.
*EPA. 1998b. Background Report: AP-42 Section 12.1. Primary aluminum.

http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch12/bgdocs/b12s01.pdf. November 12, 1998.
*EPA. 1998c. National environmental methods index. EPA methods 340.1, 340.2, and 340.3. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. http://reports.er.usgs.gov/dev60cgi/rwcgi60?
*EPA. 2000. Taking toxics out of the air: Progress in setting “maximum achievable control technology”
standards under the Clean Air Act. http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/takingtoxics/ October 03, 2003.
*EPA. 2001a. Accidental release prevention. Table of toxic endpoints. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 68, Appendix A. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcg...=
BAPPCT&SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001b. Accidental release prevention. Threshold quantity. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 68.130.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcg...=BSECCT& SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26,
2001.
*EPA. 2001c. BPT effluent limitations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal
Regulations. 40 CFR 415.82. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf...= BSECCT&SUBSET=
SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001d. Contaminated soil. Alternative LDR treatment standards for contaminated soil. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 268.49.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcg...=BSECCT& SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26,
2001.
9. REFERENCES
*EPA. 2001e. Effluent limitations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal
Regulations. 40 CFR 422.42. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf...= BSECCT&SUBSET=
SUBSET&FROM= 1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001f. Groundwater protection standards at inactive uranium processing sites. Listed constituent.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 192, Appendix I.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf...= BAPPCT&SUBSET =SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March
26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001g. Hazardous waste. Health based limits for exclusion of waste-derived-residue. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 266, Appendix VII.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf...=BAPPCT&SUBSET =SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March
26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001h. Hazardous waste. Identification and listing. Fluorine. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 261.33 (e). http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf...=
BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001i. Hazardous waste. Identification and listing. Hydrogen fluoride. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 261.33 (f). http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/
otcgi/cf...=BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001j. National primary drinking water regulations. Maximum contaminant level goals for
inorganic contaminants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR
141.51 (b). http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfil. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001k. National primary drinking water regulations. Maximum contaminant levels for inorganic
contaminants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 141.62
(b). http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfilter. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001l. National secondary drinking water regulations. Secondary maximum contaminant levels.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 143.3.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfilter. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001m. Pesticide programs. Exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 180.1001.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/ otcg...=BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26,
2001.
*EPA. 2001n. Pesticide programs. Fluorine compounds; tolerances for residues. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 180.145. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/
otcg...=BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET& FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001o. Superfund. Designation of hazardous substance. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 302.4, Appendix A. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfil.
March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001p. Superfund. The list of extremely hazardous and their threshold planning quantities. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 355, Appendix A.
http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cfr/otfil. March 26, 2001.
9. REFERENCES
*EPA. 2001q. Toxic chemical release reporting: Community right-to-know. Chemicals and chemical
categories to which this part applies. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal
Regulations. 40 CFR 372.65. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi...=BSECCT&SUBSET=SUBSET&
FROM=1&ITEM=1. March 26, 2001.
*EPA. 2001r. Water pollution. Designation of hazardous substances. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 116.4. http://ecfrback.access.gpo.gov/otcgi/cf.
*Erickson JD. 1978. Mortality in selected cities with fluoridated and non-fluoridated water supplies. N
Eng J Med 298:1112-1116.
Erickson JD. 1980. Down syndrome, water fluoridation, and maternal age. Teratology 21:177-180.
*Erickson JD, Oakley GP Jr, Flynt JW Jr, et al. 1976. Water fluoridation and congenital malformations:
No association. J Am Dent Assoc 93:981-984.
*Ericsson SY. 1977. Cariostasis mechanisms of fluorides: clinical observations. Caries Res 11(suppl
1):2-23.
*Ericsson Y. 1958. The state of fluorine in milk and its absorption and retention when administered in
milk. Acta Odontol Scand 16:51-77.
*Ericsson Y, Forsman B. 1969. Fluoride retained from mouth rinses and dentifrices in preschool
children. Caries Res 3:290-299.
Ericsson Y, Wei SH. 1979. Fluoride supply and effects in infants and young children. Pediatr Dent
1:44-54.
Ericsson Y, Hellstrom I, Hofvander Y. 1972. Pilot studies on the fluoride metabolism in infants on
different feedings. Acta Paediatr Scand 61:459-464.
Eriksen N. 1945. A study of the lethal effect of the inhalation of gaseous fluorine (F2) at concentrations
from 100 ppm to 10,000 ppm. United States Atomic Energy Commission, Pharmacology report 435.
University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. NTIS DE85-010190.
*Ernst P, Thomas D, Becklake MR. 1986. Respiratory survey of North American Indian children living
in proximity to an aluminum smelter. Am Rev Respir Dis 133:307-312.
*Essman EJ, Essman WB, Valderrama E. 1981. Histaminergic mediation of the response of rat skin to
topical fluorides. Arch Dermatol Res 271:325-340.
Evans FG, Wood JL. 1976. Mechanical properties and density of bone in a case of severe endemic
fluorosis. Acta Orthop Scand 47:489-495.
*Eyde B. 1982. Determination of fluoride in plant material with an ion-selective electrode. Fresenius Z
Anal Chem 311:19-22.
Farley JR, Wergedal JE, Baylink DJ. 1983. Fluoride directly stimulates proliferation and alkaline
phosphatase activity of bone-forming cells. Science 222:330-332.
9. REFERENCES
*Farley SM, Libanati CR, Mariano-Menez MR, et al. 1990. Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis promotes
a progressive increase in spinal bone density. J Bone Miner Res 5(Suppl. 1):37.
Farrah GH. 1964. Diffusion method for determination of urinary fluoride: Recent developments. Am
Ind Hyg Assoc J 25:55-58.
FDA. 1977. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Human Health Services. Code of Federal
Regulations. 21 CFR 103.
*FDA. 2000a. Anticaries drug products for over-the-counter human use. Anticaries active ingredients.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 355.10.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...ON=10&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000b. Anticaries drug products for over-the-counter human use. Labeling of anticaries drug
products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 355.50.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...ON=50&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000c. Anticaries drug products for over-the-counter human use. Professional labeling. U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 355.60.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo. gov/cgi...ON=60&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000d. Anticaries drug products for over-the-counter human use. Testing procedures for fluoride
dentifrice drug products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations.
21 CFR 355.70. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...ON=70&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27,
2001.
*FDA. 2000e. Indirect food additives: Adhesives and components of coatings. U.S. Food and Drug
Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 175.105 (c)(5). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/
cgi...175&SECTION=105&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000f. Requirements for specific new drugs or devices. Drug products containing certain active
ingredients offered over-the-counter. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations.
21 CFR 310.545 (a)(2). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...N=545&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT.
March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000g. Requirements for specific standardized beverages. Bottled water. U.S. Food and Drug
Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 165.110. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...
165&SECTION=110&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT. March 27, 2001.
*FDA. 2000h. Substances for use only as components of articles intended for repeated use. Textiles and
textile fibers. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 177.2800
(d)(5). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi...77&SECTION=2800&YEAR&TYPE=TEXT. March 27,
2001.
*Featherstone JDB. 1999. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Comm
Dent Oral Epidemiol 27:31-40.
*FEDRIP. 2002. Federal Research in Progress. Dialog Information Services, Inc. Palo Alto, CA.
*Feldman I, Morken D, Hodge HC. 1957. The state of fluoride in drinking water. J Dental Res 36:192-
202.
9. REFERENCES
*Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ, Richards, et al. 1994. Dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res (8)1:15-
31.
*Fejerskov O, Manji P, Vaelum V. 1990. The nature and mechanisms of dental fluorosis in man. J Dent
Res 69(Spec Iss):692-700.
Ferguson DB. 1971. Effects of low dose of fluorides on serum proteins and a serum enzyme in man.
Nature (New Biology) 231:159-160.
Feskanich D, Owusu W, Hunter DJ, et al. 1998. Use of toenail fluoride levels as an indicator for the risk
of hip and forearm fractures in women. Epidemiology 9:412-416.
Finelli VN, Que Hee S, Niemeier R. 1981. Influence of the aluminum on the toxicology of rats exposed
by inhalation to aluminum chloride and fluoride. Gen Pharmacol 12:A13.
*Fisher JR, Sievers ML, Takeshita RT, et al. 1981. Skeletal fluorosis from eating soil. Ariz Med
38:833-835.
*Fisher RL, Medcalf TW, Henderson MC. 1989. Endemic fluorosis with spinal cord compression: A
case report and review. Arch Intern Med 149(3):697-700.
*Flaten TP. 1991. A nation-wide survey of the chemical composition of drinking water in Norway. Sci
Total Environ 102:35-73.
Fleisch JH, Haisch KD. 1980. Increase in antigen-induced release of slow reacting substance of
anaphylaxis from guinea pig lung by sodium fluoride. Biochem Pharmacol 29:1843-1847.
*Fleischer M. 1962. Fluoride content of ground water in the conterminous United States. U.S.
Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigation I-387. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological
Survey.
*Fleischer M, Forbes RM, Harriss RC, et al. 1974. Fluorine. In: Geochemistry and the environment.
Volume I: The relation of selected trace elements to health and disease. Washington, DC: National
Academy of Sciences, 22-25.
Fleming HS, Greenfield VS. 1954. Changes in the teeth and jaws of neonatal Webster mice after
administration of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride to the female parent during gestation. J Dent Res
33:780-788.
Flores EMM, Martins AF. 1997. Distribution of trace elements in egg samples collected near coal power
plants. J Environ Qual 26:744-748.
*Fomon SJ. 1966. Body composition of the infant: Part I: The male “reference infant”. In: Falkner F,
ed. Human development. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 239-246.
*Fomon SJ, Ekstrand J. 1999. Fluoride intake by infants. J Public Health Dent 59(4):229-234.
*Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, et al. 1982. Body composition of reference children from birth to
age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr 35:1169-1175.
9. REFERENCES
Forsman B. 1977. Early supply of fluoride and enamel fluorosis. Scand J Dent Res 85:22-30.
Franke J. 1979. A new concept of the effect of fluorides on bone. Fluoride 12:195-208.
Franke J. 1989. Difference in skeletal response to fluoride in humans and animals: An overview.
Fluoride 22:10-19.
*Franke J, Rath H, Runge F, et al. 1975. Industrial fluorosis. Fluoride 8:61-85.
*Franke J, Runge H, Grau P, et al. 1976. Physical properties of fluorosis bone. Acta Orthop Scand
47:20-27.
Frascino JA, Freed BR, Woodard HQ. 1975. Fluorine-18 metabolism in the acutely uremic rat. Health
Phys 29:279-283.
Fratzl P, Roschger P, Eschberger J, et al. 1994. Abnormal bone mineralization after fluoride treatment in
osteoporosis: A small-angle X-ray scattering study. J Bone Miner Res 9:1541-1549.
*Freni SC. 1994. Exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with
decreased birth rates. J Toxicol Environ Health 42:109-121.
*Freni SC, Gaylor DW. 1992. International trends in the incidence of bone cancer are not related to
drinking water fluoridation. Cancer 70(3):611-618.
*Friend JP. 1989. Natural chlorine and fluorine in the atmosphere, water and precipitation. United
Nations Environmental Programme/World Meteorological Association. Scientific Assessment of
Stratospheric Ozone: 1989. Alternative Fluorocarbon Environmental Acceptability Study Report.
FSTRAC. 1989. Summary of state and federal drinking water standards and guidelines. Washington,
DC: Chemical Communication Subcommittee Federal-State Toxicology and Regulatory Alliance
Committee. March 1988.
*Fucsko J, Toth K, Pungor E, et al. 1987. Application of ion-selective electrodes in environmental

analysis: Determination of acid and fluoride concentrations in rainwater with a flow-injection system.
Anal Chim Acta 194:163-170.
*Fung KF, Zhang ZQ, Wong JWC, et al. 1999. Fluoride contents in tea and soil from tea plantations and
the release of fluoride into tea liquor during infusion. Environ Pollut 104:197-205.
Gabler WL, Leong PA. 1979. Fluoride inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Dent Res
58:1933-1939.
Gabovich RD, Ovrutskiy CD. 1969. Fluorine in stomatology and hygiene. Bethesda, MD: U.S.
Department of Health and Welfare. DHEW publication no. (NIH) 78-785, 1977.
*Gaciri SJ, Davies TC. 1993. The occurrence and geochemistry of fluoride in some natural waters of
Kenya. J Hydrol 143:395-412.
Gadhia PK, Joseph S. 1997. Sodium fluoride induced chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid
exchange in cultured human lymphocytes. Fluoride 30(3):153-156.
9. REFERENCES
Galletti P-M, Joyet G. 1958. Effect of fluorine on thyroidal iodine metabolism in hyperthyroidism. J
Clin Endocr Metab 18:1102-1110.
Galloway HL, Shoaf RE, Skaggs CH, et al. 1975. A rapid method for the determination of fluoride in
vegetation: Determination of fluoride in plant samples by a potentiometric method and near-IR
reflectance spectroscopy. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 16:721-724.
Ganesan K, Pandit VI, Dixit SN, et al. 1978. Fluoride industry: Air pollution and its impact on the
surrounding area. Indian Environ Health 20:62-69.
Garcia-Ciudad A, Garcia-Criado B, Emeterio CP-S. 1985. Determination of fluoride in plant samples by

a potentiometric method and near-IR reflectance spectroscopy. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:1107-1122.
Garland J. 1963. Sodium fluoride in bone disease. N Engl J Med 269:216-217.
Gaster D, Havivi E, Guggenheim K. 1967. Interrelations of calcium, fluoride, and vitamin D in bone
metabolism. Br J Nutr 21:413-418.
*Gdalia I. 1958. Urinary fluorine levels of children and adults. J Dent Res 37:601-604.
Gedalia I. 1970. Distribution in placental and factors. In: Fluorides and human health. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization Monographs Series 59, 12-134.
Gedalia I, Brzezinski A, Bercovici B, et al. 1961. Placental transfer of fluorine in the human fetus. Proc
Soc Exper Biol Med 106:147-149.
Gedalia I, Mayer I, Giron J, et al. 1982. Fluoride deposition in the bones of rats determined by fluoride
and x-ray diffraction analysis. Archives of Oral Biology 27:823-825.
*Geddes DAM, Bowen WH. 1990. Summary of session III: Fluoride in saliva and dental plaque. J
Dent Res 69:637.
Geeraerts F, Gijs G, Finne E, et al. 1986. Kinetics of fluoride penetration into liver and brain. Fluoride
19:108-112.
*Gelberg KH, Fitzgerald EF, Hwang S-A, et al. 1995. Fluoride exposure and childhood osteosarcoma:
A case-control study. Am J Pub Health 85(12):1678-1680.
Gerber FJ, Hinn G, Allen D, et al. 1972. Fluorine-18 bone scanning for metastasis detection of bone.
NW Med 71:380-384.
*Gerdes RA, Smith JD, Applegate HG. 1971a. The effects of atmospheric hydrogen fluorine upon
Drosophila melanogaster: 1. Differential genotypic response. Atmos Environ 5:113-116.
Gerdes RA, Smith JD, Applegate HG. 1971b. The effects of atmospheric hydrogen fluoride upon
Drosophila melanogaster: 2. Fecundity, hatchability and fertility. Atmos Environ 5:117-122.
Giavaresi G, Fini M, Gnudi S, et al. 1999. The mechanical properties of fluoride-treated bone in the
ovariectomized rat. Calcif Tissue Int 65:237-241.
9. REFERENCES
*Gibbs GW, Horowitz I. 1979. Lung cancer mortality in aluminum reduction plant workers. J Occup
Med 21(5):347-353.
Gilbert DL. 1985. Environmental effects of airborne fluorides from aluminum smelting at Invergordon,
Scotland (UK) 1971-1983. Environ Pollution (Series A) 39:293-302.
*Giwercman A, Carlsen E, Keiding N, et al. 1993. Evidence for increasing incidence of abnormalities of
the human testis: A review. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 101(2):65-71.
Glass RL, Peterson JK, Zuckerberg DA, et al. 1975. Fluoride ingestion resulting from the use of a
monofluorophosphate dentrifice by children. Br Dent J 138:423-426.
Glattre E, Wiese H. 1979. Inverse relationship between fluoride and cancer in mouth and throat? Acta
Odontol Scand 37:9-14.
Glenn FB. 1977. Immunity conveyed by a fluorine supplement during pregnancy. Journal of Dentistry
for Children 44:391-395.
Glenn FB, Glenn WD, Burdi AR. 1997. Prenatal fluoride for growth and development: Part X. J Dent
Child 64(5):317-321.
Glenn FB, Glenn WD, Duncan RC. 1982. Fluoride tablet supplementation during pregnancy for caries
immunity: A study of offspring produced. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143(5):560-564.
*Goggin JE, Haddon W, Hambly GS, et al. 1965. Incidence of femoral fractures in postmenopausal
women. Public Health Rep 80:1005-1012.
*Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, et al., eds. 1990. Goldfrank's toxicologic emergencies.
Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 198, 220-221, 745, 769-779.
*Goldman SM, Sievers ML, Templin DW. 1971. Radiculomyopathy in a Southwestern Indian due to
skeletal fluorosis. Az Med 28:675-677.
*Goldschmidt VM. 1954. Fluorine. In: Muir A, ed. Geochemistry. Oxford, England: Clarendon
Press, 568-586.
Golightly LK. 1978. Review of the use of sodium fluoride in the treatment of osteoporosis. Can J Hosp
Pharm 31:85-87.
Gopalakrishnan LV. 1980. Studies on the effects of sodium fluoride on cardiac musculature. Cheiron
9:245-249.
Gorban GP, Pliss MB, Karpilovskaya ED, et al. 1975. [The effect of long-term administration of
fluorine with food on carcinogenesis and biochemical changes in the liver of rats]. Vopr Pitan 6:21-24.
(Russian)
Gordon SL, Corbin SB. 1992. Summary of workshop on drinking water fluoride influence on hip
fracture on bone health. Osteoporos Int 2:109-117.
Gorenc B, Babic J. 1975. Potentiometric determination of fluoride in mineral waters by means of an ion-
selective electrode. Acta Pharmaceutica Jugoslavica 25:171-176.
9. REFERENCES
Gosselin RE, Smith RP, Hodge HC. 1984. Clinical toxicology of commercial products. 5th ed.
Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkens, 112, 185-193.
*Grandjean P, Thomsen G. 1983. Reversibility of skeletal fluorosis. Br J Ind Med 40(4):456-461.
*Grandjean P, Juel K, Jensen OM. 1985. Mortality and cancer morbidity after heavy occupational
fluoride exposure. Am J Epidemiol 121:57-64.
*Grandjean P, Olsen JH, Jensen OM, et al. 1992. Cancer incidence and mortality in workers exposed to
fluoride. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(24):1903-1909.
Graves CN, Feagin FF. 1988. A method of semi-quantitative microradiographic analysis of root surface
lesion remineralization. J Oral Pathol 17:241-249.
Grayson M, ed. 1980. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Vol. 10, 3rd ed. New York,
NY: John Wiley & Sons, 630-826.
Greco RJ, Hartford CE, Haith LR Jr, et al. 1988. Hydrofluoric acid-induced hypocalcemia. J Trauma
28:1593-1596.
*Greenberg SR. 1982a. The effect of chronic fluoride exposure on the liver: Part I. The parenchyma.
Proc Inst Med Chic 39:53-54.
Greenberg SR. 1982b. Leukocyte response in young mice chronically exposed to fluoride. Fluoride
15:119-123.
*Greenberg SR. 1986. Response of the renal supporting tissues to chronic fluoride exposure as revealed
by a special technique. Urol Int 41:91-94.
Greendyke RM, Hodge HC. 1976. Accidental death due to hydrofluoric acid. J Forensic Sci 9(3):383-
390.
Gregory AR. 1990. Uncertainty in health risk assessments. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 11:191-200.
Gregory GL, Harriss RC, Talbot RW, et al. 1986. Air chemistry over the tropical forest of Guyana. J
Geophys Res 91(D8):8603-8612.
*Greim H. 1990. Toxicological evaluation of emissions from modern municipal waste incinerators.
Chemosphere 20(3/4):317-331.
Grekhova TD, Katsnelson BA, Kolmogortseva VM, et al. 1993. Study on the protective effect of
glutamic acid at chronic intoxication with fluoride. Curr Toxicol 1(2):149-159.
Griffith FD, Barnes JR. 1970. Determination of fluoride in urine by fluoride electrode. In: Sunderman
FW, ed. Laboratory diagnosis of diseases caused by toxic agents, 215-217.
Griffith GW. 1985. Fluoridation and cancer mortality in Anglesey (Wales, UK). J Epidemiol
Community Health 39:224-226.
9. REFERENCES
Grimbergen GW. 1974. A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water.
Fluoride 7:146-152.
Groeneveld A, Van Eck AAMJ, Backer Dirks O. 1990. Fluoride in caries prevention: is the effect pre-
or post-eruptive? J Dent Res 69(special issue):751-5.
Groth EI. 1975. An evaluation of the potential for ecological damage by chronic low-level
environmental pollution by fluoride. Fluoride 8:224-240.
*Gruber HE, Baylink DJ. 1991. The effects of fluoride on bone. Clin Orthop Rel Res 267:264-277.
Grucka-Mamczar E, Machoy M, Tarnawski R, et al. 1997. Influence of long-term sodium fluoride

administration on selected parameters of rat blood serum and liver function. Fluoride 30(3):157-164.
Gruninger SE, Clayton R, Chang S-B, et al. 1988. Acute oral toxicity of dentifrice fluorides in rats and
mice. J Dent Res 67:334.
*Grynpas M. 1990. Fluoride effects on bone crystals. J Bone Miner Res 5:S169-S175.
Grynpas MD, Cheng P-T. 1988. Fluoride reduces the rate of dissolution of bone. Bone and Mineral 5:1-
9.
Grynpas MD, Rey C. 1992. The effect of fluoride treatment on bone mineral crystals in the rat. Bone
13:423-429.
Grynpas MD, Hancock RGV, Greenwood C, et al. 1993. The effects of diet, age, and sex on the mineral
content of primate bones. Calcif Tissue Int 52:399-405.
Guan Z-Z, Wang Y-N, Xiao K-Q, et al. 1998. Influence of chronic fluorosis on membrane lipids in rat
brain. Neurotoxicol Teratol 20(5):537-542.
Guan Z-Z, Zhuang Z-J, Yang P-S, et al. 1988. Synergistic action of iodine-deficiency and fluorine-
intoxication on rat thyroid. Chin Med J 101:679-684.
Guenter W, Hahn PHB. 1986. Fluorine toxicity and laying hen performance. Poult Sci 65:769-778.
*Guggenheim K, Simkin A, Wolinsky I. 1976. The effect of fluoride on bone of rats fed diets deficient
in calcium or phosphorus. Calcif Tissue Res 22:9-17.
*Guminska M, Sterkowicz J. 1975. Biochemical changes in the blood of humans chronically exposed to
fluorides. Acta Med Pol 16:215-224.
*Guna Sherlin DM, Verma RJ. 2001. Vitamin D ameliorates fluoride-induced embryotoxicity in
pregnant rats. Neurotox Teratol 23:197-201.
Guo MK, Nopakun J, Messer HH, et al. 1988. Retention of skeletal fluoride during bone turnover in rats.
J Nutr 118:362-366.
*Guo Z, Moisley RB, Wasson SJ, et al. 2001. Dissociation of sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas in the
presence of an indoor combustion source. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 51:616-622.
9. REFERENCES
*Gupta SK, Khan TI, Gupta RC. 2001. Compensatory hyperparathyroidism following high fluorine
ingestions- a clinico-biochemical correlation. Indian Pediatr 38:139-146.
*Gupta S, Seth AK, Gupta A, et al. 1993. Transplacental passage of fluorides. J Pediatr 123:139-141.
*Gupta SK, Gupta RC, Seth AK, et al. 1995. Increased incidence of spina bifida occulta in fluorosis
prone areas. Acta Paediatr Jpn Overseas Ed 37(4):503-506.
Gupta SK, Gupta RC, Seth AK, et al. 1996. Reversal of fluorosis in children. Acta Paediatr Jpn
Overseas Ed 38(5):513-519.
*Guy WS, Taves DR, Brey WS, Jr. 1976. Organic fluorocompounds in human plasma: Prevalence and
characterization. Am Chem Soc Symp Ser 28:117-134.
*Guzelian PS, Henry CJ, Olin SS, eds. 1992. Similarities and differences between children and adults:
Implications for risk assessment. Washington, DC: International Life Sciences Institute Press.
*Haddad LM, Winchester JF. 1990. Clinical management of poisoning and drug overdose. Second
edition. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company, 93, 495-496, 1049-1055, 1065-1069,1201, 1210-
1211, 1213-1215, 1265, 1481.
Hadjimarkos DM. 1969. Selenium toxicity: Effects of fluoride. Experientia 25:485-486.
*Hagan TL, Pasternack M, Scholz GC. 1954. Waterborne fluorides and mortality. Public Health Rep
69:450-454.
*Haguenauer D, Welch V, Shea B, et al. 2000. Fluoride for the treatment of postmenopausal
osteoporotic fractures: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 11:727-38.
Haimanot RT, Fekadu A, Bushra B. 1987. Endemic fluorosis in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Trop Geogr
Med 39:209-217.
*Hall LL, Kilpper RW, Smith FA, et al. 1977. Kinetic model of fluoride metabolism in the rabbit.
Environ Res 13:282-302.
Hall RJ. 1963. The spectrophotometric determination of sub-microgram amounts of fluorine in

biological specimens. Analyst 88:76-83.
Halton DM, Dranitsaris P, Baynes CJ. 1984. Toxicity levels to humans during acute exposure to
hydrogen fluoride. Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Canada. Report No. CA8508058.
*Hamilton IR. 1990. Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. J Dent Res 69(special issue):660-
667.
*Han YZ, Zhang JQ, Liu XY, et al. 1995. High fluoride content of food and endemic fluorosis. Fluoride
28(4):201-202.
*Hance CD, Solomon PA, Salmon LG, et al. 1997. Hydrofluoric acid in the southern California
atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 31:956-959.
9. REFERENCES
Hanhijarvi H. 1974. Comparison of free ionized fluoride concentrations of plasma and renal clearance in
patients of artificially fluoridated and non-fluoridated drinking water areas. Proc Finn Dent Soc
(Supplement III) 70:12.
Hanhijarvi H. 1982. The effect of renal impairment of fluoride retention of patients hospitalized in a
low-fluoride community. Proc Finn Dent Soc 78:13-19.
*Hannah RE. 1986. An HPLC anion exclusion method for fluoride determinations in complex effluents.
J Chromatogr Sci 24:336-339.
Harris H, Whittaker M. 1963. Differential inhibition of 'usual' and 'atypical' serum cholinesterase by
NaCl and NaF. Ann Hum Genet 27:53-58.
*Harris JC, Rumack BH, Bregman DJ. 1981. Comparative efficacy of injectable calcium and
magnesium salts in the therapy of hydrofluoric acid burns. Clin Toxicol 18(9):1027-1032.
*Harrison JE, Hitchman AJW, Hasany SA, et al. 1984. The effect of diet calcium on fluoride toxicity in
growing rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62:259-265.
Harrison MF. 1949. Urinary excretion of fluorine in some New Zealand subjects. Br J Nutr 3:166-170.
Harrold GC, Hurlburt RV. 1949. Device and technique for rapid determination of effluent fluorides.
Anal Chem 21:1504-1506.
Harwood JE. 1969. The use of an ion-selective electrode for routine fluoride analyses on water samples.
Water Res 3:273-280.
*Haskell Laboratory. 1988. Test results of acute inhalation studies with anhydrous hydrogen fluoride
with cover letter dated 03/16/88. Newark, DE. EPA/OTS. FYI-OTS-0388-0607.
*Hatai JK, Weber JN, Doizaki K. 1986. Hydrofluoric-acid burns of the eye report of possible delayed
toxicity. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 5:179-184.
Hawley GG. 1977. The condensed chemical dictionary. 9th ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand
Reinhold Co., 390-392.
Hayes WJ Jr. 1975. Ingestion of sodium fluoride as roach powder caused 47 deaths in 260 cases in
U.S.A. In: Toxicology of pesticides. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 323.
Haynes RC. 1990. Thyroid and antithyroid drugs. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, et al., eds.
Goodman and Gilman's: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 8th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon
Press, 1361-1522.
*HazDat. 2003. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Atlanta, GA. March
2003.
*Heasman MA, Martin AE. 1962. Mortality in areas containing natural fluoride in their water supplies.
Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 21:150-173.
Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC. 1989. Increased incidence of hip fracture in osteoporotic women treated with
sodium fluoride. J Bone Miner Res 4:223-225.
9. REFERENCES
Hegsted DH. 1968. The beneficial and detrimental effects of fluorides in the environment. Trace Subst
Heifetz SB, Horowitz HS. 1984. The amounts of fluoride in current fluoride therapies: Safety
considerations for children. J Dent Children 4:257-269.
Heifetz SB, Horowitz HS. 1986. Amounts of fluoride in self-administered dental products: Safety
considerations for children. Pediatrics 77:876-882.
*Heifetz SB, Driscoll WS, Horowitz HS, et al. 1988. Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis in
areas with optimal and above-optimal water-fluoride concentrations: A five-year follow-up survey. J Am
Dent Assoc 116:490-495.
*Heilman JR, Kiritsy MC, Levy SM. 1999. Assessing fluoride levels of carbonated soft drinks. JADA
130:1593-1599.
Hein JW, Bonner JF, Brudevold F, et al. 1956. Distribution in the soft tissue of the rat of radioactive
fluoride administered as sodium fluoride. Nature 178:1295-1296.
*Heindel JJ, Bates HK, Price CJ, et al. 1996. Developmental toxicity evaluation of sodium fluoride
administered to rats and rabbits in drinking water. Fundam Appl Toxicol 30:162-177.
Hellawell JM. 1988. Toxic substances in rivers and streams. Environ Pollut 50:61-85.
*Hemens J, Warwick RJ. 1972. Effects of fluoride on estuarine organisms. Water Res 6:1301-1308.
Henry JA, Hla KK. 1992. Intravenous regional calcium gluconate perfusion for hydrofluoric acid burns.
Clin Toxicol 30(2):203-207.
*Henschler D, Buttner W, Patz J. 1975. Absorption, distribution in body fluid and bioavailability of
fluoride. In: Kuhlencordt F, Kruse HP, eds. Calcium metabolism, bone and metabolic diseases. Berlin:
Springer Verlag, 111-121.
Hering F, Briellmann T, Seiler J, et al. 1985. Fluoridation of drinking water: Effects on kidney stone
formation. Urol Res 13:175-178.
*Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, et al. 2001. Neural tube defects in relation to use of folic
acid antagonists during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 153:961-968.
Hershkowitz I, Norton I. 1963. Increased incidence of melanotic tumors in two strains of Drosophila
melanogaster following treatment with sodium fluoride. Genetics 48:307-310.
Heyroth FF. 1963. Halogens. In: Patty F, ed. Industrial hygiene and toxicology. Volume II:
Toxicology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, 831-844.
Hibbs CM, Thilsted JP. 1983. Toxicosis in cattle from contaminated well water. Vet Hum Toxicol
25:253-254.
Hilado CJ, Cumming HJ. 1978. Short-term LC50 values: An update on available information. Fire
Technol 14:46-50.
9. REFERENCES
Hilado CJ, Furst A. 1976. Short-term LC50 values and fire toxicity. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 19:405-
407.
Hileman B. 1989. New studies cast doubt on fluoridation benefits. Chem Eng News 67:5-6.
*Hill IN, Blayney JR, Wolf W. 1951. The Evanston dental caries study. VII. The effect of artificially
fluoridated water on dental caries experience of 12-, 13-, and 14-year old schoolchildren. J Dent Res
30:670-675.
Hiller S, Cooper C, Kellingray S, et al. 2000. Fluoride in drinking water and risk of hip fracture in the
UK: a case-control study. Lancet 355:265-269.
*Hillman D, Bolenbaugh DL, Convey EM. 1979. Hypothyroidism and anemia related to fluoride in
dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 62:416-423.
Hindawi IJ. 1968. Injury by sulfur dioxide hydrogen fluoride, and chlorine as observed and reflected on
vegetation in the field. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 18:307-312.
Hirano S, Ando M, Kanno S. 1999. Inflammatory responses of rat alveolar macrophages following
exposure to fluoride. Arch Toxicol 73(6):310-315.
*Hodge HC. 1950. The concentration of fluorides in drinking water to give the point of minimum caries
with maximum safety. J Am Dent Assoc 40:436-439.
Hodge HC. 1960. Notes on the effects of fluoride deposition on body tissues. AMA Arch Ind Health
21:58-60, 350-352.
Hodge HC. 1961. Metabolism of fluorides. JAMA 177:313-316.
Hodge HC, Smith FA. 1970. Air quality criteria for the effects of fluorides on man. J Air Pollut Control
Assoc 20:226-232.
Hodge HC, Smith FA. 1972. Chapter 7: Fluorides. In: Lee DH, Minard D, eds. Metallic contaminants
and human health. New York, NY: Academic Press, 163-187.
*Hodge HC, Smith FA. 1965. Biological properties of inorganic fluorides. In: Simmons JH, ed.
Fluorine chemistry. Vol 4, 2-16.
Hodge HC, Smith FA. 1970. Minerals: Fluorine and dental caries. In: Dietary chemicals vs dental
caries. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 93-115.
*Hodge HC, Smith FA. 1977. Occupational fluoride exposure. J Occup Med 19:12-39.
Hodge HC, Taves DR. 1980. Chronic toxic effects on the kidneys. In: Fluorides and human health.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Series 59, 249-255.
*Hoel DG, Davis DL, Miller AB, et al. 1992. Trends in cancer mortality in 15 industrialized countries,
1969-1986. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(5):313-320.
9. REFERENCES
Hoffman DJ, Pattee OH, Wiemeyer SN. 1985. Effects of fluoride on screech owl reproduction:
Teratological evaluation, growth, and blood chemistry in hatchlings. Toxicol Lett 26:19-24.
*Hoffman R, Mann J, Calderone J, et al. 1980. Acute fluoride poisoning in a New Mexico elementary
school. Pediatrics 65:897-900.
Hogstedt C. 1984. Fluorides. In: Aitio A, Riihimaki V, Vainio H, eds. Biological monitoring and
surveillance of workers exposed to chemicals. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation,
177-186.
Hohenegger M, Huber I, Echsel H, et al. 1986. Metabolites of free fatty acids (FA) and triacylglycerol
(TG) in acute and subacute fluoride intoxication of the rat. Arch Toxicol 59:285-289.
Holland RI. 1980. Cytotoxicity of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 38:69-79.
Holm AK, Andersson R. 1982. Enamel mineralization disturbances in 12-year old children with known
early exposure to fluorides. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 10:335-336.
*Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, et al. 2000. Impact of folic acid fortification of the U.S. food
supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA 285:2981-2986.
Hongslo CF, Hongslo JK, Ekstrand J, et al. 1983. Cyclic AMP in urine, kidney, and liver following
long-term administration of fluoride to rats. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 52:276-280.
Hongslo CF, Hongslo JK, Holland RI. 1980. Fluoride sensitivity of cells from different organs. Acta
Pharmacol Toxicol 46:73-77.
*Hoover RN, Devesa SS, Cantor KP, et al. 1991a. Review of fluoride benefits and risks. Appendix E.
Fluoridation of drinking water and subsequent cancer incidence and mortality. Public Health Service.
Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.
*Hoover RN, Devesa SS, Cantor KP, et al. 1991b. Review of fluoride benefits and risks. Appendix F.
Time trends for bone and joint cancers and osteosarcomas in the surveillance, epidemiology and end
results (SEER) program. National Cancer Institute. Public Health Service. Bethesda, MD: Department
of Health and Human Services.
*Hoover RN, McKay FW, Fraumeni JF Jr. 1976. Fluoridated drinking water and the occurrence of
cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 57(4):757-768.
*Horowitz HS. 1996. The effectiveness of community water fluoridation in the United States. J Public
Health Dent 56:253-258.
Horowitz HS. 2000. Decision-making for national programs of community fluoride use. Commun Dent
Oral Epidemiol 28:321-329.
*Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, Driscoll WS, et al. 1984. A new method for assessing the prevalence of
dental fluorosis—the tooth surface index of fluorosis. J Am Dent Assoc 109:37-41.
Howard OH, Weber CW. 1962. An improved continuous internal-electrolysis analyzer for gaseous
fluorides in industrial environments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 23:48-57.
9. REFERENCES
HSDB. 1989. Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine, National Toxicology
Information System, Bethesda, MD.
*HSDB. 2003. Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine, National Toxicology
Information Program, Bethesda, MD. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search. March 27, 2001.
*Hudak PF. 1999. Fluoride levels in Texas groundwater. J Environ Sci Health Part A 34(8):1659-1676.
Hudson JT, Stookey GK, Muhler JC. 1967. The placental transfer of fluoride in the guinea pig. Arch
Oral Biol 12:237-246.
*Hutton WL, Linscott BW, Williams DB. 1951. The Brantford fluorine experiment: interim report after
five years of water fluoridation. Can J Public Health 42:81-87.
*IARC. 1982. Inorganic fluorides used in drinking-water and dental preparations. In: IARC
Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Vol. 27: Some aromatic
amines, anthraquinones and nitroso compounds, and inorganic fluorides used in drinking-water and dental
preparations. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer,
237-303.
IARC. 1987. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans.
Supplement 6: Genetic and related effects: An updating of selected IARC monographs from volumes 1
to 42. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 15-18,
313, 687-696.
*Ikenishi R, Kitagawa T. 1988. Gas chromatographic method for the determination of fluoride ion in
biological samples: II. Stability of fluorine-containing drugs and compounds in human plasma. Chem
Pharm Bull 36:810-814.
*Ikenishi R, Kitagawa T, Nishiuchi M, et al. 1988. Gas chromatographic method for the determination
of fluoride ion in biological samples: I. Fluoride level in monkey. Chem Pharm Bull 36:662-669.
Imai T, Niwa M, Ueda M. 1983. The effects of fluoride on cell growth of two human cell lines and on
DNA and protein synthesis in HeLa cells. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 52:8-11.
Imandel K, Khodabandeh A, Mesghaly A, et al. 1977. Epidemiology of fluorosis in the Borazjan area of
Iran: I. Fluoride content in drinking water. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 8:87-88.
*IOM. 1997. Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride.
Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press.
www4.nationalacademies.org/iom/iomhome.nsf.
*IRIS. 2003. Fluorine (soluble fluoride). Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/index.html. April 02, 2003.
*Ismail A, Bandekar RR. 1999. Fluoride supplements and fluorosis: A meta-analysis. Commun Dent
Oral Epidemiol 27:48-56.
Iyer BV, Fox JL, Higuchi WI, et al. 1983. A new acid abrasion procedure for studying F profiles in
demineralized/remineralized bovine tooth enamel. Caries Res 17:297-300.
9. REFERENCES
*Jaccaud M, Faron R. 1988. Fluorine. In: Gerhartz W, Yamamoto YS, Campbell FT, et al., eds.
Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Weinheim: VCH, Volume 11, 293-306.
Jachimczak D, Skotarczak B. 1978. The effect of fluorine and lead ions on the chromosomes of human
leukocytes in vitro. Genetica Polonica 19:353-357.
Jackson D, Weidmann SM. 1959. The relationship between age and the fluorine content of human
dentine and enamel: A regional survey. Br Dent J 107:303-306.
*Jackson JR, Hammersley H. 1981. Biological monitoring for occupational fluoride absorption.
Fluoride 14:75-86.
*Jackson RD, Brizendine EJ, Kelly SA, et al. 2002. The fluoride content of foods and beverages from
negligibly and optimally fluoridated communities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 30:382-391.
*Jackson RD, Kelly SA, Katz BP, et al. 1995. Dental fluorosis and caries prevalence in children residing
in communities with different levels of fluoride in the water. J Public Health Dent 55:79-84.
*Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Cooper C, et al. 1992. The association between water fluoridation and hip
fracture among white women and men aged 65 years and older. Ann Epidemiol 2:617-626.
*Jacobsen JS, Goldberg J, Miles TP, et al. 1990. Regional variation in the incidence of hip fracture:
U.S. white women aged 65 years and older. JAMA 264:500-502.
*Jacobsen JS, O’Fallon M, Melton J. 1993. Hip fracture incidence before and after the fluoridation of
the public water supply, Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Pub Health 83(5):743-745.
*Jacobson JS, Heller LI. 1971. Selective ion electrode analysis of fluoride in vegetation. In: England
HM, Beery WT, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress. New York, NY:
Academic Press, 459-462.
Jacobson JS, Weinstein LH. 1977. Sampling and analysis of fluoride: Methods for ambient air, plant
and animal tissues, water, soil, and foods. J Occup Med 19:79-87.
Jacobson JS, Weinstein LH, Farrah GH. 1972. Review of methods for monitoring the fluoride content of
air. In: Rampacek C, ed. Environmental Control; Proceedings of Symposium. New York, NY: AIME,
119-134.
Jacyszyn K, Marut A. 1986. Fluoride in blood and urine in humans administered fluoride and exposed to
fluoride-polluted air. Fluoride 19:26-32.
Jagiello G, Lin JS. 1974. Sodium fluoride as potential mutagen in mammalian eggs. Arch Environ
Health 29:230-235.
*Jain SK, Susheela AK. 1987. Effect of sodium fluoride on antibody formation in rabbits. Environ Res
44:117-125.
*Jansen I, Thomson HM. 1974. Heart deaths and fluoridation. Fluoride 7:52-57.
*Jarnberg P-O, Ekstrand J, Ehrnebo M. 1983. Renal excretion of fluoride during water diuresis and
induced urinary pH- changes in man. Toxicol Lett 18:141-146.
9. REFERENCES
Jarnberg P-O, Ekstrand J, Irestedt L, et al. 1979. Renal function and fluoride formation and excretion
during enflurane anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 23:444-452.
*Jarnberg P-O, Ekstrand J, Irestedt L, et al. 1980. Renal fluoride excretion during and after enflurane
anesthesia: Dependency on spontaneous urinary pH-variations. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 24:120-134.
*Jarnberg P-O, Ekstrand J, Irestedt L, et al. 1981. Renal fluoride excretion and plasma fluoride levels
during and after enflurane anesthesia are dependent on urnary pH. Anesthesiology 54:48-52.
*Jeandel C, Flapicuie F, Netter P, et al. 1992. Effect of age on the disposition of sodium fluoride. Eur J
Clin Pharmacol 43:295-297.
Jech JA. 1979. Comparative uptake of fluoride from sodium fluoride, ammonium fluoride, and barium
fluoride in rat teeth when predominantly administered in the pre-eruptive stage of development. Calcif
Tissue Int 27:117-119.
Jenkins GN, Edgar WM. 1973. Some observations on fluoride metabolism in Britain. J Dent Res
52:984-985.
Jethanandani P, Sharma K, Susheela AK. 1995. Circulating heptoglobin of rabbits after acute and
chronic fluoride activity. Med Sci Res 23(5):301-303.
Jha LB, Jha M. 1982. Fluoride pollution in India. Int J Environ Stud 19:225-230.
*Johanson CE. 1980. Permeability and vascularity of the developing brain: Cerebellum vs cerebral
cortex. Brain Res 190:3-16.
Johnson M. 1976. Potentiometric method for the determination of fluoride in vegetation. Fluoride 9:54-
63.
Johnson WJ, Taves DR. 1974. Exposure to excessive fluoride during hemodialysis. Kidney Int 5:451-
454.
Johnson WJ, Taves DR, Jowsey J. 1979. Fluoridation and bone disease in renal patients. In: Johnson E,
Taves DR, Olson T, eds. Continuing evaluation of the use of fluorides. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 275-293.
Jolly SS. 1976. Fluoride balance studies in endemic fluorosis. Fluoride 8:138-147.
*Jones AT. 1939. The treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 21:205-212.
Jones J, Riley M, Couper D, et al. 1999. Water fluoridation, bone mass and fracture: a quantitative
overview of the literature. Aust NZ J Public Health 23:34-40.
*Jooste PL, Weight MJ, Kriek JA, et al. 1999. Endemic goiter in the absence of iodine deficiency in
schoolchildren of the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr 53:8-12.
*Jowsey J, Riggs BL. 1978. Effects of concurrent calcium ingestion on intestinal absorption of fluoride.
Metabolism 27(8):971-974.
9. REFERENCES
Juncos LI, Donadio JV Jr. 1972. Renal failure and fluorosis. JAMA 222:783-785.
Kabrt L, Sucha L. 1980. Determination of fluorides in the atmosphere: I. Permeation tubes as a

standard source of hydrogen fluoride for the preparation of atmospheric model samples. Anal Chem
H15:103-112.
Kahl S, Ewy-Dura A. 1976. Effect of fluoride on the red cell (51Cr label), plasma (125IHSA label) and
true blood volumes of rats. Bulletin de L'Academie Polonaise des Sciences 24:397-402.
*Kakabadse GJ, Manohn B, Bather JM, et al. 1971. Decomposition and the determination of fluorine in
biological materials. Nature 299:626-627.
*Kalsbeek H, Kwant GW, Groeneveld A. 1993. Caries experience of 15-year old children in the
Netherlands after discontinuation of water fluoridation. Caries Res 27:201-205.
*Kaltreider NL, Elder MJ, Cralley LV, et al. 1972. Health survey of aluminum workers with special
reference to fluoride exposure. J Occup Med 14:531-541.
*Kaminsky L, Mahony M, Leach J, et al. 1990. Fluoride: Benefits and risks of exposure. Crit Rev Oral
Biol Med 1:261-281.
Kanisawa M, Schroeder HA. 1969. Life term studies on the effect of trace elements on spontaneous
tumors in mice and rats. Cancer Res 29(4):892-895.
Kanwar KC, Singh M. 1981a. Zinc, copper, and manganese levels in various tissues following fluoride
administration. Experientia 37:1328-1329.
Kanwar KC, Singh M. 1981b. Zinc depletion following experimental fluorosis in mice. Sci Total
Environ 22:79-83.
Kao W-F, Dart RC, Kuffner E, et al. 1999. Ingestion of low-concentration hydrofluoric acid: An
insidious and potentially fatal poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 31:35-41.
*Karagas MR, Baron JA, Barrett JA, et al. 1996. Patterns of fracture among the United States elderly:
Geographic and fluoride effects. Ann Epidemiol 6:209-216.
Kay E. 1974. An inquiry into the distribution of fluoride in the environmental of Garrison, Montana.
Fluoride 7:7-31.
Kay MI, Young RA, Posner AS. 1964. Crystal structure of hydroxyapatite. Nature 204:1050-1052.
Kazimierczak W, Adamas B. 1980. The action of various fluorides on rat mast cells: A comparative
study. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 28:941-946.
Kekki M, Lampainen E, Kauranen P, et al. 1982. The nonlinear tissue-binding character of fluoride
kinetics in normal and anephric subjects. Graphical analysis of serum fluoride data from man and rabbit.
Nephron 31:129-134.
*Kelly TJ, Mukund R, Spicer CW, et al. 1994. Concentrations and transformations of hazardous air
pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 28:378-387.
9. REFERENCES
*Kelly TJ, Ramamurthi M, Pollack AJ, et al. 1993. Ambient concentration summaries for Clean Air Act.
Title III. Hazardous air pollutants. Final Report. Research Triangle Park, July 1993.
Kelso FS, Matthews JM, Kramer HP. 1964. Ion-exchange method for determination of fluoride in
potable waters. Anal Chem 36:577-579.
*Kemp FH, Murray MM, Wilson DC. 1942. Spondylosis deformans in relation to fluorine and general
nutrition. Lancet ii:293-296.
Kempf CA, Greenwood DA, Nelson VE. 1937. Studies relating to the toxicity of fluorine compounds. J
Lab Clin Med 22:1133-1137.
*Keplinger ML. 1969. Effects from repeated short-term inhalation of fluorine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
14:192-200.
*Keplinger ML, Suissa LW. 1968. Toxicity of fluorine short-term inhalation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J
29(1):10-18.
Kessabi M, Assimi B, Braun JP. 1984. The effects of fluoride on animals and plants in the south Safi
zone. Sci Total Environ 38:63-69.
Kessabi M, Braun JP, Bernard P, et al. 1980. Acute kidney toxicity of sodium fluoride in the rat.
Toxicol Lett 5:169-174.
Kessabi M, Braun JP, Burgat-Sacaze V, et al. 1981. Comparison of sodium and stannous fluoride
nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Lett 7:463-467.
*Kessabi M, Hamliri A, Braun JP, et al. 1985. Experimental acute sodium fluoride poisoning in sheep:
Renal, hepatic, and metabolic effects. Fundam Appl Toxicol 5:1025-1033.
*Khalil AM. 1995. Chromosome aberrations in cultured rat bone marrow cells treated with inorganic
fluorides. Mutat Res 343:67-74.
*Khalil AM, Da'dara AA. 1994. The genotoxic and cytotoxic activities of inorganic fluoride in cultured
rat bone marrow cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26:60-63.
*Khandare AL, Kumar PU, Lakshmaiah N. 2000. Beneficial effect of tamarind ingestion on fluoride
toxicity in dogs. Fluoride 33(1):33-38.
Khandare AL, Rao GS, Lakshmaiah N. 2002. Effect of tamarind ingestion on fluoride excretion in
humans. European J Clin Nutr 56:82-85.
Kick CH, Bethke RM, Edgington BH. 1933. Effect of fluorine on the nutrition of swine with special
reference to bone and tooth composition. J Agric Res 46:1023-1037.
*Kidd EAM, Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, et al. 1980. Influence of fluoride in surface enamel and degree
of dental fluorosis on caries development in vitro. Caries Res 14:196-202.
Kierdorf H, Kierdorf U. 1999. Reduction of fluoride deposition in the vicinity of a brown coal-fired
power plant as indicated by bone fluoride concentrations of Roe deer. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
63:473-477.
9. REFERENCES
*Kierdorf H, Kierdorf U. 2000. Roe deer antlers as monitoring units for assessing temporal changes in
environmental pollution by fluoride and lead in a German forest area over a 67-year period. Arch
Environ Contam Toxicol 39:1-6.
King EJ, Yoganathan M, Nagelschmidt G. 1958. Tissue reactions produced by calcium fluoride in the
lungs of rats. Br J Ind Med 15:168-171.
Kinlen L. 1975. Cancer incidence in relation to fluoride level in water supplies. Br Dent J 138:221-224.
*Kinlen L, Doll R. 1981. Fluoridation of water supplies and cancer mortality: III. A re-examination of
mortality in cities in the U.S.A. J Epidemiol Community Health 35:239-244.
Kirkpatrick RL. 1980. Regulatory aspects of fluoride toxicity. J Anim Sci 51:773-774.
*Klauder JV, Shelanski L, Gabriel K. 1955. Industrial uses of compounds of fluorine and oxalic acid.
AMA Archives of Industrial Health 12:412-419.
Kleerekoper M. 1994. Non-dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 8(1):32-38.
Kleerekoper M. 1996. Fluoride and the skeleton. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA, eds.
Principles of bone biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1053-1062.
*Kleerekoper M, Peterson EL, Nelson DA, et al. 1991. A randomized trial of sodium fluoride as a
treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1:155-61.
Kleerekoper M, Peterson E, Phillips E, et al. 1989. Continuous sodium fluoride therapy does not reduce
vertebral fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis [Abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 4(1):S376.
Kleineberg GA, Geiger DL. 1975. Toxic hazard evaluation by mass spectrometric thermal analysis. In:
Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Environmental Toxicology, 21, 22, and 23 October 1975.
Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 199-216.
Kleiner HS, Allmann DW. 1982. The effects of fluoridated water on rat urine and tissue cAMP levels.
Arch Oral Biol 27:107-112.
*Kleinfeld M. 1965. Acute pulmonary edema of chemical origin. Arch Environ Health 10:942-946.
Knaus RM. 1971. The fate of fluoride and the effect of fluoride upon glucose metabolism in intact rats
[Abstract]. Diss Abst Int (Section B): Sciences and Engineering 32(4):2010B.
*Knaus RM, Dost FN, Johnson DE, et al. 1976. Fluoride distribution in rats during and after continuous
infusion of Na18F. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 38:335-343.
*Knight HG, Furr AK, Parkinson TF. 1988. Determination of fluorine by neutron activation analysis.
Anal Chem 49:1507-1510.
Knouff RA, Edwards LF, Preston DW, et al. 1936. Permeability of placenta to fluoride. J Dent Res
15:291-294.
9. REFERENCES
Koh ET, Clarke SL. 1997. Effects of fluoride and aluminum exposure to dams prior to and during
gestation on mineral compositions of bone and selected soft tissues of female mice dams and pups.
FASEB J 11(3):A406.
Kojima T, Ichise M, Seo Y. 1972. Selective gas-chromatography detection using an ion-selective

electrode: II. Selective detection of fluorine compounds. Talanta 19:539-547.
*Komori M, Nishio K, Kitada M, et al. 1990. Fetus-specific expression of a form of cytochrome P-450
in human livers. Biochemistry 29:4430-4433.
Kono K, Watanabe T, Dote T, et al. 2000. Successful treatments of lung injury and skin burn due to
hydrofluoric acid exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73:S93-S97.
Kono K, Yoshida Y, Harada A, et al. 1982. Fluoride metabolism and renal function: Concerning health
care of hydrofluoric acid workers. Proceedings of the Tenth Asian Conference On Occupational Health
2:755-762.
*Kono K, Yoshida Y, Watanabe M, et al. 1984. Urinary fluoride excretion in fluoride exposed workers
with diminished renal functions. Ind Health 22:33-40.
Kono K, Yoshida Y, Watanabe M, et al. 1992a. An experimental study on the treatment of hydrofluoric
acid burns. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 22:414-418.
Kono K, Yoshida Y, Watanabe M, et al. 1992b. Serum fluoride as an indicator of occupational

hydrofluoric acid exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:343-346.
*Kono K, Yoshida Y, Watanabe M, et al. 1993. Urine, serum and hair monitoring of hydrofluoric acid
workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:S95-S98.
*Kono K, Yoshida Y, Yamagata H, et al. 1987. Urinary fluoride monitoring of industrial hydrofluoric
acid exposure. Environ Res 42:415-520.
Koskinen-Kainulainen M, Luoma H. 1987. Excretion, serum, bone and kidney levels of F in rats after
high single dose of F and Mg+F. Magnesium 6:212-219.
*Koulourides T. 1990. Summary of session II: fluoride and the caries process. J Dent Res 69(special
issue):558.
Kour K, Singh J. 1980. Histological finding of mice testis following fluoride ingestion. Fluoride
13:160-162.
*Kram D, Schneider EL, Singer L, et al. 1978. Effects of high and low fluoride diets on the frequencies
of sister chromatid exchanges. Mutat Res 57:51-55.
*Krasowska A, Wlostowski T. 1992. The effect of high fluoride intake on tissue trace elements and
histology of testicular tubules in the rat. Comp Biochem Physiol 103C(1):31-34.
*Krelowska-Kulas M. 1994. Content of fluorine in vegetables and fruits from an industrial area.
Nahrung 38(4):397-401.
9. REFERENCES
Krishnamachari KA, Krishnaswamy K. 1974. An epidemiological study of the syndrome of Genu

valgum among residents of endemic areas for fluorosis in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Med Res 62:1415-
1423.
*Krishnan K, Andersen ME. 1994. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in toxicology. In:
Hayes AW, ed. Principles and methods of toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd., 149-
188.
*Krishnan K, Andersen ME, Clewell HJ III, et al. 1994. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic
modeling of chemical mixtures. In: Yang RSH, ed. Toxicology of chemical mixtures: Case studies,
mechanisms, and novel approaches. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 399-437.
*Kröger H, Alhava E, Honkanen R, et al. 1994. The effect of fluoridated drinking water on axial bone
mineral density: A population-based study. Bone Mineral 27:33-41.
*Krook L, Maylin GA. 1979. Industrial fluoride pollution: Chronic fluoride poisoning in Cornwall
Island cattle. Cornell Vet 69(Supplement 8):3-70.
Kruger BJ, Patterson CM, Masters CJ. 1978. Species differences in uptake and distribution of 18F. Aust
J Exp Biol Med Sci 56:427-431.
Kucharz E, Drozdz M, Jendryczko A. 1986. Influence of fluoride compounds on lysosomal enzymes

activity in blood of growing rats. Revue Roumaine de Biochimie 23:115-118.
Kudo A, Garrec JP. 1983. Accidental release of fluoride into experimental pond and accumulation in
sediments, plants, algae, molluscs and fish. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 3:189-198.
*Kuhr J, Helbig J, Anders G, et al. 1987. Interactions between fluorides and magnesium. Magnesium-
Bulletin 9:110-113.
*Kumar A, Susheela AK. 1994. Ultrastructural studies of spermiogenesis in rabbit exposed to chronic
fluoride toxicity. Int J Fertil 39(3):164-171.
*Kumar A, Susheela AK. 1995. Effects of chronic fluoride toxicity on the morphology of ductus
epididymis and the maturation of spermatozoa of rabbit. Int J Exp Pathol 76:1-11.
Kumar JV, Green EL. 1998. Recommendations for fluoride use in children. NY State Dent J Feb:41-48.
Kumar SP, Harper K. 1963. Fluorosis in Aden. Br J Radiol 36(427):497-502.
Kumari DS, Rao PR. 1991. Red cell membrane alterations in human chronic fluoride toxicity. Biochem
Int 23(4):639-648.
*Kumpulainen J, Koivistoinen P. 1977. Fluorine in foods. Residue Rev 68:37-55.
*Künzel W, Fischer T. 1997. Rise and fall of caries prevalence in German towns with different F
concentrations in drinking water. Caries Res 31:166-173.
*Künzel W, Fischer T. 2000. Caries prevalence after cessation of water fluoridation in La Salud, Cuba.
9. REFERENCES
*Künzel W, Fischer T, Lorenz R, et al. 2000. Decline of caries prevalence after the cessation of water
fluoridation in the former East Germany. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 28:382-389.
Kuo HC, Stamm JW. 1974. Fluoride levels in human rib bone: A preliminary study. Can J Public
Health 65:359-361.
*Kurttio R, Gustavsson N, Vartiainen T, et al. 1999. Exposure to natural fluoride in well water and hip
fracture: A cohort analysis in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 150:817-824.
Kyle RA, Jowsey J. 1980. Effect of sodium fluoride, calcium carbonate, and vitamin D on the skeleton
of multiple myeloma. Cancer 45:1669-1674.
Lantz EM, Smith MC. 1934. The effect of fluorine on calcium and phosphorus metabolism in albino
rats. Am J Physiol 109:645-654.
*Lantz O, Jouvin MH, DeVernejoul MC, et al. 1987. Fluoride-induced chronic renal failure. Am J
Kidney Dis 10:136-139.
Larez A, Ochoa Y, Aponte N, et al. 1980. Sodium fluoride, fetotoxicity, and oral experimental
teratogeny in rats: Toxicol aspects. International Congress of the European Association of Poison
Control Centers 9th 1980, 528-540.
Largent EJ. 1952. Rates of elimination of fluoride stored in the tissue of man. AMA Arch Ind Hyg
Occup Med 6:37-42.
Largent EJ. 1954. Metabolism of inorganic fluorides. In: Fluoridation as a public health measure.
Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 49-78.
*Largent EJ. 1960. The metabolism of fluorides in man. AMA Archives of Industrial Health 21:318-
323.
Larner J. 1950. Toxicological and metabolic effects of fluorine-containing compounds. Ind Med Surg
19:535-539.
Larsen S, Widdowson AE. 1971. Soil fluorine. J Soil Sci 22:210-221.
Larsen MJ, Kirkegaard E, Poulsen S. 1987. Patterns of dental fluorosis in a European country in relation
to the fluoride concentration of drinking water. J Dent Res 66:10-12.
Lasne C, Lu YP, Chouroulinkov I. 1988. Transforming activities of sodium fluoride in cultured Syrian
hamster embryo and BALB/3T3 cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 4:311-324.
Latham MC, Grech P. 1967. The effects of excessive fluoride intake. Am J Public Health 57:651-660.
Laurema S, Varis A-L. 1987. The fluoride content of Finnish honey. J Agric Sci Finland 59:379-386.
Laurence JA. 1982. Monitoring fluoride in the environment. In: Murray F, ed. Fluoride emissions. 1st
ed. North Ryde, Australia: Academic Press, 45-51.
*Lawrenz M, Mitchell HH, Ruth RA. 1940. Adaptation of the growing rat to the ingestion of a constant
concentration of fluorine in the diet. J Nutr 19:531-546.
9. REFERENCES
Lavoie EJ, Colement DT, Geddie NG, et al. 1985. Studies on the mutagenicity and tumor-initiating
activity of methylated fluorenes. Chem Biol Interact 52:301-309.
Lee C, Jacobs WB. 1968. The absorption, distribution, excretion, and toxicity of trifluoroamine oxide.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 13:76.
Lee JR. 1975. Optimal fluoridation: The concept and its application to municipal water fluoridation.
West J Med 122:431-436.
Lee JR. 1983. Gilbert's disease and fluoride intake. Fluoride 16:139-145.
*Leeder JS, Kearns GL. 1997. Pharmcogenetics in pediatrics: Implications for practice. Pediatr Clin
North Am 44(1):55-77.
LeGeros RZ. 1990. Chemical and crystallographic events in the caries process. J Dent Res 69(special
issue):567-574.
*Lehmann R, Wapniarz M, Hofmann B, et al. 1998. Drinking water fluoridation: Bone mineral density
and hip fracture incidence. Bone 22:273-278.
Leonard CD, Graves HB Jr. 1973. Effect of fluorine level in Valencia orange leaves on yield and fruit
quality. Proc State Florida Horticult Soc 85:13-18.
Leonard MA, Murray GT. 1974. Sulphonated alizarin fluorine blue: An improved reagent for the
positive absorptiometric determination of the fluoride ion. Analyst 99:645-651.
Leone NC, Leatherwood EC, Petrie IM, et al. 1964. Effect of fluoride on thyroid gland: Clinical study.
J Am Dental Assoc 69:179-180.
Leone NC, Martin AE, Minoguchi G, et al. 1970. Fluorides and general health. Geneva, Switzerland:
World Health Organization, Series 59, 273-321.
*Leone NC, Shimkin MB, Arnold FA, et al. 1954. Medical aspects of excessive fluoride in a water
supply. Public Health Reports 69(10):925-936.
*Leone NC, Stevenson CA, Hilbish TA, et al. 1955. A roentgenologic study of a human population
exposed to a high-fluoride domestic water: A ten year study. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med
74(5):874-885.
Less LN, McGregor A, Jones LH, et al. 1975. Fluorine uptake by grass from aluminum smelter fume.
Int J Environ Stud 7:153-160.
*Leung H-W. 1993. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling. In: Ballentine B, Marro T,

