Site Suitability Report C04XP: Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road

Autumn 2011
Site suitability report C04XP

Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
110-RG-PNC-C04XP-000584 | Autumn 2011

Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road
Site suitability report C04XP Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road
Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C04XP

List of contents
Page number
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 Purpose and structure of the report ......................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................. 1 Consultation............................................................................................. 2 Site and surroundings .............................................................................. 2 Type of site .............................................................................................. 4
Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2
3 4
Proposed use of site construction phase ................................................... 4 Proposed use of site operational phase ..................................................... 5 4.1 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Restoration and after-use ........................................................................ 6 Access ..................................................................................................... 6 Construction works considerations .......................................................... 7 Permanent works considerations............................................................. 7 Health and safety..................................................................................... 7 Introduction .............................................................................................. 8 Planning applications and permissions.................................................... 8 Planning context ...................................................................................... 9 Planning comments ............................................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................ 11 Transport ............................................................................................... 12 Archaeology........................................................................................... 13 Built heritage and townscape................................................................. 13 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water ............................. 14 Ecology .................................................................................................. 14 Flood risk ............................................................................................... 14 Air quality ............................................................................................... 14
Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 6 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4
Environmental appraisal ............................................................................... 11 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
7.9 7.10 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6
Noise ..................................................................................................... 14 Land quality ........................................................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 Socio-economic profile .......................................................................... 15 Issues and impacts ................................................................................ 16 Introduction ............................................................................................ 17 Crown land and special land comments ................................................ 17 Land to be acquired ............................................................................... 17 Property valuation comments ................................................................ 18 Disturbance compensation comments................................................... 18 Discretionary purchase costs comments ............................................... 18 Offsite statutory compensation comments ............................................. 18 Site acquisition cost assessment ........................................................... 19 Introduction ............................................................................................ 19 Engineering ........................................................................................... 19 Planning................................................................................................. 19 Environment .......................................................................................... 20 Socio-economic and community ............................................................ 21 Property ................................................................................................. 21
Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 15
Property assessment ..................................................................................... 17
Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 19
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 23 Appendix 1 Sources of information Appendix 2 Site location plan Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings Appendix 5 Transport plan Appendix 6 Services and geology plan Appendix 7 Construction phase layout Appendix 8 Operational phase layout Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
ii
List of tables
Page number
Table 3.1 Construction phase data ............................................................................ 5 Table 4.1 Operational phase data ............................................................................. 6
List of abbreviations AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SUDS TfL TD above Ordnance Datum biodiversity action plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum
iii
TLRN TPA UDP UXO
Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
iv
1 1.1
1.1.1
Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

The Site selection methodology paper (May 2009 and revised August 2011) a outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of main tunnel sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report. Whether a consideration is relevant to the assessment of a site will depend on available information and professional judgement. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: engineering, planning, environment, property and community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to this stage of assessment. The Site selection background technical paper provides information on the requirements for different types of sites, their sizes and typical activities/ facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an Engineering options report was produced, which relates to main tunnel and connection tunnel options. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). The outcomes are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.2
1.2.1
Background
The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site selection methodology paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A Creation of the long list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites Part 1B Creation of a short list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites assessment against a list of more detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
The amendments made in August 2011 do not change the site selection methodology process. The amendments only related to the introduction of a second phase of consultation (paragraphs 2.3.13-2.4.15) and minor factual updates.
Page 1
Site suitability report C04XP 1.2.2 The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C Creation of the preferred list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.2.3
The Site selection methodology paper also contains a provision for a back-check process in paragraph 2.5.6 that states: If any sites for any of the main tunnel sites or intermediate sites (or CSO site) are eliminated for any reason, if there are significant changes of circumstances in relation to existing sites or combinations of sites, if new or replacement sites are required or found or if the engineering design develops in unexpected ways then a targeted repeat of stages 1-3 will need to be undertaken in order to fill in any site gaps.
1.3
1.3.1
Consultation
Thames Waters approach to engagement and consultation for the Thames Tunnel project is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation and the accompanying Community Consultation Strategy. Thames Water has engaged regularly with all potentially affected London local authorities, other stakeholders and interested parties on sites and the project. Phase one consultation has been completed for all the preferred and shortlisted sites along with the three main tunnel route options. The analysis of the consultation responses is set out in the Report on phase one consultation and Interim engagement report. Any relevant site comments were considered at the post phase one consultation optioneering workshops. The outcomes of these workshops are reported in the Phase two scheme development report. After the workshops, engagement on sites has continued with key stakeholders, and the engineering design for sites has also continued in parallel. In autumn 2011, phase two consultation will provide another opportunity for people to comment on sites.
1.3.2
2 2.1
2.1.1
Site information Site and surroundings

This site is one of the back-check shortlisted sites for Hammersmith Pumping Station CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. The site C04XP is made up of the existing Thames Water depot and Hammersmith Pumping Station sites, both within the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The sites are roughly rectangular in shape and both accessed from Chancellors Road. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2.
2.1.2
Page 2
Site suitability report C04XP 2.1.3 The depot contains a large, single-storey building (water pumping station) at the southern end of the site which contains an office, workshop, garaging and storage facilities, a parking area, and smaller single storey building at the northern end of the site. The water pumping station building is on the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulhams Register of Local Interest. The majority of the temporary construction works are focused on the depot site. The larger of the two existing buildings would be retained during the temporary construction works and the smaller building would be demolished under initial proposals. The depot site is fully enclosed by residential properties on all sides. The western boundary of the construction site abuts dwelling nos. 10 and 11 Chancellors Street and is in very close proximity (2m to 4m) to the rear facades of dwellings along Chancellors Road, St James Street and the Peabody Estate. The existing Hammersmith Pumping Station site is bound by Chancellors Road to the north and by a vacant former industrial site, known as Hammersmith Embankment, to the east, west and south. The closest residential properties are located opposite the site, along Chancellors Road, at a distance of approximately 7m. The surrounding area is predominantly residential, but includes a mix of other uses. Modern office developments are located on the River Thames frontage towards the southwest of the site, Frank Banfield Park is located to the east of the site and Fulham Palace Road, which contains a range of commercial, retail and restaurant premises, is located further east beyond the park. The site is within a number of designated areas under the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, including the Thames Policy Area, the Winslow Road Archaeological Priority Area and the Fulham Reach Conservation Area. All the mapped designations, where data was available, are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. The site is 1.2km from the TLRN (A4), with road access to the site along main roads A219 and A306, then Chancellors Road and Distillery Road. The routes may pass under one bridge. There is no rail network local to the site. The nearest London Underground station is Hammersmith, 0.5km from the site. There are no existing wharfage/jetty facilities at the site the site is about 200m from the river and access to the river is very difficult in this area. A transport plan for the site is attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: HV cable running through the site in the proposed location of the CSO drop shaft
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8 2.1.9
2.1.10
Page 3
Site suitability report C04XP Electricity transmission cable outside the northern part of the site (maximum clearance to proposed drop shaft location approximately 20m) Thames Lee Valley 2.59mID water tunnel outside the south-eastern part of the site (maximum clearance to proposed drop shaft location approximately 60m) Gas main in Chancellors Road and Distillery Road.
2.1.11
The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the shaft would be founded in London Clay.
2.1.12
2.2
2.2.1
Type of site
The site C04XP is being considered as a CSO site to intercept the Hammersmith Pumping Station CSO (CS04X), with two options for siting of the drop shaft.
3
3.1.1
Proposed use of site construction phase

The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction phase layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: Option 1 CSO layout with the drop shaft within the Thames Water depot Option 2 CSO layout with the drop shaft in Chancellors Road and adjoining pumping station land potential access points.
3.1.2
3.1.3
These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO site construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above-ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration).
3.1.4
3.1.5
Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1.
Page 4
Site suitability report C04XP Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 2 4 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
4 4.1
4.1.1
Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

An indicative operational phase layouts for the two options for this CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational phase layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites. The underground infrastructure at this site would likely comprise an interception chamber, double flap valve chamber and a drop shaft with access openings. The above-ground infrastructure at this site would likely comprise a ventilation column and electrical control kiosk. The top structures are envisaged to be finished at a minimum level of 104.5mTD (4.5mAOD), and since the ground mean level at this site is 105mTD (5mAOD), the top structure would be flush with the current ground level. The top structure provides access and egress into the drop shaft. In Option 1, a hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. In Option 2, a hardstanding around the valve chamber would be complemented by the road surface surrounding the drop shaft located in Chancellors Road. Neither option would require fencing to be installed For both options, the Hammersmith Pumping Station and the Thames Water depot site would continue to be fully operational assets, with the pumping station at a reduced onward duty as a consequence of the Thames Tunnel project works. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1.
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6
4.1.7
4.1.8
Page 5
Site suitability report C04XP Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/ weekend) frequency of visits No. of traffic movements One daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional one-week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per ten years that could be night/day/weekend working. One van visit every six months. An additional one-week period of two to ten movements per day (estimated several vans and two cranes) every ten years.
4.2
4.2.1
Restoration and after-use

The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required.
5 5.1
5.1.1
Engineering assessment Access

This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2.
Road
5.1.2 The construction site is common to both options. It would be 1.2km from TLRN (A4), with road access to the site along main roads A219 and A306, then Chancellors Road and Distillery Road. The route may pass under one bridge. For the construction phase, there would be one access point to the site in Chancellors Road. For the operational phase, there would be a single access, also from Chancellors Road, into the depot site for the Option 1 drop shaft. For Option 2, where the drop shaft is located within Chancellors Road, there would be no specific access. Access to the valve chamber for both options would require negotiation through the existing gates of the pumping station compound.
5.1.3 5.1.4
Rail
5.1.5 There would be no rail network local to this site. The nearest London Underground station would be Hammersmith, 0.5km from the site. However, rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites.
Page 6
River
5.1.6 River access and jetty/wharfage facilities are not a requirement for CSO sites. In addition, the site would be approximately 200m from the river and access to the river would be difficult in this area.
5.2
5.2.1
Construction works considerations

For Option 1, existing buildings at the extreme north end would require to be demolished to free up space for the drop shaft works. Option 2 would require no demolition. Both drop shaft options have neighbouring third-party buildings. Residences in St James Street, Chancellors Street and the Peabody Estate surround the Option 1 drop shaft site in the depot. In Chancellors Road, there are residences opposite the Option 2 drop shaft site. Option 1 would require the connection culvert to pass under residential properties on Chancellors Road, under the existing Thames Water depot building and in relative close proximity to residential properties at the end of St James Street and Chancellors Street. There may be potential settlement issues for any of these buildings. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities show that the main items of concern for both options would be multiple utilities running along Chancellors Road, including pipes and culverts associated with the pumping station, high-voltage cables, telecoms cables, clean water pipes, gas pipes and the Hammersmith Storm Relief sewers (Stamford Brook and West Branches). Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to divert where necessary and to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. Both options would require works within Chancellors Road and would require either partial or full closure (in the Option 2 case). It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme.
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4 5.2.5
5.3
5.3.1 5.3.2
Permanent works considerations

The top structures to the drop shafts and valve chambers would be flush with ground level. For Option 2, where the drop shaft is sited within Chancellors Road, access openings would be flush with the road surface. Road closures and safety measures would be required when entry is being effected.
5.4
5.4.1 5.4.2
Health and safety

Particular care would be required for the sinking of the drop shaft within Chancellors Road for Option 2 where multiple utilities are present. There are no other unusual health and safety issues with this site.
Page 7
6 6.1
6.1.1
Planning assessment Introduction

The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
6.2
6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions

An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham online planning applications database did not identify any relevant planning applications submitted within the last five years applicable to either the existing depot or pumping station sites. However, it is worth noting that a recent hybrid (part outline/part detailed) planning application has been submitted for the comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment of the Hammersmith Embankment site (termed Fulham Reach by the current applicant), which is adjacent to the existing pumping station (application reference 2011/00407/COMB). The planning statement which supports the hybrid planning application refers to the ongoing negotiations between the Thames Tunnel project team and St George, the current Hammersmith Embankment site owner and prospective developer. It also includes a plan of the indicative working area required for the interception of the Hammersmith Pumping Station CSO on that site (C04XN). Paragraphs 2.12 and 2.13 of the statement are extracted below: It has been agreed between the two parties that if the site is preferred and works commissioned by Thames Water then in due course a works area could be located in the north east corner of the Application Site as indicated in Appendix A. This would allow for construction to proceed on the first phase of the Proposed Development. Both parties are working together to find a solution that in the event that this is the preferred location and the works are commissioned, disruption to the existing neighbourhood would be minimised whilst simultaneously allowing construction of the Thames Tunnel and redevelopment of the Application Site.
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
As part of Thames Waters statutory stakeholder response to the planning application consultation, comments have been sent to the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham which explain our intention to continue to work with the developer to reach agreement over the use of the site for temporary and permanent works. Amended drawings which accommodate both the temporary and permanent Thames Tunnel project works have been submitted to the applicant and the council for their consideration. The consultation comments also suggested a condition that could be attached to the planning consent, which would require
Page 8
Site suitability report C04XP provision to be made for the temporary and permanent Thames Tunnel project works within the siting, layout and phasing of the new development. A legal agreement to this effect is likely to be drawn up between both parties if the site is preferred.
6.3
6.3.1
Planning context
The current planning policy context for the site is provided from the saved September 2007 policies from the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003. Several planning designations and policies from this development plan are applicable to the site and are detailed below. Policies are also presented from the emerging Core Strategy, which is subject to a binding Inspectors report and anticipated for formal adoption by the council in October 2011. Due to the advanced stage of the Core Strategy, we consider the policies within the emerging development plan document to be of material weight.
Emerging Core Strategy

6.3.2 Policy RTC1, The River Thames and Grand Union Canal recognises the benefit of the River Thames to Hammersmith and Fulham as well as its strategic importance to London, particularly as a resource for sport, recreation and ecology, and as an important refuge for plants and wildlife.
Saved UDP
Thames Policy Area 6.3.3 The Hammersmith Pumping Station site is located within the Thames Policy Area. Policy EN31X requires all built development to be of a high-quality design that respects the riverside location, is of a high urban design standard and contributes to its surrounding environment. Archaeological priority areas 6.3.4 The Hammersmith Pumping Station site is located within the Winslow Road Archaeological Priority Area. Policy EN7, Archaeological Priority Areas requires developers to conduct archaeological field investigations and make provision for any remains on site to be protected, enhanced or preserved. Conservation area 6.3.5 Both the Hammersmith Pumping Station and depot sites are located within the Fulham Reach Conservation Area. UDP Policy EN2 requires all development to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, paying particular attention to the historical context, quality of design, scale, bulk, massing and materials. Building of local importance and interest 6.3.6 The water pumping station building located on the Thames Water depot site is on the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulhams Register of Local Interest. UDP Policy ENV6 states that development will not be
Page 9
Site suitability report C04XP permitted if it would result in the demolition, loss or harmful alteration to buildings of local townscape, architectural or historic interest. Amenity 6.3.7 Both the Hammersmith Pumping Station and depot sites are in close proximity to existing residential properties. Policy EN21, Environmental Nuisance seeks to ensure that no undue detriment occurs to general amenities.
6.4
6.4.1
Planning comments
There are a number of planning designations and policies that are applicable to the site. These designations and policies have been identified and described in Section 6.3 and, of these, those relating to heritage conservation and residential amenity are of most relevance to the proposed development. Two layout options are under consideration for site C04XP and are described in Section 3. Site layout Option 1 is enclosed on all sides at very close proximity by residential properties. The temporary construction worksite adjoins the side facades of nos.10 and 11 Chancellors Street and is separated by only 2m to 4m from the rear facades of dwellings along Chancellors Road and the side facades of dwellings within St James Street and the Peabody Estate. The limited availability of space on the depot site and the very close proximity of sensitive receptors will reduce scope for the implementation of successful mitigation measures which would be required to protect residential amenity from unacceptable levels of construction impact. Site layout Option 2 utilises available space on the existing Hammersmith Pumping Station site. However, the inception of the sewer is within the public highway and would require the temporary closure of part of Chancellors Road. This scenario would also locate the shaft and majority of the construction works directly in front of residential properties along Chancellors Road. A separation distance of approximately 7m (the front garden width) between the construction area and the front facades of properties along Chancellors Road is unlikely to be sufficient to safeguard amenity and, due to the very close proximity of sensitive receptors, implementation of successful mitigation measures is likely to be difficult. The temporary closure of Chancellors Road during the construction works may also impede access to a number of dwellings and would result in the temporary loss of approximately seven on-street car parking spaces. The siting of the shaft within the public highway would also create future access issues and further disturbance to existing residents during the maintenance periods of the permanent structures. For both layout options, a control of construction working hours is likely to be required to safeguard amenity. The Hammersmith Embankment site, which is adjacent to Hammersmith Pumping Station and the construction works proposed in site layout Option 2, is subject of a planning application for mixed-use redevelopment. If the
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6 6.4.7
Page 10
Site suitability report C04XP site were to be used as proposed in Option 2, the Thames Tunnel project would be required to ensure the cumulative impact of construction works associated with both developments does not cause an unacceptable impact on the surrounding area. Construction management plans are likely to be required to manage potential noise, dust and traffic impacts. 6.4.8 Mitigation may also be required during the construction period to ensure the continued enjoyment by existing users of Frank Banfield Park, located to the east of site layout Option 2. The construction works are likely to directly impact on a greater number of existing residents in layout Option 1 when compared to Option 2. However, neither option is considered acceptable from a planning perspective due to the limited scope for successful mitigation measures. The water pumping station building on the depot site is on the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulhams Register of Local Interest. This building would be retained during the temporary construction works. Mitigation such as appropriate hoarding may be required to protect the building during the construction works, in accordance with UDP Policy ENV6. A fuller assessment of built heritage impacts is included in Section 7. Both site layout options are unlikely to a have an unacceptable impact on the character or appearance of the Fulham Reach Conservation Area or Thames Policy Area. The temporary construction areas could be appropriately hoarded to protect views and returned to their former use when completed. The above-ground permanent structures would be integrated within existing Thames Water operational land and the shaft in Layout 2 would form part of the public highway. Therefore, none of the permanent works should be overly prominent features within the existing context. Appropriate mitigation may still be required to reduce potential impacts on setting, appearance and local views; however, it is considered that the proposal should not cause an unacceptable level of impact. A more detailed heritage assessment is included in Section 7. Development within the designated archaeological priority area is also unlikely to be unacceptable, with the implementation of agreed appropriate onsite investigations and remediation. A more detailed appraisal of archaeological potential is included in Section 7. The project should in principle support the aims of Policy RTC1 by enhancing the environmental quality of the River Thames and therefore making it a more attractive resource for sport, recreation, plants and wildlife.
6.4.9
6.4.10
6.4.11
6.4.12
6.4.13
7 7.1
7.1.1
Environmental appraisal Introduction

