Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infectious Diseases in West Africa
Infectious Diseases in West Africa
BRICKE
INSTITUTE INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN WEST
FOR AFRICA
HEALTH
Signed
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface 4
ANNEX 1
ANNEX 3
PREFACE
Mankind has been battling infectious diseases since the dawn of the species.
Though there have been many victories over the centuries, this is a war not yet won.
The health systems in sub-Saharan Africa face severe challenges in addressing
infectious diseases and other healthcare needs. In addition to the lack of physical
infrastructure and financial resources to provide adequate healthcare, countries are
beset with a crippling shortage of trained healthcare workers. While sub-Saharan
Africa which has 24% of the global disease burden, it has only 3% of the world
healthcare workforce and accounts for less than 17% of the global healthcare
spending. Of every 1000 babies born in the United Kingdom, five die before they
reach their first birthday. In Mozambique, nearly 350 babies out of every 1000 die
within a year. The death of any infant is a tragedy but why do forty times as many
Mozambican families suffer this painful loss. In the UK, thanks to better hygiene,
antibiotics and vaccines, infectious illnesses are a shadow of the threat they once
were. In the developing countries, however, it’s a very different story. With limited
global resources available to deal with the problem, where should we focus our
efforts? Should we develop new drugs and vaccines to combat these diseases? Or
would we be better off addressing underlying social, cultural, environmental and
economic problems? Should the rich countries do more to help the poor ones? Or
are there enough solutions ahead but not enough political will and cooperation to
implement them.
Bricke Institute for Global Health (BIGH) which is one of the major players in the
Infectious Diseases advocacy initiatives believes that no government or organization
could single handed tackle a problem as vast as Infectious Diseases in developing
countries. But many different organizations including charities and pharmaceutical
companies could make a vital impact in particular areas. The institute’s proposed
World Health Initiative (WHI) christened the ACT NOW CAMPAIGN seeks to establish
an International Public Private Partnership (IP3) for the control and eradication of
eleven major Infectious Diseases within the next five years of the implementation of
its 5-year strategic plan (2010-2014). IP3 will be a distinctive feature of the global
health care landscape. One of the many advantages of the proposed IP3 is that it
will mobilize partners with different even hostile philosophies around one common
goal. IP3 makes it possible to share risks and responsibility and they embody the
principle of ‘win-win’ solutions creating benefits for all parties. Pharmaceutical
companies know they have guaranteed sales of new products perhaps also a
subsidy from public or donor funds. Countries know they are getting high quality
products at affordable prices. The pharmaceutical companies bring its unique skills
and expertise to bear in developing new products and getting them through the
regulatory approval process.
WHI has come to believe that some of the set terrors in the limelight are caused by
three diseases very much in the news: AIDS, TB and Malaria. Such attention for the
big three infectious diseases is understandable. The consequences of the AIDS
epidemic are so profound that they are now recognized as a threat to global
security. Fuelled by the AIDS epidemic, TB has re-established itself often in its multi-
drug resistant form as a contagious and costly leading cause of death. TB’s return
with a vengeance to wealthy nations shocked the world out of its complacent view
that infectious diseases were a declining threat. Malaria stands out as probably the
single most important impediment to socio economic development in endemic
countries. It is deadly, firmly entrenched and inextricably linked to poverty. Malaria is
also important to wealthy countries because it threatens the health of International
travellers. Together, these three diseases cause over 700 Million episodes of illnesses
and more than 20 Million deaths annually.
Outbreaks of diseases are costly wherever and whenever they occur. However,
outbreaks come to an end. The burden imposed by AIDS, TB and Malaria on
economies in developing countries is enormous and constant. I believe that Malaria
has powerfully shaped the global distribution of income and poverty. If the disease
has been eliminated 35 years ago, up to $200 Billion could have been added to sub
Saharan Africa’s current GDP of $300 Billion.
Biological terror also comes in the form of so called neglected diseases, neglected
because they do not affect wealthy nations, do not make headlines and do not
interest the research community including the research based pharmaceutical
industry. They cause great terror in their homeland but little international concern.
The number of people incapacitated by these diseases is enormous. At the human
level, the impact of the disease on development can be simply expressed. People
who are sick cannot work or attend school. Malaria alone causes between 400
Million to 900 Million episodes of illnesses in African Children. High fever and febrile
convulsions in infants and children can retard brain development with profound
implications for societies. Schistosomiasis which infects 200 million people is also
associated with impaired growth and development and poor school performance.
For these and other neglected diseases, illness is not an episode like an outbreak
that ends. If untreated, infection progresses to a point where disability is permanent.
Blindness is the consequence of untreated Onchocerciasis and Trachoma. Severe
heart disease develops in young people as a result of Chagas disease. Deformities
associated with leprosy, leishmaniasis and lymphatic filariasis can become so severe
that patients are cast out of the society as well as eliminated from the work force.
The cost of medicines whether quality drugs or counterfeit can easily exceed the
purchasing power of people living on less than $1 a day in countries where total
annual health expenditure amounts to no more than $11 per person. For some of
these diseases, money cannot buy an effective cure as none exists. For others,
control tools are rapidly losing their effectiveness as antimicrobial resistance
develops and spreads. The statistics are alarming and have been for quite some
time. Conventional approaches have brought very little progress. Considerable
hope now centres on our promise of IP3. Some academic observers believe that our
idea of an efficient IP3 have the potential to transform the global public health
landscape. It will bring major resources to bear on neglected diseases that affect
large populations and can thus prove pivotal in fulfilling the moral obligation to
improve the health status of poor people in low-income countries.
The ACT NOW 5-Year strategic plan will focus primarily on key areas of infectious
disease management which include: developing Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits (RDTK)
for each of the eleven infectious diseases of interest, Drug Donation (and
Production) Partnerships (D2P and DP2), Vaccine Development and Vector Control
Initiative (VCI). We will build strong strategic alliances with government;
pharmaceutical companies, Research institutions and the private sector in various
World Health Initiatives that will ensure that new therapeutics are brought into the
market.
On the proposed WHI, our new headquarters shall have state of the art facilities and
technology which will be at the disposal of our employees. This will challenge them
to use their expertise and creativity as members of an interdisciplinary team. It is
necessary to state that our philosophy is one of shared visions, goals, knowledge and
performance. We believe this approach will bring shared success and ultimately
shared value and hopefully, within the next 5-Years, we would have been able to
achieve at least 80% of our shared goals.
Signed
EcheBriKefun
ECHEFU BRIGHT IKECHUKWU
With limited global resources available to deal with this problem, where should we
focus our efforts? Should we develop new drugs and vaccines to combat these
diseases? Or would we be better off addressing underlying social, cultural,
environmental and economic problems? Should the rich do more to help the poor?
