Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2013 10 29 CEDH Judgment DF V Latvia Obligation To Ensure Safety of A Prisoner en 3p
2013 10 29 CEDH Judgment DF V Latvia Obligation To Ensure Safety of A Prisoner en 3p
2013
Latvian authorities failed to ensure safety of prisoner at risk of violence from other prisoners
In todays Chamber judgment in the case of D.F. v. Latvia (application no. 11160/07), which is not final1, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case concerned D.F.s complaint that, as a former paid police informant and a sex offender, he was at constant risk of violence from his co-prisoners when held in Daugavpils prison between 2005 and 2006, and that the Latvian authorities failed to transfer him to a safer place of detention. The court held that, owing to the authorities failure to coordinate effectively, D.F. had been exposed to the fear of imminent risk of ill-treatment for over a year, despite the authorities being aware that such a risk existed.
Principal facts
The applicant, D.F., is a Latvian national who was born in 1963 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Riga. D.F. alleges that he worked as a police informant during the 1990s. In October 2005 he was arrested on charges of rape and indecent assault on minors and placed in pre-trial detention. In March 2006 he was convicted of those charges and sentenced to 13 years and one months imprisonment. The judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court in December 2006. Between 25 October 2005 and 26 October 2006, D.F. was kept in Daugavpils prison. He alleges that during this period he was subjected to violence by other inmates because they knew he had been a police informant and a sex offender. He maintains that the prison administration frequently moved him from one cell to another, exposing him to a large number of other prisoners. D.F. made numerous applications to be moved to a specialised prison, but these were repeatedly rejected, in particular because the Prisons Administration did not find it established that he had been a police informant. In August 2006 he asked the Prosecutor General to initiate criminal proceedings against the police, for their failure to acknowledge his collaboration with them. In October 2006 he was informed that his collaboration had been confirmed, and he was transferred to another prison.
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: David Thr Bjrgvinsson (Iceland), President, Ineta Ziemele (Latvia), Pivi Hirvel (Finland), George Nicolaou (Cyprus), Ledi Bianku (Albania), Zdravka Kalaydjieva (Bulgaria), Vincent A. de Gaetano (Malta), and also Franoise Elens-Passos, Section Registrar.