Julius Caesar William Shakespeare

You might also like

Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

William Shakespeare

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar


William Shakespeare
In 1598, Francis Meres described Shakespeare as the most
excellent in both sides - comedy and traedy!" #is comedies are
$ns$rpassed %or the mar&ello$s harmony they establish amon so
many apparently discordant elements" #is traedies, rihtly
interpreted, do not re&eal a spirit o% loom and disill$sionment" 'et,
i% (e ponder care%$lly, (hile the themes o% Shakespeare)s traedies
are indeed dark and dismal, the messae that they impart is that, no
matter ho( deep the mis%ort$ne or ho( dreary the circ$mstances,
man is capable o% risin %rom his o(n ashes, like *hoenix+ think o%
,ichard II, #enry -, .in /ear, or *rospero" 0ood (ill tri$mph o&er
e&il, in the end+ think o% #amlet, Macbeth, 1$li$s 2aesar"
3s the theme and messae in Shakespeare)s comedies, they
can be s$mmed $p in t(o lines %rom As You Like It4
3ll the (orld)s a stae,
3nd all the men and (omen merely players!
In his comedies, 5$st as in real li%e, the protaonists play
di%%erent parts in the little playlets they ha&e themsel&es impro&ised
in order to et (hat they desire" 6o one is h$rt, no one is denied the
opport$nity to 5oin in the ame, no one is le%t o$t" /i%e is a merry-o-
ro$nd and each indi&id$al may et o%% the plat%orm as soon as he no
loner en5oys the ame" 3s lon as all ends (ell7
3ll Sam$el 8aylor 2oleride maintained, Shakespeare (as
more interested in character-de&elopment than in his plots" 9esides,
in most cases, he did not in&ent the plots, he merely borro(ed them
%rom #olinshed and #all 2hronicles" 'et, his plots %ollo( the
classical 3ristotelian o$tlines"
:% Shakespeare)s traic characters, Mark 3ntony is ;$ite
o$tstandin in point o% &ersatility" #e does not exactly %it the
3ristotelian description o% the traic hero" #e is reliable and
*aina 1
William Shakespeare
tr$st(orthy %riend, a hihly intellient and tact%$l man, a ood
psycholoist, a skil%$l orator" 3nalysin 3ntony)s %amo$s speech o%
act <, scene =, (e admire its $ncanny rhetorical e%%ects and the most
pers$asi&e $se o% the emotional appeal that assist him in
disentanlin the tr$th %rom the pack o% lies concernin 1$li$s 2aesar
that 9r$t$s had 5$st told the ,oman citi>ens" 9y $sin the apophatic
approach ?the de&ice by (hich one mentions somethin by sayin it
(ill not be mentioned4 I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him,
and I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke@, 3ntony manaes
to do 5$st (hat he (as not expected or allo(ed to do4 praise 2aesar
and dispro&e (hat 9r$t$s spoke"
In a society like Shakespeare)s, (hich %elt sec$re abo$t (hat
constit$ted proper beha&io$r, social, political and %amilial roles (ere
basic so$rces o% order and $ntro$bled adherence to them symbolised
the contin$ed existence o% order" What Shakespeare presents in
Julius Caesar and in other traedies as omeo and Juliet,
!amlet, "thello, #in$ Lear, %acbeth is not $ntro$bled
adherence to the roles o% his type b$t, rather, their constant &iolation
or loss as (ell as the s$bse;$ent restoration o% order, as the masters
o% deceit (ho had thri&ed on disorder are exposed and destroyed"
3ntony speech mo&es coherently %rom one idea to another,
%rom one imae to another, as he places the ,oman citi>ens in
relation to reality and %orces them to identi%y the real traitor" 8h$s,
order is bein restored and, as Adm$nd remarks in #in$ Lear4
&he wheel is come 'ull circle"
Style and imagery:
In ,enaissance literat$re the idea that the poet, inso%ar as he
creates a (orld o% his o(n, can be compared (ith 0od, Who created
the (orld, (as already a commonplace by Shakespeare)s time" 8he
%act that St" 3$$stine compared the (orld (ith a poem and a
disco$rse (as cr$cial %or the (ay in (hich the ,enaissance (riters
concei&ed o% style and imaery"
*aina =
William Shakespeare
8he de&elopment o% poetic lan$ae, o% style and imaery,
(as the main concern o% 1B
th
cent$ry ,enaissance (riters (ho
probed the nat$re o% lan$ae and its inredients as (ell as potential
relationships bet(een (ords and reality ?brutish beasts is
intentionally $sed by 3ntony in his speech in order to imply that, by
m$rderin 2aesar, 9r$t$s acted like a br$te@, bet(een (ords and
sins as containers o% meanins"
Shakespeare)s preocc$pation (ith lan$ae (as not con%ined
to (ords as rhetorical ornaments o% tho$ht b$t, rather, re%lects the
belie% in the maic o% lan$ae that thri&es on an inter-re%erentiality
amon (ords, concepts, and thins ?the (ord 9r$t$s!, the concept
o% br$tishness, and the br$tish thin that 9r$t$s did, i"e" 2aesar
assassination@"
*aina <

You might also like