Or are there enough solutions already but not enough political will and cooperation
to implement them? Infectious Diseases have a disastrous economic impact on
developing countries. As well as the cost of treating patients, the economy suffers
because patients are not able to work. There are longer term consequences too.
Some infectious Diseases such as hepatitis B virus can simmer into long term (chronic)
conditions. Others such as malaria and Schistosomiasis may harm the physical and
mental development of children who are especially vulnerable to infection. Many
cancers are result of chronic infections.
Making more medicines seems like a good idea but where might they come from?
Muck of the technology and expertise needed to make medicines is to be found in
pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. Most pharmaceutical
companies are based in the developed countries which have different priorities
such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and Alzheimer diseases. Pharmaceutical
companies argue that they can survive and provide more therapies if they can
make profit. Most of them are reluctant to invest vast amounts of time and money to
developing drug that few could afford to buy. As a result, diseases caused by
trypanosome (sleeping sickness and Chagas disease) and leprosy, have been
dubbed neglected diseases because they attract so little investment.
This can change when people from wealthy countries catch poor country diseases.
The anti-malarial drug Mefloquine for example is a product of the United States army
research stimulated by the impact of malaria on US soldiers during the Vietnam War.
Tourism also ensures that there is still an important developing market for anti-
malarial. Similarly, leishmaniasis has bumped up the agenda when it was suggested
as a possible cause of ill health in Gulf war veterans. However, even if
pharmaceutical companies did adopt a neglected disease, the therapies will
likelihood be too expensive for developing countries. And patent protection seen as
essential to safeguard the pharmaceutical company’s high investment on drug
development, prevents poor countries from making their own versions of medicines
for many years.
Developing new therapies or making existing therapies more accessible is one way
of addressing the problem of infectious diseases in the developing countries. But
would we be better of tackling other fundamental obstacles in health such as
lifestyles, attitudes and poverty?
It is necessary to state at this juncture that geography and climate has contributed
in no small measure to the problem of infectious diseases in developing countries.
The mosquitoes that transmit malaria parasites for example cannot survive in cold
climates. Similarly, the parasitic disease Schistosomiasis has flourished largely
because of the water snails that spread the parasite. Diseases also break out after
floods or other environmental upheavals such as those caused by “El-Nino” (the
Christ child), a periodic outbreak of bad weather at Christmas time linked to
changes in ocean currents. When the horn of Africa was flooded in late 1997, it
experienced upsurges of cholera, malaria and rift valley fever.
Inevitably, it is the poor who suffers most. Subsistence farming is the bedrock of most
developing societies and there is rarely money left for medicines. To make things
worse, poor diets and malnutrition leave people less able to fight off infections. A
further problem has been the huge increase in population movements. Migration
from rural to urban areas and mass unrests means millions of people are living in
overcrowded conditions in cities and refugee camps where infections can spread
easily.
Better children’s education, including health education would have many benefits.
Adult education such as the use of condoms to prevent sexually transmitted
infections and HIV infections is another favoured option but presents many
difficulties. In many countries, discussing issues such as sex or contraceptives is
taboo, while religious groups may argue that promoting condom use encourages
promiscuity or unnatural. The persistence of smoking in the UK shows just how hard it
is to change people’s behaviour through health education.
may simply not accept that they have an infection like HIV, they cannot see.
Sometimes, even whole countries are reluctant to acknowledge the problem, a
factor that has undoubtedly encouraged the spread of AIDS.
In South Africa which has the single biggest HIV infected population in the world,
former president Thabo Mbeki long denied there was any link between AIDS and
HIV. In September 2003, he reportedly told the Washington post, “Personally, I don’t
know anybody who has died of AIDS”, sparking off angry reactions from South Africa
people and AIDS activists who estimate that 600 South Africans die of AIDS daily. By
contrast, Malawi’s president, Bakili Muluzi was widely applauded for publicly
acknowledging that he had an HIV test. There are encouraging signs that
recognizing the problem and taking concerted actions can make a difference.
Uganda illustrates what can be achieved by acknowledging the problem early and
making a real effort to change things. It has been able to half HIV infection levels in
adults.
But how much can health education really achieve with the everyday reality of
poverty. The growth of densely populated cities with unsafe water and poor
sanitation has created the perfect breeding ground for outbreaks of diseases.
Looked at from this point of view, perhaps, it would be more productive to
concentrate on providing improved sanitation, better housing, clean water and
nutritious food rather than developing new pharmaceutical products. In developed
countries, these relatively simple changes had a profound impact on people’s
health in the 19th and 20th centuries.
To treat patients effectively, doctors need to know what they are infected with. In
the UK, that would involve a trip to the GP perhaps a sample being sent to a
diagnostic laboratory or in complicated cases, referral to a specialist. Many
developing countries however have no such healthcare infrastructure to call upon.
Even knowing about symptoms may not be that helpful because many illnesses
share similar features such as fever and febrile convulsions. There is this urgent need
for simple, cheap and Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT) that could be used in rural
locations without complicated equipment. As well as helping individual patients,
accurate diagnosis and an understanding of how diseases are spread can suggest
ways in which the cycle of infection can be broken. Prevention is better than cure
and effective control strategies can save lives and money.
ONCHOCERCIAIS (RIVER
BLINDNESS)
Adult worms remain in subcutaneous nodules, limiting access to the host's immune
system. Microfilarias, in contrast, are able to induce intense inflammatory responses,
especially upon their death. Dying microfilaria have been recently discovered to
release Wolbachia-derived antigens, triggering innate immune responses and
producing the inflammation and its associated morbidity. Wolbachia species have
been found to be endosymbionts of O. volvulus adults and microfilariae, and are
thought to be the driving force behind most of O. volvulus morbidity. Severity of
illness is directly proportional to the number of microfilaria and the power of the
resultant inflammatory response.
that it can provide a simple and non invasive surveillance tool for early detection of
possible recrudescence of Onchocerciasis transmission and infection in an area
where infection has been virtually eliminated and active control operations had
been stopped. The patch involves a very small topical application of the drug DEC,
a highly potent anti-onchocerciasis agent but not amenable for systemic use-to
provoke a local reaction due to the killing of tiny oncho parasites present in the skin
where the drug is applied topically. Control officers in Africa has devised a crude
form of this tool by taking a small quantity of the drug in powder, mixing it with skin
cream, applying it to a filter paper and then onto the skin for 24 hours. The presence
of a small local skin reaction correlated with local killing of worms indicates an
infection with Onchocerca volvulus.
