Not all the neo-Scholastics are mere apologists for neo-Thomism. A few made some serious efforts to do scholarship. Perhaps the most famous was Ramirez. Ok, ok, he´s apologetist for neo-Thomism, but he is the best of a class of men celebrated among nostalgics whose ideal "eternal-now" is the glorious year 1950 (or thereabouts). Make your glorious footnote in your next masterpiece per Ramirez!
Not all the neo-Scholastics are mere apologists for neo-Thomism. A few made some serious efforts to do scholarship. Perhaps the most famous was Ramirez. Ok, ok, he´s apologetist for neo-Thomism, but he is the best of a class of men celebrated among nostalgics whose ideal "eternal-now" is the glorious year 1950 (or thereabouts). Make your glorious footnote in your next masterpiece per Ramirez!
Not all the neo-Scholastics are mere apologists for neo-Thomism. A few made some serious efforts to do scholarship. Perhaps the most famous was Ramirez. Ok, ok, he´s apologetist for neo-Thomism, but he is the best of a class of men celebrated among nostalgics whose ideal "eternal-now" is the glorious year 1950 (or thereabouts). Make your glorious footnote in your next masterpiece per Ramirez!
Not all the neo-Scholastics are mere apologists for neo-Thomism. A few made some serious efforts to do scholarship. Perhaps the most famous was Ramirez. Ok, ok, he´s apologetist for neo-Thomism, but he is the best of a class of men celebrated among nostalgics whose ideal "eternal-now" is the glorious year 1950 (or thereabouts). Make your glorious footnote in your next masterpiece per Ramirez!