Professional Documents
Culture Documents
29 Scheduling Order
29 Scheduling Order
1
2
3
4
5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O., ) 1:07-cv-0026 OWW TAG
)
10 Plaintiff, ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER
)
11 v. ) Discovery Cut-Off: 4/4/08
)
12 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., ) Non-Dispositive Motion
) Filing Deadline: 4/21/08
13 Defendants. )
) Dispositive Motion Filing
14 ) Deadline: 5/5/08
15 Settlement Conference Date:
2/6/08 10:00 Ctrm. 8
16
Pre-Trial Conference
17 Date: 7/14/08 11:00 Ctrm. 3
18 Trial Date: 8/26/08 9:00
Ctrm. 3 (JT-14 days)
19
20
21 I. Date of Scheduling Conference.
22 May 31, 2007.
23 II. Appearances Of Counsel.
24 Eugene D. Lee, Esq., and Joan Harrington, Esq., appeared on
25 behalf of Plaintiff.
26 Mark A. Wasser, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendants
27 County of Kern, Peter Bryan, Irwin Harris, Eugene Kercher,
28 Jennifer Abraham, Scott Ragland, Toni Smith and William Roy.
1
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 2 of 19
2
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 3 of 19
3
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 4 of 19
4
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 5 of 19
5
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 6 of 19
6
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 7 of 19
7
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 8 of 19
8
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 9 of 19
9
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 10 of 19
10
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 11 of 19
11
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 12 of 19
12
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 13 of 19
1 R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A) and (B) and shall include all
2 information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
3 compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the
4 testimony or other evidence offered through such experts that are
5 not disclosed pursuant to this order.
6 4. The provisions of F. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) shall
7 apply to all discovery relating to experts and their opinions.
8 Experts may be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and
9 opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will
10 result in the imposition of sanctions.
11 5. Confidentiality Orders. Documents to be produced
12 include patient medical records that contain confidential patient
13 health care information, medical peer review records that are
14 confidential pursuant to California Evidence Code § 1157, some
15 documents that are protected by the attorney/client privilege and
16 some documents that include attorney work-product and trial
17 preparation materials. The Defendants are required to redact all
18 confidential patient information before producing any patient
19 records and will do so. The parties hereby agree that
20 Defendants’ production of certain specified peer review records
21 without redaction shall not be construed as a waiver of the peer
22 review privilege in general or a waiver with regard to any other
23 documents or person. The parties hereby agree that Defendants’
24 production of certain specified relevant memos and e-mails that
25 were sent to legal counsel for the County of Kern, as well as
26 other, non-lawyer, County employees, shall not be construed as a
27 waiver of the attorney/client privilege. The parties hereby
28 agree that Defendants’ production of certain specified documents
13
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 14 of 19
14
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 15 of 19
15
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 16 of 19
16
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 17 of 19
17
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 18 of 19
18
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 29 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 19 of 19
19