Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

REL:05/17/2013

Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e Reporter of Decisions, A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r .

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA


OCTOBER TERM, 2012-2013

1120495

Ex p a r t e Brookwood H e a l t h S e r v i c e s , Inc., d/b/a Brookwood Medical Center PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In r e : A f f i n i t y H o s p i t a l , LLC, d/b/a T r i n i t y M e d i c a l of Birmingham v. Brookwood H e a l t h S e r v i c e s , Inc., d/b/a Brookwood M e d i c a l Center) (Montgomery C i r c u i t Court, CV-10-1587; Court o f C i v i l Appeals, CV-2111015) Center

1120499

Ex p a r t e St. V i n c e n t ' s H e a l t h System PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In r e : A f f i n i t y H o s p i t a l , LLC, d/b/a T r i n i t y M e d i c a l of Birmingham v. St. V i n c e n t ' s H e a l t h System) (Montgomery C i r c u i t Court, CV-10-901590; Court o f C i v i l Appeals, 2111014) Center

MOORE, C h i e f

Justice.

1120495 -- WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. 1120499 -- WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. Stuart, Bolin, Murdock part. Bryan, J . , recuses himself.
*

P a r k e r , Main, and Wise, J J . , concur. J J . , concur i n part and d i s s e n t i n

a n d Shaw,

J u s t i c e B r y a n was a member o f t h e C o u r t o f C i v i l when t h a t c o u r t c o n s i d e r e d t h e s e c a s e s .


*

Appeals

1120495 and

1120499

MURDOCK, J u s t i c e ( c o n c u r r i n g i n p a r t and d i s s e n t i n g i n p a r t ) . I concur application i n the d e n i a l of c e r t i o r a r i w i t h regard to the of the 60% occupancy rule in Rule 410-2-4-

. 1 4 ( 3 ) ( b ) , A l a . Admin. Code (SHPDA), as p r e s c r i b e d by 2 2 - 2 1 266, A l a . Code 1975. I r e s p e c t f u l l y d i s s e n t as t o t h e d e n i a l

of c e r t i o r a r i w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e a l l e g e d c o n f l i c t between the d e c i s i o n o f t h e C o u r t o f C i v i l A p p e a l s i n t h e s e c a s e s and t h e decision of t h i s Court i n Ex parte Shelby Medical Center,

I n c . , 564 So. 2d 63

(1990).

Shaw, J . , c o n c u r s .

You might also like