Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bondy - 1935 - On The Mechanism of Emulsification by Ultrasonic Waves
Bondy - 1935 - On The Mechanism of Emulsification by Ultrasonic Waves
W. JACKSON
83 5
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
29
View Online
836
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
View Online
837
According to
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
( P being the hydrodynamical pressure, p the density and 3 the velocity), the sum of pressure and kinetic energy in a flowing liquid is a constant. Thus the velocity of a liquid passing through a restriction may become so high that the hydrodynamical pressure is reduced to the vapour tension. According to Reynolds the presence of dissolved air exerts a distinct influence. In liquids which, like tap water, contain a sufficient amount of dissolved air, cavitation is always accompanied by partial de-gassing.l @ This may be explained by the fact that minute gas bubbles are formed where the liquid disrupts. These bubbles quickly unite to larger ones, which are not so readily redissolved in regions of higher pressure.
-=-(
2B
( P being the pressure at infinity external atmospheric pressure ; Ro the initial radius of the cavity ; / I the coefficient of compressibility ; P ' and I2 being the correlated pressure and radius of the cavity during the collapse .) Calculation shows that pressures of thousands of atmospheres may be developed at the moment when the cavity collapses to a small fraction of its original diameter. Obviously such collapses may cause enormous mechanical effects, high kinetic energies being concentrated a t very small spots. In fact, mechanical engineering and, specially, naval construction are quite familiar with effects of this kind. The mechanical impact due to decavitation produces extremely heavy erosion, which can be distinguished from ordinary corrosion by its different appearances and by the places where it occurs. These places moreover may be predicted from hydrodynamical reasoning. Fottinger,12 who advanced this theory of erosion by cavitation, was able to prove his views by showing that glass, which is chemically inert, is also attacked under corresponding conditions. To give some impression of the amazing effects of cavitation, it may be mentioned that after a destroyer had rushed for several hours a t maximum speed, the armour plates above the propeller were pierced by a hole of the dimensionsof about one square foot. Likewise turbines may be strongly attacked during short runs.13
l o 0. Reynolds describes this phenomenon as follows : " When the hiss is on, the water in,the tube will be somewhat opaque-rather foggy-which fog disappears after the hiss is stopped. This fog is caused by the separation of the air occluded in the water and corresponds exactly to the separation of the air, as when the temperature of the water in the kettle is above 174" F. In the case of the tube the bubbles of air, which separate out, are very much smaller than those in the kettle on account of the greater violence of the action." l1 Lord Rayleigh, Phil. Mag. (6), 19x7, 34, 94. l 2H. Fottinger, Hydraulische Probleme, Zoc. p. 14. l3 Apart from these mechanical effects, chemical effects of cavitation must also be assumed according to H. Fottinger, loc. it.,^ who points out, that owing
View Online
838
It will be apparent therefore t h a t strong mechanical action may arise from cavitation. Now, we hope to show t h a t intense ultrasonic waves are able t o produce this phenomenon, and furthermore t h a t emulsification under their influence only takes place when there is a chance for the formation, as well as for the collapse, of cavities in the radiated system.
We will first prove that the collapse of cavities does indeed represent a most efficient method for dispersing systems of water and oil. Probably the simplest way of producing cavities is to let steam condense in its own liquid phase, as in the case of the singing kettle. If for instance steam from boiling water-or even better, superheated steam -is brought through a nozzle of about I mm. diameter into the interface of water and oil, it condenses with the well-known rattling noise, a highly dispersed emulsion of the O/W type being formed at the same time. When using a soap solution instead of pure water, concentrated emulsions may be produced, provided the experiment is continued long enough. It is evident that this experiment is fundamentally different from all those where an emulsion is obtained when the steam of the disperse phase is introduced into the cool medium of dispersion. The fact that emulsification ceases as soon as the water becomes too warm to allow of sufficiently rapid condensation proves that in our case the collapse of cavities is essential. If air, instead of steam, was blown' into the system, there was no effect whatsoever, in agreement with what was t o be expected. On the contrary the addition of air to the steam reduces its efficiency, since the gas buffers the impact of the collapsing steam bubbles. The method of dispersing organic liquids in water by means of steam turned out to be of quite general value when producing all sorts of emulsions.
