Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jan Husdal IFLEX 2008
Jan Husdal IFLEX 2008
Jan Husdal IFLEX 2008
18000
16000
14000
12000
Sea
10000
Rail
8000
Road
Air
6000
4000
2000
0
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Road/rail Network Length (all roads) % National Regional Secondary roads
% Motorways (above)
700
70
600
60
500
50
400
Road 40
% N+R+2nd
Rail
300 %M
30
200 20
100 10
0 0
NO IE NL UK DE NO IE NL UK DE
3
120
2,5 100
2 80
Road
Rail Road
1,5 60
Rail
1 40
0,5 20
0
0
NO DE NL UK IE
NO IE NL UK DE
Research questions
Warning?
Adapted from:
Sheffi (2005)
Asbjørnslett (1997)
Cornish (2007)
Mitigation and contingency measures
Adapted from:
Asbjørnslett, B E and Rausand, M (1997) Assess the vulnerability of your production system.
ReportNTNU 97018. Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Department of Production
and Quality Engineering, Trondheim Norway.
Tomlin, B. (2006) On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain
Disruption Risks. Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 639-657
Ritchie, B. and Brindley, C. (2004) Risk Charcteristics of the Supply Chain – A Contingency
Framework. In: Supply Chain Risk. Ed. Brindley, C. , Ashgate Publishing, pp. 28-42,197-202
Resilient organizations
Resilient organisations
1. Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J. & Handfield, R. B. (2007) The Severity
of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities. Decision
Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 131-156.
Risk and vulnerability in Supply Chains
Location and Preparedness
• Structure
Structure:
– Badly located
– Well located
Structure
• Organization
Organization – Badly prepared
– Well prepared
Conclusion