Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesun 2009-06-22 Page12 Theft of Pblic Land Is No Petty Crime
Thesun 2009-06-22 Page12 Theft of Pblic Land Is No Petty Crime
Thesun 2009-06-22 Page12 Theft of Pblic Land Is No Petty Crime
WHEN Subang Jaya Municipal Council the council called for a public hearing three
president Datuk Adnan Md Ikhsan chaired a
public hearing on a planning application on
Nov 13, 2007, he moaned and groaned that
he had been working on an empty stomach
– and kept repeating the fact that he had not
had a drink all morning, that the people do
Theft of public land months AFTER issuing the development
order.
In this case, the damage can be repaired
by revoking the development order and
the state acquiring the land for a public
purpose, in this case a recreational facility
is no petty crime
not understand him and lamented that his job for the residents. However, that is not the
was a difficult one. point. This is not the first time land meant
Having treated residents with utter con- for public amenities has been hijacked for
tempt by keeping them waiting for an hour, commercial purposes. It has happened before
he then went to “lecture” them on who is in Bandar Utama. But the state government
qualified to attend. He viewed the residents has remained silent with folded arms as
as “nosy parkers” who were hell-bent on those responsible keep creaming off what is
preventing politicians and their cronies from meant for the public.
plonking a 15-storey commercial complex on that followed have hallmarks took office on July 1 but at no time The theft of public land must stop. We
where the balai raya in SS15 stands. Only a of heavy-handedness by MPSJ were they told that the application are told this is the modus operandi of some
telephone call from the chief secretary to the officials. In November 2005, had been rejected THREE times. politicians and their cronies aided and
government, Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan, MPSJ rejected an application by Neither were they told that the abetted by civil servants in using public
jolted him back into reality and realising TM to sub-divide the land on the previous decisions were valid and land for private purposes. Layout plans with
that he works for the people, that their views grounds that it would remain as even the appeal had been rejected. the land demarcated for public amenities
have to be heard and that their needs have a reserve for TM’s use. In Febru- But the planning committee ap- are approved, only to be changed later by
to be met. ary the following year, an appeal proved the application, and MPSJ concealing facts and figures from the
Mohd Sidek has a proclivity for going by was filed but turned down as it informed the applicant accordingly. authorities. The same methods are used all
the book and in the next few days, no would was described in the records as Residents protested and the issue over the state to take over land meant for
be surprised if Adnan is cited again for what “ditolak dengan alasan tapak was raised at the state assembly on the public. This is an act of fraud and those
is now becoming known as the “Telekom tersebut merupakan tapak kemu- CitizenNades March 12. responsible must be punished.
land scandal” in USJ6. dahaan awam (rezab telekom)”. What is worrying is that the facts For a start, Adnan has a duty to explain
Some background to the case: A piece of by R. Nadeswaran why no one was informed of rejection of the
Despite that, another applica- of the case were hidden from the
land was sold to Telekom Malaysia Berhad tion was submitted and on June state planning committee when three previous applications. They were kept
(TM) in 1988 by the developer, UEP at 17 last year, a public hearing was held on it decided to give the approval. Who with- secret to all and sundry – from the mentri
that time, later Sime-UEP and now Sime the application where residents and those held vital information such as the previous besar down to the ordinary ratepayer. The
Darby Properties, for a telecommunication affected objected on the grounds that no rejections when the committee met? usual excuse would be: “I left it in the hands
facility. When Sime submitted the layout plan traffic impact assessment (TIA) report was According to the minutes of the meeting, of the town planner.”
to the state planning committee, it remained submitted. Those present questioned the there is neither mention of the rejections nor The buck stops with the boss and he must
so, and TM has since built an office on part legality of the change in the land use. No the requirement of the TIA report. Ironically, take responsibility for such errors and omis-
of the land. Sime developed the area which answers were forthcoming. After the March the TIA report surfaced in May this year, sions. He has a duty not only to explain to
is now called USJ6 and those who bought 8 elections, no council meetings were held nine months AFTER the approval was given. the chief secretary but also to the thousands
the houses were given a layout plan which until July when the new councillors were How could the approval be given without the of ratepayers in Subang Jaya. Anything less
showed the existence of the TM building. sworn-in. So, the public hearing was held TIA report? Shouldn’t the residents have a would be unacceptable.
In 1989, the use of the land was changed to without any endorsement of the councillors right under the Town and Country Planning
“commercial” and the residents believed that or the full council or the one-stop-centre Act to view the report and then make their
it would be used as an exchange or an office (OSC). (Note the dates because the timings objections known? R. Nadeswaran says stealing from the people
by TM. are crucial.) Perhaps, MPSJ has not learnt the lesson is no petty theft and wants the perpetrators
No one would apportion blame on Adnan. In June, the OSC (without councillors that its neighbour, the Petaling Jaya City of fraud on the people to be brought to book.
He was not part of the decision-making body sitting as members) was again asked to look Council (MBPJ) is paying for not following He is editor (special and investigative
and neither were his fingerprints anywhere at the application and it referred it to the state procedures in the Mentari case. Residents reporting) at theSun. He can be reached at
on or near the documents. But the events planning committee. The new councillors of Taman Desa Ria successfully sued when citizen-nades@thesundaily.com
letters
letters@thesundaily.com