Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Did The Financial Crisis Render Economic Modelling Ineffective
Did The Financial Crisis Render Economic Modelling Ineffective
Did The Financial Crisis Render Economic Modelling Ineffective
InnaGrinis
December,14
th
,2011
Thereisnodoubtthateachnewcrisisdemonstratesthelimitationsofexistingmodels,howeverit
alsocreatesagreatopportunitytoimproveandextendthem.Thisfinancialcrisisisnoexceptionin
thisrespect;notonlydoesitprovideaninterestingapplicationofsecondandthirdgeneration
models,butitshallalsorendereconomicmodellingmoreeffectiveinthefuture.
Uptodate,threegenerationsofmodelshavebeendevelopedtounderstandandseeksolutionsto
financialcrises.
Firstgenerationmodels,suchastheFloodGarbermodel(1994),explainhowdevaluationsare
triggeredbyexcessivereserveslosses.Theyhadbeensuccessfullyappliedtotulipbubbles,the
Germanhyperinflationofthe1920s,aswellasthe1982Mexicancrisis(BlancoandGraber,1986).
However,the19921993EuropeanMonetarySystemcrises,beingcausedbyspeculativeattacksand
politicaleventsinsteadofbadeconomicfundamentals
1
(Masson,2007),demonstratedtheir
ineffectivenessandledtothedevelopmentofthesecondgenerationmodels.
Obstfeld(1994,1996)refinedtheBarroGordonmodel,developedin1983,byintroducingtime
consistencyissuesandselffulfillingexpectations,thusmakingmultipleequilibriapossibleina
certainrangeofeconomicfundamentals.Fore.g.Jeanne(1997)hasshownthatthespeculative
attackonthefrancoccurredbecauseFrenchmacroeconomicfundamentalshappenedtobeinsucha
range.Ashiftininvestorsexpectationswasthedrivingforcebehindthedevaluation.
Letmetrytoexplaintheessenceofsuchmodelsbyapplyingasimplifiedversiontothecaseofthe
Europeandebtcrisis.Animportantfeatureofthemodelisthatpolicydecisionsinourcasethe
decisiontodefaultornotdependonbenefits(lowerinterestburden,fewerausteritymeasures...)
andcosts(reputationaldamage,higherriskpremiuminthefuture...).Moreover,benefitsfrom
defaultingwillvarywithinvestorsexpectationswhichthemselvesdependoneconomic
fundamentals.Ifthefundamentalsaresound,asinthecaseofGermany,investorsdonotexpectany
default.Onesinglegoodequilibriumemerges:nodefault.Ontheotherhand,ifthefundamentals
areharrowing,theonlypossibleequilibriumisthebadone.AnobviousexampleisGreece:its
growthforecastsfor2011and2012are6%and3%respectively,anditspublicdebtisexpectedto
peakat187%in2013(IMF).Theinterestingpartiswhathappensinthemiddleregion:isSpainstill
solvent?WhataboutItaly?Thisiswheremultipleequilibria,calledsunspotequilibria
2
,arise.
1
Economicfundamentalssummarizealltheexogenousstatevariablesthatmatter(Masson,2007).Fore.g.
theinitialdebtlevel,foreignexchangereserves,externaldebtshare...
2
Inthemiddle,therearesunspotequilibria,sonamedbecausethemodeldoesnotspecifywhich
equilibriumwouldbechosen.Instead,thechoiceisassumedtobedeterminedbyextraneousvariables,
sunspots.(Masson,2007)
Benefits,Costsofdefault
Benefits(defaultexpected) Benefits(defaultunexpected)
A
Costs
B
EconomicFundamentals
Forthesamelevelofeconomicfundamentals,whetherthecountrydefaults(equilibriumA)or
not(equilibriumB)willdependonwhatisexpected,i.e.expectationsbecomeselffulfilling.An
equilibriumisafixedpointinthereciprocalmappingbetweenthebeliefsofinvestorsand
policymakersactions.(Masson,2007)Butthelatterdependsonbenefitsandcostsofdefaulting.If
netbenefits(benefitscosts)arepositive,thegovernmentdefaults,otherwiseitrepaysthe
investors.Iamassumingforsimplicitythatdefaultcostsareconstantandthatbenefitsarean
increasingfunctionofeconomicfundamentals(intuitively,ahigherinitialdebtlevelwould
necessitatemoreausteritymeasuresinordertorepaydebt,sothebenefitsofdefaultingincrease).
Expectationsofdefaultshiftthebenefitsscheduleupbecauseasinvestorsdemandahigherrisk
premiumandareunwillingtolendmoneytothegovernment,debtservicingcostsincrease,making
defaultamoreattractiveoption.