View Online
839
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
that the water close to the end of the vibrating rod turned turbid. Since it was entirely free from air, these small bubbles causing the turbidity could only be due to the disruption of the water (Zerreissen in kleine Partien) under the influence of these intense vibrations. This is evidently the same phenomenon as the formation of cavities in Reynolds experiment mentioned above. Kundt and Lehmanns experiments definitely show that acoustic waves may cause cavitation in de-gassed liquids and the expulsion of dissolved gas in gas-containing liquids.
Emulsification by Ultrasonics.
When applying these results to the question of emulsification the following assertion has to be proved : emuIsions are only obtained when the conditions are such that cavities are not only produced but also collapse. Their formation alone does nok give rise to any remarkable
15F. L. Hopwood, Nature, 1931, 128, 748. This reminds of the remark of 0. Reynolds quoted above : The boiling of water in an open tube a t ordinary temperature. l6 Richards and Loomis, Zoc. it.^ l 7 It is important to remark that de-gassing does not implicitly require cavitation. Expansions, many times smaller than those necessary for cavitation, are sufficient to cause bubbling in gas-containing fluids. This was first emphasised by R. W. Boyle and G. B. Taylor, Physic. Rev. (z), 1926, 27, 518. This typical la Unpublished experiments of H. Freundlich and G. Lindau. example may be mentioned: de-gassed water, sealed into a tube a t 43 C. disrupts a t 31 c., if cooled down in the usual way, i t already disrupts at 36 c. if radiated by ultrasonics.
View Online
840
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
Pressure in
Hg,
00
0'0
60
I00
Od
0.3
1 ' 0
150
200
2-6
300 600
760
II 0 0 I 500
2 300
5'7
4000
studied a t different air pressures, the liquids being always in equilibrium with the gas. The experiments with pressures smaller than atmospheric were done in sealed tubes, the others in open tubes of exactly the same shape, the latter being connected to a compressed air cylinder. When comparing the resulting emulsions of toluene in water, it was evident that a high concentration was not reached until the pressure exceeded a value of about 100 mm. H g ; then, there is a broad range where the Concentration increases with increasing pressure. At still higher pressures, above about 2 atmospheres, e-mulsification de-
View Online
C. BONDY AND K. SdLLNER acts again as a buffer, as was the case in the experiments done with steam.21 There is yet another most important similarity to the dispersing action of steam : emulsification by ultrasonics is much feebler when hot liquids are used. This is quite contrary to the usual experience in the technique of emulsification. It is hard to imagine any other mechanism in which emulsification would be decreased by a rise in temperature. All kinds of stirring effects, as assumed by some previous authors, should be improved a t higher temperatures. Some details as to the formation of cavities by ultrasonic waves also deserve further consideration. When discussing the experiments of Berthelot and Osborne Reynolds, i t was emphasised that the disruption of liquids largely depends upon a ready production of nuclei from dissolved gases. As was to be expected, a similar influence is found with ultrasonics : pairs of liquids such as waterlbenzene or water/nitrobenzene-saturated with gas a t atmospheric pressure-were radiated a t higher hydrostatic pressures.22 The liquids were contained in long tubes (about 25 cm.) of 10 mm. diameter. The amount of the heavier liquid was so small that its height was not more than 2.5 cm., while the lighter liquid practically filled the rest of the tube. Pressure was provided by a compressed-air cylinder. As the pressure increased emulsification rapidly decreased, and no emulsion was obtained when the pressure exceeded a certain value. This value depends on the ultrasonic energy, the temperature and the liquids used. A hydrostatic pressure of several hundred mm. Hg exerted a decisive influence.23 This behaviour was not changed by stabilisers such as soaps or gelatin. Control experiments a t normal pressure always showed strong emulsification. This result may be explained as follows : when hydrostatic pressure is applied, the system is no longer saturated as to the gas, the high column of liquid preventing saturation. Nuclei, which might have been present, are dissolved and conditions are unfavourable for the production of new ones. Consequently no cavities are formed and emulsification is prevented. It is evident that for this reason also, the liquids are not de-gassed under these conditions. Another point needs discussion. The stretching of a liquid in the experiments of Berthelot is different from that caused by ultrasonic waves, in so far as, in the former case, the liquid only undergoes a static stress, whereas ultrasonic cause a stress varying with the period of the vibration, thus' causing strong movement. The latter circumstance evidently favours disruption. This is also borne out by the fact that in Berthelot's experiment the stretched liquid is sensitive towards gentle shocks. We leave undecided the exact mechanism of this process, there being involved the extremely difficult problem of the formation of primary nuclei and their size.
