Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tom Hanks Interview
Tom Hanks Interview
om Hanks used'fo be comedian. Now he's an actor. After a two-year sf,nt of movie farces in which Hanks' quick-witted cads were often the only saving graces, last summer's
KS
'. j
*
'-
him a chance to prove he could r*-{ play a three-dimensional, essentially dramatic rote. A bit-
by director Barry
rn L;ommon
any indication, Hanks coutd indeed assurne that manile. A funny coincidence; Hanks' early drama coach, Vincent
Dowling, recalls that he and
mantic drama, Every Time We Say Goodbye. Now critics haye taken to calting Hanks "ayoung Jack Lemmlon," and if his performances here are
his former student talk to this day about working together on Eugene O'Neill's monu-
cal
written, Jack Lemmon is on the London stage, ptaying Ldmund Tyrone's authoritarian father.
As this is being
funny streak. He attended Chabot Junior Coilege in Hayward for tuvo years, then sperd a year at California
While auditioning for a region-
Hanks was raised in Oakland, California, and by his own description was a "loud-
al production of
28
==%EI
company. Hanks quit school b pertorm rotating repertory theater, appearing in numeraus works from town to town . After moving to New York
Hanks
struggled and did stage work and appeared exceedingly briefly in a 1980 slasher mov-
reer as yours might have been the main reason for it? Hanks: Oh, no. No. That
! t
(searching for right word) Divorce is inbred in Western society; it's simply a part of it. ll
l;
TV
years. When you were starting out in comedy, was there anyone who was a particular insplraton, or role-model? complete product of the box
Hanks: Not really. lwas iust a
movie (Mazes and Monsters) and some serles guest-appearances, Hanks landed the male romantic co-lead in the
[W], for the most part. I knew what time it was to go to school by what show was
over: When Love of Lrfe end-
ed, I was on my way to kindergarten (laughs). I've always considered myself very lucky, because I have something those TV comedians didn't: I had thern to rip off! Geruesrs: lt's sort of ironic that you began your career doing Shakespearean drama.
then
edy
star. ,Jackie
admiringly that, "Anybody can do a lirie. But Tom has moves. That's the ,imporlant thing. The right moves. And hes got 'em all." 'GEr'rESrs: I'm sorry to hear
abcL it
fabulous
Gr.:rEsts:
rliriie
ninety bucks on Staten lsland. I got the role because I walked into an audition and did a reading and they said oh, okay. I had three days ori this movie. I didn't know what I was doing; I just showed up and learned how to hit a mark and then moved on. I mean, c'mon, it was a long time ago? (laughs) GENEsrs: Well, it did help your career to have a movie, didn't
it?
mermaid, 'Who
Disney. 'Oh. Cute. We were all just really too scared to think that we were doing anything fantastic. We reallv liked the movie. we had F a loiot fun doing it and we all E taking off the way it did.
s maxin it?'
$ worked very, very hard. We f; weren't totally prepared for it $ turned around and did Each8 elor Party, which wasn't ex-
elor Party, and I said, 'Well, I'm really busy right now, so
? had tirne to read their script. I ! toto tnem, 'Look, this is a $ tnere's some funny stuff, $ there's something to work on here, so let's go ahead and
do it. lt was also diametrically opposed to the kind of movie Sp/ash was, so I had no qualms about doing it. Geruess: With these two movies and then Volunteers, The Man With One Red Shoe, The Money Plf and especially with Nothing in Common, you've gotten this "yuppie comic" label attached to you. . . .
rock'n'roll sex
comedy,
$ was a lot of fun. But I wasn't 3 particularly scared or worried. fr I didn't work lor a long time. e had a deal with CBS, we were
"Tn,
a rnztrh gryater rish in doins cumcdy because ,f y* stinh, people will tzll yru."
went to the top of my resume!
GEHess: Oh, c'mon.