Treatment with Ivermectin: The drug Ivermectin (Mectizan) is the treatment for
onchocerciasis; infected people can be treated once every twelve months. The
drug paralyses the microfilariae and prevents them from causing itching. In addition,
while the drug does not kill the adult worm, it does prevent them from producing
additional offspring. The drug therefore prevents both morbidity and transmission.
Additionally, Doxycycline can be added to the treatment regimen to kill the
endosymbiotic bacteria, Wolbachia. This adjunct therapy has been shown to
significantly lower microfilarial loads in the host and may have activity against the
adult worms.
The signs and symptoms of syphilis are numerous; before the advent of serological
testing, precise diagnosis was very difficult. In fact, the disease was dubbed the
"Great Imitator" because it was often confused with other diseases, particularly in its
tertiary stage. Most persons with syphilis tend to be unaware of the infection and
they can transmit the infection to sexual contacts or in the case of woman to her
unborn child. If left untreated, syphilis can cause serious consequences such as still
birth, prematurity and neonatal deaths. Adverse outcomes of pregnancies are
preventable if the infection is detected and treated before mid-second trimester.
Congenital syphilis kills more than 1 million babies a year worldwide but preventable
if infected mothers are identified and treated appropriately as early as possible.
World health Organization estimates that 12 million new cases of syphilis occur every
year. In developing countries, 20-35% of women in child bearing age have syphilis.
About 60% of pregnant women with syphilis will give birth to a dead baby and
another 30% to live baby with congenital syphilis, a condition with mortality of up to
70%.
The first well-recorded European outbreak of what is now known as syphilis occurred
in 1494 when it broke out among French troops besieging Naples. The French may
have caught it via Spanish mercenaries serving King Charles of France in that siege.
From this centre, the disease swept across Europe. As Jared Diamond describes it,
"When syphilis was first definitely recorded in Europe in 1495, its pustules often
covered the body from the head to the knees, caused flesh to fall from people's
faces, and led to death within a few months." In addition, the disease was more
frequently fatal than it is today. Diamond concludes, "By 1546, the disease had
evolved into the disease with the symptoms so well known to us today."The
epidemiology of this first syphilis epidemic shows that the disease was either new or a
mutated form of an earlier disease.
Researchers concluded that syphilis was carried from the New World to Europe after
Columbus' voyages. The findings suggested Europeans could have carried the non-
venereal tropical bacteria home, where the organisms may have mutated into a
more deadly form in the different conditions and low immunity of the population of
Europe. Syphilis was a major killer in Europe during the Renaissance.
The world Health Initiative on Syphilis Control WHISC meant to be launched in the 1st
quarter of 2010 will be in two categories: developing a Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT)
and the treatment strategy.
Rapid Diagnosis Test: It was only in the 20th century that effective tests and
treatments for syphilis were developed. Microscopy of fluid from the primary or
secondary lesion using dark field illumination is used to diagnose treponemal disease
with high accuracy.
The WHISC will be advocating the use of present-day syphilis screening tests, such as
the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL)
tests which are cheap and fast but not completely specific, as many other
conditions can cause a positive result. These tests are routinely used to screen blood
donors. Notably, the spirochete that causes syphilis does not survive the conditions
used to store blood and the number of transfusion transmitted cases of syphilis is
minuscule, but the test is used to identify donors that might have contracted HIV
from high risk sexual activity. The requirement to test for syphilis has been challenged
due to the vast improvements in HIV testing. False positives on the rapid tests can be
seen in viral infections (Epstein-Barr, hepatitis, varicella, measles), lymphoma,
tuberculosis, malaria, Chagas Disease, endocarditis, connective tissue disease,
pregnancy, intravenous drug abuse, or contamination. As a result, these two
screening tests would be followed up by a more specific treponemal test. Tests
based on monoclonal antibodies and immune fluorescence, including Treponema
pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA) and Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody
Absorption (FTA-ABS) are more specific and more expensive. Unfortunately, false
positives can still occur in related treponomal infections such as yaws and pinta.
Tests based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, ELISA, are also used to confirm
the results of simpler screening tests for syphilis.
WHISC will diagnose Neuro syphilis by finding high numbers of leukocytes in the CSF
or abnormally high protein concentration in the setting of syphilis infection. In
addition, CSF would be tested with the VDRL test although some advocate using the
FTA-ABS test to improve sensitivity. There is anecdotal evidence that the incidence of
neuro syphilis is higher in HIV patients, and some have recommended that all HIV-
positive patients with syphilis should have a lumbar puncture to look for
asymptomatic neuro syphilis.
Treatment Options: WHISC believes the first-choice treatment for all manifestations of
syphilis remains penicillin in the form of penicillin G. The effect of penicillin on syphilis
was widely known before randomized clinical trials were used; as a result, treatment
with penicillin is largely based on case series, expert opinion, and years of clinical
experience. Parenteral penicillin G is the only therapy with documented effect
during pregnancy. For early syphilis, one dose of penicillin is sufficient.
Azithromycin has been used to treat syphilis in the past because of easy once-only
dosing. However, in one study in San Francisco, azithromycin-resistance rates in
syphilis, which were 0% in 2000, were 56% by 2004.
Traditionally divided between Old World and New World parasites, more than 20
pathogenic species have been identified. Common Old World hosts are domestic
and feral dogs, rodents, foxes, jackals, wolves, raccoon-dogs, and hyraxes.
Common New World hosts include sloths, anteaters, opossums, and rodents.
Although uncommon in the United States, major epidemics currently exist in
Afghanistan, Brazil, India, and Sudan. With the increase in international travel,
Travelers, government workers, and military personnel from the United States are at
risk overseas. Since 2001, more than 700 US military personnel have been diagnosed
with cutaneous leishmaniasis and 4 with visceral leishmaniasis after serving in
Afghanistan and the Middle East. Up to 1% of US forces serving in the Southwest
Asian Theater may have been infected. During the first Persian Gulf War, an
estimated 400 cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis and 12 cases of viscerotropic
leishmaniasis were reported. The etiological agent for most of these cutaneous
leishmaniasis cases appears to have been Leishmania major.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was notified of 129 cases
between 1985 and 1990 involving travelers from the United States who acquired the
disease abroad. During World War II, more than 1000 cases of cutaneous
leishmaniasis were reported among US service members serving in the Persian Gulf.
Illnesses now attributed to leishmaniasis have been identified throughout military
campaigns from World War I back to antiquity.
Old World leishmaniasis can be found in the Middle East, Indian subcontinent, Asia,
Mediterranean, East Africa, and republics of the former Soviet Union. New World
leishmaniasis exists throughout the Americas, with the exception of Canada, Chile,
and Uruguay.
Visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis in patients with AIDS has been increasingly
appreciated as a potential opportunistic infection. Co-infection with HIV has been
reported in more than 35 countries throughout southern Europe, the Mediterranean
Basin, Central and South America, and India. Disease occurs in conjunction with
severe immunosuppression. The incidence of co-infection has decreased in
developed countries because of the widespread use of anti-retroviral therapy.
The world Health Initiative on Leishmaniasis (WHIL) will be launched in the 3rd quarter
of 2010 along with WHIT. WHIL will be addressed along two categories: developing a
Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT) and the treatment strategies (Drugs and Vaccine
Development).
Treatment Strategies: There are two common therapies containing antimony (known
as pentavalent antimonials), meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) and sodium
stibogluconate (Pentostam). It is not completely understood how these drugs act
against the parasite; they may disrupt its energy production or trypanothione
metabolism. Unfortunately, in many parts of the world, the parasite has become
resistant to antimony and for visceral or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, but the level
of resistance varies according to species. Amphotericin is now the treatment of
choice; failure of AmBisome to treat visceral leishmaniasis (Leishmania donovani) has
been reported in Sudan, but this failure may be related to host factors such as co-
infection with HIV or tuberculosis rather than parasite resistance.
Miltefosine (Impavido), is a new drug for visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis. The
cure rate of miltefosine in phase III clinical trials is 95%; Studies in Ethiopia show that it
is also effective in Africa. In HIV immunosuppressed people who are coinfected with
leishmaniasis it has shown that even in resistant cases 2/3 of the people responded
to this new treatment. Clinical trials in Colombia showed a high efficacy for
cutaneous leishmaniasis. In mucocutaneous cases caused by L.brasiliensis it has
shown to be more effective than other drugs. Miltefosine received approval by the
Indian regulatory authorities in 2002 and in Germany in 2004. In 2005 it received the
first approval for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia. Miltefosine is also currently
being investigated as treatment for mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by
Leishmania braziliensis in Colombia, and preliminary results are very promising. It is
now registered in many countries and is the first orally administered breakthrough
therapy for visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis. In October 2006 it received orphan
drug status from the US Food and Drug administration. The drug is generally better
tolerated than other drugs. Main side effects are gastrointestinal disturbance in the
1-2 days of treatment which does not affect the efficacy. Because it is available as
an oral formulation, the expense and inconvenience of hospitalisation is avoided,
which makes it an attractive alternative.
Vaccines: Several potential vaccines are being developed, under pressure from the
World Health Organization, but as of 2006 none is available. The team at the
Laboratory for Organic Chemistry at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in
Zürich are trying to design a carbohydrate-based vaccine. The genome of the
parasite Leishmania major has been sequenced, possibly allowing for identification
of proteins that are used by the pathogen but not by humans; these proteins are
potential targets for drug treatments.
Currently there are no vaccines in routine use. However, the genomic sequence of
Leishmania has provided a rich source of vaccine candidates. Genome-based
approaches have been used to screen for novel vaccine candidates. One study
screened 100 randomly selected genes as DNA vaccines against L. major infection
in mice. Fourteen reproducibly protective novel vaccine candidates were identified.
People with elephantiasis seem to disappear. They often don’t go outside because
they are embarrassed. They may be ostracized by the community. They can’t wear
shoes, and so they rarely attend church or any social activities.
The western world knows little about LF and its tremendous impact on the
developing world. “It is a forgotten disease of forgotten people,” says Frank
Richards, of the Rollins School of Public Health (RSPH). “But the numbers of people in
the world suffering from this disease are staggering.” According to WHO, 120 million
people suffer from LF, and another billion are at risk. After malaria, it is the second
leading cause of permanent disability in the world.
The physical symptoms of LF are indeed horrendous, but the economic and
psychosocial impacts can be equally devastating. A disease of the poor, it
undermines economic opportunity and destroys hope
The economic burden of the disease is poorly defined, but the cost to India alone is
estimated to be $150 billion. Although LF doesn’t kill patients outright, it often kills
their ability to make a living and have a family.
“In the past 10 years, public health authorities have come to look not only at deaths
associated with a disease but at quality of life and disability as well,” says Richards.
“LF robs people completely of their quality of life.” Although the parasite inflicts
irreversible damages, LF is one of a handful of diseases possible to eradicate. New
blood tests easily identify those infected but not yet sick from filarial infections, so
preventive care can start early—good hygiene using soap and water, elevating
affected limbs, and exercises can prevent painful acute episodes, secondary
infections, and some swelling.
We know LF can be eliminated because it’s been done before in some places.
China did it beginning in the 1950s because the disease had such an impact on
agricultural productivity. They treated 320 million people over 40 years, but they
were successful. And although it was never prevalent here, LF went away by itself in
places like South Carolina when communities improved sanitation and housing.
Medication has proven more effective than mosquito control in preventing infection
by filarial worms. Recent breakthroughs that refined drug treatment regimens have
helped make elimination of the disease possible. Drug company donations to
developing countries make it affordable.
Saint Radegund was noted for washing the feet of lepers, and Orderic Vitalis writes
of a monk, Ralf, who was so overcome by the plight of the leper that he prayed to
catch leprosy himself (he eventually did catch it). The leper would carry a clapper
and bell to warn of his approach, and this was as much to attract attention for
charity as to warn people that a diseased person was near. Most importantly, Jesus
was said to have walked with the leper, and so in Medieval religious society, it was a
noble thing to be able to converse and build relationships with the leper.
The disease is caused by a mycobacterium which multiplies very slowly (once every
two weeks compared to other bacteria, which can multiply anywhere from daily to
every 20 minutes) and mainly affects the skin, nerves, and mucous membranes. The
organism has never been successfully grown in bacteriologic media or cell culture,
and instead has been grown in mouse foot pads and more recently in nine-banded
armadillos. It is related to M. tuberculosis, the mycobacterium that causes
tuberculosis. The difficulty in culturing the organism appears to be due to the fact
that the organism is an obligate intra-cellular parasite that lacks many necessary
genes for independent survival. The complex and unique cell wall that makes the
mycobacterium family difficult to destroy is apparently also the reason for the
extremely slow replication rate.
This chronic infectious disease usually affects the skin and peripheral nerves but has
a wide range of possible clinical manifestations. Patients are classified as having
paucibacillary (tuberculoid leprosy) or multibacillary Hansen's disease (lepromatous
leprosy). Paucibacillary Hansen's disease is milder and characterized by one or more
hypo pigmented skin macules. Multibacillary Hansen's disease is associated with
symmetric skin lesions, nodules, plaques, thickened dermis, and frequent
involvement of the nasal mucosa resulting in nasal congestion and epistaxis (nose
bleeds).