21 This buffering action is perhaps also the reason why a certain time of initiation must elapse before strong emulsification begins. 22 Experiments, mainly biological, with pressures both lower and higher than atmospheric have already been carried out by several authors : F. 0. Schmitt, C . H. Johnson and A. R. Olson, C. H. Johnson, E. N. Harvey, Zoc. ciL4 23 It is well known that cavitation can be prevented by an external pressure. Engineers make use of this fact by applying hydrostatic pressures to pumps and turbines and by designing propellers of ships to operate a t the lowest possible position below the water level.
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
View Online
842
The influence of gases is so important and so complicated that it seems advisable to summarise all effects discussed here.
of emulsification, because they have a buffering effect upon the collapse of cavities.
11. An (external) hydrostatic pressure may be exerted by gases, and thus they may exert an influence.
Pressure may favour emulsification, because it is necessary for causing an efficient collapse. A higher pressure may be unfavourable to emulsification :I . If equilibrium is attained, because the energy of the ultrasonics applied can only overcome a certain pressure when forming cavities ; 2. If there is an over-pressure, not in equilibrium with the gas in solution :
(a) Because over-pressure disfavours the formation of nuclei a t the interface and therefore the production of cavities ; ( b ) for the same reason as mentioned under 11, I .
Ultrasonics do not reveal any peculiarities as to the ease of emulsification, apart from the fact that emulsification is favoured a t low temperature ; the properties of the emulsions formed are also the same as those of emulsions produced by the usual methods. Ultrasonics, nevertheless represent a very convenient, and efficient, method of preparing protected and unprotected emulsions under clean and reproducible conditions. We are inclined to believe that many of the destructive effects of ultrasonic vibrations upon living cells as described by biologists 24 are based on the same mechanism as emulsification, i.e., on the collapse of cavities.25
Summary.
I. The emulsifying action of ultrasonic waves in oil/water systems is due to cavitztion. Emulsification occurs when cavities collapse. 2. It is shown that cavitation can be caused by sound waves and ultrasonics. 3. The influence of gases upon cavitation is complex. Dissolved gases as nuclei favour the formation of cavities. The hydrostatic pressure exerted by gases is necessary for the collapse of cavities. 4. A new and general method for the preparation of emulsions based on the collapse of cavities was found : the sudden condensation of vapours, such as steam, at the interface of two immiscible liquids rapidly causes strong emulsification.
24 R. W. Wood and A. L. Loomis, Zoc. tit.', C. H. Johnson, doc. it.,^ E. K. Harvey, Zoc. cit.' (which see for further references). 25 It does not seem improbable that the chemical effects of ultrasonic waves can be explained in the same way, as was assumed by H. Fattinger, Zoc. cit.l*, for chemical effects o f cavitation in general.
View Online
843
Our heartiest thanks are due to Professor H. Freundlich for his very helpful criticism and advice during this work. We are also greatly indebted to Professor F. G. Donnan, F.R.S., for his generous hospitality and his interest.
Downloaded by Technische Universiteit Delft on 10 January 2011 Published on 01 January 1935 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/TF9353100835
F r o m the S i r W i l l i a m Ramsay Laboratories of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, University College, London.