Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1057 Relocation Admission

    Uploaded by

    paritutuiwd
    13 views1 page
    A peer review of a study from 2004 suggested comparing averages of long term residents to short term residents. However, the averages were adjusted in the study by including the highest short term result in the long term mean, inflating the long term elevation over short term by 2.5 times. This adjustment was denied in 2006 and 2007 but admitted to in 2010. This single adjustment accounted for most of the reported significant long term elevation over short term in the study.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    A peer review of a study from 2004 suggested comparing averages of long term residents to short term residents. However, the averages were adjusted in the study by including the highest short term result in the long term mean, inflating the long term elevation over short term by 2.5 times. This adjustment was denied in 2006 and 2007 but admitted to in 2010. This single adjustment accounted for most of the reported significant long term elevation over short term in the study.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views1 page

    1057 Relocation Admission

    Uploaded by

    paritutuiwd
    A peer review of a study from 2004 suggested comparing averages of long term residents to short term residents. However, the averages were adjusted in the study by including the highest short term result in the long term mean, inflating the long term elevation over short term by 2.5 times. This adjustment was denied in 2006 and 2007 but admitted to in 2010. This single adjustment accounted for most of the reported significant long term elevation over short term in the study.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    AFTER PEER REVIEW SUGGESTED COMPARING 12 LONG TERM TO 12 SHORT TERM ESR 2004 AVERAGES WERE ADJUSTED

    IN 2010 DR FOWLES ADMITTED THE HIGHEST SHORT TERM RESULT WAS PUT INTO THE LONG TERM MEAN TCDD HE HAD DENIED THIS ADJUSTMENT IN 2006 AND 2007 IT INFLATED THE LONG TERM ELEVATION OVER SHORT TERM BY 2.5 TIMES.

    APPENDIX O LISTED THE SERUM 2,3,7,8-TCDD LEVEL OF PARTICIPANT 1057 AS 33.3 PPT BY MOVING 1057 THE REPORTED MEAN TCDD ELEVATION OF 12 LONG TERM VERSUS 12 SHORT TERM INCREASED FROM 80 % TO 198 % FOR 13 VERSUS 11. THE ESR 2005 STUDY SELECTION WAS RETARGETED BASED ON THE SIGNIFICANT ELEVATION OF LONG TERM RESIDENTS.

    THE MAJORITY OF THE SIGNIFICANT LONG TERM ELEVATION OVER SHORT TERM WAS CREATED BY THIS CHANGE THE SHORT TERM PRE 1974 MEAN WAS ALREADY BIASED TO LOWER 2004 TCDD - DUE TO YOUNGER AGES AT EXPOSURE.

    You might also like