Other than humans, the only creatures known to be susceptible to leprosy are the
armadillo, mangabey monkeys, rabbits, and mice (on their footpads). According to
recent figures from the World Health Organization (WHO) new cases detected
worldwide have decreased by approximately 107,000 cases or 21% from 2003 to
2004.
This decreasing trend has been consistent for the past three years. In addition the
"global registered prevalence" of leprosy was 286,063 cases with 407,791 new cases
being detected during 2004.
In 1999, the world incidence of Hansen's disease was estimated to be 640,000; and in
2000, 738,284 cases were identified. In 1999, 108 cases occurred in the United States.
In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed 91 countries in which Hansen's
disease is endemic, with India, Myanmar, and Nepal having 70% of cases. In 2002,
763,917 new cases were detected worldwide, and in that year the WHO listed Brazil,
Madagascar, Mozambique, Tanzania and Nepal as having 90% of Hansen's disease
cases.
Hansen's disease is one of the infectious diseases tracked passively by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Its prevalence in the United States has remained
low and relatively stable. There are decreasing numbers of cases worldwide, though
pockets of high prevalence continue in certain areas such as Brazil, South Asia
(India, Nepal), some parts of Africa (Tanzania, Madagascar, Mozambique) and the
western Pacific.
Those having close contacts with patients with untreated, active, predominantly
multibacillary disease, and persons living in countries with highly endemic disease
are at risk of contracting the disease. Recent research suggests that there is genetic
variation in susceptibility. The region of DNA responsible for this variability is also
involved in Parkinson's disease, giving rise to current speculation that the two
disorders may be linked in some way at the biochemical level. In addition, men are
two times more likely to contract leprosy than women. In response to the incidence
of dapsone resistance, the WHO introduced a multi drug regimen in 1981 that
includes Rifampicin, dapsone and Clofazimine. Some clinical studies have also
shown that certain quinolonees, minocycline and azithromycin have activity against
M.leprae. The WHO recently recommended single dose treatment with rifampicin,
minocycline or ofloxacin in patients with paucibacillary leprosy who have a simple
skin lesion. However, the WHO still recommends the use of the long term multidrug
regimens whenever possible because they have been found to be more efficacious.
MALARIA
The clinical picture of severe malaria is dominated by three main problems: Anemia,
respiratory distress and Coma. The most well known and feared manifestation of
severe malaria is cerebral malaria in which the patient goes into coma and often
convulsions.
Malaria alone causes between 400 and 900 million episodes of illness in African
children. High fevers and febrile convulsions in infants and children can retard brain
development, with profound implications for societies. More than 2 Billion people
(about 40% of the world's population) in 100 countries are at risk and there are at
least 300 million cases of acute malaria each year. About 2.7 million people die of
malaria each year, most of whom are children. Other high risk groups include,
pregnant women, no-immune travelers, refugees, displaced persons or labour forces
entering into endemic areas.
Countries in topical Africa bear the brunt of malaria, accounting for more than 90%
of the 300 million annual cases of malaria. Malaria has for several years been a
major problem.
Its economic impact in sub-Saharan Africa is staggering. Beyond the human toll (it
kills 1 million people every year) (UN reports, 2004); every year Africa loses an
estimated £12 billion in GDP as a result of the disease,
Malaria diverts financial reserves into the purchase of drugs and insecticides,
decreases income through sick leave and discourages foreign investment and
tourism. It holds back and has a long term impact on their physical and mental
development.
55 years ago, there was real optimism that malaria could be tamed. The insecticide
DDT killed the mosquitoes that spread it, new powerful drugs were available to treat
those infected. Surely, it was just a matter of time before it was eradicated. Sadly, it
was a false dawn. The world grew concerned about the environmental impact of
DDT while the powerful drugs gradually became less and less effective. Malaria was
back with vengeance. The situation today is scarcely less bleak particularly in Africa.
There is still no malaria vaccine and resistance to anti-malarial drugs is spreading
alarmingly.
There is one bright spot, however within the past two or three years, global
partnerships have finished sequencing the DNA genomes of the three actors in the
malaria drama: the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, the malaria
transmitting mosquitoes, Anopheles gambiae and the human host. By themselves,
the sequences are not much medical use. But they can greatly speed up research
into the mechanisms of infection and disease.
The world Health Initiative on Malaria (WHIM) will be launched in the 3rd quarter of
2010 along with WHIT and WHIL. WHIM will be addressed along two categories:
Insecticide Treated Nets and Drugs.
Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs): ITNs are a core intervention to the WHIM program.
They are used to prevent infection and disease especially among high risk groups
such as children under the age of 5 years and pregnant women. Controlled trials of
ITNs show that mortality in children less than 5 years of age can be reduced by 17%
with high coverage of this intervention. ITNs are a highly cost effective means of
preventing malaria with cost effectiveness ranges falling into the attractive (cost per
disability Adjusted Life Year, DALY, averted below $150) or highly attractive cost per
DALY averted below $25-$30
WHIM having understood the efficacy and effectiveness of ITNs in mosquito control
will launch through an efficient IP3 in collaboration with Bayer environmental
Science formulators of the K-O Tab 1-2-3 which is a retreatment chemical popularly
called DIP-IT-YOURSELF insecticide retreatment kits. The formulation has been found
effective on polyester nets in wash trials.
Another key innovation are long lasting individual nets (LLIN) defined as a net which
gives greater than 80% mortality in 3 minuites exposure bioassays after 20
standardized washes. So far there are two LLINs models in the market the BIGH
would be investing in over the next 5 years. They are: Olyset TM produced in China
and Tanzania made out of wide meshed high density polyethylene in which the
insecticide (permethrin) is incorporated directly into the fiber (approximate retail
price is $7) and PermaNet TM produced in Vietnam which is a polyester mosquito
net impregnated with deltamethrin during manufacture approximate retail price
$4).
Drugs: The main obstacle to effective malaria treatment is the emergence of drug
resistance strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Parasite resistance to chloroquine and
other antimalarial drugs such as sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine has
increased steadily in recent years in many malaria endemic countries. ACTS that
combine artemisinin derivative with another antimalarial such as lumefantrine or
amordiaquine promise both increased efficacy and reduced rate of development
of resistance. One drug that holds a lot of promise is Novartis Artemether-
lumefantrine (coartem) (4 tablets twice daily for 3 days for an adult). The WHIM
hopefully would sign a pact with Novartis to make coartem available through Bricke
International for use in the public sector of malaria endemic countries.
