Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

CIEM 2013

THEORETICAL EVALUATIONS OF THE NATURAL INFILTRATION OF THE AIR IN BUILDINGS


TudorBARACU1, CatalinTEODOSIU2, Marius-Victor BIRSAN3, AdrianBADEA4
Heat loss throughairinfiltrationcan reach50% of totalin a buildingfrom the interactionwith the external environment. Tolimitor controlairinfiltrationinbuildingsrequires acorrect estimate of them based onseveral models. From thetechnicalliteratureare foundvariousevaluation algorithmsstarting fromtheusual"rule of practice" to rigorous analyticalalgorithms. This studyaims atpresentingvariousexistingmodelsfor estimatingair leakage, and also it is builta new algorithmto evaluate thenatural infiltrationof the air through the envelope, taking in consideration the cyclicvariation of theatmospheric pressure.

Keywords: Natural Infiltration of the Air, Air Leakage, Air Infiltration 1. Introduction Naturalairinfiltrationproblemappearedafterthe buildingenergyconcernsbecame moreintenseas a result ofthe 1973 oilcrisis. In order to evaluatescientificallythe aeraulicbehaviorof a building, it was inventedin 1977 initially in Sweden the Blower Window as a research tool, then in USA was found that using the equipment"Blower Door" is more practical for meteringair exchangeinterms ofa given pressure difference. In 1977 Esbensen and Korsgaard concluded that buildings were not so tight as they were assumed, finding that the number of air changes per hour after measurements was 5 times higher [1]. In the same year, GautamDutt make calculations for estimating heat loss in buildings from New Jersey, and in 1979 published in the "New York Times" that at measurements on some buildings the heat loss is 3 ... 7 times more than estimation calculations [2]. The problem of estimating air leakage in natural conditions based on information obtained from pressure tests resulted in an interest to researchers, but so far are mainly empirical formulas due to nonlinearity of the phenomenon and the diversity of ways and surfaces of interacting between the and outdoor. There
1 2

PhDc, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: tbaracu@yahoo.co.uk Prof. Dr., Technical University of Civil Engineering, e-mail: cteodosiu@yahoo.com 3 PhD., National Meteorological Administration, Romania, e-mail:marius.birsan@gmail.com 4 Prof. Dr., University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: adrian.badea@upb.ro

Tudor Baracu, CatalinTeodosiu, Marius-Victor Birsan, Adrian Badea

are also analytical approaches having as example the evaluations of Mattson (2007) considering the simplified case of initial pressure difference that is equilibratedin time by interaction building- environment [3]. Lee et al. (2001) [4] prepared an installation to study airtightness measurement with transient methods and succeeded to obtained also the differential equation of the process, finally obtaining close results in comparisons. This study aims to present theoretical approaches that describe the air change between building and exterior. It prepares the ground of more detailed analysis that will follow after the issues of some special defined pressure tests at the Passive House POLITEHNICA from Bucharest. At that location are already done measurements [5] according to standard EN13829 [6] and it is also in the view a new approach that will consider also the time between successive pressure points in the process of free equilibration of the pressure difference houseenvironment.In [7] was published also pressure tests for a building with detailed information of empirical procedures. 2.Estimations of the natural infiltration of the air In this section it is underlined the state of the researches involving the evaluation of natural air leakage and later is described a new algorithm that is using to the power law of the air leakage in buildings. Sherman (1987) [8] considers a relation ofthe natural infiltration of the air as air changes per hour (1) where is a correlation factor for which Sherman [8] formula: (2) where is an climatic factor function of temperature and wind, factor of height (given in tables) and is a factor of shading to the wind. In this way can be obtained the range of the values that can be taken by correlation factor. (3) From various measurements data was found that the most frequent value is centered around 20.

of

Theoretical evaluations of the natural infiltration of the air in buildings

Those empirical formulas have to be taken in consideration only as a simple reference because it is not published explicitly the methods that drived to them. An ASHRAE Addendum [9] present also a method of determination of the air leakage normalized for a year. (4) where NL is normalized leakage, a factor of weather and shielding and floors area. It is also interesting that the addendum offer a balanced approach, such that the necessary ventilation rate takes in consideration the average infiltration: (5) Awbi (2003) [9] indicates formula (6) Also it is cited the result of Building Research Establishment [10] obtained by gas tracing test and statistical processing of data available for non-domestic buildings (7) Another approach is to estimate the natural air leakage based on climatic data containing atmospheric pressure. In [11] is described a method that considered power law of the air leakage and atmospheric pressure having a simple sinusoidal cyclic variation. There was obtained finally that (8) where is a coefficient that can be calibrated according to the measurements. That algorithm is more complete if it is considered a normalized value by RMS method (9)

Tudor Baracu, CatalinTeodosiu, Marius-Victor Birsan, Adrian Badea

where

is the daily amplitude of pressure along of a day with . In this way is obtained a slightly different expression (10)

wherefm is also a coefficient that have to be calibrated by measurements. It can be considered a RMS normalization where mechanical power is analogical to the electric power in alternating current along of a period of variation. (11)

(12)

a) b) Fig. 1 Atmospheric pressure along of the year 2012:a) natural variation (Source: National Meteorological Administration, Romania); b) parametric variation

If it is analyzed the atmospheric pressure along of a year (fig. 1a) it is found that can be used a parametric form (fig. 2b) that approximate and reproduce it with a good accuracy. This parametric form is more suitable for mathematical

