Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 116 views

    Depo Tawnya Schoolitz in Re BAC HAMP Contract USD MA

    Uploaded by

    Mike_Dillon
    Q. BY Mr. BROWN: And is it your understanding that each of these trial plan payments were applied as partial payments because they were less than the total amount due? MR. MCGARRY: Objection. Lack of foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And the difference between the partial payment and the total amount due, total amount due was added to the indebtedness, was it not? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And adding it to the indebtedness would increase the forbearance amount ultimately in a modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. THE WITNESS: Yes. . BY MR. BROWN: So a borrower--the longer a borrower stayed in the trial plan, the greater amount of the forbearance that Bank of America was considering itself to have to make with a permanent modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And that could lead --ultimately, it could lead to a finding of excessive forbearance, if the amount got high enough -- MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. MR. BROWN: -- month after month? MR. MCGARRY: Excuse me. Objection to the form. Improper hypothetical. THE WITNESS: Yes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Depo Tawnya Schoolitz in Re BAC HAMP Contract USD MA

    Uploaded by

    Mike_Dillon
    116 views10 pages
    Q. BY Mr. BROWN: And is it your understanding that each of these trial plan payments were applied as partial payments because they were less than the total amount due? MR. MCGARRY: Objection. Lack of foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And the difference between the partial payment and the total amount due, total amount due was added to the indebtedness, was it not? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And adding it to the indebtedness would increase the forbearance amount ultimately in a modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. THE WITNESS: Yes. . BY MR. BROWN: So a borrower--the longer a borrower stayed in the trial plan, the greater amount of the forbearance that Bank of America was considering itself to have to make with a permanent modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And that could lead --ultimately, it could lead to a finding of excessive forbearance, if the amount got high enough -- MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. MR. BROWN: -- month after month? MR. MCGARRY: Excuse me. Objection to the form. Improper hypothetical. THE WITNESS: Yes.

    Original Title

    120509 - Depo Tawnya Schoolitz in Re BAC HAMP Contract USD MA

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Q. BY Mr. BROWN: And is it your understanding that each of these trial plan payments were applied as partial payments because they were less than the total amount due? MR. MCGARRY: Objection. Lack of foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And the difference between the partial payment and the total amount due, total amount due was added to the indebtedness, was it not? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And adding it to the indebtedness would increase the forbearance amount ultimately in a modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. THE WITNESS: Yes. . BY MR. BROWN: So a borrower--the longer a borrower stayed in the trial plan, the greater amount of the forbearance that Bank of America was considering itself to have to make with a permanent modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And that could lead --ultimately, it could lead to a finding of excessive forbearance, if the amount got high enough -- MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. MR. BROWN: -- month after month? MR. MCGARRY: Excuse me. Objection to the form. Improper hypothetical. THE WITNESS: Yes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    116 views10 pages

    Depo Tawnya Schoolitz in Re BAC HAMP Contract USD MA

    Uploaded by

    Mike_Dillon
    Q. BY Mr. BROWN: And is it your understanding that each of these trial plan payments were applied as partial payments because they were less than the total amount due? MR. MCGARRY: Objection. Lack of foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And the difference between the partial payment and the total amount due, total amount due was added to the indebtedness, was it not? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And adding it to the indebtedness would increase the forbearance amount ultimately in a modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. THE WITNESS: Yes. . BY MR. BROWN: So a borrower--the longer a borrower stayed in the trial plan, the greater amount of the forbearance that Bank of America was considering itself to have to make with a permanent modification? MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. Q. BY MR. BROWN: And that could lead --ultimately, it could lead to a finding of excessive forbearance, if the amount got high enough -- MR. MCGARRY: Objection to the form. MR. BROWN: -- month after month? MR. MCGARRY: Excuse me. Objection to the form. Improper hypothetical. THE WITNESS: Yes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10

    Exhibit 8

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 3 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 4 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 5 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 6 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 7 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 8 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 9 of 10

    Case 1:10-md-02193-RWZ Document 210-8 Filed 06/07/13 Page 10 of 10

    You might also like