TUBERCULOSIS
The classic symptoms of tuberculosis are a chronic cough with blood-tinged sputum,
fever, night sweats, and weight loss. Infection of other organs causes a wide range
of symptoms. The diagnosis relies on radiology (commonly chest X-rays), a tuberculin
skin test, blood tests, as well as microscopic examination and microbiological culture
of bodily fluids. Tuberculosis treatment is difficult and requires long courses of multiple
antibiotics. Contacts are also screened and treated if necessary. Antibiotic
resistance is a growing problem in (extensively) multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Prevention relies on screening programs and vaccination, usually with Bacillus
Calmette-Guérin (BCG vaccine).
Tuberculosis is spread through the air, when people who have the disease cough,
sneeze, or spit. One–third of the world's current population has been infected with M.
tuberculosis, and new infections occur at a rate of one per second. However, most
of these cases will not develop the full-blown disease; asymptomatic, latent infection
is most common. About one in ten of these latent infections will eventually progress
to active disease, which, if left untreated, kills more than half of its victims. The
proportion of people in the general population who become sick with tuberculosis
each year is stable or falling worldwide but, because of population growth, the
absolute number of new cases is still increasing. In 2004, mortality and morbidity
statistics included 14.6 million chronic active cases, 8.9 million new cases, and 1.6
million deaths, mostly in developing countries. In addition, a rising number of people
in the developed world are contracting tuberculosis because their immune systems
are compromised by immunosuppressive drugs, substance abuse, or AIDS. The
distribution of tuberculosis is not uniform across the globe with about 80% of the
population in many Asian and African countries testing positive in tuberculin tests,
while only 5-10% of the US population test positive. It is estimated that the US has
25,000 new cases of tuberculosis each year, 40% of which occur in immigrants from
countries where tuberculosis is endemic.
The world Health Initiative on Tuberculosis WHIT meant to be launched in the 3rd
quarter of 2010 will be in four categories: developing a Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT),
DOTS and the treatment strategies (Drugs and Vaccine Development).
Rapid Diagnosis: The Mantoux Tuberculin Skin Test is a viable test for TB. Tuberculosis
is diagnosed definitively by identifying the causative organism (Mycobacterium
tuberculosis) in a clinical sample (for example, sputum or pus). When this is not
possible, a probable diagnosis may be made using imaging (X-rays or scans) and/or
a tuberculin skin test.
The main problem with tuberculosis diagnosis is the difficulty in culturing this slow-
growing organism in the laboratory (it may take 4 to 12 weeks for blood or sputum
culture). A complete medical evaluation for TB includes a medical history, a physical
examination, a chest X-ray, microbiological smears and cultures. It may also include
a tuberculin skin test, a serological test. The interpretation of the tuberculin skin test
depends upon the person's risk factors for infection and progression to TB disease,
such as exposure to other cases of TB or immune-suppression.
Monitoring and DOTS: DOTS stands for "Directly Observed Therapy, Short-course" and
is a major plank in the WHO global TB eradication programme. The DOTS strategy
focuses on five main points of action. These include government commitment to
control TB, diagnosis based on sputum-smear microscopy tests done on patients who
actively report TB symptoms, direct observation short-course chemotherapy
treatments, a definite supply of drugs, and standardized reporting and recording of
cases and treatment outcomes. The WHO advises that all TB patients should have at
least the first two months of their therapy observed (and preferably the whole of it
observed): this means an independent observer watching tuberculosis patients
swallow their anti-TB therapy. The independent observer is often not a healthcare
worker and may be a shopkeeper or a tribal elder or similar senior person within that
society. DOTS is used with intermittent dosing (thrice weekly or 2HREZ/4HR3). Twice
weekly dosing is effective but not recommended by the WHO, because there is no
margin for error (accidentally omitting one dose per week results in once weekly
dosing, which is ineffective).
Treatment with properly implemented DOTS has a success rate exceeding 95% and
prevents the emergence of further multi-drug resistant strains of tuberculosis.
Tuberculosis Treatment: Treatment for TB uses antibiotics to kill the bacteria. The two
antibiotics most commonly used are rifampicin and isoniazid. However, instead of
the short course of antibiotics typically used to cure other bacterial infections, TB
requires much longer periods of treatment (around 6 to 12 months) to entirely
eliminate mycobacteria from the body. Latent TB treatment usually uses a single
antibiotic, while active TB disease is best treated with combinations of several
antibiotics, to reduce the risk of the bacteria developing antibiotic resistance.
People with latent infections are treated to prevent them from progressing to active
TB disease later in life. However, treatment using Rifampicin and Pyrazinamide is not
risk-free. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notified healthcare
professionals of revised recommendations against the use of rifampin plus
pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection, due to high rates of
hospitalization and death from liver injury associated with the combined use of these
drugs.
Drug resistant tuberculosis is transmitted in the same way as regular TB. Primary
resistance occurs in persons who are infected with a resistant strain of TB. A patient
with fully-susceptible TB develops secondary resistance (acquired resistance) during
TB therapy because of inadequate treatment, not taking the prescribed regimen
In South Africa, the country with the highest prevalence of TB, under the WHIT, BCG
will be given to all children under age three. However, BCG is less effective in areas
where mycobacteria are less prevalent; therefore BCG will not be given to the entire
population in these countries. In the USA, for example, BCG vaccine is not
recommended except for people who meet specific criteria: Infants or children with
negative skin test results who are continually exposed to untreated or ineffectively
treated patients or will be continually exposed to multidrug-resistant TB; Healthcare
workers considered on an individual basis in settings in which a high percentage of
MDR-TB patients has been found, transmission of MDR-TB is likely, and TB control
precautions have been implemented and were not successful.
BCG provides some protection against severe forms of pediatric TB, but has been
shown to be unreliable against adult pulmonary TB, which accounts for most of the
disease burden worldwide. Currently, there are more cases of TB on the planet than
at any other time in history and most agree there is an urgent need for a newer,
more effective vaccine that would prevent all forms of TB—including drug resistant
strains—in all age groups and among people with HIV.
Several new vaccines to prevent TB infection are being developed. The first
recombinant tuberculosis vaccine rBCG30, entered clinical trials in the United States
in 2004, sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
A 2005 study showed that a DNA TB vaccine given with conventional chemotherapy
can accelerate the disappearance of bacteria as well as protect against re-
infection in mice; it may take four to five years to be available in humans. A very
promising TB vaccine, MVA85A, is currently in phase II trials in South Africa by a group
led by Oxford University, and is based on a genetically modified vaccinia virus. Many
other strategies are also being used to develop novel vaccines, including both
subunit vaccines (fusion molecules composed of two recombinant proteins
DENGUE FEVER
DENGUE FEVER
Dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) are acute febrile diseases,
found in the tropics, and caused by four closely related virus serotypes of the genus
Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae. It is also known as breakbone fever. The geographical
spread includes northern Australia and northern Argentina, and the entire
Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Honduras, Costa Rica,
Philippines, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Mexico, Suriname, Puerto Rico, Bolivia, Brazil,
Guyana, Venezuela, Barbados, Trinidad and Samoa. Unlike malaria, dengue is just
as prevalent in the urban districts of its range as in rural areas. Each serotype is
sufficiently different that there is no cross-protection and epidemics caused by
multiple serotypes (hyper-endemicity) can occur. Dengue is transmitted to humans
by the Aedes aegypti or more rarely the Aedes albopictus mosquito, which feed
during the day.