! tryin' to put a TV show on the $ air, but that didn't work out. ' So I did some episodic stuff
pearance on faxil. But it wasn't like: Oh my god! My show's been cancelled! I'm dead, DEAD! Quick! Call up
Cross-Mfs/ I'll do a couple of
weeksl -Genests:
[including
memorable ap-
that!
GeruEsrs: Well, to use
it
and
kind of thing gives you an amount of credibility. Because the first thing people say [to a young actor] is, do
could say yes, I do. Not wlth me, of course (suppresses a yuk). But I was able to stop
There was no insecurity at all? Hanks: Sure-p/enfy of insecurity. But nothing that was
unique. Y'know, I had been in
for a moment, because it is applied to you, do you think your characters are mostly personifications of yuppie
traits? a different guy than who lwai in Sp/ash. The guy in Bachelor Party was a smartass, but he was totally monogamous, adhering to his fidelity to the woman he loved. The violinist
New York with a lamily and ten dollars lefl in. lhe.bank.
After that insecurity, anything else is a piece of cake.
Geruests: When
yeu
were
shooting Sp/ash, your first big set have any inkling how successful it was going to be?
I actually never
made a single student film in college. GEruesrs: How did you land Bosam Buddies? Hanks: ABC was-having their massive talent hunt, which is (rue.ful little laugh) a real im-
I can't tell you h.ow many times .people wolild come up to us on the street
where we were shooting and say (obnaxious voice) "Whaddya ya do-in'? Ya makin' a rnoo-vie?' Yes. 'Whuzza
in The Man With One Red Shoe, he was (quiet, laugh) kinda thick; 'he didn't get much of what was going on. And Walter Fielding in The
Money Plt, I always felt, 'Why
does he let the world make such a schlemiel ol him, why can't he fight back a little bit
(continued on page 95)
30
GENESIS
INTERVIEW
lc(.)ntrrtued from
made. lt not onlv srrL\,,5 1"6u, happens. it shows what it was iike GeruEsrs: But how eractly do you shift
gears from comecjv to drima?'
more?' The most Walter could ever say was, 'Oh, YEAH?' But what these guys
guess.
rs
come up with a halfway decent quip I've found that for what are more or
less limited roles, I've been able to work in a lot of variety. lt may be very hidden,
Hapks: ln making movies. one'ol the prerequisites is having this kind oi re-
But
(bilghtedng), making the movie was not a three month experience of cinematic psychoanalysis! So while it wouldn't be
{air to say it's autobiographical, you bet I took a bunch of my own stufl in there
laxed concentration didn't want to make the big, dramatic crying scene the event of the movie {for myselfl: 'OK, here it comes, I gotta do this. Because I
had done it that way before and failed
miserably.
GEtrEsrs: ls that one of the reasons that
with me.
er you were able to have a bit more input into your character's formation. Hanks: I did have input,b lot, because [director Garry Marshall and the producers] came to me, and they were nice
didn t? Hanks: lt gave me an opportunity to act in a much bigger, a much more obvious
enough to ask me what I thought. But I don't think that means I had any particu-
I figure those movies didn't touch any kind ol resonant chord. lt also may be that they weren't perhaps
Hanks:
well-made films. They're not the greatest movies, they're not seamless movies, they have some faults. But I think in general, what can you say? Something happened, we took a shot, they didn't do real well. But perhaps in the first place, the actual gut issues we
were addressing were not interesting to people. Geruests: Would you want to stretch
click?