Turner P, eds. General and applied toxicology. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Stockton Press, 153-164.
Leverett DH. 1986. Prevalence of dental fluorosis in fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities - a
preliminary investigation. J Public Health Dent 46:184-187.
Levi S, Zilberman L, Frumin A, et al. 1986. Exposure to fluoride in the chemical industry. Am J Ind
Med 9:153-158.
9. REFERENCES
*Levine RS. 1976. The action of fluoride in caries prevention: a review of current concepts. Br Dent J
140:9-14.
*Levy SM. 1994. Review of fluoride exposures and ingestion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
22:173-180.
Levy SM, Zavash Z-M. 1991. Evaluation of fluoride exposures in children. J Dent Child 58:467-473.
*Levy SM, Kohout FJ, Guha-Chowdhury N, et al. 1995b. Infants’ fluoride intake from drinking water
alone, and from water added to formula, beverages, and food. J Dent Res 74:1399-1407.
*Levy SM, Kiritsy MC, Warren JJ. 1995a. Sources of fluoride intake in children. J Public Health Dent
55:39-52.
*Levy SM, Warren JJ, Davis CS, et al. 2001. Patterns of fluoride intake from birth to 36 months. J
Public Health Dent 61:70-77.
*Lewis RJ, Sr. ed. 1997. Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary. 13th ed. New York, NY: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., 511, 1017.
Li J, Suzuki Y, Hayashi K, et al. 1991. The genotoxic effect of sodium fluoride [Abstract]. Mutat Res
252(1):95.
*Li XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO. 1995a. Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children. Fluoride
28(4):189-192.
*Li Y, Liang CK, Katz BP, et al. 1995b. Long-term exposure to fluoride in drinking water and sister
chromatid exchange frequency in human blood lymphocytes. J Dent Res 74(8):1468-1474.
*Li Y, Liang CK, Slemenda CW, et al. 2001. Effect of long term exposure to fluoride in drinking water
on risks of bone fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16(5):932-939.
*Li YM, Dunipace AJ, Stookey GK. 1987a. Effects of fluoride on the mouse sperm morphology test. J
Dent Res 66:1509-1511.
Li YM, Dunipace AJ, Stookey GK. 1988. Genotoxic effects of fluoride: A controversial issue. Mutat
Res 195:127-136.
*Li YM, Heerema NA, Dunipace AJ, et al. 1987b. Genotoxic effects of fluoride evaluated by sister-
chromatid exchange. Mutat Res 192:191-201.
Liberti A, Mascini M. 1969. Anion determination with ion selective electrodes using Gran's plot. Anal
Chem 41:676-679.
*Lide, DR, ed. 1992. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 73th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,
Inc, 4-62, 4-98.
Likins RC, McClure FJ, Steere AC. 1962. Urinary excretion of fluoride following defluoridation of a
water supply. In: McClure FJ, ed. Fluoride drinking waters. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of
Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Dental Research, 421-423.
9. REFERENCES
*Lim JK, Renaldo GJ, Chapman P. 1978. LD50 of stannous fluoride, sodium fluoride and sodium
mono-fluoro phosphate in the mouse compared to the rat. Caries Res 12:177-179.
Lindahl CB, Mahmood T. 1994. Fluorine compounds, inorganic. In: Kroschwitz JI, Howe-Grant M,
eds. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. 4th Edition, Vol. 11. New York, NY: John
Wiley and Sons, 426-428.
Lindahl D, Lindwall L. 1978. Physical properties of fluorosis bone: Critical comments. Acta Orthop
Scand 49:382-383.
Linde HW. 1959. Estimation of small amounts of fluoride in body fluids. Anal Chem 31:2092-2094.
*Litvinov NN, Sikivuev JN. 1973. Tumours of the bone. In: Tursov VS, ed. Pathology of tumours in
laboratory animals. Vol 1: Tumours of the rat. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International
Agency for Research on Cancer, 169-184.
Liu M, Sun RY, Zhang JH, et al. 1987. Elimination of excess fluoride in potable water with coacervation
by electrolysis using an aluminum anode. Fluoride 20:54-63.
*Livingston, AL. 1978. Forage plant estrogens. J Toxicol Environ Health 4:301-324.
Loftenius A, Andersson B, Butler JE, et al. 1999. Fluoride augments the mitogenic and antigenic
response of human blood lymphocytes in vitro. Caries Res 33:148-155.
*Lopez H, Navia JM. 1988. A method to assay fluoride in foods, beverages, and diets. Caries Res
22:210-216.
Lu FC, Grewal RS, Rice WB, et al. 1965. Acute toxicity of sodium fluoride for rhesus monkeys and
other laboratory animals. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 22:99-106.
*Lu Y, Sun ZR, Wu LN, et al. 2000. Effect of high-fluoride water on intelligence in children. Fluoride
33(2):74-78.
Lucas J. 1988. Fluorine in the natural environment. J Fluorine Chem 41:1-8.
Lucas PA, Ophaug RH, Singer L. 1984. The effect of vitamin A deficiency and fluoride on
glycosaminoglycan metabolism in bone. Connect Tissue Res 13:17-26.
*Luke J. 2001. Fluoride deposition in the aged human pineal gland. Caries Res 35:125-128.
*Lund K, Ekstrand J, Boe J, et al. 1997. Exposure to hydrogen fluoride: an experimental study in
humans of concentrations of fluoride in plasma, symptoms, and lung function. Occup Environ Med
54(1):32-37.
*Lund K, Refsnes M, Ramis I, et al. 2002. Human exposure to hydrogen fluoride induces acute
neutrophilic eicosanoid, and antioxidant changes in nasal lavage fluid. Inhal Toxicol 14:119-132.
*Lund K, Refsnes M, Sandstrom T, et al. 1999. Increased CD3 positive cells in bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid after hydrogen fluoride inhalation. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(4):326-334.
9. REFERENCES
*Luoma H. 1980. Fluoride and magnesium, two ions in the prevention of calcium salt imbalance,
including caries prevention, in man and animals. Proc Finn Dent Soc 76:73-81.
Lynch CF. 1987. Relationship of fluoride in drinking water to other drinking water parameters. Arch
*Lyon JS. 1962. Observations on personnel working with fluorine at a gaseous diffusion plant. J Occup
Med 4:199-201.
Ma TS. 1958. Determination of fluorine in quantitative organic microanalysis. Anal Chem 30:1557-
1560.
Mabury SA, Ellis DA. 2001. 19F NMR as a highly specialized tool for the investigation of fluoro-
chemicals of environmental interest. ACS Abstracts 22(1-2):37.
MacDonald DJ, Luker MA. 1980. Fluoride: Interaction with chemical mutagens in drosophila. Mutat
Res 71:211-218.
*Macejunas AG. 1969. Spectrophotometric determination of fluoride using zirconium. J Amer Water
Works Assoc 61:311-313.
*Machle W, Kitzmiller K. 1935. The effects of the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride: II. The response
following exposure to low concentration. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 17:223-229.
*Machle W, Largent EJ. 1943. The absorption and excretion of fluoride: II. The metabolism at high
levels of intake. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 25:112-123.
*Machle W, Scott EW. 1935. The effects of the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride: III. Fluorine storage
following exposure to sub-lethal concentrations. J Ind Hyg 17:230-240.
Machle W, Scott EW, Largent EJ. 1942. The absorption and excretion of fluoride: I. The normal
fluoride balance. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 24:199-202.
Machle W, Scott EW, Treon J. 1969. Normal urinary fluorine excretion and the fluorine content of food
and water. Amer J Hyg 29:139-145.
*Machle W, Thamann F, Kitzmiller K, et al. 1934. The effects of the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride: I.
The response following exposure to high concentrations. J Ind Hyg 16:129-145.
MacLean DC, Schnieder RE. 1973. Fluoride accumulation by forage continuous vs intermittent
exposures to hydrogen fluoride. J Environ Quart 2:501-503.
*Macuch P, Balazova G, Bartosova L, et al. 1963. Hygienic analysis of the influence of noxious factors
on the environment and state of health of the population in the vicinity of an aluminum plant. J Hyg
Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 7:389-403.
Macuch P, Kortus J, Balazova G, et al. 1968. Effects of sodium and hydrogen fluorides on the
metabolism of fluorine, calcium, and phosphorus in rats. Br J Ind Med 25:131-135.
*Madans J, Kleinman JC, Cornoni-Huntley J. 1983. The relationship between hip fracture and water
fluoridation: An analysis of national data. Am J Public Health 73:296-298.
9. REFERENCES
Maduska AL. 1980. Fluoride renal toxicity in fetus and neonate [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol
136:1080.
Maduska AL, Ahokas RA, Anderson GD, et al. 1980. Placental transfer of intravenous fluoride in the
pregnant ewe. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:84-86.
Mahadevan TN, Meenakshy V, Mishra UC. 1986. Fluoride cycling in nature through precipitation.
Atmos Environ 20:1745-1750.
Maheshwari UR, King JC, Brunetti AJ, et al. 1981. Fluoride balances in pregnant and nonpregnant
women. J Occup Med 23:465-468.
Maheshwari UR, King JC, Leybin L, et al. 1983. Fluoride balances during early and late pregnancy. J
Occup Med 25:587-590.
Maheshwari UR, Schneider VS, McDonald JT, et al. 1984. Relation of serum and urinary fluoride levels
to fluoride intake in healthy men. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 27:469-473.
*Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Burnett WS, et al. 1991. Bone cancer incidence rates in New York State:
Time trends and fluoridated drinking water. Am J Public Health 81(4):475-479.
Maier FJ. 1971. Fluoridation. Crit Rev Environ Control 2:387-430.
Makarov SV, Spitsyn VA, Kravchuk OI, et al. 1999. Qualitative and quantitative variation of serum
proteins in fluorosis patients. Russ J Genet 35(9):1125-1128.
Makhni SS, Singh P, Thapar SP. 1977. Long-term effects of fluoride administration: An experimental
study: I. Radiological aspects. Fluoride 10:82-86.
*Malhotra A, Tweari A, Chawla HS, et al. 1993. Placental transfer of fluoride in pregnant women
consuming optimum fluoride in drinking water. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 11:1-3.
*Mann J, Tibi M, Sgan-Cohen HD. 1987. Fluorosis and caries prevalence in a community drinking
above-optimal fluoridated water. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 15:293-295.
*Manocha SH, Warner H, Olkowski BL. 1975. Cytochemical responses of kidney, liver, and nervous
system to fluoride ions in drinking water. Histochem J 7:343-355.
*Manoguerra AS, Neuman TS. 1986. Fatal poisoning from acute hydrofluoric acid ingestion. Am J
Emerg Med 4:362-363.
*Marais JSC. 1944. Monofluoracetic acid, the toxic principle of "grifblaar" Dichapetabum cymosum
(Hook) Engl. Onderstepoort J Vet Sci Anim Indust 20:67-73.
Margolis HC, Moreno EC. 1990. Physicochemical perspectives on the cariostatic mechanisms of
systemic and topical fluorides. J Dent Res 69(special issue):606-13.
*Marie PJ, Hott M. 1986. Short-term effects of fluoride and strontium on bone formation and resorption
in the mouse. Metabolism 35:547-551.
9. REFERENCES
Marier JR. 1977. Some current aspects of environmental fluoride. Sci Total Environ 8:253-266.
*Marks TA, Schellenberg D, Metzler CM, et al. 1984. Effect of dog food containing 480 ppm fluoride
on rat reproduction. J Toxicol Environ Health 14:707-714.
Markuson KE. 1947. The use of sodium fluoride in the manufacture of steel. Industrial Medicine
16:434-436.
*Marquis RE. 1990. Diminished acid tolerance of plaque bacteria caused by fluoride. J Dent Res
Marshall BS, Wood R. 1968. A simple field test for the determination of hydrogen fluoride in air.
Analyst 93:821-826.
Marthaler TM. 1979. Fluoride supplements for systemic effects in caries prevention. In: Johansen E,
Taves DR, Olsen TO, eds. Continuing evaluation of the use of fluorides. Boulder, CO: Westview.
American Association for the Advancement of Science selected symposium no. 11, 33-59.
*Martin GR, Brown KS, Matheson DW, et al. 1979. Lack of cytogenetic effects in mice or mutations in
Salmonella receiving sodium fluoride. Mutat Res 66:159-167.
Masironi R. 1969. Trace elements and cardiovascular diseases. Bull WHO 40:305-312.
*Masters RD, Coplan MJ, Hone BT, et al. 2000. Association of silicofluroide treated water with
elevated blood level. Neurotoxicology 21(6):1091-1099
Matsuno K. 1996. The treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Occup Med 46(4):313-317.
*Maupomé G, Clark DC, Levy SM, et al. 2001. Patterns of dental caries following the cessation of water
fluoridation. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 29:37-47.
*Maurer JK, Cheng MC, Boysen BG, et al. 1990. 2-Year carcinogenicity study of sodium fluoride in
rats. J Nat Cancer Inst 82(13):1118-1126.
Maurer JK, Cheng MC, Boysen BG, et al. 1993. Confounded carcinogenicity study of sodium fluoride
in CD-1 mice. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 18:154-168.
*Maurer RL, Day HG. 1957. The non-essentiality of fluorine in nutrition. J Nutr 62:561-573.
Maxwell JA, Caffrey JL, Yorio T, et al. 1983. Fluoride-induced changes in renal papillary cyclic-AMP.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 69:138-142.
*Mayer TG, Gross PL. 1985. Fatal systemic fluorosis due to hydrofluoric acid burns. Ann Emerg Med
14:149-153.
*Maylin GA, Krook L. 1982. Milk production of cows exposed to industrial fluoride pollution. J
Toxicol Environ Health 10:473-478.
Maylin GA, Eckerlin RH, Krook L. 1987. Fluoride intoxication in dairy calves. Cornell Vet 77:84-98.
9. REFERENCES
*Mayr U, Butsch A, Schneider S. 1992. Validation of two in vitro test systems for estrogenic activities
with zearalenone, phytoestrogens and cereal extracts. Toxicology 74:135-149.
*McCann HG, Bullock FA. 1957. The effects of fluoride ingestion on the composition and solubility of
mineralized tissues of the rat. J Dent Res 36:391-398.
*McClure FJ. 1949. Fluorine in foods. Public health reports. U.S. Public Health Service. Public Health
Reports 64:1061-1074.
*McClure FJ. 1950. Availability of fluorine in sodium fluoride vs. sodium fluosilicate. Public Health
Reports 65:1175-1186.
*McClure FJ, Likins RC. 1951. Fluorine in human teeth studied in relation to fluorine in the drinking
water. J Dental Res 30:172-176.
McClure FJ, Mitchell HH. 1931a. The effect of calcium fluoride and phosphate rock on the calcium
retention of young growing pigs. J Agric Res 42:363-373.
McClure FJ, Mitchell HH. 1931b. The effect of fluorine on the calcium metabolism of albino rats and
the composition of the bones. J Biol Chem 90:297-320.
McClure FJ, Zipkin I. 1958. Physiologic effects of fluoride as related to water fluoridation. In: Burket
LW, ed. Dental clinics of North America. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 441-458.
*McClure FJ, Mitchell HH, Hamilton TS, et al. 1945. Balances of fluorine ingested from various
sources in food and water by five young men. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 27:159-170.
*McCulley JP, Whiting DW, Petitt MG, et al. 1983. Hydrofluoric acid burns of the eye. J Occup Med
25:557-450.
McCune DC. 1971. Problems involved in devising air quality criteria for the effects of fluorides on
vegetation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 32:697-701.
*McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, et al. 2000. Systematic review of water fluoridation. Br Med
J 321:855-859.
*McGarvey CJ, Ernstene AC. 1947. Skeletal changes in chronic fluorine intoxication. Cleve Clin Q
14:108-112.
McGown EL, Suttie JW. 1977. Mechanism of fluoride-induced hyperglycemia in the rat. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol 40:83-90.
McGown EL, Suttie JW. 1979. Central nervous system mediation of fluoride hyperglycemia in the rat.
*McGuire SM, Vanable ED, McGuire JA, et al. 1991. Is there a link between fluoridated water and
osteosarcoma? J Am Dent Assoc 122:38-45.
*McIvor ME, Cummings CC, Mower MM, et al. 1985. The manipulation of potassium efflux during
fluoride intoxication: Implications for therapy. Toxicology 37:233-239.
9. REFERENCES
McIvor ME, Cummings CE, Mower MM, et al. 1987. Sudden cardiac death from acute fluoride
intoxication: The role of potassium. Ann Emerg Med 16:777-781.
McLaren JR. 1976. Possible effects of fluorides on the thyroid. Fluoride 9:105-116.
McNally WD. 1923. Four deaths caused by sodium fluoride. JAMA 81:811.
Meador MC, Bethea RM. 1970. Syringe sampling technique for individual colorimetric analysis of
reactive gases. Environ Sci Technol 4:853-855.
*Melton JR, Hoover WL, Ayers JL. 1974. Known addition procedure for determining fluoride in feeds
with an ion-specific electrode. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 57:508-510.
*Menchel SM, Dunn WA. 1984. Hydrofluoric acid poisoning. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5:245-248.
Mernagh JR, Harrison JE, Hancock R, et al. 1977. Measurement of fluoride in bone. Int J Appl Radiat
Isot 28:582-583.
*Messer HH, Ophaug RH. 1993. Influence of gastric acidity on fluoride absorption in rats. J Dent Res
72(3):619-622.
*Messer HH, Armstrong WD, Singer L. 1973. Influence of fluoride intake on reproduction in mice. J
Nutr 103:1319-1326.
Meunier PJ, Courpron P, Smoller JS, et al. 1980. Niflumic acid-induced skeletal fluorosis: Iatrogenic
disease or therapeutic perspective for osteoporosis? Clin Orthop 148:304-309.
*Michael M, Barot VV, Chinoy NJ. 1996. Investigations of soft tissue functions in fluorotic individuals
of north Gujarat. Fluoride 29(2):63-71.
*Mihashi M, Tsutsui T. 1996. Clastogenic activity of sodium fluoride to rat vertebral body-derived cells
in culture. Mutat Res 368:7-13.
Milan AM, Waddington RJ, Embery G. 2001. Fluoride alters casein kinase II and alkaline phosphatase
activity in vitro with potential implications for dentine mineralization. Arch Oral Biol 46:343-351.
*Milham S. 1979. Mortality in aluminum reduction plant workers. J Occup Med 21(7):475-480.
*Miller GW, Shupe JL, Vedina OT. 1999. Accumulation of fluoride in plants exposed to geothermal and
industrial water. Fluoride 32(2):74-83.
*Miller RF, Phillips PH. 1955. The enhancement of the toxicity of sodium fluoride in the rat by high
dietary fat. J Nutr 56:447-454.
Minoguchi G. 1970. Japanese studies on water and food fluoride and general and dental health. In:
Fluorides and human health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Series 59, 294-304.
*Miszke A, Sanokowska E, Winiarski J, et al. 1984. Nasal septum and mucosa in fluorosis. Fluoride
17(2):114-118.
9. REFERENCES
Mittal RL, Sidhu SS, Khokhar SS. 1987. Role of copper in skeletal changes in fluorosis: An
experimental study in rabbits. Fluoride 20:104-108.
Modly CE, Burnett JW. 1987. Dermatologic manifestations of fluoride exposure. Cutis 40:89-90.
Mohamed AH, Chandler ME. 1982. Cytological effects of sodium fluoride on mice. Fluoride 15:110-
118.
Mohamed AH, Kemner PA. 1969. Cytogenetic effects of hydrogen fluoride on Drosophila-
melanogaster. Genetics 61:541-542.
Mohamed AH, Applegate HG, Smith JD. 1966. Cytological reactions induced by sodium fluoride in
allium cepa root-tip chromosomes. Can J Genet Cytol 8:241-244.
Molina MJ. 1981. Chemistry of fluorine in the stratosphere [Abstract]. 182nd ACS National Meeting,
New York, NY, USA, August 23-28, 1981. Abstracts of Papers/American Chemical Society 182:30.
*Moller PF, Gudjonsson SV. 1932. Massive fluorosis of bones and ligaments. Acta Radiol 13:269-294.
Monsour PA, Kruger BJ, Petrie AF, et al. 1984. Acute fluoride poisoning after ingestion of sodium
fluoride tablets. Med J Aust 141:503-505.
Monsour PA, Kruger BJ, Smid JR. 1985. Effects of a single intravenous dose of sodium fluoride on
plasma electrolyte and metabolites in rats, rabbits, and cockerels. J Dent Res 64:1281-1285.
*Morgan DP. 1989. Recognition and management of pesticide poisonings. Fourth edition. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-540/9-88-001.
*Morgan L, Allred E, Tavares M, et al. 1998. Investigation of the possible associations between
fluorosis, fluoride exposure, and childhood behavior problems. Pediatr Dent 20(4):244-252.
Mörnstad H, van Dijken J. 1982. Caries preventive doses of fluoride and cyclic AMP levels in human
plasma. Caries Res 16:277-281.
*Morris JB, Smith FA. 1982. Regional deposition and absorption of inhaled hydrogen fluoride in the rat.
*Morris JB, Smith FA. 1983. Identification of two forms of fluorine in tissues of rats inhaling hydrogen
fluoride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 71:383-390.
*Morselli PL, Franco-Morselli R, Bossi L. 1980. Clinical pharmacokinetics in newborns and infants:
Age-related differences and therapeutic implications. Clin Pharmacokin 5:485-527.
Morshina TN. 1980. Fluorine adsorption by soils. Soviet Soil Science 12:413-416.
Morshina TN, Fanaskova TP. 1985. Changes in soil properties caused by fluorine. Soviet Soil Science
17:74-79.
Moudgil A, Srivastava RN, Vasudev A, et al. 1986. Fluorosis with crippling skeletal deformities. Indian
J Pediatr 23:767-773.
9. REFERENCES
Muehlberger CW. 1930. Toxicity studies of fluorine insecticides. J Pharmacol Exper Therap 39:246-
248.
*Mueller WH. 1994. Sodium fluoride. In: Kroschwitz JI, Howe-Grant M, eds. Kirk-Othmer
encyclopedia of chemical technology. 4th Edition, Vol. 11. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 426-
428.
Mukherjee RN, Sobels FH. 1968. The effects of sodium fluoride and iodoacetamide on mutation by x-
irradiation in mature spermatozoa of Drosophila. Mutat Res 6:217-225.
*Mullenix PJ, Denbesten PK, Shunior A, et al. 1995a. Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats.
Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(2):169-177.
Mullenix PJ, Denbesten PK, Schunior A, et al. 1995b. Reply. Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(6):687-688.
*Mullet T, Zoeller T, Bingham H, et al. 1987. Fatal hydrofluoric acid cutaneous exposure with
refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Burn Care Rehabil 8:216-219.
Murakami T, Nakagaki H, Sakakibara Y, et al. 1987. The distribution pattern of fluoride concentrations
in human cementum. Arch Oral Biol 32:567-571.
Murer EH. 1976. Effects of fluoride on blood platelets. Fluoride 9:173-184.
*Murray JJ. 1993. Efficacy of preventive agents for dental caries. Systemic fluorides: water
fluoridation. Caries Res 27(suppl 1):2-8.
*Murray MM, Wilson DC. 1948. Fluorosis and nutrition in Morocco: Dental studies in relation to
environment. Br Dental J 84:97-100.
Murty GV, Viswanathan TS, Ramakrishna V. 1957. Estimation of fluorine in microgramme quantities:
A modified procedure. Anal Chim Acta 16:213-215.
*Myers HM. 1978. Fluorides and dental fluorosis. Monogr Oral Sci 7:1-76.
Naidu MR, Sastry KY, Reddy DR. 1986. Skeletal fluorosis, secondary to occult renal disease. Fluoride
19:166-168.
*Najjar VA. 1948. The isolation and properties of phosphoglucomutase. J Biol Chem 175:281-290.
Najjar VA. 1963. Phosphoglucomutase. In: Boyer PD, Lardy H, Myrback K, eds. The enzymes. Vol.
VI. New York, NY: Academic Press, 161-178.
*Narayana MV, Chinoy NJ. 1994. Effect of fluoride on rat testicular steroidogenesis. Fluoride 27(1):7-
12.
*NAS. 1971a. Biologic effects of atmospheric pollutants: Fluorides. Washington, DC: National
Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric
Pollutants, 239.
9. REFERENCES
NAS. 1971b. Guides for short-term exposures of the public to air pollutants: III. Guide for gaseous
hydrogen fluoride. Committee on Toxicology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
APTD-0765, NTIS-PB203-465, 16.
*NAS/NRC. 1989. Biologic markers in reproductive toxicity. National Academy of Sciences/National

Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 15-35.
Nash TH, Gries C. 1995. The use of lichens in atmospheric deposition studies with an emphasis on the
Arctic. Sci Total Environ 160/161:729-736.
NATICH. 1989. National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Navia JM, Aponte-Merced L, Punyasingh K. 1988. Fluoride metabolism in humans. Essential and
Toxic Trace Elements in Human Health and Disease 18:229-250.
*NCI. 1978. Bioassay of acronycine for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of
Health, NCI Carcinogenesis Technical Report Series No. 49, 152.
Neal C. 1989. Fluorine variations in Welsh streams and soil waters. Sci Total Env 80:213-223.
Nedeljkovic M, Matovic V. 1991. The effect of dose on maternal-foetal transfer of fluoride in rabbits.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 42:43-46.
*Needleman HL, Pueschel SM, Rothman KJ. 1974. Fluoridation and the occurrence of Down's
syndrome. N Engl J Med 291:821-823.
Neefus JD, Cholak J, Saltzman BE. 1970. The determination of fluoride in urine using a fluoride-
specific ion electrode. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 96-99.
Nelson RL. 1987. Dietary minerals and colon carcinogenesis (review). Anticancer Res 7:259-269.
*Neuberger JS. 1982. Fluoridation and cancer. J Kans Med Soc 83:134-139.
*Neuman WI, Neuman MW, Mair EK, et al. 1950. The surface chemistry of bone: II. Fluoride
deposition. J Biol Chem 187:655-661.
Newbrun E. 1987. Topical fluoride therapy: Discussion of some aspects of toxicology, safety, and
efficacy. J Dent Res 66:1084-1086.
NHMRC Australia. 1991. The effectiveness of water fluoridation. Canberra, Australia: Department of
Health, Housing and Community Services, National Health and Medical Research Council.
*Nicolli HB, Suriano JM, Gomez Peral MA, et al. 1989. Groundwater contamination with arsenic and
other trace elements in an area of the Pampa, province of Cordoba, Argentina. Environ Geol Water Sci
14(1):3-16.
Nielsen HM. 1960. The determination of fluoride in soft tissue, bone, and urine. Arch Indust Health
21:316-317.
9. REFERENCES
NIOSH. 1975. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to inorganic fluorides.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public Health Service. Center for
Disease Control. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHEW publication no.
(NIOSH)76-103.
NIOSH. 1976a. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to hydrogen fluoride.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public Health Service. Center for
Disease Control. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHEW publication no. (NIOSH)
76-143.
NIOSH. 1976b. National occupational hazard survey. Department of Health and Human Services.
Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
NIOSH. 1984a. National occupational exposure survey (1980-1983). Cincinnati, OH: National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health. Department of Health and Human Services.
NIOSH. 1984b. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Division of Physical
Sciences and Engineering. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
NIOSH. 1985. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH)
publication no. 85-114.
NIOSH. 1987. National occupational hazard survey. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health. Department of Health and Human Services.
*NIOSH. 1989. National occupational exposure survey (1980-1983). Cincinnati, OH: National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health. Department of Health and Human Services.
NIOSH. 1990a. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. Division of Laboratories and Criteria
Development. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department
of Health, Education and Welfare. Centers for Disease Control, 329.
NIOSH. 1990b. NIOSH pocket guide to chemicals hazards. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. Center for Disease Control. National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health. Division of Standard Development and Technology Transfer. NIOSH publication no. 90-117.
*NIOSH. 1994. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Division of Physical
Sciences and Engineering.
*NIOSH. 2001a. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Fluorine. National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0289.html. March 27, 2001.
*NIOSH. 2001b. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Hydrogen fluoride. National Institute for
*NIOSH. 2001c. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Sodium fluoride. National Institute for
NIOSH/OSHA. 1978. Occupational health guidelines for chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
9. REFERENCES
*Nopakun J, Messer HH. 1989. Fluoride absorption from the gastrointestinal tract of rats. J Nutr
119:1411-1417.
*Nopakun J, Messer HH. 1990. Mechanism of fluoride absorption from the rat small intestine. Nutr Res
10:771-779.
Nopakun J, Guo MK, Messer HH, et al. 1988. Fluoride redeposition and retention during bone turnover
in lactating rats. J Dent Res 67:1213-1216.
Nordlund AL, Ekstrand JL, Hammarstrom L. 1986. Fluorine-induced cystic changes in the enamel organ
of the rat molar. J Oral Pathol 15:87-92.
NRC. 1977a. Drinking water and health: Part I. Chapters 1-5: A report of the safe water drinking
committee. Washington, DC: The National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences. Safe
Drinking Water Committee. Advisory Center on Toxicology Assembly of Life Sciences. PB-270 422.
NRC. 1977b. Drinking water and health: Part II. Chapters 6 and 7: A report of the safe water drinking
committee. Washington, DC: The National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences. Safe
Drinking Water Committee. Advisory Center on Toxicology Assembly of Life Sciences. PB-270 423.
*NRC. 1982. Water chemicals codex. Committee on Water Treatment Chemicals. Food and Nutrition
Board, Assembly of Life Sciences. National Research Council. Washington, DC. National Academy
Press.
NRC. 1989. Recommended dietary allowances. 10th ed. Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the
RDAs Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life Sciences. National Research Council. National
Academy of Science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 235-239.
*NRC. 1993. Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. Commission on Life Sciences, National Research
Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 51-72; 125-128.
http://www.nap.edu/books/030904975X/html/.
*NRC Canada. 1971. Environmental fluoride 1971. Ottawa, Ontario: National Research Council of
Canada, NRCC Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality. NRC pub. No.
12226.
NRC Canada. 1977. Environmental fluoride, 1977. Ottawa, Ontario: National Research Council of
Canada, NRC Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality. NRCC no. 16081.
*NTP. 1990. NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of sodium fluoride in
F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 mice (drinking water studies). Washington, DC: Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, National Toxicology Program. NTP TR 393, NIH publication no. 90-2848.
Ockerse T. 1941. Endemic fluorosis in the Kenhardt and Gordonia districts, Cape Province, South
Africa. J Am Dent Assoc 28:936-941.
*Oelschälger W. 1971. Fluoride uptake in soil and its depletion. Fluoride 4:80-84
Øgaard B, Seppa L, Rǿlla G. 1994. Professional topical fluoride applications – clinical efficacy and
mechanism of action. Adv Dent Res 8(1):190-201.
9. REFERENCES
*Oguro A, Cervenka J, Horii K-I. 1995. Effect of sodium fluoride on chromosomal ploidy and breakage
in cultured human diploid cells (IMR-90): An evaluation of continuous and short-time treatment.
Pharmacol Toxicol 76:292-296.
O'Hara JP, Fraser AJ, James MP. 1982. Superphosphate poisoning of sheep: The role of fluoride. N Z
Vet J 30:199.
*Okushi I. 1971. Experimental studies on the effects of sodium fluoride upon the heart muscle of
rabbits. Fluoride 4(4):199-203.
*Oldham PD, Newell DJ. 1977. Fluoridation of water supplies and cancer. Applied Statistics 26:125-
135.
*Oliveby A, Lagerlōf F, Ekstrand J, et al. 1989. Studies on fluoride concentrations in human

submandibular/sublingual saliva and their relation to flow rate and plasma fluoride levels. J Dent Res
68(2):146-149.
*Oliveby A, Twetman S, Ekstrand J. 1990. Diurnal fluoride concentration in whole saliva in children
living in a high- and a low-fluoride area. Caries Res 24:44-47.
Olmez I, Sheffield AE, Gordon GE, et al. 1988. Compositions of particles from selected sources in
Philadelphia for receptor modeling applications. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 38(11):1392-1402.
Olszewska E, Kilbery B, Luker M. 1978. Sodium fluoride and mutagenesis in neurospora. Mutat Res
53:245-246.
Omueti JA, I., Jones RL. 1977. Regional distribution of fluorine in Illinois U.S.A soils. Scientific
Society of America-Journal 41:771-774.
Ophaug RH, Singer L, Harland BF. 1980a. Estimated fluoride intake of 6-month-old infants in four
dietary regions of the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 33:324-327.
Ophaug RH, Singer L, Harland BF. 1980b. Estimated fluoride intake of average two-year-old children in
four dietary regions of the United States. J Dent Res 59(5):777-781.
*Ophaug RH, Singer L, Harland BF. 1985. Dietary fluoride intake of 6-month and 2-year-old children in
four dietary regions of the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 42:701-707.
*Opinya GN, Bwibo N, Valderhaug J, et al. 1991a. Intake of fluoride through food and beverages by
children in a high fluoride (9 ppm) area in Kenya. Discov Innov 3(4):71-75.
Opinya GN, Bwibo N, Valderhaug J, et al. 1991b. Intake of fluoride and excretion in mothers' milk in a
high fluoride (9 ppm) area in Kenya. Eur J Clin Nutr 45(1):37-42.
OSHA. 1982. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Federal Register 47:30420.
*OSHA. 1985. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR
1910.1000
9. REFERENCES
OSHA. 1989. Air contaminants. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Federal Register
54:2332-2983.
*OSHA. 2001a. Air contaminants. Shipyards. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. U.S.
Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR 1915.1000, Table Z. http://www.osha-
slc.gov/OshStd_data/1915_1000.html. March 26, 2001.
*OSHA. 2001b. General requirements. Welding, cutting, and brazing. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration. U.S. Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR 1910.252 (c)(1).
http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/1910_0252.html. March 26, 2001.
OSHA. 2001c. Limits for air contaminants. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. U.S.
Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR 1910.1000, Table Z-1. http://www.osha-
slc.gov/OshStd_data/1910_1000_Table Z-1.html. March 26, 2001.
*OSHA. 2001d. List of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives (mandatory). Occupational
Safety and Health Administration. U.S. Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR
1910.119, Appendix A. http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/1910_0119_APP_A.html. March 26,
2001.
*OSHA. 2001e. List of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives (mandatory). Occupational
Safety and Health Administration. U.S. Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR
1926.64, Appendix A. http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/1910_0119_APP_A.html. March 26, 2001.
*OSHA. 2001f. Threshold limit values of airborne contaminants for construction. Occupational Safety
and Health Administration. U.S. Department of Labor. Code of Federal Regulations. 29 CFR 1926.55,
Appendix A. http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/1926_0055_APP_A.html. March 26, 2001.
Otey MG, Pulley H. 1973. Determination of gaseous fluorine in air. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 34:418-420.
*Owen GM, Brozek J. 1966. Influence of age, sex and nutrition on body composition during childhood
and adolescence. In: Falkner F, ed. Human development. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 222-238.
*Pader M. 1993. Dentifrices. In: Kirk-Othmer, encyclopedia of chemical technology. New York, NY:
John Wiley and Sons, 1023-1030.
*Pak CYC, Sakhaee K, Adams-Huet B, et al. 1995. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with
slow-release sodium fluoride. Final report of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 123:401-
408.
Pak CYC, Sakhaee K, Zerwekh JE, et al. 1989. Safe and effective treatment of osteoporosis with
intermittent slow release sodium fluoride: Augmentation of vertebral bone mass and inhibition of
fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 68(1):150-159.
*Pandit CG, Raghavachari TNS, Rao DS, et al. 1940. Endemic fluorosis in South India: A study of the
factors involved in the production of mottled enamel in children and severe bone manifestations in adults.
Indian J Med Res 28:533-558.
*Pang DTY, Phillips CL, Bawden JW. 1992. Fluoride intake from beverage consumption in a sample of
North Carolina children. J Dent Res 71(7):1382-1388.
9. REFERENCES
Pang YX, Guo YQ, Fu KW, et al. 1996. The effects of fluoride, alone and in combination with selenium,
on the morphology and histochemistry of skeletal muscle. Fluoride 29(2):59-62.
Pantucek MB. 1975. Hygiene evaluation of exposure to fluoride fume from basic arc-welding electrodes.
Ann Occup Hyg 18:207-212.
*Parker CM, Sharma Rap, Shupe JL. 1979. The interaction of dietary vitamin C, protein and calcium
with fluoride: Effects in guinea pigs in relation to breaking strength and radiodensity of bone. Clin
Toxicol 15:301-312.
Parker PR, Bawden JW. 1986. Prenatal fluoride exposure: Measurement of plasma levels and enamel
uptake in the guinea pig. J Dent Res 65:1341-1345.
Parkins FM, Greenlimb PE. 1974. Fluoride secretion in rat bile during periods of intestinal fluoride
absorption. J Dent Res 53:1296.
Pashley DJ, Allison NB, Easmann RP, et al. 1984. The effects of fluoride on the gastric mucosa of the
rat. J Oral Pathol 13:535-545.
Pasquini R, Scassellati-Sforzolini G, Angeli G, et al. 1996. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of pesticide-

exposed farmers in central Italy. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 15(1):29-39.
Patel D, Milind VS, Narayana MV, et al. 1994. Effects of sodium fluoride on physiology of female mice
and its reversal. Proc Acad Environ Biol 3(2):197-205.
*Pati PC, Buhnya SP. 1987. Genotoxic effect of an environmental pollutant, sodium fluoride, in
mammalian in vivo test system. Caryologia 40:79-88.
Pattee OH, Wiemeyer SN, Swineford DM. 1988. Effects of dietary fluoride on reproduction in eastern
screech-owls. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 17:213-218.
*Paul V, Ekambaram P, Jayakumar AR. 1998. Effects of sodium fluoride on locomotor behavior and a
few biochemical parameters in rats. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 6:187-191.
Penman AD, Brackin BT, Embrey R. 1997. Outbreak of acute fluoride poisoning caused by a fluoride
overfeed, Mississippi, 1993. Public Health Rep 112:403-409.
*Perkinson JD, Whitney TB, Monroe RA, et al. 1955. Metabolism of fluorine-18 in domestic animals.
Am J Physiol 182:383-389.
Peters D, Miethchen R. 1996. Symptoms and treatment of hydrogen fluoride injuries. J Fluorine Chem
79:161-165.
*Peters RA, Shorthouse M, Murray LR. 1964. Biochemistry: Enolase and fluorophosphate. Nature
202:1331-1332.
Petersen LR, Denis D, Brown D, et al. 1988. Community health effects of a municipal water supply
hyperfluoridation accident. Am J Public Health 78(6):711-713.
*Petersson LG, Ludvigsson N, Ullbro C, et al. 1987. Fluoride clearance of whole saliva in young school
children after topical application. Swed Dent J 11:95-101.
9. REFERENCES
Petraborg HT. 1974. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water (preliminary report). Fluoride
7:47-52.
Pettyjohn WA. 1975. Pickling liquors, strip mines, and ground-water pollution. Ground Water 13:4-11.
Phillips PH, Lamb AR, Hart EB, et al. 1933. Studies on fluorine in the nutrition of the rat: II. Its
influence on reproduction. Am J Physiol 106:356-364.
Phipps KR, Burt BA. 1990. Water-borne fluoride and cortical bone mass: A comparison of two
communities. J Dent Res 69(6):1256-1260.
*Phipps KR, Orwoll ES, Bevan L. 1998. The association between water-borne fluoride and bone mineral
density in older adults. J Dent Res 77(9):1739-1748.
*Phipps KR, Orwoll ES, Mason JD, et al. 2000. Community water fluoridation, bone mineral density,
and fractures: Prospective study of effects in older women. Br Med J 321:860-864.
Pillai KS, Mathai AT, Deshmukh PB. 1987. Acute toxicity of fluoride to mice. Fluoride 20:68-70.
*Pillai KS, Mathai AT, Deshmukh PB. 1988. Effect of subacute dosage of fluoride on male mice.
Toxicol Lett 44:21-30.
Pitt MJ. 1982. A vapor hazard index for volatile chemicals. Chem Ind 20:804-806.
Pitter P. 1985. Forms of occurrence of fluorine in drinking water. Water Res 19:281-284.
Pohlandt K, Strecker M, Marutzky R. 1993. Ash from the combustion of wood treated with inorganic
wood preservatives: Element composition and leaching. Chemosphere 26(12):2121-2128.
Polomski J, Fluehler H, Blaser P. 1982. Accumulation of airborne fluoride in soils. J Environ Qual
11:457-461.
*Poulsen OM, Christensen JM, Sabbioni E, et al. 1994. Trace element reference values in tissues from
inhabitants of the European Community. V. Review of trace elements in blood, serum and urine and
critical evaluation of reference values for the Danish population. Sci Total Environ 141:197-215.
Poulsen S, Moller IJ, Naerum J, et al. 1972. Prevalence of dental caries in 2383 Moroccan school
children aged eight and twelve. Arch Oral Biol 17:1165-1175.
Powell WA, Saylor JH. 1953. Fluorimetric determination of small amounts of fluoride. Anal Chem
25:960-964.
Purdell-Lewis DJ, Suckling GW, Triller M, et al. 1987. Artificially induced developmental defects in
sheep enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. J Biol Buccale 15:119-124.
Purohit SD, Gupta RC, Mathur AK, et al. 1999. Experimental pulmonary fluorosis. Indian J Chest Dis
Allied Sci 41(1):27-34.
Rajan KS, Raisen E, Mandler JW, et al. 1976. Improved fluoride incorporation and new in vitro fluorine
elemental determination. J Dent Res 55:671.
9. REFERENCES
*Rao GS. 1984. Dietary intake and bioavailability of fluoride. In: Darby WJ, ed. Annual review of
nutrition. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., 115-136.
*Rao HV, Beliles RP, Whitford GM, et al. 1995. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for
fluoride uptake by bone. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 22:30-42.
*Rao SH, Gopal ER, Raj R. 1969. A case of acute sodium fluoride (sic) intoxication. J Assoc
Physicians India 17:373-374.
Rao US, Murthy SK. 1991. The effects of β-mercaptoethanol and sodium dodecyl sulfate on the
humicola insolens β-glucosidase. Biochem Int 23(2):343-348.
*Rapaport I. 1956. Contribution a l’etude du mongolism, role pathogenique du fluor. Bulletin de

l’Academie Nationale Medecine (Paris) 140:525-531.
Rastogi R, Upreti RK, Kidwai AM. 1987a. Alteration in gastric enzymes of rats following in situ
administration of sodium fluoride. Fluoride 20:71-74.
Rastogi R, Upreti RK, Kidwai AM. 1987b. Effect of fluoride on the intestinal epithelial cell brush
border membrane. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 39:162-167.
Ream LJ, Principato R. 1981. Glycogen accumulation in the parathyroid gland of the rat after fluoride
ingestion. Cell Tissue Res 220:125-130.
*Ream LJ, Scott JN, Pendergrass PB. 1983. Bone morphology of weanling rats from dams subjected to
fluoride. Cell Tissue Res 233:689-691.
Reddy GS, Rao BS. 1972. Effect of fluoride on the skeleton of rats maintained on different levels of
calcium in the diet. Indian J Med Res 60:481-487.
*Reddy GS, Srikantia SG. 1971. Effect of dietary calcium, Vitamin C, and protein in development of
experimental skeletal fluorosis: I. Growth, serum chemistry, and changes in composition and
radiological appearance of bones. Metabolism 20:642-649.
Reddy J, Grobler SR, Reiter NF. 1988. The relationship of the periodontal status to fluoride levels of
alveolar bone and tooth roots. J Clin Periodontol 15:217-221.
Reeves TG. 1996. Technical aspects of water fluoridation in the United States and an overview of
fluoridation engineering world-wide. Commun Dent Health 13(Suppl 2):21-26.
Refsnes M, Becher R, Lag M, et al. 1999. Fluoride-induced interleukin-6 nad interleukin-8 synthesis in
human epithelial. Hum Exp Toxicol 18(11):645-652.
*Reimann C, De Caritat P, Halleraker JH, et al. 1997. Rainwater composition in eight arctic catchments
in Northern Europe (Finland, Norway and Russia). Atmos Environ 31(2):159-170.
Retief DH, Bradley EL, Barbakow FH, et al. 1979. Relationships among fluoride concentration in
enamel, degree of fluorosis and caries incidence in a community residing in a high fluoride area. J Oral
Pathol 8:224-236.
9. REFERENCES
Retief DH, Harris BE, Bradley EL. 1987. Relationship between enamel fluoride concentration and
dental caries experience. Caries Res 21:68-78.
Retief DH, Summerlin, Harris BE, et al. 1985. An evaluation of three procedures for fluoride analysis.
Reynolds KE, Whitford GM, Pashley DH. 1978. Acute fluoride toxicity: The influence of acid-base
status. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 45:415-428.
Ricca PM. 1970. A survey of the acute toxicity of elemental fluorine. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 31:22-29.
*Richards A, Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J. 1982. Fluoride pharmacokinetics in the domestic pig. J Dent Res
61:1099-1102.
*Richards A, Kragstrup J, Nielsen-Kudsk F. 1985. Pharmacokinetics of chronic fluoride ingestion in

growing pigs. J Dent Res 64:425-430.
Richmond VL. 1985. Thirty years of fluoridation: A review. Am J Clin Nutr 41:129-138.
Rigalli A, Ballina JC, Beinlich AD, et al. 1994. Pharmacokinetic differences between sodium fluoride
and sodium monofluorophosphate and comparative bone mass increasing activity of both compounds in
the rat. Arzneim Forsch 44:762-766.
*Rigalli A, Morosano M, Puche RC. 1996. Bioavailability of fluoride administered as sodium fluoride
or sodium monofluorophosphate to human volunteers. Arzneim Forsch 46(1):531-533.
*Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O'Fallon WH, et al. 1990. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in
postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 322:802-809.
*Riggs BL, O’Fallon WM, Lane A, et al. 1994. Clinical trial of fluoride therapy in postmenopausal
osteoporotic women: Extended observations and additional analysis. J Bone Min Res 9:265-75.
Rioufol C, Bourbon P, Philibert C. 1982. Histology and biochemistry of renal parenchyma in guinea-
pigs due to long-term exposure to hydrogen fluoride. Fluoride 15:157-161.
*Ripa LW. 1993. A half-century of community water fluoridation in the United States: review and
commentary. J Public Health Dent 53:17-44.
Rippel A, Janovitcova J. 1971. The effect of fluorine exhalates on the flora in the surroundings of an
aluminum plant. Ten Houten, JG (chairman) Air Pollution. Proceedings of the 1st European Congress on
the Influence of Air Pollution on Plants and Animals. Wageningen, The Netherlands, 173-178.
*Roberts JR, Merigian KS. 1989. Acute hydrofluoric-acid exposure. Am J Emerg Med 7:125-126.
*Robinson WO, Edgington G. 1946. Fluorine in soils. Soil Sci 61: 341-353.
*Rockette HE, Arena VC. 1983. Mortality studies of aluminum reduction plant workers: Potroom and
carbon department. J Occup Med 25(7):549-557.
*Rogot E, Sherrett AR, Feinleib M, et al. 1978. Trends in urban mortality in relation to fluoridation
status. Am J Epidemiol 107:104-112.
9. REFERENCES
*Roholm K. 1937. Macroscopic examination of bones. In: Fluorine intoxication. A clinical-hygienic

study. HK Lewis & Co., Ltd., London, England, 180-210.
*Rölla G, Ekstrand J. 1996. Fluoride in oral fluids and dental plaque. In: Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt
BA, eds. Fluoride in dentistry. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 215-229.
Rom WN, Barkman H. 1983. Respiratory irritants. Environ Occup Med 273-283.
Ron M, Singer L, Menczel J, et al. 1986. Fluoride concentration in amniotic fluid and fetal cord and
maternal plasma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 21:213-218.
Rope SK, Arthur WJ, Craig TH, et al. 1988. Nutrient and trace elements in soil and desert vegetation of
Southern Idaho. Environ Monit Assess 10:1-24.
*Rosen S, Frea JI, Hsu SM. 1978. Effect of fluoride-resistant microorganisms on dental caries. J Dent
Res 57:180.
Rosenholtz MJ, Ford DF. 1962. Pathologic observations in animals after single, brief exposures to
hydrogen fluoride. Edgewood Arsenal, MD: U.S. Army Chemical Research and Development
Laboratories. CRDLR 3158.
*Rosenholtz MJ, Carson TR, Weeks MH, et al. 1963. A toxicopathologic study in animals after brief
single exposures to hydrogen fluoride. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 24:253-261.
*Rosenquist JB, Lorentzon PR, Boquist LLV. 1983. Effect of fluoride on parathyroid activity of normal
and calcium-deficient rats. Calcif Tissue Int 35:533-537.
Ross JF, Daston GP. 1995. To the Editor. Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(6):685-686.
Rowley RJ, Farrah GH. 1962. Diffusion method for determination of urinary fluoride. Am Ind Hyg
Assoc J 23:314-318.
*Rubin ES. 1999. Toxic releases from power plants. Environ Sci Technol 33:3062-3067.
*Rudolph H, Kraushaar JJ, Ristinen RA, et al. 1973. Determination of trace amounts of fluoride by
nuclear inelastic scattering. Trace Subst Environ Health 7:387-393.
Ruzicka JA, Mrklas L, Rokytova K. 1984. Split-dose administration of fluoride in mice versus
incorporation and fluorosis. Pharmazie 39:349.
Rwenyonyi CM, Birkeland JM, Haugejorden O. 2000. Age as a determinant of severity of dental
fluorosis in children residing in areas with 0.5 and 2.5 mg fluoride per liter in drinking water. Clin Oral
Investig 4(3):157-161.
*Rye WA. 1961. Fluorides and phosphates -- clinical observations of employees in phosphate operation.
International Congress on Occupational Health, July 25-29, 1960, 361-364.
Saady JJ, Rose CS. 1988. A case of nonfatal sodium fluoride ingestion. J Anal Toxicol 12:270-271.
Sadilova MS, Petina AA. 1971. Hygienic significance of low fluorine concentrations for different routes
of intake. Hyg Sanit 35:181-187.
9. REFERENCES
*Sadilova MS, Selyankina KP, Shturkina OK. 1965. Experimental studies on the effect of hydrogen
fluoride on the central nervous system. Hyg Sanit 30:155-160.
*Sager M. 1987. Rapid-determination of fluorine in solid samples. Monatsh Chem 118:25-29.
Sakama H. 1980. Toxicological studies of fluorine compounds: 1. Acute toxicity of sodium fluoride to
rats and mice in relation to age, sex, animal genus and administration route. Shikwa Gakuho 80:1519-
1529.
Sandberg D, Zichner L. 1985. A case of bone fluorosis of undetermined origin. Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg 104(3):191-5.
*San Filippo FA, Battistone GC. 1971. The fluoride content of a representative diet of the young adult
male. Clin Chim Acta 31:453-457.
Sanz-Gallèn P, Noguè S, Munnè P, et al. 2001. Hypocalcaemia and hypomagnesaemia due to

hydrofluoric acid. Occup Med 51(4):294-295.
*Saralakumari D, Ramakrishna Rao PR. 1993. Endemic fluorosis in the village Ralla Anantapuram in
Andhra Pradesh: An epidemiological study. Fluoride 26(3):177-180.
Saralakumari D, Rao PR. 1991. Red blood cell glucose metabolism in human chronic fluoride toxicity.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 47:834-839.
Saric M, Zuskin E, Gomzi M. 1979. Bronchoconstriction in potroom workers. Br J Ind Med 36:211-
215.
Sato T, Yoshitake K, Hitomi G. 1986. Mechanism of fluoride absorption from the gastrointestinal tract
in rats. Stud Environ Sci 27:325-332.
*Sauerbrunn BJL, Ryan CM, Shaw JF. 1965. Chronic fluoride intoxication with fluorotic
radiculomyelopathy. Ann Intern Med 63:1074-1078.
*Sauriol A, Gauthier B. 1984. Study of Industrial Fluoride: Four Canadian Cases. Vol. 2. Conseil
Consultatif de L’environnement, Québec, Canada (December 1984).
Savas S, Cetin M, Akdoğan M. 2001. Endemic fluorosis in Turkish patients: relationship with knee
osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 21:30-35.
Saxena VK, Ahmed S. 2001. Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water-rock interaction study.
Environ Geol 40:1084-1087.
*Schamschula RG, Sugar E, Agus HM, et al. 1982. The fluoride content of human tooth enamel in
relation to environmental exposure to fluoride. Aust Dent J 27:243-247.
*Schamschula RG, Sugar E, Un PSH, et al. 1985. Physiological indicators of fluoride exposure and
utilization: An epidemiological study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 13:104-107.
Schenk GH, Dilloway KP. 1969. Determination of fluoride by fluorescence quenching. Anal Lett 2:379-
385.
9. REFERENCES
*Schick AL. 1973. Determination of fluoride in household products by ion selective electrode and
Gran's plot. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 56:798-802.
*Schiffl HH, Binswanger U. 1980. Human urinary fluoride excretion as influenced by renal functional
impairment. Nephron 26:69-72.
*Schiffl HH, Binswanger U. 1982. Renal handling of fluoride in healthy man. Renal Physiol 5:192-196.
Schiffl H, Hofmann U, Huggler M, et al. 1981. Renal fluoride excretion: Experimental evaluation of the
role of extracellular volume status during intact and impaired kidney function. Nephron 29:245-249.
*Schlesinger ER,Overton DE, Chase HC. 1956. Newburgh-Kingston caries fluorine study XIII.
Pediatric findings after ten years. J Am Dent Assoc 52:296-306.
Schnitzer-Polokoff R, Suttie JW. 1981. Effect of fluoride on the absorption of dietary fat in rats. J Nutr
111:537-544.
Schulz JA, Lamb AR. 1925. The effect of fluorine as sodium fluoride on the growth and reproduction of
albino rats. Sci 61:93-94.
*Schwarz K, Milne DB. 1972. Fluorine requirement for growth in the rat. Bioinorg Chem 1:331-338.
Scott EW, Henne AL. 1935. Titration of fluorine in biological materials. Ind Engin Chem 7:299-300.
*Selwitz RH, Nowjack-Raymer RE, Kingman A, et al. 1995. Prevalence of dental caries and dental
fluorosis in areas with optimal and above-optimal water fluoride concentrations: a 10-year follow-up
study. J Public Health Dent 55(2):85-93.
*Seixas NS, Cohen M, Zevenbergen B, et al. 2000. Urinary fluoride as an exposure index in aluminum
smelting. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 61:89-94.
*Seppä L, Kärkkäinen S, Hausen H. 2000. Caries trends 1992-1998 in two low-fluoride Finnish towns
formerly with and without fluoridation. Caries Res 34:462-468.
*Setchell BP, Waites GMH. 1975. The blood-testis barrier. In: Creep RO, Astwood EB, Geiger SR,
eds. Handbook of physiology: Endocrinology V. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.
*Seyb ST, Noordhoek L, Botens S, et al. 1995. A study to determine the efficacy of treatments for
hydrofluoric acid burns. J Burn Care Rehab 16:253-257.
*Shacklette HT, Boerngen JG. 1984. Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the
conterminous United States. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of the Interior. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 1270.
*Shacklette HT, Boerngen JG, Keith JR. 1974. Selenium, fluorine, and arsenic in surficial materials of
the conterminous United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior. Geological Survey
Circular 692.
Shahed AR, Miller A, Chalker D, et al. 1979. Effect of sodium fluoride on cyclic AMP production in rat
hepatocytes. J Cyclic Nucleotide Res 5:43-53.
9. REFERENCES
*Sharkey TP, Simpson WM. 1933. Accidental sodium fluoride poisoning: Report of eight cases, with
one fatality. JAMA 100(2):97-100.
Sharma YD. 1982. Variations in the metabolism and maturation of collagen after fluoride ingestion.
Biochim Biophys Acta 715:137-141.
Shashi. 1988. Biochemical effects of fluoride on thyroid gland during experimental fluorosis. Fluoride
21:127-130.
Shayiq RM, Raza H, Kidwai AM. 1986. Effects of fluoride on membrane permeability and brush border
enzymes of rat intestine in situ. Food Chem Toxicol 24:33-36.
Shchori D, Gedalia I, Nizel AE, et al. 1976. Fluoride uptake in rats given tea with milk. J Dent Res
55:916.
*Shearer TR. 1974. Comparative metabolic responses of rat kidneys and liver to acute doses of fluoride.
Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 146:209-212.
Shearer TR, Ridlington JW. 1976. Fluoride-selenium interaction in the hard and soft tissues of the rat. J
Nutr 106:451-456.
*Shellenberg D, Marks TA, Metzler CM, et al. 1990. Lack of effect of fluoride on reproductive
performance and development in Shetland sheepdogs. Vet Hum Toxicol 32(4):309-314.
*Shen Y-W, Taves DR. 1974. Fluoride concentrations in the human placenta and maternal and cord
blood. Am J Obstet Gynecol 119:205-207.
Shi J, Dai G, Zhang Z. 1995. Relationship between bone fluoride content, pathological change in bone
of aborted fetuses and maternal fluoride level. Chin J Prev Med 29(3):103-105.
*Shia G. 1994. Fluorine. In: Kroschwitz JI, Howe-Grant M, eds. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of
chemical technology. 4th Edition, Vol. 11. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 241-267.
*Shida N, Matsushima K, Wada M. 1986. A new method for analyzing the distribution of fluoride in
human enamel. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 28:61-76.
*Shimonovitz S, Patz D, Ever-Hadani P, et al. 1995. Umbilical cord fluoride serum levels may not
reflect fetal fluoride status. J Perinat Med 23:279-282.
*Shroy RE, Kraner HW, Jones KW, et al. 1982. Proton activation analysis for the measurement of
fluorine in food samples. Anal Chem 54:407-413.
*Shulman ER, Vallejo M. 1990. Effect of gastric contents on the bioavailability of fluoride in humans.
Pediatric Dentistry 12(4):237-240.
*Silva MJ, Ulrich SR. 2000. In vitro fluoride exposure decreases torsional and bending strength and
increases ductility of mouse femora. J Biomech 33:231-234.
Silverman DM, Taves DR. 1981. The distribution of fluoride and calcium in the liver of the carbon
tetrachloride-poisoned rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 61:172-176.
9. REFERENCES
*Simonen O, Laitinen O. 1985. Does fluoridation of drinking-water prevent bone fragility and
osteoporosis? Lancet 2:432-434.
Simpson A, Shaw L, Smith AJ. 2001. The bio-availability of fluoride from black tea. J Dent 29:15-21.
Simpson E, Shankara Rao LG, Evans RM, et al. 1980. Calcium metabolism in a fatal case of sodium
fluoride poisoning. Ann Clin Biochem 17:10-14.
Singer L, Armstrong WD. 1954. Determination of fluoride procedure based upon diffusion of hydrogen
fluoride. Anal Chem 26:904-906.
Singer L, Armstrong WD. 1959. Determination of fluoride in blood serum. Anal Chem 31:105-109.
Singer L, Ophaug R. 1982. Ionic and nonionic fluoride in plasma (or serum). CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab
Sci 18:111-140.
Singer L, Ophaug RH. 1979. Concentrations of ionic, total, and bound fluoride in plasma. Clin Chem
25:523-525.
Singh A, Jolly SS. 1970. Chronic toxic effects on the skeletal system. In: Fluorides and human health.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Monographs, Series 59, 238-249.
*Singh A, Jolly SS, Bansal BC, et al. 1963. Endemic fluorosis: Epidemiological, clinical and
biochemical study of chronic fluorine intoxication in Punjab (India). Medicine 42:229-246.
Singh M. 1984. Biochemical and cytochemical alterations in liver and kidney following experimental
fluorosis. Fluoride 17:81-93.
*Skare JA, Schrotel KR, Nixon GA. 1986. Lack of DNA-strand breaks in rat testicular cells after in vivo
treatment with sodium fluoride. Mutat Res 170:85-92.
*Skjelkvale BL. 1994. Factors influencing fluoride concentrations in Norwegian Lakes. Water Air Soil
Pollut 77:151-167.
Skolnick A. 1990. New doubts about benefits of sodium fluoride. JAMA 263:1752-1753.
*Skoog DA, West DM, Holler JF. 1990. Analytical chemistry: An introduction. 5th edition. Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 343-5, 440-1, 506-8.
*Slameňova D, Gavelova A, Ruppova K. 1992. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity testing of sodium fluoride
on Chinese hamster V79 cells and human EUE cells. Mutat Res 279:109-115.
Slameňova D, Ruppova K, Gabelova A, et al. 1996. Evaluation of mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of
sodium fluoride on mammalian cells influenced by an acid environment. Cell Biol Toxicol 12:11-17.
*Slater EC, Bonner WD. 1952. The effect of fluoride on the succinic oxidase system. Biochem J
52:185-196.
*Smith AH. 1980. An examination of the relationship between fluoridation of water and cancer
mortality in 20 large U.S. cities. N Z Med J 91(661):413-416.
9. REFERENCES
Smith FA, ed. 1966. Pharmacology of fluorides. In: Eichler O, Farah A, Herken H, et al., eds.
Handbook of experimental pharmacology. 20(1):1-500.
Smith FA. 1971. Biological monitoring guides: Fluorides. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 32:274-279.
Smith FA, Gardener DE. 1949. Effect of renal dysfunction on the urinary excretion of fluoride in the
rabbit. Fed Proc 8:333.
Smith FA, Hodge HC. 1979. Airborne fluorides and man: Part I. CRC Crit Rev Environ Control 8:293-
371.
Smith FA, Gardner DE, Hodge HC. 1953. Age increase in fluoride content in human bone. Fed Proc
12:368.
*Smith FA, Gardner DE, Leone N, et al. 1960. The effects of the absorption of fluoride. AMA Arch Ind
Health 21:330-332.
Smith GE. 1985a. Fluoride and bone: An unusual hypothesis. Xenobiotica 15(3):177-186.
Smith GE. 1985b. Toxicity of fluoride-containing dental preparations: A review. Sci Total Environ
43:41-61.
Smith GE. 1986. Fluoride, the environment, and human health. Perspect Biol Med 29 (Summer):560-
572.
Smith GE. 1988a. Fluoride and fluoridation. Soc Sci Med 26:451-462.
Smith GE. 1988b. Genotoxic effects of fluoride and implications for its use in the treatment of
osteoporosis. N Z Med J 101:213.
Smith GE. 1988c. Is fluoride a mutagen? Sci Total Environ 68:79-96.
Smith QT, Armstrong WD, Singer L. 1959. Inhibition of human salivary and prostatic acid phosphatase
and yeast enolase by low fluoride concentrations. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 102:170-173.
*Smith RA. 1994. Fluorine. In: Kroschwitz JI, Howe-Grant M, eds. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of
chemical technology. 4th Edition, Vol. 11. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 355-376.
Snow GR, Anderson C. 1985. Short-term chronic fluoride administration in beagles: A pilot study.
Bone 6:365-367.
Snyder D, Walker WG, Whelton A. 1973. Acute toxic drug ingestions at the Johns Hopkins Hospital
1963-1970. Johns Hopkins Med J 132:157-167.
Sondhi H, Gupta ML, Gupta GL. 1995. Effects of sodium fluoride on Swiss albino mice. Geobios
22:18-21.
*Sowers MFR, Clark MK, Jannausch ML, et al. 1991. A prospective study of bone mineral content and
fracture in communities with differential fluoride exposure. Am J Epidemiol 133:649-660.
9. REFERENCES
*Sowers MFR, Wallace RB, Lemke JH. 1986. The relationship of bone mass and fracture history to
fluoride and calcium intake: A study of three communities. Am J Clin Nutr 44:889-898.
*Söyseth V, Kongerud J, Ekstrand J, et al. 1994. Relation between exposure to fluoride and bronchial
responsiveness in aluminum potroom workers with work-related asthma-like symptoms. Thorax 49:984-
989.
*Spak C-J, Berg U, Ekstrand J. 1985. Renal clearance of fluoride in children and adolescents. Pediatrics
75:575-579.
*Spak CJ, Ekstrand J, Eriksson S, et al. 1986. Distribution of fluoride to the central nervous system.
Caries Res 20:157.
Spak C-J, Hardell LI, DeChateau P. 1983. Fluoride in human milk. Acta Paediatr Scand 699-701.
*Spak C-J, Sjöstedt S, Eleborg L, et al. 1989. Tissue response of gastric mucosa after ingestion of
fluoride. Brit Med J 298:1686-1687.
*Spak C-J, Sjostedt S, Eleborg L, et al. 1990. Studies of human gastric mucosa after application of
0.42% fluoride gel. J Dent Res 69(2):426-429.
Speaker JH. 1976. Determination of fluoride by scientific ion electrode and report of a fatal case of
fluoride poisoning. Forensic Sci 21:121-126.
Speirs RL. 1986. The relationship between fluoride concentrations in serum and in mineralized tissues in
the rat. Arch Oral Biol 31:373-381.
*Spencer H, Lender M. 1979. Adverse effects of aluminum-containing antacids in mineral metabolism.

Gastroenterology 76:603.
Spencer H, Kramer L, Gatza CA, et al. 1978a. Fluoride mineral interactions in man. Physiologist
21:114.
*Spencer H, Kramer L, Gatza CA, et al. 1980a. Fluoride metabolism in patients with chronic renal
failure. Arch Intern Med 140:1331-1335.
Spencer H, Kramer L, Osis D, et al. 1975b. Excretion of retained fluoride in man. J Appl Physiol
38:282-287.
Spencer H, Kramer L, Osis D, et al. 1980b. Effect of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and aluminum
on fluoride metabolism in man. Ann NY Acad Sci 355:181-194.
Spencer H, Kramer L, Wiatrowski E, et al. 1977a. Magnesium-fluoride interrelationships in man: I.

Effect of fluoride on magnesium metabolism. Am J Physiol 233:E165-169.
Spencer H, Kramer L, Wiatrowski E, et al. 1978b. Magnesium-fluoride interrelationships in man. II.

Effect of magnesium on fluoride metabolism. Am J Physiol 234:E343-347.
*Spencer H, Lewin I, Wistrowski E, et al. 1970. Fluoride metabolism in man. Am J Med 49:807-813.
9. REFERENCES
Spencer H, Osis D, Kramer L, et al. 1975c. Effect of calcium and phosphorus on fluoride metabolism in
man. J Nutr 105:733-740.
*Spencer H, Osis D, Lender M. 1981. Studies of fluoride metabolism in man: A review and report of
original data. Sci Total Environ 17:1-12.
Spencer H, Osis D, Wiatrowski E, et al. 1975d. Plasma levels and excretion of fluoride in relation to
fluoride intake in man. Trace Substances in Environmental Health 8:299-304.
Spencer H, Osis D, Wiatrowski E. 1975a. Retention of fluoride with time in man. Clin Chem 21:613-
618.
Spencer H, Wiatrowski E, Osis D, et al. 1977b. Magnesium-fluoride interrelationships in man. Trace

Substances in Environmental Health 10:389-394.
*Spoerke DG, Bennett DL, Gullekson DJ. 1980. Toxicity related to acute low dose sodium fluoride
ingestions. J Fam Pract 10:139-140.
*Sprando RL, Collins TFX, Black T, et al. 1998. Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect
spermatogenesis: A morphometric study. Food Chem Toxicol 36:1117-1124.
*Sprando RL, Collins TFX, Rorie BJ, et al. 1997. Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect
spermatogenesis in the rat. Food Chem Toxicol 35:881-890.
Sqewielow A. 1991. Wydalanie fluoru w moczu i kale szczurow w zaleznosci od zrodla tego pier
wiastka i zawartosci bialka w diecie. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 42(4):415-421.
*SRI. 2002. 2002 Directory of chemical producers: United States of America. Menlo Park, CA:
Stanford Research Institute International, 641, 643, 662, 871, 878.
*Stavert DM, Archuleta DC, Behr MF, et al. 1991. Relative acute toxicities of hydrogen fluoride,
hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen bromide in nose- and pseudo-mouth-breathing rats. Fundam Appl
Toxicol 16:636-655.
*Steichen J, Koelliker J, Grosh D, et al. 1988. Contamination of farmstead wells by pesticides, volatile
organics, and inorganic chemicals in Kansas. Ground Water Monit Rev 8(3):153-160.
*Stephen KW, McCall Dr, Tullis JL. 1987. Caries prevalence in northern Scotland before, and 5 years
after water defluoridation. Br Dent J 163:324-326.
Stevens BJ, Willis GL, Hemphrey TJ, et al. 1987. Combined toxicity of aluminum and fluoride in the
rat: Possible implications in hemodialysis. Trace Elements of Medicine 4:61-66.
*Stokinger HE. 1949. Toxicity following inhalation of fluorine and hydrogen fluoride. In: Voegtlin C,
Hodge HC, eds. Pharmacology and toxicology of uranium compounds. New York, NY: McGraw Hill
Book Company, 1021-1057.
Stokinger HE. 1981. The halogens and the nonmetals boron and silicon. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE,
eds. Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology. Vol 2B:2937-2954.
9. REFERENCES
Stokinger HE, Ashenburg WJ, DeVoldre J, et al. 1950. Acute inhalation toxicity of beryllium: The
enhancing effect of the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride vapor on beryllium sulfate poisoning in animals.
Ind Hyg Occup Med 1:398.
*Stookey GK, Crane DB, Muhler JC. 1964. Further studies on fluoride absorption. Proc Soc Exper Biol
Med 115:295-298.
Stosser L, Heinrich R. 1985. Fluoride effect of calcium and phosphate content in femur of the pregnant
rat and on calcium transfer through the placenta. Fluoride 18:216-220.
Strubelt O, Iven H, Younes M. 1982. The pathophysiological profiles of the acute cardiovascular
toxicity of sodium fluoride. Toxicology 24:313-323.
*Stumm W, Morgan JJ. 1981. Aquatic chemistry. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 365-
367.
*Stutz DR, Janusz SJ. 1988. Hazardous materials injuries: A handbook for pre-hospital care. 2nd ed.
Beltsville, MD: Bradford Communications Corporation, 284-285.
*Suarez-Almazor ME, Flowerdew G, Saunders LD, et al. 1993. The fluoridation of drinking water and
hip fracture hospitalization rates in two Canadian communities. Am J Public Health 83(5):689-693.
Suketa Y, Akiyama Y, Satoh Y, et al. 1986. Effect of fluoride administration on glucose metabolism in
rats. Fourth International Congress of Toxicology, Tokyo, Japan, July 21-25, 1986. Toxicol Lett 31:188.
Susheela AK. 1995. Epidemiological studies of health risks from drinking water naturally contaminated
with fluoride. IAHS Publ 233:123-134.
*Susheela AK, Bhatnagar M. 2002. Reversal of fluoride induced cell injury through elimination of
fluoride and consumption of diet rich in essential nutrients and antioxidants. Mol Cell Biochem
234/235:335-340.
*Susheela AK, Das TK. 1988. Chronic fluoride toxicity: A scanning electron microscopic study of
duodenal mucosa. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 26:467-476.
*Susheela AK, Jain SK. 1983. Fluoride-induced hematological changes in rabbits. Bull Environ Contam
Toxicol 30:388-393.
Susheela AK, Jethanandani P. 1994. Serum haptoglobin and c-reactive protein in human skeletal
fluorosis. Clin Biochem 27(6):463-468.
*Susheela AK, Jethanandani P. 1996. Circulating testosterone levels in skeletal fluorosis patients. Clin
Toxicol 34(2):183-189.
*Susheela AK, Kumar A. 1991. A study of the effect of high concentrations of fluoride on the
reproductive organs of male rabbits, using light and scanning electron microscopy. J Reprod Fertil
92:353-360.
Susheela AK, Kumar A. 1997. Ultrastructural studies on the leydig cells of rabbits exposed to chronic
fluoride toxicity. Environ Sci 5(2):79-94.
9. REFERENCES
Susheela AK, Mukerjee D. 1981. Fluoride poisoning and the effect on collagen biosynthesis of osseus
and non-osseus tissues of rabbit. Toxicological European Research 3:99-104.
*Susheela AK, Das TK, Gupta IP, et al. 1992. Fluoride ingestion and its correlation with gastrointestinal
discomfort. Fluoride 25(1):5-22.
Suttie JW. 1980. Nutritional aspect of fluoride toxicosis. J Anim Sci 51:759-766.
*Suttie JW, Phillips PW. 1959. The effect of age on the rats of fluorine deposition in the femur of the
rat. Arch Biochem Biophys 83:355-359.
Suttie JW, Hamilton RJ, Clay AC, et al. 1985. Effects of fluoride ingestion on white-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus): Does fluoride affect developing immune system cells? J Wildl Dis 23:283-
288.
Suttie JW, Phillips PH, Miller RF. 1958. Studies of the effects of dietary sodium fluoride on dairy cows:
III. Skeletal and soft tissue fluorine deposition and fluorine toxicosis. J Nutr 65:293-304.
Sutton PRN. 1986. Is fluorosis an etiological factor in overuse injuries (RSI)? Medical Hypotheses
21:369-371.
Suzuki Y. 1979. The normal levels of fluorine in the bone tissue of Japanese subjects. Tohoku J Exp
Med 129:327-336.
*Symonds RB, Rose WJ, Reed MH. 1988. Contribution of Cl- and F-bearing gases to the atmosphere by
volcanoes. Nature 334:415-418.
Takagi M, Shiraki S. 1982. Acute sodium fluoride toxicity in the rat kidney. Bull Tokyo Med Dent
Univ 29:123-130.
*Takahashi K, Akiniwa K, Narita K. 2001. Regression analysis of cancer incidence rates and water
fluoride in the U.S.A. based on IACR/IARC (WHO) data (1978-1992). J Epidemiol 11(4):170-179.
Takamori T. 1955. Recent studies on fluorosis. Tokushima J Exp Med 2:25-44.
Tannenbaum A, Silverstone H. The genesis and growth of tumors: IV. Effects of varying the proportion
of protein (casein) in the diet. Cancer Res 9:162-173.
*Tao S, Suttie JW. 1976. Evidence for a lack of an effect of dietary fluoride level on reproduction in
mice. J Nutr 106:1115-1122.
Tatevossian A. 1990. Fluoride in dental plaque and its effects. J Dent Res 69(special issue):645-652.
Taves DR. 1966. Normal human serum fluoride concentrations. Nature 1:192-193.
*Taves DR. 1968. Determination of submicromolar concentrations of fluoride in biological samples.

Talanta 15:1015-1023.
*Taves DR. 1977. Fluoridation and cancer mortality. In: Origins of human cancer: Book A: Incidence
of cancer in humans. Cold Spring Harbor Conferences on Cell Proliferation 4:357-366.
9. REFERENCES
*Taves DR. 1978. Fluoridation and mortality due to heart disease. Nature 272:361-362.
Taves DR. 1979. Claims of harm from fluoridation. In: Johnson E, Taves DR, Olsen TO, eds.
Continuing evaluation of the use of fluorides. American Association for the Advancement of Science-
Selected Symposium, 11:295-321.
Taves DR, Guy WS. 1979. Distribution of fluoride among body compartments. AAAS Selected
Symposium 11:159-185.
*Taves DR, Neuman WF. 1964. Factors controlling calcification in vitro: fluoride and magnesium.
Arch Biochem Biophys 108:390-397.
Taves DR, Terry R, Smith FA, et al. 1965. Use of fluoridated water in long-term hemodialysis. Arch
Intern Med 115:167-172.
Taylor A. 1954. Sodium fluoride in the drinking water. Dent Dig 60:170-172.
Taylor A, Taylor NC. 1965. Effect of sodium fluoride on tumor growth. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med
119:252-255.
*Ten Cate JM. 1999. Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride. Acta
Odontol Scand 57:325-329.
Teotia M, Teotia SP, Singh RK. 1979a. Metabolism of fluoride in pregnant women residing in endemic
fluorosis areas. Fluoride 12:58-64.
Teotia M, Teotia SP, Singh RK. 1979b. Skeletal fluoride toxicity in children. Indian J Pediatr 46:389-
396.
Teotia SP, Teotia M. 1988. Endemic skeletal fluorosis: Clinical and radiological variants (Review of 25
years of personal research). Fluoride 21:39-44.
*Teotia SP, Teotia M. 1994. A disorder of high fluoride and low dietary calcium interactions (30 years
of personal research). Fluoride 27:59-66.
Teotia SP, Teotia M, Singh RK, et al. 1978. Plasma fluoride, 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol,
immunoreactive parathyroid hormone and calcitonin in patients with endemic skeletal fluorosis. Fluoride
12:115-119.
*Tepperman PB. 1980. Fatality due to acute systemic fluoride poisoning following a hydrofluoric-acid
skin burn. J Occup Med 22:691-692.
Theuer RC, Mahoney AW, Sarett HP. 1971. Placental transfer of fluoride and tin in rats given various
fluoride and tin salts. J Nutr 101:525-532.
*Thomas FD, Kossab JY, Jones BM. 1995. Fluoridation in Anglesey 1993: a clinical study of dental
caries in 5-year old children who had experienced sub-optimal fluoridation. Br Dent J 178:55-59.
Thompson DJ. 1980. Industrial considerations related to fluoride toxicity. J Anim Sci 51:767-772.
9. REFERENCES
*Thompson RJ, McMullen TB, Morgan GB. 1971. Fluoride concentrations in the ambient air. J Air
Pollut Control Assoc 21:484-487.
*Thomson EJ, Kilanowski FM, Perry PE. 1985. The effect of fluoride on chromosome aberration and
sister-chromatid exchange frequencies in cultured human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 144:89-92.
Thurman EM, Barber LB, LeBlanc D. 1986. Movement and fate of detergents in groundwater: A field
study. J Contam Hydrol 1:143-161.
*Thylstrup A. 1990. Clinical evidence of the role of pre-eruptive fluoride in caries prevention. J Dent
Res 69(special issue):742-50.
*Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. 1978. Clinical appearance and surface distribution of dental fluorosis in
permanent teeth in relation to histological changes. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 6:329-337.
*Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, Bruun C, et al. 1979. Enamel changes and dental caries in 7-year-old
children given fluoride tablets from shortly after birth. Caries Res 13:265-76.
Toler LG. 1967. Fluoride in water in the Alafia and Peace River basins, Florida. United States
Geological Survey, State of Florida, State Board of Conservation, State of Florida 46:1-46.
Tong CC, McQueen CA, VedBrat S, et al. 1986. The lack of genotoxicity of sodium fluoride (NAF) in
an in vitro test battery. Environ Mutagen 8:86.
*Tong CC, McQueen CA, VedBrat S, et al. 1988. The lack of genotoxicity of sodium fluoride in a
battery of cellular tests. Cell Biol Toxicol 4:173-186.
Topolewski P, Zommer-urbanska S. 1987. A new spectrophotometric method of determining fluoride by

using the rutine-zirconium (IV) complex. Microchemical Journal 35:145-152.
Toth K, Sugar E, Bordacs I, et al. 1978. Fluorine content of vegetables and fruits. Acta Physiol Acad
Sci Hung 51:353-360.
Townsend D, Frey P, Jeavons A, et al. 1987. High density avalanche chamber (HIDAC) positron
camera. J Nucl Med 28:1554-1562.
TPCDB. 1989. Testing Priority Committee Database. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
Trautner K, Einwag J. 1986. Bioavailability of fluoride from some health food products in man. Caries
Res 20:518-524.
*Trautner K, Einwag J. 1987. Factors influencing the bioavailability of fluoride from calcium-rich,
health food products and CaF2 in man. Arch Oral Biol 32(6):401-406.
*Trautner K, Siebert G. 1986. An experimental study of bio-availability of fluoride from dietary sources
in man. Arch Oral Biol 31(4):223-228.
Treon JF, Dutra FR, Cappel J, et al. 1950. Toxicity of sulfuric acid mist. AMA Archives of Industrial
Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 2:716.
9. REFERENCES
*TRI01. 2003. TRI explorer. Providing access to EPA’s toxics release inventory data. Washington,
DC. Office of Information Analysis and Access. Offices of Environmental Information. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Toxic Release Inventory. http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer/. August
13, 2003.
Trivedi N, Mithal A, Gupta SK, et al. 1993. Reversible impairment of glucose tolerance in patients with
endemic fluorosis. Diabetologia 36:826-828.
Tsuboi S, Nakagaki H, Takami Y, et al. 2000. Magnesium and fluoride distribution in human cementum
with age. Calcif Tissue Int 57:466-471.
Tsuchida M, Okayasu I, Teraoka K, et al. 1991. The effect of prolonged ingestion of high levels (100
ppm) of fluorine on osseous tissues of rats. Environmental Sciences 1(2):63-72.
Tsunoda H, Sakurai S, Itai K, et al. 1984. Normal urinary fluoride levels in Japanese subjects:
Relationship between urinary fluoride levels and environmental fluoride. Fluoride 17:159-167.
Tsutsui T, Koichi I, Maizumi H. 1984a. Induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured human oral
keratinocytes by sodium fluoride. Mutat Res 140:43-48.
*Tsutsui T, Suzuki N, Ohmori M. 1984b. Sodium fluoride-induced morphological and neoplastic

transformation, chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and unscheduled DNA synthesis in
cultured Syrian hamster embryo cells. Cancer Res 44:938-941.
*Tsutsui T, Suzuki N, Ohmori M, et al. 1984c. Cytotoxicity, chromosome aberrations and unscheduled
DNA synthesis in cultured human diploid fibroblasts induced by sodium fluoride. Mutat Res 199:193-
198.
*Tsutsui T, Tanaka Y, Matsudo Y, et al. 1995. No increases in chromosome aberrations in human

diploid fibroblasts following exposure to low concentrations of sodium fluoride for long times. Mutat
Res 335:15-20.
Turkington RP. 1984. An inexpensive portable, multi-sampler. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:B-18, B-20, B-
22.
*Turner CH, Akhter MP, Heaney RP. 1992. The effects of fluoridated water on bone strength. J Orthop
Res 10(4):581-587.
*Turner CH, Boivin G, Meunier PJ. 1993. A mathematical model for fluoride uptake by the skeleton.
Calcif Tissue Int 52:130-138.
*Turner CH, Garetto LP, Dunipace AJ, et al. 1997. Fluoride treatment increased serum IGF-1, bone
turnover, and bone mass, but not bone strength, in rabbits. Calcif Tissue Int 61:77-83.
Turner CH, Hasegaw K, Zhang W, et al. 1995. Fluoride reduces bone strength in older rats. J Dent Res
74(8):1475-1481.
*Tusl J. 1970. Direct determination of fluoride in human urine using fluoride electrode. Clin Chim Acta
27:216-218.
9. REFERENCES
Underwood EJ. 1971. Fluorine. In: Trace elements in human and animal nutrition. New York, NY:
Academic Press, 369-406.
*Urbansky ET. 2002. Fate of fluorosilicate drinking water additives. Chem Rev 102:2837-2853.
Urbansky ET, Schock MR. 2000. Can fluoridation affect lead(II) in potable water? Hexafluorosilicate
and fluoride equilibria in aqueous solution. Int J Environ Studies 57:597-637.
*USC. 2001. Hazardous air pollutants. U.S. Code. 42 USC 4712. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/
42/7412.text.html. March 27, 2001.
USGS. 1984. Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United
States. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, U.S. Geological Survey.
USGS. 1999b. Minerals Yearbook 1999. Fluorspar. U.S. Geological Survey

http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/fluorspar/280499.pdf. April 19, 1999.
*USGS. 2001. Commodity Summaries. Fluorspar. U.S. Geological Survey

http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/fluorspar/280301.pdf. March 16, 2001.
*USGS. 2002a. Mineral commodity summary. Fluorspar. U.S. Geological Survey.

http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/publ/commodity/fluorspar/280302.pdf.
*USGS. 2002b. Mineral yearbook. Fluorspar. U.S. Geological Survey.

