Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Relations Notes
International Relations Notes
the most important aspects, not at all of the intricacies and variations. Perspectives and Levels of Analysis are Ideal Types Perspective: hypotheses or explanations that emphasize various causes (power, institutions, ideas, historical forces) of world events over others. Level of Analysis: the direction, or level from which different causes of international change emerge. Four types are identified: systemic, foreign policy, domestic, individual.
Ideal types help boil down a complex reality so we can see which causes/levels should be emphasized when explaining/predicting world affairs. Remember someone filters the news we receive. They shape our view on international relations. Ideal types single out primary perspectives and levels of analysis
3 Main Perspectives to decide the primary cause of an event: REALIST: hypothesizes that a struggle for power is the primary cause of what happens
A perspective that sees the world largely in terms of a struggle for power in which strong actors seek to dominate and weak actors seek to resist
LIBERAL: argues that interdependence and institutions exert the primary influence
A perspective that emphasizes repetitive relationships and negotiations, establishing patterns or institutions for resolving international conflicts
CRITICAL THEORY: questions whether causes and effects can be abstracted from historical circumstances and emphasizes the embedded and holistic character of events as they unfold
A perspective that focuses on deeply embedded forces from all perspectives and levels of analysis
3 principal levels of analysis: INDIVIDUAL: (decision-making) emphasizes leaders and decision making institutions DOMESTIC: focuses on internal characteristics of countries as a whole (cultural , political, economic)
SYSTEMIC: highlights the way countries are positioned and interact with respect to each other FOREIGN POLICY: links domestic politics and international relations (falls between systemic/domestic) Methods: the formal rules of reason (rationalist) or appropriateness (constructivist) for testing perspectives against facts Rationalist: disaggregate and explain events as one event preceding and causing a second event. Constructivist: see events as a whole as mutually causing or constituting one another rather than causing one another sequentially Causation: one fact of event comes before and causes another event that comes after it. Correlation: one fact or event occurring in the same context as another fact or event but not necessarily linked to or caused by it
Variables: Exogeneous: Autonomous factors that come from outside a theoretical model or system and that cannot be explained by the system
Endogeneous: Casual variables that are included in a theoretical model or framework Multicolinearity: a statistical situation in which multiple variables are all highly correlated with one another Process tracing: a method of connecting events in sequence to identify cause and effect Counterfactual Reasoning: a method of testing claims for causality by inverting the casual claim. The counterfactual of the claim event A caused event B is to ask If event A had never happened, would event B have happened? Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD): nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons that can kill large numbers of human beings and destroy vast portions of physical structures and environment Judgement: the broader assessment of what makes sense after accumulating as many facts and testing as many perspectives as possible Ethics and Morality: standards of good conduct for human behavior Relativism: A position that holds that truth and morality are relative to each individual or culture and that one should live and let live Universalism: claim that truth and morality are universal and cannot be adjusted to specific circumstances
Pragmatism: The idea that morality is proportionate to what is possible and causes the least harm