Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fish Farm FOI - Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations
Fish Farm FOI - Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations
From: Sent: To: Subject: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Thursday, July 7, 2011 2:19 PM Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX RE: Charr Farmind
ThanksConrad.Haveagreatday.
From: Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 12:30 PM To: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX; Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX; 'Ridley, Teri' Cc: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Subject: RE: Charr Farmind
Page 1 FNR-2012-00335
From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 10:56 AM To: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Subject: front counter.doc
Gary Klassen
S22
gary@dorocco.com 1-250-485-7408 Hi Bernadette Thanks for the email with details about a new aquaculture license The app will be in my name on the Oliver property shown above. My mailing address is Gary Klassen Box 1000 Osoyoos BC V0H 1V0 Our farm is on 6.5 acres along side the Okanagan river. (the river was channelized past our property in the 1950s. Zoning on this land is AG 1 the title plan is 1790 Lot number 311 and DL 24505 We plan to use flow thru system with our new 500 gpm 80 deep well as the supply. We are licensed to draw this water at a rate of up to 600 gpm. Robbins Drilling is the did the development of this well. We have sent sample of the water to ALS for a complete analysis. We want to obtain the correct approvals to discharge the water into the Okanagan river. The River flows down into the osoyoos lake and continues down joining the Columbia river system in Washington. The river is fish bearing. Supply water will go thru a degassing and oxygen tower prior to discharge into an elevated storage tank. My plan is to do particle filtration assure compliance before discharge into the river. We want to have an approximate 300 cubic metre of storage tanks of various sizes. Several 2 M dia tanks with three main 10m dia grow out tanks. John Lawry is my specialist to help with design. John has many years of experience in the aquaculture industry. Our initial plan will be to start with the purchasing of 1 to 2 gram Artic char fro a certified disease free hatchery. We plan to grow the fish to 1 kg and market to white table cloth restaurants throughout BC and Alberta.As a backup for marketing we have a broker in Vancouver has committed to take any volume we plan to produce. We plan to use a concrete wall around the tank perimeter and cover the whole operation with a new green house complete with shading. Please accept this as our application for an aquaculture license to grow up to 50000 lbs of Arctic Char per year.
2
Page 2 FNR-2012-00335
Page 3 FNR-2012-00335
HiBernadetteetal.ijusttalkedtoMr.Klassenonthephonetotryandassisthimwithhisaquaculture businessandregrequirements. ThemaincontactforregulatoryrequirementsforrelateddischargeisSajidBarlas,SectionHeadEnvironmental Management,EnvironmentalProtection,MOEPenticton. Sajid,Mr.Klassenwillbeemailingand/orphoningyouaboutregulatoryrequirementsfordischargingthis effluent. Thewaterwellisfromgroundwater(300backfromtheOkanaganRiverChannel)andiscurrentlyexemptfrom needingawaterlicense. PleasecontactmeifthereareanyadditionalrequirementsasrelatestoWaterActauthorizations. RegardsConrad
From: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 12:01 PM To: Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX; Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX; 'Ridley, Teri' Subject: FW: Charr Farming
MinistryofNaturalResourceOperations
441 Columbia Street Kamloops BC V2C 2T3 Telephone no. 250 828 4210 Faxno.2508284442 TollFree:18778553222 HowDidWeDo? ClientsofFrontCounterBCareinvitedtotakeourcustomersatisfactionsurvey.We'dappreciateyourinput.
1
Page 4 FNR-2012-00335
From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 10:56 AM To: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Subject: front counter.doc
Gary Klassen
S22
gary@dorocco.com 1-250-485-7408 Hi Bernadette Thanks for the email with details about a new aquaculture license The app will be in my name on the Oliver property shown above. My mailing address is Gary Klassen Box 1000 Osoyoos BC V0H 1V0 Our farm is on 6.5 acres along side the Okanagan river. (the river was channelized past our property in the 1950s. Zoning on this land is AG 1 the title plan is 1790 Lot number 311 and DL 24505 We plan to use flow thru system with our new 500 gpm 80 deep well as the supply. We are licensed to draw this water at a rate of up to 600 gpm. Robbins Drilling is the did the development of this well. We have sent sample of the water to ALS for a complete analysis. We want to obtain the correct approvals to discharge the water into the Okanagan river. The River flows down into the osoyoos lake and continues down joining the Columbia river system in Washington. The river is fish bearing. Supply water will go thru a degassing and oxygen tower prior to discharge into an elevated storage tank. My plan is to do particle filtration assure compliance before discharge into the river. We want to have an approximate 300 cubic metre of storage tanks of various sizes. Several 2 M dia tanks with three main 10m dia grow out tanks. John Lawry is my specialist to help with design. John has many years of experience in the aquaculture industry. Our initial plan will be to start with the purchasing of 1 to 2 gram Artic char fro a certified disease free hatchery. We plan to grow the fish to 1 kg and market to white table cloth restaurants throughout BC and Alberta.As a backup for marketing we have a broker in Vancouver has committed to take any volume we plan to produce.
2
Page 5 FNR-2012-00335
We plan to use a concrete wall around the tank perimeter and cover the whole operation with a new green house complete with shading. Please accept this as our application for an aquaculture license to grow up to 50000 lbs of Arctic Char per year. Please Call or contact me with any further questions. Thanks Gary Klassen
Page 6 FNR-2012-00335
AWaterActapplicationwouldberequiredfortheactualinstreamworkstoconstructtheoutlet,correct?
Lora Nield
Senior Ecosystem Biologist Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Penticton Office 250-490-8212
From: Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2011 12:30 PM To: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX; Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX; 'Ridley, Teri' Cc: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Subject: RE: Charr Farmind
HiGuys,thispersonwillbecontactingyouabouthisproposalbelow.Ihaveneverseenanapplicationlikethisbefore. Soletmeknowifitisevenpossible.
Page 7 FNR-2012-00335
MinistryofNaturalResourceOperations
441 Columbia Street Kamloops BC V2C 2T3 Telephone no. 250 828 4210 Faxno.2508284442 TollFree:18778553222 HowDidWeDo? ClientsofFrontCounterBCareinvitedtotakeourcustomersatisfactionsurvey.We'dappreciateyourinput. From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 10:56 AM To: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Subject: front counter.doc
Gary Klassen
S22
gary@dorocco.com 1-250-485-7408 Hi Bernadette Thanks for the email with details about a new aquaculture license The app will be in my name on the Oliver property shown above. My mailing address is Gary Klassen Box 1000 Osoyoos BC V0H 1V0 Our farm is on 6.5 acres along side the Okanagan river. (the river was channelized past our property in the 1950s. Zoning on this land is AG 1 the title plan is 1790 Lot number 311 and DL 24505 We plan to use flow thru system with our new 500 gpm 80 deep well as the supply. We are licensed to draw this water at a rate of up to 600 gpm. Robbins Drilling is the did the development of this well. We have sent sample of the water to ALS for a complete analysis. We want to obtain the correct approvals to discharge the water into the Okanagan river. The River flows down into the osoyoos lake and continues down joining the Columbia river system in Washington. The river is fish bearing.
2
Page 8 FNR-2012-00335
Supply water will go thru a degassing and oxygen tower prior to discharge into an elevated storage tank. My plan is to do particle filtration assure compliance before discharge into the river. We want to have an approximate 300 cubic metre of storage tanks of various sizes. Several 2 M dia tanks with three main 10m dia grow out tanks. John Lawry is my specialist to help with design. John has many years of experience in the aquaculture industry. Our initial plan will be to start with the purchasing of 1 to 2 gram Artic char fro a certified disease free hatchery. We plan to grow the fish to 1 kg and market to white table cloth restaurants throughout BC and Alberta.As a backup for marketing we have a broker in Vancouver has committed to take any volume we plan to produce. We plan to use a concrete wall around the tank perimeter and cover the whole operation with a new green house complete with shading. Please accept this as our application for an aquaculture license to grow up to 50000 lbs of Arctic Char per year. Please Call or contact me with any further questions. Thanks Gary Klassen
Page 9 FNR-2012-00335
Page 10 FNR-2012-00335
Page 11 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 12 FNR-2012-00335
From: Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:11 PM To: 'Hughes, Debra' Cc: Anderson, Des FLNR:EX; Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX; Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Subject: RE: Gary Klassen's Arctic Char application
DebraetalinadditionpleaseadviseMr.Klassentoalsosubmitasection9notificationtoFrontCounterBCin Kamloops NoteASection9orNotificationAcceptanceisrequiredtobeobtainedifthedischargeoutfallislocatedbelowthehigh watermarkonOkanaganRiver.ThankyouConradPryce ConradJ.Pryce,P.Eng. SectionHead,WaterAllocation MinistryofForests,LandsandNaturalResourceOperations OkanaganShuswapDistrict 102IndustrialPlacePentictonBCV2A7C8 tel:(250)4908208fax:(250)4902231 email:Conrad.Pryce@gov.bc.ca web:www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd
From: Hughes, Debra [mailto:Debra.Hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 1:31 PM To: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Cc: Anderson, Des FLNR:EX; Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX; Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX Subject: RE: Gary Klassen's Arctic Char application
Hello Sajid
1
Page 13 FNR-2012-00335
Thank you for your prompt response. I'll forward your email to him. Regards Debra
From: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX [mailto:Sajid.Barlas@gov.bc.ca] Sent: October 6, 2011 1:29 PM To: Hughes, Debra Cc: Anderson, Des FLNR:EX; Pryce, Conrad FLNR:EX; Nield, Lora M FLNR:EX Subject: RE: Gary Klassen's Arctic Char application
Hello Debra, Please advise Mr. Klassen to contact Mr. Des Anderson of Ministry of Forest, Land and Natural Resource Operations in our Penticton office, regarding questions involving dykes. His contact info is given below: E-mail: Des.Anderson@gov.bc.ca Phone: 250 490-8221 Regards, Sajid
From: Hughes, Debra [mailto:Debra.Hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 1:25 PM To: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Subject: Gary Klassen's Arctic Char application
Hello Sajid Thank you very for assistance in finding out who Mr. Klassen should be contacting re: directional drilling threw the dyke on the Okanagan River. I will keep you apprised of DFO's progress on the project review. Respectfully Debra Hughes Biologist Aquaculture Environmental Operations Aquaculture Division, Fisheries Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada Phone: (250) 703-0915 Fax: (250)703-0921
2
Page 14 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Shaun Please see attached application. I hope it is clear. If you indicate I will dig up more info. Thanks Gary Gary Klassen 1-250-485-7408 -----Original Message----From: desertairerealty@telus.net Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:24:32 To: <gary@dorocco.com> Subject:
Page 15 FNR-2012-00335
Page 17 FNR-2012-00335
Page 18 FNR-2012-00335
S22
S22
Page 20 FNR-2012-00335
Page 21 FNR-2012-00335
---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Gary Klassen <gary@dorocco.com> Date: Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:13 PM Subject: 11 pictures showing outfall pipe route To: Debra Hughes <debra.hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>, Dorocco <Gary@dorocco.com>, John Lawrie
S22
IMG_1599.JPG IMG_1601.JPG IMG_1602.JPG IMG_1606.JPG IMG_1608.JPG IMG_1609.JPG IMG_1612.JPG IMG_1614.JPG IMG_1615.JPG IMG_1630.JPG IMG_1631.JPG These pictures were sent with Picasa, from Google. Try it out here: http://picasa.google.com/
Page 22 FNR-2012-00335
Page 23 FNR-2012-00335
Page 24 FNR-2012-00335
Page 25 FNR-2012-00335
Page 26 FNR-2012-00335
Page 27 FNR-2012-00335
Page 28 FNR-2012-00335
Page 29 FNR-2012-00335
Page 30 FNR-2012-00335
Page 31 FNR-2012-00335
Page 32 FNR-2012-00335
Page 33 FNR-2012-00335
Shaun I guess we could cross perpendicular to dike, but would have pipe above the Shippet then. Gary ------Original Message-----From: Shaun Reimer To: gary@dorocco.com Subject: RE: Horizontal layout scanned sheets Klassen app Sent: Oct 7, 2011 2:42 PM Gary, I am leaving now but my initial thought is that you need to cross the dike at an angle perpendicular to the dike. Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231
-----Original Message----From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 2:10 PM To: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Subject: Horizontal layout scanned sheets Klassen app
Gary Klassen 1-250-485-7408 -----Original Message----From: desertairerealty@telus.net Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:26:08 To: <gary@dorocco.com> Subject:
Page 34 FNR-2012-00335
Page 35 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 36 FNR-2012-00335
Page 37 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 38 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 40 FNR-2012-00335
Page 41 FNR-2012-00335
To whom it Concerns Please see attached application for an Outfall from an aquaculture operation to the Okanagan River VDS#4 Oliver Rd 17 Regards Gary Gary Klassen 1-250-485-7408 -----Original Message----From: desertairerealty@telus.net Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:12:24 To: <gary@dorocco.com> Subject:
Page 42 FNR-2012-00335
S22
S22
Page 43 FNR-2012-00335
Page 44 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 45 FNR-2012-00335
Page 46 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 47 FNR-2012-00335
Page 49 FNR-2012-00335
Page 50 FNR-2012-00335
S22
S22
Page 51 FNR-2012-00335
Page 52 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 53 FNR-2012-00335
Page 54 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 55 FNR-2012-00335
Page 57 FNR-2012-00335
Page 58 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Shaun I imagine you have a busy schedule. It would sure simply things if you could come to the farm and look at the crossing site. Regards Gary ------Original Message-----From: Shaun Reimer To: gary@dorocco.com Subject: RE: Horizontal layout scanned sheets Klassen app Sent: Oct 7, 2011 2:42 PM Gary, I am leaving now but my initial thought is that you need to cross the dike at an angle perpendicular to the dike. Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231
-----Original Message----From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 2:10 PM To: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Subject: Horizontal layout scanned sheets Klassen app
Gary Klassen 1-250-485-7408 -----Original Message----From: desertairerealty@telus.net Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:26:08 To: <gary@dorocco.com> Subject:
Page 59 FNR-2012-00335
Page 60 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Gary, as discussed, here is a short list of QPs (Qualified Professionals). In our phone conversation, you asked for a list of Qualified Professionals. A short list could include: Associated Engineering 610-1632 Dickson Ave Kelowna, BC V1Y 7T2 (250) 763-3638 Mould Engineering 206-437 Glenmore Rd Kelowna, BC V1V 1Y5 (250) 868-2072 Kerr Wood Leidal 1411 Applebridge Road, Kelowna, (778) 477-4755 Golder Associates 220-1755 Springfield Rd Kelowna, BC V1Y 5V5 (250) 860-8424 This is only a short list and others can be found through the phone book and online. Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231
-----Original Message----From: Gary Klassen [mailto:gary@dorocco.com] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 8:17 AM To: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Subject: Design Shippet Klassen Hi Shaun I need some professional help to get this crossing designed and drawn. DFO will issue my license based on conditions and need to be confident it will be properly done, and they want to know the professionals involved.
