Ethics Committee 2005 To 2008 Annual Reports On The Serum Study Complaints

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

ESR ACKNOWLEDGED IT HAD ERRED AND LOST SCIENTIFIC AUTONOMY. HOWEVER ALSO SPENT $33,541.

52 ON A VEXATIOUS YET EFFECTIVE BROADCASTING COMPLAINT TO DISCREDIT THOSE EVIDENT ALLEGATIONS. THE MANIPULATION OF DATA TO OBSCURE PRE 1974 PEAK TCDD EXPOSURES - WAS DISMISSED BY THOSE THAT SIMPLY IGNORED - DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OBTAINED WITH THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT, AND KEY 2005 AND 2007 PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS AND SERUM RESULTS PROVIDED BY PARTICIPANTS THAT EVIDENCED EXACTLY HOW THE ESR AND MINISTRY MISREPRESENTATIONS HAD SKEWED THE STUDY DATA.

MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CENTRAL REGIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE OF 09 September 2008 HELD IN MEETING ROOM 2.06, LEVEL 2, 1-3 THE TERRACE WELLINGTON COMMENCING AT 4.30 PM. TKR 03/05/014 - Paritutu Blood Serum Dioxin Study The Committee considered a complaint regarding the above study and, following consideration, concluded that the study was conducted in accordance with the information given to participants which formed the basis for their consent.

THE STUDY INFORMATION SHEETS - NOTED - SELECTION OF THOSE WITH GREATEST 1962-1975 EXPOSURES. THE ADD ON STUDY INVESTIGATED 1974-1987. THE EVIDENCED MISREPRESENTATIONS OF ESR 2004 STUDY RESULTS AND THE ESR 2005 MODELED 1974 TO 1987 PREDICTED SERUM TCDD AND OBSERVED SERUM TCDD ALL SERVED TO SKEW THE STUDIES EXPOSURE RECONSTRUCTION AWAY FROM - THE SIGNIFICANT 1962-1973 TCDD EXPOSURES AND SIGNIFICANT BIRTH DEFECT INCREASES - BY REPEATEDLY - CLAIMING EVIDENCE OF 1974 -1987 EXPOSURE. WHEN IN FACT THERE WAS NONE OTHER THAN AN INCORRECTLY GROUPED RESULT.

You might also like