Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The British Counter Jihad
The British Counter Jihad
By Reconquista
Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad
Prelude: The British Intifada:
How Britain Will Become Europe's Israel
Background
If I were to say to you that in just ten short years, Great Britain will
be in exactly the same situation IF NOT WORSE, than the state of
Israel, how would you react?
Perhaps you'd say that although there are several parallels, such a
perilous state of existence is unique because of Israel's geographical
location and the fact that it is of course, a Jewish and not a
Christian state.
Or maybe you'd ask the barman for "a glass of what Reconquista
has been drinking".
I disagreed and was told "you need to see the bigger picture".
So the contention here is that "the big picture" is to state that the
problem is within Britain itself and that a BNP government
(something I am longing for) will solve the problem by putting an
end to the lunatic, suicidal policies of cultural Marxism by ending
mass immigration and by imposing a nationalist system of
governance.
Small Is Beautiful
Now take a look at the map of Europe and look at Great Britain. It's
well, it's not very big is it? And although we are an Island people
who have been saved on more than one occasion by the seas, the
distances between the white cliffs of Dover and France - about 35
miles - well, the sea will not be much of a protection in future
conflicts.
So let's assume the dream happens and the BNP are given the
mandate by the British people. Within 24 hours, the BNP would pull
us out of the European Union, an Islam promoting union Bat Y'eor
famously described as "Eurabia". Small but beautiful Britain, this
green and pleasant land, would then have a collection of hostile EU
nations right on its doorstep.
We are told that there are about 1.5 million Muslims in Great
Britain. This figure is contested as we all know, with some putting
the figure at double that. These are Muslims whose allegiance is not
to Great Britain and the British way of life but to Islam and the
Islamic way of life.
"We are not British Muslims we are British-born Muslims." And then
there is the treason of a Muslim peer of the realm, Lord Ahmed,
who declared his successful attempt to prevent the visit of Dutch MP
Geert Willders to Parliament for a viewing of Wilders' film "Fitna" as
"a victory for the Muslim community". To gain victory, Ahmed, Lord
of of jihad, threatened "to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims" if
his demands were not accepted.
Now let us imagine the state Great Britain could well be in just ten
years from now. The demographic weapon is one of the most -if
not THE most - effective strategies deployed by Muslims to conquer
a land in "Dar al Harb", just ask the Kosovo Serbs. It is not
unreasonable to estimate that the Muslim community in Britain will
number around 8-10 million.
"In twenty years time this place will be more like Islamabad than
Birmingham. It will all be ours."
Here's something that may surprise you: Think back 10 years. Can
you remember Islam being such a main topic of news as it is today
or that mosques and Muslims would be as common a sight as they
are right now? Because I for one had absolutely no idea whatsoever
about Islam back then, Islam simply wasn't even on my radar. Had
I been asked about Sharia Law, I'd have said "Isn't she an American
country and western singer?"
A decade ago Islam was exactly what I wished it was today: A non-
entity for me. So do you honestly think it is a figment of my
imagination to imagine violent intifadas on the streets of
Birmingham or Bradford that mirror the scenes we have witnessed
so often in the West Bank and the Gaza strip?
Should this happen in Britain - and I have to state quite clearly that
as someone who has studied the history of Islamic jihad I think it
WILL happen - then this will trigger a domino effect which again will
mirror events in the Middle East.
Love Thy Neighbour
Can you see where I'm going with this? Let me ask you:
What do you think the EU and our closest neighbours will do should
there be an intifada for a separate Islamic state in Great Britain? Do
you think these nations - who could well be facing a similar situation
themselves - will be of any support to us or do you think that they
may support our enemy in the same way that they support terrorist
organisations such as HAMAS and Hizballah?
Now think about this: Turkey is busily agitating for full membership
of the European Union. If - make that when - this nightmare
happens, Europe will be flooded with Turkish Muslims who will all
play their part in turning the infidel lands of Europe into "Dar al
Harb".
And for desert: France not only has a strong army and navy. It
possesses nuclear weaponry. Should France become part of Dar al
Islam...
A United Front
In a previous essay, Shilling for Jiahd Part Two, I outlined how the
UN has now been taken over by Islamic nations and is now playing
an active part in advancing the global jihad. Now it maybe that a
BNP government will also pull Britain out of the UN. I for one hope
so. But maybe they won't because of our veto.
One thing is for certain. Just as Israel and Serbia have discovered,
we British won't find any friends in the reptile swamp of the United
Nations. It is nothing more than a vehicle for Islamic despots and
dictators to impose Islam on the world, a task the UN is willingly
aiding.
Made In Britain
Just as Israel has its suicidal liberals - jewicidal liberals as they are
sometimes referred to - Britain also has a similar problem. Although
it can be said that liberals are well-meaning but misguided
fantasists who are pursuing a naive aim of equality that is out-of
step with the reality of human nature, there are others in our midst
who are not so well-meaning. Unlike Israel, we have committed
Marxists whose goal is to totally destroy our nation and reduce it to
a state of anarchy.