http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/fluorspar/280401.pdf.
*Uslu B. 1983. Effect of fluoride on collagen synthesis in the rat. Res Exp Med 182:7-12.
Usuda K, Kono K, Dote T, et al. 1999. Usefulness of the assessment of urinary enzyme leakage in
monitoring acute fluoride nephrotoxicity. Arch Toxicol 73(6):346-351.
Van de Putte M, De Cock J, Dryon L, et al. 1977. A contribution to the study of fluoride excretion. Clin
Chim Acta 75:205-212.
Van Der Hoeven JS, Franken HCM. 1984. Effect of fluoride on growth and acid production by
streptococcus-mutans in dental plaque. Infect Immun 45:356-359.
*Van Hook C. 1974. Fluoride distribution in the Silverbow, Montana area. Fluoride 7:181-199.
Van Leuven HCE. 1970. Organic multi-element analysis with a small mass spectrometer as detector: A
preliminary note. Anal Chim Acta 49:364-366.
Van Loveren C. 1990. The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. J Dent Res
Van Rensberg SWJ, de Vos WH. 1966. The influence of excess fluorine intake in the drinking water on
reproductive efficiency in bovines. Ondersepoort J Vet Res 33(1):185-194.
Van Rensburg BG. 1979. Metabolism of fluorides. Tydskr Tandheelkd Ver S Afr 34:163-166.
9. REFERENCES
Varadacharyulu NC, Rao PR. 1997. Gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis in fluoride-treated rats. Indian
J Exp Biol 35:906-908.
*Varner JA, Jensen KF, Horvath W, et al. 1998. Research report: Chronic administration of aluminum--
fluoride or sodium–fluoride to rats in drinking water: Alterations in neuronal and cerebrovascular
integrity. Brain Res 784:284-298.
Venkateswarlu P. 1974. Reverse extraction technique for the determination of fluoride in biological
materials. Anal Chem 46:879-882.
Venkateswarlu P, Sita P. 1971. New approach to the microdetermination of fluoride: Adsorption

diffusion technique. Anal Chem 43:758-760.
*Venkateswarlu P, Singer L, Armstrong WD. 1971. Determination of ionic (plus ionizable) fluoride in
biological fluids. Anal Biochem 42:350-359.
Vernot EH, MacEwen JD, Haun CC, et al. 1977. Acute toxicity and skin corrosion data for some organic
and inorganic compounds and aqueous solutions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 42:417-423.
*Vieira I, Sonnier M, Cresteil T. 1996. Developmental expression of CYP2E1 in the human liver:
Hypermethylation control of gene expression during the neonatal period. Eur J Biochem 238:476-483.
VIEW. 1989. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Division of Health Studies,
Atlanta, GA. September 25, 1989.
*Villa A, Anabalŏn M, Cabezas L. 2000. The fractional urinary fluoride excretion in young children
under stable fluoride intake conditions. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 28:344-355.
Villee CA. 1984. Birth defects and glycolysis. N Engl J Med 310:254-255.
*Vine MF. 1994. Biological markers: Their use in quantitative assessments. Adv Dent Res 8(1):92-99.
*Vischer TL, Bernheim C, Guerdjikoff C, et al. 1970. Industrial fluorosis. In: Visher TL, ed. Fluoride
in medicine, 96-105.
Vogel E. 1973. Strong antimutagenic effect of fluoride on mutation induction by trenimon and 1-phenyl-
3,3-dimethyltriazene in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 20:339.
*Vogel GL, Carey CM, Chow LC, et al. 1990. Fluoride analysis in nanoliter- and microliter-size fluid
samples. J Dent Res. 69:522-528.
*Vogel GL, Carey CM, Ekstrand J. 1992a. Distribution of fluoride in saliva and plaque fluid after a
0.048 mol/L NaF rinse. J Dent Res. 71(9):1553-1557.
*Vogel GL, Mao Y, Carey CM, et al. 1992b. In vivo fluoride concentrations measured for two hours
after a NaF or a novel two-solution rinse. J Dent Res. 71(3):448-452.
Vogt RL, Witherell L, LaRue D, et al. 1982. Acute fluoride poisoning associated with an on-site
fluoridator in a Vermont elementary school. Am J Public Health 72:1168-1169.
9. REFERENCES
Von Tirpitz C, Klaus J, Bruckel J, et al. 2000. Increase of bone mineral density with sodium fluoride in
patients with Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:19-24.
*Voroshilin SI, Plotko EG, Nikiforova VYA. 1975. Mutagenic effect of hydrogen fluoride on animals.
Tsitol Genet 9:40-42.
Wagner MJ, Stookey CK, Muhler K. 1958. Deposition of fluoride in soft tissue following skeletal
saturation. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 99:102-105.
Waitrowski E, Kramer L, Osis, D, et al. 1975. Dietary fluoride intake of infants. Pediatrics 55(4):517-
522.
Waldbott GL. 1955. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water. Int Arch Allergy 7:70-74.
Waldbott GL. 1961. The physiologic and hygienic aspects of the absorption of inorganic fluorides. Arch
Waldbott GL. 1963a. Acute fluoride intoxication. Acta Med Scand 174(Suppl.):1-44.
*Waldbott GL. 1963b. Fluoride in food. Am J Clin Nutr 12:455-462.
Waldbott GL. 1971. Chronic fluoride intoxication due to air pollution. In: Englund HM, ed.
Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress. 2nd ed., 151-155.
*Waldbott GL. 1979. Pre-skeletal neighborhood fluorosis: An epidemic near an Ohio enamel smelter.
Vet Hum Toxicol 21:140-144.
*Waldbott GL. 1981. Mass intoxication from accidental overfluoridation of drinking water. Clin
Toxicol 18:531-541.
Waldbott GL. 1998. The preskeletal phase of chronic fluoride intoxication. Fluoride 31(1):13-20.
*Waldbott GL, Lee JR. 1978. Toxicity from repeated low-grade exposure to hydrogen fluoride: Case
report. Clin Toxicol 13:391-402.
*Wallace-Durbin P. 1954. The metabolism of fluorine in the rat using F18 as a tracer. J Dent Res
33:789-800.
Walton KC. 1987. Fluoride in bones of small rodents living in areas with different pollution levels.
Water Air Soil Pollut 32:113-122.
*Walton KC. 1988. Environmental fluoride and fluorosis in mammals. Mammal Rev 18:77-90.
Wang J, Zheng ZA, Zhang LS, et al. 1993. An experimental study for early diagnostic features in
fluorosis. Fluoride 26(1):61-65.
Wang Y, Yin Y, Gilula LA, et al. 1994. Endemic fluorosis of the skeleton: Radiographic features in 127
patients. Am J Roentgenol 162:93-98.
Wang Y-N, Xiao K-Q, Liu J-L, et al. 2000. Effect of long term fluoride exposure on lipid composition in
rat liver. Toxicology 146:161-169.
9. REFERENCES
*Ward PFV, Hall RJ, Peters RA. 1964. Fluoro-fatty acids in the seeds of Dichapetabum toxicarium.
Nature 201:611-612.
Warneke G, Setnikar I. 1993. Effects of meal on the pharmacokinetics of fluoride from oral
monofluorophosphate. Arzneim Forsch 43(1):590-595.
*Warren JJ, Levy SM. 1999. A review of the fluoride dentifrice related to dental fluorosis. Pediatric
Dent 21(4):265-271.
*Watanabe M, Yoshida Y, Watanabe M, et al. 1975. Effect of hydrofluoric acid on glucose metabolism
of the mouse studied by whole-body autoradiography. Br J Ind Med 32:316-320.
*Waterhouse C, Taves D, Munzer A. 1980. Serum inorganic fluoride: Changes related to previous
fluoride intake renal function and bone resorption. Clin Sci 58:145-152.
Watson AP, Griffin GD. 1992. Toxicity of vesicant agents scheduled for destruction by the chemical
stockpile disposal program. Environ Health Perspect 98:259-280.
Weast RC, Lide DR, Astle MJ, et al. 1989. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 70th ed. Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.
Weatherell JA, Strong M, Robinson C, et al. 1986. Fluoride distribution in the mouth after fluoride
rinsing. Caries Res 20:111-119.
Weber CW, Reid BL. 1973. Effect of low fluoride diets fed to mice for six generations. Proceedings of
the 2nd International Symposium on Trace Element Metabolism in Animals 2:707-709.
*Weddle DA, Muhler JC. 1954. The effects of inorganic salts on fluoride storage in the rat. J Nutr
54:437-444.
Wei SH, Connor CW Jr. 1983. Fluoride uptake and retention in vitro following topical fluoride
application. J Dent Res 62:830-832.
Weiss G, ed. 1986. Hazard chemicals data book. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 16-
18.
*West JR, Smith HW, Chasis H. 1948. Glomerular filtration rate, effective renal blood flow, and
maximal tubular excretory capacity in infancy. J Pediatr 32:10-18.
West PW, Lyles GR, Miller JL. 1970. Spectrophotometric determination of atmospheric fluorides.
Environ Sci Technol 4:487-491.
Wheeler SM, Turner AD, Brock TB, et al. 1988. The effect of 30 mg/L fluoride in drinking water on
ewes and their lambs and current bone levels of sheep in New South Wales, Australia. Fluoride 21:60-68.
White DA. 1980. Hydrofluoric acid. J Soc Occup Med 30:12-14.
White DJ, Nancollas GH. 1990. Physical and chemical considerations of the role of firmly and loosely
bound fluoride in caries prevention. J Dent Res 69(special issue):587-594.
9. REFERENCES
Whitford GM. 1983. Fluorides: Metabolism, mechanisms of action and safety. Dent Hyg 57:16-18, 20-
22, 24-29.
Whitford GM. 1989. Plasma ion concentrations associated with acute fluoride toxicity [Abstract]. J
Dent Res 68:335.
*Whitford GM. 1990. The physiological and toxicological characteristics of fluoride. J Dent Res
69(Special Issue):539-549.
*Whitford GM. 1994. Effects of plasma fluoride and dietary calcium concentrations on GI absorption
and secretion of fluoride in the rat. Calcif Tissue Int 54:421-425.
*Whitford GM. 1997. Determinants and mechanisms of enamel fluorosis. Ciba Found Symp 205:226-
245.
*Whitford GM. 1999. Fluoride metabolism and excretion in children. J Public Health Dent 59(4):224-
228.
*Whitford GM, Johnson NA. 2003. Comparison of fluoride metabolism when administered as NaF or
silicofluorides to rats. J Dent Res 82 (Special Issue A):Abst 81.
*Whitford GM, Pashley DH. 1984. Fluoride absorption: The influence of gastric acidity. Calcif Tissue
Int 36:302-307.
Whitford GM, Taves DR. 1973. Fluoride induced diuresis: Renal-tissue solute concentrations,
functional, hemodynamic, and histological correlates in the rat. Anesthesiology 39:416-427.
*Whitford GM, Williams JL. 1986. Fluoride absorption: Independence from plasma fluoride levels.
Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 181:550-554.
Whitford GM, Allmann DW, Shahed AR. 1987a. Topical fluorides: Effects on physiologic and
biochemical processes. J Dent Res 66:1072-1078.
Whitford GM, Biles ED, Birdsong-Whitford NL. 1991. A comparative study of fluoride
pharmacokinetics in five species. J Dent Res 70:948-951.
*Whitford GM, Birdsong-Whitford NL, Finidori C. 1990. Acute oral toxicity of sodium fluoride and
monofluorophosphate separately or in combination in rats. Caries Res 24:121-126.
Whitford GM, Finidori C, Birdsong-Whitform NL. 1987b. Acute LD50 values of fluorine given as
sodium fluoride and/or MFP in the rat. Caries Res 21:166.
*Whitford GM, Hobbs SH, Stoddard JL, et al. 2003. Failure to find fluoride-induced learning deficits in
rats. J Dent Res 82 (Special Issue A):Abst 80.
Whitford GM, Pashley DH, Reynolds KE. 1977a. Fluoride absorption from the rat urinary bladder: A
pH-dependent event. Am J Physiol 232:F10-15.
*Whitford GM, Pashley DH, Reynolds KE. 1979a. Fluoride tissue distribution: Short-term kinetics.
Am J Physiol 236:F141-148.
9. REFERENCES
*Whitford GM, Pashley DH, Stringer GI. 1976. Fluoride renal clearance: A pH-dependent event. Am J
Physiol 230:527-532.
Whitford GM, Patten JR, Reynolds KE, et al. 1977b. Blood and urinary 18F pharmacokinetics following
parenteral administration in the rat. J Dent Res 56:858-861.
Whitford GM, Reynolds KE, Pashley DH. 1979b. Acute fluoride toxicity: Influence of metabolic
alkalosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 50:31-40.
*Whitford GM, Sampaio FC, Arneberg P, et al. 1999a. Fingernail fluoride: A method for monitoring
fluoride exposure. Caries Res 33:462-467.
*Whitford GM, Thomas JE, Adair SM. 1999b. Fluoride in whole saliva, parotid ductal saliva and
plasma in children. Arch Oral Biol 44:785-788.
*WHO. 1973. Trace elements in nutrition: A report of a WHO expert committee. Geneva, Switzerland:
World Health Organization. Technical report series no. 532.
*WHO. 1984. Fluorine and fluorides. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Distribution
and Sales Service, Environmental Health Criteria Number 36.
WHO. 1986. Diseases caused by fluorine and its toxic compounds. In: Early detection of occupational
diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 91-96.
*WHO. 1994. Fluorides and oral health: Report of a WHO expert committee on oral health status and
fluoride use. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
*WHO. 2001. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Fluoride. World Health Organization.
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_lth/GDWQ/Chemicals/fluoridefull/html. March 27, 2001.
*WHO. 2002. Fluorides. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Environmental Health
Criteria Number. 227. http://www.inchem.org/pages/ehc.html.
*Widdowson EM, Dickerson JWT. 1964. Chemical composition of the body. In: Comar CL, Bronner
F, eds. Mineral metabolism: An advanced treatise. Volume II: The elements Part A. New York:
Academic Press.
Windholz M, ed. 1976. The Merck index. 9th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., 211.
Windholz M, ed. 1983. The Merck index. 10th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., 1235.
*Wing JS, Sanderson LM, Brender JD, et al. 1991. Acute health effects in a community after a release of
hydrofluoric acid. Arch Environ Health 46(3):155-160.
Wiseman A. 1970. Effects of inorganic fluoride on enzymes. In: Handbook of experimental

pharmacology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 20(2):48-97.
*Wohlslagel LC, Dipasquale LC, Vernot EH. 1976. Toxicity of solid rocket motor exhaust: Effects of
HCl, HF, and aluminum on rodents. Journal of Combustion Toxicology 3:61.
9. REFERENCES
*Wolff WA, Kerr EG. 1938. The composition of human bone in chronic fluoride poisoning. Am J Med
Sci 195:493-497.
*Worl RG, Van Alstine RE, Shawe DR. 1973. Fluorine. In: Brobst DA, Pratt WP, eds. United States
mineral resources. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, 223-235.
*Xu R, Xu R. 1997. Electrocardiogram analysis of patients with skeletal fluorosis. Fluoride 30(1):16-
18.
*Yamamoto S, Katagiri K, Ando M. 2001. Suppression of pulmonary antibacterial defenses mechanisms

and lung damage in mice exposed to fluoride aerosol. J Toxicol Environ Health 62:485-494.
*Yiamouyiannis J, Burk D. 1977. Fluoridation and cancer: Age-dependence of cancer mortality related
to artificial fluoridation. Fluoride 10:102-125.
Yiamouyiannis JA. 1993. Fluoridation and cancer: The biology and epidemiology of bone and oral
cancer related to fluoridation. Fluoride 26(2):83-96.
Yoshida Y, Kono K, Watanabe M, et al. 1986. Kinetics of fluoride excretion in human saliva. In:
Tsunoda H, Yu M-H, eds. Studies in Environmental Science 27:415-422.
*Yoshida Y, Toyota S, Kono K, et al. 1978. Fluoride ion levels in the biological fluids of electronic
industrial workers. Bull Osaka Med Sch 24:56-68.
*Young MS, Monat JP. 1982. Development of a passive dosimeter for hydrogen fluoride monitoring.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 43:890-896.
*Yuan S, Song K, Xie Q, et al. 1994. Experimental study of inhibition on lactation due to fluorosis in
rat. Environmental Sciences 2(4):179-187.
*Yunghans RS, McMullen TB. 1970. Fluoride concentrations found in NASN samples of suspended
particles. Fluoride 3:143-152.
Zanfagna PE. 1976. Allergy to fluoride. Fluoride 9:36-41.
Zankel KL, McGirr R, Romm M, et al. 1987. Measurement of ambient ground-level concentrations of
hydrogen-fluoride. JAPCA--The International Journal of Air Pollution Control and Hazardous Waste
Management 37:1191-1196.
*Zhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, et al. 1996. Effect of a high fluoride water supply on children’s
intelligence. Fluoride 29(4):190-192.
*Zhao W, Zhu H, Yu Z, et al. 1998. Long-term effects of various iodine and fluorine doses on the
thyroid and fluorosis in mice. Endocr Regul 32:63-70.
Zhao ZL, Wu MP, Gao WH. 1995. The influence of fluoride on the content of testosterone and
cholesterol in rat. Fluoride 28(3):128-130.
*Ziegler EE, Edwards BB, Jensen RL, et al. 1978. Absorption and retention of lead by infants. Pediatr
Res 12:29-34.
9. REFERENCES
Zipkin I, Leone NC. 1957. Rate of urinary fluoride output in normal adults. Am J Public Health 47:848-
851.
Zipkin I, Likins RC. 1957. Absorption of various fluorine compounds from the gastrointestinal tract of
the rat. Am J Physiol 191:549-550.
*Zipkin I, McClure FJ. 1952. Deposition of fluorine in the bones and teeth of the growing rat. J Nutr
47:611-620.
*Zipkin I, Likins RC, McClure FJ, et al. 1956. Urinary fluoride levels associated with use of fluoridated
waters. Public Health Rep 71:767-772.
Zipkin I, McClure FJ, Leone KC, et al. 1958. Fluoride deposition in human bones after prolonged
ingestion of fluoride in drinking water. Public Health Rep 73:732-740.
*Zipkin I, Zucas SM, Lavender DR, et al. 1970. Fluoride and calcification of the aorta. Calcif Tiss Res
6:173-182.
*Zlotkin SH, Atkinson S, Lockitch G. 1995. Trace elements in nutrition for premature infants. Clin
Perinatol 22(1):223-240.
Zong-Chen L, En-Huei W. 1986. Osteoporosis - an early radiographic sign of endemic fluorosis.

Skeletal Radiology 15:350-353.
10. GLOSSARY
Absorption—The taking up of liquids by solids, or of gases by solids or liquids.
Acute Exposure—Exposure to a chemical for a duration of 14 days or less, as specified in the

Toxicological Profiles.
Adsorption—The adhesion in an extremely thin layer of molecules (as of gases, solutes, or liquids) to the
surfaces of solid bodies or liquids with which they are in contact.
Adsorption Coefficient (Koc)—The ratio of the amount of a chemical adsorbed per unit weight of
organic carbon in the soil or sediment to the concentration of the chemical in solution at equilibrium.
Adsorption Ratio (Kd)—The amount of a chemical adsorbed by sediment or soil (i.e., the solid phase)
divided by the amount of chemical in the solution phase, which is in equilibrium with the solid phase, at a
fixed solid/solution ratio. It is generally expressed in micrograms of chemical sorbed per gram of soil or
sediment.
Benchmark Dose (BMD)—Usually defined as the lower confidence limit on the dose that produces a
specified magnitude of changes in a specified adverse response. For example, a BMD10 would be the
dose at the 95% lower confidence limit on a 10% response, and the benchmark response (BMR) would be
10%. The BMD is determined by modeling the dose response curve in the region of the dose response
relationship where biologically observable data are feasible.
Benchmark Dose Model—A statistical dose-response model applied to either experimental toxicological
or epidemiological data to calculate a BMD.
Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)—The quotient of the concentration of a chemical in aquatic organisms

at a specific time or during a discrete time period of exposure divided by the concentration in the
surrounding water at the same time or during the same period.
Biomarkers—Broadly defined as indicators signaling events in biologic systems or samples. They have
been classified as markers of exposure, markers of effect, and markers of susceptibility.
Cancer Effect Level (CEL)—The lowest dose of chemical in a study, or group of studies, that produces
significant increases in the incidence of cancer (or tumors) between the exposed population and its
appropriate control.
Carcinogen—A chemical capable of inducing cancer.
Case-Control Study—A type of epidemiological study that examines the relationship between a
particular outcome (disease or condition) and a variety of potential causative agents (such as toxic
chemicals). In a case-controlled study, a group of people with a specified and well-defined outcome is
identified and compared to a similar group of people without outcome.
Case Report—Describes a single individual with a particular disease or exposure. These may suggest
some potential topics for scientific research, but are not actual research studies.
Case Series—Describes the experience of a small number of individuals with the same disease or
exposure. These may suggest potential topics for scientific research, but are not actual research studies.
10. GLOSSARY
Ceiling Value—A concentration of a substance that should not be exceeded, even instantaneously.
Chronic Exposure—Exposure to a chemical for 365 days or more, as specified in the Toxicological
Profiles.
Cohort Study—A type of epidemiological study of a specific group or groups of people who have had a
common insult (e.g., exposure to an agent suspected of causing disease or a common disease) and are
followed forward from exposure to outcome. At least one exposed group is compared to one unexposed
group.
Cross-sectional Study—A type of epidemiological study of a group or groups of people that examines
the relationship between exposure and outcome to a chemical or to chemicals at one point in time.
Data Needs—Substance-specific informational needs that if met would reduce the uncertainties of human
health assessment.
Developmental Toxicity—The occurrence of adverse effects on the developing organism that may result
from exposure to a chemical prior to conception (either parent), during prenatal development, or
postnatally to the time of sexual maturation. Adverse developmental effects may be detected at any point
in the life span of the organism.
Dose-Response Relationship—The quantitative relationship between the amount of exposure to a

toxicant and the incidence of the adverse effects.
Embryotoxicity and Fetotoxicity—Any toxic effect on the conceptus as a result of prenatal exposure to
a chemical; the distinguishing feature between the two terms is the stage of development during which the
insult occurs. The terms, as used here, include malformations and variations, altered growth, and in utero
death.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Health Advisory—An estimate of acceptable drinking water
levels for a chemical substance based on health effects information. A health advisory is not a legally
enforceable federal standard, but serves as technical guidance to assist federal, state, and local officials.
Epidemiology—Refers to the investigation of factors that determine the frequency and distribution of
disease or other health-related conditions within a defined human population during a specified period.
Genotoxicity—A specific adverse effect on the genome of living cells that, upon the duplication of
affected cells, can be expressed as a mutagenic, clastogenic, or carcinogenic event because of specific
alteration of the molecular structure of the genome.
Half-life—A measure of rate for the time required to eliminate one half of a quantity of a chemical from
the body or environmental media.
Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH)—The maximum environmental concentration of a

contaminant from which one could escape within 30 minutes without any escape-impairing symptoms or
irreversible health effects.
Incidence—The ratio of individuals in a population who develop a specified condition to the total
number of individuals in that population who could have developed that condition in a specified time
period.
10. GLOSSARY
Intermediate Exposure—Exposure to a chemical for a duration of 15–364 days, as specified in the

Toxicological Profiles.
Immunologic Toxicity—The occurrence of adverse effects on the immune system that may result from
exposure to environmental agents such as chemicals.
Immunological Effects—Functional changes in the immune response.
In Vitro—Isolated from the living organism and artificially maintained, as in a test tube.
In Vivo—Occurring within the living organism.
Lethal Concentration(LO) (LCLO)—The lowest concentration of a chemical in air that has been
reported to have caused death in humans or animals.
Lethal Concentration(50) (LC50)—A calculated concentration of a chemical in air to which exposure for
a specific length of time is expected to cause death in 50% of a defined experimental animal population.
Lethal Dose(LO) (LDLO)—The lowest dose of a chemical introduced by a route other than inhalation
that has been reported to have caused death in humans or animals.
Lethal Dose(50) (LD50)—The dose of a chemical that has been calculated to cause death in 50% of a
defined experimental animal population.
Lethal Time(50) (LT50)—A calculated period of time within which a specific concentration of a
chemical is expected to cause death in 50% of a defined experimental animal population.
Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (LOAEL)—The lowest exposure level of chemical in a study,

or group of studies, that produces statistically or biologically significant increases in frequency or severity
of adverse effects between the exposed population and its appropriate control.
Lymphoreticular Effects—Represent morphological effects involving lymphatic tissues such as the

lymph nodes, spleen, and thymus.
Malformations—Permanent structural changes that may adversely affect survival, development, or

function.
Minimal Risk Level (MRL)—An estimate of daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is
likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified route and
duration of exposure.
Modifying Factor (MF)—A value (greater than zero) that is applied to the derivation of a Minimal Risk
Level (MRL) to reflect additional concerns about the database that are not covered by the uncertainty
factors. The default value for a MF is 1.
Morbidity—State of being diseased; morbidity rate is the incidence or prevalence of disease in a specific
population.
Mortality—Death; mortality rate is a measure of the number of deaths in a population during a specified
interval of time.
10. GLOSSARY
Mutagen—A substance that causes mutations. A mutation is a change in the DNA sequence of a cell’s
DNA. Mutations can lead to birth defects, miscarriages, or cancer.
Necropsy—The gross examination of the organs and tissues of a dead body to determine the cause of
death or pathological conditions.
Neurotoxicity—The occurrence of adverse effects on the nervous system following exposure to a

chemical.
No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL)—The dose of a chemical at which there were no

statistically or biologically significant increases in frequency or severity of adverse effects seen between
the exposed population and its appropriate control. Effects may be produced at this dose, but they are not
considered to be adverse.
Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient (Kow)—The equilibrium ratio of the concentrations of a chemical

in n-octanol and water, in dilute solution.
Odds Ratio (OR)—A means of measuring the association between an exposure (such as toxic substances
and a disease or condition) which represents the best estimate of relative risk (risk as a ratio of the
incidence among subjects exposed to a particular risk factor divided by the incidence among subjects who
were not exposed to the risk factor). An odds ratio of greater than 1 is considered to indicate greater risk
of disease in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group.
Organophosphate or Organophosphorus Compound—A phosphorus-containing organic compound

and especially a pesticide that acts by inhibiting cholinesterase.
Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)—An Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
allowable exposure level in workplace air averaged over an 8-hour shift of a 40-hour workweek.
Pesticide—General classification of chemicals specifically developed and produced for use in the control
of agricultural and public health pests.
Pharmacokinetics—The science of quantitatively predicting the fate (disposition) of an exogenous

substance in an organism. Utilizing computational techniques, it provides the means of studying the
absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of chemicals by the body.
Pharmacokinetic Model—A set of equations that can be used to describe the time course of a parent
chemical or metabolite in an animal system. There are two types of pharmacokinetic models: data-based
and physiologically-based. A data-based model divides the animal system into a series of compartments,
which, in general, do not represent real, identifiable anatomic regions of the body, whereas the
physiologically-based model compartments represent real anatomic regions of the body.
Physiologically Based Pharmacodynamic (PBPD) Model—A type of physiologically based dose-

response model that quantitatively describes the relationship between target tissue dose and toxic end
points. These models advance the importance of physiologically based models in that they clearly
describe the biological effect (response) produced by the system following exposure to an exogenous
substance.
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model—Comprised of a series of compartments

representing organs or tissue groups with realistic weights and blood flows. These models require a
10. GLOSSARY
variety of physiological information: tissue volumes, blood flow rates to tissues, cardiac output, alveolar
ventilation rates, and possibly membrane permeabilities. The models also utilize biochemical information
such as air/blood partition coefficients, and metabolic parameters. PBPK models are also called
biologically based tissue dosimetry models.
Prevalence—The number of cases of a disease or condition in a population at one point in time.
Prospective Study—A type of cohort study in which the pertinent observations are made on events
occurring after the start of the study. A group is followed over time.
q1*—The upper-bound estimate of the low-dose slope of the dose-response curve as determined by the
multistage procedure. The q1* can be used to calculate an estimate of carcinogenic potency, the
incremental excess cancer risk per unit of exposure (usually µg/L for water, mg/kg/day for food, and
µg/m3 for air).
Recommended Exposure Limit (REL)—A National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations for up to a 10-hour workday during a 40-hour
workweek.
Reference Concentration (RfC)—An estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of

magnitude) of a continuous inhalation exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups)
that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious noncancer health effects during a lifetime.
The inhalation reference concentration is for continuous inhalation exposures and is appropriately
expressed in units of mg/m3 or ppm.
Reference Dose (RfD)—An estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of the
daily exposure of the human population to a potential hazard that is likely to be without risk of deleterious
effects during a lifetime. The RfD is operationally derived from the no-observed-adverse-effect level
(NOAEL-from animal and human studies) by a consistent application of uncertainty factors that reflect
various types of data used to estimate RfDs and an additional modifying factor, which is based on a
professional judgment of the entire database on the chemical. The RfDs are not applicable to
nonthreshold effects such as cancer.
Reportable Quantity (RQ)—The quantity of a hazardous substance that is considered reportable under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Reportable
quantities are (1) 1 pound or greater or (2) for selected substances, an amount established by regulation
either under CERCLA or under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act. Quantities are measured over a
24-hour period.
Reproductive Toxicity—The occurrence of adverse effects on the reproductive system that may result
from exposure to a chemical. The toxicity may be directed to the reproductive organs and/or the related
endocrine system. The manifestation of such toxicity may be noted as alterations in sexual behavior,
fertility, pregnancy outcomes, or modifications in other functions that are dependent on the integrity of
this system.
Retrospective Study—A type of cohort study based on a group of persons known to have been exposed
at some time in the past. Data are collected from routinely recorded events, up to the time the study is
undertaken. Retrospective studies are limited to causal factors that can be ascertained from existing
records and/or examining survivors of the cohort.
Risk—The possibility or chance that some adverse effect will result from a given exposure to a chemical.
10. GLOSSARY
Risk Factor—An aspect of personal behavior or lifestyle, an environmental exposure, or an inborn or

inherited characteristic that is associated with an increased occurrence of disease or other health-related
event or condition.
Risk Ratio—The ratio of the risk among persons with specific risk factors compared to the risk among
persons without risk factors. A risk ratio greater than 1 indicates greater risk of disease in the exposed
group compared to the unexposed.
Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL)—The American Conference of Governmental Industrial

Hygienists (ACGIH) maximum concentration to which workers can be exposed for up to 15 minutes
continually. No more than four excursions are allowed per day, and there must be at least 60 minutes
between exposure periods. The daily Threshold Limit Value - Time Weighted Average (TLV-TWA) may
not be exceeded.
Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR)—A ratio of the observed number of deaths and the expected
number of deaths in a specific standard population.
Target Organ Toxicity—This term covers a broad range of adverse effects on target organs or
physiological systems (e.g., renal, cardiovascular) extending from those arising through a single limited
exposure to those assumed over a lifetime of exposure to a chemical.
Teratogen—A chemical that causes structural defects that affect the development of an organism.
Threshold Limit Value (TLV)—An American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists

(ACGIH) concentration of a substance to which most workers can be exposed without adverse effect.
The TLV may be expressed as a Time Weighted Average (TWA), as a Short-Term Exposure Limit
(STEL), or as a ceiling limit (CL).
Time-Weighted Average (TWA)—An allowable exposure concentration averaged over a normal 8-hour
workday or 40-hour workweek.
Toxic Dose(50) (TD50)—A calculated dose of a chemical, introduced by a route other than inhalation,
which is expected to cause a specific toxic effect in 50% of a defined experimental animal population.
Toxicokinetic—The study of the absorption, distribution, and elimination of toxic compounds in the
living organism.
Uncertainty Factor (UF)—A factor used in operationally deriving the Minimal Risk Level (MRL) or
Reference Dose (RfD) or Reference Concentration (RfC) from experimental data. UFs are intended to
account for (1) the variation in sensitivity among the members of the human population, (2) the
uncertainty in extrapolating animal data to the case of human, (3) the uncertainty in extrapolating from
data obtained in a study that is of less than lifetime exposure, and (4) the uncertainty in using lowest-
observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) data rather than no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) data.
A default for each individual UF is 10; if complete certainty in data exists, a value of 1 can be used;
however, a reduced UF of 3 may be used on a case-by-case basis, 3 being the approximate logarithmic
average of 10 and 1.
Xenobiotic—Any chemical that is foreign to the biological system.

FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE A-1
APPENDIX A. ATSDR MINIMAL RISK LEVEL AND WORKSHEETS
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) [42 U.S.C.
9601 et seq.], as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) [Pub. L. 99–
499], requires that the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) develop jointly with
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in order of priority, a list of hazardous substances most
commonly found at facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities List (NPL); prepare toxicological
profiles for each substance included on the priority list of hazardous substances; and assure the initiation
of a research program to fill identified data needs associated with the substances.
The toxicological profiles include an examination, summary, and interpretation of available toxicological
information and epidemiologic evaluations of a hazardous substance. During the development of
toxicological profiles, Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) are derived when reliable and sufficient data exist to
identify the target organ(s) of effect or the most sensitive health effect(s) for a specific duration for a
given route of exposure. An MRL is an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance
that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified duration
of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancer health effects only and are not based on a consideration of
cancer effects. These substance-specific estimates, which are intended to serve as screening levels, are
used by ATSDR health assessors to identify contaminants and potential health effects that may be of
concern at hazardous waste sites. It is important to note that MRLs are not intended to define clean-up or
action levels.
MRLs are derived for hazardous substances using the no-observed-adverse-effect level/uncertainty factor
approach. They are below levels that might cause adverse health effects in the people most sensitive to
such chemical-induced effects. MRLs are derived for acute (1–14 days), intermediate (15–364 days), and
chronic (365 days and longer) durations and for the oral and inhalation routes of exposure. Currently,
MRLs for the dermal route of exposure are not derived because ATSDR has not yet identified a method
suitable for this route of exposure. MRLs are generally based on the most sensitive chemical-induced end
point considered to be of relevance to humans. Serious health effects (such as irreparable damage to the
liver or kidneys, or birth defects) are not used as a basis for establishing MRLs. Exposure to a level
above the MRL does not mean that adverse health effects will occur.
MRLs are intended only to serve as a screening tool to help public health professionals decide where to
look more closely. They may also be viewed as a mechanism to identify those hazardous waste sites that
APPENDIX A
are not expected to cause adverse health effects. Most MRLs contain a degree of uncertainty because of
the lack of precise toxicological information on the people who might be most sensitive (e.g., infants,
elderly, nutritionally or immunologically compromised) to the effects of hazardous substances. ATSDR
uses a conservative (i.e., protective) approach to address this uncertainty consistent with the public health
principle of prevention. Although human data are preferred, MRLs often must be based on animal studies
because relevant human studies are lacking. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, ATSDR assumes
that humans are more sensitive to the effects of hazardous substance than animals and that certain persons
may be particularly sensitive. Thus, the resulting MRL may be as much as a hundredfold below levels
that have been shown to be nontoxic in laboratory animals.
Proposed MRLs undergo a rigorous review process: Health Effects/MRL Workgroup reviews within the
Division of Toxicology, expert panel peer reviews, and agencywide MRL Workgroup reviews, with
participation from other federal agencies and comments from the public. They are subject to change as
new information becomes available concomitant with updating the toxicological profiles. Thus, MRLs in
the most recent toxicological profiles supersede previously published levels. For additional information
regarding MRLs, please contact the Division of Toxicology, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-29, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
APPENDIX A
MINIMAL RISK LEVEL (MRL) WORKSHEET
Chemical Name: Fluoride

CAS Number: NA
Date: December 1, 2003
Profile Status: Final
Route: [ ] Inhalation [X] Oral
Duration: [ ] Acute [ ] Intermediate [X] Chronic
Key to Figure: 53
Species: Humans
Minimal Risk Level: 0.05 [X] mg/kg/day [ ] mg/m3
Reference: Li Y, Liang C, Slemenda CW, et al. 2001. Effect of long-term exposure to fluoride in
drinking water on risks of bone fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:932-939.
Experimental design (human study details or strain, number of animals per exposure/control groups, sex,
dose administration details): Six communities in rural China with different levels of naturally occurring
fluoride in the water were examined. The subjects were 50 years and older; the mean ages ranged from
62.6 to 64.0 years. The majority of the subjects had been living in the same community since birth.
There was a higher percentage of males in the highest fluoride group (52.4%) than in the other groups
(41.8–47.0%). The water fluoride concentrations were 0.25–0.34, 0.58–0.73, 1.00–1.06, 1.45–2.19, 2.62–
3.56, and 4.32–7.97 ppm. Three-day dietary surveys were collected for 10% of randomly selected
subjects; estimated nutrition levels were adequate for all six populations. None of the subjects used
fluoride-containing toothpaste or mouthwashes and there was a minimal use of packaged beverages and
canned foods; fluoride levels in brewed tea samples were largely determined by the levels of fluoride in
the water. The authors calculated total daily fluoride intakes of 0.7, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 14 mg/day. The
subjects self-reported bone fractures. If the fracture received medical attention, then original x-rays were
obtained; for other fractures, x-rays were taken to verify self-reported fractures. The reliability of the
reported fracture was 99.1%.
Effects noted in study and corresponding concentrations: Age, gender, alcohol consumption, and level of
physical activity were significant factors for the risk of overall bone fractures since age 20 years; cigarette
smoking and BMI did not significantly alter bone fracture prevalence. The trend for overall bone fracture
prevalence (adjusted for age and gender) had a U-shaped pattern. As compared to the 1.00–1.06 ppm
group, significantly higher prevalences of bone fracture were found in the lowest (0.25–0.34 ppm
fluoride) and highest (4.32–7.97 ppm) groups. The prevalences were 7.41, 6.40, 5.11, 6.04, 6.09, and
7.40%, respectively. When only hip fractures since age 20 were examined, significantly higher
prevalences (adjusted for age and BMI) were found in the highest fluoride group, as compared to the
1.00–1.06 ppm group. The prevalences of hip fractures were 0.37, 0.43, 0.37, 0.89, 0.76, and 1.20%,
respectively. A similar pattern was observed when overall fractures since age 50 were examined; the
prevalences were 4.33, 3.20, 3.28, 3.30, 3.62, and 4.80 (p=0.02), respectively. Only a small number of
subjects reported spine fractures (49); none of the fluoride groups significantly differed from the 1.00–
1.06 ppm group.
APPENDIX A
Concentration and end point used for MRL derivation:
The MRL is based on a NOAEL of 0.15 mg fluoride/kg/day for increased fracture rate.
[X] NOAEL [ ] LOAEL
Uncertainty Factors used in MRL derivation:
[ ] 10 for use of a LOAEL in a sensitive subpopulation

[ ] 10 for extrapolation from animals to humans
[X] 3 for human variability; a value less than 10 was used because the most sensitive
population, elderly men and women, were examined.
Was a conversion factor used from ppm in food or water to a mg/body weight dose? Yes. Doses were
calculated using the reported daily fluoride intakes of 0.7, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 14 mg/day and a reference body
weight of 55 kg.
If an inhalation study in animals, list conversion factors used in determining human equivalent
concentration: NA
Was a conversion used from intermittent to continuous exposure? NA
Other additional studies or pertinent information that lend support to this MRL: A number of studies
have examined the possible association between exposure to fluoridated water and the risk of increased
bone fractures, in particular, hip fractures. In general, the studies involved comparing the incidence of hip
fractures among residents aged 55 years and older living in a community with fluoridated water (around
1 ppm) with the incidence in a comparable community with low levels of fluoride in the water.
Inconsistent results have been found, with studies finding decreases (Lehmann et al. 1998; Phipps et al.
2000; Simonen and Laittinen 1985), increases (Cooper et al. 1990, 1991; Danielson et al. 1992; Jacobsen
et al. 1990, 1992; Kurttio et al. 1999), or no effect (Arnala et al. 1986; Cauley et al. 1995; Goggin et al.
1965; Jacobsen et al. 1993; Karagas et al. 1996; Kröger et al 1994; Suarez-Almazor et al. 1993) on hip
fracture risk. Studies by Li et al. (2001) and Sowers et al. (1986) have examined communities with
higher levels of naturally occurring fluoride in the water. Both studies found increases in the incidence of
hip fractures in residents exposed to 4 ppm fluoride and higher (Li et al. 2001; Sowers et al. 1986, 1991);
the hip fracture incidence in the highly exposed community was compared to the rates in communities
with approximately 1 ppm fluoride in the water. Significant increases in the occurrence of nonvertebral
fractures were also observed in postmenopausal women ingesting sodium fluoride (34 mg
fluoride/kg/day) for the treatment of osteoporosis (Riggs et al. 1990, 1994). This result was not found in
another study of postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis treated with 34 mg fluoride/kg/day as
sodium fluoride (Kleerekoper et al. 1991). A meta-analysis of these data, as well as other clinical studies,
found a significant correlation between exposure to high levels of fluoride and an increased relative risk
of nonvertebral fractures (Haguenauer et al. 2000).
Agency Contact (Chemical Manager): Carolyn A. Tylenda, D.M.D., Ph.D., Dennis Jones, D.V.M..
APPENDIX A

Chemical Name: Hydrogen Fluoride
CAS Number: 7664-39-3
Route: [X] Inhalation [ ] Oral
Duration: [X] Acute [ ] Intermediate [ ] Chronic
Key to Figure: 6
Species: Humans
Minimal Risk Level: 0.02 [ ] mg/kg/day [X] ppm
Reference: Lund K, Ekstrand J, Poe J, et al. 1997. Exposure to hydrogen fluoride: an experimental study
in humans of concentrations of fluoride in plasma, symptoms, and lung function. Occup Environ Med
54:32-37.
Lund K, Refsnes M, Sandstrøm T, et al. 1999. Increased CD3 positive cells in bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid after hydrogen fluoride inhalation. Scand J Work Environ Health 25:326-334.
dose administration details): Groups of 7-9 healthy, nonsmoking males (21–44 years of age) were
exposed to 0.2-0.6, 0.7–2.4, or 2.5–5.2 mg/m³ hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour. For the last 15 minutes of the
exposure, the subjects performed an ergometric test at a fixed work load of 75W. Bronchoalveolar lavage
(BAL) was performed 3 weeks prior to exposure and 24 hours after exposure. Lung function tests were
performed immediately before exposure, every 15 minutes during exposure, at exposure termination, 30
minutes after exposure, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after exposure. Symptom surveys were completed before
exposure initiation, after 30 minutes of exposure, at exposure termination, and 4 and 24 hours after
exposure. Eye, upper airway (nose and throat), and lower airway symptoms were scored based on a 5
point scale with 5 being the most severe.
The midpoint of the range of concentrations was used to calculate ppm levels: 0.4 mg hydrogen
fluoride/m³ x 24.45/20 x 19/20 = 0.5 ppm fluoride; 1.7 mg/m³ = 1.9 ppm, 3.9 mg/m³ = 4.5 ppm
Effects noted in study and corresponding concentrations: No significant exposure-related alterations in

lung function (FEV1 or FVC) were observed and no significant correlations between plasma fluoride
concentrations and FVC or FEV1 were found. Increases (as compared to scores prior to exposure) in
upper airway symptom scores were observed in the low (p=0.06) and high (p=0.02) concentration groups
and for all concentrations combined (p<0.001); similarly, total symptom scores were significantly
(p<0.04) increased in the low and high concentration groups and all groups combined. The severity of the
upper airway score was low (scores of 1–3) in the low exposure group. All subjects reported a change in
the upper airway symptom score in the high concentration group; four subjects scored the symptoms as
low and three scored them as high. A significant increase in eye symptom score was also observed in all
groups combined, but not for individual exposure level groups. The effect of hydrogen fluoride exposure
was assessed by comparing the before and after exposure BAL fluid. Significant increases in the
percentage of CD3-positive cells were found in the bronchial portion of the mid- and high-dose group and
in the bronchoalveolar portion of the high-dose group. A significant increase in the percentage of
lymphocytes in the bronchial and bronchoalveolar portions in the mid-concentration group was observed.
A significant correlation between the individual changes in the percentage of CD3-positive cells and the
APPENDIX A
changes in the percentage of lymphocytes from the bronchoalveolar portion was also observed.
Significant increases in myeloperoxidase and interkeukin-6 levels were found in the high dose group.
Concentration and end point used for MRL derivation: The MRL is based on a minimal LOAEL of
0.5 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for upper respiratory tract irritation.
[ ] NOAEL [X] LOAEL
[X] 3 for use of a minimal LOAEL

[ ] 3 for extrapolation from animals to humans with dosimetric adjustments
[X] 10 for human variability
Was a conversion factor used from ppm in food or water to a mg/body weight dose? No
concentration:
Was a conversion used from intermittent to continuous exposure? No. Data on nasal irritation from the
Largent (1960) report, the Lund et al. (2002) study, and the intermediate-duration study by Largent (1960)
provide suggestive evidence that the severity of nasal irritation does not increase with increasing exposure
duration. These three studies identified similar LOAEL values for different exposure durations:
3.22 ppm 6 hours/day for 10 days (Largent 1960), 3.8 ppm 1 hour/day for 1 day (Lund et al. 2002), and
2.98 ppm 6 hours/day, 6 days/week for 15–50 days. Thus, time scaling was not used to derive the acute
MRL.
Other additional studies or pertinent information that lend support to this MRL: The respiratory tract
appears to be the primary target of hydrogen fluoride toxicity. Upper respiratory tract irritation and
inflammation and lower respiratory tract inflammation have been observed in several human studies.
Nasal irritation was reported by one subject exposed to 3.22 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride
6 hours/day for 10 days (Largent 1960). Very mild to moderate upper respiratory symptoms were
reported by healthy men exposed to 0.5 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al. 1997).
At higher concentrations, 4.2–4.5 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour, more severe symptoms of
upper respiratory irritation were noted (Lund et al. 1997, 2002). In subjects exposed to 4.2 ppm for
1 hour, analysis of nasal lavage fluid provided suggestive evidence that hydrogen fluoride induces an
inflammatory response in the nasal cavity (Lund et al. 2002). Similarly, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
analysis revealed suggestive evidence of bronchial inflammation in another study of subjects exposed to
1.9 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 1 hour (Lund et al. 1999); no alterations were observed at
0.5 ppm. Respiratory effects have also been reported in rats acutely exposed to hydrogen fluoride. Mild
nasal irritation was observed during 60-minute exposure to 120 ppm fluoride (Rosenholtz et al. 1963),
and respiratory distress was observed at 2,310, 1,339, 1,308, and 465 ppm fluoride for 5, 15, 30, or
60 minutes, respectively (Rosenholtz et al. 1963). Midtracheal necrosis was reported in rats exposed to
902 or 1,509 ppm fluoride as hydrogen fluoride for 2 or 10 minutes using a mouth breathing model with a
tracheal cannula (Dalbey et al. 1998a, 1998b). These effects were not observed when the tracheal cannula
was not used.
The Lund et al. (1997, 1999) study was selected as the basis of the acute-duration inhalation MRL for
hydrogen fluoride. As reported in the 1997 publication, a trend (p=0.06) toward increased upper
respiratory tract symptom score, as compared to pre-exposure symptom scores, was observed at the
lowest concentration tested (0.5 ppm). A significant increase in the total symptom score was also
APPENDIX A
observed at this concentration. No significant alterations in symptom scores were observed at the mid
concentration (1.9 ppm), and increases in upper respiratory and total symptom scores were observed at
the high concentration (4.5 ppm). Suggestive evidence of bronchial inflammation was also observed at
≥1.9 ppm fluoride (Lund et al. 1999), although no alterations in lower respiratory tract symptoms (Lund
et al. 1997) or lung function (Lund et al. 1997) were observed at any of the tested concentrations.
Agency Contact (Chemical Manager): Carolyn A. Tylenda, D.M.D., Ph.D., Dennis Jones, D.V.M.
APPENDIX A

Chemical Name: Fluorine
CAS Number: 7782-41-4
Route: [X] Inhalation [ ] Oral
Duration: [X] Acute [ ] Intermediate [ ] Chronic
Key to Figure: 6
Species: Humans
Minimal Risk Level: 0.01 [ ] mg/kg/day [X] ppm
Reference: Keplinger ML, Suissa LW. 1968. Toxicity of fluorine short-term inhalation. Am Ind Hyg
Assoc J 29(1):10-18.
dose administration details): Five volunteers (aged 19–50 years; gender not specified) were exposed to
various concentrations of fluorine: 10 ppm for 3, 5, or 15 minutes; 23 ppm for 5 minutes, 50 ppm for
3 minutes, 67 ppm for 1 minute, 78 ppm for 1 minute, and 100 ppm for 0.5 or 1 minute. The fluorine was
administered via a mask that covered the eyes and nose; the subjects could remove the mask from their
face and could breathe fresh air via their mouth. No information was provided on the amount of time
between exposures or whether all subjects were exposed to all concentrations.
Effects noted in study and corresponding concentrations: No nasal or eye irritation was noted by subjects
exposed to 10 ppm for 3, 5, or 15 minutes; it was also noted that the 15-minute exposure did not result in
respiratory tract irritation. Eye irritation was observed at ≥23 ppm; nose irritation at ≥50 ppm, and skin
irritation at ≥78 ppm. The severity of the irritation was concentration related. Exposure to 100 ppm was
considered very irritating and the subjects did not inhale during the exposure period. No incidence data
were reported.
Concentration and end point used for MRL derivation: The MRL is based on a NOAEL of 10 ppm and
LOAEL of 23 ppm fluorine for irritation in humans.
[X] NOAEL [] LOAEL
[ ] 10 for use of a LOAEL

[ ] 10 for extrapolation from animals to humans
[X] 10 for human variability
Was a conversion factor used from ppm in food or water to a mg/body weight dose? No
concentration: NA
APPENDIX A
Was a conversion used from intermittent to continuous exposure? Yes. The 15-minute exposure duration
was adjusted for a continuous 24-hour exposure using the following equation:
10 ppm x 0.25 hours/24 hours = 0.1 ppm
The study authors noted that exposure to 10 ppm for 3–5 minutes every 15 minutes over a 2- or 3-day
period resulted slight irritation to the eyes and skin, but no other subjective effects (no additional details
on this study were provided). These data are suggestive that the toxicity of fluorine may be dependent on
concentration and duration of exposure. Thus, it is appropriate to adjust for continuous exposure.
Other additional studies or pertinent information that lend support to this MRL: Respiratory effects have
also been observed in, rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs exposed to fluorine for 1–60 minutes
(Keplinger and Suissa 1968). The observed effects include diffuse lung congestion, dyspnea, irritation,
and alveolar necrosis and hemorrhage. The severity of the lung congestion was concentration-related and
no species differences were found.
Agency Contact (Chemical Manager): Carolyn A. Tylenda, D.M.D., Ph.D., Dennis Jones, D.V.M.
APPENDIX A
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE B-1
APPENDIX B. USER'S GUIDE
Chapter 1
Public Health Statement
This chapter of the profile is a health effects summary written in non-technical language. Its intended
audience is the general public, especially people living in the vicinity of a hazardous waste site or
chemical release. If the Public Health Statement were removed from the rest of the document, it would
still communicate to the lay public essential information about the chemical.
The major headings in the Public Health Statement are useful to find specific topics of concern. The
topics are written in a question and answer format. The answer to each question includes a sentence that
will direct the reader to chapters in the profile that will provide more information on the given topic.
Chapter 2
Relevance to Public Health
This chapter provides a health effects summary based on evaluations of existing toxicologic,
epidemiologic, and toxicokinetic information. This summary is designed to present interpretive, weight-
of-evidence discussions for human health end points by addressing the following questions.
1. What effects are known to occur in humans?
2. What effects observed in animals are likely to be of concern to humans?
3. What exposure conditions are likely to be of concern to humans, especially around hazardous
waste sites?
The chapter covers end points in the same order that they appear within the Discussion of Health Effects
by Route of Exposure section, by route (inhalation, oral, and dermal) and within route by effect. Human
data are presented first, then animal data. Both are organized by duration (acute, intermediate, chronic).
In vitro data and data from parenteral routes (intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous, etc.) are also
considered in this chapter.
The carcinogenic potential of the profiled substance is qualitatively evaluated, when appropriate, using
existing toxicokinetic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic data. ATSDR does not currently assess cancer
potency or perform cancer risk assessments. Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) for noncancer end points (if
derived) and the end points from which they were derived are indicated and discussed.
Limitations to existing scientific literature that prevent a satisfactory evaluation of the relevance to public
health are identified in the Chapter 3 Data Needs section.
Interpretation of Minimal Risk Levels
Where sufficient toxicologic information is available, ATSDR has derived MRLs for inhalation and oral
routes of entry at each duration of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic). These MRLs are not
meant to support regulatory action, but to acquaint health professionals with exposure levels at which
adverse health effects are not expected to occur in humans.
APPENDIX B
MRLs should help physicians and public health officials determine the safety of a community living near
a chemical emission, given the concentration of a contaminant in air or the estimated daily dose in water.
MRLs are based largely on toxicological studies in animals and on reports of human occupational
exposure.
MRL users should be familiar with the toxicologic information on which the number is based. Chapter 2,
"Relevance to Public Health," contains basic information known about the substance. Other sections such
as Chapter 3 Section 3.9, "Interactions with Other Substances,” and Section 3.10, "Populations that are
Unusually Susceptible" provide important supplemental information.
MRL users should also understand the MRL derivation methodology. MRLs are derived using a
modified version of the risk assessment methodology that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
provides (Barnes and Dourson 1988) to determine reference doses (RfDs) for lifetime exposure.
To derive an MRL, ATSDR generally selects the most sensitive end point which, in its best judgement,
represents the most sensitive human health effect for a given exposure route and duration. ATSDR
cannot make this judgement or derive an MRL unless information (quantitative or qualitative) is available
for all potential systemic, neurological, and developmental effects. If this information and reliable
quantitative data on the chosen end point are available, ATSDR derives an MRL using the most sensitive
species (when information from multiple species is available) with the highest no-observed-adverse-effect
level (NOAEL) that does not exceed any adverse effect levels. When a NOAEL is not available, a
lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) can be used to derive an MRL, and an uncertainty factor
(UF) of 10 must be employed. Additional uncertainty factors of 10 must be used both for human
variability to protect sensitive subpopulations (people who are most susceptible to the health effects
caused by the substance) and for interspecies variability (extrapolation from animals to humans). In
deriving an MRL, these individual uncertainty factors are multiplied together. The product is then
divided into the inhalation concentration or oral dosage selected from the study. Uncertainty factors used
in developing a substance-specific MRL are provided in the footnotes of the levels of significant exposure
(LSE) Tables.
Chapter 3
Health Effects
Tables and Figures for Levels of Significant Exposure (LSE)
Tables and figures are used to summarize health effects and illustrate graphically levels of exposure
associated with those effects. These levels cover health effects observed at increasing dose
concentrations and durations, differences in response by species, MRLs to humans for noncancer end
points, and EPA's estimated range associated with an upper- bound individual lifetime cancer risk of 1 in
10,000 to 1 in 10,000,000. Use the LSE tables and figures for a quick review of the health effects and to
locate data for a specific exposure scenario. The LSE tables and figures should always be used in
conjunction with the text. All entries in these tables and figures represent studies that provide reliable,
quantitative estimates of NOAELs, LOAELs, or Cancer Effect Levels (CELs).
The legends presented below demonstrate the application of these tables and figures. Representative
examples of LSE Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 are shown. The numbers in the left column of the legends
correspond to the numbers in the example table and figure.
LEGEND
APPENDIX B
See Sample LSE Table 3-1 (page B-6)
(1) Route of Exposure. One of the first considerations when reviewing the toxicity of a substance
using these tables and figures should be the relevant and appropriate route of exposure. Typically
when sufficient data exists, three LSE tables and two LSE figures are presented in the document.
The three LSE tables present data on the three principal routes of exposure, i.e., inhalation, oral,
and dermal (LSE Table 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3, respectively). LSE figures are limited to the inhalation
(LSE Figure 3-1) and oral (LSE Figure 3-2) routes. Not all substances will have data on each
route of exposure and will not, therefore, have all five of the tables and figures.
(2) Exposure Period. Three exposure periods—acute (less than 15 days), intermediate (15–364
days), and chronic (365 days or more)—are presented within each relevant route of exposure. In
this example, an inhalation study of intermediate exposure duration is reported. For quick
reference to health effects occurring from a known length of exposure, locate the applicable
exposure period within the LSE table and figure.
(3) Health Effect. The major categories of health effects included in LSE tables and figures are
death, systemic, immunological, neurological, developmental, reproductive, and cancer.
NOAELs and LOAELs can be reported in the tables and figures for all effects but cancer.
Systemic effects are further defined in the "System" column of the LSE table (see key number
18).
(4) Key to Figure. Each key number in the LSE table links study information to one or more data
points using the same key number in the corresponding LSE figure. In this example, the study
represented by key number 18 has been used to derive a NOAEL and a Less Serious LOAEL
(also see the two "18r" data points in sample Figure 3-1).
(5) Species. The test species, whether animal or human, are identified in this column. Chapter 2,
"Relevance to Public Health," covers the relevance of animal data to human toxicity and
Section 3.4, "Toxicokinetics," contains any available information on comparative toxicokinetics.
Although NOAELs and LOAELs are species specific, the levels are extrapolated to equivalent
human doses to derive an MRL.
(6) Exposure Frequency/Duration. The duration of the study and the weekly and daily exposure
regimen are provided in this column. This permits comparison of NOAELs and LOAELs from
different studies. In this case (key number 18), rats were exposed to 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane via
inhalation for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 3 weeks. For a more complete review of the dosing
regimen refer to the appropriate sections of the text or the original reference paper (i.e., Nitschke
et al. 1981).
(7) System. This column further defines the systemic effects. These systems include respiratory,
cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematological, musculoskeletal, hepatic, renal, and
dermal/ocular. "Other" refers to any systemic effect (e.g., a decrease in body weight) not covered
in these systems. In the example of key number 18, one systemic effect (respiratory) was
investigated.
(8) NOAEL. A NOAEL is the highest exposure level at which no harmful effects were seen in the
organ system studied. Key number 18 reports a NOAEL of 3 ppm for the respiratory system,
which was used to derive an intermediate exposure, inhalation MRL of 0.005 ppm (see
footnote "b").
APPENDIX B
(9) LOAEL. A LOAEL is the lowest dose used in the study that caused a harmful health effect.
LOAELs have been classified into "Less Serious" and "Serious" effects. These distinctions help
readers identify the levels of exposure at which adverse health effects first appear and the
gradation of effects with increasing dose. A brief description of the specific end point used to
quantify the adverse effect accompanies the LOAEL. The respiratory effect reported in key
number 18 (hyperplasia) is a Less Serious LOAEL of 10 ppm. MRLs are not derived from
Serious LOAELs.
(10) Reference. The complete reference citation is given in Chapter 9 of the profile.
(11) CEL. A CEL is the lowest exposure level associated with the onset of carcinogenesis in
experimental or epidemiologic studies. CELs are always considered serious effects. The LSE
tables and figures do not contain NOAELs for cancer, but the text may report doses not causing
measurable cancer increases.
(12) Footnotes. Explanations of abbreviations or reference notes for data in the LSE tables are found
in the footnotes. Footnote "b" indicates that the NOAEL of 3 ppm in key number 18 was used to
derive an MRL of 0.005 ppm.
LEGEND
See Sample Figure 3-1 (page B-7)
LSE figures graphically illustrate the data presented in the corresponding LSE tables. Figures help the
reader quickly compare health effects according to exposure concentrations for particular exposure
periods.
(13) Exposure Period. The same exposure periods appear as in the LSE table. In this example, health
effects observed within the intermediate and chronic exposure periods are illustrated.
(14) Health Effect. These are the categories of health effects for which reliable quantitative data
exists. The same health effects appear in the LSE table.
(15) Levels of Exposure. Concentrations or doses for each health effect in the LSE tables are
graphically displayed in the LSE figures. Exposure concentration or dose is measured on the log
scale "y" axis. Inhalation exposure is reported in mg/m3 or ppm and oral exposure is reported in
mg/kg/day.
(16) NOAEL. In this example, the open circle designated 18r identifies a NOAEL critical end point in
the rat upon which an intermediate inhalation exposure MRL is based. The key number 18
corresponds to the entry in the LSE table. The dashed descending arrow indicates the
extrapolation from the exposure level of 3 ppm (see entry 18 in the Table) to the MRL of
0.005 ppm (see footnote "b" in the LSE table).
(17) CEL. Key number 38r is one of three studies for which CELs were derived. The diamond
symbol refers to a CEL for the test species-mouse. The number 38 corresponds to the entry in the
LSE table.
(18) Estimated Upper-Bound Human Cancer Risk Levels. This is the range associated with the upper-
bound for lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 10,000,000. These risk levels are derived
from the EPA's Human Health Assessment Group's upper-bound estimates of the slope of the
cancer dose response curve at low dose levels (q1*).
APPENDIX B
(19) Key to LSE Figure. The Key explains the abbreviations and symbols used in the figure.
SAMPLE
1 → TABLE 3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to [Chemical x] – Inhalation
LOAEL (effect)
Exposure
frequency/ NOAEL Less serious Serious (ppm)
Key to figurea Species duration System (ppm) (ppm) Reference
2 → INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE
5 6 7 8 9 10
3 → Systemic ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
18 Rat 13 wk Resp 3b 10 (hyperplasia)

4 → 5 d/wk Nitschke et al. 1981
6 hr/d
APPENDIX B
CHRONIC EXPOSURE
Cancer 11
↓
38 Rat 18 mo 20 (CEL, multiple Wong et al. 1982

5 d/wk organs)
7 hr/d
39 Rat 89-104 wk 10 (CEL, lung tumors, NTP 1982
5 d/wk nasal tumors)
6 hr/d
40 Mouse 79-103 wk 10 (CEL, lung tumors, NTP 1982
5 d/wk hemangiosarcomas)
6 hr/d
12 → a The number corresponds to entries in Figure 3-1.
-3
b Used to derive an intermediate inhalation Minimal Risk Level (MRL) of 5x10 ppm; dose adjusted for intermittent exposure and divided
by an uncertainty factor of 100 (10 for extrapolation from animal to humans, 10 for human variability).
B-6
APPENDIX B
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE C-1
APPENDIX C. ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists

ACOEM American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
ADI acceptable daily intake
ADME absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
AED atomic emission detection
AFID alkali flame ionization detector
AFOSH Air Force Office of Safety and Health
ALT alanine aminotransferase
AML acute myeloid leukemia
AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists
AOEC Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics
AP alkaline phosphatase
APHA American Public Health Association
AST aspartate aminotransferase
atm atmosphere
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
AWQC Ambient Water Quality Criteria
BAT best available technology
BCF bioconcentration factor
BEI Biological Exposure Index
BMD benchmark dose
BMR benchmark response
BSC Board of Scientific Counselors
C centigrade
CAA Clean Air Act
CAG Cancer Assessment Group of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
CAS Chemical Abstract Services
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CEL cancer effect level
CELDS Computer-Environmental Legislative Data System
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Ci curie
CI confidence interval
CL ceiling limit value
CLP Contract Laboratory Program
cm centimeter
CML chronic myeloid leukemia
CPSC Consumer Products Safety Commission
CWA Clean Water Act
DHEW Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
DHHS Department of Health and Human Services
DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
DOD Department of Defense
DOE Department of Energy
DOL Department of Labor
DOT Department of Transportation
APPENDIX C
DOT/UN/ Department of Transportation/United Nations/

NA/IMCO North America/International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code
DWEL drinking water exposure level
ECD electron capture detection
ECG/EKG electrocardiogram
EEG electroencephalogram
EEGL Emergency Exposure Guidance Level
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
F Fahrenheit
F1 first-filial generation
FAO Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
FDA Food and Drug Administration
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
FPD flame photometric detection
fpm feet per minute
FR Federal Register
FSH follicle stimulating hormone
g gram
GC gas chromatography
gd gestational day
GLC gas liquid chromatography
GPC gel permeation chromatography
HPLC high-performance liquid chromatography
HRGC high resolution gas chromatography
HSDB Hazardous Substance Data Bank
IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer
IDLH immediately dangerous to life and health
ILO International Labor Organization
IRIS Integrated Risk Information System
Kd adsorption ratio
kg kilogram
Koc organic carbon partition coefficient
Kow octanol-water partition coefficient
L liter
LC liquid chromatography
LC50 lethal concentration, 50% kill
LCLo lethal concentration, low
LD50 lethal dose, 50% kill
LDLo lethal dose, low
LDH lactic dehydrogenase
LH luteinizing hormone
LOAEL lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
LSE Levels of Significant Exposure
LT50 lethal time, 50% kill
m meter
MA trans,trans-muconic acid
MAL maximum allowable level
mCi millicurie
MCL maximum contaminant level
MCLG maximum contaminant level goal
APPENDIX C
MF modifying factor
MFO mixed function oxidase
mg milligram
mL milliliter
mm millimeter
mmHg millimeters of mercury
mmol millimole
mppcf millions of particles per cubic foot
MRL Minimal Risk Level
MS mass spectrometry
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard
NAS National Academy of Science
NATICH National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse
NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NCE normochromatic erythrocytes
NCEH National Center for Environmental Health
NCI National Cancer Institute
ND not detected
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
ng nanogram
NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
NIEHS National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NIOSHTIC NIOSH's Computerized Information Retrieval System
NLM National Library of Medicine
nm nanometer
nmol nanomole
NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level
NOES National Occupational Exposure Survey
NOHS National Occupational Hazard Survey
NPD nitrogen phosphorus detection
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPL National Priorities List
NR not reported
NRC National Research Council
NS not specified
NSPS New Source Performance Standards
NTIS National Technical Information Service
NTP National Toxicology Program
ODW Office of Drinking Water, EPA
OERR Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA
OHM/TADS Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System
OPP Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA
OPPT Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA
OPPTS Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, EPA
OR odds ratio
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSW Office of Solid Waste, EPA
OW Office of Water
OWRS Office of Water Regulations and Standards, EPA
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
APPENDIX C
PBPD physiologically based pharmacodynamic

PBPK physiologically based pharmacokinetic
PCE polychromatic erythrocytes
PEL permissible exposure limit
pg picogram
PHS Public Health Service
PID photo ionization detector
pmol picomole
PMR proportionate mortality ratio
ppb parts per billion
ppm parts per million
ppt parts per trillion
PSNS pretreatment standards for new sources
RBC red blood cell
REL recommended exposure level/limit
RfC reference concentration
RfD reference dose
RNA ribonucleic acid
RQ reportable quantity
RTECS Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SCE sister chromatid exchange
SGOT serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase
SGPT serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase
SIC standard industrial classification
SIM selected ion monitoring
SMCL secondary maximum contaminant level
SMR standardized mortality ratio
SNARL suggested no adverse response level
SPEGL Short-Term Public Emergency Guidance Level
STEL short term exposure limit
STORET Storage and Retrieval
TD50 toxic dose, 50% specific toxic effect
TLV threshold limit value
TOC total organic carbon
TPQ threshold planning quantity
TRI Toxics Release Inventory
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TWA time-weighted average
UF uncertainty factor
U.S. United States
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USGS United States Geological Survey
VOC volatile organic compound
WBC white blood cell
WHO World Health Organization
APPENDIX C
> greater than

≥ greater than or equal to
= equal to
< less than
≤ less than or equal to
% percent
α alpha
β beta
γ gamma
δ delta
µm micrometer
µg microgram
q1* cancer slope factor
– negative
+ positive
(+) weakly positive result
(–) weakly negative result
FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE D-1
APPENDIX D. FLUORIDE AND DENTAL CARIES
Dental caries or tooth decay is a progressively destructive disease of the tooth caused by cariogenic
bacteria. These bacteria, which reside in dental plaque, colonize on tooth surfaces and produce
polysaccharides that enhance adherence of the plaque to the tooth enamel. Once plaque is formed, the
bacteria on the teeth produce an enzyme that promotes erosion of the enamel by converting sugars and
other fermentable carbohydrates into acids. The acids dissolve the minerals (calcium and phosphorus) in
the tooth enamel in a process known as demineralization (DHHS 2001b).
Several studies conducted by Dean and associates in the 1930s and 1940s demonstrated a relationship
between the levels of naturally-occurring fluoride in drinking water and the prevalence of dental caries
(Dean 1938; Dean et al. 1939, 1941, 1942). Children living in communities with high levels of fluoride
in the drinking water had lower occurrences of dental caries. This relationship between fluoride and
dental caries prompted the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan to implement a water fluoridation program in
1945. Studies conducted in some of the earliest cities to adopt a fluoridation program reported dramatic
decreases in the occurrence of dental caries (Ast et al. 1951; Dean et al. 1950; Hill et al. 1951; Hutton et
al. 1951). The prevalence of dental caries in children living in communities with fluoridated water was
50–70% lower than in children living in areas without fluoridated water. Surveys conducted after the late
1980s found smaller differences; the occurrence of dental caries was 9–25% lower in communities with
fluoridated water as compared to communities without fluoridated water (Brunelle and Carlos 1990;
DeLiefde 1998; Eklund et al. 1987; Englander and DePaola 1979; Jackson et al. 1995; Selwitz et al.
1995). In one study, no significant differences in the occurrence of dental caries was found in school-
aged children 5–17 years old (Yiamouyiannis 1990); however, when just 5 year olds were examined, the
incidence of dental caries was 42% lower in children with lifetime exposure to fluoridated water and 24%
lower in children exposed to fluoridated water for only a portion of their lifetime. Several studies have
also examined the impact of termination of a water fluoridation program on the incidence of dental caries.
Conflicting results have been reported. Some studies found increases in dental caries occurrence
(Attwood and Blinkhorn 1991; Stephen et al. 1987; Thomas et al. 1995), some found no change in the
occurrence of dental caries (Burt et al. 2000; Kalsbeek et al. 1993; Künzel and Fischer 1997; Seppä et al.
2000; Stephen et al. 1987), and other studies found decreases in dental caries occurrence (Künzel and
Fischer 2000; Künzel et al. 2000; Maupomé et al. 2001). A meta-analysis of 26 studies examined the
relationship between water fluoridation and prevalence of dental caries or the change in decayed, missing,
and filled teeth (DMFT) (McDonagh et al. 2000). In 19 of the 30 analyses conducted, a significant
increase in the prevalence of children without dental caries was found in the fluoridated areas compared
APPENDIX D
to non-fluoridated areas. Additionally, 15 of the 16 analyses found a significant increase in the mean
change in DMFT in fluoridated water areas (levels of DMFT declined in response to fluoridation).
The decline or stabilization of the occurrence of dental caries in the absence of water fluoridation has
been attributed to a number of factors (Horowitz 1996), including diffusion of effects of fluoridated
drinking water, dilution effects from other sources of fluoride on the measurement of effectiveness of
community water fluoridation, and improved dental care. The diffusion effect occurs when residents of
communities without fluoridated water consume products manufactured or bottled in areas with
fluoridated water (thus fluoride enters the foodstuff) or attend schools in areas with fluoridated water. An
often cited example of the diffusion effect is the 1986–1987 NIDR survey of dental health status of U.S.
school children (Brunelle and Carlos 1990). In the Pacific region, which has a low percentage of
communities with fluoridated water (19%), children living in area with nonfluoridated water have 61%
higher dental caries score as compared to children living in areas with fluoridated water. In contrast, in
the Midwest region with a high percentage of communities with fluoridated water (74%), there is no
difference in dental caries scores between fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas. The dilution effect is due
to the development and use of other fluoride agents, including fluoride supplements, fluoride solutions,
gels, and varnishes used by dental professionals, fluoridated toothpaste, and fluoride mouthwash. The use
of the fluoride products that provide protection from dental decay diminishes the difference in the levels
of dental decay between fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities (Ripa 1993).
The primary mechanism by which fluoride prevents the occurrence of dental caries is through its
influence on the demineralization and remineralization process (Featherstone 1999; Koulourides 1990;
Ten Cate 1999). The acid produced from the metabolism of sugars and fermentable carbohydrates by
cariogenic bacteria in plaque begins to dissolve or demineralize the enamel crystal surface of the tooth
resulting in the loss of calcium, phosphate, and carbonate from the tooth enamel. The increased acid
production results in a decrease in plaque pH and the release of fluoride from the dental plaque. This
fluoride, along with calcium and phosphate, is incorporated into the apatite molecule to form
fluor(hydroxyl)apatite. In the presence of fluoride, cycles of partial demineralization and then
remineralization will create apatite, which has less carbonate, more fluoride, and is less soluble.
Fluor(hydroxyl)apatite, which has high levels of fluoride and low levels of carbonate, is more acid
resistant (Chow 1990; Ericsson 1977; Featherstone 1999; Kidd et al. 1980; Ten Cate 1999; Thylstrup
1990; Thylstrup et al. 1979). When the beneficial effects of fluoride on caries prevention was first
discovered, it was believed that the incorporation of the fluoride into developing enamel resulted in
improved enamel and dental caries prevention (Dean et al. 1935; McClure and Likins 1951). However,
APPENDIX D
more recent data suggest that fluoride works primarily after teeth have erupted (Clarkson et al. 1996). In
a fluoride-rich environment, demineralization and remineralization cycling, which occurs throughout the
lifetime of the tooth, will result in teeth that are more resistant to cariogenic bacterial damage. Another
mechanism in which fluoride prevents dental caries is via a direct effect on cariogenic bacterial
metabolism. There are in vitro data that demonstrate that fluoride can inhibit bacterial metabolism of
carbohydrates, which results in a decreased production of acids (Bowden 1990; Bowden et al. 1982;
Marquis 1990; Rosen et al. 1978). However, it is likely that this would occur at fluoride levels that far
exceed those present in the mouth (Geddes and Bowen 1990).
Based on this relationship between fluoride and dental caries prevention, the Institute of Medicine (IOM
1997) and the World Health Organization (WHO 2002) consider fluoride to be an essential dietary
element. The Institute of Medicine has derived adequate intake levels (AIs) ranging from 0.01 to
4 mg/day (IOM 1997). The AIs for each age group are presented below:
Age Range Adequate Intake Level (mg/day)