The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables.
Page 11
7.2
Transport Option 1 Shaft located on depot land
7.2.1
Option 1 is suitable for use as a CSO site. Access is possible using an existing site access for the Thames Water depot which may require widening to enable use by construction vehicles. The internal access road will need priority working/management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road require removal to enable construction vehicles to access/egress the site and provide adequate visibility from the site access. The potential road access route to the TLRN (A4) runs through a residential and high street area and is traffic calmed (speed cushions). Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles. Alternative parking provision is available within the vicinity of the site. The potential rail access route will require the removal of traffic calming (speed humps), although rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. River access is not essential for a CSO site. There is a good possibility that the workforce will be able to use public transport to access the site, and some parking could be provided within the site boundary. On-street pay and display parking in the vicinity of the site is restricted to a maximum stay of four to eight hours and is therefore not suitable for the workforce due to time constraints. In summary, temporary traffic management will be required for the construction of a connection culvert on Chancellors Road (which will also restrict access into the CSO site), the widening of the existing site access (if required) and the removal of on-street parking on Chancellors Road.
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4
7.2.5
Option 2 Shaft located in Chancellors Road

7.2.6 Option 2 is less suitable for use as a CSO site. The temporary construction access and egress gates require construction to provide a one-way system through the site. This will reduce the need for construction vehicles to turn around within the site. The construction of the drop shaft would require a temporary road closure and the diversion route features traffic calming in the form of a raised junction and speed cushions. The diversion route would also require Crisp Road to be traffic managed or temporarily converted to two-way, requiring the removal of pinch-points and all on-street parking. During the maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, it may be possible to close one lane and implement a priority working system along Chancellors Road to allow one-way traffic. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road require removal to enable construction vehicles to access and egress to/from the site. The access route to the TLRN (A4) runs through a residential and high street area and is traffic calmed (speed cushions). The potential road access route from the TLRN (A4) requires the removal of a raised junction
Page 12
7.2.7
7.2.8
Site suitability report C04XP on Queen Caroline Street. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles. Alternative parking provision is available within the vicinity of the site. 7.2.9 The potential rail access route will require the removal of traffic calming (speed humps and raised junction), although rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. River access is not essential for a CSO site. There is a good possibility that the workforce will be able to use public transport to access the site, and some parking could be provided within the site boundary. On-street pay and display parking in the vicinity of the site is restricted to a maximum stay of four to eight hours and is therefore not suitable for the workforce due to time constraints. In summary, temporary traffic management will be required for the construction of the site access and egress gates, the construction/ maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, management of the diversion route during the temporary closure of Chancellors Road (particularly Crisp Road), removal of on-street parking on Chancellors Road and the removal of the raised junction for road access.
7.2.10
7.2.11
7.3
7.3.1
Archaeology
Based on current information, this site is considered suitable for use as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2. There is one known archaeological receptor of isolated Roman finds from within the southern part of the site, which is close to the location of the Option 2 shaft location. There are records of archaeological remains of importance in the immediate vicinity (to the southwest). Structural remains (foundations) associated with an important post-medieval house of high archaeological value may still be present within the location of the proposed drop shaft for Option 2. In addition, the fact that there has been little major disturbance in the recent past within the area suggests it is possible that archaeological remains may still exist below ground.
7.4
7.4.1
Built heritage and townscape

From a built heritage perspective, the site is less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 due to potential impacts on the water pumping station (a building of merit) and the wider Fulham Reach Conservation Area, which is predominantly residential in character. There is also the potential for indirect impacts on the Hammersmith Odeon Conservation Area, particularly during construction. Mitigation during construction is recommended in the form of appropriate lighting and hoardings. Any permanent elements should be sensitively designed. From a townscape perspective, the site is less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 due to the proposed works which would have an indirect adverse impact on the residential character of the area. Construction activities will be visually intrusive to residential properties, particularly along Chancellors Road for both options 1 and 2 and also St James Street and Chancellors Street in the case of Option 1.
Page 13
7.4.2
7.5
7.5.1
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable for both options 1 and 2 because the CSO drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are Kempton Gravel, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the CSO site. There will be limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 because there is no direct pathway to the River Thames for pollution and only standard mitigation would be required.
7.5.2
7.6
7.6.1
Ecology
This site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2. Ecological surveys and the provision of compensatory habitat (potentially involving offsite solutions) are likely to be required if the site is selected, but the scale is likely to be small. There will be no impacts on aquatic ecology receptors provided development does not encroach on the foreshore or discharge to the River Thames.
7.7
7.7.1
Flood risk
This site is suitable for use as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 as it is protected from the one in 1,000-year flood level, and the underlying geology and potential space on the site means that infiltration SUDS are likely to be suitable.
7.8
7.8.1
Air quality
This site is less suitable for use as a CSO site for both Options 1 and 2. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site and therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. However, this could somewhat be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
7.9
7.9.1
Noise
This site is less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 due to the proximity of the residential receptors on all boundaries of the site. Option 1 is less suitable in particular due to the proximity of the residential receptors to the north of the site. Any shielding afforded by the site perimeter barriers will be largely ineffectual due to the height of some of the receptors. In addition, the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to cause noise impacts on the residential properties on Chancellors Road and other nearby residential streets.
Page 14
7.10
7.10.1
Land quality
The site is considered less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from the current pumping station and depot, the historical tanks and electrical substations on site, and the chemical storage depot and fuel tanks in the vicinity of the site. This potentially poses a risk to construction workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and inhalation exposure pathways, as well as ground gas risks. Additionally, the potential exists for contaminants to be drawn to the deeper Chalk aquifer, and for migration to surface water receptors to occur through shallow groundwater transport. There is potential for unexploded ordnance to be present on site as historical information indicates that nearby areas have been cleared of ordnance (dates unknown). It would therefore be prudent for a UXO survey (or equivalent) to be conducted at the site if not done so already.
7.10.2
7.10.3
8 8.1
8.1.1
Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

The socio-economic and community assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Socio-economic profile Socio-economic and community issues and impacts.
8.2
8.2.1
Socio-economic profile
The site is located within the Fulham Reach and Hammersmith Broadway wards of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for the two wards, in comparison to the rest of Hammersmith and Fulham, London and England as a whole: Both wards have a higher rate of economically active, aged people that are full-time employees than London or England as a whole While Fulham Reach has a higher proportion having achieved Level 4 or 5 educational qualifications than the borough as a whole, London or England, Hammersmith Broadway has a lower rate than for the borough but higher than that for London or England. Both wards have a higher proportion of housing rented from the local council and a lower than London or England average of households are owner occupied A higher proportion of people aged 20 to 44, with fewer children and older people than average In both wards, approximately 62% of residents were born in the UK, and in Fulham Reach, there are a higher proportion of white British people than in the rest of the borough, although lower than in London
Page 15
Site suitability report C04XP or England. There are also a slightly higher proportion of people from Chinese ethnic groups in the Fulham Reach ward. 8.2.2 The surrounding area has a mixed population with a range of ages, ethnic backgrounds and economic conditions represented. Apart from the employees using the sites parking facilities, no visitors were observed on the site. Visitors observed in neighbouring Frank Banfield Park included groups of youths and individual adults on their lunch hour, as well as family groups.
8.3
8.3.1 8.3.2
Issues and impacts

Two layout options are under consideration for site C04XP and are described in Section 3. From a community impacts perspective, site layout Option 1 appears likely to impact on a number of residential properties which are located immediately adjacent to the proposed works areas, particularly nos.10 and 11 Chancellors Street, which are in close proximity to the proposed shaft location, and a number of dwellings along Chancellors Road, St James Street and the Peabody Estate. There are also two playgrounds opposite the proposed works which are in relative close proximity to the shaft location, and therefore likely to be disrupted by works in this area. Frank Banfield Park is also located to the northeast of the site; however, as the majority of the works are surrounded by buildings, this should screen the works from the park to some extent, thereby limiting potential impacts. The limited availability of space on the proposed worksite and the very close proximity of the residential properties and playgrounds appear likely to reduce scope for the implementation of successful mitigation measures to reduce levels of construction impact. Site layout Option 2 utilises available space on the existing Hammersmith Pumping Station site. However, the proposed shaft location is within the public highway and would require the temporary closure of part of Chancellors Road. The proposed shaft site is also located directly opposite a number of residential properties on Chancellors Road and, due to this close proximity, effective mitigation of construction impacts may be difficult to achieve. There are also a large number of further residential dwellings opposite and in close proximity to the site which are likely to be impacted. Frank Banfield Park is located in the vicinity of the site to the northeast and appears likely to be affected by construction impacts. The temporary closure of Chancellors Road during the construction works may also prevent access to a number of properties and result in the temporary loss of a number of car parking spaces, which could have a direct impact on the local community. The siting of the shaft within the public highway would also create future access issues and further disturbance to existing residents and businesses during the maintenance periods of the permanent structures.
8.3.3
8.3.4
8.3.5
8.3.6
8.3.7 8.3.8
Page 16
9 9.1
9.1.1 9.1.2
Property assessment Introduction

This report builds on the advantages and disadvantages in Table 2.3 and the assessment provides more up-to-date information. The two shaft locations options being assessed comprise land primarily within Thames ownership. However, both options will include some works within Chancellors Road and the title for this area remains unregistered.
9.2
9.2.1 9.2.2
Crown land and special land comments

The pumping station and depot sites are owned by Thames Water and therefore no acquisition will be needed of these areas. Both options will require works in Chancellors Road, albeit Option 2 will require more extensive works in this area than Option 1. This land remains unregistered; however, it is likely to be owned by adjoining landowners, whose ownership historically and typically extends to the centre of adjoining roads. If this applies in this case, there is unlikely to be any procedural issues acquiring Chancellors Road. Alternatively, the road subsoil may be owned by the council and an acquisition that is opposed by the council will create risk. Contact should be made with the council to establish ownership and, if necessary, see if an acquisition can be agreed. For both options, subsoil will need to be acquired for the connection tunnels. The acquisition of this subsoil via compulsory purchase should not present any difficulties
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.3
9.3.1
Land to be acquired
The worksite areas will be located primarily on Thames Water owned land and therefore acquisition of this area is not required. However, part of the worksite lies outside of Thames Water ownership, in Chancellors Road. The compensation assessment assumes that the worksite outside of Thames Waters ownership will be acquired temporarily via the acquisition of new rights for the period of the works stated in the engineering section above. A small area within the worksite is required permanently for operational purposes. This permanent operational land requirement is located within Thames ownership in Option 1 and located within Chancellors Road in Option 2. Subsoil will need to be acquired permanently for the connection tunnels in both options.
9.3.2
9.3.3
9.3.4
Page 17
9.4
Property valuation comments Option 1 Shaft located on depot land
9.4.1
As the worksite is located primarily on Thames Waters land and the only acquisition will be of subsoil and to allow some short-term works within Chancellors Road, the acquisition costs are likely to be relatively low and therefore acceptable.
Option 2 Shaft located in Chancellors Road

9.4.2 9.4.3 The same comments apply in relation to Option 1 as for Option 2, except for the comments set out below. The compensation estimate includes an allowance for the acquisition of Chancellors Road for the requirement to house permanent operational phase infrastructure. The acquisition costs for Option 2 are likely to be low and therefore acceptable. Both options will require acquisition of subsoil for the connection tunnels. The tunnel will be at a depth of 22 metres and therefore there should be no significant impact on property values.
9.4.4 9.4.5
9.5
9.5.1
Disturbance compensation comments

As the site comprises primarily Thames Water land and road, it is unlikely that there would be any claims for disturbance compensation.
9.6
9.6.1
Discretionary purchase costs comments

The Option 1 shaft location is in very close proximity to houses on Chancellors Street, St James Street and flats within the Queen Caroline Estate and the Peabody Trust flats. There is higher potential for high discretionary purchase costs in relation to this option. The shaft location for Option 2 is in close proximity to lower density housing on Chancellors Road and there is potential for moderate discretionary purchase costs in relation to this option. However, working is expected to be during normal working hours and therefore the potential for significant discretionary purchase costs is limited.
9.6.2
9.6.3
9.7
9.7.1
Offsite statutory compensation comments

The risk of offsite statutory compensation claims arising under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973 for both shaft location options is considered to be low. Option 1 is likely result in the closure of Chancellors Road for a short period. The risk of offsite statutory compensation claims arising under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 for shaft location Option 1 should be low if access to all properties is maintained during times of road closure.
9.7.2
Page 18
Site suitability report C04XP 9.7.3 Shaft location Option 2 results in two residential properties becoming landlocked. This will result in a compensation claim under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965. The Section 10 claim costs for Option 2 likely to be high but acceptable.
9.8
9.8.1 9.8.2
Site acquisition cost assessment

The acquisition costs are likely to be low for Option 1. The acquisition costs for Option 2 will be significantly higher due to the impact on the two houses on Chancellors Road. However, the costs will still be acceptable. Both site options have been assessed as suitable.
9.8.3
10 10.1
10.1.1
Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment, and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not.
10.2
Engineering Option 1 drop shaft located on depot land
10.2.1
Overall, the design and construction of this option retains significant residual risks on account of the very close proximity of existing critical main sewers to the drop shaft works. As a consequence, this option is deemed to be less suitable.
Option 2 drop shaft located in Chancellors Road

10.2.2 Design and construction of this option also retains significant residual risks on account of the very close proximity of existing critical utilities within Chancellors Road to the drop shaft works. During operations, this option would require closure of Chancellors Road to enable access to the drop shaft. As a consequence, this option is deemed to be less suitable.
10.3
10.3.1 10.3.2
Planning
On balance, both site layout Option 1 and site layout Option 2 are considered as not suitable for a CSO site. The construction works are likely to directly impact on a greater number of existing residents in site layout Option 1 when compared to Option 2. However, neither option is considered acceptable from a planning perspective. This is due to the limited scope for implementation of successful mitigation measures which would protect the amenity of existing residents during the period of construction works.
Page 19
10.4
Environment Option 1 Drop shaft located on depot land
10.4.1 10.4.2
Overall, the site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site for Option 1, although mitigation would be required. Based on current information, the site is suitable from the perspectives of transport, archaeology, water resources (hydrogeology and surface water), flood risk and ecology. The site is considered less suitable from the perspectives of built heritage, townscape, air quality, noise and land quality. Overall, the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether built heritage, townscape, air quality, noise and land quality impacts can be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include: built heritage and townscape a high-quality scheme design would be required to minimise impacts air quality measures to ensure dust is adequately mitigated for the closest receptors noise standard noise barriers are unlikely to be entirely effective, and other techniques may be required to reduce construction noise to acceptable levels land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this medium risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ.
10.4.3 10.4.4
Option 2 Drop shaft located in Chancellors Road

10.4.5 10.4.6 Overall, the site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site for Option 2. Based on current information, the site is suitable from the perspectives of archaeology, water resources (surface water and hydrogeology), flood risk and ecology. The site is considered less suitable from the perspectives of transport, built heritage, townscape, air quality, noise and land quality. Overall, the site is considered less suitable due to the transport issues associated with this site and also due to built heritage, townscape, air quality, noise and land quality issues. Likely mitigation considerations would include the following: Transport temporary traffic management will be required for the construction of the site access and egress gates, the construction/ maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, management of the diversion route during the temporary closure of Chancellors Road (particularly Crisp Road), removal of on-street parking on Chancellors Road and the removal of the raised junction for road access.
10.4.7 10.4.8
Page 20
Site suitability report C04XP Built heritage and townscape a high-quality scheme design would be required to minimise impacts. Air quality measures to ensure dust is adequately mitigated for the closest receptors. Noise standard noise barriers are unlikely to be entirely effective, and other techniques may be required to reduce construction noise to acceptable levels. Land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this medium risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ.
10.5
10.5.1 10.5.2
Socio-economic and community