These are the traitors who will stand with the enemy and fight with
the jihadists. So not only will we be faced with naive liberals who
will, just as they do with the situation in Israel, call for Britain to
make peace and accept a "two state solution", we will be faced with
the treachery of our own people who will collaborate with Islamic
jihadists and who share the same fanatical desire to destroy Britain.
This is the big picture of Islamic jihad, and you can now understand
why I believe that Islam is THE problem. We are truly on the cusp
of an horrific nightmare, and if the history of Islamic jihad teaches
us anything it is that it isn't a question of IF this nightmare will
happen but WHEN.
Conclusion
The oil-rich Arab-Islamic nations of the world will also play a very
active part during the British Intifada, and use of the oil weapon by
the Arab nations, especially Saudi Arabia who is pouring millions of
dollars worth of petro-dollars into spreading Islam around the
world, is just one way they will join the battle. The influence and
dominance the Islamic bloc wields in the viper's nest that is the UN
will lead to scores of resolutions against Britain which may include
sanctions or even a demand for a UN peace-keeping force to be
deployed.
Will the US, our NATO ally come to our aid or will they seek a
peaceful "2 state solution" as they do in "Palestine" or will they stay
out of it altogether?
This is how Islamic jihad is prosecuted, and this is why I assert that
THE problem we are facing here and now is Islam. And my God we
had better wake up and realise it very, very quickly or we are
doomed to a nightmare future of compliant, subservient
dhimmitude.
Background
Britain is now fighting a war unlike any other it has been engaged in
during its long and illustrious history. Gone forever are the days
where armies and navies faced other as clearly identifiable
combatants engaged in battle on battlefields devoid of civilians.
Sleepwalking To Dhimmitude
Of course, there are others amongst us who know the truth but who
will still adamantly proclaim these myths as truths for their own
greed and selfish gain.
Sadly, there are also those who won't have the faintest idea or even
the slightest interest.
Ask a Muslim as to what jihad is and they will tell you with straight-
faced piety: "It is a duty for all Muslims to pursue jihad because it is
about an inner-struggle to find peace with Allah." Whilst this is
partially true, and regarded as the "higher jihad" by some Islamic
scholars, jihad is much more than a "personal struggle". The rest of
the meaning of jihad will be withheld from you, a practice referred
to as "kitman" - concealing the whole truth about Islamic doctrines
from the unbelievers.
There are even British Nationalists who do not fully understand the
nature of jihad, again believing that jihad is all about violence and
warfare. Jihad is much much more than violent warfare and it is
certainly not limited to Islamic terrorists or that ever-so common
misnomer the press always use, "Islamic extremists".
I've just given you one of the very best facts you can use to counter
the claim that Islam is a "Religion of Peace". Did you get it?
Look at the year that ends the final paragraph in the proceeding
section, 622. It is a very significant year because that is the first
year of the Islamic calendar. Many will believe that this is the year
when the Islamic Prophet Mohammed was born, others the year he
founded Islam, others the year of Mohammed's death.
None of these are true. 622 is the year when Islam changed
forever. It is the year Mohammed and his followers fled the city of
Mecca and headed for the safety of Medina. This flight is called "The
Hirja" and it is during this flight that Allah revealed the conditions of
jihad, or the "struggle" against unbelievers to establish Islam as the
dominant religion in the world. Every action that is taken to
advance Islam is an act of jihad. This means teaching Islam in our
schools, the sale of halal meat, the building of mosques, Muslim
MPs, foot-baths in public places - you get the idea - as well as acts
of terrorism, all of these are part of the Islamic jihad.
I have engaged in God knows how many debates about Islam, both
in the real-world and in the virtual world. I have been banned from
God-knows how many sites and forums, been smeared with the
usual - and tiresome - brickbats: "Islamophobe", "Bigot" and of
course the quite ridiculous "Racist" whenever I have dared to
mention that Islam is not a "Religion of Peace". Racist, this catch-all
hate-crime that is used to silence anyone who challenges the cosy
"we're all equal" world-view of the Multiculturalists is particularly
idiotic in this instance because Islam is not a race and neither are
Muslims.
Not that facts will deter the self-righteous from their inquisitions as
we British Nationalists know all too well.
But what really exasperates me more than these asinine and lame
ad-hominem attacks is the ignorance most people display about the
Islamic religion. In every debate I have been part of, including with
British Nationalists, most of those who defend Islam do not have
the slightest clue about it. More often than not, they will trot-out
the same criticisms and sound-bites they have collected over the
years when discussing - make that criticising - the religions of
Christianity and Judaism.
I will bet you a pound to a penny that you have heard this sound-
bite that is spewed out with mind-numbing predictability:
"All religions have these cranks and bigots who take the verses of
their holy books and twist and distort them for their own ends.
