Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Absolving The Casualty
Absolving The Casualty
A combatant is an armed fighter who engages in combat with other armed fighters.
His intentions are not necessarily aggressive. They may be defensive as well.
A confrontation between combatants may be violent at the outset. But typically, both
sides know that they are engaging in a confrontation, are equally armed, and have
ample opportunity to avert the confrontation with negotiation or flight. As such
David and Goliath was a confrontation as was the rumble between the Jets and the
Sharks. Nobody was forced to show up and nobody was spontaneously attacked.
Terrorists attack civilians and massacre them. Combatants confront each other and
rout, defeat or wipe out their opponents.
Victim / Casualty
A victim is typically an unarmed or non-aggressive party who was the target of an
aggressive event (attack) and was physically, financially, or emotionally harmed (as
in massacred). A victim is one who had no personal control over the situation and did
not have the resources, the opportunity or the presence of mind to avert or flee the
scene of the harmful event. Typically, a victim was not confronted and presented with
demands and ultimatums before being attacked. Someone is truly victimized when
they have done nothing of substance to contribute to the event that harmed them. A
true victim is somebody who was merely in the wrong place at the wrong time.
So, to sum up, terrorists attacked the Twin Towers and massacred many victims.
Armed forced – combatants – confronted each other at Gettysburg and inflicted many
casualties. We would not call David a terrorist but a combatant. We would not call
their fight an attack (who attacked who?) but a confrontation. We would not call
Goliath a victim but a casualty. Nor would we call his death a massacre but a fatal
defeat.
We now established that victims are targets of attacks by terrorists or thugs. They are
not the subjects of confrontations that escalated by mutual input and eventually
turned violent. It may be said that one can be victimized by an aggressive
confrontation, but if the confrontation was foreseeable and avoidable, we must hold
the casualty responsible for not foreseeing it and avoiding it. It greatly reduces his
standing as a victim.
The Torah does not look kindly upon those who contribute to harmful events. The
Torah tells us in a number of places not to be a victim. Do not contribute to the
harmful event. Because one who contributes is responsible for their contribution no
matter how heinous was the actions of the "aggressor". Where do we see this? One
example is from Dina. Dina went out to town with the purest of intentions but she was
attacked and molested. Though she was certainly not an active party to the event, the
Torah does not fully exonerate her. It says: VaTeitzei Dina – Dina ventured out.
Chazal label her a Yatzanit bat yatzanit – a venturer daughter of a venturer. The
Torah's message is: Do all you can to avoid becoming a "victim" and do not depend
upon the kindness, nor the virtue, of strangers.
Ventureat Emptor!
But, hey, look at this! The Torah (Devarim 22:23-27) discusses a betrothed woman
who was sexually assaulted. If it happened in an isolated spot she is acquitted. But if it
happened in an urban area, she is executed along with her rapist. Granted that,
according to Chazal, she is only executed in a very extreme case where she eventually
consented to the act, yet the Torah words it in a very accusatory fashion and clearly
sets the scenario where she initially had no intention of sexual transgression and was
overpowered and yet she is executed. In both cases the actions of the rapist were the
same. But in the case of the urban attack the Torah faults her for not taking the
precautions to avert the incident. Rashi (Devarin 22:23) says it in black and white:
Hence he molested her as a breech beckons a thief. If she would have remained in her
house nothing would have happened to her.
The Torah is sending us a message about victimhood: A victim is only a victim if they
contributed nothing of substance toward the event. When the "victim" knowingly
contributes anything to the event, he or she is responsible to the extent of the
contribution! It does not lessen the evil of the perpetrator but, if readily avoidable, the
perpetrator's evil does not exonerate the "victim". This is because whenever you
contribute to something, good or bad, G-d writes a receipt out to your name for your
contribution.