The use of the site is considered not suitable from a community impacts perspective for both layout options. The construction works are likely to directly impact on a number of residential properties and, given their close proximity to the site, effective mitigation may be difficult to achieve. Option 1 is also in close proximity to two playgrounds, while Option 2 requires a large amount of work in the public highway, which appears likely to impact on the surrounding community. For both layout options, a control of construction working hours and extensive mitigation would be required to try to reduce impacts on surrounding residents and properties.
10.5.3
10.6
10.6.1
Property
The advantages and disadvantages of Option 1 site layout are as follows.
Option 1 Drop shaft located on depot land

10.6.2 The advantages of the site are as follows. 10.6.3 The site is contained primarily within Thames Water owned land, therefore acquisition costs will be low. There is lower potential for Section 10 compensation claims, provided access is maintained to all properties. Higher potential for discretionary purchase costs as the shaft is located close to and surrounded by residential properties.
The disadvantages of the site are as follows.
10.6.4
This site is considered suitable as a CSO site due to being located primarily on Thames Waters land, resulting in low acquisition cost.
Option 2 Drop shaft located in Chancellors Road

10.6.5 The advantages of the site are as follows. The site is contained primarily within Thames Water owned land, therefore acquisition costs will be low.
Page 21
Site suitability report C04XP 10.6.6 Discretionary purchase costs are likely to be lower due to the shaft being located further from high-density residential property. Increased disruption to Chancellors Road increased possibility of compensation claims under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965. Slightly increased procedural difficulties associated with acquiring rights to work in the road compared to Option 1.
The disadvantages of the site are as follows.
10.6.7
This site is considered suitable as a CSO site.
Page 22
Site suitability report C04XP Appendices
Appendices
Page 23
Site suitability report C04XP Appendices
Page 24
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 1
Appendix 1 Sources of information Engineering

Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail URS Scott Wilson Access River BMT Isis Services (Utilities) and Third Party Assets Thames Tunnel and utility companies Geology British Geological Society and Thames Tunnel Construction and Operational Layout Template Thames Tunnel Site selection background technical paper Thames Tunnel
Planning
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham online planning applications database Saved policies in the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted in 1993 Policies from the emerging Core Strategy, post submission amendments arising during examination, published May 2011
Environment
Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency
Archaeology Historic Environment data from Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service (GLAAS) National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC)
Appendix 1 Page 1
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 1 Local authority websites Bing maps
Built heritage and townscape Local authority lists of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plan and DPDs Local authority websites Bing maps
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels and contour maps (2009-11) Environment Agency water quality (surface water and groundwater) Environment Agency Groundwater Source Protection Zones Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck British Geological Survey (BGS) logs BGS 1:50,000 Geological Sheets Solid and Drift Editions (England and Wales) BGS Geology of London Special Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) Crossrail (2005) Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report: Appendix C Baseline Data. Figure C.4: Extent of Saline Intrusion based on 177 mg/l *5mmol/l) Isochlor
Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/ pages/.html
Appendix 1 Page 2
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 1 National Biodiversity Network http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales www.ukbap.org.uk
Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency National Flood and Coastal Defence Database Envirocheck
Air quality Local authority websites London Air Quality Network www.londonair.org.uk Defra UK-AIR, air quality information resource www.airquality.co.uk Defra Air Quality Management Areas http://aqma.defra.gov.uk Defra Local Air Quality Management http://laqm.defra.gov.uk
Noise Envirocheck Identification of receptors Promap Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps Identification of existing noise levels
Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information Envirocheck Data Sheets provided as a GIS Database British Geological Survey (BGS) logs
Socio-economic and community

Statistics from the Office of National Statistics 2001 Census data Frank Banfield Park upgrade: www.lbhf.gov.uk/Directory/ News_Archive/Press_releases/106835_Newly_developed_ Frank_Banfield_Park_open_to_the_public.asp PPG17: www.lbhf.gov.uk/Images/OS_Audits_Final_Report_Final %20for%20web_tcm21-108674.pdf
Appendix 1 Page 3
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 1 Fulham Reach Conservatives Newsletter: www.shaunbailey.co.uk/ media/pdfs/FR0309.pdf Petition from Hammersmith and Fulham council to oppose Thames Tunnel plans: www.gopetition.co.uk/online/21660.html Frank Banfield Park: www.lbhf.gov.uk/Directory/Environment_and_ Planning/Parks_and_open_spaces/Find_a_park/115027_ Frank_Banfield_Park.asp
Property
Mouchel Land Registry information Valuation Office Agency (VOA) website London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham online planning applications database Multimap
Appendix 1 Page 4
Appendix 2 Site location plan
Appendix 2 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled) Pumping Station
# *
! (
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM

0 10 20
40 Metres 60 80
C04XP
CS04X Hammersmith Pumping Station
* #
Hammersmith Pumping Station
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-01966 Date : .................................. 2011/10/24 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
! (
Thames Water Utilities
RICHMOND UPON THAMES
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN C04XP SITE
Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans
Appendix 3 Page 1
FI D
EN
YOVER SMITH FL HAMMER FLYOVER H IT M HAMMERS
TI AL
Legend
Thames Policy Area
BRIDGEVIEW
WO R
LID G
&
RUT
LAN D
ES TR
EE T
Area of Main Map
H FUL ACE PAL AM
GR O
VE
Legend
AF
ER
QU
OA
N EE
E LIN RO A C
R ST
T EE
RO
AD
AD
D OA
HA MM ER S
CH
AN
OR LL E C
BR
R ST
ID G
T EE
LD YE
RO AD
Y LER TIL S I D LAN E
M HA
RO
# *
YR CA
! (
E TH UA SQ RE
CR P IS RO
MI TH
J ST
ES AM
ST
ET RE
E NC HA
OR LL
'S
BIS
! (
AD
L RY BE
AD RO
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
* # C04XP

ST DU
N' S TA NS
AD Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance RO

Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
Y ER ILL ST DI RO AD
IN W OW SL
E LIN HA
RO
AD
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02119 Date : .................................. 2011/06/14 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
ST
ET RE
TR YS T EE
NB MA
C LO
RF PA
RE
RE AD RO
Title:
APPENDIX 3A PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN C04XP SITE
EN
TI AL
Legend
! ! !
Metropolitan Open Land Flood Risk Zone 3
FI D
Sites of Metropolitan Nature Conservation Importance
BRIDGEVIEW
WO R
LID G
&
RUT
LAN D
ES TR
Flood Risk Zone 2

H FUL
EE T
Area of Main Map
ACE PAL AM
GR O
VE
Legend
AF
ER
QU
OA
N EE
E LIN RO A C
R ST
T EE
RO
AD
AD
D OA
HA MM ER S
CH
AN
OR LL E C
BR
R ST
ID G
T EE
LD YE
RO AD
M HA
RO
# *
YR CA
! (
E TH UA SQ RE
CR P IS RO
MI TH
J ST
ES AM
ST
ET RE
E NC HA
OR LL
'S
BIS
! (
AD
L RY BE
AD RO
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
* # C04XP

ST DU
N' S TA NS

IN W OW SL
E LIN HA
RO
AD
ST
ET RE
TR YS T EE
NB MA
C LO
RF PA
RE
RE AD RO
Title:
APPENDIX 3B PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN C04XP SITE
EN
TI AL
Legend
!
WO R
Listed Building (point) Listed Building (polygon) Archaeological Areas Conservation Areas
BRIDGEVIEW
FI D
LID G
&
RUT
LAN D
ES TR
EE T
Area of Main Map
H FUL
ACE PAL AM
GR O
VE
Legend
AF
OA
!! !!!
BR
ER
QU
N EE
E LIN RO A C
R ST
T EE
RO
AD
AD
D OA
HA MM ER S
CH
AN
OR LL E C
R ST
ID G
T EE
LD YE
RO AD
M HA
RO
# *
YR CA
! (
E TH UA SQ RE
CR P IS RO
MI TH
J ST
ES AM
ST
ET RE
E NC HA
OR LL
'S
BIS
! (
AD
L RY BE
AD RO
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
* # C04XP

ST DU
N' S TA NS

IN W OW SL
E LIN HA
RO
AD
ST
ET RE
TR YS T EE
NB MA
C LO
RF PA
RE
RE AD RO
Title:
! PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT

HERITAGE PLAN C04XP SITE
APPENDIX 3C
Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings
Appendix 4 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
Area of Main Map
Legend
&
AF
# *
! (

0 10 20
40 Metres 60 80
C04XP
* #
! (
Title:
APPENDIX 4 AERIAL PLAN C04XP SITE
View of the entrance to the existing Thames Water Depot and adjacent properties along Chancellors Road, looking north. The area of highway shown in the photograph is proposed for the temporary construction works and shaft for layout Option 2.
View looking west along Chancellors Road (proposed for use in site layout Option 2). The Thames Water Hammersmith Pumping Station is visible behind the line of trees.
Appendix 4 Page 3
View looking northeast along St James Street towards the existing Thames Water Depot, which is visible in the centre of the photograph.
Appendix 4 Page 4
Appendix 5 Transport plan
Appendix 5 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled) Pumping Station Transport Access Route TfL Road Network Thames Path
# *
! (
London Cycle Routes
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM Speed Cushions

0 25 50
100
150
200
Metres
C04XP
On Street Parking Raised Table
! (
* #
Title:
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN C04XP SITE
m s r me
N N EE U Q
a 3
1 4
Chester Court
FW
o t
3 3
2 2
4 4 2
4.8m
CW
N I L O R A C
E EAM OR L
VERTON W OL
2
8 4
3
32
5
1
6
Centre
n T) o i t R L a ( h St t i
25
ET STRE
Station
High School
1 1
FB
FB
1 8
1 6
1 2
1 4
14b
14
El Sub Sta
Un d
MS .75 SL SL
TCBs
4 1
CW
0 3
SL
GP
s p o h S
5.6m
1 3
54
o t
l ) l a w o M l s e g b ( n i K
w) o l e b s( p o Sh 5 5 6 5
3
49
w) o l e b (
Lyric
p o Sh
Lyric
3 2
Square
4
6 4
) w o l e b ( s p o h S
Posts
3 1 o t 1
1 to 223
7 5
e c n e r a l C t r u o C
Ashcroft Square
8 5
w) o l e b p( o Sh
FB
62
o t
55
84
to
92
0 90 9 o t 4 8
C y c l e L a n e
TCBs
5 6
C y c l e L a n e
LB
75
4.6m
81
e r t n y Ce wa d a o e Br Th
BRI DGE AVENUE
o t
0 1 o t 1
70
El Sub Sta
PH
TCBs
63
0 1 o t 11m ID 1 LOWER
DROP SHAFT
AV EN U
76
11m ID LOWER DROP SHAFT
D O WN P L A C E
D O WN P L A C E
2 1
Thames Tower
G D I R B M S R E
O R
D A
Subway
Bus Station
Playground
71
0 1 o t 1 6m ID UPPER
BR I DG
Ga r de ns
Landmark House
o t
As pe n
2 2
AV EN U
DROP SHAFT
0 1 o t 1
9 to 32
BR I DG
M
2 9
2 3
0 1
Sta LB
o u r t
O
0 1 o t 1
0 1 o t 1
4 4
5 7
Al l o t me n t Ga r d e n s
e n t Ga r d e n s
I TH
0 2 5 5
K
0 1 o t 1
SM
ER
Al l o t m
AM
PH
72
70
5.4m
Be 1 t at o 15 r i c e H ou s e
74
ou s e
84
Am
el i a
L
7 1
14
t o
P o s t s
TCB
Ed i t h
t o
8 3
a 1 1
9 1
OR L I D GE
The Cottage
7 1 o1 0t 0 1
ou s e
5.3m
2 o4 1t
12
TRAFFIC DIVERSION ROUTE

94
4 o8 3t 4
6 3
LB
10 o 12 t 12 a 14 t o 19
ar y
5 4
ou s e
W
1 2
Club
an 29 s i on s E
6.2m
AD
en 0 r i et t a
20
Posts
1
4 5
t o
S o p h i a H o
t o
54
49
30
i gb y
t o 38
I D
ou s e
I TH
ha r l ot t e
48
SM
16
o t
2 6
62
House
Elsinore
l u b
t o
ER
55
House
4 6 6 6
1 1 4 2
t o
Ro wi n gC
39
AM
58
ou s e
o t
Di gb y an s i on s
49
Post
10 7
Playground
Al 16 ex an dr a
71
m ( Su i t h s pe B ns r i i on d ge )
MP
N
0 1 o t 1
er s
am
a t e s
A L L
s t s o P
1
K
0 1 o t 1
F l o o d
L
E C A R R E T
0 8
a r d
PH
R C
2
a t e r
Ha r d
MP
5.7m
Riverside Studios
1
1
4 9
4 4
Playground
a 8 4
2 9
MP
SITE ACCESS
26
a 8 4
8 4
5.0m
s t os P
Shingle
0 6
8
25
2 6
Chancellors Wharf
31 32
4 6
m u P
8 10
g n i p
n o i t a t S
4 10
LB
0 11
5.1m
2 11 4 11
39 40
INTRODUCE PRIORITY WORKING SYSTEM ON CRISP ROAD TO ENABLE TWO - WAY TRAFFIC FLOW. REMOVAL OF ONE - WAY REQUIRED
G L y l s A C
& t s n o
0 7
5.3m
f e D
W O L S N I D W A O R
Nurses Home
gh ur nb e de s an ou r H B
Chancellors Wharf
0 6
2 6
5.9m 5.0m
El
9 1
Works
s k r o
TCBs
Sub Sta
y d B d r a d W n U
10 m
40 m
T E E R T S
22
1
o t
4 1
4.7m
8 3
7 2
0 6 1
LB
LB
5.1m
4.3m Riverside
5 2
6 4
a t S b u S l E
5 10
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE

5.4m Waterfront
3 5
2 4
0 10
o t
Melcombe
4 4
6 4
Primary School
W L O C H T I D A O R
1
6 5 8 5
6 6 o1 2t 6 1
85
80
7 12
79
a t S b u S l E
El Sub Sta
8 8 0 9
9 11
W L O C
H T I
47
47
8 2
Landing Stage
5 10
37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF

4 1
o t
3 10
Thames
20
Reach
m 9 . 4
an d
17
o t
W L E K S
0 1
91
o t
Location / Town:
72
2
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM - CS04X - HAMMERSMITH PS C04XP - TW DEPOT & HAMMERSMITH PS
87
Site Name:
4 1
FB
W O B
DETAILED SITE PLAN

SCALE 1:500
OVERALL SITE PLAN

SCALE 1:2000
Drawing Title:
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN C04XP (OPTION 1)

Drawing No.: Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
PLOTTED ON
04/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_4\dms04386\100-DE-TRA-C04XP-843101.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
100-DE-TRA-C04XP-843101
3 1
6 1
D A RO L L E F
Project Name:
D OA R
6 2
H C A N R A L
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
5 0
7 2
0 3
4 4
3 1
1 4
6 1
H T I
D A O R
8 2
D A L O L R E N
1 1
9 1
9 2
3 1 1 5 1 1
El Sub Sta
8 1
7 4
5.7m
Location Code:
OS Reference:
10
5 2
7 3
9 8 1 9
SITE BOUNDARY AREA
0 4 1 2 4 1
5 2
5 6 7 6
o t
6 1 1 8 1 1
83
8 1
3 1
D A O R
W E D E OS R
D OA R
The Point, 7th Floor,

2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2277
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS
WASTE
1 0 0
1 12
3 5
5 5
1 6 3 6
6 2 o t 1 2
h c a e sR y r n e H g n i K
9 3 o t 3 3
o t
77
7 3
2 1 o t 1
0 2 o t 3 1
9 3
4 8 6 8
o t
11
1 2
2 7 4 7
3 2
SUSPENSION OF ON - STREET PARKING WITHIN SITE WORKS AREA, DETAILS TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY
o t
6 4 o t 0 4
86
8 6 0 7
2 3 o t 7 2
on f i de nt i al
0 7
6 5
Y RE RF A P
T E RE T S
99
94
o t
93
19
1 5 0
2
4 1
5
5 2
5 3
5 6
1 5
0 6
0 3
6 3
3 1
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES TO BE RETAINED. EMERGENCY ACCESS PROVIDED THROUGH SITE.

