Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Backing The Front - Gloria Flora
Backing The Front - Gloria Flora
THE FRONT
FIGHTING OIL
AND GAS
DEVELOPMENT
IN MONTANAS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN
FRONT
GLORIA FLORA
a bout th e author
Gloria Flora works for public land sustainability through her organization Sustainable Obtainable Solutions,
focusing on large landscape conservation, state-based climate change solutions, and promoting the production
and use of biochar. She is a fellow of the Post Carbon Institute and of the Center for Natural Resources and
Environmental Policy. In her twenty-three years with the U.S. Forest Service she served as the Forest Supervisor
for two national forests. She has won multiple awards for her leadership, courage, and environmental stewardship.
This publication is an excerpted chapter from The Energy Reader: Overdevelopment and
the Delusion of Endless Growth, Tom Butler, Daniel Lerch, and George Wuerthner,
eds. (Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media, 2012). The Energy Reader is copyright
2012 by the Foundation for Deep Ecology, and published in collaboration with
Watershed Media and Post Carbon Institute.
For other excerpts, permission to reprint, and purchasing visit energy-reality.org or
contact Post Carbon Institute.
Photo: EcoFlight
Post Ca r bon I nst i t u t e | 613 4t h St r e et, Su i t e 208 | Sa n ta Rosa, Ca li for n i a 95404 USA
Flor a
Gas or Gassed?
An eighteen-year Forest Service veteran, I took the
helm at Lewis & Clark National Forestwhich includes
much of the Rocky Mountain Frontjust shy of my
40thbirthday. I soon learned that much of the Front
had been leased to oil and gas companies fantasizing
about the possibility of large pockets of gas trapped
beneath its formidable surfaceand not without reason, as Canadas Rocky Mountain Front in Alberta is
heavily veined with roads, pipelines, well pads, and
all the appurtenances of gas depletion. (The common
use of the term gas production rankles me. Were not
producing fossil fuels, were depleting something produced millions of years ago.) A few exploratory wells
from decades past gave some excitement but nothing
commercially viable. Many geologists believe the layers that hold the gas on the Canadian Front become
progressively thinnerdown to as little as a few feet
this far south. Some spectacularly deep holes drilled in
recent years have come up dry.
My staff at Lewis & Clark was in the throes of an oil
and gas leasing analysis when I arrived. Just five years
before, a new law shifted responsibility for the surface
management in oil and gas development, calling for the
Forest Service to take a closer look at which lands might
be leased and under what stipulations. The assessment
was forest-wide but all eyes were on the Front.
Diving into this multiyear assessment, I spoke with
hundreds of citizens, industry representatives, politicians, and Native Americans. A surprising number of
people were advocating for no leasing. Despite agency
norms, it was abundantly clear to me that leasing more
lands for speculative energy development wasnt the
highest and best use of this land. Thousands of acres
were being leased for energy, but there was only one
Rocky Mountain Front, and there was no replacing it.
Public land managers have the honor, privilege, and
responsibility of giving voice to the land, speaking
for trees, wildlife, and water as well as for the unborn
of all species. After all, our mandate is to ensure that
future generations can enjoy the same kinds of goods,
services, and experiences from public land as the
Th e Tr i be i n Gr een
isnt N ecessa r i ly Gr een
Despite the imprudence of drilling on the Front, the
Forest Service culture is one of compromise. If an entity
wants something from public lands, the Forest Service
typically will at least give it half of what it wants. A
decade later another half is traded off, and so on each
decade that follows. It isnt hard to see how piece by
piece America is losing its unroaded wildlands. To
decide to not give in was to risk my career and fraternal acceptance in the Forest Service tribe. But one
evening, sitting on the banks of the Smith River as it
glided past my home en route to the mighty Missouri,
I realized the absurdity of my thinking. How could my
career trajectory be a concern when the future of one
of the most significant landscapes in the United States
was at stake?
I made my decision. No leasing on the Front. I
explained it to my supervisors all the way through
the chain of command to the Undersecretaries of
2
Flor a
Th e Decision
I held a press conference to announce the long-awaited
decision. There were undercover agents in the crowd
in case anyone got overly upset. I quietly explained the
conclusions reached from the extensive scientific and
cultural information in the environmental impact statement (EIS). Ecologically and culturally the Front was
too important to develop. Peoples sense of place, their
attachment to this land, and the values of its wildness
were worth more than energy development.
The response still moves me. I received over four hundred letters and phone calls from around the country
thanking me. I got notes from Forest Service employees
I didnt know saying, Today I was proud to put on my
uniform. People sent me flowers and even pictures of
their grandchildren saying, Heres who you made that
decision for.
A surprisingly small segment of the upset fossil fuel
industry took the decision to court. In an attempt to
soften public opinion, they tried a variety of tacks.
