Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SpatialCog 2010 Matthews
SpatialCog 2010 Matthews
SpatialCog 2010 Matthews
Justin L. Matthews & Teenie Matlock Cognitive and Information Sciences cogsci.ucmerced.edu
Abstract Concepts
Boroditsky (2000); Clark & Clark (1979); Gentner (2001) Lakoff and Johnson (1980); McGlone & Harding (1998); Maglio & Matlock (1999)
Pierre, SD
Toronto, Canada
Psychological Distance
Hypotheticality Social Groups
OTHERS
WE
OTHERS
WE
Current Work
Three studies examine how thought about friendship interacts with thought about physical space. Used a novel drawing task in combination with temporal judgment and distance estimation. Earlier work suggests that greater social distance is associated with greater physical distance.
General Method
1. Read a narrative 2. Draw an imagined route 3. Estimate time and distance Walking
Finish
Driving
Riding
Start
Walking
263 UC Merced undergraduates (60% ) Randomly assign to one of two conditions Read narrative Draw an imagined route Estimate time and distance
Assign
SONA ID# _________ SONA ID# _________
Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you walk through a park and pass by different people. You know these people well. They are your friends. Please draw the route you take through the park using a continuous line.
Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you walk through a park and pass by different people. You do not know these people. They are strangers. Please draw the route you take through the park using a continuous line.
Finish
Finish
Friends
Strangers
Start
Start
KMN-1
KMN-3
Read
Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you walk through a park and pass by different people. You do not know these people. They are strangers. Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you walk through a park and pass by different people. You know these people well. They are your friends.
Draw
Finish here
Finish
Please draw the route you take through the park using a continuous line Start here
Start
Estimate
Using your best guess, how much time (in minutes) did it take you to walk through the park? Using your best guess, how far (in feet) do you think you walked in the park?
Driving
324 UC Merced undergraduates (61% ) Randomly assign to one of two conditions Read narrative Draw an imagined route Estimate time and distance
Assign
Friends
Strangers
Read
Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you drive through a park and pass by different people. You do not know these people. They are strangers. Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you drive through a park and pass by different people. You know these people well. They are your friends.
Draw
Finish here Please draw the route you take through the park using a continuous line Start here
Estimate
Using your best guess, how much time (in minutes) did it take you to drive through the park? Using your best guess, how far (in feet) do you think you drove in the park?
Riding
190 UC Merced undergraduates (61% ) Randomly assign to one of two conditions Read narrative Draw an imagined route Estimate time and distance
Assign
Friends
Strangers
Read
Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you ride through a park and pass by different people. You do not know these people. They are strangers. Imagine you need to deliver a package. Along the way, you ride through a park and pass by different people. You know these people well. They are your friends.
Draw
Finish here Please draw the route you take through the park using a continuous line Start here
Estimate
Using your best guess, how much time (in minutes) did it take you to ride through the park? Using your best guess, how far (in feet) do you think you rode in the park?
Coding
Finish
distance 6 mm
Top
Middle
intersection
Bottom
Start
Absent Present
People who read the friends narrative were more likely to intersect gures
0.75
0.5
0.25
Strangers
F(1,259)=5.86, p=.02, 2=.02.
Friends
People who read the friends narrative drew routes reliably closer to the gures in the park
30
25 20 15 10 5 0 Strangers Friends
People who read the friends narrative estimated it took more time to traverse the park
25
20 15 10 5 0
Strangers
t(186.68)=5.65, p<.001.
Friends
People who read the friends narrative were more likely to intersect gures
0.75
0.5
0.25
Strangers
Friends
People who read the friends narrative drew routes reliably closer to the gures in the park
30
25 20 15 10 5 0 Strangers Friends
People who read the friends narrative estimated it took more time to traverse the park
25
20 15 10 5 0
Strangers
t(202.02)=5.67, p<.001.
Friends
People who read the friends narrative were more likely to intersect gures
0.75
0.5
0.25
Strangers
F(1,186)=5.79, p=.02, 2=.03.
Friends
People who read the friends narrative tended to draw their routes closer to the gures in the park
30
25 20 15 10 5 0 Strangers Friends
People who read the friends narrative estimated it took more time to traverse the park
25
20 15 10 5 0
Strangers
t(147.60)=3.47, p=.001.
Friends
Finish
Friends Strangers
Drawing Conclusions
Start
more prevalent when reading friend narratives as opposed to stranger narratives, even with no explicit mention of character interaction.
Estimate Conclusions
Estimates of passing time differed across conditions; more time
was associated with friends.
travel through the park to be about 6 to 8 minutes longer than those who read the stranger narrative. narrative condition.
Interaction Barriers
High Riding
Finish
Walking Low
Driving Moderate
Start
So what?
These data suggest that spatial distance and social distance possibly share conceptual expression. ...the conceptual structure of social relationships, in this case friendship, is linked to thought about space.
future directions...
Space and Social Relationships: How does it
unfold over time? What about processing?
Effort: How might it effect social distance? Agency: What if you are the bystander, and
others pass by you?
Thanks to...
those behind the curtain
Groups did not differ when estimating the distance traversed in the park
450
Strangers
t(255)=-.08, p=.94.
Friends
Strangers
t(270.56)=-2.05, p=.04.
Friends
Groups did not differ when estimating the distance traversed in the park
2500
Strangers
t(126.41)=.97, p=.33.
Friends