Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2013 Campos Europe EXTERNAL
2013 Campos Europe EXTERNAL
January, 2013
0
Methodology
1
Table of Contents
Methodology 2
Overall Summary 3
Key Findings
Data Center Profile 7
Expansion Plans 18
Implementing Expansion 32
Selecting a Partner 41
Data Center Locations 47
Appendix 53
2
Overall Summary
3
Overall Summary
EXPANSION PLANS
81% say they plan to expand their data centers in 2013.
25% say they definitely plan to expand in 2013.
31% will definitely expand in either 2013 or 2014.
88% will definitely or probably expand in either 2013 or 2014.
Companies in the UK (41%) are more likely to definitely expand in 2013
than those in France (20%), Germany (17%) or Netherlands(16%).
Among those with any plans to expand (definitely or probably in 2013):
46% say they plan to expand in two or more locations.
Security, disaster recovery and power issues are the most important reasons for
expansion.
Among the possible directions for expansion, increased power capacity (50%), a
new location (48%) and more space (41%) are mentioned more often than
cooling (24%).
On average, participants want 14.1k square feet and 5.1 kW per rack in
their expanded data centers.
4
Overall Summary
IMPLEMENTING EXPANSION
Participants with plans to expand their data centers were asked how they
plan to implement the expansion. They could select multiple responses
and 33% plan to use two or more methods.
54% will use a partner, either for design and build (35%) or to lease wholesale
space (30%) or both (11%).
30% plan to build the expansion themselves.
29% plan to use a retail colocation solution.
21% plan to use a shipping container solution.
Data authenticity (23%) and total cost (20%) are the most important
factors in choosing an outsourced technology to implement expansion.
One in three is concerned with data sovereignty in choosing an outsourced
technology.
5
Overall Summary
6
Data Center Profile
7
Data Center Summary
8
Number of Data Centers
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED HOW MANY DATA CENTERS THEIR COMPANY OPERATE NOW, EXCLUDING “IT
CLOSETS” IN BRANCH OFFICES.
68% have 3 or fewer data centers, but 9% have 6 or more data centers.
30% 28%
25%
25%
20%
17%
15%
15%
10% 9%
6%
5%
0%
One Two Three Four Five Six or more
9
Most Recent Expansion
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED WHEN THEIR COMPANY LAST BUILT OR ACQUIRED A NEW DATA CENTER.
65% have built a new data center in the past 24 months.
45%
41%
Ireland reports the least
40% recent expansion of all
other countries with only
35% 44% of companies
30% having built a new data
center in the past 2
24% years.
25%
20%
20%
15%
10% 7% 7%
5%
0%
Past 12 Mos. 13-24 Mos. Ago 25-36 Mos. Ago 37-48 Mos. Ago Over 48 Mos. Ago
10
Current Space
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE AREA (BOTH IN SQUARE METERS AND SQUARE FEET) OF
RAISED FLOORS IN THEIR DATA CENTERS.
62% report averages of 10,000 square feet (100 square meters) or more.
The overall average is 12.9k square feet.
45%
40%
40%
35%
30%
24%
25%
20% 17%
15%
10% 7%
5% 6%
5%
0%
< 5,000 sf 5,000 - 9,999 sf 10,000 - 14,999 sf 15,000 - 24,999 sf 25,000+ sf Don't know
11
Country and Current Space
This chart shows the average square feet of raised floor space in their current data centers by
country (asked in both feet and meters).
Companies in the UK report larger average existing space than France or Germany.
16,000 15,009
12,000
12,000 11,226
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
France (N=54) Germany (N=30) Ireland (N=18) Netherlands (N=31) Spain (N=10) United Kingdom
(N=58)
12
Current Power
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE KILOWATTS PER RACK ACROSS THEIR DATA CENTERS.
The average power capacity is approximately 5.0 kW per rack.
19% uses more than 6.0 kW per rack.
45% 42%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
20%
14% 15%
15%
10%
4% 5%
5%
0%
1.0 - 2.0 kW 2.1 - 4.0 kW 4.1 - 6.0 kW 6.1 - 8.0 kW Over 8.0 kW Don't know
13
Power Metering
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED WHETHER THEY MEASURE POWER USE AND, IF SO, WHERE THEY MEASURE IT.