0–6 months 0.01
6–12 months 0.5
1–3 years 0.7
4–8 years 1
9–13 years (males and females) 2
14–18 years (males and females) 3
>18 years (males) 4
>18 years (females) 3
Expert panels convened by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS 1991, 2000,
2001b) and the World Health Organization (WHO 1994) support optimal fluoridation of drinking water.
A work group assembled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (DHHS 2001b) made the
following recommendation:
“Because frequent exposure to small amounts of fluoride each day will best reduce the risk for
dental caries in all age groups, the work group recommends that all persons drink water with an
optimal fluoride concentration and brush their teeth twice daily with fluoride toothpaste. For
persons at high risk of dental caries, additional fluoride measures might be needed. Measured use
of fluoride modalities is particularly appropriate during the time of anterior tooth enamel
development (i.e., age <6 years).”
SUBSTANCE PROFILES
Tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl) Phosphate estimated to be between 9 million and 12 million lb (IARC 1979, 1999).
CAS No. 126-72-7 No data on imports or exports were available. Commercial production
was first reported in the United States in 1959 (IARC 1979, 1999).
Reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen
First Listed in the Second Annual Report on Carcinogens (1981)
Exposure
Br The primary routes of potential human exposure to tris(2,3-
CH2 dibromopropyl) phosphate are inhalation, dermal contact, and
ingestion. When released to soil, it leaches slowly to ground water, and
Br CH under basic conditions it will hydrolyze. In water, it will rapidly
CH2 hydrolyze. In the atmosphere, it will sorb to particulate matter and
O O react with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals (half-life = 3.74
H2
P C Br days). Since the compound is no longer produced in the United States,
O O CH the potential for exposure should be small; however, since CPSC has
H2
C CH2 H2C
determined that it is present in some consumer products, the risk of
Br CH Br exposure to tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate has not been
eliminated. The compound persists in fabric and plastics, making
Br
occupational and consumer exposure possible. The chemical was
Carcinogenicity widely used in children’s sleepwear and mattresses, which presents a
Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate is reasonably anticipated to be a continuing risk if the items are “handed down” or reused (EPA 1983).
human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in CPSC estimated that over a 6-year period, a child wearing clothing
experimental animals (NCI 1978, IARC 1979, 1987, 1999). When treated with tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate could absorb from 2 to
administered in the diet, tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate increased 77 mg of the compound/kg body weight. Approximately 180 µg/day is
the incidences of kidney tubular cell adenomas or adenocarcinomas in absorbed through the skin of children wearing treated polyester
rats of both sexes and male mice, hepatocellular carcinomas or pajamas (IARC 1979); more recently, the Commission indicated that
adenomas in female mice, and forestomach squamous cell papillomas concentrations may be higher. Since the compound is still available in
or carcinomas and bronchiolar/alveolar adenomas or carcinomas in the United States, it is likely that workers involved in its use are
mice of both sexes (NCI 1978). When administered topically, potentially exposed to the compound. The National Occupational
tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate increased the incidences of tumors Hazard Survey, conducted by NIOSH from 1972 to 1974, estimated
of the skin, lung, forestomach, and oral cavity in female mice (IARC that 29,000 workers were potentially exposed to tris(2,3-
1979, 1999). dibromopropyl) phosphate by dermal contact in the workplace,
No adequate human studies of the relationship between exposure primarily in the telephone communication industry (NIOSH 1976).
to tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate and human cancer have been This figure has probably decreased substantially since production was
reported (IARC 1987, 1999). banned. Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate does not occur naturally,
but it has been detected in food and water. EPA estimated that as
Properties much as 10% of U.S. production entered the environment from textile
Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate is a viscous, pale yellow or a dense finishing plants and laundries and that the remainder would have been
nearly colorless liquid. It is insoluble in water and miscible with disposed as solid waste (IARC 1979).
carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and methylene chloride. The
compound is hydrolyzed by acids and bases. Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)
Regulations
EPA
phosphate is available in the United States in at least two grades. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Typical impurities include 2,3-dibromopropanol, 1,2,3- Reportable Quantity (RQ) = 10 lb
tribromopropane, and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (HSDB 2001). Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
Toxics Release Inventory: Listed substance subject to reporting requirements
Use Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Listed Hazardous Waste: Waste codes in which listing is based wholly or partly on
Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate is no longer used in the United substance - U235
States. Previously, it was used primarily as a flame retardant additive for Listed as a Hazardous Constituent of Waste
synthetic textiles and plastics. It was also recommended for use in
phenolic resins, paints, paper coatings, and rubber. In 1977, the REFERENCES
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned the use of
tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate in children’s clothing and in fabric, ChemSources. 2001. Chemical Sources International, Inc. http://www.chemsources.com.
EPA. 1983. Draft Report: An Overview of the Exposure Potential of Commercial Flame Retardants. EPA Contract
yarn, and fiber when intended for use in such clothing. The ban, No. 68-01-6239. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Assessment Division.
however, was not fully enforced. In 1978, the Commission identified HSDB. 2001. Hazardous Substances Data Base. National Library of Medicine. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
22 products containing the compound that were commercially cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB.
IARC. 1979. Some Halogenated Hydrocarbons. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of
available, including children’s clothing, industrial uniforms, draperies, Chemicals to Humans, vol. 20. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 609 pp.
tent fabric, automobile headliners, epoxy resins for the electronics IARC. 1987. Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of
industry, Christmas decorations, and polyester thread (IARC 1979). Chemicals to Humans, Supplement 7. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 440 pp.
IARC. 1999. Re-evaluation of Some Organic Chemicals, Hydrazine, and Hydrogen Peroxide. IARC
Production Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, vol. 71. Lyon, France:
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1589 pp.
There were no reports that tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate is currently NCI. 1978. Bioassay of tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl) Phosphate for Possible Carcinogenicity (CAS No. 126-72-7).
produced in the United States (WHO 1995). Chem Sources identified Technical Report Series No76. DHEW (NIH) Publication No. 78-1326. Bethesda, MD: National
Institute of Health. 62 pp.
five U.S. distributors of the compound in 2001 (Chem Sources 2001). NIOSH. 1976. National Occupational Hazard Survey (1972-74). Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health,
The 1979 TSCA Inventory reported that three manufacturers produced Education and Welfare.
605,000 lb in 1977 (TSCA 1979). In 1975, domestic production was TSCA. 1979. Toxic Substances Control Act, Chemical Substances Inventory.
REPORT ON CARCINOGENS, ELEVENTH EDITION

SUBSTANCE PROFILES
WHO. 1995. tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl) Phosphate and bis(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate. Environmental

Health Criteria 173. Geneva: World Health Organization.
REPORT ON CARCINOGENS, ELEVENTH EDITION

Carnegie Mellon psychologist receives NIH grant
http://news.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news-3/Carnegie-Mellon-psychologist-receives-
NIH-grant-9110-1/
PITTSBURGH--Sheldon Cohen, the Robert E. Doherty Professor of

Psychology at Carnegie Mellon University, has received a $3 million
grant from the National Institutes of Health to continue his cutting-
edge research into the connection between physical health and social
factors, such as relationships and family upbringing.
Cohen is one of the world's leading health psychologists and one of the
architects of Carnegie Mellon's highly regarded health psychology
program. In 1997, he published a groundbreaking article in the Journal
of the american medical association demonstrating that people with
diverse social networks and greater sociability have better health
practices and increased resistance to disease.
The NIH grant will help Cohen and his colleagues to build on this work
by exploring two major questions. One, what is the impact of a
person's social environment on their health and well-being? The
researchers will take into account study participants' childhood
experiences, including the safety of their home and neighborhood,
their activities as children and their parents' social networks as well as
the nature of their current social activities and relationships. Next, the
researchers will try to determine which biological factors are influenced
by social well-being to impact health. Cohen already has established,
for example, that people with numerous and diverse relationships are
less susceptible to infection than others.
"What we don't know is how our social environment gets 'under the
skin' to influence our health," Cohen said.
Cohen's co-investigators on the grant are Margaretha L. Casselbrant,

William J. Doyle and Eillie Mandel at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh;
Anna Marsland and Bruce S. Rabin at the University of Pittsburgh; and
Ronald B. Turner at the University of Virginia.
Contact: Jonathan Potts

jpotts@andrew.cmu.edu
412-268-6094
Carnegie Mellon University
6-Jul-2005
Carnegie Mellon University
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Carnegie_Mellon_University
Carnegie Mellon University (also known as CMU) is a private Private

university research Research university University in
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Summary ,
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania , United States United States . It began as the
Carnegie Technical Schools, founded by Andrew Carnegie Andrew
Carnegie in 1900. In 1912, the school became Carnegie Institute of
Technology Carnegie Institute of Technology and began granting four-
year degrees. In 1967, the Carnegie Institute of Technology Carnegie
Institute of Technology merged with the Mellon Institute of Industrial
Research Mellon Institute of Industrial Research to form Carnegie Mellon
University. The University’s 140-acre main campus is three miles from
Downtown Pittsburgh Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and abuts the
campus of the University of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh in the
city's Oakland Oakland (Pittsburgh) neighborhood.
The University has seven colleges and schools: the Carnegie Institute of
Technology Carnegie Institute of Technology (engineering), the College of
Fine Arts Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts , the College of Humanities
and Social Sciences Carnegie Mellon College of Humanities and Social
Sciences , the Mellon College of Science Mellon College of Science , the
Tepper School of Business Facts About Tepper School of Business , the
School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science
, and the H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management Heinz
School .
Since its inception, Carnegie Mellon has grown into a world-renowned

institution, with numerous programs that are frequently ranked College
and university rankings among the best in the world. In the most recent
release of the Top 200 World Universities by Times Higher Education,
Carnegie Mellon was ranked 20th overall and 7th in technology. In the 2008
edition, U.S. News & World Report U.S. News & World Report ranked
Carnegie Mellon's undergraduate program 22nd in the nation amongst
national research universities, and in the 2009 edition its graduate
programs in Computer Science 4th, Engineering 7th, Business 17th, Public
Affairs 10th, Fine Arts 7th and Psychology 9th. The university attracts
students from all 50 U.S. states and 93 countries and was named one of the
"New Ivies Ivy League " by Newsweek Facts About Newsweek in 2006. Peer
institutions of Carnegie Mellon include Caltech Facts About California
Institute of Technology , Cornell Cornell University , Duke Duke University
, Emory Emory University , Georgia Tech Facts About Georgia Institute of
Technology , MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology ,
Northwestern Northwestern University , Penn University of Pennsylvania ,
Princeton Princeton University , Rice Rice University , and
Stanford Stanford University .
History
Post-Civil War American Civil War industrialists accumulated

unprecedented wealth and were eager to found institutions in their names.
Washington Duke Facts About Washington Duke at Duke University Facts
About Duke University , Leland Stanford Leland Stanford at Stanford
University Facts About Stanford University (for his late son), John D.
Rockefeller John D. Rockefeller at the University of Chicago University of
Chicago , Cornelius Vanderbilt Cornelius Vanderbilt at Vanderbilt
University Vanderbilt University , and Phoebe Hearst Phoebe Hearst at the
University of California, Berkeley Facts About University of California,
Berkeley were just a few. Carnegie Mellon University was one of such
schools.
Carnegie Technical Schools was founded in 1900 in Pittsburgh Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania by the Scottish American Scottish American industrialist
and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie Andrew Carnegie , who wrote the
time-honored words "My heart is in the work" when he donated the funds
to create the institution. Carnegie's vision was to open a vocational training
school for the sons and daughters of working-class Pittsburghers. The
name was changed to the Carnegie Institute of Technology Carnegie
Institute of Technology in 1912, and the school began offering four-year
degrees. In 1967, it merged with the Mellon Institute of Industrial
Research Mellon Institute of Industrial Research to become Carnegie
Mellon University. In addition, Carnegie founded Carnegie Mellon's
coordinate women's college Women's colleges in the United States ,
Margaret Morrison Carnegie College Margaret Morrison Carnegie College
in 1903 (the college closed in 1973).
There was little change to the campus during the period of the two World
Wars and the Great Depression Facts About Great Depression . A 1938
master plan by Githens and Keally suggested acquisition of new land along
Forbes Avenue, but the plan was not fully implemented. The period starting
with the construction of GSIA (1952) and ending with Wean Hall (1971) saw
the institutional change from Carnegie Institute of Technology to Carnegie
Mellon University. New facilities were needed to respond to the University's
growing national reputation in artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence ,
business, robotics, and the arts. In addition, an expanding student
population resulted in a need for improved facilities for student life,
athletics, and libraries. The campus finally expanded to Forbes
Avenue Forbes Avenue from its original land along Schenley
Park Schenley Park . A ravine long known as "the cut" was gradually filled
in to campus level, joining "the Mall" as a major campus open space.
The buildings of this era reflect current attitudes toward architectural style.
The International Style International style (architecture) , with its rejection
of historical tradition and its emphases on functionalism and expression of
structure, had been in vogue in urban settings since the 1930s. It came late
to the Carnegie campus because of the hiatus in building activity and a
general reluctance among all institutions of higher education to abandon
historical styles. By the 1960s, it was seen as a way to accomplish the
needed expansion and at the same time give the campus a new image.
Each building was a unique architectural statement that may have
acknowledged the existing campus in its placement, but not in its form or
materials.
During the 1970s and 1980s, the tenure of University President Richard M.
Cyert (1972–1990) witnessed a period of unparalleled growth and
development. The research budget soared from roughly $12 million
annually in the early 1970s to more than $110 million in the late 1980s. The
work of researchers in new fields like robotics Robotics and software
engineering Software engineering helped the university build on its
reputation for innovation and practical problem solving. President Cyert
stressed strategic planning and comparative advantage, pursuing
opportunities in areas where Carnegie Mellon could outdistance its
competitors. One example of this approach was the introduction of the
university's "Andrew" computing network in the mid-1980s. This
pioneering project, which linked all computers and workstations on
campus, set the standard for educational computing and established
Carnegie Mellon as a leader in the use of technology in education and
research.
Carnegie Mellon today

In the 1990s and into the 2000s, Carnegie Mellon solidified its status among
elite American universities, consistently ranking in the top 25 in US News
and World Report rankings. Carnegie Mellon is distinct in its
interdisciplinary approach to research and education and through the
establishment of programs and centers that are outside the limitations of
departments or colleges has established leadership in fields such as
computational finance Computational finance , information systems
management, arts management, product design, behavioral economics,
human-computer interaction, entertainment technology Entertainment
technology Overview , and decision science. Within the past two decades,
the university has built a new University Center, theater and drama building
(Purnell Center), business school building (Posner Hall), and several
dormitories. Baker Hall was renovated in the early 2000s, and new
chemistry labs were established in Doherty Hall soon after. Several
computer-science buildings, such as Newell Simon Hall, also were
established, renovated, or renamed in the early 2000s. The university is in
the process of building the Gates Center for Computer Science and
renovating historic academic and residence halls.
The Gates Center for Computer Science will sit on a 5.6-acre site on the
university's West Campus, surrounded by Cyert Hall, the Purnell Center for
the Arts, Doherty Hall, Newell-Simon Hall, Smith and Hamburg halls and the
Collaborative Innovation Center. It will contain 318 offices as well as labs,
computer clusters, lecture halls, classrooms and a 250-seat auditorium.
The Gates Center for Computer Science was made possible by a $20
million lead gift from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation . The building is anticipated to be completed within 2
years. The Gates Center for Computer Science and the Purnell Center for
the Arts will be connected by the Randy Pausch Randy Pausch Memorial
Footbridge.
On April 15, 1997, Jared L. Cohon Jared Cohon , former dean of Yale
University Yale University 's School of Forestry and Environmental
Studies, was elected president by Carnegie Mellon's Board of Trustees.
During Cohon's presidency, Carnegie Mellon has continued its trajectory of
innovation and growth. He leads a strategic plan that aims to leverage the
University's strengths to benefit society in the areas of
biotechnology Biotechnology Overview and life sciences, information and
security technology, environmental science Environmental science and
practices, the fine arts and humanities Humanities , and
business Business and public policy Public policy .
Campus
Carnegie Mellon's 140-acre main campus is three miles (5 km) from
downtown Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Overview , between
Schenley Park Schenley Park and the Squirrel Hill Squirrel Hill ,
Shadyside Shadyside (Pittsburgh) Overview , and Oakland Oakland
(Pittsburgh) neighborhoods. Carnegie Mellon is bordered to the west by
the campus of the University of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh .
Carnegie Mellon owns 81 buildings in the Oakland and Squirrel
Hill Squirrel Hill neighborhoods of Pittsburgh.
A large grassy area known as "the Cut" forms the backbone of the campus,
with a separate grassy area known as "the Mall" running perpendicular.
The Cut was formed by filling in a ravine (hence the name) with soil from a
nearby hill that was leveled to build the College of Fine Arts building.
The northwestern part of the campus (home to Hamburg Hall, Newell-

Simon Hall, Smith Hall, and the site of the future Gates Center for Computer
Science) was acquired from the U.S. Bureau of Mines in the 1980s.
Beyond Pittsburgh
In addition to its Pittsburgh campus, Carnegie Mellon has extension
campuses in Mountain View, California in the heart of Silicon Valley Silicon
Valley (offering masters programs in Software Engineering Software
engineering and Software Management); Education City Education City
in Qatar Carnegie Mellon University (Qatar) Summary ; and a new campus
in . The Adelaide campus, opened in May 2006, delivers masters programs
from both the H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and
Management and the Entertainment Technology Center. The Tepper School
of Business Tepper School of Business maintains a satellite center in
downtown Manhattan Manhattan and the Heinz School maintains one in
Washington, DC. Carnegie Mellon also maintains the Carnegie Mellon Los
Angeles Center in where students in the Master of Entertainment Industry
Management program are required to relocate to Los Angeles in their
second year and attend classes at this facility. Carnegie Mellon's
Information Networking Institute offers graduate programs in and , in
collaboration with Athens Information Technology and the Hyogo Institute
of Information Education Foundation, respectively. Starting in the fall of
2007, the cities of Aveiro Aveiro and will be added to the Information
Networking Institute's remote locations, and starting in 2008 the
Entertainment Technology Center will offer a graduate program in and
Singapore Singapore .
In media, entertainment & culture

The Carnegie Mellon University campus in Pittsburgh served as the locale
for many of the on-campus scenes in the 2000 film Wonder Boys Wonder
Boys (film) , starring Michael Douglas Michael Douglas and Tobey
Maguire Tobey Maguire . Other movies filmed at Carnegie Mellon include
The Mothman Prophecies Facts About The Mothman Prophecies (film) ,
Dogma Dogma (film) , Lorenzo's Oil, and Flashdance Flashdance . The
university is also featured prominently in the film Smart People Smart
People , starring Sarah Jessica Parker Sarah Jessica Parker and Dennis
Quaid Dennis Quaid Summary .
Schools and divisions
• The Carnegie Institute of Technology Carnegie Institute of

Technology includes seven engineering departments: Biomedical
Engineering Biomedical engineering , Chemical
Engineering Chemical engineering , Civil Civil engineering and
Environmental Engineering Environmental engineering ,
Electrical Electrical engineering and Computer
Engineering Computer engineering , Engineering and Public
Policy Public policy , Mechanical Engineering Mechanical
engineering , and Materials Science Materials science and
Engineering, and two institutes, the Information Networking Institute
and the Institute for Complex Engineered Systems.
• The College of Fine Arts Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts was
founded in 1905, and today is a federation of schools with
professional training programs in the visual and performing
arts Performing arts : Architecture Architecture , Art Art Overview ,
Design Design (ranked #1 MFA program in Multimedia and Visual
Communication), Drama Drama and Music Music . The college
shares research projects, interdisciplinary centers and educational
programs with other units across the university.
• The H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management offers
masters degrees in Public Policy Public policy and
Management Management Summary , Health Care Policy and
Management, Medical Management, Public Management Public
management Overview , Arts Management, Entertainment Industry
Management, and Information Security Policy and Management. The
school leads the Universitywide Master of Information Systems
Management and Master of Science in Information Technology
programs. It also offers a Ph.D. in Public Policy and Management as
well as executive education programs.
• The College of Humanities and Social Sciences Carnegie Mellon

College of Humanities and Social Sciences departments include
Economics Economics , English English studies , History HIStory ,
Modern Languages, Philosophy Philosophy ,
Psychology Psychology , Social and Decision Sciences Social and
Decision Sciences and Statistics Statistics Overview . The college
also offers an undergraduate degree program in Information
Systems Information systems Overview .
• The Mellon College of Science Mellon College of Science includes

four departments: Biological Sciences, Chemistry Chemistry ,
Mathematical Sciences and Physics Physics . In addition, the
college is expanding efforts in green chemistry Green chemistry ,
bioinformatics Bioinformatics , computational
biology Computational biology , nanotechnology Nanotechnology ,
computational finance Computational finance , sensor research and
biological physics.
• The School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon School of

Computer Science : Carnegie Mellon University helped define, and
continually redefines, the field of computer science Computer
science . The School of Computer Science is recognized
internationally as one of the top schools for computer science.
• The Tepper School of Business Tepper School of Business offers

undergraduate programs in Business Administration and
Economics Economics . The Tepper School offers masters degrees
in Business Administration and joint degrees in Computational
Finance Computational finance (MSCF) with the College of
Humanities and Social Sciences, the Mellon College of Science and
the School of Computer Science. In addition, joint degrees are
offered with Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Tepper School
offers doctoral degrees in several areas and presents a number of
executive education Executive Education programs.
In addition to the research and academic institutions, the University hosts

the Pennsylvania Governor's School for the Sciences Pennsylvania
Governor's School for the Sciences , a state-funded summer program that
aims to foster interest in science amongst gifted high school students. The
Cyert Center for Early Education is a child care center for Carnegie Mellon
faculty and staff, as well as an observational setting for students in child
development courses.
Undergraduate profile
For the undergraduate class of 2011, the admission rate was 28.0%. In
2007, the University received a record 22,356 undergraduate applicants, an
increase of 18.5% from 2006, and admitted 6,259. The 2006 class had an
average SAT verbal score of 657 and math score of 728. Also, 71% of the
admitted students for the class of 2010 were in the top 10% of their
graduating high school classes.
In 2006, the most selective undergraduate college was the Tepper School
of Business, which admitted only 13.9% of total applicants. The largest
college, in terms of enrollment, is the Carnegie Institute of Technology with
423 students in the class of 2011, followed by the College of Fine Arts (with
265 students) and the College of Humanities & Social Sciences (with 260).
The smallest college in terms of total undergraduate students is the Tepper
School of Business, with 93 undergraduate students enrolled for the class
of 2011. Carnegie Mellon enrolls students from all 50 states, and 13% of the
students are citizens of countries other than the United States. About 94%
of first-year students return for their second year, and 69.3% graduate
within four years (86.2% within six). Undergraduate tuition is $36,950 for
the class of 2011 and room and board is $9,660.
For the class of 2010, Carnegie Mellon had the highest overlap in
applications with Cornell University Cornell University , the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Facts About Massachusetts Institute of
Technology , and the University of Pennsylvania University of
Pennsylvania . The class of 2010 had the highest overlap in acceptances
with the University of Michigan University of Michigan , Johns Hopkins
University Johns Hopkins University Overview , and Washington University
in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis Summary .
Research
For the 2006 fiscal year, the University spent $315 million on research. The
primary recipients of this funding were the School of Computer Science
($100.3 million), the Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering
Institute ($71.7 million), the Carnegie Institute of Technology ($48.5
million), and the Mellon College of Science ($47.7 million). The research
money comes largely from federal sources, with federal investment of
$277.6 million. The federal agencies that invest the most money are the
National Science Foundation National Science Foundation and the
Department of Defense United States Department of Defense , which
contribute 26% and 23.4% of the total university research budget
respectively.
The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center

(PSC) is a joint effort between Carnegie Mellon University, University of
Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh , and Westinghouse Electric
Company Westinghouse Electric Company . PSC was founded in 1986 by
its two scientific directors, Dr. Ralph Roskies of the University of
Pittsburgh and Dr. Michael Levine of Carnegie Mellon University. PSC is a
leading partner in the TeraGrid TeraGrid , the National Science
Foundation’s cyberinfrastructure program.
The Robotics Institute Robotics Institute (RI) is a division of the School of

Computer Science and considered to be one of the leading centers of
robotics research in the world. The Field Robotics Center (FRC) has
developed a number of significant robots, including Sandstorm Sandstorm
(vehicle) Summary and H1ghlander H1ghlander , which finished second
and third in the DARPA Grand Challenge DARPA Grand Challenge , and
Boss, which won the DARPA Urban Challenge. The RI is primarily sited at
Carnegie Mellon's main campus in Newell-Simon hall.
The Software Engineering Institute Software Engineering Institute (SEI) is a

federally funded research and development center Federally funded
research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of
Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University, with offices in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Arlington, Virginia, and Frankfurt,
Germany. The SEI publishes books on software engineering Software
engineering for industry, government and military applications and
practices. The organization is known for its Capability Maturity
Model Capability Maturity Model (CMM) and Capability Maturity Model
Integration Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), which identify
essential elements of effective system and software engineering processes
and can be used to rate the level of an organization's capability for
producing quality systems. The SEI is also the home of CERT/CC CERT
Coordination Center , the federally-funded computer security
organization. The CERT Program's primary goals are to ensure that
appropriate technology and systems management practices are used to
resist attacks on networked systems and to limit damage and ensure
continuity of critical services subsequent to attacks, accidents, or failures.
The Human-Computer Interaction Institute (HCII) is a division of the School
of Computer Science and is considered one of the leading centers of
human-computer interaction research, integrating computer science,
design, social science, and learning science. Such interdisciplinary
collaboration is the hallmark of research done throughout the university.
Carnegie Mellon is also home to the Carnegie School Carnegie School of

management and economics. This intellectual school grew out of the
Tepper School of Business Facts About Tepper School of Business in the
1950s and 1960s and focused on the intesection of behavioralism and
management. Several management theories, most notably bounded
rationality Bounded rationality and the behavioral theory of the
firm Theory of the firm , were established by Carnegie School management
scientists and economists.
Alumni and faculty

There are more than 70,000 Carnegie Mellon alumni worldwide. Famous
alumni include former General Motors General Motors CEO and Secretary
of Defense, Charles Erwin Wilson Charles Erwin Wilson ; billionaire hedge
fund Hedge fund Summary investor David Tepper David Tepper Overview ;
James Gosling James Gosling , creator of the Java Java (programming
language) programming language; Andy Bechtolsheim Andy
Bechtolsheim , co-founder of Sun Microsystems Sun Microsystems ;
Vinod Khosla Vinod Khosla , billionaire venture capitalist and co-founder
of Sun Microsystems Sun Microsystems ; pop artist Andy Warhol Andy
Warhol Summary ; and astronaut Astronaut Judith Resnik Judith Resnik ,
who perished in the Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Challenger
disaster.
Carnegie Mellon alumni have won Nobel prizes, Turing awards, Academy
awards, Emmy awards, and Tony awards. John Forbes Nash Facts About
John Forbes Nash , a 1948 graduate and winner of the 1994 Nobel Prize in
Economics Nobel Prize in Economics , was the subject of the book and
subsequent film A Beautiful Mind A Beautiful Mind . Alan Perlis Alan Perlis
, a 1943 graduate was a pioneer in programming languages and recipient of
the first ever Turing award Turing Award . Overall, Carnegie Mellon is
affiliated with 15 Nobel laureates, ten Turing Award Turing Award winners,
seven Emmy Award Emmy Award recipients, three Academy
Award recipients, and four Tony Award Tony Award recipients (including
Andrew Omondi).
Carnegie Mellon also has produced several alumni who have had success
in Hollywood, Broadway Broadway theatre and the music industry. They
include Best Actress Academy award winner Holly Hunter Holly Hunter ,
actor James Cromwell James Cromwell , Get Smart Get Smart
Overview actress Barbara Feldon Barbara Feldon , actor Ted Danson Ted
Danson , director George Romero, actor Zachary Quinto Zachary Quinto
and actor Blair Underwood Blair Underwood , among many others.
Rankings and reputation

Carnegie Mellon's offerings in computer science Carnegie Mellon School
of Computer Science , engineering Carnegie Institute of Technology ,
business Tepper School of Business , public policy Heinz School ,
psychology, and the arts Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts are
considered among the best in their fields. Carnegie Mellon is ranked 22nd
amongst national research universities in the most recent US News and
World Report rankings. In the Times Higher Education Supplement (THES)
ranking of world universities, Carnegie Mellon ranks 12th overall in the
United States (20th in the world), fifth in the United States (7th in the world)
in the Technology category and 15th in the United States (28th in the world)
in the social sciences category. In 2007, Webometrics ranks Carnegie
Mellon 12th/13th in the World. The university is one of 60 elected members
of the Association of American Universities Association of American
Universities and its academic reputation has led it to be included in
Newsweek’s list of “New Ivies”.
Carnegie Mellon is ranked 4th for graduate studies in computer science in

2008, in rankings released by the US News and World Report. Carnegie
Mellon is also ranked #15 in the social sciences and #7 in
Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences among Shanghai Jiao
Tong University's world's top 100 universities. Detailed information on the
rankings of undergraduate and graduate programs at Carnegie Mellon is
available on the University website.
Student life
Traditions
• The Fence - In the early days of Carnegie Tech, there was a single
bridge, which connected Margaret Morrison Women's College with
the Carnegie Institute of Technology. The bridge was a meeting place
for students. In 1916, the bridge was taken down and the university
filled in the area. The senior class of 1923 put up a wooden fence to
be the new meeting place. The administration tried to tear it down,
but some fraternity brothers painted it as a prank to advertise a
fraternity party. Ever since, painting the Fence has been a Carnegie
Mellon tradition. The Fence at Carnegie Mellon lies at the center of
campus, in the area known as “the cut." Students “guard” the fence
24 hours a day, and, as long as this vigil is maintained, no other
students may “take” the fence. Once the fence is taken, however, the
painting traditionally happens between midnight and 6am.
• Mobot - "Mobot,' a general term resulting from shortening "mobile

robot," is an annual competition at Carnegie Mellon that made its
debut in 1994. In this event, robots try (autonomously) to pass
through gates, in order, and reach the finish line. There is a white
line on the pavement connecting the gates, and the line is normally
used to find the gates, though it is not mandated by the rules that the
robots follow the line.
• Spring Carnival - Usually held in April, Spring Carnival is the biggest

event of the school year. In addition to classic carnival attractions,
the Spring Carnival features the “Buggy Sweepstakes” and "Booth"
(a competition between various organizations to build small,
elaborate booths based around a theme chosen each year).
• Buggy Races - Buggy, officially called Sweepstakes, is a race

around Schenley Park Schenley Park . It can be thought of as a relay
race with five runners, using the buggy vehicle as the baton.
Entrants submit a small, usually torpedo-shaped, vehicle that is
pushed uphill and then allowed to roll downhill. The vehicles are
unpowered, including the prohibition of such energy-storing devices
as flywheels. They are, however, steered by a driver who is usually a
petite female student lying prone, arms stretched forward to steer via
a turning mechanism. Space is so tight inside the buggies that the
drivers usually cannot change position beyond turning their heads.
• Bagpipers - As the only College offering a degree in bagpipe music,

Carnegie Mellon's Pipe Band features the sounds of Scottish
bagpipes and performs at University events. Head of the Pipe Band
is world champion piper Alasdair Gillies, formerly a highly decorated
pipe major in the British Army.
• Autographing the Green Room - Seniors in the College of Fine

Arts Carnegie Mellon College of Fine Arts sign the Green Room's
walls and ceilings before leaving the university. Supposedly, Oscar-
winning actress Holly Hunter broke university tradition by signing
the Green Room during her freshman year.
• The Kiltie Band- Carnegie Mellon's Kiltie Band, dressed in full

Scottish regalia including kilts and knee socks, performs during
every home football game.
Fraternities and sororities
The Greek tradition at Carnegie Mellon University began nearly 100 years
ago with the founding of the first fraternity on campus, Theta Xi Theta Xi ,
in 1912. The Panhellenic sorority community was founded in 1945, by Chi
Omega Chi Omega , Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta , Delta
Gamma Delta Gamma , Kappa Alpha Theta Kappa Alpha Theta , and Kappa
Kappa Gamma Kappa Kappa Gamma . During the spring semester of 2006,
the Greek community consisted of 26 active fraternities and sororities: 5
Panhellenic sororities; 12 Interfraternity Council fraternities; 4 Asian
American groups, 2 fraternities and 2 sororities; and 4 National Pan-
Hellenic (historically African American) chapters represented on campus (3
fraternities and 1 sorority). Of Carnegie Mellon’s undergraduates, 965 were
members of social Greek-letter organizations. This number reflected 18.4%
of the campus population.
Current Interfraternity Council fraternities:
• Alpha Epsilon Pi Alpha Epsilon Pi

• Beta Theta Pi Beta Theta Pi
• Kappa Delta Rho Kappa Delta Rho
• Kappa Sigma Kappa Sigma
• Phi Kappa Theta Phi Kappa Theta
• Pi Kappa Alpha Pi Kappa Alpha
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon Sigma Alpha Epsilon
• Sigma Nu Sigma Nu
• Sigma Phi Epsilon Sigma Phi Epsilon
• Sigma Tau Gamma Sigma Tau Gamma
• Theta Xi Theta Xi
• Zeta Beta Tau Zeta Beta Tau Overview
Current Panhellenic sororities:
• Alpha Chi Omega Alpha Chi Omega

• Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta
• Delta Gamma Delta Gamma Overview
• Kappa Alpha Theta Kappa Alpha Theta
• Kappa Kappa Gamma Kappa Kappa Gamma
Current Pan-Hellenic Chapters (Historically Black):
• Alpha Kappa Alpha Alpha Kappa Alpha

• Alpha Phi Alpha Alpha Phi Alpha
• Kappa Alpha Psi Kappa Alpha Psi
• Omega Psi Phi Omega Psi Phi Overview
Current Asian-American fraternities and sororities:

• alpha Kappa Delta Phi Alpha Kappa Delta Phi
• Kappa Phi Lambda Kappa Phi Lambda
• Lambda Phi Epsilon Lambda Phi Epsilon
• Pi Delta Psi Pi Delta Psi Overview
Athletics
The Carnegie Mellon Tartans were a founding member of the University

Athletic Association University Athletic Association of the NCAA Division
III. Prior to World War II Carnegie Mellon (as Carnegie Tech) played with
NCAA Division I teams and in 1939 the Tartan football team earned a trip to
the Sugar Bowl Facts About Sugar Bowl . That same year, Robert Doherty,
university president at the time, banned the football team from competing
in postseason bowl games. Currently, varsity teams are fielded in
basketball, track, cross country, football, golf, soccer, swimming,
volleyball, tennis, and cheerleading. In addition, club teams exist in
Ultimate Frisbee, rowing, rugby Carnegie Mellon Rugby Football Club ,
lacrosse, hockey,, baseball, softball, and cycling. Carnegie Mellon Athletics
runs a comprehensive and popular intramural system, maintains facilities
(primarily Skibo Gymnasium, University Center, and Gesling Stadium), and
offers courses to students in fitness and sports. Carnegie Mellon's primary
athletic rivals are fellow UAA University Athletic Association schools Case
Western Reserve University Case Western Reserve University and
Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis .
The Tartans have an especially intense rivalry with the Washington
University in St. Louis Football Washington University in St. Louis football
team.
Football
In 1926, Carnegie Tech's football team beat Knute Rockne Knute Rockne
Overview 's Notre Dame Fighting Irish Notre Dame Fighting Irish football .
The game was ranked the fourth-greatest upset in college football College
football history by ESPN ESPN .
In 2006, the varsity football team was offered a bid to the NCAA Division III
playoffs, and became one of the first teams in school history (the first team
to win a Division III playoff game was in 1977, when Carnegie Mellon beat
Dayton) and University Athletic Association conference history to win an
NCAA playoff game with a 21-0 shutout of Millsaps College Millsaps
College of the SCAC conference. In addition to winning a playoff game,
several team members were elected to the All American and All Region
Squads. The 2006 team won more games in a single season than any other
team in school history. The current coach is Rich Lackner Rich Lackner ,
who is also a graduate of Carnegie Mellon and who has been the head
coach since 1986. Coach Erydl has been the offensive coordinator since
the dawn of time, and coached Dan Marino in high school. Him and Dan
Marino used to have titty size competions until the invention of Nutri
System. Eryd is still fat. Eryd also starred in the film, Happy Feet. Eryd has
his third chin pierced. He hangs out with Doug Hilling.
Crew
The Carnegie Mellon University Rowing Club is a club-sponsored

crew team organized by students of the university. They participate in
several regattas across the northeast, including the Dad Vail Regatta Dad
Vail Regatta in Philadelphia.
Track and cross country
In recent years, the varsity track Athletics (track and field) and cross
country Cross country running programs have seen outstanding success
on the Division III Division III national level. The men's cross country team
has finished in the top 15 in the nation each of the last three years, and has
boasted several individual All-America All-America ns. The men's track
team has also boasted several individual All-Americans spanning sprinting,
distance, and field disciplines. Recent All-Americans from the track team
are Brian Harvey (2007, 2008), Davey Quinn (2007), Nik Bonaddio (2004,
2005), Mark Davis (2004, 2005), Russel Verbofsky (2004, 2005) and Kiley
Williams (2005).
January 14, 2004
The Honorable Philip S. English

U.S. House of Representatives
1410 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Representative English:
The undersigned groups representing both health care providers, health professions
education institutions and health benefit providers enthusiastically support tax relief
provisions that are contained in the Higher Education Affordability and Equity Act of
2003 (H.R. 3412). We write to thank you for your sustained leadership on education tax
issues and pledge to work with you to pass this important legislation.
In particular, we are writing to support those sections of the Higher Education

Affordability and Equity Act of 2003 that would improve current law by:
?? Expanding student loan interest deduction to allow borrowers to deduct interest

payments on their student loans and increasing the income eligibility to claim the
full deduction up to $100,000 adjusted gross income (with a phase-out deduction
between $100,000-$115,000) for single taxpayers and up to $200,000 adjusted
gross income (with a phase-out deduction between $200,000-$230,000) for joint
return tax filers.
?? Excluding amounts received as part of a scholarship, fellowship or grant from

taxable income if used for qualified higher education expenses for
undergraduate and graduate recipients.
Please accept our enthusiastic endorsement for these critical provisions that would help
students finance their education and help health care professionals fulfill their dreams of
practicing to benefit all Americans.
On behalf of the following organizations:

Academy of General Dentistry
American Academy of Neurology
American Academy of Ophthalmology
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
American Academy of Periodontology
American Association for Dental Research
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
American Association of Clinical Urologists
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
American Association of Colleges of Podiatric Medicine
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
American Association of Public Health Dentistry
American College of Nuclear Physicians
American College of Nurse-Midwives
American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians
American College of Physicians
American College of Surgeons
American Geriatrics Society
American Dental Association
American Dental Education Association
American Medical Association
American Organization of Nurse Executives
American Osteopathic Association
American Podiatric Medical Association
American Psychological Association
American Student Dental Association
Arizona Dental Association
Association of Academic Health Centers
Association of American Medical Colleges
Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges
Association of Chiropractic Colleges
Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors
Child Neurology Society
Delta Dental Plans Association
Hispanic Dental Association
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Iowa Dental Association
Missouri Dental Association
National League for Nursing
National Medical Association
Nebraska Dental Association
Oklahoma State Medical Association
Society of Critical Care Medicine
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Special Care Dentistry
Virginia Dental Association
Washington State Dental Association
Coalition for an Affordable
and Accessible Graduate
Education
The Coalition is a group of graduate and professional student organizations, along with
individual universities and higher education groups, working together to make graduate
and professional education in the United States available to anyone with the desire and
skills to pursue it. We originally came together to address the question of tax exemptions
on graduate scholarships, and this page is a resource for information about that campaign.
Most Recent News
Legislative Action Day, September 22-23
We held yet another Legislative Action Day in September 2005, asking members to
support the HEAEA. This latest effort resulted in 11 more cosponsors, including another
member of the critical Ways & Means Committee. This is the most members of Congress
we have ever had signed on to our proposal, and represents major progress.
It is unclear when we will do another Washington-based day; our current plan is to

pursue a state-by-state strategy focused on Ways & Means members. However, you can
still write to your members of Congress using this action alert and ask them to support the
HEAEA!
We're On Television!
HEAEA gets local news exposure in Youngstown, Ohio. Rep. Phil English discusses his
plan, HR 1380 with students at Penn. State - Shenango and others. Click here to view the
newscast from this event.
Contact Your Legislators!
Our friends at the American Medical Student Association have put up a new action alert
at http://www.capwiz.com/ams/mail/oneclick_compose/?alertid=7207321 that will allow
you to write to your Senators and Congressperson with only one click! Please take action
now, even if you sent a letter through our old alert -- this is a new version that contacts
new people.
Join our mailing list for regular biweekly updates!

Bill Introduced in House
On March 17th, 2005, Representative Phil English of Pennsylvania introduced H.R.

1380, the Higher Education Affordability and Equity Act (HEAEA). The HEAEA
includes language that implements expanded tax exemptions for graduate scholarships, as
well as a number of highly important tax incentives for education. We have a number of
information documents about this bill, including a one-page summary, Phil English's
longer summary or the full text. When you're done, please send a letter to your
Representatives and ask them to support this bill! If you want to write your own letter,
we've even put together some talking points for you.
Legislative Action Day, February 17-18, 2005
On February 17-18, 2005, graduate and professional students once again traveled to
Washington, DC to talk to their legislators about the Higher Education Affordability &
Equity Act and other issues facing students. Graduate and professional students from
more than 30 Universities and Colleges from over 20 states met with nearly 100 members
of the House of Representatives urging their representatives to cosponsor H.R. 1380
when Phil English introduces the bill. On March 17th, 2005, Representative Phil English
introduced H.R. 1380 to the House where it has been referred to the Ways and Means
committee and the Committee on Education and the Workforce. Graduate and
professional students will once again convene in Washington D.C. over the summer to
ask their representatives to cosponsor H.R. 1380.
About The Campaign

In the News
Resources for Local and National Action
Our Supporters
About Our Campaign
Our goal is to broaden the tax exemptions on graduate and professional scholarships and
restore a functional status equivalent to what existed prior to the 1986 Internal Revenue
Code overhaul. Graduate scholarships generally include both direct tuition
reimbursement and a stipend for books, supplies, and living expenses. Although the Code
provides an exemption for scholarships (see 26 USC 117), this exemption only covers
tuition and required fees and books.
Because graduate education is preparation to be an advanced scholar in a particular field,

it does not follow as standardized a curriculum as undergraduate education. As such,
most books and supplies needed by graduate students (including personal computers) are
not considered "qualified educational expenses". Additionally, most graduate students are
older (meaning that they often have child care expenses) and cannot count on their
parents for financial support. The net result, as shown by the US Department of
Education's 2000 National Postsecondary Student Aid Survey is that while the average
aid received yearly by a graduate student is roughly $19,500, the average yearly cost of
education for that same student is $26,300. In an era where we are moving into a
knowledege-based economy, we cannot afford to drive people away from advanced
degrees by adding on this kind of debt.
Based on this clear need, we propose an expansion of the existing exemption for
scholarship aid. We initially suggested that the definition of "qualified educational
expenses" found in 26 USC 117 should be changed to be equivalent to the "cost of
education" defined in the Higher Education Act (20 USC 1087LL). Since then,
Congressional legislative counsel has found a better way -- linking graduate scholarships
to education savings accounts defined in 26 USC 529 where room and board are treated
as "qualified educational expenses". This achieves the same thing, but also makes the tax
code simpler, which is nice. You can see the exact language in the text of the HEAEA.
For more information on this proposal and the reasons behind it, we have prepared a fact
sheet and a PowerPoint presentation that give more details. You are also welcome to
contact Jim Masterson (lcc@nagps.org) , who coordinates this campaign.
Current Status
On March 17, 2005, Representative Phil English of Pennsylvania introduced H.R. 1380,
the Higher Education Affordability and Equity Act. The HEAEA contains a provision to
expand the tax-exempt treatment of all scholarships (graduate and undergraduate) by
expanding the definition of "qualified educational expenses" to include room, board, and
special needs services. It also includes provisions to make student loan interest more tax-
deductible, increase contributions to education savings accounts, and generally make
higher education more affordable at all levels. You can read a summary of the bill or the
bill itself, plus Mr. English's letter describing it.
We are currently working to build cosponsors for this bill. You can check the list of
cosponsors, and if your state's Represenatives aren't on it, send them a letter!
Resources
If you're interested in being part of the campaign or just want to know even more, we've
compiled a list of resources to help you.
• Since the focus of this campaign is now on the Higher Education Affordability &
Equity Act, the primary materials are our fact sheet on HEAEA, the longer bill
summary, talking points for students, and a sample support letter for the bill. We
also have available the full text of the bill and Rep. English's "Dear Colleague"
letter to Congress.
• If you'd like a quick way to contact your legislators, try the legislative center
provided for us by AMSA.
• We originally developed a fact sheet about the graduate tax exemption which is
still valid. It was last updated on November 6, 2003.
• For deeper analysis, we have prepared a statistical report which, using the state of
California as an example, explains more about the high cost of attending graduate
school and demonstrates the need for our proposed exemptions.
• If you're talking to a group about our work, you may want to use a version of our
PowerPoint presentation, which contains a lot more detail about policy history
and our lobbying efforts.
• We maintain several email distribution lists for people interested in receiving

regular updates. There are currently lists for graduate students, governmental
affairs professionals, and university administrators and deans. Click on any of the
links above to subscribe to that list.
• If you're trying to get your university on board, we have an example letter that
you can modify and send to your deans, provost, Chancellor, or other
administrators.<BR
Our Supporters
Groups that support the Coalition include:
• Student Associations
o National Association of Graduate-Professional Students (support letter)
o American Medical Student Association (action alert)
o Individual graduate and progessional student organizations, most notably

the University of California Student Association and the Graduate Student
Assembly at Carnegie Mellon University.
• University Associations
o Association of American Universities (House support letter, Senate
support letter)
o Council of Graduate Schools (support letter)
o American Council on Education (support letter), representing:
American Council on Education
Association of American Universities
Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities
National Association of College and University Business Officers
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant
Colleges
• Health Professions Associations (support letter)
Although their status prevents them from directly assisting our lobbying efforts, we have
also received expressions of support from foundations and institutes that fund scientific
and scholarly endeavors. For an example, see this letter from National Science
Foundation Director Rita Colwell.
If you represent a group that's interested in working on this campaign and helping to
make graduate education more affordable, please contact Jim (lcc@nagps.org)!
Jim Masterson, NAGPS Legislative Concerns Chair

Last modified: Mon Jan 30 17:54:01 EST 2006
Cut Fluoridation to Preserve Teeth, Yet Another Study
Shows
http://www.holisticmed.com/fluoride/nyscof030905.html
Tooth decay declined substantially in prevalence and severity when Hong Kong children
consumed less fluoride, indicative of a world-wide scientific trend revealing, with
fluoride, less is best; none is better.
In 1988, Hong Kong reduced water fluoride levels from 0.7 parts per million (ppm) to 0.5
ppm. By 1995, 31% fewer 11-year-olds had cavities with a 42% reduction in average
cavity rates, according to the Hong Kong Public Health Bulletin (1). Similar reductions
occurred in 1978 when Hong Kong's fluoridation rates were first cut from 1 ppm to 0.7
ppm (2).
Hong Kong's dental health is superior to the United States' (3), even though U.S. children
consume 1 ppm fluoridated water and brush with 1,000 ppm fluoridated toothpaste. And
Hong Kong children use lower concentrated (500 ppm) fluoridated toothpaste (4).
Evidence that eliminating fluoridation lessens decay:
• Seven years after fluoridation ended in LaSalud, Cuba, cavities remained low in
6- to 9-year-olds, decreased in 10- to 11-year-olds, and significantly decreased in
12- to 13-year-olds, while caries-free children increased dramatically, according
to Caries Research (5).
• East German scientists report, "following the cessation of water fluoridation in the
cities Chemnitz . . . and Plauen, a significant fall in caries prevalence was
observed," according to Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology (6) . . .
Surveys in the formerly-fluoridated towns of Spremberg and Zittau found "caries
levels for the 12-year-olds of both towns significantly decreased... following the
cessation of water fluoridation."
• In British Columbia, Canada, "the prevalence of caries decreased over time in the
fluoridation-ended community while remaining unchanged in the fluoridated
community," reported in Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology (7).
• In 1973, the Dutch town of Tiel stopped fluoridation. Researchers counted
decayed, missing, and filled permanent tooth surfaces (DMFS) of Tiel's 15-year
olds, then collected identical data from never-fluoridated Culemborg. DMFS rates
initially increased in Tiel then dipped to 11% of baseline from 1968/69 to 1987/88
while never-fluoridated Culemborg's 15-year-olds had 72% less cavities over the
same period, reports Caries Research (8).
In New York State, cavities and tooth loss are greater in fluoridated rather than in non-
fluoridated counties (9). In fact, tooth decay crises exist in most, if not all, large
fluoridated U.S. cities (10).
Sometimes stopping fluoridation has no effect as in Kuopio, Finland (11), and Durham,
North Carolina (12).
Some countries show lower decay rates in less fluoridated villages when compared to
higher fluoridated villages such as in Uganda (13, 14), the Sudan (15) and Ethiopia (15a).
In South Australia, dental examinations of 4800 ten- to fifteen-year-olds' permanent teeth

reveal unexpected results - similar cavity rates whether they drink fluoridated water or
not (16).
In the United States, despite living without fluoridated water, rural children's cavity rates
equal those of urban children, who are more likely to drink fluoridated water, according
to a large national government study of over 24,000 U.S. children (17).
And, to add insult to injury, cavity rates doubled (18) after water fluoridation began in
Kentucky (19).
References:
(1) Hong Kong Government, Public Health and Epidemiiology Bulletin 1998 -
http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/9802.htm
(2) Chart showing decline cavity rate -

http://www.info.gov.hk/tooth_club/prevent/flouride_water_e.htm
(3) Section 8 - http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/publicat/english/ohse8.pdf
(4) http://www.info.gov.hk/tooth_club/prevent/flouride_product_e.htm
(5) "Caries prevalence after cessation of water fluoridation in LaSalud, Cuba," Caries
Research Jan-Feb. 2000 -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
0601780&dopt=Abstract
(6) "Decline of caries prevalence after the cessation of water fluoridation in the former
East Germany," Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, October 2000 -
(7) "Patterns of dental caries following the cessation of water fluoridation," Community
Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, February 2001 -
(8) "Caries experience of 15-year-old children in The Netherlands after discontinuation of

water fluoridation," Caries Research, 1993 -
(9) "Fluoridation Fails to Reduce New York State's Dental Decay or Expenses as
Dentists' Promise," by Sally Stride, published February 1, 2005 -
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/11749/113458
(10) "Cavity Crises in Fluoridated Cities" -

http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof2/_pgg6.php3
(11) "Caries trends 1992-1998 in two low-fluoride Finnish towns formerly with and
without fluoridation," Caries Research, Nov-Dec 2000 -
(12) "The effects of a break in water fluoridation on the development of dental caries and
fluorosis," Journal of Dental Research, Feb. 2000 -
(13)
(14)
(15) Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Jan 6; "Severity of dental caries among 12-year-old
Sudanese children with different fluoride exposure," Birkeland JM, Ibrahim YE,
Ghandour IA, Haugejorden O. -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstr
act&list_uids=15635473
(15a) Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Oct, "The relationship between dental
caries and dental fluorosis in areas with moderate- and high-fluoride drinking water in
Ethiopia," by Wondwossen F, Astrom AN, Bjorvatn K, Bardsen A. -
(16) Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, August 2004 Consumption of

nonpublic water: implications for children's caries experience, byArmfield JM, Spencer
AJ. -
(17) Journal of Rural Health, Summer 2003, "Oral Health Status of Children and
Adolescents by Rural Residence, United States." by Clemencia M. Vargas, DDS, PhD;
Cynthia R. Ronzio, PhD; and Kathy L. Hayes, DMD, MPH -
(18) "The 2001 Kentucky Childrens Oral Health Survey: findings for children ages 24 to
59 months and their caregivers," Pediatr Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug; 25(4):365-72 by Hardison
JD, Cecil JC, White JA, Manz M, Mullins MR, Ferretti GA. -
(19) Oral Health Program, Kentucky Department of Public Health, May 2002 -
http://www.astdd.org/bestpractices/pdf/DES20001KYfluoridationsurveillance.pdf
For more information, contact:
Paul S. Beeber
President & General Counsel
New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation
PO Box 263
Old Bethpage, NY 11804
nyscof@aol.com
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof
e-CFR Data is current as of December 4, 2008
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-
idx?c=ecfr&sid=77ed7da9463357d9a09892213e5c74db&rgn=div8&view=text&node=21:2.0.
1.1.2.5.1.12&idno=21
Title 21: Food and Drugs

PART 101—FOOD LABELING
Subpart E—Specific Requirements for Health Claims
Browse Previous | Browse Next
§ 101.80 Health claims: dietary noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners and dental

caries.
(a) Relationship between dietary carbohydrates and dental caries. (1)

Dental caries, or tooth decay, is a disease caused by many factors. Both
environmental and genetic factors can affect the development of dental
caries. Risk factors include tooth enamel crystal structure and mineral
content, plaque quantity and quality, saliva quantity and quality, individual
immune response, types and physical characteristics of foods consumed,
eating behaviors, presence of acid producing oral bacteria, and cultural
influences.
(2) The relationship between consumption of fermentable carbohydrates,

i.e., dietary sugars and starches, and tooth decay is well established.
Sucrose, also known as sugar, is one of the most, but not the only,
cariogenic sugars in the diet. Bacteria found in the mouth are able to
metabolize most dietary carbohydrates, producing acid and forming dental
plaque. The more frequent and longer the exposure of teeth to dietary
sugars and starches, the greater the risk for tooth decay.
(3) Dental caries continues to affect a large proportion of Americans.

Although there has been a decline in the prevalence of dental caries among
children in the United States, the disease remains widespread throughout
the population, imposing a substantial burden on Americans. Recent
Federal government dietary guidelines recommend that Americans choose
diets that are moderate in sugars and avoid excessive snacking. Frequent
between-meal snacks that are high in sugars and starches may be more
harmful to teeth than eating such foods at meals and then brushing.
(4) Noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners, such as sugar alcohols, can

be used to replace dietary sugars, such as sucrose and corn sweeteners, in
foods such as chewing gums and certain confectioneries. Noncariogenic
carbohydrate sweeteners are significantly less cariogenic than dietary
sugars and other fermentable carbohydrates.
(b) Significance of the relationship between noncariogenic carbohydrate
sweeteners and dental caries. Noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners do
not promote dental caries. The noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners
listed in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section are slowly metabolized by
bacteria to form some acid. The rate and amount of acid production is
significantly less than that from sucrose and other fermentable
carbohydrates and does not cause the loss of important minerals from
tooth enamel.
(c) Requirements. (1) All requirements set forth in §101.14 shall be met,
except that noncariogenic carbohydrate sweetener-containing foods listed
in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section are exempt from §101.14(e)(6).
(2) Specific requirements —(i) Nature of the claim. A health claim relating
noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners, compared to other carbohydrates,
and the nonpromotion of dental caries may be made on the label or
labeling of a food described in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section, provided
that:
(A) The claim shall state that frequent between-meal consumption of foods
high in sugars and starches can promote tooth decay.
(B) The claim shall state that the noncariogenic carbohydrate sweetener
present in the food “does not promote,” “may reduce the risk of,” “useful
[or is useful] in not promoting,” or “expressly [or is expressly] for not
promoting” dental caries.
(C) In specifying the nutrient, the claim shall state “sugar alcohol,” “sugar
alcohols,” or the name or names of the substances listed in paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section, e.g., “sorbitol.” D-tagatose may be identified as
“tagatose.”
(D) In specifying the disease, the claim uses the following terms: “dental
caries” or “tooth decay.”
(E) The claim shall not attribute any degree of the reduction in risk of dental
caries to the use of the noncariogenic carbohydrate sweetener-containing
food.
(F) The claim shall not imply that consuming noncariogenic carbohydrate
sweetener-containing foods is the only recognized means of achieving a
reduced risk of dental caries.
(G) Packages with less than 15 square inches of surface area available for
labeling are exempt from paragraphs (A) and (C) of this section.
(H) When the substance that is the subject of the claim is a noncariogenic
sugar, the claim shall identify the substance as a sugar that, unlike other
sugars, does not promote the development of dental caries.
(ii) Nature of the substance. Eligible noncariogenic carbohydrate

sweeteners are:
(A) The sugar alcohols xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, isomalt, lactitol,
hydrogenated starch hydrolysates, hydrogenated glucose syrups, and
erythritol, or a combination of these.
(B) The sugars D-tagatose and isomaltulose.
(C) Sucralose.
(iii) Nature of the food. (A) The food shall meet the requirement in
§101.60(c)(1)(i) with respect to sugars content, except that the food may
contain D-tagatose or isomaltulose.
(B) A food whose labeling includes a health claim under this section shall
contain one or more of the noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners listed
in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section.
(C) When carbohydrates other than those listed in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of

this section are present in the food, the food shall not lower plaque pH
below 5.7 by bacterial fermentation either during consumption or up to 30
minutes after consumption, as measured by the indwelling plaque pH test
found in “Identification of Low Caries Risk Dietary Components,” dated
1983, by T. N. Imfeld, in Volume 11, Monographs in Oral Science, 1983. The
Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
incorporation by reference of this material in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain copies from Karger AG
Publishing Co., P.O. Box, Ch–4009 Basel, Switzerland, or you may examine
a copy at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition's Library, Harvey
W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD, or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_l
ocations.html.
(d) Optional information. (1) The claim may include information from
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, which describe the relationship
between diets containing noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners and
dental caries.
(2) The claim may indicate that development of dental caries depends on
many factors and may identify one or more of the following risk factors for
dental caries: Frequent consumption of fermentable carbohydrates, such
as dietary sugars and starches; presence of oral bacteria capable of
fermenting carbohydrates; length of time fermentable carbohydrates are in
contact with the teeth; lack of exposure to fluoride; individual
susceptibility; socioeconomic and cultural factors; and characteristics of
tooth enamel, saliva, and plaque.
(3) The claim may indicate that oral hygiene and proper dental care may
help to reduce the risk of dental disease.
(4) The claim may indicate that a substance listed in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
this section serves as a sweetener.
(e) Model health claim. The following model health claims may be used in
food labeling to describe the relationship between noncariogenic
carbohydrate sweetener-containing foods and dental caries.
(1) Examples of the full claim:
(i) Frequent eating of foods high in sugars and starches as between-meal

snacks can promote tooth decay. The sugar alcohol [name, optional] used
to sweeten this food may reduce the risk of dental caries.
(ii) Frequent between-meal consumption of foods high in sugars and

starches promotes tooth decay. The sugar alcohols in [name of food] do
not promote tooth decay.
(iii) Frequent eating of foods high in sugars and starches as between-meal

snacks can promote tooth decay. [Name of sugar from paragraph
(c)(2)(ii)(B) of this section], the sugar used to sweeten this food, unlike
other sugars, may reduce the risk of dental caries.
(iv) Frequent between-meal consumption of foods high in sugars and

starches promotes tooth decay. [Name of sugar from paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(B)
of this section], the sugar in [name of food], unlike other sugars, does not
promote tooth decay.
(v) Frequent eating of foods high in sugars and starches as between-meal

snacks can promote tooth decay. Sucralose, the sweetening ingredient
used to sweeten this food, unlike sugars, does not promote tooth decay.
(2) Example of the shortened claim for small packages:
(i) Does not promote tooth decay.

(ii) May reduce the risk of tooth decay.
(iii) [Name of sugar from paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(B) of this section] sugar does
not promote tooth decay.
(iv) [Name of sugar from paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(B) of this section] sugar may
reduce the risk of tooth decay.
[61 FR 43446, Aug. 23, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 63655, Dec. 2, 1997; 66

FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 67 FR 71470, Dec. 2, 2002; 71 FR 15563, Mar. 29,
2006; 72 FR 52789, Sept. 17, 2007]
Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines
PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANTSMANUFACTURING
WORLD BANK GROUP
Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines

for Phosphate Fertilizer Manufacturing
Introduction capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are

taken into account. The applicability of specific technical
The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are recommendations should be based on the professional opinion
technical reference documents with general and industry- of qualified and experienced persons.
specific examples of Good International Industry Practice
(GIIP) 1. When one or more members of the World Bank Group When host country regulations differ from the levels and
are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as measures presented in the EHS Guidelines, projects are
required by their respective policies and standards. These expected to achieve whichever is more stringent. If less
industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used stringent levels or measures than those provided in these EHS
together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which Guidelines are appropriate, in view of specific project
provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially circumstances, a full and detailed justification for any proposed
applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of alternatives is needed as part of the site-specific environmental
multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A assessment. This justification should demonstrate that the
complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: choice for any alternate performance levels is protective of
www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/Content/EnvironmentalGuidelines human health and the environment.
The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and Applicability

measures that are generally considered to be achievable in new
facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs. Application The EHS Guidelines for Phosphate Fertilizer Manufacturing
includes information relevant to facilities that produce
of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the
phosphoric acid, single superphosphate (SSP),
establishment of site-specific targets, with an appropriate
triplesuperphosphate (TSP), and compound fertilizers (NPK).
timetable for achieving them.
Annex A contains a description of industry sector activities. This
The applicability of the EHS Guidelines should be tailored to document is organized according to the following sections:
the hazards and risks established for each project on the basis
Section 1.0 — Industry-Specific Impacts and Management
of the results of an environmental assessment in which site-
Section 2.0 — Performance Indicators and Monitoring
specific variables, such as host country context, assimilative Section 3.0 — References and Additional Sources
Annex A — General Description of Industry Activities
1
Defined as the exercise of professional skill, diligence, prudence and foresight
that would be reasonably expected from skilled and experienced professionals
engaged in the same type of undertaking under the same or similar
circumstances globally. The circumstances that skilled and experienced
professionals may find when evaluating the range of pollution prevention and
control techniques available to a project may include, but are not limited to,
varying levels of environmental degradation and environmental assimilative
capacity as well as varying levels of financial and technical feasibility.
APRIL 30, 2007 1

WORLD BANK GROUP
1.0 Industry-Specific Impacts fuels and resulting in significant generation of greenhouse

gases. The nitrophosphate production route requires the use of
and Management
CO2. Recommendations for the management of GHGs, in
The following section provides a summary of EHS issues
addition to energy efficiency and conservation, are addressed in
associated with phosphate fertilizer plants, which occur during
the General EHS Guidelines.
the operational phase, along with recommendations for their
management. Recommendations for the management of EHS
Process Emissions – Phosphoric Acid Production
issues common to most large industrial facilities during the
Two different production processes can be used in the
construction and decommissioning phases are provided in the
manufacture of phosphoric acid:
General EHS Guidelines.
• The wet process, which is the most commonly used in
1.1 Environment fertilizer plants, where phosphate rocks are digested with
Environmental issues associated with phosphate fertilizer plants an acid (e.g. sulfuric, nitric or hydrochloric acid). The tri-
include the following: calcium phosphate from the phosphate rock reacts with
concentrated sulfuric acid to produce phosphoric acid and
• Air emissions calcium sulfate (an insoluble salt); and
• Wastewater • The thermal process, where elemental phosphorous is
• Hazardous materials produced from phosphate rock, coke, and silica in an
• Wastes electrical resistance furnace and is then oxidized and
• Noise hydrated to form the acid. Thermal-generated acid is highly
purified, but also expensive, and hence produced in small
Air Emissions quantities, mainly for the manufacture of industrial
Combustion Source Emissions phosphates;
Exhaust gas emissions produced by the combustion of gas or
Process emissions include gaseous fluorides in the form of
diesel in turbines, boilers, compressors, pumps and other
hydrofluoric acid (HF) and silicon tetrafluoride (SiF4), released
engines for power and heat generation, are a source of air
during the digestion of phosphate rock, which typically contains
emissions from phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facilities.
2-4 percent fluorine.
Guidance for the management of small combustion source
emissions with a capacity of up to 50 megawatts thermal
The emissions typically associated with the thermal production
(MWth), including air emission standards for exhaust emissions,
process of phosphoric acid include phosphate, fluoride, dust,
is provided in the General EHS Guidelines. Guidance for the
cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and radionuclides (Po-210
management of energy conservation, which can significantly
and Pb-210). Dust emissions, containing water-insoluble
contribute to the reduction of emissions related to energy
fluoride, may occur during the unloading, storage, handling and
production, is also presented in the General EHS Guidelines.
Production of phosphate fertilizers is an energy intensive
process typically requiring significant use of energy from fossil
APRIL 30, 2007 2

WORLD BANK GROUP
grinding of the phosphate rock, which is transferred to storage during the drying and neutralization phases of ammonium nitrate
and grinding sections by conveyor belts or trucks2. fertilizers. In addition, during the reaction of phosphate rock with
acid, limited amounts of organic compounds (including
Recommended emission prevention and control measures
mercaptans), present in the phosphate rock, are released and
include the following: may cause odor.3
• Properly select the phosphate rock (in terms of P2O5- Phosphate rock dust emissions should be prevented and
content, F-content, CaO/ P2O5 ratio, and physical quality) controlled through similar measures to those discussed in the
to minimize the amount of acid required in the wet phosphoric acid production section. Additional emission
production process, reduce emissions into the environment prevention and control measures include the following:
and increase the possibility of phosphogypsum reuse;
• Select proper size of screens and mills (e.g. roller or chain • Use of direct granulation may reduce the levels of fugitive
mills); emissions compared with curing emissions from indirect
• Use covered conveyor belts and indoor storage; granulation. If indirect granulation is used, the curing
• Apply good housekeeping measures (e.g. frequently section should be an indoor system with vents connected
cleaning / sweeping facility surfaces and the quay); to a scrubbing system or to the granulation section;
• Recover dust from phosphate rock grinding through use of • Use of plate bank product cooling systems to reduce air
properly operated and maintained fabric filters, ceramic flow requirements (e.g. instead of rotary drums or fluid bed
filters, and / or cyclones; coolers);
• Treat gaseous fluoride emissions using scrubbing systems • Consider use of fabric filters or high efficiency cyclones
(e.g. void spray towers, packed beds, cross-flow venture, and/or fabric filters rather than a wet scrubbing system to
and cyclonic column scrubbers). Fluorine is recovered as treat exhaust air from neutralization, granulation, drying,
fluosilicic acid, from which silica is removed through coating and product coolers and equipment vents, in order
filtration. A diluted solution of fluosilicic acid (H2SiF6) may to avoid creation of additional wastewater. Filtered air
be used as the scrubbing liquid. Recovering of H2SiF6 is should be recycled as dilution air to the dryer combustion
an additional possibility for fluoride emission reduction. system;
• Emissions from granulation should be minimized through
Process Emissions – Superphosphate Phosphate application of surge hoppers to product size distribution
Fertilizer Production measurement systems for granulation recycle control.
Dust emissions may be generated during unloading, handling,
grinding, and curing of phosphate rock, in addition to granulation Process Emissions – Compound Fertilizer Production
and crushing of superphosphates. Emissions of gaseous NPK fertilizers are typically produced from mixed acids or
hydrofluoric acid (HF), silicon tetrafluoride (SiF4), and chlorides nitrophosphate. Air emissions from NPK produced using the
may also generated from acidulation, granulation and drying. mixed acids route include ammonia emissions from the
Ammonia (NH3) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) may be generated ammonization reactors; nitrogen oxides (NOX), mainly NO and
2 IPPC BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000a) 3 IPPC BREF. October 2006
APRIL 30, 2007 3

WORLD BANK GROUP
NO2 with some nitric acid, from phosphate rock digestion in nitric • Treat gases from the digestion reactor in a spray tower
acid; fluorides from the phosphate rock reactions; aerosol scrubber to recover NOX and fluorine compounds. The pH
emissions, including ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), ammonium may be adjusted by the addition of ammonia;
fluoride (NH4F), and ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), formed in the • Reduce NOx and odor emissions by selecting high grade
gas-phase neutralization reaction between ammonia and acidic phosphate rock with low contents of organic compounds
components, as well as by sublimation from the boiling reaction and ferrous salts;
mixture; and fertilizer dust originating from drying and cooling • Control particulate matter emissions, as discussed in the
drums, and from other sources (e.g. screens, crushers, and phosphoric acid production section;
conveyors). • Prevent and / or control emissions from granulation and
product cooling include:
Air emissions from NPK produced using the nitrophosphate
o Scrubbing of gases from the granulator and the dryer
route are similar to those discussed for the mixed acids route,
in venturi scrubbers with recirculating ammonium
however they also include aerosol emissions (e.g. from the
phosphate or ammonium sulfo-phosphate solution;
dryer and granulator) of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), originating
o Discharge of scrubbed gases through cyclonic
from the reaction of ammonia and hydrogen chloride (HCl) when
columns irrigated with an acidic solution;
potassium chloride (KCl) is added to the powder.4 Other
o Use of high efficiency cyclones to remove particulates
significant air emissions include ammonia from the
from dryer gases prior to scrubbing;
neutralization of nitrophosphoric acid. Ammonia emissions may
o Recycling of the air coming from the cooling
also be generated from the calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (CNTH,
equipment as secondary air to the dryer after de-
empirical formula: Ca(NO3)2*4H2O) conversion section, the
dusting;
ammonium nitrate (AN, empirical formula: NH4NO3) evaporation
o Treating ammonia emissions by scrubbing with acidic
section, and the granulation or prilling sections. Aerosols of
solutions;
ammonium nitrate may also be formed during the different
• Fluoride emissions should be controlled through scrubbing
production steps, and emissions of hydrogen chloride (HCl) may
systems, as discussed for phosphoric acid production;
be present in the exhaust gases from drum granulators,
• Emissions to air from phosphate rock digestion, sand
cyclones, and scrubber systems.5
washing and CNTH filtration should be reduced by applying
Recommended measures to prevent and control air emissions appropriate controls (e.g. multistage scrubbing, conversion
include the following: into cyanides);
• Ammonia in off-gases from the nitrophosphoric
• Reduce NOX emission from nitric acid use in phosphate neutralization steps should be removed through counter-
rock digestion by controlling the reactor temperature,6 current scrubbers, with pH adjustment to most efficient
optimizing the rock / acid ratio, and adding urea solution; scrubbing condition (pH 3-4), with a mixture of HNO3
and/or H2SO4;
4 These emissions can cause the so-called “Tyndall-effect” creating a blue mist
• Ammonia emissions from the granulation / drying sections
at the stack. should be treated by scrubbing with acidic solutions;
5 EIPPCB BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000b,c)
6
High temperature leads to excessive NOX formation.
APRIL 30, 2007 4

WORLD BANK GROUP
• Minimize contact between wastes containing NOX and NH3 used for condensation and cleaning of vapors from process
to prevent aerosol formation in NPK nitrophosphate route; operations. Condensed acidic vapors may contain fluorine and
• Reduce aerosol emission by installing cyclones and small amounts of phosphoric acid. Water from the slurry used to
scrubbers; transport phosphogypsum, the by-product from wet phosphoric
• Reduce fluorides emissions by recycling of warm air. acid production, may be released as effluent if it is not
recirculated back into the process. Emissions to water for the
disposal of gypsum may contain a considerable amount of
Fugitive Emissions
impurities, such as phosphorus and fluorine compounds,
Fugitive emissions are primarily associated with operational
cadmium and other heavy metals, and radionuclides. Drainage
leaks from tubing, valves, connections, flanges, packings, open-
from material stockpiles may contain heavy metals (e.g. Cd,
ended lines, floating roof storage tank and pump seals, gas
mercury [Hg], and Pb),fluorides, and phosphoric acid. Specific
conveyance systems, compressor seals, pressure relief valves,
emissions to water from the thermal process of phosphoric acid
tanks or open pits/containments, and loading and unloading
production may include phosphorus and fluorine compounds,
operations of products.
dust, heavy metals, and radionuclides (e.g., Po-210 and Pb-
210). Recommended effluents management measures include
Recommended measures for reducing the generation of fugitve
the following:7
emissions include:
• Select phosphate rock with low levels of impurities to

• Selection of appropriate valves, flanges, fittings during
produce clean gypsum and reduce potential impacts from
design, operation, and maintenance;
disposal of gypsum;
• Implementation of monitoring, maintenance, and repair
programs, particularly in stuffing boxes on valve stems and • Consider dry systems for air pollution abatement (versus
wet scrubbing) to reduce wastewater generation. To
seats on relief valves, to reduce or eliminate accidental
reduce fluoride emissions, the installation of scrubbers with
releases;
suitable scrubber liquids may be necessary;
• Installation of leak detection and continuous monitoring in
all sensitive areas; • Recover fluorine released from the reactor and evaporators
as a commercial by-product (fluosilicic acid);
• Use of open vents in tank roofs should be avoided by
installing pressure relief valves. All storages and unloading • Scrubber liquors should be disposed of after neutralization
with lime or limestone to precipitate fluorine as solid
stations should be provided with vapor recovery units.
calcium fluoride, if the fluorine is not to be recovered;
Vapor processing systems may consist of different
methods, such as carbon adsorption, refrigeration, • Recycle water used for the transport of phosphogypsum
recycling collecting and burning. back into the process following a settling step;
• Where available, consideration should be given to use
Wastewater seawater as scrubbing liquid, to facilitate reaction of
Effluents – Phosphoric Acid Production fluorine to harmless calcium fluoride;
Effluents from phosphoric acid plants consist of discharges from

the vacuum cooler condensers and the gas scrubbing systems 7 IPPC BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000a)
APRIL 30, 2007 5

WORLD BANK GROUP
• Minimize contamination of the scrubber effluent with must be pumped with care to limit the risks of explosions. The
phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) by conveying vapors from main sources of nitrate and fluoride levels in effluent are the
vacuum flash coolers and vacuum evaporators to a scrubber liquors from phosphate digestion and sand (removed
separator to remove phosphoric acid droplets; from the process slurry) washing. Washing of sand also
• Minimize contamination of the scrubber effluent with generates phosphate content in the effluent.
phosphorus pentoxide P2O5 using entrainment separators.
Recommended effluent management measures include the
Additional phosphate removal can be achieved by applying
following9:
magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) or by calcium
phosphate precipitation;
• Recycle the sand washing liquor to reduce phosphate
• Consider decadmation of H3PO4 up to 95% by reactive levels in wastewater effluents;
extraction with an organic solvent.
• Avoid co-condensation of vapors from ammonium nitrate
evaporation;
Effluents - Superphosphate Fertilizer Production • Recycle NOX scrubber liquor to reduce ammonia, nitrate,
The main source of wastewater in phosphate fertilizer fluoride and phosphate levels;
production is the wet scrubbing systems to treat off-gases. • Recycle liquors resulting from scrubbing of exhaust gases
Contaminants may include filterable solids, total phosphorus, from neutralization;
ammonia, fluorides, heavy metals (e.g. Cd, Hg, Pb), and • Consider reusing effluents as scrubber medium;
chemical oxygen demand (COD). Recycling of scrubber liquids • Treat multi-stage scrubbing liquors, after circulation,
back into the process should be maximized. Production of through settling (separation of solids), and recycle the
acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR), a fertilizer product thickened portion back to the reactors.
consisting of a mixture of superphosphate and phosphate rock, • Consider combined treatment of exhaust gases from
in addition to superphosphate (SSP), and triplesuperphosphate neutralization, evaporation and granulation. This enables a
(TSP) products can reduce wastewater volumes8. recycling of all scrubber liquids to the production process
and reduce waste water generation;
Effluents - Compound Fertilizer Production • Treat waste water through a biological treatment with
Effluents are usually limited from NPK mixed acids route nitrification/denitrification and precipitation of phosphorous
facilities, mainly consisting of wastewater from granulation and compounds.
exhaust gas scrubbing.
Effluent from NPK facilities employing the nitrophosphate route Process Wastewater Treatment
may contain ammonia, nitrate, fluoride and phosphate. Techniques for treating industrial process wastewater in this
Ammonia is found in the effluents of the condensates of the sector include filtration for separation of filterable solids; flow
ammonium nitrate evaporation or the neutralization of the nitro and load equalization; sedimentation for suspended solids
phosphoric acid solution. Solutions containing ammonium nitrate reduction using clarifiers; phosphate removal using physical-
chemical treatment methods; ammonia and nitrogen removal
8 9
IPPC BREF (2006) IPPC BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000b,c)
APRIL 30, 2007 6

WORLD BANK GROUP
using physical-chemical treatment methods; dewatering and phosphogypsum from wet phosphoric acid production, and
disposal of residuals in designated waste landfills. Additional quartz sand from NPK production using the nitrophosphate
engineering controls may be required for (i) fluoride removal and route. Quartz sand should be separated, washed, and recycled
(ii) advanced metals removal using membrane filtration or other as a building material. There is limited hazardous waste
physical/chemical treatment technologies generated from the phosphate fertilizer manufacturing
processes. In addition to the industry specific information
Management of industrial wastewater and examples of
provided below, guidance on the management of hazardous and
treatment approaches are discussed in the General EHS
non-hazardous wastes is provided in the General EHS
Guidelines. Through use of these technologies and good
Guidelines.
practice techniques for wastewater management, facilities
should meet the Guideline Values for wastewater discharge as Phosphogypsum
indicated in the relevant table of Section 2 of this industry sector Phosphogypsum is the most significant by-product in wet
document. phosphoric acid production (approximately 4 - 5 tons of
phosphogypsum is produced for every ton of phosphoric acid,
Other Wastewater Streams & Water Consumption as P2O5, produced11). Phosphogypsum contains a wide range of
Guidance on the management of non-contaminated wastewater
impurities (residual acidity, fluorine compounds, trace elements
from utility operations, non-contaminated stormwater, and
such as mercury, lead and radioactive components12). These
sanitary sewage is provided in the General EHS Guidelines.
impurities and considerable amounts of phosphate might be
Contaminated streams should be routed to the treatment system
released to the environment (soil, groundwater and surface
for industrial process wastewater. Recommendations to reduce
water).Industry-specific pollution prevention and control
water consumption, especially where it may be a limited natural
practices include13:
resource, are provided in the General EHS Guidelines.
• Depending on its potential hazardousness (e.g. whether it
Hazardous Materials emits radon) phosphogypsum may be processed to
Phosphate fertilizer manufacturing plants use, store, and improve its quality and reused (e.g. as building material).
distribute significant amounts of hazardous materials (e.g. acids Possible options include:
and ammonia). Recommended practices for hazardous material o Production of cleaner phosphogypsum from raw
management, including handling, storage, and transport, are materials (phosphate rock) with low levels of
presented in the General EHS Guidelines. Manufacture and impurities
distribution of materials should be conducted according to o Use of repulping
applicable international requirements where applicable.10
Wastes 11 Gypsum contains a wide range of impurities (residual acidity, fluorine
Non-hazardous solid wastes may be generated from some compounds, trace elements such as mercury, lead and radioactive
components). IPPC BREF (2006)
phosphate fertilizer manufacturing processes, including 12 Phosphate rock, phosphogypsum and the effluents produced from a
phosphoric acid plant have generally a lower radioac-tivity than the exemption
values given in the relevant international regulations and guidelines (for
10For example, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) example, EU Directive 96/26/EURATOM)
Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides. 13 IPPC BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000a,b,c)
APRIL 30, 2007 7

WORLD BANK GROUP
• Use of di-hemihydrate recrystallization process with double prevention and control of physical, chemical, biological, and
stage filtration; radiological health and safety hazards described in the General
• If phosphogypsum can not be recycled due to the EHS Guidelines.
unavailability of commercially and technically viable
The most significant occupational health and safety hazards
alternatives, it should be managed as a hazardous or non-
occur during the operational phase of phosphate fertilizer
hazardous industrial waste, depending on its
manufacturing facilities and primarily include:
characteristics, according to the guidance in the General
EHS Guidelines.14 Additional management alternatives
• Process Safety
may include backfilling in mine pits, dry stacking15, and wet
• Chemical hazards
stacking.
• Decomposition, fires and explosions
Noise
Process Safety
Noise is generated from large rotating machines, including
Process safety programs should be implemented, due to
compressors and turbines, pumps, electric motors, air coolers,
industry-specific characteristics, including complex chemical
rotating drums, spherodizers, conveyors belts, cranes, fired
reactions, use of hazardous materials (e.g. toxic, reactive,
heaters, and from emergency depressurization. Guidance on
flammable or explosive compounds), and multi-step reactions.
noise management is provided in the General EHS Guidelines.
Process safety management includes the following actions:
1.2 Occupational Health and Safety
• Physical hazard testing of materials and reactions;
The occupational health and safety issues that may occur during
• Hazard analysis studies to review the process chemistry
the construction and decommissioning of phosphate fertilizer
and engineering practices, including thermodynamics and
manufacturing facilities are similar to those of other industrial
kinetics;
facilities, and their management is discussed in the General
• Examination of preventive maintenance and mechanical
EHS Guidelines.
integrity of the process equipment and utilities;
Facility-specific occupational health and safety issues should be • Worker training;
identified based on job safety analysis or comprehensive hazard • Development of operating instructions and emergency
or risk assessment, using established methodologies such as a response procedures.
hazard identification study [HAZID], hazard and operability study
[HAZOP], or a quantitative risk assessment [QRA]. As a general Chemical Hazards
approach, health and safety management planning should Ammonia and acids vapors, especially HF, are common toxic
include the adoption of a systematic and structured approach for chemicals in phosphate fertilizer plants. Threshold values
associated with specific health effects can be found in
14 The classification of phosphogypsum as a hazardous or non-hazardous internationally published exposure guidelines (see Monitoring
waste may depend on the level of radon emissions of the material. Removal of
this material from stack and subsequent disposal may be subject to specific below). In addition to guidance on chemical exposure provided
regulatory requirements depending on the jurisdiction.
15 It should be noted that dry stacking does not eliminate acid water seepage in the General EHS Guidelines, the following are
except in very arid climates.
APRIL 30, 2007 8

WORLD BANK GROUP
recommendations to prevent and control chemical exposure in and uniform temperature profile of the air inlet should be
this sector: ensured;
• Segregating process areas, storage areas, utility areas,
• Avoid contact of acids with strong caustic substances. The and safe areas, and adopting of safety distances.
resulting reaction is exothermic and may cause splashes;
• Implementing well controlled operation and procedures in
• Control fluoride gas build up in phosphoric acid storage avoiding hazardous gas and slurry mixtures;
tanks;
• NPK storage should be designed according to
• Install gas detectors in hazard areas; internationally recognized guidance and requirements18.
• Provide adequate ventilation (e.g. air extraction and Adequate fire detection and fighting system should be
filtration systems) in all areas where products are installed.
produced, stored, and handled;
• Storage areas should be cleaned before any fertilizer is
• Provide training and personal protection equipment for introduced. Spillage should be cleared up as soon as
personnel as described in the General EHS Guidelines. practicable. Fertilizer contamination with organic
Decomposition, Fire and Explosions substances during storage should be prevented; and
Decomposition16, fire and explosion hazards may be generated • Fertilizers should not be stored in proximity of sources of
from slurry pump explosions due to insufficient flow through the heat, or in direct sunlight or in conditions where
pump or incorrect design; slurry decompositions due to low pH, temperature cycling can occur.
high temperature and contaminated raw materials; and • Contact of phosphoric acid with ferrous metal component
hydrogen gas generation due to phosphoric acid contact with should be prevented. Stainless steel should be used for
ferrous metals. components possibly in contact with the acid.
The risk of decomposition, fire and explosion can be minimized 1.3 Community Health and Safety
by adopting measures such the following17:
Guidance on the management of community health and safety
impacts during the construction and decommissioning phases
• Inventory of ammonia, nitric and sulfuric acids should be
kept as low as possible. Supply by pipeline is common to those of other large industrial facilities are discussed
recommended in integrated chemical complexes; in the General EHS Guidelines.