The WHO says some 2.5 billion people, two fifths of the world's population, are now
at risk from dengue and estimates that there may be 50 million cases of dengue
infection worldwide every year. The disease is now epidemic in more than 100
countries.
The disease manifests as a sudden onset of severe headache, muscle and joint
pains (myalgias and arthralgias—severe pain that gives it the nick-name break-bone
fever or bone crusher disease), fever, and rash. The dengue rash is characteristically
bright red petechiae and usually appears first on the lower limbs and the chest; in
some patients, it spreads to cover most of the body. There may also be gastritis with
some combination of associated abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea.
Some cases develop much milder symptoms which can be misdiagnosed as
influenza or other viral infection when no rash is present. Thus travelers from tropical
areas may pass on dengue in their home countries inadvertently, having not been
properly diagnosed at the height of their illness. Patients with dengue can pass on
the infection only through mosquitoes or blood products and only while they are still
febrile. The classic dengue fever lasts about six to seven days, with a smaller peak of
fever at the trailing end of the disease (the so-called biphasic pattern). Clinically, the
platelet count will drop until the patient's temperature is normal. Cases of DHF also
show higher fever, variable haemorrhagic phenomena, thrombocytopenia, and
haemo-concentration. A small proportion of cases lead to dengue shock syndrome
(DSS) which has a high mortality rate. DHF combined with a cirrhotic liver has been
suspected in rapid development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given that the
Dengue virus (DEN) is related to the Hepatitis C virus, this is an avenue for further
research as HCC is among the top five cancerous causes of death outside Europe
and North America. Normally HCC does not occur in a cirrhotic liver for ten or more
years after the cessation of the poisoning agent. DHF patients can develop HCC
within one year of cessation of abuse.
The world Health Initiative on Dengue (WHID) will be launched in the 3rd quarter of
2010 along with WHIT and WHIL. WHID will be addressed along two categories:
developing a Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT) and the treatment strategies (Drugs and
Vaccine Development).
Rapid Diagnosis: The diagnosis of dengue is usually made clinically. The classic
picture is high fever with no localising source of infection, a petechial rash with
thrombocytopenia and relative leukopenia - low platelet and white blood cell
count. Care has to be taken as diagnosis of DHF can mask end stage liver disease
and vice versa.
Serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies are available to confirm the
diagnosis of dengue if clinically indicated.
SCHISTOSOMIASIS
SCHISTOSOMIASIS
This disease is most commonly found in Asia, Africa, and South America, especially in
areas where the water contains numerous freshwater snails, which may carry the
parasite.
parts of South America and the Caribbean, Africa, and the Middle East; S.
haematobium in Africa and the Middle East; and S. japonicum in the Far East. S.
mekongi and S. intercalatum are found focally in Southeast Asia and central West
Africa, respectively.
The world Health Initiative on Dengue (WHID) will be launched in the 3rd quarter of
2010 along with WHIT and WHIL. WHID will be addressed along two categories:
developing a Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT) and the treatment strategies (Drugs and
Vaccine Development) and Vector Control.
Eggs can be present in the stool in infections with all Schistosoma species. The
examination can be performed on a simple smear (1 to 2 mg of fecal material).
Since eggs may be passed intermittently or in small amounts, their detection will be
enhanced by repeated examinations and/or concentration procedures (such as
the formalin-ethyl acetate technique). In addition, for field surveys and
investigational purposes, the egg output can be quantified by using the Kato-Katz
technique (20 to 50 mg of fecal material) or the Ritchie technique.
Eggs can be found in the urine in infections with S. japonicum and with S.
intercalatum (recommended time for collection: between noon and 3 PM).
Detection will be enhanced by centrifugation and examination of the sediment.
Quantification is possible by using filtration through a nucleopore membrane of a
standard volume of urine followed by egg counts on the membrane. Investigation of
S. haematobium should also include a pelvic x-ray as bladder wall calcificaition is
highly characteristic of chronic infection.
Antimony has been used in the past to treat the disease. In low doses, this toxic
metalloid bonds to sulfur atoms in enzymes used by the parasite and kills it without
harming the host. This treatment is not referred to in present-day peer-review
scholarship; Praziquantel is universally used. Outside of the US, there is a second drug
available for treating Schistosoma mansoni (exclusively) called Oxamniquine.
HIV/AIDS
This condition progressively reduces the effectiveness of the immune system and
leaves individuals susceptible to opportunistic infections and tumors. HIV is
transmitted through direct contact of a mucous membrane or the bloodstream with
a bodily fluid containing HIV, such as blood, semen, vaginal fluid, pre-seminal fluid,
and breast milk.
This transmission can involve anal, vaginal or oral sex, blood transfusion,
contaminated hypodermic needles, exchange between mother and baby during
pregnancy, childbirth, or breastfeeding, or other exposure to one of the above
bodily fluids.
AIDS is now a pandemic. In 2007, it was estimated that 33.2 million people lived with
the disease worldwide, and that AIDS had killed an estimated 2.1 million people,
including 330,000 children. Over three-quarters of these deaths occurred in sub-
Saharan Africa, retarding economic growth and destroying human capital.
Genetic research indicates that HIV originated in west-central Africa during the late
nineteenth or early twentieth century. AIDS was first recognized by the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention in 1981 and its cause, HIV, identified in the early
1980s.
Although treatments for AIDS and HIV can slow the course of the disease, there is
currently no vaccine or cure. Antiretroviral treatment reduces both the mortality and
the morbidity of HIV infection, but these drugs are expensive and routine access to
antiretroviral medication is not available in all countries. Due to the difficulty in
treating HIV infection, preventing infection is a key aim in controlling the AIDS
epidemic, with health organizations promoting safe sex and needle-exchange
programmes in attempts to slow the spread of the virus.
The symptoms of AIDS are primarily the result of conditions that do not normally
develop in individuals with healthy immune systems. Most of these conditions are
infections caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites that are normally
controlled by the elements of the immune system that HIV damages.
Opportunistic infections are common in people with AIDS. HIV affects nearly every
organ system.