Thedecisiontodefaultisthereforeendogenous:itdoesnotonlydependontheabilityofa
governmenttoserviceitsdebt,butalsoonitswillingness.Indeed,numerousexamplesexistwhere
countrieswithdebtlevelsaslowas47%(Mexico,1982)or50%(Argentina,2001)ofGDPdecidedto
default(ReinhartandRogoff,2009).
Bythesametokeninvestorsarecaughtinaprisonersdilemma:itisintheircollectiveinterestto
rollovershorttermdebtprovidingliquidityandavoidingdefault.Nevertheless,selffulfilling
expectations(sunspots)shifttheequilibriumandforcethecountrytodefaultmakinginvestorslose
money(J.Sachs,1984).Accordingtosomeestimates,theCitiexpectshaircutsonGreekdebtas
largeas76%!
3
Inamorecomplexsetting,itispossibletomodeltheprobabilityofdefault.Above,Iderivedthat
thegovernmentdefaultsifthenetbenefitsattimet(B becomepositive.However,B dependson
investorsexpectationsattimet1ofdefaultattimet(n )andtheactualexogenousstate
variables(b :
t
)
t
t-1
t
)
B
t
= b
t
+ on
t-1
(1)
3
Seethefollowingarticle:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/citiexpects76haircutgreekdebtand95if
countrywaits4yearsdebtgdpratiobackdown6
Theeconomicfundamentals canbemodelledastheexpectationattimetofthestatevariablesat
timet+1(investorscareaboutwhetherornotthecountrywillbeabletorepayinthenextperiod):
t
t
= E
t
b
t+1
e
t+1
= b
t+1
-
t
t
= pPi |B
t+1
> u]
=pPi |e
t+1
> on
t
+
t
](seeAppendixforthederivation)(4)
=p F|on
t
+
t
]
distributionfunctionoff(.).
t
below)arisebecausebothsidesof(4)
e
p the45linewherep = n,i.e.thegovernmentdefaults.
betweenequilibriatriggeredbyacrisis
elsewhere(Masson,1999),hadtobeintroducedintoeconomicmodelling.
4
Thisiswhatconstitutes
(2)
Investorssurpriseattimet+1isthereforethedifferencebetweenexpost(realised)statevariables
andexante(expected)ones:
(3)
Furthermoresupposethegovernmentiswillingtodefaultwithprobability.
Theprobabilityofdefaultattimetishence:
n
WhereF(.)isthecumulative
Multipleequilibriaincertainrangesof (theredcurve
dependonn
t
.Expectationsofdefaultar thereforeselffulfillingsincethethresholdforthe
investorssurprisechangesastheprobabilityofdefaultvaries.
n
1
()n(')n
2
()n
3
()n
Theineffectivenessofsecondgenerationmodelsbecameapparentinthe1990swhen
ntr tal
c
multipleequilibriathresholds,sufferedneverthelessfromtheTequilacrisisinMexico(19941995).
ThesameoccurredforMalaysia,SingaporeandHongKongduringthe19971998Asiancrises,
triggeredbythedevaluationoftheThaibaht(02/07/1997).
Tounderstandsuchcrises,contagion,definedasajump
theessenceofthirdgenerationmodels.Unfortunately,spacedoesnotallowmetoderivethe
4
ForamuchmorerigorousdefinitionofcontagionseeMardiDungey&DemosthenesTambakis(2003)
fundamentalequationscharacterizingthirdgenerationmodels,butinterestedreadersmayconsult
IFS
5
andEuropeanissues
6
lecturesbyDemosthenesTambakis,orPaulMasson(1997or2007
7
).
TheonlyequationIconsideristheinterestrateagovernmentpaysattimetinordertoattract
investorsfunds:
i
t
= i
-
+ n
t+1
o (S)
-
t+1
o
t+1
)
-
HerdingmodelsdevelopedbyBanerjee(1992)andBickchandanietal.(1992)studywhy,inthe
Irrationalcontagionisinvestigatedwithinbehaviouraleconomicsthatpayattentiontothe
thoughtpatternsthatanimatepeoplesideasandfeelings,theiranimalspirits.(Akerlof,Shiller).
Wherei istheriskfreeinterestrate,inourcasetheGermanone,andn canbeseenastherisk
premium,i.e.theinterestratespread,constitutedbytheprobabilityofdefault(n ando, the
percentageofmoneyinvestorswillloseinthecaseofadefaultattimet+1.
8
Thirdgenerationmodels,initiallydevelopedtounderstandemergingcountriescrises,are
extremelyusefultoseethedynamicsbehindtheEurozonedebtcrisis.AsDeGrauweargues:
membercountriesofamonetaryunionaredowngradedtothestatusofemergingeconomies.
