Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

History of Science and

Technology
Maija Kallinen: 31.10.2006
VTT

Histories of…
 Science
 Technology
 Medicine
 …the Humanities

 Oulu: ”History of Science and Ideas”


 Torus –network: http://torus.oulu.fi

1
The ”traditional” view of science

 Whewell in search for  Objectivity


method  Rationality
 Sarton and Singer:  Intellectuality
history of science
important only in
relation to modern  Misunderstandings,
science simplifications, half-
truths…

History of Science

 describes and explains the birth, growth, and


possible decay of its subjects of study
 this is done with the help of historical
sources,
 and by using various explanatory factors

2
What does HoS study?
 theories and concepts
 inventions and innovation processes
 scientific methods and procedures
 instruments
 scientific institutions, science policy
 From local to global knowledge
 Identities of institutions and individual researchers
 Communication, retoric of science
 science and society
 failed inventions, frauds
 Controversies
 biographies

..and History of Technology


 ”machine history”
 The influence of technology on society
 Technology as an agent of change in world
history
 Which factors have shaped development of
technology?
 Cultural, political, economical

3
Sources1
 Published  Unpublished
 Monographies, articles,  Manuscripts
scientific journals  Notebooks
 Reports, travel accounts  correspondence,
 Memoires personal archives,
 Newspapers, journals, diaries
popular publications  Records and minutes of
institutions, societies etc.

1) Kragh 1987, Ch. 11.

Explanatory factors in HoS

 Internalist vs. externalist factors


 Personal factors
 Social, cultural and political factors
 Ideologies and religious factors
 Economic factors, material resources

4
Explanation…
 Which aspects do need explanations?

 Which explanatory factors are the most


important ones?

 How do we know which factors to count with?

The Dangers of Anachronism


 Evaluation from the present point of view
 The ”Whig history”
 Formalisation, modernisation
 Coherence
 Anticipation

 There is no perfect diachronism!

5
New Perspectives in STS
 STS = Science and Technology studies

 Gender
 Constructivism
 Science as a construction – historiography as
construction

The ”Classical” Sociology of


Science
 1950-1960´s
 Robert K. Merton 1938: Science, Technology
and Society in Swenteenth-Centuey England
 Career structues, reward systems, research
communities
 The correspondence theory of truth, realistic
view of science
 Against the view: Thomas Kuhn, Paul
Feyerabend

6
The ”new” Sociology of
Science
 From 1970’s on

 Social History of Science


 SSK (Sociology of Scientific Knowledge)
 From texts to actions
 From validity to credibility

The Strong Programme


 David Bloor 1976: Knowledge and Social
Imagery

 Causality
 Impartiality
 Symmetry
 Reflectivity

7
Sosiological History of
Science
 Steven Shapin & Simon Schaffer: Leviathan
and the Air-Pump 1985
 Theory dependance of observations
 interests
 Underdetermination of facts
 Controversies, closure mechanisms of…
 The cycle of credibility
 Network models (Latour’s actor-network –
theory)

SCOT
 Scot = the Social Construction of Technology

 Thomas P. Hughes: building of technological


systems

8
History of Science
and Technology –
what to make of it?

Further readings
 Mika Kiikeri & Petri Ylikoski: Tiede tutkimuskohteena,
Gaudeamus 2004
 Helge Kragh: An Introduction to the Historiography of Science,
Cambridge UP 1987
 R.C.Olby, G.N.Cantor, e.a.(eds.): Companion to the History of
Modern Science, Routledge 1990
 S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, e.a.(eds.): Handbook of Science and
Technology Studies, SAGE 1995
 Jan Golinski: Making Natural Knowledge. Constructivism and the
History of Science, CUP 1998
 Wiebe E. Bijker, Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs:Toward a
Theory of Socio-Technical Change, MIT 1994??
 Thomas P.Hughes: Networks of Power. Electrification in Western
Society 1880-1930, Baltimore1983

You might also like