1
Page 61 FNR-2012-00335
Gary
Page 62 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Shaun This Roberta Dight is the contact I have from Transport Canada. 16046662863 Please contact her with any questions on my behalf. Regards Gary Gary Klassen 1-250-485-7408
Page 63 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Shaun I have retained Rod, Associated and Summit Environmental to do the professional design and drafting on our required out let. Debra Hughes has been asking who will do the professional design. Please see email from him detailing his experience with the Shippet Oxbow and the Environmental people they will use. You both have my permission to contact Rod at any time with regard to this project. Regards Gary ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Rod MacLean <macleanr@ae.ca> Date: Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:52 PM Subject: Contact Info To: "gary@dorocco.com" <gary@dorocco.com>
Hi Gary,
Associated Engineering designed the Shippet Oxbow drain inlet for the Ministry of Environment. We have good knowledge of the project requirements. We have environmental biologists (from Summit Environmental) who are also available as required.
Hopefully we can help you with your outlet design. Please advise as to your requirements.
Rod
Page 64 FNR-2012-00335
Associated Engineering
Suite 610-1632 Dickson Avenue Kelowna, BC V1Y 7T2 Tel: 250.763.3638 Fax: 250.763.8880 Cell: 250.470.8133 macleanr@ae.ca
Page 65 FNR-2012-00335
HiVicki: Thanksfortheheadsup.ThisisthefirstIhaveheardofthisapplicationandamquiteconcernedwiththeProvincial communicationandprocessingshortfalls. AquacultureapplicationlicensesshouldbeforwardedtoregionalFisheriesSectionforcommentandreview. IwillfollowupwithLoraNieldregardingthestatus. Tara TaraWhite,R.P.Bio. SeniorFisheriesBiologist Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations OkanaganThompsonRegion Phone:(250)4902287 Email:tara.white@gov.bc.ca
From: Matthews, Steve FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:49 AM To: Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; White, Tara FLNR:EX Subject: RE: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS
From: Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:31 PM To: Matthews, Steve FLNR:EX; White, Tara FLNR:EX Subject: FW: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS
Page 66 FNR-2012-00335
From: Manning, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:19 PM To: Wong, Cindy; Herborg, Matthias ENV:EX; Fitzgerald, Monica; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Higgins, Mark; Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; XT:Kosmider, Gabrielle FLNR:IN; Jantz, Lester; Whitehouse, Timber; Hughes, Debra Cc: Johnston, Sandy Subject: RE: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS
Hi Cindy, I disagree with the bullets regarding (1) "lack of consultation with Provincial Representatives" & (2) "consultation with FN". (1) The Province has been aware of this application since July. On July 5 - Gary sent in his application to Bernadette Aura, Natural Resouce Officer, Front Counter in Kamloops. Bernadette forwarded this application to Conrad Pryce, Section Head, Water allocation from MFLNRO who also involved Lora Nield Senior Ecosytem Biologist MFLNRO in Penticton and Sajid Barlas, Section Head Environmental Management, MOE Penticton. Both myself and Deb Hughes have been in touch with Conrad Pryce & Deb Hughes has also been keeping Sajid Barla, Lora Neild, and Des Anderson informed of any developments regarding this file. In turn, Conrad Pryce has informed us that a section 9 approval will be requied if the outlet of the pipe is below the HWM, and an Environmental Management Act, LAND-BASED FINFISH WASTE CONTROL REGULATION permit would be required. The proponent has already applied for his section 9 approval and continues to work with the Province regarding any other requirements. If there are other provincial representatives that should have been engaged, we should address this now so that similar issues do not arise in the future.
(2) DFO Aquaculture Resource Management will be engaging FN on this application, through our licensing processes. If both ITC and ARM are doing this, this a duplication of work. As far as the genetic risks to native stocks - Is concern now alleviated by the use of triploids and triple screening of effluent? In the future, I think there is a need to better coordinate work (i.e. who is doing what) between ARM, AEO and ITC, and better link our processes. Thanks, Michelle Manning Aquaculture Management Coordinator | Coordinatrice - Gestion de l''aquaculture Aquaculture Management Division | La Division de Direction de l'aquaculture Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Pches et Ocans Canada 1965 Island Diesel Way Nanaimo BC V9S 5W8 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada Telephone | Tlphone 250-754-0409 Facsimile | Tlcopieur 250-754-0391
2
Page 67 FNR-2012-00335
michelle.manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
From: Wong, Cindy Sent: October 26, 2011 11:05 AM To: 'Herborg, Matthias ENV:EX'; Fitzgerald, Monica; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Higgins, Mark; Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; Kosmider, Gabrielle; Manning, Michelle; Jantz, Lester; Whitehouse, Timber; Hughes, Debra Cc: Johnston, Sandy Subject: RE: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS Good morning, I've had a chance to chat with Gary extensively this morning regarding his application. At this time, we have communicated to him the various concerns we have received: -Lack of fish health certification from the source facility -A Risk Assessment to be completed for arctic charr as per the National Code on Introductions and Transfers -A hydrological assessment for flood potential -Inspection by Local Fish Health Officer of facility -The absence of consultation with Provincial representatives -The genetic risks associated with hybridizing with native stocks -Consultations with First Nations regarding the intent of facility to discharge into Okanagan River In my conversations with Gary, he has provided the additional information: -The stock will be certified and has been triploid shocked (certification to be available any day) -He is looking to import 10,000 eggs for research in the hopes of developing a viable broodstock program. Shipment date is proposed to be November 20. -He has been consulting with First Nations in the area including the ONA Gary would like some indication as to the ability to meet the November 20 import date. He has invested time and resources into establishing his operations and has expressed that if this import doesn't look like it will be doable, he will be scrapping his whole project. I indicated that I would make one last attempt to the committee and all stakeholders today given the additional information so that if the project is a definite NO at this time, he can cancel his shipment and project today.
From: Herborg, Matthias ENV:EX [mailto:Matthias.Herborg@gov.bc.ca] Sent: October 24, 2011 4:27 PM To: Hughes, Debra; Fitzgerald, Monica; Wong, Cindy; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Johnston, Sandy Cc: XPAC Species at Risk; Higgins, Mark; Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; Wilkinson, James; Van der Slagt, Graham; Kosmider, Gabrielle; Manning, Michelle Subject: RE: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS
Page 68 FNR-2012-00335
From: Hughes, Debra [mailto:Debra.Hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:52 AM To: Fitzgerald, Monica; Wong, Cindy; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Johnston, Sandy Cc: XPAC Species at Risk; Higgins, Mark; Herborg, Matthias ENV:EX; Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; Wilkinson, James; Van der Slagt, Graham; XT:Kosmider, Gabrielle FLNR:IN; Manning, Michelle Subject: RE: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS
To all I spoke to Mr. Klassen yesterday and he assured me that he has been consulting with a number of professionals on various aspects of his proposed hatchery project. I asked him to send me an email with their names and respective roles and I would forward it to the other DFO assessors on this project. Please find his email attached. Regards Debra
From: Fitzgerald, Monica Sent: October 16, 2011 1:23 PM To: Fitzgerald, Monica; Wong, Cindy; Hughes, Debra; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Johnston, Sandy Cc: XPAC Species at Risk; Higgins, Mark; 'Matthias Herborg'; 'Vicki Marshall'; Wilkinson, James; Van der Slagt, Graham Subject: ITC Application #12662 - Gary Klassen - Arctic Charr - FOR COMMENTS Hello Everyone - Please find attached ITC application #12662 for import of Arctic Charr eggs from Whitehorse, YT to Oliver, BC. Please review the application and provide your comments to me no later than October 28, 2011. Thank you. Monica
Page 69 FNR-2012-00335
Monica Fitzgerald Governance Officer / Agent de gouvernance Aquaculture Management Division / Gestion de l'aquaculture Fisheries Management / Direction des pches Department of Fisheries and Oceans / Pches et Ocans Canada 200-401 Burrard Street / 401, rue Burrard, bureau 200 Vancouver, BC / CB V6C 3S4 Phone / tlphone: (604) 666-5783 Fax / tlcopieur: (604) 666-1076
From: XPAC FAM ITC Sent: 2011October-13 3:38 PM To: Wong, Cindy; Fitzgerald, Monica; Choi, Shirley Subject: FW: Icy Water transfer to Klassen
------------------------------------------n behalf of Gary Klassen[SMTP:GARY@DOROCCO.COM] From: S22 Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:37:57 PM To: XPAC FAM ITC Subject: Icy Water transfer to Klassen Auto forwarded by a Rule
Hi Cindy Please see attached transfers application for eggs from Icy Waters Yukon. Here is a link to their web site. www.icywaters.com see details to Icy Water marketing brochure http://www.icywaters.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Marketing_-_Ova.pdf I will request the Fish Health Certificate from Icy Waters and will forward it as soon as it comes. Thanks Gary ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: <desertairerealty@telus.net> Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:49 PM Subject: To: gary@dorocco.com
Page 70 FNR-2012-00335
HiGary,sorryIhaventgottenbacktoyousooner.Outoftheofficealotthesedaysand I S22 dontknowmuchaboutwhatyouareaskingabout.IwillphoneyoutomorrowmorningasIaminmeetingsallday today.Inthemeantime,Iwillprovidealinktofloodplainmappingforyou. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/data_searches/fpm/reports/region3.html Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231
From On Behalf Of Gary Klassen S22 Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:11 AM To: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Subject: hydrogolocial assessment plan for flood plain for your proposed aquaculture site
Hi Shaun Do you have any direction for me Introduction and transfers committee (ITC) is asking for this. Gary Klassen
Page 71 FNR-2012-00335
Page 72 FNR-2012-00335
Hi Shaun I have a drawing from Rod showing a survey of our site, pipe elevations, outlet details and slope. Rod visited the site and I have Manwell Vieira getting a quote together for us. Can you tell me, what do we need for a formal permit? And does this involve an inspection process? Gary Best Regards From: Gary Klassen gary@dorocco.com 1-250-485-7408
Page 73 FNR-2012-00335
HiVicki: IhavereviewedtheabovenotedAquacultureApplicationandprovidethefollowingcomments: 1. TriploidArcticCharreggswillbeimportedfromtheYukon.Althoughtheywillbecomingfromadisease certifiedsourceandwillbeheatshocktreatedtriploids,weknowfromtheFreshwaterFisheriesSocietyofBCs researchw/kokaneethatsterilityisnot100%effective.Thereisuptoa5%chancethattheeggswillnotbe sterile,therebyincreasingtheriskofhybridizationw/nativestocks,shouldfishescape. 2. Thefishareproposedtoberaisedintanks,inaclosedenvironment.Waterintake/dischargepipeswillbe screened.Therefore,theriskofescapeintotheOkanaganRiverislikelylow.Survivalofescapedfishisalso anticipatedtobelow,duetothewarmwatertemperaturesintheOkanaganRiverandOsoyoosLakeaportion ofyear(optimumtemperaturesforCharrare11C16C).Iffishweretoescapeduringthewintermonths, however,therisktonativestocksandecosystemhealthincreasessignificantly(ie.higherpotentialforcharr survival).Potentialriskstonativespeciesincludediseasetransfer,competitionforfood&habitatand hybridization. 3. Waterfortheproposedfacilitywillbesuppliedfromawellsituatedontheproperty(Plan1790,DL24505,Lot 311,civic8929Rd#17,Oliver).Themaximumwithdrawalrate=75L/sec.Iamnotclearwhatthismeanin termsofwateravailability&useintheOkanaganRiverbasin.Whataretheimplicationsofthewater withdrawal/useongroundwateravailabilityandrecharge?Whataretheimplicationstofishhabitatandnative stocks(eg.habitatconstraints&waterquality)?WaterisalreadylimitedintheOkanaganduringdryyears particularlybetweenJulySept. 4. TheOkanaganRiverisdirectlyconnectedtoOsoyoosLake,whichisatransboundarywatershed.Iffishwereto escapeandsurvive,therecouldalsobemanagementimplicationsintheUS.Additionally,potentialimpacts fromeffluentdischargewouldaffectCanadianwaters,aswellastheUS.Itwouldbeprudenttoconsultw/US fisheriesmanagersregardingtheproposedapplication. 5. Theapplicationindicateswaterwithdrawal/dischargepipeswillbescreened,butdoesnotprovidefurtherdetail (ie.screeningsize,lifestageandguidelinestobefollowed).ScreeningshouldmeetfreshwaterIntakeendof pipefishscreenguidelines(DFO)inordertominimizeresidentfishentrainmentandimpingementonthe screen. 6. Adrumfilterandsettlingtankareproposedtotreateffluentwaterpriortodischarge.Willthisbesufficientto filternitratesandpharmaceuticals(usedtotreathatcheryeggs/fish)fromthewaterandpreventpathogen transfertotheOkanaganRiversystem?Ifnot,whataretheimplicationstonativestocks,SARandwatershed health? 7. OsoyoosLakeexhibitsanoxygen/temperaturesqueezeduringthesummermonths.Themajorityofthelake haslittletonooxygen(<4ppm)JulySeptandonlyasmallcorridorisavailableforfishmigrationandsurvival (@15mdepth).Watertemperaturesintheupper15mofthewatercolumnareinsublethaltolethallimits forfish(1724C)taxingresidentstockstotheirlimit.DischargeofeffluentintotheOkRivermayfurther aggravatewaterqualityissuesinOsoyoosLake.
