BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES: The support fund for special curricular programs in Regional Science High Schools being provided to schools to augment their MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, student development activities and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/services to learners with potentials in the sciences. (In P'000) PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.b - RSHS)

4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: Original CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original Revised Revised 39,951

6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Total (P) Original Revised 2011 cum. 34,450

Category/Component

2012 34,450 4,963 6 39,419

2013 34,450 4,969 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Support Fund to RSHS Trainings, Seminars, Workshops Procurement of training/resource materials TOTAL, NG 7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised PS MOOE CO TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Total (P) Original Revised I II III IV-A IV-B V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII NCR CAR ARMM

34,450

2011 cum. 34,450 34,450

2012 39,419 39,419

2013 39,419 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Location: Region

CO TOTAL 9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Total Revised

2011 cum. 1,844 1,944 2,162 2,170 1,694 1,704 2,574 2,114 1,530 1,810 2,400 1,688 1,924 2,088 3,564 1,606 1,634 34,450

2012 1,866 1,944 2,202 2,220 1,682 1,750 2,630 2,036 1,530 1,906 2,510 1,800 1,976 2,084 3,666 1,588 1,592 4,437 39,419

2013 1,844 1,944 2,162 2,170 1,694 1,704 2,574 2,114 1,530 1,810 2,400 1,688 1,924 2,088 3,564 1,606 1,634 4,969 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Performance Indicator Number BenficiariesSchools Teachers* Students**

Original

2011 cum.

2012 17

Target (No.) 2013 17

Accomplishment (%)

2014

2015

2012* 50%

Slippage

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: MARIA VICTORIA E. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit

12. Certified Correct by: ___________________________

Chief Accountant

13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA Head of Agency

* Fixed Allocation downloaded to RSHSs. Additional subsidy (variable allocation) shall be transferred upon submission of actual enrolment.

BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES: The support fund for special curricular programs in Regional Science High Schools being provided to schools to augment their MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, student development activities and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/services to learners with potentials in the sciences. (In P'000) PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.b - RSHS)

4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: Original CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original Revised Revised 39,951

6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Total (P) Original Revised 2011 cum. 34,450

Category/Component

2012 34,450 4,963 6 39,419

2013 34,450 4,969 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Support Fund to RSHS Trainings, Seminars, Workshops Procurement of training/resource materials TOTAL, NG 7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised PS MOOE CO TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Total (P) Original Revised I II III IV-A IV-B V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII NCR CAR ARMM

34,450

2011 cum. 34,450 34,450

2012 39,419 39,419

2013 39,419 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Location: Region

CO TOTAL 9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Total Revised

2011 cum. 1,844 1,944 2,162 2,170 1,694 1,704 2,574 2,114 1,530 1,810 2,400 1,688 1,924 2,088 3,564 1,606 1,634 34,450

2012 1,866 1,944 2,202 2,220 1,682 1,750 2,630 2,036 1,530 1,906 2,510 1,800 1,976 2,084 3,666 1,588 1,592 4,437 39,419 39,419

2013 1,866 1,944 2,202 2,220 1,682 1,750 2,630 2,036 1,530 1,906 2,510 1,800 1,976 2,084 3,666 1,588 1,592 4,969 39,951 39,419

2014

2015

Bal.

Performance Indicator Number of BenficiariesSchools Teachers* Students**

Original

2011 cum.

2012 17

Target (No.) 2013 17

Accomplishment (%)

2014

2015

2012* 50%

Slippage

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: MARIA VICTORIA E. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit

12. Certified Correct by: ___________________________

Chief Accountant

13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA Head of Agency

* Fixed Allocation downloaded to RSHSs. Additional subsidy (variable allocation) shall be transferred upon submission of actual enrolment.

BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

(In P'000) 1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES:

PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.g - SPS/SPA)

The support fund for special curricular programs in arts and sports is being provided to implementing schools to aug MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, student develop and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/services to learners with tho the arts and sports. 4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original 6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Category/Component Support Fund to Implementing schools Total (P) Original Revised 2011 cum. 17,000 2012 17,000 2013 17,000 Revised Original 17,000 Revised

TOTAL, NG 7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised MOOE TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Location: Region Total (P) Original Revised I II III IV-A IV-B V VI VII VIII IX X XI

17,000

17,000

17,000

2011 cum. 17,000 17,000

2012 17,000 17,000

2013 17,000 17,000

2011 cum. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

2012 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

2013 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

XII XIII NCR CAR ARMM TOTAL 9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Performance Indicator Number of BenficiariesSchools Teachers* Students** Original Total Revised 2011 cum. 34

1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 17,000

1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 17,000

1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 17,000

2012 34

Target (No.) 2013 34

2014

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: MARIA VICTORIA E. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit

12. Certified Correct by: ___________________________

Chief Accountant

PROJECTS

RRICULAR PROGRAMS

plementing schools to augment their building, student development activities ervices to learners with those talented in

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

Accomplishment (%)

2015

2012 cum.