o t 0 3
8 5 1
0 5
6 1
Y E R F R A P
9 3
m u P
E N I L A H C O L
T E E R T S
6 15
T E E R T S
2 15
o t
9 1
3 6
9 5
g n i p
7 4
W O L S N I
6 2
1 1
4 6
D A O R
3 3
n o i t a t S
E N I L A H C O L
SCALE 1 : 500
nd Po
100 m
100 m
SCALE 1 : 2000
Revision History
Iss
6.2m
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JSHE
EPER
PSTV
23/09/2011
2 0 0 mm
f e D
ERY L L STI DI
8 4
2 3 1
2 1
MP
0 2
S R O L L E m NC 1 A . 5 H C
2 2 1
El Sub Sta
2 2
Queens Wharf
C
R
PH
D A O R
7 0 1
8 2
T S
3 1
M A J
2 1
4 4
S E
6 3
Y R E L L I T S I D
2 8
0 3
E N A L
3 1
0 1 1
8 3
2 1 a
T E E R T S
1 2
R E V I R
R C
5 2
0 0 1
8 4
9 1
0 2
9 1
M e a n H i g h W
Works
1 1
7 1
S R O L L E m NC 1 . 5 HA C
a 1 1
y d B d r a
4 1
3 1
3 1
E R
8 1
m 1 . 5
1
6 2
D A O R
L O
Depot
0 1 o t 1
2 1
1 1
PH
Shingle
Posts
4.7m
1 9
S R O L L E C N A H C
5
4 8 o t 7 7
T E E R T S
0 1 o t 1
d n u o r g y a l P
D A O R
1 1
W C
8 3
2 9
0 1
o t
0 1 o t 1
8 6
5 8
T S
3 2
M A H D L E Y
7 3
8 4
5.7m
0 1
1 1
3 1
M A J
o t
6 3
PH
Posts
0 1 o t 1
TCB
1
o t
4.3m
Posts
10 9
0 1 o t 1
t o
76
Q
0 1 o t 1
3 3
y r e g r u S
7 4
D A O R L Y R E B
2 9
5.0m
0 6
8 1
2 1
S E
t o
63
TCB
0 1 o t 1
70
El Sub Sta
PH
9
o t
6 1
m a h d l e Y
6 2
0 3
6.8m
Posts
7 1
o t
e s u o H
8 3
2 1 a
T E E R T S
BR
Posts
Peabody Estate
TH
Phillippa
2 1
2 2
D Fn
o t
PO
1 2
e r o n i s l E e s u o H
8 4
7 2
1 4
4.9m
LB
1 o t
3 3
5 4
Y A C S I B
8 5
1 t o 4
N E E U Q
E N I L O R A C
M A H D L E Y
t o
Posts
o t
8 4
3 3
9 5
D A O R
0 7
9 o t 1
A d e l a H o u s e
ou s e
1 t o 6
Playground
T E E R T S
1
0 4 o t 3 3
1 2 3
y d B d r a
6.3m
4 5 6
El Sub Sta
5 5
El Sub Sta
Ophelia House
D A O R
8 2
0 1
1 1
3 1
BR
St Vincents House PH
8 4
Depot
2 2
t o 6 9
I D
2 1
AD
1 1
9 1
3 1
5
Co l l e g eC
4 3 t o
St Pa ul Pr s i m ( C ar of y Sc E) ho ol
5 6
J
4 7
4 8 o t 7 7
T E E R T S
1t o1 4
1 5
t o
2 8
Police Station SL
4 3
R E V O Y L HF T I M S R E M M A H
4 2
D A O TR S TWE A E R G
1
2 9
SL
t o
5.7m
St Augustines
Surgery
Theatre
Priory
Hall
55
E l S u b
E l S u b S t a
St Augustines
0 5 o1 5t 3 1
S t a
S Br
RC Church
5.7m
Hamlet House
1 t s u r sT s e n i s g Gu n i d l i Bu
e s u o H e c r e i P
Nursery
S T R E E T
Horatio House
R U T L A N DG R O V E
4 0 J o a n n a H o u s e
1 t o
6.1m
U
TCB
e c a l P h t a B
1 o t
Chy
1 0 2
0 1 o t 1
S U S S E XP L A C E
24
5.5m
El Sub
7 5
a 5 5
191
o t
0 1 o t 1
Posts
4.6m
to 8
24
to
31
Surgery
b 1 3
Post
B r i d g e A v e n u e M a n s i o n s
Posts
D A O TR S E TW A E R G
5 5
A
1
El Sub Sta
3 4
4.4m
El Sub
Sta
2 1
D A O S R K C A L B
H T I
Bradmore House
M A H
5.5m
1 2
7 3 o t 7 2
T E E R T GS N I K
9 3
PH
D A O ER G D I R HB T I M S R E M M A H
5.5m
St Pauls Church
5 1 o t 1
4.8m
7 1
Bus Station
FB
Bus Station
Shelter
Metro Building
Metro Building
PH
The Broadway Centre
SLs
SL
Car Park
D A O HR T R A G L A T
6.7m
245
255
3 2
5 2
51
50
49
48
Peabody Estate
TH
4 4
Theatre
Bank Bank
(below)
8
(below)
0 1
Shops (below)
12
13
14
17
) w o l e b ( s p o h S 16 15
S h e l t e r
0 3 o t 8 3
TCB LB
4 9 1
0 9 1
P o U s n t s d e r g r o u n d R a i l w a y
TCB
PH
5.7m
H T I M S R AY E M W D M A A H O R B
2
208
200
LB
206
204
LB
5.7m
H A M M E R S M I T HR O A D
5.8m
5.5m
CW
1 1
10
(below) 11
1
M e t r o B p u o i l l i d t a i 5.4m n n g S s t a t i o n
The George
(PH)
6 2
FW
p m a R
3
2
B r o a d w a y
R OA D
1 o t
3 4 o2 9t 2 2
e s u k Ho o o Br
GARDEN
o t
h et ab 25 z i l E H e s ou
1 8
o6 1t
SL
SLs
a b St Su El
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK

Status:
1 2
1 0
Broadway Chambers
16
2 1 18
SL
p m a R
SL
B E A D ON
16
8
5.0m
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
17
o t
0 1
e 6 ad c Ar
Bank
4 2
22
20 TCBs
5.3m
24
54
53 52
3 7
47
46
LW ANGE K AL
45
44
89
91
93
95
105
109
5 8
2 2
H 20 et r o t ga ar e s ou
8 1
3 4
w) o l e b s( p o Sh
w) o l e b s( p o Sh 0 2 9 1
THIS DRAWING
R a m
E EAM OR L
ub S l E
2 4
2 2
T STREE
1 4
2 1
6 2
4 2
2 5
a t S
Bechtel House
RW TTE BU
111 to 117
nd ou gr ay l P
CK I
o t
16
NE STREET I Q UEEN CARO L
H am m
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY

p m a R
mp Ra
R a mp
Q S
m s er
ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
CK WI TER BUT
Ba n k
h t i
rH 20 o t no ea l E e s ou
0 2
U R A E
on i at t S
1 o t 8
10 0 t o
y wa b Su
LR (
1
3
T)
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN

Hotel
ROAD
L L K HI CHAL
PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED,
Hotel
H am
7
1 1 5 1
m m s er h t i on i at t S
LR ( T)
ERW BUTT
DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED
K ANG EL W AL
CK I
NE STREET I Q UEEN CAROL
DGE AVENUE BRI
13 1
3 2 1 3
47
5.5m
THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN

SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
y wa b Su
d n a S D g a r
a t bS Su El
NOTES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW: 1. PARTIAL CLOSURE OF CHANCELLORS ROAD JUST WEST OF DISTILLERY ROAD. DIVERSION ROUTE VIA CRISP ROAD AND QUEEN CAROLINE STREET TO ACCESS HAMMERSMITH GYRATORY. FROM GYRATORY USE FULHAM PALACE ROAD TO ACCESS CHANCELLORS ROAD. ROUTE TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION VIA RIVERFRONT, WINSLOW ROAD AND DISTILLERY ROAD. ACCESS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN SITE AREA WILL NEED TO BE RETAINED.
0 E 1 o2 9t 6 1
4 3 o1 8t 1
8 D 6 o1 7t 2 1
2.
EW DGEVI BRI
6 1
5 1
0 o1 1t
0 o1 1t
a t bS Su El
s s s e g n n i n i d l i Gu Bu t s u Tr
C
79 o t 85
3.
m a h d l Ye s a l l Vi
6 2 o1 5t 8
1
o t
1 o t 0 1
8
1 o t
M HA L FU
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 18 - 20 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - 18 - 20 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
0 1
0 o1 1t
E AC L PA
1 o t
77
RO
1 o t
AD
25
o t
10
o t
25
o t 32
h et ab z i l E H e s ou
17 o t 24
7 7
o t
LEGEND
23
25
20
H et r ga ar e s ou
7 7
ub S l E a t S
nd ou gr ay l P
o t 16
10 7a
Q S
rH 20 o t no 1 ea l E e s ou
U
R A
1 o t
AREA OF ROAD/FOOTWAY CLOSURE
2 a l o t el 1 ab s I
7 8
9 8
H e s ou
TEMPORARY WORKS
o t 0
2 ne i ol ar
H e s ou
17
21
EXCAVATION
9 9
SITE WORKING AREA
23
25
1 0 1
PEDESTRIAN/CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE
P S I
R O
D A
9 0 1
1 1 1
9 10 15 16 23 24
27
3 11
D R E LL TI S I Y R O
U F
CONSTRUCTION ROUTE
D A
LH
s t os P
M A C LA A P E R O D A
7 12
BUS STOP BS
27
R I FA Y LA P TR S T E E
s t os P
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
B L
y d B
D R E LL TI S I
M
l S
R
m a h T r e v i
s e
ROAD
e l g n i h S
g n i
r e t a y r W n h o s g i a H m n g n a i e p o
H r ei K e di ar
Y
h t a P
w o T
H e s ou
R O D A
nd Po
s t os P
M N A R B E
R
O D A
31
o t
36
ng i op l S
m
y r on as
45 o t 52 53
o t
60
2 12
CC W L
61
R
R E V I W E I V
o t 68
2m 4.
G R A
D
69
M n a e
o t 76
N E S
0 11
h g Hi W
oC r Bo
40
46
r e t a
GL , t s n o yC l As & t s n o B L y Bd
8 10
s me a h rT e v Ri
NN RA
e l g n i h dS n da n Sa
O CH RO AD
96
ST ED M U
N
nH a Me
15
d n Sa d n a
D S SQ
U
AR
e l g n i Sh
hW g i r e t a
E
SO M ER E LL VI EN AV U E
88
80
h t a gP n wi To
W
am i l l i H tM un
1
g n i d n a L
o t
63
e g a St
s on i s an
C es l r ha H od r ar
1
70
o t 24
R B N E S A O E S
C t r ou
R d r ha c i e dg bi r Bu
D R E V I
M
s on i s an
m s r me
N N EE U Q
a 3
1 4
Chester Court
FW
o t
3 3
2 2
4 4 2
4.8m
CW
N I L O R A C
E EAM OR L
VERTON W OL
2
8 4
3
32
5
1
6
Centre
n T) o i t R L a ( h St t i
25
ET STRE
Station
High School
1 1
FB
FB
1 8
1 6
1 2
1 4
14b
14
El Sub Sta
Un d
MS .75 SL SL
TCBs
4 1
CW
0 3
SL
GP
s p o h S
5.6m
1 3
54
o t
l ) l a w o M l s e g b ( n i K
w) o l e b s( p o Sh 5 5 6 5
3
49
w) o l e b (
Lyric
p o Sh
Lyric
3 2
Square
4
6 4
Posts
3 1 o t 1
1 to 223
7 5
e c n e r a l C t r u o C
Ashcroft Square
8 5
w) o l e b p( o Sh
FB
62
o t
55
84
to
92
0 90 9 o t 4 8
C y c l e L a n e
TCBs
5 6
C y c l e L a n e
LB
75
4.6m
81
e r t n y Ce wa d a o e Br Th
BRI DGE AVENUE
o t
0 1 o t 1
70
El Sub Sta
PH
TCBs
63
0 1 o t 1
D O WN P L A C E
D O WN P L A C E
2 1
Thames Tower
G D I R B M S R E
O R
D A
Subway
Bus Station
Playground
AV EN U
76
Q
0 1 o t 1
BR I DG
Ga r de ns
Landmark House
o t
As pe n
2 2
AV EN U
R
0 1 o t 1
0 1 o t 1
71
9 to 32
BR I DG
M
2 9
2 3
Posts
4.6m
to 8
24
to
31
0 1
Surgery
b 1 3
Post
B r i d g e A v e n u e M a n s i o n s
Posts
D A O TR S E TW A E R G
Sta LB
o u r t
O
0 1 o t 1
0 1 o t 1
4 4
5 7
Al l o t me n t Ga r d e n s
e n t Ga r d e n s
I TH
0 2 5 5
K
0 1 o t 1
SM
ER
Al l o t m
AM
PH
72
70
5.4m
Be 1 t at o 15 r i c e H ou s e
74
ou s e
Am
el i a
L
7 1
14
t o
P o s t s
TCB
Ed i t h
8 3
a 1 1
9 1
OR L I D GE
The Cottage
7 1 o1 0t 0 1
ou s e
5.3m
2 o4 1t
4 o8 3t 4
6 3
94
LB
10 o 12 t 12 a 14 t o 19
ar y
5 4
ou s e
W
1 2
Club
an 29 s i on s E
6.2m
AD
en 0 r i et t a
20
Posts
1
4 5
t o
S o p h i a H o
t o
54
49
30
i gb y
t o 38
I D
ou s e
I TH
ha r l ot t e
48
SM
16
o t
2 6
62
House
Elsinore
l u b
t o
ER
55
House
4 6 6 6
1 1 4 2
t o
Ro wi n gC
39
AM
58
ou s e
o t
Di gb y an s i on s
49
Post
10 7
Playground
Al 16 ex an dr a
71
m ( Su i t h s pe B ns r i i on d ge )
MP
N
0 1 o t 1
er s
am
a t e s
A L L
s t s o P
1
K
0 1 o t 1
F l o o d
L
E C A R R E T
0 8
a r d
PH
R C
2
a t e r
Ha r d
MP
5.7m
a 8 4
2 9
MP
26
a 8 4
6m ID UPPER DROP SHAFT
5.0m
s t os P
Shingle
0 6
8
25
2 6
31 32
8 4
Chancellors Wharf
4 6
m u P
8 10
g n i p
n o i t a t S
4 10
LB
0 11
5.1m
2 11 4 11
39 40
SITE ACCESS
INTRODUCE PRIORITY WORKING SYSTEM ON CRISP ROAD TO ENABLE TWO - WAY TRAFFIC FLOW. REMOVAL OF ONE - WAY REQUIRED
G L y l s A C
& t s n o
0 7
5.3m
f e D
W O L S N I D W A O R
Nurses Home
gh ur nb e de s an ou r H B
Chancellors Wharf
0 6
2 6
5.9m 5.0m
El
9 1
Works
s k r o
TCBs
Sub Sta
y d B d r a d W n U
10 m
40 m
T E E R T S
22
1
o t
4 1
4.7m
8 3
7 2
0 6 1
LB
LB
8 5 1
0 5
6 1
Y E R F R A P
5.1m
5 2 o t 0 3
4.3m Riverside
a t S b u S l E
5 10
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE

5.4m Waterfront
3 5
2 4
0 10
o t
Melcombe
4 4
6 4
Primary School
W L O C H T I D A O R
1
6 5 8 5
6 6 o1 2t 6 1
o t
6 4 o t 0 4
86
8 6 0 7
2 7 4 7
85
80
7 12
79
a t S b u S l E
El Sub Sta
8 8 0 9
9 11
W L O C
H T I
47
47
8 2
Landing Stage
5 10
37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF

4 1
o t
3 10
Thames
20
Reach
m 9 . 4
an d
17
o t
W L E K S
0 1
91
o t
Location / Town:
72
2
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM - CS04X - HAMMERSMITH PS C04XP - TW DEPOT & HAMMERSMITH PS
87
Site Name:
4 1
FB
W O B
DETAILED SITE PLAN

SCALE 1:500
OVERALL SITE PLAN

SCALE 1:2000
Drawing Title:
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN C04XP (OPTION 2)

PLOTTED ON
04/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04386\100-DE-TRA-C04XP-843102.dgn
100-DE-TRA-C04XP-843102
3 1
6 1
D A RO L L E F
Project Name:
D OA R
6 2
H C A N R A L
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
5 0
7 2
0 3
4 4
3 1
1 4
6 1
H T I
D A O R
8 2
D A L O L R E N
1 1
9 1
9 2
3 1 1 5 1 1
El Sub Sta
8 1
7 4
5.7m
Location Code:
OS Reference:
10
5 2
7 3
9 8 1 9
SITE BOUNDARY AREA
0 4 1 2 4 1
5 2
5 6 7 6
o t
6 1 1 8 1 1
83
8 1
3 1
D A O R
W E D E OS R
D OA R
The Point, 7th Floor,

2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2277
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
WASTE
1 0 0
1 12
3 5
5 5
1 6 3 6
6 2 o t 1 2
77
PROPOSED TURNING HEAD

