EDUCATION IN A COMPETITIVE WORLD

SUMMARY Randy Davids article entitled Education in a competitive world discussed the obsession of countries in lifting their world ranking in terms of the education of their young people, which would determine if political systems really affect their countrys achievement. The said rankings came from two reputable research agencies. First is the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which was identified as an office in the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). PISA came up with rankings based on the result of their research of the educational attainment of 15-year old students in 32 countries. The result gave power countries a shock. Four Asian countries namely Shanghai (China), South Korea, Hongkong (China), and Singapore made it to top five while only one European country, Finland, was included in the prestigious list. While people had doubts about the ranking result, it was supported by another reliable research agency the McKinsey, a research and consultancy firm. This gave the ranking a more solid bone. In another study conducted by McKinsey, three Asian countries were also considered the top 3 in the world for a sustained improvement in education, with three or more data points over five years or more. These are: Singapore (1st), Hong Kong (2nd) and South Korea (3rd), all from which there had been a period of assessment between 1983 to 2007 REFLECTION: After reading the reveletions of Randys David article. I ponder on the following questions. What do these countries really have in common? What do they do to bring themselves forward or stay on the top? On the other hand, what do other countries do that left their educational system down? After reading the article, I looked at Pisas website (www.pisa.oecd.org) to at least take a peek at Philippines ranking in their research, but sadly, I found out that our country is a non-participant to their researches. This gave me sad feelings because after reading the articles, I became very curious about the current educational standing of our youth today the result was a little bit frustrating while reading about these rankings. It felt good that Asians ranked well in the survey/study conducted, but it could have been a great feeling if the Philippines rank well too. On my personal perspective, I am confident that we have a high rate of educated youth, since I would agree with Randy Davids statement that we Asians have a high value we assign to education. Most Filipinos can read and write. Even the little kids we see selling fish balls and candies and cigarettes on the streets know math since they knew how to count their clients payment and give an exact change in return. The beggars for example, can understand traffic signs. But of course education does not evolve up to that point only. It is beyond simple comprehension. Education is something that would give people necessary skills to function as a worker in the working society. Education is a laboratory for future leaders. Education is something that gives power to people. So, would we say that Philippine schools give quality education to their youth? Take the present situation in public schools as an example 60 students in a medium-sized classroom; two or three shifts a day; few teachers; lack of facilities that will aid learning. So, what more could we expect? The fund allotted by the government to Philippine education, I believe, is not enough. Since years after the 1900s, we have been dealing with the same problems until the recent educational system we have today, so the government should have at least learned from the mistakes of the past. But the problem still remains and is currently experienced by our poor

children. Why? I could only say that maybe it is because of the lack of planning. The government should have at least the long-term goal that will only be successfully achieved through careful planning and experimentation. They should also adapt educational policies which were tested by other institutions. Quoted from The Economist are the important factors for educational reform which I think may also apply in all institutions in and out of the country. These are: (1) letting schools themselves set their own targets, with full support from the top, and calling on civic pride to raise the performance level of local schools; (2) paying particular attention to the needs of underachievers; (3) experimenting with a diverse range of schools that are suited to their milieu, including those run by parents, charities, and local groups; and (4) recruiting the best teachers and justly compensating them. Philippines may have an edge with teacher training. I would give my praise to the efforts of the Philippine government, especially to the Department of Education, for finding ways on how to improve the Philippine educational system. I would agree that it was difficult at first to adjust from the traditional teaching style to the changing pace of our curriculum and giving out our best in improving the teaching strategies, but lets face it, embracing the new programs and k-12 curriculum gives a bigger opportunity for the students, especially the underachievers, to learn new things without the usual spoon-feeding inside the classroom. It is about giving activities that would let learners discover things, then appreciate. It may require an extra effort from the teachers, but we cannot deny the fact that it also teaches us teachers to anchor professional discipline and reminds us of our sworn oath of educating the youth. With all these, the best competition, I believe, is when countries show how they value their education and work hard for it. Perhaps everybody appeals for quality education, not just for politically-motivated reasons or agenda, but the time when there will be good competition among education-powered nations. Hopefully, the Philippines can be within the circle soon.