Indeed,likeemergingcountriesthathavetoissuedebtinforeigncurrency,membersofthe
Eurozoneceasetohavecontroloverthecurrencyinwhichtheirdebtisissued.Thoughnorich
countryhasdefaultedsince1948,reversegraduation(Reinhart,Rogoff)fromserialdefaultis
neverthelesspossibleforEZmembers.Themodelsprovideamechanismthroughwhichasolvent
andhealthycountrycanbeforcedintoinsolvency.Thestartingpointisasuddenstopincapital
inflows(Calvo,1998).Investorsexpectationsshiftandtheyarenolongerwillingtolendmoney.
Aliquiditycrisisoccurs.
In1998,EastAsiasawa$33billioncapitaloutflow.Sincethemajorshareofdebthadbeenissued
indollars,asforeignexchangereservesdriedup,manygovernmentswereforcedtodevalue.
Outstandingdebtburdensbecomingunbearable,aseriesofbankruptciesfollowed.Butdefaultand
devaluationmodelsarecloselyrelated:insteadofareservesthresholdbelowwhichthecountry
devalues,wehaveadebttoGDPratiothresholdthatvarieswithtimeandstochastictaxrevenues
andabovewhichthecountrydefaults.Suddenstopsarethereforeextremelyrelevantinthecase
oftheEurozone:forinstanceGreeknetexternaldebtisexpectedtopeakat128%ofGDPin2012,
whichrepresentsabouttwothirdsoftotalGreekofficialdebtliabilities.
Contagionhappensthroughthreechannels:
_monsoonaleffects:globaleventsaffectingallcountries.Inequation(5)ifi rises,allEZmembers
willseetheirborrowingcostsincrease.
_purecontagion:shiftsinexpectations.
contextofasymmetricinformationanduncertaintyabouteconomicfundamentals,investorsprefer
toimitateothersratherthanrespondtoinformationavailabletothem.Inthiscase,contagionisa
rationalresponseonthepartofinvestorswhentherearefixedcostsofacquiringandprocessing
countryspecificinformation.(Dungey,Tambakis,2003).
5
Lecture4
6
Lecture3
7
Chapter3
8
Iassumeforsimplicitythatinvestorsareriskneutral.ForamorecompleteanalysisconsultD.Tambakis:
Europeanissues,Lecture3.
_spillovers:theprobabilityofdefaultn
t+1
ofoneparticularcountrywilldependonwhether
anothercountryhasdefaultedornot.Thiscreatesthepossibilitythatcountriestakentogethercan
s89%
sahigherriskpremium(DeGrauwe,2011),orwhyBelgium,withthethirdhighestdebt
toGDPratio(96.8%)inEurope,stillhasanAArating(S&Ps)?Thirdgenerationmodelsprovidean
dby17
re
ZgovernmentsspreadsmakingthetotalbillfortheEZ
ir
ngthelastdecade,andbeingunabletodevaluetoregainit,theyare
to
rth
odels?
ReinhartandRogoff(2009)thatmuchmoreattentionshouldbepaidto
bevulnerabletoattacks,whereaswhentakenseparatelytheywouldbeimmunetomultiple
equilibria.
OnemightaskwhySpainthathasadebttoGDPratiolowerthanthatoftheUK(72%versu
in2011)pay
answertosuchquestions.Whencapitalstartsflyingtoquality,governmentsfindthemselvesshort
ofliquidity.Beingunabletoprintmoneytorollovershorttermdebt,theyhavetoraiseinterest
ratestoattractmorefunds.Thisincreasesthedebtburdencreatingadevilishinteractionbetween
liquidityandsolvencycrises.(DeGrauwe).Thecountryistriggeredtowardsthebadsunspot
equilibrium,butthewholeEZisalsosweptalongintotheabyssbecauseofverystrongspillover
effects.Arezkietal.(2011)examinehowratingagenciesannouncementsinducefinancialinstability.
Fore.g.thedowngradeofGreeceonDecember,the8
th
,2009,notonlyraisedtheGreeksprea
basispointscostingtheGreekgovernment8.5million,butalsoraisedtheIrishspreadby5basis
pointsimplyinga2.5millionbillforIreland.
AonenotchratingdowngradeforFrancewouldcostitstaxpayers3billionperyear.Furthermo
itwillcertainlyhavelargespilloversonotherE
evenmoreimpressive.Aparadoxemerges:thesedeadweightlossesintermsofhigherdebtservicing
costscouldbeusedtoactuallyreducedebtlevels,butaresimplywastedwhileatthesametime
raisingdefaultprobabilities!