40
h c a e sR y r n e H g n i K
9 3 o t 3 3
o t
7 3
2 1 o t 1
0 2 o t 3 1
9 3
4 8 6 8
o t
11
1 2
3 2
2 3 o t 7 2
on f i de nt i al
0 7
6 5
Y RE RF A P
T E RE T S
99
94
o t
93
19
5 3
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES TO BE RETAINED. EMERGENCY ACCESS PROVIDED THROUGH SITE.
6 4
1 5 0
2
4 1
5
5 2
5 6
1 5
0 6
0 3
6 3
3 1
9 3
m u P
E N I L A H C O L
T E E R T S
6 15
T E E R T S
2 15
o t
9 1
3 6
9 5
g n i p
7 4
W O L S N I
6 2
1 1
4 6
D A O R
3 3
n o i t a t S
E N I L A H C O L
SCALE 1 : 500
nd Po
100 m
100 m
SCALE 1 : 2000
Revision History
Iss
6.2m
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JSHE
EPER
PSTV
23/09/2011
2 0 0 mm
f e D
ERY L L STI DI
8 4
2 3 1
2 1
MP
9 1
0 2
Riverside Studios
1
1
4 9
4 4
Playground
0 2
S R O L L E m NC 1 A . 5 H C
2 2 1
El Sub Sta
2 2
Queens Wharf
C
R
PH
D A O R
7 0 1
8 2
T S
3 1
M A J
2 1
4 4
S E
6 3
Y R E L L I T S I D
2 8
0 3
E N A L
3 1
0 1 1
8 3
SITE ACCESS
2 1 a
T E E R T S
1 2
R E V I R
R C
5 2
0 0 1
8 4
9 1
M e a n H i g h W
Works
1 1
7 1
S R O L L E m NC 1 . 5 HA C
a 1 1
y d B d r a
4 1
3 1
3 1
E R
8 1
m 1 . 5
1
6 2
D A O R
L O
Depot
0 1 o t 1
2 1
1 1
PH
Shingle
Posts
4.7m
1 9
5
4 8 o t 7 7
T E E R T S
0 1 o t 1
d n u o r g y a l P
D A O R
1 1
W C
8 3
2 9
0 1
o t
0 1 o t 1
8 6
5 8
T S
3 2
M A H D L E Y
7 3
8 4
5.7m
0 1
1 1
3 1
M A J
o t
6 3
PH
Posts
0 1 o t 1
TCB
1
o t
4.3m
Posts
10 9
0 1 o t 1
t o
76
Q
0 1 o t 1
3 3
y r e g r u S
7 4
D A O R L Y R E B
2 9
5.0m
0 6
8 1
2 1
S E
t o
63
TCB
0 1 o t 1
70
El Sub Sta
PH
9
o t
6 1
m a h d l e Y
6 2
0 3
6.8m
Posts
7 1
o t
e s u o H
8 3
2 1 a
T E E R T S
BR
Posts
Peabody Estate
TH
Phillippa
2 1
2 2
D Fn
o t
PO
1 2
e r o n i s l E e s u o H
8 4
7 2
1 4
4.9m
LB
1 o t
3 3
5 4
Y A C S I B
8 5
1 t o 4
N E E U Q
E N I L O R A C
M A H D L E Y
t o
Posts
o t
8 4
3 3
9 5
D A O R
0 7
9 o t 1
A d e l a H o u s e
ou s e
1 t o 6
Playground
T E E R T S
1
0 4 o t 3 3
1 2 3
y d B d r a
6.3m
4 5 6
El Sub Sta
5 5
El Sub Sta
Ophelia House
D A O R
8 2
0 1
1 1
3 1
BR
St Vincents House PH
8 4
Depot
2 2
t o 6 9
I D
2 1
AD
1 1
9 1
3 1
5
Co l l e g eC
4 3 t o
St Pa ul Pr s i m ( C ar of y Sc E) ho ol
5 6
J
4 7
4 8 o t 7 7
T E E R T S
1t o1 4
1 5
t o
2 8
Police Station SL
4 3
4 2
D A O TR S TWE A E R G
1
2 9
SL
t o
5.7m
St Augustines
Surgery
Theatre
Priory
Hall
55
E l S u b
E l S u b S t a
St Augustines
0 5 o1 5t 3 1
S t a
S Br
RC Church
5.7m
Hamlet House
1 t s u r sT s e n i s g Gu n i d l i Bu
e s u o H e c r e i P
Nursery
S T R E E T
Horatio House
R U T L A N DG R O V E
4 0 J o a n n a H o u s e
1 t o
6.1m
U
TCB
e c a l P h t a B
1 o t
Chy
1 0 2
0 1 o t 1
S U S S E XP L A C E
24
5.5m
El Sub
7 5
a 5 5
191
5 5
A
1
El Sub Sta
3 4
4.4m
El Sub
Sta
2 1
D A O S R K C A L B
H T I
Bradmore House
M A H
5.5m
1 2
7 3 o t 7 2
T E E R T GS N I K
9 3
PH
D A O ER G D I R HB T I M S R E M M A H
5.5m
St Pauls Church
5 1 o t 1
4.8m
7 1
Bus Station
FB
Bus Station
Shelter
Metro Building
Metro Building
PH
The Broadway Centre
SLs
SL
Car Park
D A O HR T R A G L A T
6.7m
245
255
3 2
5 2
51
50
49
48
Peabody Estate
TH
4 4
Theatre
Bank Bank
(below)
8
(below)
0 1
Shops (below)
12
13
14
17
) w o l e b ( s p o h S 16 15
S h e l t e r
0 3 o t 8 3
TCB LB
4 9 1
0 9 1
P o U s n t s d e r g r o u n d R a i l w a y
TCB
PH
5.7m
H T I M S R AY E M W D M A A H O R B
2
208
200
LB
206
204
LB
5.7m
H A M M E R S M I T HR O A D
5.8m
5.5m
CW
1 1
10
(below) 11
1
M e t r o B p u o i l l i d t a i 5.4m n n g S s t a t i o n
The George
(PH)
6 2
FW
p m a R
3
2
B r o a d w a y
R OA D
1 o t
3 4 o2 9t 2 2
e s u k Ho o o Br
GARDEN
o t
h et ab 25 z i l E H e s ou
1 8
o6 1t
SL
SLs
a b St Su El

Status:
1 2
1 0
Broadway Chambers
16
2 1 18
SL
p m a R
SL
B E A D ON
16
8
5.0m
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
17
o t
0 1
e 6 ad c Ar
Bank
4 2
22
20 TCBs
5.3m
24
54
53 52
3 7
47
46
LW ANGE K AL
45
44
89
91
93
95
105
109
5 8
2 2
H 20 et r o t ga ar e s ou
8 1
3 4
w) o l e b s( p o Sh
w) o l e b s( p o Sh 0 2 9 1
THIS DRAWING
R a m
E EAM OR L
ub S l E
2 4
2 2
T STREE
1 4
2 1
6 2
4 2
2 5
a t S
Bechtel House
RW TTE BU
111 to 117
nd ou gr ay l P
CK I
o t
16
NE STREET I Q UEEN CARO L
H am m
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY

p m a R
mp Ra
R a mp
Q S
m s er
ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
CK WI TER BUT
Ba n k
h t i
o t
rH 20 o t no ea l E e s ou
0 2
U R A E
on i at t S
1 o t 8
10 0 t o
y wa b Su
LR (
1
3
T)
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN

Hotel
ROAD
L L K HI CHAL
PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED,
Hotel
H am
7
1 1 5 1
m m s er h t i on i at t S
LR ( T)
ERW BUTT
DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED
K ANG EL W AL
CK I
NE STREET I Q UEEN CAROL
DGE AVENUE BRI
13 1
3 2 1 3
47
5.5m
THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN

SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
y wa b Su
d n a S D g a r
a t bS Su El
NOTES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW: 1. PARTIAL CLOSURE OF CHANCELLORS ROAD JUST WEST OF DISTILLERY ROAD. DIVERSION ROUTE VIA CRISP ROAD AND QUEEN CAROLINE STREET TO ACCESS HAMMERSMITH GYRATORY. FROM GYRATORY USE FULHAM PALACE ROAD TO ACCESS CHANCELLORS ROAD. ROUTE TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION VIA RIVERFRONT, WINSLOW ROAD AND DISTILLERY ROAD. ACCESS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN SITE AREA WILL NEED TO BE RETAINED.
0 E 1 o2 9t 6 1
4 3 o1 8t 1
8 D 6 o1 7t 2 1
2.
EW DGEVI BRI
6 1
5 1
0 o1 1t
0 o1 1t
a t bS Su El
s s s e g n n i n i d l i Gu Bu t s u Tr
C
79 o t 85
3.
m a h d l Ye s a l l Vi
6 2 o1 5t 8
1
o t
1 o t 0 1
8
1 o t
M HA L FU
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 18 - 20 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - 18 - 20 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
0 1
0 o1 1t
E AC L PA
1 o t
77
RO
1 o t
AD
25
o t
10
o t
25
o t 32
h et ab z i l E H e s ou
17 o t 24
7 7
o t
23
25
20
H et r ga ar e s ou
LEGEND
7 7
ub S l E a t S
nd ou gr ay l P
o t 16
10 7a
Q S
rH 20 o t no 1 ea l E e s ou
U
R A
1 o t
AREA OF ROAD/FOOTWAY CLOSURE
2 a l o t el 1 ab s I
7 8
9 8
H e s ou
TEMPORARY WORKS
o t 0
2 ne i ol ar
H e s ou
17
21
EXCAVATION
9 9
23
25
SITE WORKING AREA
1 0 1
P S I
R O
PEDESTRIAN/CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE
D A
9 0 1
1 1 1
9 10 15 16 23 24
27

3 11
D R E LL TI S I Y R O
U F
CONSTRUCTION ROUTE
C LA A P
7 12
D A
LH
s t os P
M A E R O D A
27
BUS STOP BS TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
R I FA Y LA P TR S T E E
s t os P
B L
y d B
D R E LL TI S I
M
l S
R
m a h T r e v i
s e
ROAD
e l g n i h S
g n i
r e t a y r W n h o s g i a H m n g n a i e p o
H r ei K e di ar
Y
h t a P
w o T
H e s ou
R O D A
nd Po
s t os P
M N A R B E
R
O D A
31
o t
36
ng i op l S
m
y r on as
45 o t 52 53
o t
60
2 12
CC W L
61
R
R E V I W E I V
o t 68
2m 4.
G R A
D
69
M n a e
o t 76
N E S
0 11
h g Hi W
oC r Bo GL , t s n o yC l As
r e t a
8 10
s me a h rT e v Ri
46
NN RA
& t s n o B L y Bd
e l g n i h dS n da n Sa
O CH RO AD
96
ST ED M U
N
nH a Me
15
d n Sa d n a
D S SQ
U
AR
e l g n i Sh
hW g i r e t a
E
SO M ER E LL VI EN AV U E
88
80
h t a gP n wi To
W
am i l l i H tM un
1
g n i d n a L
o t
63
e g a St
s on i s an
C es l r ha H od r ar
1
70
o t 24
R B N E S A O E S
C t r ou
R d r ha c i e dg bi r Bu
D R E V I
M
s on i s an
Appendix 6 Services and geology plan
Appendix 6 Page 1
25mm 1 NED BANDO
1
PP LI ES 6 "
80mm 1
2
IL-0.67m
3
R P "S 6 " 3 1138
4 N
5
6304
6
Status:
ABANDONED
CON 133N
AB AN DO NE D
GEOLOGY
2675
SU
1 2 1 9
FVA DC PS B A
IL-0.75m 1146
WO
2 OM 8 9 ER 6
1 80 mm
N E
ST
CU
2647
IL-6.98m
2683
SE 1308
VMH LS
N 1 D 8 O 0 m N m E 1314 D 1315
" 3
D E R E T E M
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
mm
0m
25
VT
80mm 1
0m
IL-1.45m 2685
VT
1 x 52 4 32 mm
IL-7.32m 2202 SE
2206
8 1 3
1 8
1 2 1 9
& 4" 1 4 x "
0214
CL5.57m IL-1.58m
1 25 mm
SE
IL-1.56m
4 91 0 x 61
THIS DRAWING
VT CL5.06m IL-1.26m
AB D NE DO mm 2 1 AN 5 2 1 " 8 21 x 0 9"
2681
3 0 0
A B A N D O 1 N 8 E 2205 0 D m m
9 0 m A m B A N D O N E D
SE
Ground level 105 (m OD + 100)
4202
CL
22 1
CI
Base of Made Ground and Superficial

4206
mm 00 1
m m 5 2 1
95 (m OD + 100)
EOS
IL-0.95m
0 0 3
T FI
FV
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE
NE LI
m D m NE 3 6 DO AN AB
0207 SE
ST 0201
9 m 0m
I TH
0204 SE
IL-6.26m
CON 2N
IL-1.55m
m m 0 D 8 E 1 1145 2204 N O D N A B A 2 IL-1.15m 6 7
H M M A
IL-1.05m
VT CL4.74m IL-1.59m
" 4
NUMBER 100019345
S R E
m m 5 2 1 e r i F
0m
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN 6208 PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS Suggested invert level of shaft 74.31 (m OD + 100) ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES
IL-7.36m
TH WI
H T I M
1139
I P 1 LI 524 NE
96
x 3 4 1 1
m m 0 8 1 E R I F
m m 0 9
PE
9 3 1 1 2 8 1 x
O T S
m 5m 22
28
IL-0.21m
IL-7.37m
LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN
M R
m m
1 2
2676
IL-1.59m
975
E I L E R
SL
CI
1 5 2
2 5 m m
4"
O N
3 2 m m
1144 1102
m m 0 8 1
A N
IL-1.34m D E N O D N A B A
4207
SD
IL-0.23m
0131 0122 SEIL-0.2m 0130 A B A 0128 N D O N E D 0113 SE 0112 IL-6.93m SE
90mm AT
5 7 DEPTH 0.3m 3
1111
IL-1.49m IL-1.55m
m 0m 8 1
7 1 R D S
) E N I L
N I A M ( R E 1 IL-7.39m . o E N P
IL-1.92m
ZBV205608 4123
6 R2
R IL-7.38m P S IL-7.38m " 6 ZBV205999
SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME. Base of London Clay Formation COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO THE TUNNEL DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
986
00 1
W E S
9 m 0 m
ZBV205995 5105
8 1 2
48 (m OD + 100)
IL-0.36m
00 0
0111 SE
0
FV FV
B O C 3 0 4 7 0116 SE
2
m 32m
FV
IL-5.78m 0114 SE 0127 0115 SE
6 3 m m
WO
m m D 0 5 E 9 7 N O 3 D N A B A 0125
7 1 R D S
PS IL-1.73m
IL-2.51m IL-0.38m
1 6 2 6
1 98 1
B
1 98 1
m 5 0 W 3 m E 0 8 S 3 1 1140 1 D 8 L E 0 E ZBV050133 0 SE R E m N 2107 I 3 I m x V F 2106 0 L SE E 9m D 5109 9 2135 " ( E L m P 1 R N m m I 3 H0 P 5 2 O 4116 L 2 T D 1 S 5104 R 1 9 I WO W S N E A O W B I " 0 W L K A C0 3 E EV E E HAMMERSMITH OLD SPS (ABANDONED) 3 " 1107 IL-7.39m S R 0 2131 D 4 C VT 7 0 - EV 1 E < 2132 3 S R F VMH N R D 8 I 974 EV E E 0 S I L 0 3 T 4106 5 3 IL-1.85m N 0 WO L 4 2103 7 U 0 P 1 O E D 2 3 5110 I E C E R P VMH L BOC 3027 N D D S D N BS O E 5 4120 E A 0 3101 T D N RM I T m 3 N N DO E C m VMH S S O T O 3 A R R D A 6 " CL5.93m B N 5 C U U N I 4 A BA ST 2 H B A B L IL-1.64m T 2 P B 2116 I A U WO A E E D W H WO IL-1.97m SE P P T R I I DBV014264 2115 I E P P D W 4119 M SE e E E 1110 IL-1.65m S m m S N PS r mm I i m m R L DS F HW 2133 F 5 0 0 m 4117 E E 5 I 9 8 P m 2 2 L M I 1 5 1143 WW 1 D E L 2 2117 0 em 2 M E R 0 S 1 rm N 3 i CON 3N A SE " M O 3006 F 0 H R 4 D O 3011 N 8 T 4118 FV 1 A S B A H IL-7.4m 1141 T 8 2033 I 3 M 4 S 2 R D E E M N D M 0 A O E 0 H D N 9 3 0 3 N O 1 0366 0 1 A 5004 D 5 28 B N 3 1 7 3 IL-1.76m A A B x 0 A
1103
0 0 1 E P
H T I
0 0 1 E P m IL-7.43m m 0 9 WO 2134
IL-1.95m
4104 SE
T WW S R U B
4102
BS
VT CL4.71m
I P
D ) E N E O ED N I D N N L A DO B N A AN I B A A M
D E N O D N A B A 5106
m m 5 0 2 0 1 3
W (
E
T S
A R B H C N
NOTES: Base of Lambeth Group 37 (m OD + 100) 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
45
Base of Thanet Sand Formation 23 (m OD + 100)
D NE DO AN AB
NN EL
TH
AM
C04XP (6862m)
m P P I E B U R
TU
LEGEND
5113
D E N O D N A D B E A N O D N A B A
FW FW
M 00M 1
EE
-L
ES
"
1 02
1015 2020 SE 1016 DS 1 IL-2.9m D FV . 5 1022 FV N o 2 1012 A N 2 T 9 T 1017 DC R S 3 FV E 0 R 3 IL-1.33m U V DC FV 1 B L 5 U 8 C FV 9 C E O 9 8 1 1018 P DC 1003 B 2 I Y 1028 P R 1 VT SE 1 E 8 8 1004 9 m V 9 9 2 m I 1 1 2 0 1 L
6 m m 3
0m 8 1
9 1 2 1
ABA
m m
FOUL WATER
m 80m NED 1 NDO " 21
" - 4
3 1 8 m m x 80 1
9 21 1
SW
SW
SURFACE WATER
CLEAN WATER
5 2 1
3 81
32
9"
I D m ) m 7 0 0 8 1 9 1 (
Chalk
GAS
00
CI
P I
CABTV
CABTV
FIBRE OPTICS
5 U 2 B 2 E
E OS CL 4"
8 1
m m 0 ) 0 7 1 8 9 1 (
3008
0 3
3013
m m 0 0 1
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
S R
m 0 0 1 m
V I L E D
V L U C 8 3 Y 2 4 R E
IL-8.89m
T R E
I
2 . o N
m m 0 P
N D O E N
IL-9.02m
2002 T VMH S
R U B
5 9 8 2
3010
FL
IL-2.01m
B A
2 1
-F T I
E V
3012
0 0 3
IL-1.71m
2031
E D P E I N P O 2001 m D N 2029 m VMH A 0 B 8 1 A FL