The most significant community health and safety hazards
• NPK fertilizer decomposition hazard should be prevented
during the operation of phosphate fertilizers facilities relate to
through temperature control during production, adjustment
the management, storage and shipping of hazardous materials
of formulations, and reduction of impurities. Compound
and products, with potential for accidental leaks / releases of
build–up on the inlet vanes in the dryer should be avoided
toxic and flammable gases, and the disposal of wastes (e.g.
phosphogypsum, off-spec products, sludge). Plant design and
16 The manufacture, storage and transport of NPK fertilizers may generate a
hazard related to self-sustaining decomposition of fertilizer compounds with
ammonium nitrate at temperatures in excess of 130°C16. Decomposition is
dependant on product grades and formulations, and may release significant
amounts of toxic fumes. 18 See for example the EC Fertilizer Directives EC 76/116 and EC 80/876 and
17 EFMA. 2000b,c the COMAH Directive 96/82/EC.
APRIL 30, 2007 9

WORLD BANK GROUP
operations should include safeguards to minimize and control designed and operated facilities through the application of
hazards to the community, including the following measures: pollution prevention and control techniques discussed in the
preceding sections of this document.
• Identify reasonable design leak scenarios;
• Assess the effects of potential leaks on surrounding areas, Effluent guidelines are applicable for direct discharges of treated
including groundwater and soil pollution; effluents to surface waters for general use. Site-specific
• Assess potential risks arising from hazardous material discharge levels may be established based on the availability
transportation and select the most appropriate transport and conditions in use of publicly operated sewage collection and
routes to minimize risks to communities and third parties; treatment systems or, if discharged directly to surface waters,
• Select plant location with respect to the inhabited areas, on the receiving water use classification as described in the
meteorological conditions (e.g. prevailing wind directions), General EHS Guidelines. These levels should be achieved,
and water resources (e.g., groundwater vulnerability). without dilution, at least 95 percent of the time that the plant or
Identify safe distances between the plant area, especially unit is operating, to be calculated as a proportion of annual
the storage tank farms, and the community areas; operating hours. Deviation from these levels in consideration of
• Identify prevention and mitigation measures required to specific, local project conditions should be justified in the
avoid or minimize community hazards; environmental assessment.
• Develop an Emergency Management Plan with the

Combustion source emissions guidelines associated with
participation of local authorities and potentially affected
steam- and power-generation activities from sources with a
communities.
capacity equal to or lower than 50 MWth are addressed in the
Guidance on the transport of hazardous materials, the General EHS Guidelines with larger power source emissions
development of emergency preparedness and response plans, addressed in the Thermal Power EHS Guidelines. Guidance
and other issues related to community health and safety is on ambient considerations based on the total load of emissions
discussed in the General EHS Guidelines. is provided in the General EHS Guidelines.
Environmental Monitoring
2.0 Performance Indicators and
Environmental monitoring programs for this sector should be
Monitoring
implemented to address all activities that have been identified to
2.1 Environment have potentially significant impacts on the environment, during
normal operations and upset conditions. Environmental
Emissions and Effluent Guidelines
monitoring activities should be based on direct or indirect
Tables 1 and 2 present emission and effluent guidelines for this
indicators of emissions, effluents, and resource use applicable
sector. Guideline values for process emissions and effluents in
to the particular project. Monitoring frequency should be
this sector are indicative of good international industry practice
sufficient to provide representative data for the parameter being
as reflected in relevant standards of countries with recognized
monitored. Monitoring should be conducted by trained
regulatory frameworks. The guidelines are assumed to be
individuals following monitoring and record-keeping procedures
achievable under normal operating conditions in appropriately
and using properly calibrated and maintained equipment.
APRIL 30, 2007 10

WORLD BANK GROUP
Monitoring data should be analyzed and reviewed at regular purposes only and individual projects should target continual
intervals and compared with the operating standards so that any improvement in these areas.
necessary corrective actions can be taken. Additional guidance
on applicable sampling and analytical methods for emissions Table 3. Resource and Energy Consumption
and effluents is provided in the General EHS Guidelines. Industry
Product Unit
Benchmark
Table 1. Air Emissions Guidelines for Phosphoric Ton phosphate 2.6-3.5 (1)
Phosphate Fertilizers Plants Acid rock/ton P2O5
Pollutant Units Guideline Value Ton H2SO4/ton P2O5 2.1-2.3 (1)
Phosphoric Acid Plants KWh/ton P2O5 120-180 (1)
Fluorides (gaseous) as HF mg/Nm 3 5 m3 cooling water/ton 100-150 (1)

Particulate Matter mg/Nm 3 50 P2O5
Phosphate Fertilizer Plants NPK A KWh/ton NPK 30-33 (1)(2)

Fluorides (gaseous) as HF mg/Nm 3 5
Total energy for drying 300-320 (1)(2)
Particulate Matter mg/Nm 3 50
MJ/ton NPK
Ammonia mg/Nm 3 50
HCl mg/Nm 3 30 NPK B KWh/ton NPK 50 (1)(2)
500 nitrophosphate unit
NOX mg/Nm 3
70 mix acid unit Total energy for drying 450 (1)(2)
MJ/ton NPK
NPK C KWh/ton NPK 50-109 (2)

Table 2. Effluents Guidelines for Phosphate
NPK C m3 cooling water/ton 17 (2)
Fertilizer Plants NPK
Pollutant Units Guideline Value NPK C Ton CO2 required/ton 1(1)(2)

P2O5
pH S.U. 6-9
Total Phosphorus mg/L 5 SSP KWh/ton SSP 19-34 (2)
mg/L 20
kg/ton NPK 0.03 SSP m3 water/ton SSP 0.1-2 (2)
Fluorides kg/ton
Phosphorus oxide 2 Notes:
(P2O5) NPK PLANTS A Granulation with a Pipe Reactor and Drum with ammoniation
NPK PLANTS B Mixed Acids Process
TSS mg/L 50
NPK PLANTS C Nitrophosphate Process
Cadmium mg/L 0.1 1. European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association (EFMA). 2000.
Total Nitrogen mg/L 15 2. EU IPPC - Reference Document on Best Available Tec hniques in Large Volume
Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilizers Industries. December
Ammonia mg/L 10
2006
Total Metals mg/L 10
Resource Use and Energy Consumption,

Emission and Waste Generation
Table 3 provides examples of resource consumption indicators
for energy and water in this sector. Table 4 provides examples
of emission and waste generation indicators in this sector.
Industry benchmark values are provided for comparative
APRIL 30, 2007 11

WORLD BANK GROUP
Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH),19 the Pocket

Table 4. Emissions, Effluents and Waste
Generation Guide to Chemical Hazards published by the United States
Industry National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH),20

Parameter Unit
Benchmark Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) published by the
Phosphoric acid plants Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the United
Fluoride SO2 mg/Nm 3kg/ton HF 5–300.001 – 0.01 States (OSHA),21 Indicative Occupational Exposure Limit Values
Solid Waste Generation ton/ton P2O5 3.2/4-5 (1) published by European Union member states,22 or other similar
(phosphogypsum) sources.
(thermal/wet process)
NPK Production – Nitrophosphate Process
Accident and Fatality Rates
NH3 air emissions kg/ton P2O5 0.2
Projects should try to reduce the number of accidents among
NOX (as NO2) air kg/ton P2O5 1.0
emissions project workers (whether directly employed or subcontracted) to
Fluoride airFluorides air kg/ton P2O5 0.01 a rate of zero, especially accidents that could result in lost work
emissions
time, different levels of disability, or even fatalities. Facility rates
Total nitrogen effluents kg/ton P2O5 0.001 – 0.01
may be benchmarked against the performance of facilities in this
P2O5 effluents kg/ton P2O5 1.2
sector in developed countries through consultation with
Fluorides effluents kg/ton P2O5 0.7
published sources (e.g. US Bureau of Labor Statistics and UK
NPK Production – Mixed Acids Process
Health and Safety Executive)23.
NH3 emissions kg/ton NPK 0.2
NOX (as NO2) emissions kg/ton NPK 0.3

Occupational Health and Safety Monitoring
Fluorides emissions kg/ton NPK 0.02
The working environment should be monitored for occupational
Dust emissions kg/ton NPK 0.2
hazards relevant to the specific project. Monitoring should be
Total nitrogen effluents kg/ton NPK 0.2
designed and implemented by accredited professionals24 as part
Fluorides effluents kg/ton NPK 0.03
of an occupational health and safety monitoring program.
Fluorides air emissions mg/Nm 3 0.4-4
Facilities should also maintain a record of occupational
Dust air emissions mg/Nm 3 30-50 accidents and diseases and dangerous occurrences and
Chloride air emissions mg/Nm 3 19-20 accidents. Additional guidance on occupational health and
safety monitoring programs is provided in the General EHS
2.2 Occupational Health and Safety Guidelines.
Performance
Occupational Health and Safety Guidelines 19 Available at: http://www.acgih.org/TLV/ and http://www.acgih.org/store/
20 Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/
Occupational health and safety performance should be 21 Available at:
evaluated against internationally published exposure guidelines, http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDAR

DS&p_id=9992
22 Available at: http://europe.osha.eu.int/good_practice/risks/ds/oel/
of which examples include the Threshold Limit Value (TLV®) 23 Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/ and
occupational exposure guidelines and Biological Exposure http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/index.htm

24 Accredited professionals may include Certified Industrial Hygienists,
Indices (BEIs®) published by American Conference of Registered Occupational Hygienists, or Certified Safety Professionals or their
equivalent.
APRIL 30, 2007 12

PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANTS
WORLD BANK GROUP
3.0 References and Additional Sources

European Commission. 2006. European Integrated Pollution Prevention and US EPA. 40 CFR Part 63, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Control Bureau (EIPPCB). Reference Document on Best Available Techniques Pollutants for Source Categories: Subpart AA—National Emission Standards for
in Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilizers. Seville: Hazardous Air Pollutants from Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants.
EIPPCB. Available at http://eippcb.jrc.es/pages/FActivities.htm Washington, DC: US EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-
I.info/
European Fertilizer Manufacturer’s Association (EFMA). 2000a. Best Available
Techniques (BAT) Production of Phosphoric Acid (Booklet No. 4). Brussels: US EPA. 40 CFR Part 418 Fertilizer Manufacturing Point Source Category.
EFMA. Available at http://www.efma.org/Publications/ Subpart A—Phosphate Subcategory. Washington, DC: US EPA. Available at
http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.info/
EFMA. 2000b. BAT Production of NPK Fertilizers by the Nitrophosphate Route
(Booklet No. 7). Brussels: EFMA. Available at http://www.efma.org/Publications/ US EPA. 40 CFR Part 418 Fertilizer Manufacturing Point Source Category.
Subpart G—Mixed and Blend Fertilizer Production Subcategory. Washington,
EFMA. 2000c. BAT Production of NPK Fertilizers by the Mixed Acid Route DC: US EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.info/
(Booklet No. 8). Brussels: EFMA. Available at http://www.efma.org/Publications/
US EPA. 40 CFR Part 422 Phosphate Manufacturing Point Source Category.
EFMA and International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA). 1992. Handbook Washington, DC: US EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-
for the Safe Storage of Ammonium Nitrate Based Fertilizers. Zurich/Paris: I.info/
EFMA/IFA. Available at http://www.efma.org/publications/
German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear
Safety (BMU). 2004. Waste Water Ordinance – AbwV. (Ordinance on
Requirements for the Discharge of Waste Water into Waters). Promulgation of
the New Version of the Waste Water Ordinance of 17 June 2004. Berlin: BMU.
Available at
http://www.bmu.de/english/water_management/downloads/doc/3381.php
German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear
Safety (BMU). 2002. First General Administrative Regulation Pertaining to the
Federal Emission Control Act (Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control – TA
Luft). Berlin: BMU. Available at
http://www.bmu.de/english/air_pollution_control/ta_luft/doc/36958.php
United Kingdom (UK) Environmental Agency. 2002. Sector Guidance Note

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IIPC) S4.03. Guidance for the
Inorganic Chem icals Sector. Bristol: Environment Agency. Available at
http://www.environment-
agency.gov.uk/business/444304/1290036/1290086/1290209/1308462/1245952/
International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA) / United Nations Environment

Programmme (UNEP) / United Nations Industrial Development Organization
(UNIDO). 1998. The Fertilizer Industry's Manufacturing Processes and
Environmental Issues. (Technical Report No. 26, Part 1). Paris:
IFA/UNEP/UNIDO.
United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1995. Office of

Compliance. Sector Notebook Project. Profile of the Inorganic Chemical
Industry. Washington, DC: US EPA. Available at
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/publications/assistance/sectors/noteb
ooks/inorganic.html
US EPA. 40 CFR Part 60, Standards of Performance for New and Existing
Stationary Sources: Subpart T—Standards of Performance for the Phosphate
Fertilizer Industry: Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid Plants. Washington, DC: US
EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.info/
US EPA. 40 CFR Part 60, Standards of Performance for New and Existing
Stationary Sources: Subpart W—Standards of Performance for the Phosphate
Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate Plants. Washington, DC: US EPA.
Available at http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.info/
APRIL 30, 2007 13

WORLD BANK GROUP
Annex A: General Description of Industry Activities

A modern phosphate fertilizer manufacturing complex is the remaining SO2 in the acid. The SO2 laden air is returned to
characterized by large volume productions and is normally the process.
highly integrated with upstream (e.g. ammonia, and acids such
as nitric, sulfuric, and phosphoric) and downstream (e.g. Phosphoric Acid
ammonium nitrate and calcium ammonium nitrate) production Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) is primarily used in the manufacture of
with the aim at optimizing production cost, logistics, safety and phosphate salts (e.g. for fertilizers and animal feed
environmental protection (Figure A.1). Phosphate fertilizer supplements). Two different processes can be used in the
plants may produce single (or normal) superphosphate (SSP) manufacture of phosphoric acid. In the first process, known as
and triple superphosphate (TSP); mixed fertilizers such as the thermal process, elemental phosphorous is produced from
Mono-Ammonium Phosphate (MAP) and Di-Ammonium phosphate rock, coke, and silica in an electrical resistance
Phosphate (DAP); and all grades of compound fertilizers (NPK) furnace and is then oxidized and hydrated to form the acid.
using the nitrophosphate / nitric acid route and the mixed acid / Thermal-generated acid is highly purified, but also expensive,
sulfuric acid route. Facilities are usually equipped with an and hence produced in small quantities, mainly for the
integrated steam and electric power distribution grid servicing all manufacture of industrial phosphates.
the plants and supplied by a central steam boiler and power
The second type of process, known as the wet process, involves
station. A waste water treatment plant is usually present.
digesting phosphate rocks with an acid (e.g. sulfuric, nitric or
Sulfuric Acid hydrochloric acid). The tri-calcium phosphate from the

phosphate rock reacts with concentrated sulfuric acid to produce
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is used in the phosphate fertilizer industry
phosphoric acid and calcium sulfate, which is an insoluble salt.
for the production of phosphoric acid. Sulfuric acid is
The operating conditions are generally designed so that the
manufactured mainly from sulfur dioxide (SO2), produced
through the combustion of elemental sulfur. The exothermic calcium sulfate is precipitated as anhydrite, hemihydrate (HH)
and dihydrate (DH).
oxidation of sulfur dioxide over several layers of a suitable
catalyst (e.g. vanadium pentoxide) to produce sulfur trioxide
Different processes are needed because of different rocks and
(SO3) is the most common process in sulfuric acid
gypsum disposal systems.26 The main production steps include
manufacturing plants.25
grinding of phosphate rock (if necessary); reaction with sulfuric
acid in a series of separate agitated reactors at a temperature of
Sulfuric acid is obtained from the absorption of SO3 and water
70-80°C, filtration to separate the phosphoric acid from the
into H2SO4 (with a concentration of at least 98 percent) in
absorbers installed after multiple catalyst layers. The warm acid calcium sulfate; and concentration up to commercial phosphoric
acid with a concentration of 52-54 percent phosphorus
produced is sparged with air in a column or in a tower to collect
pentoxide (P2O5).
25 IPPC BREF (2006) 26 EIPPCB BREF (2006) and EFMA (2000a)
APRIL 30, 2007 14

WORLD BANK GROUP
When the phosphoric acid plant is linked to a sulfuric acid plant, sprayed onto recycled fertilizer fines in a granulator. Granules
the high-pressure steam produced in the waste heat recovery grow and are then discharged to a dryer, screened, and sent to
boiler from the sulfuric acid is normally used to produce electric storage.29
power, and the low-pressure exhaust steam is used for
phosphoric acid vacuum concentration. The steam consumption Compound Fertilizers (NPK)
needed for the concentration can be reduced by using waste Compound fertilizers are a large group of products, varying
heat originating in the sulfuric acid plant. This may be recovered based on the particular nitrogen / phosphorus / potassium
as heated water and used in the process of concentrating weak (N/P/K) ratios. Production processes are also numerous and
acid to intermediate concentration. Phosphoric acid is most product types include PK, NP (e.g. DAP), NK and NPK. This
commonly stored in rubber-lined steel tanks, although stainless can be achieved by using two different routes, namely
steel, polyester and polyethylene-lined concrete are also used. production by the nitrophosphate route, and production by the
Storage tanks are normally equipped to keep the solids in mixed acid route.
suspension to avoid costly cleaning of the tank27.
Nitrophosphate Route
Phosphate Fertilizers (SSP / TSP) The integrated nitrophosphate (NP) process produces
Phosphate fertilizers are produced by adding acid to ground or compound fertilizers (NPK) containing ammonium nitrate,
pulverized phosphate rock. If sulfuric acid is used, single or phosphate, and potassium salts (Figure A.2). The integrated
normal, superphosphate (SSP) is produced, with a phosphorus process starts with the dissolution of the phosphate rock in nitric
content of 16–21 percent as phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5). acid. Varying amounts of volatile compounds, such as carbon
SSP production involves mixing the sulfuric acid and the rock in dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and hydrogen fluoride
a reactor. The reaction mixture is discharged onto a slow- (HF), may be emitted, depending on the phosphate rock
moving conveyor belt. If the reaction The mixture is directly fed characteristics. The resulting digestion solution contains
to a granulator, the process is the so called “direct” granulation. different amounts of suspended solids (e.g. quartz sand) that
In “indirect” granulation, the reaction mixture is stored for are removed by centrifuges, hydrocyclones or, lamella
“curing” for 4 to 6 weeks before bagging and then granulated.28 separators.30 After washing, the solids can be reused in the
building industry.
If phosphoric acid is used to acidulate the phosphate rock, triple
superphosphate (TSP) is produced with a phosphorus content The liquor obtained from the process contains calcium ions in a
of 43–48 percent as P2O5. Two processes are used to produce proportion that too high to guarantee the production of plant
TSP fertilizers: run-of-pile and granulation. The run-of-pile available P2O5. The solution is therefore cooled so that calcium
process is similar to the SSP process. Granular TSP uses nitrate tetrahydrate (CNTH) crystallizes out. The solution of
lower-strength phosphoric acid (40 percent, compared with 50 phosphoric acid, remaining calcium nitrate, and nitric acid,
percent for run-of-pile method). The reaction mixture, a slurry, is called nitrophosphoric acid, can be separated from the CNTH
27 EFMA (2000a) 29 EIPPCB BREF (2006)

28 EIPPCB BREF (2006) 30 EFMA (2000b)
APRIL 30, 2007 15

WORLD BANK GROUP
crystals by filtration. The nitrophosphoric acid is then neutralized In spherodizer granulation, the slurry is sprayed into a special
with ammonia, mixed with potassium / magnesium salts, sulfate rotating drum, called a spherodizer, where warm air, heated to
and/or micro-nutrients, and converted to NPK in a rotary 300-400°C, flows co-currently thus evaporating the water
granulation drum, fluidized bed, prilling tower, or pug-mill to building up on granules.35
obtain solid compound fertilizers.31
In all processes, the dry NPK granules are screened. The on-
The separated calcium nitrate crystals are dissolved in an size fraction passes to the conditioning process, and the over-
ammonium nitrate solution and treated with an ammonium size fractions are taken out, crushed and recycled together with
carbonate solution. This solution is filtered to remove the the under-size fractions. The screen, crusher, and conveyor
calcium carbonate crystals and it is used for the production of discharges are de-dusted using the air required for granulation.
granular calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fertilizer. The The commercial product from the drying and screening is cooled
resulting dilute ammonium nitrate solution is concentrated and in a fluidized bed, a bulk flow heat exchanger, or a rotating
also used to produce CAN or NPK. The calcium nitrate solution drum. Off-gases from these latter stages, containing minor
may also be neutralized and evaporated to obtain a solid amounts of dust, and generally no ammonia, are de-dusted in
fertilizer.32 cyclones. Finally, the product is cooled and coated before
storage, to minimize the subsequent caking of the material. The
Three types of processes are normally used for the production
coating consists of a treatment with an organic agent and
of NPK fertilizers from the NP liquor, namely prilling, drum or
inorganic powder, added in a drum. The calcium nitrate crystals
pug-mill, and spherodizer granulation. In prilling, NP liquor,
from the nitrophosphate process can be processed to a solid
mixed with the required salts and recycled product, overflows calcium nitrate (CN) fertilizer, using prilling or pan-granulation
into a rotating prill bucket from which the slurry is sprayed into
technology, as an alternative to the combination of CNTH
the prill tower. Fans at the top of the tower cause ambient air to
conversion and subsequent processing to CAN.36
flow counter-current to the droplets formed by solidification.33
Mixed Acid Route
In drum or pug-mill granulation, the NP liquor, together with
Processes applied in the mixed acid route of production are
required salts and recycled products, is sprayed into a rotating
numerous, the most common including granulation with a pipe
drum granulator where granules formed are dried in a rotating
reactor system; drum granulation with ammoniation; and a
drying drum with hot air. The air leaving the drums contains
mixed acid process with phosphate rock digestion.37 A simplified
water vapor, dust, ammonia and combustion gases. The air
flow chart showing the three processes together is presented on
from the granulation and drying drums is treated in high
Figure A.3.
performance cyclones.34
Granulation with a pipe reactor system works with a classical
granulation loop with one or two pipe reactors. One pipe reactor
31 Ibid.
32 Ibid 35 Ibid
33 Ibid 36 EFMA (2000b)
34 Ibid 37
EFMA (2000c)
APRIL 30, 2007 16

WORLD BANK GROUP
is fitted in the granulator and another may be used in the dryer. is being recycled is fed to the pipe reactor in the granulator.
Phosphoric acid or a mixture of phosphoric and sulfuric acids is Finally, the gases are vented through cyclonic columns irrigated
neutralized in the pipe reactors with gaseous or liquid ammonia. with an acidic solution. The gases coming from the dryer are de-
A wide range of grades, including ammonium phosphates dusted in high efficiency cyclones to remove the majority of the
(monoammonium phosphate – MAP, and diammonium dust before scrubbing. The air coming from the cooling
phosphate – DAP), can be produced.38 The required solid raw equipment is generally recycled as secondary air to the dryer
materials such as potassium chloride, potassium sulfate, after de-dusting.41
superphosphate, secondary nutrients, micronutrients and filler
The mixed acid process with phosphate rock digestion is very
are fed into the granulator together with the recycled material.
flexible and produces grades with varying degrees of phosphate
The pipe reactor fitted in the granulator is designed to receive
water solubility. The first step of the process is the exothermic
phosphoric acid, part of the ammonia, and all the other liquid
feeds such as sulfuric acid and recycled scrubber liquor. digestion of phosphate rock with nitric acid resulting in a solution
of phosphoric acid and calcium nitrate. Acid gases such as
Concentrated ammonium nitrate solution may be added directly
oxides of nitrogen and fluorine compounds are formed during
into the granulator and ammoniation rates in the pipe reactor
the digestion, depending on the type of phosphate rock. Other
vary according to the product. Further ammoniation may be
raw materials such as phosphoric, sulfuric, and nitric acids or
carried out in the granulator. A pipe reactor fitted in the dryer is
AN solution are added after the digestion. The acid slurry is
fed with phosphoric acid and ammonia.
ammoniated with gaseous ammonia and after neutralization,
Drum granulation with ammoniation consists of a classical and other components such as ammonium phosphates,
granulation loop using mainly solid raw materials. Ammonium superphosphates, ammonium sulfate, and compounds
nitrate solution and / or steam is / are fed into the granulator. containing potassium and magnesium are added. Most of these
The process is very flexible, and is able to produce a broad materials may also be added before or during neutralization, but
spectrum of grades including products with low nitrogen content. if the raw material contains chloride, the pH of the slurry should
Ammonium nitrate solution is sprayed directly into the granulator be 5 – 6 to avoid the production of hydrogen chloride. The
and sulfuric acid may be fed into the granulator followed by reactor battery ends with a buffer tank. The slurry granulation
ammoniation39. The granules obtained in both granulation can then be performed by different equipment such as drum,
processes are dried in a drying section using a heated air blunger and spherodizer.42
stream.40 The dry granules are managed as discussed for the
The gases from the digestion reactors, where phosphate rock is
NP route.
digested in nitric acid, are treated separately in a spray tower
Gases from the granulator and the dryer are scrubbed in venturi scrubber to recover NOX and fluorine compounds. The pH is
scrubbers with recirculating ammonium phosphate or adjusted by the addition of ammonia. The ammoniation reactor
ammonium sulfo-phosphate solution. The scrubber liquor which gases are scrubbed in several stages of counter-current
38 Ibid.
39 EFMA (2000c) 41 Ibid.
40 Ibid. 42 Ibid.
APRIL 30, 2007 17

WORLD BANK GROUP
scrubbing. The pH is adjusted to the most efficient scrubbing

condition, pH 3-4, with a mixture of HNO3 and/or H2SO4. The
first scrubbing stage ensures a saturation of the gases; the
second high pressure venturi stage is designed to remove
aerosols. The subsequent stages make the recovery efficiency
high and the final stage operates with the cleanest scrubbing
liquid. A droplet separator is installed in the stack or immediately
before it. The gases from the dryer (granulator / dryer) are led
through cyclones before entering the scrubber. The scrubber
consists of a variable throat venturi with subsequent two-stage
scrubbing. The last stage should be operated with the cleanest
liquid. A part of the liquor, after the circulation, goes to a settler
for the separation of solids. The thickened part is fed to the
reactors.43
Figure A.1: Integrated Phosphate Fertilizer Plants
Water Water Sulfur Water Air NH8

Phosphate
rock
H2SO4
Phosphoric Sulfuric Nitric acid
acid acid
H8PO4 NH8 HNO8

Phosphate H2SO4 Phosphate HNO8 Phosphate
rock rock H8PO4 K, rock
H2SO4 Mg, S
NH8
NPK NPK
TSP SSP Mixed acid route Nitrophosphate CO2
route
NPK,
TSP SSP NPK
AN/CAN
43 EFMA (2000c)
APRIL 30, 2007 18

WORLD BANK GROUP
Figure A.2: Compound Fertilizers: Nitrophosphate Route

K,
Mg, S H2SO4 NH8 HNO3 Phosphate NH8
rock
H8PO4
Complex HNO3 Nitrophosphoric
fertilizers acid
Ca(NO8)2
NH8
Calcium nitrate
CO2
conversion
CaCO3
NH4 NO3
Calcium
Calcium nitrate
ammonium
fertilizers nitrate fertilizers
NPK Ca(NO3)2 AN / CAN
APRIL 30, 2007 19

WORLD BANK GROUP
Figure A.3: Mixed Acid Route
Gas
HNO8 Digestion Scrubbing
Phosphate
reactors system Off-gas
rock
Scrubbing
liquid
Gas
AN Ammoniation /
solution Granulation & Cyclones /
NH3 Bag filters
H2SO4 / Pipe reactor /
H3PO4 Granulator
K, Mg, S
Off-spec
Dust
Dusty
Hot air, Dryer / Screener / air General
Coating Cooler & Coating dedusting system Off-gas
agents Gas /
dusty air
NPK
APRIL 30, 2007 20

Fluoride - Should We Be Drinking This? An EPA study
links fluoride to Attention Deficit Disorder and lead poisoning
http://www.nofluoride.com/kalamazoo.html
By Jane Louise Boursaw
You come in from working outside and pour yourself a glass

of refreshing, ice-cold water. But what if it was
contaminated with a hazardous waste product of the aluminum, uranium, and
phosphate fertilizer industry? Guess what? It is. It's called silicofluoride, a highly-
toxic chemical added to over 90 percent of America's drinking water, according to a
recent study, funded in part by the Environmental Protection Agency.
UNTESTED TOXIC
For years, dentists have touted the benefits of fluoride, claiming it helps prevent
tooth decay. And that may be true with regard to "sodium" fluoride. But
silicofluoride, the kind now used to treat water supplies, has been linked to cancer,
infertility, bone fractures, and premature joint and ligament aging.
What's more, the EPA study, just released in September of 1999, shows a new
correlation between silicofluorides and high levels of lead in children's blood, which
has been linked to learning disabilities, hyperactivity, substance abuse, and the root
causes of crime.
"Silicofluorides are largely untested," said Roger Masters, Emeritus professor of

government at Dartmouth College, who led the study. "Virtually all research on
fluoridation safety has focused on sodium fluoride, even though studies in the 1930's
showed important biological differences between these chemicals."
A.D.D. CONNECTION
In particular, a large number of children diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder
(ADD) have been shown to have dangerously high levels of lead, manganese, or
cadmium in bodily tissues, noted the study.
This information was of special interest to Bill Siegmund, a microbiologist, certified

water specialist, and managing director of Pure Water Works in Traverse City.
Siegmund's son -- who was raised in Grand Rapids, the first U.S. city to be
fluoridated in the 1950's -- has been diagnosed with ADD. In fact, Grand Rapids has
an extremely high incidence of ADD, noted Siegmund.
"I have heard numbers like the highest percentage in the United States," he said.
"What they discovered is that heavy metals in the blood stream during the formative
years of prenatal to puberty will prevent you from making the neurological function
to transfer messages from short-term to long-term memory. That, in essence, is
what ADD is.
"It's not the silicofluorides that are causing ADD, but the fact that they cause you to
absorb more lead," Siegmund adds. "So even though lead exists in a very small
amount in a municipal system, you absorb more of it in the presence of fluoride."
HEAVY METAL OVERLOAD
He added that this neurological glitch occurs at any age, not just childhood. He also
noted that heavy metals accumulate in a person's body over a lifetime. "It is difficult
or impossible to get rid of them," said Siegmund. "So a small exposure over a period
of time is what the danger is."
A source at the Grand Rapids-Lake Michigan Filtration facility, who did not wish to be
identified, noted that they recently switched from powdered silicofluorides to a liquid
form called hydrofluosilicic acid (HFS).
"They're both poisonous," said the source, "but I think they wanted to get away from
the powder, because even with the dust collection system, you did have some of it in
the atmosphere throughout the plant...it wasn't hazardous to the people, but I think
they wanted to get away from that."
But hydrofluosilicic acid, although greatly diluted, has it's own problems, he noted.
"The quality of the piping and the molds and everything have to meet the standards
for an acid like that. You've got the hazards there, too, but you don't have anything
in the atmosphere, unless you have a leak or something." (See sidebar)
IN DEFENSE OF FLUORIDE
John Wierenga, plant supervisor for the Grand Rapids-Lake Michigan Filtration
facility, agreed that hydrofluosilicic acid is preferable to the powder they used to use,
"simply because the powder presented a dust hazard to the employees," he said.
"But basically, whatever compound you use, you feed it into the water to derive the
same amount of fluoride."
Wierenga believes there is no difference between food-grade sodium fluoride and

industrial-grade hydrofluosilicic acid. "The purity of both would be very high," he
said. "We're only feeding one part per million, so if there is an impurity there, it
would have to be exceedingly high to be measurable."
The Grand Rapids plant receives their hydrofluosilicic acid in 4000-gallon tanker
shipments from Florida. "The air pressure just puts it in our tank, and that's all there
is to it," said Wierenga. "It's a sealed system."
He added that, among other things, fluoride is used in many insecticides. "Like so
many things, it's all a question of dose. In the small amounts that we take it in for
public health, it's healthful and without side effects. But if that amount is exceeded,
then there can be side effects... an enormous number of accusations have been
made about fluoride. I think, almost without exception, they've been proven false.
The anti-fluoridationists today are still very active, perhaps because of their
opposition to what some would term 'enforced medication.' But, of course, put in the
water, [fluoride] is widely available and widely beneficial."
MANY STUDIES
Still, even Wierenga has his doubts about fluoride, even though he works around it
every day and has a chemistry background. He cited an article written several years
ago for "Chemical and Engineering News," a widely disseminated publication for
professional chemists, in which the author raised a number of legitimate concerns
about fluoride.
"I thought the article was well researched, and I guess I've always held the belief
that if you tried to get fluoride in the water today, you would have great difficulty
doing so," said Wierenga.
For one thing, things weren't studied in 1945 like they are today, he noted. "The
dentists knew it was good for the teeth and in the water it went. But how much
study was done at that time on other health effects? If there were any, they were
very few. Since then, there have been enormous numbers of studies.
Wierenga was not aware of the recent study linking fluoride with Attention Deficit
Disorder.
50-YEAR BLUNDER?
If all this isn't enough, here are a few more facts about fluoride from an article
entitled "Fluoridation: a 50-Year-Old Blunder and Cover-Up," by David C. Kennedy,
D.D.S., published by the Preventive Dental Health Association (PDHA), a non-profit
educational corporation:
1) Fluoride has been linked to cancer. In 1956, Dr. John Chaffey, a professor of
clinical pediatrics at the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University,
noted cortical defects in the bone X-rays of 13.5 percent of the children living in
fluoridated Newburgh, compared to only 7.5 percent in the neighboring non-
fluoridated Kingston. Studies have now confirmed a dramatic increase in bone cancer
in young males exposed to fluoride during growth of the bones, and a 5 percent
increase in all types of cancers in fluoridated communities.
2) Studies have shown that fluoride in the drinking water adversely affects fertility
rates in women. A review of animal studies shows that fluoride affects fertility in
most other animal species, as well.
3) According to the National Research Council, fluorosis, a disease characterized by

brown and white spots on the
Drink up...
not Hydrofluosilicic acid, the chemical agent most used for water fluoridation in the
U.S., is the most corrosive chemical agent known to man. It is derived from toxic
gases produced in the manufacture of phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers. It
contains lead, mercury, arsenic, and high concentrations of radionucleides.
Even bystanders who witnessed a 1994 tanker truck accident which spilled 4,500
gallons of industrial grade hydrofluosilicic acid near Deltona, Florida, were close to
death, according to Orlando Sentinel reporter Bo Poertner, an eyewitness to the
accident.
"We began to worry when an emergency service officer introduced himself and
declined to shake Mike's hand," said Poertner. "We knew we had been exposed to a
dangerous chemical; after that we began to feel contaminated. A towing service
worker reminded me the next day, 'You don't know how close to death you came.'"
TOXIC BYPRODUCTS
Because the industrial grade fluosilicic acid is a toxic waste byproduct recovered
from chimney pollution scrubbers ("scrubber liquor"), the volume of contaminants
is profoundly influenced by the method of manufacture and the quality of raw
materials used.
A co-product from phosphate fertilizer manufacture is yellow-cake uranium, a

radioactive substance used in the manufacture of nuclear weapons and the nuclear
power industry. The wastes (fluosilicic acid) from the manufacture of phosphate
fertilizers are also contaminated with radium and are among the most concentrated
radioactive wastes produced from natural materials. These radioactive wastes are
referred to as naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), and the EPA has
no regulations for NORM waste disposal.
The manufacturers of fluosilicic acid do not routinely monitor for levels of uranium
contaminating the acid. No testing is done for NORM levels in Florida where much
of the fluosilicic acid used to fluoridate municipal water supplies is produced.
The EPA's position on the use of industrial grade fluosilicic acid for the fluoridation
of municipal water supplies is that it is the ideal solution to the long-standing
dilemma of disposing of the hazardous waste by-product produced from the
manufacture of phosphate fertilizers. They contend that by recovering fluosilicic
acid, water and air pollution are minimized and water utilities are afforded a low-
cost source of fluoride.
COSTLY MISTAKE
Are you wondering why food grade fluoride isn't used in the water fluoridation
process? The bottom line, of course. Although it would ensure purity and
consistency, the cost factors would be prohibitive.
Another issue is that fluoride, heavy metals and insoluble contaminants contained
in chemically treated water are concentrated with cooking (heating). There are no
required or recommended tests to determine the cumulative contaminant levels
ingested daily from chemically treated water. The EPA bases the "maximum
contaminant levels" for the average amount of water ingested (drunk by an
individual) in liters per kilogram of body weight (not to exceed a concentration of
4.0 milligrams per liter). It does not account for incidental sources like foods,
processed or cooked, or soft drinks made with chemically treated water.
And, although the EPA/National Research Council cites many "safety and
effectiveness" studies in their 1993 publication, "The Health Effects of Ingested
Fluoride," they never state what grades of fluoride products were used for the
clinical studies. There are industrial, food, and pharmaceutical grades of fluoride,
and the results of those studies would depend greatly upon the grade of chemicals
used.
Source: "Water A Toxic Dump?" by George Glasser, printed in the December, 1994,
Sarasota ECO Report.
teeth, affects 8 to 51 percent of children and as many as 80 percent of children

growing up in areas where drinking water contains one part per million (1 ppm)
fluoride.
4) Fluoride can also have a detrimental effect on bone growth and can cause
premature joint and ligament aging, according to a 1993 report by the U.S. Dept. of
Health and Human Services. "Postmenopausal women and elderly men in fluoridated
communities may be at increased risk of bone fractures."
NEVER APPROVED BY FDA
Fluoride in any form -- be it drops, tablets or vitamins -- has never been approved
by the Food and Drug Administration (as required by law since 1938). And no
application is pending either. This means that the FDA has no proof of the safety or
effectiveness of fluoride. Also, the International Academy of Oral Medicine and
Toxicology has classified fluoride as an unapproved dental medication, due to its high
toxicity.
All this came to light in 1993, when New Jersey State Assemblyman John V. Kelly
sought an FDA ban on fluoride supplements and led an investigation which revealed
that neither the FDA, National Institute of Dental Research, or American Academy of
Pediatric Dentistry had proof of fluoride's safety or effectiveness. Although virtually
every American is exposed daily to fluoride, the official FDA classification for fluoride
is "Unapproved New Drug."
OVERDOSED ON FLUORIDE
In 1997, the Sierra Club issued a paper proclaiming that the FDA should be required
to put fluoride through the "rigorous controlled studies necessary for FDA Approval."
They also contend that if fluoride gains FDA approval, it should be treated as a
prescribed medication in order to prevent over-exposure.
Exposing the population to fluoride via drinking water invariably leads to uncontrolled
random dosages, noted the Sierra Club. Infants and adults who drink more
beverages than others will be significantly overdosed on fluoride.
There is also a wide variation in fluoride levels in food and water. The fluoride at the
faucet may vary from .1 ppm to as high as 4 ppm, according to the EPA mean
contaminant levels. Excessive fluoride in the water from accidental overfeed has
poisoned literally thousands of people and recently killed a Native American in
Alaska, noted the Sierra Club paper.
THE TOOTH DECAY MYTH?
What's more, adding silicofluorides to drinking water has not been proven to reduce
tooth decay. Studies done in the 1940s indicated that as the level of "natural"
fluoride in the drinking water increased, the prevalence of tooth decay declined; so
says a 1991 report published by the United States Public Health Service's Committee
to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs.
These early studies led to the practice of adding food-grade sodium fluoride to
municipal drinking water to bring the total level of fluoride to approximately 1 part
per million (ppm). The optimal range of community water fluoridation (optimal with
respect to reducing tooth decay and minimizing the risk of dental fluorosis) has been
determined by the United States Public Health Service to be 0.7- 1.2 parts per
million.
However, in a more recent study on the newer silicofluorides and tooth decay (the
largest ever) done by the U.S. Public Health Service, dental records of over 39,000
children showed that the decay rate of permanent teeth was virtually the same in
areas treated with silicofluorides as non-fluoridated areas. In fact, tooth decay has
decreased more in some non-fluoridated communities than in fluoridated ones.
The scary thing is we're consuming more fluoride than ever. In the 1940s, the U.S.
Public Health Service reported a total daily fluoride intake from typical diets in the
range of 0.2 to 0.3 milligrams. By the 1970s, the total from dietary sources had
increased to as much as 3.44 mg/day, even in non-fluoridated areas. By 1991, the
range in total daily dosage had exceeded 7 mg/day in some areas.
Care for some toxic waste for dinner tonight?

Fluoride: An Invisible Killer
by Floyd Maxwell, BASc
Author of the International Anti-Fluoridation Database
http://www.just-think-it.com/no-f.htm
*********
"We would not purposely add arsenic to the water supply. And we would not purposely
add lead. But we add fluoride. The fact is that fluoride is more toxic than lead and just
slightly less toxic than arsenic." (source)
*********
"The federal maximum contaminant level (MEL) for lead is 15 parts per billion (ppb), 5
ppb for arsenic and 4000 ppb for fluoride." (source)
*********
1952: The Delaney Committee 82nd Congress Hearings on Fluoride revealed that there
was no actual scientific basis for the fluoridation of water supplies in the prevention of
tooth decay. The recommendation of the Committee was that more research be done,
before proceeding with this national mass medication. Their recommendation was totally
ignored.
*********
A common obstacle one runs into when trying to inform others of the dangers of a
product is being told you are not an "expert". This can, however, be used to one's
advantage if one happens to find an "expert" who verifies your own views on the benefits
of natural versus chemical approaches to health.
My background is that of a Chemical Engineer, having earned my B.A.Sc. from the

University of British Columbia in 1984. When it comes to chemistry I can say that I am
an "expert" in this area due to studying it full time for over 10 years.
Luckily I also retained the ability to think for myself...
*********
Built on Basics
Chemistry is built on basic principles. For example, "like dissolves like" means that salt
(a polar molecule) dissolves in water (highly polar) but does not dissolve in oil (non
polar).
In studying the elements (see the Periodic Table of the Elements graphic above),
application of just a few basic principles can lead to a grouping of families of elements
based on their similar chemical properties.
As one goes down the Table, the size of elements increases while the reactivity
decreases.
The second-to-last column of the Periodic Table are the halides, and start with F
(Fluoride), then Cl (Chlorine), Br (Bromine), I (Iodine) and As (Astatine).
Applying the reactivity rule one can accurately say that Fluorine is more reactive than
Chlorine, that is more reactive than Bromine, that is more reactive than Iodine.
This reactivity rule also holds true for molecules/compounds (composed of two or more
atoms that may be the same element or different ones) provided that one atom remains
the same and only the halide changes.
Thus, we can infer that HF is more reactive than HCl. HCl (Hydro Chloric acid) was the
strongest acid we used in school. But HF is so reactive, and so deadly that it was never
seen or used in any of the 10 years of chemistry demonstrations and labs I took part in.
Allen Hoffmann (micron99@pacbell.net), a former Scientific Glassblower, was forced to
be in contact with HF as part of his work (and is now seeking Worker's Compensation for
the damage it did to his body) notes that:
HF can't be smelled until 24ppm but has an IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life or
Health) concentration level of 30ppm.
In other words, by the time you smell it, your life is danger! -- hence the title of this
article: "Fluoride: An Invisible Killer".
*********
How strong, and prevalent, are fluorine-containing compounds?
HF is one of the strongest acids in the world. So strong it can etch glass (in fact, this is a
common test for the presence of fluoride), making storage of this compound rather
difficult!
Not to mention the danger in handling it!
Searching for "hydrofluoric acid" on Google produced about 12,000 web pages, evenly
divided between typical chemical data sheets [with stringent handling procedures!] and
health warning pages!
In fact, Fluorine is the most reactive of all the elements (elemental Fluoride is never
found by itself in nature) and it was only the relatively recent laboratory-induced joining
of Fluoride to Xenon, one of the previously "inert" elements (those in the right-most
column in the picture above) that caused this group of elements to be renamed "noble"
instead.
This photograph shows what the fluorine added to Calgary, Alberta's drinking water has
done to a thick and "corrosion resistant" steel water supply valve.
Fluoride is used extensively in computer chip and Aluminum and steel manufacture,
causing a staggering amount of environmental damage.
In fact, in May, 2000, 3M Corporation announced it was discontinuing a whole family of

fluorinated compounds, including Scotchgard, due to their incredible destructiveness to
the environment.
Fluoridated compounds are also extremely effective in killing bugs. The wholely
predictable side effect of spraying crops with fluoridated pesticides is that fluoride
remains on the produce, making fluoride-caused food contamination a very real concern
and a good reason, by itself, to consider eating only organic food. Beverage drinkers are
not safe either.
Fluorine is also found in mind-affecting drugs like Prozac and the "date rape" drug
Rohypnol. Click here for a more complete list of drugs containing fluorine.
*********
What are "Free Radicals"?
Perhaps some of you have heard of "free radicals" in recent years. The natural health
industry has worked on finding compounds that can absorb, prevent the formation of or
ameliorate the consequences of "free radicals".
But what are they?
Free radicals are what you get when you break a molecule into unstable pieces. This is
achieved by subjecting an otherwise stable molecule to a jolt of energy of some sort
(sunlight, heat, flame, etc.). Thus, too much sunlight can cause the formation of free
radicals, as can heat or partial combustion (ie. smoke).
We are all already aware of the damaging effects of the sun. And we are increasingly
aware of the harmful effects of smoke. But did we know that "free radicals" are one of
the biggest and most dangerous by-products of smoking? Has anyone told us this?
Free radicals are so destructive because they are unstable and extremely reactive. So
reactive, in fact, that they will react with almost anything, and in doing so will alter what
they reactive -- in plain terms, healthy tissue becomes unhealthy tissue due to the action
of free radicals. It's that simple.
Many of us are already aware of something similar to this regarding the Chlorine that is
sometimes added to municipal water supplies -- that it forms families of compounds in
the water. Well, Fluorine is much more reactive than Chlorine, so one can only imagine
the range of deadly compounds it is capable of creating when it is added to drinking
water.
I just want to emphasize that, chemically, free radicals are much worse than most cancer
causing compounds because free radicals can do "whatever they want" when they contact
your body. They can alter virtually anything they contact -- cells, blood vessels, organs,
etc.
*********
Recapping:
• Chlorine is known to form numerous compounds after it is added

to municipal water supplies.
• Fluorine is much more reactive than Chlorine.
*********
So, what happens when you add F to municipal water?
It turns out that there are vast ramifications from adding F, and va$t rea$on$ for doing it.
In essence, the fertilizer, aluminum and steel industries produce, in the process, massive
quantities of fluoride that used to be industrial waste. To save large amounts of money,
they came up with the idea of dumping this industrial waste into drinking water. Now,
instead of having to pay to have the fluoride waste hauled away, they are paid to poison
us.
Here are just a few of the numerous web links that I encourage you to explore:
Ask the government for your 1992 Fluoridation Census report

http://www.cdc.gov/
The Fluoridation Fiasco: Poison In Your Water:
http://rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
The Fluoride Stop:
http://bruha.com/pfpc/
NoFluoride.com
http://www.nofluoride.com/
Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation
http://www.fluoridation.com/epa2.htm
Fluoride Pollution: An Overview
http://www.fluoridealert.org/f-pollution.htm
*********
Just Think It's International Anti-Fluoridation Database:

http://www.just-think-it.com/the-f-db.htm
150+ facts, horror stories and cover-ups about Fluoride

http://www.just-think-it.com/f-facts.htm
*********
Call to ACTION
Assuming that Fluoride is "bad", how should we minimize or eliminate the problem?
(1) Lobby
Quite simply, most of you are being poisoned and you should be very concerned about
this and should tell your official representatives of your concern.
And you should not stop until they stop adding it.
Find articles about Fluoride. Print them. Fax them. Send letters to local newspapers. Find
out if your community is being poisoned and if it is and we don't already know about it,
tell us so we can tell other people in your community.
Do something.
Or suffer...
(2) Avoid it
Note that I did not say "Remove it" because this is not possible, contrary to what
countless manufacturers are claiming. The key reasons why not: (1) Fluorine's extreme
reactiveness, causing it to "cling" more tightly to water than anything I am aware of, and
(2) the size of the F atom.
We have already dealt with one aspect of the Fluorine atom's size -- that it makes the
atom extremely reactive.
The second aspect of Fluorine can be revealed by comparing the weight of a "mole"
(602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms) of F to that of a mole of H2O (water). [To
confirm the calculation, refer to the Periodic Table of the Elements graphic above.] F
weighs 19 grams per mole (g/M), H2O weighs 18 g/M.
Summoning another well known rule of chemistry, that the size of a molecule/atom is
directly related to its molecular weight and we can infer that these two molecules are
almost identical in size.
Ineffectiveness of Reverse Osmosis units
Reverse Osmosis [RO] manufacturers' claim they can remove fluoride. Don't believe
their claim$.
RO units work on the same principle as our kidneys. Think of a mesh, like the mosquito
netting on your screen door. The mesh lets in air, but not mosquitos, because air
molecules are smaller than mosquitos.
An RO unit is thus great for removing "heavy metals" like Pb (Lead), Hg (Mercury) and
Cd (Cadmium), as well as Cl- family compounds like PCBs and PCP's (Poly Chlorinated
Phenyls and BiPhenyls) because these are all large molecules relative to the size of H2O.
In fact, even Cl (the smallest of these) is relative large (molecular weight of 35 g/M) and
so if the RO unit is new and it is well made (ie. with precision tolerances on the RO
membrane) it might even filter out some of the Cl. Note the "ifs" and conditions in the
last sentence.
So, an RO unit will not filter out F atoms, as F atoms are too similar in size to H2O
molecules.
Equally Ineffective Distillation units
Distillation units will also not work because similar sized polar molecules have similar
boiling and freezing points.
Water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit and FH boils at 203 to 239 degress Fahrenheit. So,
when your distillation unit has warmed up the water to 212 degrees Fahrenheit, and the
water starts to boil off (evaporate), *so* does the Fluoride! It stays right with the water
vapor, and gets condensed back into liquid at the end of the process.
So, don't let anyone tell you otherwise and don't trust those that do.
(3) Don't trust your water
Unlike Chlorine, Fluoride is colorless, odorless and tasteless so you have almost no way
of knowing if it is present in the water you are drinking or using.
Even bathing or showering in fluoridated water will cause you to absorb an unhealthy
amount of it through your skin.
Fruit juices often have very high concentrations of Fluorine, due to the use of Fluorine in
pesticides.
Pop and other packaged beverages are also common and substantial sources of Fluorine,
not only because of the fluoridated water but because of fluoride-laced ingredients, and
the concentration of same during the manufacturing process.
Bottled water can be an option, but choose carefully. Mineral Waters of the World
provides a free and very detailed analysis of the composition of over 600 types of bottled
water available throughout the world.
(4) Don't trust the experts
Before you even listen to someone's opinion about Fluoride, figure out what they have to
gain by their opinion.
RO manufacturers would see sales "dry up" if they admitted that their units can not
remove it. They will thus never admit it, and will try to "poison" our efforts to give
people unbiased information.
Fluoride producers (the multi-billion dollar aluminum, fertilizer and steel industries) have
everything to lose and nothing to gain by admitting that Fluoride is even remotely bad for
anyone.
Ditto toothpaste manufacturers and thus dentists. Yes, dentists have a lot to gain by
fluoridation -- dental fluorosis, caused by fluoridation, produces mottled teeth (in
advanced stages, fluorosis can turn teeth into black stumps -- see for yourself, or view
this 46 page slide show) and this leads people to get very expensive cosmetic dental work
performed...by dentists.
As to the supposed benefits of drinking fluoridated water, read the results of this study,
or this one, or this one, or this:
Any tooth decay reducing effect attributable to fluoride occurs by topical mechanisms
involving action on tooth surfaces and on oral bacteria that promote dental caries. There
is negligible anti-caries benefit from ingested fluoride that does not have actual contact
with the surfaces of the teeth. - "Fluoride in Dentistry", 2nd Edition (source)
Of course, topical application has its own problems:
Children under age 4 swallow 40% or more of the toothpaste they use.
- Oregon Citizens for Safe Drinking Water
And "public" health officials will definitely *not* want to admit that they have been
officially encouraging the largest act of public poisoning the world has ever known.
"Anti-Expert" shields up!
(5) Hound the water bottling companies
For some reason (worth an investigation itself) water bottling companies in the U.S. are
not required to report the content of water on the label (and thus most don't).
Oh sure, they report how many calories the water has (zero), how much of the
recommended daily allowance of protein, carbohydrates, and vitamins xyz (all zero) but
there is no mandatory listing of the amounts of such common elements as Ca (Calcium),
Na (Sodium), Cl (Chlorine) and (F) Fluoride!
Then visit their web sites. I did this for the largest bottlers in the Phoenix area and learned
exactly nothing about the content of the water they are selling. I also learned that many
are owned by larger companies, such as Perrier. And that they have "zero point zero" (ie.
no) interest in communicating with the people who buy their product. On the Perrier site
there was no way to contact them. No forms to fill out, no email addresses to use and,
when I used my Internet knowledge to send to standard email addresses that every
domain usually has I still got exactly zero response. Why?! Think about it...
I finally went with Sedona Springs because they told me the (low and naturally occuring)
Fluoride content of their spring water. [Free plug: Sedona Springs, 602-254-0000, home
or office delivery, sport bottles, half or full size jugs for your/rented water cooler...and "6
gallons for the price of 5"]
We encourage everyone to adopt this approach as well. Check the chemical analysis of
your local water bottlers online at Mineral Waters of the World. If some or all of your
local brands are not on the list, try to contact your local bottlers/sellers. Ask them for a
chemical analysis of their water, and especially the fluoride content. If you should
manage to obtain this information, give it to Mineral Waters of the World and they will
update their database.
Our children thank you. For your action.
Sincerely,
Floyd Maxwell
Contact:
floyd@just-think-it.com
*********
NOTES:
[1] Dr. John Yiamouyiannis, "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products", Fifth Ed.,
Williams and Wilkins. Quote at: http://rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
FLUORIDE FATIGUE
Revised 3rd printing
Paua
FLUORIDE POISONING: is fluoride

in your drinking water—and from
other sources—making you sick?
Bruce Spittle Forewords by Albert W Burgstahler and AK Susheela
FLUORIDE
F-
F-
F-
z
z
z
z
FATIGUE
FLUORIDE FATIGUE
FLUORIDE POISONING: is fluoride
in your drinking water—and from
other sources—making you sick?
Bruce Spittle
FLUORIDE FATIGUE
FLUORIDE FATIGUE
Paua Press
Dunedin, New Zealand
INFORMATION ON PAUA PRESS LIMITED AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
I formed Paua Press Limited in 2007 with the goal of publishing books on
topics of interest. The paua is an abalone, a large edible New Zealand shellfish of
the genus Haliotis with attractive blue and purple colours on the inner surface of
the shell but with a rough unattractive outer shell. The vivid colouration within can
Paua
be revealed by grinding and polishing the outer surface and the shell is then
sometimes used in jewellery. Just as a paua appears dull and nondescript on the
outside but is of compelling interest when the surface dross is taken away, I am hopeful that the
books my press publishes will have, at their centre, something of substance for the reader.
Bruce Spittle. Paua Press Limited, 727 Brighton Road, Ocean View, Dunedin 9035, New Zealand;
Phone/Fax: 64 3 4811418; E-mail: spittle@es.co.nz; www.pauapress.com.
Fluoride fatigue. Fluoride poisoning: is fluoride in your drinking water—and from other sources—
making you sick? Copyright © Bruce Spittle, 2008. The right of Bruce Spittle to be identified as the
author of this work in terms of the Copyright Act 1994 is hereby asserted. Designed, including cover,
by Bruce Spittle. First published by Paua Press Limited, 1 January 2008. First printing of
prepublication copies December 2007. Revised 2nd printing January 2008. Revised 3rd printing,
printed and bound in Australia, March 2008.
Available from: All Seasons CLS, PO Box 3459, Mount Gambier SA 5290, Australia.
Contact details: Phone +61 8 8724 8611, E-mail: allseasons@afo.net.
ISBN 978–0–473–12991–0
QUOTATIONS EMBODYING THE SPIRIT OF PAUA PRESS LIMITED

Sapere aude. Motto of the University of Otago. It can be translated to mean: dare to be wise, have the
courage to think for yourself rather than blindly accepting the opinions of authorities.
All great truths begin as blasphemies. George Bernard Shaw
All truth passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, third
it is accepted as being self-evident. Arthur Schopenhauer
Great thinkers have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
Albert Einstein
Don’t worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are that good, you’ll have to ram
them down people’s throats. Howard Aitken
Time’s glory is to calm contending kings,
To unmask falsehood, and bring truth to light. Shake-speare
In an age of conformism and “team work,” where compromise and harmony are offered as
the watchwords of human activity, being critical may be considered antisocial. But science
without criticality is unthinkable, for the only route to scientific objectivity is to question, not
to “accept.” Anon. Statistics, science and sense [editorial]. JAMA 1963;186:508. Cited before the preface
in: Waldbott GL. A struggle with titans. New York: Carlton Press; 1965.
As every past generation has had to disenthrall itself from an inheritance of truisms and
stereotypes, so in our time we must move on from reassuring repetition of stale phrases to a
new, difficult, but essential confrontation with reality.
For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived, and dishonest—
but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our
forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of
opinion without the discomfort of thought. President John F Kennedy, Commencement address,
Yale University, 11 June 1962. Cited after the dedications in: Waldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL.
Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
CONTENTS
v. ............. DEDICATION
v............... FOREWORD BY ALBERT W BURGSTAHLER
vi ............. FOREWORD BY AK SUSHEELA
vi..............ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1–2.......... INTRODUCTION
2–4...........THE SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS OF THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME
4–6...........THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE SYMPTOMS
6–9.......... MAKING THE DIAGNOSIS OF THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME
9–10 ........ WHAT TO DO IF THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY IS MADE
10............ CASE REPORTS OF FLUORIDE TOXICITY
11–12...... ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN CANADA
12–18...... ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN THE USA
18–20...... ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN NEW ZEALAND
20–22...... ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN THE NETHERLANDS
22–23...... ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN INDIA
23–26...... OTHER ILLNESSES DUE TO FLUORIDE
26–27...... WHAT TO DO IN THE FACE OF SKEPTICISM ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THE

EXISTENCE OF A CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME FROM
FLUORIDATED DRINKING WATER
27–32...... ILLUSTRATIONS OF SOME OF THE ABNORMALITIES UNDERLYING THE

SYMPTOMS OF CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY
32–48...... AN EXAMPLE OF THE OPPOSITION TO THE CONCEPT OF A CHRONIC FLUORIDE

TOXICITY SYNDROME FROM FLUORIDATED WATER
49............ FURTHER COMMENTS ON THE SUGGESTION THAT THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE

TOXICITY SYNDROME IS PSYCHOSOMATIC
50–58...... ILLNESS IN ANIMALS
58–59...... FURTHER COMMENTS ON CANARIES IN THE COAL MINE
59–75...... CLOSING COMMENTS
76............ ABOUT THE AUTHOR
77–78...... INDEX
ILLUSTRATIONS
2........... FIGURE 1. GEORGE L WALDBOTT 50 . ...... FIGURE 34. CHINCHILLA
2........... FIGURE 2. ALBERT W BURGSTAHLER 52 ........ FIGURE 35. ALLIGATOR
2........... FIGURE 3. H LEWIS MCKINNEY 52 ........ FIGURE 36. ALLIGATOR
3........... FIGURE 4. AK SUSHEELA 52 ........ FIGURE 37. ALLIGATOR
4........... FIGURE 5. ANNA STRUNECKÁ 52 ........ FIGURE 38. ALLIGATOR
4........... FIGURE 6. JIRI PATOCKA 53 ........ FIGURE 39. CAIMAN
4........... FIGURE 7. RUSSELL L BLAYLOCK 53 ........ FIGURE 40. CAIMAN
7.......... FIGURE 8. POWDERED COAL AND CLAY 54 ........ FIGURE 41. HORSE’S TEETH
8.......... FIGURE 9. CHILLIES DRYING 54 ........ FIGURE 42. HORSE’S TEETH
8.......... FIGURE 10. CORN DRYING 55 ........ FIGURE 43. HORSE’S TEETH
8.......... FIGURE 11. CORN DRYING 55 . ...... FIGURE 44. HORSE’S HOOF
16 ....... FIGURE 12. HARVEY PETRABORG 56 ........ FIGURE 45. HORSE RADIOGRAPHS
21 ....... FIGURE 13. HANS MOOLENBURGH 56 ........ FIGURE 46. HORSE’S METACARPUS
27 ........ FIGURE 14. SKELETAL MUSCLE 57 ........ FIGURE 47. ALLERGY TO FLUORIDE IN A
HORSE
27 ........ FIGURE 15. SKELETAL MUSCLE
57 . ...... FIGURE 48. ALLERGY TO FLUORIDE IN A
27 ....... FIGURE 16. SKELETAL MUSCLE
HORSE
28 ........ FIGURE 17. STOMACH
58 ........ FIGURE 49. ALLERGY TO FLUORIDE IN A
28 ........ FIGURE 18. STOMACH HORSE
28 ........ FIGURE 19. STOMACH 63 ........ FIGURE 50. WESTON A PRICE
29 ........ FIGURE 20. SPERM 64 ........ FIGURE 51. NILOUFER J CHINOY
29 ........ FIGURE 21. SPERM 65......... FIGURE 52. JOHN COLQUHOUN
29 ........ FIGURE 22. SPERM 66 ........ FIGURE 53. TOOTH DECAY
29 ........ FIGURE 23. SPERM 67 ........ FIGURE 54. TOOTH DECAY
30 ........ FIGURE 24. MEMBRANE CALCIFICATION 68 ........ FIGURE 55. TOOTH DECAY
30 ........ FIGURE 25. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 69......... FIGURE 56. TOOTH DECAY
30 ........ FIGURE 26. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 70 ........ FIGURE 57. TOOTH DECAY
31 ........ FIGURE 27. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 70......... FIGURE 58. TOOTH DECAY
31 ...... FIGURE 28. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 71 . ...... FIGURE 59. TOOTH DECAY
31 ...... FIGURE 29. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 71 . ...... FIGURE 60. RICHARD G FOULKES
31 ........ FIGURE 30. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 72 . ...... FIGURE 61. HARDY LIMEBACK
32 .... .... FIGURE 31. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 73 ........ FIGURE 62. PAUL H CONNETT
32 .... .... FIGURE 32. PERIOSTITIS DEFORMANS 76 ........ FIGURE 63. ALBERT BURGSTAHLER
AND BRUCE SPITTLE
49 ........ FIGURE 33. KAJ ROHOLM
v
DEDICATION
Dedicated to all those who have struggled, in the face of criticism, to see an end
to the irrational policy of fluoridating public water supplies.
FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR EMERITUS ALBERT W BURGSTAHLER

This is a vitally important book that has been long needed and begging to be
written. Although dental public health officials in countries promoting water
fluoridation adamantly deny the existence of illness caused by fluoride in
drinking water, undeniable medical ill effects from fluoride added to drinking
water have been known and reported since the start of water fluoridation over
50 years ago. Even today, those who experience these adverse effects, whether
from fluoride in their drinking water or from other sources, know only too well
how insidious these ailments can be, what a relief it is to find out what is
causing them, and how easily they can often be overcome simply by reducing
excessive intake of fluoride.
Those who deny reality and persist in discounting sensitivity to fluoride in
drinking water are like ostriches with their heads in the sand. They would do
well to heed what Dr. Spittle has reported here and stop continuing to promote
and be misled by scientifically indefensible claims that do not hold up under
scrutiny.
Albert W Burgstahler, PhD (Harvard, 1953)
Professor Emeritus of Chemistry
The University of Kansas, USA
Editor, Fluoride
Website for Fluoride: http://www.fluorideresearch.org
vi
FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR AK SUSHEELA