Slippage

e. ntation. 13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA Head of Agency

BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

(In P'000) 1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES:

PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.h - SPED)

The support fund for special curricular programs in special education (SPED) is being provided to implementing scho augment their MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, s development activities and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/serv learners with disabilities and special needs. 4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: Original CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original 6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Total (P) Category/Component Original Revised Subsidy/Support for Operations to schools implementing SPED Training, Workshops, Conferences, etc. TOTAL, NG 7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised MOOE TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Location: Region Total (P) Original Revised I II III IV-A IV-B V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII 2011 cum. 2012 3,525 1,000 3,025 1,800 2,500 1,425 350 2,650 750 700 225 2,475 1,700 2013 3,525 1,000 3,025 1,800 2,500 1,425 350 2,650 750 700 225 2,475 1,700 2011 cum. 2012 27,000 27,000 2013 41,400 41,400 2011 cum. 2012 27,000 2013 27,000 14,400 41,400 Revised Revised 41,400

27,000

XIII NCR CAR ARMM CO TOTAL 9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Performance Indicator Number BenficiariesSchools Original Total Revised 2011 cum. 2012 155 -

225 3,950 700 27,000

225 3,950 700 14,400 41,400

Target (No.) 2013 155

2014

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: MARIA VICTORIA E. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit

12. Certified Correct by: ___________________________

Chief Accountant

PROJECTS

RRICULAR PROGRAMS

ided to implementing schools to chers capacity building, student delivery of instruction/services to

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

Accomplishment (%)

2015

2012* cum.

Slippage

e. ntation. 13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA Head of Agency

BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

(In P'000) 1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES:

PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.i - S&T Oriented)

The support fund for special curricular programs in implemented by Science and Technology Oriented Schools to au MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, student develop and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/services to learners with po sciences. 4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: Original CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original 6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Total (P) Category/Component Original Revised Subsidy/Support Fund to Schools Implementing S&T-ESEP Trainings, Seminars, Workshops TOTAL, NG 7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised PS MOOE* CO TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Location: Region Total (P) Original Revised I II III IV-A IV-B V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII 2011 cum. 2012 3,569 3,931 4,246 4,151 1,786 4,572 4,653 2,596 3,080 2,672 4,253 2,362 2,123 2013 3,569 3,931 4,246 4,151 1,786 4,572 4,653 2,596 3,080 2,672 4,253 2,362 2,123 2011 cum. 52,913 52,913 2012 58,500 58,500 2013 61,516 61,516 2011 cum. 52,913 52,913 2012 53,441 5,059 58,500 2013 53,441 8,075 61,516 Revised Revised 39,951

XIII NCR CAR ARMM CO TOTAL 9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Performance Indicator Number of BenficiariesSchools Original Total Revised 2011 cum. 198 2012 198 -

1,882 5,605 1,960 5,059 58,500

1,882 5,605 1,960 8,075 61,516

Target (No.) 2013 198

2014

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: MARIA VICTORIA E. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit

12. Certified Correct by: ___________________________

Chief Accountant

* Per GAA 2011 ** Fixed Allocation downloaded to S&T-ESEP Oriented Schools.

PROJECTS

RRICULAR PROGRAMS

ed)

gy Oriented Schools to augment their building, student development activities ervices to learners with potential in the

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

2014

2015

Bal.

Accomplishment (%)

2015

2012** cum. 49%

Slippage 51%

e. ntation. 13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA Head of Agency

BP 202: REQUIREMENTS OF LOCALLY-FUNDED PROJECTS

(In P'000) 1. PROJECT NAME: 2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY/IES: Bureau of Secondary Educatrion 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/OBJECTIVIES: The support fund for special curricular programs in science, special education, arts and spsorts is being provided to implementing schools to augment their MOOE. Such fund shall be used to cover the costs for school head and teachers capacity building, student development activities and procurement of relevant materials and supplies to improve the delivery of instruction/services to learners with disabilities, those talented in the arts and sports and potential in the sciences. 4. IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: Original CY 2013 5. TOTAL PROJECT COST: Original 6. PROJECT CATEGORY & APPROVED ALLOCATION: Category/Component SPA/SPS RSHS S&T Oriented HS SPED TOTAL, NG Total (P) Original Revised 2011 cum. 17,000 34,450 52,913 27,000 131,363 2012 17,000 39,419 58,500 27,000 141,919 2013 17,000 39,951 61,475 51,400 169,826 2014 2015 Bal. Revised Revised 169,827 PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND TO SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS

(A.III.17.b - RSHS), (A.III.17.g - SPS/SPA), (A.III.17.h - SPED), (A.III.17.i - S&T Oriented)

7. COST STRUCTURE BY EXPENSE CLASS Total (P) Original Revised MOOE TOTAL, NG 8. BUDGET BY LOCATION Location: Luzon Visayas Mindanao Central Office TOTAL Total (P) Original Revised 2011 cum. 2012 2013 72,673.5 23,243.5 36,465 37,444 169,826 2014 2015 Bal. 2011 cum. 131,363 131,363 2012 141,919 141,919 2013 169,826 169,826 2014 2015 Bal.

9. PHYSICAL TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENT Performance Indicator Number BenficiariesSchools Teachers* Students** Total Original Revised 2011 cum. 2012 404 3,232 ###### ## Target (No.) 2013 404 3,232 ###### ##
Accomplishment (%)

2014

2015

2007 cum.

Slippage

10. IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS 1. Delay in the approval of guidelines on the utilization of program support funds. 2. Inability of program implementers to submit proposal and accomplishment report on time. 3. Inability of central/field offices to monitor fund utilization and effect on program implementation. 11. Prepared by: M.V. CERVANTES
OIC, Admin. Unit PLANNING OFFICER CHIEF ACCOUNTANT

12. Certified Correct by:

13. Approved by:

LOLITA M. ANDRADA HEAD OF AGENCY

*No. of school multiplied by 8-teachers per school ** No. of school multiplied by 45-students per school (estimated)