1
Page 74 FNR-2012-00335
8. Itisunclearastowheretheeffluentwaterwillbedischarged.Willitbedischargedontheproperty,intothe neighbouringoxbowsortheOkanaganRiver? 9. Theeffluentdischargerateproposed=75L/s.Willthisratebecontinuousyearroundorforaspecifiedtime period?Waterdoesthismeanintermsoflicenseduse?AasIunderstanditwellsarenotlicensed.... 10. Waterforthefacilityistobesuppliedfromawelland12C.Thetemperatureofdischargewater,howeverwas notidentified.Dischargeofeffluentwatershouldmeetspecifiedguidelinesforaquaticlifeparticularlywhen dealingwithasensitiveecosystem&fishstocks. 11. ThehatcheryisproposedinasensitiveecologicalareanearhistoricoxbowsofftheOkanaganRiver.Whatis therisktothefloodplain,SARandsurroundingareafromproposeddevelopmentandwaterwithdrawaland discharge? 12. TheapplicationstatesfishwillbesuppliedDirecttoFoodMarket.Willfishbetransportedlive?Ifso,thiswill increaserisktonativestocks. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingtheinformationprovided,pleasefeelfreetogivemeacall.Ihavecopiedregional EP,WaterandEcosystemsstaffonmyresponse. CheersTara
><((((>
From: Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 9:09 AM To: White, Tara FLNR:EX Subject: FW: Klassen Updated Application Submitted
S22
CanItrytosetupameetingforustodiscusstheissues
From: Choi, Shirley [mailto:Shirley.Choi@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 10:43 AM To: Higgins, Mark; Herborg, Matthias ENV:EX; Marshall, Vicki FLNR:EX; Sheppard, Mark; Keith, Ian; Martin, Stacee Subject: FW: Klassen Updated Application Submitted
Hi ITC, So the madness has begun (again) for the Klassen file. This time he has hired a consultant to help with the set up of his site. He still wants to get triploid Arctic Char eggs from Icy Waters in the Yukon, are we still concerned that it is not an FHPR certified site? We have asked that an ITC application be submitted, but thought we could use a head start to this application. I don't believe a hydrological assessment has been done, does he still need one? Other information on effluent treatment, fish health and fish habitat can be found in the document below as well (Start at Page 18).
2
Page 75 FNR-2012-00335
Thanks, Shirley
______________________________________________ From: Manning, Michelle Sent: 2012May-01 12:04 PM To: Hughes, Debra; Choi, Shirley; Martin, Stacee Cc: Meadows, Shelley; Lim, Susan; Kosmider, Gabrielle Subject: Klassen Updated Application Submitted
Hi all, Attached is Gary Klassen's updated application. He is going to be sending in some engineered plans separately (I will forward these on when I receive them). He has asked me to walk through the application with him Thursday morning to make sure he is not missing any info. I was hoping you could all take a look at it and see if there is anything else we need from him. He wants to move fish in June and it would be a great success if we could facilitate that for him this year. The earlier we get our requirements to him (if any), the better.
Michelle Manning
Aquaculture Management Coordinator | Coordinatrice - Gestion de l''aquaculture Aquaculture Management Division | La Division de Direction de l'aquaculture Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Pches et Ocans Canada 1965 Island Diesel Way Nanaimo BC V9S 5W8 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada Telephone | Tlphone 250-754-0409 Facsimile | Tlcopieur 250-754-0391 michelle.manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Page 76 FNR-2012-00335
Page 77 FNR-2012-00335
Page 78 FNR-2012-00335
S22
Page 79 FNR-2012-00335
Page 80 FNR-2012-00335
Page 81 FNR-2012-00335
Page 82 FNR-2012-00335
Page 83 FNR-2012-00335
Page 84 FNR-2012-00335
Page 85 FNR-2012-00335
Page 86 FNR-2012-00335
Page 87 FNR-2012-00335
Page 89 FNR-2012-00335
Page 90 FNR-2012-00335
Page 91 FNR-2012-00335
Page 92 FNR-2012-00335
Page 93 FNR-2012-00335
Page 94 FNR-2012-00335
Page 95 FNR-2012-00335
Page 96 FNR-2012-00335
Page 97 FNR-2012-00335
Page 98 FNR-2012-00335
Page 99 FNR-2012-00335
theimplicationsofwaterallocationonotherelementsoftheecosystem.Specifically,therearefisheriestemporal concernsaroundwaterquality/temperaturesinOsoyoosLake.Detailscanbeprovidedbyregionalfisheries managementstaff. Thefollowingconcernshavealsobeenraisedandtomyknowledgeremainunanswered: 1. Thefishareproposedtoberaisedintanks,inaclosedenvironment.Waterintake/dischargepipeswillbe screened.Therefore,theriskofescapeintotheOkanaganRiverislikelylow.Survivalofescapedfishisalso anticipatedtobelow,duetothewarmwatertemperaturesintheOkanaganRiverandOsoyoosLakeaportion ofyear(optimumtemperaturesforCharrare11C16C).Iffishweretoescapeduringthewintermonths, however,therisktonativestocksandecosystemhealthincreasessignificantly(ie.higherpotentialforcharr survival).Potentialriskstonativespeciesincludediseasetransfer,competitionforfood&habitatand hybridization. 2. Waterfortheproposedfacilitywillbesuppliedfromawellsituatedontheproperty(Plan1790,DL24505,Lot 311,civic8929Rd#17,Oliver).Themaximumwithdrawalrate=75L/sec.Iamnotclearwhatthismeanin termsofwateravailability&useintheOkanaganRiverbasin.Whataretheimplicationsofthewater withdrawal/useongroundwateravailabilityandrecharge?Whataretheimplicationstofishhabitatandnative stocks(eg.habitatconstraints&waterquality)?WaterisalreadylimitedintheOkanaganduringdryyears particularlybetweenJulySept. 3. Theapplicationindicateswaterwithdrawal/dischargepipeswillbescreened,butdoesnotprovidefurtherdetail (ie.screeningsize,lifestageandguidelinestobefollowed).ScreeningshouldmeetfreshwaterIntakeendof pipefishscreenguidelines(DFO)inordertominimizeresidentfishentrainmentandimpingementonthe screen. 4. Adrumfilterandsettlingtankareproposedtotreateffluentwaterpriortodischarge.Willthisbesufficientto filternitratesandpharmaceuticals(usedtotreathatcheryeggs/fish)fromthewaterandpreventpathogen transfertotheOkanaganRiversystem?Ifnot,whataretheimplicationstonativestocks,SARandwatershed health? 5. OsoyoosLakeexhibitsanoxygen/temperaturesqueezeduringthesummermonths.Themajorityofthelake haslittletonooxygen(<4ppm)JulySeptandonlyasmallcorridorisavailableforfishmigrationandsurvival (@15mdepth).Watertemperaturesintheupper15mofthewatercolumnareinsublethaltolethallimits forfish(1724C)taxingresidentstockstotheirlimit.DischargeofeffluentintotheOkRivermayfurther aggravatewaterqualityissuesinOsoyoosLake.
6. Itisunclearastowheretheeffluentwaterwillbedischarged.Willitbedischargedontheproperty,intothe neighbouringoxbowsortheOkanaganRiver? 7. Theeffluentdischargerateproposed=75L/s.Willthisratebecontinuousyearroundorforaspecifiedtime period?Waterdoesthismeanintermsoflicenseduse?AasIunderstanditwellsarenotlicensed.... 8. Waterforthefacilityistobesuppliedfromawelland12C.Thetemperatureofdischargewater,howeverwas notidentified.Dischargeofeffluentwatershouldmeetspecifiedguidelinesforaquaticlifeparticularlywhen dealingwithasensitiveecosystem&fishstocks. 9. ThehatcheryisproposedinasensitiveecologicalareanearhistoricoxbowsofftheOkanaganRiver.Whatis therisktothefloodplain,SARandsurroundingareafromproposeddevelopmentandwaterwithdrawaland discharge? 10. TheapplicationstatesfishwillbesuppliedDirecttoFoodMarket.Willfishbetransportedlive?Ifso,thiswill increaserisktonativestocks. Iwillseektotrytoidentifyandresolveissuessurroundingtheapplicationprocessandhowregionalfishbiologistcan entertheirreviewcommentsintotheprocess,asthisiscausingconfusion.Perhapswecoulddiscussfurther. Regards, MatthiasHerborg ProvincialCoChair,IntroductionsandTransfersCommittee
TaraandRogerandShaun, IspokewithbothGaryKlassenandAdamNeil(SummitEnvironmental)regardingthefishfarmapplicationdownnear Oliver. Summitispreparingasummaryreportincludingtheproposedworks,constructionmethodsandmitigationmethodsto supporttheapplicationstoDFOandWaterStewardship(Section9).IunderstandthatGaryhasretainedAssociated Engineeringtoassembletheengineeringdrawings,andasof2daysago(orso),Summittohandlethe environmental/permittingaspects. GaryhopestohaveshovelsinthegroundbyJuly22ndofthisyear.ThesummaryreportbySummitisexpectedbythe endofthismonth(June).Ifthisdateisnotpossible,weshouldlethimknowsoonerthanlater. FromaSection9perspective,unlessthedesignchanges,Idontseeanyshowstoppersatthemoment.Iwillonlybe concernedwiththeoutfallpipewhichwillbeadirectionaldrillthroughthedyke.Iwillalsobeconcernedifthe constructionencroachesonShippetOxbow,whichisadjacenttotheproposedfarm.Thisdoesntseemtobethecase rightnow. Shaun,Imnotsureiftheyhaveapproachedyouregardingdrillingthroughthedyke.TheyplantocrossShippetOxbow anddirectionaldrillverycloseto,whatappearstobe,aculvertthroughthedykeatthelowerendofShippetOxbow. Roger,Tarasaidyouarehandlingtheirpermit.MyunderstandingfromGaryandAdamatthispointisthattheyare undertheimpressionthatadischargepermitisalreadyinplace(Imaybewrongonthis).ItalkedtoTaraaboutthis, andthatdoesntsoundlikeitisthecase.IthinkifAdamhasntcontactedyouatthispoint,thenitwouldbeagoodidea toinformthemofthestatusoftheirpermit. IwillbeaddingtexttotheSection9Approvalregardingtheotherpermitrequirementsthathavetobeinplacepriorto undertakingthework.Soifyoucanletmeknowwhatpermitsneedtobeinplace,thatwillhelpmeout. Ifyouknowanyoneelsewhoisapartofthisapprovalprocessmaybewecanaddthemtothecclistandexpandthe conversationsoweareallonthesamepage. Thanks, Neil.
