Ses3 Structures PPT 0709

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Structures of Proportionality

Problems

Krisan Stone, VMP


Leslie Ercole, VMP
Marge Petit, Marge Petit Consulting
(MPC)

Modified October
2008

Original materials created as a part of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing Assessment
Project (OGAP) funded by NSF (EHR-0227057) and US DOE (S366A020002)

OGAP Proportionality Framework


Structures of Problems

Mathematical Topics Other Structures


And Contexts

Evidence in Student Work to Inform Instruction

Proportional Transitional Non-proportional Underlying


Strategies Proportional Reasoning Issues, Errors,
Strategies Misconceptions

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

1
Structure of the problems
that students solve

Structure refers to –
how the problems are
built

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

Structures of Proportionality Problems

• Multiplicative relationships in a problem (Karplus, Polus, & Stage,


1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

2
A Research Finding

When the multiplicative relationships in a


proportional situation are integral, it is easier for
students to solve than when they are non-integral.
(Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993; Karplus, Polus, & Stage, 1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 5
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

Multiplicative Relationships

Carrie is packing apples. It takes 3 boxes to


pack 2 bushels of apples. How many boxes will
she need to pack 8 bushels of apples?

Non-integral Integral
multiplicative multiplicative
relationship
3 boxes x boxes relationship
=
2 bushels 8 bushels

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 6
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

3
Multiplicative Relationships

Carrie is packing apples. It takes 3 boxes to


pack 2 bushels of apples. How many boxes will
she need to pack 8 bushels of apples?

Non-integral
multiplicative Integral
relationship multiplicative
relationship

3 boxes 2 bushels
=
x boxes 8 bushels

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 7
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

Multiplicative Relationships

What are the multiplicative


relationships in this
proportional situation?

Carrie is packing apples for an orchard’s mail


order business. It takes 3 boxes to pack 2
bushels of apples. How many boxes will she
need to pack 7 bushels of apples?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 8
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

4
A Research Finding

When the multiplicative relationships in a


proportional situation are both non-integral then
students have more difficulty and often revert
back to non-proportional reasoning and
strategies. (Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993; Karplus, Polus, & Stage, 1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 9
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002)

Structures of Proportionality Problems

• Multiplicative relationships in a problem (Karplus, Polus, & Stage,


1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0

5
Case Study - Multiplicative Relationships
(VMP Pilot Study, Grade 7 Students, n=153)

• Three similar problems administered across a one week period


(Monday, pilot 1; Wednesday, pilot 2; and Friday, pilot 3)
• Main difference between the problems is the multiplicative
relationship within and between figures.

PILOT 1: A school is enlarging its playground. The dimensions of


the new playground are proportional to the dimensions of the old
playground. What is the length of the new playground?

40 ft.
120 ft.
80 ft.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1

Student Work Analysis


(n=6 students)
Part 1
• Solve each problem.
• Identify the multiplicative relationship within and between
the figures.
• Anticipate difficulties that students might have when solving
each problem.

Part 2
Discussion with a partner:
• Identify the multiplicative or additive relationship evidenced
in the student response (e.g., x 3, between figures; + 6, within figures).
• Place your analysis in the cell that corresponds with the
student number and pilot number in the table on page 3.
• Complete Discussion Questions on page 3.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2

6
Multiplicative Relationships Study:
Discussion Questions

• What did you see that you expected?

• What surprised you?

• What are the implications for instruction


and assessment?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3

OGAP Study Findings


(2006 Pilot, n=153)

Multiplicative Relationships Percent of Correct


within and between figures Responses

Pilot 1 Both integral 80%

Pilot 2 One integral, one non-integral 65%

Pilot 3 Both non-integral 35.5%

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4

7
Structures of Proportionality Problems

• Multiplicative relationships in a problem (Karplus, Polus, & Stage,


1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5

Context Matters

• More familiar contexts tend to be easier for


students than unfamiliar contexts. (Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993)

• How proportionality shows up in different contexts


impacts difficulty. (Harel, & Behr, 1993)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6

8
Context Matters
Which contexts might be more familiar to students?
How does proportionality show up in these different contexts?

• The scale factor relating two similar rectangles is 1.5. One side of
the larger rectangle is 18 inches. How long is the corresponding
side of the smaller rectangle?

• Nate’s shower uses 4 gallons of water per minute. How much


water does Nate use when he takes a 15 minute shower?

