Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Songkhram Habitat Classification
Songkhram Habitat Classification
Songkhram Habitat Classification
1 Surin Inland Fisheries Research and Development Centre, 2 & 4 Asian Institute of Technology, 3 Maha Sarakhram
Inland Fisheries Research and Development Centre, 4 Nongkhai Inland Fisheries Research and Development Centre
ABSTRACT
Remote sensing, a technique of investigating the earth from satellite platform with the use of
Electro-Magnetic Radiation (EMR), has a potential to help support fisheries study through
investigating spatial distribution of habitats important for fisheries production and management
in integration with GIS technology. The main objective of this study was to map habitats, which
are essential for fisheries production in the lower part of the Songkhram River Basin. The core
methodological steps involved delineating inundated floodplain, which expands during wet
season and estimating reproductive areas for fisheries production and also other type of habitats
important for aquatic production through ancillary GIS analyses.
Two Landsat ETM images from 17 September 2000 and 18 March 2003 were classified into
thematic land cover maps using supervised classification with maximum likelihood method. A
self-developed classification protocol was used to map the habitat across dry and wet seasons
of the study area. Prior to the image classification, standard preparatory image processing of
layer stacking, image co-registration, subsets and cloud removal were performed using ERDAS
image processing software. The orthorectified TM image from 6 November 1992 was used as
the master image for the image co-registration.
A system of land cover classification using satellite data, then, combined with field
observations presented of habitats types. Ground truth data was collected from several
field visits to the study area (Lower Songkhram River Basin) during July to August 2006
using Garmin Map 60 GPS. Field data collection was supplemented with information from
topographic maps at a scale 1:50,000 and field observations by the research team.
Thematic habitat maps from preliminary analysis to serve fisheries field of studies exhibited
ten major habitats in the lower Songkhram River Basin. Permanent water bodies of the main
Songkhram River and its tributaries, other water bodies, inundated flooded areas mostly
associated with riparian mixed vegetation, paddy fields (lowland) and some agricultural crops
in wet season represent the most important habitats essential for fisheries production inside
study area. Inundated flooded extended in the wet season was more than 50,000 hectare. It is
anticipated that this information combined with spatially explicit GIS maps could help fishery
managers to link with catch information to estimate catch production in the lower basin by
habitat types and/or helping present a scenario of fish stock for better management. However,
the completion of habit mapping for fisheries would require an accuracy assessment to evaluate
Page 19
Proceedings of the 8th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries
the correctness of habitats. In addition, revision of classified habitat maps, by integrating ground
truth data, is recommended for further spatial analyses relative to future fishery management.
INTRODUCTION
Low-land floodplain is the important system of wetland and also a sensitive ecosystem which
requires a proper monitoring system to determine the change. This area can produce big amount
of production and generate the big food chain to serve many living organism from the bottom
to top level (Bayley 153 – 58; Chapman and Chapman 23 – 30). However, the large variation
is affect by a seasonal and inter-annually condition, especially fisheries sector. The fisheries
production potential in the floodplain river system is directly related to the duration and extent
of floods and consequently led to potential of fisheries production.
The Songkhram is very well known an important floodplain ecosystem with its huge area
covers extensive in the lower part of the basin (David Balke and Rattaphon Pitakthepsombat
118 – 1; Interim Committee for Coordination of Investigations of the Lower Mekong Basin
1 – 11). There were record of many Mekong species migrate to this river system and utilized
this area as a spawning ground and nursing ground. This caused of a big amount of fisheries
production occurred every year during wet season (AMCF 1 – 34; Sjorslev et al. 5 – 19;
Suntornratana et al. 29).
Estimated fisheries production roughly in the lower part of the basin which covers around
4,000 km2 was possible more than 16,000 tonnes (AMCF 1 – 34; Sjorslev et al. 5 – 19). The
extrapolation on production conducted by introducing a simple interview survey altogether with
broad inventory on community’s fisheries. The used of Geographic Information System (GIS)
was to estimate area of habitat in order to support assessing fisheries production. However, the
suggestion provided was a proper system to estimate habitat area could help better assessing
fisheries production.
This paper, then, presented a methodology used the technique of Remote Sensing (RS) and
Geographic Information System (GIS) to visualize habitat and monitor the surface changed,
especially flood extended area which is important for fisheries production. The RS technique
considered an observation from space though time series which can help monitoring surface
change seasonally (Butler et al. 1 – 165; Dekker et al. 211 – 25; Ellis and Woitowich 98 – 109).
The techniques is also useful in assessing the status of the environmental system and long-term
monitoring habitat change to support decision making for fisheries management foe better
sustainable used.
Page 20
Habitat mapping for fisheries using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Lower Songkhram River Basin
METHODOLOGY
Habitat classification mapping were generated used of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic
Information System (GIS) technologies which basically apply a remote sensed data integrated
and organized through a computer based systems. The core analytical procedure included two
phases: habitat classification and spatial analysis. Habitat classification phase concerned with
the classification of remote sensing data into thematic habitat maps. Spatial analysis dealt with
the quantification of the seasonal dynamics of major fishery habitats through a change vector
analysis.