_____________________________________________________
Neil Goeller, M.Sc., G.I.T.
Regional Hydrologist Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Okanagan Shuswap District Ph: (250) 490-8265, Fx: (250) 490-2231
ThanksShaun,IwillbringRod(ourEngineer)uptospeedandhavehimandGarysubmitthisapplicationaswe discussed.
From: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX [mailto:shaun.reimer@gov.bc.ca] Sent: June 15, 2012 1:51 PM To: Adam Neil Subject: FW: Section 9 Water Act Applications and information and Dike Maintenance act info Adam,hereisalinktotheformsinquestionandbackgroundinfoforfillingthemout.IdidsendthistoGarylastOctober. Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231 Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231 _____________________________________________ From: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 10:29 AM To: 'gary@dorocco.com' Subject: Section 9 Water Act Applications and information and Dike Maintenance act info HelloGary, IhaveattachedalinkfortheformtousetoapplyforSection9WaterActApprovals.Itsfoundat: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/water_rights/licence_application/section9/application.pdf ChecktheNotificationboxontheform;youdontneedtosubmitanapplicationfeeforthatandtheprocessisquicker.Thereisa smallchancethatthereviewerswouldsaythatyourproposalrequirestheApproval(thatdeterminationisnotmycall)butIthinkit unlikely. TheformwillbesubmittedtoFrontCounterBC.Itsat: http://www.frontcounterbc.gov.bc.ca/
1
Thereisatollfreenumberlistedatthatsiteforanyquestionsregardingtheapplicationprocess. Thefollowingsiteexplainstheprocesswithmorelinkstorelevantwebsites: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/water_rights/licence_application/section9/index.html TheDikeMaintenanceActinfoandform(attachedasaWorddocument)regardingtheseapprovalsareat: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/public_safety/flood/dma_approvals.html Youcancallmetodiscussbuttrytofillinanythingyoucanfirst. Regards... Shaun Reimer, P.Eng. Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8
FYI,additionalinformationregardingGaryKlassensfishfarm.
From: Adam Neil [mailto:an@summit-environmental.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:24 AM To: debra.hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca; Goeller, Neil FLNR:EX; gary@dorocco.com Subject: Gary Klassen Hatchery Project: Mitigation Plan and Environmental Assessment
Suite 200, 2800 29 Street Vernon, B.C., Canada V1T 9P9 Tel 250.545.3672 Fax 250.545.3654 www.summit-environmental.com
June 28, 2012 File: 2012-2040.001 Gary Klassen Dorocco Developments Ltd. Box 1000 Osoyoos, B.C. V0H 1V0 CC: Debra Hughes (DFO) debra.hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Neil Goeller (MFLNRO) neil.goeller@gov.bc.ca
Re:
OKANAGAN RIVER EFFLUENT DISCHARGE PIPE: MITIGATION PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Dear Mr. Klassen: Summit Environmental Consultants Inc. (Summit) is pleased to provide this Mitigation Plan (MP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) for construction of an effluent discharge pipe adjacent to the Okanagan River. The effluent discharge pipe is part of an Arctic Char fish hatchery proposed by Dorocco Developments Ltd. (Dorocco) near Oliver, B.C. Dorocco has previously submitted a Section 9 Application and DFO Review for this project. The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (MFLNRO) and Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) have requested additional information on the project design, mitigation plan and environmental effects, as they relate to construction of the effluent discharge pipe, to supplement Doroccos permit applications1,2. This letter provides a description of the proposed project and environmental baseline within the project area. A proposed mitigation plan is presented below with an assessment of residual effects on the environment. This letter only addresses construction of the effluent discharge pipe.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Dorocco is proposing an Arctic Char fish hatchery near Oliver, B.C (Figure 1). Project infrastructure will include a hatchery facility, waste settling basin, effluent discharge pipe and outlet structure (Figure 2). The hatchery facility and waste settling basin will be located in a private field outside of any environmentally sensitive areas (i.e. > 15 m from any watercourse). The effluent discharge pipe will cross the Shippet Oxbow and flood dike, and the outlet structure will be located on the bank of the Okanagan River (Figure 2 and 3).
1 2
Personal communication. Neil Goeller (MFLNRO). June 13, 2012. Personal communication. Debra Hughes (DFO). June 12, 2012.
The effluent discharge pipe will be constructed of sections of PVC and steel pipe (300 mm diameter) connected together by couplings and set in precast cement structures. The pipe will be buried in a trench from its connection to the waste settling basin to the outlet structure, with the exception of that section which will overhang the Shippet Oxbow. Generally, the trench will be about 1 to 2 m wide by 1 m deep. A 10 m wide by 3 m deep trench will be required to install the pipe across the flood dike (Figure 2); additional details on construction of this section of pipe will be provided in the Dike Maintenance Application for this project. The outlet structure will be precast in cement and set into place on the bank of the Okanagan River.
ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE
Summit completed a field assessment of the project area on June 15, 2012. Riparian areas adjacent to the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River are largely disturbed, mainly due to the flood dike and adjacent farm land (Photos 1 to 3). Riparian species present in these areas consist of Sumac (Rhus Spp.), Willow (Salix spp.), Wylch Elm (Ulmus glabra) and Cattail (Typha spp.). The riparian areas adjacent to the Shippet Oxbow are about 3 m and 7 m wide on the left and right banks, respectively. The width of the riparian area on the right bank of the Okanagan River is about 2 m. The bankfull width and height of the Okanagan River is about 50 m and 2.5 m, respectively (Figure 2). Flow in the Okanagan River was in excess of 70 m3/s during the field assessment. The banks of the Okanagan River are entirely composed of large rip-rap since this section of river has been channelized (Photo 4). Habitat suitability and availability is low for juvenile fish and high for adults. The depth and velocity of the river in this area is relatively high, with little cover, velocity refuge and habitat complexity. Juvenile rearing habitat is likely limited to the margins of the channel, while adult fish would utilize the entire width of the river. A summary of fish species present in the Okanagan River is presented in Table 13. The bankfull width and height of the Shippet Oxbow is about 8 m and 2 m, respectively (Figure 2). During the field assessment the wetted width and depth of the oxbow was about 1.5 m and 0.2 m, respectively. There was minimal flow (< 20 lps) through the oxbow during this assessment because the inlet was closed due to the risk of flooding. The banks and bed of the oxbow are composed of fines and organic material (Photos 5). Habitat suitability and availability is moderate for juvenile fish and low for adults within this area of the Shippet Oxbow. There is a general lack of habitat complexity and cover in these areas. The section of Shippet Oxbow adjacent to the project area is an inlet channel with high value habitat located further downstream. All fish species inhabiting the Okanagan River can access the Shippet Oxbow. An overview of the project area showing riparian areas, watercourses, project infrastructure and construction footprints is provided in Figure 4.
3
Ministry of Environment. 2012. Fisheries Information Summary System. Accessed online June 26, 2012.
MITIGATION PLAN
Construction works will be completed by Dorocco and/or a designated contractor. All project works will be completed within the reduced risk instream work window for the Okanagan River (July 22 to August 31) according to Standards and Best Management Practices for Instream Works4. Excavation, infilling and re-grading will be completed using an excavator. These works will be completed in the dry from the top of bank in sensitive areas adjacent to watercourses. Water level elevations in the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River will be far below the trench elevation during the construction period. In the event that water levels are not below this critical elevation, works will be postponed until water levels recede. A double layer silt fence will be installed between construction areas and watercourses to prevent erosion and sedimentation. This fencing will remain in place until these areas are stabilized well after the construction and restoration periods. Construction materials and equipment required for the project will be stored in a designated location well away from any watercourses (>30 m). Material (sediment and debris) removed from the trench will also be stockpiled next to the trench, and not allowed to slough back into the trench or adjacent water courses. Excess material will
4
Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection (WLAP). 2004. Standards and Best Management Practices for Instream Works
be removed from the site and disposed of in an appropriate location and timely manner. Equipment will be refuelled from a tidy tank in a designated location well away from any watercourses (i.e. > 30 m). All equipment and machinery will be in good operating condition, free of leaks, excess oil, and grease. Equipment and machinery will be checked prior to entering the project area and frequently during construction. We recommend that hydraulic machinery have environmentally sensitive hydraulic fluids that are non-toxic to aquatic life and that are readily or inherently biodegradable. A spill contaminant kit will be readily accessible onsite in the event of a release of deleterious substance to the environment. All construction personnel will be trained in spill containment and responsible for responding to a spill. Spills will be immediately reported to the Provincial Emergency Program. Precast cement structures required for the pipe connections and outlet structure will be constructed in a designated area well away from any watercourses. Structures will be completely cured before placement so there is no risk of spills or leaching. These structures will be lifted into place using an excavator. Temporarily disturbed riparian areas will be restored to a pre-disturbance state immediately following the construction phase. Native plant species identified in Section 2 will be planted at a density of 1 plant per 1 m 2. Diversity of planting will mimic the natural surroundings. Native grass seed will also be broadcast in disturbed areas. Channel banks will be re-graded to a pre-disturbance state using the same material which was removed. Environmental monitoring will be completed on a full time basis by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) to ensure compliance with BMPs and regulatory permits. A pre-construction meeting will be held to discuss construction activities, mitigation measures and environmental concerns. All construction personnel will be aware of environmental concerns onsite and the Section 9 Water Act approval will be kept on site at all times. The EM will have authority to stop or postpone works if there any environmental concerns. An environmental monitoring report will be completed and submitted to the regulatory agencies following project completion.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The total temporary disturbance of riparian and instream areas will be 158 m 2 and 12 m2. These values represent a 4 m wide construction right-of-way along the pipe alignment. Instream areas are considered those areas of the channel bank below the high-water elevation in the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River. The total permanent loss in instream areas for the project is 4 m2 which consists of the outlet structure located on the bank of the Okanagan River. A summary of temporary and permanent disturbances of riparian and instream areas is presented in Table 2, with an overview of these areas provided in Figure 4.
The proposed project will have short term minor impacts on riparian areas if the mitigation plan noted above is followed. As previously mentioned, restoration of these areas will commence immediately following the construction period. Impacts on water quality are not expected since all works will be completed in the dry and isolated using silt fencing. Temporary disturbance of instream areas are not expected to have an effect on fish or other aquatic biota since these areas will be dry during construction. The permanent loss of instream areas under the footprint of the outlet structure is not expected to adversely affect fish. This area is typically dry during most periods of the year and is only wetted during extreme high flow events. Moreover, this area is entirely composed of rip-rap which provides little habitat value for fish. Juvenile fish may use these areas to escape high velocities; however, there is abundant like-value habitat through this area of the Okanagan River so minor losses will have a negligible effect. The effluent discharge pipe will remain above the high-water mark in the Shippet Oxbow so there will be no adverse effects.