People with AIDS also have an increased risk of developing various cancers such as
Kaposi's sarcoma, cervical cancer and cancers of the immune system known as
lymphomas. Additionally, people with AIDS often have systemic symptoms of
infection like fevers, sweats (particularly at night), swollen glands, chills, weakness,
and weight loss. The specific opportunistic infections that AIDS patients develop
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is the most common tumor in HIV-infected patients. The
appearance of this tumor in young homosexual men in 1981 was one of the first
signals of the AIDS epidemic. Caused by a gamma herpes virus called Kaposi's
sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV), it often appears as purplish nodules on the
skin, but can affect other organs, especially the mouth, gastrointestinal tract, and
lungs.
AIDS patients often develop opportunistic infections that present with non-specific
symptoms, especially low-grade fevers and weight loss. These include infection with
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare and cytomegalovirus (CMV). CMV can cause
colitis, as described above, and CMV retinitis can cause blindness.
Penicilliosis due to Penicillium marneffei is now the third most common opportunistic
infection (after extrapulmonary tuberculosis and cryptococcosis) in HIV-positive
individuals within the endemic area of Southeast Asia.
The world Health Initiative on Dengue (WHIAIDS) will be launched in the 3rd quarter
of 2010 along with WHIT and WHIL. WHIAIDS will be addressed along two categories:
developing a Rapid Diagnosis Test Kit (RDT) and the treatment strategies (Drugs and
Vaccine Development).
Rapid Diagnosis: The diagnosis of AIDS in a person infected with HIV is based on the
presence of certain signs or symptoms. Since June 5, 1981, many definitions have
been developed for epidemiological surveillance such as the Bangui definition and
the 1994 expanded World Health Organization AIDS case definition. However,
clinical staging of patients was not an intended use for these systems as they are
neither sensitive, nor specific. In developing countries, the World Health Organization
staging system for HIV infection and disease, using clinical and laboratory data, is
used and in developed countries, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
Classification System is used.
Many people are unaware that they are infected with HIV. Less than 1% of the
sexually active urban population in Africa has been tested, and this proportion is
even lower in rural populations. Furthermore, only 0.5% of pregnant women
attending urban health facilities are counseled, tested or receive their test results.
Again, this proportion is even lower in rural health facilities. Therefore, donor blood
and blood products used in medicine and medical research are screened for HIV.
HIV tests are usually performed on venous blood. Many laboratories use fourth
generation screening tests which detect anti-HIV antibody (IgG and IgM) and the
HIV p24 antigen. The detection of HIV antibody or antigen in a patient previously
known to be negative is evidence of HIV infection. Individuals whose first specimen
indicates evidence of HIV infection will have a repeat test on a second blood
sample to confirm the results.
The window period (the time between initial infection and the development of
detectable antibodies against the infection) can vary since it can take 3–6 months
to seroconvert and to test positive. Detection of the virus using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) during the window period is possible, and evidence suggests that an
infection may often be detected earlier than when using a fourth generation EIA
screening test. Positive results obtained by PCR are confirmed by antibody tests.
Routinely used HIV tests for infection in neonates, born to HIV-positive mothers, have
no value because of the presence of maternal antibody to HIV in the child's blood.
HIV infection can only be diagnosed by PCR, testing for HIV pro-viral DNA in the
children's lymphocytes
Treatment Strategies: Current treatment for HIV infection consists of highly active
antiretroviral therapy, or HAART. This has been highly beneficial to many HIV-infected
individuals since its introduction in 1996 when the protease inhibitor-based HAART
initially became available. Current optimal HAART options consist of combinations
(or "cocktails") consisting of at least three drugs belonging to at least two types, or
"classes," of antiretroviral agents. Typical regimens consist of two nucleoside
analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NARTIs or NRTIs) plus either a protease
inhibitor or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Because HIV
disease progression in children is more rapid than in adults, and laboratory
parameters are less predictive of risk for disease progression, particularly for young
infants, treatment recommendations are more aggressive for children than for
adults. In developed countries where HAART is available, doctors assess the viral
load, rapidity in CD4 decline, and patient readiness while deciding when to
recommend initiating treatment.
For some patients, which can be more than fifty percent of patients, HAART
achieves far less than optimal results, due to medication intolerance/side effects,
prior ineffective antiretroviral therapy and infection with a drug-resistant strain of HIV.
Non-adherence and non-persistence with therapy are the major reasons why some
people do not benefit from HAART. The reasons for non-adherence and non-
persistence are varied. Major psychosocial issues include poor access to medical
care, inadequate social supports, psychiatric disease and drug abuse. HAART
regimens can also be complex and thus hard to follow, with large numbers of pills
taken frequently. Side effects can also deter people from persisting with HAART,
these include lipodystrophy, dyslipidaemia, diarrhoea, insulin resistance, an increase
in cardiovascular risks and birth defects. Anti-retroviral drugs are expensive, and the
majority of the world's infected individuals do not have access to medications and
treatments for HIV and AIDS.
ANNEX 3
APPRECIATION
The following materials were consulted while this report was been prepared:
• Wellcome trust Dying for Change, Lab notes 5 published June 2004
• TDR’s Partnership for Malaria control: Engaging the formal and informal
private sectors
Web Resources
• Wikipedia
• ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS
Center for Disease and Control (CDC)
Board of Governors
The executive board chaired by a Chief Development Officer (CDO), report directly
to the board of governors and he/she is responsible for the day to day management
of Bricke International’s operations and activities.
The following are the units of Bricke International. Each unit is headed by a Director.
The coordinators of each of these units are members of Bricke International
executive board.
• The Center for Global Health (Biomedical Research and Public Engagement
Unit)
3.2 GLOSSARY
CANCER: General term used to describe any malignant growth in any part of the
body
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES: Diseases that affect the heart and the blood vessels
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM: The system of the body that coordinates all reflex and
non reflex actions. That is the system in which the brain and the spinal cord fall.
CONGENITAL INFECTIONS: Abnormal conditions present at birth. Most times they are
hereditary.
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: Countries with very low GDP (Gross domestic product)
DISPENSARY: A place in the hospital or school where drugs are stored for treatment
purposes
DRUGS: The generic name for any substance used for the prevention, diagnosis and
treatment of diagnosed diseases and also to relief symptoms
DIABETES: A disease condition arising from low insulin level hence a high blood sugar
level. It is characterized by polyuria.
FONTANELLES: Fontanelles are the soft spot at the top/front of the baby's skull,
where the bones of the skull join
GASTROINTESTINAL INFECTIONS: Infections that affect the stomach and the intestine
INFLUENZA: An acute viral infection of the nasopharynx and respiratory tract which
occurs in epidemic or pandemic form.
MENINGES: The surrounding membrane of the brain and the spinal cord
MICROBIOLOGY: A field of biological sciences that deals with the study of micro
organisms
TB: Tuberculosis