Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

I I t ~J ::l'{

'i:"I.'"'''.' ~/ ~l FRK
"'.­
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNm~S!A$ COURT
DIVISION THIRTEEN THIRD JUDi.CrA~ DIST.
~t Utt.nM, , ~
'" !'. ,.." 1\ t\ ;,..

ZOOq Hf\R I 8 P 2: I \
In the Matter of the Marriage of: )

HAL RICHARDSON, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) Case No. 96 D 00217


)

CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

Now on this 17th day of March, 2009, the above-captioned matter comes before the Court,

The petitioner appears in person and by counsel Donald Hoffman. The respondent does not appear.

Thereupon the Court takes up the respondent's motion for recusal. The Court finds that

pursuant to KS.A. 20-311d the motion was improperly filed but after review and consideration

denies the motion for recusal. Ifrespondent wishes to proceed with her motion for recusal, she can

proceed as outlined in KS.A. 20-311d(b).

The Court finds the respondent was personally served with the Motion and Order to Appear

and Show Cause for Contempt, scheduled for April 6, 2009 at 1:30 p.m., pursuant to KS.A. 60­

303(d)(4). The Court appoints Kevin Cook, a member ofthe bar ofthe State ofKansas, as counsel

of record to appear on behalf of respondent in all stages of the Contempt proceedings herein.

The Court considers and denies the respondent's motion filed on December 29, 2008 entitled

"Expedited Judicial Process", respondent's motion # 81 entitled "Motion For Court To Be In

Compliance With Current Federal, State and Kansas Appellate Rulings In That The Last Of Order

Of This Court (December 16, 2008) Is In Direct Violation Of And Demands The Court To Correct

Its megal Ruling Immediately And Take Any All Further Steps To Be In Compliance With The

Current Laws Setforth", motion # 83 entitled "Motions for Orders ofJustice", and motion # 85 which

is entitled the same as motion number 81. The Court finds that none of the respondent's motion

allege any new information or any legal basis for overturning the Court's decision ofDecember 16,

2008 or offer any basis for granting a new trial or hearing pursuant to K.S.A 60-259.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

~~~
DlvIJ57B. DEBENHAM
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing Order was deposited

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this } N day of March, 2009, addressed to the

following:

Kevin 1. Cook, Esq, Claudine Dombrowski, Pro Se


Cook & FisherL.L.P. P.O. Box 4974
1206 SW lOth T~peka,__Kans~s 66604
Topeka~-Kansas 66604

Jill Dykes, Esq. Donald R. Hoffinan


1243 SW Topeka Blvd. Hoffinan & Hoffinan
Topeka, Kansas 66612 CoreFirst Bank & Trust Building
100 E. 9th Street - 3rd Floor East
Topeka, Kansas 66612

Dianne Plemons
Administrative Assistant

You might also like