Yours truly,
Oliver
Subject Site
BRITISH COLUMBIA
Prince George
Osoyoos
Figure 1 Subject Site Location
DATE: PROJECT: PREPARED FOR:
_ ^
0 Kilometers
June, 2012
DRAWN BY:
2012-2040.000
DA
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, iPC, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, Gary Klassen METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), and the GIS User Community Page 118 FNR-2012-00335
SHIPPET INLET
TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED 300 PVC PIPE @ 0.1% TOP OF BANK TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF BANK EXTENTS OF EXISTING ROCK MINIMUM FLOW IN OKANAGAN RIVER = 3m 3/s
START OF CONTRACT
2040-1-101
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING
Signature: Date:
EXISTING GROUND 200 200 GRILLAGE TO BE 50mm BARS, HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED, APPROX. SPACING = 50mm
R IP
500
RA P
STEEL PIPE SCHEDULE 40 324 O.D. 303 I.D. ARMTEC MODEL 50C ROUND FLAP GATE OR EQUIVALENT
1243
1844
200
R IP
RA P
1406
500
400
559 OUTLET STRUCTURE STEEL PIPE BOLTED TO ARMTEC MODEL 50C ROUND FLAP GATE OR EQUIVALENT PIPE INVERT = 282.65
1000
2040-1-102
Existing Barn
Pleaseconsiderthefollowingcomment: ProjectDescription: ThisSection9applicationisfora12inchpipetobeplaced(directionallydrilled)withintheShippetOxbow.Thepipe willalsorunthroughtheleveealongtheOkanaganRiverchannel.Thepurposeofthepipeistodischargeeffluentfrom aproposedfishfarm.DistrictFirstNationsstaffunderstandthefishfarmingoperationrequiresfurtherpermittingvia MOEEnvironmentalProtectionstaff. InitialReview ThisprojectwasreferredtoallrespectiveFirstNationsasidentifiedbyFrontCounterBCincludingtheOkanaganand Nlakapamuxgroupsandtheirrespectivecommunities.ThecoregroupsincludeOsoyoos,LowerSimilkameenand PentictonIndianBand. Theproposedwaterworksposealowriskofimpactingaboriginalinterests.Theimpactisbelievedtobelowbecause theworksareassociatedwithprivatelandwhichishighlycultivated,andpreviouslydisturbedareasofthelevee.The Shippetoxbowisnotfishbearing,andphotographsindicatetheoxbowisfillingin. TheOkanaganRiverareaisassociatedwitharelativelystrongaboriginaltitleclaimbecauseofitsproximitytovillage sites,andrecordsofuseandoccupationoftheOkanaganRiver.TheOkanaganRiverareaisalsoassociatedwith relativelystrongclaimsofaboriginalrightstofish,gatherfoodsandmedicines.Itisadocumentedtravelrouteofthe Okanaganpeople. Recommendation Basedonthisreview,theappropriatelevelofconsultationwouldbenotification.FCBChasprovidednotificationtothe keyOkanagangroupsandnoresponseswerereceived.ThisreviewislimitedtotheSection9approval. Laverne Cormier, RPF
First Nations Relations Advisor Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural Resource Operations Phone: 250.490.2203 Fax:250.490.2231 Email: laverne.cormier@gov.bc.ca
_____________________________________________________
Neil Goeller, M.Sc., P.Geo.
Regional Hydrologist Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Okanagan Shuswap District Ph: (250) 490-8265, Fx: (250) 490-2231
_____________________________________________________
Neil Goeller, M.Sc., P.Geo.
Regional Hydrologist Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Okanagan Shuswap District Ph: (250) 490-8265, Fx: (250) 490-2231
File: A8-6524
Gary Klassen Box 1000 Osoyoos, BC V0H 1V0 Attention: Gary Klassen Re: Section 9 Water Act Approval Pipeline Crossing of Shippet Oxbow and Outfall into Okanagan River
Approval for the above has been granted, and the approval document verifying this is attached. This Approval, or copy of it, must be kept on the work site so that it may be shown to a Ministry official upon request. It is the Approval Holders responsibility to ensure that their activities, works or construction are in compliance with all legislation, including the Fisheries Act (Canada), as well as with any applicable federal, provincial or local government bylaws, regulations or enactments. The Approval includes as an Attachment the document entitled Habitat Officers Terms and Conditions for changes in and about a stream specified by Ministry of Environment Habitat Officers, Okanagan Region, which describes requirements specified by the Ministrys Ecosystem Section. For any questions about those requirements, please contact Rob Stewart, Ecosystems Biologist 250-490-8253. If you have any other questions or concerns regarding this Approval, please contact Neil Goeller, P.Geo. Regional Hydrologist in Penticton at (250) 490-8265. Yours truly,
Conrad J. Pryce, P.Eng. Assistant Regional Water Manager Attachments pc: Adam Neil, Summit Environmental Consultants, Vernon Rob Stewart, Ecosystems Section, Penticton
Shawn LHenaff, Front Counter BC, Vernon Jeff Guerin, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Kamloops Shaun Reimer, Hydrotechnical Engineer, FLNRO Tara White, Senior Fisheries Biologist, FLNRO Roger Cavadini, Environmental Protection Officer, MoE
APPROVAL Changes in and about a stream WATER ACT - SECTION 9 (1) Gary Klassen is hereby authorized to make changes in and about a stream as follows:
A. B.
The stream is Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River. The changes to be made in and about the stream are construction of a pipeline crossing of Shippet Oxbow and an outfall structure on the banks of Okanagan River as submitted with the application. All works shall comply to design plans submitted by Summit Environmental Consultants for the application. The works authorized shall be completed on or before December 31st, 2012. This Approval does not constitute authority of any other agency. The holder of this Approval shall have the necessary permits from other agencies concerned prior to the commencement of the works authorized herein. Instream work shall be undertaken during the period July 22nd to September 15th to minimize the impact on the fisheries resource. Work may be scheduled to occur outside of this designated work window if the qualified environmental professional determines that the work can be completed without contravening the federal Fisheries Act and any other applicable legislation. Also, the approval holder must comply with steps 2 and 3 described in paragraph (a) Fish and Fish Habitat (page 1 of 5) of the attachment entitled Habitat Officers Terms and Conditions for changes in and about a stream specified by Ministry of Environment Habitat Officers, Okanagan Region. The approval holder must ensure that necessary documentation, as outlined in the attachment is obtained and kept at hand when undertaking instream work under the Approval outside of the designated work window. A qualified environmental professional shall be onsite at all times of the work. The qualified environmental professional shall have the authority to suspend work at any time if a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat in the stream appears imminent.
C.
D. E.
F.
G.
H.
This Approval or copy of it must be kept on the work site so that it may be shown to a Ministry official upon request. No silt, or other deleterious substances, shall be allowed to enter the water. This must be ensured through the use of appropriate silt curtain and/or cofferdam materials. All work shall be conducted in the dry portion of the channel. No equipment shall be operated in the water. All work shall be conducted from the top of the bank. No equipment shall be operated in the channel. The holder of this Approval shall take reasonable care to avoid damaging any land, works, trees or other property, and shall make full compensation to the owners for any damage or loss resulting from the exercise of the rights granted with this Approval. This Approval does not authorize entry onto privately held land. Vegetation shall be disturbed as little as possible. All disturbed areas shall be restored to their original condition and protected from erosion. All excavated material and debris shall be removed from the site and taken to an appropriate facility or placed in a stable area above the high water mark and protected from erosion by planting grass and/or vegetation. Fuelling and servicing of vehicles and equipment must occur away from all streams, lakes and water bodies and any spills must be properly cleaned up and reported as required by the Spill Reporting Regulation (B.C. Reg. 263/90). Any machinery operated on the site shall be in good repair and be free of hydraulic leaks and excess surface oil and grease. All reasonable effort will be made to avoid any negative impacts to the streams ecosystem. Appropriate design methods and construction techniques for the site conditions shall be utilized.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M. N. O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
Where rock riprap is used to protect against erosion, it shall be clean, durable, angular in shape and suitably graded and sized to resist movement by freshet flows. The riprap shall have an apron or entrenched toe of rock placed on the streambed at the toe of the slope. The resulting protected channel must have a cross-sectional area greater than or equal to the present cross-sectional area. Where rock riprap is used to protect against erosion, the upstream end of the riprap must be keyed (trenched) back into the bank so that the bank protection is not outflanked by erosion farther upstream. Rock riprap must not be end-dumped down the bank of the stream but must be placed against the bank/apron/toe trench using an excavator with a thumb. Holder(s) of water licences within one kilometer downstream are to be provided with an alternate supply of fresh water during periods when water quality may be adversely affected. Upon commencement of the project, the works shall be pursued to completion as quickly as possible.
V.
W.
X.
Y.
Approval: A806524
Habitat Officers Terms and Conditions for changes in and about a stream specified by Ministry of Environment Habitat Officers, Okanagan Region Section 42 (1) of the Water Regulation gives authority to a Habitat Officer to add specific conditions to ensure the protection of habitat in addition to the conditions of general application. Under this authority, Ministry of Environment (MoE) Habitat Officers, Okanagan Region, require the following mandatory terms and conditions: 42 (1) To protect habitat, a person making a change in and about a stream 1 under this regulation, other than under section 44(1)(o) to (s) or (2), must make that change in accordance with terms and conditions specified by the habitat officer with respect to
a) The timing window or the period or periods of time in the year during which the change can proceed without causing harm to fish, wildlife or habitat, Windows of least risk for fish and wildlife, including some species at risk, in Okanagan Region can be found on the work windows webpage: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/regions/okr/wateract/workwindows.html Fish and Fish Habitat: 1. All activities in fish streams, as well as tributaries that have a risk of depositing sediment into fish streams, must be undertaken within a window of least risk to fish and fish habitat. Windows of least risk are designed to protect all fish species known to occur in a stream. If works are proposed outside the listed windows the proponent must engage a qualified professional to assess species and habitats present and determine if a site specific plan can be developed to ensure compliance with the Fisheries Act. The recommendations and the technical rational for the plan must be developed, signed and sealed by an appropriately qualified professional(s). A report must be maintained by the proponent in the event the works are monitored or a compliance inspection is conducted. If impacts cannot be mitigated to avoid the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction to fish and/or fish habitat, and the proponent wishes to continue to seek approval for the operations to proceed, the proponent must proceed with the process for obtaining an authorization from the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (outlined in section (h) below). Notwithstanding the above, the fisheries timing window is not applicable if the stream channel is naturally dry (no flow), or frozen to the bottom, at the worksite and the instream activity will not adversely impact fish habitat (e.g. result in the introduction of sediment into fish habitat or damage to fish habitat).
2.
3.
4.
5.
. A stream is defined in the Water Act as a natural watercourse or source of water supply, whether usually containing water or not, ground water, and a lake, river, creek, spring, ravine, swamp and gulch. For the purposes of this document, the definition of stream includes all those watercourses that are considered to be fish habitat, including channelized streams, and ditches that are fish habitat.
Wildlife: 1. Most species of wildlife are at their highest risk for disturbance during the period where they raise their young. 2. Some may be at risk during their dormant or hibernating period. 3. Wildlife observation records can be obtained through the Conservation Data Centre http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cdc for species at risk. 4. Habitat Wizard http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/habwiz/ provides observation records for other species. 5. The absence of an observation record does not confirm that a species is not present. 6. A qualified professional may be able to determine minor variances to these least risk work windows based on the location in the region and species presence. NOTE: In all cases, minimize the amount of time the work site is in a disturbed state by completing work as quickly as possible, while considering worker safety and minimizing environmental risk. b) The minimum instream flow or the minimum flow of water that must remain in the stream while the change is being made, The natural rate of water flow must be maintained upstream and down stream of the worksite during all phases of instream activity. c) The removal of material from the stream or stream channel in connection with the change, 1. In fish streams, the permanent removal of stable, naturally occurring material from the stream or stream channel is not permitted. 2. In non fish streams with a species at risk, or habitat of a species at risk, the permanent removal of stable, naturally occurring material from the stream or stream channel is not permitted. 3. In non-fish bearing streams without species at risk, the permanent or temporary removal of stable, naturally occurring material must be minimized and completed only as necessary to make the change in accordance with Part 7 of the Water Regulation. 4. The removal of material must not lead to stream channel instability or increase the risk of sedimentation into the watercourse. 5. Any spoil materials must be placed in a manner that ensures that sediment, or debris, does not enter the watercourse. 6. The spoil must be placed where it will not impact riparian habitats or impact habitats of species at risk
d) The addition of substance, sediment, debris or material to the stream or stream channel in connection with the change, 1. Instream activities must be conducted in the dry (no water present within the worksite) and the worksite must be isolated from water flowing in the stream channel. 2. Measures must be taken to ensure that no harmful material (e.g. fuel and other hydrocarbons, soil, road fill, or sediment), which could adversely impact water quality, fish and other aquatic life, species at risk and/or fish habitat(including riparian and or emergent vegetation), can enter the wetted perimeter as a result of the project activities. 3. All equipment must be located and operated outside of the wetted perimeter of the stream unless operated from a barge where deleterious substances will not enter the water and in a manner that will not result in grounding of the barge. 4. Equipment used in close proximity to the wetted perimeter must be free of deleterious material (e.g. hydrocarbons) and in good mechanical condition (e.g. no fuel or hydraulic leaks). 5. Erosion and sediment control structures are to be available onsite and utilized as necessary. 6. Do not work in weather conditions likely to substantially increase the risk of sediment introduction to the stream 7. If approved, beaver dam removal must occur slowly, a portion at a time, in order to minimize scouring and the addition of silt to downstream areas. A dam breach should normally not exceed 0.2 square metres in area (i.e., a typical breach could measure 1.0 metre x 20 centimetres in size). All material removed from a beaver dam must be disposed of in such a manner that it cannot re-enter the stream. e) The salvage or protection of fish or wildlife while the change is being made or after the change has been made, 1. If dewatering of the worksite is necessary, fish salvage must occur on a fish-bearing stream prior to commencing works. A fish salvage permit must be obtained from the Ministry of Environment prior to commencing salvage activities (http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/pasb/applications/process/scientific_fish_collect.html) 2. If an area is de-watered as a result of beaver dam removal or modification and results in the stranding of fish, then these fish must be salvaged and returned to the stream. 3. Measures must be taken to ensure that operating equipment (e.g. water pumps) does not harm aquatic life. 4. NOTE if you are undertaking an activity in a red zone based on known western ridged mussel (Gonidea angulata) occurrences (see LLP1), salvage mussels and relocate them to an areas with similar site conditions. Salvage must be untaken by a qualified professional and must be consistent with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Salvage Protocol (contact MOE Ecosystems Staff to obtain this protocol). Follow up monitoring is to be conducted for 2 years post relocation and reports provided to the Habitat Officer annually.
