This isnt the first time that Labor has blown up | Article | The Punch

15/05/13 12:58 PM

This isnt the first time that Labor has blown up

Over its 122-year history, the Labor party has suffered three major internal cataclysms. In 1917, the issue of conscription saw leader Billy Hughes take many Labor members with him across to the Liberal party. It took years for Labor to recover.

Jack Lang demonstrating the Labor values In 1930, the depression saw Jack Lang leave the party, form his own, and wreak havoc with Labor support for a decade. In 1955, the issue of communism saw many Catholic members of the Labor party defect to the DLP. This kept Labor out of office for a generation. The Gillard versus Rudd affair reached a preliminary climax on Monday. The 71-31 vote appears conclusive. But the word preliminary is necessary, as some fundamental issues are left hanging. First, none of the previous internal disputes involved such venomous language and vitriolic attacks as the past week or so. The Gillard camp, especially, could only be described as using poisonous ferocity. The Rudd camp was also far from genteel. Can these caucus members, who spent a week attempting to destroy the reputation, credibility and character of their colleagues, now re-unite and work together? If they do, then much of what was said during the fracas was hypocrisy. If they do not, then the Labor government is almost certainly doomed to ignominious defeat in 2013. Second, the government and the party now has to decide just what it believes in, what it stands for, and what its ideology is. In simple terms, what content is there left in the historic light on the hill? Before and during the fracas, Julia Gillard seemed to depend on vacuous mantras: getting the job done; this is the Australian way, we follow it because we are us; Labor says yes to Australias future. During the depths of the internecine battle, Kevin Rudd was accused of not holding Labor values. Is anyone in the Labor party able to provide a clear description of what these are? Some of the Labor caucus were members of the 2007-10 Rudd ministry. In the past few days they have reviled him and his style. Yet they worked with him until the 2010 coup. Third, during the battle over leadership, Julia Gillard seemed to ignore the flat-lined polls for the last year. In
http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/this-isnt-the-first-time-labor-has-blown-up/ Page 1 of 2

This isnt the first time that Labor has blown up | Article | The Punch

15/05/13 12:58 PM

fact, the few days of passionate debate appeared as two ships passing: Gillard with a crew of most of the cabinet and caucus arguing that it was not a matter of polls, but of getting the job done; Rudd with a crew of a majority of Australian voters clearly favouring him. During the crisis, Julia Gillard appealed to the Labor caucus, and secured a solid vote of support. Kevin Rudd appealed on the basis that he had a clear lead among the voters, and had a better chance of winning the next election. Will Julia Gillard now be able to convince the voters that their opinions matter? Fourth, Kevin Rudd promised no second challenge if he lost. He will join the back bench. But that does not mean that there will not be another leadership change. Unless the polls shift decisively in favour of Labor in the next few months, at least to the point of having a chance to win, then there will be a solid collection of very nervous Labor backbenchers looking for a leader who can bring support. My non-scientific poll of a random sample of voters brought a unanimous response: a plague on the whole lot of them. The fracas was damaging for Labor, but also apparently for the whole political process. All politicians need now to focus on the best policies for Australia and Australians, not on themselves.

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/this-isnt-the-first-time-labor-has-blown-up/

Page 2 of 2