• A 20-ounce box of Toasty Oats costs $3.00. A 15-ounce box of


Toasty Oats costs $2.10. Which box costs less per ounce?
Explain your reasoning.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7

Structures of Proportionality Problems

• Multiplicative relationships in a problem (Karplus, Polus, & Stage,


1983; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

• Context (Heller, Post, & Behr, 1985; Karpus, Polus, & Stage, 1983)
• Types of problems (Lamon, 1993)
• Complexity of the numbers (Harel & Behr, 1993)
• Meaning of quantities as defined by the
context and the units (Silver, 2006 Vermont meeting; VMP OGAP Pilots, 2006)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8

9
Types of Problems

• Ratio
• Rate
• Rate and ratio comparisons
• Missing value
• Scale factor
• Qualitative questions
• Non- proportional
OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 1
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9

Types of Problems

Ratio – is a comparison Rate – A rate is a special


of any two like quantities ratio. Its denominator is
(same unit). always 1.

The ratio of boys to girls is 1:2. $5.00 per hour


The ratio of people with brown $3.00 per pound
eyes to blue eyes is 1:4. 25 horses per acre

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0

10
Types of Problems: Ratio
Relationships - Part : Part or Part : Whole
Referents - Implied or Explicit
OGAP Proportionality Framework

Dana and Jamie ran for student council president at Midvale Middle School. The
data below represents the voting results for grade 7.

7th Grade Votes


Jamie Dana
Boys 24 40
Girls 49 20

John says that the ratio of the 7th grade boys who voted for Jamie to the 7th
grade students who voted for Jamie is about 1:2. Mary disagreed. Mary says it is
about 1:3. Who is correct? Explain your answer.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1

Types of Problems: Ratio Missing Value


Relationships - Part : Part or Part : Whole
Referents - Implied or Explicit

There are red and blue marbles in a bag.


The ratio of red marbles to blue marbles is 1:2.
If there are 10 blue marbles in the bag, how
many red marbles are in the bag?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2

11
Types of Problems: Rate Missing Value

What are the meanings of the quantities in this problem?


What is the meaning of the answer?

Leslie drove at an average speed of 55 mph for 4 hours.


How far did Leslie drive?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3

Types of Problems: Rate Comparison

What is the general structure of rate comparison problems?

• A 20-ounce box of Toasty Oats costs $3.00. A 15-ounce box


of Toasty Oats costs $2.10. Which box costs less per ounce?
Explain your reasoning.

• Big Horn Ranch raises 100 horses on 150 acres of pasture.


Jefferson Ranch raises 75 horses on 125 acres of pasture.
Which ranch has more acres of pasture per horse? Explain
your answer using words, pictures, or diagrams.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4

12
Case Study - Meaning of the Quantities
In Part I of this case study, you will analyze 4 student
solutions to Ranch problem. The solutions represent the
kinds of “quantity interpretation” errors that students
make when they solve rate comparison problems.

Big Horn Ranch raises 100 horses on 150 acres of pasture.


Jefferson Ranch raises 75 horses on 125 acres of pasture.
Which ranch has more acres of pasture per horse? Explain
your answer using words, pictures, or diagrams.
October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5

Case Study - Meaning of the Quantities

In pairs, analyze the student solutions and then respond


to the following.
• What is the evidence that the student may not be
interpreting the meaning of the quantities in the
problem?
• Suggest some questions you might ask each student
or activities you might do to help them understand the
meaning of the quantities in the problem and the
solution.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6

13
Case Study - Meaning of the Quantities

What evidence is there of


the student’s understanding
of both the meaning of the
quantities in the problem
and in the solution?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7

Types of Problems: Missing Value

What is the general structure


of a missing value problem?

Carrie is packing apples. It takes 3 boxes to


pack 2 bushels of apples. How many boxes
will she need to pack 8 bushels of apples?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8

14
A Research Finding
The location of the missing value may affect performance. (Harel, & Behr,1993)

Carrie is packing apples for an orchard’s mail order business.


It takes 3 boxes to pack 2 bushels of apples.
How many boxes will she need to pack 7 bushels of apples?

Carrie is packing apples for an orchard’s mail order business.


It takes 3 boxes to pack 2 bushels of apples. She needs 7
bushels of apples packed. How many boxes will she need?

Internal Structure OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 2
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9

Research Applications

Paul’s dog eats 15 pounds of food in


18 days. How long will it take Paul’s
dog to eat 45 pound bag of food?

Explain your thinking.

Change this problem to make it


easier, and then harder.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0

15
Structures of The Problems
A school is enlarging its playground. The dimensions of the new
playground are proportional to the old playground. What is the
measurement of the missing length of the new playground?
Show your work.
Old Playground New Playground

90 ft. 110 ft.

630 ft.

What type of problem is


this similarity problem? OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1

Structures of The Problems

What type of problem is


this similarity problem?