f) The protection of natural materials and vegetation that contribute to habitat or stream channel stability, Minimize disturbance to natural materials and vegetation that contribute to habitat or stream channel stability. In addition to fish habitats this includes protection of riparian habitats for wildlife. g) The restoration of the work site after the change has been made, and 1. Complete restoration activities (including erosion control), as soon as possible following construction/disturbance. 2. Any disturbed areas must be restored to function as they did in their pre-disturbance condition (e.g. riparian areas, including grasslands). Appropriate native seed/plant/tree species must be used to restore the site to pre disturbance conditions. 3. Restoration must be completed in a manner that will minimize colonization and spread of invasive plants. h) The requirement to obtain an approval from the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans in connection with the change. 1. Proponents are responsible for complying with the federal Fisheries Act. No harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat is authorized by this document. If a qualified professional or Habitat Officer determines a potential HADD may occur as a result of the works, a review for formal authorization from DFO is required. If requested, the proponent will need to provide the Habitat Officer more information (including assessments by qualified professionals) to determine if an authorization is required from DFO. If you are constructing a dock (as defined in the Okanagan Large Lake Foreshore Protocol 1 ) the following applies: (A) An approval from DFO is not required when: 1. The structure is proposed on a water body not indentified in the Okanagan Large Lake Foreshore Protocol(1) (LLP) or in a no colour or yellow zone (as identified in the LLP). In addition, dock construction and design must meet all of the conditions and measures outlined in the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pacific Region Operation Statement for Dock and Boathouse Construction in Fresh water System 2 (ROS). If some of the conditions or measures of the ROS cannot be met then you must engage a qualified professional (fish biologist) to assist you in your design and construction to ensure a HADD does not occur. 2. The structure is proposed in a red zone (as identified in the LLP) where there is no shore spawning habitat, and a qualified professional (fish biologist) has been engaged to ensure all of the conditions and measures outlined in the ROS have been followed and that a HADD will not occur.
2. 3.
NOTE:
3. The structure is proposed in a red zone (as identified in the LLP), and All ROS conditions and measures will be adhered to, except for Measure 3 (i.e. dock is in a known spawning habitat); and A qualified professional (fish biologist) has been engaged to ensure that a HADD will not occur, and All of the design criteria identified below are adhered to. Design Criteria: All instream works must occur during the least risk timing window; Piles are not to be placed within known or potential spawning substrates; The spanning structure (gangway) of spawning area must be no greater than 1.5m in width; The spanning structure (gangway) over the spawning area must be made with light penetrating materials; Dock must be no less than 0.5m above the high water mark, or the Geodetic Survey of Canada datum (if available); Batter boards are not to be used on the dock; and There will be no floating structures.
(B) An approval from DFO is required when: 1) A qualified professional or a Ministry of Environment Habitat Officer has indicated a HADD will likely occur as a result of your works, regardless of what lake or zone you are in. 2) The structure is proposed in a black zone on any of the lakes identified in the LLP (see section 6.1 of the LLP). 3) The structure is proposed in a red zone (as identified in the LLP) where there is no shore spawning habitat and the ROS will not be adhered to. 4) The structure is proposed in a red zone (as identified in the LLP) where there is shore spawning and ROS (except Measure 3), and all design criteria (listed above), will not be adhered to.
Okanagan Region Large Lakes Foreshore Protocol http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/okanagan/esd/ollp/ollp.html Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pacific Region Operation Statement for Dock and Boathouse Construction in Fresh water Systems (http://www-heb.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/decisionsupport/os/operational_statements_e.htm)
2
ThanksShaun
From: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX [mailto:shaun.reimer@gov.bc.ca] Sent: September 12, 2012 11:01 AM To: Adam Neil Subject: RE: Dike Maintenance Application - Gary Klassen
Noattachment...
Shaun Reimer, P.Eng.
Hydrotechnical Engineer Ministry of Forests, Lands, & Natural Resource Operations 102 Industrial Place Penticton, BC, V2A 7C8 (250) 490-8229 fax: (250) 490-2231
From: Adam Neil [mailto:an@summit-environmental.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:56 AM To: Reimer, Shaun FLNR:EX Cc: gary@dorocco.com Subject: Dike Maintenance Application - Gary Klassen
Suite 200, 2800 29 Street Vernon, B.C., Canada V1T 9P9 Tel 250.545.3672 Fax 250.545.3654 www.summit-environmental.com
June 28, 2012 File: 2012-2040.001 Gary Klassen Dorocco Developments Ltd. Box 1000 Osoyoos, B.C. V0H 1V0 CC: Debra Hughes (DFO) debra.hughes@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Neil Goeller (MFLNRO) neil.goeller@gov.bc.ca
Re:
OKANAGAN RIVER EFFLUENT DISCHARGE PIPE: MITIGATION PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Dear Mr. Klassen: Summit Environmental Consultants Inc. (Summit) is pleased to provide this Mitigation Plan (MP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) for construction of an effluent discharge pipe adjacent to the Okanagan River. The effluent discharge pipe is part of an Arctic Char fish hatchery proposed by Dorocco Developments Ltd. (Dorocco) near Oliver, B.C. Dorocco has previously submitted a Section 9 Application and DFO Review for this project. The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (MFLNRO) and Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) have requested additional information on the project design, mitigation plan and environmental effects, as they relate to construction of the effluent discharge pipe, to supplement Doroccos permit applications1,2. This letter provides a description of the proposed project and environmental baseline within the project area. A proposed mitigation plan is presented below with an assessment of residual effects on the environment. This letter only addresses construction of the effluent discharge pipe.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Dorocco is proposing an Arctic Char fish hatchery near Oliver, B.C (Figure 1). Project infrastructure will include a hatchery facility, waste settling basin, effluent discharge pipe and outlet structure (Figure 2). The hatchery facility and waste settling basin will be located in a private field 31 m and 15 m, respectively, away from any watercourses and environmentally sensitive areas. The effluent discharge pipe will cross the Shippet Oxbow and flood dike, and the outlet structure will be located on the bank of the Okanagan River (Figure 2 and 3).
1 2
Personal communication. Neil Goeller (MFLNRO). June 13, 2012. Personal communication. Debra Hughes (DFO). June 12, 2012.
The effluent discharge pipe will be constructed of sections of PVC and steel pipe (300 mm diameter) connected together by couplings and set in precast cement structures. The pipe will be buried in a trench from its connection to the waste settling basin to the outlet structure, with the exception of that section which will overhang the Shippet Oxbow. Generally, the trench will be about 1 to 2 m wide by 1 m deep. A 10 m wide by 3 m deep trench will be required to install the pipe across the flood dike (Figure 2); additional details on construction of this section of pipe will be provided in the Dike Maintenance Application for this project. The outlet structure will be precast in cement and set into place on the bank of the Okanagan River.
ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE
Summit completed a field assessment of the project area on June 15, 2012. Riparian areas adjacent to the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River are largely disturbed, mainly due to the flood dike and adjacent farm land (Photos 1 to 3). Riparian species present in these areas consist of Sumac (Rhus Spp.), Willow (Salix spp.), Wylch Elm (Ulmus glabra) and Cattail (Typha spp.). The riparian areas adjacent to the Shippet Oxbow are about 3 m and 7 m wide on the left and right banks, respectively. The width of the riparian area on the right bank of the Okanagan River is about 2 m. The bankfull width and height of the Okanagan River is about 50 m and 2.5 m, respectively (Figure 2). Flow in the Okanagan River was in excess of 70 m3/s during the field assessment. The banks of the Okanagan River are entirely composed of large rip-rap since this section of river has been channelized (Photo 4). Habitat suitability and availability is low for juvenile fish and high for adults. The depth and velocity of the river in this area is relatively high, with little cover, velocity refuge and habitat complexity. Juvenile rearing habitat is likely limited to the margins of the channel, while adult fish would utilize the entire width of the river. A summary of fish species present in the Okanagan River is presented in Table 13. The bankfull width and height of the Shippet Oxbow is about 8 m and 2 m, respectively (Figure 2). During the field assessment the wetted width and depth of the oxbow was about 1.5 m and 0.2 m, respectively. There was minimal flow (< 20 lps) through the oxbow during this assessment because the inlet was closed due to the risk of flooding. The banks and bed of the oxbow are composed of fines and organic material (Photos 5). Habitat suitability and availability is moderate for juvenile fish and low for adults within this area of the Shippet Oxbow. There is a general lack of habitat complexity and cover in these areas. The section of Shippet Oxbow adjacent to the project area is an inlet channel with high value habitat located further downstream. All fish species inhabiting the Okanagan River can access the Shippet Oxbow. An overview of the project area showing riparian areas, watercourses, project infrastructure and construction footprints is provided in Figure 4.
3
Ministry of Environment. 2012. Fisheries Information Summary System. Accessed online June 26, 2012.
MITIGATION PLAN
Construction works will be completed by Dorocco and/or a designated contractor. All project works will be completed within the reduced risk instream work window for the Okanagan River (July 22 to August 31) according to Standards and Best Management Practices for Instream Works4. Excavation, infilling and re-grading will be completed using an excavator. These works will be completed in the dry from the top of bank in sensitive areas adjacent to watercourses. Water level elevations in the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River will be far below the trench elevation during the construction period. In the event that water levels are not below this critical elevation, works will be postponed until water levels recede. A double layer silt fence will be installed between construction areas and watercourses to prevent erosion and sedimentation. This fencing will remain in place until these areas are stabilized well after the construction and restoration periods. Construction materials and equipment required for the project will be stored in a designated location well away from any watercourses (>30 m). Material (sediment and debris) removed from the trench will also be stockpiled next to the trench, and not allowed to slough back into the trench or adjacent water courses. Excess material will
4
Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection (WLAP). 2004. Standards and Best Management Practices for Instream Works
be removed from the site and disposed of in an appropriate location and timely manner. Equipment will be refuelled from a tidy tank in a designated location well away from any watercourses (i.e. > 30 m). All equipment and machinery will be in good operating condition, free of leaks, excess oil, and grease. Equipment and machinery will be checked prior to entering the project area and frequently during construction. We recommend that hydraulic machinery have environmentally sensitive hydraulic fluids that are non-toxic to aquatic life and that are readily or inherently biodegradable. A spill contaminant kit will be readily accessible onsite in the event of a release of deleterious substance to the environment. All construction personnel will be trained in spill containment and responsible for responding to a spill. Spills will be immediately reported to the Provincial Emergency Program. Precast cement structures required for the pipe connections and outlet structure will be constructed in a designated area well away from any watercourses. Structures will be completely cured before placement so there is no risk of spills or leaching. These structures will be lifted into place using an excavator. Environmental monitoring will be completed on a full time basis by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) to ensure compliance with BMPs and regulatory permits. A pre-construction meeting will be held to discuss construction activities, mitigation measures and environmental concerns. All construction personnel will be aware of environmental concerns onsite and the Section 9 Water Act approval will be kept on site at all times. The EM will have authority to stop or postpone works if there any environmental concerns. An environmental monitoring report will be completed and submitted to the regulatory agencies following project completion.