Transformational Leadership
Disciplines > Leadership > Leadership styles > Transformational Leadership Assumptions | Style | Discussion | See also

Assumptions
People will follow a person who inspires them. A person with vision and passion can achieve great things. The way to get things done is by injecting enthusiasm and energy.

Style
Working for a Transformational Leader can be a wonderful and uplifting experience. They put passion and energy into everything. They care about you and want you to succeed. Developing the vision Transformational Leadership starts with the development of a vision, a view of the future that will excite and convert potential followers. This vision may be developed by the leader, by the senior team or may emerge from a broad series of discussions. The important factor is the leader buys into it, hook, line and sinker. Selling the vision The next step, which in fact never stops, is to constantly sell the vision. This takes energy and commitment, as few people will immediately buy into a radical vision, and some will join the show much more slowly than others. The Transformational Leader thus takes every opportunity and will use whatever works to convince others to climb on board the bandwagon. In order to create followers, the Transformational Leader has to be very careful in creating trust, and their personal integrity is a critical part of the package that they are selling. In effect, they are selling themselves as well as the vision. Finding the way forwards In parallel with the selling activity is seeking the way forward. Some Transformational Leaders know the way, and simply want others to follow them. Others do not have a ready strategy, but will happily lead the exploration of possible routes to the promised land. The route forwards may not be obvious and may not be plotted in details, but with a clear vision, the direction will always be known. Thus finding the way forward can be an ongoing process of course correction, and the Transformational Leader will accept that there will be failures and blind canyons along the way. As long as they feel progress is being made, they will be happy. Leading the charge The final stage is to remain up-front and central during the action. Transformational Leaders are always visible and will stand up to be counted rather than hide behind their troops. They show by their attitudes and actions how everyone else should behave. They also make continued efforts to motivate and rally their followers, constantly doing the rounds, listening, soothing and enthusing. It is their unswerving commitment as much as anything else that keeps people going, particularly through the darker times when some may question whether the vision can ever be achieved. If the people do not believe that they can succeed, then their efforts will flag. The Transformational Leader seeks to infect and reinfect their followers with a high level of commitment to the vision. One of the methods the Transformational Leader uses to sustain motivation is in the use of ceremonies, rituals and other cultural symbolism. Small changes get big hurrahs, pumping up their significance as indicators of real progress. Overall, they balance their attention between action that creates progress and the mental state of their followers. Perhaps more than other approaches, they are people-oriented and believe that success comes first and last through deep and sustained commitment.

Discussion
Whilst the Transformational Leader seeks overtly to transform the organization, there is also a tacit promise to followers that they also will be transformed in some way, perhaps to be more like this amazing leader. In some respects, then, the followers are the product of the transformation. Transformational Leaders are often charismatic, but are not as narcissistic as pure Charismatic Leaders, who succeed through a belief in themselves rather than a belief in others. One of the traps of Transformational Leadership is that passion and confidence can easily be mistaken for truth and reality. Whilst it is true that great things have been achieved through enthusiastic leadership, it is also true that many passionate people have led the charge right over the cliff and into a bottomless chasm. Just because someone believes they are right, it does not mean they are right. Paradoxically, the energy that gets people going can also cause them to give up. Transformational Leaders often have large amounts of enthusiasm which, if relentlessly applied, can wear out their followers.

Transformational Leaders also tend to see the big picture, but not the details, where the devil often lurks. If they do not have people to take care of this level of information, then they are usually doomed to fail. Finally, Transformational Leaders, by definition, seek to transform. When the organization does not need transforming and people are happy as they are, then such a leader will be frustrated. Like wartime leaders, however, given the right situation they come into their own and can be personally responsible for saving entire companies.