62% say they measure power use.
Of those who measure power use, over half measure at the server.
60%
54%
50%
42%
40% 38%
34%
32%
30%
22%
20%
10%
0%
Server Rack UPS Utility RPP PDU
14
Power Usage Effectiveness
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE POWER USAGE EFFECTIVENESS (PUE) OF THEIR DATA
CENTERS.
12% is unfamiliar with the term PUE.
19% doesn’t know their PUE.
The average reported PUE is 2.53.
16% report a PUE of 3 or more; 28% report a PUE below 2.0.
30%
25%
25%
21%
20% 19%
15%
12%
11%
10%
6%
5%
5%
1%
0%
1 - 1.39 1.4 - 1.69 1.7 - 1.9 2.0 - 2.9 3.0 - 3.9 4.0+ Don't Know OurNot
PUEFamiliar with PUE
Base = Total (N=201)
15
Container Solutions
Fewer than half of the respondents (45%) report using a shipping container module as a
data center solution.
Fewer companies in
Ireland report using
shipping containers
Don't Know (11%) than in other
7% countries (48%).
Yes
45%
No
48%
16
Hot/Cold Aisle Containment
Three in five respondents (58%) report using hot or cold aisle containment in their data
centers.
Don't Know
20%
No Yes
22% 58%
17
Expansion Plans
18
Expansion Plan Summary
19
Expansion Plan Summary (Cont’d)
On average, participants want 14.1k square feet for their expanded data
centers, compared to 15.6k sf in the previous survey.
Participants want 5.1 kW per rack on average in their expanded data
centers, versus 5.7 in the previous survey.
For data center decisions and planning, the most important information
topics are power reliability and supply; power requirements and
efficiency; and data center operations and management.
20
Expansion Plans in 2013
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED HOW LIKELY THEY ARE TO EXPAND THEIR DATA CENTERS DURING 2013.
81% say they will definitely or probably expand in 2013.
25% say they definitely have plans to expand in 2013, compared to 22% in 2012.
56% say they will probably expand in 2013.
Definitely Not
4%
Probably Not
Definitely
14%
25%
Probably
56%
21
Expansion Plans in 2014
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED HOW LIKELY THEY ARE TO EXPAND THEIR DATA CENTERS DURING 2014.
21% say they definitely have plans to expand in 2014, similar to the plans for 2013.
31% will definitely expand in either 2013 or 2014.
12% are unlikely to expand in either 2013 or 2014.
Definitely Not
4%
Definitely
Probably Not 21%
18%
Probably
57%
22
Country and Expansion Plans
43%
60%
72%
60%
Definitely Not
56%
60%
Probably Not
40% 48%
Probably
Definitely
20% 41%
0%
23
Regions for Expansion
RESPONDENTS WITH ANY EXPANSION PLANS (DEFINITELY OR PROBABLY) IN 2013 AND 2014 WERE ASKED
WHERE THEY WOULD BE LIKELY TO EXPAND.
The majority plan to expand in Europe, although one in three plan to expand in the UK;
many plan to expand in the U.S. or in the Asia Pacific region.
80%
72%
70% 65%
60%
50%
40% 35%
31%
30% 27%
25%
23%
20% 18%
10%
1% 1% 1% 1%
0%
Europe UK U.S. Asia Pacific Other Not Sure
24
Expansion Plans by Revenue
There is no systematic relationship between revenues and expansion plans for 2013.
80%
71%
70%
60%
60%
53%
49%
50%
40%
32%
30% 26%
19% 20%
20%
14% 13% 13%
12%
10%
10% 5%
2%
0%
0%
Definitely Probably Probably Not Definitely Not
< €1Bn (N=59) €1Bn - €9.9Bn (N=86) €10Bn - €19.9Bn (N=31) €20Bn+ (N=15)
25
Number of Locations for Expansion
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED IN HOW MANY LOCATIONS THE COMPANY HAS PLANS TO EXPAND ITS DATA
CENTERS IN 2013.
46% say they have plans to expand in two or more locations.