SITE RESTORATION
Temporarily disturbed riparian areas will be restored to a pre-disturbance state immediately following the construction phase. Native plant species identified in Section 2 will be planted at a density of 1 plant per 1 m 2. Diversity of planting will mimic the natural surroundings. Native grass seed will also be broadcast in disturbed areas. Channel banks will be re-graded to a pre-disturbance state using the same material which was removed.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The total temporary disturbance of riparian and instream areas will be 158 m 2 and 12 m2. These values represent a 4 m wide construction right-of-way along the pipe alignment. Instream areas are considered those areas of the channel bank below the high-water elevation in the Shippet Oxbow and Okanagan River. The total permanent loss in instream areas for the project is 4 m2 which consists of the outlet structure located on the bank of the Okanagan River. A summary of temporary and permanent disturbances of riparian and instream areas is presented in Table 2, with an overview of these areas provided in Figure 4.
Oliver
Subject Site
BRITISH COLUMBIA
Prince George
Osoyoos
Figure 1 Subject Site Location
DATE: PROJECT: PREPARED FOR:
_ ^
0 Kilometers
June, 2012
DRAWN BY:
2012-2040.000
DA
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, iPC, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, Gary Klassen METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), and the GIS User Community Page 149 FNR-2012-00335
SHIPPET INLET
TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED 300 PVC PIPE @ 0.1% TOP OF BANK TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF BANK EXTENTS OF EXISTING ROCK MINIMUM FLOW IN OKANAGAN RIVER = 3m 3/s
START OF CONTRACT
2040-1-101
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING
Signature: Date:
EXISTING GROUND 200 200 GRILLAGE TO BE 50mm BARS, HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED, APPROX. SPACING = 50mm
R IP
500
RA P
STEEL PIPE SCHEDULE 40 324 O.D. 303 I.D. ARMTEC MODEL 50C ROUND FLAP GATE OR EQUIVALENT
1243
1844
200
R IP
RA P
1406
500
400
559 OUTLET STRUCTURE STEEL PIPE BOLTED TO ARMTEC MODEL 50C ROUND FLAP GATE OR EQUIVALENT PIPE INVERT = 282.65
1000
2040-1-102
Existing Barn
From: Manning, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:38 PM To: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Cc: Cavadini, Roger ENV:EX Subject: RE: Char Fish Farm
Hi Sajid and Roger, Just a quick email to let you know that DFO has approved the issuance of the aquaculture licence to Mr. Klassen. The licence will be generated and mailed to him shortly. Regards,
Michelle Manning
Aquaculture Management Coordinator | Coordinatrice - Gestion de l''aquaculture Aquaculture Management Division | La Division de Direction de l'aquaculture Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Pches et Ocans Canada 1965 Island Diesel Way Nanaimo BC V9S 5W8 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada Telephone | Tlphone 250-754-0409 Facsimile | Tlcopieur 250-754-0391 michelle.manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
From: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX [mailto:Sajid.Barlas@gov.bc.ca] Sent: September 17, 2012 1:51 PM To: 'Donna Butler' Cc: Cavadini, Roger ENV:EX; White, Tara FLNR:EX; Manning, Michelle Subject: RE: Char Fish Farm
Hi Donna, The primary approval for the proposed Char Fish Farm will be given by DFO Canada - an aquaculture licence issued by the minister charged with the administration of the Fisheries Act. The contact info for DFO contact person is: Michelle Manning Aquaculture Management Coordinator | Coordinatrice - Gestion de l''aquaculture Aquaculture Management Division | La Division de Direction de l'aquaculture Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Pches et Ocans Canada 1965 Island Diesel Way Nanaimo BC V9S 5W8 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada Telephone | Tlphone 250-754-0409
1
Facsimile | Tlcopieur 250-754-0391 michelle.manning@dfo-mpo.gc.ca www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca Provinces role is limited to registration for exemption for waste discharge, under the Land-Based Finfish Waste Control Regulation of the Environmental Management Act. The proponent has submitted a registration for the proposed farm but it has not been processed by my staff as it lacks aquaculture licence number, which (to my knowledge) has not yet been issued. Please let me know if you need additional information or have any questions. Sajid Barlas
From: Donna Butler [mailto:dbutler@rdos.bc.ca] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:52 AM To: Barlas, Sajid A ENV:EX Subject: Char Fish Farm
S22 S22
S22
S22
File: A8-6524 Proponent: Gary Klassen Works: Effluent Outfall on Okanagan River Location: Okanagan River south of Oliver
Staff with the Ministry of Environment have reviewed the above application and have the following comments. To ensure that a HADD of fish habitat does not occur during works and that impacts to other aquatic and terrestrial species and habitats I recommend the proponent meet the following terms and conditions: The Habitat Officers Terms and Conditions for changes in and about a stream http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/regions/okr/wateract/terms_conditions_okanagan.pdf Additionally I recommend the proponent review information at the following website to ensure they are in compliance with the Water Act: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/water_rights/licence_application/section9/index.html The Ecosystem Section of BC Natural Resources Operations recommends that a qualified professional (QP) be engaged by the proponent if proposed activities are inconsistent with the Best Management Practices, term and conditions, or the established work window. It is the proponents responsibility to ensure their activities are in compliance with all legislation, including the Fisheries Act. I recommend that the proponents plans include all the QP recommendations and that the QP works to ensure a HADD will not occur as a result of the proponents proposal. Additional Terms and Conditions Works must be completed by September 15, 2012. If you have any other questions or require further information please contact Robert Stewart at (250) 490-8253.
GoodpointsAl.Iwillwaittohearbackfromyounextweek.
_____________________________________________ From: Hare, Al FLNR:EX Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 4:31 PM To: Johnson, Jerry FLNR:EX; Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Subject: RE: Another project - FCBC Project 101660
IvediscussedwithShaunReimerwhorunsOkanaganRiverandGaryKlassenhasalsosubmittedanapplicationunder theDikeMaintenanceActforthiswork.Shaunisoftheopinionthattherearenumerouswaterlines,dischargelinesetc whichhavebeenplacedacrossthedikeovertheyearswithoutanyauthoritysowhyarewesoconcernedaboutthis pipe.HewantstodiscussthiswithConradPrycenextweekbuthefeelsthattheApprovalundertheWaterActshould besufficientauthorityfortheseworkswithoutobtainingaPermitoverCrownLand. Anyway,holdontothisapplicationuntilIcangettogetherwithWaternextweekandIllkeepyouintheloop.Mysense isthatiftheapplicantinsistsonsometypeoflegalauthorityotherthantheApprovalthenweshouldinsistthatWater ManagementincludeaPCLwiththeexistingApproval.Justsoyoureaware,WaterisreluctanttoissuePCLswith ApprovalsbutIfeelthattoaccepttheapplicationunderourUtilityPolicyisoverlybureaucraticandcostlytoboththe clientandtheProvince. Thanks! AlHare LandOfficer RegionalOperationsDivision
1
_____________________________________________ From: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:59 PM To: Johnson, Jerry FLNR:EX Subject: Another project - FCBC Project 101660
MinistryofNaturalResourceOperations
441 Columbia Street Kamloops BC V2C 2T3 Telephone no. 250 828 4210
Faxno.2508284442
2
_____________________________________________ From: Aura, Bernadette FLNR:EX Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:58 PM To: Anderson, Des FLNR:EX Subject: Application over MOE Property FCBC Project 101660 Importance: High
MinistryofNaturalResourceOperations
441 Columbia Street Kamloops BC V2C 2T3 Telephone no. 250 828 4210
S22
S22
MinistryofNaturalResourceOperations
441 Columbia Street Kamloops BC V2C 2T3 Telephone no. 250 828 4210 Faxno.2508284442 TollFree:18778553222 HowDidWeDo? ClientsofFrontCounterBCareinvitedtotakeourcustomersatisfactionsurvey.We'dappreciateyourinput.
1
Pages 182 through 218 redacted for the following reasons: ---------------------------Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Pages 220 through 224 redacted for the following reasons: ---------------------------Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Not Responsive
Pages 227 through 324 redacted for the following reasons: ---------------------------Not Responsive
Pages 326 through 468 redacted for the following reasons: ---------------------------Not Responsive
Applicant Business Information: Telephone: ( ) Cell: ( 250 ) 485 7408 Fax: ( ) Email: gary@dorocco.com 2) Applicant Business Mailing Address: Box 1000 Osoyoos BC - (Office Mailing Postal Code:V0H 1V0 Address) 1) Applicant Name(s) (Full Legal Name(s) or Registered Company Name) Dorocco Developments Ltd. 3) Doing Business as: 4) BC Inc #, BC Registration # or BC Society # 2011345697 Interprovincial ID: 858241979
5) Physical Business Address (if different from above): 8315 Main Street Osoyoos BC V0H 1V0 (Office Physical Address)
Contact Business Information: Telephone: ( ) Cell: ( 250 ) 485 7408 Email: gary@dorocco.com
Fax: (
Agent/Representative Business Information: Telephone: ( ) Cell: (902 ) 692 0992 Fax: ( Email: jeremylee@btinternet.com Postal Code: Letter of Authorization: Yes
No
1
Page 471 FNR-2012-00335
9) Type of Application:
Licence of Occupation
Lease
Investigative Permit
Proposed
Amendment Type:
(required only for type of amendment applied for, attach additional page if necessary)
In Freshwater Body
U-Catch
NWPA #
Parcel Identification #
(Private land)
2
Page 472 FNR-2012-00335
2) Geographic location of site: Okanagan Valley Rural Oliver ________________________ 3) Site Common Name: ______________________________________________________ 4) DFO Area: Sub Area: (if applicable) and/or
5) Canadian Hydrographic Service Chart (CHS) Marine Chart Number: Topographical Map Number:
6) If the site is surveyed, provide legal description of site (e.g., Land District and Lot Number): Land District Similkameen Division of Yale Lot 311 Plan 1790 PID 003-749-614 __________ Civic Address
S22
Oliver, BC ___________________________________________
7) If the site is not surveyed, provide metes and bounds description from a surveyed point or geographic coordinate: _______________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________
8) Provide GPS coordinates for the center of the application area/tenure: Latitude: 49 7_ deg. 4.44 min.
10) Physical Structures (Improvements): Complete the table below describing all applicable structures. Attach another page if required.
Purpose: Indicate the purpose of the infrastructure. Examples for buildings include: Office, Residence, Hatchery, Grow-out, Quarantine, etc; examples for tanks include: Fish Rearing, Quarantine, Solids Capture, Water Storage, Purge Tank, etc. Location: Indicate whether the infrastructure is located in-doors (provide building number), or out-doors. Lined: Are the ponds lined, Yes or No?
3
Page 473 FNR-2012-00335
4
Page 474 FNR-2012-00335
DESCRIPTION
e.g.: Building 1 e.g.: Tanks 1
PURPOSE
Hatchery Fish Rearing
NEW PROPOSED
QUANTITY
1 2
DIMENSIONS (m)
10 x 10 x 4 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.5
LOCATION
LAND-BASED
Building 1
please note: construction in association with fish and fish habitat may require redesign, relocation, mitigation and/or a fish habitat survey review and approval prior to installation. See section E. Buildings 1 2 3 4 5 Heath Stacks 1 2 3 Troughs 1 2 3 Tanks 1 2 3 4 5 Raceways 1 2 3 Well House Growout Shop&Hatchery
x x x x x x x x
1 1 1
Hatchery
0.5x0.5x1
Building 3
2 5 4 2 1
300L 50m each 250m 12m each 48m 12m each 24m
5
Page 475 FNR-2012-00335
PURPOSE
QUANTITY
LINED
PURPOSE EXISTING AT THE SITE
NEW PROPOSED QUANTITY DIMENSIONS (m) TOTAL WATER VOLUME LOCATION
x
IN FRESHWATER BODY
1 300mm D 120gpm Okanagan River
please note: proposed in water works or undertakings will require a fish habitat information review. See section E. Containment Structures 1 2 3 4 Work Floats 1 2 3 4 5 OTHER (describe) PURPOSE EXISTING AT THE SITE NEW PROPOSED QUANTITY DIMENSIONS (m) TOTAL WATER VOLUME TYPE
6
Page 476 FNR-2012-00335
7
Page 477 FNR-2012-00335
SECTION C: MAPS AND DIAGRAMS: Attach the following maps and diagrams. They must be submitted to scale and be consistent with the other information in this application. Please refer to the Guide for details and sample diagrams. 1) Location Maps: i. A topographic map at a scale of 1:50,000 to 1:250,000 indicating the general location of area under application, noting the location of significant geographic features, such as a lake, mountain, road, community, etc. ii. lA Cadastral map, Topographical map, or Canadian Hydrographic Service Marine Chart (if applicable) of a scale between 1:20,000 and 1:40,000, showing the general location of the area under application. 2) Operational Diagram: A 1:5000 scale topographical map or hydrographic chart showing the specific area under application and the operational components as outlined in the guide. 3) Site Plan: A plan of the site identifying the location of buildings and out-door infrastructure. Use the table from question 10 to label the plan. Clearly indicate the location of your water source(s) and discharge point(s), along with any water bodies (including culverts and ditches) located on or near the site. 4) Engineered Plans: Any new or proposed infrastructures/construction require an engineered plan. 5) For applications In Freshwater Bodies: Include a 1:2000 scale map(s) showing a side view diagram of the containment array(s) which at minimum must illustrate and itemize all structures above the surface and include all underwater structures (based on season of lowest water). 6) For applications situated On Land: If you are located within or near a flood plain, include a flood plain map (www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/data_searches/fpm/reports/regoff.html) SECTION D: WATER USE
1.
x Yes
No
2.