Perhaps as a woman, she was too soft-hearted to the
pleas of citizens, or maybe she was premenopausal
and not thinking clearly? Maybe she made this whole
sense-of-place thing up? One industry rep summed up
the problem (and I swear to God she actually said it),
She listened too much to the public. By this time,
my agency, seeing the flood of positive support, boldly
stepped forward taking bows.
The judges at the District and the 9th Circuit Courts
couldnt find a single point in industrys arguments that
bore support and the case held completely in favor of
the Forest Service. The plaintiffs didnt stop until the
Supreme Court refused to hear the case.
All victories are but steps along the way. In 1998, I
went off to the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in
Nevada, where I ended up resigning from the Forest
Service to call attention to the anti-federal government
forces who were behaving in abysmal and life-threatening ways to the land and to my employees. They were
egged on by a few right-wing members of Congress
with a mission to emasculate the Forest Service and its
regulations. But that is a story for another day.
Flor a
Flor a
Seei ng is Beli ev i ng
Armed with clear, compelling information and photographs, we stayed on message and we kept delivering it.
The Coalition was completely clear that our intent was
to stop this proposed development and our reasons were
sound. The proposed drilling and what it could lead
to in a full-field development scenario would destroy
irreplaceable values. Wildlife, including threatened
and endangered species such as the grizzly bear, wolf,
and cutthroat trout, as well as the abundant deer, elk,
mountain goat, and bighorn sheep populations would
be severely impacted. Cultural values such as the traces
Flor a
Th e A r mor Cr acks
The Front and its spokespeople appeared in documentaries and major media, from the Los Angeles Times to the
New York Times, from Time magazine to The Economist.
Editorials urged protection and reports chronicled
how far the Bush administration was willing to go to
feed the hungry maw of energy companies. PBSs Bill
Moyers sent David Brancaccio out to cover the story.
David and producer Brian Myers were spellbound by
the landscape and its stories and the fate that could befall
it. The fifteen-minute piece they produced for NOW
with Bill Moyers tracked my history with the Front
and its current peril.
The day before the shows airing in October 2004, the
producer got a call from the Department of the Interiors
Press Office. We know you are going to excoriate us.
We want to inform you we are terminating the EIS.
(That is, they were canceling the project.) You need to
pull the piece or announce our intention. When Brian
relayed that to me, I said, Theyre lying. Ask them
and I proceeded with a list of questions and requests.
The call came back; they had answered all the questions. I still didnt believe them and sent back another
set of questions which they answered satisfactorily. The
piece aired with the closing note that the EIS had just
been withdrawn. It was the first and only time an oil
and gas EIS had been terminated midstream.
The Department of the Interior formally announced
not only that the BLM was terminating the EIS on the
proposed drilling but also that they were advising current leaseholders to consider selling their leases back
to the government and were instituting programs to
protect up to 170,000 acres of private land by buying
conservation easements from willing sellers. You could
have knocked me over with a feather.
Id love to give the Coalition full credit for this, but we
were just luckily in the right place on the timeline of
history: one month before elections and Bushs reelection bid. He had announced to conservative sporting
groups, after decimating wetlands protections, that
indeed there were places too special to drill (although
he failed to identify any). Likely his administration
6
Flor a
W er e on a Roll
The Forest Service released their new draft Travel Plan
in 2005. The Coalition helped generate 37,000comments, the vast majority supporting quiet recreation
and wildlife protection. The final Travel Plan released
in 2007 was reasonable, rational, and ground-truthed.
With few exceptions, it fit traditional patterns and
showed true regard for the wildlife and fish of the Front.
In the Badger-Two Medicine, thanks to Keith Tatsey
and other leaders in the Blackfeet Nation, the Forest
Service honored the no-motorized-traffic alternative
supported by the Blackfeet. Score again!
Now we were ready to move forward with the Big
Idea: a citizen-driven collaborative effort to design a
bill that would indeed permanently protect the Front
and keep it like it is. This was shaky ground for us organization types accustomed to being campaign leaders
and the designers of bills. Our plan was straightforward: Wed work in concentric circles of stakeholders.
Wed kick off the first meeting, but then the inner
circle, the Coalition members, had to hammer out a
vision and strategy, form a Steering Committee, and
hone the tactics. We aimed for consensus, even if it was
given grudgingly.
The next circle included more of the community,
especially those with a vested interest in keeping the
Front the way it is, including people we assumed would
be opposed. The proposal was certainly going to add
wilderness, include grazing leases, and put the fear of
uncontrolled wildfire into peoples hearts. Those are all
fightin words in the West.
It was pretty brutal at times. Negotiations were hardwon and the lines on the map moved regularly. Feelings
were hurt, and some people walked out (they usually
came back). But we pressed on. For four years, we
held planning meetings, personal visits, surveys, interviews, barbeques, public meetings, agency meetings,
tribal meetings, events, and traveling lectures, and we
published press releases, articles, op-eds, editorial board
visits, economic studies, and even a visitors map in
partnership with the Chamber of Commerce that rivals
a national park brochure. Coalition members went to
7
Flor a
ENERGY