No decision
5% NOTE: To produce a large enough
Four or more sample for analysis, the discussion of
expansion plans will use those
7% companies (N=164) that will definitely
or probably expand in 2013.
Three
11%
One
49%
Two
27%
26
Reasons for Expansion
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED TO RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERAL REASONS FOR EXPANDING THEIR DATA
CENTERS.
Security, followed by disaster recovery and power issues, are the most important reasons for
expansion.
100% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 2% 4% 4% 5%
6%
10%
15% 15%
18% 20% 21% 22% 19% 23%
22% 23% 24% 21%
24% 23%
80%
26%
40%
60%
41% 52% 56%
51% 49% 51% 53% 51%
48% 49% 48% 55% 51% Not Very Important
43%
40% Somewhat Important
Very Important
Extremely Important
20% 41%
32%
27% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 22% 22% 20% 20%
0%
60%
50%
50% 48%
41%
40%
30%
24%
20%
10%
0%
Power Capacity Cooling New Location Space
28
Expansion Space Requirements
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE AREA OF RAISED FLOORS FOR THEIR EXPANDED DATA
CENTERS (IN BOTH FEET AND METERS).
The average desired space is 14.1k square feet, compared to 15.6k square feet in the
previous survey.
45%
40%
40%
35%
30%
25% 23%
20% 17%
15%
10% 7% 8%
5%
5%
0%
< 5,000 sf 5,000 - 9,999 sf 10,000 - 14,999 sf 15,000 - 24,999 sf 25,000+ sf Don't Know
29
Expansion Power Requirements
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE KILOWATTS PER RACK FOR THEIR EXPANDED DATA
CENTERS.
The average power requirement is 5.1 kW per rack.
40%
35%
35%
30%
25%
20%
20%
16% 16%
15%
10% 8%
5%
5%
0%
1.0 - 2.0 kW 2.1 - 4.0 kW 4.1 - 6.0 kW 6.1 - 8.0 kW Over 8.0 kW Don't Know
30
Information About Data Center Planning
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED TO RATE THE VALUE OF INFORMATION FOR PLANNING AND MAKING DATA
CENTER DECISIONS.
The most valuable information relates to power reliability/supply, power
requirements/efficiency and data center operations/management.
100% 2% 2% 3% 4% 2% 4% 5%
6% 9%
13% 16% 13%
17% 18%
20%
23% 24%
80% 25%
60% 48%
46% 50%
46% 47%
47% Not Very Important
47% 50% Somewhat Important
45%
40% Very Important
Extremely Important
0%
31
Implementing Expansion
32
Expansion Strategies
33
Use of a Partner
PARTICIPANTS WITH PLANS TO EXPAND THEIR DATA CENTERS WERE ASKED HOW THEY PLAN TO IMPLEMENT
THE EXPANSION. THEY COULD SELECT MULTIPLE RESPONSES AND 33% PLAN TO USE TWO OR MORE
METHODS.
54% will use a partner, either for design and build (35%) or to lease wholesale space (30%) or
both (11%).
30% plan to build the expansion themselves.
29% plan to use a retail colocation solution and 21% plan to use a shipping container
solution.
40%
NOTE: Total responses
35%
35% exceed 100% because of
multiple data centers and/or
30% 30% 29% using multiple methods on a
30%
single data center.
25%
21%
20%
15%
10% 8%
5%
0%
Design/Build Partner Lease Wholesale Space Build Themselves Lease Colo Space Container Solution No Decision Yet
In this survey 54% will use a partner for either design/build or lease wholesale space or both,
fewer than the 59% in the previous survey, and 69% in January 2011.
Plans to use a design/build partner have decreased over three surveys.
Plans to lease wholesale space have decreased from 36% to 31% and 30%.
50% 47%
40%
35% 36%
35% 32%
30% 31% 30% 30% 29%
30%
26%
25%
21%
20% 18%
15%
15%
11%
10% 8%
5%
5%
0%
Design/Build Partner Lease Wholesale Build Themselves Lease Colo Space Container Solution No Decision Yet
Space
35
Expansion by Shipping Container: Reasons
Those who plan to implement their expansion using a shipping container module as a data
center solution (21% of those expanding) were asked their primary reason for doing so.