If yes, and if water source is surface water (not ground), provide name:
3.
If you already have a water licence at this site, please provide licence number, or provide date of submission of an application: Do not require water licence for existing well.
8
Page 478 FNR-2012-00335
SECTION E: FIRST NATIONS CONSIDERATION Please describe any contact you may have had, including the name of the First Nation(s) and individuals contacted. Provide copies of, or a description of any information you may have acquired from or provided to the First Nations(s) and any archaeological resources and areas of cultural significance you are aware of in the vicinity of the proposed project. Consult the Consultative Area Database (CAD) Public Map Service for First Nations contact information instructions and supporting information ftp://ftp.geobc.gov.bc.ca/pub/outgoing/CAD/CAD_Public_Map_Service-User_GuidanceTechnical_Instructions.pdf .
Colette Louie clouie@oib.ca Certified Fisheries Technician Osoyoos Indian Band 250 498 3942
Contact Person: Richard Bussanich Rbussanich@syilx.org Tel: 250 707-0095 (x.108) Cell: 250 215-0255
9
Page 479 FNR-2012-00335
PART II INFORMATION FOR THE BC MINISTRY OF FORESTS, LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS
Introduction
The following information is required as part of the Provincial Crown Land Tenure application to make a licensing decision for licensing under the BC Land Act. Parts I, II and V of the Pacific Freshwater and Land-Based Aquaculture application will be used to review this application for tenure under the BC Land Act.
If water-based, is the site situated in a manner whereby it does not infringe on the riparian rights of an upland owner? If No, has the owner provided written consent for you to occupy the site for the term of the tenure? Yes No If Yes, include a copy of the written consent. Indicate if the upland property is: Crown Private
Is the intended use consistent with approved local government bylaws for land use planning and zoning? Provide the name of the Regional District or Municipality for the area: ________Regional District of Similkameen______________________ If No, have you discussed your application with local government and have you initiated a re-zoning process? ? Yes No Please provide details: ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________
Is the intended use consistent with a local area plan or Coastal Zone Management Plan? Name of Plan: __________________________________________________________
10
Page 480 FNR-2012-00335
Please provide details where an application for variance is submitted: ________________________________________________________________ Check if not applicable
Is the site situated in an area of cultural or heritage significance as determined in the Heritage Conservation Act? If Yes, have you contacted the Heritage and Conservation Branch to discuss your application? Yes No If Yes, provide details: _____________________ ________________________________________________________________
SECTION B: ADDITIONAL CROWN LANDS INFORMATION 1. 2. 3. Is Applicant or Applicants Spouse a Provincial Government Employee Canadian Citizen or Permanent Resident: Age: 19 or over
Yes x No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Joint Tenant
or
Tenants in Common
11
Page 481 FNR-2012-00335
___
Has an application previously been submitted for this location? If Yes, provide details:
Yes
No
On June 21, 2011 I submitted a harmonized freshwater application form. Aquaculture licence # AQFW6673
Well ID #:
ITC #:
Does the British Columbia Riparian Areas Regulation apply to this project? If Yes, are you requesting a variance? File #:
Yes
x No
Yes
No
This completed document will form the site management plan on which your aquaculture licence conditions will be based.
12
Page 482 FNR-2012-00335
SECTION A: WATER
1) WATER SOURCES Complete the table below referring to the guide for detailed instructions. Well ID #: To determine whether you require a well ID number, visit: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/plan_protect_sustain/groundwater/wells/identification/faqs.html
NEW PROPOSED
GOVT ID
(Water Act Licence #, or Well ID #)
GPS COORDINATES
Surface Water Intake1: Name of Water Body: _______________________ #S1 #S2 Well #W1 #W2 #W3 #W4 Municipal Water #1 Other (describe):
Fresh
17884
4976.2N,1193417.2W
75 L/sec
: Please ensure your intake is screened according to the appropriate reference documents (see Guide). ***Site currently withdraws 600 gallon/min but application is for 1200 gal/min. Well engineered said no addition permits required for 1200 gal/min withdrawal rate
13
Page 483 FNR-2012-00335
2) WATER DISCHARGE Complete the table below referring to the guide for detailed instructions.
NEW PROPOSED
GOVT ID
(Water Act Licence or Authorization #)
GPS COORDINATES
Surface Water Outfall: Name of Water Body: ____Settling Tank then Okanagan River #S1 #S2 Ground Infiltration #G1 #G2 Municipal Sewer #1 Other (describe): Fresh
75 L/sec
A) Have you applied for a permit under the Environmental Management Act or an exemption under the Land-based Finfish Waste Control Regulations? Yes (Ref. File # ________) No xNot Applicable Provide details: Not required because dilution ratio will always be greater than 20 to 1.
14
Page 484 FNR-2012-00335
NEW PROPOSED
TONNAGE (MT)
0.45
Onchorhyncus mykiss
Arctic Charr
Salvelinus Alpinus
80 000
90%
72 000
0.36
0.36
Table 2: Annual Expected Grow-Out Production: (excludes shellfish for marine grow-out)
Application Version: Final Draft Effective Date: 20120321 15
Page 485 FNR-2012-00335
NEW PROPOSED
Onchorhyncus mykiss
50 000
10%
Arctic Charr
Salvelinus Alpinus
70 000
18
50 000
50 MT
50 MT
16
Page 486 FNR-2012-00335
Table 3: U-Catch
SPECIES (COMMON NAME) SPECIES (SCIENTIFIC NAME) NUMBER OF FISH STOCKED PER YEAR EXISTING AT THE SITE NEW PROPOSED
Onchorhyncus mykiss
200
17
Page 487 FNR-2012-00335
Triploid Arctic Charr eggs will be imported from Icy Waters Ltd. located in Whitehorse, Yukon.
BUSINESS PLAN 5) Purpose of culture for each proposed species (ex. Sale to other Aquaculturists, Direct to Food Market, etc). Refer to guide for assistance.
STOCKING DENSITY 6) Indicate the maximum projected stocking density for each licensed or proposed species. 120 kg m
xYes
No
18
Page 488 FNR-2012-00335
8) Indicate when, during the calendar year, you expect to reach Peak Biomass. (Multiple year class operations may have multiple Peak Biomasses). Will be attempting to have consistent production 52 weeks of the year.
xYes
No
FEEDING 2) Specify the method and amount that the stock will be fed:
PREDATORS 3) Outline the measures you will undertake to avoid the attraction of predators to your site and how you will deal with them, should a problem arise: Fish tanks will all be in a contained building in a controlled, insulated environment.
19
Page 489 FNR-2012-00335
ESCAPES 4) Outline the infrastructure used and the practices employed at the facility to prevent the escape of cultivated fish: Water will go through 3 levels of screening. Screen at tank, screen before settling tank, and drum filter prior to discharge. Screen size will be based on size of fish.
EFFLUENT TREATMENT 5) Provide a detailed description of any effluent treatment works (UV, ozone, biological and/or mechanical filtration) and/or monitoring occurring or proposed on site (see Guide):
20
Page 490 FNR-2012-00335
WASTE 6) Describe the methods for storage and disposal of sludge and other waste materials:
Water will flow through swirl separators, then into the settling tank with 5 chambers, and through a drum filter prior to discharge. The sludge and other waste materials will be composted on site.
MORTALITIES 7) Describe the procedures employed to store and dispose of fish/shellfish carcasses during routine operations and major mortality events (refer to guide for specific requirements):
21
Page 491 FNR-2012-00335
2) Fish are considered sentient beings deserving of welfare and proper husbandry. Outline the basic fish health and husbandry practices you will employ to ensure the health and welfare of your fish (see guide for specific requirements): We will be employing state of the art oxygen monitoring sensors linked with an oxygen injection system. The fish will be fed in a systematic and consistent method, both automatically and by hand. Water will be regularly tested and adjusted to optimize all of the basic husbandry practices for parameters such PH, ammonia levels, CO levels, and suspended solids. The well water is 12 Celsius; this temperature is considered optimal for arctic char culturing.
22
Page 492 FNR-2012-00335
1) Does the proposed project: a) Have any components within 30 m of the high water mark of a watercourse or water body (this includes intakes, outfalls or water crossings)? ****Within 30 m of a Channelized RIver
Yes please see Application Guide or contact AEO (see contact information). No - go to question (b).
Yes (or maybe) please see Application Guide or contact AEO (see contact information). No No additional information is required.
23
Page 493 FNR-2012-00335
Is the site situated greater than 30 m from the edge of the approach channel to a small craft harbour, federal wharf or dock?
SECTION B: ADDITIONAL TRANSPORT CANADA INFORMATION 1.a) Waterway Name: b) Width(m): c) Depth Range(m):
2. Nearest Community:
3. Is this Work:
Proposed
Existing
Photographs at the site of the proposed/existing work and surrounding area Environmental Assessment documents (if any)
24
Page 494 FNR-2012-00335
FrontCounter BC will not accept personal cheques drawn on US banks, regardless of what currency. Payment will not be accepted even if it has CDN Funds handwritten on the cheque. PLEASE NOTE: Additional items may be required (eg. Advertising, Security Deposit, Proof of Insurance, Letter of Consent). Some items may have additional associated costs or require additional processing time.
As the management of this fishery program is both a federal and provincial government responsibility, the information you provide may be subject to the following legislation: British Columbia Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPP Act); the federal Access to Information Act; and the federal Privacy Act. The personal information collected by the Government of BC is collected under the authority of section 26 (c) of the FOIPP Act and will be used to process your application(s) and will be shared only with the necessary government agencies needed to provide you with the service that you have requested. If you have any questions regarding the handling of your personal information, please contact FrontCounter BC at 1-877-855-3222 or by writing to Manager, Provincial Operations, FrontCounter BC at 441 Columbia Street, Kamloops, BC V2C 2T3 and/or the Director, Access to Information and Privacy Secretariat at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Transport Canada. The Province of British Columbia, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Transport Canada do not consider the information submitted in this form to be confidential unless it is subject to the privacy protection of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act or the Access to Information Act. I understand that the information supplied will be used to review my applications under the BC Land Act, BC Fisheries Act (until such time as it is amended) Federal Fisheries Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Act and information will be shared amongst the other agencies, First Nations and/or with the public.
25
Page 495 FNR-2012-00335
Date
*If signature is by an authorized representative please supply a letter granting authorization to act on behalf of the applicant.
Submit completed application, and additional supporting information (if applicable) to: In Person: Any FrontCounter BC office. Visit http://www.frontcounterbc.gov.bc.ca for the location nearest you. By Mail: FrontCounter BC, 2080a Labieux Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6J9 By Email: frontcounterbc@gov.bc.ca
(NOTE: IF FEES ARE APPLICABLE, CLIENT MUST CONTACT FRONTCOUNTER BC BY TELEPHONE WITH CREDIT CARD INFORMATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION ELECTRONICALLY. DO NOT INCLUDE PAYMENT (CREDIT CARD) INFORMATION VIA EMAIL OR FAX.)
PLEASE RETAIN A COPY OF THIS APPLICATION FOR YOUR RECORDS APPLICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE THE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM DOES NOT IN ANY MANNER CONVEY ANY RIGHTS TO USE OR OCCUPY CROWN LAND AND/OR CONDUCT REQUESTED ACTIVITIES
26
Page 496 FNR-2012-00335
This is a consolidated map compiled from representational data to be used for convenience only and has no legal sanction. The Regional District of Okanagan -Similkameen makes no warranty to the correctness or accuracy of the infomation on this map.
Scale: 1:19,999
0 80 160 240 320 m.
May 9, 2012
S22
This is a consolidated map compiled from representational data to be used for convenience only and has no legal sanction. The Regional District of Okanagan -Similkameen makes no warranty to the correctness or accuracy of the infomation on this map.
Scale: 1:5,000
0 20 40 60 80 m.
May 9, 2012