March 20th, 2013

Sabri Mohamed / Ngo Vi Lan Snr Product Engineers

Background

8 GFi50Y

8 GF65Y

8 GFi65Y

637Y

647Y

647Y

Latest Smith Bits run by VSP

TD Date Well Name Well No Oper Size

Type

IADC

Serial No Depth IN Depth Int (m) (m) OUT (m) PR2453 PR2452 PR2454 PM3297 PP9519 PS4079 PS4080 PN6695 4593 4138 4422 4071 4258 4811 4891 4694 4858 2927 4868 4735 4430 4599 4258 4593 4131 4422 4891 4972 4811 4868 3028 4998 4858 4735 6 120 171 60 164 80 81 117 10 101 130 123 305

Hrs

ROP (m/hr) 0.2 4.0 3.4 1.8 2.9 2.3 1.7 2.8 2.0 5.1 8.7 14.1 10.2

WOB Total Hi RPM (klbs) Hi 30 30 40 29 35 35 35 35 20 26 44 35 33 45 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 70 90 80 60 60

RP

Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Aug-12 Feb-10 Feb-10 Feb-10 Feb-10 Feb-10

RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# RC-DM# 1209 1209 1209 1209 1209

410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410

VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP VSP

8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5

GF65YBDOD1 GF65YBDOD1 GF65YBDOD1 GFi50YOD1V GFi50YOD1V GFi65YOD1V GFi65YOD1V GFi65YOD1V FGi40YOD FGi40YOD FGi40YOD GFi50YOD1V GFi50YOD1V

647Y 647Y 647Y 637Y 637Y 647Y 647Y 647Y 617Y 617Y 617Y

PP0054 PP0070

29.4 29.9 50.3 32.6 55.6 34.9 47.4 42.0 5.0 20.0 15.0 8.8 29.9

BHA 1 1 WT A E E E IN BT CP HP 5 1 2 3 2 8 SD A 1 2 3 2 E 1 2 3 2 E 1 2 3 2 E 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 2 LT PP

GR & Sonic

Lithology

FORMATION
ABRASION
M OD E R A TE
CNG L

FORMATION
IMPACT
M OD E R A TE N OR M A L V .H E A VY

SH

CL AY CL YS MA RL

SS SILT

Delt a-T Compres siona l (DTCO)

140

(us/f)

40
(6in)( G R)

CH RT

AN

HL

V OL C

IGNE META PY RT

Smith bits performance in VSP DM-410 well

8 GFi65YOD1VRD sn: PN6695 IADC: 647Y. 117m with mud motor
GFi50YOD1VRD PM3297 60m GF65YBDOD1RD PR2452 127m 4.0 m/r 1-2-W T-AE-I-CT-BHA 1-1-W T-A- E-I-BT-CP

M .De pth ( m)

N OR M A L

V .H E A VY

H EA V Y

(RM) (ECO[1])

(GAPI)

200

LS

CHA L

DOL COA L

UCM PS (psi)

30000

H EA V Y

4250
3664 .67 TVDSS

GFi50YOD1VRD PP9519 164m 2.9 m/hr 2-1-W T-AE-I-NO-HR

4500
3729 .46 TVDSS

GF65YBDOD1RD PR2454 171m 3.4 m/hr 4-3-LT/BT-AE-I-W T-HR

GF65YBDOD1RD PR2453 101m 3-4-W T-A-E-1/16-BT-BHA GFi65YOD1VRD PN6695 117m 2.8 m/hr 5-8-SD-G-E-1LT/BT/W T-PP GFi65YOD1VRD PS4079 80m 2-3-W T-G-E-I-NO-HR

4750
3724 .50 TVDSS

Smith Bits gauge conditions

8 GFi65YOD1VRD sn: PN6695

647Y

Gauge durability is a concern and need to be improved upon Inner row needs to be improved too if the gauge is performing
4

Issues on GFi65Y Gauge durability - Need more inserts on gauge Durability mainly in the inner row Lost Cones

 Gauge durability - Need more inserts on gauge - More inserts in the adjacent to gauge area Durability

8 FHi70YOD1RD Gauge durability - Need more inserts on gauge - More inserts in the adjacent to gauge area - Larger and more ATLAS in the heel row

8 FHi70YOD1RD Gauge durability - Need more inserts on gauge - More inserts in the adjacent to gauge area - Larger and more ATLAS in the heel row - Reduce radial gauge load
Large R load

Small

8 FHi70YOD1RD Gauge durability - Need more inserts on gauge - More inserts in the adjacent to gauge area - Larger and more ATLAS in the heel row - Reduce radial gauge load

ROP???