I am delighted with this book which very capably addresses a burning health
problem in many developed and developing countries that is afflicting millions
of men, women, and children. In particular, the damage caused by fluoride to
expectant mothers and the growing embryo and foetus in utero is extremely
devastating in terms of growth retardation and impaired brain development—so
much so that it is hard to compensate for such harmful effects.
I sincerely hope that, besides the general public, policy makers and health
officials, in the interest of the nation and the people they are sworn to serve, will
learn from reading this book to recognize and desist from the “madness” being
exercised by “fluoridation of drinking water.” I wish the very best for bringing
this vitally important message to the people who need help and guidance in
understanding the harmful effects of fluoride on health and, in the event that
they are victims, in learning how they can deal with the health problems by
significantly minimizing fluoride entry into the body.
Professor AK Susheela, PhD, FAMS (India), FASc, Ashoka Fellow
Executive Director
Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation
Delhi, India
Website for the Foundation: http://www.fluorideandfluorosis.com
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author acknowledges the advice of Albert W Burgstahler, BSc (Magna
cum Laude, Notre Dame, 1949), MA, PhD (Harvard, 1950, 1953), Professor
Emeritus of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA, and
Editor, 1999–2007, of Fluoride, Quarterly Journal of the International Society
of Fluoride Research. Previously he was Co-editor, 1968–1981, Acting Editor
1982–1991, Co-Editor 1992–1997, and Scientific Editor, 1998. He co-authored
Fluoridation: the great dilemma with Dr George L Waldbott, MD, and
Professor H Lewis McKinney (Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978).
The author is likewise grateful for the kindness of Professor AK Susheela,
PhD, FAMS (India), FASc, Ashoka Fellow, Executive Director, Fluorosis
Research and Rural Development Foundation, Delhi, India, for giving
permission for her photographs of structural changes due to fluoride to be used
and for her work to be referred to, of Dr Bao-shan Zheng, for the use of his
photographs related to food contamination by fluoride, and of Sarah Hamilton,
New Zealand Chinchilla Rescue, for allowing the use of a photograph of a
chinchilla.
FLUORIDE FATIGUE
FLUORIDE POISONING: IS FLUORIDE IN YOUR DRINKING WATER—AND FROM OTHER
SOURCES—MAKING YOU SICK?
INTRODUCTION
The focus of this book is the fatigue, not relieved by sleep, and various other
symptoms experienced by many when they drink fluoridated water. As such it is
not a comprehensive account of fluoride toxicity but looks at only a part of the
overall picture. Fluoride is ingested from other sources apart from fluoridated
water such as pesticides, post-harvest fumigants, air, food, salt, medications,
toothpaste, dental restorations, and health supplements. Fluoride also causes other
illness such as osteosarcoma and hip fractures.
Fluoridated water may be having its most devastating effects on the most
vulnerable, those in utero and infants less that one year old, whose brains are most
sensitive to developmental neurotoxins such as fluoride.a When body weight is
taken into account, non-nursing infants receiving formula made with water
fluoridated at or near the level of 1 mg fluoride (F)/litre (L) or 1 part per million
(ppm), less than one year old, have been estimated to have a fluoride intake on
average of about three times that of adults (0.086 mg/kg/day of F for infants
compared to 0.03 mg/kg/day of F for adultsb). About 30% of children in
fluoridated areas have chalky white areas on the teeth due to dental fluorosis.
However the mottled appearance is due only in part to the presence of fluoride per
se in the erupted teeth and is a sign that fluoride resulted in a thyroid hormone
deficiency during a critical time of tooth development, from in utero to
approximately 30 months for deciduous teeth (milk teeth, the first teeth to erupt)
and permanent incisors (the upper and lower two teeth on each side, closest the
midline, and medial to the canine teeth).c
Thyroid hormone is the crucial regulator of all the tissue-specific differentiation
programmes during development and appropriate levels are critically important for
the coordination of developmental processes. When fluoride reduces the level of
thyroid hormone during tooth development, by activating a calcium-transducing
G-protein receptor G q/11, there is delayed tooth eruption, delayed removal of
enamel matrix proteins, and delayed enamel maturation. The evidence of the
deficiency is seen later with mottled teeth. While the teeth are developing so also
is the brain. There is a growing concern about the effect of fluoride on the
developing brainb and a possible connection between fluoride and autism has been
queried.d
Another emerging area of interest is the interaction between fluoride and iodine
resulting in a functional iodine deficiency. Iodine is required for the proper
aGrandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 2006;368:2167-78.
b
Doull J, Boekelheide K, Farishian BG, Isaacson RL, Klotz JB, Kumar JV, Limeback H, Poole C, Puzas JE, Reed N-MR,
Thiessen KM, Webster TF, Committee on Fluoride in Drinking Water, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology,
Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. Fluoride in drinking water: a
scientific review of EPA’s standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Available for purchase online
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 85.
c
Schuld A. Is dental fluorosis caused by thyroid hormone disturbances? [editorial]. Fluoride 2005;38:91-4.
dRookard CJ. Fluoride and autism: is there a connection? [letter]. Fluoride 2000;33:99-100.
2 FLUORIDE FATIGUE. FLUORIDE POISONING: is fluoride in your drinking water—and from other sources—
making you sick?
functioning of many organs of the body and reduced tissue iodine levels, possibly
through the inhibition of mammary gland deiodinases by fluoride, may be a factor
in the development of breast cancer.ab
However, this book will concentrate on the fatigue, not relieved by sleep, and
other symptoms due to fluoride from drinking water and other sources. The very
existence of this problem is being denied on the basis of seemingly authoritative
reports which can have such restrictive inclusion criteria that they can exclude
from consideration reports of fluoride causing fatigue and other symptomsc and
then be quoted as evidence that fluoride does not cause such illnesses.d Thus there
is a need to spell out the clinical features of this illness—the chronic fluoride
toxicity syndrome or preskeletal fluorosis.
THE SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS OF THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME
George L Waldbott, MD, studied about 500 people affected by chronic fluoride
toxicity and, together with Professor Albert W Burgstahler, PhD, and Professor
Lewis McKinney, PhD, in Fluoridation: the great dilemma, made a list of the
clinical features (Figures 1–3).e
Figure 1. George L Waldbott, Figure 2. Professor Albert W Figure 3. Professor H Lewis

MD. Burgstahler, PhD. McKinney, PhD.
14 January 1898 – 20 December 1935 –
17 July 1982. 5 February 2004.
a
Eskin BA, Anjum W, Abraham GE, Stoddard F, Prestrud A, Brooks AD. Identification of breast cancer by differences in
urinary iodide. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Research 2005;46:504.
b
Eskin BA. Iodine and mammary cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 1977;91:293-304.
c
McDonagh M, Whiting P, Bradley M, Cooper J, Sutton A, Chestnutt I, Misso K, Wilson P, Treasure E, Kleijen J. A
systematic review of public water fluoridation. Report 18. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of
York; 2000.
d
Cutress TW. Response to a list of “50 reasons to oppose fluoridation,” compiled by Dr Connett. 2005. A copy is available
in the McNab Room, 3rd floor, Dunedin Public Library, Dunedin. It is included as part of a report on Fluoridation of Public
Water Supplies to the Infrastructure Services Committee, Dunedin City Council, from the Water and Waste Services
Manager, for the meeting on 12 March 2007, as appendix 4 to a letter, dated 6 March 2007, to Mr Gerard McCombie,
Water Operations Team Leader, Dunedin City Council, by Dr John Holmes, Medical Officer of Health and Dr Dorothy
Boyd, Senior Public Health Dentist, written in response to a submission made by Dr Bruce Spittle to the 2006/07
Community Plan opposing the use of fluoride in Dunedin’s water supply.
e
Waldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p.392-3.
The symptoms and signs of the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome 3
He noted, however, that the symptoms could have other origins even in someone
suffering from chronic fluoride poisoning.
1 chronic fatigue, not relieved by extra sleep or rest
2 headaches
3 dryness of the throat and excessive water consumption
4 frequent need to urinate
5 urinary tract irritation
6 aches and stiffness in the muscles and bones; arthritic-like pains in the lower back, neck,
jaw, arms, shoulders and legs
7 muscular weakness
8 muscle spasms, involuntary twitching
9 tingling sensations in the feet and, especially, in the fingers
10 gastrointestinal disturbances: abdominal pains, diarrhoea, constipation, blood in stools,
bloated feeling or gas, and tenderness in the stomach area
11 feeling of nausea, flu-like symptoms
12 pinkish-red or bluish-red spots, like bruises but round or oval, on the skin, that fade and
clear up in 7–10 days (Chizzola maculae.a They were first recognized by an Italian general
practitioner, Dr M Cristofoloni, in the neighbourhood of an aluminium factory near the village
of Chizzola in northern Italy).
13 skin rash or itching, especially after showers or bathing
14 mouth sores, also with using fluoridated toothpaste
15 loss of mental acuity and the ability to concentrate
16 depression
17 excessive nervousness
18 dizziness
19 tendency to lose balance
20 visual disturbances, temporary blind spots in the field of vision, a diminished ability to focus
21 brittle nails
Professor AK Susheela, Executive
Director of the Fluorosis Research and Rural
Development Foundation, Delhi, India,
(Figure 4), made a similar list and added
that, when patients came from an area with
high fluoride levels in the water, fluoride
toxicity should be suspected when there
were complaints of:b
22 repeated miscarriages or still births
23 male infertility
24 dental fluorosis with discolouration of the
enamel of the front teeth, the central or lateral
incisors of the upper and lower jaws
She noted that the presence of dental
fluorosis may be a clue that there has been
exposure to drinking water contaminated
with fluoride. Dental fluorosis can only Figure 4. Professor AK Susheela, PhD,
occur if the fluoride exposure is during the FAMS (India), FASc, Ashoka Fellow.
first years of life while the teeth are forming.
a
Cristofoloni M, Largaiolli D. Su di una probabile tossidermia da fluoro. Rivista Med Trentina 1966;4:1-5. [in Italian].
b
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2001. p. 53-60,
78-9.
making you sick?
The discolouration starts with the teeth losing their shine and developing white
and yellow spots, or chalky white patches. The discolouration may turn brown and
form horizontal streaks or spots on the enamel surface. She considered brown
streaks near the tip of the permanent teeth occurred with exposure to fluoride up to
the 2nd year, in the middle of the teeth from 2–4 years, and in the part of the teeth
closest to the gums from 4–6 years.
THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE SYMPTOMS
a
How fluoride is toxic is complicated, and a recent review by Professor Anna
Strunecká, DSc, Professor J Patočka, DrSc, Dr Russell L Blaylock, and the late
Professor Emerita Niloufer J Chinoy, PhD, with 331 references is especially
noteworthy (Figures 5–7 and 51).b
Figure 5. Professor Anna Figure 6. Professor Jiří Figure 7. Russell L

Strunecká, DSc. Patočka, DrSc. Blaylock, MD.
In the acidic environment of the stomach, with a pH of 1–4, fluoride forms

hydrofluoric acid which penetrates the tissues and causes corrosion, irritation, and
inflammation.c The mechanism for the occurrence of urinary urgency is less clear.
Tissue irritation from hydrofluoric acid is again a possibility but the pH of urine is
usually close to neutral, i.e. 7, although it can vary between 4.5 and 8. At pH 7,
only about 0.015% of the F is present as undissociated HF. Whether this is enough
to produce this clinical symptom is uncertain and it may be due to indirect effects.
Fluoride, maybe in the form of HF, has been reported to form strong hydrogen
bonds with amide groups and thereby alter the shape of proteins and thus
enzymes.de
a
Spittle B. Psychopharmacology of fluoride: a review. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1994;9:79-82.
b
Strunecká A, Patočka J, Blaylock RL, Chinoy NJ. Fluoride interactions: from molecules to disease. Current Signal
Transduction Therapy 2007;2:190-213.
cWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p. 246-7, 359.
d
Emsley J, Jones DJ, Miller JM, Overill RE, Waddilove RA. An unexpectedly strong hydrogen bond: ab initio calculations
and spectroscopic studies of amide–fluoride systems. J Am Chem Soc 1981;103:24-8.
e
DeLauder SF, Mauro JM, Poulos TL, Williams JC, Schwarz FP. Thermodynamics of hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen
fluoride binding to cytochrome c peroxidase and its Asn-82→Asp mutant. Biochem J 1994;302:437-42.
The pathophysiology or mechanisms underlying the symptoms 5
After the discovery of the ability of fluoride to release, in conjunction with

calcium, inflammatory mediators such as histamine from white blood cells,
including mast cells,ab the focus moved to G-proteins. Aluminium fluoride has
been shown to act as a phosphate analogc and stimulate G-protein receptors and
signalling pathways, such as the phosphatidylinositol pathway, which control
protein phosphorylation, the uptake of calcium into cells, and the release of
calcium from intracellular stores.d These processes are involved in hormonal and
immunologic responses, transmission of nerve impulses, cell division, and even
neoplastic transformations.e
Many of the symptoms of chronic fluoride toxicity are identical to those
observed in thyroid or iodine deficiency disorders (IDD).f Aluminium fluoride can
mimic the action of TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) by activating a calcium-
transducing G-protein receptor, G q/11, in the thyroid leading, via a feedback
mechanism with increased intracellular cAMP, to desensitization of the TSH
receptorg and ultimately hypothyroidism. Fluoride, like TSH, has the ability to
influence all aspects of thyroid hormone homeostasis in all tissues where the TSH
receptor is expressed, which includes the brain and bone as well as the thyroid,
including iodine uptake and utilization, thyroid hormone homeostasis,
deiodination, and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) activity. Deiodination involves the
conversion of the hormone produced in the thyroid gland, thyroxine or T4, to the
active thyroid hormone triiodothyronine, T3.hij Moreover, Dr Russell Blaylock has
suggested that fluoride may lead to excitotoxicity with cell death in the brain from
overstimulation. It may also induce, via brain NMDA receptor stimulation, a
chronic activation of the microglial cells in the brain, with the release of high
levels of the excitotoxic aminoacids glutamate and aspartate, and the secretion of
high levels of immune cytokines, and other immune factors, which can enhance
excitotoxicity.klmn
Some persons are evidently more sensitive than others for developing the
symptoms of chronic fluoride toxicity, particularly those with renal (kidney)
a
Patkar SA, Kazimierczak W, Diamant B. Histamine release by calcium from sodium fluoride-activated rat mast cells:
further evidence for a secretory process. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1978;57:146-54.
b
Kuza M, Kazimierczak W. On the mechanism of histamine release from sodium fluoride-activated mouse mast cells.
Agents Actions 1982;12:289-94.
cStrunecká A, Patocka J. Pharmacological and toxicological effects of aluminofluoride complexes. Fluoride 1999;32:230-42.
d
Hunter T. Protein kinases and phosphatases: the yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling [review]. Cell
1995;80:225-36.
e
Birnbaumer L. Expansion of signal transduction by G proteins The second 15 years or so: from 3 to 16 alpha subunits plus
betagamma dimers. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007;1768(4):772-93.
fSchuld A. Fluoride effects on thyroid function. Fluoride 2003;36:72.
g
Tezelman S, Shaver JK, Grossman RF, Liang W, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, et al. Desensitization of adenylate cyclase in
Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
Endocrinology.1994;134(3):1561-9.
h
Lubkowska A, Zyluk B, Chlubek D. Interactions between fluorine and aluminium [editorial]. Fluoride 2002; 35:73-7.
iStrunecká A, Patocka J. Pharmacological and toxicological effects of aluminofluoride complexes. Fluoride 1999;32:230-42.
j
k
Blaylock RL. Fluoride neurotoxicity and excitotoxicity/microglial activation: critical need for more research. Fluoride
2007;40:89-92.
lBlaylock RL. Excitotoxicity: a possible central mechanism in fluoride neurotoxicity. Fluoride 2004;37:301-14.
m
Blaylock RL. Health and nutrition secrets that can save your life. Revised ed. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Health Press;
2006. p. 93-131.
n
Blaylock RL. Excitotoxins: the taste that kills. How monosodium glutamate, aspartame (Nutrasweet®) and similar
substances can cause harm to the brain and nervous system and their relationship to neurodegenerative diseases such as
Alzheimer’s, Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) and others. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Health Press; 1997.
making you sick?
disease, diabetes mellitus, and allergies. Patients with renal impairment are less
able to eliminate fluoride promptly, diabetics tend to drink more water than
average, and allergic individuals are less tolerant to noxious agents than are
normal individuals. Dr Waldbott estimated that about 1% of persons exposed to
fluoridated water develop the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome, while Dr Hans
Moolenburgh, a general practitioner in the Netherlands, considered the proportion
to be about 5–6%.ab Subtle toxicity may affect many more.
MAKING THE DIAGNOSIS OF THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME
Not all the symptoms are necessarily present at the same time. Their severity and
duration, which is often episodic, depend on a person’s age, nutritional status,
environment, kidney function, amount of fluoride ingested, genetic background,
tendency to allergies, and other factors such as the degree of “hardness” of the
fluoridated water due to the amount of calcium and magnesium present.
Dr Waldbott, together with Professors Albert Burgstahler and Lewis McKinney,
noted that to test whether or not fluoride is causing symptoms of ill health the
following must, as far as possible, be rigorously avoided:
1 all fluoridated water (Substitute distilled or other nonfluoridated water such as that obtained with
a reverse osmosis filter. Ordinary charcoal or carbon water filters do not remove fluoride. Dr
Michael Easley, a profluoridationist and dental coordinator for the state Department of Health,
Florida, notes “Nobody drags anyone to a water faucet and makes them drink. Dig a well. Move
out of the country.” but his comments are both unsympathetic and impractical.c)
2 fluoridated beverages
3 fluoride-rich foods such as tea, ocean fish, gelatin, skin of chicken, fluoridated salt, food
contaminated with fluoride-containing insect or post-harvest fumigants (e.g. sulfuryl fluoride) and
pesticides (e.g. cryolite, sodium aluminium fluoride, Na3AlF6, which may be used on grapes),
etc.
4 fluoridated toothpastes
5 fluoride from any other environmental source, including cigarette smoke and industrial pollution,
e.g. fluoride in dust and fumes from industries such as those manufacturing steel, aluminium,d
enamel,e pottery, glass, bricks, phosphate fertilizer, and others involved with power, welding,
water fluoridation plants,f refrigeration, rust removal, oil refining,g plastics, pharmaceuticals,
tooth-paste, chemicals, and automobiles.h
Dr Susheela notes that other sources of fluoride may include:i
6 medications containing fluoride and fluoride mouth rinses
7 black rock salt (fluorite, CaF2) and foods containing black rock salt (Kala Namak) for flavour, e.g.
Dhalmoth, other salty snacks, chat masala, etc.
8 red rock salt and foods made using red rock salt
9 tobacco or supari (Aracanut) when they are chewed by themselves
In China, fluoride toxicity occurs with:
10 brick tea made, in Tibet, by compressing the older tea leaves, which have a higher fluoride
content, into “bricks.” Part of the brick is broken off to prepare the tea.j
a
Waldbott GL. Affidavit in: Dr Waldbott presents affidavit to assist Massachusetts Superior Court Case. National
Fluoridation News 1980;XXVI(3):1-2.
bMoolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
c
Anton M. For some fluoridated water still hard to swallow. Los Angeles Times. 2007 Dec 27.
d
Waldbott GL. Fluoridation: a clinician’s experience. South Med J 1980;73:301-6.
eWaldbott GL. Preskeletal fluorosis near an Ohio enamel factory: a preliminary report. Vet Hum Toxicol 1979;21:4-8.
f
Waldbott GL. Subacute fluorosis due to airborne fluoride. Fluoride 1983;16:72-82.
g
Waldbott GL, Lee JR. Toxicity from repeated low-grade exposure to hydrogen fluoride: case report. Clin Toxicol
1978;13(3):391-402.
hSusheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 3rd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2007.
p. 17-8.
i
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2001. p. 100.
j
Cao J, Liu JW, Tang LL, Sangbu DZ, Yu S, Zhou S, et al. Dental and early-stage skeletal fluorosis in children induced by
fluoride in brick-tea. Fluoride 2005;38:44-7.
Making the diagnosis of the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome 7
11 food contaminated with fluoride. In some parts of China, food, such as chillies and corn,
becomes contaminated with fluoride over a period of months as it is dried in dwellings in which
the heating and cooking is done with coal briquettes made by mixing cheaper powder coal with
clay which is high in fluoride. The presence of clay results in smoke with a high fluoride level and,
in the absence of a chimney flue, the food stored in the dwelling gradually becomes
contaminated with fluoride (Figures 8-11).ab
If the symptoms are in fact caused by fluoride, they should diminish markedly
within a week and largely disappear within several weeks. If symptoms persist,
consult a physician for possible alternative explanations. True fluoride toxicosis
can be reproduced by re-exposure to fluorides from whatever source. Dr Susheela
found the gastrointestinal symptoms settled within 15 days.c She noted that for
diagnosing skeletal fluorosis, measuring the levels of fluoride, in the blood and
urine, was helpful along with taking radiographs of the forearm to look for the
presence of calcification of the interosseous membrane or a wavy outline of the
bones of the forearm, and of any region or joint where there was pain, rigidity or
stiffness, looking for increased bone density, or, in patients with calcium
deficiency, a weakening of the bone (osteomalacia).
powdered coal
clay
Photograph by BS Zheng
Figure 8. Powered coal, which is one third of the price of lumps of coal, is mixed with clay
to form briquettes so that air spaces are present in the fire to allow the coal to burn. The clay
acts as an adhesive to form lumps of a mixture of coal powder and clay. The air can enter
between the lumps in the fire thus allowing the coal to burn.
aZheng BS, Wu DS, Wang BB, Liu XJ, Wang AM, Chen XZ, et al. Fluorosis caused by indoor coal combustion in China:
discovery and progress. Proceedings of the XXVIIth conference of the International Society for Fluoride Research; 2007
Oct 9-12; Beijing, PR China.
b
Wu DS, Zheng BS, Wang AM, Yu GQ. Fluoride exposure from burning coal-clay in Guizhou Province, China. Fluoride
2004;37:20-7.
c
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 3rd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2007.
p. 95.
making you sick?
Photograph by BS Zheng Photograph by BS Zheng

Figure 9. Chillies drying above a stove Figure 10. Corn drying above a stove without
without a flue burning powdered coal a flue burning powdered coal briquettes
briquettes made with high fluoride clay made with high fluoride clay.
and becoming contaminated with
fluoride from the smoke.
Photograph by BS Zheng
Figure 11. Corn drying above a stove without a flue burning powdered coal briquettes
made with high fluoride clay.
Making the diagnosis of the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome 9
She considered that if the patient has joint pain, such as in the neck, back, knee,
or shoulder, then, when taking a radiograph of the affected region, it was important
to take a radiograph of the forearm.ab The forearm has two long bones in it, the
radius on the thumb side and the ulna on the side of the little finger, with a fibrous
membrane between the bones (interosseous membrane). Normally there is no bone
in the membrane and it does not show up as an opacity in radiographs or “X-rays.”
When fluoride toxicity is present, bone containing calcium is laid down in
membranes, ligaments, and joints where it does not normally appear. When it is
laid down in the membrane between the two bones in the forearm, it is called
forearm interosseous membrane calcification.
In the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome or preskeletal fluorosis, Dr Waldbott
found that although fluoride levels in the urine are occasionally elevated or lower
than normal, the lack of consistency does not permit the use of these tests as
absolute diagnostic criteria for fluoride poisoning.c He found the degree of
poisoning does not necessarily parallel the amount of the toxic agent stored in
organs or present in the blood stream and that merely the flow of a toxic agent
through a person could damage their health. He noted that an elevation of the
urinary fluoride is not a prerequisite for the diagnosis of nonskeletal fluorosis.
Although fluoride may be present in a medication or an anaesthetic agent, it may
be less toxic by being in a bound rather than a free form. Unless fluorinated
organic chemicals are metabolised in the body to release the fluoride they contain,
the covalently bound fluoride may be eliminated from the body without having
been released as free fluoride ions. A small increase in the serumd fluoride level
occurs with the partially metabolized ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic,
while a larger increase occurs with fluorinated anaesthetics such as halothane,
which are metabolised to a greater extent.e It is possible that small amounts of
fluoride released from fluoride-containing medications may be a cause of illness,
particularly if the release is in an area, such as the brain, where even minute
concentrations may have a very potent effect.
WHAT TO DO IF THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY IS MADE
If symptoms remit after avoiding fluoride, little encouragement should be
needed to continue to avoid it. Neither laboratory studies on animals nor data on
human teeth and bones have provided conclusive evidence that fluoride is
essential for life.f
aSusheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 3rd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2007.
p. 63-7.
b
Susheela AK. Fluorosis: an easily preventable disease through practice of interventions for doctors functioning in all health
delivery outlets in endemic districts in India. India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2005. p. 10-1.
c
p. 243, 255.
dSerum is the clear straw coloured fluid that is left after blood coagulates or clots, or the clear supernatant left after the red
and white blood cells (erythrocytes and leukocytes) in the blood are separated, usually by centrifugation.
e
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 49-51.
f
p. 243, 76-85.
making you sick?
Rather than medication for remediation, Dr Susheela recommends proper

nutrition to give a diet containing at least 1.0 g of calcium a day together with
vitamin C, vitamin E, and other antioxidants such as β-carotene, glutathione,
quercetin, allicin, capasaican, ellagic acid, gallic acid, epicatechin, lycopene,
glucosinolates, lutein and zeaxanthin.ab Antioxidants are particularly important in
protecting the body from fluoride toxicity. They act as “scavengers” to remove
“free radicals” and occur naturally in fresh fruit and vegetables. Vitamin E (α-
tocopherol), a potent antioxidant, exerts its protective effect primarily through
destruction of cell damaging free oxygen species.c Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is an
antioxidant with detoxification properties. Calcium may help overcome the
hypocalcaemia induced by fluoride and act synergistically with vitamin C.
CASE REPORTS OF FLUORIDE TOXICITY
The 507-page, 2006 National Research Council report, Fluoride in drinking
water: a scientific review of EPA’s standards (2006 NRC report),d notes that the
primary symptoms of gastrointestinal injury are nausea, vomiting, and abdominal
pain, and that these had been reported in case studies by Waldbotte and Petraborgf
as well as in a double-blind clinical study by Grimbergeng involving the research
group of doctors in the Netherlands with Dr Hans Moolenburgh. The report noted
that the case reports were well documented and that the authors could have been
examining a group of patients whose gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were particularly
hypersensitive. It noted:
“The possibility that a small percentage of the population reacts systematically to fluoride,
perhaps through changes in the immune system, cannot be ruled out. …
“Perhaps it is safe to say that less than 1% of the population complains of GI symptoms after
fluoridation is initiated (Feltman and Kosel 1961h). The numerous fluoridation studies in the
past failed to rigorously test for changes in GI symptoms and there are no studies on
drinking water containing fluoride at 4 mg/L in which GI symptoms were carefully
documented. …
“In a recent study, Machalinski et al. 2003i) reported that the four different human leukemic
cell lines were more susceptible to the effects of sodium hexafluorosilicate, the compound
most often used in fluoridation, than to NaF [sodium fluoride].”
Feltman and Kosel, whose large controlled clinical study was conducted by
dental supporters of fluoride.wrote:
aSusheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 3rd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2007.
p. 89-94.
b
p. 89-94.
c
Chinoy NJ, Nair SB, Jhala DD. Arsenic and fluoride induced toxicity in gastrocnemius muscle of mice and its reversal by
therapeutic agent. Fluoride 2004;37:243-8.
dDoull J, Boekelheide K, Farishian BG, Isaacson RL, Klotz JB, Kumar JV, Limeback H, Poole C, Puzas JE, Reed N-MR,
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 269, 293, 303.
e
Waldbott GL. Incipient chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water. II. Distinction between allergic reactions and drug
intolerance. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1956;9(5):241-9.
f
Petraborg HT. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water (preliminary report). Fluoride 1974;7:47-52.
gGrimbergen GW. A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water (preliminary report). Fluoride
1974;7:146-52.
h
Feltman R, Kosel G. Prenatal and postnatal ingestion of fluoride: fourteen years of investigation; final report. J Dent Med
1961;16:190-8.
i
Machaliński B, Baskiewicz-Masiuk M, Sadowska B, Machalinska M, Marchlewicz M, Wiszniewska B, et al. The influence of
sodium fluoride and sodium hexafluorosilicate on human leukemic cell lines: preliminary report. Fluoride 2003;36;231-40.
Case reports of fluoride toxicity 11
“One percent of our cases reacted adversely to the fluoride (1 mg/day tablets). By the
use of placebos, it was definitely established that the fluoride and not the binder was
the causative agent. These reactions, occurring in gravid women and in children of all
ages in the study group, affected the dermatologic, gastro-intestinal, and neurological
systems. Eczema, atopic dermatitis, urticaria, epigastric distress, emesis, and
headache have all occurred with the use of fluoride and disappeared upon the use of
placebo tablets, only to recur when the fluoride tablet was, unknowingly to the
patient, given again. When adverse reactions occur, the therapy can be readily
discontinued and the patient or parent advised of the fact that sensitivity exists and
the element is to be avoided as much as possible.”
Some case reports from Canada, the USA, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and
India will now be presented to illustrate the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome.
ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN CANADA
Sickness occurred with people after fluoride has been added to their drinking
water. Fluoride was added to the drinking water in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, on
11 September 1962.a However, the local health department did not announce
immediately that the change had been made because they feared an adverse
reaction by the citizens. This situation provided an excellent opportunity to test
whether fluoridated water produced sickness. When the press announced the
commencement of fluoridation to the public two weeks later, eight individuals
were able to diagnose their own disease.
Mrs MH and Mrs EK:b Two of the eight, Mrs MH, a nurse, age 57, and Mrs EK,
age 38, had been in the habit of drinking one or two glasses of water before
breakfast. For some unknown reason, they suddenly experienced abdominal
cramps and vomited immediately after their customary morning drink. During the
course of the day they developed headaches, pains in the lower spine, and
numbness and pains in the arms and legs. They had never before had any such
discomfort and were not aware that Windsor’s water had been fluoridated. The
doctor for Mrs MH, Dr FS, considered at first that she had a stomach ailment but
medication did not help. After several days of careful observation he suspected
that the water might somehow be involved in her illness and advised her to
discontinue drinking it. She then promptly recovered. Mrs EK resorted to the use
of distilled water on her own and also promptly recovered.
Miss CD:c Another of the eight was a 13-year-old schoolgirl, Miss CD, who in
mid-September 1962 developed increasingly severe migraine-like headaches,
pains and numbness in her arms and legs, and a distinct deterioration in her mental
alertness which interfered with her attendance at school. A consulting neurologist
ruled out the possibility of a brain tumour. Tests to determine whether the
headaches were caused by allergy were negative. On the advice of another patient
who had been similarly affected, she stopped drinking the Windsor drinking water.
Her illness began to subside immediately and she had recovered completely after
10 days. On Mondays and Thursdays however the headaches recurred when, after
aWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p.121.
b
p.121-2.
c
p.122-3.
making you sick?
gym classes, she quenched her thirst with Windsor drinking water. These
recurrences stopped after she began carrying her own distilled drinking water to
school. Proof that the fluoride caused the illness was obtained when the disease
was reproduced by a Windsor doctor giving fluoride in water in a double-blind
manner. After the symptoms had subsided with being on a fluoride-free water
supply, the condition recurred when water was used containing 1 part per million
of fluoride (2.2 ppm of sodium fluoride) with neither the patient nor the testing
doctor being aware of when the fluoride was reintroduced.
ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN THE USA
Mrs SS:a In 1954, Mrs SS, age 40, a resident of Bay City, Michigan, USA, was
referred to an allergy specialist in Warren, Michigan, George L Waldbott, MD,
because of painful spastic bowels, frequent nausea and vomiting, bloating of the
stomach, and persistent migraine-like headaches. She mentioned that every
morning on awakening she was so thirsty that she had to drink several glasses of
water. She wondered if the Bay City’s water could account for her stomach and
bowel upsets because they usually occurred in the morning after she had
consumed water. She gave the clue to her diagnosis by noting that whenever she
was away from the city, her mouth and throat no longer felt dry, she was no longer
thirsty, the cramps in her abdomen stopped, and her headaches did not occur.
Neither she nor Dr Waldbott realized that Bay City’s water was fluoridated in
1951. This was the first case of fluoride toxicity Dr Waldbott encountered.
Mrs MJ:bcd Dr Waldbott met another patient a few months later in 1954. Mrs
MJ, age 35, of Highland Park, Michigan, USA, had a mysterious illness with a
variety of symptoms. Highland Park’s water had been fluoridated since 1952. Her
condition was more severe than the Bay City patient. She was constantly
nauseated, vomited frequently, had periodic pains in the stomach, suffered
diarrhoea, and had pains in the lower back. Her general health deteriorated so that
she became bedridden and reported a progressive weight loss, passed blood
repeatedly from her kidneys and uterus, had a constant and frequently unbearable
pain in her head, and had a problem with her eyesight, noticing blind spots or
moving spots in both eyes. She had lesions on her skin that she thought were the
result of bleeding or bruises, and the muscles of her hands and arms weakened so
that she often dropped potatoes when she was peeling them. She often lost control
of her legs, could no longer coordinate her thoughts, and became incoherent,
drowsy, and forgetful. She had lived near Hanchow, China, an area with a high
fluoride level, until the age of 5, and had had mottled teeth since early childhood.
This gave a clue to her diagnosis.
She was admitted to hospital in Detroit and examined by eight specialists who
considered her illness to be serious but could not make an overall diagnosis. Until
the preliminary tests were completed she had been instructed to continue to use the
fluoridated Highland Park water. She was then changed to the nonfluoridated
a
p.114-5.
bWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p.115-8.
c
Waldbott GL. Chronic fluorine intoxication from drinking water. Int Arch Allergy 1955;7:70-4.
d
Waldbott GL. Incipient fluorine intoxication from drinking water. Acta Medica Scandinavica 1956;CLVI:157-68.
Illness in people in the USA 13
Detroit water with 0.1 ppm of fluoride. Within two days the stomach symptoms
and headaches subsided and she was soon well enough to be discharged. Neither in
the hospital nor after her discharge was she given any medication. Instead she was
instructed to strictly avoid fluoridated water, not only for drinking but also for
cooking her food. She was also told to avoid both tea and seafood because of their
high fluoride content. The headaches, eye disturbances, and muscular weakness
disappeared in a most dramatic manner. After about two weeks her mind began to
clear and she underwent a complete change in her personality. For the first time in
two years she was able to undertake her household duties without having to stop
and rest. Within a four-week period she had gained five pounds.
Subsequently the patient was subjected to a series of tests which definitely
proved that her disease was related to fluoridated water. Without being aware of
what she was receiving, she developed symptoms with fluoridated water but not
distilled water. A classical attack of migraine headache was produced by one
milligram of fluoride in two glasses of water.
She recovered completely without any treatment other than the elimination of
Highland Park fluoridated water for drinking and cooking. A feature of her disease
was that the more water, she drank the thirstier she became. The numbness in her
arms, hands, and legs, and the arthritic pains in the spine were worse upon
awakening in the morning, whereas one would usually have expected the reverse
after a night’s rest.
Mrs HM:abA few weeks later, in November 1954, Dr Waldbott saw 30 people in
Saginaw, Michigan, USA, who had been ill there, and who had become suspicious
of fluoridated water because their health improved immediately, and their illnesses
gradually cleared up completely, following the termination of fluoridation in
Saginaw. Nine of the 30 had a disease that matched that of the Highland Park case
of Mrs MJ. Some of them had experienced relief when they were away from
Saginaw, even for short periods. Most of them had been unaware that fluoride was
being added to their drinking water until they were confronted with voting in a
referendum on fluoridation. Some of the individuals suffered exclusively from
bladder and bowel symptoms. Mrs HM, age 49, had mottled teeth like Mrs MJ and
had spent her childhood near Toronto, Canada, where the well water was said to
contain fluoride. During July 1953, two years and three months after Saginaw
fluoridated its water supply, she noted a peculiar gnawing sensation in her stomach
after eating “as though there was something burning inside.” At the same time she
experienced increasing stiffness of her back which was partly relieved by using a
board on her bed. Her hands began to tingle in the areas around her ring and little
fingers. She could not finish peeling her potatoes. She lost control of her legs
which “seemed to collapse” under her. Gradually she developed severe muscular
pains in her arms and legs. Her throat, eyes, and nose became extremely dry. The
more drinking water she drank the thirstier she became. Her head became “foggy,”
her thinking “not clear,” her hair began to fall out, and her finger nails became
brittle and ridged. On hot days, when she drank more water, the general weakness,
a
p.118-9.
b
making you sick?
mental sluggishness, and dryness of the throat became worse. On 19 October 1953
she started to use bottled water for drinking and distilled water for cooking after
learning, for the first time, that the Saginaw water was fluoridated. Within a few
days her illness began to clear up. The pain in the stomach and dryness of the
mouth improved first. The backache and muscular pains lasted for about three
more weeks. The nails became normal after several months and she then remained
in excellent health.
Mr RM:a Mr RM, age 42, was also in the Saginaw group of 30. He was about to
give up his job because of progressive pains and weakness in his hands that
prevented him from grasping the steering wheel of his car. The condition became
so severe that he often had to stop on the highway. He finally became suspicious of
Saginaw’s water because the disease invariably lessened when he was on extended
sales trips away from Saginaw. When fluoridation was abandoned there in 1954 he
quickly recovered.
Dr Waldbott also cared for the next two patients, Mrs CMK and Miss GL.
Mrs CMK:b “Mrs CMK, a 30-year-old ragweed, hayfever patient, under my care
since March 1963, had allergic reactions to many drugs including codeine, iodine,
penicillin and xylocaine. On 15 June 1965, two years and nine months after the
Windsor, Ontario water supply had, unbeknown to her, become fluoridated, she
had extensive laboratory studies in a Windsor hospital because of periorbital
edema, a tendency to generalized fluid retention associated with headaches,
scintillating scotomata, and spastic bowels. The EEG had suggested a tendency to
“convulsive disorders,’ but otherwise no diagnosis had been made.
“On 20 May 1966 she was hospitalized at Harper Hospital, Detroit, by Dr JPG.
In addition to the above complaints, she stated that she had frequent episodes of
abdominal pains, dysuria and urinary tenesmus, and muscular weakness with a
tendency to fall down without warning and without losing consciousness. She had
noted slurred speech, pains, paraesthesias in the arms and legs, general malaise,
marked mental sluggishness, and a gradual deterioration of the eyesight which was
not corrected by glasses.
“On examination she showed fibrillation of the facial muscles and grayish-blue
suffusions [coloured areas] on the arms and legs, 2 to 3 cm in diameter, which she
stated came on frequently without trauma. The neurological examination (Dr JEG)
showed slightly increased tendon reflexes. Electromyographic tests (Dr FSS) were
indicative of hypocalcaemic tetany. Retinoscopy [viewing the retinae of the eyes]
(Dr OAB) showed slight edema of the optic discs in both eyes. Cystoscopic
examination (Dr HVM) of the bladder revealed evidence of mild urethritis
[inflammation of the ureters] and cystitis [inflammation of the bladder].
“A test dose of 6.8 mg of fluoride (15 mg sodium fluoride, NaF), [given on 19
May 1966], 24 hours prior to admission, resulted in a marked aggravation of her
condition and precipitated an episode of urticaria [an allergic skin reaction with
swelling and itching similar to that produced by the sting of a nettle] which
a
p.119-20.
b
Waldbott GL. Hydrofluorosis in the U.S.A. Fluoride 1968;1:94-102.
Illness in people in the USA 15
persisted for two days. Throughout the hospital stay, while on low fluoride water
(0.1 mg/L or ppm) she improved progressively. Upon discharge, on 6 June 1966,
she was free of symptoms. Serum calcium levels ranged from 8.2 to 9.2 mg/dL or
mg% (normal 8.8–10.0 mg/dL), shortly after admission, and urinary calcium from
86 to 150 mg/24 hours (normal <250 mg/24 hr). Otherwise the laboratory tests
were unremarkable.
“On 9 June 1966 she was given a double-blind test under supervision of Dr JPG.
She was able to identify the bottle which contained the fluoride in water because
of the gradual return of her previous illness, particularly the general edema and the
abdominal symptoms.
“Three identical bottles labelled #1, 2, and 3, are prepared by the pharmacist: Two contain
plain distilled water, the third, 1 mg of fluoride (2.2 mg sodium fluoride, NaF) per tablespoon of
water, the daily dose recommended for the prevention of tooth decay. Neither the patient nor the
physician knows which bottle contains fluoride. The patient is instructed to take half a
tablespoon twice a day in one pint of water (before breakfast and before dinner) from bottle #1
for one week, from bottle #2 the second week, and from bottle #3 the third week. Usually the
fluoride water causes the symptoms to recur within 1 to 3 days. During the test, urinary fluoride
determinations are made.
“Since avoiding tea, seafood, and fluoridated water, she had remained well
except for minor recurrences which have been due to inadvertently imbibing
Windsor fluoridated water. On 20 May 1966, after she was given the above test,
the 24 hour urinary fluoride excretion was 2.8 mg; on 6 June 1968, the day after
she was discharged from the hospital, 0.27 mg.”
Miss GL:a “Miss GL, 27 years old, had been under my care since July 1966
because of allergic nasal and sinus disease of about six years’ duration. She
complained also of frontal and occipital headaches, of paresthesias and pains in the
arms and hands, of backache, of arthritis in the interphalangeal joints [the joints in
the fingers and toes], of persistent gastralgia [stomach pain] and spastic
constipation, of frequent episodes of ulcers in the mouth, and of pyelocystitis for
which she was being treated by other specialists. Desensitization for ragweed,
grass pollen, and fungi to which she was sensitive cleared up the nasal allergy but
failed to affect any of the other symptoms.
“The urinary tract disturbances and the marked generalized weakness progressed
to such an extent that they interfered with her employment as a teacher and
necessitated hospitalization at Hutzel Hospital on 1 February 1967.
“Laboratory tests, including kidney function studies were unremarkable. A
cystoscopy and pyelography [radiograph or “X-ray” showing kidney function by
using a dye, IVP, intravenous pyelogram] revealed an ectopic left kidney which
failed to excrete the indigo carmine dye. The urologist (Dr FSB) considered this
kidney without function and advised its removal. There was also a congenital
fusion of the lumbar vertebrae, congenital absence of two lumbar segments and
disc spaces; the right leg had been amputated at age 8 because of a congenital
abnormality.
“Because the patient’s condition failed to respond to therapy and because of the
similarity of the clinical picture with that encountered in other individuals
a
Waldbott GL. Hydrofluorosis in the U.S.A. Fluoride 1968;1:94-102.
making you sick?
intolerant to fluoride—without being aware of it she been drinking fluoridated

water for 17 years in Highland Park, Michigan—she was placed on distilled water
for cooking and drinking, and instructed to avoid “high fluoride” food (tea and
seafood). The gastrointestinal symptoms and headaches disappeared completely
within 10 days. On 12 June 1967, pyelography and cystoscopy revealed that the
function of the ectopic left kidney had returned to normal. No blind or double-
blind tests were carried out in this case because of the risk involved, particularly
with respect to the kidneys.
“The patient has had no further urinary disturbances and has remained symptom-
free. The 24-hour urinary fluoride, on 9 December 1966, prior to the
hospitalization on 1 February 1967, was 1.3 mg. On 14 June 1967 no fluoride was
detected in the urine.”
In 1972, Mr J Quirk brought to the
attention of Dr Harvey T Petraborg, MD, of
Aitkin, Minnesota, USA, the plight of six
people in Cudahy, Wisconsin, USA, who
had developed a variety of systemic
symptoms after their water supply was
fluoridated on 8 November 1966 and whose
symptoms cleared up promptly after they
stopped using fluoridated water (Figure 12).
Dr Petraborg interviewed these six people
together with a seventh person, also
identified by Mr Quirk, in fluoridated Saint
Francis, Wisconsin, on 3–5 August 1972.a
Mr EH: Mr EH, age 52, became ill in the
second week of November 1966, within a Figure 12. Harvey T Petraborg, MD.
week of fluoridation starting. After having 3 February 1895–24 August 1981.
been in excellent health, he developed
bloating in the lower portion of the abdomen, oedema in the extremities and pain
in the feet and fingers. As the illness progressed he developed diarrhoea with 7–8
watery stools daily which were often tinged with blood. He was admitted to
hospital for 4 days and had a variety of tests which did not show the cause of his
illness. The diarrhoea persisted after his discharge from hospital. He developed
marked itching on his legs when he showered but no itching occurred with
showers at his workshop where the water was not fluoridated. He developed
general dermatitis when he took a bath. This drew his attention to the possibility
that his illness might be related to drinking water. He switched to nonfluoridated
water and the bleeding and diarrhoea stopped. On several subsequent occasions
whenever, unbeknown to himself, he drank fluoridated water the diarrhoea
promptly recurred.
Mrs RAJ: Mrs RAJ, age 31, became unwell in November 1966 with persistent
headaches, intermittent abdominal cramps with diarrhoea, and increasing fatigue
which gradually became more severe and made it difficult for her to do her
a
Illness in people in New Zealand 17
housework. The condition promptly subsided in 1971 when she moved with her
family to Stratford, Wisconsin, which was not fluoridated. In April 1972, the
family moved to fluoridated Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and within 24 hours the
headaches returned, followed shortly afterwards by diarrhoea and abdominal
cramps. At first the intestinal disorders occurred once or twice a week and lasted
1–2 days but gradually they became persistent. Her abdomen was constantly
bloated and severe general disability followed. On being advised about
fluoridation by Mr Quirk she began to use spring water for cooking and drinking.
Within a few days her health improved remarkably and by continuing to avoid
fluoridated water she remained in good health.
Mrs RM: Mrs RM, age 31, also became ill in November 1966 after fluoridation
started. She experienced a gradual deterioration in her strength with a loss of
appetite and weight. She became so weak that it was a great effort for her to do her
housework. On the advice of Mr Quirk she switched to nonfluoridated spring
water and within a short time her appetite returned, she gained weight, she slept
well, and her energy and strength recovered. By continuing to use nonfluoridated
water she remained in good health.
Mr FT: Mr FT, a machinist, age 36, had been in perfect health until soon after
fluoridation began when he began to be tired and lethargic. He became tense,
mentally depressed, and experienced frequent headaches. After a day’s work he
found it necessary to lie down and sleep for several hours. He developed
generalized itching after bathing. The symptoms all went when, on the advice of
Mr Quirk, he stopped using the fluoridated Cudahy water. After several weeks on
the low fluoride regime he returned to Cudahy water because he found it
inconvenient and expensive to keep himself supplied with nonfluoridated water.
The itching, headaches, general malaise, and mental depression then promptly
returned. His symptoms again disappeared when he resumed using nonfluoridated
water.
Mrs JM: Mrs JM, age 31, had excellent health while living in nonfluoridated
Boyceville, Wisconsin, but within 24 hours of moving to fluoridated Cudahy, on 4
July 1971, she experienced constant abdominal pains, bloating, and diarrhoea.
This was soon followed by persistent vertigo and general malaise which
progressed to the point where she was unable to walk without assistance. Her
vision became blurred and her comprehension began to fail. Her legs collapsed
frequently and she was unable to rise from the floor. She found that she was
always thirsty and drank excessive amounts of the Cudahy water. In the latter part
of July 1971, she developed severe pain in the right side of her head and
paresthesias in the right part of her face. She underwent extensive tests at a
hospital including having a lumbar puncture but no diagnosis was made. About
one week after leaving hospital she was given nonfluoridated spring water as a
trial and instructed to avoid the Cudahy water for drinking and cooking. Within a
week the dizziness, lethargy, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms cleared up and
she has enjoyed perfect health since.
Mrs AM: Mrs AM, age 74, was in good health until 1965 when the family moved
to Saint Francis, Wisconsin, which uses Milwaukee fluoridated water. Within a
few days she developed headaches, vertigo, nausea, abdominal pains with
making you sick?
diarrhoea, and a gradual loss of weight. The headaches became severe and the
vertigo so pronounced that she could no longer walk from one room to another
without colliding with the furniture. The general exhaustion rendered her
bedridden during part of the day. Gradually she developed back pain as well as
arthritis in both knees and right shoulder joint. On the recommendation of Mr
Quirk, she started using nonfluoridated spring water in 1969. Within one to two
weeks, a remarkable change in her physical condition took place. All her
symptoms cleared except for her arthritic pains in her back and knees which
gradually lessened. Subsequently she has enjoyed good health.
Mr AA: Mr AA, 47 years, stated that about 4 years ago in 1968 he had an acute
episode involving kidney stones [nephrolithiasis]. He was hospitalized for 4 days
and passed 5 kidney stones. On his discharge from hospital he was advised to
drink large quantities of water. Shortly after carrying out this advice, he began to
complain of fatigue, vertigo, irritability, and had to restrict his activity at work. He
developed continuous headaches involving the whole skull bilaterally [on both
sides]. Although he had been flying his own aeroplane for 25 years, he could no
longer perform any precision maneuvering. At night, he could not see as well as
formerly. Because of the dizziness, he no longer felt safe flying his plane. In 1970,
on the advice of Mr Quirk, he switched from the fluoridated Cudahy water to
nonfluoridated spring water. Within a few days, the headaches, vertigo, and lack of
energy disappeared and he was able to pilot his airplane as well as ever.
ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN NEW ZEALAND
Mrs PA (pseudonym A): In 1997, Mrs PA, a 77-year-old woman in Dunedin,
New Zealand, where fluoride was added to the water in 1967, had a ten year
history of weight loss and abdominal pain from a gastric ulcer, which was shown
by biopsy to be severe chronic active gastritis with campylobacter pylori present.a
She obtained only temporary relief from the medication given to her. She said that
for many years her activities were restricted by abdominal pain and that she
existed on plain yoghurt. She said she could eat only about four tablespoonfuls of
a meal and was unable to tolerate foods like vegetables. Her symptoms remitted
within about two weeks of her commencing to use, in 1997, water from which the
fluoride had been removed with a reverse osmosis filter. She also noted a marked
improvement in the arthritis that she had in her back, shoulders, and jaw. Ten years
later, in 2007, at the age of 87, she remained well and had gained 6.4 kg in weight.
She continued to use filtered water which she said had been “like magic.” She said
that the improvement in her health had been “just a miracle.”
Mrs PB: On 30 July 2007, Mrs PB, a 67-year-old Dunedin woman, reported
having multiple symptoms and having noted that she became worse after being
back in Dunedin for about a month after being away for several weeks in other
parts of New Zealand that did not have fluoridated water. After a month back in
Dunedin, she noticed that her balance was poorer, she had tingling in her toes at
night that she tried to relieve by getting up and walking about, she felt that her
mouth was dry and that she should drink more during the day, she became aware
a
Spittle B. Dyspepsia associated with fluoridated water. Proceedings of the XXVIIth conference of the International Society
for Fluoride Research; 2007 Oct 9-12; Beijing, PR China.
Illness in people in New Zealand 19
of “blind spots” in her vision for the first time, she felt tired, and she had right
upper abdominal tenderness. She said that she had had the abdominal pain several
years previously and that it was attributed to “a twisted bowel.” She said that she
had a pain in her jaw and that she had a bluish spot on the inner aspect of her left
arm that came and went. It was about 10 mm in diameter and was not a bruise due
to an injury. It did not turn yellow or brown. She said she had headaches, felt
nervous, and was aware of palpitations. She also reported nausea, constipation,
and pain in her lower-mid thoracic spine. She was aware of a weakness in her arms
and was playing poorly at sport involving her arms. She said she tended to be
dizzy and that her nails broke easily. She commenced a trial of avoiding
fluoridated water by using nonfluoridated water, and not using fluoridated
toothpaste or tea. On 13 August 2007 she reported that her balance was “so much
better” and that she was less tired than before. She said that the tingling in her legs
at night, which she had had for a long time and which had been getting worse, had
lessened. She said that her right upper abdominal pain had improved. She reported
that her constipation had improved without any change in medication, that her
nausea was better, and that the headaches had gone. She said that the pain in her
mid-lower thoracic spine was better, her vision was better, and that the
troublesome spots had gone. She said that the dryness of her throat had gone and
she was not experiencing a lack of energy. Her ability to play sport had improved
and she was better able to anticipate her opponents’ moves. She said that her
nervousness had gone and that she had not had any more palpitations. She said that
she had lost the pain in her jaw and that the improvement had been remarkable. On
4 September 2007 she remained improved with not having the dark spots in her
vision, dry mouth, or constipation and with a better sense of balance. She said that
she could put her shoes on standing on one leg. The other areas of improvement
also remained and she planned to continue to avoid fluoridated water, fluoridated
toothpaste, and tea. The cause of her improvement could not be proven to be
related to avoiding fluoride, but the pattern of improvement is consistent with that
described for chronic fluoride toxicity.
Mr PC: On 8 June 2006, Mr PC, a 38-year-old man in Dunedin described having
a long standing problem with chronic fatigue, gastro-intestinal difficulties, and
problems with his memory and concentration. He said that he drank a lot of water,
up to about 4 L a day of the fluoridated Dunedin water. He said that he used to
swallow fluoridated toothpaste when he was younger. He commenced a trial of
using nonfluoridated spring water from a public source at Speight’s Brewery,
Rattray Street, Dunedin, with 0.1 ppm of fluoride, and avoiding fluoridated
toothpaste. He reported a week later that his energy had improved and that he had
been for a run, something he had previously been unable to do. He continued to
improve in his energy and on 22 June 2006 said that he felt his energy was at a
higher level than it had ever been before. On 29 June 2006 he reported that he was
going for small runs on three mornings a week and that he was managing on 6
hours sleep a night, which was less than he had previously slept for. On 27
November 2007, 17 months later, he remained well on nonfluoridated water,
continued to experience an increased energy level, and had further increased his
capacity for running.
making you sick?
Mrs PD: On 24 September 2007, Mrs PD, a 59-year-old Dunedin woman with a
long history of urinary urgency that had been investigated and considered to be
due to a small bladder capacity and for which an appropriate treatment would be
an operation to dilate the bladder, reported that her bladder problem had settled
after a trial of some weeks of using nonfluoridated spring water and reducing her
tea consumption from about 1.5 L a day to about 400 mL daily. On 18 October
2007 she reported a further improvement in the urgency and that she had had
several good days without any symptoms. She said that she was pleased with this
and felt that it meant that she did not have to have “a bladder stretching operation.”
She said that she had also had less stomach pain than she usually had and that she
did not have the bloating that she usually experienced. She reported that she had
skin itching after showering. Although a causative relationship cannot be proven,
the improvement in her symptoms is consistent with that described by others with
chronic fluoride toxicity.
Mrs IH:a Also in the South Island of New Zealand, in late 1973, Mrs IH, a 47-
year-old Timaru woman, found that, soon after fluoride was introduced into the
water supply, she became constipated for the first time in her life. She said that she
tried everything from bran to fresh fruit but nothing worked. She said that she
knew it must be something that she was taking but could not work out what it was.
She said somebody suggested it could be fluoride but she scoffed at the idea.
When she stayed with her son in nonfluoridated Christchurch her problem
vanished. Back in Timaru, her illness did not return while she used nonfluoridated
water from a reservoir on the outskirts of town but as soon as she went back to the
fluoridated water she became constipated again. She was convinced by her
experience that her constipation had been due to the fluoridated water.
Mrs PE: Mrs IH also reported that another woman had had a bad skin rash for
two years, ever since fluoridation started in Timaru, for which medical treatment
had been unsuccessful. Tests by her doctor suggested fluoride might be the cause.
The woman then switched to nonfluoridated water and within two weeks her rash
was gone.
ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN THE NETHERLANDS
Dr Hans Moolenburgh, a family physician, in Haarlem, the Netherlands, with an
interest in allergy, reported his experiences when fluoridation was introduced on
20 March 1972 to half of his practice in nearby Heemstede, which received water
from Amsterdam, while the other half of his practice in Haarlem remained free
from fluoridation (Figure 13).b
Miss PF: He said that he would never forget his first patient with fluoride
toxicity.c A 14-year-old girl, Miss PF, got colicky pains in her stomach two weeks
after fluoridation started that prevented her from going to school. He suggested
that she use nonfluoridated water. It was difficult to convince her parents to do this
because they had not known that fluoridation had started but with the
aAnon. Fluoridation stopped in Timaru, New Zealand. National Fluoridation News 1986; XXXI(4):2.
b
Moolenburgh H. Fluoride: the freedom fight. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing; 1987. p. 64
c
IIlness in people in the Netherlands 21
nonfluoridated water the girl had immediate pain relief. However, one Sunday
morning, the pain suddenly came back. The father commented that it was not
fluoridated water after all. Dr Moolenburgh asked him to think carefully. The
father then began to laugh and said “You’re right doc, I remember bringing up the
tea this morning and making it with drinking water.”
Mr PG: His second patient, Mr PG, had an
itchy rash all over his body.a
Dr Moolenburgh reported that one of the first
symptoms seen in fluoridated Amsterdam was
small, white, very painful sores in the mouth
(aphthous stomatitis). Later he saw this
regularly in the users of fluoridated toothpaste.
There were people with nagging pains in the
abdomen who often had another side-effect of
increased thirst which led them into a vicious
circle in which, the more drinking water they
drank, the more their symptoms increased.
Baby PH: He also noted “A five-week-old
Figure 13. Dr Hans Moolenburgh.
baby started crying and cried on and on, day and
night. It was taken to the hospital where nothing could be found wrong with the
child. It went on crying after returning home and was in pain from something.
After some weeks when the parents were frantic with despair, I suggested
nonfluoridated water. (This baby was not in my practice and the parents only heard
about our research when the illness of the child had continued for several weeks.)
With nonfluoridated water in the bottle the baby changed overnight to a sweet
contented child and stayed that way.”
Baby M: Dr Moolenburgh saw respiratory problems. He wrote “A boy, Michael,
two weeks old, was taken to the doctor because his breathing was not right.b The
mother had three older children. She said, ‘His breathing is different from the other
ones. It is laboured.’ Neither the doctor nor the specialist could find anything
wrong. The breathing grew steadily worse. As I am very interested in allergy, this
boy was brought to me when he was five months old. Here was typical asthmatic
breathing, and the child was not so bright and kicking as might be expected from a
healthy baby. He looked a little bit drowsy. I suggested nonfluoridated water in the
bottle to begin with, and in three days the child was healed. … The boy is now 11
years old and absolutely healthy.”
Baby PI: Dr Moolenburgh observed that, when using fluoridated water, allergic
children showed a tendency to fall back into old allergic complaints or show a
severe worsening of still existing complaints. He recorded “For instance, there was
a ten-month-old boy in my practice who had been healed from getting eczema by
changing the cow’s milk in the bottle for soy milk. Three days after the
a
b
Moolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
making you sick?
introduction of fluoridation the eczema was back all over the skin (without cows’
milk!) and only healed after the tap water had been thrown out.”a
Mrs PJ: Dr Moolenburgh stated that apart from skin troubles, gastrointestinal
complaints, and respiratory illnesses, other troubles during these first months of
fluoridation were headache, excessive thirst, a general feeling of being unwell, and
difficulty in concentration. He referred also to the side-effect of arthritis-like
complaints that came on much later, after several months, and went away more
slowly, over several weeks. They were mostly located in the lower part of the back
and in the small finger joints. One lady, Mrs PJ, was nearly crippled by these
complaints and, because even small amounts of fluoridated water were enough to
keep the illness going, she eventually had to move to a nonfluoridated region.b
Dr PK: Dr Moolenburgh formed a group with other doctors to conduct research
into the side-effects of fluoridation.c One day, Dr PK, a 60-year-old doctor in his
research group, looked pale and gloomy.d They asked him if he did not feel well
and he confessed that he had had a slowly increasing pain in his abdomen for some
months and was afraid that he had cancer. One of them, as a joke, suggested it was
the fluoridated water. He replied that that was “Stuff and nonsense” and that it did
not happen to him. Dr Moolenburgh suggested he try nonfluoridated water. He did
and was healed in three days. However a week later his complaints suddenly
returned and he did not understand why until he discovered that he had drunk
some coffee made with fluoridated water while attending a home delivery. He
continued to avoid fluoridated water and his complaints never returned.
ILLNESS IN PEOPLE IN INDIA
Professor AK Susheela described patients who became ill from fluoride in
India. Mr PL: Mr PL, a 45-year-old man who drank water with an elevated
fluoride level, complained of aches and pains in his joints and a 12-year history of
non-ulcer dyspepsia (nausea, loss of appetite, pain in the stomach, gas formation
and a bloated feeling, constipation followed by intermittent diarrhoea, and
headache).e He took a laxative magnesium hydroxide (Milk of magnesia) for the
constipation. The presence of skeletal fluorosis was confirmed by radiographs
showing forearm interosseous membrane calcification, and increased bone mass
and density. The fluoride levels in his blood and urine were also increased. After
three weeks of hospitalization and using water with less than 0.5 ppm of fluoride,
he was discharged with the abdominal pain, and the joint aches and pains, largely
relieved.
Master PM and Mr PN: Master PM, a 10-year-old boy suffered from excessive
thirst (polydipsia), drinking 4 L of water a day at school between 7 am and 2 pm,
and frequent urination (polyuria).f He limped when he got out of bed and also had
aMoolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
b
Moolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
c
Grimbergen GW. A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water (preliminary report). Fluoride
1974;7:146-52.
dMoolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
e
f
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2001. p. 111-3.
Illness in people in India 23
constipation with a bowel movement every three days. His serum and urine
fluoride levels were elevated at 0.08 mg/L (ppm, normal range ≤ 0.02 mg/L) and
8.0 mg/L (normal ≤ 0.10 mg/L) respectively. His father, Mr PN, also had
symptoms with abdominal pain, a bloated feeling with gas formation, nausea,
constipation followed by intermittent diarrhoea, extreme weakness, and fatigue.
Both were receiving excessive amounts of fluoride through water, food, and
toothpaste and responded to avoiding fluoridated toothpaste and a lowered intake
of fluoride in the food and water. After 7 months of intervention the boy’s serum
fluoride had fallen to 0.02 mg/L and the urine fluoride to 0.60 mg/L. Both Master
PM and Mr PN continued to be well.
While a urine fluoride level of ≤ 0.10 mg/L would be normal on a low fluoride
diet, a level of 0.2–0.3 mg/L might still be considered fairly normal in today's
environment even without fluoridated water.
Mr PO: Mr PO, a 59-year-old man, was diagnosed with fluoride toxicity after
forearm interosseous membrane calcification was found by an orthopaedic
surgeon.a He had a 15-year-history of back ache, found it difficult to climb stairs,
and was very depressed. He was found to have severe non-ulcer dyspepsia
symptoms with gas formation, a bloated stomach, nausea, and constipation with
intermittent diarrhoea. His serum and urine fluoride levels were elevated at 0.08
mg/L (normal range ≤ 0.02 mg/L) and 2.50 mg/L (normal ≤ 0.10 mg/L),
respectively. His drinking water fluoride was not elevated but he was using
fluoridated toothpaste, and consuming 100–150 g of Dhalmoth, a salted snack
with black rock salt, and was treating himself with an Ayurvedic tablet, Hajmola,
which also contained black rock salt. Black rock salt (Kala Namak, fluorite, CaF2)
has a high fluoride content, about 250 ppm. With a nutritional intervention,
avoiding fluoridated toothpaste and black rock salt, and taking a diet with 1.0 g of
calcium a day, vitamins C and E, and antioxidants, he improved remarkably over
10 months, at which stage his serum and urine fluoride levels were 0.03 mg/L and
0.70 mg/L.
OTHER ILLNESSES DUE TO FLUORIDE
An apparent, but statistically non-significant, association has been found
between fluoridation and the earlier onset of female sexual maturity. Girls
examined in fluoridated Newburgh, New York, had an average age for starting to
menstruate (menarche) of 12 years compared to 12 years 5 months in the
nonfluoridated control city of Kingston.b Animal studies with Mongolian gerbils
found a similar effect.cd A hormone, melatonin, produced in the pineal gland in the
brain, normally controls the onset of sexual maturity. Fluoride is concentrated in
the pineal gland, which has a rich blood supply, and the 2006 NRC report calls for
a
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2001. p. 109-
11.
bSchlesinger ER, Overton DE, Chase HC, Cantwell KT. Newburgh-Kingston caries-fluorine study, XIII. Paediatric findings
after ten years. J Am Dent Assoc 1956;52(3):296-306.
c
Luke JA. The effect of fluoride on the physiology of the pineal gland [thesis]. Guildford: University of Surrey; 1997.
d
Luke J. Effects of fluoride on the physiology of the pineal gland in the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. Fluoride
1998;31(3):S24.
making you sick?
further research to determine if it reduces melatonin production and causes an

earlier menarche.a
Fluoride has been linked to other illnesses such as the occurrence of a rare form
of bone cancer, osteosarcoma, in young men after exposure to fluoridated water as
young boys. Exposure of 6–8-year-old-boys to fluoridated water resulted in
significant increase, 500% at age 7, in the occurrence of osteosarcoma by age 20
years.bc Ingested fluoride is partly excreted in the urine and partly stored in bones
where it can inhibit the normal cycle of bone breaking down and being rebuilt.
Fluoride first affects the bone-resorbing cells, resulting in more bone being formed
(osteomegaly).d Over time, or with greater fluoride exposure, bone-forming cells
are also affected, resulting in less bone being present (osteopaenia). Thus fluoride
initially stimulates bone formation resulting in bones that are more dense but the
quality of the bone is inferior. Bones with high fluoride levels are more brittle and
hip fractures increase as the level of fluoride in the water supply increases.efg
Fluoride causes thyroid hormone disturbances. A close similarity exists between
the numerous symptoms and signs of hypothyroidism and those for fluoride
toxicity including dental fluorosis.hij There is also evidence that Down Syndrome
is associated with fluoridation.klmno
Increased violent crime has been linked to fluoridation with silicofluorides such
as sodium silicofluoride or hydrofluosilicic acid.p These are the forms of fluoride
usually used in fluoridation rather than sodium fluoride, are by-products of
industrial processes such as the manufacture of phosphate fertilizers rather than
being of pharmaceutical grade, have not been properly tested for safety in
fluoridating water, and differ in their effects from those of sodium fluoride by
being more potent in inhibiting acetylcholinesterase and increasing lead
absorption into the body, resulting in an impairment of brain functioning with a
lessened control over violent behaviour.q Silicofluorides act as a solvent for lead,
a
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 264, 267.
b
Bassin EB, Wypij D, Davis RB, Mittleman MA. Age-specific fluoride exposure in drinking water and osteosarcoma (United
States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:421-8.
cBryson C. The fluoride deception. New York: Seven Stories Press; 2006. [trade paperback edition]. p.xiv-xxx.
d
Krook LP, Justus C. Fluoride poisoning of horses from artificially fluoridated drinking water. Fluoride 2006;39:3-10.
e
Connett P. Waterborne fluoride and bone fractures [editorial]. Fluoride 2001;34:91-4.
fDiesendorf M, Colquhoun J, Spittle BJ, Everingham DN, Clutterbuck FW. New evidence on fluoridation. Aust NZ J Public
Health 1997;21:187-90.
g
Lindsay R. Fluoride and bone: quantity versus quality [editorial]. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:845-6.
h
Susheela AK, Bhatnagar M, Vig K, Mondal NK. Excess fluoride ingestion and thyroid hormone derangements in children
living in Delhi, India. Fluoride 2005;38:98-108.
iSchuld A. Fluoride effects on thyroid function. Fluoride 2003;36:72.
j
k
Susheela AK, Bhatnagar M, Vig K, Mondal NK. Excess fluoride ingestion and thyroid hormone derangements in children
living in Delhi, India. Fluoride 2005;38:98-108.
lBurgstahler AW. Fluoride and Down’s syndrome (Mongolism) [editorial review]. Fluoride 1975;8:1-11.
m
Burgstahler AW. Fluoridated water and Down’s syndrome [abstract]. Fluoride 1997;30:113.
n
Takahashi K. Fluoride-linked Down syndrome births and their estimated occurrence due to water fluoridation [review].
Fluoride 1998;31:61-73.
oBurgstahler AW. Fluoride and Down syndrome: an update. Proceedings of the XXVIIth conference of the International
Society for Fluoride Research; 2007 Oct 9-12; Beijing, PR China.
p
Masters RD. A moratorium on silicofluoride usage will save $$millions [editorial]. Fluoride 2005;38:1-5.
q
Coplan MJ, Masters RD. Silicofluorides and fluoridation [editorial]. Fluoride 2001;34:161-4.
Other illnesses due to fluoride 25
dissolving it into a solution, so that lead ingested from the environment, such as
soil contaminated by lead paint or from plumbing fittings containing lead, is more
readily absorbed.a In combination with water disinfection agents, such as
chloramines and ammonia, silicofluorides cause a greater leaching of lead from
leaded-brass plumbing parts.b Another factor leading to a raised blood lead
concentration may involve increased fluoride exposure increasing the dietary
requirement for calcium, and higher blood and tissue concentrations of lead
occurring when the diet is low in calcium.c A study by Jay Seavey suggested that
sodium fluoride was associated with violent crime independently of lead.d
Lowered intelligence has been reported in children from high fluoride areas,
particularly when associated with iodine deficiency, and the toxic effects of
fluoride on the development of the brain are supported by animal studies.efghijkl
A rare form of skin cancer affecting the genital area in women, vulvar
extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD), has also been linked to fluoridated
water.m Ms CH: Ms CH, age 67, first encountered fluoridated water when she
moved to a fluoridated community in Washington State, USA, in 1994. Within five
years she developed a small itchy area in the perineal area that was initially
diagnosed as a fungal infection and later as a “chronic perianal and vulvar
dermatitis.” Treatment with antifungal and topical medication was ineffective and
the condition came and went for several years. In 2003 she had an ovarian cyst
removed and a partial colectomy for the treatment of diverticulitis. One month
later, the perineal rash doubled in size and became unbearably painful. In addition,
she experienced other symptoms including dry skin, rashes on her arms and body,
earaches, a build up of “a white wax-like substance in her tonsils (‘tonsil stones’),”
dizzy spells, pain in her legs, and an allergy to latex (rubber). She was found to
have high blood pressure and blood tests showed high calcium and parathyroid
hormone levels. A biopsy showed extramammary Paget’s disease and surgical
removal of the affected skin was recommended. She had trained as a nurse and
suspected that she may be allergic to something. She tested various foods over a
a
Hirzy JW. Silicofluorides and blood-lead: a mechanistic investigation [abstract]. Fluoride 2005;38:231.
bMass RP, Patch SC, Christian AM, Coplan MJ. Effects of fluoridation and disinfection agent combinations on lead leaching
from leaded-brass parts. Neurotoxicology 2007;28:1023-31.
c
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 52.
d
Seavey J. Water fluoridation and crime in America. Fluoride 2005;38:11-22.
eLi XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO. Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children. Fluoride 1995;28:189-92.
f
Zhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, Wu XR. Effect of a high fluoride water supply on children’s intelligence. Fluoride
1996;29:190-2.
g
Ge YM, Ning HM, Feng CP, Wang HW, Yan XY, Wang SL, et al. Apotosis in brain cells of offspring rats exposed to high
fluoride and low iodine. Fluoride 2006;39:173-8.
hTrivedi MH, Verma RJ, Chinoy NJ, Patel RS, Sathawara NG. Effect of high fluoride water on intelligence of school children
in India. Fluoride 2007;40:178-83.
i
Xiang Q, Liang Y, Chen L, Wang C, Chen B, Chen X, et al. Effect of fluoride in drinking water on children’s intelligence.
Fluoride 2003;36:84-94.
j
Xiang QY, Liang YX. Blood lead of children in Wamiao-Xinhuai intelligence study [letter]. Fluoride 2003;36:198-9.
kBurgstahler AW. Influence of fluoride and lead on children’s IQ: U.S. tolerance standards in question [editorial]. Fluoride
2003;36:79-81.
l
Spittle B. Fluoride and intelligence [editorial]. Fluoride 2000;33:49-52.
m
Connett MP. Vulvar Paget’s disease: recovery without surgery following change to very low-fluoride spring and well water.
Fluoride 2007;40:96-100.
making you sick?
six month period but found no relationship between any foods and the pain.
Because she had not had any problem previously when living in nonfluoridated
Wichita, Kansas, she decided to test whether fluoride in water affected her
condition. Within three days of using spring water for drinking and cooking, she
noticed an “immediate” improvement in her symptoms. She then continued with a
six week trial of spring water followed by the long term use of low fluoride (<0.1
ppm [mg/L] of fluoride). She noted:
“I stopped using the tap water for drinking and bathing and the Paget’s started clearing up
immediately. I now use well water from my son’s house and go there to bathe. I was free of
symptoms within weeks—except the tonsil stones. It took about a year for those to
completely go away.”
The blood pressure, calcium level, and parathyroid hormone level returned to
normal and her vulvar Paget’s cleared up completely. Apart from one brief
recurrence, when she used fluoridated water again, it has remained settled. She
said:
“In 2005 I had house guests and we were on the go a lot. I didn’t want to go to my kids’
house to bathe so I showered at home. We ate out a lot at local restaurants that use the
local tap water. I started itching and turning red in the same area. The symptoms cleared up
in 2–3 days after I stopped [using the tap water].”
Since the improvement occurred when the change was made from using
fluoridated drinking water to low fluoride spring or well water it was considered
that fluoride, or possibly some other component of drinking water such as
chlorinated disinfection by-products, contributed to her skin disease.
Impaired glucose tolerance in humans has been found with fluoride intakes of
0.07–0.4 mg/kg/day thus putting infants, children aged 1–2 years, athletes and
heavy manual workers, and patients with diabetes mellitus and nephrogenic
diabetes insipidus at risk with fluoridated water with 1 mg F/L.a
WHAT TO DO IN THE FACE OF SKEPTICISM ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THE EXISTENCE
OF A CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY SYNDROME FROM
FLUORIDATED DRINKING WATER
The examples used to illustrate the occurrence in some people, perhaps 1–5% of
the population, of a chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome from using fluoridated
water will not be convincing to many, particularly numerous health professionals
including dentists and doctors. Health professionals tend to have the views taught
to them by their teachers, and their teachers, in turn, are influenced by what they
see as the views of the various authorities at the time. These things change very
slowly over decades. It has been said that “Science progresses, funeral by funeral.”
The Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy identified the problem when he wrote
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can
seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them
to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues,
which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into
the fabric of their lives.”
a
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 65, 256-67.
Other illnesses due to fluoride 27
For this slowness to see the light, I have coined the term "tardive photopsia."a
Thus those with symptoms consistent with chronic fluoride toxicity have nothing
to lose from having a trial of avoiding fluoride for a few weeks, to see if it results
in improved health, and have the possibility of much to gain.
ILLUSTRATIONS OF SOME OF THE ABNORMALITIES UNDERLYING THE SYMPTOMS IN
CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY
Skeletal muscle, in the arms and
legs, has actin and myosin filaments
arranged regularly to give a striped or
striated pattern on microscopic
examination (Figure 14). With
chronic fluoride toxicity the regular
arrangement is disrupted by areas of
degeneration (Figures 15–16). The
patient with this degeneration
experiences muscle weakness.b
Photograph by AK Susheela
Figure 14. Transmission electron
micrograph showing actin and myosin
filaments forming the structural framework
of a skeletal muscle fibre.
Photograph by AK Susheela Photograph by AK Susheela

Figure 15. Skeletal muscle from a Figure 16. Skeletal muscle from a fluorosed
fluorosed human subject showing human subject showing widespread
widespread degenerative changes of actin degenerative changes of actin and myosin
and myosin filaments. filaments.
a
Spittle B. Fluoridation promotion by scientists in 2006: an example of “tardive photopsia” [editorial]. Fluoride 2006;39:157-
62.
b
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 2nd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2003.
p. 59-61.
making you sick?
The intestinal lining or mucosa of the duodenal region normally has cells with
small protrusions on them (microvilli) and a layer of slimy substance (mucus,
Figure 14). The microvilli and mucus are lost with chronic fluoride toxicity giving
rise to symptoms such as nausea, loss of appetite, pain in the stomach, gas
formation and a bloated feeling, constipation followed by intermittent diarrhoea,
and headache (Figures 15–16).a These symptoms of non-ulcer dyspepsia are early
warning signs of fluoride toxicity.
Figure17 Figure 18
Figure 17. Scanning electron micrograph of the
intestinal mucosa of the duodenal region
showing the normal mucosal surface with
columnar cells packed with microvilli and
mucus droplets.
mucus droplets microvilli

showing the columnar cells with scanty
microvilli and a loss of mucus droplets from a
person consuming drinking water with 1.2 mg/L
or ppm of fluoride.
showing the columnar cells with a loss of
microvilli and mucus droplets, and a “cracked
clay appearance of the mucosa” from a person Figure 19
consuming drinking water with 3.2 mg/L or ppm
of fluoride.
a
Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 2nd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2003.
p. 66-8.
Illustrations of some of the abnormalities underlying the symptoms of chronic fluoride toxicity 29
Male infertility with abnormalities in sperm morphology (Figures 20–23), a

deficiency in the number of spermatozoa in the semen (oligospermia), the absence
of spermatozoa from the semen (azoospermia), and low testosterone levels are
very common in those residing in areas of India where chronic fluoride toxicity is
common due to fluoride-contaminated water.a Some individual variation in the
susceptibility to developing infertility is present.

