Professional Documents
Culture Documents
045 Aereo Boston Decision - October 10, 2013 - FINAL
045 Aereo Boston Decision - October 10, 2013 - FINAL
PREVAILS
IN
PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
PROCEEDING
IN
U.S.
DISTRICT
COURT
FOR
THE
DISTRICT
OF
MASSACHUSETTS
Ruling
from
Federal
Judge
Nathaniel
Gorton
finds
in
favor
of
Aereo,
stating
that
Hearst
has
not
demonstrated
a
sufficient
likelihood
of
success
on
the
merits
nor
the
requisite
irreparable
harm
Long
Island
City,
New
York
(October
10,
2013)
Federal
Judge
Nathaniel
M.
Gorton
today
issued
a
ruling
in
the
United
States
District
Court
for
the
District
of
Massachusetts,
Hearst
Stations
Inc.
d/b/a
WCVB-TV
v.
Aereo,
Inc.
Civil
Action
No.
13-11649- NMG,
in
favor
of
Aereo,
denying
the
plaintiff
its
motion
for
a
preliminary
injunction
against
the
company.
In
his
decision,
Judge
Gorton
concludes,
After
considering
the
relevant
factors,
the
Court
finds
that
a
preliminary
injunction
is
unwarranted.
Hearst
has
not
demonstrated
a
sufficient
likelihood
of
success
on
the
merits
nor
the
requisite
irreparable
harm
and
therefore
it
is
not
entitled
to
that
extraordinary
and
drastic
remedy.
After
a
careful
review
and
analysis
of
the
claims
advanced
by
plaintiff,
the
Court
stated
that,
Hearst
fails
to
make
a
sufficient
showing
that
it
is
likely
to
prevail
on
any
of
[its]
claims
and
therefore
this
factor
weighs
against
a
preliminary
injunction
in
its
favor.
Todays
decision,
coupled
with
the
decisions
in
favor
of
Aereo
in
the
Southern
District
of
New
York
(July
11,
2013)
and
the
Second
Circuit
Court
of
Appeals
(April
1,
2013
and
July
16,
2013),
shows
that
when
you
comply
not
only
with
the
letter,
but
the
spirit
of
the
law,
justice
will
prevail,
said
Aereo
CEO
and
Founder
Chet
Kanojia.
Todays
victory
belongs
to
the
consumer
and
todays
decision,
makes
clear
that
that
there
is
no
reason
that
consumers
should
be
limited
to
1950s
technology
to
access
over-the-air
broadcast
television.
Using
Aereo,
a
consumer
can
simply
and
easily
use
an
individual
remote
antenna
and
cloud
DVR
via
the
Internet
to
record
and
watch-over-the
air
programs.
In
addition
to
the
Courts
denial
of
the
plaintiffs
motion
for
a
preliminary
injunction,
the
court
also
denied
Aereos
motion
to
transfer
the
case
to
New
York.
###
For
media
inquiries:
Aereo,
Inc.
LaunchSquad
for
Aereo
Virginia
Lam,
VP
Communications
aereo@launchsquad.com
vlam@aereo.com
/
347.647.1210