The dimension of 4 rectangles are given


below. Which two rectangles are similar?
• 2” x 8”
• 4” x 10”
• 6” x 12”
• 6” x 15”

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2

16
Structures of The Problems
What is the general structure of
scale factor problems?

Jack built a scale model of the John Hancock Center. His model was
2.25 feet tall. The John Hancock Center in Chicago is 1476 feet tall.
How many feet of the real building does one foot on the scale model
represent? Be sure to show all of your work.

The scale factor relating two similar rectangles is 1.5.


One side of the larger rectangle is 18 inches. How long
is the corresponding side of the smaller rectangle?

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3

Structures of The Problems

The scale factor relating two similar rectangles is


1.5. One side of the larger rectangle is 18 inches.
How long is the corresponding side of the smaller
rectangle?

If a student was unable to solve this


problem successfully, what variables
would you change to make it more
accessible? Why?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4

17
A Research Finding

Students should interact with


qualitative predictive and comparison
questions as they are developing their
proportional reasoning…. (Lamon,1993)

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5

Types of Problems: Qualitative


Why do you think researchers suggest
these types of problems as important
stepping stones?

• Kim ran more laps than Bob. Kim ran her laps in
less time than Bob ran his laps. Who ran faster?

• If Kim ran fewer laps in more time than she did


yesterday, would her running speed be: A) faster;
B) slower; C) exactly the same; D) not enough
information.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6

18
A Research Finding

Students need to see examples of


proportional and non-proportional
situations so they can determine when it
is appropriate to use a multiplicative
solution strategy. (Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993)

OGAP Proportionality Framework

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 7

Solve these problems


(Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993)

Sue and Julie were


running equally fast
3 U.S. dollars can be
around a track. Sue
exchanged for 2 British
started first. When she
pounds. How many
had run 9 laps, Julie had
pounds for $21 U.S.
run 3 laps. When Julie
dollars?
completed 15 laps, how
many laps had Sue run?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 8

19
A Research Finding
A Classic Non-proportional Example
(Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993)

Sue and Julie were running equally


fast around a track. Sue Started first.
When she had run 9 laps, Julie had
run 3 laps. When Julie completed 15
laps, how many laps had Sue run?

22 out of 33 undergraduate students


treated this as a proportional relationship.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 3
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 9

A Contrasting Research Finding

Three U.S. dollars can be exchanged for 2 British


pounds. How many pounds for 21 U.S. dollars?

• Same group – 100% solved it correctly


using traditional proportional algorithm.
• No one in the same group could explain
why this is a proportional relationship
while the “running laps” is not.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 0

20
Case Study - Proportional and Non-proportional??
(VMP Pilot Study, ???)

Kim and Bob were running equally fast


around a track. Kim started first. When
she had run 9 laps, Bob had run 3 laps.
When Bob completed 15 laps, how
many laps had Kim run?

Do student work sort!

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 1

Vermont Version Grade 6(n= 82)

Kim and Bob were running equally fast around a track. Kim
started first. When she had run 9 laps, Bob had run 3 laps.
When Bob completed 15 laps, how many laps had Kim run?

• 39/82 (48%) solved as a proportion


• 33/82 (40%) solved as an additive situation
• 10/82 (12%) non-starters

What are the instructional implications?

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 2

21
Elements of a Proportional Structure
That Affect Performance

• Problem types (comparison, missing value, etc.)


• Mathematical topics/contexts (scaling, similarity, etc.)
• Multiplicative relationships (integral or non-integral)
• Meaning of quantities (ratio relationships and ratio referents)
• Type of numbers used (integer vs. non-integer)

No wonder proportions are


tough to teach and learn.

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 3

What Are the Hallmarks of a


Proportional Reasoner?

• Recognizes the nature of proportional relationships,


• Finds an efficient method based on multiplicative reasoning to
solve problems,
• Represents the quantities in the solution with units that reflect
the meaning of the quantities for the problem situation.

Ultimately, a proportional reasoner should not be deterred by


structures, such as context, problem types, the quantities in the
problems. (Cramer, Post, & Currier, 1993; Silver, 2006)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 4

22
Activity: Analyzing Pre-Assessment Tasks

Analyze each of the tasks for:


• Problem types
• Mathematical topics/contexts (scaling, similarity, etc.)
• Multiplicative Relationships (integral or non-integral)
• Ratio Relationships (part:whole or part:part) and referents
(implied or implicit - if applicable)
• Type of numbers used (integer or non-integer)
• Internal Structure (parallel or non-parallel)

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 5

General Directions:
Administering the OGAP Pre-assessment

• Administer the pre-assessment and bring a set of 20 to 25 to our


next session
• Calculators are not allowed
• Tips for students
• Time
• Level of teacher assistance
• Do not analyze student work before our next meeting

October 2008 Version 12.0 Vermont Mathematics Partnership (funded by the National 4
Science Foundation EHR-0227057 and the US Department of Education S366A020002) 6

23

You might also like