Cost, space and speed of deployment are the leading reasons for considering a shipping
container solution.
Cost 26%
Space 26%
Batch Application 9%
Burst Capacity 6%
36
Country and Use of a Partner
This chart shows how the countries plan to implement their data center expansion.
In each country, as many or more plan to use a partner (for either design/build or lease
wholesale space) as other implementation methods.
Companies in France (25%), Germany (28%) and UK (23%) are more likely to use a container
solution than other countries.
Companies in the UK are more likely to use a partner (68%) because of the large number
who are more likely to lease wholesale space (43%).
60%
50%
50%
43% 42%
40%
40% 38%
36%
34% 33% 33%
31% 31% 32%
29% 28% 28%
30% 27%
24% 25%26% 25% 25%
23%
20%
20%
13% 13%13% 13%13% 13% 13%
8% 9%
10% 7% 6%
4%
0%
0%
Design/Build Partner Lease Wholesale Space Build Themselves Lease Colo Space Container Solution No Decision Yet
France (N=52) Germany (N=25) Ireland (N=15) Netherlands (N=24) Spain (N=8) United Kingdom (N=53)
Less than €1Bn (N=49) €1-€9.9Bn (N=78) €10-€19.9Bn (N=29) €20Bn+ (N=13)
RESPONDENTS WHO ARE PLANNING TO EXPAND WERE ASKED TO RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERAL
CONSIDERATIONS IN CHOOSING AN OUTSOURCED TECHNOLOGY FOR EXPANDING THEIR DATA CENTERS.
The most important factor is data authenticity/security, followed by physical security and the
total cost of the technology.
100% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
3%
12% 12% 10% 15% 13% 15% 13%
80%
35%
44% 46%
45% 49%
60% 50%
54%
Not Very Important
Somewhat Important
40% Very Important
Extremely Important
52%
20% 42% 41% 40% 37% 34%
30%
0%
Base = Those who plan to
expand (N=164)
39
Choosing an Outsourced Technology: Most Important
RESPONDENTS WERE THEN ASKED WHICH ONE OF THESE CONSIDERATIONS IS MOST IMPORTANT IN
CHOOSING AN OUTSOURCED TECHNOLOGY FOR EXPANDING THEIR DATA CENTERS.
Data authenticity and total cost were mentioned most often.
The two factors in data sovereignty (data authenticity/security and geopolitical/legal
location) are the most important considerations for 31% of the respondents.
25%
23%
20%
20%
15% 14%
13%
10% 10%
10% 8%
5%
0%
40
Selecting a Partner
41
Partner Summary
Of those who plan to expand in 2013, 54% will use a partner, either for
design and build (35%) or to lease wholesale space (30%) or both (11%).
The list of potential partners is usually developed by high or mid-level
executives, as opposed to C-levels or lower-level managers.
The most important qualifications in choosing a partner are ISO 27001
(Information Security), ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) and
financial stability.
When evaluating a partner, the single most important factor is providing
information/understanding about potential regulatory issues.
IT has the highest level of participation in selecting a partner for
expansion, followed by the IT Steering Committee, C-level Executives,
Finance and Boards of Directors.
The most influence on the final decision is spread around C-level
Executives, Boards of Directors, IT Steering Committees and IT.
These final decision makers are likely to be located in their company’s
own country, with many in London and Paris.
42
Developing a Consideration List
This chart shows the titles of those who participants say are responsible for developing a
comprehensive list of all potential partners.
Executives at the Director or Senior Director levels are most likely to develop the list of
potential partners for expansion.
35% 33%
31%
30%
25%
20% 19%
16%
15%
10%
5%
0%
C-Level Executive: Director Executive: MD, D of Ops Manager: Program, Project
43
Evaluating Partners: Qualifications
PARTICIPANTS WHO ARE PLANNING TO USE A PARTNER WERE ASKED TO RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERAL
AREAS OF PROVIDER EXPERIENCE IN SELECTING A PARTNER FOR EXPANDING THEIR DATA CENTERS.
