Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report 2013 AHS Radiography AC PDF
Report 2013 AHS Radiography AC PDF
Program is dedicated to the education of students in preparation for entry level clinical practice. Program administration, faculty and staff provide didactic and clinical education opportunities, which adhere to recognized standards, to all established students. The program is committed to graduating students who are prepared to write appropriate certifying examinations and who are prepared to become practicing radiography professionals. Goal: Students will become clinically competent
Outcome
1. Students will display radiographic positioning skills
Measurement Benchmark
Students will obtain a semester average of 10 points or higher on a sliding scale of up to 20 points. The scale can change based on the position given. Students will obtain a min. score of 90% on a 100% scale for comp positioning criteria in clinics Students will obtain a semester average of 10 points or higher on a 13 point maximum. Students will obtain a Yes for image critique in clinics
Method
Practical grading sheet procedures portion
Time Frame
Multiple times throughout Fall and Spring semesters in RAD 371, 373
Responsible Party
Lab Instructor
Results
22 1st years were evaluated in positioning labs and averaged 18.6 of possible 20 in practical exams in lab 46 students (both 1st and 2nd yr) were evaluated on comps in the clinical setting. 4 received a fail on the comp 22 1st years were evaluated in lab and averaged 11.6 of 13 for proper exposure factors
Action(s)
Continue to monitor and evaluate positioning lab skills
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Continue to monitor
Practical grading sheet equipment knowledge portion Clinical competency evaluation form. Image critique #6
Multiple times throughout Fall and Spring semesters in RAD 371, 373 Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Lab Instructor
Continue to monitor
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
22 students averaged 6.287 of three radiation protection items observed during lab procedures 46 students (both 1st and 2nd yr) were evaluated during clinical. On three studies shielding was NOT done
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Revised competency evaluations were developed for Fall 2011. Data is currently being gathered Continue to monitor and stress radiation safety practices for all mock positioning items in labs and clinical Continue to monitor and stress radiation safety principles
Students will obtain a combined average of 80% or higher on 2 written tests. Students will obtain an 80% or higher on each patient care skills practicals
Instructor
Students will obtain 6 points or higher for patient care in labs on an 8 point maximum
Practical evaluation on CPR, Vital signs, Sterile and aseptic technique, venipuncture, patient transfer Practical grading sheet patient care portion
Instructor
126 of 130 total students averaged 80% or higher in RAD 117 Pt. Care class. (4 failures) 126 or 130 total students completed the Pt. Care practicals with a score of 80% or higher 22 1st yr students averaged 7.9 of 8 pts for pt. care during lab practicals
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
Multiple times throughout Fall and Spring semesters in RAD 371, 373
Lab Instructor
Continue to monitor
Outcome
1. Students will recognize emergency patient conditions and initiate appropriate treatments
Measurement
Students will obtain a Yes for patient care in emergency situations
Method
Clinical competency evaluation form. Patient care #7
Time Frame
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Responsible Party
Site clinical instructor and UNLV clinical coordinator
Results
Students received yes on clinical comps regarding pt. emergency situations. Twice, a student was the first on scene and performed successful CPR on a pt. No isolation pt. violations were noted. 46 total students 22 students were monitored and averaged 8.78 of 9 on lab film critique and evaluation 46 students were monitored and clinical image critique scores showed 96% proper critiques
Actions
Continue to monitor
Students will obtain a Yes for patient care in isolation 2. Students will determine corrective measures that may be needed for suboptimal radiographs Students will obtain a semester average of 6 points or higher for film critique out of a 9 point maximum. Students will obtain a Yes for Image Critique
Clinical competency evaluation form. Patient care #2 Practical grading sheet. Film critique portion
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334 Multiple times throughout Fall and Spring semesters in RAD 371, 373 Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
Outcome
1. Students will communicate effectively with patients
Measurement
Students will obtain a Yes in communicating with patients
Method
Clinical competency evaluation form. Patient care aspect #1, 3, 4, & 8.
Time Frame
Throughout the clinical semesters for each exam. RAD 330, 331, 332, 333, 334
Responsible Party
Site clinical instructor and UNLV clinical coordinator
Results
46 students were evaluated in the clinical setting and proper communication was demonstrated 92% of the time 46 students were evaluated and averaged a score of 3.8 of 5 on the PGA
Actions
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
Spring semester
Instructor
Continue to monitor
Outcome
1. Students will demonstrate a professional appearance
Measurement
Students will obtain a semester average of 3 points or higher on appearance on a 5 point maximum scale. Students will obtain a semester average of 3 points or higher on demeanor on a 5 point maximum scale. Students will obtain a semester average of 3 points or higher on attendance and dependability on a 5 point maximum scale.
Method
Professional Growth Assessment #2
Time Frame
Midterm and Final of each semester
Responsible Party
Site clinical instructor and UNLV clinical coordinator
Results
46 students averaged 4.2 or 5 on the PGA in clinical
Actions
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
3. Students will demonstrate a professional work ethic through attendance and dependability
Continue to monitor
Program effectiveness
Outcome
1. Graduating students will pass the ARRT registry
Measurement
Obtain a score of passing on the 1st attempt in the ARRT Board at least 80% of 1st time test examinees within 6 mos. of graduating
Method
ARRT Annual Report
Time Frame
Annually (fall each year)
Responsible Party
Program Director
Results
UNLV RAD Grads scored passing registry scores for 82% of the class. 4 fails of 22 attempts (two were from yr. 2006 class). 8th yr where one or more scored the highest in the US
Actions
Continue to monitor
Min. of 80% of graduate surveys returned will score a 7 or higher. On a 1-10 satisfaction scale. From actual date of beginning required RAD coursework, students will ALL required RAD and Core curriculum coursework From date of graduation, a 5 year average minimum of 80% of those seeking employment will be employed in imaging Min. of 80% of employers will report a 7 or higher that graduates are overall clinically competent. On a 1-10 satisfaction scale
Program Director
3. Students will complete the Program within 4 total years from acceptance.
Program Director
4. Of graduate students seeking employment, students will be employed with in six months of graduation 5. Employers are satisfied with the UNLV Radiography program.
Graduate survey
Program Director/Faculty
100% of students desiring to complete the program since this policy was implemented have completed the program within 4 yrs. 20/22 had gained employment within 6 months of completing the program (90%)
Continue to monitor
Continue to monitor
Employer survey
Continue to monitor