Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T5 B57 T Eldrige Primary Docs 20th Hijackers 2 of 4 FDR - Muahammad Qahtani Withdrawal of Application For Admission - InS DOJ
T5 B57 T Eldrige Primary Docs 20th Hijackers 2 of 4 FDR - Muahammad Qahtani Withdrawal of Application For Admission - InS DOJ
T5 B57 T Eldrige Primary Docs 20th Hijackers 2 of 4 FDR - Muahammad Qahtani Withdrawal of Application For Admission - InS DOJ
Basis for Action (check all that apply): File No: A 77929941
Date: 08/04/2001
Application for Admission Withdrawn
Visa/BCC Canceled
VWPP Refusal
Ordered removed (inadmissible) by immigration judge -Section 235(b)(2)(order attached)
| | Ordered removed (inadmissible) by INS-Section 235(b)(l)(order attached)^ r
Waiver revoked (2 1 2 (d)(3))(order attached)
Departure required (8 CFR 240.25)(Form 1-213 attached)
Notice to: American Consul, RIYADH SAUDI ARABIA From: USINS, ORL-IAP
(Location) (Location)
JOSEEMELENDEZ-PEREZ, II
Name and Title of Officer (Print)
Form 1-275 (Rev. 4/1/97)
U.S. Department of Justice
Immigration and Naturalization Service Co uation Page for Form 1-275
United States and that person would pick him up and take him around. He said that he was going to stay in the
United States for six days; however, the person that was suppose to be coming to meet him here was arrriving in three
to four days. In reality, it didn't make any sense that he was going to spend six days in the United States, travel
around the county when he was going to wait for this person for three or four days leaving him only two of three days
to travel hi the United States. At this time, I asked the subject again why he did not have a return ticket and he
replied, "I cannot purchase a return ticket because this person knows where I'm going and is going to make all the
arrangement". I asked for this person's phone number and he refused to provide it and stated that that was none of my
business because that was a personal matter and he did not see any reason for me to contact this person. Subject
contradicted himself and lied and changed his original story on various occasions. Subject was very hostile
throughout the whole interview. Subject was in possession of $2,800 USD and no credit cards. Taking into
consideration that he has to pay for his hotel bill, return ticket, and living expenses, $2,800 are not sufficient funds.
As an example, a one way return ticket to Dubai where he originated his trip, was $2,200 USD. When encountered
with this situation, he stated that his friend was going to bring him some money. Why is this person bringing you
some money? Just because he is a friend. How long do you know this person? Not too long. After carefully
analyzing this statement provided by the subject, his intention for visiting the United States was not clear. Taking
into consideration that he contradicted himself and lied throughout the interview, I decided to place him under oath
and take a sworn statement. I explained my intentions and the purpose of placing him under oath to take the sworn
statement and he agreed with it. At this time, the subject refused to answer any questions. At this time, it is not clear
why this person lied and contradicted himself throughout the inteview. We cannot determine his true intentions for
visiting the United States because he refused to answer any questions under oath. It is believed that this person is
hiding something. I explained that because we could not complete the inspection we were going to refuse entry and
he was allowed the opportunity to withdraw his application.Subject appeared inadmissable under Section 212
(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the INA. Subject withdrew his application and departed foreign via VS16 to London/Dubai.
of pages