Overall simple framework for assessing fisheries sector is the information of habitat and
fisheries should be able to integrate and combine for better assessing this sector. The structure
of integrating the different types of information presented as in Figure 1. Spatial implication
used of remote sensed datasets can visualize and monitor various types of habitat, included
the habitat important for fisheries production. This classified habitat, then, can be merged with
a non-geographic information from other surveys and present scenario of fisheries situation
and monitor the trend of change. For the main purpose to conduct habitat classification using
Remote Sensing and GIS techniques, the diagram presented process of Land covered analysis.
Information in
Non-geographic Statistic technique fisheries which
dataset on fisheries for manipulating presented in simple
result tabular
Figure 1. Framework for integrated remote sensed data with interview survey for assessing
fisheries and process of land cover analysis for habitat classification.
Page 21
Proceedings of the 8th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries
Study area
The lower part of Songkhram River Basin (Figure 2) was selected for study as it is very well
known an important lowland floodplain in the upper northeast region of Thailand. The area
selected for habitat classification was around one-third of the total basin area which covers
more than 12,700 km². It locates between latitude 14º 14' and 18º 98', longitude 103º 75' and
104º 48'.
The ecosystem of this area is mainly a wetland consists of special vegetation and the extent
of inundated flooded occurred annually for two to three month during wet season. This natural
event generate huge fisheries production to serve local communities in the area. Information
from various studies showed big amount of fisheries production occurred every year and many
reports showed the evidence of fisheries production was generate due to large area of floodplain
in this river system (AMCF 1 – 34; Yingcharen and Virapat; David Balke and Rattaphon
Pitakthepsombat 118 – 1).
103°0'0"E 104°0'0"E
VIET NAM
LAO PDR
LAO PDR
H.
K
Me
hong
Songkhram
kon
H.
River Basin
Hi
Na
m
18°0'0"N So
ngk 18°0'0"N
THAILAND hra
m
Nam
Ma
o
Gulf of Thailand
Nam Oon
River
Flooded area
THAILAND
17°0'0"N
17°0'0"N
0 10 20 40
km
103°0'0"E 104°0'0"E
Figure 2. Study area in lower part the Songkhram River Basin, upper northeast region of Thailand
Two Landsat ETM+ images from 18 March 2003 and 28 September 2004 were purchased from
Michigan State University. The orthorectified TM image from 6 November 1992 and ETM+
image from 17 September 2000 were downloaded from the Global Land Cover Facility (http://
glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml) (Table 1). Topographic maps at a scale of 1: 50,000 covering
Page 22
Habitat mapping for fisheries using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Lower Songkhram River Basin
the lower part of Songkhram River Basin were obtained from Technical Advisor Division
of the Mekong River Commission (TSD-MRC). Those were used as reference and training
materials required for image registration, evaluation of habitat reflectance signatures and image
classification
Table 1. List of satellite images data used for habitat classification and co-registration parameters
Satellite and sensor Acquisition date Sun azimuth Ground RMS Source
and angle resolution (root MSE)
Landsat 7, ETM + 17 September 2000 118.62, 60.87 30 x 30 m 12.8 m GLCF
Landsat 7, ETM + 18 March 2003 119.68, 55.73 30 x 30 m 13.2 m MSU
Orthorectified
Landsat 5, TM 6 November 1992 137, 46 30 x 30 m GLCF
(Master) image
Landsat 7, ETM+ 26 April 2003 95, 64 30 x 30 m 9.04 m GLCF
Landsat 7, ETM+ 28 September 2004 125.94, 58.60 30 x 30 m 10 m MSU
Image preprocessing
Ground reference data required for the reflectance signature development for the image
classification was collected from an intensive field work during the period between July and
August 2006. The research teams recorded approximately fifty ground reference points covering
all major habit types, using a GARMIN GPS 60 receiver. In addition, a self-designed field data
collection sheet was used to record the attribute data such as surrounding land cover, human
activities and other environmental variables (e.g. soil erosion). Reflectance signatures for each
habitat type were developed based on ground reference data, training and reference materials as
well as researchers’ familiarity with the area.
Page 23
Proceedings of the 8th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries
Image classification
Supervised classification with maximum likelihood classifier classified all image pixels of each
Landsat image into nine habitat types (Table 2).
Table 2. General description of habitat types in the lower Songkhram River Basin
Page 24
Habitat mapping for fisheries using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Lower Songkhram River Basin
to be misclassified and maintained the spatial cohesiveness among image pixels. Subsequently,
non-channel type and channel type permanent water bodies and inundate flooded area were
extracted from the dry and wet season habitat maps and were vectorized. A GIS overlay
between wet and dry season habitat GIS maps produced a map showing inundated flooded
bodies in the wet season. Area statistics of the extended water body was calculated from the
attribute table of the output map.
Spatial analysis
Supervised classification was one of the post classification techniques that have been widely
used in several land cover/use and habitat mapping studies. The method has also proven to be
comparable with other classification methods, such as unsupervised classification and hybrid
method, in terms achieving high classification accuracies.
