Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ses3 Structures PPT 0709
Ses3 Structures PPT 0709
Ses3 Structures PPT 0709
Problems
Modified October
2008
Original materials created as a part of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing Assessment
Project (OGAP) funded by NSF (EHR-0227057) and US DOE (S366A020002)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
1
Structure of the problems
that students solve
Structure refers to –
how the problems are
built
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
2
A Research Finding
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 5
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
Multiplicative Relationships
Non-integral Integral
multiplicative multiplicative
relationship
3 boxes x boxes relationship
=
2 bushels 8 bushels
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 6
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
3
Multiplicative Relationships
Non-integral
multiplicative Integral
relationship multiplicative
relationship
3 boxes 2 bushels
=
x boxes 8 bushels
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 7
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
Multiplicative Relationships
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 8
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
4
A Research Finding
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 9
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)
• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0
5
Case Study - Multiplicative Relationships
(VMP Pilot Study, Grade 7 Students, n=153)
40 ft.
120 ft.
80 ft.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1
Part 2
Discussion with a partner:
• Identify the multiplicative or additive relationship evidenced
in the student response (e.g., x 3, between figures; + 6, within figures).
• Place your analysis in the cell that corresponds with the
student number and pilot number in the table on page 3.
• Complete Discussion Questions on page 3.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2
6
Multiplicative Relationships Study:
Discussion Questions
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4
7
Structures of Proportionality Problems
• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5
Context Matters
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6
8
Context Matters
Which contexts might be more familiar to students?
How does proportionality show up in these different contexts?
• The scale factor relating two similar rectangles is 1.5. One side of
the larger rectangle is 18 inches. How long is the corresponding
side of the smaller rectangle?
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7
• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8
9
Types of Problems
• Ratio
• Rate
• Rate and ratio comparisons
• Missing value
• Scale factor
• Qualitative questions
• Non- proportional
OGAP Proportionality Framework
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9
Types of Problems
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0
10
Types of Problems: Ratio
Relationships - Part : Part or Part : Whole
Referents - Implied or Explicit
OGAP Proportionality Framework
Dana and Jamie ran for student council president at Midvale Middle School. The
data below represents the voting results for grade 7.
John says that the ratio of the 7th grade boys who voted for Jamie to the 7th
grade students who voted for Jamie is about 1:2. Mary disagreed. Mary says it is
about 1:3. Who is correct? Explain your answer.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2
11
Types of Problems: Rate Missing Value
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4
12
Case Study - Meaning of the Quantities
In Part I of this case study, you will analyze 4 student
solutions to Ranch problem. The solutions represent the
kinds of “quantity interpretation” errors that students
make when they solve rate comparison problems.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6
13
Case Study - Meaning of the Quantities
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8
14
A Research Finding
The location of the missing value may affect performance. (Harel, & Behr,1993)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9
Research Applications
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0
15
Structures of The Problems
A school is enlarging its playground. The dimensions of the new
playground are proportional to the old playground. What is the
measurement of the missing length of the new playground?
Show your work.
Old Playground New Playground
630 ft.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2
16
Structures of The Problems
What is the general structure of
scale factor problems?
Jack built a scale model of the John Hancock Center. His model was
2.25 feet tall. The John Hancock Center in Chicago is 1476 feet tall.
How many feet of the real building does one foot on the scale model
represent? Be sure to show all of your work.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4
17
A Research Finding
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5
• Kim ran more laps than Bob. Kim ran her laps in
less time than Bob ran his laps. Who ran faster?
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6
18
A Research Finding
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8
19
A Research Finding
A Classic Non-proportional Example
(Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0
20
Case Study - Proportional and Non-proportional??
(VMP Pilot Study, ???)
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1
Kim and Bob were running equally fast around a track. Kim
started first. When she had run 9 laps, Bob had run 3 laps.
When Bob completed 15 laps, how many laps had Kim run?
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2
21
Elements of a Proportional Structure
That Affect Performance
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4
22
Activity: Analyzing Pre-Assessment Tasks
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5
General Directions:
Administering the OGAP Pre-assessment
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6
23