ThecoreproblemforsuchcountriesasGreece,Spain,Portugal,orItalyisthat,havinglostthe
relativecompetitivenessduri
forcedintoaninternaldevaluationconsistingofadeflationaryspiralandaprolongedrecession,
amplifiedbyausteritymeasures.Thismakestheireconomicfundamentalsevenworseleadingto
ratingdowngradesandfurthercapitaloutflows.Theviciouscirclecanonlybebrokenbyjumping
thegoodequilibrium.Manyinterestingideas,includingaEurobondssystemthatwouldavoid
moralhazardproblems,havebeendeveloped(DeGrauwe),butpoliticalreasonsimpedetheir
application.
Whatimpactwillthiscrisishaveoneconomicmodelling?Whatshouldbeincludedinthefou
generationm
HavingdiscoveredthefollowinggraphinaResearchPaperpublishedbytheSocitGnrale,Ishall
completelyagreewith
domesticdebtandoffbalanceitems.
Muchmoretransparency,historicaldataonpastrepayments,andactualdebtburdensatnational
andregionallevelsareneededinordertomakeeconomicmodellingmoreeffective.
Anotherfeaturethatthiscrisishasdemonstratedisthatastimegoesbyandnewcountriesare
infected;exitingthebadequilibriumbecomesarealchallenge.
2000words
Appendix:
Wehave:
B
t
= b
t
+ on
t-1
B
t+1
= b
t+1
+ on
t
t
= E
t
b
t+1
e
t+1
= b
t+1
-
t
Furthermoresupposethegovernmentiswillingtodefaultwithprobability.
n
t
= pPi |B
t+1
> u]
= pPi |b
t+1
+ on
t
> u]substituting(*)
Therefore: (*)
Theeconomicfundamentalsfunctionis:
Theinvestorssurpriseattimet+1is:
(**)
Theprobabilityofdefaultattimetishence:
= pPi
t
> u]substituting(**) | e
t+1
+
t
+ on
| e
t+1
> -(
t
+ on
t
)]
| e
t+1
<
t
+ on
t
]assuminganormaldistribution(symmetric)
p F|on
t
+
t
]
andShiller,R.J.,AnimalSpirits,2009;
Arezki,R.,Candelon,B.,andSy,A.N.R.,March2011:
eignRatingNewsandFinancialMarketsSpillovers: is,
Banerjee,A.,1992,Asimplemodelofherdbehaviour
eifer,D.andWelch,I.,1992,Atheoryoffads,fashion,custom,and
Garber,PM.,1986,Recurrentdevaluationandspeculativeattacksonthe
Mexicanpeso.JournalofPoliticalEconomy;
ises:TheSimpleEconomicsofSudden
Stops.JournalofAppliedEconomics;
11,CEPSWorkingPaper;
budgetfundamentalism,September2011,
RFWorkingPaper;
Edwards,A.andGrice,D.(GlobalStrategyTeam
dGarber,PM.,1994,Collapsingexchangerateregimes:Somelinear
examples.,JournalofInternationalEconomics
ofInternational
Masson,P.R.:
macroeconomicmodelswithmultipleequil
1994,CahiersEconomiquesetMonetaires,Paris,Banquede
;
.,andRogoff,K.S.,Thistimeisdifferent,2009;
ance,54.
Tambakis,D.N.:
,EconomicsTripos,Michaelmas2011lectures);
_EuropeanIssues(PartIIB,EconomicsTripos,Michaelmas2011lectures).
= pPi
= pPi
=
Bibliography:
Akerlof,G.A.,
Sover EvidencefromtheEuropeanDebtCris
IMFWorkingPaper;
,QuarterlyJournalofEconomics;
Bikchandani,S.,Hirshl
culturalchangeasinformationalcascades,JournalofPoliticalEconomy;
Blanco,H.and
Calvo,G.,1998,CapitalFlowsandCapitalMarketCr
DeGrauwe,P.:
_TheGovernanceofaFragileEurozone,May20
_Balanced CEPSCommentary;
Dungey,M.andTambakis,D.N.,2003,InternationalFinancialContagion:WhatDoWe
Know?,CE
,SocitGnrale,CrossAssetResearch),
27/10/2011;Bust,bust,andbust,GlobalStrategyWeekly;
Flood,RP.,an
;
Jeanne,O.,1997,Arecurrencycrisesselffulfilling?Atest.Journal
Economics,43.
_LecturesinInternationalFinance(2007);
_Contagion: ibria,JournalofInternationalMoneyand
Finance(1999);
Obstfeld,M.
_TheLogicofCurrencyCrises,
France
_ModelsofCurrencyCriseswithSelfFulfillingFeatures,1996,EuropeanEconomicReview.
Reinhart,C.M
Sachs,J.,1984,Theoreticalissuesininternationalborrowing,PrincetonStudiesin
InternationalFin
_TheInternationalFinancialSystem(PartIIB