The document discusses solving polynomial inequalities by analyzing cases. It provides an example of solving the inequality (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0. There are two cases to consider:
1) All terms must be ≤ 0 or one term ≤ 0 and the others ≥ 0. This leads to the solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0 for x ≤ -2 or x ≥ 1.
2) All terms must be ≥ 0 or one term ≥ 0 and the others ≤ 0. This leads to the additional solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≥ 0 for
The document discusses solving polynomial inequalities by analyzing cases. It provides an example of solving the inequality (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0. There are two cases to consider:
1) All terms must be ≤ 0 or one term ≤ 0 and the others ≥ 0. This leads to the solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0 for x ≤ -2 or x ≥ 1.
2) All terms must be ≥ 0 or one term ≥ 0 and the others ≤ 0. This leads to the additional solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≥ 0 for
The document discusses solving polynomial inequalities by analyzing cases. It provides an example of solving the inequality (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0. There are two cases to consider:
1) All terms must be ≤ 0 or one term ≤ 0 and the others ≥ 0. This leads to the solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≤ 0 for x ≤ -2 or x ≥ 1.
2) All terms must be ≥ 0 or one term ≥ 0 and the others ≤ 0. This leads to the additional solution (x^2+4x+5)/(x^2+1) ≥ 0 for
Fitting a polynomial equation to its graph: There is no fixed-steps formula for this. The best way is to demonstrate with an example. Cases are extremely important and be sure to intersect the answer with the case requirements. Example: 1. Solve the inequality algebraically. ( ) 2 2 2 0 9 20 x x x x x + s + +
First, factor: ( )( ) ( )( ) 2 1 0 4 5 x x x x x + s + +
We need to use cases: Case 1:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 5 4 5 4 5 x x x x x x x x x x + > + > + < + < ( (
> > < < ( (
> <
( )( ) 2 1 0 x x x + s Again, we need cases. This time, there are three expressions involved. For the final product to be less than or equal to 0, either all of the expressions need to be less than or equal to 0 or one of the expressions needs to be less than or equal to 0 and the other two nonnegative. Writing this in mathematical terms, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) ( ) 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x s + s s (
s + > > > + s > > + > s ( ( (
s s s (
s > > > s > > > s ( ( (
s s s
Combining this result with the case requirements, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 0 1 4 5 4 2 5 0 1 x x x x x x x s s s > < ( (
< s < s s
Case 2:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 4 5 4 5 5 4 x x x x x x x x x + > + < + < + > ( (
> < < > ( (
< <
( )( ) 2 1 0 x x x + > Again, we need cases. This time, there are three expressions involved. For the final product to be nonnegative, either all of the expressions need to be nonnegative or one of the expressions needs to be nonnegative and the other two less than or equal to 0. Writing this in mathematical terms, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) ( ) 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x > + > > (
> + s s s + > s s + s > ( ( (
> > > (
> s s s > s s s > ( ( (
> s s
Combining this result with the case requirements, ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 2 0 5 4 x x x > s s < < (
C
Final answer: ( ) ( ) ( ) 4 2 5 0 1 x x x < s < s s or ( , 5) ( 4, 2] [0,1]