Figure 20. Scanning electron micrograph Figure 21. Scanning electron micrograph
of normal human sperm. of abnormal double-headed human
sperm from an infertile male consuming
fluoride-contaminated water.

Figure 22. Scanning electron micrograph Figure 23. Scanning electron micrograph
of abnormal human sperm with multiple of abnormal human sperm with an
and coiled tails from an infertile male abnormal head and midpiece from an
consuming fluoride-contaminated water. infertile male consuming fluoride-
contaminated water.
The capacity of fluoride to induce new bone formation in areas of the body
where it does not normally occur such as in the forearm interosseous membrane is
illustrated by the condition of periostitis deformans, described by Dr Soriano,bc
due to the habitual drinking of wine that was illegally contaminated by fluoride. It
aSusheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. 2nd ed. Delhi, India: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2003.
p. 69-71.
b
Soriano M. Periostitis deformans due to wine fluorosis. Fluoride 1968;1:56-64.
c
Soriano M, Manchón F. Radiological aspects of a new type of bone fluorosis, periostitis deformans. Radiology
1966;87:1089-94.
making you sick?
is a rare condition and the extra bone formation was much greater in Dr Soriano’s
patients than that usually seen in fluoride toxicity (Figure 24).abc This may have
been due to the higher levels of fluoride in the contaminated wine, 8–72 mg/L or
ppm, and the presence of poor nutrition with a lack of protection from adequate
amounts of calcium and antioxidants in persons with alcohol dependence. With
poor nutrition there is a lack of the dietary factors that give protection against
fluoride toxicity. Other factors such as alcohol and impaired liver function may
also have contributed to the excessive bone formation in areas where bone does
not usually occur such as in membranes and tendons (fibrosititis ossificans), and
muscles (myositis ossificans, Figures 25–31). The initial change in the bones of an
increased bone density (osteosclerosis) can be followed by a later stage of reduced
bone density (osteoporosis) and bone atrophy. Bones affected by fluoride are
weaker and fracture more readily (Figure 32).
Figure 25. Forearms with swellings

simulating bone tumours due to periosteal
stimulation due to fluoride toxicity in a
patient in Spain who had been drinking
wine to which fluoride had been added to
retard fluoridation resulting in fluoride levels
of 8–72 mg/L (8–72 ppm). The condition is
called periostitis deformans. (Soriano,
1968).
24A 24B
Interosseous membrane calcification
Figure 24. Forearm radiographs. 24A: 51-

year-old with normal forearm. 24B: 54-year- Figure 26. Periosteal growth in the forearm
old with calcification of the interosseous (pseudotumours) involving the
membrane due to fluoride toxicity. interosseous membrane (invading
(Khandare, Rao, Balakrishna, 2007). osteophytosis). The osseous lamellae with
irregular margins at the interosseous
membrane of the forearm are typical of
wine fluorosis. (Soriano, 1968).
aKhandare AL, Rao GS, Balakrishna N. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) study of endemic skeletal fluorosis in a
village of Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Fluoride 2007;40:190-7.
b
Soriano M. Periostitis deformans due to wine fluorosis. Fluoride 1968;1:56-64.
c
Waldbott GL. New observations on fluorosis [editorial]. Fluoride 1968;1:54-5.
Illustrations of some of the abnormalities underlying the symptoms of chronic fluoride toxicity 31
Distal
(wrist) end Proximal
of forearm (elbow) end
of forearm
Figure 27. Radiograph of a forearm showing the initial, osteoblastic stage, of periosteal
growth with the formation of new bone (calcification). Usually growth occurs in this condition,
found in Spanish drinkers of wine adulterated with fluoride, for 3–5 months and the growths,
on the forearms and thighs, can be as large as an apple. (Soriano, 1968).
Distal
Proximal (wrist) end
(elbow) of forearm
end of
forearm
Figure 28. Radiograph of a same forearm as in Figure 24, one year later. After 3–5
months of growth, the lesions cease growing and their size decreases (atrophic stage).
The osteophytes have a lamellar appearance on the radiographs. (Soriano, 1968).
Figure 29. Advanced periosteal

growth in the forearm in the
osteoclastic phase of periostitis
deformans in another patient.
After the lesions have grown for
3–5 months bone resorption
occurs (osteoclastic phase) and
the size of the lesions decreases
(atrophic stage). Periostitis
deformans differs from the typical
picture in skeletal fluorosis in
which calcification of the
interosseous membrane of the
forearm may occur but not the
large growths. (Soriano, 1968).
Figure 30. Bone formation) in muscle

of the thigh (myositis ossificans, on left)
with marked osteosclerosis (increased
bone density) of the femur (on right).
(Soriano, 1968).
making you sick?
Figure 31. Bone formation in muscle of

Figure 32. Endosteal lesions of the femur.
near the knee (myositis ossificans) in
Fracture in an osteoporotic (reduced bone
“Wine fluorosis. (Soriano, 1968).
density) zone of the striated compact bone;
atrophy (wasting) of the femoral head; and
osteosclerosis of the pelvis. (Soriano, 1968).
AN EXAMPLE OF THE OPPOSITION TO THE CONCEPT OF A CHRONIC FLUORIDE

TOXICITY SYNDROME FROM FLUORIDATED WATER
The concept of chronic low-grade poisoning by fluoride was examined in New
Zealand by a Commission appointed by Command of His Excellency, the
Governor-General CWM Norrie on 6 November 1956. Wilfred Stilwell, Esquire,
Judge of the Arbitration Court, chairman; Norman Edson, Esquire, Professor of
Biochemistry, member; and Percy Stainton, Esquire, Merchant, member, presented
their report, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on the Fluoridation of Public
Water Supplies, on 10 July 1957, to the House of Representatives.a
In paragraph 307 they noted:
“We have listed in paragraph 232 (10) a number of complaints which in themselves
are of a minor nature. They included mental and physical inertia, loss of feeling in the
fingers, loss of the use of limbs, the dropping of small objects, cramps in the
extremities, dry mouth, thirst, nausea, and various skin troubles. It was argued that
these minor complaints were the outward expression of chronic fluoride intoxication
at a low level of intake. It was said that some persons are more sensitive or allergic to
fluoride than others, and on this account some members of the community will exhibit
signs and symptoms of low-grade poisoning while others will not. In medical literature
a group of signs and symptoms, which are said collectively to represent the effect of
a single morbid cause, constitutes a “syndrome.” We use this term to cover the signs
a
Stilwell WF, Edson NL, Stainton PVE. Report of the commission of inquiry on the fluoridation of public water supplies.
Wellington: RE Owen, Government Printer; 1957.
An example of the opposition to the concept of a chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome 33
from fluoridated water
and symptoms collectively, although it should be emphasized that any one person
may not exhibit all these manifestations or all simultaneously.”
It was noted that Dr Leo Spira and Dr George Waldbott were the most prominent
of the medically qualified persons who had vigorously opposed fluoridation in the
United States, and their views were considered in detail in 10 pages of text.
In paragraph 336 the case of Mrs MJ is referred to, who as discussed earlier,
spent the first five years of her life near Hanchow, China, and became ill after the
Highland Park water was fluoridated.
“336. As we have stated, Dr Waldbott also believes in the existence of a syndrome
comprised of minor ailments which he regards as the manifestations of incipient
fluorine poisoning. He states:
“‘No information on the incipient stage of this disease which would make it possible to
establish an early diagnosis can be found it the literature.’ (Waldbott, 1956.a)
“He states also that a case [Mrs MJ] which he described presented:
“‘presumptive evidence of incipient chronic fluorine poisoning from drinking water at 1
part per million. …’”
The commission recorded Dr Waldbott’s views:
“337. In reviewing his observations Dr Waldbott states;
“‘One is impressed by the sparsity of objective findings, by the absence of changes in
joints, bones, and teeth, and by the great variety of symptoms. Nevertheless, on
carefully examining the case reports, a clear-cut disease pattern can be discerned.
“…The most characteristic manifestations are backache, numbness, and pain in the
legs and arms, especially in the ulnar area, gastro-intestinal and bladder
disturbances as well as ulcers in the mouth and visual disturbances. Most impressive
are extreme malaise and mental sluggishness. Two unusual phenomena may
perhaps be considered pathognomic as they probably occur in no other disease; the
more water the patient drinks the more he complains of dryness in the mouth and
throat (this is in distinction to acute poisoning in which excessive salivation is a major
symptom). Exhaustion is most pronounced when the patient should feel most rested,
namely in the morning after resting at night. Arthritis, headaches, and seborrhoeic
dermatitis may or may not be a feature of this disease.’
“Elsewhere he mentions brittle and breakable nails, gastritis, and irritation of mucous
membranes in the alimentary and lower urinary tract.”
The Commission considered that the grounds on which Dr Waldbott dismissed
the syndrome as being psychosomatic in nature as being inadequate:
“338. It will be seen that Dr Waldbott’s description of the syndrome is almost identical
with that of Dr Spira, but he appears to be more cautious. “So far,” he has said, “the
evidence that this is fluorine poisoning is presumptive,” and he states the facts on
which the presumptive conclusion is based. He discusses the possibility of a
psychosomatic basis (the influence of the mind and emotions on bodily health) for the
syndrome and dismisses the possibility but on grounds which appear to be quite
insufficient. Finally Dr Waldbott says:
“‘The evidence presented so far is lacking final substantiation by determination of
fluorine in urine, blood, and in bones and other organs. Such studies are now in
progress.’”
a
making you sick?
Dr Waldbott addressed the question of a psychosomatic basis for the syndrome

in his 1956 papera which was given by the Commission as a reference in
paragraph 336. In this paper Dr Waldbott wrote;
“Is there a psychosomatic basis?
“In order to rule out other diseases, adequate consultation by competent specialists
was obtained in the hospitalized cases. They were unable to establish a diagnosis,
but did not attribute the illness to psychosomatic causes.
“This view is supported by the following facts: In two individuals subjected to
exploratory surgery (prostatectomy and exploratory laparotomy, respectively), the
operation did not relieve the urinary symptoms or the abdominal pains.1 (1 A third
case in Lubbock, Texas with natural fluorides at 4.2 ppm, with advanced skeletal
fluorosis, the record of which I was able to study (Methodist Hosp. Record No.
177822) had a laparotomy which did not reveal the cause of an acute abdomen.) An
operation would certainly have produced a sufficient stimulus to reveal a
psychosomatic basis. Months later these patients recovered completely without any
treatment when fluoride water was eliminated without their knowledge. Other patients
were neither aware that fluorides had been added to the drinking water or that
fluoridation had been discontinued. This, I believe, is a more valid test than any
carefully devised “blindfold” or placebo studies.
“It is inconceivable that these patients could have been familiar with the description
of this disease. Although residing in different parts of the country, they reported
exactly the same symptoms in different words. For instance, the ulnar nerve damage
is described in the following manner by a different person in each case: ‘cannot grip a
golf club,’ ‘cannot peel potatoes,’ ‘cannot hold a hymn book in church,’ ‘cannot grip
my steering wheel,’ ‘things are dropping from my grasp for no apparent reason.’
“The lack of control in their legs was described as follows: ‘my legs buckle under me,’
‘I suddenly collapse,’ ‘my legs are not tracking,’ ‘my legs give way,’ ‘I suddenly lurch
towards buildings.’ Thus, it is clear that this syndrome cannot be explained on a
psychosomatic basis.”
The Commission did not explain why they found the grounds given by Dr
Waldbott for dismissing a psychosomatic cause to be inadequate. It is hard to see
how Mrs MH and Mrs EK who became ill in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, after the
water was fluoridated had a psychosomatic illness when they were not aware that
fluoridation had started when they became ill.
The Commission noted Dr Waldbott’s summary and view in paragraph 339.
“339. Basing his data on fifty-two cases, Dr Waldbott (1956) summarises the signs
and symptoms described in paragraph 337 and goes on to state:
“‘The evidence so far is based on: The identity of the symptoms observed with those
described: (a) in my first reported case from artificially fluoridated water; (b) in
industrial poisoning in men; (c) in fluorosis encountered in natural fluoride areas; (d)
in animals grazing near plants emanating fluorides. Whereas there is an appreciable
deterioration of general health, laboratory and objective findings are sparse at this
stage of the disease. The cardinal features associated with advanced fluorosis,
namely, changes in bones, ligaments, joints, and teeth, were not noted in its incipient
stage.
a
“Further corroborating studies now in progress, indicate that a variety of diseases of

heretofore unknown origin, may be due to, or at least aggravated by, traces of
fluorine in air, food, and water.’”
In paragraphs 340–3 the Commission summarized and evaluated Dr Waldbott’s
claims.
“340. The evidence for the syndrome as outlined by Dr Waldbott consists of:
“(1) Identity of the symptoms with those described in the first case (Waldbott, 1955b a
[Mrs MJ]); and
“(2) Analogies with industrial poisoning, fluorosis due to excessive ingestion of high-
fluoride water, and fluorosis in animals grazing near industrial plant from which the
hazard emanates.
“We have been informed by Mr Penlington by letter dated 17 June 1957 that Dr
Waldbott is to publish a series of five articles, the first of which has already appeared
(Waldbott, 1956). The first of this series is referred to in paragraph 339 and shows
that Dr Waldbott has not changed the basis for his theories. This basis we now
proceed to examine.
“341. There is no evidence that the symptoms exhibited by Dr Waldbott’s first case
were in fact due to either the 1 ppm of fluoride present in the water consumed or to
any other fluoride ingested, and there is no rational basis for concluding that the
existence of analogies is proof that the syndrome is due to fluoride. Dr Waldbott has
introduced a doubtful note at the conclusion of his summary where he states that
“‘a variety of diseases of heretofor unknown origin, may be due to, or at least
aggravated by, traces of fluoride in air, food, and water.’
“(The italics are ours.) These statements suggest that he is aware of the fact that he
possesses no scientific evidence to demonstrate that the syndrome is caused by
fluoride.
“342. In the absence of evidence to demonstrate that the conditions described are
due to fluoride poisoning, both Dr Waldbott and Dr Spira have used ‘therapeutic tests’
to support their arguments. In these tests fluoridated water has been withdrawn and
low-fluorine diets have been prescribed. Both physicians have claimed
disappearance of symptoms after these and other precautions were taken. In no
case was the urinary fluoride determined in relation to the test. These arguments are
unconvincing and fail to persuade us that the effects described were due to the
withdrawal of fluoride, real or presumptive.”
In paragraph 345 the Commission stated its conclusions:
“345. At this point we summarise our conclusions on the “Spira-Waldbott Syndrome”
as follows:
“(1) We are of the opinion that the individual signs and symptoms of the alleged
syndrome may be due to any number of unrecognised causes; and
“(2) We are satisfied that there is no causal relationship between any of these signs
and symptoms and the ingestion of water containing 1 ppm of fluoride and food
cooked in this water.”
The Commission states in paragraph 341 that there was no evidence to show that
the symptoms present in the patient, Mrs MJ, were due to the 1 ppm of fluoride in
the water consumed. However Dr Waldbott showed that she recovered within
weeks from a serious illness when she stopped using the Highland Park water
a
Waldbott GL. Chronic fluorine intoxication from drinking water. Int Arch Allergy 1955;7:70-4.
making you sick?
containing 1 ppm of fluoride with no other treatment. The nausea, vomiting, and
abdominal pain cleared up within a week. She gained five pounds in weight in four
weeks. When she was placed again on Highland Park fluoridated water, on 1
November 1954, she became ill again within three days with general weakness,
exhaustion, and lethargy; cramping of the hands and legs day and night; and
tingling and numbness in the fourth and fifth fingers as high as the elbow, but with
no objective findings on examination.
It is not clear how the Commission can describe as being “no evidence” the
alleviation of illness after withdrawing water containing 1 ppm of fluoride and the
relapse of illness with the reintroduction of this water. If they were implying that
some other component of the water other than the fluoride was responsible they
have given no evidence of what this is.
Dr Waldbott gave more detail about Mrs MJ in Fluoridation: the great dilemma
where he noted:a
“Until completion of the preliminary tests in the hospital, the patient [Mrs MJ] was
instructed to use fluoridated Highland Park water that she had brought with her to the
hospital. After the tests were completed, she began drinking unfluoridated (0.1 ppm)
Detroit water. Within only two days the stomach symptoms and headaches subsided,
and she was soon well enough to be discharged.
“Neither in the hospital nor after her discharge was she given any medication.
Instead, she was instructed to avoid fluoridated water strictly, not only for drinking but
also for cooking her food as well. She was also told to avoid both tea and seafood
because of their high fluoride content. The headaches, eye disturbances, and
muscular weakness disappeared in a most dramatic manner. After about two weeks
her mind began to clear, and she underwent a complete change in personality. For
the first time in two years she was able to undertake her household duties without
having to stop and rest. Within a four-week period she had gained five pounds.
“Subsequently, the patient was subjected to a series of tests which definitely proved
that her disease was related to fluoridated water. She was given test injections of
minute amounts of fluoride in drinking water and distilled water as a control. She was
not aware which water contained fluoride. The fluoride solutions induced a
recurrence of the symptoms, whereas the fluoride-free water showed no adverse
effects. In one of the subsequent tests a classical attack of migraine headache was
produced by one milligram of fluoride taken in two glasses of water. This is about one
fifth to one half the average amount ingested in one day by people living in a
fluoridated area.
“Further laboratory and other diagnostic studies were contemplated, especially a
study of the behavior of calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium, the activity of certain
enzymes, and a tracing of her brain waves before and after administration of a test
dose of fluoride. These plans came to an abrupt end when the patient suffered
another sudden episode of excruciating pains in the head, muscles and spine
following an experimental dose of fluoride. The severity of her response to this so-
called blind test made me stop all further testing. Fortunately, the patient recovered
completely without any treatment other than the elimination of Highland Park
fluoridated water for drinking and cooking.”
Dr Waldbott also addressed the question about whether something else in the
water other than fluoride might have caused her illness:
a
p. 117-8.
“Could something other than fluoride have caused the disease, perhaps another
poison in the water? This question was definitely answered by the ease with which
this disease could be reproduced at will when extremely small amounts of fluoride
were administered to her. In order to ascertain the cause of her problem she was
given a test dose of fluoride in water without being told the nature of the test. She
had, of course, given me permission to carry out any test I saw fit.”
Thus the Commission was incorrect to say in paragraph 341 that there was no
evidence the symptoms in Dr Waldbott’s first case were due to fluoride. Dr
Waldbott had collected the evidence that fluoride was involved by eliciting the
symptom of headache after giving her a test dose of 1 mg of fluoride in two glasses
of water. This detail, of giving 1 mg of fluoride in two glasses of water, was
published by Dr Waldbott in Fluoridation: the great dilemma in 1978 and was not
mentioned in the 1956 paper referred to by the Commission. However the 1956
paper noted:
“This condition cleared up completely following elimination of fluoridated water at the
1 P.P.M. concentration and recurred following its resumption.”
If the Commission wanted to “split hairs” and imply that some other component
of the water apart from fluoride was involved they could have asked Dr Waldbott
if there was additional information available or given him the chance to comment
on their conclusion before the Commission’s report was presented.
In paragraph 242 the Commission stated that it found the arguments based on
“therapeutic test” where fluoridated water has been withdrawn and low-fluorine
diets have been prescribed to be unconvincing and failing to persuade them
without spelling out their reasons for so concluding. It noted that in no case had the
actual fluoride intake been measured and that in only one case [Mrs MJ] was the
urinary fluoride excretion determined in relation to the test.
They appear to be implying that the fluoridated water in places like Highland
Park and Caduhy in Wisconsin, USA, or in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, where
people became sick consuming the water may not have in fact contained the 1 ppm
of fluoride that the water was claimed to have. Water engineers routinely monitor
fluoridated water to check that the level of fluoride is at the intended level. Dr
Waldbott and Dr Petraborg have accepted the situation that the fluoridated water in
the places studied did in fact have the levels of fluoride of about 1 ppm. To dismiss
the results of the “therapeutic tests” because documentation was not given to show
that water fluoridated by a water department to a level of 1 ppm did in fact have 1
ppm of fluoride in it appears to be pedantic and likely to result in a type II error,
the situation of “missing a winner,” where a significant result is overlooked.
Although the Commission saw monitoring the urine fluoride levels to be
important they did not show why this information was critical to acceptance or not
of the results of the “therapeutic tests.” Dr Waldbott noted:a
“The evidence presented so far is lacking final substantiation by determination of fluorine in
urine, blood, and in bones and other organs. Such studies are now in progress.
a
making you sick?
“Symptoms of fluorine poisoning do not always parallel either fluorine levels in bones and
blood, nor its elimination in the urine. It is general knowledge that relatively large amounts
may be stored and eliminated without ill effect. Seven years in one instance, and even ten
years after patients had stopped drinking fluoride-water, stored fluorine is still excreted in
excess amounts. On the other hand, there is evidence that relatively small doses can cause
symptoms of poisoning in individuals or animals susceptible to the disease. The well-known
authority on the subject, DeEdsa observed that the ‘streaming through the system of
fluorides, even in relatively small amounts, may cause considerable damage to the organs
involved.’
“Urinary fluorine output depends mainly on the amount of stored fluoride mobilized from the
bones under conditions not yet explained, and on the amount of fluoride ingested in food,
especially tea and fish. The absorption of ingested fluoride into the blood stream from the
intestinal tract varies with the presence of other minerals in the water, with the compound of
fluoride and the acidity of the stomach.”
Two of the case reports above by Dr Susheela, published in 2001, involving a
10-year-old boy, Master PM, and a 59-year-old man, Mr PO, showed that the
urinary and serum (blood) fluoride levels fell as the “therapeutic test” proceeded.b
However the availability of this additional information, from Dr Waldbott in
1978 about Mrs MJ becoming ill when given 1 mg of fluoride in two glasses of
waterc or of the urinary and serum fluoride falling during a ‘therapeutic test” from
Dr Susheela in 2001, has not altered the stance taken by the Ministry of Health in
New Zealand on fluoridation.
The Ministry of Health has been reluctant to participate in meetings where
research on fluoride toxicity has been discussed. Although one person from the
Ministry, Julia Purchas, attended and reported back on the 25th conference of the
International Society for Fluoride Research held in Dunedin in 2003, no
representatives from the Ministry were present at the 22nd conference in
Bellingham, Washington State, USA, in 1998; the 23rd conference in Szczecin,
Poland in 2000; the 24th conference in Otsu, Shiga, Japan, in 2001; the 26th
conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, in 2005; or the 27th conference in Beijing,
China, in 2007. When Yvonne McDonald wrote to The Hon. Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Health, to ask if a Member of Parliament would be attending the 26th
conference at Wiesbaden, Germany, 26–29 September 2005, he replied, in a letter
dated 18 May 2005,d that
“The International Society for Fluoride Research is not a reputable body so the
Government will not be sending a representative …”
In a letter to Mr Hone Harawira, Member of Parliament, Te Tai Tokerau,
Parliament Buildings, dated 19 July 2006, The Hon. Pete Hodgson, Minister of
Health replied to a letter from Mr Harawira:e
“Tena koe Mr Harawira
a
Largent EJ. Rates of elimination of fluoride stored in the tissues of man. A M A Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med 1952;6(1):37-42.
b
cWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p.115-8.
d
Hodgson P. Letter to Yvonne McDonald. 2005 May 18. Unpublished.
e
Hodgson P. Letter to Hone Harawira. 2006 Jul 6. Unpublished.
“Thank you for your letter of 15 May 2006, with enclosed email from Mr Bill Wilson, about
fluoridation. I apologise for the long delay in responding.
“Like other natural occurring trace elements, fluoride is essential for good health. There are
many essential nutrients, elements and vitamins which taken in excess, are toxic. The
important point is dosage of each element or nutrient, not the element itself. In areas in New
Zealand where drinking water is fluoridated, the concentration of fluoride generally ranges
from 0.7 to 1.0 mg/litre (or one part per million).
“The Ministry of Health holds routinely collected data on the oral health status of children at
age five and year eight, from 1990 onwards. The data consistently shows that children in
non-fluoridated areas have poorer oral health than children in fluoridated areas. This data is
available on the Ministry’s website as part of the ‘Oral Health Toolkit’
(www.newhealth.govt.nz/toolkits-old/oralhealth.htm).
“I have communicated in previous correspondence to Mr Wilson that I am aware of Mr
Connett’s infamous report 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation. I am also familiar with the
views of the late John Colquhoun [Figure 52]. Ministry of Health officials recently viewed an
interview with the late Mr Colquhoun, made in 1998. The interview was conducted by
Professor Paul Connett [Figure 62] and was enclosed in Mr Wilson’s most recent
correspondence to me concerning fluoridation.
“The views of both Professor Connett and Mr Colquhoun are regarded as highly
unconventional. Nevertheless, Ministry officials commissioned an independent review of
Professor Connett’s report in order to be satisfied that the weight of literature supporting
fluoridation remained valid.
“Independent scientists have also considered Professor Connett’s views against recent
reviews by the Australian National Health Medical Research Council (1999), the York report
(2000) and the World Health Organization. The conclusion of the Ministry’s review and of
these independent reports is uniform. Evidence does not support suggestions of health risks
associated with water fluoridation.
“The benefits of water fluoridation are most pronounced for those most at risk of poor oral
health, including the poorer areas of your consistency. The Ministry continues to believe that
water fluoridation is effective as a means of reducing current inequalities in oral health. To
deny areas of need of an effective oral health measure would be unfortunate.
“The decision whether or not to fluoridate a region’s water supply is not made by the Ministry
but the responsible district council. Therefore, if you require further details of fluoridation in
the Far North, I suggest contracting Northland District Council directly. The contact details
are:
“Far North District Council, Memorial Avenue, Private Bag 752, Kaikohe; Freephone: 0800
920029.
“The council should also be able to provide you with information on how data sampling was
carried out in the decision to fluoridate the Far North’s water supply.
“The Government and the Ministry believe that there is overwhelming evidence of the
effectiveness and safety of water fluoridation in improving the dental health of New
Zealanders. Additional information on the Ministry of Health position on water fluoridation is
available on the Ministry’ website (www.moh.govt.nz/fluoride).
“I trust this information is useful in replying to Mr Wilson.
“Naku noa, na
“Hon Pete Hodgson
“Minister of Health”
The Hon Pete Hodgson, Minister of Health, subsequently visited Oamaru, North
Otago, New Zealand, on 21 September 2007, shortly before a referendum on
making you sick?
fluoridation was held. It was reported that he said that it would be “a sad outcome”
if the Waitaki District voted against fluoridation and that he considered the
benefits of fluoridation far exceeded any perceived risks. He urged voters to make
sure they were fully informed about the issues based on sound scientific evidence
rather than being swayed by what he termed “scam science off the Internet.”a
Evidence based decision making is laudable but not easy to achieve. Many of the
points made by The Hon. Pete Hodgson in his letter to Mr Harawira are
contestable. Dr AK Susheela, Director of the Fluorosis Research and Rural
Development Foundation, Delhi, India, also appealed to science stating:b
“The ‘take home’ message for the professionals of India is that they should … practise the
recent scientific developments in the field of Fluoride and Fluorosis …”
However she had the opposite message:
“The ‘take home’ message for the professionals of India is that they should not follow the
practices of the ‘West’ but should practise the recent scientific developments in the field of
Fluoride and Fluorosis, which have led to the concept that fluoride should not enter the body
as far as possible. Trace amounts entering through sources which are beyond any one’s
control need to be overlooked. Promoting fluoridation of dental products in India should be
considered as a ‘crime.’”
She included New Zealand on her world map showing areas where there is
widespread chronic fluoride toxicity. She considers that dental caries are not a
fluoride deficiency disorder and that topical fluoride as contained in toothpaste or
mouthwashes does not have the potential to remineralise or rectify the damage to
the teeth due to caries.
The Hon. Pete Hodgson, Minister of Health, noted how the World Health
Organization supported fluoridation. Waldbott, Burgstahler, and McKinney noted:
“On July 23, 1969, fluoridation was brought up again at the 22nd World Health Organization
Assembly in Boston. The resolution recommending the measure appeared on the agenda
daily but was strongly opposed and blocked by delegates from Italy, Senegal, the Congo,
and elsewhere. G. Penso, head of the Italian delegation, expressed his concern regarding
‘this mania of our century to add additives to anything.’ He pointed out that there are
unknown amounts of fluoride in the air we breathe and in the food we eat. He cautioned
particularly about possible damage to future generations. Nevertheless, during the final
hours of the session, when only 55 to 60 of the 1,000 delegates from 131 countries were still
present, all bills that had not been accepted were collected into one and voted upon,
including a statement on fluoridation. The mildly-worded resolution urged that member
states examine the possibility of introducing fluoridation in those communities where fluoride
intake from water and other sources ‘is below the optimal levels.’ It also requested the
Director General ‘to continue to encourage research into the etiology of dental caries, the
fluoride content of diets, the mechanism of action of fluoride at optimal levels in drinking
water, and into the effects of greatly excessive intake of fluoride from natural sources, and to
report thereon to the World Health Assembly …”c
A study published in 2007, by Oxman, Lavis, and Fretheim, found that

systematic reviews and concise summaries of findings were rarely used for
aBruce D. Minister sees need for fluoridation. Otago Daily Times. 2007 Sept 22;21.
b
p. 17-8.
c
p.283-5.
developing WHO recommendations.a Instead the processes usually relied heavily

on experts in a particular speciality, rather than representatives of those who have
to live with the recommendations, or on experts in particular methodological
areas. WHO officials admitted that most recommendations and guidelines were
prepared by the special interest groups without external review. WHO
recommendations are thus nothing but special pleading like the promotion of
fluoridation by groups such as the US Centers for Disease Control, US Public
Health Service, and the American Dental Association. The unsuitability of the
WHO guideline of 1.5 mg/L of fluoride as the “desirable” upper limit in drinking
water is being increasing felt and Senegal has reduced the permissible upper limit
to 0.6 mg/L.b The 2006 World Health Organization publication, Fluoride in
drinking water, makes no reference to the 2006 NRC report on the same topic, has
only 20 references in chapter 3 on “Human health effects,” and does not include
any of the publications by Dr Waldbott.c
The Hon. Pete Hodgson, Minister of Health, noted that Ministry of Health
officials had commissioned an independent review of Professor Connett’s report
on 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation and that this review did not support Connett’s
view that there were health risks associated with fluoridation.
A 20-page paper by Dr Terry W Cutress, BDS, PhD, dental scientist, dated 25
October 2005, Response to a list of ‘50 reasons to oppose fluoridation,’ complied
by Dr Connett (www.fluoridealert.org/50) was peer reviewed by Paul Fitzmaurice,
Food Safety, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd.d
The responses to reasons 12 and 30 concerned fluoride retention in the body.
For reason 12 Connett stated:
“Reason 12. Fluoride is a cumulative poison. On average, only 50% of the fluoride we ingest
each day is excreted through the kidneys. The remainder accumulates in our bones, pineal
gland, and other tissues. If the kidney is damaged, fluoride accumulation will increase, and
with it, the likelihood of harm.”
In his response to reason 12 Dr Cutress stated:
“Fluoride is not continuously cumulative in the body tissues—see recent comprehensive
reviews (NHMRC, 1999;e York Report, 2000;f MRC, 2002;g WHO, 2002h). Approximately
99% of body fluoride is stored in the mineralized tissues (bones and teeth). However, these
a
Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Fretheim A. Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. Lancet 2007;369:1883-9.
b
p. 15-6.
cFawell J, Bailey K, Chilton J, Dahi E. Fluoride in drinking-water. London: IWA Publishing and World Health Organization
(WHO); 2006.
d
Cutress TW. Response to a list of “50 reasons to oppose fluoridation,” compiled by Dr Connett. 2005. A copy is available in
the McNab Room, 3rd floor, Dunedin Public Library, Dunedin. It is included as part of a report on Fluoridation of Public
Water Supplies to the Infrastructure Services Committee, Dunedin City Council, from the Water and Waste Services
Manager, for the meeting on 12 March 2007, as appendix 4 to a letter, dated 6 March 2007, to Mr Gerard McCombie,
Water Operations Team Leader, Dunedin City Council, by Dr John Holmes, Medical Officer of Health and Dr Dorothy Boyd,
Senior Public Health Dentist, written in response to a submission made by Dr Bruce Spittle to the 2006/07 Community Plan
opposing the use of fluoride in Dunedin’s water supply.
e
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Review of water fluoridation and fluoride intake from
discretionary fluoride supplements. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; 1999.
fMcDonagh M, Whiting P, Bradley M, Cooper J, Sutton A, Chestnutt I, Misso K, Wilson P, Treasure E, Kleijen J. A
York; 2000.
g
Medical Research Council, United Kingdom. Water fluoridation and health: working group report. London: Medical
Research Council, United Kingdom; 2002.
h
World Health Organization (WHO). Fluorides. Environmental Health Criteria No. 227. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
making you sick?
mineralized tissues can accumulate up to a maximum 4% by weight. Kidney is the only

organ with soft tissue that has a changing fluoride content—reflecting its glomerular fluid.
Fluoride does not accumulate over a lifetime, its levels in the blood and tissues reflect recent
exposure to fluoride, with excess fluoride lost via sweat and faeces. Cumulative
concentration of fluoride in the pineal gland is unproven. (note: Kidney tissues are not
affected by low levels of fluoride—urinary concentrations of fluoride are proportional to
intake.”
For reason 30 Connett stated:
“Reason 30. Once fluoride is put into the water it is impossible to control the dose each
individual receives. This is because:
“1. some people, (e.g. manual labourers, athletes, diabetics, and people with kidney
disease), drink more water than others
“2. we receive fluoride from sources other than the water supply. Other sources of fluoride
include food and beverages processed with fluoridated water (Kiritsy 1996a and Heilman
1999b), fluoridated dental products (Bentley 1999c and Levy 1999d), mechanically deboned
meat (Fein 2001e), teas (Levy 1999f), and pesticide residues on food (Stannard 1991g and
Burgstahler 1997h).”
In his response to reason 30 Dr Cutress stated:
“Fluoride ingestion and excretion from the body achieves a balance dependent on the
availability of fluoride. Bones and teeth are the only tissue to accumulate fluoride but this is
limited to less than 4% by weight. Excess fluoride is excreted via urine, sweat, saliva and
faeces within a few hours of ingestion. Less fluoride is excreted in younger people until the
primary (99%) storage tissue, bone reaches saturation at 3.8%. The variation in water
intakes by individuals determines respective fluoride intakes, but retention levels decrease
and plateau in early adulthood.”
In his response, dated 25 October 2005, to reason 12, Dr Cutress states that
“Cumulative concentration of fluoride in the pineal gland is unproven.” However
Dr Jennifer Luke published an article in 2001 on Fluoride deposition in the aged
human pineal gland showing that by old age the pineal gland had readily
accumulated fluoride with a level of 297±257 mg F/kg wet weight of pineal
compared to 0.5±0.4 mg F/kg wet weight of muscle.i Bone contained 2,037±1,095
mg F/kg bone ash weight. In the 2006 National Research Council report, Fluoride
in drinking water: a scientific review of EPA’s standards (2006 NRC report)
fluoride and the pineal are discussed. The report notes that the pineal gland, a
small organ, weighing 150 mg in humans, located near the centre of the brain, is a
calcifying tissue and that as with other calcifying tissues, it can accumulate
fluoride. Fluoride is present in the pineal glands of older people, aged 72–100
years, in concentrations of 14–875 mg of fluoride per kg of gland. The fluoride
aKiritsy MC, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Guha-Chowdhury N, Heilman JR, Marshall T. Assessing fluoride concentrations of juices
and juice-flavored drinks. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127: 895-902.
b
Heilman JR, Kiritsy MC, Levy SM, Wefel JS. Fluoride concentrations of infant foods. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128(7):857-
63.
c
Bentley EM, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste by young children. Br Dent J 1999;186: 460-2.
dLevy SM, Guha-Chowdhury N. Total fluoride intake and implications for dietary fluoride supplementation. J Public Health
Dent 1999;59:211-23.
e
Fein NJ, Cerklewski FL. Fluoride content of foods made with mechanically separated chicken. J Agric Food Chem
2001;49: 4284-6.
f
Levy SM, Guha-Chowdhury N. Total fluoride intake and implications for dietary fluoride supplementation. J Public Health
Dent 1999;59:211-23.
gStannard JG, Shim YS, Kritsineli M, Labropoulou P, Tsamtsouris A. Fluoride levels and fluoride contamination of fruit
juices. J Clinic Pediatr Dent 1991;16:38-40.
h
Burgstahler AW, Robinson MA. Fluoride in California wines and raisins. Fluoride 1997;30:142-6.
i
Luke J. Fluoride deposition in the aged human pineal gland. Caries Res 2001;35:125-8. [abstract in Fluoride 2001;34:152].
concentration in the pineal gland is positively related to the calcium concentration

in the pineal gland, but not to the bone fluoride, suggesting that pineal fluoride is
not necessarily a function of cumulative fluoride exposure of the individual. It is
noted that fluoride has not been measured in the pineal glands of children or young
adults, and that investigations have not been made of the relationship between
pineal fluoride concentrations and either recent or cumulative fluoride intakes. In
the discussion the report states that whether fluoride exposure causes decreased
nocturnal melatonin production or an altered circadian (daily) rhythm of melatonin
production in humans has not been investigated but that fluoride is likely to cause
decreased melatonin production and to have other effects on normal pineal
function, which in turn could contribute to a variety of effects in humans.a In the
recommendations it is noted that the major areas for investigation include pineal
function, including, but not limited to, melatonin production. Thus the brief
dismissal of the topic by Dr Cutress with “Cumulative concentration of fluoride in
the pineal gland is unproven” is not supported by the literature and does not do
justice to the complexity of the issue.
In his response, dated 25 October 2005, to reasons 12 and 30, Dr Cutress states
that fluoride is stored in bones and teeth until a saturation point is reached at 3.8%
by weight and then excess fluoride is excreted via the urine, sweat, saliva, and
faeces within a few hours, with the implication that this is safe. The overall
chemical formula of fluoroapatite is Ca10F2(PO4)6 but is often simplified to
Ca5F(PO4)3. The formula weight is 1008.6 g/mole, and the percentage of F is (38/
1008) × 100 = 3.77% or approximately 38,000 mg F/kg or 38,000 ppm F. This
figure represents the complete conversion of the normal dihydroxyapatite,
Ca10(OH) 2(PO4)6 into fluoroapatite. Therefore 38,000 ppm F or 3.8% by weight
is the maximum possible content of F in bone ash (all mineral) consisting of only
fluoroapatite. In the 2006 NRC report, it is noted, on page 21, that 1% fluoride in
bone ash is equivalent to 10,000 mg/kg or 10,000 ppm.b It is further noted, on page
140, that bone ash is assumed to include 65% of the volume of viable bone. Thus
3.8% by weight, 38,000 mg/kg or ppm of fluoride in bone ash is equivalent to
about 65% of 38,000 ppm or 24,700 mg F/kg or ppm of F or 2.47% by weight of
F in dry, fat-free bone before ashing. Thus the saturation point of 3.8% referred to
by Dr Cutress applies to bone ash rather than to bone.
On pages 173–7 of the NRC report it is noted that in stage II skeletal fluorosis
the bone ash fluoride concentrations are 4,300–9,200 mg F/kg and 3,000–4,600
mg F/kg in bone (dry fat-free material from the iliac crest or pelvis) while for stage
III skeletal fluorosis the bone ash fluoride concentrations are 4,200–12,700 mg F/
kg and the mean bone concentration was 3,600 mg F/kg (dry fat-free material from
the iliac crest or pelvis). Clinical stage II skeletal fluorosis is associated with
a
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 252-6, 267.
b
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 21,140, 173-7.
making you sick?
chronic joint pain, arthritic symptoms, calcification of ligaments, and

osteosclerosis of cancellous bones (increased bone density of the non-cortical
bone, or bone away from the surface of the bone). Stage III has been termed
“crippling” skeletal fluorosis because mobility is significantly affected as a result
of excessive calcification in joints, ligaments, and vertebral bodies. This stage may
also be associated with muscle wasting and neurological deficits due to spinal cord
compression.
The 2006 NRC report notes that the excessive intake of fluoride will manifest
itself in a musculoskeletal disease, skeletal fluorosis, with a high morbidity. The
view expressed by Dr Cutress that fluoride is stored in bones and teeth until a
saturation point is reached at 3.8% by weight, 38,000 mg F/kg of bone [ash], and
then excess fluoride is excreted via the urine, sweat, saliva, and faeces within a
few hours, is at odds with the occurrence clinically of skeletal fluorosis with
excessive intake and the bone levels of fluoride in this condition being
considerably lower than 38,000 mg F/kg of bone ash, with the range for the bone
ash fluoride concentration in stage II skeletal fluorosis being 4,300–9,200 mg F/kg
Similar point by point replies could be made to the other responses by Dr
Cutress. However only reason 22 will be commented on further as it is relevant to
the syndrome of chronic fluoride toxicity or preskeletal fluorosis described by Dr
Waldbott. For reason 22 Connett stated:
“Reason 22. In the first half of the 20th century, fluoride was prescribed by a number of
European doctors to reduce the activity of the thyroid gland for those suffering from
hyperthyroidism (over-active thyroid; Stecher 1960,a Waldbott 1978b). With water
fluoridation, we are forcing people to drink a thyroid-depressing medication which could, in
turn, serve to promote higher levels of hypothyroidism (under-active thyroid) in the
population, and all the subsequent problems related to this disorder. Such problems include
depression, fatigue, weight gain, muscle and joint pains, increased cholesterol levels, and
heart disease. It bears noting that according to the Department of Health and Human
Services (1991c) fluoride exposure in fluoridated communities is estimated to range from 1.6
to 6.6 mg/day, which is a range that actually overlaps the dose (2.3–4.5 mg/day) shown to
decrease the functioning of the human thyroid (Galletti and Joyce 1958d). This is a
remarkable fact, particularly considering the rampant and increasing problem of
hypothyroidism in the United States (in 1999, the second most prescribed drug of the year
was Synthyroid [thyroxine sodium], which is a hormone replacement drug used to treat an
under-active thyroid). In Russia, Bachinskii (1985e) found a lowering of thyroid function,
among otherwise healthy people, at 2.3 ppm fluoride in water.
In his response, dated 25 October 2005, to reasons 13–22, 24–28, and 34–35, Dr
Cutress states that many diverse disease and health conditions, including fatigue,
weight gain, muscle and joint pains, and heart disease have been claimed to be
linked to the supplementation of water with low concentrations of fluoride but
a
Stecher PG, editor. The Merck index: an encyclopedia of chemicals and drugs. 7th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., inc.;
1960. p. 952.
b
cDepartment of Health & Human Services. (U.S. DHHS). Review of Fluoride: Benefits and Risks. Report of the Ad Hoc
Committee on Fluoride, Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs. Washington, DC:
Department of Health and Human Services, USA; 1991.
d
Galletti PM, Joyet G. Effect of fluorine on thyroidal iodine metabolism in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab1958;18: 1102-10.
e
Bachinskii PP, Gutsalenko OA, Naryzhniuk ND, Sidora VD, Shliakhta AI. Action of fluoride on the function of the pituitary-
thyroid system of healthy persons and patients with thyroid disorders. Probl Endokrinol (Mosk) 1985; 31: 25-9. [in
Russian].
that, according to recent major reviews, none of the conditions can be explained by
a fluoride aetiology. As an example he quotes the University of York systematic
review, 2000, as stating:a
“Insufficient evidence is available to reach a conclusion that bone fractures, cancer, or other
adverse health conditions were associated with fluoride in water.”
I was unable to find this quotation in the University of York systematic review.
In the section of the executive summary on other possible negative effects, pages
xiii–xiv, it is noted:
“A total of 33 studies of the association of water fluoridation with other possible negative
effects were included in the review. Interpreting the results of studies of other possible
negative effects is very difficult because of the small numbers of studies that met inclusion
criteria on each specific outcome, and poor study quality. A major weakness of these studies
generally was failure to control for any confounding factors.
“Overall, the studies examining other possible negative effects provide insufficient evidence
on any particular outcome to permit confident conclusions. Further research in these areas
needs to be of a much higher quality and should address and use appropriate methods to
control for confounding factors.”
The quotation given by Dr Cutress did not appear in the discussion at the end of
chapter 10 on “Other possible negative effects,” page 63, which finished with:
“… Overall, the studies examining other possible negative effects provide insufficient
evidence on any particular outcome to reach conclusions.”
Similarly, the quotation does not appear in chapter 12 on Conclusions in section
12.4 addressing “Does fluoridation have negative effects?,” page 67, where it is
noted:
“… The miscellaneous other adverse effects studied did not provide enough good quality
evidence on any particular outcome to reach conclusions. The outcomes related to infant
mortality, congenital defects and IQ indicate a need for further high quality research, using
appropriate analytical methods to control for confounding factors. While fluorosis can occur
within a few years of exposure during tooth development, other potential adverse effects
may require long-term exposure to occur. It is possible that this long-term exposure has not
been captured by these studies.”
Again in section 12.9.2 addressing adverse effects studies, page 70, the quotation
is not present:
“… The other possible adverse effect studies suffered greatly by not sufficiently controlling
for important confounding factors, many of which were discussed by authors in the study
report, but not controlled for. Very few of the possible adverse effects studied appeared to
show a possible effect. High quality research that takes confounding factors into account is
needed.”
Thus I have been unable to find the exact quotation which Dr Cutress states as
coming from the University of York systematic review. The quotation
“Insufficient evidence is available to reach a conclusion that bone fractures, cancer, or other
adverse health conditions were associated with fluoride in water”
leaves some uncertainty with the reader to what extent the syndrome of chronic
fluoride toxicity or pre-skeletal fluorosis described by Dr Waldbott has been
carefully examined and found to be wanting. The publications by Dr Waldbott on
fluoride number 142.b The University of York systematic review has 294
a
York; 2000.
making you sick?
references in the bibliography but not one is by Dr Waldbott. A reference is

included to a paper by me on “Allergy and hypersensitivity to fluoride” in which I
referred to seven papers by Waldbott, but the reference to my paper in the
systematic review was only to reject it because it did not meet the inclusion
criteria.ab
“Although some authors (Spittle 1993) have reported cases of hypersensitivity to fluoridated
water, no studies meeting the inclusion criteria were found.”
Thus, rather than the University of York systematic review having carefully
considered the work of Dr Waldbott, they set inclusion criteria for their review that
were such as to exclude his work from consideration. The statement by Dr Terry
Cutress that University of York systematic review found insufficient evidence to
reach a conclusion that other adverse health conditions were associated with
fluoride in water cloaks the reality that the review did not in fact examine any of
Waldbott’s publications. In contrast to the 2000 University of York systematic
review, with 243 pages and 294 references, the 2006 NRC report with 507 pages
and 1077 references considered Waldbott’s work and was not dismissive of it. As
already noted on page 9 of this book, the 2006 NRC reportc stated that the primary
symptoms of gastrointestinal injury are nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain and
that these had been reported in well documented case studies by Waldbottd and
Petraborge as well as in a double-blind clinical study by Grimbergenf involving the
research group of doctors in the Netherlands with Dr Hans Moolenburgh and that
these authors could have been examining a group of patients whose
gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were particularly hypersensitive. Similarly the work by
these doctors on skin reactions was noted:
“In the studies by physicians treating patients who reported problems after fluoridation was
initiated, there were several reports of skin irritation (Waldbott 1956;g Grimbergen 1974;h
Petraborg 1977i). …”
The Australian National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 1999)
reportj has been updated by a 203-page 2007 report,k A systematic review of the
efficacy and safety of fluoridation, with 113 references, but does not include any
bAnon. Fluoride publications of George L Waldbott, MD. Fluoride 1998;31:21-5.

a
Spittle B. Allergy and hypersensitivity to fluoride. Fluoride 1993;26:267-73.
b
York; 2000. p. 59.
cDoull J, Boekelheide K, Farishian BG, Isaacson RL, Klotz JB, Kumar JV, Limeback H, Poole C, Puzas JE, Reed N-MR,
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 269, 293, 303.
d
e
fGrimbergen GW. A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water (preliminary report). Fluoride
1974;7:146-52.
g
h
Grimbergen GW. A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water (preliminary report). Fluoride
1974;7:146-52.
iPetraborg HT. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water (preliminary report). Fluoride 1974;7:47-52.
j
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Review of water fluoridation and fluoride intake from
discretionary fluoride supplements. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; 1999.
k
Australian Government. National Health and Medical Research Council. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of
fluoridation. Canberra: Australian Government. National Health and Medical Research Council; 2007.
publications by Dr Waldbott. Similarly the World Health Organization report

(2002) has been updated by a 144-page 2006 report, Fluoride in drinking-water,
with 248 references, but none of Dr Waldbott’s publications.ab The Australian
NHMRC report dismisses the relevance to water fluoridation of the 2006 NRC
report, Fluoride in drinking water: a scientific review of EPA’s standards, which
includes Dr Waldbott’s work on people affected by fluoridated water, in two
sentences:
“The reader is also referred to recent comprehensive reports regarding water fluoridation
published by the World Health Organisation (WHO, 2006) and the National Research
Council of the National Academies (NAS, 2006). The NAS report refers to the adverse
health effects from fluoride at 2–4 mg/L, the reader is alerted to the fact that fluoridation of
Australia’s drinking water occurs in the range of 0.6 to 1.1 mg/L.”
The NHMRC report does not alert the reader to the fact that it is the dosage
rather than the concentration in the water that is important so that someone
drinking 3 L with 1 ppm of fluoride would receive the same amount, 3 mg, as is
contained in 1.5 L of water with 2 ppm of fluoride. Those with above average
water intakes include some athletes, persons doing heavy manual labour, persons
with diabetes, and those with renal failure. The 2006 NRC reportc is of clear
relevance to water fluoridation and, in addition to referring to two of Waldbott’s
publications, reviewed animal studies showing adverse changes occurred in the
brains of rats with water containing 0.34 ppm and 1 ppm of fluoride. Similarly the
report included data on fluoride and fractures involving fluoridated water, and the
relevant animal work studying fluoride and the pineal gland. The NHMRC report
repeats uncorrected mistakes present in the York report,d e.g. in Table 62 on page
122 of the NHMRC report the I.Q. difference reported by Zhao (1996)e is given as
–7.7 when the correct figure from the original study is –7.5, and on page 123 it is
stated:
“Lin (1991)f found a significant negative association of combined low iodine and high fluoride
with goitre and mental retardation.”
whereas Lin FF et al. found that the average I.Q. of children in high fluoride and
low iodine areas was 19–25% lower than the average I.Q. of children in control
areas.g A positive association was present between the water fluoride level and
mental retardation. As the fluoride level increased, so too did the incidence of
a
World Health Organization (WHO). Fluorides. Environmental Health Criteria No. 227. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
bFawell J, Bailey K, Chilton J, Dahi E. Fluoride in drinking-water. London: IWA Publishing and World Health Organization
(WHO); 2006.
c
at: http://www.nap.edu. p. 131-80, 216-7, 252-6. An abstract of the paper Varner JA, Jensen KF, Horvath W, Isaacson RL.
Chronic administration of aluminum-fluoride or sodium fluoride to rats in drinking water: alterations in neuronal and
cerebrovascular integrity. Brain Res 1998;784:284-98 is in Fluoride 1998;21:91-5.
d
York; 2000. p. 59-63.
eZhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, Wu XR. Effect of a high fluoride water supply on children’s intelligence. Fluoride
1996;29:190-2.
f
Lin FF, Zhao HX, Lin J, Jian JY. The relationship of a low-iodine and high-fluoride environment to subclinical cretinism in
Xinjiang. Yutian, Xinjiang, China: Xinjiang Institute for Endemic Disease Control and Research, Office of Leading Group for
Endemic Disease Control of Hetian Prefectural Committee of the Communist Party of China and County Health and
Endemic Prevention Station, Yutian, Xinjiang; 1991. Unpublished report submitted through NHS CRD web site. The
reference was omitted from the NHMRC report but included in the York report.
g
Ge YM, Ning HM, Feng CP, Wang HW, Yan XY, Wang SL, Wang JD. Apoptosis in brain cells of offspring rats exposed to
high fluoride and low iodine. Fluoride 2006;39:173-8.
making you sick?
mental retardation. The NHMRC report does not make it easier for the reader to
check the Lin quotation by omitting the paper from the references. The York report
noted an inverse association between the water fluoride level and I.Q. had been
reported by Zhao (1996) and Lin (1991). As the fluoride level increased, the I.Q.
decreased. No mention is found in the discussion in the NHMRC report of the
inverse association between the water fluoride level and intelligence.
Dr Cutress noted in his introductory general comments on Dr Connett’s list of 50
reasons to oppose fluoridation that:
“Many of the references are from doubtful publications (e.g. 10% are published in the
journal Fluoride which specialises in anti-fluoride articles).
Publication in Fluoride is determined by the scientific merit of the articles which
are peer reviewed by an international editorial board. The International Society for
Fluoride Research does not hold an official position as a Society on issues such as
water fluoridation but encourages, through its conferences and the publication of
papers, commentaries, and letters to the editor, a critical examination of the
scientific basis of the views which are held by individuals and organizations.
Rather than publishing “anti-fluoride” articles, the Society promotes the sharing of
scientific information on all aspects of inorganic and organic fluorides and has
done this by publishing its quarterly journal Fluoride since 1968 and hosting 27
international conferences in Spain, Austria, the Netherlands, England, the United
States of America, Switzerland, India, Japan, Hungary, China, Poland and New
Zealand. Fluoride, an open access journal, is available, free in full text including
the most recent issues, at http://www.fluorideresearch.org.
The authors of the 2000 University of York systematic review did have not any
difficulties with using references from Fluoride and had 9 such references in the
total of 294 (3.1%).a Similarly 57 of the 1077 references in the 2006 NRC report
were from Fluoride (5.3%).b
Public health advocates of fluoridation tend to consider of little or no scientific
value evidence contradicting their views when it is published in journals such as
Fluoride, not indexed by PubMed, but covered by other search engines such as
SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science.cd Fluoridation promoters, from whose
ranks the journal selection panels for PubMed are invariably selected, are thus
“able” to maintain and safeguard their self-interests, and ignore and discount a
large body of solid research that contradicts their position.
a
York; 2000.
bDoull J, Boekelheide K, Farishian BG, Isaacson RL, Klotz JB, Kumar JV, Limeback H, Poole C, Puzas JE, Reed N-MR,
at: http://www.nap.edu
c
Armfield JM. When public action undermines public health: a critical examination of antifluoridationist literature. Aust N Z
Health Policy 2007;4:25. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-4-25.
d
Maupomé G, Gullion CM, Peters D, Little SJ. A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members
living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas. J Public Health Dent 2007;67:224-33.
49
FURTHER COMMENTS ON THE SUGGESTION THAT THE CHRONIC FLUORIDE TOXICITY

SYNDROME IS PSYCHOSOMATIC
Dr Waldbott commented further in 1978 in Fluoridation: the great dilemma on
criticism that the so-called “fluoride intolerance” was a variety of unrelated
conditions or had a psychogenic (psychosomatic) basis.a He noted:
“Like most other kinds of chronic poisoning, intoxication from long-term fluoride intake is difficult to
diagnose because it develops slowly and unobtrusively with a wide variety of symptoms of the kind
that are common to many other ailments. Dwelling on this point, WD Armstrong wrote in the
American Journal of Public Health:b
“‘He [Waldbott] describes patients who complained of a variety of bizarre symptoms affecting a large
number of organ systems. These symptoms, attributed by Dr. Waldbott to the use of fluoridated
water, were present with few or no objective signs of specific disease and included gastric distress,
pain in the spine, paresthesias, flatulence, polydipsia, mental aberrations, tinnitus, muscular
weakness, etc. Rapid symptomatic cures were reported on withdrawal of fluoridated water, and Dr.
Waldbott attempts to discount the suggestion that his patients’ complaints had a psychogenic basis.’
“ER Schlesinger elaborated further on this seemingly plausible criticism in a publication of the World
Health Organization:c
'‘Of a selected group of 123 allergic patients tested, five developed a wide variety of symptoms and
signs which developed five minutes to three hours after the test dose and lasted from twelve hours
to ten days. Of the 21 symptoms and signs reported, only six occurred in more than one patient, and
these were mainly of a nondescript nature, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, and epigastric
pain. Physical findings such as muscular fibrillation, “cystitis,” “spastic colitis,” and facial oedema
were each found in not more than one patient.
“The absence of any suggestion of a clinical
syndrome leads to the conclusion that a variety of
unrelated conditions were presented as cases of so-
called “fluoride intolerance.”’This statement creates
the false impression that only a limited number of
patients experienced chronic poisoning. Actually, the
five cases mentioned were only part of a larger group
of allergic patients without symptoms of fluoride
intolerance. They were subjected to a special fluoride
loading test for the purpose of recording any unusual
reactions, following the test dose. My experience with
the disease now includes approximately 500 cases.
“With respect to the wide spectrum of symptoms, I
have already shown in Chapter 11 [In: Fluoridation:
the great dilemma] that there is solid experimental
evidence to link every one of the above-named
manifestations with fluoride intake. This nonskeletal
phase of chronic fluoride poisoning was first
discussed by Roholm (Figure 33),d one of the
foremost authorities on the subject, in conjunction
with advanced skeletal fluorosis and has been well
confirmed by other investigators. Furthermore, any
experienced physician can usually recognize whether
or not he is dealing with a real disease or
psychosomatic complaints. Having had a lifetime of
experience in the practice of allergic diseases—a
medical speciality that concentrates, more than any
Figure 33. Professor Kaj Roholm,
other, on the detection of the causes of a disease—I
1902–1948, a pioneer in fluoride
have learned to distinguish readily between research and author of the first
imaginary and real complaints. Moreover, a careful comprehensive monograph on
appraisal of the combination of the unusual fluoride toxicity Fluorine intoxication:
symptoms which I described suggests a distinct a clinical-hygienic study with a
syndrome that does not occur in any other disease: review of the literature and some
an attenuated phase of the acute stage of fluoride experimental investigations.
poisoning.” London: HK Lewis; 1937.
aWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p. 240-2.
b
Armstrong WD. Books and reports: review of The American fluoridation experiment. Am J Public Health 1957;47:1022.
c
Schlesinger ER. Health studies in areas of the USA with controlled water fluoridation. In: Adler P, Armstrong WD, Bell ME,
Bhussry BR, Büttner W, Cremer H-D, et al. Contributors. Fluorides and human health. WHO Monograph Series No. 59.
Geneva: World Health Organization;1970. p. 309.
making you sick?
ILLNESS IN ANIMALS
Another indicator that the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome is not
psychosomatic is the response of animals to receiving fluoride in their water and
food. Presumably, animals are less likely to be affected by psychological factors.
Like the response of canaries to methane gas in a coal mine, the health of animals
may give a clue that an environment is becoming unsafe for humans. Miners used
to take canaries into coal mines to warn them about the build up of firedamp or
methane that could become explosive with air. It was ominous if the canary began
to sway noticeably on his perch before falling. Some examples will be given of
animals being affected by fluoride in their water and diet.
Chinchillas: For six months in the early
1970s Roy Freeman, of Auburn, Kansas,
USA, successfully raised chinchillas, a South
American rodent about the size of a guinea-
pig with a very soft fur (Figure 34).a Within
three days of his changing from low-fluoride
Auburn well water to drinking water
fluoridated with fluorosilicic acid, the
animals started to drink twice as much as
before and gradually displayed inferior fur
quality, stillbirths and premature mortality.
When half the 50 animal colony was placed
on distilled water the water consumption in Photograph by Sarah Hamilton, http://
this group soon decreased and became www.freewebs.com/nzchinchilla-rescue/index.htm,
NZ Chinchilla Rescue, New Zealand’s Chinchilla
normal, the quality of the fur was restored Rescue & Boarding Service.
and no further stillbirths occurred. The Figure 34. A chinchilla

chinchillas became sick drinking fluoridated
water. Earlier work in the 1950s by Dr HL Richardson at the University of Oregon
showed that fluoride in food pellets led to abortions, stillbirths, and infertility in
the chinchilla ranch of Mr WR Cox, of Gresham, Oregon, USA.bc
In an interim report, dated April 1951, Dr Richardson noted that he had
personally performed over 200 autopsies on Cox’s fluoride-poisoned chinchillas
and had found lesions in the kidneys and testes. The kidneys had lesions in the
tubules (tubular nephrosis) and the testes showed generalized testicular atrophy.
Increased drinking may be sign of impaired kidney function.
Hamsters, guinea-pigs, and rabbits were also found by Dr Richardson to be
affected by fluoride with the hamsters being the most sensitive. When the hamsters
were fed pellets containing 14 parts per million (ppm) or mg/L of fluoride they
developed oedema (swelling of the body due to the accumulation of fluid) after 2–
dRoholm K. Fluorine intoxication: a clinical-hygienic study with a review of the literature and some experimental
investigations. London: HK Lewis; 1937. p. 137-8.
a
Burgstahler AW, Freeman RF, Jacobs PN. Early and prolonged toxic effects of silicofluoridated water on chinchillas,
caimans, alligators, and rats in captivity [abstract]. Fluoride 2002;35:259-60.
b
Waldbott GL. A struggle with titans. New York: Carlton; 1965. p. 242.
c
Cox WR. Hello, test animals …chinchillas? or you and your grandchildren. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Lee Foundation for
Nutritional Research; 1953.
Illness in animals 51
3 months. On autopsy examination, they had lesions in the kidneys (tubular

nephrosis), atrophy of the testes, and lesions in the adrenal glands. Mr Cox found
that hamsters given commercial food pellets containing 26.5 ppm of fluoride were
listless and took no interest in their surroundings whereas another group with
pellets containing 5 ppm of fluoride prepared by a chemist, Mr Raphael Maiers,
were “full of life.”
Mr Cox found that as time went on guinea-pigs raised on commercial pellets
with a high fluoride content began to look ragged and a bit listless. He found that
the health of the babies gradually deteriorated. At first the babies were weak and
one or two of a litter would die. The next phase was that one or two of the babies
would be stillborn and finally the whole litters would be stillborn. After that there
would be no litters at all.
He noted that the same thing happened with rabbits except that it took three
times as long for it to happen.
A similar progressive deterioration in the quality of the litters with successive
generations of chinchillas, fed on high fluoride pellets, was also seen. After four or
five generations had been fed on high fluoride pellets, there were few litters. They
seldom conceived and when they did conceive it was not uncommon for one to die
within two weeks of the due date. If a pregnant chinchilla survived that period and
actually delivered, the litter might have one or more stillborn babies. It they were
born alive and it was a multiple birth, then invariably one of the babies was
scrawny and would not survive more than a day or two. Those that were left would
probably grow well and behave normally until weaning on day 60 when Mr Cox
would then find one dead in the morning and within a day or two the other would
also be dead. If this period was survived he was not surprised to see bare spots on
the animal where the fur had come out. Soon the fur would begin to grow back and
shortly thereafter the animal would drop dead. Very few of these chinchillas
survived.
Rats, alligators and caimans: From 1961 until 1981 Pat Nichols Jacobs, of
Kansas City, Missouri, USA, successfully bred and raised rats, alligators and
caimans, an alligator-like reptile from South and Central America.a On 9 April
1981 the water supply for her animals changed to drinking water fluoridated with
fluorosilicic acid. Within three days the eye membranes of the caimans and the
alligators started to swell, gradually became reddened, and then ulcerated. The
animals also began to avoid being in the water, preferring to remain on deck more
than normal and going from tank to tank, evidently in search of water less irritating
to their eyes (Figures 35–38). Within two years, without any change in the diet or
housing conditions or evidence of vector-borne disease, some of the animals began
to exhibit bloated bellies, gastric distress and spinal deformities (Figures 39–40).
During the next 20 years, 32 caimans and 3 alligators died, many in apparent
agony. Eighteen of the 35 reptiles were less than 10 years old compared to a
normal lifespan of 25 years or more. Autopsies showed severe disintegration of the
aBurgstahler AW, Freeman RF, Jacobs PN. Early and prolonged toxic effects of silicofluoridated water on chinchillas,
caimans, alligators, and rats in captivity [abstract]. Fluoride 2002;35:259-60.
making you sick?
gastrointestinal tract, Crohn’s disease, and liver silicosis. None of the eggs laid
since 1981 hatched and all were found to be infertile even though matings had
occurred. As the colony used about 2,500 L of water a day the cost of
defluoridating the drinking water or obtaining nonfluoridated water was
prohibitive. However hatchling caimans raised on distilled water remained in
excellent health until they were switched to the fluoridated drinking water at about
age 4 months. They then developed the eye swelling and ulceration, bloated
bellies, gastric distress, and spinal deformities.
Photograph by Pat Nichols Jacobs

Figure 36. The right eye of Nicholas on
18 November 1981 after 7 months
Photograph by Pat Nichols Jacobs exposure to fluoridated water showing
Figure 35. Nicholas, a healthy, 3 metre long, 227 inflammation of the eye membranes or
kg, 12-year-old alligator on 10 September 1980 conjunctivae which were swollen and
before fluoridation commenced on 9 April 1981 in red. The lower eyelids were displaced
Kansas City, Missouri, USA. She was raised from 1 downwards 19 mm.
February 1968, age 2 months, by Pat Nichols
Jacobs who described her as “Perfectly normal,
absolutely flawless, a magnificent, splendid, lovely
lady who was my beloved friend. She represented
an enormous investment of time, work, money and
love.”

Figure 38. The left eye of Nicholas on
19 November 1984 after 3½ years
exposure to fluoridated water showing
conjunctival inflammation and
ulceration. Pat Jacobs said “Nick got
Photograph by Pat Nichols Jacobs worse and worse … She moaned and
Figure 37. The right eye of Nicholas on 10 cried. On 3 December 1987 after 5½
September 1983 after 2 years 5 months’ exposure years of exposure to fluoridated water
to fluoridated water showing inflammation of the this marvelous, beloved pet suffered to
eye membranes with downward displacement of death. She represented 20 years of my
the lower eyelids by 38 mm. life too.”

Figure 39. Hiss-a-fer, a 6-year-old female caiman, with a severely bloated belly in late 1981.
Hiss-a-fer had been cared for by Pat Nichols Jacobs, Technical Illustrator and Curator of
Reptiles, at the Parrot Hill Croc Farm, Kansas City, Missouri, USA, since her arrival on 15 June
1975 at the age of 6 months.