Islam is no different, there are evil Muslims who mis-interpret the
teachings of the Qu'ran to excuse their hatred just as Christians and
Jews mis-interpret the teachings of the Bible."
Leading By Example
The esteem Muslims have for their Prophet should not be under-
estimated. He is regarded as "al insan al kamil uswa hasana" - the
ideal man, the perfect example for all time.
"La ilaha illa Allah, Mohammed rasulu Allah." - There is one God and
Mohammed is his messenger."
Yet this crucial fact about the Islamic religion is rarely, if ever,
mentioned by politicians, the media, and of course, Muslim leaders
whenever they are responding to accusations that Islam isn't
peaceful. They will always say something along the lines of "The
Qu'ran doesn't sanction..." or "The Qu'ran is being quoted out of
context..." and other such apologetic nonsense.
Perhaps the very best example of this came recently from the Lord
of Jihad himself, Lord Ahmed. This is a Muslim peer of the House of
Lords who as part of his campaign to prevent Geert Wilders from
attending the Lords to debate the film "Fitna" stated:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4dxE8hhNuA
Married a six year old girl and consummated the marriage when she
was 9.
Burned atheists.
All documented in the Sunnah and you can find out more about the
shining beacon of Islamic morality in this excellent Islam 101 over
on JihadWatch:
Chasing Phantoms
1. That Muslims who call for and carry out violence against infidels
are "extremists".
2. That not all Muslims wage jihad and that just like other religions,
there are "moderate" Muslims.
Let's look at the first claim, that Muslims who wage Jihad against
infidels are "extremists". It is clear that the Islamic Prophet
Mohammed waged violent jihad, including personally committing
acts of violence as well as murder, against the infidel.
The second claim, that there exists a group who are "moderate"
Muslims is simply an insult to the intelligence. I can easily prove
this by asking you a question:
If I said to you:
Conclusion
There are a number of issues arising from this first essay - I will be
writing further essays discussing the British counter-jihad - that are
of concern to British Nationalists.
3. That the Achilles heel of Islam is the truth about Islam and its
prophet Mohammed and that Muslims are fully aware of this
weakness.
<a
href="http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resour
ces/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html">Sahih Bukhari
Volume 4 Book 52 Number 220</a>
Background
Muslims are very well aware that infidels throughout the west are
largely unaware of the serious threat Islam poses to them. In the
case of Britain - and of course most western nations but let's
confine this to Britain - Muslims also know that one of our
noteworthy virtues is also one of our main weaknesses: our
tolerance of other people and of other cultures.
They are not just brainwashed by PC. Muslims know these liberal-
minded people will also fall for all of the lies and deceptions that
portray Islam as "a religion of peace" and it is crucial that British
nationalists are fully informed about all of these deceptions and
falsities that will be trotted out to shelter Islam from the spotlight of
truth and continue to trap people in a dense fog of ignorance so
that the intolerant is tolerated.
We must not let that happen and that means sounding the clarion
call to awaken our people to the reality of Islam and the escalating
threat of Islamic jihad. It is crucial to the British counter-jihad that
we possess an informed awareness as to what we can expect from
our opponents whenever we expose Islam for what it truly is.
It's a great answer isn't it? Seems a perfectly logical and fair
statement to make about all religions. All religions that is apart
from Islam and here's why:
For a start everyone doesn't have the right to practice their faith. If
you believe that your faith is superior to others and that those who
do not accept your religion can be killed or subjugated then you
most certainly do not have the right to practice that faith. Not in a
society that regards itself as enlightened and civilised that is.
Most Muslims are peaceful. Is this true? If by peaceful you mean
that they don't commit acts of terror then maybe this is correct. But
Islamic jihadists have committed more than 12800 terror attacks
since 9/11 and if most Muslims are peaceful, then where are the
Muslims who are calling for those committing these atrocities to
cease? These are the same peaceful Muslims who march in their
millions demanding the death of Danish cartoonists, British authors
and a Dutch politician but who are conspicuous by their absence
when it comes to marching for peace after Islamic jihadists have
slaughtered scores of infidels in yet another bombing.
But what about those Muslims who demand for Sharia law to be
accommodated; mega-mosques to be built; Islam to be taught in
all schools; Halal food to be sold in shops and served in schools,
prisons and public buildings; who demand ramadan customs be
followed by all employees in public offices and that other Islamic
traditions such as Eid be openly celebrated whilst calling the
celebrations of other religious feasts "offensive". Are these peaceful
tolerant Muslims? Is Ahmed Lord of Jihad a shining example of a
respected moderate Muslim even though he demanded the
suppression of free speech and threatened to mobilise an army of
10,000 Muslims - who would all be moderate and peaceful no doubt
- should his demand be ignored?
And just where, exactly, are the cranks and nutters from other
faiths who are committing thousands of terrorist attacks in the
name of their religion or executing non-believers on videos viewed
by believers all over the world on the Internet? Executions complete
with readings from the Qu'ran and to the cry of "Allahu akhbar". Are
other religious people committing such horrific murders in the name
of their faith?
What will follow from the above as sure as eggs are eggs is the
accusation that the "extremists" who are committing these
atrocities whilst reciting verses from the Qu'ran are cherry-picking
verses which they are then taking out of context.
I'm betting you're now nodding your head as you've heard this,
right?
This is much easier to counter for two reasons: The Qu'ran is not
the sole guide as to how Muslims practice their faith, for that, they
have to turn to the Sunnah to refer to the perfect example of all
time - the Islamic prophet Mohammed and this gives us the second
reason: That of the use of the word "extremist".
It is so important that the example of Mohammed is the main focus
of any debate involving Islam. Why?
This is a huge problem for apologists and I have to say that I have
yet to be defeated in debate because of this simple fact. When
jihadists behead infidels they are following the example of their
prophet who personally beheaded non-believers. When they murder
infidels in terrorist attacks they are following the example of their
prophet who personally murdered infidels. When they stone
adulterers to death they are following the example of their prophet
who ordered adulterers to be stoned to death. When adult Muslim
males marry little girls - some as young as three but in Sharia Law
the age is set at nine - they do so because their prophet married a
six year old girl who he raped when she was just nine years old.
Does this mean therefore that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was
an extremist? Obviously it does to the infidels whose religions do
not have such a violent, sex-crazed psychopath as a prophet. But to
Muslims, Mohammed is no such thing. He is the perfect example for
all time, the final prophet of Allah, a prophet who is the
embodiment of the Islamic faith. Remember the quote in my
previous essay from Turkish PM Erdogan? Now you know why he
said it.
In Sharia law, grown men are allowed to marry girls of nine years of
age. This again reflects in Islamic jurisprudence the example
personally set by Mohammed with Aisha. It is one of the most
damning indictments of Mohammed, and by God there are many,
the fact that he sexually abused a little girl and it also puts Islam
directly in conflict with British law because marrying children is
illegal as we regard sex with children under sixteen as paedophilia,
one of the most repulsive of crimes.
Yet apologists and Muslims will defend this heinous act. They will
state that in the seventh century, such marriages between grown
men and children were common-place in Arabic tribes and that
Mohammed was simply following what was the custom of his time.
Esteemed scholar and director of JihadWatch.Org Robert Spencer
has also cited this in mitigation of Mohammed.
Although this is true I for one am simply not buying it and for a
very simple but vitally important reason. If a man is regarded as a
messenger of God, entrusted to deliver the will of God to God's own
people, then are we to believe that God's will involves grown men
enjoying sex with children? Because that is what Mohammed
claimed with Aisha, that "Allah delivered her to me in a dream" - do
you fully comprehend what this lust-crazed "messenger of God" is
saying here?
But the apology doesn't wash for another reason: That Islamic
Sharia TODAY still permits grown men to marry little girls. So
stating that it was something that happened back in the seventh
century is ia non sequitur because it is STILL happening in Islamic
countries - and non-Islamic countries where Muslims reside - all
blessed by Sharia and fully in accordance with the example set by
the Islamic prophet himself.
<a href="http://www.homa.org/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=104&Itemid=58">Khomeini:
Fatwa On Sex With Infants</a>
How on earth can ANYONE, I don't care if you are Muslim or not,
tolerate these vile acts of child abuse? Millions of little girls have
had to suffer at the hands of adult Muslim males because of what
Mohammed did to Aisha and we are supposed to tolerate this and
remain silent because "it's their religion, they have a right to
practise their faith and we shouldn't offend them."
Well I refuse to accept that the God of any religion will send his
messenger to commit paedophilia. This shameful issue alone should
be enough to condemn Islam as an evil ideology that is totally
incompatible with British moral values and British law. The bottom-
line is this:
The tactic at work behind this is to distract attention from Islam and
to stifle your quite reasonable criticisms of Islam by portraying you
as either a misunderstander, ignorant, bigoted, Islamophobic and
finally - go on, take a guess, I'm sure you'll get it without needing 3
attempts!
And they're right, the Qu'ran is written in classical Arabic. But like
any language, it can and has been translated accurately into various
languages, not just English. Also, the New Testament was largely
written in Aramaic, the Old Testament in Hebrew. Does this mean
that those who are not native speakers of these languages cannot
understand Judaism or Christianity?
But here's the killer blow for this lame distraction: There are
Muslims whose first language isn't Arabic - Turks, Pakistanis,
Indians, Chinese, Russians, Africans etc. - does this then mean that
these people will not be able to understand the Qu'ran so therefore
they can't ever be Muslims?
The racist card will be played against you without a doubt. People
who resort to this quite ridiculous smear - Islam and Muslims are
not a race - are ensconced in the gutter and they simply aren't
worth debating with because they are dishonest. Better to say: "You
are lowering the debate into a sewer and I refuse to join you there."
Been there, done it worn the tee-shirt and I now simply refuse to
debate with pig-ignorant retards who resort to this dishonest tactic.
Trust me it isn't worth wasting your valuable time.
The Cure For Islam
Hopefully you will be debating with sincere folk who have a genuine
desire to question, to criticise, to argue and to debate with an
intention to leave the debate with increased knowledge. My goal is
not just to present an argument that reveals the reality of Islam but
to arouse curiosity so that people will continue to ask questions
about Islam so they increase their knowledge after the debate is
finished.
"I agree that there are problems with Islam and what I believe
Islam needs is to undergo a reformation, similar to the reformations
that Christianity has performed so that Islam becomes a more
peaceful, tolerant religion more in-tune with the peaceful messages
of the Qu'ran than the violent intolerant messages."
1. Alter the absolute word of Allah. Muslims believe that the verses
of the Qu'ran are words spoken directly by Allah.
What is crucial to understand about Islam is that the Qu'ran and the
Sunnah are sacred to Muslims. For humans to start to change these
in anyway is forbidden. Innovation in Islamic Sharia - bida -
meaning altering in anyway the texts or the history of these sacred
books is not common and indeed, although there are Muslims who
are calling for reform, whether or not that reform would entail a
rejection of the Medinan verses and the last ten years of
Mohammed's life I believe is highly unlikely.
Translated Pickthal:
Unfortunately, there are many more verses like this and they make
a peaceful reform of Islam almost impossible. The other problem to
consider is that even if a peaceful reformation occurred, would all
Muslims accept it or would sects form who remain true to the
original teachings of Allah and the Islamic prophet Mohammed?
I have a question for you: What kind of religion includes a verse like
8:39 in its holy texts?
Whilst I was writing this essay, I came across the following video of
an Islamic march on the streets of the capital of Great Britain which
will provide you with a visual and audio reference that gives further
supporting evidence for the claims I have made in this essay, all
from the actions and words of Muslims themselves:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=3_vR5moPjJ0">Islamic Jihadists March Through London
28/02/09</a>
1. Look at what the poster of the video "Soldier For Islam" has
written regarding establishing Britain as part of an Islamic "Khilafa".
Conclusion
The truth about Islam and its perverted, psychopathic prophet is its
Achilles heel and the more we spread this truth the quicker Islam
will be finished in our land without the need for violent conflict.
Every British nationalist can play a part in sounding the clarion call
to awaken our people to the truth about Islam. Forums, blogs,
websites all give us the chance to comment, debate and challenge
the lies and myths about "the religion of peace". The truth is the
deadliest weapon we possess to help us defeat the global Islamic
jihad. If we use it, we will prevail.
Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad
"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to
you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with
those who keep their duty unto Him."
- Qu'ran Sura 9, Verse 123
Background
Behold, this is the reality of the Islamic future that awaits you and
your children...
I'm sure every Briton has heard the word "infidel". But I wonder
how many of them know what an infidel actually is? For that matter,
I wonder how many British Nationalists possess a full awareness of
what this pejorative word means? Ask for a definition and more
likely than not you will hear "Oh it's someone who isn't a Muslim" or
even as I have heard several times "isn't it someone who is white?"
Understanding exactly how an infidel is regarded by Muslims is the
first and most important step to take when studying the attitude of
Muslims to, along with their treatment of, non-believers. When a
land has been conquered by Islam, it becomes part of "Dar al
Islam" meaning that it is a land where Islamic Sharia holds
jurisprudence. So step one, what is the definition of an infidel under
Sharia law.
When people hear the word "Nigger" they are outraged, yet they
remain totally indifferent to "kuffar". Nigger, although pejorative
too, is a word that solely describes someone as being black and is
derived from the Latin word "niger" - black. Yet look at those ten
najis and see what Muslims regard the kuffar as the equivalent of.
Just watch this, Muslims singing about kuffars, and I'm proud to see
that our illustrious leader Nick Griffin gets a mention:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grPh2LZKN4w">Dirty
Kuffar</a>
Lovely video, isn't it, especially the end. It begins with the shahada,
and a greeting "bismallah al rahim" - in the name of Allah the most
merciful. See for yourself just how merciful Allah is.
"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that
forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and his Messenger
(Mohammed), nor acknowledge the religion of truth even if they are
people of the book (Jews and Christians) until they pay the Jizya
with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."
Please read that verse once again, it is the most important verse in
the Qu'ran for kuffars to be aware of and is referred to as "The
Verse Of Tribute".
An important note here before I continue. You may recall from the
previous essay a video of an Islamic demonstration where Da'wa -
the call to Islam - was issued several times. I stated that this is
very important and here's why. Read 9:29 and you will see "..nor
acknowledge the religion of truth...". This means that if kuffars
accept Islam and convert, then all is well. However, if they refuse,
they are subjugated or killed. This is exactly how Mohammed waged
war against the infidels, by first offering the call to Islam. The
Islamic jihad being waged upon us today is all about the example
set by Mohammed as I have stated repeatedly throughout these
essays.
I really hope you can now see why that particular Islamic march
isn't quite as innocent as it looks. OK, let's continue and you're
going to see exactly how 9:29 works.
The choices given to kuffars are quite clear in this verse: Convert to
Islam, accept dhimmitude WILLINGLY or fight and die. The whole
status of dhimmitude though is just a ruse. The end result is
ALWAYS the same: Convert, fight or die.
Of course Muslims will be outraged at what I'm writing, but they're
outraged about anything and everything aren't they? Instead of
listening to demented pious fanatics who try to bully and intimidate
people into accepting their own demise, let's look around the world
and see what actually happens to kuffars wherever Islamic Sharia
rules.
Sunday, Sunday
Saudi Arabia, the land where Muslims believe the Islamic prophet
Mohammed received the revelations of the Qu'ran, offers a good
start to gain an insight of Muslim hatred towards the kuffar. Not
only are Jews forbidden to enter Saudi Arabia, no kuffar is allowed
to enter the holy cities of Mecca and Medina on pain of death.
"First we deal with the Saturday people then we deal with the
Sunday people."
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=ZWpIWDjQLUU&">The West Doesn't Realise What They Are
Facing With Islam</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9YkfLXlOs">They
Hate You Because Of Religion</a>
Whilst our military personnel are fighting and dying in Iraq "to
establish democracy", this is what is happening to Assyrian
Christians:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=oHjzRBex0Mo">Convert, Pay Or Die</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=h503pUkqfoQ">Genocide of Iraqi Christians</a>
<a
href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/2007/07/0
17595print.html">Boy Crucified, Baby Roasted</a>
Then there's that place where those Nazi Jews are oppressing the
poor Arab Muslims:
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?
ARTICLE_ID=31285">Christians In The Palestine Authority</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=21orCM7KkRI&NR">Palestinians Persecute Christians In
Lebanon</a>
The video above sounds a very clear warning about what is going
to happen to Britain, the circumstances that led to the destruction
of Lebanon are exactly the circumstances being created in Britain
right now. And let me ask you this:
Funny how the media never mention any of this though isn't it? Too
busy spreading pro-Palestinian propaganda for HAMAS and
Hizballah no doubt. Well, they have to keep their Saudi paymasters
happy. Mustn't offend our Saudi masters whatever we do.
But what about Egypt? Surely things are better there? It's a lovely
place for a holiday and everyone knows it's now a modern secular
society:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=D3tmcpUqWGo">Christian Copts Live In The Garbage 1of 3</a>
<a
href="http://voiceofthecopts.org/en/breaking_news/muslim_burns_
a_young_copt_alive_and_murders_his_father_because_o.html/">C
hristian Burned Alive In Egypt</a>
Surely that's all because of the unique problems in the Middle East,
it's not as bad in other Muslim countries such as one of the world's
biggest Muslim populations, Indonesia:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=2eKOB1ZPGnk">Christians Persecuted In Indonesia</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXjlkaM-
ikY">Christians Persecuted By Muslims Around The World</a>
Choosing Extermination
What grates with me is the typical "turn the other cheek" suicidal
Christian cowardice the narrator makes at the end. Feeling spiritual
is much better than standing up to Muslim brutality and persecution
is it? Not if you want to survive - along with your faith - it isn't.
Christians have to understand: Muslims are not playing a game
here. The choice is Islam, subjugation or death and being spiritual
isn't going to cut the mustard. Islam must be stopped or Islam will
destroy you unless you convert. Period.
But why take Reconquista's words about persecution of Christians
being a very real fate for kuffar Britons. The Muslims are telling you
themselves:
"So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the
idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and
besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they
repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way
free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
The Saturday people and the Sunday people aren't the only kuffars
to be persecuted at the hands of devout Muslims. The verse above,
9:05 from the Qu'ran, is also called "The Verse of the Sword" and it
defines how Muslims are to deal with idolaters. Idolaters such as the
Hindus in India who have been on the receiving end of Islamic jihad
since 638, total deaths estimated at a staggering EIGHTY MILLION
and it is a persecution that continues today.
Yes, you read that correctly, Buddhists. Those people who believe
strictly in non-violence and peace, who believe no living creature
should be harmed and who have pretty much caused no harm to
any other people are now being treated to the delights of "The
Religion of Peace." Over 3,300 Buddhists have been slaughtered to
date by fanatical Islamic jihadists who fight in Allah's cause.
And yet once again, the media give little coverage to this conflict,
focusing attention instead on the sham "Palestinian" cause
conveniently ignoring the fact that Muslims are oppressing and
slaughtering thousands upon thousands of non-believers around the
world all to the cry of "Allahu Akhbar!" as they devoutly follow the
perfect example of their faith, the insane paedophile, murderer and
enslaver Mohammed.
<a
href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/thailand/090311/thailan
d-the-war-youve-never-heard">Jihad Against Buddhists</a>
The following video discusses the jihad against the Buddhists and
makes some very interesting comparisons between how the Thai
and western governments respond to Islamic jihad:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nOg7_0UHQ8">Jihad
In Thailand</a>
Whenever you hear Islamic apologists trotting out the usual lame,
pathetic excuses to tolerate the intolerable, you can now ask them
why it is that Muslims can't even tolerate Buddhists.
<a
href="http://www.zombietime.com/thai_jihad_photos/">Buddhists
Massacred By Muslims</a>
Did you get the word used in the "get out of town" note the Thai
Muslim jihadists sent to the Buddhist teacher?
Time To Reflect
"No more Islam, not here, not anywhere. We tolerate the intolerant
no more."
"Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males provided they are not
disabled or incapacitated to prepare themselves for the conquest of
countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the
world. But those who study Islamic holy war will understand why
Islam wants to conquer the whole world." - Ayatollah Khomeini
Background
But I'm not going to debunk all of the lame excuses trotted out to
defend Islam by deceitful Muslims and infidel apologists alike. I'll
leave that for a future time.
Instead, I want to let Islam speak for itself by taking a good, hard
look at Islamic countries, countries where Sharia law is enforced. In
other words, we're now going to see how Muslims treat Muslims to
see how peacefully they TREAT THEIR OWN PEOPLE.
Bear this firmly in mind as you read: What they are capable of
doing to each other they will in turn do to you, your children and
your children's children if Islam continues to be tolerated and
promoted in Great Britain. Islamic hegemony comes with Sharia law
and...
A core principle of British justice is that all are equal before the law.
Obviously, there are many exceptions to this fine principle, you and
I both know that the great unwashed are treated differently from
the ruling elite and they always have been. But by and large, the
concept of equality before the law is applied in the main.
Does Islamic Sharia law uphold this noble principle? I'm sad to say
that it absolutely does not and in this essay you're going to discover
the shocking, brutal reality about the legal system that enforces the
will of Allah and his "Religion of Peace".
Sharia law, in full accordance with the example set by the Islamic
prophet Mohammed, legally permits adult Muslim males to marry
little girls when they reach nine years of age as they are deemed to
be sexually developed women at this tender stage in their lives. In
some Islamic countries, grown men have taken children as young
as three years old for their brides in weddings conducted according
to the Sharia, Afghanistan especially.
Welcome to Sharia.
The contempt male Muslims have for their own women is again all
down to the example of "al insan al kamil uswa hasana", the perfect
example for all time, their revered prophet Mohammed. This is a
prophet who had a low opinion of the fairer sex, an opinion he made
clear on several occasions and here's just one example:
"I was standing at the edge of the fire of hell and most of the
people going in were women." - Islamic Prophet Mohammed
"Your wives are a tilth for you, so go into your tilth when you like,
and do good beforehand for yourselves; and be careful (of your
duty) to Allah, and know that you will meet Him, and give good
news to the believers."
- Qu'ran, Sura 2, Al Baqara (The Cow) Verse 223
In this charming verse, Allah states that Muslim wives are nothing
more than fields (tilth) to be entered whenever a man feels like it.
And under Islamic Sharia, a man is entitled to marry four wives
whereas the same "privilege" is not afforded to any Muslim woman,
although with men having the legal right to beat their wives under
Sharia, wanting to marry up to four men would not be a popular
choice with Muslim women I think you'd agree. I wonder what
Muslim women would really think? Who knows, they're not entitled
to freely hold their own opinions about these matters, and besides,
their menfolk will tell them exactly what to think and do as they
know best.
Forbidden Fruit
Before I continue, let's just take a quick checkpoint here. I've stated
that Sharia law enforces apartheid. So far we've seen that under
this Islamic legal system, Muslim women are:
Regarded as half the worth of a Muslim male;
Are not all of these abuses of women enough to convince you that
this is gender apartheid? That all of this abuse amounts to nothing
less than the mental, physical and sexual abuse of women, fully
legalised under Islamic Sharia. Women who are being relegated to
the level of chattels and punch-bags whose sole "sacred religious
duty" in life is to serve and obey their Muslim male masters all
cunningly camouflaged as the expressed will of "a great and exalted
deity".
You'd think all of this cruel and widespread abuse of females would
be sufficient to draw the strongest possible condemnation from the
entire civilised world wouldn't you? Sanctions, exclusion from
sporting events, celebrities refusing to visit Islamic countries along
with pious, preaching musicians playing to packed out stadia all
demanding an end to "the inhumanity of apartheid" just as they all
did with South Africa.
