Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Evaluation: Academic Skills Editorial Skills Administrative Skills Communication Skills
Peer Evaluation: Academic Skills Editorial Skills Administrative Skills Communication Skills
Peer Evaluation: Academic Skills Editorial Skills Administrative Skills Communication Skills
Work and educational environments require working together to satisfy a common goal. You are required to develop an efficient, fair, and productive workgroup. It requires the subsuming of the individual into the group dynamic - yet retaining and harnessing strengths of each individual - for the good of the whole. Clearly, each team member will have individual strengths and weaknesses and it is the responsibility of the team to use these appropriately. The team must ensure that the workload is distributed evenly. Part of your assignment is the development of a team and the evaluation of the contribution of each team member to the group. This requires the assessment of productivity in a number of areas:
Academic Skills Analysis Evaluation Synthesis Application Editorial Skills Typing Editing tone/style Scheduling meetings Editing language Conducting meetings Editing format Planning tasks Spell checking Distributing task Grammar checking Diligent Helpful Positive Patient Active Administrative Skills Scheduling task completion Communication Skills Constructive Reinforcing
Teamwork Groups will receive a raw score value for their projects out of 100% from the teacher. Each group member will also receive a score for group work based on peer evaluation of contribution to the group. This score will be allocated confidentially by each group member and given to the teacher. Individual scores will be adjusted from the raw score according to their peer evaluation Confidential evaluation: must be submitted. Grade will not be given unless the evaluation is received by the deadline. 100-points to be allocated to team members at team's discretion.
Each team member will receive an adjusted project grade based on the following calculation:
1.
2.
Peer Evaluation Peer 1 Peer 2: Peer 3: Peer 4: Peer5: Total Average 21 23 18 19 19 100 20
3.
Team Member 4's Average / even distribution (20 with 5 team members) 19 / 20 = 95% Modify raw score: 85 X .95 = 80.75 Team member 4 would receive a grade of 81% for the group assignment. Team member 2s Average / even distribution (20 with 5 team members) 23/ 20 = 115% Modify raw score: 85 X .1.15 = 97.75% Team member 2 would receive a grade of 98 % for the group assignment.
4.
PEER EVALUATION SEMESTER: TEAM NAME MEMBER NAME Fall 2012 Abu Dhabi team Mustafa Essam Eldin Ahmed Mustafa Essam Milad Fahed Year: 2012
Productivity Areas
1.
Abdulla Qassem
total 100
Each productivity area has 100 points to be allocated between team members. Total of team scores must not add up to more than 100.
Quality of work: Work is correct, clear, complete, and relevant to the task
Score:
26
Score:
26
Score:
23
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
2.
Ability to communicate: Listens effectively to other team members Speaks clearly and contributes to discussion Understands directions Writes effectively
Score:
25
Score:
25
Score:
25
Score:
25
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
3.
4.
Demonstrated Effectiveness: Member is constructive, positive and helpful Takes initiative, makes suggestions and provide a focus Manages time effectively and meets deadlines Project benefited from this persons contributions Commitment to team and project: Regularly attends meetings Punctual, prepared & ready to work Does what was promised Willing to take on additional work
Score:
25
Score:
25
Score:
25
Score:
25
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Score:
27
Score:
27
Score:
27
Score:
22
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
Comments/Justification
103 Total
103
102
95
Signature:
_____________________________
Date:
_______________