8 FHi70YOD1RD So wheres the ROP is going to come from? - Lower journal angle
Medium Formations
High Journalangle

Soft to Medium Formations

Low Journalangle

10

Performance of Low Journal angle

TY PE Well M FGR MFGR

SE RI AL NO.

DEP TH DE P TH DRLG IN (m) OUT (m ) 3358 3552 4974 4021 373 2 512 4 4283

HRS On

Krevs ROP m /hr WOB ( Klb s) 520 359 489 399 363 497 375 1 5.0 2 3.0 1 5.3 1 7.5 1 6.9 1 5.3 1 5.3 4 05 0 3 04 0 4 05 0 44 5 3 54 5 45 25 5

P a r a me t e rs RPM FL O W (GPM) 190 20 0 140 /2 20 2 10 2 10 140 19 0 2 05 120 18 5 51 5 55 0 54 0 55 0 50 0 50 0 45 0

MUD ANGLE Wt ppg 9. 5 9. 2 8. 6 SW 9 SW 8. 6 57 33 52 71 76 88 88 8 7 3 4 6 2 2 7 8 4 5 8 3 4 CT BT WT WT LT WT WT

DULL

CODE

(m ) Botto m 672 669 650 624 620 619 611 44. 8 29. 1 42. 5 35. 6 36. 7 40. 5 40. 0

SD 5X SD 12 I SD 8 I SV 3 P SD 21P SV 7 P SV 2 P

GF45 YOD1R D MX 55DX MX 55DX GF45 YOD1R D M X LDS55 DX 2 SEB 26 85D3P GF45 YOD1R D

Smit h HTC HTC Smit h HTC SEC Smit h

MX299 4 506 1118 505 2562 MZ391 9 509 6109 1127 568 8 MZ391 6

26 86 28 83 43 24 33 97 31 12 45 05 36 72

A H A A A A A

E F F E F E E

3 2 1 3 5 2 3

BT

HR

C D TQ/PP ER BT /LT CD BT LT HR PP TQ HR HP

11

8 FHi70YOD1RD So wheres the ROP is going to come from? - Lower journal angle - Higher gauge scraping distance
Large Small

12

8 FHi70YOD1RD So wheres the ROP is going to come from? - Lower journal angle - Higher gauge scraping distance - Increase scraping in the inner rows
Row Scraping Distribution Comparison

Large

Small

13

8 FHi70YOD1RD Durability : - A more equally balanced force between all 3 cones

Small

Large

14

8 FHi70YOD1RD Gauge durability ROP Lost Cones

15

Improvement made on FHi70Y to avoid lost cones - Thicker cones

16

Improvement made on FHi70Y to avoid lost cones - Thicker cones - Shallower grooves

FHi69UY

FHi70Y
17

8 FHi70YOD1RD : Conclusions Gauge durability

- Need more inserts on gauge - More inserts in the adjacent to gauge area - Larger and more ATLAS in the heel row - Reduce radial gauge load

ROP from inner rows - Lower journal angle

- Higher gauge scraping distance - Carbide grade - Cone force balanced

To tackle lost cones issues

- Thicker cone shell - Shallower grooves on the cone shell - Half carburization on the ball race

18

ER8600

8 FHi70YOD1RD

IADC 647Y

Designed specifically for drilling very hard and abrasive granite in Vietnam. Design criteria are based on lesson learnt from previous 8 FHi69UYOD1GRD run.

Gauge durability Low journal angle Harder carbide grade Cone force balanced Thicker cone shell Half carburization on the ball race

Features
Y : Conical OD1 : 100% Diam ond inserts on the heel rows RD : Diam ond inserts on legback i : IDEAS design

100% large diameter ATLAS diamond enhanced inserts on heel row

maximumbottomhole coverage

The End

20