Figure 40. Shep, a male caiman,
hatched from an egg held in the hand
of Pat Jacobs on 8 June 1978. He
developed skeletal fluorosis with a
spinal deformity and a bloated belly
after prolonged exposure to fluoridated
water and died, on 15 September
1998, aged 20 years.
making you sick?
During the six months after fluoridation began, the appearance and health of the
rats declined dramatically. Tumours started to appear with over 200 being counted
with as many as 6 per rat. Beginning on 1 October 1981 the rats were given only
distilled water to drink. Their condition quickly improved and no further tumours
were detected. Their reproductivity and lifespans also increased significantly with
some of the rats reaching more than 7 years of age.
Pat Nichols Jacobs also noted that, during warm weather, pigeons and other wild
birds consistently used the open-air bird baths filled with distilled water before
using the ones filled with fluoridated water.
Horses: Cathy Justus, a quarter horse breeder at Pagosa Springs, Colorado,
USA, noticed that after fluoridation started in 1985 her horses began to have colic
on a regular basis and within two years the horses had chronic fluoride poisoning
with brown staining of the teeth (dental fluorosis, Figures 41–43), hoof and leg
deformities (Figure 44), increased bone formation (Figures 45–46), decreased
thyroid hormone levels, and low conception rates.a After the fluoridation stopped
in 2005 the colic gradually ceased and other improvements occurred.
Figure 41. Incisor teeth of 2-year-10-month- Figure 42. Incisor teeth of 6-year-8-month-
old Quarter horse foal introduced to the farm old Quarter horse gelding on fluoridated
with fluoridated water at 7 months of age. water from birth. There is severe brown
The upper (maxillary) permanent central discoloration of the central enamel of all
incisor teeth have extensive enamel defects teeth, and this enamel is thinner and has
distally (the part furthest from the gum or receded from surrounding enamel. There is
gingiva). also recession of the maxillary gingiva
(upper gum), and the exposed distal enamel
shows extensive defects. The mandibular
gingival (lower gum) has receded and is
bulging, and the entire masticatory surface of
the mandibular (lower) teeth exhibits severe
brown discoloration.
In addition some horses developed allergic reactions in the skin which

disappeared promptly when the horse was removed from the fluoridated water and
returned quickly when the animal was re-exposed.b In one horse the lesions were
roughly circular, 1.2–10 cm in diameter, with a centre raised up to 1.5 cm which
receded after a few days to leave a crater-like lesion with a well demarcated ring
a
Krook LP, Justus C. Fluoride poisoning of horses from artificially fluoridated drinking water. Fluoride 2006;39:3-10.
b
Justus C, Krook LP. Allergy in horses from artificially fluoridated water. Fluoride 2006;39:89-94.
(urticaria, Figures 47–48). In another horse numerous skin nodules developed

ranging in size from that of marbles to golf balls (1.0–2.5 cm in diameter) with a
hard centre until a change was made to nonfluoridated water when they became
softer and smaller (figure 49).
Figure 43. Incisor teeth of 23-

year-8-month-old Quarter
horse mare on fluoridated
water for 21 years. There is
brown discoloration of the
enamel with extensive defects
of the distal enamel of the
maxillary teeth. Severe loss
and recession of apical bone
have resulted in exposure to
the distal clinical crown and the
upper part of the roots of the
maxillary teeth, together with
recession and bulging of the
gingiva of the mandibular
teeth.
Figure 44. Severe hoof deformity in

left thoracic limb of 22-year-7-month-
old Quarter horse mare on fluoridated
water for 21 years.
making you sick?
Figure 46. Photo of the left

MCIII of 21-year-old Quarter
horse mare on fluoridated
Figure 45. Radiographs of lower two-thirds of left thoracic water all her life. The bone is
third metacarpus (MCIII) cut longitudinally at the dorso- cut lengthwise in the dorso-
palmar midline (palmar is to the left). The left radiograph is palmar midline with the lower
from an old thoroughbred horse (routine necropsy at Cornell end, not including the joint
College of Veterinary Medicine); the right radiograph is from a cartilage, at the bottom. The
17-year-old Quarter horse gelding on fluoridated water for the dorsal contour is to the left. The
last 11 years. dorsal cortex of the wall bulges
Left: The subchondral bone plate is well defined from the severely into the marrow
lamellar epiphyseal bone. The metaphyseal lamellae become space, beginning just proximal
gradually thinner and disappear at the lower half of the to the epiphysis, creating
picture. The cortex is sharply demarcated from the medullary endosteal hyperostosis
cavity. “enostosis”. The added bone is
Right: The subchondral bone plate blends diffusely with the less dense than the original
epiphyseal bone. The metaphyseal trabeculae remain thick cortex; the contour of the
and extend throughout the entire medullary cavity. The original cortex is well
cortical surface facing the medulla is less sharply defined, defined.
most eloquently so at the upper palmar cortex.
Further comments on canaries in the coal mine 57
Figure 47. 1.
Figure This
ThisQuarter
Quarter horse fillywas
horse filly wasphotographed
photographed at ageat 1age
year1 and
year2 and 2 months,
months, when shewhen she
had been on artificially
had been on artificiallyfluoridated waterfor
fluoridated water for7 7 months.
months. UnderUnder and below
and below the horizontal
the horizontal part of part of
the halter
the halter are well demarcated, annular remnants of allergic lesions. Receding
are well demarcated, annular remnants of allergic lesions. Receding allergic allergic
reactions are present on the neck as small nodules. The once annular remnant of the lesion
reactions
below are present
the eye is nowon theanneck
only as small
irregular strand,nodules.
which areThe irregular present
so abundantly strand in
below
Figurethe
2. eye was
once annular lesion. The extent of the lesions over the body is shown in Figure 48.
Not long after being acquired in the late fall of 2002, the filly soon experienced
one of Colorado's most renowned commodities—snow. Apparently guided by
natural instincts, she began replacing AFW with snow and was somewhat
successful in reducing her skin lesions. More impressive results occurred when
she was taken to shows in places without AFW. There the urticaria disappeared
within 12 to 15 hours. Upon her return to AFW on the farm, the urticaria
Figure 48.
This figure
shows the
extent of the
allergic
reactions
over the body
with irregular
strands,
nodules, and
annular
remnants, at
the same
time as in
Figure 47.
making you sick?
Figure
Figure4. This
49. figure
This shows
figure receding
shows skin
receding lesions
skin that
lesions originally
that ranged
originally in size
ranged from
in size 1.0–2.5
from cm
1.0–2.5
cm.
Thus sickness has been observed in animals as diverse as chinchillas, rats,

alligators, caimans, and horses when they used drinking water to which fluoride
had been added. Fluoride from industrial air pollution may also cause sickness in
animals as has occurred with chronic lameness in free ranging eastern grey
kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) at the smelter site at Portland Aluminium at
Portland, Victoria, Australia.a
FURTHER COMMENTS ON CANARIES IN THE COAL MINE
b
Dr Moolenburgh also referred to the canaries in the coal mine:
“There is one thing I should like to add. As you know, we did research with the help of double
blind cases. This was to prove our case, though for me, clinical proof was enough. These
people became quite ill during these double blind cases, and I felt the procedure was
dubious from the standpoint of medical ethics.
“Some of the cases were directed to the allergists in our group. These cases had been
through double blind tests. It had been scientifically proved that fluoride caused the
complaints. And yet our allergist said, ‘I cannot find an allergy!’
“It was only after correspondence with Dr. Waldbott that this error in our research was
detected and eliminated. What we were seeing was not allergy (a strange reaction of a
certain individual from some compound), but low-grade poisoning. This is extremely
important. When, during the hay fever season, the pollen concentration in the air increases
a million fold, only those allergic to pollen will begin to sneeze. With poisoning, you have a
different proposition. When you slowly increase the concentration of the poison, more and
a
Clarke E, Beveridge I, Slocombe R, Coulson G. Fluorosis as a probable cause of chronic lameness in free ranging eastern
grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 2006;37(4):477-86.
bMoolenburgh HC. Dutch doctor describes hazards of fluoridated water. National Fluoridation News 1979;XXV(4):3.
Further comments on canaries in the coal mine 59
more people will show side-effects until at last everybody will be ill (and the most sensitive
will be dead).
“And this is the case with fluoridation. Those people showing ill effects are the most sensitive
ones in the population. They can be compared to the little birds that coal miners take with
them into the mines. These birds are extremely sensitive to small amounts of mine gas.
When the birds begin to suffer, the miners are warned of the danger. These people who
have adverse reactions to fluoridated water (between 5% and 6% of the population) are like
those little birds. They warn the population that there is a poison at large and that they
should avoid it, or as can easily be done here, get the poison out.”
In addition to the adverse reactions found clinically by Dr Moolenburgh subtle
effects on psychological functioning have been found on detailed examination.a
CLOSING COMMENTS
In this book the focus has been on describing the clinical features of chronic
fluoride toxicity as it affects people so that those in fluoridated areas experiencing
ill health can consider whether or not it is possible that fluoride is contributing
adversely to their health and whether they should have a trial of avoiding fluoride
for a few weeks. A number of case histories involving similar symptoms have
been presented so that readers can make up their own minds about whether there is
such a thing as a chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome associated with the use of
water fluoridated with about 0.7–1 ppm of fluoride.
Widely divergent views are held on this point. The New Zealand Commission of
Inquiry on the Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies reported in 1957 that they
were satisfied that the individual signs and symptoms of the alleged syndrome
may be due to any number of unrecognized causes and that they were satisfied that
there was no causal relationship with the ingestion of water containing 1 ppm of
fluoride and food cooked in this water.b The Minister of Health in New Zealand,
The Hon. Pete Hodgson, in a letter, dated 19 July 2006, stated that the evidence
from a Ministry of Health review does not support suggestions of health risks
associated with water fluoridation.c Similarly, Brian Rousseau, Chief Executive,
Otago District Health Board, in a letter dated 6 September 2007, stated that adding
fluoride to water was “a safe way of reducing tooth decay” and that for people in
communities where tooth decay was a serious problem “It would be a tragedy if
they are denied an opportunity to improve their health in this way because of the
vehement opposition of some people.” He noted “The World Health Organization,
the New Zealand Dental Association, the New Zealand Medical Association, the
Plunket Society and our own Ministry of Health fully support this initiative—high
endorsement indeed.”d
Although it was reported, on 28 June 2007, that the Otago District Health Board
would be responsible for providing impartial, balanced, information on
fluoridation to voters in forthcoming referenda, no mention was made by Mr
Rousseau of the advice given on 9 November 2006 by the American Dental
Association that, in order to reduce the risk of enamel fluorosis in teeth, “If using a
a
Rotton J, Tikofsky RS, Feldman HT. Behavioural effects of chemicals in drinking water. J Appl Psychol 1982;67(2)230-8.
bStilwell WF, Edson NL, Stainton PVE. Report of the commission of inquiry on the fluoridation of public water supplies.
Wellington: RE Owen, Government Printer; 1957.
c
Hodgson P. Letter to Hone Harawira. 2006 Jul 6. Unpublished.
d
Rousseau B. Opposition respected but fluoride necessary [letter]. Otago Daily Times 2007 Sept 6;17.
making you sick?
product that needs to be reconstituted, parents and caregivers should consider

using water that has no or low levels of fluoride.”ab Similarly, no mention was
made of the findings of the National Research Council’s 507-page report on
Fluoride in drinking water: a scientific review of EPA’s standardsc or of the review
of this by Robert J Carton, PhD.d In like manner, Jason Armfield made no
reference to the NRC report, published on 22 March 2006, in his defence of
fluoridation submitted on 24 June 2007.e
Dr Carton’s review concluded:
“The NRC [National Research Council] committee’s reevaluation of EPA’s
MCLG [Environmental Protection Agency, Maximum Contaminant Level Goal]
for fluoride in drinking water failed to identify a safe level of fluoride in drinking
water. This failure can be attributed to misdirection by EPA of the intended goal of
the effort. When the committee requested and received a change in its mandate
from evaluating the MCL [Maximum Contaminant Level] to the MCLG, EPA
strangely omitted the key scientific criteria necessary for evaluating this standard.
The committee should have been told to look for health effects that “can be
reasonably anticipated, even though not proved to exist.” As a result of this
omission, the NRC panel focused only on end points that were totally certain and
concluded that the current standard of 4 mg/L did not protect against bone
fractures and severe dental fluorosis. For the first time in history, a committee of
the NRC removed severe dental fluorosis from the benign category of cosmetic
effects and added it to the list of adverse health effects. In addition, Stage II
skeletal fluorosis was added to the list, but the committee was unable to state with
absolute certainty that this was occurring at the current EPA standards.
“This review applied the necessary criteria to some but not all of the adverse
health effects discussed in the NRC report. The results are as follows:
“1 Moderate dental fluorosis is an adverse health effect occurring at fluoride levels
of 0.7–1.2 mg/L, the levels of water fluoridation.
“2 The Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) for bone fractures is at
least as low as 1.5 mg/L and may be lower than this figure.
“3 Stage II and Stage III skeletal fluorosis may be occurring at levels less than 2
mg/L.
“4 Stage I skeletal fluorosis, arthritis clinically manifested as pain and stiffness in
joints, is an adverse health effect which may be occurring with a daily fluoride
intake of 1.42 mg/day, which exceeds the amount the average person obtains in
their diet in non-fluoridated areas. The Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
(MCLG) should be zero.
“5 Decreased thyroid function is an adverse health effect, particularly to individuals
with inadequate dietary iodine. These individuals could be affected with a daily
a
ADA.org [homepage on the Internet]. Chicago: American Dental Association; c1995-2008. Interim guidance on
reconstituted infant formula [ADA E-Gram]. 2006 Nov 9. Available from: http://www.ADA.org
b
cited in: Burgstahler AW. Fluoridated bottled water [editorial]. Fluoride 2006;39:252-4.
cDoull J, Boekelheide K, Farishian BG, Isaacson RL, Klotz JB, Kumar JV, Limeback H, Poole C, Puzas JE, Reed N-MR,
at: http://www.nap.edu
d
Carton RJ. Review of the 2006 United States National Research Council report: Fluoride in drinking water. Fluoride
2006;39:163-72.
e
Armfield JM. When public action undermines public health: a critical examination of antifluoridationist literature. Aust N Z
Health Policy 2007;4:25. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-4-25.
Closing comments 61
fluoride dose of 0.7 mg/day (for a “standard man”). Since this exceeds the
amount already in the diet, the MCLG should be zero.
“6 Fluoride has adverse effects on the brain, especially in combination with
aluminum. Seriously detrimental effects are known to occur in animals at a
fluoride level of 0.3 mg/L in conjunction with aluminum. The goal for this effect
should also be zero.
“The committee should be applauded for their efforts in general and in particular
for ignoring directives not to include discussions of water fluoridation and
silicofluorides. Their recommendations for research should be taken seriously.
EPA has sufficient information in this report to act immediately, using the
appropriate criteria set forth in the Safe Drinking Water Act. Using the preventive
public health intent of the law, the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for fluoride
in drinking water should be zero.”
Returning to the situation in Dunedin and the views of The World Health
Organization, the New Zealand Dental Association, the New Zealand Medical
Association, the Plunket Society, and the Ministry of Health, no one doubts that
these authorities are sincere and well meaning with the best interests of the
population, particularly vulnerable children, at heart. After the Commission of
Inquiry reported in 1957 that fluoridation was safe and effective, it was left to local
authorities to implement it.a Eight referenda were planned for November 1959. In
Dunedin, after the announcement for a referendum was made, the Otago
Children’s Dental Health Association was formed to promote fluoridation with an
impressive list of patrons including people connected with the Schools of
Dentistry and Medicine of the University of Otago and the Health Department. All
the referenda results were of heavy majorities against the introduction of
fluoridation. In Dunedin 23,000 voted of the 47,000 eligible to vote, more than
those voting in the mayoral election. The result was 14,247 (63.2%) voted against
it and 8,312 for it. The majority was so decisive that the special votes were not
counted. Fluoridation was subsequently started in Dunedin in 1967 without a
further referendum. When the Otago District Health Board, based in Dunedin,
sponsored referenda in North, West, South and Central Otago in 2007 they did not
give Dunedin residents an opportunity to express their views again. The results
from the Waitaki District in North Otago in October 2007 were 6,363 (68.7%)
against fluoride being added to the water and 2,900 being for it.
Despite the continued endorsement of fluoridation by prestigious authorities, it is
well to consider that Galileo noted: “In questions of science, the authority of a
thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.” There is no
sound evidence that swallowing fluoride helps to prevent tooth decay. There is
growing concern about the role of fluoride as a neurodevelopmental toxin.b The
human brain does not complete its development until early adult life and there is
an awareness that exposure to toxins during that time may interfere with a person’s
potential. Perhaps one day the folly of having an Otago Children’s Dental Health
Association promoting fluoridation will be recognized and an Otago Children’s
Mental Health Association will be formed in Dunedin in recognition of the
aMitchell A. Fluoridation in Dunedin: a study of pressure groups and public opinion. Political Science 1960;12(1):71-93.
bGrandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 2006;368:2167-78.
making you sick?
fundamental importance, for having a healthy and satisfying life, of avoiding

exposure to neurotoxins, such as fluoride, during the developmental period of the
brain.
There is now general agreement that it is not sensible to take fluoride
systematically by swallowing when it acts topically on the surface of the teeth.a
Over 600 professionals signed a statement, released on 9 August 2007, calling for
an end to the practice of water fluoridation worldwide.b In February 2008 the
number of professional signatories was over 1400. When an editorial commenting
on the statement was published in Fluoride an editor’s note commented:c
“When founded 40 years ago, the International Society for Fluoride Research
(ISFR) and its journal Fluoride were responding to an acute need for a more open
climate for conducting and publishing bio-medical and environmental fluoride-
related research—a climate that would be free from restrictions imposed by
editorial policies of mainstream journals bent on upholding a particular point of
view about controversial issues such as the subject of the guest editorial below.
Unfortunately, this veil of forced conformity, although beginning to be pierced,
has not yet been entirely lifted, and, in a number of countries, it not only continues
to stifle and prevent funding of nonconforming research, but it also impedes
proper care and concern for public health and welfare that are the hallmarks of
genuine and honest science. Although the ISFR and Fluoride do not take an
official position on the issue of water fluoridation, it is in a spirit of openness to
differing views that we are happy to publish this guest editorial.”
Some debate exists, however, as to whether topical fluoride, as in toothpaste, is
of any value. Although topical fluoride gives consumers a choice and many see it
as useful, there is evidence that fluoride can be harmful to the teeth. Large-scale
studies in Japan and India indicated that dental caries rates can actually be lower
with less rather than more natural fluoride in the drinking water.def An adequate
intake of calcium, along with other important tooth nutrients, which today are
often still deficient among children, even in developed countries, is far more
important for caries resistance than exposure to fluoride.ghi
Weston Price, DDS (Doctor of Dental Surgery), examined many primitive or
First Nation people in widespread parts of the world in the early decades of the
twentieth century and found they had excellent teeth when they ate their traditional
diets (Figure 50).j These diets were diverse and based on sea foods, domesticated
a
Burgstahler AW, Limeback H. Retreat of the fluoride-fluoridation paradigm [editorial]. Fluoride 2004;37:239-42.
b
Connett P. Professionals mobilize to end water fluoridation worldwide [editorial]. Fluoride 2007;40:155-8.
c
Burgstahler AW. Editor’s note. Fluoride 2007;40:155.
d
Burgstahler AW. Fluoridated bottled water [editorial]. Fluoride 2006;39:252-4.
e
Imai Y. Relation between fluoride concentration in drinking water and dental caries in Japan. Koku Eisei Gakkai Zasshi
1972;22(2):144-96. [Abstracted in Fluoride 1973;6(4):248-51].
fRay SK, Ghosh S, Tiwari IC, Nagchaudhuri J, Kaur P, Reddy DCS. An epidemiological study of caries and its relationship
with the fluoride content of drinking water in rural communities near Varanasi. Indian J Prev Soc Med 1981;12(3):154-8.
[Abstracted in Fluoride 1983;16(1):69].
gTeotia SPS, Teotia M. Dental caries: a disorder of high fluoride and low dietary calcium interactions (30 years of personal
research). Fluoride 1994;27:59-66.
hBurgstahler AW. Fluoridated bottled water [editorial]. Fluoride 2006;39:252-4.
i
p. 243, 377-80.
j
Price WA. Nutrition and physical degeneration. 7th ed. La Mesa, CA, USA: Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation; 2006. p.
201-15.
Closing comments 63
animals, game, or dairy products. Some contained almost no plant foods while
others had a variety of fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes. In some, the food
was mainly cooked while, in others, many foods, including animal foods, were
eaten raw. However, they shared several characteristics such as not containing any
refined foods such as white sugar or flour. He found that more vitamins, both fat
and water soluble, and minerals were present compared to modern diets. He found
that parents who had excellent teeth and facial features on a traditional diet could
have children with poorly developed narrow dental arches with crowded teeth,
poor development of the nasal passages and the middle third of the face, and
marked dental decay when they used a modern diet including white flour and
sugar. He noted that the Maoris of New Zealand were:
“… reported by early scientists to be the
most physically perfect race living on the
face of the earth. They accomplished this
largely through diet and a system of social
organization designed to provide a high
degree of perfection in their offspring. To do
this they utilized foods from the sea very
liberally. The fact that they were able to
maintain an immunity to dental caries so
high that only one tooth in two thousand had
been attacked by tooth decay (which is
probably as high a degree of immunity as
that of any contemporary race) is a strong
argument in favor of their plan of life.”
Dr Price found the Maori in New
Zealand had excellent teeth with a
decay rate of less than 1 tooth in 2000
teeth. As a person has about 28 teeth by
the age of 12, with the last four, the
four third molars not erupting until
after the age of 18, when the total is
then 32, this corresponds
Photograph courtesy of Joan Grinzi, RN,
approximately to less than one person Executive Director,
Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation,
in 62 having dental decay or less than 7890 Broadway, Lemon Grove, CA 91945, USA.
2% of Maoris without the use of added
Figure 50. Weston A Price, DDS, author of
fluoride. In 2006, in New Zealand, Nutrition and physical degeneration,
over 60% of Maori children in Year 8 published by the Price-Pottenger Nutrition
at school, about age 12, in both Foundation, http://www.ppnf.org.
fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas,
had some dental decay.a
Clearly adding fluoride to water has not restored the teeth of Maori children back
to the level of excellence they had in the past. In short, fluoridation has been
ineffective. The ineffectiveness is the result of the practice not being built on
sound science. The attempt to improve dental health with fluoridated water has not
been effective and never had a sound scientific basis. In my view, the use of topical
a
Ministry of Health Manatü Hauora, New Zealand Health Strategy DHB Toolkits [homepage on the Internet]. Wellington;
Ministry of Health; c2007 [cited 2007 Nov 11]. Available from http://www.newhealth.govt.nz/tookits/; click on “Oral Health,”
then on “Age 5 and year 8 health data from the School Dental Services 2006, then click on “Y8 2006” in the menu on the
bottom of the screen.
making you sick?
fluoride in dental products is also unsound and fluoride does not result in teeth
being decay free. The apparent reduction in decay in the first teeth to appear, the
deciduous teeth, is related to fluoride delaying the eruption of these teeth so that
they have less time exposed to the decay-producing environment in the mouth.
The timing of the eruption of the teeth is determined by thyroid hormones, and
fluoride interferes with these.a
No clinically significant differences in the rates
of dental decay are found in the permanent teeth
when factors such as socioeconomic status and
ethnicity are controlled for.bcde Professor John
Spencer and Jason Armfield compared the dental
caries prevalence in children ingesting public
(fluoridated) and nonpublic (nonfluoridated)
water in South Australia. For deciduous teeth, a
small apparent benefit of fluoridation was
observed but for permanent teeth “The effect of
consumption of nonpublic water on permanent
caries experience was not significant.” Mark
Diesendorf noted that this was consistent with
other studies which found that fluoridation is
ineffective in permanent teeth.f Figure 51. Niloufer Jamshed
I consider that the relationship of diet to dental Chinoy, PhD, Professor Emerita,
health described by Weston Price will be a more Gujarat University, Ahmedabad,
India. 17 October 1939–8 May
rewarding path to follow than the blind alley of 2006. She was the first to report the
fluoridation and topical fluoride. genotoxic effect of fluoride on
humans exposed to high levels of
That Western countries deliberately added fluoride in drinking water. She
fluoride to their water supplies puzzled the late published over 300 research and
review articles in the scientific
Professor Emerita Niloufer Chinoy, who was literature. She was puzzled that
only too aware of the health problems caused by Western countries would voluntarily
add fluoride to their water supplies
naturally occurring fluoride in Gujarat State, when she was so aware of the
India, and published 66 articles on fluoride, damage it caused in Gujarat State,
India.
including its effects on the liver, kidneys,
muscles, brain, testes, and ovaries (Figure 51).g
The impetus for fluoridation appears to have come from the need to solve an
industrial pollution problem rather than being the result of careful studies on how
to reduce tooth decay. The green light for the procedure was given by Oscar
Ewing, Director of Social Security in charge of the United States Public Health
a
b
Armfield JM, Spencer AJ. Consumption of nonpublic water: implications for children’s caries experience. Community Dent
Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:283-96. [abstract in Fluoride 2004(3):316].
c
Spencer J. Dental research on fluoridation misused. Fluoride 2006;39:326-7.
d
Diesendorf M. Response to John Spencer’s obfuscation of the results of his own paper. Fluoride 2006;39:327-30.
eSpittle B. Fluoridation promotion by scientists in 2006: an example of “tardive photopsia” [editorial]. Fluoride 2006;39:157-
62.
f
Diesendorf M. Comments by Dr Mark Diesendorf [on Armfield JM, Spencer AJ. Consumption of nonpublic water:
implications for children’s caries experience. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:283-96]. Fluoride 2004(3):316-7.
g
Rao MV, Verma RJ, Jain NK, Jhala DD. Niloufer Jamshed Chinoy—Our cherished president, 1939–2006. Fluoride
2006;39:81-5.
Closing comments 65
Service, when the trials in Newburgh, New York, USA; Grand Rapids, Michigan,
USA, and Brantford, Ontario, Canada, had been under way for only five years and
before any permanent teeth of the children, born in these cities since the trials
started, had erupted.a The experiments were supposed to have run for 10–15 years
before a decision on implementing fluoridation was made. No reliable scientific
conclusions about the benefits of fluoridation on permanent teeth could possibly
have been made when fluoridation was approved by Mr Ewing, as none of these
teeth had erupted in the children born under fluoridation.
In 1944 Ewing was employed by the
Aluminium Company of America (ALCOA),
which had a serious problem disposing of the
fluoride produced in aluminium smelters
because it contaminated the atmosphere,
poisoned livestock and damaged plant life, at an
annual salary of $750,000, although apparently
no major ligation was pending at the time. A few
months later he was made Federal Security
Administrator with an announcement that he
was taking a big salary cut in order to serve his
country,b and as a member of President
Truman’s cabinet, he committed the Public
Health Service to the promotion of fluoridation.
In addition to the aluminium manufacturers Figure 52. John Colquhoun,
BDS, PhD. 4 January 1924–23
having a problem with fluoride pollution, the March 1999. Editor of Fluoride
makers of the atomic bomb faced threats of 1991–1998. While serving as an
Auckland City Councillor for Glen
damages due to the release of fluoride. Uranium Eden from 1955 to 1958 he
hexafluoride is used in the production of persuaded the Mayor and fellow
councillors to agree to fluoridate
enriched uranium. Christopher Bryson has the Auckland water supply, apart
noted, in his book The fluoride deception, there from Onehunga. He was later the
Principal Dental Officer for
is evidence that the Atomic Energy Commission Auckland. His account of why, in
supported fluoridation in an attempt to improve 1983, he changed his mind about
fluoridation is available in
the image of fluoride.c Fluoride 1997;31(2):179-85 at
www.fluorideresearch.org
Slowly a new light is dawning. The late Dr
John Colquhoun (Figure 52), was once an ardent
fluoride promoter and in 1977 published a paper reporting how children’s tooth
decay had declined in Auckland, particularly in the low-income areas following
fluoridation of its water.d He noted “I was so articulate and successful in my
support of water fluoridation that my public service superiors in our capital city,
Wellington, approached me and asked my to make fluoridation the subject of a
world study tour in 1980—after which I would become their expert on fluoridation
and lead a campaign to promote fluoridation in those parts of New Zealand which
a
Waldbott GL. A struggle with titans. New York: Carlton; 1965. p. 17, 41, 135.
bWaldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL. Fluoridation: the great dilemma. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press; 1978.
p. 310-4.
c
Bryson C. The fluoride deception. New York: Seven Stories Press; 2004.
d
Colquhoun J. The influence of social rank and fluoridation on dental treatment requirements. NZ Dent J 1977;73:146-8.
making you sick?
had resisted having fluoride put into their drinking water.” However, by 1983,
after looking at the world situation and studying the treatment statistics for all the
12- and 13-year-old children in New Zealand, he became thoroughly convinced
that fluoridation caused more harm than good and had the courage to change his
mind.a He found that when similar fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas were
compared, child dental health was slightly better in the non-fluoridated areas. In
addition, he noted that tooth decay had started to decline in New Zealand well
before the use of water fluoridation and fluoridated toothpaste commenced and
that the decline continued after children had received fluoride all their lives so that
the continuing decline could not be because of fluoride.b He noted that the cause
of the decline could justifiably be described as a “mystery” but that it correlated
well with changes in the diet that had occurred. While sugar consumption had
remained high, there had been an increased dietary intake of fresh fruit and
vegetable, which contained important micronutrients, and of cheese which had
decay-inhibiting properties.
Solid line: mean number of decayed missing or filled teeth (dmft)

Broken line: tooth decay prevalence (100 minus the % that are decay-free)
Fluoridation (solid line) percent of population with fluoridated water
Fluoride tooth paste (broken line): percent of total toothpaste sales.
Figure 53. 50-year decline in tooth decay of 5-year-olds in New Zealand.
a
Colquhoun J. Why I changed my mind about water fluoridation. Perspect Biol Med 1997;41;29-44. Reprinted in Fluoride
1998;21:103-118. Further articles discussing the paper are: Pollick H. Critical review of Why I changed my mind about
water fluoridation by John Colquhoun. Fluoride 1998;21:119-26. Colquhoun J. Response to critique of Howard Pollick.
Fluoride 1998;31:127-8; Spittle B. Changing one’s mind: and examination of evidence from both sides of the fluoridation
debate. Fluoride 1998;31:235-44.
b
Colquhoun J. Fluorides and the decline in tooth decay in New Zealand. Fluoride 1993;26:125-34.
Closing comments 67
He noted that the overall decline in permanent tooth decay was similar to that for
primary teeth but the pattern of decline was complicated by the sudden reduction
of fillings in permanent teeth, reflected in an immediate very steep decline in
DMFT and decay prevalence, following a change in 1977 in the diagnostic
procedure (Figure 54).
Solid line: mean number of decayed missing or filled teeth (dmft)

Broken line: tooth decay prevalence (100 minus the % that are decay-free)
Fluoridation (solid line) percent of population with fluoridated water
Fluoride tooth paste (broken line): percent of total toothpaste sales.
Figure 54. 50-year declines in tooth decay (mean dmft or DMFT) for
children aged 12–13, 8–9 and 5 years in New Zealand.
Until 1977 New Zealand school dental operators diagnosed as “decay” even
slight surface defects in permanent teeth. They inserted fillings at that earliest
stage of possible decay. Such “thorough” criteria were applied to permanent teeth
rather than to primary teeth, and especially to older children receiving their final
treatment before passing into the care of private dentists. In 1977 a new filling
policy was adopted. Instead of “in doubt, fill” the approach became “if in doubt,
wait and see and spend more time on educational and preventive procedures.”
making you sick?
It has been acknowledged that the decline in the DMFT and decay prevalence
after the 1977 change was too steep to be wholly due to a reduction in tooth decay
prevalence and surveys revealed no increase in the “D” (decayed) component of
the DMFT scores compared to earlier surveys. The use of X-rays by early
examiners complicated the interpretation of the results. X-rays revealed smooth
surface decay between teeth which was often undetectable without X-rays and the
use of X-rays declined in 1948–1950 and in 1954–1955. Thus an apparent
reduction in decay might have just reflected a decreased use of X-rays in
diagnosis. However, even when the “with X-rays” results are disregarded, the
overall declines from 1950 to 1993 were found to be similar for permanent and
primary teeth.a
In the USA, Bill Osmunson, DDS, MPH, has also shown graphically the lack of
a relationship between the presence of fluoridation in the water at a state or county
level and the presence of dental decay.b He found that having very good or
excellent teeth was related to having a high income rather than fluoridated water
(Figures
p 55 and 56).
The
percentage of 100.0
the whole
population of
fifty USA 80.0
States and the
District of
Columbia on 60.0
fluoridated %
%
water and the 40.0
percentage in
each state of
high and low 20.0
income
reporting very
good/excellent 0.0
teeth
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49
Fifty USA States and the District of Columbia ranked in order
of the percentage of their whole population on fluoridated water
% high income reporting very good/excellent teeth
% low income reporting very good/excellent teeth
% receiving fluoridated water
Figure 55. Fifty USA States and the District of Columbia ranked in order of the percentage of
their whole population on fluoridated water and the percentage in each state of high and low
income reporting very good/excellent teeth. To arrive at the percentage of whole population
fluoridated, the USGS percent of those served by public water was multiplied by the percent
on fluoridated public water.
a
Colquhoun J. Fluorides and the decline in tooth decay in New Zealand. Fluoride 1993;26:125-34.
b
Osmunson B. Water fluoridation intervention: dentistry’s crown jewel or dark hour? [guest editorial]. Fluoride
2007;40(4):214-21.
Closing comments 69
The percentage of
thirty-nine 100
Washington State
counties plotted in 90
order of the
percentage of 80
residents receiving
fluoridated public
water and 3rd grade 70
students evaluated
for treated and
untreated decayed %
% 60
or filled tooth
surfaces 50
40
30
20
10
0
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37
Thirty-nine Washington State counties plotted in order of
the percentage of residents receiving fluoridated public
water
Figure 56. Thirty-nine Washington State counties plotted in order of the percentage of
residents receiving fluoridated public water and 3rd grade students evaluated for treated and
untreated decayed or filled tooth surfaces.
At an international level, Chris Neurath found that graphs of tooth decay trends
for 12-year-olds in 24 countries, prepared using the most recent World Health
Organization data, show that the decline in dental decay in recent decades has been
comparable in 16 nonfluoridated countries and 8 fluoridated countries which met
the inclusion criteria of having (i) a mean annual per capita income in the year
2000 of US$10,000 or more, (ii) a population in the year 2000 of greater than 3
million, and (iii) suitable WHO caries data available.a The WHO data do not
support fluoridation as being a reason for the decline in dental decay in 12 year
olds that has been occurring in recent decades (Figures 57–59). Similarly,
Professor Cheng, professor of epidemiology at Birmingham University, Sir Iain
Chalmers, UK Cochrane Centre, and Professor Sheldon, Department of Health
Studies, University of York, who chaired the Advisory Board for the 2000 York
report,b found that cavity rates had declined equally in fluoridated and
nonfluoridated European countries over three decades.c They noted, “This trend
aNeurath C. Tooth decay trends for 12 year olds in nonfluoridated and fluoridated countries. Fluoride 2005;38(4):324-5.
b
York; 2000.
c
Cheng KK, Chalmers I, Sheldon TA. Adding fluoride to water supplies. BMJ 2007;335:699-702.
making you sick?
has occurred regardless of the concentration of fluoride in water or the use of

fluoridated salt.” They indicated that fluoridation, touted as a safer cavity
preventive, never was proven safe or effective and may be unethical. They
considered that, “In the case of fluoridation, people should be aware of the
limitations of the evidence about its potential harms and that it would be almost
impossible to detect small but important risks (especially for chronic conditions)
after introducing fluoridation.”
Figure 57. Tooth decay trends,

as indicated by the DMFT Index
(Decayed, Missing, or Filled
Permanent Teeth), for 12 year
olds in eight nonfluoridated
countries (Austria, Belgium,
Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Italy) using
World Health Organization data.
Figure 58. Tooth decay trends,

as indicated by the DMFT Index
Permanent Teeth), for 12 year
olds in eight nonfluoridated
countries (Japan, The
Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
The United Kingdom) using
World Health Organization
data.
Closing comments 71
Figure 59. Tooth decay trends, as

indicated by the DMFT Index
Permanent Teeth), for 12 year olds
in eight fluoridated countries
(Australia, Canada, Hong Kong,
Iceland, Israel, New Zealand,
Singapore, The United States of
America) using World Health
Organization data.
In a like manner, to Dr Colquhoun changing his mind, Dr Richard Foulkes, in

December 1973, in a two volume report entitled Health Security for British
Columbians (colloquially termed “The Foulkes Report”) made 264
recommendations, including one advocating that “mandatory” fluoridation of
drinking water be introduced into the Province of British Columbia, Canada,
Subsequently he realised the practice was no longer tenable and worked towards
ending it (Figure 60).a
Figure 60. Richard G Foulkes, MD. 15 January

1923–3 September 2007. Associate Editor of
Fluoride 2000–2007. After recommending, in
December 1973, in a two volume report Health
security for British Columbians the “mandatory”
fluoridation of drinking water, he changed his
mind, in 1990, and spent much of his time
speaking and writing on fluoride and fluoridation.
He noted the impact of fluoridation on salmon
species in an article published in Fluoride
1994;27:220-6.
a
Burgstahler AW. Richard Gordon Foulkes, MD. 1923–2007[in memoriam]. Fluoride 2007;40(4):225-7.
making you sick?
Similarly, in April 1999, Associate

Professor Hardy Limeback, Head of
Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of
Dentistry, University of Toronto took
a public stand against water
fluoridation (Figure 61).a Together
with Professor Emeritus Albert
Burgstahler he noted that correcting
calcium deficiency is a much more
critical need than fluoride to prevent
tooth decay.bcdThey observed that
nutritionally deficient, refined sugar-
rich diets—not lack of fluoride—are
increasingly recognized as the
principal cause of continued and
even increasing high rates of tooth
decay, especially in early childhood,
occurring in fluoridated as well as
nonfluoridated communities. In
addition, they pointed out that there Figure 61. Hardy Limeback, BSc, PhD
was unrefuted evidence for caries- (Biochemistry), DDS. Associate Professor and
resistant teeth being formed by Head, Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry,
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In April
optimal, complete dental nutrition 2000 he wrote an open letter indicating that he
and that the teeth of monkeys, was now officially opposed to adding fluoride,
especially hydrofluosilicic acid, to drinking water
hamsters, and rats, raised on a because of new evidence for the lack of
natural diet “do not develop effectiveness of fluoridation in modern times and
new evidence for potential serious harm from
appreciable caries later on very high long-term fluoride ingestion.
sugar diets but do develop caries
with an early high sugar diet during
tooth development.”e Domestic animals including young and adult cats and dogs
kept as pets, when fed nutritionally balanced diets rich in calcium and phosphorus,
do not develop dental caries.
Emeritus Professor Paul Connett has spent over a decade working tirelessly in
an attempt to bring science into the fluoridation debate (Figure 62). He considers
that the evidence is now clear that fluoridation is ineffective and unsafe that it is
now a matter of ensuring that this is reflected in legislation. He has helped
mobilize professionals representing a variety of disciplines but all having an
abiding interest in ensuring that government public health and environmental
a
Limeback H. Recent studies confirm old problems with water fluoridation: a fresh perspective [editorial]. Fluoride
2001;34:1-6.
b
Price WA. Nutrition and physical degeneration: a comparison of primitive and modern diets and their effects. Los Angeles:
Am Acad Appl Nutr; 1948, especially Ch.16.
cÅslander A. The technique of complete tooth nutrition. Pakistan Dent Rev 1968;18(4):2-9. Cf. Laplaud P. Prevention
sociale de la carie dentaire. Thése pour le doctorat en chiurgie dentaire. Dactylo-Sorbonne, Paris, 1969. p. 125-6.
d
Teotia SPS, Teotia M. Dental caries: a disorder of high fluoride and low dietary calcium interactions (30 years of personal
research). Fluoride 1994;27:59-66.
e
Sognnaes RF. Is the susceptibility to dental caries influenced by factors operating during the period of tooth development?
J Calif State Dent Assoc 1950;26(3) Suppl:37-52.
Closing comments 73
policies be determined honestly, with full attention paid to the latest scientific
research and to ethical principles, to call for an end of the practice of water
fluoridation worldwide. He notes:a
“In the wake of a number of important
research reports, reviews, and
government advisories that have been
published or issued over the last few
years, opponents of water fluoridation
have been reaching out to professionals
in medical, dental, scientific, academic,
legal, and environmental fields, from
around the world, to sign a statement
calling for an end to this practice.
“The Professionals’ Statement refers to
eight “events” as the basis for an urgent
call to end fluoridation worldwide. The
most important event cited is the
publication in March 2006, of the 507-
page National Research Council (NRC)
report Fluoride in Drinking Water: A
Scientific Review of EPA's
Standards.bThis report, which took over
three and half years to complete, was
conducted by one of the most balanced
panels ever assembled in the US to look
at fluoride. Not directed to look at water Figure 62. Paul H Connett, BS (Honors),
fluoridation per se, the panel reviewed a PhD., Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, St
Lawrence University, Canton, New York, USA;
large body of literature in which fluoride Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network
was shown to have a statistically (FAN) www.FluorideAction.net
significant association with a wide range His 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation are
of adverse effects. These include an posted on the FAN website together with the
response from the Irish Government, and his
increased risk of bone fractures, detailed 87-page reply, dated January 20, 2006,
decreased thyroid function, lowered IQ, to Mr John Molonoy.
arthritic-like conditions, and dental
fluorosis. Based on their analysis of
these findings, the Statement emphasizes that, ‘Considering the substantial variation in
individual water intake, exposure to fluoride from many other sources, its accumulation in
the bone and other calcifying tissues, and the wide range of human sensitivity to any toxic
substance, fluoridation provides NO margin of safety for many adverse effects, especially
lowered thyroid function.’
“Even though fluoridation promoters in the US and other fluoridating countries have
essentially ignored the NRC fluoride report, it did trigger at least one change in policy. The
American Dental Association (ADA) is now advising parents not to use fluoridated tap water
to make up baby formula.cAlthough the ADA issued this advisory to reduce the risk of dental
fluorosis, which now impacts 32% of all American children and up to 40% in fluoridated
communities, the Professionals’ Statement points to the fact that fluoridated water contains
a
Connett P. Professionals mobilize to end water fluoridation worldwide [editorial]. Fluoride 2007;40:155-8.
b
scientific review of EPA’s standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. [Contract No.: 68-C-03-013.
Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency].
c
Ada.org [homepage on the Internet]. Chicago: American Dental Association; c1995–2007 [cited 2007 Aug 7]. Available
from: http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/infantsformula_faq.asp
making you sick?
250 times more fluoride than naturally present in mothers’ milk in nonfluoridated
communities (i.e., 1 ppm versus 0.004 ppm F ion).ab
“Buttressing health concerns, the Statement cites an extensive list of publications since
1982 indicating there is little evidence of any significant difference in tooth decay between
fluoridated communities and non-fluoridated communities. It also refers to the UK
government sponsored “York Review,” the first systematic review of water fluoridation, which
could find no grade A studies (“high quality, bias unlikely”) demonstrating anti-caries benefits
of fluoridation.c Such dismal evidence for the benefits of fluoridation, despite the
enthusiastic support given to this practice by the US Public Health Service for over 50 years,
is consistent with another event discussed in the Statement: the concession by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1999 and again in 2001 that the predominant
action of fluoride on the teeth is topical, not systemic.de
“With such findings in hand, the Statement concludes that whatever the meager dental
benefits may be, they do not justify the serious risks involved. The seriousness of those risks
received further reinforcement by another event: the publication in May 2006 of a peer-
reviewed, case-control study from Harvard University that found a 5- to 7- fold increase in
osteosarcoma in young males associated with exposure to fluoridated water during their 6th,
7th, and 8th years of life.f While the Statement cautiously admits that “this study does not
prove a relationship between fluoridation and osteosarcoma beyond any doubt, the weight
of evidence and the importance of the risk call for serious consideration.” As the late Dr John
Colquhoun, former editor of this journal, asked me in a videotaped interview in 1998, “Is one
death of a teenage boy from osteosarcoma an adequate exchange for saving a part of a
cavity in a child’s tooth? I think when you put that issue to the lay public, they are mostly
common sense people, they say no. If there is the slightest possibility of harm we shouldn’t
be adding it to the water, even if it does prevent cavities, for which there is now considerable
doubt.” The fact that this type of bone cancer is frequently fatal tilts the balance
overwhelmingly in favor of ending water fluoridation.
“The Statement further calls upon “medical and dental professionals, members of water
departments, local officials, public health organizations, environmental groups and the
media to examine for themselves the new documentation that fluoridated water is ineffective
and poses serious health risks.” In addition, the Statement points out: “It is no longer
acceptable to simply rely on endorsements from agencies that continue to ignore the large
body of scientific evidence on this matter—especially the extensive citations in the NRC
(2006) report.” …
“In summary, the Statement concludes: “It is time for the US, and the few remaining
fluoridating countries, to recognize that fluoridation is outdated, has serious risks that far
outweigh any minor benefits, violates sound medical ethics, and denies freedom of choice.
Fluoridation must be ended now.”
aBeltrán-Anguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BR, Griffen SO, Hyman J, Jaramillo F, Kingman A, Nowjack-
Raymer R, Selwitz RH, Wu T. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel
fluorosis—United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002 [surveillance summary]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005 Aug
26;54(SS-3):1-43.
b
scientific review of EPA’s standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. [Contract No.: 68-C-03-013.
Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]. p. 40.
c
McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, Sutton AJ, Chestnutt I, Cooper J, Misso K, Bradley M, Treasure E, Kleijen J.
Systematic review of water fluoridation. BMJ 2000;321:855-9. Full report available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/
fluorid.htm. Analysis and comment available from: http://www.fluoridealert.org/york.htm.
dDivision of Oral Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Achievements in Public Health, 1900–1999: Fluoridation of Drinking Water to Prevent Dental
Caries. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999 Oct 22;48(41):933-40. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/
mmwrhtml/mm4841a1.htm
e
Adair SM, Bowen WH, Burt BA, Kumar JV, Levy SM, Pendrys DG, Rozier RG, Selwitz RH, Stamm JW, Stookey GK,
Whitford GM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control
dental caries in the United States [recommendations]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001 Aug 17;50(RR14):1-42.
Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5014a1.htm.
f
Bassin EB, Wypij D, Davis RB, Mittleman MA. Age-specific fluoride exposure in drinking water and osteosarcoma (United
States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:421-8. [abstracted in Fluoride 2006:39(2):152]
Closing comments 75
Dan Fagin, writing in Scientific American, January 2008, noted that the
overconsumption of fluoride can raise risks of disorders affecting the teeth, bones,
the brain, and the thyroid gland.a He noted that the committee of the National
Research Council (NRC) that released the 2006 report Fluoride in drinking water:
a scientific report on EPA’s standards concluded that fluoride could subtly alter
endocrine function, especially in the thyroid and that the effects appeared to be
strongly influenced by diet and genetics.b Fagin reported that John Doull,
Professor Emeritus of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the University of Kansas
Medical Center, who chaired the report said, “The thyroid changes do worry me.
There are some things there that need to be explored. … What the committee
found is that we’ve gone with the status quo regarding fluoride for many years—
for too long, really—and now we need to take a fresh look. In the scientific
community, people tend to think this is settled. I mean, when the U.S. surgeon
general comes out and says this is one of the 10 greatest achievements of the 20th
century, that’s a hard hurdle to get over. But when we looked at the studies that
have been done, we found that many of these questions are unsettled and we have
much less information than we should, considering how long this [fluoridation]
has been going on. I think that’s why fluoridation is still being challenged so many
years after it began. In the face of ignorance, controversy is rampant.”
Dr Waldbott foresaw an end to the controversy but only when medical
practitioners recognized the existence of the chronic fluoride toxicity syndrome
and water fluoridation was made illegal. In 1978, four years before his death in
1982, he wrote:
“As I enter the twilight of my long and active medical career, I know that the path I chose long
ago, though strewn with many obstacles, is the only one I could have taken. No more
satisfying nor humane goal can be attained than the truth which alleviates the suffering of
mankind. When medical practitioners everywhere also recognize the severity of the
problems of chronic fluoride toxicosis, and laws mandating truly safe drinking water are
sincerely enforced, the health of millions will dramatically improve. Only then will fluoridation
cease to be The Great Dilemma.”c
Twenty-five years later Dr Susheela has echoed these sentiments in her foreword
to this book:
“I sincerely hope that, besides the general public, policy makers and health officials, in the
interest of the nation and the people they are sworn to serve, will learn from reading this
book to recognize and desist from the ‘madness’ being exercised by ‘fluoridation of drinking
water.’ “
In the meantime, many people using fluoridated drinking water will have illness
with fatigue that is not relieved by sleep. Hopefully, this book will help those so
affected to realise that their health is in their own hands and that a cure is possible.
Feedback from readers will be welcomed by the author (contact details on p. ii.).
aFagin D. Second thoughts about fluoride: new research indicates that a cavity-fighting treatment could be risky if overused.
Sci Am 2008:298:74-81.
b
at: http://www.nap.edu.
c
p. 384.
making you sick?
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bruce J Spittle, MB ChB with
distinction, DPM (Otago),
Fellow of the Royal Australian
and New Zealand College of
Psychiatrists (Figure 46).
Recipient of John Malcolm
Memorial Prize in Physiology
and Biochemistry, William
Ledingham Christie Prize in
Applied Anatomy, Geigy
Psychiatric Essay Prize, Dunedin
Hospital Staff Fund Prize in
Psychological Medicine,
Ophthalmological Society of
New Zealand Prize, Sir Gordon
Bell Prize in Clinical Surgery,
Batchelor Memorial Medal and
Prize in Gynaecology and
Obstetrics (shared), Rita Gillies
Figure 63. Professor Emeritus Albert W Burgstahler
Gardener Memorial Prize, (left) and the author (right) at the Badaling section of
Undergraduate distinctions in the Great Wall of China prior to their attending the
Anatomy, Physiology and XXVIIth conference of the International Society for
Fluoride Research, Beijing, China, 9–12 October
Biochemistry, Medical 2007.
Microbiology, and Preventive
and Social Medicine, Senior
Scholarship in Medicine 1966, Fowler Scholarships in Medicine 1967 and 1968, and
the Travelling Scholarship in Medicine 1969.
Part-time Student Lecturer in Anatomy and Physiology to the Physiotherapy Class,
Department of Anatomy, University of Otago Medical School, 1967–1969. Student
Prosector for the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Department of Anatomy,
University of Otago Medical School, 1967–1968. House Surgeon, Otago Hospital
Board, 1970–1971. Assistant Lecturer and Registrar, Department of Medicine,
University of Otago Medical School and Otago Hospital Board, 1972. Assistant
Lecturer and Registrar, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago
Medical School and Otago Hospital Board, 1973–1975. Otago Postgraduate Medical
Fellow, 1976. Fulbright-Hays Research Scholar and Post-doctoral Fellow in
Psychiatry, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA, 1977. Senior Lecturer,
Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of
Otago, New Zealand, and Consultant Psychiatrist for the Otago District Health Board,
1978–2004.
Co-editor 1994–1998, Managing Editor 1999–2007 of Fluoride Quarterly Journal of
the International Society for Fluoride Research. Dr Spittle has published several
articles on the effects of fluoride on health and was a peer reviewer for the 2000
University of York systematic review, A systematic review of water fluoridation. His
work is referred to in both the York review and the 2006 NRC report, Fluoride in
Drinking Water: a scientific review of EPA’s standards. He received a distinction
award in 2000 at the XXIIIrd conference of the International Society for Fluoride
Research in Szczecin, Poland, for service to the Society
77
INDEX
ALCOA 65 Case histories: Cox WR 50-1

allergies 4 Baby M 21 Cristofoloni M 3
alligators 51, 58 Baby PH 21 Cutress TW 41-6, 48
aluminum 61 Baby PI 21-2 deiodinase enzymes 4
American Academy of Dr PK 22 dental fluorosis 3-4, 24, 59-
Allergy 47 Master PM 22-3, 38 60
American Dental Miss CD 11-2 Department of Health & HS
Association 41 Miss GL 15-6 44
anaesthetics 9 Miss PF 20-1 developmental neurotoxins
antioxidants 10 Mr AA 18 1
Armfield J 48, 60, 64 Mr EH 16 diabetes mellitus 4
Armstrong WD 48 Mr FT 17 diagnosis of chronic F
aspartate 5 Mr PC 19 toxicity 6
atomic bomb 65 Mr PG 21 Diesendorf M 64
Atomic Energy Commission Mr PL 22 diet 62-3, 65, 67, 72
65 Mr PN 22-3 Doull J 75
Austen KE 47 Mr PO 23, 38 Down Syndrome 24
Bachinskii PP 44 Mr RM 14 Dunedin 61
Bassin EB 74 Mrs AM 17-8 duodenal mucosa 28
Bentley EM 42 Mrs CMK 14-5 Easley M 6
Blaylock RL 4 Mrs EK 11, 34 Edson N 32
blood fluoride levels 7 Mrs HM 13-4 EPA 60
bone fluoride 43 Mrs IH 20 essentiality of fluoride 9
bone fractures 24 Mrs JM 17 Ewing O 64
Mrs MH 11, 34 excitotoxicity 5
Books: A struggle with
Mrs MJ 12-3, 33, 35-8 extramammary Paget’s
titans ii, 50
Mrs PA 18 disease 25
A treatise on fluorosis 3-9,
Mrs PB 18-9 Fagin D 75
22, 40-41
Mrs PD 20 Fein NJ 42
Fluoridation the great
Mrs PE 20 Feltman R 10-1
dilemma 2-6, 11-4, 36-8,
Mrs PJ 22 Fitzmaurice P 41
40, 44, 48-9, 62, 65, 75
Mrs RAJ 16-7 fluoridation 68-9
The fluoride deception 24,
Mrs RM 17 fluoride in medication 9
65
Mrs SS 12 fluoride in milk 74
brain 1,60, 75
Ms CH 25-6 Fluoride journal 48
breast cancer 2
Chalmers I 69 fluoroquinolone 9
brick tea 6
Cheng KK 69 food contaminated with
Bryson C 65
chinchillas 50-1, 58 fluoride 7-8
Burgstahler AW v-vi, 2, 6,
Chinoy NJ 4, 64 Foulkes RG 71
42
Chizzola maculae 3 Galileo G 61
caimans 51, 53, 58
chloramines 25 Galletti PM 44
calcification of membranes
chronic fluoride toxicity 2-3, glucose tolerance 26
9 9 glutamate 5
Carton RJ 60-1 ciprofloxacin 9 G-proteins 1, 4
Centers for Disease Control Colquhoun J 39, 65-7, 71-4 Grimbergen GW 10, 46-7
41 Connett PH 39, 42, 44, 72-3 guinea pigs 50
making you sick?
halothane 9 Association 59 Rousseau B 59

hamsters 50 NZ Medical Association 59 Safe Drinking Water Act 61
Harawira H 38-9 non-ulcer dyspepsia 28 Schlesinger ER 49
Health Department 61 Norrie CWM 32 Seavey J 25
Hileman B 42 nutrition 10 sensitivity to fluoride 4
Hodgson Hon P 38-40, 59 Osmunson B 68 sexual maturity 23
horses 54-8 osteosarcoma 24, 74 Shelton TA 69
hydrofluosilicic acid 24 Otago Children’s Dental silicofluorides 24
hydrogen bonds 4 Health Association 61 skeletal fluorosis 43, 60
hypothyroidism 4, 24, 44 Otago District Health skeletal muscle 27, 42
income 68-9 Board 59 sodium silicofluoride 10, 24
infertility 29 Oxman AD 40 Soriano M 29-32
Institute of Environmental
Patocka J 4 sources of fluoride 6
Science and Research
Penso G 40 Spencer J 64
41
Petraborg HT10,16, 37, sperm morphology 29
intelligence 25
46-7 Spira L 33, 35
iodine 1-2, 60
phosphate fertilizers 24 Spittle BJ 2, 4, 18, 24-5, 27,
ISFR 38, 48, 76
pineal gland 23-4, 42 41, 46, 64, 66, 76
Jacobs PN 51
Plunket Society 59 Stannard JG 42
Justus C 54
preskeletal fluorosis 9 Stecher PG 44
Kangaroos 58
Kiritsy MC 42 Price WD 62-4 Strunecká A 4
Kosel G 10-1 professionals statement Susheela vi, 3-4, 6-10, 22-
lead 24-5 61, 73-4 3, 27-9, 38, 40, 75-6
Levy SM 42 psychosomatic basis 34 tardive photopsia 27
Limeback H 72 Public Health Service 41, teeth, very good &
Lin FF 47-8 64-5 excellent 68-9
LOAEL 60 Purchas J 38 thyroid function 60, 75
Luke J 42 Quirk J 16-7 thyroid hormone, TSH 4,
Machaliński B 10, rabbits 50 24, 44
Maiers R 50 radiograph of the forearm 9 Tolstoy L 26-7
Maoris 63 rats 51, 54, 58 tooth decay 70-1
Maupomé G 48 Reasons: fifty reasons 39, Truman H 65
McKinney L 2, 6 41 University of Otago 61
MCL and MCLG 60 reason 12: 41, 43 uranium hexafluoride 65
mechanisms 4-5 reason 22: 44 urine fluoride levels 7
melatonin 23, 43 reason 30: 42-3 violent crime 24
microglial cells 5 referenda 61 Waitaki District 60
Ministry of Health 59 renal impairment 4 Waldbott GL 2, 4-10, 12-3,
Moolenburgh H 6, 10, 20-1, Reviews: NHMRC 38, 46- 33-8, 41, 44-8, 58, 75-6
46, 7 water disinfection agents
58-9 NRC 10, 43-4, 46-8, 60, 25
muscle weakness 27 73-5 WHO 40-1, 59
Neurath C 69-71 WHO 39, 41, 46-7 Wilson B 39
New Zealand Commission
York 39, 44-8, 74 Zhao LB 47-8
32, 59
Richardson HL 50 Zheng BS 7
New Zealand Dental
Roholm K 49
FLUORIDE FATIGUE outlines the chronic fatigue, not
I ill effects experienced by many when
relieved by extra sleep, and other various
they drink fluoridated water. The book notes how to test if fluoride is causing these
symptoms and, if it is, how they may often be cured.
“This book describes undeniable medical ill effects from fluoride added to
drinking water. … Those who deny reality and persist in discounting sensitivity to
fluoride in drinking water are like ostriches with their heads in the sand. They
would do well to heed what Dr Spittle has reported here and stop continuing to
promote and be misled by scientifically indefensible claims that do not hold up
under scrutiny.”
Albert W Burgstahler, PhD (Harvard, 1953)

Professor Emeritus of Chemistry
The University of Kansas, USA.
Editor, Fluoride (www.fluorideresearch.org)
“I am delighted with this book which very capably addresses a burning health
problem in many developed and developing countries that is afflicting millions of
men, women, and children. … I sincerely hope that, besides the general public,
policy makers and health officials, in the interest of the nation and the people they
are sworn to serve, will learn from reading this book to recognize and desist from
the “madness” being exercised by “fluoridation of drinking water.”
Professor AK Susheela, PhD, FAMS (India), FASc, Ashoka Fellow

Executive Director
Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation
Delhi, India.
Bruce Spittle,
MB ChB (with distinction),
DPM (Otago), FRANZCP.
ISBN 978-0-473-13092-3
Paua
Fluorides (as F)
IDLH Documentation
CAS number: Varies
NIOSH REL: 2.5 mg/m3 TWA
Current OSHA PEL: 2.5 mg/m3 TWA
1989 OSHA PEL: Same as current PEL
1993-1994 ACGIH TLV: 2.5 mg/m3 TWA
Description of Substance: Varies
Original (SCP) IDLH: 500 mg F/m3
Basis for original (SCP) IDLH: No data on acute inhalation toxicity are available on
which to base the IDLH for fluorides. The chosen IDLH, therefore, has been estimated
from the human acute lethal dose of 5 grams of sodium fluoride [Largent 1961 cited by
AIHA 1965]. AIHA [1965] stated that the atmospheric concentration immediately
hazardous to life is unknown, but "particulate fluorides are not likely to cause acute
health problems among workmen unless large quantities are swallowed, or unless the
more toxic decomposition products are involved. Exact concentrations producing
immediate illness are unknown, but most likely are very high."
Short-term exposure guidelines: None developed
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA
Lethal concentration data:
Adjusted 0.5-
hr
Species Reference LC50 LCLo Time Derived value
LC (CF)
SiF4
Carpenter et al. 69,220 101,071 mg 10,107 mg
Rat ----- 4 hr
1949 mg/m3 F/m3 F/m3
Lethal dose data:
LD50 LDLo
Adjusted Derived
Species Reference Route (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
LD value
CaF2 >17,051 mg >1,705 mg

Budavari 1989
G. pig oral ----- >5,000 F/m3 F/m3
Vest Akad Med
Rat oral ----- 4,250 14,488 mg 1,449 mg
Nk 1977
F/m3 F/m3
AlF6·3Na
34,208 mg 3,421 mg
Rabbit Largent 1948 oral ----- 9,000
F/m3 F/m3
F6Si·2Na
Gig Tr Prof
Mouse oral ----- 70 297 mg F/m3 30 mg F/m3
Zabol 1988
Rabbit oral ----- 125 530 mg F/m3 53 mg F/m3
Sine 1993
F6Si·Mg·6H2O
G. pig Frear 1969 oral 200 581 mg F/m3 58 mg F/m3
Human data: Skin rashes and complaints of the gastric, intestinal, circulatory,
respiratory, and nervous systems have been reported in workers exposed chronically to
concentrations ranging from 11 to 24 mg F/m3 [Roholm 1937]. Chronic exposures at
concentrations greater than 24 mg F/m3 have been considered to be "elevated" and a
concentration of 10 mg F/m3 was considered "excessive" [Collings et al. 1952]. It has
also been stated that the atmospheric concentration immediately hazardous to life is
unknown, and particulate fluorides are not likely to cause acute health problems among
workers unless large quantities are ingested; concentrations producing immediate illness
are unknown, but most likely are very high [AIHA 1965]. It has been stated that 5 grams
of sodium fluoride is the probable lethal oral dose [Largent 1961]. [Note: An oral dose of
5 grams is equivalent to a worker being exposed to about 1,500 mg F/m3 for 30 minutes,
assuming a breathing rate of 50 liters per minute and 100% absorption.]
Revised IDLH: 250 mg F/m3
Basis for revised IDLH: The revised IDLH for fluorides is 250 mg F/m3 based on
toxicity data in humans [AIHA 1965; Largent 1961; Roholm 1937]. This may be a
conservative value due to the lack of relevant acute toxicity data for workers exposed to
concentrations above 250 mg F/m3.
REFERENCES:
1. AIHA [1965]. Fluoridebearing dusts and fumes (inorganic). In: Hygienic guide series.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 26:426430.
2. Budavari S, ed. [1989]. 1669. Calcium fluoride. In: The merck index. 11th edition.
Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., p. 253.
3. Carpenter CP, Smyth HF Jr, Pozzani UC [1949]. The assay of acute vapor toxicity, and
the grading and interpretation of results on 96 chemical compounds. J Ind Hyg Toxicol
31:343346.
4. Collings GH, Fleming RBL, May R, Bianconi WO [1952]. Absorption and excretion
of inhaled fluorides. AMA Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med 6:368373.
5. Frear EH, ed. [1969]. Pesticide index. 4th ed. State College, PA: College Science
Publishers, p. 265.
6. Gig Tr Prof Zabol [1988]; 53(11):80 (in Russian).
7. Largent EJ [1948]. The comparative toxicity of cryolite for rats and for rabbits. J Ind
Hyg Toxicol 30:9297.
8. Largent EJ [1961]. Fluorosis, the health aspects of fluorine compounds. Columbus,

OH: Ohio State University Press.
9. Roholm K [1937]. Fluorine intoxication. A clinical hygiene study with a review of the
literature and some experimental investigations. London, England: H.K. Lewis & Co.
10. Sine C, ed. [1993]. Safsan®. In: Farm chemicals handbook '93, p. C302.
11. Vest Akad Med Nk [1977]; 2:2833 (in Russian).
Go back to the Documentation for Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health

Concentrations (IDLHs)
This page was last updated 8/16/96:
Go back to the NIOSH home page or to the CDC home page.

FLUOTIC®
Hoechst Marion Roussel
Sodium Fluoride
Otospongiosis Therapy
http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b2.pharmaceutical/b2.1.monographs/CPS-
%20Monographs/CPS-%20(General%20Monographs-
%20F)/FLUOTIC.html
Action And Clinical Pharmacology: Sodium fluoride acts partly by reducing

bone resorption in the bone remodeling cycle and partly by increasing
bone deposition. In organ culture of otospongiotic bone removed at
operation, sodium fluoride increased radioactive calcium uptake. Analysis
of the fluoride content of otospongiotic bone showed a higher fluoride
content in untreated patients, than in the endochrondral bone of the
noninvolved stapes, or the skeletal bone of the meatus. This is explained
by the increased vascularity and bone remodeling activity, with increased
opportunity of trace amounts of fluoride normally present in food and
water, to contact the active focus. Following moderate dosage of sodium
fluoride treatment for 6 months, the fluoride content of meatal bone and
stapedial crura is barely perceptibly increased, but that of otospongiotic
bone is increased nearly threefold compared to untreated conditions. Thus,
otospongiotic bone has an affinity for circulating fluoride.
The most convincing evidence of the effectiveness of sodium fluoride in

reducing the activity of otospongiotic bone has been provided by enzyme
studies in organ cultures of mature and immature specimens removed at
surgery from treated and untreated patients. These investigations indicate
a marked reduction in the enzyme activity of otospongiotic bone after
treatment and during cultivation when fluoride is added to the culture
medium.
Of great significance has been the finding that cytotoxic enzymes, found
in the majority of patients undergoing stapedectomy who had shown
progression in sensorineural loss before operation, were very rarely found
in similar patients after sodium fluoride treatment for 6 months. The toxic
enzymes liberated by the active focus appear to be the mechanism of the
sensorineural deterioration. Sodium fluoride acts partly as an enzyme
inhibitor and partly to decrease osteoclastic resorption and to increase
calcification of the focus, thus arresting its activity.
Over 9 000 cases of otospongiotic patients treated with sodium fluoride

have been reported in the medical literature since 1964. In most cases,
between 40 to 60 mg of sodium fluoride a day was administered. The
duration of treatment in these studies varied between 6 months to more
than 7 years in certain cases with no ill effects to the patients.
The drug was generally well tolerated, especially in patients who received
concomitantly a supplement of calcium and of vitamin D. The side effects
most frequently reported were gastrointestinal complaints and
musculoskeletal pain. There seems to be a relationship between
therapeutic results and serum blood levels of fluoride and the optimum
serum level appears to be from 8 to 12 µmol/L.
The overall clinical results indicate a stabilization of the sensorineural loss

of hearing in 80% of cases. Other symptoms such as tinnitus, vertigo and
postural imbalance associated with otospongiosis may be improved in 50
to 80% of cases depending on the symptoms involved and the severity of
the condition.
Sodium fluoride is rapidly and almost completely absorbed from the

gastrointestinal tract.
Certain cations such as calcium, magnesium, aluminum and iron retard

the absorption of fluoride ion by forming low solubility complexes in the
gastrointestinal tract.
Fluoride can be detected in all organs and tissues and especially in bones,
thyroid, aorta and kidney. Fluoride is predominantly deposited in the
skeleton and teeth and the degree of skeletal storage is related to age and
intake. 50% of a given dose is excreted in the urine while the rest forms a
chemical bond with bone.
Indications And Clinical Uses: Nonsurgical

cases: In patients with diagnosed
neurosensorial hearing loss or tinnitus due to otospongiosis, especially if
accompanied by a positive Schwartze sign indicating a vascular active
focus.
In patients with postural imbalance and/or vertigo caused by a lesion of

the posterior labyrinth consecutive to otospongiosis and in patients with
radiologically demonstrated demineralization of the cochlear capsule.
Postsurgical cases: In patients where, following surgery, a soft vascular

focus is encountered at the oval window or when the patient begins to
experience progressive neurosensorial deterioration after successful
stapedectomy.
Contra-Indications: Pregnancy,Children and Adolescents: Since the safety

of sodium fluoride has not been established in pregnant women, in
children and adolescents up to 18 years old, the drug should not be used in
these patients.
The drug is also contraindicated in severe renal insufficiency and in
patients with an active peptic ulcer.
Fluotic is not intended for dental

Manufacturers' Warnings In Clinical States:
use. The drug should preferably be prescribed with a daily supplement of
calcium and vitamin D.
Adverse Reactions:Sodium fluoride, at the recommended dosage, is usually

well tolerated. Mild reactions consisting of gastrointestinal complaints,
musculoskeletal pain and skin rash may occur.
Symptoms And Treatment Of Overdose: Symptoms: Initial symptoms are

secondary to the local action of sodium fluoride on the mucosa of the
gastrointestinal tract. Salivation, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and
diarrhea are frequent. Systemic symptoms are varied and severe. The
patient shows signs of increasing irritability of the nervous system,
including paresthesias, a positive Chvostek sign, hyperactive reflexes, and
tonic and clonic convulsions.
These signs are related to the calcium binding effect of sodium fluoride.
Hypocalcemia and hypoglycemia are frequent laboratory findings. The
signs may be delayed for several hours. Pain in various muscle groups
may occur. The blood pressure falls, presumably due to central vasomotor
depression as well as a direct toxic action on cardiac muscle. The
respiratory center is first stimulated and later depressed. Death usually
results from either respiratory paralysis or cardiac failure. It is stated that
the lethal dose of sodium fluoride for man is about 5 g; however, recovery
has been reported in patients ingesting much larger doses, whereas a dose
as low as 2 g has been fatal. In children as little as 500 mg of sodium
fluoride may be fatal.
Treatment: 1) Act quickly; 2) Start i.v. therapy with glucose in isotonic

saline solution to maintain blood sugar and to have a venous channel
available for transfusion in the event of shock; 3) Wash the stomach with
limewater (0.15% calcium hydroxide solution) and then give limewater at
frequent intervals; 4) Have calcium gluconate available for i.v.
administration and watch closely for signs of tetany; 5) Maintain high
urine volumes with parenteral fluid.
Dosage And Administration: The average dose of Fluotic is 20 mg 3 times a

day with meals. Clinical experience with sodium fluoride in osteoporosis,
multiple myeloma and otospongiosis has shown that best results can be
achieved by the addition of a calcium salt and of vitamin D.
The addition of calcium, preferably calcium carbonate, 2 to 3 g a day, is

of prime importance since the use of sodium fluoride alone has been
associated with a fall of serum calcium and hyper-parathyroidism. The net
result is osteomalacia and increased bone resorption which may negate
any beneficial effect that fluoride may have on bone formation. The effect
of fluoride alone on bone is well known. Stimulation of osteoblastic bone
formation occurs but in the absence of additional calcium, the bone is
incompletely mineralized.
Recalcification of the focus is the indication to reduce the dosage to a

maintenance level, while continued or increased activity as shown by
polytomography, positive Schwartze sign and neurosensorial loss
progression are the indications to continue treatment or to increase the
dosage.
Control of patients: It is important to make periodic examinations of

patients as follows:
Clinical examination of patients should be made every 6 to 12 months

along with a renal function test and a serum fluoride determination.
Radiological examination to exclude the possibility of fluorosis should be

made every 2 years.
Clinical experience has shown that the optimum fluoride serum level
should be between 8 to 12 µmol/L.
Availability And Storage: Each red, enteric film-coated tablet contains:

sodium fluoride 20 mg. Nonmedicinal ingredients: cellulose acetate
phthalate, colloidal silicon dioxide, diethyl phthalate, FD&C red #40
aluminum lake, FD&C yellow #6 aluminum lake, hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose, lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol,
polysorbate, stearic acid and titanium dioxide. Gluten-free. Bottles of 100.
GERMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY TO PLEAD GUILTY
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pjus/is_200302/ai_3580832802/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1
US Department of Justice
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, an international

chemical conglomerate based in Germany, has agreed to plead guilty
and pay a $12 million fine for its participation in a conspiracy that
suppressed competition in the world markets for an industrial chemical
used in the production of commercial and consumer products,
including pharmaceuticals, herbicides, and plastic additives, the
Department of Justice announced today. The chemical,
monochloroacetic acid (MCAA), has annual U.S. sales of approximately
$50 million.
In a one-count felony case filed today in U.S. District Court in San

Francisco, Hoechst was charged with fixing prices and allocating
market shares of MCAA sold in the U.S. and elsewhere from
September 1995 until June 1997.
Hoechst will be the third company to plead guilty to participating in

this conspiracy. In Hoechst's plea agreement, which requires court
approval, the company has agreed to pay a $12 million fine and to
cooperate fully with the ongoing federal investigation of
anticompetitive behavior in the MCAA market.
In June 2001, the Dutch chemical giant Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV

pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $12 million fine for its
involvement in this conspiracy. Elf Atochem of France pleaded guilty to
participating in the conspiracy and was fined $5 million in March 2002.
"The Antitrust Division has demonstrated its commitment to identifying

and prosecuting all companies, domestic or foreign, that harm
American businesses and consumers," said R. Hewitt Pate, Acting
Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department's Antitrust
Division.
Hoechst is charged with conspiring, through its officers and

employees, to suppress and eliminate competition among MCAA
producers by:
participating in meetings and conversations to discuss the prices and

market shares of MCAA sold in the U.S. and elsewhere; agreeing,
during those meetings and conversations, to charge prices at certain
levels and otherwise to increase and maintain prices of MCAA sold in
the U.S. and elsewhere; agreeing, during those meetings and
conversations, to allocate among major MCAA producers the market
shares of MCAA to be sold in the U.S. and elsewhere; issuing price
announcements and price quotations in accordance with the
agreements reached; and exchanging information on sales of MCAA in
the U.S. and elsewhere, for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing
adherence to the agreed-upon prices and market shares.
James M. Griffin, the Antitrust Division's Deputy Assistant Attorney

General for Criminal Enforcement, stated, "Hoechst's decision to plead
guilty indicates the strength of the Antitrust Division's enforcement
powers against international cartels."
The charge against Hoechst was brought under Section 1 of the

Sherman Act, which carries a maximum fine of $10 million for
corporations. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain
derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the
crime if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory
maximum.
The charge announced today stems from continuing investigations

being conducted by the Antitrust Division's San Francisco Field Office
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in San Francisco.
German firm fined under FD&C Act - Hoechst AG, federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_/ai_11348640
FDA Consumer, Sept, 1991 by Paula Kurtzweil
A large German pharmaceutical and chemical company that does

business in the United States and one of its former research directors
have become the first foreign entities to be successfully prosecuted
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for conduct that
occurred overseas.
Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, or Hoechst AG, of Frankfurt, Germany, and

Rainer Zapf, M.D., a former director of the company's clinical research
division, were sentenced last April in the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey for failing to report in a timely manner the
deaths of two foreign patients associated with the use of the
company's antidepressant nomifensine maleate.
FDA regulations require drug manufacturers to report to FDA serious

and unexpected adverse drug reactions both before and after the drug
is approved for marketing in the United States. During clinical testing
before approval), such adverse drug reactions must be reported within
three days. After approval, significant adverse drug reactions must be
reported within 15 days after the manufacturer has received the
information.
These reports are required whether the adverse reactions occurred in

the United States or elsewhere. Until now, FDA has charged only U.S.
drug manufacturers with failing to file such reports.
In the Hoechst AG case, FDA determined that the deaths of an Italian

woman, age unknown, in 1980 and a 57-year-old French woman in
1984-before die drug was approved in the United States - were
associated with the use of nomifensine and that Hoechst AG had
known of the deaths but failed to report them until 1986, months after
the drug had been withdrawn from the market.
The drug was approved by FDA in 1984 and marketed in this country
as a prescription drug under the trade name Merital between 1985 and
1986 by the company's subsidiary, Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals
Inc., of Somerville, N.J.
Hoechst AG, which had marketed the drug in almost 80 countries,

voluntarily stopped selling it in January 1986 because of a rising
incidence of hemolytic anemia associated with its use. Hemolytic
anemia is a potentially fatal condition in which the oxygen-carrying red
blood cells break down faster than the body can replace them.
Nine other deaths involving hemolytic anemia - including three deaths

in the United States - were reported in people who used the drug.
(Most of these were promptly reported to FDA.) However, the agency
was able to confirm only the deaths of the two European women as
definitely associated with nomifensine.
In August 1986, shortly after Hoechst AG halted sales of nomifensine,

FDA began an investigation of the company's U.S. subsidiary, Hoechst-
Roussel. The investigation stemmed from a congressional hearing on
Merital earlier in the year.
The investigation, which lasted a year and a half, was lengthy because
officials of the U.S. company refused to allow personnel who had been
directly involved in analyzing and reporting adverse drug reactions to
speak to FDA investigators. In addition, months often passed before
they provided written answers to investigators' questions.
Despite the obstacles, investigators pieced together evidence showing

Hoechst AG and Zapf had been aware of the deaths of the two
European women shortly after they had occurred but had failed to
report them to FDA as required. FDA found no evidence that Hoechst-
Roussel had withheld such information from FDA.
In April 1989, FDA forwarded its evidence to the Department of

Justice. On Dec. 12, 1990, the U.S. attorney for the District of New
Jersey charged Hoechst AG with failing to report the deaths of the two
European women, first while Merital was being tested and then again
after it was approved. Zapf was charged with pre-approval violations.
No charges were filed against Hoechst-Roussel.
On April 26, 1991, Hoechst AG and Zapf pleaded guilty to the charges.
The company was fined $202,000, and Zapf, $2,200. Both fines were
the maximum allowed under then existing law.

Fluoride: The Ultimate Cluster Flux Folder 2A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fluoride: The Ultimate Cluster Flux Folder 2A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fluoride: The Ultimate Cluster-Flux

And the Players Involved

A Compilation of Documents and Articles

If you are sickened and appalled by the approved use of fluoride in

I would like to thank (or curse) Christopher Bryson whose excellent

For more information on fluoride, I would recommend the Fluoride Action

In addition to full-time, on-campus programs in Pittsburgh and Adelaide, Heinz College

American Journal of Public Health

C.-E. A. WINSLOW, DR.P.H., Editor

THE BATTLE FOR SOUND TEETH

of nature cannot be indefinitely condoned, in the face of accumulating mountains

OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS

Toxicological Profiles are a unique compilation of toxicological information on a given hazardous

Primary Chapters/Sections of Interest

Other Sections of Interest:

ATSDR Information Center

Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Taking an Exposure History—The importance of taking an

Managing Hazardous Materials Incidents is a three-volume set of recommendations for on-scene

Other Agencies and Organizations

The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) is an association of

Carolyn A. Tylenda, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Dennis Jones, D.V.M.

Lisa Ingerman, Ph.D.

THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS:

3. Michael Kleerekoper, M.B., B.S., F.A.C.P., F.A.C.E., Departments of Internal Medicine,

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT.......................................................................................................... 1

2. RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH ................................................................................................. 15

3.2.2 Oral Exposure........................................................................................................................ 72

3.12.3 Ongoing Studies .................................................................................................................. 185

4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION.............................................................................. 187

5. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL .......................................................... 193

6. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE ......................................................................................... 203

7. ANALYTICAL METHODS ............................................................................................................... 243

8. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIES ............................................................................................... 255

9. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 265

10. GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................... 351

A. ATSDR MINIMAL RISK LEVEL AND WORKSHEETS ...............................................................A-1

B. USER'S GUIDE .................................................................................................................................. B-1

C. ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS...................................................................... C-1

D. FLUORIDE AND DENTAL CARIES ...............................................................................................D-1

3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Inhalation ................................................... 41

3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine – Inhalation .................................................................... 50

3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Inhalation .................................................................... 54

3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Oral ............................................................................. 87

3-5. Conceptual Representation of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model for a

3-6. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluoride ......................................................................... 170

3-7. Existing Information on Health Effects of Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrofluoric Acid.......................... 171

3-8. Existing Information on Health Effects of Fluorine ......................................................................... 172

2-1. Adequate Intake Levels for Fluoride .................................................................................................. 16

3-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Inhalation ................................................... 37

3-2. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluorine – Inhalation .................................................................... 43

3-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Inhalation .................................................................... 53

3-4. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Oral ............................................................................. 76

3-5. Levels of Significant Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride – Dermal ..................................................... 128

3-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to Fluoride – Dermal ...................................................................... 129

3-7. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vitro ..................................................................................................... 133

3-8. Genotoxicity of Fluoride In Vivo...................................................................................................... 135

5-3. Facilities that Produce, Process, or Use Fluorine ............................................................................. 198

7-1. Analytical Methods for Determining Fluoride in Biological Materials............................................ 245

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

1.1 WHAT ARE FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE?