Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C-Sema's 2012 Annual Report (Narrative)
C-Sema's 2012 Annual Report (Narrative)
Supported by
Contents
Section 1. Introduction 2. Summary of Project Progress 3. Success Stories/Case Studies 4. Organizational Capacity Building based on 5C Model 5. Linking and Learning 6. Lessons Learnt 7. Challenges 8. Plans for next Quarter & Expected Expenditure Page 3 3 4-5 6 6 7 7 8
2|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
1. Introduction
The year 2012 begun with lots of hope for the take-off of the National Child Helpline after several preparations in 2011. However, it was until 3rd January, 2013 that the much anticipated Agreement Between Ministry of Community Development, Gender and Children (MCDGC) and C-Sema for Operationalisation of Child Helpline (CHL) was officially signed to pave way to the establishment of the first ever National Child Helpline in Tanzania. This ground-breaking achievement was only possible thanks to ICS resources which enabled C-Sema to host, travel and communicate with the Government officials during the drafting and consultation of the signed contract. The year 2012 also saw the piloting of the Opinion Boxes in Dar es salaam schools as an alternative violence reporting mechanism (Helpline) for children. Many children do not feel comfortable expressing difficult issues or complaints directly, so the initiative encourages children to instead write out their feelings, problems, needs and/or ideas and drop them inside the Happy/Sad Letter boxes affixed in a conspicuous place within their schools. Lastly, 2012 also saw C-Sema team (with a couple of stakeholders: Government; Unicef; and Save the Children) identifying 6 Districts where CHL will be piloted and later C-Sema team travelled to all 6 Districts to get a better sense of how the Child Protection Teams (CPTs) operate, henceforth better understand the work of the Social Welfare Officers and the Child Protection Management Information System (CPMIS) for which C-Sema will be responsible when the CHL call centre is operationalised.
The formal structures include: the Police; Judiciary; Social Welfare; Community Development; Health services; Education institutions; Local Government administrative structures at District, Ward and Village levels and corresponding statutory committees. The informal structures include: Most Vulnerable Children Committees (MVCC); Community Justice Facilitators (CJF); Faith Based Organisations (FBOs); clan and kinship structures; children and youth groups, notably Childrens Councils, youth networks and child rights clubs; child rights advocates and legal aid service providers; Non - Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and Community Based Organisations (CBOs); childrens homes, informal fostering agencies; womens groups and para social workers 2 Temeke was selected because it is one of the 6 Districts in the entire country where the Department of Social Welfare is currently piloting Child Protection Systems Strengthening (CPSS) model where all relevant sectors of local government and civil societies i.e. the health, social welfare, police, education and justice sectors are working together as part of a District Child Protection Team to ensure cases of child abuse are prevented and/or dealt with, swiftly and appropriately. 3 The Department of Social Welfare models a child protection systems strengthening initiative (CPSS) in 6 Districts: Temeke; Kasulu; Magu; Hai; Musoma; and Bukoba. In these Districts all relevant sectors of local government and civil society have been engaged to form a District Child Protection Team (DCPT) coordinated by Social Welfare. In the districts, the health, social welfare, police, education and justice sectors, as well as the informal structures (NGO/CBOs) are working together to ensure cases of child abuse are dealt with appropriately. It is therefore good use of resources to only pilot the CHL in the 6 Districts where referral mechanism already exists. 4 38 Females & 34 males govt. officers; and 19 females & 19 males informal offices were reached during out interactions at the Ministries and Districts (Department of Social Welfare (DSW); Children Development Department (CDD); District Child Protection teams in Temeke; Magu; Kasulu; Musoma; Bukoba; and Hai).
1
3|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
Figure 3:
Over 100 pupils in Bahati Primary School complained about the bad shape of their latrines. Children were sad because latrines are out of order but they are forced to use them since they dont have an alternative. They are worried that its a time bomb and sooner than expected disa ster is going to strike. A pupil wrote that she was worried younger children may fall into the broken holes). The picture below shows one of the latrines holes.
4|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
Children reported 134 Violence (VAC) cases out of all 943 received opinions. These Violence Against Children (VAC) cases included 13 Most Vulnerable Children (MVCs); 3 Sexual Violence5; 45 Emotional Abuse; and 73 Corporal Punishment. The Temeke District Child Protection team has since dedicated time to address the opinions specifically VAC cases which need immediate actions: incidents of sexual harassment are prioritised by first investigating the allegations and later taking disciplinary measures against the perpetrators including dismissal of the perpetrators from teaching career. The results were also shared with Unicef and Save the Children among other partners to steer up the responses to address the situation. Lastly, C-Sema and the Districts Child Protection Team are currently developing guidelines to help pupils report Child Protection (VAC) cases as opposed to the past general way of airing their views. Figure 4: In the 1st picture a child wrote in Kiswahili which translates: Mr. Musa (a teacher) whips us like bulls. A child wrote and illustrates with an image
where a teacher tells a pupil to bend and touch his/her shoes then whips him/her with a cane. The second picture children pose for a photo behind their Happy/Sad Box.
Figure 5: The 1st photo shows a letter stating the devastating conditions of the Bahati Primarys latrines & second photo shows C -Sema team enganging pupils in dialogues after opening of box
A teacher is mentioned (name withheld) to have been engaged in indecently touching/pinching girls breasts while punishing them. Another teacher is known to be engaging pupils in sexual seductions.
5
5|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
6|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
7. Challenges
Challenge/Constraint Identifying CHLs pilot districts in a country with over 100 districts How they were addressed The 6 model districts where Child Protection System Strengthening (CPSS) provide the best avenue for CHL piloting.
7|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m
Establish a pilot CHL in Dar es salaam Roll out the Happy/Sad Boxes in 90 more schools in Dar es salaam
9. Annexes
Project Progress Monitoring Table (attached separately) Financial Report in Excel Format in local currency and in Euros, including a financial plan for the next quarter (attached Separately)
8|Pa g e
1 7
O c e a n
R o a d
S e a
V i e w ,
U p a n g a
D a r
e s
s a l a a m