The most important factors are ISO 27001 (Information Security), ISO 14001 (Environmental
Management) and financial stability.
100% 2% 3% 2% 4% 3%
1% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3%
9%
15% 14% 14%
16% 18% 18% 14% 14%
17% 18% 17% 18% 18% 19%
80% 22%
20% 41% 40% 39% 38% 38% 37% 37% 35% 34% 33% 31% 30% 28% 25% 24%
0%
44
Base = Those who plan to use a partner (N=93)
Evaluating Partners: Considerations
RESPONDENTS WHO ARE PLANNING TO USE A PARTNER WERE ASKED TO RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERAL
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN CHOOSING A PARTNER FOR EXPANDING THEIR DATA CENTERS.
The single most important factor is providing information/understanding about potential
regulatory issues. None of these other considerations in evaluating a partner is
unimportant.
1%
100% 5%
5% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3%
35%
45%
60% 31% 42% 45% 46% 45%
44% 45% 48%
Not Very Important
45%
Somewhat Important
40% Very Important
Extremely Important
47%
43%
20% 39% 39% 38% 37% 37% 35% 34% 32%
29%
0%
45
Base = Those who plan to use a partner (N=93)
Decisions About Partners
PARTICIPANTS WHO PLAN TO USE A PARTNER WERE ASKED FIRST, WHICH DEPARTMENTS PARTICIPATE IN
THEIR DATA CENTER SELECTION DECISION AND SECOND, WHICH SINGLE DEPARTMENT HAS THE MOST
INFLUENCE.
IT has the highest level of participation, followed by the IT Steering Committee, C-level
Executives, Finance and Boards of Directors.
The most influence on the final decision is spread across C-level Executives, Boards of
Directors, IT Steering Committees and IT.
60% 56%
50%
41% 41% 40% 39%
40%
30% 25%
22% 20%
20% 17% 18% 18%
13%
10% 7%
3%
0%
IT IT Steering Finance Executives (C- Board of Directors Business Unit Real
Committee level) Estate/Facilities
46
Data Center Locations
47
Data Center Location Summary
When asked where they would prefer to locate a new data center, most
prefer countries in Europe -- led by UK (37%), France (29%), Germany
(24%) -- and the United States (20%).
The majority choose their own country (68%), in addition to sites in other
countries.
The most preferred cities are London (29%), Paris (24%), Frankfurt (21%)
and New York (17%).
Over half (54%) choose cities in their own country.
When asked about factors in choosing a data center site, security and
connectivity are the most important.
48
Countries to Locate a New Data Center
This chart shows countries where respondents who plan to expand in 2013 would like to
locate a new data center. Multiple responses were allowed.
Most of the locations are in the three largest countries in Europe.
68% mention sites in their own country, in addition to sites in other locations.
40% 37%
35%
29%
30%
24%
25%
20%
20%
14% 13%
15% 12% 12%
9% 9%
10%
5% 2%
0%
49
Cities to Locate a New Data Center
This chart shows cities where respondents who plan to expand in 2013 would like to locate a
new data center. Multiple responses were allowed.
Most of the locations are cities in Europe. In the U.S., New York, Chicago and San Francisco
are mentioned. In the Asia Pacific region, Tokyo, Mumbai, Singapore and Hong Kong are
mentioned.
54% of the respondents choose cities inside their own countries.
35%
30% 29%
25% 24%
21%
20% 17%
15% 14%
13% 13%
12% 12%
10% 10%
10% 9%
8% 8%
6%
5%
0%
50
Other Locations
51
Factors in Choosing a Location
PARTICIPANTS WERE ASKED TO RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERAL FACTORS IN SELECTING A GEOGRAPHIC
LOCATION FOR THEIR DATA CENTERS.
Security and connectivity are the most important factors, followed by accessibility to
company personnel and power costs.
100% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2%
10% 12% 9% 13% 13% 15%
16% 12% 14%
80%
40%
45% 48%
41% 48%
60% 49% 50%
53%
58% Not Very Important
Somewhat Important
Very Important
40%
Extremely Important
48%
20% 41% 41% 40% 37% 36% 35%
31%
26%
0%
53
Confidence Intervals
54