Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School Bd. Comm. MTG - Committee Members
School Bd. Comm. MTG - Committee Members
Security
Department
201 N. Front Street, Camden, NJ 08102, Tel.: 856.966.2101/2102 Fax: 856.966.2144
8568856856856966856.966.2522 85856.966.222 856.966.2522
In addition, security is a fluid and pro-active process that depends on daily, and
at times, hourly deployment changes in staffing to meet the immediate need of the
district.
At present, the security department staffing has 120 full- time security officer
positions and 5 part- time substitute positions assigned proportionately throughout the
district at all schools and the Administration building. Supervision within the
department consists of 2 middle management positions called Operations Officers.
Their oversight responsibility begins with one of the two main high schools and includes
all the elementary and middle schools that feed those respective high schools, along with
an even split of the remaining alternative schools. There is no security department
supervision at the individual school level. However, there exists an unsanctioned, yet
understood “lead Officer” position in those schools with more than one officer.
Current Administrative policy dictates that officers report to and receive daily
deployment instructions from the individual school administrators. It is understood that
security staff are assigned to the individual principal and it is the accepted practice that
such staff are the sole possession of that principal and school. This practice has been
verbally stated to me by a variety of principals and is sustained by the security officers
written job description established by Human Resources. As a result, there is a level of
administrative resistance that prevents the security department from deploying security
staff permanently or to meet an emergent need.
Past practice for the hiring of security staff was fraternal. The qualifications for
the position are minimal at best and the pre-screening process of applicants is well
below industry standards.
Current staff training is scattered around a variety of “made-up” courses taught
by uncertified instructors. Training records within the department are non-existent. The
absence of sanctioned training courses and properly maintained training records leaves
the district vulnerable to civil action.
Uniformed officers are issued a list of clothing choices to design their individual
uniform not to exceed $300.00. In reviewing the appearance of the staff, many look like
“street thugs” (i.e. Sean John/Roca Wear black hooded sweatshirts, multi-colored
sneakers, tactical pants, wool caps, etc.). This is inappropriate for the position they hold.
As you can see, the security department is a dysfunctional entity that possesses
no clear mission, operates well outside of industry standards and is manipulated on a
daily basis by dozens of administrators whose individual concept of security takes
precedent over a district-wide concept established and implemented by security
professionals.
Listed below are some of the more pertinent issues facing the department and
requiring quicker Board action.