Theoretical evaluations of the natural infiltration of the air in buildings

analysis and also gives in a simplistic manner the trends of atmospheric pressure variation. Fig. 2b is the representation of the equation:

(13) In this way, the variation of the pressure along of a year has mainly 3 cyclic components with their initial phases , , and periods , and . However, in the equations solved in this study it is used an simplified parametric form (14) The most quantifiable situations of air leakage are: pressure difference between two faces of a building (example: one face being upwind and the other downwind) such that in steady regime the flow rate that goes in is equal to the flow rate that goes out; an initial pressure difference indoor-outdoor that diminishes progressively after the building is put in interaction with the environment; pressure difference due created by the cyclic outdoor pressure variation. Mattson (2007) [3] proposed a differential equation of the air leakage considering an initial known pressure difference outdoor-indoor.

(15) or, in a simple form (16) Resolving the equation he found the solution (17) In this study is proposed a generalization of Mattsons approach considering not only a pressure equilibration after an initial disequilibrium but an active and cyclic action (in simplified sinusoidal form) of the daily outdoor pressure.

Tudor Baracu, CatalinTeodosiu, Marius-Victor Birsan, Adrian Badea

Equation (13) had shown earlier three main cyclic components of atmosphere pressure along of the year, and in order to simplify the problem will be considered only the daily variation. Because of the slow variation along of the day with relatively small amplitude (about 500 Pa) the regime of air flow in the infiltration process it is laminar. The equation will have the general form (18) Exponent a of the power law of air leakage has values in the range of 0.5-1.0 and the value a=2/3 is the most common. The problem is that for noninteger values of a, like 1/2 or 2/3, the differential equation is non-resolvable by quadrature methods. The only way to find a parametric solution for the equation (18) is to consider value a=1, the upper limit of the exponent. (19) where it is considered that initially the indoor and outdoor pressure are the same (pi=pe=pm), so (20) Firstly it is solved the linear differential equation (21) obtainingthe integrating factor (22) is obtained the general solution (23) and applying initial condition gives

Theoretical evaluations of the natural infiltration of the air in buildings

(24) For a given exponent a, the pressure difference will be considered as the pressure difference for a=1 corrected by a factor fa that can be calibrated by experimental measurements. (25) This article, by its approaches prepares the theoretical background of the practical tests that will be issued later. It is aimed in the end to be done comparative analysis, calibrations of the theoretical results from the measurements. 6. Conclusions In this study was presented empirical formula that evaluate the air leakage of the buildings normalized for long periods (usually one year) published by several authors. Additionally, it is remarked an analytic approach of Mattson for simplified physical conditions of air leakage. The empirical data of atmospheric pressure was parameterized in order to obtain a sinusoidal expression of it and to be able to use it in the differential equation of air leakage. Atmospheric pressure have relatively slow variation along of the time of a day and this fact conducted to the assumption that the regime of air leakage through envelope of the building is laminar, a thing that is different from the standard Pa, pressure tests where the regime is turbulent especially for pressure differences like 50 Pa, 75 Pa. In this paper was adapted and completed the approach of Mattson for more realistic outdoor conditions like the cyclic variation of the atmospheric pressure. It was assumed a value a=1 of the exponent of power low in order to obtain a solvable differential equation. The solution of the differential equation will be corrected by a factor that will take in consideration empirical measurements. There are prepared the analytical instruments of evaluation of the air leakage of a building and additionally are planned some pressure tests to the Passive House POLITEHNICA where will be added new algorithms of measurements. It will be consideredexplicitly the time in the transient process of air exchange building-environment while are passed through different pressure points by the indoor air in the process of free equalization with the outdoor conditions.

Tudor Baracu, CatalinTeodosiu, Marius-Victor Birsan, Adrian Badea

REFERENCES
[1]. T. V. Esbensen, V. Korsgaard, Performance of Zero Energy House in Denmark, 1st German Solar Energy Forum 26.-28. September 1977, Hamburg, 1977 [2]. http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/blower-door-basics [3]. B. Mattsson, J. A. Claesson, Transient Pressurisation Method for Air Infiltration Measurements of Building Envelope Components, Journal of Building Physics July 2007 31: 35-53, 2007 [4]. M. J. Lee, Air tightness measurement with transient methods using sudden, 2011 [5]. C. Teodosiu, Determination of air permeability, Report of UTCB, 2010 [6]. EN13829:2002, Thermal Performance of Buildings - Determination of air permeability of buildings - Fan pressurisation method, Brussels, 2002 [7]. A. Damian, V. Iordache, V. Nastase, System of measurement of the permeability of the buildings, The 15th Conference of Comfort, Efficiency, Energy Conservation and Protection of environment, 26-28 November, Bucharest, 2008. [8]. The Energy Conservatory, Minneapolis Blower Door- Operation Manual for Model 3 and Model 4 Systems, 2010 [9]. ASHRAE Addendum 62.2 2010, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in LowRise Residential Buildings, Atlanta, 2012 [10]. H. B. Awbi, Ventilation of buildings, 2 Ed., Spon Press, Taylor & Francis, London, 2003 [11]. T.Baracu, V.Tanasiev, T.Mamut, C.Streche, A.Badea, A transient thermal analysis by thermal networks of the Passive House POLITEHNICA from Bucharest, International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, Taylor & Francis, London - Seoul, 2013.

You might also like