DB DB
3009 0393
HW
WO
E R
1 1142 8 8 1 C 0 IL-0.9m B
2017 SE VMH
VMH 2041
0 0 3
HAMMERSMITH STORM SPS WO HAMMP1ZZ
m m 0 8 1 SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING PURPOSES
M (
LV
LV
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
P I
D I
D E N m O m D 80 " 3 1 1 1 2 8 x
9 1
m m 0 ) 0 7 1 8 9 1 (
m m 0 7 0 8 1 9 1 I I( D D
NE LI
S E W
HV
HV
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
m m 0 0 1
U R
EXISTING TUNNELS
8 9 1
D I
S T
2 2 5
N o 1 .
W
973 5003
0 5 4
TH I
IL-1.26m
2 2010 4 3 8
DS
> -
m m D 5 2 NE 1 DO AN AB
FL
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
L N I E
A N I
22
4008 4003
3 0 0
5010 AC
DM09556
m 5m
2 1
NAME NK SPS LOC CODE NK
5009
0 5 4
D E N Omm D D N 0 A 8 NE 0 B 1 O 5 D 4 A D NE N A DO B A AN 4902 B A 0 5 4
0 5 4 5012
" 3 E R I F
0 6 5 3
WATER STORM & FOUL SEWERS
- ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
9 1
IL-2.05m
00 1 PE
x 8 3 1
E D
SD
4007
25mm 1 D ABANDONE
" 1
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS:
" 9 mm 0 5 2 4"
1 8 9 1
R2
SITE BOUNDARY
FH
5905 3558
GAS
971 DBV014261
" 5
4901
0 0 3
- LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE
970
0 5 4
5904
IL-2.13m
m
10 m
100 m
VT 3902 D E D N mm E VT DO 80 N 1 N O 3903 A D B 1 N A 38 A 5 B 0 A 3 3559

A B
0 0 3
1079
0 ED 0 3ON ED D ON m N m ED A ND 0 B 8 ON A BA 1 A D N A B A
m m 5 2 1
Revision History 0 0 1 E P Iss
7 1 R D S
SCALE 1 : 1000
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
5906
4905
0 0 3
W D E N I L
H T I
IL-2.19m
0 0 3
3801
" 4
P I L S
5 2 2
D E D N E O N D DO D N A N m E B A m N A AB 80 DO 1 N A B A
0 0 3
5801 1081
6801
m 9" 0m 25 4"
E R I F " 5
WO
0 0 1 E P m m 3 6
7 1 R D S
m m 0 8 m 1 m m 0 5m 9 2 1 e r i F
5 2 2
0 0 3
H T I
" 4
SU
ED
m m D 0 E 5 0 N 2 3 1 O D N A B A
4802
" 4
L S IL-2.24m
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road,
P I
D E N I L
Paddington, London W2 1AF

Location Code: OS Reference:
an d
" 4
25 1
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
TQ2877
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
Project Group:
4801
NN EL
1082
WO 5802

Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE 5 0 0
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM - CSO4X-HAMMERMITH PS C04XP - TW DEPOT & HAMMERSMITH PS
FH
E LE
TU
3650 DBV014260
22 5
5 2 2 " 4
" 9
THAMES TUNNEL
DBV014533
Contract Name:
S-
T S IL-2.27m
22
AM E
5702
6704 WO
" 4
Drawing Title:
968
1 02 "
5 2 2
5 2 2
SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN C04XP

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
TH
0701 0702
PLOTTED ON 02/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_4\dms04386\100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143001.dgn
" 4
4"
6702 Drawing No.: SE

9"
VT
DM09557
100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143001

5
r af t
1:1000
A1
AA
1 0 0
3802 1080
BA 0 A 30
E R I F " 4
on f i de nt i al
m m 5 2 1 D E N O D N A B A
" 4
1 5 0
" 21
m m 3 6
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JNHM
PSTV
JSWE
28/10/2011
2 0 0 mm
1 8 9 1
4903
5902 SE
5901
DBV014262
TELECOMS ELECTRICITY
- ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
2
" 1
9 1 2 1
" m 9 0 5 2 " 4
m 3 m
3 1 8
W O L
2 1
9 1
V E L
x 3 81
L E
A N D O E N D 3 00
8 1 m 0m
W S R
O N
N I A M E N I L
ND ON
" 21
" 1 3
0 30
9" m m 0 25
9 21
mm
3 81
mm 63
2 2 5 2 2 5 4 "
Appendix 7 Construction phase layout
Appendix 7 Page 1
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
N E E U Q
E N I L O R A C
T E E R T S
THIS DRAWING
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345 SHAFT AND SEGMENT STORAGE AREA
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE
EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE
SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
EXCAVATED MATERIAL\SPOIL 6m PIPE 900m
200m
OFFICES \ WELFARE (INSIDE HAMMERSMITH DEPOT)
0m 10
R O L L E C N A H C
T E E R T S
HAMMERSMITH DEPOT (REMAINS INTACT)
R E V I R
E C A R R E T
4m PIPE
D A O R
G A S S A P
KEY:
W E Y A
EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA
M A J . T S
S E
T E E R T S
4m PIPE
STOCKYARD
100m
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORES
DEEP CONNECTION TUNNEL 22m TO I.L. TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 3004m
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
SITE ACCESS
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
R O L L E C N A H C
10 m
40 m
SCALE 1 : 500
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JNHM
PSTV
JSWE
30/03/2011
HAMMERSMITH PUMPING STATION (HPS)
SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 6861m

an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2378
UBR
Sub Process:
JBRO

WASTE 5 0 0
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT C04XP - OPTION 1

100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143102
PLOTTED ON 02/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04386\100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143102.dgn c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
Y A
) S S A P Y B (
O
C R P S I R D A
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
N E E U Q
E N I L O R A C
T E E R T S
THIS DRAWING
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 3000m THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
OFFICES / WELFARE (INSIDE HAMMERSMITH DEPOT)
R O L L E C N A H C
T E E R T S
HAMMERSMITH DEPOT (REMAINS INTACT) 100m
R E V I R
E C A R R E T
T E E R T S
D A O R
G A S S A P
KEY:
W E Y A
EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA
M A J . T S
S E
4m PIPE
STOCKYARD
100m
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORES
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN
SITE ACCESS 11m ID LOWER DROP SHAFT
EXCAVATED MATERIAL\SPOIL
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
6m ID UPPER DROP SHAFT 190m SITE ACCESS
SHAFT AND SEGMENT STORAGE AREA
R O L L E C N A H C
1100m
10 m
40 m
SCALE 1 : 500
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JNHM
PSTV
JSWE
30/03/2011
SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 6861m
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2378
UBR
Sub Process:
JBRO

WASTE 5 0 0
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT C04XP - OPTION 2

100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143202
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
Y A
) S S A P Y B (
O
C R P S I R D A
Appendix 8 Operational phase layout
Appendix 8 Page 1
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
THIS DRAWING
A
VENT COLUMN MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING FOR CRANE ACCESS
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT,
11m ID CSO DROP SHAFT VENTILATION CHAMBER
FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE
SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
6m PIPE
4m PIPE
B
D A O R
4m PIPE
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE OPERATION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
2.0m x 0.6m x 1.5m HIGH ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK 10 m 0 40 m
SCALE 1 : 500 INTERCEPTION CHAMBER

Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JNHM
PSTV
JSWE
30/03/2011
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2877
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS

WASTE 5 0 0
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT C04XP - OPTION 1

100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143103
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
THIS DRAWING
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
11 ID LOWER DROP SHAFT
VENTILATION CHAMBER
6m PIPE
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE OPERATION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
2.0m x 0.6m x 1.5m HIGH ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK 10 m 0 40 m
4m PIPE SCALE 1 : 500 INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING FOR CRANE ACCESS
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JNHM
PSTV
JSWE
30/03/2011
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2877
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS

WASTE 5 0 0
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT C04XP - OPTION 2

100-DL-PNC-C04XP-143203
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
) S S A P Y B (
6
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 150 0 50
Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
- - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
WASTE LONDON N/A
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
PLOTTED ON 04\12\09 BY Andy.Purdy LOCATION : Thames Tideway Tunnel x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
NTS
A1
AB
100
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables

Transport Site considerations Access to road network Option 1 Comments Drop shaft located on existing car park for Thames Water depot and will require the removal of an existing building within the site. The interception chamber is located within the Hammersmith Pumping Station and will require temporary traffic management (TTM) on Chancellors Road to enable the construction of the connection culvert. Access into the CSO site will be restricted during the connection culvert works. Both temporary construction and permanent accesses are onto Chancellors Road at the same access point. Mitigation required and conclusions Site will use an existing access for the Thames Water depot which will require widening to enable use by construction vehicles. An existing lighting column and telegraph pole may need to be relocated to enable the access to be widened to the east. The internal access road will need priority working/ management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. Chancellors Road will require TTM to enable the construction of the connection culvert for the sites interception chamber. Access into the CSO site will be restricted Comments Drop shaft located within the Hammersmith Pumping Station and in Chancellors Road adjacent to the Thames Water depot access. The sites interception chamber is located within the Hammersmith Pumping Station. A temporary road closure and diversion route would be required during the construction of the drop shaft. The diversion route would be via Fulham Palace Road, the Hammersmith Gyratory, Queen Caroline Street and Crisp Road. However, Crisp Road is one-way southbound and would need temporary Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Temporary construction access and egress gates will require construction. Access and egress will be taken directly from/onto Chancellors Road to provide a one-way system through the site. A temporary road closure and diversion route would be required during the construction of the drop shaft. The diversion route is traffic calmed and would require traffic management on Crisp Road or the temporary conversion of Crisp Road to two-way (with the removal of pinch-points and all on-street parking). During the maintenance/ servicing of the drop
Appendix 9 Page 1
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments The access point will use an existing access for the Thames Water depot, although will require widening to allow construction vehicle access and egress. An existing lighting column and telegraph pole may need to be relocated to enable the access to be widened to the east. The internal access road will need priority working/ management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. Some on-street parking spaces opposite the access will also require removal to enable construction vehicle access and egress. Visibility is unrestricted to the west from the access, although may be restricted to the east by Mitigation required and conclusions when connection culvert works are being carried out. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to enable construction vehicles to access and egress the site, and to provide adequate visibility from the access. Additional on-street parking bays will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles along Chancellors Road. Several constraints exist to access the TLRN (A4), which include passing through a residential area, on-street parking and traffic calming (speed cushions) on Chancellors Road. Conclusion: Site will use Comments conversion to two-way (requiring removal of pinch-points and all on-street parking) or traffic management. This route also features traffic calming in the form of raised junctions and speed cushions. During the maintenance/ servicing of the drop shaft, it may be possible to close one lane of Chancellors Road and implement a priority working system to allow one-way traffic. The temporary construction access will be taken directly off Chancellors Road through temporary gates at the sites western extent. Temporary construction egress will be taken onto Chancellors Road through Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions shaft, it may be possible to close one lane of Chancellors Road and implement a priority working system to allow one-way traffic. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to enable construction vehicles to access and egress the site. Additional on-street parking bays will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles along Chancellors Road. Several constraints exist on the route to the TLRN (A4), which include passing through a residential area, on-street parking and traffic calming (speed cushions) on Chancellors Road. An
Appendix 9 Page 2
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Mitigation required and conclusions on-street parking. an existing access which Several on-street parking will need to be widened, bays to the east of the and may require the access will require relocation of a lighting removal to ensure column and telegraph adequate visibility. pole. The internal access road will need priority Chancellors Road is subject to a 30mph speed working/management to enable a one-way limit, features traffic calming (speed cushions) operation, or will require widening. Several and is street lit. It has a carriageway width of 8.1m on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road and contains on-street will require removal. parking on both sides There are several (reducing effective carriageway width to 4m). constraints along the Several on-street parking route to the TLRN (A4). TTM will be required on bays will require removal Chancellors Road during on Chancellors Road to provide passing places for the construction of the connection culvert. construction vehicles. Access into the CSO site Access to the A4 (TLRN will be restricted when strategic highway connection culvert works network) is achievable are being carried out. from Chancellors Road on to Fulham Palace Road, Comments Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions temporary gates at the additional constraint sites eastern extent. This exists upon accessing the will enable a one-way site from the TLRN (A4) in system through the site, the form of a raised and will reduce the junction on Queen likelihood of construction Caroline Street which will vehicles having to turn require removal. around. Temporary site Conclusion: Site will access gates will need to require the construction of be constructed. temporary access and Permanent access will be egress gates on taken from Chancellors Chancellors Road to Road. provide a one-way system Several on-street parking through the site. A spaces along Chancellors temporary road closure Road will require removal and diversion route would be required on to enable construction vehicle access and Chancellors Road during egress. Visibility from the the construction of the drop shaft. The diversion site egress is considered adequate as directly onto route would require traffic management on Crisp Chancellors Road. Road or the temporary Chancellors Road is subject to a 30mph speed conversion of Crisp Road to two-way. During the limit, features traffic calming (speed cushions) maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, it may be
Appendix 9 Page 3
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments then on to the Hammersmith Gyratory (using the A306 for westbound A4). Access to the A4 (TLRN strategic highway network) runs through a residential area and high street, and has constraints in the form of traffic calming (speed cushions) and parking on both road sides of Chancellors Road. Route passes under the Hammersmith flyover, with no visible height restrictions. Distance to TLRN 0.9km for westbound A4 and 1.1km for eastbound A4. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions and is street lit. It has a possible to close one lane carriageway width of 8.1m on Chancellors Road and and contains on-street implement a priority parking on both sides working system to allow (reducing effective one-way traffic. Several carriageway width to 4m). on-street parking bays Several on-street parking along Chancellors Road bays will require removal will require removal. on Chancellors Road to There are several provide passing places for constraints along the construction vehicles route to/from the TLRN leaving the site. (A4), and a raised junction will require removal on Access to the A4 (TLRN Queen Caroline Street to strategic highway enable construction network) is achievable from Chancellors Road on vehicle access. to Fulham Palace Road, then on to the Hammersmith Gyratory (using the A306 for westbound A4). The route runs through a residential area and high street and has constraints in the form of traffic calming (speed cushions) and parking on both road
Appendix 9 Page 4
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Comments sides of Chancellors Road. Route passes under the Hammersmith flyover, with no visible height restrictions. Access from the A4 (TLRN) is achievable from the Hammersmith Gyratory, Queen Caroline Street, Crisp Road and then on to Chancellors Road. The route runs through a residential area and high street and has constraints in the form of traffic calming (speed cushions and raised junction) and on-street parking. The raised junction on Queen Caroline Street would require removal to enable construction vehicle access. Distance to TLRN 0.9km for westbound A4 and Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 5
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Comments 1.1km for eastbound A4. Distance from TLRN 1.1km from westbound A4 and 1.7km from eastbound A4. Access to river Site is not directly adjacent to river. River access is not essential for a CSO site. Access to rail unlikely to be feasible due to small volumes of excavated material produced by the site. Access to the Barnes railway site uses the route to the TLRN (A4), then follows the A4 and continues to the junction with the A316, where it heads south along the A316 towards the junction with Hartington Road. The route then follows along a narrow road adjacent to the Thames River access is not essential as excavated material will be transported away by road. Route to possible rail link (near Barnes Bridge) runs along a narrow road which is traffic calmed (speed humps) adjacent to the Thames, in addition to the constraints encountered upon accessing TLRN (A4). Speed humps will require removal. Railway sidings would need to be constructed in order for the site to be utilised. Same as for Option 1, see Same as for Option 1, see left. left. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Access to rail
Same as for Option 1, see Same as for Option 1, see left. left.
Appendix 9 Page 6
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments before reaching the site. Constraints include those encountered when accessing the TLRN, in addition to traffic calming (speed humps) and a narrow road width alongside the river in close proximity to the Barnes site. Distance 5.3km to rail access from site. Railway sidings would need to be constructed in order for the site to be utilised. Parking Parking currently not provided on plans within site; however, some parking could be made available within the sites boundary for workforce. Limited parking is available on Chancellors Road and on surrounding roads for permit holders Alternative on-street parking (pay and display, maximum stay varying from 4hrs to 8hrs) is unsuitable for workforce due to time constraints. Removal of several on-street residential parking bays on Chancellors Road Same as for Option 1, see left. On-street residential parking may also require removal on Crisp Road if temporarily converted to two-way to provide a diversion route. Same as for Option 1, see left. Removal of several on-street residential parking bays may also be required on Crisp Road. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 7
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments and pay and display users, although only for a maximum stay of 4hrs (2.40/hr), Mon-Sat, 08:30-18:30. Parking on Distillery Road for permit holders and pay and display users for a maximum stay of 8hrs (2.40/hr). On-street provision is therefore unsuitable for workforce due to time constraints. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road require removal to enable construction vehicles to access/egress the site. Alternative residential parking is available within the vicinity of the site. Public transport accessibility PTAL 5-6 (high), as identified within Table 2.3. Mitigation required and conclusions required. Alternative residential parking available within vicinity of site. Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Good possibility of workforce being able to use public transport to access site.
Same as for Option 1, see Same as for Option 1, see left. left.
Appendix 9 Page 8
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Traffic management Option 1 Comments Site access is existing although will require widening. An existing lighting column and telegraph pole may need to be relocated to enable the access to be widened to the east. The internal access road will need priority working/ management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road will require removal to enable construction vehicles to access/egress the site, and to provide passing places for construction vehicles along Chancellors Road. Alternative residential parking is available on Chancellors Road. The interception chamber Mitigation required and conclusions The site access will require widening and may require the relocation of a lighting column and telegraph pole. The internal access road will need priority working/ management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. The removal of some on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road and speed humps for rail access is required. Temporary traffic management (TTM) on Chancellors Road required during construction of the connection culvert. Access into the CSO site will be restricted during the connection culvert works. Comments Site will require the construction of temporary access and egress gates on Chancellors Road. A temporary road closure on Chancellors Road and diversion route would be required during the construction of the drop shaft. The diversion route is traffic calmed and would require Crisp Road to be traffic managed or converted to two-way (with the removal of pinch-points and all on-street parking). During the maintenance/ servicing of the drop shaft, it may be possible to close one lane on Chancellors Road and implement a priority working system to allow one-way traffic. The route from the TLRN Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Temporary access and egress gates require construction. A temporary road closure of Chancellors Road and diversion route would be required during the construction of the drop shaft. The diversion route would require Crisp Road to be traffic managed or converted to two-way. During the maintenance/ servicing of the drop shaft, it may be possible to close one lane on Chancellors Road and implement a priority working system to allow one-way traffic. A raised junction requires removal to enable construction vehicles to access the site. Speed humps require removal to enable construction
Appendix 9 Page 9
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Comments is located within the Hammersmith Pumping Station and will require temporary traffic management (TTM) on Chancellors Road to enable the construction of the connection culvert. Access into the CSO site will be restricted during the connection culvert works. Speed humps will require removal to allow construction vehicles to access the rail access point. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments (A4) requires the removal of a raised junction on Queen Caroline Street to allow construction vehicles to access the site. Speed humps will also require removal to allow construction vehicles to access the rail access point. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road will require removal to enable construction vehicles to access/egress the site, and to provide passing places for construction vehicles along Chancellors Road. Alternative residential parking is available on Chancellors Road. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions vehicles to access the rail access point. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road also require removal.
Summary:
The site is suitable as a CSO site. Access is possible using an existing site access for the Thames Water depot which will require widening to enable use by construction vehicles. The internal access road will
This site is less suitable as a CSO site. The temporary construction access and egress gates require construction to provide a one-way system through the site. This will reduce the need for construction
Appendix 9 Page 10
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Mitigation required and conclusions need priority working/management to enable a one-way operation, or will require widening. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road require removal to enable construction vehicles to access/ egress the site and provide adequate visibility from the site access. The potential road access route to the TLRN (A4) runs through a residential and high street area and is traffic calmed (speed cushions). Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles. Alternative parking provision is available within the vicinity of the site. The potential rail access route will require the removal of traffic calming (speed humps), although rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. The site is not adjacent to the river, although river access is not essential for a CSO site. There is a good possibility that the workforce will be able to use public transport to access the site, and some parking could be provided within the site boundary. On-street pay and display parking in the vicinity of the site is restricted to a maximum stay of 4-8hrs and is therefore not suitable for workforce due to time constraints. Comments Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions vehicles to turn around within the site. The construction of the drop shaft would require a temporary road closure, and the diversion route features traffic calming in the form of a raised junction and speed cushions. The diversion route would also require Crisp Road to be traffic managed or temporarily converted to two-way, requiring the removal of pinch-points and all on-street parking. During the maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, it may be possible to close one lane and implement a priority working system along Chancellors Road to allow one-way traffic. Several on-street parking bays along Chancellors Road require removal to enable construction vehicles to access and egress to/from the site. The access route to the TLRN (A4) runs through a residential and high street area and is traffic calmed (speed cushions). The potential road access route from the TLRN (A4) requires the removal of a raised junction on Queen Caroline Street. Several on-street parking bays on Chancellors Road will require removal to provide passing places for construction vehicles. Alternative parking provision is available within the vicinity of the site. The potential rail access route will require the removal of traffic calming (speed humps and raised junction),
Appendix 9 Page 11
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Option 1 Mitigation required and conclusions Temporary traffic management will be required for the construction of connection culvert on Chancellors Road (which will also restrict access into the CSO site), the widening of the existing site access (if required) and the removal of on-street parking on Chancellors Road. Comments Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions although rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. The site is not adjacent to the river, although river access is not essential for a CSO site. There is a good possibility that the workforce will be able to use public transport to access the site, and some parking could be provided within the site boundary. On-street pay and display parking in the vicinity of the site is restricted to a maximum stay of 4-8hrs and is therefore not suitable for workforce due to time constraints. Temporary traffic management will be required for the construction of the site access and egress gates, the construction/maintenance/servicing of the drop shaft, management of the diversion route during the temporary closure of Chancellors Road (particularly Crisp Road), removal of on-street parking on Chancellors Road and the removal of the raised junction for road access.
Appendix 9 Page 12
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including archaeological priority areas Summary of historical uses Option 1 Comments The western border of the site is just within the Hammersmith and Fulham Archaeological priority Area. The location of the Option 1 shaft site on the northern side of Chancellors Road (north arm Option 1) is shown on the 1862-1882 mapping as having gardens behind a row of terraced housing fronting the road. The area of the proposed Option 1 shaft site remained undeveloped until the 1930s, when industrial premises consisting of several small narrow buildings were erected. By the 1940s, Chancellors Road was renamed Distillery Road, which suggests the nature of the industrial premises. The Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable. Comments Same as Option 1, see left. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as Option 1, see left.
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
The southern portion of site containing the shaft site is located within the historical grounds of Brandenburg House, which was erected by Sir Nicholas Crispe in the seventeenth century. The house was plundered by Parliamentarians during the Civil War. In 1683, Prince Rupert purchased the house and gave it to his mistress, the actress Margaret Hughes. In 1740, the house was purchased by George Bubb Dodington, afterwards Lord Melcombe, who undertook extensive renovations.
Same as Option 1, see left.
Appendix 9 Page 13
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Option 1 Comments road was renamed Chancellors Road again by the 1960s. The southern portion of site is located within the historical grounds of Brandenburg House, which was erected by Sir Nicholas Crispe in the seventeenth century. The house was plundered by Parliamentarians during the Civil War. In 1683, Prince Rupert purchased the house and gave it to his mistress, the actress Margaret Hughes. In 1740, the house was purchased by George Bubb Dodington, afterwards Lord Melcombe, who undertook extensive renovations. The Margrave of Brandenburgh-Anspach purchased the house in 1792. By the close of the Mitigation required and conclusions Comments The Margrave of Brandenburgh-Anspach purchased the house in 1792. By the close of the eighteenth century, the house still contained a fair portion of the original house built by Crispe in the mid-seventeenth century. The site was cleared in the mid-19th century but was not developed with buildings, possibly associated with a distillery, to the west of the site. On the southern edge of the grounds of Brandenburg House (c 35m to the southwest outside the site), early Saxon settlement and later remains were discovered during trial excavations in 1999, 2001 and 2005/7 (NMR ACT UID 1434460). Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 14
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Option 1 Comments eighteenth century, the house still contained a fair portion of the original house built by Crispe in the mid-seventeenth century. The southern part of site was cleared in the mid-19th century but was not developed with buildings, possibly associated with a further distillery, to the west of the site. On the southern edge of the grounds of Brandenburg House (c 35m to the southwest outside the site), early Saxon settlement and later remains were discovered during trial excavations in 1999, 2001 and 2005/7 (NMR ACT UID 1434460). Mitigation required and conclusions Comments The northern side of Chancellors Road (North arm Option 1) is shown on the 1862-1882 mapping as having a row of terraced housing behind and to the north, of which are gardens. The area of the proposed Option 1 shaft site remained undeveloped until the 1930s, when industrial premises consisting of several small narrow buildings were erected. By the 1940s, Chancellors Road was renamed Distillery Road, which suggests the nature of the industrial premises. The road was renamed Chancellors Road again by the 1960s. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 15
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected Option 1 Comments No archaeological receptors of high or very high value are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being present within the site. Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. NB. Mitigation of waterlogged archaeological remains through excavation is often logistically complex and potentially costly. A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. Comments Same as for Option 1, see left. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
One archaeological receptor, MLO77778 residual or curated Roman artefacts were recovered from the site, including five copper alloy coins dating from AD 260-385. A number of Roman pottery shards and tile were located immediately to the south of the site of the proposed interception chamber.
One archaeological receptor, MLO77778, is located close to the shaft site itself residual or curated Roman artefacts were recovered from the site, including five copper alloy coins dating from AD 260-385, a number of Roman pottery shards and tile.
Same as for Option 1, see left.
Appendix 9 Page 16
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected Option 1 Comments The dewatering of waterlogged deposits is unlikely to be a major issue as the site is located at some distance from the Thames. The historic map evidence shows the construction of terraced housing in the 19th century, but whether this was significant enough to disturb any earlier archaeological remains requires further investigation. Borehole data in the area indicates up to 10m of made ground, some of which could be archaeological in nature. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable. Comments Same as for Option 1, see left. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
Extent of existing disturbance (if known)
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Appendix 9 Page 17
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Potential issues Option 1 Comments The location of the site close to the known remains of the 17th Century Brandenburg House suggests the possibility of remains relating to this structure. In addition, the presence of a Roman find spot within or very close to the site and a Saxon settlement (NMR ACT UID 1434460) in relatively close proximity to the southwest of the site suggests the possibility of remains of this date also. Detailed design proposals and an outline method statement will be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
Mitigation methods could Same as for Option 1, see include: left. desk-based assessment production of deposits model archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations archaeological evaluation archaeological watching brief archaeological excavation.
Appendix 9 Page 18
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Option 1 Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: Based on current information, this site is considered suitable for use as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2. There is one known archaeological receptor of isolated Roman finds from within the southern part of the site, which is close to the location of the Option 2 shaft location. There are records of archaeological remains of importance in the immediate vicinity (to the southwest). Structural remains (foundations) associated with an important post-medieval house of high archaeological value may still be present within the location of the proposed drop shaft for Option 2. In addition, the fact there has been little major disturbance in the recent past within the area suggests it is possible that archaeological remains may still exist below ground.
Appendix 9 Page 19
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including conservation areas, including trees Option 1 Comments Listed buildings Temple Lodge, Grade II: 124m Carling Apollo Theatre, Grade II*: 185m Nurses home on north side of Lochlaine Street (116 Fulham Palace Road), Grade II: 197m Hammersmith Bridge, Grade II: 205m 6 Lower Mall, Grade II: 224m No 7 Lower Mall, Grade II: 240m Buildings of local interest The borough of Hammersmith and Fulham holds a list of Buildings of Merit. One building of merit is located within 250m of C04XP. Water Pumping Station, St James Street: 0m Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
In the case of listed buildings, Same as for Option 1, see left. buildings of merit and conservation areas, a highquality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment, in conjunction with archaeology work, will be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals. On the basis of currently available information (Feb 2011) and on the basis of certain receptors not being present within 250m of C04XP, mitigation will not be applicable in the case of registered historic parks and gardens, locally listed parks and gardens, and protected views.
Appendix 9 Page 20
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Option 1 Comments Conservation areas Fulham Reach Conservation Area: 0m Hammersmith Odeon Conservation Area: 5m The Mall Conservation Area: 100m Hammersmith Broadway Conservation Area: 124m Crabtree Conservation Area: 134m Registered historic parks and gardens There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of C04XP. Locally listed parks and gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens within 250m of C04XP. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 21
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Option 1 Comments Protected views There are no protected views within 250m of C04XP. Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected There is the potential for the Fulham Reach Conservation Area to be directly impacted as C04XP lies directly within its boundaries. Mitigation in the form of a Same as for Option 1, high-quality and sensitive see left. scheme design and/or screening would be required to ensure that the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Fulham Reach Conservation Area. Any demolition or removal of trees will require conservation area consent. The welfare facilities should be installed in a sensitive manner, with physical impacts limited. Same as for Option 1, see left. Same as for Option 1, see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected
There is the potential for one building of merit to be directly impacted due to the introduction of welfare facilities into the building.
Appendix 9 Page 22
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Option 1 Comments There is the potential for six listed buildings (one Grade II* and five Grade II) to be indirectly affected due to impacts on their setting. There is also the potential for four conservation areas to be indirectly impacted by the works. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
Only one conservation area, Same as for Option 1, the Hammersmith Odeon see left. Conservation Area, shares a visual relationship with the site. Consequently, the scheme has the potential to have an adverse impact on its setting. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design and/or screening is therefore likely to be required. The listed buildings do not share a visual relationship with the site. The development would therefore not result in an impact on these structures and mitigation would not be required. Mitigation in the form of screening during construction would be required. Same as for Option 1, see left.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected
The identified building of merit will also have indirect impacts on its setting due to the addition of the stockyard.
Appendix 9 Page 23
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs Option 1 Comments Site in Thames Policy Area, strategic and local cycle route runs to the east of the site, green open space to the east of site. Site on pumping station and industrial area across Chancellors Road. Residential area with an area of public open space, Frank Banfield Park on Distillery Road. Pumping station is only remaining building on open derelict site. Some mature trees and vegetation around pumping station. Construction activities would potentially involve the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores, and demolition of existing pumping station and loss of vegetation. This would result in an adverse direct impact on the site and adverse indirect impacts on the Mitigation required and conclusions Retention of trees where possible, and protection in accordance with BS 5837. The proposed works would have an indirect adverse impact on the residential character of the area. Mitigation during construction will be required to reduce impacts on the conservation area. This would take the form of hoardings and appropriate lighting. Comments Same as for Option 1, see left. Except, construction activities would involve the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores, the closing of Chancellors Road, and possible loss of vegetation. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for Option 1, see left.
Appendix 9 Page 24
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Option 1 Comments residential character of the area and the River Thames to the west. The site lies within the Fulham Reach Conservation Area, which is largely residential in nature. The site itself is occupied by derelict land alongside existing historic industrial structures. There will be an adverse impact on the residential character during construction works. Permanent elements are unlikely to adversely impact on this character. Potential views likely to be affected Open views from Distillery Road and residents along Chancellors Road, Chancellors Street, Queen Caroline Street and St James Street. Partially interrupted views from Crisp Road, Chancellors Way, River Terrace, Frank Banfield Park, Fulham Palace During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would minimise visual impact. The construction site will be located within an industrial area. Construction activities will be visually intrusive to residential properties, particularly from along Same as for Option 1, see left. Except, there are only open views from Distillery Road and residents along Chancellors Road and St James Street. There are partially interrupted views from During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would minimise visual impact. The construction site will be located within an industrial area. Construction activities Mitigation required and conclusions Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 25
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Option 1 Mitigation required and conclusions Road, Charing Cross Hospital Chancellors Road, St James and the river. Street and Chancellors Views from within the Fulham Street. Reach Conservation Area will be impacted during construction. Views from Hammersmith Odeon Conservation Area will also be affected during construction due to the presence of cranes and moving machinery. The construction works will be visually intrusive to residential properties. Permanent structures are unlikely to adversely impact any views associated with the heritage assets. Comments There are unlikely to be any adverse impacts resulting from the permanent elements due to the existing industrial character of the site. However, the site does lie within a conservation area The design of the site and any permanent structures will need to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Fulham Reach Conservation Area, and be sympathetic to the building of Comments Crisp Road, Chancellors Way, Frank Banfield Park, Fulham Palace Road, Charing Cross Hospital and the river. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions will be visually intrusive to residential properties, particularly from along Chancellors Road.
Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required
Appendix 9 Page 26
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Option 1 Comments and adjacent to a building of merit. Potential issues The development has the potential to directly impact on one conservation area and the setting of a further conservation area. These impacts will be limited to the construction phase. Mitigation required and conclusions merit. The scheme design will need to be of high quality to limit impacts on the Fulham Reach Conservation Area. In addition, mitigation will be required during construction to minimise visual impacts. Any demolition or removal of trees from the site will require conservation area consent. Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: From a built heritage perspective, the site is less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2, due to potential impacts on the water pumping station (a building of merit) and the wider Fulham Reach Conservation Area, which is predominantly residential in character. There is also the potential for indirect impacts on the Hammersmith Odeon Conservation Area, particularly during construction. Mitigation during construction is recommended in the form of appropriate lighting and hoardings. Any permanent elements should be sensitively designed. From a townscape perspective, the site is less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2, due to the proposed works which would have an indirect adverse impact on the residential character of the area. Construction activities will be visually intrusive to residential properties, particularly along Chancellors Road for both options 1 and 2 and also St James Street and Chancellors Street in the case of Option 1.
Appendix 9 Page 27
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (groundwater and surface water) From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. Options 1 and 2 Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (10m) London Clay (47m) Lambeth Group (11m) Thanet Sand (14m) Hydrogeology Piezometric level in Chalk aquifer: ~ -32mAOD (~ 37mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater monitoring location EA hydrometry sites: No hydrometry site nearby. SPZ Not located in a source protection zone defined by EA EA licensed groundwater abstractions and details No public water supply Two licensed abstraction boreholes within 2 km radius. A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the total capture zone of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100 mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows: 1. 72m 2. 255m As a result, the drop shaft will not be located within either of these catchment areas. Mitigation required and conclusions The drop shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 31mbgl, therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head (1) in the Chalk is approximately 6m below the base of the construction. Therefore, there is no potential issue in terms of geotechnical design.
SPZs and groundwater users
Appendix 9 Page 28
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Options 1 and 2 Comments Licence numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0221 (1 borehole) 2. 28/39/39/0137 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.6km southeast of the site 2. 1.8km west of the site Operator: 1. Fulham Football Club Ltd 2. Fuller Smith & Turner Ltd Abstracted aquifer unit: 1. Chalk 2. Gravel Abstraction purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports grounds/facilities spray irrigation) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (food and drink non-evaporative cooling) Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 29
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Options 1 and 2 Comments Abstraction quantity (annual): 1. 6,500 m3 2. 81,828 m3 Local authorities (LA) unlicensed groundwater abstractions and details No abstraction borehole within 1km radius. Borehole locations and depths There are seven historical records of water wells: Four deep wells and three shallow wells within 1km radius. Depth range: 96.9 167.6m Depth range: 5.5 9.5m The site is not located adjacent to the River Thames. The site is behind flood defences so the pollution risk is through drainage to the River Thames. No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). At shallow depth, the drop shaft is located in Kempton Gravel, which is classified as a secondary aquifer. Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by sheet piling. Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions
Impacts on surface water features Impacts on groundwater (resources and quality)
Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23. See below (likely types of mitigation measures that will be required)
Appendix 9 Page 30
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Likely types of mitigation measures that will be required Potential issues Options 1 and 2 Comments Mitigation required and conclusions No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. Not applicable
Limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer due to sheet Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer will piling. depend on construction.
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable for both options 1 and 2 because the CSO drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are Kempton Gravel, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the CSO site. There will be limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 because there is no direct pathway to the River Thames for pollution and only standard mitigation would be required.
(1) Piezometric head is a specific measurement of water pressure above a datum.
Appendix 9 Page 31
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Non-statutory designated wildlife sites BAP priority habitats Options 1 and 2 Comments Barn Elms LNR is approximately 750m SW of the site, on the opposite bank of the Thames estuary. None identified. Mitigation required and conclusions No likely impact. Not applicable.
Part of the site appears to conform to London BAP Loss of wasteland habitat may require limited priority habitat Wasteland. compensatory provision. If bat roosts or nesting black redstart were found to be present, mitigation would be required, possibly including offsite provision. Mitigation will be possible but may require offsite provision. Not applicable.
Protected or otherwise Multi-storey building present on site may have notable species within the some potential for roosting bats or breeding black study area redstart. Site has potential to support reptiles and breeding birds and invertebrates. No direct impact on aquatic receptors. Potential issues No further issues.
Summary: This site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2. Ecological surveys and the provision of compensatory habitat (potentially involving offsite solutions) are likely to be required if the site is selected but the scale is likely to be small. There will be no impacts on aquatic ecology receptors provided development does not encroach on foreshore or discharge to the River Thames.
Appendix 9 Page 32
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood risk zone Options 1 and 2 Comments Flood Zone 3 (one in 200-year flood extent) but defended to the one in 1,000-year flood level there is a residual risk of a breach for which mitigation would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to Table D.2 of PPS25. There is available space for SUDS and the geology of the site is sand and gravel, and should therefore be suitable for infiltration SUDS. No further issues. Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the residual risk of flooding to the site.
Assessment of conditions for SUDS Potential issues
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Summary: This site is suitable for use as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2 as it is protected from the one in 1,000-year flood level and the underlying geology and potential space on the site means that infiltration SUDS are likely to be suitable.
Appendix 9 Page 33
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Air quality Site considerations AQMA Sensitive receptors Options 1 and 2 Comments The air quality objective for NO 2 is exceeded on major roads in the vicinity of the site. There are residential properties and a hospital along Fulham Palace Road (A219). There are also residential properties the site access route and adjacent to site access. There are residential properties within 20m of the proposed site on Chancellors Road, St James Street and Chancellors Street. The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions on A219 and A4 corridors. See above. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route the construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works.
Existing traffic issues Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring Potential issues
Additional vehicle emissions have a high potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See above.
There is no data available at the likely access to the Collect minimum six months diffusion tube data at A219 and the nearest existing data indicates existing site access to A219 or other point of access to major exceedance of AQLV. road network. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts is moderate. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hour. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 34
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Air quality Site considerations Options 1 and 2 Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: This site is less suitable for use as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site and therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. However, this could somewhat be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Appendix 9 Page 35
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58dB L Aeq and night-time noise levels of less than 50dB L Aeq at residential properties located along Chancellors Road. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively low daytime and night-time noise levels due to their distance from major roads. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. There are sensitive receptors in close proximity to all boundaries of the site. The closest receptors are located on Chancellors Street. There are also residential properties to the east on the Peabody Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Same as for Option 1, see left. Same as for Option 1, see left.
Sensitive receptors
Not applicable
There are sensitive receptors Same as for Option in close proximity to the 1, see left. northern boundary of the site. Further residential properties are located to the east on Fulham Palace Road. Residential properties are also
Appendix 9 Page 36
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Comments Estate, to the north at Eleanor House and Margaret House, and to the south on James Street. The closest receptors located on Chancellors Street consist of two-storey dwellings. These are located on the boundary of the temporary working area and the shaft area. Receptors at the Peabody Estate consist of five-storey dwellings and are located approximately 4m from the temporary working area and 4m from the shaft area. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including Chancellors Road, which will be considerably affected by HGV traffic. There is the Frank Banfield Park and associated playground facilities located Mitigation required and conclusions Comments located to the south on Winslow Road. Sensitive receptors to the north consist of two- and three- storey residential dwellings at Chancellors Road, at a distance of approximately 7m from the temporary working area and 16m from the shaft location. Sensitive receptors to the east on Fulham Palace Road are located approximately 125m away from the temporary working area and shaft location. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including Chancellors Road, which will be considerably affected by HGV traffic. There is the Frank Banfield Park and associated playground facilities located immediately to the east of the Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 37
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Comments immediately to the east of the site. Existing traffic issues Local road traffic, coupled with Not applicable more distant road traffic on the A4 to the north, the A306 to the west and the A219 to the east, will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Local road traffic, coupled with Not applicable more distant road traffic on the A4 to the north, the A306 to the west and the A219 to the east, will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. There is no information currently available with regard to the pumping station, which exists on Chancellors Road, as a source of noise. Construction: The construction period is estimated at up to two years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm), Monday to Saturday. This has Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction Mitigation required and conclusions site. Same as for Option 1, see left. Same as for Option 1, see left. Comments Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Existing sources of significant noise emissions
Same as for Option 1, see left. Same as for Option 1, see left.
Potential issues
Construction: The construction period is estimated at up to two years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm), Monday to Saturday. This
Appendix 9 Page 38
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Comments the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site and, in particular, those on Chancellors Road and Winslow Road. The number of HGV movements per day is anticipated to be relatively high. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along Winslow Road, where the proposed haul route travels. The immediate site area is fairly small and, while the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors to minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant Mitigation required and conclusions activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences. Comments has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site and, in particular, those on Chancellors Road and Winslow Road. The number of HGV movements per day is anticipated to be relatively high. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along Winslow Road, where the proposed haul route travels. The immediate site area is fairly small and, while the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the southern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 39
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Comments and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of less than 10m. It is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking but may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case-by-case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Mitigation required and conclusions Comments and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 16m, and it is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking but may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case-by-case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 40
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Noise Option 1 Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions Comments ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is less suitable due to the proximity of the residential receptors on all boundaries of the site. Any shielding afforded by the site perimeter barriers will be largely ineffectual due to the height of some of the receptors. In addition, the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to cause noise impacts on the residential properties on Chancellors Road and other nearby residential streets. Same as for Option 2, see left. Except this site layout is less suitable in particular due to the proximity of the residential receptors to the north of the site. Option 2 Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 41
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Site location Current site use Topography Field evidence of contamination (ie, visual/ olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site) Grid reference: 523336, 178079 No site visit undertaken by a land quality specialist at this stage. No site visit undertaken by a land quality specialist at this stage. None identified at this stage. Options 1 and 2
North: Commercial and residential uses. East: Distillery Road (4m wide) and public park (Frank Banfield Park) beyond. Commercial and residential uses. South: Remainder of vacant brownfield site, demarcated for redevelopment. Winslow Road beyond. West: Remainder of vacant brownfield site, demarcated for redevelopment. Commercial and residential uses.
Geological and hydrogeological information Geological strata1 Superficial geology and made ground (10m) London Clay (47m) Lambeth Group (11m) Thanet Sand (14m)
Underlying aquifer classes
Unproductive strata: London Clay Secondary aquifer: River terrace deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sand Principal aquifer: Chalk
Appendix 9 Page 42
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Groundwater vulnerability/ Soil classification (High/Intermediate/Low/Not applicable)2 Source protection zone details Surface water receptor Options 1 and 2 River terrace deposits secondary aquifer High leaching potential of soils (U)1
Not located in a source protection zone defined by EA River Thames (185m southwest)
Relevant information within a 250m radius of the site Historical potentially contaminating activities (based on mapping data) On site Residential housing (south), 1862-1967 Undeveloped land (north), 1909-1920 Pumping station (north), 1947 - 1972 Tanks contents unknown (north), 1951-1952 Electrical substations (north), 1951-1952 Site cleared, unknown building, 1968 Historical building plans list transformers (south), 1970 Buildings on site (believed to be Thames Water property blocks), (south), 1974 present Water pumping station (south), 1974 present Depot (north), 1990 present Off site Chemical storage depot (adjacent south), 1949-1991
Appendix 9 Page 43
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Pollution incidents to controlled waters Options 1 and 2 Historical building plans list asbestos (adjacent southeast), 1958-1970 Historical building plans list above-ground fuel tanks (6m south), 1970 Oil fuel boilers (10m south), 1970 Numerous tanks (contents unknown) in a south/southwest direction, (closest located 19m south), 1951 Areas cleared due to enemy action, (19m east), 1955 Electrical substation, (closest 27m north), 1952 Historical building plans list numerous fuel-related tanks in a south/southwest direction, (closest located 40m south), 1970 Sugar refinery (45m south), 1974-1977 Spirit distillery (65m southwest), 1862-1948 Gasometer (70m southwest), 1869-1896 Coal yard (83m south), 1951 Metal casting/foundry (95m west), 1896-1916 Factory or works (95m west), 1938-1948 Wharf (transport support and cargo handling), (100m west), 1988 Sugar refinery (120m southwest), 1898-1978 Wharf (transport support and cargo handling), (175m west), 1920 Hospital (186m east), 1988 Preserved food factory (225m southwest), 1951-1978
One General minor incident (230m west) within River Thames
Appendix 9 Page 44
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Landfill sites Other waste sites None One registered waste disposal site: Scrap yard, very small ( less than 10,000 tonne/year) license listed as lapsed/cancelled, 1993, (160m northeast) None None Eleven Car body repairs, inactive (85m south) Carpet, curtain and upholstery cleaning, active (140 east) Precision engineers, inactive (155m east) Bottle manufacturers and suppliers, inactive (155m east) Scrap metal merchants, inactive (157m northeast) Dry cleaners, inactive (157m northwest) Waste disposal services, inactive (157m northwest) Cleaning services domestic, active (165m north) Domestic appliances servicing, repairs and parts, inactive (167m southeast) Waste disposal services, inactive (190m north) Medical equipment manufacturers, inactive (205m northeast) Options 1 and 2
Registered radioactive substances Fuel stations/depots Contemporary trade directory entries
Appendix 9 Page 45
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Site classification based on above information Activity Potential site contaminants derived from surface sources (eg, contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Pumping station 3) Depot 4) Tanks contents unknown 5) Electrical substations/ transformers Potential site contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site 1) Chemical storage depot 2) Fuel tanks 3) Oil fuel boilers 1) Adjacent to site, south 2) Closest located 6m south 3) 10m south 1) Chemicals unknown 2) Metals, TPH, PAHs 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs Distance and direction to site 1) On site and directly adjacent to site 2) On site (north then south) 3) On site (north) 4) On site (north) 5) On site (north) 5) PCBs Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH 2) Metals, phenols, PAHs, TPH 3) Metals, PAHs, TPH 4) Metals, PAHs, TPH, solvents Options 1 and 2
Appendix 9 Page 46
Site suitability report C04XP Appendix 9 Land quality Site considerations Potential contamination pathways to site (Conceptual Site Model)3 Contamination category Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 Source 2: E1, F7 Category 2 assessed as medium risk Options 1 and 2
Summary: The site is considered less suitable as a CSO site for both options 1 and 2, based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from the current pumping station and depot and historical tanks and electrical substations on site, and the chemical storage depot and fuel tanks in the vicinity of the site. This potentially poses a risk to construction workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and inhalation exposure pathways, as well as ground gas risks. Additionally, the potential exists for contaminants to be drawn to the deeper Chalk aquifer, and for migration to surface water receptors to occur through shallow groundwater transport. There is potential for unexploded ordnance to be present on site as historical information indicates that nearby areas have been cleared of ordnance (dates unknown). It would therefore be prudent for a UXO survey (or equivalent) to be conducted at the site if not done so already. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathway-receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 47
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report C04XP: Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Site Suitability Report C04XP: Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Site Suitability Report C04XP: Thames Water Depot and Pumping Station, Chancellors Road