Result of habitat classification
Followed the RS and GIS techniques, images have been identified and estimated for area
covered in the lower part of the Songkhram River Basin into different categories of nine major
habitat types. Output from image classification included dry and wet season maps showing
major habitats in the lower part of the basin (Figure 3 and 4).
Figure 3. Thematic mapping classified habitat into nine categories in the lower part of the
Songkhram in dry season
Page 25
Proceedings of the 8th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries
Figure 4. Thematic mapping classified habitat into nine categories included inundated flooded
extended area in the lower part of the Songkhram in wet season.
During peak flooded period in September 2000, the image presented clearly of flood-pulse
extent covered lowland area of the basin. This area determined a large area of habitat essential
for fisheries production which possibly changed every year due to the rate of precipitation, run
off from Songkhram sub-catchments and also the water level in the mainstream Mekong.
Beside major output of two thematic maps showing the habitat types in the lower
Songkhram River Basin, an ancillary statistics: area statistics for each habitat types and
seasonal change was also summarized. The statistics outputs were exported to excel format and
delimited formats for further calculation. Habitat-wise area statistics across two seasons are
given in Table 3. The most important output from the spatial analysis was the map showing the
spatial distribution of inundated water bodies in the wet season. Clearly shown of an extended
inundated flooded was approximately 53,000 hectare.
Even though the different of area in all habitat types could not be compared directly due to
the limitation to get the images in between two seasons the same period of flooded cycle in a
year. This flooded area extent presented could possible determine the area of paddy field which
clearly different between the two seasons for around 36 percent of the total area of paddy field
inside study area in dry season. However, the change of paddy area was under the assumption
of no change over time in two years.
In relevant to the extent flooded area and all water bodies of both channel and non-channel
types, it was considered that the class of Riparian Mixed Vegetation was also the important
habitat for fisheries production, especially during wet season. This area cover found along the
Page 26
Habitat mapping for fisheries using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Lower Songkhram River Basin
river/stream channel and scatter around an inundated flooded area. Statistic showed more than
ten percent of the total area and seemed to be decrease by time.
Table 3. Area statistics of nine habitat types in the lower part of the Songkhram River Basin. (*)
indicated the extent water body during peak flooded in the wet season
* The different of area changed was under the assumption of land used pattern in the lower part of the Songkhram River Basin
was not significantly change during three years.
Recommendation
The result obtained of this trial study have demonstrated the possibility of habitat classification.
Application of RS and GIS can help visualizing various types of habitat included habitat
essential for fisheries production like an inundated flooded area, riparian mixed vegetation,
paddy and water bodies inside study area. However, the difficult was to encounter for
identification ground control points on the image due to the low resolution.
With the completion of habitat classification and mapping for fisheries field of study,
following technical recommendation are made for the improvement of habitat maps for further
spatial analyses.
• The classified habitat maps are subject to accuracy assessment to evaluate the correctness
of each habitat type.
• Revision of classified maps could be necessary using ground truth data. Ground truth data
collection can be done during accuracy assessment in which randomly selected habitat
mapping places are field-visited.
Page 27
Proceedings of the 8th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries
• Required more satellite images of different seasons in the same period of year (flooded
cycle) for better comparison of the change over time and seasonal affect of change.
REFERENCES
AMCF. 2003. Baseline fisheries the Lower Songkhram Basin; Draft report. Udonthani,
Thailand. 34 pp.
Butler, M. J. A et al. 1988. The Application of Remote Sensing Technology to Marine Fisheries:
an Introductory Manual. Rome: FAO.
Chapman, L. J and C. A Chapman. 1993. Fish populations in tropical floodplain pools: a re-
evaluation of holden’s data on the River Sokoto. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2.2 (1993):
p. 23 – 30.
David Balke and Rattaphon Pitakthepsombat. 2006. Situation Analysis: Lower Songkhram
River Basin, Thailand. Mekong Wetland Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Used
Programme (MWBP). Bangkok. 118 pp.
Dekker, A. J et al. 1992. The effect of spectral bandwidth and positioning on the spectral
signature analysis of inland waters. Remote Sensed Environment. p. 211 – 225.
Ellis, T. J and W. A Woitowich. 1989. An Overview of the Use of Remote Sensing for the Study
of Rivers and River Systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences.
Page 28
Habitat mapping for fisheries using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Lower Songkhram River Basin
Sjorslev, J. G et al. 2001. Combining Sampling and Census Approaches for Fisheries Habitat
Assessment in Songkhram River Basin, North East Thailand. Phnom Penh, Cambodia:
Mekong River Commission.
Suntornratana, U et al. 2002. Migration Onto the Floodplain of the Songkhram River Basin.
Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Mekong River Commission, 2002.
Suntornratana, U et al. 1999. Preliminary Study on Migration and Spawning of Fish in the
Songkhram River, Thailand. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Mekong River Commission
Secretariat.
Yingcharen and Virapat, C. 1998. Final Report Aquatic Ecology and Fisheries
Page 29