Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 195 views

    Hydraulic Analysis Versus Piping Stress Analysis Approach

    Uploaded by

    alan172081
    1. The document discusses dynamic analysis simulation using response spectrum analysis and time history analysis to model fluid hammering in a pipe system. 2. It describes the pipe properties and calculates the theoretical hammer loading duration. However, the valve closure time from hydraulic analysis is longer than this duration, preventing a accurate dynamic analysis. 3. An alternative approach using piping stress analysis is presented, which indicates fluid hammering may occur at a node if the valve closure time exceeds a threshold. But the hydraulic analysis result contradicts this.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Hydraulic Analysis Versus Piping Stress Analysis Approach

    Uploaded by

    alan172081
    195 views1 page
    1. The document discusses dynamic analysis simulation using response spectrum analysis and time history analysis to model fluid hammering in a pipe system. 2. It describes the pipe properties and calculates the theoretical hammer loading duration. However, the valve closure time from hydraulic analysis is longer than this duration, preventing a accurate dynamic analysis. 3. An alternative approach using piping stress analysis is presented, which indicates fluid hammering may occur at a node if the valve closure time exceeds a threshold. But the hydraulic analysis result contradicts this.

    Original Description:

    Pipe Stress

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. The document discusses dynamic analysis simulation using response spectrum analysis and time history analysis to model fluid hammering in a pipe system. 2. It describes the pipe properties and calculates the theoretical hammer loading duration. However, the valve closure time from hydraulic analysis is longer than this duration, preventing a accurate dynamic analysis. 3. An alternative approach using piping stress analysis is presented, which indicates fluid hammering may occur at a node if the valve closure time exceeds a threshold. But the hydraulic analysis result contradicts this.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    195 views1 page

    Hydraulic Analysis Versus Piping Stress Analysis Approach

    Uploaded by

    alan172081
    1. The document discusses dynamic analysis simulation using response spectrum analysis and time history analysis to model fluid hammering in a pipe system. 2. It describes the pipe properties and calculates the theoretical hammer loading duration. However, the valve closure time from hydraulic analysis is longer than this duration, preventing a accurate dynamic analysis. 3. An alternative approach using piping stress analysis is presented, which indicates fluid hammering may occur at a node if the valve closure time exceeds a threshold. But the hydraulic analysis result contradicts this.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS SIMULATION : 1.

    RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

    PIPE DATA : 1. Speed of pressure wave = c = 1244 m/s 2. Pipe 24" Sch.10S A358 -> OD=610 mm -> t=6 mm -> ID=596mm -> A=2794 cm2 3. Approximate t-duration (hammer loading) from Tank1 to Tank-2 (L =562 m)
    td = 0.452 s = 452 ms

    Spectral Data (INPUT) ------------------------->

    RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD Time-Force Profile DLF @50-260 Time (ms) Force (Kg) 0 0 1000 12560 --> ???? 98 12560 1098 0 TIME HISTORY METHOD Spectrum/ Time-History Data @50-260 time Load 0 0 4.4 1 4.6 9 19.9 28.9 1000 1 --> ????

    PROBLEM STATEMENT: Since valve closure time regarding to hydraulic analysis result 1 sec which is larger than hammering time duration @nodal 50 -260 then INPUT spectral data can't be simulated ?? and DYNAMICS analysis can't be performed.

    HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS VERSUS PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS APPROACH PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS POINT OF VIEW: Fluid Hammering will occur at downstream side of Node 78 if valve closure > Ts=2 * L / c ..... (Seminar note page. 452) where : L from node 78 to check valve = 302 m Then : Ts = 2 * 302 / 1244 = 0.49 sec = 490 ms HYDRAULICS ANALYSIS RESULT Fluid Hammering was occur with valve closure min 1 sec (Node 78) --> This result is contradiction with condition that can be assessed by Piping Stress Analysis software ?? Estimated force from hydraulic result as shown below:
    2. TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS Spectral Data (INPUT) -------------------------> Time-History Profile (@u/s node 78) from 78 to Pipe Length (m) td(ms) 78 0 0 50 5.5 4.4 400 5.7 4.6 440 24.7 19.9 Time-History Profile (@d/s node 78) from 78 to Pipe Length (m) td(ms) 78 0 0 260 122 98 350 73.1 58.8

    TH (ms) 0 4.4 9 28.9 TH (ms) 0 98 156.8

    301314 = 302 m

    t-duration (hammer loading) Nodal 50-400 td = L / C = 5,7 [m] / 1244 [m/s] = 0,0045 s = 4.58 ms t-duration (hammer loading) Nodal 400-440 td = L / C = 24,7 [m] / 1244 [m/s] = 0,019 s = 19 ms

    t-duration (hammer loading) Nodal 350-Check valve (LNG Tank) td = L / C = 109,7 [m] / 1244 [m/s] = 0,088 s = 88 ms

    t-duration (hammer loading) Nodal 260 - 350 td = L / C = 32.4 [m] / 1244 [m/s] = 0,026 s = 26 ms

    59 Ton

    78

    38.2 Ton

    12.6 Ton
    t-duration (hammer loading) Nodal 50 - 250 td = L / C = 122 [m] / 1244 [m/s] = 0,098 s = 98 ms

    You might also like