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C04XP

110-RG-PNC-C04XP-000584 | Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C04XP

Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C04XP

Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2

Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 6 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4

Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 15

Property assessment ..................................................................................... 17

Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 19

TLRN TPA UDP UXO

Site suitability report C04XP

Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

Site information Site and surroundings

Proposed use of site construction phase

Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

Restoration and after-use

Engineering assessment Access

Site suitability report C04XP

Construction works considerations

Permanent works considerations

Health and safety

Site suitability report C04XP

Planning assessment Introduction

Planning applications and permissions

Emerging Core Strategy

Environmental appraisal Introduction

Site suitability report C04XP

Transport Option 1 Shaft located on depot land

Option 2 Shaft located in Chancellors Road

Built heritage and townscape

Site suitability report C04XP

Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

Site suitability report C04XP

Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

Issues and impacts

Site suitability report C04XP

Property assessment Introduction

Crown land and special land comments

Site suitability report C04XP

Property valuation comments Option 1 Shaft located on depot land

Option 2 Shaft located in Chancellors Road

Disturbance compensation comments

Discretionary purchase costs comments

Offsite statutory compensation comments

Site acquisition cost assessment

Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

Engineering Option 1 drop shaft located on depot land

Option 2 drop shaft located in Chancellors Road

Site suitability report C04XP

Environment Option 1 Drop shaft located on depot land

Option 2 Drop shaft located in Chancellors Road

Socio-economic and community

Option 1 Drop shaft located on depot land

The disadvantages of the site are as follows.

Option 2 Drop shaft located in Chancellors Road