One of the very worst crimes a woman can fall victim to is rape. It
is a cruel, inhumane violation of her person, it is an abuse of her
sexuality, a crime against her entire being with deep-seated mental
scars to accompany the physical wounds she will have received
during the traumatic assault.
How can this be so? How can a woman so cruelly violated once go
on to be ruthlessly and mercilessly violated a second time by the
Islamic courts who enforce and uphold the Sharia, the legal system
of the "Religion of Peace"?
So much suffering for so many women all from this one incident.
What Sharia Isn't - Or Is It?
I will however state that Muslim families who are guilty of killing
their wives, sisters or daughters because they want to "regain the
family honour" are rarely punished under Sharia law and if they are
punished, they are punished very lightly indeed.
Robert Spencer nails the issue of honour killings and Islam in this
excellent article over on DhimmiWatch:
<a
href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/022891.p
hp">Islam and Honour Killings</a>
Playing Away
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=uGaXxtvf2bM">Punishment For Adultery In Islam</a>
The narrator's comment at the end says it all really.
<a
href="http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm">Adult
erers Punished In Iran By Stoning</a>
The point here is not to mistake Islamic terrorists as the only ones
who commit violent atrocities in the name of Islam. It is not just
about Islamic terror, it is all about what Islam truly is in its entirety.
Chop Chop!
Violations of proximity laws and sex crimes are not the only crimes
to be punished so brutally and so cruelly under Islamic Sharia law.
As well as highlighting it as a legal system that enforces gender
apartheid, religious apartheid and the violent abuse of women,
Sharia also carries out harsh, inhumane punishments on other
criminals.
Most of us have had our property stolen at some point in our lives:
A bicycle, a car, money, jewellery, phone, etc. and although it is
annoying and upsetting, the punishments handed out to thieves in
western societies are in stark contrast to those dealt out in Sharia
law.
I'm sure we've all said something like: "If I got my hands on them
they'd be sorry!" when we're angry but I wonder how many of us
would seriously advocate the following as a suitable punishment for
thieves:
"And (as for) the man who steals and the woman who steals, cut off
their hands as a punishment for what they have earned, an
exemplary punishment from Allah; and Allah is Mighty, Wise. "
- Qu'ran Sura 5 Al Maeda (The Table) Verse 38
This is what Islam will bring to our nation. Islam comes with Sharia
law and it is a law Muslims will impose upon you, by force if
necessary. It is a law being practised and enforced around the world
wherever Islam goes and the inhumane punishments meted out
under the Sharia are going to come to Britain. Cruel, inhumane
punishments such as the following:
<a
href="http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/handcutting.htm">
Thieves Punished Under Sharia Law</a>
Note again who decreed that this was a just punishment with the
quote from the appropriate haddith, again demonstrating as I have
stressed throughout these essays: We must stop listening to
apologists and do what Muslims do and that is to refer not just to
the verses of the Qu'ran but also to the example of the Islamic
prophet Mohammed as described and witnessed in the Sunnah. If
we want to know the truth about Islam then that is where we will
find it.
Conclusion
In this essay, you have now seen that under Islamic Sharia law,
Muslims inflict cruel and inhumane treatment on their own people,
including the enforcement of gender apartheid. The horrific abuses
women are enduring in Islamic countries around the world and of
course, in Muslim communities in Great Britain, are the same
horrific abuses that WILL FOR SURE be inflicted upon your wives,
your sisters, your daughters, your mothers - ALL BRITISH WOMEN -
under the rule of Islamic Sharia law.
Until then, may I humbly request that you re-read these four essays
to remind yourself about all of the issues raised so that they're
fresh in your mind ready for the battle ahead. Can I further ask you
to brainstorm ideas with fellow nationalists about how we can
PEACEFULLY and LEGALLY counter Islamic jihad and PM them to me
or Green Arrow on the Green Arrow forum at his brilliant BNP
supporting blog here:
Finally, I think it most fitting that I end this essay with one of the
most courageous women fighting the global Islamic jihad, a woman
from Syria who has experienced first-hand the very real horrors
inflicted upon human beings under Islamic Sharia law, the
inspirational Wafa Sultan. She warns us of the Islamic nightmare
being prepared for Great Britain and the west unless we fightback:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=up3yuQDAWKQ">Defend The Heaven You Live In</a>
Wafa Sultan says no one is listening and no one has the courage to
speak the truth about Islam. It's time we listened, it's time we
spoke the truth and it's time we took peaceful but effective action to
fight Islam. It is a matter of the utmost urgency, it really is our
civilised way of life or their retarded, inhumane and barbaric death
cult. Islam has declared war on us and now it's us or them, that's
your stark but simple choice.
Time for you to get involved in the British Counter-Jihad, let's stand
together and fight together for an Islam-free Britain.
Reconquista.