Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dna Part 2
Dna Part 2
Dna Part 2
-Interpretation of Results
Step 1: collecting
samples
What are the biological samples
more likely to be found on a crime
scene?
Human DNA can be extracted from any
fluid or bodily (saliva, blood, semen,
hair, nails etc) It can also be extracted
from any object that has been
contaminated by any bodily fluid such
as chewing gum, cigarette butts,
fabric, metals, paper tissues etc.
SAMPLES FROM WHICH DNA CAN BE EXTRACTED
• blood
• sperm
• organic tissues
• saliva
• sweat
• bones
• teeth
• urine
• feces
Can DNA samples be contaminated during collection
phase?
Very unlikely
Analysis results interpretation according to
the SIGU recommendations, following
COUNCIL OF EUROPE
Committee Recommendation No. R (92) 1
Genetic profiling results can lead to:
Exclusion: the DNA cannot be traced
back to the suspect
Compatibility: only a partial
analysis can be performed on
“difficult substrates; identity cannot
be ruled out but it is not attributable
with high probability
Identity: material present in
discrete/good quality/quantity.
Probability of having same identity
extremely high.
PCR analysis
Contamination during this stage may
always occur in any lab. However, several
protocols exist that help to minimize the
danger.
The biologist in charge has assured that
maximum care was employed to avoid any
chance of contamination.
However, test are always repeated just to
make sure that results are not false
positive (or even false negative)
Has the defendants’ DNA been found non-
compatible with the traces found on the
victim body/crime scene?
NO
Has the defendants’ DNA been found
compatible with the traces found on the
victim body/crime scene?
NO
Has the identity of the defendants’ been
established as per their DNA found on the
victim body/crime scene?
YES
Theanalysis from 9 a 15 STR allows
to establish a probability of match
over 99,9999%, leading to a report of
identity as signed by the biologist in
charge of the analyses.
STRs used in human DNA fingerprinting
ENFSI CODIS
(7 loci) (13 loci)
TH01 TH01
D21S11 D21S11
D18S51 D18S51
vWA vWA
FGA FGA
D8S1179 D8S1179
TPOX
CSF1PO
D16S539
D7S820
D13S317
D5S818
D3S1358 D3S1358
1500
Sample to be analyzed
150
?
Sometimes only one of the two alleles at a locus is amplified. In the
above figure, allele 14 at site D13S317 hasn’t amplified
However, it is well known how
they are part of the most
common defense strategies,
such as :
• Contamination
• Statistical Weight of a Match
• Degradation/PCR Inhibition of “True”
Perp
• Artifacts (N+4 stutter, etc.)
• Thresholds Set Too High (missing
peaks)
• Examiner Bias
We know at times some of it may
happen…
…however the evidence
produced by prosecutors
should be argued on the base
of scientific expert knowledge
and not by reasoning that…
the crime took place in Italy
hence the results-curiously
limited to two of the
References
Hammond et al, 1994 Am J Hum Genet
55:175-189;
Garofano et al, 1998 J Forensic Sci 43: 837-
840;
Garofano et al., 1998 Forensic Science Int.
97: 53-60)
www.bioforensic.com/conference07/index
John M. Butler "Forensic DNA typing:
biology and technology behind STR
markers".1st ed ACADEMIC PRESS 2001
N. Rudin and K. Inman,“An introduction to
Forensic DNA analysis”Second edition CRC
Press 2002