other job, alry other gig. I've always tried to invest as much realistic emotion into whatever part it is, in whatever movie it's going to be, even something that turned' out to be as innocuous as the Ihe Man With One fred Shoe, or as I guess kinda
through something in life and then dredging it up so that he can use it as the key or template for whatever emo-
stupid as Bachelor Party. I think what we do as actors and fllmmakers is capture a period of time. And the best movies don't just capture what happened at this period of time, but they capture what it was like. One of the best examples, I think, is Ihe Eesf Years of Our Llves (William Wyler's 1946 classic about returning WWll vets), which is one of the greatest motion pictures ever
ing a villain whoOver it would be is to have him very firmly rooted in the real
world and also be kind of witty. I always thought the greatest villain was lago [the
him
togethef'off-screen? Hanks: No. I mean, what am I gonna do, 'Hey, Jackiel Come by.my trailer, we'll play cardsl' C'mon. What am I gonna do?'Can I come in?! Can I come in and hang out?!'
cause if I do that, I'm not being an actor, I'm being this pesky titile fan. .Remember th-at scene where you'n' Norton got drunk?! How' ja do thai, huh?!, GENEsrs: At the same time, weren't you concerned that Jackie Gleason's iast few films were ail prefty bad and alt died at the box otlice?
ing tor things to go, and he would offer a lew things, but I made a conscious choice before we went in to the movie llat l'm not going to ask this guy quesOe-
Geltesrs: Gleason and Nothing in Common director Garry Marshall Came trom a different generdtion of comedy than
rt.
their vaudeville/sitcom sensibilities wit6 your Any creative differences in that regard? Hanks: Well, 'creative ditferences'is this somebody walks off a movie. yeah, we hld arguments, we had all kinds of disagreements. But creative differences no, because we were all involved in the creative process. There were times when I yelled (assumes an upset voice), 'l'm not gonna say this, I'm not gonna say it, I'm not gonna say it. y'know whf (laughs) No, actuaily, whdn we naO Oisagreements like that, I did not just say I
it ditficutt meshini
of humor?
Hanks: No. Not at all." I guess as an actor I realize that just because a movie stinks, you can't blame a single person lor that. Because as an actor, the first thing I thought of was The Husiler [the classic '1961 Gleason / paul Newmin / George C. Scott poot-ptayer dramal. I
and .'.
'Cuz it's stupid. 'Cuz, it's stupid an'd, 'cuz I'm not gonna say it!'
refuse to do this;
Jackie Gleason movie"? Hanks: I don't think they do. I think peo. ple forget the flops. lt's onty when (jokingly) newspaper writers bring up thbse
thingsl
belleve me,
reviews: 'Tom Hanks, who CAN'T make a decent movie to save his life since
Pryor says he does, about someday just not being funny anymore? Hanks: Well, Richa-l.d pryor's a standup comedian. There's a lot more validity iir that, a lot more risk. I don't stand up by fys_elf and say, 'Thank you for comingi, l'm funny and l'm gonnabe funny for thi
some instances you plead your case. which to me is viable. So yein, we had stuff like that go on ail the iime. GENEsrs: Do you ever worry, as Richard
i i
!t qlalk to high heaven., And it's your fault. So you're out there much more onthe-line with comedy than you are in a clrama. ln a drama, an audience can sit very silently and you can have the biggest smash in the world with everybody absolutely loving it. tn a comedv ft tnev sit silently, you are dead, DEAD, OfnOi And because of that it's much scarier and much more difficult than drama and. you can't really explain it. lt's either tun_ ny or it's not. One thing I learned from Jackie Gleason: Just trust your instincts imolicitlv. And never, never allow anyO6Oy io screw that up. lf you have a system of working, work that way and you'lll be fine. Trust yourself, trust that initiat gut direction you're goin' in- you won't "do" wrong. D
risk. in doing comedy, oecluje"it vt-u stink to- high heaven, you t<now right ,you away. And people telt you: kn6w
same worry to me. lf I'm really not funny. someone else will be. Genesls: But you do seem to be movino away from straight, larcical comedy and into light drama. Which is thg harder of two for you to do, comedy or drama? !f.re Hanks: I think there's a much greater
",*uu. didn't write it. I had !9 say it., t ian always hide behind m:at. ti s not rhe
next twenty minutes.' lf I reairv want to l?ke,.a cleap shot, I can say, i